essay on man epistle 4 summary

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Alexander Pope (1688–1744)

Poems & Poets

An Essay on Man: Epistle I

To Henry St. John, Lord Bolingbroke Awake, my St. John! leave all meaner things To low ambition, and the pride of kings. Let us (since life can little more supply Than just to look about us and to die) Expatiate free o'er all this scene of man; A mighty maze! but not without a plan; A wild, where weeds and flow'rs promiscuous shoot; Or garden, tempting with forbidden fruit. Together let us beat this ample field, Try what the open, what the covert yield; The latent tracts, the giddy heights explore Of all who blindly creep, or sightless soar; Eye Nature's walks, shoot folly as it flies, And catch the manners living as they rise; Laugh where we must, be candid where we can; But vindicate the ways of God to man. I. Say first, of God above, or man below, What can we reason, but from what we know? Of man what see we, but his station here, From which to reason, or to which refer? Through worlds unnumber'd though the God be known, 'Tis ours to trace him only in our own. He, who through vast immensity can pierce, See worlds on worlds compose one universe, Observe how system into system runs, What other planets circle other suns, What varied being peoples ev'ry star, May tell why Heav'n has made us as we are. But of this frame the bearings, and the ties, The strong connections, nice dependencies, Gradations just, has thy pervading soul Look'd through? or can a part contain the whole? Is the great chain, that draws all to agree, And drawn supports, upheld by God, or thee? II. Presumptuous man! the reason wouldst thou find, Why form'd so weak, so little, and so blind? First, if thou canst, the harder reason guess, Why form'd no weaker, blinder, and no less! Ask of thy mother earth, why oaks are made Taller or stronger than the weeds they shade? Or ask of yonder argent fields above, Why Jove's satellites are less than Jove? Of systems possible, if 'tis confest That Wisdom infinite must form the best, Where all must full or not coherent be, And all that rises, rise in due degree; Then, in the scale of reas'ning life, 'tis plain There must be somewhere, such a rank as man: And all the question (wrangle e'er so long) Is only this, if God has plac'd him wrong? Respecting man, whatever wrong we call, May, must be right, as relative to all. In human works, though labour'd on with pain, A thousand movements scarce one purpose gain; In God's, one single can its end produce; Yet serves to second too some other use. So man, who here seems principal alone, Perhaps acts second to some sphere unknown, Touches some wheel, or verges to some goal; 'Tis but a part we see, and not a whole. When the proud steed shall know why man restrains His fiery course, or drives him o'er the plains: When the dull ox, why now he breaks the clod, Is now a victim, and now Egypt's God: Then shall man's pride and dulness comprehend His actions', passions', being's, use and end; Why doing, suff'ring, check'd, impell'd; and why This hour a slave, the next a deity. Then say not man's imperfect, Heav'n in fault; Say rather, man's as perfect as he ought: His knowledge measur'd to his state and place, His time a moment, and a point his space. If to be perfect in a certain sphere, What matter, soon or late, or here or there? The blest today is as completely so, As who began a thousand years ago. III. Heav'n from all creatures hides the book of fate, All but the page prescrib'd, their present state: From brutes what men, from men what spirits know: Or who could suffer being here below? The lamb thy riot dooms to bleed today, Had he thy reason, would he skip and play? Pleas'd to the last, he crops the flow'ry food, And licks the hand just rais'd to shed his blood. Oh blindness to the future! kindly giv'n, That each may fill the circle mark'd by Heav'n: Who sees with equal eye, as God of all, A hero perish, or a sparrow fall, Atoms or systems into ruin hurl'd, And now a bubble burst, and now a world. Hope humbly then; with trembling pinions soar; Wait the great teacher Death; and God adore! What future bliss, he gives not thee to know, But gives that hope to be thy blessing now. Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never is, but always to be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come. Lo! the poor Indian, whose untutor'd mind Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind; His soul, proud science never taught to stray Far as the solar walk, or milky way; Yet simple nature to his hope has giv'n, Behind the cloud-topt hill, an humbler heav'n; Some safer world in depth of woods embrac'd, Some happier island in the wat'ry waste, Where slaves once more their native land behold, No fiends torment, no Christians thirst for gold. To be, contents his natural desire, He asks no angel's wing, no seraph's fire; But thinks, admitted to that equal sky, His faithful dog shall bear him company. IV. Go, wiser thou! and, in thy scale of sense Weigh thy opinion against Providence; Call imperfection what thou fanciest such, Say, here he gives too little, there too much: Destroy all creatures for thy sport or gust, Yet cry, if man's unhappy, God's unjust; If man alone engross not Heav'n's high care, Alone made perfect here, immortal there: Snatch from his hand the balance and the rod, Rejudge his justice, be the God of God. In pride, in reas'ning pride, our error lies; All quit their sphere, and rush into the skies. Pride still is aiming at the blest abodes, Men would be angels, angels would be gods. Aspiring to be gods, if angels fell, Aspiring to be angels, men rebel: And who but wishes to invert the laws Of order, sins against th' Eternal Cause. V. Ask for what end the heav'nly bodies shine, Earth for whose use? Pride answers, " 'Tis for mine: For me kind Nature wakes her genial pow'r, Suckles each herb, and spreads out ev'ry flow'r; Annual for me, the grape, the rose renew, The juice nectareous, and the balmy dew; For me, the mine a thousand treasures brings; For me, health gushes from a thousand springs; Seas roll to waft me, suns to light me rise; My foot-stool earth, my canopy the skies." But errs not Nature from this gracious end, From burning suns when livid deaths descend, When earthquakes swallow, or when tempests sweep Towns to one grave, whole nations to the deep? "No, ('tis replied) the first Almighty Cause Acts not by partial, but by gen'ral laws; Th' exceptions few; some change since all began: And what created perfect?"—Why then man? If the great end be human happiness, Then Nature deviates; and can man do less? As much that end a constant course requires Of show'rs and sunshine, as of man's desires; As much eternal springs and cloudless skies, As men for ever temp'rate, calm, and wise. If plagues or earthquakes break not Heav'n's design, Why then a Borgia, or a Catiline? Who knows but he, whose hand the lightning forms, Who heaves old ocean, and who wings the storms, Pours fierce ambition in a Cæsar's mind, Or turns young Ammon loose to scourge mankind? From pride, from pride, our very reas'ning springs; Account for moral, as for nat'ral things: Why charge we Heav'n in those, in these acquit? In both, to reason right is to submit. Better for us, perhaps, it might appear, Were there all harmony, all virtue here; That never air or ocean felt the wind; That never passion discompos'd the mind. But ALL subsists by elemental strife; And passions are the elements of life. The gen'ral order, since the whole began, Is kept in nature, and is kept in man. VI. What would this man? Now upward will he soar, And little less than angel, would be more; Now looking downwards, just as griev'd appears To want the strength of bulls, the fur of bears. Made for his use all creatures if he call, Say what their use, had he the pow'rs of all? Nature to these, without profusion, kind, The proper organs, proper pow'rs assign'd; Each seeming want compensated of course, Here with degrees of swiftness, there of force; All in exact proportion to the state; Nothing to add, and nothing to abate. Each beast, each insect, happy in its own: Is Heav'n unkind to man, and man alone? Shall he alone, whom rational we call, Be pleas'd with nothing, if not bless'd with all? The bliss of man (could pride that blessing find) Is not to act or think beyond mankind; No pow'rs of body or of soul to share, But what his nature and his state can bear. Why has not man a microscopic eye? For this plain reason, man is not a fly. Say what the use, were finer optics giv'n, T' inspect a mite, not comprehend the heav'n? Or touch, if tremblingly alive all o'er, To smart and agonize at ev'ry pore? Or quick effluvia darting through the brain, Die of a rose in aromatic pain? If nature thunder'd in his op'ning ears, And stunn'd him with the music of the spheres, How would he wish that Heav'n had left him still The whisp'ring zephyr, and the purling rill? Who finds not Providence all good and wise, Alike in what it gives, and what denies? VII. Far as creation's ample range extends, The scale of sensual, mental pow'rs ascends: Mark how it mounts, to man's imperial race, From the green myriads in the peopled grass: What modes of sight betwixt each wide extreme, The mole's dim curtain, and the lynx's beam: Of smell, the headlong lioness between, And hound sagacious on the tainted green: Of hearing, from the life that fills the flood, To that which warbles through the vernal wood: The spider's touch, how exquisitely fine! Feels at each thread, and lives along the line: In the nice bee, what sense so subtly true From pois'nous herbs extracts the healing dew: How instinct varies in the grov'lling swine, Compar'd, half-reas'ning elephant, with thine: 'Twixt that, and reason, what a nice barrier; For ever sep'rate, yet for ever near! Remembrance and reflection how allied; What thin partitions sense from thought divide: And middle natures, how they long to join, Yet never pass th' insuperable line! Without this just gradation, could they be Subjected, these to those, or all to thee? The pow'rs of all subdu'd by thee alone, Is not thy reason all these pow'rs in one? VIII. See, through this air, this ocean, and this earth, All matter quick, and bursting into birth. Above, how high, progressive life may go! Around, how wide! how deep extend below! Vast chain of being, which from God began, Natures ethereal, human, angel, man, Beast, bird, fish, insect! what no eye can see, No glass can reach! from infinite to thee, From thee to nothing!—On superior pow'rs Were we to press, inferior might on ours: Or in the full creation leave a void, Where, one step broken, the great scale's destroy'd: From nature's chain whatever link you strike, Tenth or ten thousandth, breaks the chain alike. And, if each system in gradation roll Alike essential to th' amazing whole, The least confusion but in one, not all That system only, but the whole must fall. Let earth unbalanc'd from her orbit fly, Planets and suns run lawless through the sky; Let ruling angels from their spheres be hurl'd, Being on being wreck'd, and world on world; Heav'n's whole foundations to their centre nod, And nature tremble to the throne of God. All this dread order break—for whom? for thee? Vile worm!—Oh madness, pride, impiety! IX. What if the foot ordain'd the dust to tread, Or hand to toil, aspir'd to be the head? What if the head, the eye, or ear repin'd To serve mere engines to the ruling mind? Just as absurd for any part to claim To be another, in this gen'ral frame: Just as absurd, to mourn the tasks or pains, The great directing Mind of All ordains. All are but parts of one stupendous whole, Whose body Nature is, and God the soul; That, chang'd through all, and yet in all the same, Great in the earth, as in th' ethereal frame, Warms in the sun, refreshes in the breeze, Glows in the stars, and blossoms in the trees, Lives through all life, extends through all extent, Spreads undivided, operates unspent, Breathes in our soul, informs our mortal part, As full, as perfect, in a hair as heart; As full, as perfect, in vile man that mourns, As the rapt seraph that adores and burns; To him no high, no low, no great, no small; He fills, he bounds, connects, and equals all. X. Cease then, nor order imperfection name: Our proper bliss depends on what we blame. Know thy own point: This kind, this due degree Of blindness, weakness, Heav'n bestows on thee. Submit.—In this, or any other sphere, Secure to be as blest as thou canst bear: Safe in the hand of one disposing pow'r, Or in the natal, or the mortal hour. All nature is but art, unknown to thee; All chance, direction, which thou canst not see; All discord, harmony, not understood; All partial evil, universal good: And, spite of pride, in erring reason's spite, One truth is clear, Whatever is, is right.

