- Science Notes Posts
- Contact Science Notes
- Todd Helmenstine Biography
- Anne Helmenstine Biography
- Free Printable Periodic Tables (PDF and PNG)
- Periodic Table Wallpapers
- Interactive Periodic Table
- Periodic Table Posters
- Science Experiments for Kids
- How to Grow Crystals
- Chemistry Projects
- Fire and Flames Projects
- Holiday Science
- Chemistry Problems With Answers
- Physics Problems
- Unit Conversion Example Problems
- Chemistry Worksheets
- Biology Worksheets
- Periodic Table Worksheets
- Physical Science Worksheets
- Science Lab Worksheets
- My Amazon Books
Bohr Model of the Atom
The Bohr model or Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom is a cake or planetary model that describes the structure of atoms mainly in terms of quantum theory. It’s called a planetary or cake model because electrons orbit the atomic nucleus like planets orbit the Sun, while the circular electron orbits form shells, like the layers of a cake. Danish physicist Niels Bohr proposed the model in 1913.
The Bohr model was the first atomic model incorporating some quantum mechanics. Earlier models were the cubic model (1902), plum-pudding model (1904), Saturnian model (1904), and Rutherford model (1911). Ultimately, models based entirely on quantum mechanics replaced the Bohr model. Yet, it’s an important model because it describes the quantum behavior of electrons in simple terms and explains the Rydberg formula for the spectral emission lines of hydrogen.
Key Points of the Bohr Model
- The atomic nucleus consists of protons and neutrons and has a net positive charge.
- Electrons have a negative charge and orbit the nucleus.
- Electron orbits are circular, but not all electrons orbit in the same plane (like planets around a star), resulting in spheres or shells where an electron might be found. While gravity determines orbits of planets around stars, electrostatic forces (Coulomb force) causes electrons to orbit the nucleus .
- The lowest energy for an electron (most stable state) is in the smallest orbit, which is closest to the nucleus.
- When an electron moves from one orbit to another, energy is absorbed (moving from lower to higher orbit) or emitted (moving from higher to lower orbit).
The Bohr Model of Hydrogen
The simplest example of the Bohr Model is for the hydrogen atom (Z = 1) or for a hydrogen-like ion (Z > 1), in which a negatively charged electron orbits a small positively charged nucleus. According to the model, electrons only occupy certain orbits. The radius of possible orbits increases as a function of n 2 , where n is the principle quantum number. If an electron moves from one orbit to another, energy is absorbed or emitted. The 3 → 2 transition produces the first line of the Balmer series. For hydrogen (Z = 1), this line consists of photons with a wavelength of 656 nm (red).
Bohr Model for Heavier Atoms
The hydrogen atom only contains one proton, while heavier atoms contain more protons. Atoms require additional electrons to cancel out the positive charge of multiple protons. According to the Bohr model, each orbit only holds a certain number of electrons. When the level filled, additional electrons occupy the next higher level. So, the Bohr model for heavier electrons introduces electron shells. This explains some properties of heavy atoms, such as why atoms get smaller as you move from left to right across a period (row) of the periodic table, even though they contain more protons and electrons. The model also explains why noble gases are inert, why atoms on the left side of the periodic table attract electrons, and why elements on the right side (except noble gases) lose electrons.
One problem applying the Bohr model to heavier atoms is that the model assumes electron shells don’t interact. So, the model doesn’t explain why electrons don’t stack in a regular manner.
Problems With the Bohr Model
While the Bohr model surpassed earlier models and described absorption and emission spectra, it had some issues:
- The model couldn’t predict spectra of large atoms.
- It doesn’t explain the Zeeman effect.
- It doesn’t predict relative intensities of spectral lines.
- The model violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle because it defines both the radius and orbit of electrons.
- It incorrectly calculates ground state angular momentum. According to the Bohr model, ground state angular momentum is L = ħ . Experimental data shows L=0.
- The Bohr model doesn’t explain fine and hyperfine structure of spectral lines.
Improvements to the Bohr Model
The Sommerfeld or Bohr-Sommerfeld model significantly improved on the original Bohr model by describing elliptical electron orbits rather than circular orbits. This allowed the Sommerfeld model to explain atomic effects, such as the Stark effect in spectral line splitting. However, the Sommerfeld model couldn’t accommodate the magnetic quantum number.
In 1925, Wolfgang’s Pauli’s atomic model replaced the Bohr model and those based upon it. Pauli’s model was based purely on quantum mechanics, so it explained more phenomena than the Bohr model. In 1926, Erwin Schrodinger’s equation introduced wave mechanics, leading to the modifications of Pauli’s model that are used today.
- Bohr, Niels (1913). “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Part I”. Philosophical Magazine . 26 (151): 1–24. doi: 10.1080/14786441308634955
- Bohr, Niels (1914). “The spectra of helium and hydrogen”. Nature . 92 (2295): 231–232. doi: 10.1038/092231d0
- Lakhtakia, Akhlesh; Salpeter, Edwin E. (1996). “Models and Modelers of Hydrogen”. American Journal of Physics . 65 (9): 933. Bibcode:1997AmJPh..65..933L. doi: 10.1119/1.18691
- Pauling, Linus (1970). “Chapter 5-1”. General Chemistry (3rd ed.). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co. ISBN 0-486-65622-5.
Related Posts
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
- When did science begin?
- Where was science invented?
- Is mathematics a physical science?
- Why does physics work in SI units?
- How is the atomic number of an atom defined?
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- Space.com - The Bohr model: The famous but flawed depiction of an atom
- University of Rochester - Department of Physics and Astronomy - The Bohr Model
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - Bohr's 1913 molecular model revisited
- UEN Digital Press with Pressbooks - Introductory Chemistry - Bohr’s Theory
- The University of Hawaiʻi Pressbooks - The Bohr Model
- The Chemistry LibreTexts - Bohr Diagrams of Atoms and Ions
- Kahn Academy - The Bohr model
Bohr model , description of the structure of atoms , especially that of hydrogen , proposed (1913) by the Danish physicist Niels Bohr . The Bohr model of the atom , a radical departure from earlier, classical descriptions, was the first that incorporated quantum theory and was the predecessor of wholly quantum-mechanical models. The Bohr model and all of its successors describe the properties of atomic electrons in terms of a set of allowed (possible) values. Atoms absorb or emit radiation only when the electrons abruptly jump between allowed, or stationary, states. Direct experimental evidence for the existence of such discrete states was obtained (1914) by the German-born physicists James Franck and Gustav Hertz .
Immediately before 1913, the Rutherford model conceived of an atom as consisting of a tiny positively charged heavy core, called a nucleus, surrounded by light, planetary negative electrons revolving in circular orbits of arbitrary radii.
Bohr amended that view of the motion of the planetary electrons to bring the model in line with the regular patterns (spectral series) of light emitted by real hydrogen atoms. By limiting the orbiting electrons to a series of circular orbits having discrete radii, Bohr could account for the series of discrete wavelengths in the emission spectrum of hydrogen. Light, he proposed, radiated from hydrogen atoms only when an electron made a transition from an outer orbit to one closer to the nucleus. The energy lost by the electron in the abrupt transition is precisely the same as the energy of the quantum of emitted light.
