assignment in a legal context

Assignment: Legal Concept Explained

Readers will likely agree that understanding legal concepts can be challenging.

This article promises to clearly explain the concept of assignment in legal contexts to help demystify this complex topic.

You'll learn the definition of assignment, its importance in areas like real estate, contract stipulations around assigning rights/obligations, and practical considerations when crafting assignment agreements.

Introduction to Assignment: Legal Concept Explained

Assignment is a legal concept that allows the transfer of rights or property from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This article will provide an overview of assignment, defining key terminology and outlining the goals of explaining this concept.

Assignment Definition and Scope

Assignment refers to the transfer of rights, interests, or property from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). In contract law, it enables a contractual party to transfer the benefits and burdens of a contract to a third party. It also allows the transfer of property interests, like in real estate transactions.

Key elements of an assignment include:

• The assignor transfers their rights or property to the assignee
• The assignee acquires those rights and becomes the new holder
• Requires the consent of all original parties to the contract
• Rights transfer "as-is" from assignor to assignee

Assignment provisions are common in contracts to provide flexibility in the event of corporate restructures, mergers and acquisitions.

Understanding the Roles: Assignor, Assignee, and Obligor

There are three key roles in an assignment:

Assignor : The party who transfers the rights or property to another party. This could be an individual or a legal entity.

Assignee : The party who receives the rights or property from the assignor. They take on all transferred rights and obligations.

Obligor : The party who has the duty to perform the obligation that is being assigned. For example, in a contract assignment, the obligor is the counterparty.

So in a contract assignment scenario, the assignor transfers rights to the assignee, while the obligor must continue performing duties under the contract, but now to the assignee instead of the original counterparty.

The Importance of Assignment in Real Estate

Assignment is a critical concept in real estate transactions. It allows property interests to be transferred from a seller to a buyer.

Common real estate assignment scenarios include:

• Transferring rights under a purchase contract to a new buyer
• Assigning the interest in a mortgage note to another lender
• Transferring a lease agreement to another tenant

Overall, assignment facilitates the exchange of real property between parties. It provides flexibility to transfer interests as circumstances change. Understanding assignment is key for real estate professionals and property owners alike.

What is the concept of assignment?

An assignment is the transfer of rights or property from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). In legal terms, it is the transfer of contractual rights, property interests, or legal claims from one person to another.

Some key things to know about assignments:

An assignment transfers rights or property from one party to another. For example, a tenant's rights under a lease could be assigned from the current tenant to a new tenant.

Assignments are often used to transfer interests in contracts, intellectual property rights, securities, and real estate.

For an assignment to be valid, there must be a valid contract in place and the assignment must have consideration (something of value exchanged).

The assignor transfers the entirety of their rights or interests to the assignee. The assignee legally "stands in the shoes" of the assignor.

In real estate, an assignment of a lease transfers the lessee's entire interests to a new tenant for the remainder of the lease term.

For personal service contracts, duties cannot be assigned without the consent of the contracting parties. But rights under the contract can still be assigned.

So in summary, an assignment enables contractual rights, property interests, or legal claims to be transferred from one party to another through a contractual agreement and an exchange of consideration. The assignee then gains all rights that were held by the assignor.

What does assigns mean in legal terms?

The term "assigns" in legal contracts refers to the transfer of rights or property from one party (the assignor) to another party (the assignee).

An assignment is the act of legally transferring an existing right, benefit, or property interest from the assignor to the assignee. Common things that can be assigned include:

• Rights under a contract
• Ownership of property
• Rights to collect money owed
• Rights to take legal action

For example, Company A signs a contract with Company B. The contract states that "Company A and its assigns have the exclusive right to distribute Company B's products in the United States." This means Company A can legally transfer (assign) its distribution rights under the contract to another company, which would then become the assignee.

The words "and its assigns" are important in this example. They specify that the rights being granted under the contract can be transferred to another party in the future. Without this language, Company A would typically not be able to assign its contractual rights to a third party.

The assignee acquires all the rights, benefits, and property interests that were initially held by the assignor. The assignment puts the assignee in privity of contract with the obligor (the party who has the duty to perform under the contract). This means the assignee can enforce the contract directly against the obligor.

In property law, an assignment occurs when ownership of real estate or personal property is transferred from one party to another through a legal document like a bill of sale or quitclaim deed. The assignee becomes the new legal owner after the assignment.

So in legal terminology, an "assignment" refers to the transfer of contractual rights or property interests from an assignor to an assignee. The words "assigns" indicates such a transfer is permitted.

What is the meaning of assignment in court?

An assignment is a legal mechanism that transfers rights or property from one party (the assignor) to another party (the assignee). In a court context, an assignment most commonly refers to the transfer of legal claims or contractual rights.

Some key things to know about assignments in the legal system:

An assignment transfers legal ownership of a claim or right from the assignor to the assignee. This allows the assignee to step into the shoes of the assignor and assert the legal claim or enforce the contractual right.

For an assignment to be valid, the assignor must intend to transfer present ownership of the claim or right to the assignee. Also, the assignee must give consideration (something of value) in return for the assignment.

In litigation, the assignee becomes the real party in interest for a claim. This means the assignee has the legal right to bring a lawsuit based on that claim.

Assignments are commonly used in the context of contracts, judgments, mortgages, leases, insurance claims, and intellectual property rights.

Certain claims and rights cannot be legally assigned, such as personal injury claims or rights tied intrinsically to a person.

In summary, an assignment in the court system refers to the transfer of legal claims or contractual rights to another party. When valid, it gives the assignee standing to assert those claims or enforce those rights. Understanding assignments is important for plaintiffs, defendants, and counsel in civil litigation.

What is meant by assignment in company law?

Assignment in company law refers to the transfer of rights, obligations, interests, or property from one party to another. Some key things to know about assignment in the context of company law include:

The Ability to Assign Contracts

Many commercial contracts include assignment clauses allowing a party to assign or transfer the contract to a third party. For example, a tenant may assign their lease to another company, transferring the rights and obligations under the lease agreement.

Transferring Shares

Shareholders can assign or transfer their shares in a company to other parties. This transfers the ownership rights attached to those shares. There may be restrictions or conditions around assigning shares stipulated in a company's articles of association.

Assignment of Patents or IP

A company may assign ownership of a patent, trademark, or other intellectual property to another party. This transfers the proprietary rights to commercially exploit that IP. Assignments of IP must be formally registered.

This involves the substitution of a new contract for an existing one. The new contract extinguishes the rights and duties of the old one. All parties must agree to the novation.

So in summary, assignment allows the transfer of contractual rights, shares, IP, and other interests from one party to another through formal legal mechanisms. There are specific laws and procedures governing assignments in the context of company law.

sbb-itb-585a0bc

Fundamentals of assignment in contract law, contractual assignments: rights and obligations.

The assignment of contractual rights refers to the transfer of rights, interests, and obligations from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This allows the original party to the contract to essentially "assign" their role and associated rights and duties to another entity.

Some key points regarding contractual assignments:

Assignments can transfer all or just a portion of rights and obligations under a contract. For example, Party A may assign their right to receive payments under a supply agreement to Party B, but retain all other rights and duties.

Assignments require consideration to be valid. Usually the assignee provides payment or some other benefit to the assignor in exchange for the assigned rights or interests.

Unless stated otherwise, assignments do not release the assignor of their obligations. So if Party B defaults, the counterparty can still seek recourse from Party A.

Certain rights can not be assigned without permission, such as personal service contracts.

To execute an assignment, it is common to use an Assignment of Contract template or Agreement. This formally documents the transfer of rights between parties.

Interpreting 'Successors and Assigns' Meaning

The phrases "successors and assigns" and "successors and permitted assigns" are common in contractual agreements. These refer to:

Successors - Any entity that succeeds the original party due to events like mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations, etc.

Assigns - Any party that receives an assignment of rights/obligations from the original party.

Including this language states that the terms of the contract will continue to be binding on any successor or assign entities. This provides continuity of obligations even when parties change due to corporate events.

Contract Law Essentials: Offer, Acceptance, and Consideration

For an assignment to be legally valid, the fundamental elements of contract law must be met:

Offer and Acceptance - There must be an offer to assign rights/obligations and an acceptance of that offer on stated terms. This constitutes a "meeting of the minds".

Consideration - The assignee must provide consideration (payment or other benefit) to the assignor in exchange for the assignment. Past consideration is not sufficient.

If these essential components are not satisfied, the assignment can be challenged as invalid or void.

Privity of Contract and Third-Party Beneficiary Rights

Assignments create a concept called "privity of contract". This means the assignee gains enforceable rights under the contract despite not being an original party. However, the assignee's rights are subject to any defenses that could have been raised against the assignor.

Sometimes a third-party beneficiary has rights under an agreement they are not directly party to. However, their rights may be subject to more limitations compared to an assignee in privity.

Assignment Restrictions and Limitations

Assignments of contracts or property rights are not always valid or enforceable. There are several legal restrictions and limitations to be aware of:

Navigating Non-Assignment Clauses

Parties to a contract may include a non-assignment clause that prohibits or limits the ability to assign rights or obligations to third parties. These clauses are generally enforceable, with some exceptions. If an assignment occurs despite a non-assignment clause, the assignment may be considered invalid or breach the contract.

There are a few ways around a non-assignment clause, such as obtaining consent from the non-assigning party, arguing the clause is unreasonable or against public policy, or showing the contract has provisions that imply assignability. But these arguments don't always succeed, so non-assignment clauses should be taken seriously.

Legal Barriers: Illegality, Public Policy, and Unconscionability

Attempted assignments may fail if they involve illegal activities, violate public policy, or are deemed unconscionable by a court.

For example, assignments related to gambling debts, drug trafficking, and other illegal activities will not be enforced. And courts can refuse assignments that unfairly waive legal rights or place unreasonable burdens on one party.

Implications of Force Majeure and Frustration of Purpose

If extraordinary events beyond the parties' control occur, such as natural disasters, it may frustrate the purpose of the contract or trigger force majeure clauses. This can invalidate pending assignments or terminate the rights and duties under the contract.

So parties should be aware that assignments shortly before or during major unforeseen disruptions may not be enforceable. Carefully assessing the timing is prudent.

The Role of Equitable Interest in Assignments

Courts recognize equitable interests in addition to legal property rights. This allows more flexibility for assignments to succeed in equity, even if barred at common law.

Equitable doctrines like promissory estoppel can also create enforceable rights supporting assignments. So equitable arguments open additional avenues for validating assignments when other legal restrictions might block them.

In summary, assignments have limits under contract law, property law, public policy, and equity. But creatively navigating non-assignment clauses, equitable interest, and other barriers can sometimes permit assignments to succeed despite restrictions. Legal counsel helps fully assess options.

Practical Aspects of Assignment Agreements

Crafting an effective assignment of contract template.

When creating an assignment of contract template, it is important to clearly identify the parties and the rights and obligations being transferred. The template should include:

The full legal names of the assignor (the party transferring the rights), assignee (the party receiving the rights), and any other parties to the original agreement.

A description of the original contract or agreement being assigned. This includes the date, names of the original parties, and subject matter.

An effective date for the assignment.

The rights, interests, duties, and obligations under the original agreement that are being assigned from the assignor to the assignee. These should be clearly delineated.

Any rights or obligations that are not being assigned and will remain with the assignor.

The consideration (payment) provided in exchange for the assignment.

Signatures of assignor and assignee, dated on the effective date.