An Essay on Man: Epistle I

Pope, alexander (1688 - 1744).

An Essay on Man: Epistle I

To Henry St. John, Lord Bolingbroke Awake, my St. John! leave all meaner things To low ambition, and the pride of kings. Let us (since life can little more supply Than just to look about us and to die) Expatiate free o’er all this scene of man; A mighty maze! but not without a plan; A wild, where weeds and flow’rs promiscuous shoot; Or garden, tempting with forbidden fruit. Together let us beat this ample field, Try what the open, what the covert yield; The latent tracts, the giddy heights explore Of all who blindly creep, or sightless soar; Eye Nature’s walks, shoot folly as it flies, And catch the manners living as they rise; Laugh where we must, be candid where we can; But vindicate the ways of God to man. I. Say first, of God above, or man below, What can we reason, but from what we know? Of man what see we, but his station here, From which to reason, or to which refer? Through worlds unnumber’d though the God be known, ‘Tis ours to trace him only in our own. He, who through vast immensity can pierce, See worlds on worlds compose one universe, Observe how system into system runs, What other planets circle other suns, What varied being peoples ev’ry star, May tell why Heav’n has made us as we are. But of this frame the bearings, and the ties, The strong connections, nice dependencies, Gradations just, has thy pervading soul Look’d through? or can a part contain the whole? Is the great chain, that draws all to agree, And drawn supports, upheld by God, or thee? II. Presumptuous man! the reason wouldst thou find, Why form’d so weak, so little, and so blind? First, if thou canst, the harder reason guess, Why form’d no weaker, blinder, and no less! Ask of thy mother earth , why oaks are made Taller or stronger than the weeds they shade? Or ask of yonder argent fields above, Why Jove’s satellites are less than Jove? Of systems possible, if ’tis confest That Wisdom infinite must form the best, Where all must full or not coherent be, And all that rises, rise in due degree; Then, in the scale of reas’ning life, ’tis plain There must be somewhere, such a rank as man: And all the question (wrangle e’er so long) Is only this, if God has plac’d him wrong? Respecting man, whatever wrong we call, May, must be right, as relative to all. In human works, though labour’d on with pain, A thousand movements scarce one purpose gain; In God’s, one single can its end produce; Yet serves to second too some other use. So man, who here seems principal alone , Perhaps acts second to some sphere unknown, Touches some wheel, or verges to some goal; ‘Tis but a part we see, and not a whole. When the proud steed shall know why man restrains His fiery course, or drives him o’er the plains: When the dull ox, why now he breaks the clod, Is now a victim, and now Egypt’s God: Then shall man’s pride and dulness comprehend His actions’, passions’, being’s, use and end; Why doing, suff’ring, check’d, impell’d; and why This hour a slave, the next a deity. Then say not man’s imperfect, Heav’n in fault; Say rather, man’s as perfect as he ought: His knowledge measur’d to his state and place, His time a moment, and a point his space. If to be perfect in a certain sphere, What matter, soon or late, or here or there? The blest today is as completely so, As who began a thousand years ago. III. Heav’n from all creatures hides the book of fate, All but the page prescrib’d, their present state: From brutes what men, from men what spirits know: Or who could suffer being here below? The lamb thy riot dooms to bleed today, Had he thy reason, would he skip and play ? Pleas’d to the last, he crops the flow’ry food, And licks the hand just rais’d to shed his blood. Oh blindness to the future! kindly giv’n, That each may fill the circle mark’d by Heav’n: Who sees with equal eye, as God of all, A hero perish, or a sparrow fall, Atoms or systems into ruin hurl’d, And now a bubble burst, and now a world. Hope humbly then; with trembling pinions soar; Wait the great teacher Death; and God adore! What future bliss, he gives not thee to know, But gives that hope to be thy blessing now. Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never is, but always to be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin’d from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come. Lo! the poor Indian, whose untutor’d mind Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind; His soul, proud science never taught to stray Far as the solar walk, or milky way; Yet simple nature to his hope has giv’n, Behind the cloud -topt hill, an humbler heav’n; Some safer world in depth of woods embrac’d, Some happier island in the wat’ry waste, Where slaves once more their native land behold, No fiends torment, no Christians thirst for gold. To be, contents his natural desire, He asks no angel’s wing, no seraph’s fire; But thinks, admitted to that equal sky, His faithful dog shall bear him company. IV. Go, wiser thou! and, in thy scale of sense Weigh thy opinion against Providence; Call imperfection what thou fanciest such, Say, here he gives too little, there too much: Destroy all creatures for thy sport or gust, Yet cry, if man’s unhappy, God’s unjust; If man alone engross not Heav’n’s high care, Alone made perfect here, immortal there: Snatch from his hand the balance and the rod, Rejudge his justice , be the God of God. In pride, in reas’ning pride, our error lies; All quit their sphere, and rush into the skies. Pride still is aiming at the blest abodes, Men would be angels, angels would be gods. Aspiring to be gods, if angels fell, Aspiring to be angels, men rebel: And who but wishes to invert the laws Of order, sins against th’ Eternal Cause. V. ask for what end the heav’nly bodies shine, Earth for whose use? Pride answers, ” ‘Tis for mine: For me kind Nature wakes her genial pow’r, Suckles each herb, and spreads out ev’ry flow’r; Annual for me, the grape, the rose renew, The juice nectareous, and the balmy dew; For me, the mine a thousand treasures brings; For me, health gushes from a thousand springs; Seas roll to waft me, suns to light me rise; My foot -stool earth, my canopy the skies.” But errs not Nature from this gracious end, From burning suns when livid deaths descend, When earthquakes swallow, or when tempests sweep Towns to one grave, whole nations to the deep? “No, (’tis replied) the first Almighty Cause Acts not by partial, but by gen’ral laws; Th’ exceptions few; some change since all began: And what created perfect?”