forensic medicine research papers

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology

• Subscribe to journal Subscribe
• Get new issue alerts Get alerts

Secondary Logo

Journal logo, current issue.

June 2024 - Volume 45 - Issue 2

• Editor-in-Chief: D. Kimberley Molina, MD
• ISSN: 0195-7910
• Online ISSN: 1533-404X
• Frequency: 4 issues / year
• Ranking: Medicine, Legal 14/17; Pathology 67/76
• Impact Factor: 1.0

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

Current Issue Highlights

• Reviewer Thank You

Updated AJFMP 2023 Reviewer Thank You

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):97, June 2024.

• Permissions

The Canceling of Excited Delirium

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):98-102, June 2024.

• Original Articles

Homicide Manner-of-Death Classification in Arrest-Related Death

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):103-110, June 2024.

• Abstract Abstract

Autopsy-Based Comparative Study of Gross and Histopathological Findings at Bone Fracture Surfaces Before and After Death

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):111-117, June 2024.

• Review Article

A Narrative Review on the Clinical Relevance of Imaging the Circumventricular Brain Organs and Performing Their Anatomical and Histopathological Examination in Acute and Postacute COVID-19

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):151-156, June 2024.

Go to Full Text of this Article

• Historical Review

Forensic Analysis of the Abraham Lincoln Assassination: An On-Site Study of the Presidential Box at Ford's Theatre

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):157-161, June 2024.

• Technical Note

Technical Note: Removal of Circle of Willis During Autopsy

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):162-166, June 2024.

• Case Reports

A Series of 8 Illicit Fentanyl Intoxication Deaths in Infants and Toddlers

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):167-171, June 2024.

Self-Chiropractic Cervical Spinal Manipulation Resulting in Fatal Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):172-176, June 2024.

• Firearm News

Lehigh Defense Xtreme Defense Penetrator Ammunition

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):182-183, June 2024.

• Letters to the Editor

Update on Sodium Nitrite Poisoning: Can Certain Diseases Influence the Lethal Concentrations of MetHb?

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):184-185, June 2024.

Re: “Muscular Hemorrhages Around the Scapula Provide Insight on the Manner of Asphyxia's Study: Concerns and Considerations”

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 45(2):186, June 2024.

Follow Us on Social Media!

Featured Jobs

Latest articles.

View More Recent Articles

• You are here:
• American Chemical Society
• Discover Chemistry

Recent advances in forensic science research

For immediate release, acs news service weekly presspac: april 20, 2022.

Forensic scientists collect and analyze evidence during a criminal investigation to identify victims, determine the cause of death and figure out “who done it.” Below are some recent papers published in ACS journals reporting on new advances that could help forensic scientists solve crimes. Reporters can request free access to these papers by emailing  newsroom@acs.org .

“Insights into the Differential Preservation of Bone Proteomes in Inhumed and Entombed Cadavers from Italian Forensic Caseworks” Journal of Proteome Research March 22, 2022 Bone proteins can help determine how long ago a person died (post-mortem interval, PMI) and how old they were at the time of their death (age at death, AAD), but the levels of these proteins could vary with burial conditions. By comparing bone proteomes of exhumed individuals who had been entombed in mausoleums or buried in the ground, the researchers found several proteins whose levels were not affected by the burial environment, which they say could help with AAD or PMI estimation.

“Carbon Dot Powders with Cross-Linking-Based Long-Wavelength Emission for Multicolor Imaging of Latent Fingerprints” ACS Applied Nanomaterials Jan. 21, 2022 For decades, criminal investigators have recognized the importance of analyzing latent fingerprints left at crime scenes to help identify a perpetrator, but current methods to make these prints visible have limitations, including low contrast, low sensitivity and high toxicity. These researchers devised a simple way to make fluorescent carbon dot powders that can be applied to latent fingerprints, making them fluoresce under UV light with red, orange and yellow colors.

“Proteomics Offers New Clues for Forensic Investigations” ACS Central Science Oct. 18, 2021 This review article describes how forensic scientists are now turning their attention to proteins in bone, blood or other biological samples, which can sometimes answer questions that DNA can’t. For example, unlike DNA, a person’s complement of proteins (or proteome) changes over time, providing important clues about when a person died and their age at death.

“Integrating the MasSpec Pen with Sub-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization for Rapid Chemical Analysis and Forensic Applications” Analytical Chemistry May 19, 2021 These researchers previously developed a “MasSpec Pen,” a handheld device integrated with a mass spectrometer for direct analysis and molecular profiling of biological samples. In this article, they develop a new version that can quickly and easily detect and measure compounds, including cocaine, oxycodone and explosives, which can be important in forensics investigations.

The American Chemical Society (ACS) is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. ACS’ mission is to advance the broader chemistry enterprise and its practitioners for the benefit of Earth and all its people. The Society is a global leader in promoting excellence in science education and providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple research solutions, peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences, eBooks and weekly news periodical Chemical & Engineering News . ACS journals are among the most cited, most trusted and most read within the scientific literature; however, ACS itself does not conduct chemical research. As a leader in scientific information solutions, its CAS division partners with global innovators to accelerate breakthroughs by curating, connecting and analyzing the world’s scientific knowledge. ACS’ main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.

To automatically receive press releases from the American Chemical Society, contact newsroom@acs.org .

Note: ACS does not conduct research, but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies.

Media Contact

ACS Newsroom newsroom@acs.org

Discover Chemistry  —Menu

• News Releases
• ACS in the News

Accept & Close The ACS takes your privacy seriously as it relates to cookies. We use cookies to remember users, better understand ways to serve them, improve our value proposition, and optimize their experience. Learn more about managing your cookies at Cookies Policy .

1155 Sixteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA |  service@acs.org  | 1-800-333-9511 (US and Canada) | 614-447-3776 (outside North America)

• Terms of Use
• Accessibility

Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Advance Articles
• Special Issues
• High-Impact Collection
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Call for Papers
• Open Access Options
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Why Publish with Us?
• About Forensic Sciences Research
• Journal Metrics
• About the Academy of Forensic Science
• Editorial Board
• Advertising & Corporate Services

Article Contents

Introduction, the global impact of forensic imaging, the application of forensic imaging in different forensic disciplines, advantages, disadvantages and prospects, compliance with ethical standards, disclosure statement.

• < Previous

Forensic Imaging: A Powerful Tool in Modern Forensic Investigation

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Min Zhang, Forensic Imaging: A Powerful Tool in Modern Forensic Investigation, Forensic Sciences Research , Volume 7, Issue 3, September 2022, Pages 385–392, https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.2008705

• Permissions Icon Permissions

Forensic imaging is a non-invasive examination process during the forensic investigation. It is mainly used in forensic pathology as an adjunct to the traditional autopsy. In the past two decades, forensic imaging has been vigorously developed by forensic experts from computed tomography (CT) to multiple augmented techniques through CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The application field of forensic imaging has also been broadened as its advantages are recognised by more forensic practitioners. In addition to the forensic pathology, this technique has been used in other forensic disciplines, including forensic anthropology, forensic odontology, forensic ballistics and wildlife forensics, etc. This article reviews the development of forensic imaging as the practice and research development in different forensic disciplines based on the relevant literature analysis.

Modern forensic investigation utilises novel tools and advanced technologies to solve criminal and civil cases. Forensic imaging is obviously a powerful tool in this new era. Thanks to X-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other medical imaging technologies, which have laid a solid foundation for the development of forensic imaging. Forensic imaging is the use of images to explain and document findings for forensic and medico-legal purposes [ 1 ]. It includes the X-ray, the multi-slice CT, MRI, the augmented minimally invasive techniques through CT and MRI such as angiography and biopsy, and three-dimensional (3D) surface scanning as an adjunct or alternative to the traditional invasive autopsy [ 1 , 2 ]. Because of its non-invasive features, postmortem imaging is often used in pathology instead of a traditional autopsy when the case is of sensitive religious concern, or a traditional autopsy is rejected by family members for other reasons [ 2 ]. In death investigations, postmortem imaging is also frequently applied prior to a traditional autopsy, in order to accurately locate traumas and pathological changes in the deceased [ 3 ]. In some traumatic deaths, such as fatal motor vehicle accidents [ 4 ], postmortem imaging has the ability to detect or presume fatal traumas. In the circumstances such as fatal traumas, an autopsy is not necessary if the forensic pathologists can determine the cause of death according to imaging results.

Since forensic imaging has been used in forensic investigation, it mainly focused on research and applications of forensic pathology [ 5 , 6 ]. It is worth noting that in recent years, this technique has been adopted in other forensic investigative disciplines including forensic anthropology [ 7 ], odontology [ 8 ], forensic ballistics [ 9 ], wildlife forensics [ 10 ] and clinical forensic medicine [ 2 ]. Clearly, forensic imaging has become a powerful tool for modern forensic investigation. This article summarizes the application and research progress on forensic imaging in different forensic investigative disciplines.

In recent years, with the increasing recognition of its strengths, forensic imaging has been explored globally in forensic practice and research. For example, the forensic imaging research teams at the University Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva [ 1 , 11 ], the University of Berne [ 5 ] and the University of Zurich [ 8 ] in Switzerland, employed forensic imaging techniques, particularly CT and MRI in their outstanding research; the Chief Medical Examiner’s Office of Maryland in the United States utilises CT as an auxiliary method in autopsy [ 12 ]; the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (disestablished in 2011, continues as American Institute of Radiologic Pathology) performed CT especially in gunshot and drown cases [ 13 , 14 ]; the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia [ 15 ] and the Institute of Forensic Medicine at University of Southern Denmark [ 16 ] performed CT scan along with standard autopsy in forensic cases; forensic pathologists in Italy made use of CT scan as a screening diagnostic test before conducting a traditional autopsy [ 17 ]; in Austria, researchers utilised forensigraphy imaging technique to detect relevant traces on and within the body of an examined person [ 18 ]; in Japan, 26 of 47 prefectures have at least one autopsy imaging centre with scanners that are dedicated for postmortem imaging [ 19 ]; the Academy of Forensic Science in China started conducting postmortem multi-slice computed tomography (PMCT) research since 2005 and has completed more than 500 forensic imaging cases with different causes of death [ 20 , 21 ], this team also contributed thin layer CT scanning and imaging reconstruction to estimate the age of teenagers through the sternal end of clavicle epiphyseal growth [ 22 ].

Pre - CT time

Before the CT technology was invented in 1972 [ 23 ], the use of medical imaging in forensic investigation was not uncommon. X-ray was the primary imaging technique employed in forensics. As early as in the end of 19th century, X-ray was used for postmortem purposes [ 1 ]. In 1940s, stereoscopic radiography was utilised in hypertensive and ischemic heart disease deaths investigation in order to obtain pathological information [ 24 ]. Later, X-ray was widely used in forensic investigation, such as to assist in investigating the skull fracture mechanism [ 25 ] and the cause of death [ 26 ], to identify individuals [ 27 , 28 ] and study Egyptian mummy [ 29 ] in forensic anthropology, to develop the procedures and techniques in dental identification [ 30 ], to calculate gunshot size and pattern in forensic ballistics [ 31 ], to study the putrefaction which could cause radiographic postmortem changes in feline [ 32 ] and canine cadavers [ 33 ] in wildlife forensics, to investigate the injuries in industrial accidents, suicidal attempts and criminal assault of forensic living cases [ 34 ], etc.

Since CT and MRI were invented and used in the medical field in the 1970s, they have been increasingly used in forensic investigations.

Forensic pathology

In 1979, Flodmark et al. [ 35 ] performed CT 10 days before autopsy in 90 neonates that had suffered perinatal hypoxia. They confirmed that findings at autopsy were correlated with the CT diagnosis. In 1987, Varnell et al. [ 36 ] found that CT could reveal the marked diffuse cerebral swelling with associated loss of gray-white differentiation in cyanide poisoning death, whereas this type of death may masquerade as natural disease and can be difficult to diagnose both clinically and pathologically. In 1999, Oliver et al. [ 37 ] demonstrated the advantages and pitfalls of CT in forensic pathological diagnosis of arterial gas embolism in fatal diving accidents, they pointed out that an understanding of pitfalls will aid in an accurate imaging diagnosis in diving accident cases.

Based on the development of CT and MRI in medicine, forensic imaging ushered in its improvement heyday. CT was proved to be an excellent visualisation tool with great potential for forensic documentation and evaluation of decomposed bodies [ 38 ]; it assisted in finding intrahepatic gas in deceased with the exceptions of putrefied or burned corpses [ 39 ]; it also showed the reliability in estimation of abdominal blood volume [ 40 ]. CT and MRI techniques were used to assist in correct examination of charred bodies [ 41 ]; CT and MRI showed comparable potential as forensic diagnostic tools for traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage, and revealed that MRI is more sensitive than CT for detection of subarachnoid hemorrhagic findings [ 42 ]; CT and MRI also assessed postmortem weights of liver and spleen accurately, and CT even could overcome the limitation of putrefaction and venous air embolism by the possibility to exclude gas, and in congestion cases, the imaging might be even more accurate than autopsy in weighing the livers [ 43 ].

After 2006, angiography was incorporated in forensic imaging. It was first tested in animal models for rapid vascular phenotyping [ 44 , 45 ]. Subsequently, a minimally invasive two-step postmortem angiographic technique was established with the first step of a bolus injection of oily contrast agent into human cadavers and the second step of radiographic imaging. Postmortem angiography enabled detailed examination of the vascular system which is difficult to be examined by traditional autopsy methods [ 46 ]. The wholebody postmortem MR angiography (PMMRA) was proved to be feasible [ 47 ]. However, pitfalls of postmortem CT angiography (PMCTA) were reported as a hemorrhagic pericardial effusion happened during the venous phase of angiography, and suggested it is necessary to critically analyse CT and PMCTA images in order to distinguish between artifacts, true pathologies and iatrogenic findings [ 48 ]. With this lesson in mind, in the subsequent studies, angiography incorporated forensic imaging emerged remarkable role in differentiation of hemopericardium due to ruptured myocardial infarction or aortic dissection on unenhanced CT [ 49 ]. In addition, researchers successfully applied angiography without traditional autopsy in a fatal bronchovascular fistula after lobectomy case [ 50 ] which further confirmed angiography is technically feasible in forensic pathology.

With the advent of the new approach which has the capability to perform 3D surface scans as well as postmortem image-guided bones and soft tissues biopsy, forensic imaging has developed into a 3D and micromorphology era. In 2010, Virtobot, a multi-functional robotic system for 3D scanning and automatic postmortem biopsy was first introduced to the research field [ 51 ]. In 2014, the second prototype of Virtobot updated the previous prototype, and the updated Virtobot is more accurate in biopsy and focuses on streamlining the workflow and increasing the level of automation [ 52 ]. Recently, a more advanced 3D scanning technology multispectral full-body imaging employed multispectral photogrammetry between 365 and 960 nm by utilising modified digital cameras, ultraviolet, near-infrared light sources and lens filters to visualise the latent evidence on the body such as latent bodily fluids and latent bruises [ 53 ].

Forensic anthropology

CT imaging technology was widely used in forensic anthropology since 1980s. In 1981, Wong [ 54 ] was able to identify Hirschsprung disease in desiccated human remains by using CT. In 1993, Haglund and Fligner [ 55 ] successfully utilised CT to confirm human identification by comparing antemortem and postmortem skull CT scan scout views. In 1996, for facial reconstruction purposes, Phillips and Smuts [ 56 ] found the variation of the facial tissue thickness for the mixed racial population group of South Africa by CT scanning. In 1997, Quatrehomme et al. [ 57 ] proposed a new computerized methodology with the advantages of CT scan for facial reconstruction. By performing this new method, this research team was able to reconstruct by computer 3D facial model of the deceased. In 2006, Turner et al. [ 58 ] reported the first mathematical representation of the face continuum associated with given skull and collected a comprehensive CT head-scan database for forensic facial reconstruction, in order to assist in the identification of missing person and victims of violent crime. In the same period, Sidler et al. [ 59 ] proved that CT may be used as a valuable tool in disaster victim identification after a mass fatality incident because of the high efficiency of the technology.

By the end of the 20th century, forensic imaging application in forensic anthropology was elevated to a new level. In 2009, Harth et al. [ 60 ] applied Flat-Panel-CT eXplore Locus Ultra (eLU) system in determining the correlation between age and the stages of skull suture closure. The research team appraised that this method is useful in conjunction with other methods in age estimation. In 2014, López-Alcaraz et al. [ 61 ] applied CT on the pubic symphysis surface and the pubic body to relate them with age, and suggested that the image analysis of pubic bone offers a valid and alternative method for age estimation. In 2017, Ikeda [ 62 ] used Bayesian statistics in combination with CT imaging and suggested that they together can be used to estimate age at death based on costal cartilage calcification. Recently, Fan et al. [ 63 ] developed the CT image reconstruction of laryngeal cartilage and hyoid bone in adult age estimation using data mining methods. They suggested that this reconstruction should not be used alone in practice but can be used in combination with other indicators.

Forensic odontology

Forensic odontology is the study of deceased’s dental records in order to identify the unknown individual. Dental radiology plays a critical role in forensic odontology. After forensic imaging was applied in forensic studies, researchers started utilising this technology in forensic odontology. In 2005, Jackowski et al. [ 64 ] introduced the application of CT in a burned corpse dental identification. They believe that transportable dental CT scanner can greatly help identify disaster victims and offers new possibilities of comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental information. In 2008, Jackowski et al. [ 65 ] successfully performed CT and 3D volume rendering to distinguish between dental ceramics and composite fillings and proved that this method is suitable for human dentition visualisation for forensic purposes. Bassed and Hill [ 66 ] utilised postmortem CT to determine the deceased children’s age by dentition in 2009 Victorian Bushfire disaster in Australia. They concluded that CT imaging is a useful tool for age estimation in certain conditions including the dental development can be obviously visualised and the presence or absence of restorations is irrelevant. In 2013, Franco et al. [ 67 ] observed the 3D reconstructions and CT slices of 103 postmortem full body CT and obtained optimal dental chart, which can serve as a valuable additional tool in the human dental identification. In 2014, Trochesset et al. [ 68 ] proposed the application of cone beam CT (CBCT) to forensic odontology, because the CBCT data sets can be displayed in three dimensions to visualise the dentition. They successfully generated intra-oral-like images from CBCT volumes and proved that these images are similar enough to traditional dental radiographs to allow for forensic dental identification. In 2015, Sakuma et al. [ 69 ] compared five corresponding anatomical reference points between postmortem CT images and dental original radiographs by superimposing the two types of images, and they found out there were significant anatomical differences in these two type images, which suggested odontology forensic imaging can aid in avoiding incorrect personal identification owing to erroneous information.