Having an effective template ensures all key information is captured to legally transfer the contractual rights and obligations.

Due Diligence in Assignment Transactions

Conducting due diligence is critical when acquiring rights through an assignment transaction. Key items to verify through due diligence include:

Title Search : Confirm the assignor validly holds the rights being transferred and there are no other claims, liens or encumbrances attached to those rights.

Contract Review : Carefully review the original contract to ensure the rights are assignable and fully understand any restrictions or obligations being taken on.

Credit Checks : Assess the financial condition and credibility of the assignor.

Regulatory Compliance : Confirm all legal and regulatory requirements related to the transfer are fulfilled.

While due diligence takes time upfront, it prevents costly problems down the road in an assignment transaction.

Assignment and Novation: Distinguishing the Differences

There are key differences between an assignment and a novation:

In an assignment , the assignor transfers rights and obligations to the assignee, but the assignor may retain residual rights and remains liable to the counterparty for performance of any ongoing obligations.

In a novation , the original party's rights and obligations are completely extinguished and the new party takes their place. All three parties must consent.

An assignment only requires consent of the assignor and assignee. A novation requires consent of all three parties.

A novation completely replaces a party to the contract with the new party. An assignment transfers rights to a new party but the original party may remain involved.

Understanding these differences is essential when transferring contractual rights.

Managing Assignments of Mortgage Notes and Equitable Interests

For an assignment of a mortgage note or equitable interest to be legally valid, certain key steps should be taken:

The assignment agreement must be in writing and include a description of the rights being transferred.

The assignee should take physical possession of the mortgage note or other documents conferring the equitable interest.

Proper notice should be provided to the obligor and any other affected parties.

The assignment should be duly recorded according to state laws to protect the assignee's interests.

Any necessary consents of other parties must be obtained.

Properly executing these formalities helps ensure the assignee can enforce its newly acquired rights.

Assignment in the Context of Real Property

Assignment can play an important role in real property transactions. When property interests are assigned from one party to another, it essentially transfers the rights, title, and obligations attached to that property.

Conveyancing Real Property through Assignment

The conveyance of real property interests through an assignment involves legally transferring ownership and title from the assignor to the assignee. This is typically done through a deed or other legal document that assigns and conveys the property rights. The deed serves as evidence of the assignment.

It's important that the assignment follow proper legal protocols to ensure clean title transfer. The assignor must have clear title to convey. And the assignment deed must be legally executed and recorded for the assignee to establish claim on the title.

Overall, assignment allows real property interests to change hands smoothly through conveyancing. When done properly, it provides continuity in property ownership.

Assignment and Leasing: Commercial and Residential Considerations

Assignment has implications in both commercial and residential leasing situations.

For commercial leases, assignment rights allow tenants to transfer their remaining lease obligations to another party. This provides flexibility to exit a lease early if business needs change. Landlords often restrict rights of assignment in commercial leases to control turnover.

In residential leasing, assignment occurs when a tenant transfers rental responsibility to another tenant. Landlords may prohibit assignment without consent to prevent disruption. Requirements around security deposits and maintenance of the unit can also complicate assignment.

Impact of Assignment on Security Deposits and Tenant Rights

When a lease is assigned, obligations around the security deposit must also transfer to the new tenant. Generally, the new tenant is entitled to the original security deposit, minus any amounts legally withheld by the landlord.

In some cases, landlords attempt to make new tenants pay an additional deposit. But legally, tenants are protected from having to "double deposit". Rights regarding fair housing, repairs, and other tenant protections also carry over to the assignee.

Assignment Clauses in Real Estate Contracts

Real estate purchase and sale contracts contain assignment clauses that dictate rights around transferring interest in the property to another party.

Standard assignment clauses allow buyers to assign the contract freely. Restrictive clauses only allow assignment with seller's prior written consent. Prohibitive clauses forbid assignment entirely.

Courts typically uphold restrictive/prohibitive assignment clauses. But "silent" contracts without an assignment clause generally allow free assignment rights.

Conclusion: Mastering the Assignment Legal Concept

The concept of assignment is an important one in contract and property law. It refers to the transfer of rights or property from one party to another. Key points about assignment include:

An assignment involves the transfer of contractual rights and obligations from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). It requires the consent of all original parties to the contract.

Assignments are often used to transfer interests in real property. This may involve transferring ownership rights via a deed, transferring a lease agreement, or transferring the right to collect mortgage payments.

There are some limits on what can be assigned. Personal service contracts generally cannot be assigned, for example. Some contracts also contain non-assignment clauses. Rights can only be assigned if they actually exist at the time of the assignment.

For an assignment to be valid, there must be a clear intention to assign, proper documentation of the assignment, delivery of the assignment documentation, and acceptance by the assignee. Valuable consideration is also typically required.

By properly understanding the legal requirements and processes for assignments, parties can effectively transfer contractual rights and property interests. Seeking legal advice is prudent to ensure assignments are valid and enforceable.

Related posts

• Trust: Legal Concept Explained
• Jurisdiction: Legal Concept Explained
• Novation: Legal Concept Explained
• Caveat Emptor: Legal Concept Explained

CenterBase vs SmokeBall: A Comparative Review

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act: Law Explained

The Controlled Substances Act: Law Explained

(404) 738-5471

Ultimate Checklist for Understanding Contract Assignment Rules

• February 28, 2024
• Moton Legal Group

In contracts, understanding assignment is key. Simply put, an assignment in contract law is when one party (the assignor) transfers their rights and responsibilities under a contract to another party (the assignee). This can include anything from leasing agreements to business operations. But why is this important? It’s because it allows for flexibility in business and personal dealings, a critical component in our world.

Here’s a quick rundown: – Contract Basics: The foundational agreements between parties. – Assignment Importance: Allowing the transfer of obligations and benefits to keep up with life’s changes.

Contracts are a staple in both personal and business worlds, acting as the backbone to many transactions and agreements encountered daily. Understanding the nuances, like assignments, can empower you to navigate these waters with confidence and ease. Whether you’re a business owner in the Southeast looking to expand or an individual managing personal agreements, grasp these basics, and you’re on the right path.

Understanding Contract Assignment

Contract Assignment sounds complicated, right? But, let’s break it down into simple terms. In contracts and legal agreements, knowing about assignment can save you a lot of headaches down the road. Whether you’re a business owner, a landlord, or just someone who deals with contracts, this is for you.

Legal Definition

At its core, contract assignment is about transferring rights or obligations under a contract from one party to another. Think of it as passing a baton in a relay race. The original party (the assignor) hands off their responsibilities or benefits to someone else (the assignee). But, there’s a twist – the race keeps going with the new runner without starting over.

Contract Law

In contract law, assignment comes into play in various ways. For example, if you’re a freelancer and you’ve agreed to complete a project but suddenly find yourself overbooked, you might assign that contract to another freelancer. This way, the job gets done, and your client is happy. However, not all contracts can be freely assigned. Some require the other party’s consent, and others can’t be assigned at all, especially if they involve personal skills or confidential trust.

Property Law

When it comes to property law, assignment often surfaces in landlord-tenant relationships. Say you’re renting a shop for your business, but you decide to move. If your lease allows it, you might assign your lease to another business. This means they take over your lease, stepping into your shoes, with all the rights and obligations that come with it.

The concept might seem straightforward, but there are important legal requirements and potential pitfalls to be aware of. For instance, an assignment could be prohibited by the contract itself, or it may significantly change the original deal’s terms in a way that’s not allowed. Plus, when you’re dealing with something that requires a unique skill set, like an artist or a consultant, those services typically can’t be passed on to someone else without agreement from all parties involved.

To navigate these complexities, understanding the fundamentals of assignment in contract law and property law is crucial. It ensures that when you’re ready to pass that baton, you’re doing it in a way that’s legal, effective, and doesn’t leave you tripping up before you reach the finish line.

The goal here is to make sure everyone involved understands what’s happening and agrees to it. That way, assignments can be a useful tool to manage your contracts and property agreements, keeping things moving smoothly even when changes come up.

For more detailed exploration on this topic, consider checking the comprehensive guide on Assignment (law)). This resource dives deeper into the nuances of contract assignment, offering insights and examples that can help clarify this complex area of law.

By grasping these basics, you’re well on your way to mastering the art of contract assignment. Whether you’re dealing with leases, business deals, or any agreement in between, knowing how to effectively assign a contract can be a game-changer.

Key Differences Between Assignment and Novation

When diving into contracts, two terms that often cause confusion are assignment and novation . While both deal with transferring obligations and rights under a contract, they are fundamentally different in several key aspects. Understanding these differences is crucial for anyone involved in contract management or negotiation.

Rights Transfer

Assignment involves the transfer of benefits or rights from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). However, it’s important to note that only the benefits of the contract can be assigned, not the burdens. For instance, if someone has the right to receive payments under a contract, they can assign this right to someone else.

Novation , on the other hand, is more comprehensive. It involves transferring both the rights and obligations under a contract from one party to a new party. With novation, the original party is completely released from the contract, and a new contractual relationship is formed between the remaining and the new party. This is a key distinction because, in novation, all parties must agree to this new arrangement.

Obligations Transfer

Assignment doesn’t transfer the original party’s obligations under the contract. The assignor (the original party who had the rights under the contract) might still be liable if the assignee fails to fulfill the contract terms.

In contrast, novation transfers all obligations to the new party. Once a novation is complete, the new party takes over all rights and obligations, leaving the original party with no further legal liabilities or rights under the contract.

Written Agreement

While assignments can sometimes be informal or even verbal, novation almost always requires a written agreement. This is because novation affects more parties’ rights and obligations and has a more significant impact on the contractual relationship. A written agreement ensures that all parties are clear about the terms of the novation and their respective responsibilities.

In practice, the need for a written agreement in novation serves as a protection for all parties involved. It ensures that the transfer of obligations is clearly documented and legally enforceable.

For example, let’s say Alex agrees to paint Bailey’s house for $1,000. Later, Alex decides they can’t complete the job and wants Chris to take over. If Bailey agrees, they can sign a novation agreement where Chris agrees to paint the house under the same conditions. Alex is then relieved from the original contract, and Chris becomes responsible for completing the painting job.

Understanding the difference between assignment and novation is critical for anyone dealing with contracts. While both processes allow for the transfer of rights or obligations, they do so in different ways and with varying implications for all parties involved. Knowing when and how to use each can help ensure that your contractual relationships are managed effectively and legally sound.

For further in-depth information and real-life case examples on assignment in contract law, you can explore detailed resources such as Assignment (law) on Wikipedia).

Next, we’ll delve into the legal requirements for a valid assignment, touching on express prohibition, material change, future rights, and the rare skill requirement. Understanding these will further equip you to navigate the complexities of contract assignments successfully.

Legal Requirements for a Valid Assignment

When dealing with assignment in contract law , it’s crucial to understand the legal backbone that supports a valid assignment. This ensures that the assignment stands up in a court of law if disputes arise. Let’s break down the must-know legal requirements: express prohibition, material change, future rights, and rare skill requirement.

Express Prohibition

The first stop on our checklist is to look for an express prohibition against assignment in the contract. This is a clause that outright states assignments are not allowed without the other party’s consent. If such language exists and you proceed with an assignment, you could be breaching the contract. Always read the fine print or have a legal expert review the contract for you.