—Why then man? If the great end be human happiness, Then Nature deviates; and can man do less? As much that end a constant course requires Of show’rs and sunshine, as of man’s desires; As much eternal springs and cloudless skies, As men for ever temp’rate, calm, and wise. If plagues or earthquakes break not Heav’n’s design , Why then a Borgia, or a Catiline? Who knows but he, whose hand the lightning forms, Who heaves old ocean, and who wings the storms, Pours fierce ambition in a Cæsar’s mind, Or turns young Ammon loose to scourge mankind? From pride, from pride, our very reas’ning springs; Account for moral , as for nat’ral things: Why charge we Heav’n in those, in these acquit? In both, to reason right is to submit. Better for us, perhaps, it might appear, Were there all harmony, all virtue here; That never air or ocean felt the wind; That never passion discompos’d the mind. But ALL subsists by elemental strife; And passions are the elements of life. The gen’ral order, since the whole began, Is kept in nature, and is kept in man. VI. What would this man? Now upward will he soar, And little less than angel, would be more; Now looking downwards, just as griev’d appears To want the strength of bulls, the fur of bears. Made for his use all creatures if he call, Say what their use, had he the pow’rs of all? Nature to these, without profusion, kind, The proper organs, proper pow’rs assign’d; Each seeming want compensated of course, Here with degrees of swiftness, there of force; All in exact proportion to the state; Nothing to add, and nothing to abate. Each beast, each insect, happy in its own: Is Heav’n unkind to man, and man alone? Shall he alone, whom rational we call, Be pleas’d with nothing, if not bless’d with all? The bliss of man (could pride that blessing find) Is not to act or think beyond mankind; No pow’rs of body or of soul to share, But what his nature and his state can bear. Why has not man a microscopic eye? For this plain reason, man is not a fly. Say what the use, were finer optics giv’n, T’ inspect a mite, not comprehend the heav’n? Or touch, if tremblingly alive all o’er, To smart and agonize at ev’ry pore? Or quick effluvia darting through the brain, Die of a rose in aromatic pain? If nature thunder’d in his op’ning ears, And stunn’d him with the music of the spheres, How would he wish that Heav’n had left him still The whisp’ring zephyr, and the purling rill? Who finds not Providence all good and wise, Alike in what it gives, and what denies? VII. Far as creation’s ample range extends, The scale of sensual, mental pow’rs ascends: Mark how it mounts, to man’s imperial race, From the green myriads in the peopled grass : What modes of sight betwixt each wide extreme, The mole’s dim curtain, and the lynx’s beam: Of smell, the headlong lioness between, And hound sagacious on the tainted green: Of hearing, from the life that fills the flood, To that which warbles through the vernal wood: The spider’s touch, how exquisitely fine! Feels at each thread, and lives along the line: In the nice bee, what sense so subtly true From pois’nous herbs extracts the healing dew: How instinct varies in the grov’lling swine, Compar’d, half-reas’ning elephant, with thine: ‘Twixt that, and reason, what a nice barrier; For ever sep’rate, yet for ever near! Remembrance and reflection how allied; What thin partitions sense from thought divide: And middle natures, how they long to join, Yet never pass th’ insuperable line! Without this just gradation, could they be Subjected, these to those, or all to thee? The pow’rs of all subdu’d by thee alone, Is not thy reason all these pow’rs in one? VIII. See, through this air, this ocean, and this earth, All matter quick, and bursting into birth. Above, how high, progressive life may go! Around, how wide! how deep extend below! Vast chain of being, which from God began, Natures ethereal, human, angel, man, Beast, bird, fish, insect! what no eye can see, No glass can reach! from infinite to thee, From thee to nothing!—On superior pow’rs Were we to press, inferior might on ours: Or in the full creation leave a void, Where, one step broken, the great scale’s destroy’d: From nature’s chain whatever link you strike, Tenth or ten thousandth, breaks the chain alike. And, if each system in gradation roll Alike essential to th’ amazing whole, The least confusion but in one, not all That system only, but the whole must fall. Let earth unbalanc’d from her orbit fly, Planets and suns run lawless through the sky; Let ruling angels from their spheres be hurl’d, Being on being wreck’d, and world on world; Heav’n’s whole foundations to their centre nod, And nature tremble to the throne of God. All this dread order break—for whom? for thee? Vile worm!—Oh madness, pride, impiety! IX. What if the foot ordain’d the dust to tread, Or hand to toil, aspir’d to be the head? What if the head, the eye, or ear repin’d To serve mere engines to the ruling mind? Just as absurd for any part to claim To be another, in this gen’ral frame: Just as absurd, to mourn the tasks or pains, The great directing Mind of All ordains. All are but parts of one stupendous whole, Whose body Nature is, and God the soul; That, chang’d through all, and yet in all the same, Great in the earth, as in th’ ethereal frame, Warms in the sun, refreshes in the breeze, Glows in the stars, and blossoms in the trees , Lives through all life, extends through all extent, Spreads undivided, operates unspent, Breathes in our soul, informs our mortal part, As full, as perfect, in a hair as heart; As full, as perfect, in vile man that mourns, As the rapt seraph that adores and burns; To him no high, no low, no great, no small; He fills, he bounds, connects, and equals all. X. Cease then, nor order imperfection name: Our proper bliss depends on what we blame. Know thy own point: This kind, this due degree Of blindness, weakness, Heav’n bestows on thee. Submit.—In this, or any other sphere, Secure to be as blest as thou canst bear: Safe in the hand of one disposing pow’r, Or in the natal, or the mortal hour. All nature is but art, unknown to thee; All chance, direction, which thou canst not see; All discord, harmony, not understood; All partial evil, universal good: And, spite of pride, in erring reason’s spite, One truth is clear, Whatever is, is right.

Summary of An Essay on Man: Epistle I

Analysis of literary devices used in “an essay on man: epistle i”.

“Lo! the poor Indian, whose untutor’d mind Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.”

Analysis of Poetic Devices Used in “An Essay on Man: Epistle I”

“And, spite of pride, in erring reason’s spite, One truth is clear, Whatever is, is right.”

Quotes to be Used

“ All nature is but art, unknown to thee; All chance, direction, which thou canst not see; All discord, harmony, not understood; All partial evil, universal good.”

Related posts:

Post navigation.

We’re fighting to restore access to 500,000+ books in court this week. Join us!

Send me an email reminder

By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone.