Forensic ballistics

In forensic ballistics, forensic imaging is primarily used in the study of gunshot residues, shooting distance, foreign body’s location, and paths in the livings and deceased. In 2000, Stein et al. [ 70 ] conducted the gunshot wound forensic assessment research with CT application. In this research, caliber .38 Special, 357 magnum and 22 LR bullets were shot at experimental fresh pink skins from a range of 0 cm to 100 cm. The results suggested that CT records can differentiate between a contact shot and firing ranges of more than 10 cm. In 2003, Thali et al. [ 9 ] performed forensic imaging on eight gunshot fatalities, and the findings were confirmed by traditional autopsy that PMCT, MRI, 2D multi-planar reformation (MPR) and 3D shaded surface display (SSD) reconstruction have the capability to visualise the ballistic fracture pattern, the bullet track and localisation, trauma, pathological changes and gunshot residue deposition in a non-destructive method. In 2009, Puentes et al. [ 71 ] applied 3D-multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in a non-fatal gunshot case. In this case, the bullet’s trajectory was accurately determined by 3D-MSCT and this technology was proved to be helpful in estimating the victim and suspects locations in a multiple aggressor situation in crime scene investigation. In 2014, Maiese et al. [ 72 ] reported that PMCT and the 3D rendering of CT slice stack images not only helped with the wound path visualisation and bullet localisation, but also offered data for the crime scene reconstruction. In 2019, Gascho et al. [ 73 ] assessed the synergy of CT and MRI in gunshot wound cases with foreign bodies in head. They suggested that MRI provides a valuable supplement to postmortem CT for the detection of wound channel and soft tissue injuries. In 2020, Gascho et al. [ 74 ] emphasized the importance of MRI in gunshot case investigation. In one of the shooting investigations, MRI clearly showed the soft tissue injuries and the ruptured medulla oblongata, providing the investigators the graphic information on the death. Gascho et al. [ 75 ] also pointed out that special MRI sequences at 7 tesla MRI can delineate micro injury in soft tissue which could be easily ignored by macroscopical autopsy.

Wildlife forensics

Although forensic imaging is not as widely used in wildlife forensics as human forensics, it has been reported in the field of wildlife. In 2008, Cooper and Cooper [ 76 ] proposed that imaging method can be used in forensic animal investigation. In 2008 and 2009, Heng et al. [ 32 , 33 ] applied X-ray on 41 feline animals and canine cadavers, and concluded that putrefaction could cause radiographic postmortem changes in animals. In 2015, Ribas [ 77 ] performed X-ray before forensic necropsy on a young female white-eared opossum ( Didelphis albiventris ). The images clearly revealed diffuse increased radio-opacity in both hemi-thoraces, and in situ necropsy findings confirmed bloody effusion in thorax cavity. In 2015, Frankenberg et al. [ 10 ] performed CT, PMCTA and MRI to determine the cause and manner of death in a 4-month-old deceased male fox. The results proved that the effects of semi-jacketed hunting ammunition in the fox were clearly revealed by forensic imaging without the need for any manual dissection. In 2018, Pankowski et al. [ 78 ] utilised X-ray and CT in a fatal common buzzard gunshot case. By performing imaging on the deceased buzzard, they estimated that the shot was taken from a smoothbore hunting gun with a probable 12 mm, 16 mm or 20 mm caliber and the buzzard died most likely as a result of spinal cord injury from a single shot of a hunting gun. In 2020, Hamel et al. [ 79 ] performed CT, MRI, necropsy, histology, culture, and molecular diagnostics on a freshly dead juvenile bottlenose dolphin, and these investigation methods together demonstrated disseminated coinfection of dolphin morbillivirus and Aspergillus fumigatus .

The advantages of forensic imaging are obvious. First, forensic imaging is the most suitable alternative of a traditional autopsy, especially when the case is religious sensitive, or the family member of the deceased cannot accept a traditional autopsy [ 2 ]. Second, high-resolution CT scan can be used to obtain the best quality images in forensic imaging because the radiation exposure issue can be neglected for postmortem examination [ 80 ]. Third, when performing the autopsy on the deceased who had an infectious disease such as tuberculosis [ 81 ] and coronavirus disease [ 82 ]. In this circumstance, forensic imaging can prevent practitioners from being directly exposed to uncertain pathogens, this irreplaceable advantage is particularly important during the global COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the inestimable social value of the forensic imaging—the potential of being used in any unpredictable pandemic in the future. Fourth, in traditional experience-dependent investigations, forensic imaging can provide objective data to enhance the credibility of results. For example, in forensic anthropology and odontology age estimation, imaging data are a reliable reference in age determination by skeleton [ 60 , 61 ] and dentition [ 66 ]; in forensic odontology, imaging can be used to compare the dental repair material of the suspect with the suspicious material found at crime scene to support the evidence chain [ 65 ]. Fifth, true-to-scale 3D non-destructive gathering of forensic imaging findings can reveal the original injuries and pathological changes instead of destructing original evidence by surgical procedure. For example, in forensic ballistics, it is important to find out the bullet path in victims, and forensic imaging is ­definitely a fantastic method to investigate the original trajectory instead of destructively dissect the paths [ 71–74 ].

Disadvantages

In order to apply forensic imaging objectively and correctly, the disadvantages of this technique should not be ignored. Forensic imaging has formally entered the field of forensics for nearly two decades, but due to its high cost, it is still not widely used in the daily work of forensics. The high costs include the instruments, the facility, the professional operator’s training, the hardware and software accessories and the maintenance [ 21 , 83 ]. In forensic pathology, sometimes imaging is unable to detect the pathological conditions in the deceased. For example, solely CT scanning has the limitation in detecting soft-tissue injury, MRI or 3D surface scanning are needed to assist in such cases [ 2 ]; forensic imaging did not reveal all the hemorrhagic sites in the brain injury, and a direct comparison between neuroimaging and forensic-neuropathological findings was necessary in this circumstance [ 42 ]; although forensic angiography enables detailed examination of the vascular system, PMCTA has the potential to induce the rupture during its performance [ 48 ], therefore attentions are needed in such cases. In forensic ballistic, forensic imaging shows its limitation in reacting to the metal foreign objects. For example, due to the metal artifacts caused by residual bullets, the radiological assessment of gunshot wounds on CT may be severely impeded [ 74 ]. In forensic anthropology and odontology, imaging is often used to assist in age estimation or human identification. However, the validity of forensic imaging is not confirmed yet, and it must be used as an aid together with other methods to estimate the age [ 60 ] or identify the unknown [ 67 ].

Due to the high cost of forensic imaging, it is not realistic for all forensic institutes to own the facility. In order to make better use of resources, a forensic imaging resource sharing platform can be established in the region. The forensic imaging resource sharing platform can include the facility access information, the training resources, the general guideline of forensic imaging performances, etc. Forensic imaging relies on instruments and technologies derived from the medical field. Any update or development of medical imaging technology may help to promote the development of imaging applications in forensics. With the maturity of deep learning technology [ 84 , 85 ] and artificial intelligence [ 86 ] technologies, they are promising for potential applications as a screening tool or in computer-aided diagnostics in forensic cases.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Grabherr S Egger C Vilarino R Modern post-mortem imaging: an update on recent developments . Forensic Sci Res . 2017 ; 2 : 52 – 64 .

Google Scholar

Dirnhofer R Jackowski C Vock P VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy . Radiographics . 2006 ; 26 : 1305 – 1333 .

Sonnemans LJP Kubat B Prokop M Can virtual autopsy with postmortem CT improve clinical diagnosis of cause of death? A retrospective observational cohort study in a Dutch tertiary referral Centre . BMJ Open . 2018 ; 8 : e018834

Shiotani S Shiigai M Ueno Y Postmortem computed tomography findings as evidence of traffic accident-related fatal injury . Radiat Med . 2008 ; 26 : 253 – 260 .

Thali MJ Yen K Schweitzer W Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study . J Forensic Sci . 2003 ; 48 : 386 – 403 .

Ampanozi G Halbheer D Ebert LC Postmortem imaging findings and cause of death determination compared with autopsy: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy and meta-analysis . Int J Legal Med . 2020 ; 134 : 321 – 337 .

Christensen AM Passalacqua NV Bartelink EJ. Forensic anthropology: current methods and practice . London (UK) : Academic Press ; 2019 . p. 100 – 103 .

Google Preview

Manigandan T Sumathy C Elumalai M Forensic radiology in dentistry . J Pharm Bioallied Sci . 2015 ; 7 : S260 – S264 .

Thali MJ Yen K Vock P Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy findings . Forensic Sci Int . 2003 ; 138 : 8 – 16 .

Franckenberg S Kern F Vogt M Fatal gunshot to a fox: the virtopsy approach in a forensic veterinary case . J Forensic Radiol Imag . 2015 ; 3 : 72 – 75 .

Grabherr S Doenz F Steger B Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol . Int J Legal Med . 2011 ; 125 : 791 – 802 .

Weiss D McLeod-Henning D Waltke H.   Using advanced imaging technologies to enhance autopsy practices . National Institute of Justice . 2017 . Available from: https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/using-advanced-imaging-technologies-enhance-autopsy-practices

Levy AD Abbott RM Mallak CT Virtual autopsy: preliminary experience in high-velocity gunshot wound victims . Radiology . 2006 ; 240 : 522 – 528 .

Levy AD Harcke HT Getz JM Virtual autopsy: two- and three-dimensional multidetector CT findings in drowning with autopsy comparison . Radiology . 2007 ; 243 : 862 – 868 .

O’Donnell C Rotman A Collett S Current status of routine post-mortem CT in Melbourne, Australia . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2007 ; 3 : 226 – 232 .

Leth PM. The use of CT scanning in forensic autopsy . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2007 ; 3 : 65 – 69 .

Cirielli V Cima L Bortolotti F Virtual autopsy as a screening test before traditional autopsy: the verona experience on 25 cases . J Pathol Inform . 2018 ; 9 : 28 .

Kerbacher S Pfeifer M Webb B Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria . Forensic Sci Res . 2017 ; 2 : 65 – 74 .

Okuda T Shiotani S Sakamoto N . Background and current status of postmortem imaging in Japan: short history of “Autopsy imaging (Ai)” . Forensic Sci Int . 2013 ; 225 : 3 – 8 .

Chen Y. State of the art in post-mortem forensic imaging in China . Forensic Sci Res . 2017 ; 2 : 75 – 84 .

Wan L Song YX Li ZD The approach of virtual autopsy (virtopsy) by postmortem multi-slice computed tomography (PMCT) in China for forensic pathology . Forensic Imag . 2020 ; 20 : 200361 .

Wang YH Wei H Ying CL . [The staging method of sternal end of clavicle epiphyseal growth by thin layer CT scan and imaging reconstruction] . Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi . 2013 ; 29 : 168 – 171 . Chinese.

Kalender WA. X-ray computed tomography . Phys Med Biol . 2006 ; 51 : R29 – R43 .

Harrison CV Wood P. Hypertensive and ischaemic heart disease; a comparative clinical and pathological study . Br Heart J . 1949 ; 11 : 205 – 229 .

Garland LH. Forensic skiagraphy . Calif Med . 1957 ; 87 : 295 – 297 .

Lovell FW Berry FB. The medical profession in air safety . Ann Surg . 1961 ; 153 : 625 – 638 .

Greulich WW. Value of x-ray films of hand and wrist in human identification . Science . 1960 ; 131 : 155 – 156 .

Fitzpatrick JJ. Role of radiology in human rights abuse . Am J Forensic Med Pathol . 1984 ; 5 : 321 – 325 .

Cockburn A Barraco RA Reyman TA Autopsy of an Egyptian mummy . Science . 1975 ; 187 : 1155 – 1160 .

Fischman SL. The use of medical and dental radiographs in identification . Int Dent J . 1985 ; 35 : 301 – 306 .

Ordog GJ Wasserberger J Balasubramaniam S. Shotgun wound ballistics . J Trauma . 1988 ; 28 : 624 – 631 .

Heng HG Teoh WT Sheikh-Omar AR. Postmortem abdominal radiographic findings in feline cadavers . Vet Radiol Ultrasound . 2008 ; 49 : 26 – 29 .

Heng HG Selvarajah GT Lim HT Serial postmortem thoracic radiographic findings in canine cadavers . Forensic Sci Int . 2009 ; 188 : 119 – 124 .

Bakay L Glasauer FE Grand W. Unusual intracranial foreign bodies. Report of five cases . Acta Neurochir (Wien) . 1977 ; 39 : 219 – 231 .

Flodmark O Becker LE Harwood-Nash DC Correlation between computed tomography and autopsy in premature and full-term neonates that have suffered perinatal asphyxia . Radiology . 1980 ; 137 : 93 – 103 .

Varnell RM Stimac GK Fligner CL. CT diagnosis of toxic brain injury in cyanide poisoning: considerations for forensic medicine . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol . 1987 ; 8 : 1063 – 1066 .

Oliver J Lyons TJ Harle R. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of arterial gas embolism in fatal diving accidents in Tasmania . Australas Radiol . 1999 ; 43 : 37 – 40 .

Thali MJ Yen K Schweitzer W Into the decomposed body—forensic digital autopsy using multislice-computed tomography . Forensic Sci Int . 2003 ; 134 : 109 – 114 .

Jackowski C Sonnenschein M Thali MJ Intrahepatic gas at postmortem computed tomography: forensic experience as a potential guide for in vivo trauma imaging . J Trauma . 2007 ; 62 : 979 – 988 .

Ampanozi G Hatch GM Ruder TD Post-mortem virtual estimation of free abdominal blood volume . Eur J Radiol . 2012 ; 81 : 2133 – 2136 .

Thali MJ Yen K Plattner T Charred body: virtual autopsy with multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging . J Forensic Sci . 2002 ; 47 : 1326 – 1331 .

Añon J Remonda L Spreng A Traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage: correlation of postmortem MSCT, MRI, and forensic-pathological findings . J Magn Reson Imag . 2008 ; 28 : 823 – 836 .

Jackowski C Thali MJ Buck U Noninvasive estimation of organ weights by postmortem magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography . Invest Radiol . 2006 ; 41 : 572 – 578 .

Grabherr S Hess A Karolczak M Angiofil-mediated visualization of the vascular system by microcomputed tomography: a feasibility study . Microsc Res Tech . 2008 ; 71 : 551 – 556 .

Grabherr S Djonov V Friess A Postmortem angiography after vascular perfusion with diesel oil and a lipophilic contrast agent . AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2006 ; 187 : W515 – W523 .

Grabherr S Gygax E Sollberger B Two-step postmortem angiography with a modified heart-lung machine: preliminary results . AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2008 ; 190 : 345 – 351 .

Ruder TD Hatch GM Ebert LC Whole body postmortem magnetic resonance angiography . J Forensic Sci . 2012 ; 57 : 778 – 782 .

Grabherr S Wittig H Dedouit F . Pitfalls in post-mortem CT-angiography-intravascular contrast induces post-mortem pericardial effusion . Leg Med (Tokyo) . 2015 ; 17 : 218 – 219 .

Ampanozi G Flach PM Ruder TD Differentiation of hemopericardium due to ruptured myocardial infarction or aortic dissection on unenhanced postmortem computed tomography . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2017 ; 13 : 170 – 176 .

Hinderberger P Fliss B Thali MJ Fatal bronchovascular fistula after lobectomy visualised through postmortem computed tomography angiography: a case report . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2017 ; 13 : 234 – 239 .

Ebert LC Ptacek W Naether S . Virtobot—a multi-functional robotic system for 3D surface scanning and automatic post mortem biopsy . Int J Med Robot . 2010 ; 6 : 18 – 27 .

Ebert LC Ptacek W Breitbeck R Virtobot 2.0: the future of automated surface documentation and CT-guided needle placement in forensic medicine . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2014 ; 10 : 179 – 186 .

Kottner S Schulz MM Berger F Beyond the visible spectrum — applying 3D multispectral full-body imaging to the VirtoScan system . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2021 ; 17 : 565 – 576 .

Wong PA. Computed tomography in paleopathology: technique and case study . Am J Phys Anthropol . 1981 ; 55 : 101 – 110 .

Haglund WD Fligner CL. Confirmation of human identification using computerized tomography (CT) . J Forensic Sci . 1993 ; 38 : 708 – 712 .

Phillips VM Smuts NA. Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population . Forensic Sci Int . 1996 ; 83 : 51 – 59 .

Quatrehomme G Cotin S Subsol G A fully three-dimensional method for facial reconstruction based on deformable models . J Forensic Sci . 1997 ; 42 : 649 – 652 .

Turner W Tu P Kelliher T Computer-aided forensics: facial reconstruction . Stud Health Technol Inform . 2006 ; 119 : 550 – 555 .

Sidler M Jackowski C Dirnhofer R . Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification—advantages and limitations . Forensic Sci Int . 2007 ; 169 : 118 – 128 .

Harth S Obert M Ramsthaler F Estimating age by assessing the ossification degree of cranial sutures with the aid of Flat-Panel-CT . Leg Med (Tokyo) . 2009 ; 11 : S186 – S189 .

López-Alcaraz M González PM Aguilera IA Image analysis of pubic bone for age estimation in a computed tomography sample . Int J Legal Med . 2015 ; 129 : 335 – 346 .

Ikeda T. Estimating age at death based on costal cartilage calcification . Tohoku J Exp Med . 2017 ; 243 : 237 – 246 .

Fan F Dai XH Zhan MJ [Adult age estimation of CT image reconstruction of the laryngeal cartilages and hyoid bone based on data mining] . Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi . 2021 ; 37 : 15 – 20 . Chinese.

Jackowski C Aghayev E Sonnenschein M Maximum intensity projection of cranial computed tomography data for dental identification . Int J Legal Med . 2006 May; 120 : 165 – 167 .

Jackowski C Wyss M Persson A Ultra-high-resolution dual-source CT for forensic dental visualization—discrimination of ceramic and composite fillings . Int J Legal Med . 2008 ; 122 : 301 – 307 .

Bassed RB Hill AJ. The use of computed tomography (CT) to estimate age in the 2009 Victorian Bushfire Victims: a case report . Forensic Sci Int . 2011 ; 205 : 48 – 51 .

Franco A Thevissen P Coudyzer W . Feasibility and validation of virtual autopsy for dental identification using the INTERPOL dental codes . J Forensic Leg Med . 2013 ; 20 : 248 – 254 .

Trochesset DA Serchuk RB Colosi DC. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison . J Forensic Sci . 2014 ; 59 : 510 – 513 .

Sakuma A Makino Y Saitoh H Evaluation of a personal identification method using the fusion function of CT images and dental radiographs . Dentomaxillofac Radiol . 2015 ; 44 : 20140137 .

Stein KM Bahner ML Merkel J Detection of gunshot residues in routine CTs . Int J Legal Med . 2000 ; 114 : 15 – 18 .

Puentes K Taveira F Madureira AJ Three-dimensional reconstitution of bullet trajectory in gunshot wounds: a case report . J Forensic Leg Med . 2009 ; 16 : 407 – 410 .

Maiese A Gitto L De Matteis A Post mortem computed tomography: useful or unnecessary in gunshot wounds deaths? Two case reports . Leg Med (Tokyo) . 2014 ; 16 : 357 – 363 .

Gascho D Tappero C Zoelch N Synergy of CT and MRI in detecting trajectories of lodged bullets in decedents and potential hazards concerning the heating and movement of bullets during MRI . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2020 ; 16 : 20 – 31 .

Gascho D Marosi M Thali MJ Postmortem computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of gunshot wounds to the neck . J Forensic Sci . 2020 ; 65 : 1360 – 1364 .

Gascho D Deininger-Czermak E Zoelch N . Noninvasive 7 tesla MRI of fatal craniocerebral gunshots — a glance into the future of radiologic wound ballistics . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2020 ; 16 : 595 – 604 .

Cooper JE Cooper ME. Forensic veterinary medicine: a rapidly evolving discipline . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2008 ; 4 : 75 – 82 .

Ribas LM. Postmortem analysis of injuries by roadkill of a white-eared opossum (Didelphis albiventis) by radiographs and forensic necropsy—a virtopsy case report . J Veterinar Sci Technol . 2015 ; 07 : 2 – 5 .

Pankowski F Bogiel G Paśko S Fatal gunshot injuries in the common buzzard Buteo buteo L. 1758 — imaging and ballistic findings . Forensic Sci Med Pathol . 2018 ; 14 : 526 – 530 .