Material Change

Next up is the material change requirement. The law states that an assignment cannot significantly alter the duties, increase the burdens, or impair the chances of the other party receiving due performance under the contract. For instance, if the contract involves personal services tailored to the specific party, assigning it to someone else might change the expected outcome, making such an assignment invalid.

Future Rights

Another important aspect is future rights . The rule here is straightforward: you can’t assign what you don’t have. This means that a promise to assign rights you may acquire in the future is generally not enforceable at present. An effective assignment requires that the rights exist at the time of the assignment.

Rare Skill Requirement

Lastly, let’s talk about the rare skill requirement . Some contracts are so specialized that they cannot be assigned to another party without compromising the contract’s integrity. This is often the case with contracts that rely on an individual’s unique skills or trust. Think of an artist commissioned for a portrait or a lawyer hired for their specialized legal expertise. In these scenarios, assignments are not feasible as they could severely impact the contract’s intended outcome.

Understanding these legal requirements is pivotal for navigating the complexities of assignment in contract law. By ensuring compliance with these principles, you can effectively manage contract assignments, safeguarding your interests and those of the other contracting party.

For anyone looking to delve deeper into the intricacies of contract law, you can explore detailed resources such as Assignment (law) on Wikipedia).

Moving forward, we’ll explore the common types of contract assignments, from landlord-tenant agreements to business contracts and intellectual property transfers. This will give you a clearer picture of how assignments work across different legal landscapes.

Common Types of Contract Assignments

When we dive into assignment in contract law , we find it touches nearly every aspect of our business and personal lives. Let’s simplify this complex topic by looking at some of the most common types of contract assignments you might encounter.

Landlord-Tenant Agreements

Imagine you’re renting a fantastic apartment but have to move because of a new job. Instead of breaking your lease, you can assign your lease to someone else. This means the new tenant takes over your lease, including rent payments and maintenance responsibilities. However, it’s crucial that the landlord agrees to this switch. If done right, it’s a win-win for everyone involved.

Business Contracts

In the business world, contract assignments are a daily occurrence. For example, if a company agrees to provide services but then realizes it’s overbooked, it can assign the contract to another company that can fulfill the obligations. This way, the project is completed on time, and the client remains happy. It’s a common practice that ensures flexibility and efficiency in business operations.

Intellectual Property

Intellectual property (IP) assignments are fascinating and complex. If an inventor creates a new product, they can assign their patent rights to a company in exchange for a lump sum or royalties. This transfer allows the company to produce and sell the invention, while the inventor benefits financially. However, it’s critical to note that with trademarks, the goodwill associated with the mark must also be transferred to maintain its value.

Understanding these types of assignments helps clarify the vast landscape of contract law. Whether it’s a cozy apartment, a crucial business deal, or a groundbreaking invention, assignments play a pivotal role in ensuring these transitions happen smoothly.

As we navigate through the realm of contract assignments, each type has its own set of rules and best practices. The key is to ensure all parties are on the same page and that the assignment is executed properly to avoid any legal pitfalls.

Diving deeper into the subject, next, we will explore how to execute a contract assignment effectively, ensuring all legal requirements are met and the process runs as smoothly as possible.

How to Execute a Contract Assignment Effectively

Executing a contract assignment effectively is crucial to ensure that all legal requirements are met and the process runs smoothly. Here’s a straightforward guide to help you navigate this process without any hiccups.

Written Consent

First and foremost, get written consent . This might seem like a no-brainer, but it’s surprising how often this step is overlooked. If the original contract requires the consent of the other party for an assignment to be valid, make sure you have this in black and white. Not just a handshake or a verbal agreement. This ensures clarity and avoids any ambiguity or disputes down the line.

Notice of Assignment

Next up, provide a notice of assignment to all relevant parties. This is not just common courtesy; it’s often a legal requirement. It informs all parties involved about the change in the assignment of rights or obligations under the contract. Think of it as updating your address with the post office; everyone needs to know where to send the mail now.

Privity of Estate

Understanding privity of estate is key in real estate transactions and leases. It refers to the legal relationship that exists between parties under a contract. When you assign a contract, the assignee steps into your shoes, but the original terms of the contract still apply. This means the assignee needs to be aware of and comply with the original agreement’s requirements.

Secondary Liability

Lastly, let’s talk about secondary liability . Just because you’ve assigned a contract doesn’t always mean you’re off the hook. In some cases, the original party (the assignor) may still hold some liability if the assignee fails to perform under the contract. It’s essential to understand the terms of your assignment agreement and whether it includes a release from liability for the assignor.

Executing a contract assignment effectively is all about dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s . By following these steps—securing written consent, issuing a notice of assignment, understanding privity of estate, and clarifying secondary liability—you’re setting yourself up for a seamless transition.

The goal is to ensure all parties are fully informed and agreeable to the changes being made. This not only helps in maintaining good relationships but also in avoiding potential legal issues down the line.

We’ll dive into some of the frequently asked questions about contract assignment to clear any lingering doubts.

Frequently Asked Questions about Contract Assignment

When navigating contracts, questions often arise, particularly about the concepts of assignment and novation. Let’s break these down into simpler terms.

What does assignment of a contract mean?

In the realm of assignment in contract law , think of assignment as passing the baton in a relay race. It’s where one party (the assignor) transfers their rights and benefits under a contract to another party (the assignee). However, unlike a relay race, the original party might still be on the hook for obligations unless the contract says otherwise. It’s like handing off the baton but still running alongside the new runner just in case.

Is an assignment legally binding?

Absolutely, an assignment is as binding as a pinky promise in the playground – but with legal muscle behind it. Once an assignment meets the necessary legal criteria (like not significantly changing the obligor’s duties or having express consent if required), it’s set in stone. This means both the assignee and the assignor must honor this transfer of rights or face potential legal actions. It’s a serious commitment, not just a casual exchange.

What is the difference between assignment and novation?

Now, this is where it gets a bit more intricate. If assignment is passing the baton, novation is forming a new team mid-race. It involves replacing an old obligation with a new one or adding a new party to take over an old one’s duties. Crucially, novation extinguishes the old contract and requires all original and new parties to agree. It’s a clean slate – the original party walks away, and the new party steps in, no strings attached.

While both assignment and novation change the playing field of a contract, novation requires a unanimous thumbs up from everyone involved, completely freeing the original party from their obligations. On the other hand, an assignment might leave the original party watching from the sidelines, ready to jump back in if needed.

Understanding these facets of assignment in contract law is crucial, whether you’re diving into a new agreement or navigating an existing one. Knowledge is power – especially when it comes to contracts.

As we wrap up these FAQs, the legal world of contracts is vast and sometimes complex, but breaking it down into bite-sized pieces can help demystify the process and empower you in your legal undertakings.

Here’s a helpful resource for further reading on the difference between assignment and cession.

Now, let’s continue on to the conclusion to tie all these insights together.

Navigating assignment in contract law can seem like a daunting task at first glance. However, with the right information and guidance, it becomes an invaluable tool in ensuring that your rights and obligations are protected and effectively managed in any contractual relationship.

At Moton Legal Group, we understand the intricacies of contract law and are dedicated to providing you with the expertise and support you need to navigate these waters. Whether you’re dealing with a straightforward contract assignment or facing more complex legal challenges, our team is here to help. We pride ourselves on our ability to demystify legal processes and make them accessible to everyone.

The key to successfully managing any contract assignment lies in understanding your rights, the obligations involved, and the potential impacts on all parties. It’s about ensuring that the assignment is executed in a way that is legally sound and aligns with your interests.

If you’re in need of assistance with a contract review, looking to understand more about how contract assignments work, or simply seeking legal advice on your contractual rights and responsibilities, Moton Legal Group is here for you. Our team of experienced attorneys is committed to providing the clarity, insight, and support you need to navigate the complexities of contract law with confidence.

For more information on how we can assist you with your contract review and other legal needs, visit our contract review service page .

In the constantly evolving landscape of contract law, having a trusted legal partner can make all the difference. Let Moton Legal Group be your guide, ensuring that your contractual dealings are handled with the utmost care, professionalism, and expertise. Together, we can navigate the complexities of contract law and secure the best possible outcomes for your legal matters.

Thank you for joining us on this journey through the fundamentals of assignment in contract law. We hope you found this information helpful and feel more empowered to handle your contractual affairs with confidence.

For more information Call :

Reach out now.

" * " indicates required fields

Recent Blog Posts:

Understanding the Role of Purchase and Sale Agreements in Real Estate

Start Your Business Journey: Essential Tips from Top Formation Lawyers

Expert Tips for Handling Business Purchase and Sale Agreements

How to Craft a Legally Binding Purchase and Sale Agreement

The Complete Guide to Contracts of Sale in Real Estate

Understanding Undue Influence in Contract Law 101

• assignments basic law

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Read more about our firm

© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved  | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design

assignment - Meaning in Law and Legal Documents, Examples and FAQs

An assignment is the act of legally transferring rights, ownership, or interests from one party to another, often used in contracts, intellectual property, or debt obligations.

In normal language you would also say " transfer " instead of " assignment "

Need help understanding your legal documents?

What does "assignment" mean in legal documents?

An assignment is a legal term that refers to the transfer of rights, property, or benefits from one party (the assignor) to another party (the assignee). It's like passing the baton in a relay race – the assignor hands over their legal claim or ownership to the assignee.

In the context of contracts, an assignment typically involves two key components: the transfer of rights and the delegation of duties. Let's say you hired a guitar teacher to give you lessons, but you later decide to transfer that contract to your friend. The guitar teacher's right to receive payment would be assigned to your friend, and the duty to provide lessons would be delegated to your friend as well.

It's important to note that not all rights and duties can be freely assigned or delegated. There are certain restrictions in place to protect the interests of all parties involved. For instance, if the promised performance requires a highly specialized skill, it may not be possible to delegate that duty to someone else without the original party's consent.

Assignments can also occur in property law, particularly in landlord-tenant situations. Imagine you're renting an apartment, but you need to move out before your lease ends. You might be able to assign your remaining lease term to someone else, essentially transferring your rights and obligations as the tenant to the new person.

What are some examples of "assignment" in legal contracts?

Employment Contract: "The employee shall not assign or transfer any of their rights or obligations under this agreement without the prior written consent of the employer."

Lease Agreement: "The tenant may not assign or sublet the premises without the prior written consent of the landlord."

Intellectual Property License: "The licensee shall not assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this license agreement without the prior written consent of the licensor."

Loan Agreement: "The borrower shall not assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this loan agreement without the prior written consent of the lender."

Franchise Agreement: "The franchisee shall not assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this franchise agreement without the prior written consent of the franchisor."

Construction Contract: "The contractor shall not assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this construction contract without the prior written consent of the owner."

Insurance Policy: "The insured may not assign or transfer any of their rights or obligations under this insurance policy without the prior written consent of the insurer."

Consulting Agreement: "The consultant shall not assign or transfer any of their rights or obligations under this consulting agreement without the prior written consent of the client."

FAQs about "assignment"

What is an assignment in legal terms.

An assignment is the act of transferring rights, interests, or property from one party (the assignor) to another party (the assignee). It is a legal mechanism that allows the assignor to transfer their rights, obligations, or ownership to the assignee.

What types of things can be assigned?

Various types of legal rights, interests, or property can be assigned, such as contracts, leases, intellectual property rights (e.g., patents, trademarks, copyrights), insurance policies, debt obligations, and even real estate or personal property.

How is an assignment different from a sale?