Bohr Model of the Atom Explained
Planetary Model of the Hydrogen Atom
ThoughtCo / Evan Polenghi
- Chemical Laws
- Periodic Table
- Projects & Experiments
- Scientific Method
- Biochemistry
- Physical Chemistry
- Medical Chemistry
- Chemistry In Everyday Life
- Famous Chemists
- Activities for Kids
- Abbreviations & Acronyms
- Weather & Climate
- Ph.D., Biomedical Sciences, University of Tennessee at Knoxville
- B.A., Physics and Mathematics, Hastings College
The Bohr Model has an atom consisting of a small, positively charged nucleus orbited by negatively charged electrons. Here's a closer look at this planetary model.
Overview of the Bohr Model
Niels Bohr proposed the Bohr Model of the Atom in 1915. Because the Bohr Model is a modification of the earlier Rutherford Model, some people call Bohr's Model the Rutherford-Bohr Model. The modern model of the atom is based on quantum mechanics. The Bohr Model contains some errors, but it is important because it describes most of the accepted features of atomic theory without all of the high-level math of the modern version. Unlike earlier models, the Bohr Model explains the Rydberg formula for the spectral emission lines of atomic hydrogen .
The Bohr Model is a planetary model in which the negatively charged electrons orbit a small, positively charged nucleus similar to the planets orbiting the sun (except that the orbits are not planar). The gravitational force of the solar system is mathematically akin to the Coulomb (electrical) force between the positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged electrons.
Main Points of the Bohr Model
- Electrons orbit the nucleus in orbits that have a set size and energy.
- The energy of the orbit is related to its size. The lowest energy is found in the smallest orbit.
- Radiation is absorbed or emitted when an electron moves from one orbit to another.
Bohr Model of Hydrogen
The simplest example of the Bohr Model is for the hydrogen atom (Z = 1) or for a hydrogen-like ion (Z > 1), in which a negatively charged electron orbits a small positively charged nucleus. Electromagnetic energy will be absorbed or emitted if an electron moves from one orbit to another. Only certain electron orbits are permitted. The radius of the possible orbits increases as n 2 , where n is the principal quantum number . The 3 → 2 transition produces the first line of the Balmer series . For hydrogen (Z = 1) this produces a photon having wavelength 656 nm (red light).
Bohr Model for Heavier Atoms
Heavier atoms contain more protons in the nucleus than the hydrogen atom. More electrons were required to cancel out the positive charge of all of the protons. Bohr believed each electron orbit could only hold a set number of electrons. Once the level was full, additional electrons would be bumped up to the next level. Thus, the Bohr model for heavier atoms described electron shells. The model explained some of the atomic properties of heavier atoms, which had never been reproduced before. For example, the shell model explained why atoms got smaller moving across a period (row) of the periodic table, even though they had more protons and electrons. It also explained why the noble gases were inert and why atoms on the left side of the periodic table attract electrons, while those on the right side lose them. However, the model assumed electrons in the shells didn't interact with each other and couldn't explain why electrons seemed to stack irregularly.
Problems With the Bohr Model
- It violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle because it considers electrons to have both a known radius and orbit.
- The Bohr Model provides an incorrect value for the ground state orbital angular momentum .
- It makes poor predictions regarding the spectra of larger atoms.
- The Bohr Model does not predict the relative intensities of spectral lines.
- It does not explain fine structure and hyperfine structure in spectral lines.
- The Bohr Model does not explain the Zeeman Effect.
Refinements and Improvements to the Bohr Model
The most prominent refinement to the Bohr model was the Sommerfeld model, which is sometimes called the Bohr-Sommerfeld model. In this model, electrons travel in elliptical orbits around the nucleus rather than in circular orbits. The Sommerfeld model was better at explaining atomic spectral effects, such the Stark effect in spectral line splitting. However, the model couldn't accommodate the magnetic quantum number.
Ultimately, the Bohr model and models based upon it were replaced Wolfgang Pauli's model based on quantum mechanics in 1925. That model was improved to produce the modern model, introduced by Erwin Schrodinger in 1926. Today, the behavior of the hydrogen atom is explained using wave mechanics to describe atomic orbitals.
- Lakhtakia, Akhlesh; Salpeter, Edwin E. (1996). "Models and Modelers of Hydrogen". American Journal of Physics . 65 (9): 933. Bibcode:1997AmJPh..65..933L. doi: 10.1119/1.18691
- Linus Carl Pauling (1970). "Chapter 5-1". General Chemistry (3rd ed.). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co. ISBN 0-486-65622-5.
- Niels Bohr (1913). "On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Part I" (PDF). Philosophical Magazine . 26 (151): 1–24. doi: 10.1080/14786441308634955
- Niels Bohr (1914). "The spectra of helium and hydrogen". Nature . 92 (2295): 231–232. doi:10.1038/092231d0
- How to Calculate Atomic Mass
- Organic Chemistry Prefixes and Suffixes
- What Are the States of Matter?
- Molecular Geometry Introduction
- Basic Model of the Atom and Atomic Theory
- Make an Atom Model
- What Is an Atom?
- What Are Some Examples of Atoms?
- Functional Groups in Organic Chemistry
- Common Functional Groups in Organic Chemistry
- What Is the Atomic Number?
- Geometric Isomerism: Cis and Trans
- 10 Interesting Facts About Atoms
- How Many Protons, Neutrons, and Electrons in an Atom?
- What Is the Difference Between Atomic Radius and Ionic Radius?
- What Is a Skeletal Structure?
CERN Accelerating science
Atomic flashback: A century of the Bohr model
In July 1913, Niels Bohr published the first of a series of three papers introducing his model of the atom
12 July, 2013
By Kelly Izlar
Niels Bohr, a founding member of CERN, signs the inauguration of the Proton Synchrotron on 5 February 1960. On the right are François de Rose and then Director-General Cornelius Jan Bakker (Image: CERN)
The most instantly recognizable image of an atom resembles a miniature solar system with the concentric electron paths forming the planetary orbits and the nucleus at the centre like the sun. In July of 1913, Danish physicist Niels Bohr published the first of a series of three papers introducing this model of the atom, which became known simply as the Bohr atom.
Bohr, one of the pioneers of quantum theory, had taken the atomic model presented a few years earlier by physicist Ernest Rutherford and given it a quantum twist.
Rutherford had made the startling discovery that most of the atom is empty space. The vast majority of its mass is located in a positively charged central nucleus, which is 10,000 times smaller than the atom itself. The dense nucleus is surrounded by a swarm of tiny, negatively charged electrons.
Bohr, who worked for a key period in 1912 in Rutherford’s laboratory in Manchester in the UK, was worried about a few inconsistencies in this model. According to the rules of classical physics, the electrons would eventually spiral down into the nucleus, causing the atom to collapse. Rutherford’s model didn’t account for the stability of atoms, so Bohr turned to the burgeoning field of quantum physics, which deals with the microscopic scale, for answers.
Bohr suggested that instead of buzzing randomly around the nucleus, electrons inhabit orbits situated at a fixed distance away from the nucleus. In this picture, each orbit is associated with a particular energy, and the electron can change orbit by emitting or absorbing energy in discrete chunks (called quanta). In this way, Bohr was able to explain the spectrum of light emitted (or absorbed) by hydrogen, the simplest of all atoms.
Bohr published these ideas in 1913 and over the next decade developed the theory with others to try to explain more complex atoms. In 1922 he was rewarded with the Nobel prize in physics for his work.