Hamel PES Giglio RF Cassle SE Postmortem computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in a case of coinfection of dolphin morbillivirus and Aspergillus Fumigatus in a juvenile bottlenose dolphin ( Tursiops truncatus ) . J Zoo Wildl Med . 2020 ; 51 : 448 – 454 .

Gascho D Thali MJ Niemann T. Post-mortem computed tomography: technical principles and recommended parameter settings for high-resolution imaging . Med Sci Law . 2018 ; 58 : 70 – 82 .

Bolliger SA Filograna L Spendlove D Postmortem imaging-guided biopsy as an adjuvant to minimally invasive autopsy with CT and postmortem angiography: a feasibility study . AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2010 ; 195 : 1051 – 1056 .

Xue Y Lai L Liu C Perspectives on the death investigation during the COVID-19 pandemic . Forensic Sci Int Synerg . 2020 ; 2 : 126 – 128 .

Thali M Buck U Näther S.   Virtopsy: expert opinion based on 3D surface and radiological scanning and documentation in forensic medicine . International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury . 2008 September 17–19. Bern , Swizerland .

Cao Y Ma Y Vieira DN A potential method for sex estimation of human skeletons using deep learning and three-dimensional surface scanning . Int J Legal Med . 2021 ; 135 : 2409 – 2421 .

Garland J Ondruschka B Stables S Identifying fatal head injuries on postmortem computed tomography using convolutional neural network/deep learning: a feasibility study . J Forensic Sci . 2020 ; 65 : 2019 – 2022 .

O’Sullivan S Holzinger A Zatloukal K Machine learning enhanced virtual autopsy . Autops Case Rep . 2017 ; 7 : 3 – 7 .

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 2471-1411
• Print ISSN 2096-1790
• Copyright © 2024 Academy of Forensic Science
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Forensic Science - Science topic

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Big footsteps and new challenges

• Open access
• Published: 03 May 2022
• Volume 18 , pages 123–124, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Claas T. Buschmann 1 ,
• Biagio Solarino 2 &
• Takahito Hayashi 3  

1764 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

After nearly 15 years, the scientific Chief Editorial Team of Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology has changed in January 2022 [ 1 , 2 ].

First of all, we gratefully thank former Editor-in-Chief Roger W. Byard, former European Editor Michael Tsokos, and former North American Editor John Hunsaker III for their time and passion invested over the past 15 years in the journal — they have not only read, reviewed, and edited thousands of papers, they have also published extensively themselves and thus contributed to the reputation of the journal, too. Together with the Editorial Board, they made the journal what it is today.

Secondly, we would like to thank the whole team at Springer, who gave us three “newcomers” the opportunity to follow in these big footsteps. We will do our best.

Now brought to the second-most important journal worldwide in forensic medicine with regard to its current impact factor by the former Editorial team, Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology will continue to explore all aspects of modern-day forensics. The range of topics covered will continue to include international forensic science, medicine, nursing, and pathology, as well as toxicology, human identification, mass disasters/mass war graves, profiling, imaging and forensic radiology, forensic age estimation, policing, wound assessment, child maltreatment, sexual assault, anthropology, archeology, entomology, botany, biology, veterinary pathology, medical-historical forensic research, and DNA. We will continue to insist on high scientific quality of papers in fluent and sufficiently readable English language. We pay great attention to evaluating the mega-authorship reports and ask to limit the number of self-citations, particularly if not necessary.

Mors auxilium vitae (Death Is Help For The Living) , and looking beyond the horizon is crucial in modern forensic medicine. Interdisciplinary questions arising in the daily autopsy routine can be addressed scientifically, and forensic medicine can contribute to walk new paths. Thus, we also welcome “outside-the-box” papers, i.e., scientific research from the interface of forensic medicine and other medical disciplines — there is a significant overlap between forensic medicine and several curative disciplines, especially after a second look [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. This also applies to the interface of forensic medicine and the judicial system, i.e., legal assessment of forensic findings. As a sub-category of case reports, we have established “From The Court Room” as a brief case description to present and discuss — not necessarily extraordinary — autopsy and/or crime scene features in a specific case and their legal evaluation. What are legal consequences of our work for those affected, and where are the limits of forensic diagnostics? Where can we get better? With this new proposal, we can discuss once again the inference of the forensic publications in a trial [ 6 ]. How does the Judge determine the scientific value of the articles and the qualifications and credentials of a proposed expert witness? Even considering the differences among the legal systems worldwide, we are looking forward to submissions addressing these points.

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology will continue to present a balance of forensic research and reviews from around the world to reflect modern advances through peer-reviewed papers, short communications, meeting proceedings, new forensic textbook comments, and case reports. Furthermore, we will open the journal to answers to forensic questions that involve interfaces with other medical disciplines, especially with regard to complications arising from performed — or necessary, but omitted — medical procedures in the broadest sense. Forensic scientists are often involved in medical malpractice lawsuits, healthcare policy, and patient safety management. Therefore, the authors have the opportunity to discuss unusual adverse events, causes of medical malpractice, and the forensic medicine approach to such an interesting field of research. The dead can teach the living.

The scientific future of forensic medicine comprises not only of forensic issues, but involves interdisciplinary cooperation. We intend to be a relevant part of this future — and we can achieve this goal solely with the help of you, the authors and reviewers from all over the world!

Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Claas T. Buschmann, Kiel/Lübeck, Germany

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Biagio Solarino, Bari, Italy

Associate Editor

Prof. Takahito Hayashi, Kagoshima, Japan

Byard RW, Hunsaker JC, Tsokos M. Forensic science medicine and pathology – a change of command. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022;18:116–7.

Article   Google Scholar  

Byard RW. Academic standing and publication. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022;18:1–3.

Buschmann C. More interdisciplinary research is needed in forensic medicine. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019;15:131–2.

Buschmann C, Tsokos M, Kleber C. Preventive pathology: the interface of forensic medicine and trauma surgery for pre-hospital trauma management. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015;11:317–8.

Lacour P, Buschmann C, Storm C, et al. Cardiac implantable electronic device interrogation at forensic autopsy – an underestimated resource? Circulation 2018;137:2730–40.

Jones AW. Highly cited forensic practitioners in the discipline legal and forensic medicine and the importance of peer-review and publication for admission of expert testimony. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022;18:37–44.

Download references

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel / Lübeck, Germany

Claas T. Buschmann

Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy

Biagio Solarino

Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan

Takahito Hayashi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claas T. Buschmann .

Ethics declarations

The editorial was written in compliance with Ethical Standards.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was not required for this type of paper.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was not required for this type of paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Buschmann, C.T., Solarino, B. & Hayashi, T. Big footsteps and new challenges. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 18 , 123–124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00482-5

Download citation

Accepted : 25 April 2022

Published : 03 May 2022

Issue Date : June 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00482-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Technology in forensic sciences: innovation and precision.

1. Introduction

2. methodology, 2.1. inclusion criteria, 2.2. exclusion criteria, 3. new technologies for forensic crime scene investigation, 3.1. 3d scanning and modeling, 3.2. digital technologies, 3.3. artificial intelligence and data analytics, 3.4. biometric technologies, 3.5. advances in nanotechnology, 3.6. autopsy and radiology techniques, 3.7. 3d printing techniques, 3.8. genetic identification technologies, 3.9. speech and audio recognition technologies, 3.10. technologies for the detection of illicit substances, 3.11. extended reality (xr), 4. impacts of technology on forensic investigation, 5. challenges and limitations in the implementation of case resolution technologies in forensic sciences, 6. future perspectives on the use of new technologies in forensic sciences, 7. discussion, 8. conclusions, author contributions, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• Kloosterman, A.; Mapes, A.; Geradts, Z.; Van Eijk, E.; Koper, C.; Van Den Berg, J.; Verheij, S.; Van Der Steen, M.; Van Asten, A. The interface between forensic science and technology: How technology could cause a paradigm shift in the role of forensic institutes in the criminal justice system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015 , 370 , 20140264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Smith, A.M.; Neal, T.M.S. The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science. Sci. Justice 2021 , 61 , 319–331. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Johnson, S.A.; Ananthakumaran, S. Smart Digital Forensic Framework for Crime Analysis and Prediction using AutoML. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021 , 12 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ferrara, M.; Sessa, F.; Rendine, M.; Spagnolo, L.; De Simone, S.; Riezzo, I.; Ricci, P.; Pascale, N.; Salerno, M.; Bertozzi, G.; et al. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to solve complex crimes: A case report. Egypt. J. Forensic Sci. 2019 , 9 , 11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• ICITAP—Blog. Available online: https://www.pai.com.co/blog/post/1/ (accessed on 27 January 2024).
• Arora, A. Future of Forensic and Crime Scene Science Technologies. In Technology in Forensic Science ; Rawtani, D., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 357–370. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Moher, D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021 , 372 , n27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xavier, C.; Omar, F. Dataset: Technologies Forensic Sciences—I&P. Mendeley Data V1. Available online: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/264nznwdm9/1 (accessed on 3 May 2024).
• Crime Scene Documentation—Preserving the Evidence and the Growing Role of 3D Laser Scanning—ProQuest. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2627853646/fulltextPDF/ED99609DCE3A49B7PQ/5?accountid=33194&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals (accessed on 10 February 2024).
• Mohd Sabri, N.E.; Chainchel Singh, M.K.; Mahmood, M.S.; Khoo, L.S.; Mohd Yusof, M.Y.P.; Heo, C.C.; Muhammad Nasir, M.D.; Nawawi, H. A scoping review on drone technology applications in forensic science. SN Appl. Sci. 2023 , 5 , 233. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Johnson, M.; Liscio, E. Suspect Height Estimation Using the Faro Focus 3D Laser Scanner. J. Forensic Sci. 2015 , 60 , 1582–1588. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Generación Automática de Modelos 3D—eyesCloud3D. Available online: https://eyescloud3d.com/ (accessed on 21 February 2024).
• Atlam, H.F.; El-Din Hemdan, E.; Alenezi, A.; Alassafi, M.O.; Wills, G.B. Internet of Things Forensics: A Review. Internet Things 2020 , 11 , 100220. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Johnson, R. Emerging and Advanced Technologies in Diverse Forensic Sciences ; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Magherescu, D. Challenges of the forensic science facing new technologies. IUS Sci. 2021 , 1 , 48–61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• MacDermott, A.; Lea, S.; Iqbal, F.; Idowu, I.; Shah, B. Forensic Analysis of Wearable Devices: Fitbit, Garmin and HETP Watches. In Proceedings of the 2019 10th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), Canary Islands, Spain, 24–26 June 2019; IEEE: Canary Islands, Spain; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fukami, A.; Stoykova, R.; Geradts, Z. A new model for forensic data extraction from encrypted mobile devices. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 2021 , 38 , 301169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahmed, O.; Saleem, S.A.; Khan, A.A.; Daruwala, S.; Pettiwala, A. Artificial intelligence in forensic odontology—A review. Int. Dent. J. Stud. Res. 2023 , 11 , 54–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, J.; Deng, K.; Zhang, J.; Qin, Z.; Huang, P. Digital whole-slide image analysis for automated diatom test in forensic cases of drowning using a convolutional neural network algorithm. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019 , 302 , 109922. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Galante, N.; Cotroneo, R.; Furci, D.; Lodetti, G.; Casali, M.B. Applications of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences: C urrent potential benefits, limitations and perspectives. Int. J. Legal Med. 2023 , 137 , 445–458. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arbab-Zavar, B.; Wei, X.; Bustard, J.D.; Nixon, M.S.; Li, C. On Forensic Use of Biometrics. In Handbook of Digital Forensics of Multimedia Data and Devices ; Ho, A.T.S., Li, S., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 270–304. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ray, P.P. ChatGPT and forensic science: A new dawn of investigation. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2023 , 20 , 1–2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Guleria, A.; Krishan, K.; Sharma, V.; Kanchan, T. ChatGPT: Forensic, legal, and ethical issues. Med. Sci. Law 2024 , 64 , 150–156. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Berezowski, V.; Mallett, X.; Moffat, I. Geomatic techniques in forensic science: A review. Sci. Justice 2020 , 60 , 99–107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Roux, C.; Willis, S.; Weyermann, C. Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? Sci. Justice 2021 , 61 , 678–686. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mahfud, M.; Farsia, L.; Roesa, N.; Safrina, S. Satellite Image Data as Environmental Crime Evidence in the Field of Illegal Logging. Fiat Justisia J. Ilmu. Huk. 2021 , 15 , 269–286. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• New Threats and Countermeasures in Digital Crime and Cyber Terrorism. Available online: https://books.google.com/books/about/New_Threats_and_Countermeasures_in_Digit.html?hl=es&id=8IQfCgAAQBAJ (accessed on 22 February 2024).
• Tom, K.R.; Knorr, K.B.; Davis, C.E. Next Generation Identification system: Latent print matching algorithm and casework practices. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022 , 332 , 111180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Krish, R.P.; Fierrez, J.; Ramos, D.; Alonso-Fernandez, F.; Bigun, J. Improving automated latent fingerprint identification using extended minutia types. Inf. Fusion 2019 , 50 , 9–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sarıbey, A.Y.; Çetin, A.; Gören, F.F.; Akın, K. The performance of automatic ballistics identification system, BALİSTİKA, for 7.62 mm × 39 mm cartridge case correlation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022 , 331 , 111085. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Tistarelli, M.; Grosso, E.; Meuwly, D. Biometrics in Forensic Science: Challenges, Lessons and New Technologies. In Biometric Authentication ; Cantoni, V., Dimov, D., Tistarelli, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 8897, pp. 153–164. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bleka, Ø.; Prieto, L.; Gill, P. CaseSolver: An investigative open source expert system based on EuroForMix. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019 , 41 , 83–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Dror, I.E.; Wertheim, K.; Fraser-Mackenzie, P.; Walajtys, J. The Impact of Human–Technology Cooperation and Distributed Cognition in Forensic Science: Biasing Effects of AFIS Contextual Information on Human Experts. J. Forensic Sci. 2012 , 57 , 343–352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Francese, S. Criminal profiling through MALDI MS based technologies—Breaking barriers towards border-free forensic science. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2019 , 51 , 623–635. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Foster + Freeman ES | Innovación en Ciencia Forense. Available online: https://es.fosterfreeman.com/ (accessed on 22 February 2024).
• Terranova, C.; Cestonaro, C.; Fava, L.; Cinquetti, A. AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine? Front. Med. 2024 , 10 , 1337335. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Giorgetti, A.; Giraudo, C.; Viero, A.; Bisceglia, M.; Lupi, A.; Fais, P.; Quaia, E.; Montisci, M.; Cecchetto, G.; Viel, G. Radiological investigation of gunshot wounds: A systematic review of published evidence. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2019 , 133 , 1149–1158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Timonov, P.; Novakov, S.; Sivkov, S.; Fasova, A.; Novakov, I.; Spasov, S. The advantage of the virtual forensic autopsy—A new approach which could benefit forensic expertise. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2019 , 62 , 69–71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• La Russa, R.; Catalano, C.; Di Sanzo, M.; Scopetti, M.; Gatto, V.; Santurro, A.; Viola, R.V.; Panebianco, V.; Frati, P.; Fineschi, V. Postmortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) and traditional autopsy in cases of sudden cardiac death due to coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol. Med. 2019 , 124 , 109–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cecchetto, G. Micro-imaging in forensic medicine. In P5 Medicine and Justice: Innovation, Unitariness and Evidence ; Ferrara, S.D., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 560–575. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rawtani, D.; Mustansar Hussain, C. Concluding Notes: Future of Technology in Forensic Science. In Technology in Forensic Science , 1.a ed.; Rawtani, D., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 371–374. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carew, R.M.; French, J.; Morgan, R.M. 3D forensic science: A new field integrating 3D imaging and 3D printing in crime reconstruction. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2021 , 3 , 100205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schweitzer, W.; Thali, M.; Aldomar, E.; Ebert, L. Overview of the use of 3D printing in forensic medicine. Rechtsmedizin 2020 , 30 , 292–299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mennell, J. The future of forensic and crime scene science. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006 , 157 , S13–S20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Mennell, J.; Shaw, I. The Future of Forensic and Crime Scene Science. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006 , 157 , S7–S12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Connon, C.C. Forensic DNA Analysis: An Overview of the Laboratory Process. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Methods and Protocols ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 2685, pp. 3–20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carmo, S.; Rehder, M.I.B.C.; Almeida, L.N.; Villegas, C.; Dantas, C.R.V.; Vasconcelos, D.; Andrade, E. Forensic analysis of auditorily similar voices. Rev. CEFAC 2023 , 25 , e4022. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cavalcanti, J.C.; Eriksson, A.; Barbosa, P.A. Multiparametric Analysis of Speaking Fundamental Frequency in Genetically Related Speakers Using Different Speech Materials: Some Forensic Implications. J. Voice 2024 , 38 , 243.e11–243.e29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bhatt, P.V.; Pandey, G.; Tharmavaram, M.; Rawtani, D.; Mustansar Hussain, C. Nanotechnology and Taggant Technology in Forensic Science. In Technology in Forensic Science ; Rawtani, D., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 279–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Neves, J.A.; Lopes, L.B.; Machado, V.; Botelho, J.; Delgado, A.S.; Mendes, J.J. Evidence of Age Estimation Procedures in Forensic Dentistry: Results from an Umbrella Review. Medicina 2024 , 60 , 42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• The Experience of Using Augmented Reality in the Reconstruction of the Crime Scene Committed in Transport | SpringerLink. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-96380-4_120 (accessed on 22 February 2024).
• Pringle, J.K.; Stimpson, I.G.; Jeffery, A.J.; Wisniewski, K.D.; Grossey, T.; Hobson, L.; Heaton, V.; Zholobenko, V.; Rogers, S.L. Extended reality (XR) virtual practical and educational eGaming to provide effective immersive environments for learning and teaching in forensic science. Sci. Justice 2022 , 62 , 696–707. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thali, M.; Yen, K.; Schweitzer, W.; Vock, P.; Boesch, C.; Ozdoba, C.; Schroth, G.; Ith, M.; Sonnenschein, M.J.; Doernhoefer, T.; et al. Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: Virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—A feasibility study. J. Forensic Sci. 2003 , 48 , 386–403. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maneli, M.A.; Isafiade, O.E. 3D Forensic Crime Scene Reconstruction Involving Immersive Technology: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access 2022 , 10 , 88821–88857. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Del Mar-Raave, J.R.; Bahşi, H.; Mršić, L.; Hausknecht, K. A machine learning-based forensic tool for image classification—A design science approach. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 2021 , 38 , 301265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carew, R.M.; Collings, A.J. 3D forensic science: An introductory statement from the members of the Forensic Capability Network (FCN) Visual Technologies Research Group (VTRG). Forensic Imaging 2023 , 33 , 200546. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yarlagadda, S.K.; Güera, D.; Bestagini, P.; Zhu, F.M.; Tubaro, S.; Delp, E.J. Satellite Image Forgery Detection and Localization Using GAN and One-Class Classifier. arXiv 2018 , arXiv:1802.04881. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hughes, N.; Karabiyik, U. Towards reliable digital forensics investigations through measurement science. WIREs Forensic Sci. 2020 , 2 , e1367. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Suárez, F.; Flor, O.; Rosales, L. Sistema de interpretación de conductas para identificación de situaciones de riesgo. Rev. Ibérica Sist. E Tecnol. Informação 2020 , E31 , 309–317. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mayne, R.; Green, H. Virtual reality for teaching and learning in crime scene investigation. Sci. Justice 2020 , 60 , 466–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weyermann, C.; Willis, S.; Margot, P.; Roux, C. Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development. Forensic Sci. Int. 2023 , 348 , 111592. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Piyush, K.R.; Maithri, T.; Gaurav, P. Conventional Technologies in Forensic Science. In Technology in Forensic Science: Sampling, Analysis, Data and Regulations ; Rawtani, D., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jani, G.; Johnson, A.; Marques, J.; Franco, A. Three-dimensional(3D) printing in forensic science–An emerging technology in India. Ann. 3D Print. Med. 2021 , 1 , 100006. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kloosterman, A.; Sjerps, M.; Quak, A. Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: Definition, numbers, impact and communication. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014 , 12 , 77–85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Morgan, R.; Benson, S. Australasian Forensic Science Summit 2016: Future technology and research towards 2030. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2018 , 50 , 268–274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martinengo, L.; Van Galen, L.; Lum, E.; Kowalski, M.; Subramaniam, M.; Car, J. Suicide prevention and depression apps’ suicide risk assessment and management: A systematic assessment of adherence to clinical guidelines. BMC Med. 2019 , 17 , 231. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Chango, X.; Flor-Unda, O.; Gil-Jiménez, P.; Gómez-Moreno, H. Technology in Forensic Sciences: Innovation and Precision. Technologies 2024 , 12 , 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12080120

Chango X, Flor-Unda O, Gil-Jiménez P, Gómez-Moreno H. Technology in Forensic Sciences: Innovation and Precision. Technologies . 2024; 12(8):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12080120

Chango, Xavier, Omar Flor-Unda, Pedro Gil-Jiménez, and Hilario Gómez-Moreno. 2024. "Technology in Forensic Sciences: Innovation and Precision" Technologies 12, no. 8: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12080120

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Forensic Sci Int Synerg

Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019–2022

Associated data.

