More From Forbes

Understanding education 4.0: the machine learning-driven future of learning.

  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Linkedin

Individuals and societies face motivating, inspiring and potentially broad difficulties as a result of digitization and virtualization in education. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in education will be important drivers of growth and innovation, just like they have been in all industries. Individuals should be able to build more comprehensive expertise, knowledge and abilities, as well as release their innovative potential, using smart and intelligent educational methods and resources. While AI-powered solutions have been around for a while in the EdTech field, the industry has been sluggish to embrace them.

On the other side, the pandemic drastically altered the landscape, forcing instructors to rely on technology for virtual instruction. AI has the potential to improve both learning and teaching, assisting the educational industry in evolving to benefit both students and teachers. The education system can follow businesses and mega-corporations to ensure the advancement of learning and prepare their students for jobs roles incorporating enterprise AI. It refers to the use of advanced machine learning and cognitive skills to uncover and distribute organizational knowledge, data and information in a manner that closely resembles how humans search for and analyze information.

What is Education 4.0?

Technology began to penetrate the educational process in the new millennium, and both students and teachers began to use technology in fundamental ways (otherwise known as Education 2.0). Education 3.0 emerged as technology advanced, especially the widespread adoption of a more user-generated internet. This enabled students to access their own information sources, the ability to learn electronically and platforms to communicate with teachers and other students. Education became more networkable, with students having their own direct link to a range of different knowledge sources, rather than being concentrated on a back-and-forth between students and teachers.

Education 4.0 is a technique of learning that is connected with the fourth industrial revolution and focuses on transforming the future of education through advanced technology and automation. Smart technology, artificial intelligence and robotics are part of this industrial revolution. They are all affecting our daily lives. Universities must prepare their students for a world in which cyber-physical systems are ubiquitous across all industries if they are to continue to produce successful graduates. This entails incorporating technology into the curriculum, altering the learning process entirely, and leveraging technology to enhance the university experience.

Understanding Education 4.0- The Machine Learning-Driven Future of Learning

What Implementation of Enterprise AI Means?

Enterprise AI applications can solve challenges that were previously unsolvable. Enterprise AI applications have a plethora of uses. Organizations across practically every industry are now deploying corporate AI solutions to solve a wide range of use cases, ranging from predictive maintenance of industrial assets to machine learning for a wide range of tasks. Every field is transforming with advancing technology. It is vital to adapt the educational system to society's new development requirements; in these new circumstances, only knowledge learned will help to the growth of Industry 4.0 and its safe development.

Best Travel Insurance Companies

Best covid-19 travel insurance plans.

Employees in industries, as well as organizations, are affected by the introduction of new technology. Due to the divergence of processes, specialized skills and human activities for Industry 4.0 may differ depending on the industrial sector. There have been several adjustments in terms of talents and tasks. As a result, human capital will play a large role in the workplace, and occupations and learning will be redirected.

What Are the Benefits of Machine Learning in Education?

Preparing Students for Evolving Industries

As cyber-physical systems become more integrated into many businesses, the skills needed for employees will undoubtedly change. According to McKinsey Digital research, 60% of all vocations could have at least a third of their tasks automated as a result of the fourth industrial revolution.

As a result of technology's ability to keep us linked at all times, employment responsibilities are becoming increasingly flexible and adaptable. Education 4.0 is all about changing with the changes, and for higher education institutions, that means figuring out what their future graduates will need.

Automating Basic Administrative Tasks

Teachers devote a significant amount of time to administrative tasks. The application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in education can aid in the automation of activity grading and assessment. Administrative tasks can be automated, allowing teachers to spend more time with pupils and improving the learning experience.

Offering Personalized Education

The goal of using AI and machine learning in education is not to replace instructors but to assist them in better understanding each student's potential and limitations.

Providing Constructive Criticism

Teachers can use AI in the classroom to help them enhance the instructions they provide their students as well as make learning more engaging and exciting. Students benefit from immediate feedback, since it enables them to see where they are doing wrong and how they may improve.

Offering Access to All Pupils

Learning becomes universally accessible for all pupils when AI and machine learning is used in the classroom. It can help students to overcome geographical hurdles to learning.

Universities must integrate their teaching and operations with technology improvements in order to prepare future graduates for work. Education 4.0 is a method of learning that is aligned with the fourth industrial revolution. Involving AI in the field of business and corporate environment is changing the need an employer is searching for in the candidate. With machine learning in education, every job prospect will be different.

Adaption of learning incorporating artificial intelligence and machine learning in education will keep the students up to date. It highlights the importance of preparing pupils to face and overcome problems. To stay up with the times, old educational paradigms must be revisited with a futuristic perspective. Students should be able to master the abilities required by rapidly changing technology, they should be guided rather than instructed, and knowledge should be made available rather than fed to them. Both general and vocational education should strive to prepare students to compete in the labor market.

Naveen Joshi

  • Editorial Standards
  • Reprints & Permissions

Everything You Need to Know About Education 4.0

future-loading

In order to prepare future graduates for work, universities must align their teaching and processes with  technological  advanc ements .   

In the new millennium, technology  began  to infiltrate the education process, and both student s  and teacher s   started  to utilize technology in basic ways ( otherwise known as  Education 2.0).  

A s  this t echnology  advanced, including the mass infiltration of a more user-generated internet,  Education 3.0 was  formed.    

Students now had their own  access to information, the option to learn virtually, and platforms to easily connect with faculty and other students.  

Education was no longer centered upon a back and forth between student s  and teacher s , but instead took on a more networked approach, with students having their own direct connection to a variety of different information sources.  

This encouraged the development of a more personalized way of learning   where the student’s independence and unique approach to study was celebrated.  

However, we ’re  now on the cusp of a new phase ;  Education 4.0.   

What is Education 4.0?  

Education 4.0 is a desired approach to learning that aligns itself with the emerging  fourth  industrial revolution .   

This industrial revolution   focuses on  smart technology, artificial intelligence, and robotics; all of which  now impact our everyday lives.   

For universities to continue to produce successful graduates, they must  prepare their students for a world where  these cyber-physical systems are prevalent across all industries.  

This means teaching students about this technology as part of the curriculum, changing the   approach to learning altogether, and utilizing this technology to better improve the university experience.  

career options; something that will be  extremely  valuable in the future.   

Alongside their degrees, they might also look for job opportunities for students to allow them to gain work experience to support themselves financially and to build their skills in teamwork and communication in readiness for the careers ahead of them.

Preparing students  for evolving industries   

Cyber-physical systems are steadily becoming more integrated into various industries, inevitably affecting the skill s  requirements  for  employees.   

Research by McKinsey Digital  revealed that due to the  fourth  industrial revolution 60% of all occupations  could potentially  have at least  a third  of their activities automated.  

The topic of how  a rtificial  i ntelligence might affect jobs in the future was explored in our previous blog :   How will Artificial Intelligence Influence the Global Higher Education Sector?  

However, there is much more to consider than the potential disruption to the  hard   skills required for various  job  roles.   

The  fourth  industrial revolution will also impact the  soft  skills that students will need in the future.  

In 2016,  the   World Economic Forum  produced a report exploring these changes. They predicted that by 2020 ,  “more than a third of the desired core skill sets of most occupations will be comprised of skills that are not yet considered crucial to the job today.”  

Some of the soft skills they claim will soon become indispensable include complex problem solving, social skills, and process skills.  

T echnology  also  allows us to be constant ly  connected, and as a result ,  job  roles  are steadily becoming more flexible and  adaptable .   

Education 4.0 is about evolving with the times, and for higher education institutions ,  this means understanding what is required of their future graduates.   

Undoubtedly, in order to produce more graduates who are prepared to take on the future state of employment, universities must evolve, and accept that  changes to  some  traditional   processes are inevitable.  

A new approach to learning    

By aligning teaching and learning methods with the skills needed in the future, universities can be sure they are successfully preparing their students for the  fourth  industrial revolution.  

One method of doing so is by encouraging a ccelerated remote learning , which i s the idea that students will learn theoretical knowledge remotely using digital means, whilst ensuring any practical skills are still learnt face-to-face.   

This is a more flexible way of learning that requires accountability and good time management; skills that will be  relied  on  due to the rise in the freelance economy.  

The move towards this way of working will also  require  students  t o learn how to adapt quickly to new situations they may face in their evolving careers.   

Project-based learning highlight s  the importance of studying a wide set of skills that can then be applied to each scenario , as opposed to sticking to a set of skills directly linked to a specific job role.   

Learning practices such as SCALE-UP are increasing in popularity, with insti t utions such as  North Carolina State University  utilizing the practice.   

A SCALE-UP way of learning  has  students s i t at round tables scattered across the room, allowing the teacher to freely walk through the space and approach students if necessary.   

With this way of learning students are also  “working out problems on laptops and whiteboards, answering real-time quiz questions ,  and helping each other learn.”  

The approach to exams and assessments will also change, moving away from t he t raditional method of  a bsorbing  and relaying  a vast amount of information; skill s  not as necessary in the future.   

We may see students assessed instead  “by analyzing their learning journey through practical and experiential learning-based projects or field works . ”  

Of course ,  the biggest change we are likely to see as part of Education 4.0 is a deeper fusion of technology into the teaching process.   

The ultimate purpose of utilizing this technology and adopt ing  new methods  is  to place students at the center of the education process,  “shifting the focus from teaching to learning.”  

Adapting  to new realities   

Higher education institutions are  moving towards a more personalized way of learning.   

By utilizing data and tracking student performance, universities will be able to  identify  struggling students and provide optimized learning strategies to suit their needs.   

The various ways data is being used by universities is explored in more detail in our white paper:  Your A-Z Guide to Data in Higher Education .  

Education 4.0 embraces this advance in analytics and uses it to treat each student as an individual ,  understanding that everyone’s learning needs and desired outcomes will be different.  

There have also been talks of entirely customizable degrees, whereby a student does n’t  have to pick just  one  or  two  subjects to study, but instead  can  select modules from multiple programs.   

There are some ,  however, who are n’t  yet convinced by this approach and  view  this move away from the traditional degree structure  as  problematic.   

For example, Oxford Professor of Higher Education ,   Simon  Marginson ,  believes that ,  “ as long as they retain fixed curricula,  flexibility makes other institutions look of lower quality.”  

Yet the new approach to program structure is likely to create more versatile, well-rounded students who can adapt themselves to various career options; something that will be  extremely  valuable in the future.   

More QS Insights

How can arab universities boost global research impact and collaboration.

A student in a cafeteria

How can UK universities build trust in times of unrest? 

what is the importance of education 4.0

How to enter the QS World University Rankings: Your questions answered 

A staff member looking at data on a laptop.

How business schools foster innovation and business acumen among students

A graduate on their graduation day.

Sign up for industry insights

Receive the latest insights, expertise and commentary on the topics which matter most in higher education, straight to your inbox.