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

Pope's Essay on man; in four epistles

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

3 Favorites

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

For users with print-disabilities

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by SheliaDeRoche on July 1, 2009

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

An Essay on Man

30 pages • 1 hour read

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Epistle Summaries & Analyses

Symbols & Motifs

Literary Devices

Further Reading & Resources

Discussion Questions

Meter and Form

Pope wrote “An Essay on Man” as both a philosophical essay and lyric poem. He uses the heroic couplet to express abstract ideas about human nature , society, and God. In a heroic couplet, each pair of two lines perfectly rhymes, and each line is written in iambic pentameter. Iambic pentameter is a meter where each line has ten syllables or beats (or five “feet”), and each beat consists of an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed syllable. Iambic pentameter is one of the most popular metrical forms from this era. Many poets wrote epics of the past in iambic pentameter, which is how the form came to be known as the “heroic” couplet.

Related Titles

By Alexander Pope

An Essay on Criticism

Eloisa to Abelard

The Dunciad

The Rape of the Lock

Featured Collections

Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics

View Collection

Religion & Spirituality

School Book List Titles

Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love

An Essay on Man (Epistle I)

An essay on man (epistle i) lyrics, the design..

Having proposed to write some pieces on human life and manners, such as (to use my Lord Bacon’s expression) come home to men’s business and bosoms, I thought it more satisfactory to begin with considering man in the abstract, his nature and his state; since, to prove any moral duty, to enforce any moral precept, or to examine the perfection or imperfection of any creature whatsoever, it is necessary first to know what condition and relation it is placed in, and what is the proper end and purpose of its being. The science of human nature is, like all other sciences, reduced to a few clear points: there are not many certain truths in this world. It is therefore in the anatomy of the mind as in that of the body; more good will accrue to mankind by attending to the large, open, and perceptible parts, than by studying too much such finer nerves and vessels, the conformations and uses of which will for ever escape our observation. The disputes are all upon these last, and, I will venture to say, they have less sharpened the wits than the hearts of men against each other, and have diminished the practice, more than advanced the theory, of morality. If I could flatter myself that this essay has any merit, it is in steering betwixt the extremes of doctrines seemingly opposite, in passing over terms utterly unintelligible, and in forming a yet not, and a yet not system of ethics. This I might have done in prose; but I chose verse, and even rhyme, for two reasons. The one will appear obvious; that principles, maxims, or precepts so written, both strike the reader more strongly at first, and are more easily retained by him afterwards: the other may seem odd, but is true; I found I could express them more shortly this way than in prose itself; and nothing is more certain, than that much of the force as well as grace of arguments or instructions, depends on their conciseness. I was unable to treat this part of my subject more in detail, without becoming dry and tedious; or more poetically, without sacrificing perspicuity to ornament, without wandering from the precision, or breaking the chain of reasoning: If any man can unite all these without diminution of any of them, I freely confess he will compass a thing above my capacity. What is now published, is only to be considered as a general map of Man, marking out no more than the greater parts, their extent, their limits, and their connexion, but leaving the particular to be more fully delineated in the charts which are to follow. Consequently, these epistles in their progress (if I have health and leisure to make any progress) will be less dry, and more susceptible of poetical ornament. I am here only opening the, and clearing the passage. To deduce the, to follow them in their course, and to observe their effects, may be a task more agreeable.

OF THE NATURE AND STATE OF MAN WITH RESPECT TO THE UNIVERSE.

Of man in the abstract. I. That we can judge only with regard to our own system, being ignorant of the relations of systems and things, ver. 17, &c. II. That Man is not to be deemed imperfect, but a being suited to his place and rank in the creation, agreeable to the general order of things, and conformable to ends and relations to him unknown, ver. 35, &c. III. That it is partly upon his ignorance of future events, and partly upon the hope of a future state, that all his happiness in the present depends, ver. 77, &c. IV. The pride of aiming at more knowledge, and pretending to more perfection, the cause of Man’s error and misery. The impiety of putting himself in the place of God, and judging of the fitness or unfitness, perfection or imperfection, justice or injustice of his dispensations, ver. 109, &c. V. The absurdity of conceiting himself the final cause of the creation, or expecting that perfection in the moral world, which is not in the natural, ver. 131, &c. VI. The unreasonableness of his complaints against Providence, while on the one hand he demands the perfections of the angels, and on the other the bodily qualifications of the brutes; though to possess any of the sensitive faculties in a higher degree, would render him miserable, ver. 173, &c. VII. That throughout the whole visible world, an universal order and gradation in the sensual and mental faculties is observed, which causes a subordination of creature to creature, and of all creatures to Man. The gradations of sense, instinct, thought, reflection, reason; that reason alone countervails all the other faculties, ver. 207. VIII. How much further this order and subordination of living creatures may extend, above and below us; were any part of which broken, not that part only, but the whole connected creation must be destroyed, ver. 233. IX. The extravagance, madness, and pride of such a desire, ver. 259. X. The consequence of all, the absolute submission due to Providence, both as to our present and future state, ver. 281, &c. to the end.