While a sale involves the transfer of ownership in exchange for payment, an assignment typically involves the transfer of rights or interests without necessarily involving the exchange of money. The assignee essentially steps into the shoes of the assignor and assumes the same rights and obligations.

What are the requirements for a valid assignment?

For an assignment to be valid, there are typically several requirements:

• The right or interest being assigned must be assignable (some rights are non-transferable).
• The assignment must be made in accordance with any specific requirements or formalities outlined in the original agreement or applicable laws.
• The assignor must have the legal authority to make the assignment.
• The assignment must be properly documented, often in writing.

Can an assignment be revoked or undone?

In general, once an assignment is properly executed and the assignee has accepted the assignment, it cannot be revoked or undone unilaterally by the assignor. However, there may be specific circumstances or provisions in the original agreement that allow for the revocation or termination of the assignment under certain conditions.

What are the potential benefits of an assignment?

Assignments can provide several benefits, such as:

• Allowing parties to transfer rights or obligations to others who may be better positioned to fulfill them.
• Facilitating the sale or transfer of businesses or assets.
• Enabling the monetization of certain rights or interests by transferring them to parties who can better exploit them.
• Providing flexibility in managing legal relationships and obligations.

How do assignments impact third parties?

Assignments can have implications for third parties who may have existing relationships or agreements with the assignor or the assigned rights or interests. In some cases, third-party consent may be required for the assignment to be valid and enforceable against them. It's important to review any relevant agreements or laws to understand the potential impact on third parties.

These legal terms could also be helpful

assisted suicide

Assisted suicide, commonly referred to as euthanasia, is the act of intentionally ending someone's life to relieve them from an incurable or painful condition, usually with the individual's consent.

associate justice

An associate justice is a judge who serves on a higher court, such as the Supreme Court, alongside the chief justice, providing legal expertise and voting on important cases to shape the interpretation of laws.

In the legal context, an 'associate' refers to a lawyer who works for a law firm or legal practice, often as an employee or junior partner, gaining experience and working towards potentially becoming a full partner in the firm.

association

An association is a group of people or organizations that come together for a common purpose, such as a professional association for lawyers or a neighborhood association for residents.

Contact us whenever you need it!

+1 855 997 0206

Contact Hours: Sun-Sat 8am - 10pm ET

• LawDistrict ❯
• Legal Dictionary

Assignment is a legal definition that refers to the transfer of rights, property, or other benefits between two parties. The party allocating the rights is known as the “assignor”, while the one receiving them is called the “assignee”. The other original party to the contract is known as the “ obligor ”.

A burden, duty, or detriment cannot be transferred as an assignment without the agreement of the assignee . Furthermore, the assignment can be carried out as a gift, or it may be paid for with a contractual consideration .

Keep reading to learn how this important legal term is used both in contract and property law and to see relevant examples.

• Assignment Examples

A common example of assignment within property law can be seen in rental agreements between landlords and tenants. For example, a tenant may be renting from a landlord but wants another party to take over the property . In this scenario, the tenant may be able to choose between assigning the lease to a new tenant or subleasing it.

If assigning it, the new tenant will be given the entire balance of the term, with no reversion to anyone else being possible. In other words, the new tenant would have a legal relationship with the landlord. On the other hand, if subleasing the property, the new tenant would be given a limited term and no legal responsibility towards the property owner, only towards the original tenant.

Another example of assignment can be seen within contract law . Let’s say that a school hires a piano teacher for a monthly employment contract with a salary of $2000 per month. As long as there is consent from all parties, the teacher could assign their contract to another qualified piano instructor.

This would be an assignment both of the piano teacher’s rights to receive $2000 per month, and a delegation of their duty to teach piano lessons. This illustrates the fact that under contract law, assignment always includes a transfer of both rights and duties between the parties. If a breach of contract is made by either party, for example for defective performance, then the new teacher or the school can sue each other accordingly.

• Legal Requirements for Assignment

For an assignment to be legally valid, it must meet certain requirements . If these are not met, a trial court can determine that the transfer of rights did not occur. The legal requirements for assignment are as follows:

• All parties must consent and be legally capable to carry out the assignment.
• The objects, rights, or benefits being transferred must be legal.
• The assignment is not against public policy or illegal.
• Some type of consideration is included if necessary.
• The contract in question must already be in place and doesn’t prohibit assignment.
• If a duty is being transferred, and it requires a rare genius or skill, then it cannot be delegated.
• The assignment doesn’t significantly change the expected outcome of a contract.
• Assignment Steps

To successfully assign a contract, certain steps must be followed to ensure the process is legally valid. The necessary assignment steps are listed below:

• Ensuring there is no anti-assignment clause in the contract.
• Executing the assignment by transferring the obligations and rights to a third party.
• Notifying the obligor of the transfer, which in turn relieves the assignor of any liability.
• Avoiding Assignment

In certain situations, one of the two parties may not want to allow their counterpart to assign the contract. This can be prevented by setting anti-assignment clauses in the original contract. An example of this is making it necessary for prior written consent to be attained from the other parties before the assignment is approved. Nevertheless, an anti-assignment clause cannot be included in an assignment that was issued or ordered by a court.

• Assignment vs. Novation

Novation occurs when a party would like to transfer both the benefits and burden of a contract to another party. This is similar to assignment in the sense that the benefits are transferred, but in this case, the burden is also passed on. When novation is finalized, the original contract is deleted and a new one is created, in which a third party becomes responsible for all the obligations and rights of the original contract.

• Assignment vs. Delegation

Although delegation and assignment are similar in purpose, they are two different concepts. Delegation refers to transferring the obligation to a third party without an assignment contract . While in assignment an entire contract and its rights and benefits can be passed on, in delegation only a particular contractual task or activity is transferred.

Let’s look at an example . Lisa is a homeowner that wants to hire Michael with an independent contractor agreement to remodel her garage. He plans to do all the work himself, but he’s not a painter, so he wants to delegate the painting work to his friend Valentina.

In this example, the contract is between Lisa, the obligor, and Michael, the delegator. Valentina would then be known as a delegatee, she doesn’t assume responsibility for the contract nor does she receive the contractual benefits, which in this case would be monetary compensation. However, Michael may have a separate agreement with Valentina to pay her in return for her work.

It’s also important to note that some duties are so specific in nature that it’s not possible to delegate them. In addition, if a party wants to avoid delegation , it’s recommended to add a clause to prevent the other party from delegating their duties.

Create a Customizable Legal Form Now

Get 7 Days Total Access to Our Entire Catalog!

Not logged in

• Contributions
• Create account

Contracts/Assignment

Page actions.

• Edit source

An assignment [1] is a legal term used in the context of the law of contract and of property . In both instances, assignment is the process whereby a person, the assignor , transfers rights or benefits to another, the assignee . [2] An assignment may not transfer a duty, burden or detriment without the express agreement of the assignee. The right or benefit being assigned may be a gift (such as a waiver ) or it may be paid for with a contractual consideration such as money.

The rights may be vested or contingent, [3] and may include an equitable interest . [4] Mortgages and loans are relatively straightforward and amenable to assignment. An assignor may assign rights, such as a mortgage note issued by a third party borrower, and this would require the latter to make repayments to the assignee.

A related concept of assignment is novation wherein, by agreement with all parties, one contracting party is replaced by a new party. While novation requires the consent of all parties, assignment needs no consent from other non-assigning parties. However, in the case of assignment, the consent of the non-assigning party may be required by a contractual provision. [5]

• 1 Procedure
• 2 Liabilities and duties
• 3.1 When assignment will be permitted
• 3.2.1 Requirement of a writing
• 3.3 Delegation
• 4.1 Revocability
• 4.2 Breach and defenses
• 4.3 Successive assignments
• 5.1 Property rights
• 5.2 Partnership rights
• 5.3 Intellectual property rights
• 5.4 Personal injury torts
• 5.5 Legal malpractice
• 6.1 General principles
• 6.2 Mere expectancies
• 8 References

Procedure [ edit | edit source ]

The assignment does not necessarily have to be in writing; however, the assignment agreement must show an intent to transfer rights. The effect of a valid assignment is to extinguish privity (in other words, contractual relationship, including right to sue) between the assignor and the third-party obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee.

Liabilities and duties [ edit | edit source ]

Unless the contractual agreement states otherwise, the assignee typically does not receive more rights than the assignor, and the assignor may remain liable to the original counterparty for the performance of the contract. The assignor often delegates duties in addition to rights to the assignee, but the assignor may remain ultimately responsible.

However, in the United States, there are various laws that limit the liability of the assignee, often to facilitate credit, as assignees are typically lenders. [6] Notable examples include a provision in the Truth in Lending Act [7] and provisions in the Consumer Leasing Act and the Home Ownership Equity Protection Act . [6]

In other cases, the contract may be a negotiable instrument in which the person receiving the instrument may become a holder in due course , which is similar to an assignee except that issues, such as lack of performance, by the assignor may not be a valid defense for the obligor. [8] As a response, the United States Federal Trade Commission promulgated Rule 433, formally known as the "Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Preservation of Consumers' Claims and Defenses", which "effectively abolished the [holder in due course] doctrine in consumer credit transactions". [8] In 2012, the commission reaffirmed the regulation. [9]

Assignment of contract rights [ edit | edit source ]

After the assignment of contractual rights, the assignee will receive all benefits that had accrued to the assignor. For example, if A contracts to sell his car for $100 to B, A may assign the benefits (the right to be paid $100) to C. [10] In this case, Party C is not a third party beneficiary , because the contract was not made for C's benefit. Assignment takes place after the contract was formed; they may not precede them. Template:Cn

When assignment will be permitted [ edit | edit source ]

The common law favors the freedom of assignment, so an assignment will generally be permitted unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the contract ( Allhusen v. Caristo Construction , 1952). Where assignment is thus permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract. An assignment cannot have any effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it reduce the possibility of the other party receiving full performance of the same quality. Certain kinds of performance, therefore, cannot be assigned, because they create a unique relationship between the parties to the contract. For example, the assignment of a legal malpractice claim is void since an assignee would be a stranger to the attorney-client relationship, who was owed no duty by the attorney and would imperil the sanctity of the highly confidential and fiduciary relationship existing between attorney and client.

The Restatement (Second) of Contracts lists prohibitions in §317(2)(a) based upon the effect to the nonassigning party (obligor), [11] with similar prohibitions in the Uniform Commercial Code §2-210. [12] For example, UCC §2-210 states the following: [13] Template:Cquote

Equipment Lease Agreements typically contain language prohibiting the lessee from assigning the lease to a third party. For example, "You have no right to sell, transfer, assign, sublease, or encumber the equipment or this agreement" protects the Lessor’s collateral and credit underwriting guidelines in the event the lessee ever wants to transfer the lease to another party. However, it is possible to assign the lease, but the new party (assignee) will be subject to the lessor’s credit evaluation process and approval. Even if the assignee is approved, the existing lessee’s (assignor’s) personal guarantee(s), if any, might not be released unless the assignee’s credit stature is extremely strong.

Requirements for an effective assignment [ edit | edit source ]

For assignment to be effective, it must occur in the present. No specific language is required to make such an assignment, but the assignor must make some clear statement of intent to assign clearly identified contractual rights to the assignee. A promise to assign in the future has no legal effect. Although this prevents a party from assigning the benefits of a contract that has not yet been made, a court of equity may enforce such an assignment where an established economic relationship between the assignor and the assignee raised an expectation that the assignee would indeed form the appropriate contract in the future.