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sustainability-logo

Article Menu

what is the importance of education 4.0

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review.

what is the importance of education 4.0

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. context of the study, 2.2. education 4.0 in industry 4.0, 2.3. learning dimensions, 2.4. stakeholders in the competency frameworks of the 21st century, 2.5. teaching and learning methods, 2.6. systematic literature review method, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

A1Tiemann, R. and Annaggar, A. (2020). A framework for the theory-driven design of digital learning environments (FDDLEs) using the example of problem-solving in chemistry education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.
A2Priemer, B., Eilerts, K., Filler, A., Pinkwart, N., Rösken-Winter, B., Tiemann, R., and Zu Belzen, A. U. (2020). A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 105–130.
A3Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., and Aksit, F. (2016). Active learning promoting student teachers’ professional competencies in Finland and Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 471–490.
A4Menekse, M., Purzer, S., and Heo, D. (2019). An investigation of verbal episodes that relate to individual and team performance in engineering student teams. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–13.
A5Portman, D. and Broido, M. (2019). Apprenticing future economists: Analyzing an ESP course through the lens of the new CEFR extended framework. Language Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 395–413.
A6Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Nagel, M. T., Brückner, S., Schmidt, S., and Shavelson, R. J. (2020). Assessing University Students’ Critical Online Reasoning Ability: A Conceptual and Assessment Framework with Preliminary Evidence.
A7Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Beck, K., Schmidt, S., and Marino, J. P. (2019). Assessment of university students’ critical thinking: Next-generation performance assessment. International Journal of Testing, 19(4), 337–362.
A8Zgraggen, M. (2021). Blended learning model in a vocational educational training hospitality setting: from teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Training Research, 1–27.
A9Wright, N. and Wrigley, C. (2019). Broadening design-led education horizons: Conceptual insights and future research directions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 1–23.
A10Mehrotra, S. and Mehrotra, V. S. (2018). Challenges Beyond Schooling: Innovative Models for Youth Skills Development in India. In Transitions to Post-School Life (pp. 13–34). Springer, Singapore.
A11Gretter, S. and Yadav, A. (2016). Computational thinking and media & information literacy: An integrated approach to teaching twenty-first century skills. TechTrends, 60(5), 510–516.
A12Yadav, A., Good, J., Voogt, J., and Fisser, P. (2017). Computational thinking as an emerging competence domain. In Competence-based vocational and professional education (pp. 1051–1067). Springer, Cham.
A13Hoogland, K. and Tout, D. (2018). Computer-based assessment of mathematics into the twenty-first century: pressures and tensions. ZDM, 50(4), 675–686.
A14Tan, L. (2016). Confucius: Philosopher of twenty-first century skills. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(12), 1233–1243.
A15Hodge, C. J. (2018). Decolonizing Collections-Based Learning: Experiential Observation as an Interdisciplinary Framework for Object Study. Museum Anthropology, 41(2), 142–158.
A16Hu, Y. and Spiro, R. J. (2021). Design for now, but with the future in mind: a “cognitive flexibility theory” perspective on online learning through the lens of MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 373–378.
A17Laru, J., Vuopala, E., Iwata, M., Pitkänen, K., Sanchez, I., Mäntymäki, A., … and Näykki, J. (2019). Designing seamless learning activities for school visitors in the context of Fab Lab Oulu. In Seamless Learning (pp. 153–169). Springer, Singapore.
A18Moya, S. and Camacho, M. (2021). Developing a Framework for Mobile Learning Adoption and Sustainable Development. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–18.
A19Eddles-Hirsch, K., Kennedy-Clark, S., and Francis, T. (2020). Developing creativity through authentic programming in the inclusive classroom. Education 3–13, 48(8), 909–918.
A20Sullivan, K., Bray, A., and Tangney, B. (2020). Developing twenty-first century skills in out-of-school education: the Bridge21 Transition Year programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1–17.
A21Javed, M. S., Athar, M. R., and Saboor, A. (2019). Development of a twenty-first century skills scale for Agri varsities. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1692485.
A22Butler, D., Leahy, M., Hallissy, M., and Brown, M. (2017). Different strokes for different folks: Scaling a blended model of teacher professional learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.
A23Niemi, H. and Multisilta, J. (2016). Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 451–468.
A24Kusumoto, Y. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking through active learning. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 45–63.
A25Kay, K., and Honey, M. (2006). Establishing the R&D agenda for twenty-first century learning. New Directions for Youth Development, (110), 63–80.
A26Reichert, F., Zhang, D. J., Law, N. W., Wong, G. K., and de la Torre, J. (2020). Exploring the structure of digital literacy competence assessed using authentic software applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 2991–3013.
A27Salleh, H. (2016). Facilitation for professional learning community conversations in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 285–300.
A28Ahonen, A. K., and Kinnunen, P. (2015). How do students value the importance of twenty-first century skills? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–412.
A29Arati, D., Todorova, A., and Merrett, R. (2011). Implementation and sustainability of a global ICT company’s programme to help teachers integrate technology into learning and teaching in Germany, France, and the UK. Research in Learning Technology, 19.
A30Herodotou, C., Sharples, M., Gaved, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Rienties, B., Scanlon, E., and Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovative pedagogies of the future: An evidence-based selection. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 4, p. 113). Frontiers.
A31Izzrech, K., Del Giudice, M., and Della Peruta, M. R. (2013). Investigating entrepreneurship among Algerian youth: Is it a knowledge-intensive factory? Journal of the knowledge economy, 4(3), 319–329.
A32Başaran, B. (2020). Investigating science and mathematics teacher candidate’s perceptions of TPACK-21 based on 21st century skills. Ilkogretim Online, 19(4).
A33Gold, A. U., Oonk, D. J., Smith, L., Boykoff, M. T., Osnes, B., and Sullivan, S. B. (2015). A lens on climate change: Making climate meaningful through student-produced videos. Journal of Geography, 114(6), 235–246.
A34Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., and Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1673–1694.
A35Doorman, M., Bos, R., de Haan, D., Jonker, V., Mol, A., and Wijers, M. (2019). Making and implementing a mathematics day challenge as a makerspace for teams of students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 149–165.
A36Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., and Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.
A37Cherner, T. and Smith, D. (2017). Reconceptualizing TPACK to meet the needs of twenty-first century education. The New Educator, 13(4), 329–349.
A38Kickbusch, S., Wright, N., Sternberg, J., and Dawes, L. (2020). Rethinking learning design: Reconceptualizing the role of the learning designer in pre-service teacher preparation through a design-led approach. International Journal of Design Education, 14(4), 29–45.
A39Lee, C. S., and Kolodner, J. L. (2011). Scaffolding students’ development of creative design skills: A curriculum reference model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 3–15.
A40Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Kommers, P., Zuziak, W., and Gladun, M. (2017). Selected aspects and conditions of the use of robots in STEM education for young learners as viewed by teachers and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.
A41Alden-Rivers, B. (2016). Social innovation education: Designing learning for an uncertain world. In Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
A42Kitchens, R. K., and Barker, M. E. (2016). Synthesizing pedagogies and engaging students: Creating blended eLearning strategies for library research and writing instruction. The Reference Librarian, 57(4), 323–335.
A43Hannaway, D. M., and Steyn, M. G. (2017). Teachers’ experiences of technology-based teaching and learning in the Foundation Phase. Early Child Development and Care, 187(11), 1745–1759.
A44Blau, I., Peled, Y., and Nusan, A. (2016). Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge in one-to-one classroom: teachers developing “digital wisdom”. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1215–1230.
A45Weninger, C. (2017). The “vernacularization” of global education policy: media and digital literacy as twenty-first century skills in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 500–516.
A46Lin, T. B., Mokhtar, I. A., and Wang, L. Y. (2015). The construct of media and information literacy in Singapore education system: global trends and local policies. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(4), 423–437.
A47Viinikka, K.-, and Ubani, M. (2019). The expectations of Finnish RE student teachers of their professional development in their academic studies in the light of twenty-first century skills. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 40(4), 447–463.
A48Gupta, R. (2021). The Role of Pedagogy in Developing Life Skills. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(1), 50–72.
A49Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., and Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3).
A50Snape, P., and Fox-Turnbull, W. (2011). Twenty-first century learning and technology education nexus. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 34, 149.
A51Wilson, J. I. (2006). Twenty-first century learning for teachers: helping educators bring new skills into the classroom. New Directions for Youth Development, (110), 149–154. Doi: 10.1002/yd.175
A52Engerman, J. A., Carr-Chellman, A. A., and MacAllan, M. (2019). Understanding learning in video games: A phenomenological approach to unpacking boy cultures in virtual worlds. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3311–3327.
A53Sahlin, J. S., Tsertsidis, A., and Islam, M. S. (2017). Usages and impacts of the integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in elementary classrooms: a case study of Swedish municipality schools. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(5), 561–579.
A54Lipiäinen, T., Ubani, M., Viinikka, K., and Kallioniemi, A. (2020). What does “new learning” require from religious education teachers? A study of Finnish RE teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Religious Education, 68(2), 213–231.
A55Knox, A. (2006). Why American business demands twenty-first century learning: A company perspective. New Directions for Youth Development, (110), 31–7.
A56Bruett, K. (2006). Why American business demands twenty-first century skills: an industry perspective. New directions for youth development, (110), 25–30.
  • UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. 2020. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/ (accessed on 5 August 2021).
  • McLennan, M. The Global Risks Report. 2021 16th Edition. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2021).
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Framework for 21st Century Learning. 2019. Available online: https://bit.ly/3FS9JBC (accessed on 2 April 2021).
  • Tecnologico de Monterrey. Razonamiento para la Complejidad. In Tecnologico de Monterrey, 7 Competencias con las que el Tec Busca Preparar a sus Estudiantes ; 2019; Available online: https://bit.ly/3AsM6NL (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  • Morin, E.; Pakman, M. Introducción al Pensamiento Complejo ; Gedisa: Barcelona, Spain, 2011; ISBN 978-84-7432-518-8. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ramírez-Montoya, M.S.; Álvarez-Icaza, I.; Sanabria-Zepeda, J.C.; López-Caudana, E.O.; Alonso, P.E.; Miranda, J. Scaling Complex Thinking for Everyone through Open Science: A Conceptual Methodological Framework. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality TEEM21, Barcelona, Spain, 26–29 October 2021; University of Barcelona: Barcelona, Spain, 2021; pp. 806–811. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chaka, C. Skills, Competencies and Literacies Attributed to 4IR/Industry 4.0: Scoping Review. IFLA J. 2020 , 46 , 369–399. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Álamo Venegas, J.J.; Alonso Díaz, L.; Yuste Tosina, R.; López Ramos, V.M. La Dimensión Educativa de la robótica: Del Desarrollo del Pensamiento al Pensamiento Computacional en el aula. Campo Abierto. Rev. de Educ. 2021 , 40 , 2. Available online: https://bit.ly/3jbxUkG (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  • van Laar, E.; van Deursen, A.J.A.M.; van Dijk, J.A.G.M.; de Haan, J. The Relation between 21st-Century Skills and Digital Skills: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017 , 72 , 577–588. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Noh, S.C.; Karim, A.M.A. Design Thinking Mindset to Enhance Education 4.0 Competitiveness in Malaysia. IJERE 2021 , 10 , 494. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • González-Salamanca, J.C.; Agudelo, O.L.; Salinas, J. Key Competencies, Education for Sustainable Development and Strategies for the Development of 21st Century Skills. A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 10366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gleason, N.W. (Ed.) Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution ; Springer: Singapore, 2018; ISBN 9789811301933. Available online: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23279 (accessed on 16 September 2021).
  • Hong, C.; Ma, W.W.K. (Eds.) Introduction: Education 4.0: Applied Degree Education and the Future of Work. In Applied Degree Education and the Future of Work ; Lecture Notes in Educational Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 1–13. ISBN 9789811531415. [ Google Scholar ]
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). Will Robots Really Steal Our Jobs? An International Analysis of the Potential Long-Term Impact of Automation 2018. Available online: https://www.pwc.co.uk/economic-services/assets/international-impact-of-automation-feb-2018.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  • Bonfield, C.A.; Salter, M.; Longmuir, A.; Benson, M.; Adachi, C. Transformation or Evolution? Education 4.0, Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age. High. Educ. Pedagog. 2020 , 5 , 223–246. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Karlos de Sousa Oliveira, K.; André Cavalcante de Souza, R. Habilitadores Da Transformação Digital Em Direção à Educação 4.0. Renote 2020 , 18 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ciolacu, M.; Tehrani, A.F.; Beer, R.; Popp, H. Education 4.0—Fostering Student’s Performance with Machine Learning Methods. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), Constanta, Romania, 26–29 October 2017; pp. 438–443. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Miranda, J.; Navarrete, C.; Noguez, J.; Molina-Espinosa, J.-M.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S.; Navarro-Tuch, S.A.; Bustamante-Bello, M.-R.; Rosas-Fernández, J.-B.; Molina, A. The Core Components of Education 4.0 in Higher Education: Three Case Studies in Engineering Education. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2021 , 93 , 107278. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • García Vaquero, M.; Sánchez-Bayón, A.; Lominchar, J. European Green Deal and Recovery Plan: Green Jobs, Skills and Wellbeing Economics in Spain. Energies 2021 , 14 , 4145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Alles, M.A. Desarrollo del Talento Humano Basado en Competencias ; Ediciones Granica SA: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Duque Ceballos, J.L.; García Solarte, M.; Hurtado Ayala, A. Influencia de la inteligencia emocional sobre las competencias laborales: Un estudio empírico con empleados del nivel administrativo. Estud. Gerenc. 2017 , 33 , 250–260. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • OCDE. The Future of Education and Skills. Education 2030. 2018. Available online: http://go.uv.es/1fDpQnn (accessed on 12 August 2021).
  • Fadel, C.; Bialik, M.; Trilling, B.; Schleicher, A. Four-Dimensional Education: The Competencies Learners Need to Succeed ; Center for Curriculum Redesign: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-5186-4256-2. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cedefop. Annual Report 2014 ; Cedefop Information Series; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2015; Available online: https://bit.ly/3AOReKz (accessed on 1 September 2021).