However, the model was misleading in several ways and ultimately destined for failure. The maturing field of quantum mechanics revealed that it was impossible to know an electron’s position and velocity simultaneously. Bohr’s well-defined orbits were replaced with probability “clouds” where an electron is likely to be.
But the model paved the way for many scientific advances. All experiments investigating atomic structure - including some at CERN, like those on antihydrogen and other exotic atoms at the Antiproton Decelerator , and at the On-Line Isotope Mass Separator ( ISOLDE) - can be traced back to the revolution in atomic theory that Rutherford and Bohr began a century ago.
"All of atomic and subatomic physics has built on the legacy of these distinguished gentlemen," says University of Liverpool’s Peter Butler who works on ISOLDE.
Related Articles
Unesco awards niels bohr gold medal to cern, also on physics, cosmic count exceeds expectation, alice does the double-slit, na62 announces its first search for long-live..., amber releases its first results, atlas probes uncharted territory with lhc run..., lhcb investigates the properties of one of ph..., lhcb investigates the rare σ+→pμ+μ- decay, going the extra mile to squeeze supersymmetry..., atlas dives deeper into di-higgs.
30.2 Discovery of the Parts of the Atom: Electrons and Nuclei
Learning objectives.
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Describe how electrons were discovered.
- Explain the Millikan oil drop experiment.
- Describe Rutherford’s gold foil experiment.
- Describe Rutherford’s planetary model of the atom.
Just as atoms are a substructure of matter, electrons and nuclei are substructures of the atom. The experiments that were used to discover electrons and nuclei reveal some of the basic properties of atoms and can be readily understood using ideas such as electrostatic and magnetic force, already covered in previous chapters.
Charges and Electromagnetic Forces
In previous discussions, we have noted that positive charge is associated with nuclei and negative charge with electrons. We have also covered many aspects of the electric and magnetic forces that affect charges. We will now explore the discovery of the electron and nucleus as substructures of the atom and examine their contributions to the properties of atoms.
The Electron
Gas discharge tubes, such as that shown in Figure 30.4 , consist of an evacuated glass tube containing two metal electrodes and a rarefied gas. When a high voltage is applied to the electrodes, the gas glows. These tubes were the precursors to today’s neon lights. They were first studied seriously by Heinrich Geissler, a German inventor and glassblower, starting in the 1860s. The English scientist William Crookes, among others, continued to study what for some time were called Crookes tubes, wherein electrons are freed from atoms and molecules in the rarefied gas inside the tube and are accelerated from the cathode (negative) to the anode (positive) by the high potential. These “ cathode rays ” collide with the gas atoms and molecules and excite them, resulting in the emission of electromagnetic (EM) radiation that makes the electrons’ path visible as a ray that spreads and fades as it moves away from the cathode.
Gas discharge tubes today are most commonly called cathode-ray tubes , because the rays originate at the cathode. Crookes showed that the electrons carry momentum (they can make a small paddle wheel rotate). He also found that their normally straight path is bent by a magnet in the direction expected for a negative charge moving away from the cathode. These were the first direct indications of electrons and their charge.
The English physicist J. J. Thomson (1856–1940) improved and expanded the scope of experiments with gas discharge tubes. (See Figure 30.5 and Figure 30.6 .) He verified the negative charge of the cathode rays with both magnetic and electric fields. Additionally, he collected the rays in a metal cup and found an excess of negative charge. Thomson was also able to measure the ratio of the charge of the electron to its mass, q e q e / m e / m e —an important step to finding the actual values of both q e q e and m e m e . Figure 30.7 shows a cathode-ray tube, which produces a narrow beam of electrons that passes through charging plates connected to a high-voltage power supply. An electric field E E is produced between the charging plates, and the cathode-ray tube is placed between the poles of a magnet so that the electric field E E is perpendicular to the magnetic field B B of the magnet. These fields, being perpendicular to each other, produce opposing forces on the electrons. As discussed for mass spectrometers in More Applications of Magnetism , if the net force due to the fields vanishes, then the velocity of the charged particle is v = E / B v = E / B . In this manner, Thomson determined the velocity of the electrons and then moved the beam up and down by adjusting the electric field.
To see how the amount of deflection is used to calculate q e / m e q e / m e , note that the deflection is proportional to the electric force on the electron:
But the vertical deflection is also related to the electron’s mass, since the electron’s acceleration is
The value of F F is not known, since q e q e was not yet known. Substituting the expression for electric force into the expression for acceleration yields
Gathering terms, we have
The deflection is analyzed to get a a , and E E is determined from the applied voltage and distance between the plates; thus, q e m e q e m e can be determined. With the velocity known, another measurement of q e m e q e m e can be obtained by bending the beam of electrons with the magnetic field. Since F mag = q e vB = m e a F mag = q e vB = m e a , we have q e / m e = a / vB q e / m e = a / vB . Consistent results are obtained using magnetic deflection.
What is so important about q e / m e q e / m e , the ratio of the electron’s charge to its mass? The value obtained is
This is a huge number, as Thomson realized, and it implies that the electron has a very small mass. It was known from electroplating that about 10 8 C/kg 10 8 C/kg is needed to plate a material, a factor of about 1000 less than the charge per kilogram of electrons. Thomson went on to do the same experiment for positively charged hydrogen ions (now known to be bare protons) and found a charge per kilogram about 1000 times smaller than that for the electron, implying that the proton is about 1000 times more massive than the electron. Today, we know more precisely that
where q p q p is the charge of the proton and m p m p is its mass. This ratio (to four significant figures) is 1836 times less charge per kilogram than for the electron. Since the charges of electrons and protons are equal in magnitude, this implies m p = 1836 m e m p = 1836 m e .
Thomson performed a variety of experiments using differing gases in discharge tubes and employing other methods, such as the photoelectric effect, for freeing electrons from atoms. He always found the same properties for the electron, proving it to be an independent particle. For his work, the important pieces of which he began to publish in 1897, Thomson was awarded the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics. In retrospect, it is difficult to appreciate how astonishing it was to find that the atom has a substructure. Thomson himself said, “It was only when I was convinced that the experiment left no escape from it that I published my belief in the existence of bodies smaller than atoms.”
Thomson attempted to measure the charge of individual electrons, but his method could determine its charge only to the order of magnitude expected.
Since Faraday’s experiments with electroplating in the 1830s, it had been known that about 100,000 C per mole was needed to plate singly ionized ions. Dividing this by the number of ions per mole (that is, by Avogadro’s number), which was approximately known, the charge per ion was calculated to be about 1 . 6 × 10 − 19 C 1 . 6 × 10 − 19 C , close to the actual value.
An American physicist, Robert Millikan (1868–1953) (see Figure 30.8 ), decided to improve upon Thomson’s experiment for measuring q e q e and was eventually forced to try another approach, which is now a classic experiment performed by students. The Millikan oil drop experiment is shown in Figure 30.9 .