A contract may contain a non-assignment clause , which prohibits the assignment of specific rights and some various rights, or of the entire contract, to another. However, such a clause does not necessarily destroy the power of either party to make an assignment. Instead, it merely gives the other party the ability to sue for breach of contract if such an assignment is made. However, an assignment of a contract containing such a clause will be ineffective if the assignee knows of the non-assignment clause, or if the non-assignment clause specifies that "all assignments are void".

Two other techniques to prevent the assignment of contracts are rescission clauses or clauses creating a condition subsequent . The former would give the other party to the contract the power to rescind the contract if an assignment is made; the latter would rescind the contract automatically in such circumstances.

Requirement of a writing [ edit | edit source ]

There are certain situations in which the assignment must be in writing.

• Assignment of wages ; additionally, statutes may prohibit this assignment [11]
• Assignment of any interest in real property

Delegation [ edit | edit source ]

A parallel concept to assignment is delegation , which occurs when one party transfers his duties or liabilities under a contract to another. A delegation and an assignment can be accomplished at the same time, although a non-assignment clause may also bar delegation.

Remedies [ edit | edit source ]

Legal remedies may be available if the nonassigning party's rights are affected by the assignment.

Revocability [ edit | edit source ]

Assignments made for consideration are irrevocable, meaning that the assignor permanently gives up the legal right to take back the assignment once it has been made. Donative assignments, on the other hand, are generally revocable, either by the assignor giving notice to the assignee, taking performance directly from the obligor, or making a subsequent assignment of the same right to another. There are some exceptions to the revocability of a donative assignment:

• The assignment can not be revoked if the obligor has already performed
• The assignment can not be revoked if the assignee has received a token chose ( chose being derived from the French word for "thing", as in a chose of action) - a physical object that signifies a right to collect, such as a stock certificate or the passbook to a savings account.
• The assignment can not be revoked if the assignor has set forth in writing the assignment of a simple chose - a contract right embodied in any form of token.
• Estoppel can prevent the revocation of a donative assignment if the assignee changed their position in reliance on the assignment.

Breach and defenses [ edit | edit source ]

A cause of action for breach on the part of the obligor lies with the assignee, who will hold the exclusive right to commence a cause of action for any failure to perform or defective performance. At this stage, because the assignee "stands in the shoes" of the assignor, the obligor can raise any defense to the contract that the obligor could have raised against the assignor. Furthermore, the obligor can raise against the assignee counterclaims and setoffs that the obligor had against the assignor. For example, suppose that A makes a contract to paint B's house in exchange for $500. A then assigns the right to receive the $500 to C, to pay off a debt owed to C. However, A does such a careless job painting the house that B has to pay another painter $400 to correct A's work. If C sues B to collect the debt, B can raise his counterclaim for the expenses caused by the poor paint job, and can reduce the amount owed to C by that $400, leaving only $100 to be collected.

When the assignor makes the assignment, he makes with it an implied warranty that the right to assign was not subject to defenses. If the contract had a provision that made the assignment ineffective, the assignee could sue the assignor for breach of this implied warranty. Similarly, the assignee could also sue under this theory if the assignor wrongfully revoked the assignment.

Successive assignments [ edit | edit source ]

Occasionally, an unscrupulous assignor will as of the assignment, and on the timing of the assignments relative to certain other actions.

In a quirk left over from the common law, if the assignment was donative, the last assignee is the true owner of the rights. However, if the assignment was for consideration, the first assignee to actually collect against the assigned contract is the true owner of the rights. Under the modern American rule , now followed in most U.S. jurisdictions, the first assignor with equity (i.e. the first to have paid for the assignment) will have the strongest claim, while remaining assignees may have other remedies. In some countries, the rights of the respective assignees are determined by the old common law rule in Dearle v Hall .

• Earlier donative assignees for whom the assignment was revocable (because it had not been made irrevocable by any of the means listed above) have no cause of action whatsoever.
• Earlier donative assignees for whom the assignment was made irrevocable can bring an action for the tort of conversion , because the assignment was technically their property when it was given to a later assignee.
• Later assignees for consideration have a cause of action for breaches of the implied warranty discussed above.

See interpleader .

Special rules for assignment of certain rights [ edit | edit source ]

Property rights [ edit | edit source ].

Real property rights can be assigned just as any other contractual right. However, special duties and liabilities attach to transfers of the right to possess property. With an assignment, the assignor transfers the complete remainder of the interest to the assignee. The assignor must not retain any sort of reversionary interest in the right to possess. The assignee's interest must abut the interest of the next person to have the right to possession. If any time or interest is reserved by a tenant assignor then the act is not an assignment, but is instead a sublease.

The liability of the assignee depends upon the contract formed when the assignment takes place. However, in general, the assignee has privity of estate with a lessor. With privity of estate comes the duty on the part of the assignee to perform certain obligations under covenant, e.g. pay rent. Similarly, the lessor retains the obligations to perform on covenants to maintain or repair the land.

If the assignor agrees to continue paying rent to the lessor and subsequently defaults, the lessor can sue both the assignor under the original contract signed with the lessor as well as the assignee because by taking possession of the property interest, the assignee has obliged himself to perform duties under covenant such as the payment of rent.

Unlike a Novation where consent of both the lessor and lesse is required for the third party to assume all obligations and liabilities of the original lessee, an assignment does not always need the consent of all parties. If the contract terms state specifically that the lessor's consent is not needed to assign the contract, then the lesee can assign the contract to whomever the lesee wants to.

Absent language to the contrary, a tenant may assign their rights to an assignee without the landlord's consent. In the majority of jurisdictions, when there is a clause that the landlord may withhold consent to an assignment, the general rule is that the landlord may not withhold consent unreasonably unless there is a provision that states specifically that the Landlord may withhold consent at Landlord's sole discretion.

Partnership rights [ edit | edit source ]

A person can also assign their rights to receive the benefits owed to a partner in a partnership . However, the assignee can not thereby gain any of the assignor's rights with respect to the operation of the partnership. The assignee may not vote on partnership matters, inspect the partnership books, or take possession of partnership property; rather, the assignee can only be given the right is to collect distributions of income, unless the remaining partners consent to the assignment of a new general partner with operational, management, and financial interests. If the partnership is dissolved, the assignee can also claim the assignor's share of any distribution accompanying the dissolution.

Intellectual property rights [ edit | edit source ]

Ownership of intellectual property, including patents , copyrights , and trademarks , may be assigned, but special conditions attach to the assignment of patents and trademarks. In the United States , assignment of a patent is governed by statute , Template:USCode . Patent rights are assignable by an "instrument in writing." Title in a patent can also be transferred as a result of other financial transactions, such as a merger or a takeover , or as a result of operation of law, such as in an inheritance process, or in a bankruptcy . An assignment of a patent can be recorded with the United States Patent and Trademark Office . Although such recording is not required, if an assignment is not recorded at the USPTO within three (3) months or prior to a subsequent assignment, the assignment will be void against a subsequent assignee without notice of the earlier, unrecorded assignment.

With respect to a trademark, the owner of the mark may not transfer ownership of the mark without transferring the goodwill associated with the mark.

Companies sometimes request from employees that they assign all intellectual property they create while under the employment of the company. This is typically done within an Employment Agreement, but is sometimes done through a specific agreement called Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement (PIIA).

Personal injury torts [ edit | edit source ]

The standard rule is that personal injury tort causes of action are nonassignable as a matter of public policy . [11] [14] These should be distinguished from final settlements or judgments resulting from lawsuits brought on such causes of action, which may be assignable.

Legal malpractice [ edit | edit source ]

In the majority of jurisdictions, assignments involving fraud or legal malpractice causes of action are void as against public policy. [15]

Equitable assignment [ edit | edit source ]

An equitable assignment is an assignment, or transfer of rights, in equity.

General principles [ edit | edit source ]

There are numerous requirements that exist for an equitable assignment of property, outside the 'standard' clear and unconditional intention to assign . [16] These requirements are fundamental characteristics of a statutory assignment: Absolute assignment (an unconditional transfer: conditions precedent or part of a debt are not absolute) and the assignment must be made in writing and signed by the assignor, and in particular, this applies to real property. [17]

Assigning future property in equity cannot be gratuitous. The assignor must receive consideration for the agreement, otherwise the assignment will be ineffective. [3] However, an absolute assignment does not require consideration to be given. Secondly, between the period of agreement between assignor and assignee and acquisition by the assignor, the assignees rights are not contractual , but rather a proprietary right to the property. [18] This means the assignee has an interest in this future property, in the same manner any owner has over property.

In equity, these principles operate to protect both the assignor and the assignee. In Norman v Federal Commissioner of Taxation , [3] a taxpayer attempted to assign by deed , to his wife certain moneys which he was eventually going to receive. This included dividends and interest due on loans . The court held the interest and the dividends were expectancies or possibilities which could not be assigned without consideration. The court's worry was that assignments without consideration might be used as instruments of fraud, to avoid creditors and tax collection.

Mere expectancies [ edit | edit source ]

Courts will not enforce a contract to assign an expectancy unless there is a valuable consideration. For example, under a settlement of property the respondent "the son" would have been entitled to an equal portion of properties along with his other siblings which was gained in a settlement by his mother. This portion was only his when allocated to him at his mothers discretion. Prior to this allocation being made, the respondent allotted his benefit to trustees for a voluntary settlement. He was assigning or purporting to assign something which he might become entitled to in the future, not a contingent interest . The judgment held it ineffective and elaborated on previous points to state the respondent cannot be compelled to allow the trustees to retain the appointed sum. [19]

Cases [ edit | edit source ]

• Owen v. CNA , 2001

References [ edit | edit source ]

• ↑ Latin cessio
• ↑ For the assignment of claim see Trans-Lex.org
• ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Template:Cite AustLII .
• ↑ Australian Law Dictionary. oxford university press.
• ↑ Tips and traps in contracting: novation versus assignment , (August 2010)
• ↑ 6.0 6.1 Assignee Liability: Through the Minefield . Arnstein & Lehr LLP.
• ↑ See 15 U.S.C. 1641(a).
• ↑ 8.0 8.1 Commercial Paper: Holder in Due Course & Defenses Archived from the original on 2012-11-28.
• ↑ FTC Opinion Letter Affirms Consumers' Rights under the Holder Rule . FTC.
• ↑ In this scenario, Party A is the obligee/assignor , Party B is an obligor , and Party C is the assignee .
• ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Stark T. (2003). Negotiating and Drafting Contract Boilerplate , Ch. 3: Assignment and Delegation . ALM Publishing.
• ↑ Chapter 18: Assignment and Delegation . LexisNexis study outline.
• ↑ Uniform Commercial Code § 2-210. Delegation of Performance; Assignment of Rights .
• ↑ Pony v. County of Los Angeles , 433 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir. 2006).
• ↑ Cowan Liebowitz & Latman, PC v. Kaplan , 902 So. 2d 755, 759-760 (Fla. 2005).
• ↑ Template:Cite AustLII .
• ↑ Template:Cite Legislation AU .
• ↑ Northumberland (Duke) v Inland Revenue Comrs
• Contract law

• Case briefs
• Law schools
• Law professors
• Recent changes

Follow Wiki Law School

Share this page

• Special pages
• Browse properties

User page tools

• What links here
• Related changes
• Printable version
• Permanent link
• Page information

• This page was last edited on December 17, 2023, at 19:07.
• Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License unless otherwise noted.
• Privacy policy
• About Wiki Law School
• Disclaimers

Primary tabs

Assign is the act of transferring rights , property , or other benefits to another party (the assignee ) from the party who holds such benefits under contract (the assignor). This concept is used in both  contract  and property law . 