  • Himmetoglu, B.; Aydug, D.; Bayrak, C. Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 2020 , 21 , 12–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Aziz Hussin, A. Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. IJELS 2018 , 6 , 92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Salmon, G. May 4 Be with You: Creating Education 4.0. J. Learn. Dev. 2019 , 6 , 95–115. Available online: https://bit.ly/3aKxXiX (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  • Shirazi, F.; Hajli, N. IT-Enabled Sustainable Innovation and the Global Digital Divides. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 9711. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ferrari, A. DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. 2013. Available online: https://tinyurl.com/yc9at8t6 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  • Bacigalupo, M. Entrepreneurship as a competence. In World Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship ; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rayna, T.; Striukova, L. Fostering Skills for the 21st Century: The Role of Fab Labs and Makerspaces. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021 , 164 , 120391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Vivas-Fernandez, L.; Sáez-López, J.M. Integración de la robótica educativa en Educación Primaria. Rev. Latinoam. De Tecnol. Educ.-RELATEC 2019 , 18 , 107–129. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wing, J.M. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 2006 , 49 , 33–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Modelos y Estrategias de Enseñanza para Ambientes Innovadores ; Editorial Digital: Monterrey, México, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Pradas Montilla, S. La Neurotecnología Educativa. Claves Del Uso de La Tecnología En El Proceso de Aprendizaje. ReiDoCrea Rev. Electrónica De Investig. Docencia Creat. 2017 , 6 , 40–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Deja, M.; Rak, D.; Bell, B. Digital Transformation Readiness: Perspectives on Academia and Library Outcomes in Information Literacy. J. Acad. Librariansh. 2021 , 47 , 102403. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Seufert, C.; Oberdörfer, S.; Roth, A.; Grafe, S.; Lugrin, J.-L.; Latoschik, M.E. Classroom Management Competency Enhancement for Student Teachers Using a Fully Immersive Virtual Classroom. Comput. Educ. 2022 , 179 , 104410. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Silva-Díaz, F.; Carrillo-Rosúa, J.; Fernández-Plaza, J.A. Uso de Tecnologías Inmersivas y Su Impacto En Las Actitudes Científico-Matemáticas Del Estudiantado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria En Un Contexto En Riesgo de Exclusión Social. Educar 2021 , 57 , 119–138. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Santos, A.F.; Barber III, D.; Harris, M.; Haymore, J. What Can Universities Learn From Organizational Creative Space Design Research? A Look at Maker Spaces. JHETP 2021 , 21 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wong, C.; Shih, Y. Enhance STEM Education by Integrating Product Design with Computer-Aided Design Approaches. CADandA 2021 , 19 , 694–711. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • van den Hurk, A.; Meelissen, M.; van Langen, A. Interventions in Education to Prevent STEM Pipeline Leakage. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2019 , 41 , 150–164. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Daher, W.; Awawdeh Shahbari, J. Design of STEM Activities: Experiences and Perceptions of Prospective Secondary School Teachers. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020 , 15 , 112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
  • Kayan-Fadlelmula, F.; Sellami, A.; Abdelkader, N.; Umer, S. A Systematic Review of STEM Education Research in the GCC Countries: Trends, Gaps and Barriers. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2022 , 9 , 2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Brereton, P.; Kitchenham, B.A.; Budgen, D.; Turner, M.; Khalil, M. Lessons from Applying the Systematic Literature Review Process within the Software Engineering Domain. J. Syst. Softw. 2007 , 80 , 571–583. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
  • Higgins, J.P.; Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6. Cochrane Libr. 2006 , 4 , 49–55. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kitchenham, B. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews ; Keele University: Keele, UK, 2004; Volume 33, pp. 1–26. Available online: https://bit.ly/2XnwE6y (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  • Chambers, D.; Rodgers, M.; Golder, S.; Pepper, C.; Todd, D.; Woolacott, N. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2009. Available online: https://bit.ly/3FSM9oe (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  • García-Peñalvo, F.J. Mapeos Sistemáticos de Literatura, Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura y Benchmarking de Programas Formativos. 2017. Available online: http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1056 (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  • Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021 , 372 , n160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sifaki, E.; Petousi, V. Contextualising Harm in the Framework of Research Misconduct. Findings from Discourse Analysis of Scientific Publications. IJSD 2020 , 23 , 149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Categories
CompetenciesTransversal competencies(i) Critical Thinking, (ii) Cooperation, (iii) Collaboration, (iv) Communication, (v) Creativity
Disciplinary competencies.(i) Training and developing functional, technical, and technological knowledge and successful workplace performance skills. (ii) The capacity to research, design, create and implement new technologies. (iii) The use of emerging technologies and best practices to propose technology-based solutions.
Learning methodsLearning delivery modalities.(i) Face-to-Face learning based mainly on Active Learning. (ii) Online distance learning. (iii) Hybrid learning.
Learning strategies Pedagogical approaches such as challenge-based learning, problem-based learning, learning-by-doing, and gamification-based learning.
Information and communication technologies (ICT) categoriesTechnology-basedArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, High-Data-Processing applying Data Science, Data Analytics and Cloud Computing, and Virtual Image Processing for virtual and experiential environments.
Tools and PlatformsSynchronous online sessions to support student learning through web conference technologies (e.g., ZOOM, Meets, Webex, M-Teams) and asynchronous learning platforms (Learning Management Systems, (LMS)).
Infrastructure levelsClassroom levelInnovative furniture; connected tools; classrooms, rooms, and libraries adapted with specific architecture, colors, illumination, sounds, and temperature to improve learning; virtual and augmented reality, and hologram systems.
Institutional level Includes recreation, comfort, sustainability, and accessibility; services such as online libraries, instant messaging systems, remote laboratories enabled and widely used; access to internet services.
Strategy CategoryTechniquesDescription
Reflection strategies to encourage self-regulated thinking.Case-based learning.
Electronic portfolios.
Meta-learning.
Reflection strategies include professional self-perception, understanding, creativity, reflective observation, decision-making, sharing, capacity for dialogue, competency to propose improvements, social commitment, and others.
Research strategies to apply knowledge.Research-based learning.
Project-based learning.
Evidence-based educational innovation.
The student’s mental processes are not in the knowledge per se (as is the case with the analysis processes), but the interest is in using this knowledge in specific situations.
Construction strategies to promote analysis.Problem-based learning.
Debate.
Argumentation.
Can be used in face-to-face, b-learning, e-learning and m-learning environments, where spaces foster collaborative learning and systemic self-learning.
Contextualization strategies to foster collaboration.Authentic.
Engaged.
Situated learning.
Collaborative learning is one of the main goals to achieve high levels of cognition in meaning and essential qualities for personal and professional development. It also brings excellent interpersonal benefits.
Technology-mediated strategies for promoting digital competencies.Mobile learning.
Learning objects.
Open educational resources.
Information access and use skills that form the basis for continuous lifelong learning are common to all disciplines, learning environments, and all levels of education. They enable learners to master content and extend their research, become more self-directed, and assume greater control over their learning process.
DimensionResearch Questions (RQ)Type of Answer Sought
Characteristics of published studies of frameworks for 21st century skills. RQ1. What were the articles’ objects of study?
RQ2. How many studies are in the Scopus and WoS databases over time and the dimension of learning targeted?
Id of articles and references.
No. of articles in the Scopus and WoS databases from 2006 to 2020?
Learning dimensions: Skills, knowledge, character and meta-learning (Fadel et al., 2015)
Core components: Education 4.0 and 21st century skillsRQ3. What are the core Education 4.0 teaching and learning strategies applied in the study?Teaching and learning Strategies (Ramírez-Montoya, 2012):
Collaborative
Contextualized
Application
Reflection
Technology-mediated
Core Education 4.0 (Miranda et al., 2021)
Competencies
Learning methods
Information and communication technologies (ICT)
Infrastructure
Learning dimensions and stakeholdersRQ4. Who are the stakeholders identified in the publications, and what core Education 4.0 competencies have been worked on in the frameworks?Stakeholders (Own classification):
Teachers
Students
Schools
CCR Learning dimensions (Fadel et al., 2015):
Skills
Knowledge
Character
Meta-learning
ScopusWos
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (“twenty-first century skills”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (frameworks))TEMA: (“twenty-first century skills”) AND TEMA: (frameworks)
Id
( )
TitleFramework Approach for Components of Education 4.0
A1A framework for the theory-driven design of digital learning environments (FDDLEs) using the example of problem-solving in chemistry education (Tiemann and Annaggar, 2020)The framework consists of the steps “Analysis”, “Design”, “Development”, “Quality Assurance” and “Evaluation & Implementation.”Each step is characterized by a defined milestone, which, together with a cycle between crucial and non-arbitrary steps, indicates a product and goal orientation for development that distinguishes the model from conventional approaches.
A2A framework to foster problem-solving in STEM and computing education (Priemer, et al., 2020)This article emphasized twenty-first century skills, such as solving authentic problems. It integrated an interdisciplinary framework of problem-solving in STEM and computer science education by cumulatively including problem-solving methods from all of these domains. The framework can be used to develop STEM competencies and computer science education
A3Active learning promoting student teachers’ professional competencies in Finland and Turkey (Niemi, et al., 2016)This study shows the results of a quantitative analysis utilizing a regression analysis. It provided strong evidence that active learning impacts professional competencies. The qualitative analysis further revealed that active knowledge creation with high engagement by students to learn tasks and a collaborative learning culture were important active learning modes. Self-regulated and collaborative learning provided the theoretical framework for the active learning measurements.
A4An investigation of verbal episodes that relate to individual and team performance in engineering student teams (Menekse, et al., 2019)This study examined the different types of verbal episodes (questions, conflict, and reasoning episodes) in engineering student teams and how these verbal interactions related to individual and team performances. Collaborative problem-solving in team settings is a critical practice in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields as an effective teaching method that promotes outcomes associated with individual student learning and the quality of team solutions. The authors recommend from the findings that educators should monitor team interactions and promote student verbal exchanges to boost student learning and produce positive team outcomes.
A5Apprenticing future economists: Analyzing an ESP course through the lens of the new CEFR extended framework (Portman and Broido, 2019)Common European Framework (CEFR) provides valuable guidance to help institutions develop curricula to achieve English language skills. This paper describes advanced English for an economics course, aiming to facilitate economics students’ transformation from student to professional, in terms of English can-dos (mostly B2-C1), as described in the 2018 CEFR Companion Volume. The pedagogy underpinning the course is three-pronged, drawing on English for specific purposes, twenty-first century skills, and the CEFR.
A6Assessing University Students’ Critical Online Reasoning Ability: A Conceptual and Assessment Framework with Preliminary Evidence (Molerov, et al., 2020)This paper presents a conceptual framework for Critical Online Reasoning (COR), based on prior approaches (“information problem-solving,” “multiple-source comprehension,” “web credibility,” “informal argumentation,” and “critical thinking”). Critical evaluation skills of online information are considered necessary in many research and education frameworks. Higher education students are more likely to use the internet instead of offline sources such as textbooks when studying for exams. The internet poses various challenges, including a large amount of incomplete, contradictory, erroneous, and biased information, and needs a curated learning environment. Despite the central importance of critically evaluating online information, its assessment in higher education is still an emerging field.
A7Assessment of University Students’ Critical Thinking: Next Generation Performance Assessment (Shavelson et al., 2019)This approach leads to developing the project iPAL (The international Performance Assessment of Learning) framework, consolidating previous research and focusing on next-generation performance assessments. This paper presents iPAL’s assessment framework and shows how it guides the development of performance assessments, exemplifying these assessments with a concrete task and providing preliminary evidence of its reliability and validity.
A8Blended learning model in a vocational educational training hospitality setting: from teachers’ perspectives (Zgraggen, 2021)This research study explored the Vocational Educational Training (VET) teachers’ perspectives and experiences of a proposed Conceptual Blended Learning Framework (CBLF) model in a VET hospitality setting at the William Angliss Institute of Sydney (WAIS).
A9Broadening design-led education horizons: conceptual insights and future research directions (Wright and Wrigley, 2019)This paper introduces the Design-led Education Innovation Matrix, providing a prototype design-led framework to assist educators in developing and accessing twenty-first century knowledge, skills, and mindsets. In addition, it identifies related future research areas for academia, thereby extending the reach and scope of this emerging research area. It is a comprehensive literature review on educating a workforce for the knowledge economy. The role of design in business and educational innovation has contributed to a new approach to building a culture of practice for design-led education, based on the theory of the Innovation Matrix.
A10Challenges Beyond Schooling: Innovative Models for Youth Skills Development in India (Mehrotra and Mehrotra, 2018)The paper discusses the steps taken by the government to improve the articulation of vocational education in higher education, thus changing the “dead end” image of vocational education. The transition from school to work is the main policy focus, especially concerning the VET reforms. A radical change is taking place under the National Skills Qualification Framework.
A11Computational Thinking and Media and Information Literacy: An Integrated Approach to Teaching Twenty-First Century Skills (Gretter and Yadav, 2016)Developing students’ 21st century skills, including creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving, has been a prevailing concern in our globalized and hyper-connected society. This article proposes an integrated approach to develop students’ 21st century skills in the classroom, considering computational thinking and media and information literacy and their practical applications.
A12Computational thinking as an emerging competence domain (Yadav, et al., 2017)This article discusses how computational thinking ideas are relevant to vocational education and training. It supports the view of digital literacy as a critical component of computational thinking and the need to incorporate it into vocational education and training. It provides directions for future research on the role of computational thinking in primary, secondary, and vocational education.
A13Computer-based assessment of mathematics into the twenty-first century: pressures and tensions (Hoogland and Tout, 2018)In recent decades, technology has influenced various aspects of assessment in mathematics education: (1) supporting the assessment of higher-order thinking skills in mathematics, (2) presenting authentic everyday problems to apply mathematical knowledge and skills, and (3) making the delivery of tests and psychometric analysis of results more sophisticated. This article describes the mathematics education essential for educating young people to be creative problem-solving agents in the twenty-first century.
A14Confucius: Philosopher of twenty-first century skills (Tan, 2016)This article introduces a structured interdisciplinary framework for collections-based learning, which intrinsically privileges the observer’s viewpoint and interpretations over makers, users, and descendant community members, producing a “colonizing” effect. This outcome does not serve anthropology’s decolonizing intentions of cultural relativism and context—or the “twenty-first century skills” with which anthropology aligns.
A15Decolonizing Collections-Based Learning: Experiential Observation as an Interdisciplinary Framework for Object Study (Hodge, 2018)This paper proposes a semi-structured experiential observation approach that unites formal art historical analysis, multisensory observations, and reflexive, polysemous cultural interpretation. The framework offers an interdisciplinary, decolonizing method of object study.
A16Design for now, but with the future in mind: a “cognitive flexibility theory” perspective on online learning through the lens of MOOCs (Hu and Spiro, 2021)This article shows the need for such a reframing is a tenet of cognitive flexibility theory (CFT) and the value of diverse perspectives afforded by the MOOCocracy culture. It also discusses how a CFT-based epistemic stance may further inform MOOCs’ future design and practice and, similarly, online learning in general. It presents some examples of ways CFT’s application of learning and instruction principles can benefit online learning for adaptive worldviews. The resultant development of adaptive skills is becoming increasingly essential for life and work. As a principled overlay of urgent preparation for current schooling, this framework can help us with better education designs and construction.
A17Designing seamless learning activities for school visitors in the context of Fab Lab Oulu (Laru, et al., 2019)Maker culture has expanded from its traditional niches (people interested in computers, programming, and the digital world) to other, more general fields such as education, business, and government, despite the interest in the Maker Movement and its connection to formal and informal education.
A18Developing a Framework for Mobile Learning Adoption and Sustainable Development (Moya and Camacho, 2021)This study focuses on research in the field of frameworks and models that highlight mobile learning rewards. This study investigates the main characteristics of a strategic framework for the adaption and sustainable use of mobile learning.