This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in biological sciences from 2019 to 2022 as a part of the 20th INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. Topics reviewed include rapid DNA testing, using law enforcement DNA databases plus investigative genetic genealogy DNA databases along with privacy/ethical issues, forensic biology and body fluid identification, DNA extraction and typing methods, mixture interpretation involving probabilistic genotyping software (PGS), DNA transfer and activity-level evaluations, next-generation sequencing (NGS), DNA phenotyping, lineage markers (Y-chromosome, mitochondrial DNA, X-chromosome), new markers and approaches (microhaplotypes, proteomics, and microbial DNA), kinship analysis and human identification with disaster victim identification (DVI), and non-human DNA testing including wildlife forensics. Available books and review articles are summarized as well as 70 guidance documents to assist in quality control that were published in the past three years by various groups within the United States and around the world.

1. Introduction

This review explores developments in forensic biology and forensic DNA analysis of biological evidence during the years 2019–2022. In some cases, there may be overlap with 2019 articles mentioned in the previous INTERPOL review covering 2016 to 2019 [ 1 ]. This review includes books and review articles, published guidance documents to assist in quality control, rapid DNA testing, using law enforcement DNA databases plus investigative genetic genealogy DNA databases along with privacy/ethical issues, forensic biology and body fluid identification, DNA extraction and typing methods, mixture interpretation involving probabilistic genotyping software (PGS), DNA transfer and activity level evaluations, next-generation sequencing (NGS), DNA phenotyping, lineage markers (Y-chromosome, mitochondrial DNA, X-chromosome), new markers and approaches (microhaplotypes, proteomics, and microbial DNA), kinship analysis and human identification with disaster victim identification (DVI), and non-human DNA testing including wildlife forensics.

Multiple searches, using the Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate) databases, were conducted in the first half of 2022 with “forensic” and “DNA” or “biology” and “2019 to 2022” as search options. Over 4000 articles were returned with these searches. Through visual examination of titles and authors, duplicates were removed, and articles sorted into 32 subcategories to arrive at a list of almost 2000 publications that were supplemented throughout the remainder of the year as this review was being prepared. The tables of contents for non-indexed journals, such as WIRES Forensic Science , Journal of Forensic Identification , and Forensic Genomics were also examined to locate potentially relevant articles.

For example, a Scopus search conducted on June 13, 2022, using “forensic DNA” and “2019 to 2022” found a total of 3059 documents. Table 1 lists the top ten journals from this search. The Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series (see row #4 in Table 1 ) provides the proceedings of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) meeting held in Prague in September 2019. This volume contains 914 pages with 347 articles (although only 172 showed up in the Scopus search) that are freely available at https://www.fsigeneticssup.com /[ 2 ]. Thus, searches conducted with one or even multiple databases (e.g., Scopus and Web of Science) may not be comprehensive or exhaustive.

Top ten journals with forensic DNA articles published from 2019 to 2022 based on a Scopus search on June 13, 2022.

1.1. Books, special issues, and review articles of note

Books published during the period of this review relating to forensic biology and forensic DNA include Essential Forensic Biology, Third Edition [ 3 ], Principles and Practices of DNA Analysis: A Laboratory Manual for Forensic DNA Typing [ 4 ], Forensic DNA Profiling: A Practical Guide to Assigning Likelihood Ratios [ 5 ], Forensic Practitioner's Guide to the Interpretation of Complex DNA Profiles [ 6 ], Silent Witness: Forensic DNA Evidence in Criminal Investigations and Humanitarian Disasters [ 7 ], Mass Identifications: Statistical Methods in Forensic Genetics [ 8 ], Probability and Forensic Evidence: Theory, Philosophy, and Applications [ 9 ], Interpreting Complex Forensic DNA Evidence [ 10 ], Understanding DNA Ancestry [ 11 ], Understanding Forensic DNA [ 12 ], and Handbook of DNA Profiling [ 13 ]. The 2022 Handbook of DNA Profiling spans two volumes and 1206 pages with 54 chapters from 115 contributors representing 17 countries.

Over the past three years, several special issues on topics related to forensic biology were published in Forensic Science International: Genetics and Genes . These special issues were typically collated virtually rather than physically as invited articles were published online over some period of time and then bundled together virtually as a special issue. Some of these review articles or a set of special issue articles are open access (i.e., the authors paid a publication fee so that the article would be available online for free to readers).

During the time frame of this INTERPOL DNA review, FSI Genetics published two special issues: (1) “Trends and Perspectives in Forensic Genetics” (editor: Manfred Kayser) 1 with nine review and two original research articles published between September 2018 and January 2019, and (2) “Forensic Genetics – Unde venisti et quo vadis?” [Latin for “where did you come from and where are you going?”] (editor: Manfred Kayser) with nine articles published in 2021 and early 2022 and likely two more before the end of 2022. Topics for review articles in these special issues include DNA transfer [ 14 ], probabilistic genotyping software [ 15 ], microhaplotypes in forensic genetics [ 16 ], investigative genetic genealogy [ 17 ], forensic proteomics [ 18 ], distinguishing male monozygotic twins [ 19 ], and using the human microbiome for estimating post-mortem intervals and identifying individuals, tissues, or body fluids [ 20 , 21 ]. All of these topics will be discussed later in this article.

A Genes special issue “Forensic Genetics and Genomics” (editors: Emiliano Giardina and Michele Ragazzo) 2 published 11 online articles plus an editorial from April 2020 to January 2021 while another Genes special issue “Forensic Mitochondrial Genomics” (editors: Mitch Holland and Charla Marshall) 3 compiled 11 articles from February 2020 to April 2021. An “Advances in Forensic Genetics” Genes special issue (editor: Niels Morling) 4 included 25 articles shared between April 2021 and May 2022. In July 2022, the Advances in Forensic Genetics articles were compiled as a 518-page book. 5 Other Genes special issues in development or forthcoming covering aspects of forensic DNA and requesting potential manuscripts by late 2022 or early 2023 include “State-of-the-Art in Forensic Genetics” (editor: Chiara Turchi), 6 “Trends in Population Genetics and Identification—Impact on Anthropology (editors: Antonio Amorim, Veronica Gomes, Luisa Azevedo), 7 “Identification of Human Remains for Forensic and Humanitarian Purposes: From Molecular to Physical Methods” (editors: Elena Pilli, Cristina Cattaneo), 8 “Improved Methods in Forensic and DNA Analysis” (editor: Marie Allen), 9 “Forensic DNA Mixture Interpretation and Probabilistic Genotyping” (editor: Michael Coble) 10 , and “Advances in Forensic Molecular Genetics” (editors: Erin Hanson and Claire Glynn). 11 There has been a proliferation of review articles and special issues in this field in the past several years!

A new journal Forensic Science International: Reports was launched in November 2019. As of June 2022, it has published 89 articles involving DNA, most of which are descriptions of population genetic data. Likewise, a June 27, 2022, PubMed search with “forensic DNA” and the journal “Genes” found 88 articles – many of which are part of the previously mentioned special issues.

1.2. Guidance documents

Numerous documentary standards and guidance documents related to forensic DNA have been published by various organizations around the world. Table 2 lists 70 such documents released in the past three years (2019–2022) in the United States, UK, Australia, and the European Union.

Guidance documents related to forensic DNA published from 2019 to 2022. The titles are hyperlinked to available documents. Abbreviations: FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), CODIS (Combined DNA Index System), SWGDAM (Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods), NGS (next generation sequencing), US DOJ (United States Department of Justice), ULTR (Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports), AABB (Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies), ASB (Academy Standards Board), OSAC (Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science), UKFSR (United Kingdom Forensic Science Regulator), ENFSI (European Network of Forensic Science Institutes), NIFS (National Institute of Forensic Science), ISFG (International Society for Forensic Genetics).

1.2.1. SWGDAM, FBI, and other US DOJ activities

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Laboratory funds the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM) 12 to serve as a forum for discussing, sharing, and evaluating forensic biology methods, protocols, training, and research. In addition to creating guidelines on various topics, SWGDAM, which meets semiannually in January and July, provides recommendations to the FBI Director on the Quality Assurance Standards (QAS) used to assess U.S. forensic DNA laboratories involved in the National DNA Index System (NDIS) that perform DNA databasing and forensic casework. New versions of the QAS became effective July 1, 2020.

SWGDAM work products from the timeframe of 2019–2022 (see Table 2 ) include QAS audit and guidance documents, mitochondrial DNA analysis and short tandem repeat (STR) interpretation guideline revisions related to next-generation sequencing (NGS), training and Y-chromosome interpretation guidelines, a Y-chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD) update for U.S. laboratories, and reports on investigative genetic genealogy and Y-screening of sexual assault evidence kits. These documents are all accessible online. 13

In January 2022, the FBI produced a 13-page guide 14 on rapid DNA testing describing booking station applications and their vision for future integration of crime scene sample analysis and the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), which builds on a joint position statement published in July 2020 by leaders of U.S. and European groups [ 22 ]. In addition, the FBI has shared guidance on their website for non-CODIS use of rapid DNA testing with law enforcement applications 15 and considerations for court. 16

United States Department of Justice (US DOJ) Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports (ULTRs), 17 contain three ULTRs for the forensic DNA discipline that became effective in March 2019: autosomal DNA with probabilistic genotyping, mitochondrial DNA, and Y-STR DNA. USDOJ also released an interim policy on investigative genetic genealogy in November 2019 [ 23 ] along with an opinion piece in the journal Science calling for responsible genetic genealogy [ 24 ].

Other agencies within US DOJ, namely the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), published a guide for prosecutors on triaging forensic evidence [ 25 ] and best practices for improving DNA laboratory process efficiency [ 26 ]. A 200-page report to Congress on the needs assessment of forensic laboratories and medical examiner/coroner offices was released in December 2019 calling for $640 million annually in additional funding to support U.S. forensic efforts [ 27 ].

In September 2021, the Forensic Technology Center of Excellence (FTCOE), which is funded by NIJ, published a 29-page implementation strategy on next-generation sequencing for DNA analysis that was written by the NIJ Forensic Laboratory Needs Technology Working Group (FLN-TWG) [ 28 ]. In May 2022, FTCOE released a 50-page landscape study examining technologies and automation for differential extraction and sperm separation used in sexual assault investigations [ 29 ]. An introduction to forensic genetic genealogy was released in September 2022 [ 30 ].

The FTCOE also published a human factors forensic science sourcebook 18 in March 2022 through open access articles in the journal Forensic Science International: Synergy . This sourcebook, which has general applicability rather than being specific to forensic DNA analysts, includes an overview article [ 31 ] along with articles on personnel selection and assessment [ 32 ], the benefits of committing errors during training [ 33 ], how characteristics of human reasoning and certain situations can contribute to errors [ 34 ], stressors that impact performance [ 35 ], and the impact of communication between forensic analysts and detectives using a new metaphor [ 36 ].

1.2.2. OSAC and ASB activities

The Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC) 19 is congressionally-funded and administered by the Special Programs Office within the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). OSAC consists of a governing board and over 600 members and associates organized into seven scientific area committees (SACs) and 22 subcommittees. The Biology SAC is divided into human and wildlife forensic biology activities. The Human Forensic Biology Subcommittee 20 focuses on standards and guidelines related to training, method development and validation, data analysis, interpretation, and statistical analysis as well as reporting and testimony for human forensic serological and DNA testing. The Wildlife Forensics Subcommittee 21 works on standards and guidelines related to taxonomic identification, individualization, and geographic origin of non-human biological evidence based on morphological and genetic analyses.

The Academy Standards Board (ASB) 22 is a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) and was established as a standards developing organization (SDO). In 2015, ASB was accredited as an SDO by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The ASB DNA Consensus Body, with a membership consisting of practitioners, researchers, and lawyers, develops standards and guidelines related to the use of DNA in legal proceedings. Many of the documents developed by ASB were originally proposed OSAC standards or guidelines.

The OSAC Registry 23 is a repository of high-quality and technically-sound standards (both published and proposed) that are intended for implementation in forensic science laboratories. As of July 2022, the OSAC Registry contains 11 standards published by ASB as well as two (2) proposed OSAC standards or best practice recommendations related to human forensic biology. Another four ASB standards and two proposed OSAC standards related to wildlife forensic biology are on the OSAC Registry. The ASB standards issued in the past three years related to human forensic biology cover interpretation and comparison protocols, training in various parts of the process, and validation of forensic serological and DNA analysis methods as well as probabilistic genotyping systems (see Table 2 for names of these documents). A number of other documents 24 related to serological testing methods, assigning propositions for likelihood ratios in forensic DNA interpretations, validation of forensic DNA methods and software, familial DNA searching, management and use of quality assurance DNA elimination databases, setting thresholds, evaluative forensic DNA testimony, and training in use of statistics are in development within OSAC and ASB.

Additional work products of OSAC include (1) a lexicon 25 with 3282 records (although multiple records may exist for the same word, e.g., there are five definitions provided for “validation” from various sources), (2) a 35-page technical guidance document 26 on human factors in validation and performance testing that describes key issues in designing, conducting, and reporting validation research, (3) a listing of research and development needs in forensic science 27 including 18 identified by the OSAC Human Forensic Biology Subcommittee during their deliberations ( Table 3 ), and (4) process maps for several forensic disciplines including a 42-page depiction of current practices and decisions in human forensic DNA analysis released in May 2022 [ 37 ]. As a visual representation of critical steps and decision points, a process map is intended to help improve efficiencies and reduce errors, and highlight gaps where further research or standardization would be beneficial. Process maps can assist with training new examiners and enable development of specific laboratory policies or help identify best practices for the field.

Research and development needs in forensic biology as identified by the OSAC Human Forensic Biology Subcommittee (as of July 2022, see https://www.nist.gov/osac/osac-research-and-development-needs ).

1.2.3. UK Forensic Science Regulator

The UK Forensic Science Regulator (UKFSR) oversees forensic science efforts in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. In March 2021, the Regulator released the seventh issue 28 of the Codes of Practice and Conduct for forensic science providers and practitioners in the criminal justice system. This 114-page document, which has been updated every few years, provides the overall framework for forensic science activities in the UK with other supporting guidance documents on specific areas like DNA analysis or general tasks like validation. In September 2020, a number of the Regulator documents were revised and reissued. As noted in Table 2 (see rows with documents containing “Issue 1” in the title), new guidance documents were also released in the past few years on sexual assault examinations, development of evaluative opinions, proficiency testing for DNA mixture interpretation, Y-STR profiling, DNA relationship testing, and methods employing rapid DNA testing devices. Table 2 lists 20 guidance documents pertinent to forensic biology from the UKFSR.

1.2.4. European Union and Australia

The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) DNA Working Group published two documents in the past three years: one on DNA database management and the other on training of staff in forensic DNA laboratories (see Table 2 ). A best practice manual for human forensic biology and DNA profiling is also under development.

The Australian National Institute of Forensic Science (NIFS) published three documents of relevance to forensic biology on case record review, empirical study design, and transitioning technology from the laboratory to the field (see Table 2 ).

1.2.5. Other international efforts

The Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) 29 published the 15th edition of their Standard for Relationship Testing Laboratories, which became effective on January 1, 2022. This documentary standard was developed by the AABB Relationship Testing Standards Committee and applies to laboratories accredited for paternity testing and other forms of genetic relationship assessment.

The International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) DNA Commission 30 published two articles during the timeframe of this INTERPOL review (see Table 2 ). In 2020, guidelines and considerations were published on evaluating DNA results under activity level propositions [ 38 ]. In addition, the state of the field regarding interpretation of Y-STR results was examined along with different approaches for haplotype frequency estimation using population data – with the Discrete Laplace approach being recommended [ 39 ]. Future ISFG DNA Commission efforts will address STR allele sequence nomenclature and phenotyping.

2. Advancements in current practices

This section (Section 2 ) is intended to be law enforcement and practitioner-focused through examination of advances in current practices. The following section (Section 3 ) is intended to be researcher-focused through emphasis on emerging technologies and new developments. In this section, topics specifically covered include rapid DNA analysis, use of DNA databases to aid investigations (including familial searching, investigative genetic genealogy, genetic privacy and ethical concerns, and sexual assault kit testing), body fluid identification, DNA extraction and typing methods, and DNA interpretation at the sub-source and activity level.

2.1. Rapid DNA analysis

Rapid DNA instruments that provide integrated “swab-in-profile-out” results in 90 min or less can be used in police booking station environments and assist investigations outside of a traditional laboratory environment. These instruments were initially designed for analysis of buccal swabs to help speed processing of reference samples associated with criminal cases. Such samples are expected to contain relatively large quantities of DNA from a single contributor. Some attempts to extend the range of sample types to low quantities of DNA or mixtures have been published with various levels of success (see Table 4 ). Researcher and practitioners from Australia [ [40] , [41] , [42] ], Canada [ 43 ], China [ 44 ], Italy [ 45 ], Japan [ 46 , 47 ], and the United States [ [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] ] have contributed to an increased understanding of rapid DNA testing capabilities and limitations.

Summary of 20 rapid DNA instrument validation and evaluation studies published from 2019 to 2022. Abbreviations: A-Chip (arrestee cartridge, designed for high-quantity DNA samples), I-Chip (investigative cartridge, designed for low-quantity DNA samples), ACE (arrestee cartridge with GlobalFiler STR markers), RapidINTEL (uses 32 rather than 28 PCR cycles to increase success with low-quantity DNA samples). A-Chip and I-Chip amplify the FlexPlex set of 23 autosomal STRs, three Y-STRs, and amelogenin [ 51 ]. ACE and RapidINTEL utilize the GlobalFiler set of 21 autosomal STRs, one Y-STR, one Y-chromosome InDel, and amelogenin.