Contract Law  

Under contract law, when one party assigns a  contract , the assignment represents both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of  duties . 

• For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C. 
• Here, A has both: (1) assigned A’s rights under the contract to the $50; and (2) delegated A’s  duty  to teach guitar, to C. 
• In this example, A is both the “assignor” and the “delegee” who delegates  the duties to another (C), C is known as the “ obligor ” who must perform the  obligations  to the  assignee , and B is the assignee who is owed duties and is liable to the obligor.

Assigning of Rights/Duties Under Contract Law

There are a few notable rules regarding assignments under contract law. 

First, if an individual has not yet secured the contract to perform duties to another, they cannot assign their future right to an assignee. 

• That is, if A has not yet contracted with B to teach B guitar, A cannot assign their rights to C. 

Second, rights cannot be assigned when they  materially change the obligor’s duty and rights. 

Third, the obligor can sue the assignee directly if the assignee does not pay them. 

• Following the previous example, this means that C ( obligor ) can sue B ( assignee ) if C teaches guitar to B, but B does not pay C $50 in return.

Delegation of Duties

If the promised performance requires a rare genius or skill, then the delegee cannot delegate it to the obligor. It can only be delegated if the promised  performance  is more commonplace. Further, an obligee can sue if the  assignee  does not perform.  However, the delegee is  secondarily liable  unless there has been an  express   release  of the delegee. 

• Meaning if B does want C to teach guitar but C refuses to, then B can sue C. If C still refuses to perform, then B can compel A to fulfill the duties under secondary liability.

Lastly, a related concept is  novation , which is when a new obligor substitutes and releases an old obligor.  If novation occurs, then the original obligor’s duties are wiped out. Novation requires an original obligee’s  consent . 

Property Law

Under  property law , assignment typically arises in landlord-tenant situations.

• For example, A might be renting from landlord B but wants another party (C) to take over the property. 
• In this scenario, A might choose between  assigning  and  subleasing  the property to C. 
• If  assigning , A would give C the entire balance of the term , with no reversion to anyone; whereas if  subleasing , A would give C the property for a limited period of the remaining term.
• Under assignment, C would have  privity  of  estate  with the landlord while under a sublease, C would not. 

[Last updated in June of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team ]

• business law
• property & real estate law
• business sectors
• commercial transactions
• property law
• wex articles
• wex definitions

Assignment of Contract

Jump to section, what is an assignment of contract.

An assignment of contract is a legal term that describes the process that occurs when the original party (assignor) transfers their rights and obligations under their contract to a third party (assignee). When an assignment of contract happens, the original party is relieved of their contractual duties, and their role is replaced by the approved incoming party.

How Does Assignment of Contract Work?

An assignment of contract is simpler than you might think.

The process starts with an existing contract party who wishes to transfer their contractual obligations to a new party.

When this occurs, the existing contract party must first confirm that an assignment of contract is permissible under the legally binding agreement . Some contracts prohibit assignments of contract altogether, and some require the other parties of the agreement to agree to the transfer. However, the general rule is that contracts are freely assignable unless there is an explicit provision that says otherwise.

In other cases, some contracts allow an assignment of contract without any formal notification to other contract parties. If this is the case, once the existing contract party decides to reassign his duties, he must create a “Letter of Assignment ” to notify any other contract signers of the change.

The Letter of Assignment must include details about who is to take over the contractual obligations of the exiting party and when the transfer will take place. If the assignment is valid, the assignor is not required to obtain the consent or signature of the other parties to the original contract for the valid assignment to take place.

Check out this article to learn more about how assigning a contract works.

Contract Assignment Examples

Contract assignments are great tools for contract parties to use when they wish to transfer their commitments to a third party. Here are some examples of contract assignments to help you better understand them:

Anna signs a contract with a local trash company that entitles her to have her trash picked up twice a week. A year later, the trash company transferred her contract to a new trash service provider. This contract assignment effectively makes Anna’s contract now with the new service provider.

Hasina enters a contract with a national phone company for cell phone service. The company goes into bankruptcy and needs to close its doors but decides to transfer all current contracts to another provider who agrees to honor the same rates and level of service. The contract assignment is completed, and Hasina now has a contract with the new phone company as a result.

Here is an article where you can find out more about contract assignments.

Assignment of Contract in Real Estate

Assignment of contract is also used in real estate to make money without going the well-known routes of buying and flipping houses. When real estate LLC investors use an assignment of contract, they can make money off properties without ever actually buying them by instead opting to transfer real estate contracts .

This process is called real estate wholesaling.

Real Estate Wholesaling

Real estate wholesaling consists of locating deals on houses that you don’t plan to buy but instead plan to enter a contract to reassign the house to another buyer and pocket the profit.

The process is simple: real estate wholesalers negotiate purchase contracts with sellers. Then, they present these contracts to buyers who pay them an assignment fee for transferring the contract.

This process works because a real estate purchase agreement does not come with the obligation to buy a property. Instead, it sets forth certain purchasing parameters that must be fulfilled by the buyer of the property. In a nutshell, whoever signs the purchase contract has the right to buy the property, but those rights can usually be transferred by means of an assignment of contract.

This means that as long as the buyer who’s involved in the assignment of contract agrees with the purchasing terms, they can legally take over the contract.

But how do real estate wholesalers find these properties?

It is easier than you might think. Here are a few examples of ways that wholesalers find cheap houses to turn a profit on:

• Direct mailers
• Place newspaper ads
• Make posts in online forums
• Social media posts

The key to finding the perfect home for an assignment of contract is to locate sellers that are looking to get rid of their properties quickly. This might be a family who is looking to relocate for a job opportunity or someone who needs to make repairs on a home but can’t afford it. Either way, the quicker the wholesaler can close the deal, the better.

Once a property is located, wholesalers immediately go to work getting the details ironed out about how the sale will work. Transparency is key when it comes to wholesaling. This means that when a wholesaler intends to use an assignment of contract to transfer the rights to another person, they are always upfront about during the preliminary phases of the sale.

In addition to this practice just being good business, it makes sure the process goes as smoothly as possible later down the line. Wholesalers are clear in their intent and make sure buyers know that the contract could be transferred to another buyer before the closing date arrives.

After their offer is accepted and warranties are determined, wholesalers move to complete a title search . Title searches ensure that sellers have the right to enter into a purchase agreement on the property. They do this by searching for any outstanding tax payments, liens , or other roadblocks that could prevent the sale from going through.

Wholesalers also often work with experienced real estate lawyers who ensure that all of the legal paperwork is forthcoming and will stand up in court. Lawyers can also assist in the contract negotiation process if needed but often don’t come in until the final stages.

If the title search comes back clear and the real estate lawyer gives the green light, the wholesaler will immediately move to locate an entity to transfer the rights to buy.

One of the most attractive advantages of real estate wholesaling is that very little money is needed to get started. The process of finding a seller, negotiating a price, and performing a title search is an extremely cheap process that almost anyone can do.

On the other hand, it is not always a positive experience. It can be hard for wholesalers to find sellers who will agree to sell their homes for less than the market value. Even when they do, there is always a chance that the transferred buyer will back out of the sale, which leaves wholesalers obligated to either purchase the property themselves or scramble to find a new person to complete an assignment of contract with.

Learn more about assignment of contract in real estate by checking out this article .

Who Handles Assignment of Contract?

The best person to handle an assignment of contract is an attorney. Since these are detailed legal documents that deal with thousands of dollars, it is never a bad idea to have a professional on your side. If you need help with an assignment of contract or signing a business contract , post a project on ContractsCounsel. There, you can connect with attorneys who know everything there is to know about assignment of contract amendment and can walk you through the whole process.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Meet some of our Lawyers

Litigation and Discovery Management; Drafting and Filing of Pleadings, Motions and Briefs In Support; Preparation and Closing of Residential and Commercial Real Estate Sales and Purchase Transactions; Handling of Quiet Title Actions; Preparation and Filing of Probate Letters of Administration and Caveat Emptors; Review of Real Estate Documents and Settlement Negotiation.

Ido Alexander is dedicated to helping his clients identify risks and understand how to navigate the unknowns. He has a keen ability to sort through the noise to develop strategies for growth and advance clients' interests. An experienced counsel, he focuses on finding solutions for businesses, estate planning needs, helping resolve complex and strategic disputes, and at times restructuring through bankruptcy or out of court, while keeping his clients' financial health as the top priority.

Motivated and self-starting Corporate and Commercial Counsel with over 12 years of experience in providing strategic legal solutions. Exceptional analytical and negotiation skills, focusing on Cyber Security, Finance, and Software. Proven track record of success in handling complex M&A matters. Expertly led negotiations and full five M&A transactions from start to finish (over $100M), resulting in successful integration including raising capital on Reg. A and Reg. D exemptions. Drafted, reviewed and negotiated commercial agreements including, Restructure Agreements Partnership Agreements, Asset Purchase Agreements, Stock Purchase Agreements, Restructure Agreements, Loan conversion Agreements, Debt Conversion Agreements. Provided business and capital strategy, such as restructuring of companies, due diligence, and SEC filings. Proven expertise in M&A and equity debt finance, with a track record of handling diverse clients. Provided strategic guidance on corporate governance, compliance, fiduciary duties, and ethical issues

I am an attorney in Michigan. I attended Boston College for my undergraduate degree and Suffolk University Law School for my law degree. I have been practicing law for over 20 years.

Business and Real Property

I am a corporate lawyer with over 15 years of experience in litigation and in advising companies on a variety of legal issues, including mergers and acquisitions, securities regulations, and contract negotiations. I have a deep understanding of the technology industry and have represented numerous tech companies in my career.

As a Senior Legal Professional, I have 16+ years experience with extensive background in commercial transactions and as a corporate generalist. I am well versed in contracts lifecycle, risk assessment, compliance, and healthcare regulations. My competencies extend to contract management and detailed project management skills. I have leveraged my legal contracts expertise to mitigate organizational risk, reduce costs, and drive multi-million-dollar revenue increases.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

Need help with a Contract Agreement?

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

CONTRACT LAWYERS BY TOP CITIES

• Austin Contracts Lawyers
• Boston Contracts Lawyers
• Chicago Contracts Lawyers
• Dallas Contracts Lawyers
• Denver Contracts Lawyers
• Houston Contracts Lawyers
• Los Angeles Contracts Lawyers
• New York Contracts Lawyers
• Phoenix Contracts Lawyers
• San Diego Contracts Lawyers
• Tampa Contracts Lawyers

ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT LAWYERS BY CITY

• Austin Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Boston Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Denver Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Houston Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• New York Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment Of Contract Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment Of Contract Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

How It Works

Want to speak to someone.

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

• Find a Lawyer
• Legal Topics
• Contract Law

Contract Assignments

(This may not be the same place you live)

  What is a Contract Assignment?

In a contract assignment, one of the two parties to a contract may transfer their right to the other’s performance to a third party. This is known as “contract assignment.” Generally, all rights under a contract may be assigned. A provision in the contract that states the contract may not be assigned usually refers to the delegation of the assignor’s (person who assigns) duties under that contract, not their rights under the contract. 

In modern law, the phrase “assignment of contract” usually means assignment of both rights and duties under a contract.

Who are the Various Parties Involved in a Contract Assignment?