A19Developing creativity through authentic programming in the inclusive classroom (Eddles-Hirsch, et al., 2020)This paper will respond to educators’ needs by addressing the meaning of creativity and providing examples on how to develop it using models and strategies found in the research to be effective evidence-based frameworks for creativity in an inclusive classroom.
A20Developing twenty-first century skills in out-of-school education: the Bridge21 Transition Year program (Sullivan, et al., 2020)This article describes an instrumental case study of an out-of-school education program (Bridge21) designed to help students develop 21st century skills. Findings suggest that the Bridge21 model can provide significant and sustained increases in student confidence across a range of skills and that various program design elements contribute directly to this.
A21Development of a twenty-first century skills scale for Agri varsities (Javed et al., 2019)This article presents an exploratory study for generating a 19-items scale to measure twenty-first century skills and bridge the gap between science and practice.
A22Different strokes for different folks: scaling a blended model of teacher professional learning (Butler, et al., 2017)This paper describes an innovative model of teacher professional learning that has evolved over a decade (2006 to 2016) to develop three phases of a robust, flexible framework that meets teachers’ expressed needs. The most recent phase expands on the emergence of a fourth wave of online learning to design and develop a massive open online course (MOOC) that potentially enables the massive scaling up of access to this already validated teacher professional development model.
A23Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement (Niemi and Multisilta, 2016)This study presents the theoretical framework based on sociocultural theories. Learning occurs because of dialogical interactions between people, substances, and artifacts. This approach has been used to create the Global Sharing Pedagogy (GSP) model for the empirical study of student engagement in learning twenty-first century skills.
A24Enhancing critical thinking through active learning (Kusumoto, 2018)Framework for 21st Century Learning developed by the Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21) values the importance of cultivating critical thinking. This paper reports on a study that explores how active learning with CLIL instruction helped Japanese EFL learners to develop critical thinking skills.
A25Establishing the R&D agenda for twenty-first century learning (Kay and Honey, 2006)Building on frameworks created by the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, this study proposes questions to guide research on teaching, professional development, and assessment relevant to twenty-first century skills. Knowing that educational change depends on providing teachers with the tools, support, and training to make fundamental changes in their practice, the authors argue for extensive research around best practices.
A26Exploring the structure of digital literacy competence assessed using authentic software applications (Reichert, et al., 2020)Digital literacy competence (DL) is essential for students learning in a rapidly changing world. The design of the DL assessment is discussed, emphasizing the influence of digital applications and environments on DL assessments and achievement scores.
A27Facilitation of professional learning community conversations in Singapore (Salleh, 2016)Professional Learning Community (PLC) has the potential to act as leverage school-based curricula development and innovation to provide diverse learning experiences that achieve broader learning outcomes beyond academic achievements (e.g., the twenty-first century skills). New competencies facilitate PLC conversations. This paper describes key findings of observations by three Grade 5 PLC facilitators in an intervention to explore how PLC facilitators can support teachers’ collective learning.
A28How Do Students Value the Importance of Twenty-first Century Skills? (Ahonen and Kinnunen, 2015)This article presents results from a Finnish study in which 718 school pupils aged 11 to 15 were asked to anticipate the skills they would need in the future. Social skills and collaboration were ranked highest in the listed frameworks and the students’ free responses. As expected, the boys appreciated technical skills, while the girls ranked social skills more highly.
A29Implementation and sustainability of a global ICT company’s programme to help teachers integrate technology into learning and teaching in Germany, France, and the UK (Arati, et al., 2011)This paper discusses implementing the “Intel Teach” professional development program in Germany, the UK, and France. The programme is designed to help school teachers effectively integrate technology into learning and teaching and help students develop critical “twenty-first century skills.”These factors are grouped into three categories: (1) concept transfer, (2) experience transfer, and (3) establishing standards.
A30Innovative Pedagogies of the Future: An Evidence-Based Selection (Herodotou, et al., 2019)In this work, an integrated framework with five dimensions was developed to select pedagogies for inclusion: (a) relevance to effective educational theories, (b) research evidence on the effectiveness of the proposed pedagogies, (c) correlation to the development of twenty-first century skills, (d) innovative aspects of pedagogy, and (e) level of adoption in educational practice. The selected pedagogies related to drones, robots, and citizen inquiry were linked to specific technological developments.
A31Investigating Entrepreneurship Among Algerian Youth: Is It a Knowledge-Intensive Factory? (Izzrech, et al., 2013)Entrepreneurs should be knowledgeable and skillful in economic development through entrepreneurial activity in the twenty-first century, especially in a knowledge-based economy. Many young individuals tend to create their own jobs worldwide in this millennium.
A32Investigating science and mathematics teacher candidate’s perceptions of TPACK-21 based on 21st century skills (Başaran, 2020)A relational survey model was used in the research. In the research, the scale developed by Valtonen et al. (2017) determining prospective teachers’ TPACK-21 21st century skills were used. The data obtained in the study were analyzed by structural equation modeling to determine the direct and positive effects of Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK21) and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK21) from external variables. The binary knowledge fields of the research are seen in TPACK-21.
A33A lens on Climate Change: Making Climate Meaningful Through Student-Produced Videos (Gold, et al., 2015)This study to present a program engaged students in research and learning about climate change and sparked their interest in science careers.
A34Logical Reasoning in Formal and Everyday Reasoning Tasks (Bronkhorst, et al., 2020)Evaluated results showed that students were highly motivated by the experience, developed a genuine interest in their science topic, learned about the scientific process, and developed twenty-first century skills.
A35Making and Implementing a Mathematics Day Challenge as a Makerspace for Teams of Students (Doorman, et al., 2019)This study addresses twenty-first century skills in mathematics education with the maker movement’s framework and methodological approach. The design of these learning spaces for students and the practices engaged are described and analyzed. The results show that the maker perspective bears similarities to the problem-solving perspective, but emphasizes the importance of tinkering, making something, and working as a community of practice. The task characteristics that facilitate students’ making processes are meaningful contexts, the low-floor, high-ceiling character of the open problem, and the request for a product.
A36Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills (Häkkinen, et al., 2017)This article aims to present a pedagogical framework for the twenty-first century learning practices in teacher education. It elaborates the processes and strategies for collaborative problem-solving skills and strategic learning. It specifies current skills and provides case examples of strategic learning skills, collaborative problem-solving skills, and the skills to use information and communication technologies in diverse contexts.
A37Reconceptualizing TPACK to Meet the Needs of Twenty-First Century Education (Cherner and Smith, 2017)This research examined TPACK’s multiple dimensions and re-conceiving it to focus on students learning twenty-first century skills.
A38Rethinking learning design: Reconceptualizing the role of the learning designer in pre-service teacher preparation through a design-led approach (Kickbusch, et al., 2020)Design-thinking approaches are practical for developing and acquiring twenty-first century skills. This study combined research on learning design, teacher self-efficacy, and design-led educational innovation to formulate the Learning DESIGN Model, a conceptual model of how learning designers can improve students’ acquisition of twenty-first century skills. The model facilitates the development of design-thinking processes, skills, and mindsets in PSTs to improve their self-efficacy and enable more student-centered approaches toward curriculum design and classroom practice.
A39Scaffolding students’ development of creative design skills: A curriculum reference model (Lee and Kolodner, 2011)This paper provides a framework for promoting creative design capabilities among high school students to achieve sustainable community goals. The framework can be used as a reference model to design formal or out-of-school curriculum units in any geographical region. The framework helps curricula adaptation over a variety of communities while maintaining the main structures of the curricula. Modular content and the sequencing of strategies and tactics support learning science and creative design skills.
A40Selected aspects and conditions of the use of robots in STEM education for young learners as viewed by teachers and students (Smyrnova-Trybulska, et al., 2017)This paper discusses science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education issues. It emphasizes the need to prepare students with twenty-first century skills through STEM-related teaching, especially at the elementary level. The authors stress that using kits to build and program robots in workshops is a modern form of interdisciplinary education for children and youth.
A41Social innovation education: Designing learning for an uncertain world (Alden-Rivers, 2016)This study proposes a reconceptualization of undergraduate education to support the development of students as agents of positive social change. Social innovation education is put forward as a new pedagogy for the twenty-first century.
A42Synthesizing Pedagogies and Engaging Students: Creating Blended eLearning Strategies for Library Research and Writing Instruction (Kitchens, et al., 2016)This article identifies reference opportunities and the importance of online and face-to-face student support. This article highlights a chunked, contextual eLearning instead of a linear approach to information literacy.
A43Teachers’ experiences of technology-based teaching and learning in the Foundation Phase (Hannaway and Steyn, 2017)This article describes two qualitative research case studies of technology-rich schools using research methods with photovoice, semi-structured interviews and field notes. It examined teachers’ experience with the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge framework to understand the Foundation Phase, providing a vital contribution to understanding how technology-based teaching and learning occurs.
A44Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in one-to-one classroom: teachers developing “digital wisdom.” (Blau, et al., 2016)This article describes the results were examined through phenomenological research techniques and discussed in terms of the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and “digital wisdom” approaches. The teachers showed significant increase in technological knowledge. However, only moderate connections between technology and pedagogy as well as between technology and content were found.
A45The “vernacularization” of global education policy: media and digital literacy as twenty-first century skills in Singapore (Weninger, 2017)This paper investigates media and digital literacy at the nexus of global twenty-first century education initiatives and theirlocal interpretation within Singapore’s education system, with special
attention to the role of creative digital production. It examines how technological changes have reshaped communication, social life, and the conditions of work, challenging schools to foster skills and capacities that help youth navigate these new socio-technological terrains competently and confidently as workers, citizens, and private individuals.
A46The construct of media and information literacy in Singapore education system: global trends and local policies (Lin, et al., 2015)This paper discusses information literacy and media literacy in Singapore education as part of its twenty-first century competencies framework with particular attention to the role of creative digital production.
A47The expectations of Finnish RE student teachers of their professional development in their academic studies in the light of twenty-first century skills (Viinikka and Ubani, 2019)This study examines the expectations of religious education (RE) student teachers about their professional development during their academic studies. The RE student teachers also considered the twenty-first century skills relevant for a competent RE teacher.
A48The Role of Pedagogy in Developing Life Skills (Gupta, 2021)This article examines the role of pedagogy in developing life skills (or twenty-first century skills) and how these can be incorporated into the school/university curriculum. The article briefly touches on how teachers’ beliefs affect their classroom practices and recommends focusing on teachers’ professionalization. Only then can students acquire skills relevant to the twenty-first century, which employers seek.
A49TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills (Valtonen, 2017)Students of today and the future are expected to have the skills necessary for collaborating, problem-solving, creative and innovative thinking, and taking advantage of information and communication technology (ICT) applications. Teachers must be familiar with various pedagogical approaches and the appropriate ways to use ICT to support the development of their students’ twenty-first century skills. The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework provides a theoretical model for studying teachers’ use of ICT in education.
A50Twenty-first century learning and technology education nexus (Snape, 2011)The author discusses existing strategies that will guide educators in infusing twenty-first century skills into traditional content areas such as math, English, geography, and science. Public policy regarding educational standards, professional development, assessments, and physical school structures must exist to enable educators to employ twenty-first century skills, leading to student success in contemporary life. The price of not making twenty-first century skills a priority in the classroom will have negative consequences for future economic wellbeing. The writers introduce two perspectives developed to address twenty-first century learning and highlight how the Technology Education curriculum and Guided Inquiry are ideally suited for delivering this skill set.
A51Twenty-first century learning for teachers: helping educators bring new skills into the classroom (Wilson, 2006)The motivation behind every educator’s dedication and hard work in the classroom is the knowledge that his or her teaching will result in students’ success in life. Educators are committed to implementing twenty-first century skills; they have no question that students need them to be equipped for life beyond school. The author discusses existing strategies that will guide educators in infusing twenty-first century skills into traditional content areas such as math, English, geography, and science. Ultimately, public policy regarding educational standards, professional development, assessments, and physical school structures must exist to enable educators to employ twenty-first century skills, leading to student success in contemporary life.
A52Understanding learning in video games: A phenomenological approach to unpacking boy cultures in virtual worlds (Engerman, et al., 2019)This paper describes how experiences that mirrored twenty-first century skills aligned with the Partnership for Twenty-first Century Learning framework through digital gameplay and the findings of a phenomenological research study to uncover possible skills that boys learn through peer-supported activities using commercial off-the-shelf video games.
A53Usages and impacts of the integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in elementary classrooms: a case study of Swedish municipality schools (Sahlin, et al., 2017)Many schools have started implementing information and communication technologies with learning devices (such as laptops, tablets, cell phones, and active boards) in classroom settings to increase learning outcomes. This study aimed to find which activities and outcomes were evident in using computing devices and how they aided elementary-level students in their learning activities.
A54What does “new learning” require from religious education teachers? A study of Finnish RE teachers’ perceptions (Lipiäinen, et al., 2020)The study highlights the Assessment and Teaching of Twenty-first Century Skills (ATC21S) framework and its four teacher categories. For teachers, it emphasizes the ways of thinking, tools for working, and ways of working categories.
A55Why American business demands twenty-first century learning: A company perspective (Knox, 2006)Microsoft is an innovative corporation demonstrating the caliber of job skills needed in the twenty-first century. It demonstrates its commitment to twenty-first century skills by holding its employees accountable to a set of core competencies, enabling the company to run effectively. The author explores how Microsoft’s core competencies parallel the Partnership for 21st Century Skills learning frameworks.
A56Why American business demands twenty-first century skills: an industry perspective (Bruett, 2006)Dell supports schools in meeting educational goals, striving to supply students with the necessary twenty-first century skills. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills, of which Dell is a member, has led an initiative to define what twenty-first century learning should entail.
MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