The Accelerated Nuclear DNA Equipment (ANDE) 6C (ANDE, Longmont, CO, USA) and the RapidHIT ID (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) are the current 31 commercially available rapid DNA systems. Each system consists of a swab for introducing the sample, a cartridge or biochip with pre-packed reagents, the instrument, and analysis software with an expert system for automated STR allele calling. Different sample cartridges can be run on each system depending on the sample type and expected quantity of DNA.

For ANDE, the arrestee cartridge (A-Chip), can accommodate up to five samples and is intended for relatively high quantities of DNA typically collected from reference buccal swabs, while the investigative cartridge (I-Chip), can process up to four samples and is intended for lower quantities of DNA that might be present in casework or disaster victim identification samples. Both ANDE cartridges use the FlexPlex27 STR assay that tests 23 autosomal STR loci, three Y-chromosome STRs, and amelogenin to generate data compatible with DNA databases around the world [ 51 ]. The RapidHIT ID ACE cartridge and RapidINTEL cartridge serve similar purposes as the ANDE A-Chip and I-Chip using GlobalFiler Express kit markers (21 autosomal STRs, DYS391, a Y-chromosome insertion/deletion marker, and amelogenin) instead of the FlexPlex assay. The ACE sample cartridge uses buccal swabs while the EXT sample cartridge processes DNA extracts [ 56 ]. Sensitivity is enhanced in the RapidINTEL cartridge by increasing the number of PCR cycles from 28 to 32 and decreasing the lysis buffer volume from 500 μL to 300 μL compared to the ACE cartridge parameters [ 46 ].

With rapid DNA testing's swab-in and answer-out integrated configuration, limited options exist for testing conditions (e.g., either A-Chip or I-Chip with ANDE). Therefore, users should evaluate performance for the sample types they desired to routinely test in their specific environment. Table 4 summarizes recently published studies containing rapid DNA assessments.

National DNA Index System (NDIS) approval has been provided by the FBI Laboratory for accredited forensic DNA laboratories to use either the ANDE 6C or RapidHIT ID Systems (A-Chip and ACE cartridges only) 32 with eligible reference mouth swabs. As noted in Table 2 , the FBI.gov website contains three documents related to rapid DNA testing: “Non-CODIS Rapid DNA Considerations and Best Practices for Law Enforcement Use” (7-pages), “Rapid DNA Testing for Non-CODIS Uses: Considerations for Court” (5-pages), and “A Guide to All Things Rapid DNA” (13-pages) in January 2022 to provide information on the topic to law enforcement agencies.

The ENFSI DNA Working Group, SWGDAM, and an FBI Rapid DNA Crime Scene Technology Advancement Task Group co-published a position statement on the use of rapid DNA testing from crime scene samples [ 22 ]. These groups emphasized the need to have future rapid DNA systems with (1) methods to identify low quantity, degradation, and inhibition as well as meeting the human quantification requirements shared by SWGDAM and others, (2) the ability to export analyzable raw data for analysis or reanalysis by trained and qualified forensic DNA analysts, (3) an on-board fully automated expert system to accurately flag single-source or mixture DNA profiles requiring analyst evaluation, (4) improved peak height ratio balance (per locus and across loci) for low-quality and mixture samples “through enhancements in extraction efficiencies, changes in cycling parameters, and/or changes in STR kit chemistries,” and (5) published developmental validation studies on a wide variety of forensic evidence type samples with “data-supported recommendations regarding types of forensic evidence that are suitable and unsuitable for use with Rapid DNA technology” [ 22 ].

With a likely increase in the capabilities and the availability of rapid DNA systems, investigators will need to decide whether to use this capability onsite in specific situations or to send collected samples to a conventional forensic laboratory for processing at a later time. A group in the Netherlands collaborated with the New York City Police Department Crime Scene Unit and Evidence Collection Team to explore a decision support system [ 60 ]. In this study, participants were informed that rapid DNA testing was less sensitive compared to laboratory analysis and that the sample would be consumed, but that results from rapid DNA testing could identify a suspect within 2 h as opposed to waiting an average of 45 days for the laboratory results [presumably due to sample backlogs]. They were also told that a DNA profile obtained with rapid DNA would be acceptable in court. In the end, “>90% of the participants (85 out of 91) saw added value for using a Rapid DNA device in their investigative process …” with “a systematic approach, which consists of weighing all possible outcomes before deciding to use a Rapid DNA analysis device” [ 60 ]. The authors note that for such an approach to be successful “knowledge on DNA success rates [with various evidence types] is necessary in making evidence-based decisions for Rapid DNA analysis” [ 60 ].

A group in Australia performed a cost-benefit analysis of a decentralized rapid DNA workflow that might exist in the future with instruments placed at police stations around their country [ 61 ]. A virtual assessment considered all reference DNA samples collected during a two-month time period at 10 participating police stations in five regions of Australia. Processing times at the corresponding DNA analysis laboratories were calculated based on when the sample was received compared to the day when a DNA profile was obtained for that sample. From the survey conducted, it was estimated that up to 80,000 reference DNA samples are currently processed each year in forensic DNA laboratories across Australia [ 61 ].

Consumable costs for conventional DNA testing reagents in Australia were found to range from $17 to $35 whereas the rapid DNA consumable costs were estimated to be $100 per sample along with an anticipated $100,000 instrument cost per police station. Of course, the rate of use is expected to vary based on the number of reference samples collected in that jurisdiction. Since rapid DNA instruments utilize consumable cartridges with expiration dates, it was estimated that a police station would need to process six DNA samples per week to avoid having to discard an expired cartridge and thus increase the overall cost of their rapid DNA testing efforts. The authors of this study conclude “that routine laboratory DNA analysis meets the current needs for the majority of cases … It is anticipated that while the cost discrepancy between laboratory and rapid DNA processing remains high, the uptake of the technology in Australia will be limited [at least for a police booking station scenario]” [ 61 ].

Rapid DNA technology can be used in a variety of contexts including some that extend beyond traditional law enforcement. Seven distinct use contexts for rapid DNA capabilities have been described [ 62 ]: (1) evidence processing at or near crime scenes to generate leads for confirmation by a forensic laboratory, (2) booking or detection stations to compare an individual's DNA profile to a forensic database while the individual is still in custody, (3) disaster victim identification to permit rapid DNA processing of a victim's family members during their visit to family assistance centers when filing missing persons reports, (4) missing persons investigations to quickly process unidentified human remains and/or family reference samples to generate leads for confirmation by a forensic laboratory, (5) border security to develop DNA data from detainees for comparison to indices of prior border crossers while the individual is still in custody, (6) human trafficking and immigration fraud detection to permit immigration officials to verify family relationship claims, and (7) migrant family reunification to allow immigration officials to verify parentage claims and reunite family members separated at the border. Social and ethical considerations have been proposed for each of these use contexts in terms of data collection, data access and storage, and oversight and data protection [ 62 ].

One study [ 47 ] evaluating buccal swabs and mock disaster victim identification samples drew an important conclusion worth repeating here: “The Rapid DNA system provides robust and automated analysis of forensic samples without human review. Sample analysis failure can happen by chance in both the Rapid DNA system and conventional laboratory STR testing. While re-injection of PCR product is easily possible in the conventional method, this is not an option with the Rapid DNA system. Accordingly, the Rapid DNA system is a suitable choice but should be limited to samples that can easily be collected again if necessary or to samples that are of sufficient amount for repeated analysis. Application of this system to valuable samples such as those related to casework need to be considered carefully before analysis.”

2.2. Using DNA databases to aid investigations (national databases, familial searching, investigative genetic genealogy, genetic privacy & ethical concerns, sexual assault kit testing)

Forensic DNA databases can aid investigations by demonstrating connections between crime scenes, linking a previously enrolled DNA profile from an arrestee or convicted offender to biological material recovered from a crime scene, or aiding identification of missing persons through association of remains with biological relatives. Establishment of these databases requires significant investments over time to enroll data from crime scenes and potential serial offenders or unidentified human remains and relatives of missing persons. This section explores issues around national DNA databases, familial searching, investigative genetic genealogy, and genetic privacy and ethical concerns.

A systematic review regarding the effectiveness of forensic DNA databases looked at 19 articles published between 1985 and 2018 and found most studies support the assumption that DNA databases are an effective tool for the police, society, and forensic scientists [ 63 ]. Recommendations have been proposed to make cross-border exchange of DNA data more transparent and accountable with the Prüm system that enables information sharing across the European Union [ 64 ]. An analysis of news articles discussing the use of DNA testing in family reunification with migrants separated at the U.S.-Mexico border has been performed [ 65 ], and a standalone humanitarian DNA identification database has been proposed [ 66 ]. Aspects of international DNA kinship matching were explored to aid missing persons investigations and disaster victim identification processes [ 67 ]. A business case was presented for expanded DNA indirect matching using additional genetic markers, such as Y-chromosome STRs, mitochondrial DNA, and X-chromosome STRs, to reveal previously undetected familial relationships [ 68 ].

Approaches to transnational exchange of DNA data include (1) creation of an international DNA database, (2) linked or networked national DNA databases, (3) request-based exchange of data, and (4) a combination of these [ 69 ]. For example, the INTERPOL DNA database 33 contains more than 247,000 profiles contributed by 84 member countries. The I-Familia global database assists with missing persons identification based on international DNA kinship matching. 34

2.2.1. National DNA databases

Since the United Kingdom launched the first national DNA database in 1995, national DNA databases continue to be added in many countries including Brazil [ 70 , 71 ], India [ 72 ], Pakistan [ 73 , 74 ], Portugal [ 75 ], and Serbia [ 76 ]. A survey of 15 Latin American countries found that 13 of them had some kind of DNA database [ 77 ]. The opinions of 210 prisoners and prison officials in three Spanish penitentiary centers were also collected regarding DNA databases [ 78 ].

The effectiveness of databases has been debated over the years. Seven key indicators were used in a 2019 examination of the effectiveness of the UK national DNA database. These indicators included (1) implementation cost – the financial input required to implement the database system, (2) crime-solving capability – the ability of the database to assist criminal justice officials in case resolution, (3) incapacitation effect – the ability of the database to reduce crime through the incapacitation of offenders, (4) deterrence effect – the preventative potential of the database through deterrence of individuals from committing crime, (5) privacy protection – protection of the privacy or civil liberty rights of individuals, (6) legitimacy – compliance of the databasing system to the principle of proportionality, and (7) implementation efficiency – the time and non-monetary resource required to implement the database system [ 79 ].

A follow-up article concluded: “Available evidence shows that while DNA analysis has contributed to successful investigations in many individual cases, its aggregate value to the resolution of all crime is low” [ 80 ]. The systematic review of 19 articles on DNA databases cited previously noted “the expansion of DNA databases would only have positive effects on detection and clearance if the offender were already included in the database” [ 63 ]. When previous offenders are not already in a law enforcement DNA database to provide a hit to a crime scene profile, efforts are increasingly turning to familial searching and investigative genetic genealogy as described in the following sections.

2.2.2. Familial DNA searching

Familial DNA searching (FDS) extends the traditional direct matching of STR profiles within law enforcement databases to search for potential close family relationships, such as a parent or sibling, of a profile in the database. 35 FDS typically uses Y-STR lineage testing to narrow the set of candidate possibilities along with other case information such as geographic details of the crime and age of the person(s) of interest. For example, FDS helped solve murder cases in Romania [ 81 ] and China [ 82 ] by locating the perpetrator through a relative in the DNA database. A survey of 103 crime laboratories in the United States found that 11 states use FDS while laboratories in 24 states use a similar but distinct practice of partial matching [ 83 ].

The expansion of the number of STRs from 15 to 20 or 21 helps distinguish between true and false matches during a DNA database search by reducing the number of FDS adventitious matches [ 84 ]. Another study noted that the choice of allele frequencies affects the rate at which non-relatives are erroneously classified as relatives and found that using ancestry inference on the query profile can reduce false positive rates [ 85 ]. New Y-STR kits have been developed to assist with familial searching [ 86 , 87 ]. FDS of law enforcement databases differs from investigative genetic genealogy in two important ways – the genetic markers and the databases used for searching [ 88 , 89 ].

2.2.3. Investigative genetic genealogy

In recent years when national DNA databases fail to generate a lead to a potential person of interest, law enforcement agencies have started to utilize the capabilities of investigative genetic genealogy (IGG), also called forensic genetic genealogy (FGG) or forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG), as an approach to locate potential persons of interest in criminal or missing persons cases. For example, a pilot case study in Sweden used IGG to locate the perpetrator of a double murder from 2004 who had evaded detection despite 15 years of various investigation efforts including more than 9000 interrogations and mass DNA screenings of more than 6000 men [ 90 ]. Hardly a week goes by without mention in the global media of another cold case being solved with IGG. Since the arrest of Joseph DeAngelo in April 2018 identified as the infamous Golden State Killer using IGG, hundreds of cold criminal and unidentified human remains cases have been resolved [ 91 ].

IGG involves examination of about 600,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rather than the 20 or so STRs used in conventional forensic DNA testing, to enable associations of relatives as distant as third or fourth cousins [ 17 ]. IGG relies on a combination of publicly accessible records and the consent of individuals who have uploaded their genetic genealogy DNA profiles to genetic genealogy databases [ 92 ]. Multiple reviews and research articles have been published describing current IGG methods, knowledge, and practice along with the effectiveness and operational limits of the technique [ 17 , 30 , [93] , [94] , [95] , [96] , [97] ]. IGG works best with high-quality, single-source DNA samples. A case study involving whole genome sequencing of human remains from a 2003 murder victim found that it was possible to perform IGG for identification of the victim in this situation [ 98 ].

The four main direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic genealogy companies, 23andMe (Mountain View, CA), Ancestry (Salt Lake City, UT), FamilyTree DNA (Houston, TX), and My Heritage (Lehi, UT), have DNA data from over 41 million individuals 36 as of July 2022 [ 97 ]. Individuals can upload their DTC data to GEDmatch, which is a DNA comparison and analysis website launched in 2010 and purchased in 2019 by Verogen (San Diego, CA). Law enforcement IGG searches are currently permitted with DTC data for individuals who opt into the GEDmatch database or do not opt out of the FamilyTree DNA database [ 99 , 100 ]. Currently most DTC genetic genealogy data comes from the United States and individuals of European origin. A UK study found that 4 of 10 volunteer donors could be identified with IGG including someone of Indian heritage demonstrating that under the right circumstances individuals of non-European origin can be identified [ 101 ].

As noted previously in Section 1.2.1 , the U.S. Department of Justice released an interim policy guide to forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and searching [ 23 ], and the FBI Laboratory's chief biometric scientist published an editorial in Science calling for responsible genetic genealogy [ 24 ]. SWGDAM has provided an overview of IGG that emphasizes the approach being used only after a regular STR profile search of a law enforcement DNA database fails to produce any investigative leads [ 102 ]. Policy and practical implications of IGG have been explored in Australia [ 103 ] and within the UK as part of probing the perceptions of 45 professional and public stakeholders [ 104 , 105 ].

Four misconceptions about IGG were examined by several members of the SWGDAM group: (1) when law enforcement conducts IGG in a genetic genealogy database, they are given special access to participants' SNP profiles, (2) law enforcement will arrest a genetic genealogy database participant's relatives based on the genetic information the participant provided to the database, (3) IGG necessarily involves collecting and testing DNA samples from a larger number of innocent persons than would be the case if IGG were not used in the investigation, and (4) IGG is or soon will be ubiquitous because there are no barriers to IGG that limit the cases in which it can be conducted [ 106 ].

In May 2021, the state of Maryland passed the first law in the United States and in the world that regulates law enforcement's use of DTC genetic data to investigate crimes. A policy forum article in Science explained how this new law provides a model for others in this area [ 107 ]. Six important features were described: (1) requiring judicial authorization for the initiation of an IGG search, (2) affirming individual control over the investigative use of one's genetic data, (3) establishing strong protections for third parties who are not suspects in the case, (4) ensuring that IGG is available to prove either guilt or innocence, (5) imposing consequences and fines for violations, and (6) requiring annual public reporting and review to enable informed oversight of IGG methods. However, as of September 2022, these regulations have not been implemented apparently due to lack of resources with these unfunded requirements. 37

Efforts have been made to raise awareness among defense attorneys about how IGG searches can potentially invade people's privacy in unique ways [ 108 ]. Important perspectives on ethical, legal, and social issues have been offered along with directions for future research [ 109 ]. These concerns about data privacy, public trust, proficiency and agency trust, and accountability have led to a call for standards and certification of IGG to address issues raised by privacy scholars, law enforcement agencies, and traditional genealogists [ 110 , 111 ] and for an ethical and privacy assessment framework covering transparency, access criteria, quality assurance, and proportionality [ 112 ].

2.2.4. Genetic privacy and ethical concerns

Two important topics are considered in this section: (1) do the genetic markers used in traditional forensic DNA typing reveal more than identity and therefore potentially impact privacy of the individuals tested? and (2) are samples collected and tested according to ethical principles?

Forensic DNA databases utilize STR markers that were intentionally selected to avoid phenotypic associations. An extensive review of the literature examined 107 articles associating a forensic STR with some genetic trait and found “no demonstration of forensic STR variants directly causing or predicting disease” [ 113 ]. A study of the potential association of 15 STRs and 3 facial characteristics on 721 unrelated Han Chinese individuals also found “scarcely any association between [the] STRs with studied facial characteristics” [ 114 ].

In 2021, the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) published a standard for authentication of human cell lines using DNA profiling with the 13 CODIS STR markers [ 115 ]. This use of forensic STR markers for biospecimen authentication led a bioethicist and a law professor to write a policy forum article in Science titled “Get law enforcement out of biospecimen authentication” [ 116 ]. The authors of this policy forum believe that using the same genetic markers could potentially: (1) undermine efforts to recruit research participants from historically marginalized and excluded groups that are underrepresented in research, (2) risk drawing law enforcement interest in gaining access to these research data, and (3) impose additional potential harms on already vulnerable populations, particularly children. Instead they advocate for using non-CODIS STRs or a new SNP assay to distinguish biospecimens in repositories, something done recently at the Coriell Institute for Medical Research with six new STR markers [ 117 ]. A responsive letter to the editor regarding this policy forum article expressed that “their proposal could potentially create artificial silos between genomic data in the justice system and in biomedical research, making it inefficient and ultimately counterproductive” [ 118 ]. The authors of the original article responded that “the risk of attracting law enforcement interest to research data increases when the data are available in a recognizable way” [ 119 ].

Modern scientific research seeks to protect the dignity, rights, and welfare of research participants by following ethical requirements. Six forensic science journals over the time period of 2010–2019 were examined for their reporting of ethical approval and informed consent in original research using human or animal subjects [ 120 ]. These journals were Forensic Science International: Genetics , Science & Justice , Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine , the Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences , Forensic Science International , and the International Journal of Legal Medicine . A total of 3010 studies that described research on human or animal subjects and/or samples were selected from these journals with only 1079 articles (36%) reporting that they had obtained ethical approval and 527 articles (18%) stating that informed consent was sought either by written or verbal agreement. The authors of this study noted that reported compliance with ethical guidelines in forensic science research and publication was below what is considered minimal reporting rates in biomedical research and encouraged widespread adoption of the 2020 guidelines described below [ 120 ].