In the Millikan oil drop experiment, fine drops of oil are sprayed from an atomizer. Some of these are charged by the process and can then be suspended between metal plates by a voltage between the plates. In this situation, the weight of the drop is balanced by the electric force:
The electric field is produced by the applied voltage, hence, E = V / d E = V / d , and V V is adjusted to just balance the drop’s weight. The drops can be seen as points of reflected light using a microscope, but they are too small to directly measure their size and mass. The mass of the drop is determined by observing how fast it falls when the voltage is turned off. Since air resistance is very significant for these submicroscopic drops, the more massive drops fall faster than the less massive, and sophisticated sedimentation calculations can reveal their mass. Oil is used rather than water, because it does not readily evaporate, and so mass is nearly constant. Once the mass of the drop is known, the charge of the electron is given by rearranging the previous equation:
where d d is the separation of the plates and V V is the voltage that holds the drop motionless. (The same drop can be observed for several hours to see that it really is motionless.) By 1913 Millikan had measured the charge of the electron q e q e to an accuracy of 1%, and he improved this by a factor of 10 within a few years to a value of − 1 . 60 × 10 − 19 C − 1 . 60 × 10 − 19 C . He also observed that all charges were multiples of the basic electron charge and that sudden changes could occur in which electrons were added or removed from the drops. For this very fundamental direct measurement of q e q e and for his studies of the photoelectric effect, Millikan was awarded the 1923 Nobel Prize in Physics.
With the charge of the electron known and the charge-to-mass ratio known, the electron’s mass can be calculated. It is
Substituting known values yields
where the round-off errors have been corrected. The mass of the electron has been verified in many subsequent experiments and is now known to an accuracy of better than one part in one million. It is an incredibly small mass and remains the smallest known mass of any particle that has mass. (Some particles, such as photons, are massless and cannot be brought to rest, but travel at the speed of light.) A similar calculation gives the masses of other particles, including the proton. To three digits, the mass of the proton is now known to be
which is nearly identical to the mass of a hydrogen atom. What Thomson and Millikan had done was to prove the existence of one substructure of atoms, the electron, and further to show that it had only a tiny fraction of the mass of an atom. The nucleus of an atom contains most of its mass, and the nature of the nucleus was completely unanticipated.
Another important characteristic of quantum mechanics was also beginning to emerge. All electrons are identical to one another. The charge and mass of electrons are not average values; rather, they are unique values that all electrons have. This is true of other fundamental entities at the submicroscopic level. All protons are identical to one another, and so on.
The Nucleus
Here, we examine the first direct evidence of the size and mass of the nucleus. In later chapters, we will examine many other aspects of nuclear physics, but the basic information on nuclear size and mass is so important to understanding the atom that we consider it here.
Nuclear radioactivity was discovered in 1896, and it was soon the subject of intense study by a number of the best scientists in the world. Among them was New Zealander Lord Ernest Rutherford, who made numerous fundamental discoveries and earned the title of “father of nuclear physics.” Born in Nelson, Rutherford did his postgraduate studies at the Cavendish Laboratories in England before taking up a position at McGill University in Canada where he did the work that earned him a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1908. In the area of atomic and nuclear physics, there is much overlap between chemistry and physics, with physics providing the fundamental enabling theories. He returned to England in later years and had six future Nobel Prize winners as students. Rutherford used nuclear radiation to directly examine the size and mass of the atomic nucleus. The experiment he devised is shown in Figure 30.10 . A radioactive source that emits alpha radiation was placed in a lead container with a hole in one side to produce a beam of alpha particles, which are a type of ionizing radiation ejected by the nuclei of a radioactive source. A thin gold foil was placed in the beam, and the scattering of the alpha particles was observed by the glow they caused when they struck a phosphor screen.
Alpha particles were known to be the doubly charged positive nuclei of helium atoms that had kinetic energies on the order of 5 MeV 5 MeV when emitted in nuclear decay, which is the disintegration of the nucleus of an unstable nuclide by the spontaneous emission of charged particles. These particles interact with matter mostly via the Coulomb force, and the manner in which they scatter from nuclei can reveal nuclear size and mass. This is analogous to observing how a bowling ball is scattered by an object you cannot see directly. Because the alpha particle’s energy is so large compared with the typical energies associated with atoms ( MeV MeV versus eV eV ), you would expect the alpha particles to simply crash through a thin foil much like a supersonic bowling ball would crash through a few dozen rows of bowling pins. Thomson had envisioned the atom to be a small sphere in which equal amounts of positive and negative charge were distributed evenly. The incident massive alpha particles would suffer only small deflections in such a model. Instead, Rutherford and his collaborators found that alpha particles occasionally were scattered to large angles, some even back in the direction from which they came! Detailed analysis using conservation of momentum and energy—particularly of the small number that came straight back—implied that gold nuclei are very small compared with the size of a gold atom, contain almost all of the atom’s mass, and are tightly bound. Since the gold nucleus is several times more massive than the alpha particle, a head-on collision would scatter the alpha particle straight back toward the source. In addition, the smaller the nucleus, the fewer alpha particles that would hit one head on.
Although the results of the experiment were published by his colleagues in 1909, it took Rutherford two years to convince himself of their meaning. Like Thomson before him, Rutherford was reluctant to accept such radical results. Nature on a small scale is so unlike our classical world that even those at the forefront of discovery are sometimes surprised. Rutherford later wrote: “It was almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you. On consideration, I realized that this scattering backwards ... [meant] ... the greatest part of the mass of the atom was concentrated in a tiny nucleus.” In 1911, Rutherford published his analysis together with a proposed model of the atom. The size of the nucleus was determined to be about 10 − 15 m 10 − 15 m , or 100,000 times smaller than the atom. This implies a huge density, on the order of 10 15 g/cm 3 10 15 g/cm 3 , vastly unlike any macroscopic matter. Also implied is the existence of previously unknown nuclear forces to counteract the huge repulsive Coulomb forces among the positive charges in the nucleus. Huge forces would also be consistent with the large energies emitted in nuclear radiation.
The small size of the nucleus also implies that the atom is mostly empty inside. In fact, in Rutherford’s experiment, most alphas went straight through the gold foil with very little scattering, since electrons have such small masses and since the atom was mostly empty with nothing for the alpha to hit. There were already hints of this at the time Rutherford performed his experiments, since energetic electrons had been observed to penetrate thin foils more easily than expected. Figure 30.11 shows a schematic of the atoms in a thin foil with circles representing the size of the atoms (about 10 − 10 m 10 − 10 m ) and dots representing the nuclei. (The dots are not to scale—if they were, you would need a microscope to see them.) Most alpha particles miss the small nuclei and are only slightly scattered by electrons. Occasionally, (about once in 8000 times in Rutherford’s experiment), an alpha hits a nucleus head-on and is scattered straight backward.
Based on the size and mass of the nucleus revealed by his experiment, as well as the mass of electrons, Rutherford proposed the planetary model of the atom . The planetary model of the atom pictures low-mass electrons orbiting a large-mass nucleus. The sizes of the electron orbits are large compared with the size of the nucleus, with mostly vacuum inside the atom. This picture is analogous to how low-mass planets in our solar system orbit the large-mass Sun at distances large compared with the size of the sun. In the atom, the attractive Coulomb force is analogous to gravitation in the planetary system. (See Figure 30.12 .) Note that a model or mental picture is needed to explain experimental results, since the atom is too small to be directly observed with visible light.
Rutherford’s planetary model of the atom was crucial to understanding the characteristics of atoms, and their interactions and energies, as we shall see in the next few sections. Also, it was an indication of how different nature is from the familiar classical world on the small, quantum mechanical scale. The discovery of a substructure to all matter in the form of atoms and molecules was now being taken a step further to reveal a substructure of atoms that was simpler than the 92 elements then known. We have continued to search for deeper substructures, such as those inside the nucleus, with some success. In later chapters, we will follow this quest in the discussion of quarks and other elementary particles, and we will look at the direction the search seems now to be heading.