Awake, my St. John! leave all meaner things To low ambition, and the pride of Kings. Let us (since Life can little more supply Than just to look about us and to die) Expatiate free o’er all this scene of Man; A mighty maze! but not without a plan; A Wild, where weeds and flow’rs promiscuous shoot; Or Garden, tempting with forbidden fruit. Together let us beat this ample field, Try what the open, what the covert yield; The latent tracts, the giddy heights, explore Of all who blindly creep, or sightless soar; Eye Nature’s walks, shoot Folly as it flies, And catch the Manners living as they rise; Laugh where we must, be candid where we can; But vindicate the ways of God to Man. I. Say first, of God above, or Man below, What can we reason, but from what we know? Of Man, what see we but his station here, From which to reason, or to which refer? Thro’ worlds unnumber’d tho’ the God be known, ‘Tis ours to trace him only in our own. He, who thro’ vast immensity can pierce, See worlds on worlds compose one universe, Observe how system into system runs, What other planets circle other suns, What vary’d Being peoples ev’ry star, May tell why Heav’n has made us as we are. But of this frame the bearings, and the ties, The strong connexions, nice dependencies, Gradations just, has thy pervading soul Look’d thro’? or can a part contain the whole? Is the great chain, that draws all to agree, And drawn supports, upheld by God, or thee? II. Presumptuous Man! the reason wouldst thou find, Why form’d so weak, so little, and so blind? First, if thou canst, the harder reason guess, Why form’d no weaker, blinder, and no less? Ask of thy mother earth, why oaks are made Taller or stronger than the weeds they shade? Or ask of yonder argent fields above, Why Jove’s satellites are less than Jove? Of Systems possible, if ‘tis confest That Wisdom infinite must form the best, Where all must full or not coherent be, And all that rises, rise in due degree; Then, in the scale of reas’ning life, ‘tis plain, There must be, somewhere, such a rank as Man: And all the question (wrangle e’er so long) Is only this, if God has plac’d him wrong? Respecting Man, whatever wrong we call, May, must be right, as relative to all. In human works, tho’ labour’d on with pain, A thousand movements scarce one purpose gain; In God’s, one single can its end produce; Yet serves to second too some other use. So Man, who here seems principal alone, Perhaps acts second to some sphere unknown, Touches some wheel, or verges to some goal; ‘Tis but a part we see, and not a whole. When the proud steed shall know why Man restrains His fiery course, or drives him o’er the plains: When the dull Ox, why now he breaks the clod, Is now a victim, and now Ægypt’s God: Then shall Man’s pride and dulness comprehend His actions’, passions’, being’s, use and end; Why doing, suff’ring, check’d, impell’d; and why This hour a slave, the next a deity. Then say not Man’s imperfect, Heav’n in fault; Say rather, Man’s as perfect as he ought: His knowledge measur’d to his state and place; His time a moment, and a point his space. If to be perfect in a certain sphere, What matter, soon or late, or here or there? The blest to day is as completely so,, As who began a thousand years ago. III. Heav’n from all creatures hides the book of Fate, All but the page prescrib’d, their present state: From brutes what men, from men what spirits know: Or who could suffer Being here below? The lamb thy riot dooms to bleed to-day, Had he thy Reason, would he skip and play? Pleas’d to the last, he crops the flow’ry food, And licks the hand just rais’d to shed his blood. Oh blindness to the future! kindly giv’n, That each may fill the circle mark’d by Heav’n: Who sees with equal eye, as God of all, A hero perish, or a sparrow fall, Atoms or systems into ruin hurl’d, And now a bubble burst, and now a world. Hope humbly then: with trembling pinions soar; Wait the great teacher Death; and God adore. What future bliss, he gives not thee to know, But gives that Hope to be thy blessing now. Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin’d from home, Rests and expatiates in a life to come. Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutor’d mind Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind: His soul, proud Science never taught to stray Far as the solar walk, or milky way; Yet simple Nature to his hope has giv’n, Behind the cloud-topt hill, an humbler heav’n; Some safer world in depth of woods embrac’d, Some happier island in the watry waste, Where slaves once more their native land behold, No fiends torment, no Christians thirst for gold. To Be, contents his natural desire, He asks no Angel’s wing, no Seraph’s fire; But thinks, admitted to that equal sky, His faithful dog shall bear him company. IV. Go, wiser thou! and, in thy scale of sense, Weight thy Opinion against Providence; Call imperfection what thou fancy’st such, Say, here he gives too little, there too much: Destroy all Creatures for thy sport or gust, Yet cry, If Man’s unhappy, God’s unjust; If Man alone engross not Heav’n’s high care, Alone made perfect here, immortal there: Snatch from his hand the balance and the rod, Re-judge his justice, be the God of God. In Pride, in reas’ning Pride, our error lies; All quit their sphere, and rush into the skies. Pride still is aiming at the blest abodes, Men would be Angels, Angels would be Gods. Aspiring to be Gods, if Angels fell, Aspiring to be Angels, Men rebel: And who but wishes to invert the laws Of Order, sins against th’ Eternal Cause. V. Ask for what end the heav’nly bodies shine, Earth for whose use? Pride answers, “‘Tis for mine: For me kind Nature wakes her genial Pow’r, Suckles each herb, and spreads out ev’ry flow’r; Annual for me, the grape, the rose renew The juice nectareous, and the balmy dew; For me, the mine a thousand treasures brings; For me, health gushes from a thousand springs; Seas roll to waft me, suns to light me rise; My foot-stool earth, my canopy the skies.” But errs not Nature from his gracious end, From burning suns when livid deaths descend, When earthquakes swallow, or when tempests sweep Towns to one grave, whole nations to the deep? “No, (‘tis reply’d) the first Almighty Cause Acts not by partial, but by gen’ral laws; Th’ exceptions few; some change since all began: And what created perfect?” — Why then Man? If the great end be human Happiness, Then Nature deviates; and can Man do less? As much that end a constant course requires Of show’rs and sun-shine, as of Man’s desires; As much eternal springs and cloudless skies, As Men for ever temp’rate, calm, and wise. If plagues or earthquakes break not Heav’n’s design, Why then a Borgia, or a Catiline? Who knows but he, whose hand the lightning forms, Who heaves old Ocean, and who wings the storms; Pours fierce Ambition in a Caesar’s mind, Or turns young Ammon loose to scourge mankind? From pride, from pride, our very reas’ning springs; Account for moral, as for nat’ral things: Why charge we Heav’n in those, in these acquit? In both, to reason right is to submit. Better for Us, perhaps, it might appear, Were there all harmony, all virtue here; That never air or ocean felt the wind; That never passion discompos’d the mind. But All subsists by elemental strife; And Passions are the elements of Life. The gen’ral Order, since the whole began, Is kept in Nature, and is kept in Man. VI. What would this Man? Now upward will he soar, And little less than Angel, would be more; Now looking downwards, just as griev’d appears To want the strength of bulls, the fur of bears. Made for his use all creatures if he call, Say what their use, had he the pow’rs of all? Nature to these, without profusion, kind, The proper organs, proper pow’rs assign’d; Each seeming want compensated of course, Here with degrees of swiftness, there of force; All in exact proportion to the state; Nothing to add, and nothing to abate. Each beast, each insect, happy in its own: Is Heav’n unkind to Man, and Man alone? Shall he alone, whom rational we call, Be pleas’d with nothing, if not bless’d with all? The bliss of Man (could Pride that blessing find) Is not to act or think beyond mankind; No pow’rs of body or of soul to share, But what his nature and his state can bear. Why has not Man a microscopic eye? For this plain reason, Man is not a Fly. Say what the use, were finer optics giv’n, T’ inspect a mite, not comprehend the heav’n? Or touch, if tremblingly alive all o’er, To smart and agonize at every pore? Or quick effluvia darting thro’ the brain, Die of a rose in aromatic pain? If Nature thunder’d in his op’ning ears, And stunn’d him with the music of the spheres, How would he wish that Heav’n had left him still The whisp’ring Zephyr, and the purling rill? Who finds not Providence all good and wise, Alike in what it gives, and what denies? VII. Far as Creation’s ample range extends, The scale of sensual, mental pow’rs ascends: Mark how it mounts, to Man’s imperial race, From the green myriads in the peopled grass: What modes of sight betwixt each wide extreme, The mole’s dim curtain, and the lynx’s beam: Of smell, the headlong lioness between, And hound sagacious on the tainted green: Of hearing, from the life that fills the Flood, To that which warbles thro’ the vernal wood: The spider’s touch, how exquisitely fine! Feels at each thread, and lives along the line: In the nice bee, what sense so subtly true From pois’nous herbs extracts the healing dew? How Instinct varies in the grov’lling swine, Compar’d, half-reas’ning elephant, with thine! ‘Twixt that, and Reason, what a nice barrier, For ever sep’rate, yet for ever near! Remembrance and Reflection how ally’d; What thin partitions Sense from Thought divide: And Middle natures, how they long to join, Yet never pass th’ insuperable line! Without this just gradation, could they be Subjected, these to those, or all to thee? The pow’rs of all subdu’d by thee alone, Is not thy Reason all these pow’rs in one? VIII. See, thro’ this air, this ocean, and this earth, All matter quick, and bursting into birth. Above, how high, progressive life may go! Around, how wide! how deep extend below! Vast chain of Being! which from God began, Natures ethereal, human, angel, man, Beast, bird, fish, insect, what no eye can see, No glass can reach; from Infinite to thee, From thee to Nothing. — On superior pow’rs Were we to press, inferior might on ours: Or in the full creation leave a void, Where, one step broken, the great scale’s destroy’d: From Nature’s chain whatever link you strike, Tenth or ten thousandth, breaks the chain alike. And, if each system in gradation roll Alike essential to th’ amazing Whole, The least confusion but in one, not all That system only, but the Whole must fall. Let Earth unbalanc’d from her orbit fly, Planets and Suns run lawless thro’ the sky; Let ruling Angels from their spheres be hurl’d, Being on Being wreck’d, and world on world; Heav’n’s whole foundations to their centre nod, And Nature tremble to the throne of God. All this dread Order break — for whom? for thee? Vile worm! — Oh Madness! Pride! Impiety! IX. What if the foot, ordain’d the dust to tread, Or hand, to toil, aspir’d to be the head? What if the head, the eye, or ear repin’d To serve mere engines to the ruling Mind? Just as absurd for any part to claim To be another, in this gen’ral frame: Just as absurd, to mourn the tasks or pains, The great directing Mind of All ordains. All are but parts of one stupendous whole, Whose body Nature is, and God the soul; That, chang’d thro’ all, and yet in all the same; Great in the earth, as in th’ ethereal frame; Warms in the sun, refreshes in the breeze, Glows in the stars, and blossoms in the trees, Lives thro’ all life, extends thro’ all extent, Spreads undivided, operates unspent; Breathes in our soul, informs our mortal part, As full, as perfect, in a hair as heart: As full, as perfect, in vile Man that mourns, As the rapt Seraph that adores and burns: To him no high, no low, no great, no small; He fills, he bounds, connects, and equals all. X. Cease then, nor Order Imperfection name: Our proper bliss depends on what we blame. Know thy own point: This kind, this due degree Of blindness, weakness, Heav’n bestows on thee. Submit. — In this, or any other sphere, Secure to be as blest as thou canst bear: Safe in the hand of one disposing Pow’r, Or in the natal, or the mortal hour. All Nature is but Art, unknown to thee; All Chance, Direction, which thou canst not see; All Discord, Harmony not understood; All partial Evil, universal Good: And, spite of Pride, in erring Reason’s spite, One truth is clear, Whatever Is, Is Right.