Guidelines and recommendations for ethnical research on genetics and genomics of biological material were jointly adopted and published in Forensic Science International: Genetics [ 121 ] and Forensic Science International: Reports [ 122 ]. These guidelines utilize the following principles as prerequisites for publication in these two journals as well as the Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series : (1) general ethics principles that are regulated by national boards and represent widely signed international agreements, (2) universal declarations that require implementations in state members, such as the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki biomedical research on human subjects, and (3) universal declarations and principles drafted by independent organizations that have been widely adopted by the scientific community. This includes the U.S. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (“Common Rule”) that was revised in 2017 (with a compliance date delayed to January 21, 2019). 38

Submitted manuscripts must provide the following supporting documentation to demonstrate compliance with the publication guidelines: (1) ethical approval in the country of [sample] collection by the appropriate local ethical committee or institutional review board, (2) ethical approval in the country of experimental work according to local legislation; if material collection and experimentation are conducted in different countries, both (1) and (2) are required, (3) template of consent forms in the case of human material as approved by the relevant ethical committee, and (4) approved export/import permits as applicable. Authors must declare in their submitted manuscript that these guidelines have been strictly followed [ 121 , 122 ].

Forensic genetic frequency databases, such as the Y-chromosome Haplotype Reference Database (YHRD), have been challenged over the ethics of DNA holdings, specifically of samples originating from the minority Muslim Uyghur population in western China [ 123 , 124 ]. A survey of U.S. state policies on potential law enforcement access to newborn screening samples found that nearly one-third of states permit these samples or their related data to be disclosed to or used by law enforcement and more than 25% of states have no discernible policy in place regarding law enforcement access [ 125 ].

A framework for ethical conduct of forensic scientists as “lived practice” has been proposed, and three case studies were discussed in terms of decision-making processes involving forensic DNA phenotyping and biographical ancestry testing, investigative genetic genealogy, and forensic epigenetics [ 126 ]. An ethos for forensic genetics involving the values of integrity, trustworthiness, and effectiveness has likewise been described [ 127 ].

2.2.5. Sexual assault kit testing

Unsubmitted or untested sexual assault kits (SAKs) may exist in police or laboratory evidence lockers for many years leading to rape kit backlogs that can spark community outrage when discovered. A number of articles have been published in the past three years describing success rates with examining SAKs and the policies surrounding them. For example, an evaluation of 3422 unsubmitted SAKs in Michigan found 1239 that produced a DNA profile eligible for upload into CODIS with 585 yielding a CODIS hit [ 128 ]. In addition, results from a groping and sexual assault case were presented to support the expansion of touch DNA evidence in these types of cases [ 129 ].

To assess success rates in their jurisdiction, the Houston Police Department randomly selected 491 cases of over 6500 previously unsubmitted sexual assault kits [ 130 ]. Of these, 336 cases (68%; 336/491) screened positive for biological evidence; a DNA profile was developed in 270 cases (55%; 270/491) with 213 (43%; 213/491) uploaded to CODIS; and 104 (21% total; 104/491 or 49% of uploaded profiles; 104/213) resulted in a CODIS hit. The statute of limitation had expired in 44% of these CODIS-hit cases, which prohibited arrests and prosecution. Victims were unwilling to participate in a follow-up investigation in another 25% of these cases. When the data were compiled for the publication, charges had been filed in only one CODIS-hit case [ 130 ].

Sexual assault cases can be difficult to prosecute as victims may be re-traumatized when a cold case is reopened. The authors of one study shared: “A key to successful pursuit of cold case sexual assaults is to have a well-crafted victim-notification plan and a victim advocate as part of the investigative team” [ 131 ]. Interviews with eight assistant district attorneys provided important prosecutors’ perspectives on SAK cases, the development of narratives to explain the evidence in a case, and the decision on whether a case should be pursued or what further investigative activities may be needed [ 132 ]. The authors concluded: “Our findings suggest that forensic evidence does not magically lead to criminal justice outcomes by itself, but must be used thoughtfully in conjunction with other evidence as part of a well-considered strategy of investigation and prosecution” [ 132 ].

Discussing a data set from Denver, Colorado where 1200 sexual assault cold cases with testable DNA samples were examined and 600 cases were processed through the laboratory resulting in 97 CODIS hits, 55 arrests and court filings, and 48 convictions, the authors conclude that the cost of the Denver cold case sexual assault program was worth the investment [ 131 ].

From December 2015 to July 2018, the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office (Florida, USA) researched more than 5500 cases and evaluated evidence from previously untested sexual assault kits spanning a 43-year period at a cost of over $1 million. Of the 1558 sexual assaults examined, there were 686 cases (44%; 686/1558) with CODIS-eligible profiles, 261 CODIS hits, and 5 arrests when the article was written in mid-2019 [ 133 ]. The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office also helped develop a backlog reduction effort through creating a biological processing laboratory within the Boca Raton Police Services Department [ 134 ]. With this joint effort from 2016 to 2018, the total average turnaround time decreased from 30 days to under 20 days with the 3489 DNA profiles entered into CODIS resulting in 1254 associations and 965 investigations aided. Important takeaway lessons include the value of (1) engaging legal counsel early to outline necessary legal procedures and the timeline, (2) bringing all stakeholders “to the table” early to discuss expectations, as well as legal and operational responsibilities, and (3) creating a realistic timeline with a comprehensive memorandum of understanding so all parties have agreed to their roles and responsibilities [ 134 ].

From 275 previously untested sexual assault kits submitted for DNA testing in one region of Central Brazil, a total of 176 profiles were uploaded to their DNA database resulting in 60 matches (34%; 60/176) and 32 assisted investigations (18%; 32/176) with information about the suspect identity or the connection of serial sexual assaults assigned to the same individual [ 135 ]. Another study from the same region of Brazil examined 2165 cases and noted that 13% (286/2165) had information regarding the victim-offender relationship with 63% (179/286) being stranger-perpetrated rapes and 37% (107/286) being non-stranger [ 136 ]. The authors then summarize: “Hits were detected only with stranger-perpetrated assaults ( n  = 41), which reinforces that DNA databases are fundamental to investigate sexual crimes. Without DNA typing and DNA databases, probably these cases would never be solved” [ 136 ].

Given that laboratories have limited resources and need to prioritize their efforts, some business analytics have been applied to SAK testing. An analysis of the potential societal return on investment (ROI) for processing backlogged, untested SAKs reported a range of 10%–65% ROI depending on the volume of activity for the laboratory conducting the analysis [ 137 ]. An evaluation of data from 868 SAKs tested by the San Francisco Policy Department Criminalistics Laboratory during 2017–2019 found that machine learning algorithms outperformed forensic examiners in flagging potentially probative samples [ 138 ].

An examination of 5165 SAKs collected in Cuyahoga County (Ohio, USA) from 1993 through 2011 found 3099 with DNA of which 2127 produced a CODIS hit, with 803 investigations leading to an indictment and eventually 78 to trial along with 330 pleas [ 139 ]. The authors report a “cost savings to the community of $26.48 million after the inclusion of tangible and intangible costs of future sexual assaults averted through convictions” and advocate for “the cost-effectiveness of investigating no CODIS hit cases and support an ‘investigate all’ approach” [ 139 ]. Likewise an assessment of 900 previously-untested SAKs from Detroit (Michigan, USA) found that “few of the tested variables were significant predictors of CODIS hit rate” and “testing all previously-unsubmitted kits may generate information that is useful to the criminal justice system, while also potentially addressing the institutional betrayal victims experienced when their kits were ignored” [ 140 ].

A group in the Philippines described an integrated system to improve their SAK processing [ 141 ]. With an optimized workflow in Montreal, Canada, SAK processing median turnaround time decreased from 140 days to 45 days with a foreign DNA profile being obtained in 44% of cases [ 142 ]. In addition, this group examined casework data to guide resource allocation through identifying the likelihood of specific types of cases and samples yielding foreign biological material [ 142 ]. Decision trees and logistic regression models were also used to try and predict whether or not SAKs will yield a CODIS-eligible DNA profile [ 143 ]. Finally, direct PCR and rapid DNA approaches to streamline SAK testing were reviewed [ 144 ].

2.3. Forensic biology and body fluid identification

The basic workflow for biological samples in forensic examinations typically involves a visual examination of the evidence, a presumptive and/or confirmatory test for a suspected body fluid (e.g., the amylase assay for saliva), and DNA analysis and interpretation [ 145 ]. Body fluid identification (BFID), in particular with blood, saliva, semen, or vaginal fluid stains, provides valuable evidence in many investigations that can aid in the resolution of a crime [ 146 ]. Many of these BFID tests are presumptive and not nearly as sensitive as modern DNA tests meaning that “obtaining a DNA profile without being able to associate [it] with a body fluid is an increasingly regular occurrence” and “it is necessary and important, especially in the eyes of the law, to be able to say which body fluid that the DNA profile was obtained from” [ 147 ].

A number of approaches are being taken to improve the sensitivity and specificity of BFID in recent years including DNA methylation [ [148] , [149] , [150] , [151] , [152] , [153] , [154] , [155] , [156] , [157] , [158] , [159] , [160] , [161] ], messenger RNA (mRNA) [ [162] , [163] , [164] , [165] , [166] ], microRNA (miRNA) [ 167 ], protein mass spectrometry for seminal fluid detection [ 168 ], and microbiome analysis [ 169 , 170 ]. Although many new techniques are being described in the scientific literature, traditional methods for semen identification are still widely used in regular forensic casework [ 171 ].

When using RNA assays, DNA and RNA are co-extracted from examined samples [ 172 , 173 ]. Some tests may only distinguish between two possible body fluids, such as saliva and vaginal fluid [ 174 ], while other tests may attempt to distinguish six forensically relevant body fluids – vaginal fluid, seminal fluids, sperm cells, saliva, menstrual blood, and peripheral blood – although not always as clearly as desired [ 175 ]. BFID assays must also cope with mixed body fluids [ 176 ].

2.4. DNA collection and extraction

The process of obtaining a DNA profile begins with collecting a biological sample and extracting DNA from it. A review of recent trends and developments in forensic DNA extraction focused on isolating male DNA in sexual assault cases, using portable rapid DNA testing instruments, recovering DNA from difficult samples such as human remains, and bypassing DNA extraction altogether with direct PCR methods [ 177 ].

2.4.1. Touch evidence and fingerprint processing methods

Various studies have explored the compatibility of common fingerprint processing methods with DNA typing results [ [178] , [179] , [180] , [181] , [182] , [183] , [184] , [185] , [186] , [187] , [188] ]. For example, DNA recovery was explored after various steps in three different latent fingerprint processing methods – and fewer treatments were judged preferable with a 1,2-indanedione-zinc (IND/Zn) method appearing least harmful to downstream DNA analysis [ 187 ]. A different study found improved recovery of DNA from cigarette butts following latent fingerprint processing with 1,8-diazafluoren-9-one (DFO) compared to IND/Zn [ 179 ].

DNA losses were quantified with mock fingerprints deposited on four different surfaces to better understand DNA collection and extraction method performance [ 189 ]. The application of Diamond Dye has been shown to enable visualization of cells deposited on surfaces without interfering with subsequent PCR amplification and DNA typing [ [190] , [191] , [192] ].

It was possible to recover DNA profiles from clothing that someone touched for as little as 2 s [ 193 ]. DNA sampling success rates from car seats and steering wheels were studied [ 194 ] and recovery of DNA from vehicle surfaces using different swabs was explored [ 195 ]. In addition, the double-swab technique, where a wipe using a wet swab is followed by a wipe with a dry one, was revisited with an observation that for non-absorbing surfaces, the first web swab yielded 16 times more DNA than the second dry swab [ 196 ]. Swabs of cotton, flocked nylon, and foam reportedly provided equivalent DNA recoveries for smooth/non-absorbing surfaces, and an optimized swabbing technique involving the application of a 60-degree angle and rotating the swab during sampling improved DNA yields for cotton swabs [ 197 ].

2.4.2. Results from unfired and fired cartridge cases

Ammunition needs to be handled to load a weapon and thus DNA from the handler may be deposited onto the ammunition via touch [ 198 ]. Important progress has been made in recovering DNA from ammunition such as unfired cartridges or fired cartridge cases (FCCs) that may remain at a crime scene after a weapon has been fired. Trace quantities of DNA recovered from firearm or FCC surfaces has been used to try and link results to gun-related crimes.

A 2019 review of the literature regarding obtaining successful DNA results from ammunition examined collection techniques, extraction methodologies, and various amplification kits and conditions [ 199 ]. A direct PCR approach detected more STR alleles than methods using DNA extraction, and the authors noted that mixtures are commonly observed from gun surfaces, bullets, and cartridges in both controlled experimental conditions and from actual casework evidence and they encourage careful interpretation of these results [ 200 ]. The development of a crime scene FCC collector was combined with a new DNA recovery method that uses a rinse-and-swab technique [ 201 ].

Research studies and review articles have considered factors affecting DNA recovery from cartridge cases and the impact of metal surfaces on DNA recovery [ [202] , [203] , [204] , [205] , [206] , [207] , [208] , [209] ]. Recovery of mtDNA from unfired ammunition components has been assessed for sequence quality [ 210 ].

2.5. DNA typing

Following collection of DNA evidence and its extraction from biological samples, the typical typing process involves DNA quantitation, PCR amplification of STR markers, and STR typing using capillary electrophoresis. Direct PCR avoids the DNA extraction and quantitation steps, which can improve recovery of trace amounts of DNA [ 211 , 212 ]. Whole genome amplification prior to STR analysis has also been examined to aid recovery of degraded DNA [ 213 ] and to enable profiling of single sperm cells [ 214 ].

PCR amplification using STR typing kits can sometimes produce artifacts that impact DNA interpretation including missing (null) alleles [ 215 ], false tri-allelic patterns [ 216 ] or extra peaks when amplified in the presence of microbial DNA [ [217] , [218] , [219] ].

Applied Biosystems Genetic Analyzers have been the primary means of performing multi-colored capillary electrophoresis for many years [ 4 ]. First experiences with Promega's new Spectrum Compact CE System have recently been reported [ 220 ]. A number of new research and commercial STR kits have been introduced in recent years along with the publication of at least 24 validation studies ( Table 5 ). These validation studies typically follow guidelines outlined by the ENFSI DNA Working Group, 39 SWGDAM 40 , or a 2009 Chinese National Standard. 41

STR kits assessed with 24 published validation studies during 2019–2022.

A report on the first two years of submissions to the STRidER 42 (STRs for Identity ENFSI Reference) database for online allele frequencies revealed that 96% of the submitted 165 autosomal STR datasets generated by CE contained errors, showing the value of centralized quality control and data curation [ 245 ].

2.6. DNA interpretation at the source or sub-source level

The designation of STR alleles and genotypes of contributors in DNA mixtures are key aspects of DNA interpretation [ 246 , 247 ]. Electropherograms generated by CE instruments exhibit both STR alleles and artifacts that complicate data interpretation. Efforts are underway to understand and model instrumental artifacts [ [248] , [249] , [250] , [251] ] as well as biological artifacts of the PCR amplification process such as STR stutter products [ 252 , 253 ]. Machine learning approaches are being applied to classify artifacts versus alleles with the goal to eventually replace manual data interpretation with computer algorithms [ [254] , [255] , [256] , [257] ]. One such program, FaSTR DNA, enables potential artifact peaks from stutter, pull-up, and spikes to be filtered or flagged, and a developmental validation has been published examining 3403 profiles generated with seven different STR kits [ 258 ].

2.6.1. DNA mixture interpretation

Forensic evidence routinely contains contributions from multiple donors, which result in DNA mixtures. A number of approaches have been taken and advances made in DNA mixture interpretation [ 259 ]. These include probabilistic genotyping software [ 15 ], using genetic markers beyond traditional autosomal STR typing [ 260 ], or separating contributor cells and performing single-cell analysis [ [261] , [262] , [263] , [264] , [265] , [266] ].

In June 2021, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released a draft report regarding the scientific foundations of DNA mixture interpretation [ 267 ]. This 250-page document described 16 principles that underpin DNA mixture interpretation, provided 25 key takeaways, and cited 528 references. NIST also began a Human Factors Expert Working Group on DNA Interpretation in February 2020 and plans to release a report with recommendations in 2023.

Assessment of the number of contributors (NoC) is a critical element of accurate DNA mixture interpretation. For example, the LRs relating to minor contributors can be reduced when the incorrect number of contributors is assumed [ 268 ]. Allele sharing among contributors to a mixture and masking of alleles due to STR stutter artifacts can lead to inaccurate NoC estimates based on simply counting the number of alleles at a locus. Different approaches and software programs have been used for NoC estimation [ [269] , [270] , [271] , [272] , [273] , [274] , [275] ]. Total allele count (TAC) distribution via TAC curves showed an improvement in manually estimating the number of contributors with complex mixtures [ 276 ]. Sequence analysis of STR loci expands the number of possible alleles compared to CE-based length measurements and thus can improve NoC estimates [ 277 ].

In the past three years, validation studies have been performed with a number of probabilistic genotyping software (PGS) systems including EuroForMix [ 278 ], DNAStatistX [ 279 , 280 ], TrueAllele [ 281 ], STRmix [ 282 ], Statistefix [ 283 ], Mixture Solution [ 284 ], Kongoh [ 285 ], and MaSTR [ 286 , 287 ]. Developers of EuroForMix, DNAStatistX, and STRmix provided a review of these systems [ 288 ]. Multi-laboratory assessments have been described [ 289 , 290 ] and likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix compared [ [291] , [292] , [293] , [294] ]. With a growing literature in this area, there are many other articles that could have been cited.

2.7. DNA interpretation at the activity level

DNA interpretation at the source or sub-source level helps to answer the question of who deposited the cell material, whether attribution for the result can be made to a specific cell type (i.e., source level) or simply to the DNA if no attribution can be made to a specific cell type (i.e., sub-source level). Activity-level propositions seek to answer the question of how did an individual's cell material get there. Interpretation at the activity level is sometimes referred to as evaluative reporting [ 295 , 296 ].

In 2020, the ISFG DNA Commission [ 38 ] discussed the why, when, and how to carry out evaluative reporting given activity level propositions through providing examples of formulating these propositions. These Commission recommendations emphasize that reports using a likelihood ratio based on case-specific propositions and relevant conditioning information should highlight the assumptions being made and that “it is not valid to carry over a likelihood ratio from a low level, such as sub-source, to a higher level such as source or activity propositions … because the LRs given sub-source level propositions are often very high and LRs given activity level propositions will often be many orders of magnitude lower” [ 38 ]. Another recommendation specifies that “scientists must not give their opinion on what is the ‘most likely way of transfer’ (direct or indirect), as this would amount to giving an opinion on the activities and result in a prosecutor's fallacy (i.e., give the probability that X is true). The scientists' role is to assess the value of the results if each proposition is true in accordance with the likelihood ratio framework (the probability of the results if X is true and if Y is true)” [ 38 ] (emphasis in the original). This DNA Commission provided 11 recommendations and 4 considerations that should be studied carefully by those who implement activity-level DNA interpretation.

2.7.1. DNA transfer and persistence studies

To evaluate DNA findings given activity-level propositions it is important to understand the factors and variables that may impact DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence, and recovery (DNA-TPPR). These factors include history of contacting surfaces, biological material type, quantity and quality of DNA, dryness of biological material, manner and duration of contact, number and order of contacts, substrate type(s), time lapses and environment, and methods and thresholds used in the forensic DNA laboratory to generate the available data [ 297 ].

Three valuable review articles were published on this topic in 2019 [ 14 , 28 , 299 ]. Following a comprehensive January 2019 review that cited [ 298 ] references on DNA-TPPR [ 14 ], the same authors provided an update in November 2021 on recent progress towards meeting challenges and a synopsis of 144 relevant articles published between January 2018 and March 2021 [ 297 ]. While few studies provide the information needed to help assign probabilities of obtaining DNA results given specific sets of circumstances, progress includes use of Bayesian Networks [ 300 ] to identify variables for complex transfer scenarios [ 38 , [301] , [302] , [303] , [304] , [305] ] as well as development of an online database DNA-TrAC 43 for relevant research articles [ 299 ] and a structured knowledge base 44 with information to help practitioners interpret general transfer events at an activity level [ 306 ].