PhET Explorations
Rutherford scattering.
How did Rutherford figure out the structure of the atom without being able to see it? Simulate the famous experiment in which he disproved the Plum Pudding model of the atom by observing alpha particles bouncing off atoms and determining that they must have a small core.
This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.
Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.
Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/college-physics-2e/pages/1-introduction-to-science-and-the-realm-of-physics-physical-quantities-and-units
- Authors: Paul Peter Urone, Roger Hinrichs
- Publisher/website: OpenStax
- Book title: College Physics 2e
- Publication date: Jul 13, 2022
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/college-physics-2e/pages/1-introduction-to-science-and-the-realm-of-physics-physical-quantities-and-units
- Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/college-physics-2e/pages/30-2-discovery-of-the-parts-of-the-atom-electrons-and-nuclei
© Jul 9, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.
The History of the Atomic Model: Rutherford and Bohr
The work of J.J Thomson’s student, Ernest Rutherford, led to the discovery of the Proton. Working with alpha particles fired at a piece of gold foil it was observed that instead of passing straight through it was scattered. Suggesting there was something large in the centre of the atom.
The plum pudding model did not last long however, in 1909 a former pupil of Thomson’s, Ernest Rutherford discovered that the atom itself had a mass of positive charge at the centre, contrary to the plum pudding model. It was through the Geiger Marsden experiment that Rutherford made this conclusion. In this experiment alpha particles were fired at a sheet of gold foil and the scattering of the alpha particles measured on fluorescent paper. The scientists predicted that that as a plum pudding model the alpha particles would go through the gold foil in a straight line, but what they discovered was that it was scattered everywhere. This led the scientists to the conclusion that at the centre of the atom was a large positive mass and Rutherford suggested a planetary model where electrons moved around this central mass like the planets around the sun.
Rutherford further followed this up in 1917 when he proved that a hydrogen nucleus (1 proton) is present in other nuclei of different elements most notably nitrogen gas in the air. Rutherford conducted a number of experiments with hydrogen nuclei and nitrogen in air using alpha particles and after a number of theories concluded that the hydrogen atom made up other atoms. He named this new fundamental particle as a proton. Now the atomic model had a central particle and electrons around it, reversing he plum pudding model of Thomson.
It was not until the earlier 20th Century that the scientific community arrived at the modern day atomic model. Max Planck and Albert Einstein in the field of physics postulated that light energy can be absorbed and emitted as quanta. This theory was adopted by Niels Bohr in 1913 who theorised that electrons could orbit the nucleus in a circular orbits and that the distance of the electron to the nucleus was fixed unless it moved between energy levels with the absorption or emission of light. This conclusion led to the theory that electrons exist in energy levels around the positive nucleus and have their own distinct properties in each of their energy levels.
About the Author
Nathan has a degree in BSc Biomedical Chemistry at Warwick University and a degree in PGCE Science at Wolverhampton University, UK. Nathan's subject matter ranges from general chemistry and organic chemistry. Nathan also created the curriculum on Breaking Atom in the course page.
Terms in section
Corpuscularism was a theory proposed by Descartes that all matter was composed of tiny particles.
Rene Descartes was a famous mathematician and philosopher of the 16th century who hypothesised the theory of corpuscularism about the atom
Luster is a term for a reflective surface that reflects light giving a shiny appearance.
Semi conductors is a term to describe metalloids that are able to conduct a current when electrical energy is applied due to the movement of electrons but the conductivity measurements are not as high as metals due to fewer electrons to carry a charge or a less ordered structure.
An ionic compound is a bond that forms between metals and non metals to form a large ionic lattice
Nuclear fusion is a process which occurs in. the sun. Hydrogen atoms under a lot of heat and pressure are forced together to make a larger atom of helium
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is used to describe the relationship between the momentum and position of an electron. Where by if the exact position of the electron is known the momentum will be uncertain.
Werner Heisenberg was a German physicist who was a pioneer in the field of quantum mechanics. He devised the principle of uncertainty relating to the momentum and position of an electron.
Lobes refers to the shape of electron waves and the area of highest probability of where that electron as a particle would be found.
The Pauli Exclusion refers to the theory that each electron can only have a unique set of the 4 quantum numbers and no two electrons can have the same quantum numbers
Quantum numbers is a term used to describe the assigning of numbers to electrons as a mathematical function to describe their momentum and energy.
The Bohr model refers to the treatment of electrons as particles that orbit the nucleus.
The term quantum mechanics refers to energy levels and the theoretical area of physics and chemistry where mathematics is used to explain the behaviour of subatomic particles.
A trough is the lowest point on a transverse wave.
A peak is the highest point on a transverse wave.
Vibrational modes is a term used to describe the constant motion in a molecule. Usually these are vibrations, rotations and translations.
Erwin Schrodinger was an Austrian physicist who used mathematical models to enhance the Bohr model of the electron and created an equation to predicted the likelihood of finding an electron in a given position.
The alkali metals, found in group 1 of the periodic table (formally known as group IA), are so reactive that they are generally found in nature combined with other elements. The alkali metals are shiny, soft, highly reactive metals at standard temperature and pressure.
Alkaline earth metals is the second most reactive group of elements in the periodic table. They are found in group 2 of the periodic table (formally known as group IIA).
Unknown elements (or transactinides) are the heaviest elements of the periodic table. These are meitnerium (Mt, atomic number 109), darmstadtium (Ds, atomic number 110), roentgenium (Rg, atomic number 111), nihonium (Nh, atomic number 113), moscovium (Mc, atomic number 115), livermorium (Lv, atomic number 116) and tennessine (Ts, atomic number 117).
The post-transition metals are the ones found between the transition metals (to the left) and the metalloids (to the right). They include aluminium (Al), gallium (Ga), indium (In), thallium (Tl), tin (Sn), lead (Pb) and bismuth (Bi).
Oganesson (Og) is a radioactive element that has the atomic number 118 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is in Group 18. It has the symbol Og.
Tennessine (Ts) is a radioactive element that has the atomic number 117 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is in Group 17. It has the symbol Ts.
Livermorium (Lv) is a radioactive element that has the atomic number 116 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is in Group 16. It has the symbol Lv.
Moscovium (Mc) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 115 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is in Group 15. It has the symbol Mc.
Flerovium (Fl) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 114 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is in Group 14. It has the symbol Fl.
Nihonium (Nh) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 112 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is in Group 13. It has the symbol Nh.
Copernicium (Cr) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 112 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 11. It has the symbol Rg.
Roentgenium (Rg) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 111 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 11. It has the symbol Rg.
Darmstadtium (Ds) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 110 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 10. It has the symbol Ds
Meitnerium (Mt) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 109 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 9. It has the symbol Mt.
Hassium (Hs) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 108 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 8. It has the symbol Hs.
Bohrium (Bh) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 107 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 7. It has the symbol Bh.
Seaborgium (Sg) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 106 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 6. It has the symbol Sg.
Dubnium (Db) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 105 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 5. It has the symbol Db.
Rutherfordium (Rf) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 104 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is a Transition metal in Group 4. It has the symbol Rf.
Lawrencium (Lr) is a silvery-white colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 103 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Lr.
Nobelium (No) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 102 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol No.