González-Pérez, L.I.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

González-Pérez LI, Ramírez-Montoya MS. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability . 2022; 14(3):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

González-Pérez, Laura Icela, and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2022. "Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review" Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Creatrix Campus

Why Higher Education Institutions Should Focus on Education 4.0?

Education 4.0

Education 4.0: The impact of today’s education has a very long tale. Tablets and smartphone supportive classrooms, online assessments, robotics, and Artificial Intelligence (AI), big data are all the infiltration of technology.

Thanks to those innovative minds and to the needs of the fourth industrial revolution, Education 4.0 is here— the fourth Education revolution, replacing the clumsy old procedures of conventional education. 

What is Education 4.0?

Education 4.0 is a purposeful approach to learning that lines up with the fourth industrial revolution and about transforming the future of education using advanced technology and automation.

Creativity is the foundation of Education 4.0. It emphasizes the need to prepare students to take on challenges, head-on.

To keep up with the change, one has to revisit the traditional educational paradigms with a futuristic approach. Students should be adept with skills set by the fast-changing technology; they should be led, but not instructed; information should be made accessible, but not fed to them.

Both general and vocational education should aim at making students skill-ready to compete with the outside labor force. 

Major trends of Education 4.0

Major trends of Education 4.0

We have tried to summarise the major trends of Education 4.0 here below.  

(i) A more personalized learning

Education 4.0 appreciates the individuality of every single student and their own pace of learning. Having a personalized way of teaching will have a greater impact on students to achieve their outcomes easily. 

With Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing, there are numerous tools available that tweak the whole teaching process as per the individual learner’s needs learning pace.

Faculty, on the other hand, will be able to easily identify the strengths and weaknesses of the students and provide instant feedback.

(ii) More remote learning opportunities

The cornerstone of Education 4.0 is making learning available anywhere, anytime with the set of e-learning tools that promote remote and self-paced learning. 

The Active Blended Learning (ABL) concept is picking up, where students get to be actively involved in learning beyond classrooms. This way, they end up mastering both practical and experiential learning. 

(iii) The plethora of education tools 

Education 4.0 offers a clear route to students by making tools and techniques handy in their learning environment. 

This means that the students will be able to choose the tools and techniques through which they want to acquire knowledge. Collaborative and engagement tools flipped learning, and blended learning are a few to mention.

(iv) Project-based learning

The project-driven approach that Education 4.0 supports helps students learn in a fun and interesting way! 

It shuns theoretical knowledge and prompts students to learn time management skills, organizational skills, collaborative skills, time management skills, much needed for their employment for the road ahead. 

(v) Easy and accurate assessment 

A more practical way of assessment comes into place with Education 4.0. There are both online and offline assessments and students get assessed on projects, assignments, and fieldwork.

(vi) Data at the fingertips

There are greater insights into the students learning journey with data analytics and reporting in Education 4.0. The statistical analysis allows teaching staff to learn where students exactly stand and guide them appropriately.  

How industry 4.0 affect the education industry?

industry 4.0 affect the education industry

The effect of Industry Revolution 4.0 has had on Education can never be ignored.   

With education 4.0, there’s a cultivating peer-to-peer learning atmosphere with students being able to learn collaboratively and from each other.

The role of teachers is that of facilitators. The curriculum and learning outcomes focus on complex 21st-century skills including problem-solving, critical thinking, creativity, people management, teamwork and collaboration, emotional intelligence, judgment and decision-making, service orientation, negotiation, and cognitive flexibility.  

Is 4.0 helping the education industry? Why do education institutions need curriculum 4.0? 

Education 4.0 is nothing but the curriculum of the future. It is about evolving with the times, and for higher education institutions, this means understanding what is required of their future graduates. 

World leaders have laid numerous predictions about the kind of jobs the future would bring up with technology and automation. Updating the content and delivery of the education system should be an urgency. 

McKinsey and Company’s recent analysis of Automation predicts that nearly 51% of the total job would be automated, which is shocking for job seekers and educators. If not addressed on time, the situation could lead to a serious level of unemployment in the coming future.   

A majority of hiring managers believe that AI will impact the types of skills their companies need.

The below graph is an indication of what the hiring managers would foresee in the tech-driven workforce transformation.

tech-driven workforce transformation in Education 4.0

Source: Future of Jobs Survey - World Economic Forum

How can education institutions prepare students for Education 4.0?

The only way is by aligning industry requirements with education. Here are a few ways by which the same could be achieved;

Remodeling of Curriculum with special stress on futuristic subjects. With digitization and automation, a skill-based curriculum is an order of the day. Employers are running short of skilled workforce and bank on universities and educational institutions to upskill the present workforce. 

Building digital skills . Institutions should have modern workplace skills and focus on training their faculty to build digital skills to develop fully able students for their workplace.  Soft skills should be made indispensable with a mix of problem-solving, social skills, and process skills. 

Top 10 Digital skills education 4.0 demands

Opt for digital tools for virtual learning (face to face) environments (VLEs) . This is picking up across the world where students and faculty gain remote access for teaching through LMS. Learning and teaching, accessing course content, online chat facilities, discussions, collaborations, peer teaching, blended learning, all happen in flexible hours. 