How is a contract assignment created, when is a contract assignment prohibited, which parties are liable to each other in a contract assignment, are there issues with multiple assignments, should i hire a lawyer for contract assignments.

In a contract, there are two parties to the agreement, X and Y. The parties may agree to let X assign X’s rights to a third party . Once the third party enters the picture, each party has a special name. For instance, suppose X, a seller of bookmarks, contracts with Y, a purchaser of bookmarks. Y desires to have Y’s right to X’s performance (the sale of bookmarks on a monthly basis) to another person. 

This third person, Z, is called the assignee. X is called the obligor , and Y is called the assignor , since Y has assigned its right to X’s performance . X, the obligor, is obligated to continue to perform its duties under the agreement.

There are no “magic words” needed to create an assignment. The law simply requires that the would-be assignor have an intent to immediately and completely transfer their rights in the agreement. In addition, writing is typically not required to create an assignment. As long as X and Y both adequately understand what right is being assigned, an assignment is created. 

Words that indicate a transfer is to take place suffice, such as “I intend to transfer my rights under this agreement,” or, “I intend to give my rights to Z,” or “I intend to confer an assignment on Z.” In addition,consideration,which is a bargained-for exchange required for a contract to be valid, is not required for assignment.

In certain instances, an assignment of contract rights can be prohibited. If the contract contains a clause prohibiting assignment of “the contract,” without specifying more, the law construes this language as barring only delegation of the assignor’s duties, not their rights. If the assignment language states “assignment of contractual rights are prohibited,” the obligor may sue for damages if the assignor attempts to assign the agreement. If the contract language states that attempts to assign “will be void,” the parties can bar assignment.of rights.

Under modern contract law, the phrase “I assign the contract” is usually interpreted to mean that one is assigning rights and duties. What is an assignment of duties? An assignment of duties occurs where Y, called the obligor or delegator, promises to perform for X, the obligee. Y then delegates their duty to perform to Z, the delegate. Under the law, most duties can be delegated. 

There are exceptions to this rule. Delegation can be prohibited when:

• The duties to be performed involve personal judgment and special skill (e.g., a portrait, creation of a custom-made dress). 
• “Personal judgment” is the exercise of some kind of superior judgment when it comes to determining how, when, or where to do something. Examples of individuals who exercise personal judgment include talent scouts and financial advisors.  Special skill is the unique ability to create a good or perform a service. A delegator can be prohibited from delegating duties when it is that specific delegator’s services are sought. For example, if the services of a specific famous chef are sought, and the original agreement was entered into on the understanding that the chef was hired for their specific talent, the delegator may not delegate the services;
• The assignment fundamentally changes risks or responsibilities under the agreement;
• The assignment is over future rights associated with a future contract that does not currently exist;
• Delegation would increase the obligation of the obligee. For example, if a shoe manufacturer contracts to deliver soles to a store in the same town as the shoe factory, the other party cannot assign the delivery to a different store in another state. Doing so would impose a greater obligation on the obligee than was originally contemplated;
• The obligee had placed special trust in the delegator. For example, assume that you have hired a patent attorney, based on that attorney’s significant skill and expertise, to obtain a valuable patent. You have placed special trust in this person, hiring them instead of other patent attorneys, because of their unique expertise. In such a situation, the attorney may not delegate his duties to another attorney (delegate), since the attorney was hired because of one person’s special capabilities;
• The delegation is of a promise to repay a debt; or
• The contract itself restricts or prohibits delegation. If the contract states, “any attempt to delegate duties under this contract is void,” a delegation will not be permitted.

In a contract involving assignment of rights, the assignee may sue the obligor. This is because the assignee, once the assignee has been assigned rights, is entitled to performance under the contract. If the obligor had a defense that existed in the original contract between obligor and assignor, the obligor may assert that defense against the assignee. Examples of such defenses include the original contract was not valid because of lack of consideration, or because there was never a valid offer or acceptance).

An assignee may also sue an assignor. Generally, if an assignment is made for consideration,it is irrevocable. Assignments not made for consideration, but under which an obligor has already performed, are also irrevocable. If an assignor attempts to revoke an irrevocable assignment,the assignee may sue for “wrongful revocation.” 

In circumstances involving delegation of duties,an obligee must accept performance from the delegate of all duties that may be delegated. The delegator remains liable on the agreement. Therefore, the obligee may sue the delegator for nonperformance by the delegate. The obligee may sue the delegate for nonperformance, but can only require the delegate to perform if there has been an assumption by the delegate. An assumption by the delegate is a promise that the delegate will perform the delegated duty, which promise is supported by consideration. 

Assignments that are not supported by consideration are revocable. If an initial assignment is revocable, a subsequent assignment can revoke it. If a first assignment is irrevocable, because consideration was present,the first assignment will usually prevail over a subsequent assignment. This means the person who can claim the assignment was first made to them will prevail over someone who claims a subsequent assignment. 

If, however, the second person paid value for the assignment, and entered into the assignment without knowing of the first assignment, the “subsequent”assignee is entitled to proceeds the first judgment against the obligor (the original party who still must perform), in the event such a judgment is issued,

If you have an issue with assignment of rights or duties under a contract, you should contact a contract lawyer  for advice. An experienced business lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, advise you of your rights, and represent you in court proceedings.

Save Time and Money - Speak With a Lawyer Right Away

• Buy one 30-minute consultation call or subscribe for unlimited calls
• Subscription includes access to unlimited consultation calls at a reduced price
• Receive quick expert feedback or review your DIY legal documents
• Have peace of mind without a long wait or industry standard retainer
• Get the right guidance - Schedule a call with a lawyer today!

Need a Contract Lawyer in your Area?

• Connecticut
• Massachusetts
• Mississippi
• New Hampshire
• North Carolina
• North Dakota
• Pennsylvania
• Rhode Island
• South Carolina
• South Dakota
• West Virginia

Daniel Lebovic

LegalMatch Legal Writer

Original Author

Prior to joining LegalMatch, Daniel worked as a legal editor for a large HR Compliance firm, focusing on employer compliance in numerous areas of the law including workplace safety law, health care law, wage and hour law, and cybersecurity. Prior to that, Daniel served as a litigator for several small law firms, handling a diverse caseload that included cases in Real Estate Law (property ownership rights, residential landlord/tenant disputes, foreclosures), Employment Law (minimum wage and overtime claims, discrimination, workers’ compensation, labor-management relations), Construction Law, and Commercial Law (consumer protection law and contracts). Daniel holds a J.D. from the Emory University School of Law and a B.S. in Biological Sciences from Cornell University. He is admitted to practice law in the State of New York and before the State Bar of Georgia. Daniel is also admitted to practice before the United States Courts of Appeals for both the 2nd and 11th Circuits. You can learn more about Daniel by checking out his Linkedin profile and his personal page. Read More

Jose Rivera

Managing Editor

Related Articles

• Acceleration Clause Lawyers
• What is Rescission of Contract?
• When Is a Contract Considered Void or Voidable?
• Illegal Contract Lawyers
• Nominal Damages in a Contracts Claim
• Breach of Contract Defense: Laches
• Breach of Contract Defenses: Unclean Hands
• Material Breach of Contract and Lawsuits
• Breaching vs. Non-Breaching Parties in a Contract
• What is a Contract?
• Fraudulent Inducement
• Contract Law: Fraud Cases
• Limitation of Liability Clauses in Construction Contracts
• Homeowners Hiring Unlicensed Contractors
• Business Licenses for Independent Contractors
• State Statute of Limitations for a Breach of Contract Action
• Email Contracts
• Employer Liability for Wage Violations of Subcontractors
• Employee or Independent Contractor?
• Tax Requirements for Independent Contractors
• Statutory Damages in Breach of Contract Cases
• Hiring an Independent Contractor
• Attorney's Fees in Breach of Contract Cases
• What Is the Proper Court for a Breach of Contract Lawsuit?
• Exclusive Dealing Contracts
• Defenses to Breach of Employment Contract
• Real Estate Contracts: Exclusive Right to Sell
• Exculpatory Clauses
• Exterminators Breach of Contract Liability
• Negligent Misrepresentation

Discover the Trustworthy LegalMatch Advantage

• No fee to present your case
• Choose from lawyers in your area
• A 100% confidential service

How does LegalMatch work?

Law Library Disclaimer

16 people have successfully posted their cases

• Practical Law

Practical Law UK Glossary 1-107-6442  (Approx. 4 pages)

• Lending: General
• After Death
• General Contract and Boilerplate
• Security and Quasi Security

Contracts: assignment

Practical law uk practice note 7-381-7509  (approx. 44 pages), get full access to this document with practical law.

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can enhance productivity, increase efficiency, and improve response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

• Increase efficiency
• Enhance productivity
• Improve response time
• General Contract and Boilerplate
• Substantive Law
• 1 Scope of this note
• 2 What is an assignment?
• 3 Effect of assignment
• 4 When is assignment used?
• 5 Types of assignment
• 6 Assignment formalities
• Personal contracts
• Assignments prohibited by public policy
• Construing non-assignment provisions
• Requirements for consent
• Circumventing restrictions on assignment
• Legal restrictions on non-assignment provisions
• "Conditional benefit" exception discredited for assigning contractual obligations
• Creating a legal assignment
• When are legal assignments used?
• Who must consent?
• Must a legal assignment be in writing?
• Who must sign the assignment?
• Is consideration required?
• Notice of assignment
• Notice must be in writing
• Must the notice take any particular form?
• Does the notice need to state the date of the assignment?
• When should notice be given?
• Who can give notice?
• To whom can notice be given?
• Can notice be given in advance of assignment?
• Can the other contracting party demand sight of the assignment agreement?
• Which methods of giving notice are valid?
• Effect of non-assignment provision on a notice of assignment
• What happens if notice of assignment is not given to the other contracting party?
• Creating an equitable assignment
• When are equitable assignments used?
• Must an equitable assignment be in writing?
• Is notice of assignment required?
• Subject to equities
• Recovery of loss by assignee
• 14 Assignment of a third party right
• Conditional fee agreements
• Construction agreements
• Consumer contracts
• Security arrangements
• General reading
• Assignment of other choses in action
• 17 Drafting assignment provisions
• 18 Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925

• Platform Overview All-in-one legal research and workflow software
• Legal Research Unmetered access to primary and secondary sources
• Workflow Tools AI-powered tools for smarter workflows
• News & Analysis Paywall-free premium Bloomberg news and coverage
• Practical Guidance Ready-to-use guidance for any legal task
• Contract Solutions New: Streamlined contract workflow platform
• Introducing Contract Solutions Experience contract simplicity
• Watch product demo
• Law Firms Find everything you need to serve your clients
• In-House Counsel Expand expertise, reduce cost, and save time
• Government Get unlimited access to state and federal coverage
• Law Schools Succeed in school and prepare for practice
• Customer Cost Savings and Benefits See why GCs and CLOs choose Bloomberg Law
• Getting Started Experience one platform, one price, and continuous innovation
• Our Initiatives Empower the next generation of lawyers
• Careers Explore alternative law careers and join our team
• Press Releases See our latest news and product updates
• DEI Framework Raising the bar for law firms
• Request Pricing
• Business of Law

Checklist: Getting the Assignment

February 9, 2023

[This document is part of a series focused on core litigation skills. Bloomberg Law subscribers can access the full Core Litigation Skills Toolkit with practical guidance on key aspects of litigation practice. Not a subscriber? Request a demo .]