Mendelevium (Md) is a radioactive metal that has the atomic number 101 in the periodic table, its appearance is not fully known due to the minuscule amounts produced of it. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Md.
Fermium (Fm) is a silvery-white colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 100 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Fm.
Einsteinium (Es) is a silvery-white colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 99 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Es.
Californium (Cf) is a silvery-white colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 98 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Cf.
Berkelium (Bk) is a silvery colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 97 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Bk.
Curium (Cm) is a silvery-white colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 96 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Cm.
Americium (Am) is a silvery colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 95 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Am.
Plutonium (Pu) is a silvery colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 94 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Pu.
Neptunium (Np) is a silvery colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 93 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Np.
Protactinium (Pa) is a shiny silver colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 91 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Pa.
Thorium (Th) is a silvery-white colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 90 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Th.
Actinium (Ac) is a silvery colored radioactive metal that has the atomic number 89 in the periodic table. It is an Actinoid Metal with the symbol Ac.
Radium (Ra) is a silvery-white colored metal that has the atomic number 88 in the periodic table. It is an Alkaline earth Metal with the symbol Ra and is located in Group 2 of the periodic table.
Francium (Fr) is thought to be a gray colored metal that has the atomic number 87 in the periodic table. It is an Alkali Metal with the symbol Fr and is located in Group 1 of the periodic table.
Radon (Rn) is a colourless, odourless, radioactive gas non-metal that has the atomic number 86 in the periodic table in Group 18. It has the symbol Rn.
Astatine (At) is a radioactive non-metal that has the atomic number 85 in the periodic table in Group 17. It has the symbol At.
Polonium (Po) is a silvery-gray metal that has the atomic number 84 in the periodic table in Group 16. It has the symbol Po.
Bismuth (Bi) is a hard steel-gray metal that has the atomic number 83 in the periodic table in Group 15. It has the symbol Bi.
Lead (Pb) is a soft gray metal that has the atomic number 82 in the periodic table in Group 14. It has the symbol Pb.
Thallium (Tl) is a soft gray metal that has the atomic number 81 in the periodic table in Group 13. It has the symbol Tl.
Mercury (Hg) is a liquid silver coloured metal that has the atomic number 80 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 12. It has the symbol Hg.
Gold (Au) is a soft gold coloured metal that has the atomic number 79 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 11. It has the symbol Au.
Platinum (Pt) is a heavy white metal that has the atomic number 78 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 10. It has the symbol Pt.
Iridium (Ir) is a heavy white metal that has the atomic number 77 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 9. It has the symbol Ir.
Osmium (Os) is a hard fine black powder or blue-white metal that has the atomic number 76 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 8. It has the symbol Os.
Rhenium (Re) is a silvery-white coloured metal that has the atomic number 75 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 7. It has the symbol Re.
Tungsten (W) is a steel-gray coloured metal that has the atomic number 74 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 6. It has the symbol W.
Tantalum (Ta) is a gray coloured metal that has the atomic number 73 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 5. It has the symbol Ta.
Hafnium (Hf) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 72 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal in Group 4. It has the symbol Hf.
Lutetium (Lu) is a silvery-white coloured metal that has the atomic number 71 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Lu.
Ytterbium (Yb) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 70 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Yb.
Thulium (Tm) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 69 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Tm.
Erbium (Er) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 68 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Er.
Holmium (Ho) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 67 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Ho.
Dysprosium (Dy) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 66 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Dy.
Terbium (Tb) is a silvery-gray coloured metal that has the atomic number 65 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Tb.
Gadolinium (Gd) is a silvery-white coloured metal that has the atomic number 64 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Gd.
Europium (Eu) is a silvery-white coloured metal that has the atomic number 63 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Eu.
Samarium (Sm) is a silvery coloured metal that has the atomic number 62 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Sm.
Promethium (Pm) is a rare metal that has the atomic number 61 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Pm.
Neodymium (Nd) is a silvery white coloured metal that has the atomic number 60 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Nd.
Praseodymium (Pr) is a silvery white coloured metal that has the atomic number 59 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Pr.
Cerium (Ce) is a iron-gray coloured metal that has the atomic number 58 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol Ce.
Lanthanum (La) is a soft silvery white coloured metal that has the atomic number 57 in the periodic table. It is a Lanthanide metal. It has the symbol La.
Barium (Ba) is a soft silvery white coloured metal that has the atomic number 56 in the periodic table. It is an Alkaline earth metal and is located in Group 2 of the periodic table. it has the symbol Ba.
Caesium (Cs) is a soft gray coloured metal that has the atomic number 55 in the periodic table. It is an Alkali Metal and is located in Group 1 of the periodic table. it has the symbol Cs.
Xenon (Xe) exists as a colourless, odourless gas and is chemically inert. It has the atomic number 54 in the periodic table and belongs in Group 18, the Noble Gases. It is a non metal with the symbol Xe.
Iodine (I) is a purple grey solid non metal. It has the atomic number 53 in the periodic table. It is located in Group 17, the Halogens. It has the symbol I.
Tellurium (Te) is a silver-white semi metal that has the atomic number 52 in the periodic table. It is located in Group 16 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Te.
Antimony (Sb) is a hard brittle silver-white semi metal that has the atomic number 51 in the periodic table. It is located in Group 15 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Sb.
Tin (Sn) is a silver-white metal that has the atomic number 50 in the periodic table. It is located in Group 14 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Sn.
Indium (In) is a silver-white metal that has the atomic number 49 in the periodic table. It is located in Group 13 of the periodic table. It has the symbol In.
Cadmium (Cd) is a blue-white metal that has the atomic number 48 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 12 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Cd.
Silver (Ag) is a silver metal that has the atomic number 47 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 11 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Ag.
Palladium (Pd) is a silver-white metal that has the atomic number 46 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 10 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Pd.
Rhodium (Rh) is a brittle silver-white metal that has the atomic number 45 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 9 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Rh.
Ruthenium (Ru) is a brittle silver-gray metal that has the atomic number 44 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 8 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Ru.
Technetium (Tc) is a silvery-gray metal that has the atomic number 43 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 7 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Tc.
Molybdenum (Mo) is a silvery-white metal that has the atomic number 42 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 6 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Mb.
Niobium (Nb) is a shiny white metal that has the atomic number 41 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 5 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Nb.
Zirconium (Zr) is a gray white metal that has the atomic number 40 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 4 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Zr.
Yttrium (Y) is a silvery metal that has the atomic number 39 in the periodic table. It is a Transition metal and located in Group 3 of the periodic table. It has the symbol Y.
The plum pudding model was suggested as the first atomic model by J.J Thomson where he suggested that the atom was a sea of positive charge that surrounded small negative electrons
Ernest Rutherford was a British physicist who by experimenting with gold foil and alpha particles found that there was a large central mass at the centre of the atom with a positive charge.
The Geiger Marsden experiment was conducted by two research partners of Ernest Rutherford where alpha particles were fired at a sheet of gold foil and were deflected in all directions.
Alpha particles are made of 2 protons and 2 neutrons released from a nucleus when it breaks apart
Max Planck was a German physicist who discovered that energy that is emitted is released in small packets called quanta. He related the amount of energy released to the frequency of the wave.
Albert Einstein was a German physicist who was pivotal in many scientific discoveries in his life. He contributed to the field of chemistry through his work on the photoelectric effect and mathematics of the atom.
Quanta is the plural term for quantum which means a small packet of energy. For example a photon is defined as a small packet of energy of light.