Tweaking of course delivery. There should be a synchronization between the Faculty and the curriculum taught. Faculty should be open to using technological applications to improve students’ cognitive learning abilities.

They should adapt to personalized adaptive learning techniques for a smarter learning approach to make the whole process fun and interesting.

A robust professional framework with career planning inter disciplines should be included. This aspect will futurize Indian education for building a workforce for enterprise 4.0. 

Technology built classrooms to be initiated across universities, colleges, and higher education institutions to deliver successful graduates for the cyber-physical systems prevalent across all industries.

This means building a technology-rich curriculum, transforming the learning approach, to better the student experience.

This education industrial revolution 4.0 focuses on modern and smart technology, AI, robotics, all of which influence our everyday lives.

Hence universities and colleges should gear up to this massive transformation of bringing technology-driven design into the curricula with the assistance of educationists and other visionaries. 

Giving today’s workforce the right tools will help create a more multifaceted society where everyone plays their part well, adding to a self-sustainable model of education. 

At Creatrix Campus we value the power digital technology has on transforming education and we are here to help you watch your step in every way possible. We know that the future of higher education is uncertain and complex. But at Creatrix Campus we will unwind it for you. 

Our product Creatrix Campus is end-to-end higher education software that digitizes and automates the toughest processes and makes your campus future-ready.

We have tools to provide 24/7 virtual learning, platforms to offer personalized learning and to easily connect with faculty and other students, tools to develop curriculum the way you prefer, admit, and enroll students, conduct assessments online, etc. 

There’s an Outcome-based education module for your Accreditation needs,   Competency-based education module for developing effective skill-based learning.

We have built some hybrid products that improve the experience, reduce the cost of operations, and automate processes within Higher Education.

Your scheduling efforts, Virtual Classroom enablement, Accreditation, strategic planning, everything is taken care of with a set of Project Management Tools, Reporting & Analytics tools.

With Creatrix, you are not alone while planning for your next big shift in the education paradigm. Together let’s plan a preferable future for today’s students.  

Related Blog

10 Benefits of Building Multilingual Software for Colleges

Education 4.0

Transforming the future of education through advanced technology.

What does the rise of AI mean for education?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the world and education is no exception. Our new report looks at the current state of play, including apps that are available today and case studies to demonstrate where they have already made an impact.

Read the report and find out more.

How can we use technology to improve the future of assessment?

Existing and emerging technologies are starting to play a role in changing assessment. Our report sets five targets for the next five years to progress assessment towards being more authentic, accessible, appropriately automated, continuous and secure.

Read our five principles and five targets for 2025.

Debra Gray, principal of Grimsby Institute, part of TEC Partnership

“I know that students we are educating will be engaging with technology in their careers, that industry 4.0 advancements are transforming the world of work and that colleges must change and adapt to serve that new world.” 

Headshot of Debra Gray.

How to reframe the student experience in a post-pandemic world

The second episode of the HE leaders podcast examines the new and changing needs of students and how universities can engage them in helping to design their own experience.

Why university leaders need to know their digital

Industry and education must work together to boost skills, how higher education leaders are putting digital at the heart of institutional strategy, the student of the future.

What do you think teaching and learning will be like in ten years? Fast forward to 2029 and discover Natalie_4.0, a fully immersive experience from the perspective of a history and geography undergraduate of the future.

Explore education 4.0

  • Discover how we innovate

Institute of Entrepreneurship Development

Education 4.0: Here’s Why it has Come to Stay

Education 4.0: Here’s Why it has Come to Stay

If you are an educator or simply enjoy following educational trends, you must have noticed a lot of fuss around Education 4.0. In case you were wondering what this new type of education is and how it is linked with the fourth industrial revolution, keep on reading to learn more about its exciting prospects.

Let’s find out.

The Role of Education

Education has intertemporal value in our society. Its primary role is to create values and shape attitudes and behaviours aligned with society’s expectations. Furthermore, education’s secondary role is to provide students with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in life.

But what is “needed” in life has a dynamic nature that changes with culture and technology evolution. Especially nowadays, that the world is currently undergoing a rapid digital transformation, there is an urgency for educational systems to adapt. This school adaptation relates to both speeding up innovations and technology integration in schools and improving school curricula.

The still-going COVID-19 pandemic exposed the inefficiencies of education systems around the world. But luckily, this situation sped up the digital transformation of schools, making them better prepared to support Education 4.0.    

what is the importance of education 4.0

What is Education 4.0?

Education 4.0 is what we call the current state of education with all the digital tools (blended learning) and the newly aligned educational goals. For those not familiar with the term, its name originates from the fourth industrial revolution or Industry 4.0 in short.

“Industrie 4.0 refers to the intelligent networking of machines and processes for the industry with the help of information and communication technology”. In other words, we are talking about new ways of production, value creation and real-time optimization with new technologies’ help. For example, important components of industry 4.0 are the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data, machine learning and others.

what is the importance of education 4.0

As a result of this new technological boom, there is also an increased demand for tech skills. And that is when education 4.0 chimes in with the important role to teach young children the necessary digital skills. Specifically, the job types that today’s children will do in the near future do not exist yet . Additionally, it is observed that the gap between education and work is further widened after limited innovation in education systems.  Therefore, Education 4.0 is crucial to begin the reskilling revolution to meet the current demand in digital skills and competencies and the future needs.     

The Education 4.0 Benefits

As Education 4.0 will support the 4.0 Industry, it is evident that its role will be critical for the future. When education catches up with the technological advancements of the fourth industrial revolution, it will serve as a key enabler of its advantages.

Just imagine all the benefits from the previous industrial revolutions that have led to today’s unprecedented standards of living. Education can provide meaningful support to this technological revolution and improve further:

  • The labour market
  • Health Sector

More specifically, Education 4.0 will create a wider base of higher-skilled workers and reduce workforce shortages in critical sectors. Furthermore, this new type of educations aspires to create a deeper link between employers and schools. Thus, school curricula will adapt better to the actual needs of the workplace, and students will have better chances to be employed.

Education 4.0 for Youth European Project

Of course, this critical educational revolution could not be missing from the context of EU project funding. Education 4.0 for Youth ERASMUS+ project will seek to educate around this new type of education and show its relevance to the fundamental concept of the Industrial Revolution.

For this project consortium, identifying sources of learning is equally important to skills acquisition and knowledge accumulation. For that reason, the expected outcomes of this EU project are creating a digital platform for learning and online learning content in the spirit of Education 4.0.

Stay tuned for further updates on Education 4.0 for Youth European project and follow it through its project implementation period.

what is the importance of education 4.0

Vasilis Bouronikos

Content & Communication Manager

[email protected]

Do you want to write for us? Read our guest post guidelines here !

Privacy Overview

  • ESPAÑOL

Intelitek

What is Education 4.0?

Post author avatar

  • By Graham Celine
  • Published May 11, 2018
  • Posted in Blog / Industry 4.0
  • 5 mins read

In the last 250 years, society has experienced four Industrial Revolutions, which have entirely changed the face of industry as we know it. Here at Intelitek, we believe that the changes in industry should and must have a direct impact on the way we build the education system for today’s students. If your goal is to create students who can become valuable members of the workforce and independent problem solvers, educational paradigms need to be rebuilt alongside each new revolution in society.

The Four Industrial Revolutions: An Overview

Industrial Revolution Timeline

In 1780, the invention of the Steam Engine by James Watts changed the workforce forever. Suddenly, manual labor was less in demand, as machines were able to complete jobs faster and more accurately. New jobs working machinery were created, and families moved from the countryside to the city, from agricultural life to a life of industry.

These kinds of jobs were in demand until around 1900, when the production line became popular during the second industrial revolution. Soon, workers all had their own role to play in the production line, with expertise in one small area, instead of end-to-end knowledge about a product. The production line improved efficiency, and allowed for high quality products to be sold cheaply to the masses. Notably, Steel production heralded the creation of Skyscrapers, Railways, Electric motors, and more. Society had changed again.

Just 70 years later, the computer brought a third industrial revolution. The rigid systems of the production line were suddenly made flexible, and computing quickly spread across all industries, from Agriculture, to Banking, Management and Shipping.

In 2000, the ubiquitous nature of the Internet ushered in the fourth industrial revolution, the Connected Computer. Connectivity between systems has made remote working and collaboration a possibility, allowing businesses to become global enterprises, and retail to explode internationally with the help of production, shipping and finance online industries. Society has adapted to be more social, more knowledgeable, and many believe the world is a far smaller place than ever before.

The Effect on Education

If we look back at how education has changed since the first industrial revolution, we might better understand the challenges for students and teachers today.

In 1780, there was little to no expectation that children would have any education whatsoever. People learned a trade, typically with on the job apprentice training. Where it existed, education was a luxury for the rich. Later, when the second revolution occurred, industry needed skilled workers, who needed to be literate in order to be valuable in the workforce. Suddenly, an education was needed. And this education system, founded on the needs of the second industrial revolution is in many ways still in place today.

Based on earlier life learning models, schools taught knowledge. Students came in with no knowledge, the teacher fed them information in specific subjects and at the end, the student was tested to evaluate if they remembered what they were taught. This fostered a rigid framework of study disciplines, education standards and eventually standardized testing. A production line!

The introduction of the computer did not change the underlying ethos behind our education system. Instead, education professionals simply took advantage of the technology and replaced teachers with computers, enabling teaching, learning and assessment to be handled by machine. While long distance learning and a vast amount of information is now accessible thanks to the Internet revolution, the structure of our education system has still been left unchallenged. Learning outcomes are still being tested by the criteria set out in the second industrial revolution. We are still treating educators and students like they are part of a production line.

Education 4.0

In order for this to change, we must revisit the educational paradigms, and focus on the areas that need rethinking. In today’s new world of fast changing technology and information overload, students need to be trained and not taught. Information needs to be made accessible and students need to learn how to find it rather than the teacher offering it to them in a rigid structure.

We now understand that students are not alike, do not have the same starting point, can learn and absorb different areas of focus differently and need to be guided to develop their skills rather than taught a set of predefined data points. Education 4.0 needs to align with Industry 4.0 and prepare students for the next industrial revolution which will happen in their lifetime.

Aligning Education 4.0 with Industry 4.0

It’s time to bring education into the 21 st Century. Flexible, tailor-made curricula, taught by teachers who become mentors to their students, and treat them as individuals is the least that today’s schools deserve. Giving the workforce of tomorrow the tools to become active lifelong learners can create a diverse and pluralistic society where every person understands and plays to their strengths, building a fair and self-sustaining model for education rather than knowledge.

aligning industry requirements with education

Read more about Industry 4.0 and Education 4.0 by downloading this white paper from Intelitek.