Forensic DNA pioneer Peter Gill emphasized that awareness of the limitations of DNA evidence is important for users of this data given that an increased sensitivity of modern DNA methods means that DNA may be recovered that is irrelevant to the crime under investigation [ 307 ]. An ISFG DNA Commission (see Section 1.2.5 ) emphasized that the strength of evidence associated with a DNA match at the sub-source level cannot be carried over to activity level propositions [ 38 ]. Structuring case details into propositions, assumptions, and undisputed case information has been encouraged [ 308 ].

Factors affecting variability of DNA recovery on firearms were studied with four realistic, casework-relevant handling scenarios along with results obtained including DNA quantities, number of contributors, and relative profile contributions for known and unknown contributors [ 309 ]. These studies found that sampling several smaller surfaces on a firearm and including the sampling location in the evaluation process can be helpful in assessing results given alternative activity-level propositions in gun-related crimes. The authors recommend that “further extensive, detailed and systematic DNA transfer studies are needed to acquire the knowledge required for reliable activity-level evaluations” [ 309 ].

Other recent studies on DNA-TPPR include examining prevalence and persistence of DNA or saliva from car drivers and passengers [ [310] , [311] , [312] ], evaluation of DNA from regularly-used knives after a brief use by someone else [ 313 ], studying the accumulation of endogenous and exogenous DNA on hands [ 314 ] and non-self-DNA on the neck [ 315 ], considering the potential of DNA transfer via work gloves [ 316 , 317 ] or during lock picking [ 318 ], and investigating whether DNA can be recovered from illicit drug capsules [ 319 , 320 ] or packaging [ 321 ] to identify those individuals preparing or handling the drugs.

Efforts have been made to estimate the quantity of DNA transferred in primary versus secondary transfer scenarios [ 322 ]. As quantities of DNA transferred can be highly variable and thought to be dependent on the so-called “shedder status” – how much DNA an individual exudes, several studies explored this topic [ [323] , [324] , [325] , [326] , [327] ]. Studies have also considered the level of DNA an individual transfers to untouched items in their immediate surroundings [ 328 ], the position and level of DNA transferred during digital sexual assault [ 329 ] or during various activities with worn upper garments [ 330 , 331 ], and the DNA composition on the surface of evidence bags pre- and post-exhibit examination [ 332 ]. Studies assessing background levels of male DNA on underpants worn by females [ 333 ] and background levels of DNA on flooring within houses [ 334 ] are providing important knowledge about the possibilities and probabilities of DNA transfer and persistence.

The authors of one study summarize some key points that could be extended to many other studies as words of caution: “From a wider trace DNA point of view, this study has demonstrated that the person who most recently handled an item may not be the major contributor and someone who handled an item for longer may still not be the major contributor if they remove more DNA than they deposit. The amount of DNA transferred and retained on an item is highly variable between individuals and even within the same individual between replicates” [ 320 ].

3. Emerging technologies, research studies, and other topics

New technologies to aid forensic DNA typing are constantly under development. This section explores recent activities with next-generation DNA sequencing, DNA phenotyping for estimating a sample donor's age, ancestry, and appearance, lineage markers, other markers and approaches, and non-human DNA and wildlife forensics, and is expected to be of value to researchers and those practitioners looking to future directions in the field.

3.1. Next-generation sequencing

Next-generation sequencing (NGS), also known as massively parallel sequencing (MPS) in the forensic DNA community, expands the measurement capabilities and information content of a DNA sample beyond the traditional length-based results with STR markers obtained with capillary electrophoresis (CE) methods. Additional genetic markers, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microhaplotypes, and mitochondrial genome (mtGenome) sequence, may be analyzed along with the full sequence of STR alleles. This higher information content per sample opens up new potential applications such as phenotyping of externally visible characteristics and biogeographical ancestry as described in review articles [ 335 , 336 ].

As mentioned in Section 1.2.1 , the NIJ Forensic Laboratory Needs Technology Working Group (FLN-TWG) published a 29-page implementation strategy on next-generation sequencing for DNA analysis in September 2021 [ 28 ]. This guide discusses how NGS works and its advantages and disadvantages, the various instrument platforms and commercial kits available with approximate costs, items to consider regarding facilities, data storage, and personnel training, and resources for implementing NGS technology. A total of 73% of 105 forensic DNA laboratories surveyed from 32 European countries already own an MPS platform or plan to acquire one in the next year or two and one-third of the survey participants already conduct MPS-based STR sequencing, identity, or ancestry SNP typing [ 337 ].

Validation studies have been described with the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep kit and the MiSeq FGx system [ [338] , [339] , [340] ], with the Verogen ForenSeq Primer Mix B for phenotyping and biogeographical ancestry predictions [ 341 , 342 ], and for resizing reaction volumes with the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep kit library preparation [ 343 ]. MPS sequence data showed excellent allele concordance with CE results for 31 autosomal STRs in the Precision ID GlobalFiler NGS STR Panel from 496 Spanish individuals [ 344 ] and from 22 autosomal STR loci in the PowerSeq 46GY panel with 247 Austrians [ 345 ].

STR flanking region sequence variation has been explored [ 346 ] and reports of population data and sequence variation were published for samples from India [ 347 ], France [ 348 ], China [ 349 , 350 ], Korea [ 351 ], Brazil [ 352 ], Tibet [ 353 ], and the United States [ 354 ].

In April 2019 the STRAND ( S hort T andem R epeat: A lign, N ame, D efine) Working Group was formalized [ 355 ] to consider several possible approaches to sequence-based STR nomenclature that have been proposed [ 356 , 357 ]. An overview of software options has been provided for analysis of forensic sequencing data [ 358 ]. Some recent published options include STRinNGS [ 359 ], STRait Razor [ 360 ], ArmedXpert tools MixtureAce and Mixture Interpretation to analyze MPS-STR data [ 361 ], and STRsearch for targeted profiling of STRs in MPS data [ 362 ]. To aid interpretation of MPS-STR data, sensitivity studies were performed with single-source samples and sequence data analyzed by DNA quantity and method used [ 363 ]. A procedure has been described to address calculation of match probabilities when results are generated using MPS kits with different trim sites than those present in the relevant population frequency database [ 364 ]. Performance of different MPS kits, markers, or methods can be compared for accuracy and precision using the Levenshtein distance metric [ 365 ].

Novel MPS STR and SNP panels developed in recent years include IdPrism [ 366 ], a QIAGEN 140-locus SNP panel [ 367 ], the 21plex monSTR identity panel [ 368 ], a 42plex STR NGS panel to assist with kinship analysis [ 369 ], the 5422 marker FORCE (FORensic Capture Enrichment) panel [ 370 ], a forensic panel with 186 SNPs and 123 STRs [ 371 ], the SifaMPS panel for targeting 87 STRs and 294 SNPs [ 372 ], a 1245 SNP panel [ 373 ], 90 STRs and 100 SNPs for application with kinship cases [ 374 ], an adaption of the SNPforID 52plex panel to MPS [ 375 ], 448plex SNP panel [ 376 ], a 133plex panel with 52 autosomal and 81 Y-chromosome STRs [ 377 ], and a forensic identification multiplex with 1270 tri-allelic SNPs involving 1241 autosomal and 29 X-chromosome markers [ 378 ]. The 124 SNPs in the Precision ID Identity Panel were examined in a central Indian population [ 379 ] and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles used in the early 1990s were revisited with MPS capability [ [380] , [381] , [382] ].

MPS methods have demonstrated utility with compromised samples [ [383] , [384] , [385] , [386] , [387] , [388] ] and mixture interpretation [ [389] , [390] , [391] , [392] , [393] , [394] , [395] ]. Microhaplotype assays have also been developed to assist with DNA mixture deconvolution [ 396 , 397 ]. Collaborative studies have explored variability with laboratory performance using MPS methods [ 398 , 399 ]. Population structure [ 400 ] and linkage and linkage disequilibrium [ 401 ] were examined among the markers in forensic MPS panels.

A review of transcriptome analysis using MPS discussed efforts with body fluid and tissue identification, determination of the time since deposition of stains and the age of donors, the estimation of post-mortem interval, and assistance to post-mortem death investigations [ 402 ]. The potential for MPS methods to assist with environmental trace analysis was reviewed in terms of forensic soil analysis, forensic botany, and human identification utilizing the skin microbiome [ 403 ]. The possibility of non-invasive prenatal paternity testing using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma was explored with the Precision ID Identity Panel [ 404 ] and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit [ 405 ]. Pairwise kinship analysis was also examined using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit and multi-generational family pedigrees [ 406 , 407 ]. Nanopore sequencing has also been explored for sequencing STR and SNP markers [ [408] , [409] , [410] , [411] , [412] , [413] , [414] , [415] , [416] ].

3.2. DNA phenotyping (ancestry, appearance, age)

Continuing research into the genetic components of biogeographic ancestry, appearance, and age predictions have improved forensic DNA phenotyping capabilities [ 417 ]. These forensic innovations may sometimes impact public expectations [ 418 ]. The investigation in a murder case was assisted using information from forensic DNA phenotyping that predicted eye, hair, and skin color of an unknown suspect with the HIrisPlex-S system involving targeted massively parallel sequencing [ 419 ].

The VISAGE ( Vis ible A ttributes Through Ge nomics) Consortium, which consists of 13 partners from academic, police, and justice institutions in 8 European countries, has established new scientific knowledge and developed and tested prototype tools for DNA analysis and statistical interpretation as well as conducted education for stakeholders. In the 2019 to 2022 time window of this review, this concerted effort produced 45 one review article [ 417 ], 22 original research publications [ 337 , [420] , [421] , [422] , [423] , [424] , [425] , [426] , [427] , [428] , [429] , [430] , [431] , [432] , [433] , [434] , [435] , [436] , [437] , [438] , [439] , [440] ], and three reports [ [441] , [442] , [443] ].

DNA phenotyping is currently an active area of research, and numerous activities and publications exist beyond the VISAGE articles noted here. Another 137 articles have appeared in the literature in the past three years on biogeographical ancestry, appearance (primarily hair color, eye color, and skin color), and biological age predictions (typically utilizing DNA methylation) (see Supplemental File ).

3.3. Lineage markers (Y-chromosome, mtDNA, X-chromosome)

Lineage markers consist of Y-chromosome, mitochondrial DNA, and X-chromosome genetic information that may be inherited from just one parent without the regular recombination that occurs with autosomal DNA markers. Research in terms of new markers, assays, and population studies continue to be published for these lineage markers.

3.3.1. Y-chromosome

Several recent review articles were published on forensic applications of Y-chromosome testing [ [444] , [445] , [446] ]. As discussed previously in Section 1.2 , an ISFG DNA Commission summarized the state of the field with Y-STR interpretation [ 39 ]. Rapidly mutating Y-STR loci can be used to differentiate closely related males [ [447] , [448] , [449] ]. New statistical approaches to assessing evidence with Y-chromosome information have been described [ 450 , 451 ]. Four commercial Y-STR multiplexes were compared with the NIST 1032 U S. population sample set and the allele and haplotype diversities explored with length-based versus sequence-based information [ 452 ].

A number of Y-STR typing systems have been described along with validation studies, such as a 36plex [ 453 ], a 41plex [ 454 ], a 29plex [ 455 ], a 17plex [ 456 ], a 24plex [ 457 ], the Microreader 40Y ID System [ 458 ], the 24 Y-STRs in the AGCU Y SUPP STR kit [ 459 ], the DNATyper Y26 PCR amplification kit [ 460 ], a multiplex with 12 multicopy Y-STR loci [ 461 ], the Yfiler Platinum PCR Amplification Kit [ 462 ], a 45plex [ 463 ], the Microreader 29Y Prime ID system [ 464 ], an assay with 30 slow and moderate mutation Y-STR markers [ 465 ], the 17plex Microreader RM-Y ID System [ 466 ], and a 26plex for rapidly mutating Y-STRs [ 467 ]. A machine learning program predicted Y haplogroups using two Y-STR multiplexes with 32 Y-STRs [ 468 ].

Deletions and duplications with 42 Y-STR were reported in a sample of 1420 unrelated males and 1160 father-son pairs from a Chinese Han population [ 469 ]. Using Y-STR allele sequences has enabled locating parallel mutations in deep-rooting family pedigrees [ 470 ]. The surname match frequency with Y-chromosome haplotypes was explored using 2401 males genotyped for 46 Y-STRs and 183 Y-SNPs [ 471 ]. In the Y-chromosome's role as a valuable kinship indicator to assist in genetic genealogy and forensic research, models to improve prediction of the time to the most recent common paternal ancestor have been studied with 46 Y-STRs and 1120 biologically related genealogical pairs [ 472 ]. A massively parallel sequencing tool was developed to analyze 859 Y-SNPs to infer 640 Y haplogroups [ 473 ]. Another MPS tool, the CSYseq panel, targeted 15,611 Y-SNPs to categorize 1443 Y-sub-haplogroup lineages worldwide along with 202 Y-STRs including 81 slow, 68 moderate, 27 fast, and 26 rapidly mutating Y-STRs to individualize close paternal relatives [ 474 ].

3.3.2. Mitochondrial DNA

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is maternally inherited with a high copy number per cell, can aid human identification, missing persons investigations, and challenging forensic specimens containing low quantities of nuclear DNA such as hair shafts [ [475] , [476] , [477] ]. Validation studies have been published using traditional Sanger sequencing [ 478 ] and next-generation sequencing [ [479] , [480] , [481] ]. Illumina and Thermo Fisher now provide mtDNA whole genome NGS assays [ [482] , [483] , [484] , [485] ]. Many mtDNA population data sets were published in the past three years including high-quality data from U.S. populations [ 486 ]. The suitability of current mtDNA interpretation guidelines for whole mtDNA genome (mtGenome) comparisons has been evaluated [ 487 ].

NGS methods have increased sensitivity of mtDNA heteroplasmy detection [ 488 , 489 ], which can influence the ability to connect buccal reference samples and rootless hairs from the same individual [ 490 , 491 ]. Twelve polymerases were compared in terms of mtDNA amplification yields from challenging hairs – with KAPA HiFi HotStart and PrimeSTR HS outperforming AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase that is widely used in forensic laboratories [ 492 ]. Multiple studies and review articles have discussed distinguishing mtDNA from nuclear DNA elements of mtDNA (NUMTs) that have been inserted into our nuclear DNA [ [493] , [494] , [495] , [496] ].

NGS sequencing of the mtGenome has permitted improved resolution of the most common West Eurasian mtDNA control region haplotype [ 497 ]. Phylogenetic alignment and haplogroup classification have continued to be refined with new sequence information [ 498 ], and new assays have been developed to aid haplogroup classification [ 499 ]. Concerns over potential paternal inheritance of mtDNA have also been addressed [ 500 , 501 ].

3.3.3. X-chromosome

A 20-year review of X-chromosome use in forensic genetics examined the number and types of markers available, an overview of worldwide population data, the use of X-chromosome markers in complex kinship testing, mutation studies, current weaknesses, and future prospects [ 502 ]. One example of the forensic application of X-chromosome markers include use in relationship testing cases involving suspicion of incest or paternity without a maternal sample for comparison [ 503 ]. Four new X-STR multiplex assays were described along with validation studies including a 19plex [ 504 ], a 16plex [ 505 ], another 19plex – the Microreader 19X Direct ID System [ 506 ], and an 18plex named TYPER-X19 multiplex assay [ 507 ]. A collaborative study examined paternal and maternal mutations in X-STR markers [ 508 ]. A software program for performing population statistics on X-STR data was introduced [ 509 ] and sequence-based U.S. population data described for 7 X-STR loci [ 510 ].

3.4. New markers and approaches (microhaplotypes, InDels, proteomics, human microbiome)

In this section on new markers and approaches, publications related to microhaplotypes and insertion/deletion (InDel, or DIP for deletion insertion polymorphisms) markers are reviewed along with proteomic and microbiome approaches to supplement standard human DNA typing methods.

3.4.1. Microhaplotypes

Microhaplotype (MH) markers consist of multiple SNPs in close proximity (e.g., typically <200 bp or <300 bp) that can be simultaneously genotyped with each DNA sequence read using NGS. Two or more linked SNPs will define three or more haplotypes. Compared to STR markers, MHs do not have stutter artifacts (which complicate mixture interpretation), can be designed with shorter amplicon lengths in some cases (which benefits recovery of genetic information from degraded DNA samples), possess a higher degree of polymorphism compared to single SNP loci (which benefits discrimination power), and exhibit low mutation rates (which enables relationship testing and biogeographical ancestry inference). Thus, MH markers bring advantages to human identification, ancestry inference, kinship analysis, and mixture deconvolution to potentially assist missing person investigations, relationship testing, and forensic casework as discussed in several recent reviews [ 16 , 511 ]. A new database, MicroHapDB, has compiled information on over 400 published MH markers and frequency data from 26 global population groups [ 512 ].

A number of MH panels have been described [ [513] , [514] , [515] , [516] , [517] , [518] , [519] ]. Population data has been collected from a number of sources around the world including four U.S. population groups examined with a 74plex assay with 74 MH loci and 230 SNPs [ 520 ]. Various MH panels have been evaluated for effectiveness with kinship analysis [ [521] , [522] , [523] ]. Likewise the ability to detect minor contributors in DNA mixtures has been assessed [ [524] , [525] , [526] ].

3.4.2. InDel markers

InDel markers can be detected using a CE-based length analysis, and thus use instrumentation that forensic DNA laboratories already have. InDels can also be designed to amplify short DNA fragments (e.g., <125 bp) to help improve amplification success rates with low DNA quantity and/or quality. However, with only two possible alleles like SNPs, InDels are not as polymorphic as STRs and thus require more markers to obtain similar powers of discrimination as multi-allelic STR markers and do not work as well with mixed DNA samples. InDels possess a lower mutation rate than STRs and can be used as ancestry informative markers (AIMs) since allele frequencies may differ among geographically separated population groups.

Two commercial InDel kit exist: (1) Investigator DIPlex (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) with 30 InDels [ [527] , [528] , [529] , [530] , [531] ] and (2) InnoTyper 21 (InnoGenomics, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA) with 21 autosomal insertion-null (INNUL) markers [ [532] , [533] , [534] , [535] ]. In addition, a number of InDel assays have been published including a 32plex [ 536 ], a 35plex [ 537 ], a 38plex [ 538 ], a 39plex with AIMs [ 539 ], a 43plex [ 540 ], a 57plex [ 541 ], a 60plex with 57 autosomal InDels, 2 Y-chromosome InDels, and amelogenin [ 542 ], a 32plex with X-chromosome InDels [ 543 ], and a 21plex with AIMs [ 544 ].

A multi-InDel marker is a specific DNA fragment with more than one InDel marker located tightly in the physical position that provides a microhaplotype [ 545 ]. Several multi-InDel assays have been published include a 12plex [ 546 ] and an 18plex [ 547 ].

3.4.3. Proteomics

Protein analysis, often through immunological assays, has traditionally been used to identify body fluids and tissues. With improvements in protein mass spectrometry in recent years, genetic variation can be observed in hair shafts via single amino acid polymorphisms. Detection of these genetically variant peptides (GVPs) can infer the presence of corresponding SNP alleles in the genome of the individual who is the source of the protein sample. A thorough review of forensic proteomics in 2021 cited 375 references [ 18 ]. Recent efforts in this area have focused on using GVPs to differentiate individuals through their human skin cells [ [548] , [549] , [550] ] or hair samples [ [551] , [552] , [553] , [554] , [555] , [556] , [557] , [558] , [559] ]. An algorithm has been proposed for calculating random match probabilities with GVP information [ 560 ].