Niels Bohr was a Danish physicist who made many leaps in theoretical chemistry using mathematical modelling. He developed the model of electrons existing in shells or energy levels.
The nucleus is the term given to the centre of the atom comprising of the proton and neutron
An orbit is the circular or dumbbell shaped motion that the electrons follow around the nucleus. Much like the planets orbiting the sun
The History of the Atomic Model: Chadwick and the Neutron
The History of the Atomic Model: Thomson and the Plum Pudding
Periodic tables.
has been derived from Benjamin Crowell's series of free introductory textbooks on physics. See the for more information.... |
| | |
|
The stage was now set for the unexpected discovery that the positively charged part of the atom was a tiny, dense lump at the atom's center rather than the "cookie dough" of the raisin cookie model. By 1909, Rutherford was an established professor, and had students working under him. For a raw undergraduate named Marsden, he picked a research project he thought would be tedious but straightforward.
It was already known that although alpha particles would be stopped completely by a sheet of paper, they could pass through a sufficiently thin metal foil. Marsden was to work with a foil only 1000 atoms thick. (The foil was probably made by evaporating a little gold in a vacuum chamber so that a thin layer would be deposited on a glass microscope slide. The foil would then be lifted off the slide by submerging the slide in water.)
Rutherford had already determined in his previous experiments the speed of the alpha particles emitted by , a fantastic 1.5x10 m/s. The experimenters in Rutherford's group visualized them as very small, very fast cannonballs penetrating the "cookie dough" part of the big gold atoms. A piece of paper has a thickness of a hundred thousand atoms or so, which would be sufficient to stop them completely, but crashing through a thousand would only slow them a little and turn them slightly off of their original paths.
Marsden's supposedly ho-hum assignment was to use the apparatus shown in the figure to measure how often alpha particles were deflected at various angles. A tiny lump of radium in a box emitted alpha particles, and a thin beam was created by blocking all the alphas except those that happened to pass out through a tube. Typically deflected in the gold by only a small amount, they would reach a screen very much like the screen of a TV's picture tube, which would make a flash of light when it was hit. Here is the first example we have encountered of an experiment in which a beam of particles is detected one at a time. This was possible because each alpha particle carried so much kinetic energy; they were moving at about the same speed as the electrons in the Thomson experiment, but had ten thousand times more mass. Marsden sat in a dark room, watching the apparatus hour after hour and recording the number of flashes with the screen moved to various angles. The rate of the flashes was highest when he set the screen at an angle close to the line of the alphas' original path, but if he watched an area farther off to the side, he would also occasionally see an alpha that had been deflected through a larger angle. After seeing a few of these, he got the crazy idea of moving the screen to see if even larger angles ever occurred, perhaps even angles larger than 90 degrees.
The crazy idea worked: a few alpha particles were deflected through angles of up to 180 degrees, and the routine experiment had become an epochmaking one. Rutherford said, "We have been able to get some of the alpha particles coming backwards. It was almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you." Explanations were hard to come by in the raisin cookie model. What intense electrical forces could have caused some of the alpha particles, moving at such astronomical speeds, to change direction so drastically? Since each gold atom was electrically neutral, it would not exert much force on an alpha particle outside it. True, if the alpha particle was very near to or inside of a particular atom, then the forces would not necessarily cancel out perfectly; if the alpha particle happened to come very close to a particular electron, the 1/r form of the Coulomb force law would make for a very strong force. But Marsden and Rutherford knew that an alpha particle was 8000 times more massive than an electron, and it is simply not possible for a more massive object to rebound backwards from a collision with a less massive object while conserving momentum and energy. It might be possible in principle for a particular alpha to follow a path that took it very close to one electron, and then very close to another electron, and so on, with the net result of a large deflection, but careful calculations showed that such multiple "close encounters" with electrons would be millions of times too rare to explain what was actually observed.
At this point, Rutherford and Marsden dusted off an unpopular and neglected model of the atom, in which all the electrons orbited around a small, positively charged core or "nucleus," just like the planets orbiting around the sun. All the positive charge and nearly all the mass of the atom would be concentrated in the nucleus, rather than spread throughout the atom as in the raisin cookie model. The positively charged alpha particles would be repelled by the gold atom's nucleus, but most of the alphas would not come close enough to any nucleus to have their paths drastically altered. The few that did come close to a nucleus, however, could rebound back-wards from a single such encounter, since the nucleus of a heavy gold atom would be fifty times more massive than an alpha particle. It turned out that it was not even too difficult to derive a formula giving the relative frequency of deflections through various angles, and this calculation agreed with the data well enough (to within 15%), considering the difficulty in getting good experimental statistics on the rare, very large angles.
What had started out as a tedious exercise to get a student started in science had ended as a revolution in our understanding of nature. Indeed, the whole thing may sound a little too much like a moralistic fable of the scientific method with overtones of the Horatio Alger genre. The skeptical reader may wonder why the planetary model was ignored so thoroughly until Marsden and Rutherford's discovery. Is science really more of a sociological enterprise, in which certain ideas become accepted by the establishment, and other, equally plausible explanations are arbitrarily discarded? Some social scientists are currently ruffling a lot of scientists' feathers with critiques very much like this, but in this particular case, there were very sound reasons for rejecting the planetary model. As you'll learn in more detail later in this course, any charged particle that undergoes an acceleration dissipates energy in the form of light. In the planetary model, the electrons were orbiting the nucleus in circles or ellipses, which meant they were undergoing acceleration, just like the acceleration you feel in a car going around a curve. They should have dissipated energy as light, and eventually they should have lost all their energy. Atoms don't spontaneously collapse like that, which was why the raisin cookie model, with its stationary electrons, was originally preferred. There were other problems as well. In the planetary model, the one-electron atom would have to be flat, which would be inconsistent with the success of molecular modeling with spherical balls representing hydrogen and atoms. These molecular models also seemed to work best if specific sizes were used for different atoms, but there is no obvious reason in the planetary model why the radius of an electron's orbit should be a fixed number. In view of the conclusive Marsden-Ruther-ford results, however, these became fresh puzzles in atomic physics, not reasons for disbelieving the planetary model.
The planetary model may not be the ultimate, perfect model of the atom, but don't underestimate its power. It already allows us to visualize correctly a great many phenomena.
As an example, let's consider the distinctions among nonmetals, metals that are magnetic, and metals that are nonmagnetic. As shown in the figures, a metal differs from a nonmetal because its outermost electrons are free to wander rather than owing their allegiance to a particular atom. A metal that can be magnetized is one that is willing to line up the rotations of some of its electrons so that their axes are parallel. Recall that magnetic forces are forces made by moving charges; we have not yet discussed the mathematics and geometry of magnetic forces, but it is easy to see how random orientations of the atoms in the nonmagnetic substance would lead to cancellation of the forces.
Even if the planetary model does not immediately answer such questions as why one element would be a metal and another a nonmetal, these ideas would be difficult or impossible to conceptualize in the raisin cookie model.
A | In reality, charges of the same type repel one another and charges of different types are attracted. Suppose the rules were the other way around, giving repulsion between opposite charges and attraction between similar ones. What would the universe be like? |
KentChemistry HOME
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The gold-foil experiment showed that the atom consists of a small, massive, positively charged nucleus with the negatively charged electrons being at a great distance from the centre. Niels Bohr built upon Rutherford's model to make his own. In Bohr's model the orbits of the electrons were explained by quantum mechanics.