How to Format Lyrics:

• Type out all lyrics, even repeating song parts like the chorus
• Lyrics should be broken down into individual lines
• Use section headers above different song parts like [Verse], [Chorus], etc.
• Use italics ( <i>lyric</i> ) and bold ( <b>lyric</b> ) to distinguish between different vocalists in the same song part
• If you don’t understand a lyric, use [?]

To learn more, check out our transcription guide or visit our transcribers forum

Find answers to frequently asked questions about the song and explore its deeper meaning

• 1. An Essay on Man (Epistle I)
• 2. An Essay on Man (Epistle II)
• 3. An Essay on Man (Epistle III)
• 4. An Essay on Man (Epistle IV)

Genius is the world’s biggest collection of song lyrics and musical knowledge

Pope's Poems and Prose

By alexander pope, pope's poems and prose summary and analysis of an essay on man: epistle iii.

The subtitle of the third epistle is “Of the Nature and State of Man, with Respect to Society,” and this section discusses man’s relation to family, government, and religion. Pope states that love connects the universe and that all creatures exchange services in a symbiotic relationship. Individual instances of human tyranny, however, offend nature. Instinct and reason are the guiding principles of man’s behavior and have dictated man’s trajectory since creation.

Here is a section-by-section explanation of the third epistle:

Introduction (1-6): The introduction simply reiterates the points Pope made in the first two epistles.

Section I (7-78): Section I suggests that the whole universe is one system of society. Nothing is made wholly for the benefit to itself, nor wholly for the benefit of others. Instead, everything is bound together in a neighboring embrace and all “parts relate to whole” (21). Those who fail to perform the role that nature has ordained will not be aided by society.

Section II (79-108): Section II states that all creatures are given either reason or instinct, whichever is best suited to the individual. Reason or instinct operates all society in both man and the animals.

Section III (109-46): Section III first demonstrates how far society can be carried by instinct, then shows how much farther society can be carried by reason. In society, creatures are instinctively united by mutual need. Reason extends that instinct into emotional connection.

Section IV (147-98): Section IV discusses the state of man at the time of creation, in particular the harmony between all elements of society. Initially bound by instinct, man looked to other creatures for instruction on how to act and develop their own forms of society, using reason to teach themselves.

Section V (199-214): Section V explains the development of political societies, especially the origins of monarchy and patriarchal government.

Section VI (215-318): Section VI examines the roles of religion and government in society. According to Pope’s argument, the origin of both true religion and government is the principle of love: faith is the love of God and government is the love of man. By contrast, superstition and tyranny both originate from the same principle of fear. Thus self-love, through just and unjust means, can either drive man’s ambition or restrain him. Pope then describes man’s efforts to restore true religion and government on their first principle. Both religion and government take many forms, but their ultimate ends are to govern the soul and to govern society.

The third epistle treats on man’s social contract with family, government, and religion, and Pope focuses on the bonds that unite man with others. While the second epistle shows that self-love governs man’s actions, love governs the universe, binding its disparate elements. Modern readers might be inclined to interpret this to mean erotic or familial love, but Pope actually refers to a sort of contractual love, which forms a building-block of God’s design and the chain of being. Atoms, for example, attract and are attracted to each other, which ensures that they remain in their proper place. Likewise, dirt sustains the growth of plants, and when a plant dies, it returns to dirt to nourish its fellow plants. Man’s grass and flowers provide food for antelope while antelope also nourish man. All parts in the circle of life thus “relate to whole,” and love “connects each being, greatest with the least / Made beast in aid of man, and man of best; / All serv’d, all serving: nothing stands alone” (21, 23-5). Love provides a convenient way for Pope to describe symbiosis in the relationship between God’s creatures, indicative of God’s greater design.

Pope goes on to discuss the effects that instinct and reason have on God’s creation. All creatures are imbued with either instinct or reason, whichever is best suited to their nature. According to Pope’s argument, instinct tends to characterize beasts while man serves reason. Those governed by instinct are largely complacent, needing no assistance from “pope or council” (84). By contrast, reason seems to result in more calculated behavior and these creatures must labor at happiness which instinct quickly secures. While these are hardly original observations, Pope implies that instinct is the work of God while reason is that of man. This conclusion accounts for the development of man. In man’s infancy humans were governed by instinct. Man then learned various behaviors—ploughing from the mole, political arts from the bees, etc.—by copying animals, thus developing human reason.

Through observations of his fellow creatures, man began to build his own cities, demonstrating sociability through government and religion. Man’s early societies were patriarchal, featuring mild and natural rulers. Everyone conducted themselves virtuously and celebrated God until patriarchs directed self-love towards personal ambition and priests perverted religious worship. It was not until man redirected self-love towards its natural sociability through restraint, namely “government and laws,” that man formed a social contract, which established good government and laws by rational agreement for mutual security (272). Pope’s conclusion, therefore, is that private good is best achieved by preventing a conflict with public good: “Thus God and nature link’d the general frame, / And bade self-love and social be the same” (317-8).

Pope’s Poems and Prose Questions and Answers

The Question and Answer section for Pope’s Poems and Prose is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.

The Rape of the Lock

In Canto I, a dream is sent to Belinda by Ariel, “her guardian Sylph” (20). The Sylphs are Belinda’s guardians because they understand her vanity and pride, having been coquettes when they were humans. They are devoted to any woman who “rejects...

Who delivers the moralizing speech on the frailty of beauty? A. Chloe B. Clarissa C. Ariel D. Thalestris

What is the significance of Belinda's petticoat?

Did you answer this?

Study Guide for Pope’s Poems and Prose

Pope's Poems and Prose study guide contains a biography of Alexander Pope, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

• About Pope's Poems and Prose
• Pope's Poems and Prose Summary
• Character List

Essays for Pope’s Poems and Prose

Pope's Poems and Prose essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Alexander Pope's Poems and Prose.

• Of the Characteristics of Pope
• Breaking Clod: Hierarchical Transformation in Pope's An Essay on Man
• Fortasse, Pope, Idcirco Nulla Tibi Umquam Nupsit (The Rape of the Lock)
• An Exploration of 'Dulness' In Pope's Dunciad
• Belinda: Wronged On Behalf of All Women

Wikipedia Entries for Pope’s Poems and Prose

• Introduction

• International
• Education Jobs
• Schools directory
• Resources Education Jobs Schools directory News Search

An Essay on Man, Epistle 2, by Alexander Pope - Full Lesson Activities - CIE Poetry iGCSE 2026

Subject: English

Age range: 14-16

Resource type: Lesson (complete)

Last updated

20 August 2024

• Share through email
• Share through twitter
• Share through linkedin
• Share through facebook
• Share through pinterest

In this 18-slide PowerPoint, you will find: short video task with a biography of Alexander Pope with comprehension questions, list of key themes, tricky vocabulary explained, interpretative questions, homework PDF, line-by-line questions, line-by-line analysis, linking structure to content ideas, essay question, and an essay plan. It should probably take 2 to 3 hours to complete, maybe longer if the discussion is rich. It works better as a PP.

Tes paid licence How can I reuse this?

Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.

It's good to leave some feedback.

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.

Not quite what you were looking for? Search by keyword to find the right resource:

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Laughing ‘with’ vs. ‘at’: exploring emotional bonds in media strategies.