Receiving an assignment can be challenging, especially if you aren’t familiar with the client’s case and/or the area of the law. Consider the following before going into a meeting to get a research assignment .

Think ahead, come prepared

Think ahead about questions to ask to make sure you fully understand the assignment. If it is not provided, always ask about background case information, logistical issues such as the deadline, the client/matter number, and billing instructions.

Take a lot of notes

Be ready to take a lot of notes when receiving the assignment and don’t assume you will remember it all later when you start the assignment. Make sure you know whom to contact if you have questions or need your memory refreshed.

Do you understand what is being asked of you?

Confirm your understanding of the question being asked. When the assigning attorney is finished with their initial explanation of the assignment, repeat back to them what they want you to research.

Ask questions

Don’t be afraid to ask questions.

Understand the context

If the assignor doesn’t tell you, ask why they need to know the answer to the research question. Where does it fit into the overall case? What is the best answer for the client? Is there a second-best answer? What if you find the opposite of what they want you to find? These pieces of information can be important in knowing what strands of the research are more relevant, help you know when to stop researching, and make you a more efficient researcher.

What are the key facts of the case?

Knowing the key facts will enable you to keep an eye out for case law that is factually analogous to yours. There may be an existing document or filing that lays out the facts in more detail. If so, that document should be your first stop when you have questions.

What is the jurisdiction?

Be sure to pinpoint the relevant jurisdiction. If it is a pending case, the court where it is pending will tell you that. Also be sure to get the docket number from the assignor. If the research question is for a case that is not yet filed, be sure to ask where the case would be filed. If there is a choice of where to file, determine whether the assignor wants information to compare jurisdictions.

Confirm the final work product

What final product does the assignor want from you? A formal memo for the client? A memo for the file? An email that pinpoints the relevant cases? An oral summary? This is very important, especially for time management.

How will the research be used?

Is the research to be used for a pending motion? If you are helping with a motion for summary judgment, for example, your goal is to find cases that are in the same procedural posture as yours and come out favorably for your side (i.e., if your client is the one filing the motion, try to find cases where a motion for summary judgment was granted, not denied). Keep in mind the burden of proof for different kinds of motions.

How much time?

Ask for an estimate of how much time/money the assignor expects this to take or is willing to initially authorize. Keep track of the estimate, and as soon as it looks like it might be insufficient, check back in with the assignor for more instructions. Do they want you to go past the estimate? Stop with what you know now? Modify to a narrower track?

How does the assignor like to be contacted?

Ask for the best times and method (email, phone call, office visit, etc.) to reach the assignor if you need clarification or have follow-up questions. Knowing how and when your assignor should be contacted is core to building and maintaining a positive and successful working relationship.

Reference Shelf

Article: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers Explained

Article: How to Conduct Legal Research

Webinar:  How to Succeed as a Junior Associate

Analysis: RTO or WFH? Attorneys and Employers Find Common Ground

Article: They’ve Got Next: The 40 Under 40—Meet Our 2022 Honorees

Recommended for you

See bloomberg law in action.

From live events to in-depth reports, discover singular thought leadership from Bloomberg Law. Our network of expert analysts is always on the case – so you can make yours. Request a demo to see it for yourself.

Constitutional Theory in a Comparative Context

Gary Jacobsohn and Miguel Schor (eds)  Comparative Constitutional Theory  (2 ed, 2024) 

16 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2024

Adrienne Stone

University of Melbourne - Law School

Lael K. Weis

Melbourne Law School

Date Written: June 02, 2024

Comparative constitutional law presents both opportunities and challenges for doing constitutional theory. In this chapter, written for the second edition of Jacobsohn and Schor Comparative Constitutional Theory, we begin with a prior foundational question: ‘what is constitutional theory?’ In the first part of the chapter, we put forward an account of constitutional theory that situates it among other ways of studying and understanding constitutions. We also advance a set of criteria for evaluating the adequacy of a constitutional theory namely that a good constitutional theory will be well-structured internally; will have normative appeal and will be ‘empirically adequate’. The third of these criteria means that a constitutional theory must be able to accommodate a reasonable range of constitutions as they exist in the world. In the second part of the chapter, we explore the challenges of doing constitutional theory in a comparative context for the abstraction or idealisation necessary for theory-formation. When a constitutional theory purports to have application beyond a single case — to a group of constitutions or, most ambitiously, to any constitution — there is a risk that the theory cannot account for the variety of constitutions and diversity in constitutional practice. Purportedly general propositions may turn out to embed assumptions that are particular to one (or a set of) jurisdictions. In short, doing constitutional theory in a comparative context places pressure on empirical adequacy. We explore these challenges through a number of case studies, drawing on the work of Aileen Kavanagh, Yaniv Roznai and NW Barber. These studies expose a tension between two possible ambitions of theorisation: the desire for universal application and the desire for contextual richness. In conclusion, we suggest that constitutional theory formation in a comparative context may be better served not by resisting general claims but rather by refining general claims in light of the particular.

Keywords: Constitutional theory, constitutional law, comparative constitutional law, comparative constitutional theory

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Adrienne Stone (Contact Author)

University of melbourne - law school ( email ).

University Square 185 Pelham Street, Carlton Victoria, Victoria 3010

Melbourne Law School ( email )

University of Melbourne Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, comparative & non-u.s. constitutional law ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy eJournal

Floorplanning with I/O assignment via feasibility-seeking and superiorization methods

• Censor, Yair
• Luo, Guojie

The feasibility-seeking approach offers a systematic framework for managing and resolving intricate constraints in continuous problems, making it a promising avenue to explore in the context of floorplanning problems with increasingly heterogeneous constraints. The classic legality constraints can be expressed as the union of convex sets. In implementation, we introduce a resetting strategy aimed at effectively reducing the problem of algorithmic divergence in the projection-based method used for the feasibility-seeking formulation. Furthermore, we introduce the novel application of the superiorization method (SM) to floorplanning, which bridges the gap between feasibility-seeking and constrained optimization. The SM employs perturbations to steer the iterations of the feasibility-seeking algorithm towards feasible solutions with reduced (not necessarily minimal) total wirelength. To evaluate the performance of Per-RMAP, we conduct comprehensive experiments on the MCNC benchmarks and GSRC benchmarks. The results demonstrate that we can obtain legal floorplanning results 166 times faster than the branch-and-bound (B&B) method while incurring only a 5% wirelength increase compared to the optimal results. Furthermore, we evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithmic flow that considers the I/O assignment constraints, which achieves an 6% improvement in wirelength. Besides, considering the soft modules with a larger feasible solution space, we obtain 15% improved runtime compared with PeF, the state-of-the-art analytical method. Moreover, we compared our method with Parquet-4 and Fast-SA on GSRC benchmarks which include larger-scale instances. The results highlight the ability of our approach to maintain a balance between floorplanning quality and efficiency.

• Mathematics - Optimization and Control;
• Computer Science - Hardware Architecture

Advertisement

Trump Has Been Convicted. Can He Still Run for President?

The Constitution and U.S. law have clear answers for only some of the questions raised by the criminal conviction of a major presidential candidate.

• Share full article

By Maggie Astor

• June 5, 2024

Not since Eugene V. Debs campaigned from a prison cell more than a century ago has the United States experienced what is now happening: a prominent candidate with felony convictions running for president. And never before has that candidate been someone with a real chance of winning.

A Manhattan jury convicted former President Donald J. Trump on Thursday of falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to a porn star. He has been charged with dozens of other felonies across three additional cases : two federal and one in Georgia .

For now, he faces no formal campaign restrictions, and he remains highly competitive in polls. But his sentencing on the New York convictions is approaching, on July 11, the other cases are still looming, and the Constitution and U.S. law have clear answers for only some of the questions that have arisen and may still arise.

Others could bring the country into truly uncharted territory, with huge decisions resting in the hands of federal judges.

Here is what we know, and what we don’t know.

Can Trump still run after his conviction?

This is the simplest question of the bunch. The answer is yes.

The Constitution sets very few eligibility requirements for presidents. They must be at least 35 years old, be “natural born” citizens  and have lived in the United States for at least 14 years.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

What is the significance of an equitable assignment in the context of the assignment of future rights under a contract (or a chose in action)?

An assignment is the transfer of a right or an interest vested in one party (assignor) to another party (assignee). The effect of a valid assignment is to entitle the assignee to demand performance of a contractual obligation.

Assignments may be legal or equitable.

A legal assignment is one which meets the requirements set out in section 136(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925). It must be:

absolute and unconditional and not purport to be by way of charge only

made in writing and signed by the assignor

expressly notified in writing to the obligor

Equitable assignments may arise in the following circumstances:

where there is an intention to assign, but not all of the formalities of a legal assignment are met under LPA 1925, s 136(1), the assignment may still be valid as an equitable assignment . The formalities for an equitable assignment to be effective are far less stringent

Access this content for free with a 7 day trial of LexisNexis and benefit from:

• Instant clarification on points of law
• Smart search
• Workflow tools
• 41 practice areas

** Trials are provided to all LexisNexis content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisNexis services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.

Get your quote today and take step closer to being able to benefit from:

• 36 practice areas

Get a LexisNexis quote

* denotes a required field

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE

Related legal acts:

• Law of Property Act 1925 (1925 c 20)

Key definition:

Equitable assignment definition, what does equitable assignment mean.

Assignments can occur in equity when any of the requirements of legal assignment are not satisfied.

Popular documents

Novation in construction projects.

Novation in construction projectsWhat is novation?Novation is the transfer of one party’s rights and obligations under a contract to a third party. Novation effectively substitutes a contracting party (the 'outgoing party') with a new party (the 'incoming party') and, in legal terms, it amounts to

Notice of assignment—construction projects

Notice of assignment—construction projectsTo: [insert company name]Address: [insert address for the service of notices]Dear [insert name of party/organisation being notified of the assignment],[insert details of the development to which the assigned documents relate] (the ‘Development’)As a result

The 'no loss' defence in construction contracts

The 'no loss' defence in construction contractsA no loss defence often arises due to the nature of the contractual matrix on construction projects. For example, a contract may be novated, the employer may not own the land on which the works are carried out, or the development may be sold after

What is the significance of an equitable assignment in the context of the assignment of future rights

What is the significance of an equitable assignment in the context of the assignment of future rights under a contract (or a chose in action)?An assignment is the transfer of a right or an interest vested in one party (assignor) to another party (assignee). The effect of a valid assignment is to

0330 161 1234

• International Sales(Includes Middle East)
• Latin America and the Caribbean
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Philippines
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United States

Popular Links

• Supplier Payment Terms
• Partner Alliance Programme

HELP & SUPPORT

• Legal Help and Support
• Tolley Tax Help and Support

LEGAL SOLUTIONS

• Compliance and Risk
• Forms and Documents
• Legal Drafting
• Legal Research
• Magazines and Journals
• News and Media Analysis
• Practice Management
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Settings
• Terms & Conditions
• Data Protection Inquiry
• Protecting Human Rights: Our Modern Slavery Agreement

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Suspended Counterparty Program

FHFA established the Suspended Counterparty Program to help address the risk to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks (“the regulated entities”) presented by individuals and entities with a history of fraud or other financial misconduct. Under this program, FHFA may issue orders suspending an individual or entity from doing business with the regulated entities.

FHFA maintains a list at this page of each person that is currently suspended under the Suspended Counterparty Program.

This page was last updated on 03/26/2024