The Rutherford model was devised by Ernest Rutherford to describe an atom. Rutherford directed the Geiger-Marsden experiment in 1909, which suggested, upon Rutherford's 1911 analysis, that J. J. Thomson 's plum pudding model of the atom was incorrect. Rutherford's new model [ 1] for the atom, based on the experimental results, contained new ...
The Bohr model or Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom is a cake or planetary model that describes the structure of atoms mainly in terms of quantum theory. It's called a planetary or cake model because electrons orbit the atomic nucleus like planets orbit the Sun, while the circular electron orbits form shells, like the layers of a cake.
Bohr model, description of the structure of atoms, especially that of hydrogen, proposed (1913) by the Danish physicist Niels Bohr. The Bohr model of the atom, a radical departure from earlier, classical descriptions, was the first that incorporated quantum theory and was the predecessor of wholly quantum-mechanical models. The Bohr model and ...
Rutherford's atomic model or planetary model of the atom is a model proposed by Ernest Rutherford. In 1909 the Geiger and Marsden experiment was performed, also known as the Rutherford experiment, as it was led by Rutherford himself. The Rutherford scattering observed in the investigation suggested that the early "Panettone" and "Saturnian ...
The simplest example of the Bohr Model is for the hydrogen atom (Z = 1) or for a hydrogen-like ion (Z > 1), in which a negatively charged electron orbits a small positively charged nucleus. Electromagnetic energy will be absorbed or emitted if an electron moves from one orbit to another. Only certain electron orbits are permitted.
Bohr model in 1921 [4] after Sommerfeld expansion of 1913 model showing maximum electrons per shell with shells labeled in X-ray notation. In the early 20th century, experiments by Ernest Rutherford established that atoms consisted of a diffuse cloud of negatively charged electrons surrounding a small, dense, positively charged nucleus. [5] Given this experimental data, Rutherford naturally ...
The most instantly recognizable image of an atom resembles a miniature solar system with the concentric electron paths forming the planetary orbits and the nucleus at the centre like the sun. In July of 1913, Danish physicist Niels Bohr published the first of a series of three papers introducing this model of the atom, which became known simply as the Bohr atom.
Bohr's model calculated the following energies for an electron in the shell, n. . : E ( n) = − 1 n 2 ⋅ 13.6 eV. Bohr explained the hydrogen spectrum in terms of electrons absorbing and emitting photons to change energy levels, where the photon energy is. h ν = Δ E = ( 1 n l o w 2 − 1 n h i g h 2) ⋅ 13.6 eV.
The experiment that Rutherford designed is shown in Figure 22.2. ... The planetary model of the atom pictures low-mass electrons orbiting a large-mass nucleus. The sizes of the electron orbits are large compared with the size of the nucleus, and most of the atom is a vacuum. The model is analogous to how low-mass planets in our solar system ...
In 1913, Danish physicist Niels Bohr applied Max Planck's quantum theory to the nuclear atom of Ernest Rutherford, thus formulating the well-known planetary model of the atom, wherein electrons orbit a central nucleus in well-defined levels of energy ( Figure 1 ). Note that Bohr stated that electrons in the atom follow elliptical orbits (not ...
Explain the Millikan oil drop experiment. Describe Rutherford's gold foil experiment. Describe Rutherford's planetary model of the atom. Just as atoms are a substructure of matter, electrons and nuclei are substructures of the atom. The experiments that were used to discover electrons and nuclei reveal some of the basic properties of atoms ...
The plum pudding model did not last long however, in 1909 a former pupil of Thomson's, Ernest Rutherford discovered that the atom itself had a mass of positive charge at the centre, contrary to the plum pudding model. It was through the Geiger Marsden experiment that Rutherford made this conclusion.
The Planetary Model of the Atom. Ernest Rutherford. The stage was now set for the unexpected discovery that the positively charged part of the atom was a tiny, dense lump at the atom's center rather than the "cookie dough" of the raisin cookie model. By 1909, Rutherford was an established professor, and had students working under him.
The Planetary Model 5. Key features of Rutherford ... Rutherford proposed a novel atomic model based on the findings of the Geiger-Marsden experiment. His model suggested that an atom consisted of ...
In 1913 Bohr published a theory about the structure of the atom based on an earlier theory of Rutherford's. Rutherford had shown that the atom consisted of a positively charged nucleus, with negatively charged electrons in orbit around it. Bohr expanded upon this theory by proposing that electrons travel only in certain successively larger ...
What Is Bohr's Atomic Theory? Niel Bohr's Atomic Theory states that - an atom is like a planetary model where electrons were situated in discretely energized orbits. The atom would radiate a photon when an excited electron would jump down from a higher orbit to a lower orbit. The difference between the energies of those orbits would be ...
That's why his model is called the planetary model. Rutherford didn't know exactly where or how electrons orbit the nucleus. That research would be undertaken by later scientists, beginning with Niels Bohr in 1913. New and improved atomic models would also be developed. Nonetheless, Rutherford's model is still often used to represent the ...
The Nagaoka model is also known as the Saturnian atomic model or planetary model. This atomic model is a hypothetical model of the atomic structure, unlike Thomson's raisin pudding model. ... In March 1924, he described experiments where he claimed to have obtained one milligram of gold and some platinum. The discovery was made by subjecting ...
6. According to Rutherford, most of the atom's mass is concentrated in the electrons. True | False. 7. Ernest Rutherford won the Noble Prize for his model of the atom. True | False. 8. An atom ...
Model Validation Confirming the accuracy of their model, the team reported an X-ray drop in flux over a span of two months, starting on August 14, 2023. This sudden change can be interpreted as ...
This work details the design of a sliced-cone model with a flap embedded within the slice. The flap is controlled by a fast acting servo to simulate a control force of a hypersonic vehicle. Design considerations such as sensor placement, expected loading, servo arm selection, and cavity temperatures are detailed in this work. Such a design imparts a dynamic response of the test article and as ...
"Vira combines the speed and efficiency of consumer graphics modelers with the scientific accuracy of GIANT," Gnam said. "This tool will allow scientists to quickly model complex environments like planetary surfaces." The Vira modeling engine is being used to assist with the development of LuNaMaps (Lunar Navigation Maps).
Surveying the convoluted amalgamation of equipment in his windowless lab at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory the other day, Kevin P. Hand, a planetary scientist and astrobiologist, said he sees ...
In another case, its experiments took too long to complete, hitting our timeout limit. Instead of making its code run faster, it simply tried to modify its own code to extend the timeout period."
Finally, to measure the magnitude of the emission impact of the global diet shift, we model the transition from diets in 2019 to the widespread adoption of the planetary health diet.
This phenomenon is already evident: The sets of molecules found in carbonaceous meteorites, prebiotic simulation experiments, organic geopolymers (e.g., coal, oil, kerogen), and organisms themselves can all be distinguished in various ways, for example, via type, carbon isotope composition, and/or chirality of components such as amino acids ().In terms of thermodynamics, the efficient coupling ...
The development of high-speed motors has stimulated the demand for high-speed reducers. In response to the lack of research on high-speed reducers and the challenge of developing high-speed transmission systems, this study proposes a novel wedge-loading planetary traction drive (WPTD). First, a more accurate theoretical analysis model is established by considering the combined effects of ...