You Might Also Like

Read more about the article Why community college students need dedicated manufacturing training labs

Why community college students need dedicated manufacturing training labs

5 modern education myths debunked, infographic: how education needs to keep up with industry 4.0, need help try our new knowledge base.

what is the importance of education 4.0

CONTACT INFO

18 Tsienneto Road. Derry, NH 03038 USA Toll Free: +1-800-221-2763 (US only) Phone: +1-603-413-2600 Fax: +1-603-437-2137 Email: [email protected]

PRODUCT CATALOGS

what is the importance of education 4.0

CONNECT WITH US

  • Our Partners
  • Our Company
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Code of Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • COPPA/FERPA Policy

what is the importance of education 4.0

Intelitek Sales & Service

18 Tsienetto Rd, Derry NH p 603.413.2600

[email protected]

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving OH, MI, NY & NJ

IST 150 Industrial Drive Lexington, OH 44904 Toll-free: 844.447.8644 email: [email protected]

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT

Technology Education Concepts, Inc. 32 Commercial St., Concord, NH 03301 p 800-338-2238 Ext. 301 | f 603-225-7766

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving AK, ID, MT, OR, WA

Northwest Technical Products 4928 SW Lake Flora Road Port Orchard, WA 98367 Toll-free: 800.258.8893 p 360.874.1822 | f 360.876.1871

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Iowa, Nebraska & South Dakota

Mid-West 3D Solutions 1018 – 8th Street, PMB 22 Boone, IA 50036 p 888.509.0690 | f 515.598.5129

110 Locust Panama, NE 68419 p 888.509.0690 | f 402.788.2802

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Texas & Oklahoma

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving New York & New Jersey

Joe Zahra Associates 91 Blake Avenue Bohemia, NY 11716 p 516-695-0392

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Illinois, Indiana & Pennsylvania

JBH Technologies P.O. Box 2218 Glenview, IL 60025-2218 p 800.455.9310 | f 847.729.1755

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Colorado, Utah, Wyoming

High Country Technology Consultants P.O. Box 336222 Greeley, CO 80633 Toll-free: 866.303.5582 p 970.351.0005 | f 970.351.0006

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin

First Technologies, Inc. Brookfield, Wisconsin Toll-free: 800.787.9717 email: [email protected] 

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving VirginiA, West Virginia, Maryland, & DElaware

Diversified Education Systems   205 E. Washington Street Middleburg, VA 20118 Toll-free 800.409.8641 p 540.687.7063 e  [email protected]

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Kansas & Missouri

DEPCO Enterprises, LLC 264 N. Industrial Drive Frontenac, Kansas 66763 p 800.767.1062

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Arizona & New Mexico

Aztech Educational Resources LLC 17611 N. Foothills Drive Sun City, AZ 85373 p 623.815.1394 | f 623.815.1454

alpha-tech-logo-v2 (1)

Serving Canada

Alpha Educational & Technological Solutions Inc. Unit B3, 1410 Parkway Blvd., Dep 19 Coquitlam, BC, Canada, V3E 3J7 p 604.782.4568 | f 604.942.4419 email:    [email protected]

what is the importance of education 4.0

Contact an International Dealer

To contact a local dealer in other countries please leave your details and we will have someone reach out to you as soon as possible:

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving MISSISSIPPI, Arkansas & Louisiana

Magee Enterprises, Inc. 105 Millcreek Corners Brandon, MS 39047 Toll-free: 800.613.1085 p 601.992.0741 | f 601.992.2162

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving CAlifornia, Hawaii & Nevada

Paton Group 787 W. Woodbury Rd., #10 Altadena, CA 91001 p 800.826.0570 | f 626.791.1476

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving AL, GA, KY, NS, SC, TN

Learning Labs, Inc. P.O. Box 1419 Calhoun, GA 30703 Toll-free: 800.334.4943 p 706-629-4624 | f 706.629.6761

what is the importance of education 4.0

Serving Florida

Technical Training Aids 2076 Valleydale Terrace Birmingham, AL 35244

800-851-3987 [email protected]

what is the importance of education 4.0

October 6 Celebrating

Leaders in CTE Training for MFG

what is the importance of education 4.0

We are happy to help you with any education needs or queries.

Leave your details here and one of our team or our local partner will reach out to you as soon as possible to discuss your needs.

what is the importance of education 4.0

Preparing Students for the Future: The Importance of Education 4.0

February 8, 2023.

Countless forecasts have been made regarding the future of work . Leading organizations from all over the world have been warning of impending changes in the way the working world is structured for years.

The impact and opportunities of the internet have been evident for more than a decade. A thorough analysis by McKinsey in 2011 revealed that while the Internet has eliminated 500,000 jobs over the past 15 years, it has also generated 1.2 million new ones, totaling a net increase of 700,000 or 2.4 jobs for each job that was eliminated. This implies that digitalization and connectivity offers a field of opportunities, just waiting to be plucked.

significant shifts in the employment landscape

This shows that there has been a clear shift in the priority of skill sets in the 21st-century employment landscape. Digital literacy and fundamental ICT skills are becoming increasingly essential now more than ever.

In 2019, The Future of Work report by OECD recognized three factors that has a significant impact on the job market- Globalization, technological advancement, and demographic shift.

The Education 4.0 initiative was launched by the World Economic Forum and UNICEF in 2020 to increase access to digital learning, eradicate the disparities in the Indian education system, and foster a holistic learning environment for the youth of India.

Want to explore the 5 foundational pillars of Education 4.0? Click here .

Skill development for the evolving 21st-century job landscape received widespread attention in the Education 4.0 initiative.

Table of Contents

Transforming the Education Landscape to Align with Industry 4.0

transforming-the-education-landscape-to-align-with-industry-four-point-zero

Nearly all occupations are changing to reflect the expanding use of technology and the automation of repetitive tasks, along with the emergence of new fields. In order to maintain a competitive advantage and develop students for digitally advanced industries, education institutions should prioritize the following:

  • Development of digital infrastructure to facilitate blended learning strategies.
  • Development of digital literacy for a comfortable “school-to-work” transition.

A clear advantage over machines in modern workplaces will continue to exist for companies with robust digital infrastructure and employees with well-trained digital literacy. Hence, in addition to receiving a foundational education in ICT, students should be immersed from the start in a cutting-edge digital ecosystem.

Digital Infrastructure:

The digital infrastructure of a university can be defined as the equipment, tools, and technological innovations implemented and used to establish itself in the online world. A robust digital infrastructure allows institutions to completely transform their existing brick-and-mortar setup and maximize efficiency in the long run.

For instance, digital edtech platforms, internet connectivity, devices like smartboards, etc.

Some of the unmatched benefits of a well-established digital infrastructure:

  • Educators and students can stay connected at all times via the internet.
  • Limitless digital course content repositories accessed online and on demand.
  • Blended learning environment for continuous practice and maximum knowledge retention.
  • Effective assessment and evaluation through online assignments.
  • Automation of mundane and repetitive tasks for ease of management.
  • Immediate feedback to guide and eliminate knowledge gaps in real-time.
  • Precise analytics and insights into learning patterns and student behavior.
  • Multimedia content for the comprehension of intangible concepts like quantum physics, chemical bonds, astronomy, etc.

Digital Literacy:

Digital infrastructure is worthless without digital literacy.

Institutions, colleges, and universities are open to the idea of creating a blended learning environment, which is unachievable without digital tools and cloud-based technologies. Students in this digital era need to get familiar with digital dashboards, automation, multimedia content, and other immersive technologies that are already prevalent in many industries.

Universities continue to play a crucial role in ensuring that the youth is prepared to be active citizens and productive workers in light of the growing “job disruption” and “increased socioeconomic polarization.”

To prepare students for the digitally advanced workspaces of the twenty-first century, existing curricula need to be redesigned. Lessons should be taught through interactive methods via digital platforms that foster the critical and individual thinking required in the innovation-driven future.

Creative problem-solving, collaboration, and self-management need to be explicitly taught via blended learning pedagogies alongside academic knowledge and deeply ingrained into the curriculum.

The Ultimate Goal

In a perfect world, educational models would integrate digital learning pedagogies, enabling the students to gain the skills and abilities they need to succeed, ultimately resulting in a more “inclusive, interconnected, and productive world.”

As discussed above, the students of this technologically advanced era need to be immersed in digital learning to develop specific skills for the 21st-century workspace. Universities with robust digital infrastructure and opportunities for digital literacy will unlock innovative blended learning strategies and facilitate a seamless transition to the working world, ultimately producing successful innovators of tomorrow.

Modernizing STEM Education with Möbius

DigitalEd India offers an interactive Möbius platform that enables students to work in an increasingly digital world. It helps create a cohesive digital learning ecosystem for STEM students.

Here’s how Möbius aligns STEM education with industry 4.0:

  • An immersive digital learning environment to prepare students for modern workspace;
  • It facilitates a blended learning approach with a seamless and easy-to-use digital dashboard;
  • Educators can design, develop and distribute interactive digital courses across the globe;
  • Educators can stay connected with the students digitally throughout the learning process;
  • Educators can add multimedia content and inline questions to reinforce knowledge in-between lessons.

Want to learn more?

Contact us to book an in-depth demo session with our product expert.

Stay tuned for more additions to the Education 4.0 series.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Home » Blog – LEAD Gurukul » What is Education 4.0 – 5 Key Takeaways

What is Education 4.0 – 5 Key Takeaways

What-is-Education-4-0-5-key-takeaways

Last Updated On: 20/08/2024

Siddharth Saxena

School Owner

Education has intertemporal value in our society. Its main function is to instil values and mould attitudes and behaviours in line with societal norms. Additionally, giving students the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in life is education’s secondary goal.

The dynamic nature of what is “required” in life, however, shifts as culture and technology advance. Hence the evolution and advancement of education have led to the birth of Education 4.0.

what is the importance of education 4.0

“AI is in a ‘golden age’ and solving problems that were once in the realm of sci-fi.” – Jeff Bezos.

In this article

What-is-Education-4-0

What is Education 4.0?

Education-4-0-5-Key-Benefits-in-Learning-Landscape

Education 4.0 - 5 Key Benefits in Learning Landscape

How-is-LEAD-Catalysing-Education-4-0-Revolution

How is LEAD Catalysing the Education 4.0 Revolution?

In the 21st century, technology started to permeate the educational process, and both students and teachers started the use of technology in education in fundamental ways that came to be known as Education 2.0. Technology advancements, particularly the wide adoption of a more user-generated internet, led to the emergence of education 3.0. 

Now, Education 4.0, a learning approach associated with the fourth industrial revolution, aims to transform education in the future through cutting-edge technology and automation. This technological revolution includes robotics, artificial intelligence, and smart technology.

Never miss a story

Stay updated with the latest news and articles related to school education

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

 alt=

Research by McKinsey Digital revealed that 60% of all occupations could potentially have at least a third of their activities automated due to the fourth industrial revolution. Hence, an increasing need to adopt Education 4.0 and the use of technology in education . Here are the key benefits of education 4.0:

  • Preparing students for evolving industries The skills required of employees will surely evolve as more organisations combine cyber-physical systems. The ability of technology to keep us connected at all times has led to an increase in the flexibility and adaptability of job duties. Hence,  Education 4.0 is all about adapting to change, bringing the use of technology in education and for schools to determine what their future students will require.
  • Automating basic administrative tasks Administrative work takes up a lot of time for teachers. Automation of activity grading and assessment will become easier with the use of technology in education, benefitting the teachers. Automating administrative duties with cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enables teachers to spend more time with students, further enhancing the learning experience in classrooms.
  • Offering personalised education The purpose of AI and ML in education is to aid teachers in better understanding each student’s potential and limitations through the use of technology in education . Each student has a different learning method and pace & teachers are able to cater to these needs of students now through AI and ML.
  • Providing constructive criticism AI can be used by teachers in the classroom to improve the guidance they give to their students and to make studying more exciting as the students are engaged in active learning. It also allows teachers to provide students with instant feedback, which helps students identify their weaknesses and figure out how to address them.
  • Offering access to all pupils AI and machine learning are utilised in the classroom to make learning accessible to all students. Even students who are visually impaired or have hearing disabilities can access education with the help of AI tools like real-time subtitles, etc.  

The use of well-designed artificial intelligence in education enables teachers and students to benefit from the advancements in technology that can improve educational methods . AI-powered tools will assist teachers in improving students’ academic performance and sharpening their critical thinking abilities.

LEAD Teacher

LEAD Webinar - Technology Integration in Schools

School Transformation, the LEAD way

LEAD, India’s largest school EdTech company, is committed to bringing innovation to the core of the education system and offers the best EdTech solutions for schools to embrace Education 4.0.

The following solutions, incorporating the use of technology in education , provided by LEAD are a catalyst in the Education 4.0 revolution:

  • LEAD empowers schools with cutting-edge smart classroom setup.
  • The LEAD teacher tablet supports multimodal learning and provides real-time insights for teachers to identify struggling students.
  • LEAD offers a next-generation integrated learning management system that perfectly combines curriculum, pedagogy, and technology to help schools keep costs down while delivering quality education to their students.
  • LEAD has introduced subjects such as Coding & Computational Skills (CCS) in the school curriculum itself. Rather than simply consuming content using technology, LEAD enables students to become creators by using technology to build apps, websites and games and thus become future-ready.