1. Introduction

2. methodology, 3. general analysis, 3.1. the general cultural and historical context, 3.2. the focus on television in portugal, 3.3. the risk of symbolic laughter, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Alberti, Verena. 1999. [Laughter and the Laughable: In the History of Thought] O riso e o Risível: Na História do Pensamento . Rio de Janeiro: Zahar. [ Google Scholar ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2022. Daytime Television in Portugal: An Analysis of the Role of Laughter in the Main Morning Talk Shows. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. Available online: http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/75831 (accessed on 19 August 2024).
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024a. A Cultural History of Laughter . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024b. Daytime television in Portugal: A look at the evolution of morning talk shows (1985–2023). Observatorio (OBS*) 18: 99–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024c. Do societies have emotions? Societies 14: 65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024d. Introduction. In A Cultural History of Laughter . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024e. Laughter in different social atmospheres: The multiple meanings of laughter in different emotional climates. In A Cultural History of Laughter . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024f. Laughter in the modern world: How laughter became the symbol of happiness. In A Cultural History of Laughter . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024g. Laughter in the old world: How laughter became a sin. In A Cultural History of Laughter . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024h. Laughter in the progress of media and technology. In A Cultural History of Laughter . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio. 2024i. Praising pop emotions: Media emotions serving social interests. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11: 757. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almeida, Abílio, and Dominique Wolton. 2024. The role of television in shaping democracy: An old dream with a big future? Comunicação e Sociedade 45: e024007. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Alpalhão, Margarida. 2015. [Laughter and medieval encyclopaedic texts] O riso e os textos enciclopédicos medievais. In O Riso. Teorizações, Leituras, Realizações . Edited by Elisa Esteves, Isabel Dias and Margarida Reffóios. Casal de Cambra: Caleidoscópio, pp. 161–70. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ambrose. 1961. The six days of creation. In The Fathers of the Church: A New Translation—Saint Ambrose: Hexameron, Paradise, and Cain and Abel . Translated by John Savage. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, vol. 42, pp. 3–283. [ Google Scholar ]
• Aristotle. 1882. On the Parts of Animals . Translated by William Ogle. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World . Translated by Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bataille, Georges. 1985. Literature and Evil . Translated by Alastair Hamilton. London and New York: Marion Boyars. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bataille, Georges. 1986. Erotism: Death & Sensuality . Translated by Mary Dalwood. San Francisco: City Lights Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Benedict. 1925. The Rule of Saint Benedict . Translated by Cardinal Gasquet. London: Chatto & Windus. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bergson, Henri. 1913. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic . Translated by Cloudesley Brereton, and Fred Rothwell. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd. [ Google Scholar ]
• Burton, Robert. 1989. The Anatomy of Melancholy . Edited by Thomas Faulkner, Nicolas Kiessling and Rhonda Blair. Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 1. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bustamante, Enrique. 2003. [The Television Economy: Media Management Strategies] A Economia da Televisão: As Estratégias de Gestão de um Media . Translated by Lígia Calapez. Porto: Campo das Letras. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cabanas, Edgar, and Eva Illouz. 2019. Manufacturing Happy Citizens: How the Science and Industry of Happiness Control Our Lives . Cambridge: Polity Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cantril, Hadley, and Gordon Allport. 1935. The Psychology of Radio , 2nd ed. New York and London: Harper & Brothers. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carey, James. 1988. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society . New York and London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carmo, Hermano, and Manuela Ferreira. 2008. [Research Methodology: A Guide to Self-Learning] Metodologia da Investigação: Guia para Auto-Aprendizagem , 2nd ed. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta. [ Google Scholar ]
• Carvalho, Ronald. 1931. [Rabelais and the Laughter of the Renaissance] Rabelais e o riso do Renascimento . Rio de Janeiro: Briguiet & Cia. [ Google Scholar ]
• Casetti, Francesco, and Roger Odin. 1990. [From paleo to neo-television. Semio-pragmatic approach] De la paléo- à la néo-télévision. Approche sémio-pragmatique. Communications 51: 9–26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chrysostom, John. 1890. Epistle to the Hebrews. In A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church . Edited by Philip Schaff. New York: The Christian Literature Company, vol. XIV, pp. 335–522. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chrysostom, John. 1956. Second epistle of St. Paul the apostle to Timothy. In A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church . Edited by Philip Schaff. Grand Rapids: WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing, vol. XIII, pp. 475–518. [ Google Scholar ]
• Correia, João. 2015. [Ubiquity: The next television revolution] Ubiquidade: A próxima revolução televisiva. In A Televisão Ubíqua . Edited by Paulo Serra, Sónia Sá and Washington Filho. Covilhã: LabCom, pp. 39–52. Available online: http://www.labcom-ifp.ubi.pt/livro/136 (accessed on 19 August 2024).
• Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection . London: John Murray. [ Google Scholar ]
• Darwin, Charles. 1871a. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex . London: John Murray, vol. 2. [ Google Scholar ]
• Darwin, Charles. 1871b. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex . London: John Murray, vol. 1. [ Google Scholar ]
• Darwin, Charles. 1872. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals . London: John Murray. [ Google Scholar ]
• Denscombe, Martyn. 2003. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects , 2nd ed. Maidenhead and Philadelphia: Open University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Descartes. 1989. The Passions of the Soul . Translated by Stephen Voss. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dewey, John. 1894. The theory of emotion. I: Emotional attitudes. Psychological Review 1: 553–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eco, Umberto. 1986. [Journey into Everyday Unreality] Viagem na Irrealidade Quotidiana . Translated by Maria Pinto. Lisboa: Difel. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ekman, Paul. 2003. Emotions Revealed . New York: Times Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Filho, Washington. 2015. [The influence of technology in the transformation of television in the 21st century] A influência da tecnologia na transformação da televisão no século XXI. In A Televisão Ubíqua . Edited by Paulo Serra, Sónia Sá and Washington Filho. Covilhã: LabCom, pp. 83–104. Available online: http://www.labcom-ifp.ubi.pt/livro/136 (accessed on 19 August 2024).
• Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences . New York: Pantheon Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Freud, Sigmund. 1960. Volume VIII. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious . Translated and Edited by James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gaisberg, Fred. 1942. The Music Goes Round . New York: The Macmillan Company. [ Google Scholar ]
• GfK. 2019. [Mornings: Channels. Period Analyzed: January to April 2019 (Business Days Excluding Holidays)] Manhãs: Canais. Período Analisado: Janeiro a Abril 2019 (Dias Úteis Excluindo Feriados) . Company Internal Document. Lisboa: GfK. [ Google Scholar ]
• Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies . Stanford: Stanford University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Giddens, Anthony. 2001. Sociology , 4th ed. Cambridge: Polity Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gilhus, Ingvild. 1997. Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins: Laughter in the History of Religion . London and New York: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Giotta, Gina. 2017. Sounding live: An institutional history of the television laugh track. Journal of Communication Inquiry 41: 331–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gradim, Anabela. 2015. [Television in its labyrinth] A televisão no seu labirinto. In A Televisão Ubíqua . Edited by Paulo Serra, Sónia Sá and Washington Filho. Covilhã: LabCom, pp. 69–82. Available online: http://www.labcom-ifp.ubi.pt/livro/136 (accessed on 19 August 2024).