3.4.4. Human microbiome

Microorganisms live in and on the human body, and efforts are underway to utilize the human microbiome for a variety of potential forensic applications [ 21 , [561] , [562] , [563] ]. There are also active efforts with analysis of microbiomes in the environment (e.g., soil or water samples), which could be classified under non-human DNA testing. Forensic microbiome research covers at least six areas: (1) individual identification, (2) tissue/body fluid identification, (3) geolocation, (4) time since stain deposition estimation, (5) forensic medicine, and (6) post-mortem interval (PMI) estimation. Biological, technical, and data issues have been raised and potential solutions explored in a recent review article [ 21 ]. For example, microbes on deceased individuals are being studied to estimate the postmortem interval [ 20 ] and postmortem skin microbiomes were found to be stable during repeated sampling up to 60 h postmortem [ 564 ].

Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA using NGS provides information on the microbiome community present in a tested sample [ 565 ]. The Forensic Microbiome Database 46 correlates publicly available 16S rRNA sequence data as a community resource. If the skin microbiome is extremely diverse among individuals, then the potential exists to associate the bacterial communities on an individual's skin with objects touched by this individual assuming that the bacteria originating from the donor's skin are deposited (i.e., transfer to and persist on the surface) and can be detected and interpreted.

Specific aspects of the microbiome (e.g., the bacterial community) may be able to provide details about the donor through bacterial profiling. For example, in one study correlations were observed between the bacterial profile and gender, ethnicity, diet type, and hand sanitizer used [ 566 ]. Another study with 30 individuals found that each person left behind microbial signatures that could be used to track interaction with various surfaces within a building, but the authors concluded “we believe the human microbiome, while having some potential value as a trace evidence marker for forensic analysis, is currently under-developed and unable to provide the level of security, specificity and accuracy required for a forensic tool” [ 565 ].

Direct and indirect transfer of microbiomes between individuals has been studied [ 567 , 568 ] along with identifying background microbiomes [ 569 ] and the possibility of transfer of microbiomes within a forensic laboratory setting [ 570 ]. Changes in four bacterial species in saliva stains were charted, showing that it was possible to correctly predict deposition time within one week in 80% of the stains [ 571 ]. The ability to detect sexual contact has been explored through using the microbiome of the pubic region [ [572] , [573] , [574] ]. The microbiomes on skin, saliva, vaginal fluid, and stool samples have been compared [ 575 ]. The stability, diversity, and individualization of the human skin virome was explored with 59 viral biomarkers being found that differed across the 42 individuals studied [ 576 ]. It will be interesting to see what the future holds and what other findings come from this active area of research.

3.5. Kinship analysis, human identification, and disaster victim identification

Kinship analysis, which uses genetic markers and statistics to evaluate the potential for specific biological relationships, is important for parentage testing, disaster victim identification (DVI), and human identification of remains that may be recovered in missing person cases. New open-source software programs have been described that can assist with kinship analysis [ 577 , 578 ].

A potential biological relationship is commonly evaluated using a likelihood ratio (LR) by comparing the likelihoods of observing the genetic data given two alternative hypotheses, such as (1) an individual is related to another individual in a defined relationship versus (2) the two individuals not related. Higher LR values indicate stronger support with the genetic data if the proposed relationship is true. Multiple factors influence LR kinship calculations including the specific hypotheses, the genetic markers examined, the allele frequencies of the relevant population(s), the co-ancestry coefficient applied, and approaches to address potential mutations. STR genotypes were reported for 11 population groups used by the FBI Laboratory [ 579 ]. The status quo has been challenged in recent articles regarding how hypotheses are commonly established [ 580 ] and whether race-specific U.S. population databases should be used for allele frequency calculations [ 581 ].

Depending on the relationship being explored, information can be optimized through genetic information from additional known relatives or through collecting results at more loci [ 582 ]. Potential error rates have been modeled with the observation that false negatives, which occur when related individuals are misinterpreted as being unrelated, are more common than false positives, where unrelated people are interpreted as being related [ 583 ]. While LRs are generally reliable in detecting or confirming parent/child pairs, limitations of kinship determinations exist (e.g., distinguishing siblings from half-siblings) when using STR data [ 584 ].

Pairwise comparisons have been studied in forensic kinship analysis [ [585] , [586] , [587] ]. The effectiveness of 40 STRs plus 91 SNPs was shown to be better than 27 STRs and 91 SNPs or 40 STRs alone [ 588 ]. Only a minor increase in LRs was observed when taking NGS-generated allele sequence variation rather than fragment length allele variation [ 589 ]. The statistical power of exclusion and inclusion can be used to prioritize family members selected for testing in resolving missing person cases [ 590 ]. A strategy for making decisions when facing low statistical power in missing person and DVI cases was published [ 591 ].

The most challenging kinship cases involve efforts to separate pairs of individuals who are typically thought to be genetically indistinguishable (i.e., monozygotic twins) or distant relatives (e.g., fourth cousins) where there is an increased uncertainty in the possible relationship. In some situations, somatic mutations may permit distinguishing monozygotic twins following whole genome sequencing – and this approach was successful in four of six cases reported recently [ 19 ]. The probative value of NGS data for distinguishing monozygotic twins was explored [ 592 ]. A unique case of heteropaternal twinning was reported where opposite-sex twins apparently had different fathers [ 593 ]. An impressive effort in kinship analysis using direct-to-consumer genetic genealogy information from 56 living descendants of multiple genealogical lineages helped resolve a contested paternity case from over a century and a half ago to identify the biological father of Josephine Lyon [ 594 ].

Techniques for identification of human remains continue to improve particularly with the capabilities of NGS and hybridization capture [ 595 ] and ancient DNA extraction protocols [ 596 , 597 ]. Studies have reported variation in skeletal DNA preservation [ 598 ] and retrospectively considered success rates with compromised human remains [ 599 ].

A simulated airplane crash enabled six forensic laboratories in Switzerland to gain valuable DVI experience with kinship cases of varying complexity [ 600 ]. The ISFG Spanish-Portuguese Speaking Working Group likewise conducted a DVI collaborative exercise with a simulated airplane crash to explore fragment re-associations, victim identification through kinship analysis, coping with related victims, handling mutations or insufficient number of family references, working in a Bayesian framework, and the correct use of DVI software [ 601 ]. Other groups have explored the capability of a particular software tool [ 602 ] or implemented rapid DNA analysis to accelerate victim identification [ 603 ]. The International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) has gained considerable experience with DNA extraction and STR amplification from degraded skeletal remains and kinship matching procedures in large databases [ 604 ]. To supplement the INTERPOL DVI Guide, 47 some lessons learned and experienced-based recommendations for DVI operations have recently been provided [ 605 ].

3.6. Non-human DNA testing and wildlife forensics

Non-human biological evidence may inform criminal investigations when animals or plants are victims or perpetrators of crime or the presence of specific material, such as cat or dog hair, may contribute to reconstructing events at a crime scene. Non-human DNA testing includes wildlife forensics and domestic animal species as well as forensic botany and has many commonalities and some important differences compared to human DNA testing [ [606] , [607] , [608] , [609] , [610] ]. Pollen analysis can assist criminal investigations [ 611 , 612 ]. The potential for and the barriers associated with the wider application of forensic botany in civil proceedings and criminal cases have been examined [ 613 , 614 ].

Mammalian species identification can assist in determining the origins of non-human biological material found at crime scenes through narrowing the range of possibilities [ 615 ]. New sequencing methods have been developed to assist species identification [ 616 ]. A multiplex PCR assay was developed to simultaneously identify 22 mammalian species (alpaca, Asiatic black bear, Bactrian camel, brown rat, cat, cow, common raccoon, dog, European rabbit, goat, horse, house mouse, human, Japanese badger, Japanese wild boar, masked palm civet, pig, raccoon dog, red fox, sheep, Siberian weasel, and sika deer) and four poultry species (chicken, domestic turkey, Japanese quail, and mallard) [ 617 ]. A number of other species identification assays have also been reported [ [618] , [619] , [620] ].

An important effort for harmonizing canine DNA analysis is an ISFG working group known as the Canine DNA Profiling Group, or CaDNAP. 48 The CaDNAP group published an analysis of 13 STR markers in 1184 dogs from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland [ 621 ]. Six traits for predicting visible characteristics in dogs, namely coat color, coat pattern, coat structure, body size, ear shape, and tail length, were explored with 15 SNPs and six InDel markers [ 622 ]. Canine breed classification and skeletal phenotype prediction has been explored using various genetic markers [ 623 ]. A novel assay using a feline leukemia virus was developed to demonstrate that a contested bobcat was not a domestic cat hybrid [ 624 ] and a core panel of 101 SNP markers was selected for domestic cat parentage verification and identification [ 625 ].

DNA tests have been developed to assist with illegal trafficking investigations involving elephant ivory seizures [ 626 ], falcons [ 627 ], and precious coral material [ 628 ]. Accuracy in animal forensic genetic testing was explored with interlaboratory assessments performed in 2016 and 2018 [ 629 ]. A collaborative exercise conducted in 2020 and 2021 by the ISFG Italian Speaking Working Group examined performance across 21 laboratories with a 13-locus STR marker test for Cannabis sativa [ 630 ]. A molecular approach was explored to distinguish drug-type versus fiber-type hemp varieties [ 631 ].

Acknowledgments and disclaimer

I am grateful to Dominique Saint-Dizier from the French National Scientific Police for the invitation and opportunity to conduct this review and for the support of my supervisor, Shyam Sunder, for granting the time to work on this extensive review. Input and suggestions on this manuscript by Todd Bille, Thomas Callaghan, Kevin Kiesler, François-Xavier Laurent, Robert Ramotowski, Kathy Sharpless, and Robert Thompson are greatly appreciated. Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

1 https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/forensic-science-international-genetics/special-issue/10TSDS4360H .

2 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/Forensic_Genetic .

3 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/forensic_mitochondrial_genomics .

4 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/Advances_Forensic_Genetics .

5 https://www.mdpi.com/books/pdfdownload/book/5798 .

6 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/Bioinformatics_Forensic_Genetics .

7 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/genetics_anthropology .

8 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/Identification_of_Human_Remains .

9 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/Forensic_DNA_analysis .

10 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/Forensic_DNA_Mixture .

11 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes/special_issues/28FBA0G4DH .

12 See https://www.swgdam.org/ .

13 https://www.swgdam.org/publications .

14 https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/rapid-dna-guide-january-2022.pdf/view .

15 https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/non-codis-rapid-dna-best-practices-092419.pdf/view .

16 https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/rapid-dna-testing-for-non-codis-uses-considerations-for-court-073120.pdf/view .

17 https://www.justice.gov/olp/uniform-language-testimony-and-reports .

18 https://forensiccoe.org/human_factors_forensic_science_sourcebook/ .

19 https://www.nist.gov/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science .

20 https://www.nist.gov/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science/human-forensic-biology-subcommittee .

21 https://www.nist.gov/topics/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science/wildlife-forensics-subcommittee .

22 https://www.aafs.org/academy-standards-board .

23 https://www.nist.gov/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science/osac-registry .

24 See https://www.nist.gov/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science/human-forensic-biology-subcommittee .

25 https://lexicon.forensicosac.org/ .

26 https://www.nist.gov/osac/human-factors-validation-and-performance-testing-forensic-science .

27 https://www.nist.gov/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science/osac-research-and-development-needs .

28 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-science-providers-codes-of-practice-and-conduct-2021-issue-7 .

29 https://www.aabb.org/standards-accreditation/standards/relationship-testing-laboratories .

30 https://www.isfg.org/DNA+Commission .

31 Previously available rapid DNA systems included the RapidHIT 200 from IntegenX and MiDAS (Miniaturized integrated DNA Analysis System) from the Center for Applied NanoBioscience at the University of Arizona.

32 See https://le.fbi.gov/science-and-lab-resources/biometrics-and-fingerprints/codis/rapid-dna .

33 See https://www.interpol.int/How-we-work/Forensics/DNA .

34 See https://www.interpol.int/How-we-work/Forensics/I-Familia .

35 See https://le.fbi.gov/science-and-lab-resources/biometrics-and-fingerprints/codis#Familial-Searching .

36 See https://isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_DNA_testing_comparison_chart .

37 See https://www.wmar2news.com/infocus/maryland-quietly-shelves-parts-of-genealogy-privacy-law .

38 See https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/finalized-revisions-common-rule/index.html .

39 See https://enfsi.eu/about-enfsi/structure/working-groups/dna/ .

40 See https://www.swgdam.org/publications .

41 See https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF/English.aspx/GAT815-2009 .

42 See https://strider.online/ .

43 See https://bit.ly/2R4bFgL (DNA-TrAC).

44 See https://cieqfmweb.uqtr.ca/fmi/webd/OD_CIEQ_CRIMINALISTIQUE (Transfer Traces Activity DataBase).

45 See https://www.visage-h2020.eu/index.html#publications .

46 See http://fmd.jcvi.org/ .

47 See https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Forensics/Disaster-Victim-Identification-DVI .

48 See https://www.isfg.org/Working+Groups/CaDNAP .

Appendix A Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100311 .

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the supplementary data to this article:

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

•  We're Hiring!
•  Help Center

Forensic Medicine

• Most Cited Papers
• Most Downloaded Papers
• Newest Papers
• Last »
• Forensic Pathology Follow Following
• Forensic Science Follow Following
• Forensic Anthropology Follow Following
• Forensics Follow Following
• forensic Medicine and Toxicology Follow Following
• Forensic Toxicology Follow Following
• Forensic Odontology Follow Following
• Forensic Archaeology Follow Following
• Legal Medicine Follow Following
• Forensic Genetics Follow Following

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• Academia.edu Journals
•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Paper Archives
• Journal Indexing
• Research Conference
• Add Journal

Searching By

• Search More ...

Forensic Medicine and Anatomy Research (ISSN: 2327-4115)

Publisher Scientific Research Publishing

ISSN-L 2327-4115

ISSN 2327-4115

E-ISSN 2327-4107

IF(Impact Factor) 2024 Evaluation Pending

Website http://www.scirp.org/journal/fmar

Description

Last modified: 2015-03-03 12:48:17

• No Archives

Advertisement

Insilico Medicine unveils Science42:DORA to streamline academic writing and research

• Download PDF Copy

Writing research papers is critical for disseminating scientific findings, but it does come with efficiency burdens, particularly for early-career researchers and non-native English speakers. A survey published in Nature in 2018 indicated that approximately 37% of respondents reported that they spend more than 20 hours a week on writing and revising scientific papers.

Recent progress in Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology, particularly with the rise of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) and other Large Language Models (LLMs), has equipped researchers with a powerful set of tools for processing extensive amounts of literature quickly. Insilico Medicine ("Insilico"), a clinical-stage generative AI-driven biotechnology company, has launched a preview version of its draft outline research assistant, Science42:DORA, to streamline the generation of scientific content.

Science42: DORA (aka DORA) integrates multiple AI agents that leverage LLMs, designed to streamline the process of drafting academic papers and other scientific documents including grant and patent applications, internal research summaries, IND applications, etc. It assists researchers in drafting these types of documents with proper referencing through engineered prompts, proprietary databases, and pre-designed content generation workflows. 

"Often the most difficult step when it comes to writing is starting the process. Something that I experienced first-hand as a graduate student when I was tasked with writing numerous grants, papers and reports." said Petrina Kamya, PhD, Global head of AI Platform, Vice President of Insilico Medicine. "We developed Science42:DORA to help eliminate that debilitating barrier to writing scientific documents."

To further validate DORA's abilities, Insilico's developers collaborated with researchers at the University of Copenhagen to submit a paper on medRxiv. The paper drafted by DORA and later manually curated and extended, performs a comparative study about radiotherapy outcomes across brain tumor types, namely Glioblastoma Multiform and Low-Grade Gliomas based on radiotherapy phenotype and expression data from 32 cancer datasets. Insilico plans to further test DORA in multiple types of document generation and launch a free trial version of the AI assistant to the public in late 2024.

Here at Insilico, we strive to integrate state-of-art AI innovations with human intelligence for faster and better advancements in research and development, and LLM-based AI agents have been our recent focus. With DORA, we hope not only to streamline the writing process but also to elevate the overall quality of scholarly output, which in turn powers practical applications and meaningful delivery." Alex Zhavoronkov, PhD, Founder and CEO of Insilico Medicine

Related Stories

• Research highlights green tea's potential role in improving ovarian cancer outcomes
• Study suggests lifetime selection biases skew positive health claims in alcohol research
• What happens to narcissism as we age? Research shows declining trends

Insilico Medicine is a pioneer in using generative AI for drug discovery and development. The Company first described the concept of using generative AI for the design of novel molecules in a peer-reviewed journal in 2016. Then, Insilico developed and validated multiple approaches and features for its generative adversarial network (GAN)-based AI platform and integrated those algorithms into the commercially available Pharma.AI platform, which includes generative biology, chemistry, and medicine.

Since 2021, Insilico has nominated 18 preclinical candidates in its comprehensive portfolio of over 30 promising therapeutic assets and has advanced seven molecules to the clinical stage. In March 2024, the Company published a paper in Nature Biotechnology that discloses the raw experimental data and the preclinical and clinical evaluation of its lead drug – a potentially first-in-class TNIK inhibitor for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis discovered and designed using generative AI currently in Phase II trials with patients. 

InSilico Medicine

Posted in: Device / Technology News | Medical Science News

Tags: Aging , Biotechnology , Brain , Brain Tumor , Cancer , Central Nervous System , Clinical Trial , Drug Discovery , Drugs , Fibrosis , Glioblastoma , Gliomas , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , immunity , Infectious Diseases , Language , Machine Learning , Medicine , Nervous System , Phenotype , Preclinical , Pulmonary Fibrosis , Radiotherapy , Research , Technology , Tumor

Suggested Reading

Cancel reply to comment

• Trending Stories
• Latest Interviews
• Top Health Articles

Revolutionizing hepatocyte count for researchers

Dan Schieffer

In this interview, NewsMedical speaks to DeNovix's Dan Schieffer about the new app developed for CellDrop, and how it aims to revolutionize hepatocyte count for the drug discovery industry, and more.

E-Cigarettes and Ethanol: A forensic Perspective on Vaping

Michelle Peace

In this interview conducted at Pittcon 2024 in San Diego, we spoke to Professor Michelle Peace about the challenges and implications of detecting ethanol in e-cigarettes for drug testing and forensic toxicology.

Understanding Consumer-Consented Data to Optimize Digital Health Programs

LexisNexis® Risk Solutions

In this interview, News Medical speaks with the Healthcare Business of LexisNexis® Risk Solutions about optimizing clinical trial screening and digital health programs through a better understanding of consumer-consented data.

Latest News

Newsletters you may be interested in

Your AI Powered Scientific Assistant

Hi, I'm Azthena, you can trust me to find commercial scientific answers from News-Medical.net.

A few things you need to know before we start. Please read and accept to continue.

• Use of “Azthena” is subject to the terms and conditions of use as set out by OpenAI .
• Content provided on any AZoNetwork sites are subject to the site Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
• Large Language Models can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.

Great. Ask your question.

Azthena may occasionally provide inaccurate responses. Read the full terms .

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions .

Provide Feedback