“Technology is not just a tool; it can give learners a voice that they may not have had before”- George Couros

Education 4.0 ensures that students are capable of mastering the skills needed by the rapidly advancing world. LEAD is helping 3000+ private schools in India transform their classrooms into smart classrooms, thus making millions of children future-ready. Get in touch with us today to know how LEAD can transform your school with the use of technology in education .

Article Summary

  • Schools should ensure preparing students for a world where cyber-physical systems are common.
  • According to Education 4.0, technology must be incorporated into the curriculum, the learning process must be completely changed, and technology must be used to improve the learning experience.
  • Education 4.0 makes students future-ready by enabling an understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning and making education more inclusive.
  • LEAD has well understood the emerging demand for technology-enabled learning and is therefore providing EdTech solutions in the same direction.

Other Related Blogs

what is the importance of education 4.0

Siddharth is a Senior Content Executive in the Content Marketing Team at LEAD School. He is an alumnus of Delhi University and has been working as a Content Writer/Copywriter for the past 7 years in Ed-Tech and various other industries. He truly believes in LEAD's mission of providing excellent education and works tirelessly towards it, every day.

Twitter

Exciting OFFERS ending SOON!!

Give your school the lead advantage, give your child the lead advantage.

lead

Here's a handy guide for you

what is the importance of education 4.0

Download the EBook

Download the nep ebook.

CHALLENGES AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATION 4.0 IN THE EDUCATION SECTOR

  • October 2021
  • Volume:03 October-2021(Issue:10):2582-5208

Shuchita Mudgil at Kalaniketan Polytechnic College Jabalpur

  • Kalaniketan Polytechnic College Jabalpur

Discover the world's research

  • 25+ million members
  • 160+ million publication pages
  • 2.3+ billion citations
  • Bibissara Ismakova
  • Yuliya Bakina
  • Tatyana Chaussova
  • Svetlana Udartseva
  • Christopher Alan Bonfield
  • Marie Salter
  • Alan Longmuir
  • Chie Adachi

Purwono Hendradi

  • INT J PROD RES

Yongxin Liao

  • Florian C. Kleemann

Lutz Sommer

  • Recruit researchers
  • Join for free
  • Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Calculate for all schools

Your chance of acceptance, your chancing factors, extracurriculars, what is the value of perseverance in a college student.

I've often heard people mention that perseverance is a vital quality in students, but how does this trait specifically play out in the college setting? I'm curious because I'd like to understand what kind of personal qualities colleges appreciate the most.

Perseverance is indeed one of the most important qualities a college student can possess, and it's often seen extremely favorably by higher education institutions. At its core, perseverance enables students to push through challenging circumstances, thereby fostering academic success and personal growth.

College is a significant step up from high school in terms of academic rigor and personal responsibility. With myriad responsibilities such as attending classes, completing assignments, maintaining a social life, and perhaps holding down a job or an internship, the experience can often feel overwhelming. Therein lies the role of perseverance: it's the fuel that keeps you going when things get tough.

For instance, consider a scenario where you're up against a challenging course. Perseverance would compel you to seek help, perhaps in the form of tutoring or office hours, rather than giving up or settling for a lower grade. This mindset of pushing through adversity and seeking solutions is highly valued in the professional world as well, making perseverance a beneficial quality post graduation.

Moreover, college life isn't just about academics—it's a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and experiences. There may be instances where you feel like an outsider or face situations that challenge your sense of belonging. Here again, the power of perseverance allows you to confront and overcome such hurdles, ultimately making you a stronger person.

In terms of college admissions, demonstrating a track record of perseverance can help you stand out. Admissions officers are on the lookout for students who can not only handle the academic pressure, but also carve a niche for themselves in the college community. Hence, essays and personal statements are excellent arenas to highlight instances where you've exhibited this trait.

Finally, it's important to remember that while perseverance is highly valued, it's equally crucial to balance it with self-care. College is a marathon, not a sprint, and charging ahead constantly without rest or relaxation can lead to burnout. In conclusion, perseverance is a cornerstone of success in the collegiate arena, but remember to go easy on yourself.

About CollegeVine’s Expert FAQ

CollegeVine’s Q&A seeks to offer informed perspectives on commonly asked admissions questions. Every answer is refined and validated by our team of admissions experts to ensure it resonates with trusted knowledge in the field.

COMMENTS

  1. Defining Education 4.0: A Taxonomy for the Future of Learning

    This document unifies the World Economic Forum's broader Education 4.0 initiative behind a common foundation and understanding of how to reimagine education systems, and serves as an instrument to facilitate that transformation. The Education 4.0 learning taxonomy presents a comprehensive set of skills, attitudes, and values to prepare young ...

  2. The future of learning: AI is revolutionizing education 4.0

    With increasing interest in AI and education, the Education 4.0 Alliance sought to understand the current state and future promises of the technology for education. The latest report - Shaping the Future of Learning: The Role of AI in Education 4.0 - shows four key promises that have emerged for AI to enable Education 4.0: 1.

  3. PDF Defining Education 4.0: A Taxonomy for the Future of Learning

    Education 4.0 are not new, and have been embraced by experts, educators and others in the education workforce for years. In addition, several comprehensive and well-established learning frameworks - such as the OECD's Learning Compass 2030 - have acted as important reference points for this work. This Education 4.0 Taxonomy

  4. Understanding Education 4.0: The Machine Learning-Driven ...

    Education 4.0 is a technique of learning that is connected with the fourth industrial revolution and focuses on transforming the future of education through advanced technology and automation ...

  5. Shaping the Future of Learning: The Role of AI in Education 4.0

    Shaping the Future of Learning: The Role of AI in Education 4.0. This report explores the potential for artificial intelligence to benefit educators, students and teachers. Case studies show how AI can personalize learning experiences, streamline administrative tasks, and integrate into curricula. This report explores the potential for ...

  6. Everything You Need to Know About Education 4.0

    What is Education 4.0? Education 4.0 is a desired approach to learning that aligns itself with the emerging fourth industrial revolution. This industrial revolution focuses on smart technology, artificial intelligence, and robotics; all of which now impact our everyday lives. For universities to continue to produce successful graduates, they ...

  7. The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case

    The diagram in Figure 1 compiles the relevant concepts of the higher education transition from Education 1.0 to the current industrial and educational paradigm of Education 4.0. The infographic's sources to define the structure are the works of various authors whose research elements were included in this section [ 4 , 5 ].

  8. Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in

    ABSTRACT. This paper, originally written just before the outbreak of COVID-19, will provide a review of Education 4.0 in a select range of UK and international higher education providers and offer an initial discussion of the role and importance of digital personal assistants and online and lifelong learning in delivering world-class learning ...

  9. (PDF) Education 4.0: The Concept, Skills, and Research

    Most researchers outline numerous technical, communication, digital, and cognitive skills as a skillset of Industry 4.0. Teaching and Learning in Education 4.0. The traditional pedagogy or face-to ...

  10. PDF Catalysing Education 4.0 Investing in the Future of Learning for a

    Chapter 3: Investing in education 4.0: key opportunity areas. 3.1 Opportunity area: new assessment mechanisms. 3.2 Opportunity area: adoption of new learning technologies. 3.3 Opportunity area: empowering the education workforce. Chapter 4: Call to action. due to Education 4.0 adop. ionEndnotesSources.

  11. Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4

    The main technologies of Education 4.0, which play an important role in sustaining Industry 4.0 and have a significant impact on reshaping engineering education itself, are presented by Mogoş and Bodea (2019). Buzov (2020) reveals the importance of Education 4.0 for preschool education. •

  12. Reskilling Revolution

    Align on key skills for childhood education and co-create a public narrative around the importance of incorporating these skills in childhood learning; Surface and promote innovate, public-private-led approaches to developing Education 4.0 skills; Incentivize the adoption of Education 4.0 skills within childhood learning

  13. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks ...

    Responsive educational proposals to develop skills to meet the demands of Industry 4.0 have become imperative to guarantee inclusive, equitable, and quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all, also reducing the negative impact of COVID-19 and the major post-pandemic social issues. This article analyzes which components of Education 4.0 have been considered in 21st ...

  14. Why Higher Education Institutions Should Focus on Education 4.0

    Education 4.0 is a purposeful approach to learning that lines up with the fourth industrial revolution and about transforming the future of education using advanced technology and automation. Creativity is the foundation of Education 4.0. It emphasizes the need to prepare students to take on challenges, head-on.

  15. Education 4.0

    The student of the future. What do you think teaching and learning will be like in ten years? Fast forward to 2029 and discover Natalie_4.0, a fully immersive experience from the perspective of a history and geography undergraduate of the future. Transforming the future of education through advanced technology.

  16. Education 4.0: Here's Why it has Come to Stay

    Education 4.0 is what we call the current state of education with all the digital tools (blended learning) and the newly aligned educational goals. For those not familiar with the term, its name originates from the fourth industrial revolution or Industry 4.0 in short. "Industrie 4.0 refers to the intelligent networking of machines and ...

  17. PDF May the Fourth Be with You: Creating Education 4

    Part 1: Tracking Change. One way of looking back for Higher Education is to consider the developments of the World Wide Web. The Web started off as transmissive (1.0), then social (2.0), and 3.0 (semantic). The big change from Web 1.0 to 2.0 was not the technology but in the way that it was used.

  18. The three critical skillsets cultivated by Education 4.0

    Problem-solving, collaboration and adaptability are the three critical skills that Education 4.0 must impart to students. Education 4.0 reimagines education as an inclusive, lifelong experience that places the responsibility for skill-building on the learner, with teachers and mentors acting as facilitators and enablers.

  19. What is Education 4.0?

    Education 4.0 needs to align with Industry 4.0 and prepare students for the next industrial revolution which will happen in their lifetime. Aligning Education 4.0 with Industry 4.0. It's time to bring education into the 21 st Century. Flexible, tailor-made curricula, taught by teachers who become mentors to their students, and treat them as ...

  20. Preparing Students for the Future: The Importance of Education 4.0

    In 2019, The Future of Work report by OECD recognized three factors that has a significant impact on the job market- Globalization, technological advancement, and demographic shift. The Education 4.0 initiative was launched by the World Economic Forum and UNICEF in 2020 to increase access to digital learning, eradicate the disparities in the ...

  21. What is Education 4.0

    According to Education 4.0, technology must be incorporated into the curriculum, the learning process must be completely changed, and technology must be used to improve the learning experience. Education 4.0 makes students future-ready by enabling an understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning and making education more inclusive.

  22. (Pdf) Challenges and Implementation of Education 4.0 in The Education

    Education 4.0 enhances th e freedom to study as well a s the freedom to invent, think, and act by. demonstrating promising results in a variety of fields. As a result, both students and educators ...

  23. Catalysing Education 4.0: Investing in the Future of Learning for a

    In Catalysing Education 4.0, developed in consultation with leading education experts from the public, private and educational sectors, we estimate that investment in critical skills for the future such as collaborative problem-solving could add an additional $2.54 trillion in increased productivity to the global economy, with highest relative gains in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and ...

  24. What is the value of perseverance in a college student?

    Perseverance is indeed one of the most important qualities a college student can possess, and it's often seen extremely favorably by higher education institutions. At its core, perseverance enables students to push through challenging circumstances, thereby fostering academic success and personal growth. College is a significant step up from high school in terms of academic rigor and personal ...

  25. BPSC TRE 4.0 MUSIC SUBJECT IMPORTANT MCQS LIVE CLASS 28

    BPSC TRE 4.0 MUSIC SUBJECT IMPORTANT MCQS LIVE CLASS 28 || #bpscteacher || #bpsctre4.0 #bpsc2024CHANDIGARH TGT EXAM 2024 MUSIC PAPER ANSWER KEY (27/06/2024) ...

  26. Family-Style Dining is an Important part of DoDEA Americas

    In a major enhancement for early childhood education, the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) Americas has introduced a full-day Prekindergarten program at 28 schools.