• Hennefeld, Maggie. 2016. Death from laughter, female hysteria, and early cinema. Differences 27: 45–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hollingdale, Reginald. 1999. Nietzsche: The Man and His Philosophy , Revised ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• James, William. 1884. II—What is an emotion? Mind 9: 188–205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Krüger, Gustav. 1910. Augustine, Saint. In Encyclopædia Britannica , 11th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. II, pp. 907–10. [ Google Scholar ]
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern . Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1981. The Naked Man . Translated by John, and Doreen Weightman. New York, Cambridge, Hagerstown, Philadelphia, San Francisco, London, Mexico City, São Paulo, and Sydney: Harper & Row. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lipovetsky, Gilles. 2007. [The paradoxical happiness: Essay on the society of hyperconsumption] A felicidade paradoxal: Ensaio sobre a sociedade de hiperconsumo . Translated by Maria Machado. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lipovetsky, Gilles. 2014. [The Era of Emptiness] A Era do Vazio . Translated by Miguel Pereira, and Ana Faria. Lisboa: Edições 70. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lourenço, Eduardo. 2006. [In the shadow of Nietzsche] À sombra de Nietzsche. In Heterodoxias . Edited by Carlos Sousa and João Lima. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, vol. 1. [ Google Scholar ]
• Maffesoli, Michel. 2001. [The Eternal Instant: The Return of the Tragic in Postmodern Societies] O Eterno Instante: O Retorno do Trágico nas Sociedades Pós-Modernas . Translated by Maria Figueiredo. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget. [ Google Scholar ]
• Maffesoli, Michel. 2014. [Homo Eroticus: Emotional Communions] Homo Eroticus: Comunhões Emocionais . Translated by Abner Chiquieri. Rio de Janeiro: Forense. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin, James. 2011. Between Heaven and Mirth: Why Joy, Humor, and Laughter Are at the Heart of the Spiritual Life . New York: HarperOne. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martins, Moisés. 2011. [Crisis in the Castle of Culture. From the Stars to the Screens] Crise no Castelo da Cultura. Das estrelas para os ecrãs . Coimbra: Grácio Editor. [ Google Scholar ]
• McQuail, Denis. 2003. [Mass Communication Theory] Teoria da Comunicação de Massas . Translated by Carlos Jesus. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mead, Margaret. 1979. Do very primitive societies have humor? What forms does it take? (March 1963). In Margaret Mead—Some Personal Views . Edited by Rhoda Metraux. New York: Walker Publishing Company, pp. 121–22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Miller, Toby. 2009. [Television is over, television has become a thing of the past, television is gone] A televisão acabou, a televisão virou coisa do passado, a televisão já era. In A TV em Transição: Tendências de Programação no Brasil e no Mundo . Translated by Vanessa Purper. Edited by João Filho. Porto Alegre: Sulina, pp. 9–25. [ Google Scholar ]
• Minois, Georges. 2003. [History of Laughter and Mockery] História do Riso e do Escárnio . Translated by Maria Assumpção. São Paulo: Editora Unesp. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moreira, Sonia. 2005. [Documentary analysis as a method and technique] Análise documental como método e como técnica. In Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa em Comunicação . Edited by Jorge Duarte and Antonio Barros. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, pp. 269–79. [ Google Scholar ]
• Murphy, Francis Xavier. 2003. Patristic theology. In New Catholic Encyclopedia , 2nd ed. Edited by Thomas Carson and Joann Cerrito. Detroit, New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Cleveland, New Haven, Waterville, London, Munich: Thomson Gale, vol. 10 (Mos-Pat), pp. 964–69. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1978. Thus Spoke Zarathustra . Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Penguin Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2001. The Gay Science . Translated by Josefine Nauckhoff. Edited by Bernard Williams. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2005. Twilight of the idols or how to philosophize with a hammer. In The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings . Translated by Judith Norman. Edited by Aaron Ridley and Judith Norman. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–229. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nosanchuk, T. A., and Jack Lightstone. 1974. Canned laughter and public and private conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29: 153–56. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pardal, Luís, and Eugénia Lopes. 2011. [Social Research Methods and Techniques] Métodos e Técnicas de Investigação Social . Porto: Areal. [ Google Scholar ]
• Plato. 1937. Republic . Translated by Paul Shorey. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, vol. I. [ Google Scholar ]
• Plato. 1942. Republic . Translated by Paul Shorey. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, vol. II. [ Google Scholar ]
• Plato. 1975. Philebus . Translated by Justin Gosling. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Plato. 1986. Phaedrus . Translated by Christopher Rowe. Warminster: Aris & Phillips. [ Google Scholar ]
• Propp, Vladimir. 2009. On the Comic and Laughter . Translated and Edited by Jean-Patrick Debbèche, and Paul Perron. Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Provine, Robert. 2001. Laughter: A Scientific Investigation . New York: Penguin Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Provine, Robert. 2012. Curious Behavior: Yawning, Laughing, Hiccupping, and Beyond . Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Queiroz, Eça de. 2008. [To Joaquim de Araújo] A Joaquim de Araújo. In Eça de Queiroz—Correspondência . Edited by Alfredo Campos Matos. Alfragide: Caminho, vol. 1, pp. 165–80. [ Google Scholar ]
• Resnick, Irven. 1987. Resnick, Irven. 1987. ‘Risus monasticus’. Laughter and medieval monastic culture. Revue Bénédictine 97: 90–100. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Russell, Bertrand. 1984. A History of Western Philosophy . London, Boston and Sydney: Unwin Paperbacks. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sacks, Mike. 2010. Canned Laughter: Ben Glenn II, Television Historian [Interview]. The Paris Review. Available online: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2010/07/20/canned-laughter-ben-glenn-ii-television-historian/ (accessed on 19 August 2024).
• Scolari, Carlos Alberto. 2008. Scolari, Carlos Alberto. 2008. [Towards hypertelevision. The first symptoms of a new configuration of the television device] Hacia la hipertelevisión. Los primeros síntomas de una nueva configuración del dispositivo televisivo. Diálogos de la comunicación 77: 1–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Smith, Jacob. 2005. The frenzy of the audible: Pleasure, authenticity, and recorded laughter. Television and New Media 6: 23–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spencer, Herbert. 1857. The origin and function of music [October, 1857]. In Fraser’s Magazine . London: John W. Parker and Son, West Strand Publisher, vol. 56, pp. 396–408. [ Google Scholar ]
• Spencer, Herbert. 1860. The physiology of laughter [March, 1860]. In Macmillan’s Magazine . Edited by David Masson. London: Macmillan and Co, vol. 1, pp. 395–402. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stole, Inger. 2003. Televised consumption: Women, advertisers and the early daytime television industry. Consumption Markets and Culture 6: 65–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Subtil, Filipa. 2014. [James W. Carey’s cultural approach to communication] A abordagem cultural da comunicação de James W. Carey. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação 37: 19–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tatian. 1982. Oratio ad Graecos. In Tatian: Oratio ad Graecos and Fragments . Translated and Edited by Molly Whittaker. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 2–77. [ Google Scholar ]
• Timberg, Bernard. 2002. Television Talk: A History of the TV Talk Show . Austin: University of Texas Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vieira, Antonio. 1710. [The tears of Heraclitus] As lágrimas de Heráclito. In Sermoens, e Varios Discursos do Padre Antonio Vieyra da Companhia de Jefu, Prègador de Sua Mageftade . Edited by Valentim Deslandes. Obra Pofthuma: Impreffor de Sua Mageftade, vol. XIV, pp. 211–24. [ Google Scholar ]
• Winiarczyk, Marek. 2016. Diagoras of Melos: A Contribution to the History of Ancient Atheism . Translated by Witold Zbirohowski-Kościa. Berlin: De Gruyter. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wolton, Dominique. 1990. [Praise of the General Public: A Critical Theory of Television] Éloge du Grand Public: Une Théorie Critique de la Télévision . Paris: Flammarion. [ Google Scholar ]

Share and Cite

Almeida, A. Laughing ‘With’ vs. ‘At’: Exploring Emotional Bonds in Media Strategies. Journal. Media 2024 , 5 , 1162-1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030074

Almeida A. Laughing ‘With’ vs. ‘At’: Exploring Emotional Bonds in Media Strategies. Journalism and Media . 2024; 5(3):1162-1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030074

Almeida, Abílio. 2024. "Laughing ‘With’ vs. ‘At’: Exploring Emotional Bonds in Media Strategies" Journalism and Media 5, no. 3: 1162-1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030074

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals