You can find some useful tips in our how-to guide.
The maximum length of your abstract should be 250 words in total, including keywords and article classification (see the sections below).
Your submission should include up to 12 appropriate and short keywords that capture the principal topics of the paper. Our how to guide contains some practical guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords.
Please note, while we will always try to use the keywords you’ve suggested, the in-house editorial team may replace some of them with matching terms to ensure consistency across publications and improve your article’s visibility.
During the submission process, you will be asked to select a type for your paper; the options are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:
You will also be asked to select a category for your paper. The options for this are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:
Reports on any type of research undertaken by the author(s), including:
Covers any paper where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation. This includes journalistic and magazine-style pieces and the topic should relate to contemporary issues in qualitative market and consumption research. Commentaries should be no longer than 2000-4000 words (abstract no longer than 150 words) with no more than 5 references and written in the first person. If authors wish to submit a paper discussing a specific paper (i.e. commentary on a paper), please use the viewpoint category when submitting.
Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.
Focuses on developing hypotheses and is usually discursive. Covers philosophical discussions and comparative studies of other authors’ work and thinking.
Describes actual interventions or experiences within organizations. It can be subjective and doesn’t generally report on research. Also covers a description of a legal case or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise.
This category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique the literature in a particular field. It could be a selective bibliography providing advice on information sources, or the paper may aim to cover the main contributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.Only systematic literature reviews with a qualitative focus, or literature reviews that specifically advance the use of qualitative methods are in scope.
Provides an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive.
Headings must be concise, with a clear indication of the required hierarchy.
The preferred format is for first level headings to be in bold, and subsequent sub-headings to be in medium italics.
Notes or endnotes should only be used if absolutely necessary. They should be identified in the text by consecutive numbers enclosed in square brackets. These numbers should then be listed, and explained, at the end of the article.
All figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, webpages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted electronically. Both colour and black and white files are accepted.
There are a few other important points to note:
Tables should be typed and submitted in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the main body of the article with corresponding labels clearly shown in the table file. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Roman numerals (e.g. I, II, etc.).
Give each table a brief title. Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure or plate.
Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content hosting platform, or on an institutional or personal repository. All supplementary material must be submitted prior to acceptance.
, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format ‘Supplementary_material_appendix_1’ or ‘Supplementary tables’. . A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of EarlyCite publication.
Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copyedited, typeset, and authors will not receive proofs. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.
Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:
, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available.
Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).
All references in your manuscript must be formatted using one of the recognised Harvard styles. You are welcome to use the Harvard style Emerald has adopted – we’ve provided a detailed guide below. Want to use a different Harvard style? That’s fine, our typesetters will make any necessary changes to your manuscript if it is accepted. Please ensure you check all your citations for completeness, accuracy and consistency.
References to other publications in your text should be written as follows:
, 2006) Please note, ‘ ' should always be written in italics.A few other style points. These apply to both the main body of text and your final list of references.
At the end of your paper, please supply a reference list in alphabetical order using the style guidelines below. Where a DOI is available, this should be included at the end of the reference.
Surname, initials (year), , publisher, place of publication.
e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), , Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
Surname, initials (year), "chapter title", editor's surname, initials (Ed.), , publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum", Stankosky, M. (Ed.), , Elsevier, New York, NY, pp.15-20.
Surname, initials (year), "title of article", , volume issue, page numbers.
e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century", , Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.72-80.
Surname, initials (year of publication), "title of paper", in editor’s surname, initials (Ed.), , publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. Wilde, S. and Cox, C. (2008), “Principal factors contributing to the competitiveness of tourism destinations at varying stages of development”, in Richardson, S., Fredline, L., Patiar A., & Ternel, M. (Ed.s), , Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, pp.115-118.
Surname, initials (year), "title of paper", paper presented at [name of conference], [date of conference], [place of conference], available at: URL if freely available on the internet (accessed date).
e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: ;(accessed 20 February 2007).
Surname, initials (year), "title of article", working paper [number if available], institution or organization, place of organization, date.
e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.
(year), "title of entry", volume, edition, title of encyclopaedia, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. (1926), "Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY, pp.765-771.
(for authored entries, please refer to book chapter guidelines above)
Surname, initials (year), "article title", , date, page numbers.
e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope", , 21 January, pp.1, 3-4.
(year), "article title", date, page numbers.
e.g. (2008), "Small change", 2 February, p.7.
Surname, initials (year), "title of document", unpublished manuscript, collection name, inventory record, name of archive, location of archive.
e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of Commerce", unpublished manuscript, Simon Litman Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
If available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as well as the date that the resource was accessed.
Surname, initials (year), “title of electronic source”, available at: persistent URL (accessed date month year).
e.g. Weida, S. and Stolley, K. (2013), “Developing strong thesis statements”, available at: (accessed 20 June 2018)
Standalone URLs, i.e. those without an author or date, should be included either inside parentheses within the main text, or preferably set as a note (Roman numeral within square brackets within text followed by the full URL address at the end of the paper).
Surname, initials (year), , name of data repository, available at: persistent URL, (accessed date month year).
e.g. Campbell, A. and Kahn, R.L. (2015), , ICPSR07218-v4, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI, available at: (accessed 20 June 2018)
There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a smooth and trouble-free submission.
Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important points:
You will find a helpful submission checklist on the website Think.Check.Submit .
All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.
The only way to submit to the journal is through the journal’s ScholarOne site as accessed via the Emerald website, and not by email or through any third-party agent/company, journal representative, or website. Submissions should be done directly by the author(s) through the ScholarOne site and not via a third-party proxy on their behalf.
A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.
Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.
Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work. Don’t have one yet?
It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier .
Visit the ScholarOne support centre for further help and guidance.
You will receive an automated email from the journal editor, confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with a manuscript number, which will be used in all future correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent, please contact the journal editor in the first instance.
Review and decision process.
Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the language/manuscript quality is too low.
If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they will send it to at least two independent referees for double anonymous peer review. Once these reviewers have provided their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.
This journal offers an article transfer service. If the editor decides to decline your manuscript, either before or after peer review, they may offer to transfer it to a more relevant Emerald journal in this field. If you accept, your ScholarOne author account, and the accounts of your co-authors, will automatically transfer to the new journal, along with your manuscript and any accompanying peer review reports. However, you will still need to log in to ScholarOne to complete the submission process using your existing username and password. While accepting a transfer does not guarantee the receiving journal will publish your work, an editor will only suggest a transfer if they feel your article is a good fit with the new title.
While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is that the editor will inform you of their first decision within 60 days.
During this period, we will send you automated updates on the progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you can log in to check on the current status of your paper. Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive an email that does not match these criteria, it could be fraudulent, please contact the journal editor in the first instance.
Emerald’s manuscript transfer service takes the pain out of the submission process if your manuscript doesn’t fit your initial journal choice. Our team of expert Editors from participating journals work together to identify alternative journals that better align with your research, ensuring your work finds the ideal publication home it deserves. Our dedicated team is committed to supporting authors like you in finding the right home for your research.
If a journal is participating in the manuscript transfer program, the Editor has the option to recommend your paper for transfer. If a transfer decision is made by the Editor, you will receive an email with the details of the recommended journal and the option to accept or reject the transfer. It’s always down to you as the author to decide if you’d like to accept. If you do accept, your paper and any reviewer reports will automatically be transferred to the recommended journals. Authors will then confirm resubmissions in the new journal’s ScholarOne system.
Our Manuscript Transfer Service page has more information on the process.
Open access.
Once your paper is accepted, you will have the opportunity to indicate whether you would like to publish your paper via the gold open access route.
If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge). This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence , which outlines how readers can reuse your work.
All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence form. This should be checked for accuracy, for example whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us electronically. If there is a reason why you can’t assign copyright to us, you should discuss this with your journal content editor. You will find their contact details on the editorial team section above.
Two to three months before the scheduled print publication of an issue, we carry out editorial checks on your paper and a pre-typeset version appears in the Accepted Articles section of the journal’s online content. Your paper is then copyedited, typeset, and proofs are sent to you (if you are the corresponding author) for your review. You receive advance notification of this. Please note, this is your opportunity to correct any typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this stage.
Visit our author rights page to find out how you can reuse and share your work.
To find tips on increasing the visibility of your published paper, read about how to promote your work .
Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction notice. Find out more about our article withdrawal and correction policies .
Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.
| The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article-processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal), and never at submission.
At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication, processing, or review. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email that appears to be from Emerald, the journal, or a third party, asking you for payment to publish, please contact our support team via . |
| Please contact the editor for the journal, with a copy of your CV. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. |
| First, log into your author centre on the journal's ScholarOne site. Click on and check the column of the table at the bottom of the page. If the editor has assigned your paper to an issue, the volume and issue number will appear. If they have yet to assign it, you can email them to request further details. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. |
| Please email the journal editor – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. If you ever suspect an email you’ve received from Emerald might not be genuine, you are welcome to verify it with the content editor for the journal, whose contact details can be found on the editorial team tab on this page. |
| If you’ve read the aims and scope on the journal landing page and are still unsure whether your paper is suitable for the journal, please email the editor and include your paper's title and structured abstract. They will be able to advise on your manuscript’s suitability. You will find their contact details on the Editorial team tab on this page. |
| Authorship and the order in which the authors are listed on the paper should be agreed prior to submission. We have a right first time policy on this and no changes can be made to the list once submitted. If you have made an error in the submission process, please email the Journal Editorial Office who will look into your request – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. |
CiteScore 2023
CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.
Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same four years.
For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition
CiteScore Tracker 2024
(updated monthly)
CiteScore Tracker is calculated in the same way as CiteScore, but for the current year rather than previous, complete years.
The CiteScore Tracker calculation is updated every month, as a current indication of a title's performance.
2023 Impact Factor
The Journal Impact Factor is published each year by Clarivate Analytics. It is a measure of the number of times an average paper in a particular journal is cited during the preceding two years.
For more information and methodology see Clarivate Analytics
5-year Impact Factor (2023)
A base of five years may be more appropriate for journals in certain fields because the body of citations may not be large enough to make reasonable comparisons, or it may take longer than two years to publish and distribute leading to a longer period before others cite the work.
Actual value is intentionally only displayed for the most recent year. Earlier values are available in the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics .
Time to first decision
Time to first decision , expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.
Data is taken from submissions between 1st June 2023 and 31st May 2024
Acceptance to publication
Acceptance to publication , expressed in days, is the average time between when the journal’s editorial team decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript and the date of publication in the journal.
Data is taken from the previous 12 months (Last updated July 2024)
Acceptance rate
The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %
Data is taken from submissions between 1st June 2023 and 31st May 2024 .
This figure is the total amount of downloads for all articles published early cite in the last 12 months
(Last updated: July 2024)
Peer review process.
This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.
The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.
Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.
The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.
All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.
Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.
More reviewer information
Roots: creating routes for budding perspective in qualitative market research from early career researchers.
Introduction The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet' Aristotle. Roots lay foundations, and routes pave the way for growth. They provide structure and direction. In terms...
Introduction The cost-of-living crisis has put further pressure on brands’ supply chains and their ability to appeal to consumers who have increasingly less disposable income. This is in addition to a decade that has seen ...
Curated by Clive Boddy, Anglia Ruskin University Introduction The editors of Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal...
Call for Special Issues The Qualitative Market Research (QMR) editorial team would welcome special issue proposals from interested colleagues on aspects of qu...
The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2022 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for the contributions made. With their help, the journal has been able to publish such high...
Qualitative Market Research is delighted to introduce Dr. Fiona Spotswood as the new Editor from 2023, taking over from Dr. Andrew Lindridge. Fiona is based at the University of Bristol Business School. She has background in cons...
The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following, for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for this journal. We are very grateful for the contributions made. With their help, the journal has ...
We are pleased to announce our 2023 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Papers Consumers’ Perception on Artificial Int...
We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper The role of social media to ge...
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal (QMR) publishes scholarly research from around the world that aims to further the frontiers of knowledge and understanding of qualitative market research and its applications.
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal (QMR) publishes high-quality research papers that both inform and challenge our awareness of the dichotomy of practices and principles in research in an analytical and practical way.
As a journal that aims to further our understanding of qualitative market research, papers can use a variety of inter-disciplinary applications, such as cultural studies, economics and sociology; and from related fields in discourse analysis, ethnography, semiotics and grounded theory, phenomenology and psycho-analysis. As such, only systematic literature reviews with a qualitative focus, or literature reviews that specifically advance the use of qualitative methods are in scope.
QMR welcomes papers that utilise qualitative methodologies that cover all aspects of marketing, including but not limited to consumer behaviour, online marketing, marketing strategy, services and social marketing.
For example, we are particularly interested in research exploring:
I have been fortunate enough to publish in the journal (QMR) several times and I read it rigorously, always finding something new and interesting. It is THE source for such research and there is simply nothing better.
These are the latest articles published in this journal (Last updated: July 2024)
Navigating brand purpose in the post-pandemic era: insights from marketing agencies on supporting sdgs through strategic delineation and execution, developing artificial intelligence enabled marketing 4.0 framework: an industry 4.0 perspective, top downloaded articles.
These are the most downloaded articles over the last 12 months for this journal (Last updated: July 2024)
Advertising to gen-z college students with memes a focus group study, virtual influencer marketing: a study of millennials and gen z consumer behaviour.
These are the top cited articles for this journal, from the last 12 months according to Crossref (Last updated: July 2024)
How to make a collaborative videography using phygital affordances to study sensitive topics, developing internal marketing strategies for measuring and managing employee-based brand equity.
We aim to champion researchers, practitioners, policymakers and organisations who share our goals of contributing to a more ethical, responsible and sustainable way of working.
This journal is part of our Marketing collection. Explore our Marketing subject area to find out more.
See all related journals
Marketing Intelligence & Planning (MIP) serves as a key link between scholarly research and practice in the domain of...
Corporate Communications: An International Journal (CCIJ) addresses the issues arising from the increased awareness that...
International Marketing Review (IMR) is a journal that has, as its core remit, the goal of publishing research that...
What is qualitative data, what are the ingredients of a good qualitative data analysis, how to conduct an enlightening qualitative data analysis, the pros and cons of qualitative data analysis, get great results from qualitative data analysis.
When numbers fall short and you need the full story, qualitative data analysis comes to the rescue. Instead of following assumptions based on numerical data, qualitative data analysis methods let you dig deeper. Qualitative data analysis examines non-numerical data – words, images, and observations, to uncover themes, patterns, and meanings.
And in this article, we’ll tell you exactly how to do it yourself, in-house.
Qualitative data analysis uncovers the stories and feelings behind numbers. Qualitative methods gain information from conversations, interviews, and observations, capturing what people think and why they act a certain way. Unlike hard numbers, qualitative data helps us see the color and texture of people’s opinions, experiences, and emotions.
Examples of the textual data that often makes up qualitative data pieces are a user’s detailed feedback on a mobile app’s usability, a shopper’s narrative about choosing eco-friendly products, or observational notes on customer behavior in a retail setting.
This type of qualitative data collection helps us understand real feelings and thoughts, and goes beyond numbers and assumptions.
Get qual research with Video Responses
Unlock the voice of the consumer with qualitative insights. Get fast, reliable Video Responses straight from your target customers.
There’s a big difference between knowing that 50% of customers prefer your new product and understanding the nuanced reasons behind that preference.
It’s easy to get blinded by shiny numbers. In this case, a preference signals that you’re doing something great. But not knowing what, means you can’t replicate it, or double down on it to crank up that 50% even more.
So what you’ll need to do is dig into the ‘why’ behind the ‘what’. And we mean really dig. A strong qualitative data analysis process really aims at not putting words inside your customers mouths but letting them speak for themselves.
Another example is when a company finds out through a quick quantitative data survey that customers rate their service 4 out of 5. Which isn’t bad. But how can they improve it – or even work to maintain it? Guesswork is lethal here, yet it’s what so many companies resort to.
Which leads to obvious follow-up actions that are usually not customer-centric. Let’s say that this company assumes people are mostly happy because of their quick response times. So, they implement chatbots to take care of the first part of conversations, to speed things up even more. What could be wrong with that?
But what if through in-depth interviews, they could have discovered that the personal touch from the staff right from the get-go is what customers really value?
In consumer research, these nuances are gold. They allow your team to make finely tuned adjustments that resonate deeply with your audience. It’s what helps you move beyond the one-size-fits-all approach suggested by quantitative data.
So if you want to start making experiences and products that feel personal and relevant to each customer, here are some ways to approach qualitative data research.
What it is: Content analysis involves examining texts, reviews, and comments to identify frequently occurring words and sentiments, providing a quantitative measure of qualitative feedback.
Good to know:
Chances are, you already have a lot of content that can be analyzed for qualitative data research. In that case, content analysis is your go-to approach to getting started. Content analysis means zooming in on recurring words, phrases, and sentiments scattered across reviews and comments.
Dig into reviews, comments, and emails and start flagging words and phrases that keep coming back. These can help you identify areas for improvement, but also show you what really is working.
This way, content analysis offers a quantitative measure of qualitative feedback, enabling you to prioritize actions based on what’s most mentioned by your customers, when they’re not prompted or asked anything specifically.
By systematically categorizing and quantifying this feedback, you’ll be able to make informed decisions on product features, marketing messages, and even future design innovations.
What it is: Narrative analysis delves into customers’ stories to understand their experiences, decisions, and emotions throughout their journey with your brand.
A lot of times brands are mostly interested in the beginning and end of a customer journey: how do I get in front of customers, and how do I get in their shopping basket?
But the story of what happens between those two moments is just as, if not more important. And with narrative analysis, you can help connect the dots.
You won’t just be looking at the touchpoints there were, but also what customers were thinking and feeling at each stage. By interpreting qualitative data, you can create a full story from start to finish on how customers think and feel and make decisions in your market.
And that is so much more than just a nice story. Narrative analysis shows you where you can swoop in, where you should change your communications or where you should offer more support — for a happy ever after.
What it is: Discourse analysis examines language and communication on platforms like social media to understand how they influence public perception and consumer behavior.
Discourse analysis looks at the broader conversation around topics relevant to your brand. This qualitative data analysis method looks at how language and communication on platforms like social media shape public perception and influence consumer behavior.
Discourse analysis not just about what’s being said about your brand and products; it’s about understanding the cultural, social, and environmental currents that drive these conversations.
For example, when customers discuss “sustainability,” they’re not just talking about your specific packaging; they’re engaging in a larger dialogue about corporate responsibility, environmental impact, and ethical consumption.
Discourse analysis helps you grasp the nuances of these discussions, revealing how your brand can authentically contribute to and lead within these conversations.
This strategic insight allows you to align your messaging with your audience’s values, build credibility, and position your brand as a leader in meaningful sustainability efforts.
By engaging with and influencing the discourse, you can adapt to current consumer expectations but you can even take it a step further, and shape future trends and behaviors in alignment with your brand’s values and goals.
What it is: Thematic analysis seeks to find common themes within qualitative data, moving beyond individual opinions to uncover broader patterns.
Plenty of brands are already sitting on qualitative data from thousands of customer interactions, which might seem like a jumble of individual opinions and experiences.
You might look at them and think ‘ ha, humans really all want or value different things ’. But there will be overlap, and that is where the real value lies.
Thematic analysis aims at finding common themes in this qualitative data. You move beyond surface-level chaos by categorizing all pieces of feedback into distinct themes.
These themes could range from specific product features, such as “battery life” in electronics, to broader experiential factors, like “customer service excellence” or “ease of use.” By identifying these recurring patterns, you gain a clearer, more organized understanding of your customers’ priorities and pain points.
One of the benefits of thematic analysis is that it helps you organize a wide range of feedback into clear, actionable insights for each team in your business. You may uncover themes about the product, about communication, or other parts of your business that customers get exposed to. In other words: every business could benefit from some thematic analysis.
What it is: Grounded theory uses early feedback from users to develop theories and strategies that meet their needs, focusing on continuous improvement.
For those launching a new service, grounded theory takes feedback from early users and starts building from there. It uses real, raw customer thoughts to shape a strategy that better meets their needs.
This approach isn’t just about collecting data; it’s about letting qualitative data direct your next moves, ensuring your innovations are not just shots in the dark but informed, strategic decisions aimed at fulfilling genuine customer needs.
When you adopt grounded theory, you commit to a process of continuous improvement and adaptation. As feedback starts rolling in from those first users or beta testers, you’re given a unique opportunity to see your product through the eyes of those it’s meant to serve.
This early-stage feedback is gold—unfiltered, direct, and incredibly insightful. It tells you what’s resonating with your audience, what’s missing the mark, and, crucially, how to adjust your offering for better alignment with customer expectations.
Bear in mind that when done right, grounded theory goes beyond merely reacting to feedback. It’s about proactively seeking it out and engaging with it. This means not just reading comments or reviews, but diving deeper through follow-up questions, interviews, or focus groups to really understand the why behind the feedback.
Diving into qualitative data analysis can feel like a big task for many brands. There’s often worry about how much time it’ll take. Or how much money. And then there’s the question of whether all that detail might lead you off track instead of to clear answers.
After all, businesses move fast these days, and spending a lot of time on a research project doesn’t always fit the schedule.
But those worries don’t have to stop you. With the right plan and the best tools, you can dodge those issues. Start by creating a roadmap, so you know what the next few days, weeks or months will look like. See? It’s less daunting already.
Below, we’ll break the whole process down into simple steps. We’re going to walk through how to tackle qualitative data analysis without getting bogged down.
When it comes to qualitative research, if something’s said, it’s crucial. And that means you gotta write it down. Or at least have a tool to do it for you.
‘ ’I don’t wanna miss a thing’ ’ is your theme song for this step.
Every chuckle, pause, or sigh can give you insights into what your customers really think and feel. Now, I know what you’re thinking: “Transcribing interviews sounds like a lot of work. Let alone conducting all of them!”
But here’s the good news—using Attest makes this step a pleasant breeze on a hot summer night. With Attest, you can send out surveys that dive deep into all the qualitative questions you’ve been itching to ask. Our platform is designed to capture rich, detailed responses in a way that is easy to search and analyze.
This means you don’t have to worry about spending hours transcribing interviews. The responses are already there in writing, ready for you to analyze. This doesn’t just save time; it ensures accuracy. You’re getting the unfiltered voice of your customer, directly and conveniently. No more playing detective with hours of audio recordings.
Next, sift through your transcribed interviews, survey responses, and notes. Your goal here is to spot patterns or themes that crop up repeatedly.
This could be similar sentiments about a product feature or shared experiences with your service. Organizing data helps you identify themes that move from scattered bits of feedback to clear, common threads that tell a bigger story.
There are plenty of software tools out there designed to help with qualitative data analysis. These tools can help you code your qualitative data, which means tagging parts of the text with keywords or themes, making it easier to organize and analyze textual data. They can save you a heap of time and help you stay accurate and consistent in your analysis.
That’s where Attest’s innovative Video Responses come into play, offering a seamless and impactful way to gather and analyze qualitative data directly from your target audience – all in the same platform as your quantitative data.
Here’s how we transform qualitative research:
As consumer behaviors and preferences continue to evolve at lightning speed, it’s products like Video Responses that will help brands win more based on decisions made with a deeper understanding of their customers. Jeremy King, CEO and Founder of Attest
Understanding the context in which feedback is provided is crucial in qualitative analysis. It’s not just about what your customers are saying; it’s also about why they’re saying it at that particular moment. This deeper layer of insight can significantly impact how you interpret and act on the data you collect.
Why context matters:
How to account for context in your qualitative analysis:
Once you’ve got some preliminary findings, it’s a good idea to circle back to your participants. This could mean confirming your interpretations with them or diving deeper into certain areas.
This will help you be sure your analysis aligns with your respondents’ intended meanings and experiences. Plus, it shows respect for their contributions and can uncover even richer insights.
Finally, bring your analysis to life in a report that mixes clear, concise writing with visual elements like charts, graphs, and quotes.
Visualization helps make complex insights more accessible, engaging, and persuasive. Your report should not only present what you’ve found but also tell the story of how these research findings can influence decisions and strategies.
The real value of qualitative data analysis lies in its application. Use the insights to inform decisions, refine strategies, and better meet your customers’ needs. This is where your analytical journey makes a tangible impact on your business.
Previously when we’ve had to do qualitative research, it’s taken months and months. Attest gets the information that we need quickly. By the very next day we’re able to implement some of the changes and then go back for round two. Simon Gray, Head of Marketing, Zzoomm
Qualitative data analysis looks at the human side of data. It offers insights that numbers alone can’t provide. But like all research methods, even qualitative data analysis methods have their strengths and weaknesses, especially when it comes to shaping a marketing plan that hits the mark.
Bringing qualitative data into your strategy brings about transformative advantages that can significantly transform how your business connects with your audience and adapts to the market. Without further ado, let’s look at the benefits it brings.
Want to go beyond meeting the explicit needs of your customers, and also address their unspoken desires and creating experiences that truly matter to them? Qualitative analysis offers an unparalleled depth of understanding by capturing the subtleties and complexities of customer behavior and sentiment.
By engaging directly with your audience through interviews, focus groups, or social media interactions, you gain nuanced perspectives that quantitative data alone cannot provide. These rich insights enable you to craft marketing strategies and product innovations that resonate on a deeper level with your audience.
Numbers can be quite limiting. The benefit of qualitative analysis is that you’re not confined to a predetermined set of questions or outcomes.
Instead, you have the freedom to explore new directions, probe interesting findings further, and let the data guide your research process. This flexibility means your research process can evolve in real-time, responding to unexpected insights or shifting market dynamics.
The insights gained from qualitative analysis can significantly inform strategic decision-making. By understanding the nuances of customer feedback, you can make informed and detailed choices about where to allocate resources, which product features to prioritize, and how to position your business in the market.
You can go beyond generic moves in the right direction and make sure you hit the nail on the head on the first try, instead of slowly creeping towards it.
Businesses are always looking for ways to innovate, but where to look? It’s often less obvious and loud than you think. And innovation doesn’t always have to be massively disrupting or a big pivot. Sometimes small changes made by listening to your customers’ unmet needs and emerging desires will tell you everything you need to know for your next product launch.
Innovation that brings information in from customers is often much more to-the-point than innovation that comes from inside the business, where people tend to be focused on the product and possibilities around it a lot. But try a different approach every once in a while. Listen to the people that use your product, not just the ones who create it.
Qualitative data puts your customer’s voice front and center. It highlights their stories, opinions, and feelings, making your marketing strategy more empathetic and customer-focused. This will allow you to build stronger connections with your audience.
Not by any marketing gimmicks, creating online communities or carefully curated UGC campaigns, but by speaking directly to customers’ experiences and emotions. Using qualitative data across your organization brings transformative effects, deeply embedding a culture of attentiveness, adaptability, and unwavering focus on the customer at every level of your business.
This approach does more than just inform product development or marketing strategies—it reshapes the very foundation of how your business operates and interacts with the people it was created for.
We’re not going to pretend that qualitative data analysis is something you can do on autopilot. But while qualitative data analysis brings its set of challenges, understanding these can help you navigate through them more effectively.
Moreover, with the right tools and strategies, the benefits you gain far outweigh any of the potential drawbacks we’ve listed below. Here’s a closer look at these challenges and how to turn them into opportunities:
Yes, qualitative analysis often* demands time and resources. The depth it requires—from collecting detailed narratives to transcribing and interpreting vast amounts of text—can seem daunting. However, this investment in time is what uncovers the nuanced insights that quantitative methods might miss.
*… but not always. With Attest’s Video Responses, you get reliable qual insights fast, alongside your quantitative data!
Of course, the interpretive nature of qualitative data analysis does introduce the risk of subjectivity and bias. But ignoring all opinions and thoughts around your product or brand is arguably worse. What this challenge underscores all the more is the importance of a structured, systematic approach to analysis.
By implementing standardized procedures for coding and analyzing data, and employing tools that facilitate consistency across the process, you can mitigate the risks of subjective bias.
And if you involve a diverse team in the analysis process and make sure you pick a representative set of respondents, qualitative research can enable a deeper, more empathetic understanding of ALL your customers; experiences and perspectives.
Qualitative data collection can indeed be tricky to scale and generalize across a broader market. But who said you can only do qualitative research with in-person interviews? With the right survey tool, like Attest, you can ask quantitative questions at scale, to an audience that is large and diverse.
Our participant audience consists of 125 million people spread across 59 countries, and once you send out a survey, results can come back in mere minutes or hours. So if scalability is holding you back, online surveys with video responses are the answer.
Unlock the full potential of qualitative data analysis with Attest. Gain actionable insights, bridge the gap between raw data and emotional intelligence, and make informed decisions. Discover how Attest can support your journey to deeper consumer understanding at Attest for insights professionals and learn about our commitment to data quality .
Customer Research Manager
How to find gaps in the market – 8 important steps, market analysis, consumer research guide: best process and examples, hybrid and flexible working at attest, subscribe to our newsletter.
Fill in your email and we’ll drop fresh insights and events info into your inbox each week.
* I agree to receive communications from Attest. Privacy Policy .
You're now subscribed to our mailing list to receive exciting news, reports, and other updates!
Qualitative data analysis is the work of organizing and interpreting descriptive data. Interview recordings, open-ended survey responses, and focus group observations all yield descriptive—qualitative—information. This is the opposite of quantitative data, which is all about numbers and statistics.
Qualitative data can’t easily be cleaned, sliced, and diced like its numerical sister. So researchers use specific qualitative data analysis methods to understand the information they collect.
The field of research recognizes five qualitative data analysis methods. We’ll quickly define each one. Then we’ll break down how to use them, when, and why.
Content analysis is when researchers categorize and organize words, concepts, patterns, and themes in their data.
Content analysis is useful for identifying trends and patterns in research.
The trends could be literally anything. Market researchers could look at a large sample of contemporary ad campaigns to spot trends in how businesses use emotions to appeal to their customers.
Social researchers could study mommy blog posts and Instagram momfluencers from 2010 to 2020 to identify patterns about how motherhood changed in the span of a decade.
You get the idea.
Content analysis hasis flexible, and to better understand it, get to know the two subtypes of content analysis: conceptual analysis and relational analysis.
First, let’s look at conceptual analysis.
When people talk about content analysis, they often mean conceptual analysis. This method involves picking a concept and then counting how often it appears in your data. The basic goal is to see how frequently certain terms come up. In general, conceptual analysis requires you to do three things:
Relational analysis takes conceptual analysis a step further. It involves identifying patterns and focusing on the relationships between them, rather than studying the existence of the patterns themselves.
There are three subtypes of relational analysis:
How do you know when to use cognitive vs. relational concept analysis?
It’s simple.
Say you run a survey to ask a group of dog owners whether they let their furry friends sleep in their beds with them. Conceptual content analysis can reveal how many times certain words are used, like “always,” “never,” “cuddle,” and “scratch.” It can also show you trends in the attitudes pup parents have about bedsharing (or not) with their furbabies.
Relational analysis can help you explore themes among people who responded “yes” and people who said “no.” This, in turn, can help you understand the reasons behind the answers.
Narrative analysis involves collecting stories or accounts and looking for underlying themes.
Use narrative analysis when you need to understand the stories behind client or customer experiences.
If your goal is to improve your customer journey, for instance, narrative analysis can reveal what your customers think about the journey as it is right now. What they love about it—and what they don’t.
The content you need for narrative analysis might already be out there. Do your customers or clients give reviews? Those count as narratives that can be analyzed.
But you can also be intentional and methodical about collecting the qualitative data you need for these reviews. Consider hosting one-on-one interviews with a small group of customers. Or running a focus group. Even surveys with space for long-form responses provide narratives you can dig through.
Imagine a mid-sized retail company, Fashion ABC, is facing a decline in repeat customers. This is despite offering high-quality products—and even getting top influencers to be brand ambassadors. For some reason, though, Fashion ABC just can’t hang onto as many customers as they’d like to.
To get to the bottom of this, they decide to use narrative analysis on customer feedback collected over the past year.
Here’s how Fashion ABC runs the process, step by step.
If the changes work, the team knows that the inefficient return process really was the culprit. If not, they can go back to square one and keep digging.
Discourse analysis looks at how people structure and express language within a cultural context.
Discourse analysis is a great tool to use when you want to understand how language shapes and reflects us. It’s ideal for examining how different groups or institutions communicate—and helps measure the impact of language choices.
Take political speeches, for example. Politicians hire speechwriters for a reason. They’re looking for people who can carefully use words to influence public opinion and persuade people to a specific point of view. (Hot tip: If you’ve never done discourse analysis before, these speeches are a great place to do some practice analysis.)
Like any type of concept analysis, though, discourse analysis is helpful in just about every field.
In education, it can highlight how the language teachers use affects learning. In healthcare, it can help researchers understand how language between doctors and patients impacts the quality of care.
It’s also really useful in media studies. You can use it to look at how news outlets frame specific stories, which can reveal hidden biases. All it takes is looking at one news story from the point of view of five different publications to see how the language used in each one might influence the reader to a specific viewpoint.
In short, discourse analysis doesn’t just help you understand what is being said. It also helps you understand why it’s being said the way it is.
Let’s pretend we’re analyzing an ad for a new herbal tea. Here’s the general process we’d take for discourse analysis.
First, we’d choose a specific ad promoting a brand of herbal tea.
Then we’d look for recurring themes within the images. Does the ad emphasize relaxation? Health benefits? Luxury? All three?
Let’s look at the image below, which shows a billboard for Pukka tea. Specifically, for a tea that’s meant to help people get ready for a good night’s sleep.
Let’s look at what words and phrases the company uses to communicate these themes.
There’s not a lot on the billboard, but what’s there is powerful: “Unwind with Nature.” Pukka’s signature twisty vines and flowers bookend the corners of the billboard, and the purple hues and steam rising from the cup help complete the ad.
The language here is telling us that with Pukka tea, we can relax and look forward to a good night’s sleep. It also suggests that by drinking Pukka tea, we’re connected to nature—even in the middle of a city.
Thematic analysis involves looking at a set of qualitative data, like interview transcripts or survey responses, and extracting meanings and themes from it.
Thematic analysis is helpful for finding ideas—aka themes—in qualitative data. You can use it to analyze things like interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses, focus group discussions, and just about any type of qualitative data you collect or source from elsewhere.
And with today’s AI-powered tools like NVivo and ATLAS.ti , thematic analysis is easier than ever. (More on how to use AI for content analysis in a moment.)
Thematic analysis is especially useful early on in your research, especially when you’re trying to generate new ideas. Or when you’re exploring a topic without any specific hypotheses in mind.
For example, if you’re in healthcare research, you might use thematic analysis to understand how patients feel about a new treatment. In education, it can help you explore what teachers think about a new curriculum. In the business world, it’s useful for analyzing customer feedback to spot common complaints.
Let’s say we’ve decided to use thematic analysis to analyze customer feedback for our new coffee shop. To begin, we collect and read through 50 customer reviews. Our goal is to look for recurring words or phrases that point to specific ideas—things like “friendly staff,” “cozy atmosphere,” and “long wait times.”
Next, we’ll group these elements into broader themes. “Friendly staff” and “cozy atmosphere” go in a “Positive Experiences” category. Points like “pricey menu” and “long wait times” go under a “Needs Work” category.
From there, we can summarize our findings and use them to make improvements to our new coffee shop.
Grounded theory is a way of trying to understand the meanings of peoples’ actions—based on their own interpretations of those actions.
You should use grounded theory when you’re trying to use your data to develop a theory, rather than the other way around. Grounded theory is particularly useful when existing theories about something don’t really fit, and you’re looking for a different angle or answer.
For instance, let’s say you’re studying how people adapt to remote work in a field like telehealth. With grounded theory, you can use participants’ actual experiences and interactions to generate theories and better understand the topic of your research.
So why is it called grounded theory, anyway?
The answer lies in this definition of grounded theory, which comes to us from a 2021 article titled, “Grounded theory: what makes a grounded theory study?” in the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing : “The focus of [grounded theory] is to generate theory that is grounded in data and shaped by the views of participants.”
In other words, it’s a qualitative research method that invites theory to originate from the ground up, instead of the other way around.
Imagine you want to develop software to help digital nomads keep track of their working hours and block distractions. (For reference, digital nomads are people who work remotely using technology and travel as they work.)
There’s not much existing research on how these folks manage their work-life balance or connect with other people. It must be hard, since they’re always on the go. How do they do it? What does it mean for their work-life balance? You want to use grounded theory to learn more about this growing segment of people so your product can support their needs.
To collect data, you start by surveying a variety of self-proclaimed digital nomads. You also spend time observing online forums like Reddit to get more of an insider perspective.
As you dig into the survey responses and your observation notes, you start the coding process. To do this, you identify concepts like “flexible work hours,” “isolation,” “community support,” and “travel logistics.”
Next, you connect these concepts into broader categories. For instance, “flexible work hours” and “travel logistics” might merge into a category called “lifestyle management,” while “isolation” and “community support” could come together under “social dynamics.”
Finally, you refine these categories into a new, core theory. You might come up with the idea that digital nomads thrive by balancing autonomy and flexible scheduling with community support. This theory highlights how digital nomads create routines that help them manage work and travel. At the same time, they rely on online and physical communities to fill their social cup.
Your grounded theory suggests that the sustainability of the digital nomad lifestyle hinges on balancing personal freedom, structured but flexible work hours, and social connectedness.
At the end of this journey, you’ve decided to build software that provides digital nomads with a one-stop shop for logging work hours, blocking distractions, and connecting with other nomads.
AI is a hot-button topic, but there’s no question it can help with qualitative analysis. It can’t—and shouldn’t—do all the work for you, though.
Here’s a quick round-up of Do’s and Don’ts when it comes to using AI in qualitative analysis.
Don’t:
Tools like ATLAS.ti, Nvivo, and Tableau can help you with the AI-friendly parts of qualitative research. Trust your experience as a human being to help you with the rest.
Keep reading about user experience.
Qualitative data presents information using descriptive language, images, and videos instead of numbers. To help make sense of this type of data—as opposed to quantitative…
Usability testing helps designers, product managers, and other teams figure out how easily users can use a website, app, or product. With these tools, user…
Qualitative data analysis is the work of organizing and interpreting descriptive data. Interview recordings, open-ended survey responses, and focus group observations all yield descriptive—qualitative—information. This…
UX research tools help designers, product managers, and other teams understand users and how they interact with a company’s products and services. The tools provide…
Qualitative data is information you can describe with words rather than numbers. Quantitative data is information represented in a measurable way using numbers. One type…
It seems like every other company is bragging about their AI-enhanced user experiences. Consumers and the UX professionals responsible for designing great user experiences are…
UX metrics help identify where users struggle when using an app or website and where they are successful. The data collected helps designers, developers, and…
Ease of use is a common expectation for a site to be considered well designed. Over the past few years, we have been used to…
Think that speeding up your website isn’t important? Big mistake. A one-second delay in page load time yields: Your site taking a few extra seconds to…
User experience is one of the most important aspects of having a successful website, app, piece of software, or any other product that you’ve built. …
Your website’s navigation structure has a huge impact on conversions, sales, and bounce rates. If visitors can’t figure out where to find what they want,…
A heatmap is an extremely valuable tool for anyone with a website. Heatmaps are a visual representation of crucial website data. With just a simple…
The problem with a lot of the content that covers website analysis is that the term “website analysis” can refer to a lot of different things—and…
Here, we show you how to use Google Analytics together with Crazy Egg’s heatmap reports to easily identify and fix 3 common website problems.
We share the 3-step process for the website usability testing we recommend to our customers, plus the tools to pull actionable insights out of the process.
Over 300,000 websites use Crazy Egg to improve what's working, fix what isn't and test new ideas.
Last Updated on September 14, 2021
Japanese(日本語)
Their applications: a guide to business success.
In the previous article , we discussed the purpose and importance of marketing research in detail. By capturing market voices accurately and understanding consumer needs, you can build a foundation that supports your business growth. Marketing research is a powerful tool that underpins this process.
What marketing research methods are currently available? And how are they useful in different business scenarios? Marketing research can be broadly categorized into two main types: “qualitative research” and “quantitative research.” Each of these methods has its own strengths and applicable scenarios. Additionally, desk research is effective as a supplementary information-gathering method.
In this article, we will introduce the characteristics and benefits of each type of marketing research and specific applicable scenarios. This will help you choose the most suitable research method for your business challenges and develop more effective strategies.
Marketing research can be categorized primarily into two main types: "qualitative research" and "quantitative research." Each research method has unique characteristics and advantages, and it is crucial to use them appropriately, depending on the situation. The primary data obtained from "qualitative research" and "quantitative research" requires manual data collection, which can be time-consuming and costly. However, this effort can yield new unique information that only some know, allowing you to acquire valuable yet widely unavailable data.
In marketing research, it is efficient to review secondary data through desk research first and then collect any missing information as primary data.
Quantitative research is a method designed to gather data in the form of numbers or objective indicators by having respondents choose from predefined options. This method enables extensive data collection and works well when collecting objective facts. Below are some commonly known methods of quantitative research:
Internet Research : This method involves collecting data by having eligible respondents complete surveys online. It is cost-effective, requires less effort, and can be conducted in short-term research, making it the mainstream method for quantitative research today.
Mystery Shopping : This involves sending researchers disguised as customers to stores or other service locations to evaluate service quality, staff behavior, and other aspects. It offers the advantage of capturing actual service conditions.
Face-to-Face Interviews : This method involves researchers visiting respondents at their homes or workplaces to conduct interviews. The advantage of this approach is that it allows for the presentation and discussion of actual products or advertisements during the interview.
Mail Surveys : This involves sending questionnaires to respondents by mail, which they complete and return. It is beneficial for reaching older generations who may not use the internet.
Automated Telephone Surveys : This method uses an automated voice response system to conduct surveys. Respondents follow voice prompts and press keys to provide answers. It allows for rapid data collection without human intervention.
Qualitative research is a method where respondents are allowed to express themselves freely, and their words are the data themselves. This approach works well when you want to understand consumers' emotions, opinions, and reasons for their behavior or when you want to explore complex issues that are difficult to quantify or the motivations behind consumer actions. Below are some representative methods of qualitative research.
Focus Groups : This method involves conducting a discussion session where participants talk about a specific theme, and opinions and ideas are collected. It typically involves 6 to 8 participants in a group with a moderator facilitating the discussion.
Depth Interviews : This method involves a one-on-one interview between the respondent and the interviewer. It allows them to dig into topics that may be difficult to discuss in front of a larger group.
Observational Research : This anthropological method involves observing the subjects' natural behavior and activities in their environment. Cameras and recording devices are set up in sales areas to conduct interviews while watching the footage or documenting and analyzing observed behaviors.
Marketing research plays a crucial role in a wide range of business scenarios. Below are some specific application scenarios and examples.
ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
Automotive Industry Marketing Research Case Study
Screening questions are included in the questionnaire to group "taxi users" by area.
The survey examines first recall acquisition and usage of the dispatch app to investigate the effectiveness of PR activities by age and area. You can assess the promotional effects by comparing them with past results.
While some information cannot be conveyed fully through text alone in the questionnaire, including logo images, videos, and links to service sites ensures accurate data collection. ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
IT Industry Marketing Research Case Study
The survey aims to clarify the image of the product, brand, and company using a questionnaire, thereby understanding the accurate status of the company in the market. ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー
Net research is a highly effective method to deeply understand consumers and aid in product development and customer acquisition. GMO Research & AI supports strategic decision-making for your business challenges. For detailed information or consultations, please feel free to contact us .
Beginner's Guide to Successful Online Survey
Using online surveys is a quick and cost-effective way to understand your target consumer and build right strategies. |
INDEX: Articles
11 min read
35% of startups fail because there is no market need. This is because they haven’t conducted any customer research to determine whether the product they are building is actually what customers want.
To gather the information needed to avoid this, quantitative data is a valuable tool for all startups. This article will examine quantitative data, the difference between quantitative and qualitative data, and how to collect the former.
Quantitative data is information that can be measured and expressed numerically. It is essential for making data-driven decisions, as it provides a concrete foundation for analysis and evaluation.
In various fields, such as market research , quantitative data helps businesses understand consumer behavior, market trends, and overall performance. Companies can gain insights that drive strategic decisions and improve their products or services by collecting and analyzing numerical data.
Whether conducting a survey, running experiments , or gathering information from other sources, quantitative data analysis is key to uncovering patterns, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on solid evidence.
Quantitative data comes in many forms and is used across various industries to provide measurable and numerical insights. Here are some examples of quantitative data:
Quantitative data and qualitative data are two fundamental types of information used in research and analysis, each serving distinct purposes and represented in different forms.
Quantitative data is numeric and measurable. It allows you to quantify variables and identify patterns or trends that can be generalized. For example, tracking product trends or analyzing charts to understand market movements. Some quantitative data examples include:
On the other hand, qualitative data is descriptive and subjective, often represented in words and visuals. It aims to explore deeper insights, understand data , and provide context to behaviors and experiences.
Examples of qualitative data include:
Understanding the different types of quantitative data is essential for effective data analysis . These types help categorize and analyze data accurately to derive meaningful insights and make informed decisions.
Nominal data categorizes information without a specific order or ranking. It is used to label variables that do not have a quantitative value.
For instance, in a SaaS platform , user roles can be categorized as ‘admin,’ ‘editor,’ or ‘viewer.’ Subscription types might be classified as ‘free,’ ‘basic,’ ‘premium,’ or ‘enterprise.’
This data type is typically represented using bar charts or pie charts to show the frequency or proportion of each category.
Ordinal data categorizes information with a specific order or ranking. It is used to label variables that follow a particular sequence.
Examples include:
This type of data is typically represented using bar charts or stacked bar charts to illustrate the order and frequency of each category.
Discrete data is numerical values that can only take on specific values and cannot be subdivided meaningfully.
Examples include the number of new sign-ups daily, the count of support tickets received, and the number of active users at a given time.
This type of numerical data is often represented using bar charts or column charts to display the frequency of each value.
Continuous data is numerical information that can take on any numerical value within a range.
In a SaaS context, examples include measuring the amount of time users spend on a platform, the bandwidth usage of an application, and the revenue generated over a specific period. Continuous data, along with interval data, helps identify patterns and trends over time.
Analyzing quantitative data offers several advantages, making it a valuable approach in various fields, especially in SaaS. Here are some key benefits:
Quantitative data is numeric and objective, allowing for precise measurement and verification. This reduces the influence of personal biases and subjectivity in analysis, leading to more reliable and consistent results.
Analyzing customer data using quantitative methods can provide clear insights into user behavior and preferences, helping businesses make data-driven decisions.
Quantitative data analysis can handle large datasets efficiently, enabling the identification of patterns and trends across extensive samples.
This capability makes it possible to draw broad, generalized conclusions that can be applied to larger populations. For example, a company might analyze usage data from thousands of users to understand overall engagement trends and identify areas for improvement .
Quantitative data allows straightforward comparisons across various groups, time periods, and variables. This facilitates the evaluation of changes over time, differences between demographics, and the impact of different factors on outcomes.
For instance, comparing customer satisfaction scores before and after a product update can help assess the effectiveness of the changes and guide future improvements.
While quantitative data analysis offers many benefits, it also has some drawbacks:
Quantitative data can miss the deeper context and nuances of human behavior, focusing solely on numbers without explaining the reasons behind actions. For example, tracking user behavior may show usage patterns but not the motivations or feelings behind them.
Accurate analysis and interpretation of quantitative data require specialized skills . Without proper expertise, there is a risk of misinterpretation and incorrect conclusions, which can negatively impact decision-making.
The reliability of quantitative analysis depends on the data collection methods and the quality of measurement tools. Poor data collection can lead to data discrepancies , affecting the validity of the results. Ensuring consistent, high-quality data collection is essential for accurate analysis.
Collecting data for quantitative research involves using systematic and structured methods to gather numerical information. Let’s look at a few methods in detail.
Customer feedback surveys are a key method for collecting quantitative data. Tools like Userpilot can trigger in-app surveys with closed-ended questions to ensure consistent data collection.
Conducting these surveys quarterly or after a specific period helps track changes in customer satisfaction and other important metrics. This approach provides reliable, numerical insights into customer opinions and experiences.
Product analytics tools are essential for tracking user interactions and feature usage. Utilizing these tools allows you to monitor metrics such as user sessions, feature adoption , and user engagement regularly.
This quantitative data provides valuable insights into how users interact with your product, helping you understand their behavior and improve the overall user experience.
Tracking customer support data is crucial for quantitative research. You can record details such as ticket number, issue type, resolution time, and customer feedback by monitoring support tickets.
Organize these tickets into categories, such as feature requests , to identify common problems and areas needing product improvement . This approach helps understand customer needs and enhance overall service quality.
Implementing experiments, such as A/B tests , is a powerful method for collecting quantitative data. By comparing the performance of different features or designs, you can gain valuable insights into what works best for your users.
Use the insights gained from these A/B tests and other product experimentation methods to make informed decisions that enhance your product and user experience.
Searching for datasets on platforms like Kaggle or Statista can provide valuable information relevant to your research. However, to avoid issues with data discrepancy , ensure these datasets are accurate and reliable before incorporating them into your analysis.
Utilizing accurate open-source datasets can significantly enhance your product analysis by providing a broader context and more robust quantitative data for comparison and insights.
Analyzing quantitative data involves using various methods to extract meaningful and actionable insights. These techniques help understand the data’s patterns, trends, and relationships, enabling informed decision-making and strategic planning .
Statistical analysis involves using mathematical techniques to summarize, describe, and infer patterns from data. This method helps validate hypotheses and make data-driven decisions .
For SaaS companies, statistical analysis can be crucial in understanding user behavior , evaluating the effectiveness of new features, and identifying trends in user engagement.
By leveraging statistical techniques, SaaS businesses can derive meaningful insights from their data, allowing them to optimize their products and services based on empirical evidence.
Trend analysis involves tracking quantitative data points and metrics to identify consistent patterns. Using a tool like Userpilot, SaaS companies can generate detailed trend analysis reports that provide valuable insights into how various metrics evolve.
This method enables SaaS companies to forecast future outcomes, understand seasonal variations, and plan strategic initiatives accordingly. By identifying trends, businesses can anticipate changes, adapt their strategies, and stay ahead of market dynamics.
Funnel analysis defines key stages in the user journey and tracks the number of users progressing through each stage.
This method helps SaaS companies identify friction and drop-off points within the funnel. By understanding where users are dropping off, businesses can implement targeted improvements to enhance user experience and increase conversions.
Cohort analysis groups users into cohorts based on attributes such as the month of sign-up or acquisition channel and tracks their behavior over time.
This method allows SaaS companies to understand user retention and engagement patterns by comparing how cohorts perform over various periods. By analyzing these patterns, businesses can identify successful strategies and improvement areas.
Path analysis maps user journeys and analyzes the actions taken by users. This method helps SaaS companies identify the “ happy path ” or the optimal route users take to achieve their goals.
By understanding these paths , businesses can streamline the user experience, making it more intuitive and efficient.
Feedback analysis involves using questionnaires and examining responses to close-ended questions to identify patterns in customer feedback . This quantitative data helps you to understand common user sentiments, preferences, and areas needing improvement.
Businesses can make informed decisions to enhance their products and services by systematically analyzing feedback.
Collecting quantitative data is important if you want a product that will succeed. Your customers are the only people who can signal your success, so speaking to them and analyzing the quantitative data you collect will help you to produce the best product you can.
If you want help collecting quantitative data and analyzing it, Userpilot can help. Book a demo now to see exactly how it can help.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
The fastest way to learn about Product Growth,Management & Trends.
The coolest way to learn about Product Growth, Management & Trends. Delivered fresh to your inbox, weekly.
The fastest way to learn about Product Growth, Management & Trends.
10 customer service metrics + how to track them, 7 product analytics examples to learn from (+best tools).
Saffa Faisal
Aazar Ali Shad
Top 10 research house methodologies.
Home » Top 10 Research House Methodologies
The world of research has evolved dramatically, driven by technological advancements and the growing demand for insightful data. With a multitude of methodologies at our disposal, researchers now face the challenge of selecting the most effective approaches to gather valuable information. This evolution brings us to the forefront of leading research techniques, which are essential for navigating complexities in various fields.
Leading research techniques encompass diverse methodologies, each designed to meet specific objectives. These techniques lay the groundwork for informed decision-making and strategic planning. By understanding and applying these methodologies, researchers can extract meaningful insights and drive impactful change, ultimately enriching their organizational knowledge and enhancing their project's outcomes.
Qualitative research methodologies focus on understanding complex behaviors, perceptions, and experiences through rich, detailed descriptions rather than numerical data. These methodologies emphasize personal engagement with participants, allowing researchers to gather deeper insights. This aligns with leading research techniques that promote a fuller understanding of the subject matter.
Among various qualitative research methods, several stand out. Firstly, in-depth interviews allow researchers to explore individual perspectives comprehensively. Secondly, focus groups facilitate discussions among participants, revealing shared feelings and experiences. Thirdly, observations provide direct insights into behaviors within their natural context. Finally, content analysis allows researchers to interpret existing data for deeper meaning. Together, these methodologies provide a robust framework for obtaining qualitative insights that are indispensable in numerous fields of study, ensuring a valid understanding of human behavior and motivations.
In-depth interviews are a powerful tool for gathering personal insights, allowing researchers to dive deep into the thoughts, feelings, and motivations of individuals. By engaging one-on-one with participants, researchers can uncover unique perspectives that quantitative methods might miss. This personal connection enables the exploration of intricate topics such as pain points, desires, and behavioral patterns.
Moreover, the qualitative data obtained through these interviews provide a rich narrative that adds context to statistical findings. For instance, a recruiter might express a substantial pain point regarding the hiring process, highlighting inefficiencies in evaluating candidates. These discussions offer valuable clues that can inform strategies and improve processes. Consequently, in-depth interviews play an integral role in leading research techniques, as they deliver nuanced insights that empower decision-makers to create targeted solutions.
Focus groups serve as a vital tool for gathering collective perspectives, enabling researchers to capture diverse opinions in a structured environment. These sessions consist of small groups of participants discussing specific topics, allowing for a deeper understanding of customer attitudes and behaviors. By fostering open dialogue, focus groups can unveil insights that individual surveys might miss, creating a rich tapestry of perspectives.
The process involves careful planning and facilitation to ensure all voices are heard. Researchers typically use guided questions to steer discussions while remaining flexible to new topics that may arise. The qualitative data obtained from focus groups can inform various strategies, from product development to marketing approaches. This methodology exemplifies one of the leading research techniques, demonstrating the power of collaboration in uncovering nuanced insights that drive business decisions.
Quantitative research techniques are essential tools for collecting and analyzing numerical data. These methods provide reliable insights through structured approaches, allowing researchers to identify patterns and measure variables statistically. Leading research techniques often involve surveys, experiments, and observations to quantify attitudes, behaviors, and other measurable phenomena.
When implementing quantitative research, researchers should consider several core approaches. First, surveys can gather data from a large sample to assess opinions and frequency. Next, experiments help establish causal relationships by controlling variables in a structured setting. Lastly, observational studies can offer insights into real-world behaviors without intervention. Each method has distinct advantages and helps researchers build a robust foundation for decision-making and strategy development.
Surveys play a pivotal role in collecting large-scale data efficiently, making them a cornerstone of leading research techniques. They allow researchers to gather insights from diverse populations with minimal resources. By employing structured questionnaires and insightful queries, researchers can reach a broad audience and obtain valuable data quickly. This methodological approach not only streamlines data collection but also enhances the quality of insights derived.
Effective survey design should include several key components. First, ensure the clarity of questions to avoid any ambiguities. Next, utilize a mixed-methods approach by combining quantitative closed-ended questions with qualitative open-ended discussions. Additionally, employing incentives can significantly improve response rates and participant engagement. Finally, after conducting the surveys, employing robust data analysis methods will ensure the integrity of results and findings. Overall, thoughtful execution of surveys can transform the data collection process and lead to actionable insights.
Experiments in controlled settings are essential to validate hypotheses within research methodologies. This approach enables researchers to isolate variables and assess the causal relationship between them. By carefully designing experiments, researchers can minimize external influences that might skew results, thus increasing the reliability of findings.
A successful experiment involves several key steps. First, researchers must clearly define their hypothesis and variables. Next, a suitable sampling method should be chosen to select participants, ensuring representation of the target population. After that, researchers should implement a control group, which does not receive the experimental treatment, to compare outcomes effectively. Finally, data analysis is crucial for interpreting results and drawing valid conclusions. These leading research techniques foster a deeper understanding of experimentation, ultimately contributing to the advancement of knowledge in various fields.
The Mixed-Methods Approach combines qualitative and quantitative research techniques, offering a comprehensive view of the data. This methodology allows researchers to explore complex questions and validate patterns identified through different lenses. Utilizing both forms of data collection enhances the richness of insights, ensuring a well-rounded understanding of research topics.
One prominent feature of this approach is triangulation, which promotes accuracy by cross-verifying information from various sources. Additionally, it fosters flexibility, enabling researchers to adapt their strategies based on emergent findings. Mixed-methods also enhance participant engagement, as diverse data collection methods can make research more relatable. By incorporating multiple perspectives, this approach aligns with leading research techniques, empowering researchers to derive deeper insights and make informed decisions based on a wider range of evidence.
Combining qualitative and quantitative data enriches research methodologies and provides a well-rounded understanding of complex issues. By integrating these two approaches, researchers can capture the nuances of human behavior while reinforcing their findings with numerical evidence. Qualitative data offers in-depth insights into participants' thoughts and motivations, whereas quantitative data supplies measurable facts and trends that can be generalized across larger populations.
To effectively combine these approaches, several strategies can be employed. First, aligning research objectives ensures that both qualitative and quantitative data serve common goals. Second, using qualitative findings to inform quantitative survey design can yield more relevant questions. Finally, cross-validating results from both data types enhances the credibility of insights. These leading research techniques can guide organizations in making informed decisions, ultimately leading to more comprehensive insights that drive successful outcomes.
In case studies that utilize multiple data sources, researchers employ various leading research techniques to generate comprehensive insights. By integrating qualitative and quantitative data, they can unveil deeper connections and highlight trends that might otherwise go unnoticed. For instance, combining customer interviews with survey results can enrich the understanding of consumer behavior and preferences.
A holistic approach enhances the analysis, allowing researchers to triangulate findings from different methodologies. This integration offers a robust platform for decision-making and strategy formulation. Additionally, using multiple data sources helps validate results, minimizing bias and improving the reliability of insights. By examining real-world scenarios through this lens, researchers can provide actionable recommendations tailored to specific industry challenges. The case studies serve as a testament to the effectiveness of using diverse data points to inform business strategies and improve outcomes.
In the realm of market analysis, leading research techniques are vital for generating reliable insights. These techniques ensure that data collection is consistent and relevant, allowing organizations to make informed decisions based on accurate information. The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods enhances the overall understanding of consumer behavior and market trends.
Some essential techniques include surveys, focus groups, and interviews. Surveys offer a broad reach and can capture both numerical data and opinions. Focus groups provide an interactive environment for deeper discussions, revealing the why behind consumer preferences. Interviews offer personalized insights, allowing for in-depth exploration of specific topics related to customer experiences. Utilizing these methods effectively leads to comprehensive market insights, guiding strategic initiatives that resonate with target audiences. Implementing these leading research techniques in market analysis strengthens a company's capability to adjust to dynamic conditions and fulfill customer needs.
In the realm of research house methodologies, competitive analysis is essential. By benchmarking against industry leaders, organizations can understand how their methods stack up. This evaluation highlights strengths and uncovers areas for improvement, ultimately guiding strategic decisions. Leading research techniques not only enhance data collection but also ensure that insights are actionable and valuable.
Several key elements contribute to a successful competitive analysis. First, it’s important to identify top competitors and their methodologies. Then, assess their data analysis techniques, focusing on efficiency and effectiveness. Another critical aspect is collaboration; understanding how industry leaders share insights can inform improvements in your own processes. Finally, consider the innovative approaches competitors take to engage with their audience and gather feedback. By exploring these dimensions, research houses can refine their techniques and better serve their clients’ needs.
Consumer behavior studies play a crucial role in understanding buyer motivations, offering insights that drive business decisions. Organizations often apply leading research techniques to analyze customer sentiments, preferences, and purchasing patterns. Through the study of emotions tied to pricing and product experience, companies can adapt their strategies to meet customer expectations effectively.
To appreciate these buyer motivations, several key aspects emerge. First, sentiment analysis allows businesses to gauge customer feelings regarding their products or services. Next, customer journey mapping provides a visual representation of a buyer's experience, identifying touchpoints that can enhance satisfaction. Finally, developing customer personas enables organizations to segment their market and tailor communications effectively. By fostering a deeper understanding of consumer behavior, businesses can increase their market share and refine their offerings in response to evolving customer needs.
Advanced analytical techniques play a crucial role in the realm of leading research techniques. These methods allow researchers to uncover deeper insights from complex datasets, ultimately enhancing the overall quality of research findings. By employing advanced techniques such as predictive analytics, data mining, and natural language processing, researchers can interpret vast amounts of data with greater precision.
One significant aspect of these advanced techniques is their ability to identify patterns and trends that may not be visible through traditional methods. For instance, predictive analytics can forecast future behaviors based on historical data, enabling businesses to make data-driven decisions. Additionally, natural language processing helps in analyzing qualitative data, such as interview transcripts, to extract meaningful insights efficiently. Overall, using advanced analytical techniques empowers researchers to generate actionable insights, thereby improving strategic direction and outcomes.
Data mining involves analyzing vast amounts of data to uncover hidden patterns and valuable insights. By employing leading research techniques, organizations can identify trends that enhance decision-making and strategy formulation. With these methodologies, data scientists and researchers examine connections within data that are not immediately apparent, leading to innovative solutions in various industries.
Additionally, data mining processes can be categorized into several key techniques. These include clustering, which groups similar data points, and classification, which assigns predefined labels to data based on identified features. Furthermore, regression analysis helps in predicting outcomes by understanding relationships among variables. Lastly, association rule mining uncovers relationships between different data elements, providing actionable insights. Utilizing these techniques effectively can transform raw data into strategic advantages, making data mining a crucial component in today’s research methodologies.
Statistical modeling utilizes mathematical frameworks to derive predictions about future trends from existing data. Its primary goal is to analyze historical patterns and identify potential future outcomes with a high degree of accuracy. By employing various techniques, researchers can transform raw data into actionable insights that inform business strategies and decision-making processes, showcasing some of the key leading research techniques in the industry.
Key elements in statistical modeling include regression analysis, time series analysis, and machine learning algorithms. Regression analysis helps in establishing relationships among variables, while time series analysis focuses on trends over time. Machine learning algorithms enhance predictive capabilities by learning from data patterns automatically. Together, these methods enable organizations to foresee market dynamics and shifts, making statistical modeling an indispensable tool in research methodologies and trend prediction.
The future of leading research techniques is poised for remarkable growth, shaped by advancing technologies and evolving research needs. As organizations continue to seek actionable insights, the integration of artificial intelligence will play a crucial role. It enables efficient data scraping and summarization, significantly streamlining the research process and freeing up valuable time for analysts. This transition marks a shift towards more strategic, high-impact methodologies.
Furthermore, the increasing complexity of niche markets demands a greater emphasis on expert interviews. As traditional data sources become scarce, tapping into specialized knowledge will be essential. Looking ahead, the ability to blend human expertise with innovative research tools will define the next chapter in leading research techniques. Embracing these methodologies will enhance decision-making and lead to more informed investment strategies.
On this Page
You may also like, 8 customer-centric approaches for 2024.
5 effective platform marketing strategies.
Unlock Insights from Interviews 10x faster
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
The hotel architectural design factors influencing consumer destinations: a case study of three-star hotels in hua hin, thailand.
2. literature review, 2.1. the characteristics of hotels in aesthetic perception and evaluation approach, 2.2. the characteristics of hotels in physical comfort approach, 2.3. the characteristics of hotels in emotional comfort, safety, and security: influencing consumer perceptions, 2.4. sensitivity of mind approach: influencing consumer emotions and decision-making, 3. methodology, 3.1. data sources, 3.1.1. professional group, 3.1.2. consumer group, 3.2. data collection, 3.2.1. in-depth interviews with professionals, 3.2.2. open-ended questions with the consumer group, 3.2.3. developing a questionnaire for consumer groups, collection of main data, 3.3. data analysis, 4.1. aesthetics perspectives, 4.2. physical comfort perspectives, 4.3. emotional comfort perspectives, 4.4. security and sensibility of mind perspectives, 5. conclusions and discussion, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Grroup 1: Aesthetic Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | Observed Frequency (O) | Expected Frequency (E) | (O − E) /E | Test Result |
Design Concept Theme | 55 | 47.56 | 1.17 | Not Significant |
Harmony | 41 | 47.56 | 0.91 | Not Significant |
Balance | 40 | 47.56 | 1.2 | Not Significant |
Space | 39 | 47.56 | 1.54 | Not Significant |
Style | 53 | 47.56 | 0.63 | Not Significant |
Beautiful | 61 | 47.56 | 3.92 | Significant |
Creativity | 47 | 47.56 | 0.01 | Not Significant |
Environment | 50 | 47.56 | 0.13 | Not Significant |
Perspective & Visual | 42 | 47.56 | 0.65 | Not Significant |
Group 2: Physical Comfort Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | Observed Frequency (O) | Expected Frequency (E) | (O − E) /E | Test Result |
Function | 60 | 47.56 | 3.19 | Significant |
Shape | 35 | 47.56 | 3.38 | Significant |
Proportion & Mass | 48 | 47.56 | 0 | Not Significant |
Texture & Material | 49 | 47.56 | 0.05 | Not Significant |
Human Scale | 38 | 47.56 | 1.92 | Not Significant |
Durability | 43 | 47.56 | 0.44 | Not Significant |
Color | 50 | 47.56 | 0.13 | Not Significant |
Furniture | 45 | 47.56 | 0.14 | Not Significant |
Comfortable | 60 | 47.56 | 3.19 | Significant |
Facilities | 38 | 47.56 | 1.92 | Not Significant |
Circulation | 40 | 47.56 | 1.2 | Not Significant |
Total | 466 | 523.16 | 15.56 | Not Significant |
Group 3: Emotional Comfort Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | Observed Frequency (O) | Expected Frequency (E) | (O − E) /E | Test Result |
Sense of Place | 52 | 40.45 | 3.26 | Significant |
Location | 35 | 40.45 | 0.73 | Not Significant |
Feeling | 38 | 40.45 | 0.15 | Not Significant |
Relationships & Ties | 33 | 40.45 | 1.38 | Not Significant |
Natural Touch | 47 | 40.45 | 1.07 | Not Significant |
Relax | 42 | 40.45 | 0.06 | Not Significant |
Warmth | 37 | 40.45 | 0.29 | Not Significant |
Peaceful | 40 | 40.45 | 0.01 | Not Significant |
Service | 55 | 40.45 | 5.3 | Significant |
Social | 28 | 40.45 | 3.79 | Significant |
Friendly | 45 | 40.45 | 0.51 | Not Significant |
Total | 452 | 445 | 16.55 | Not Significant |
Group 4: The Security and Sensibility Group | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | Observed Frequency (O) | Expected Frequency (E) | (O − E) /E | Test Result |
Safety | 50 | 39.56 | 2.75 | Significant |
Security | 35 | 39.56 | 0.53 | Not Significant |
Risk | 30 | 39.56 | 2.31 | Significant |
Satisfaction | 48 | 39.56 | 1.79 | Significant |
Loyalty | 45 | 39.56 | 0.75 | Not Significant |
Communication | 33 | 39.56 | 1.09 | Not Significant |
Legal Requirements | 36 | 39.56 | 0.32 | Not Significant |
Modernity | 38 | 39.56 | 0.06 | Not Significant |
Innovation | 47 | 39.56 | 1.4 | Significant |
Sustainability | 32 | 39.56 | 1.44 | Not Significant |
Value/Equality | 39 | 39.56 | 0.01 | Not Significant |
Quality | 55 | 39.56 | 6.05 | Significant |
Efficiency | 40 | 39.56 | 0 | Not Significant |
Expectations | 42 | 39.56 | 0.15 | Not Significant |
Convenient | 38 | 39.56 | 0.06 | Not Significant |
Cleanliness | 47 | 39.56 | 1.4 | Significant |
Room Comfort | 45 | 39.56 | 0.75 | Not Significant |
Remember | 32 | 39.56 | 1.44 | Not Significant |
Total | 724 | 711.08 | 21.7 | Not Significant |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Sirirat, S.; Thampanichwat, C.; Pongsermpol, C.; Moorapun, C. The Hotel Architectural Design Factors Influencing Consumer Destinations: A Case Study of Three-Star Hotels in Hua Hin, Thailand. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082428
Sirirat S, Thampanichwat C, Pongsermpol C, Moorapun C. The Hotel Architectural Design Factors Influencing Consumer Destinations: A Case Study of Three-Star Hotels in Hua Hin, Thailand. Buildings . 2024; 14(8):2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082428
Sirirat, Sanawete, Chaniporn Thampanichwat, Chotewit Pongsermpol, and Chumporn Moorapun. 2024. "The Hotel Architectural Design Factors Influencing Consumer Destinations: A Case Study of Three-Star Hotels in Hua Hin, Thailand" Buildings 14, no. 8: 2428. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082428
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Since March 2008, the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection (MoGCSP) in Ghana has been implementing the Livelihood Empowerment against Poverty (LEAP) program, a cash transfer for extremely poor households. A new initiative, LEAP 1000, was implemented in 2015-2018 targeting children in the first 1000 days of their life to improve nutrition and well-being in households with pregnant women and children under 12 months of age. CPC led the design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation of qualitative data about the processes and mechanisms of LEAP impact collected from caregivers in an embedded, longitudinal qualitative cohort of LEAP participants and provided technical support to the quantitative evaluation implemented by UNICEF. Baseline data was collected in 2015 with endline data collected in 2018. Findings from this evaluation contribute to the growing evidence base regarding cash transfer programs in Sub-Saharan Africa.
The principal investigator and other individuals who contribute to the scientific development or execution of a project in a substantial or meaningful way. (per NIH)
The entity or entities that have provided funding for this research.
We classify projects as on hold or ongoing. Ongoing projects are defined as projects where data collection or analysis is continuing.
If a project has a standing externally-facing website, it is listed here.
An online listing of the project's published works.
The overarching themes associated with each project.
Countries whose populations are the focus of a project or analysis.
Defined as a group whose members share a defining characteristic or experience at a point in time.
The date range over which a project received funding.
The parent project under which this project operates.
Data source.
Location where the project's published data can be requested.
Link to information about obtaining public-use source-code.
The date range through which the project ran.
Published on 7.8.2024 in Vol 26 (2024)
Authors of this article:
1 School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong)
2 Hong Kong Lutheran Social Service, Kowloon, China (Hong Kong)
3 Department of Health, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong Island, China (Hong Kong)
Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, PhD
School of Nursing
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
China (Hong Kong)
Phone: 852 34003805
Email: [email protected]
Background: The use of wearable monitoring devices (WMDs), such as smartwatches, is advancing support and care for community-dwelling older adults across the globe. Despite existing evidence of the importance of WMDs in preventing problems and promoting health, significant concerns remain about the decline in use after a period of time, which warrant an understanding of how older adults experience the devices.
Objective: This study aims to explore and describe the experiences of community-dwelling older adults after receiving our interventional program, which included the use of a smartwatch with support from a community health workers, nurses, and social workers, including the challenges that they experienced while using the device, the perceived benefits, and strategies to promote their sustained use of the device.
Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive approach in this study. Older adults who had taken part in an interventional study involving the use of smartwatches and who were receiving regular health and social support were invited to participate in focus group discussions at the end of the trial. Purposive sampling was used to recruit potential participants. Older adults who agreed to participate were assigned to focus groups based on their community. The focus group discussions were facilitated and moderated by 2 members of the research team. All discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used the constant comparison analytical approach to analyze the focus group data.
Results: A total of 22 participants assigned to 6 focus groups participated in the study. The experiences of community-dwelling older adults emerged as (1) challenges associated with the use of WMDs, (2) the perceived benefits of using the WMDs, and (3) strategies to promote the use of WMDs. In addition, the findings also demonstrate a hierarchical pattern of health-seeking behaviors by older adults: seeking assistance first from older adult volunteers, then from social workers, and finally from nurses.
Conclusions: Ongoing use of the WMDs is potentially possible, but it is important to ensure the availability of technical support, maintain active professional follow-ups by nurses and social workers, and include older adult volunteers to support other older adults in such programs.
Technological advancements have facilitated the self-management of chronic diseases among community-dwelling older adults. Wearable monitoring devices (WMDs), such as smartwatches, are among the common technological tools that assist older adults with health monitoring, physical and cognitive training, medication reminders, and fall prevention [ 1 , 2 ]. The literature shows that WMDs are effective at reducing the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases [ 3 ], increasing the physical activity levels [ 4 ], and improving the quality of life [ 5 ] of older adults. However, despite the benefits and high adoption rate of these wearable devices, there is a lack of studies demonstrating the adherence rate of older adults in maintaining consistent use of WMDs [ 6 - 8 ]. A survey with a sample of >4000 Canadian adults revealed that 33% of the participants did not use WMDs to monitor their health on a regular basis [ 9 ]. Similarly, another survey conducted in Australia reported an abandonment rate of 29% for WMDs, without specifying the population [ 10 ]. Physical disability, a lack of knowledge about the functions of wearable devices, and technological anxiety were summarized as notable reasons for poor adherence to these devices among older adults [ 11 - 13 ].
Self-determination theory has highlighted that long-term behavioral change is determined by one’s intrinsic motivation, which is defined as one’s action driven by the enjoyment and interest in the activity itself and is affected by 3 factors: competence, autonomy, and relatedness [ 14 ]. When an individual has a sense of competence and autonomy in adopting a new behavior and has someone who is socially and psychologically connected (relatedness) to support the behavior, they are more likely to adhere to, and maintain, the behavior over the long term. Recent studies have focused on providing training sessions to help older adults familiarize themselves with the functions of WMDs and enhance their competence and autonomy. However, the results showed no difference in adherence between the participants who received the training sessions and those who did not [ 15 , 16 ]. Older adults have expressed in a qualitative study that 1 preintervention training session is not sufficient to enhance their knowledge of WMDs or resolve their technological anxiety [ 17 ]. It was suggested that nursing or peer support, with the simultaneous provision of social support, might be necessary throughout the health program to increase the intrinsic motivation of older adults to adopt WMDs [ 15 ]. However, there have been limited studies on the offering of nursing or peer support for older adults in the use of WMDs. In the study by Farivar et al [ 11 ], nursing feedback was provided to older adults when their real-time step counts, which were displayed on the WMDs, were unsatisfactory. The program was found to be feasible and acceptable to older adults, but it encountered challenges such as infrequent updates of the WMDs and low engagement and retention rates. Another study, which designed a similar program that provided nursing support to older adults when abnormal vital signs were detected in the WMDs, demonstrated a high dropout rate of 21% and short-term adherence to the WMDs [ 18 ]. Recent studies emphasize the importance of implementing a clear nursing service model, such as a case management model, that encompasses problem identification, goal setting, and regular follow-up. This model aims to enhance the intrinsic motivation of older adults to consistently use new technologies, such as mobile health apps and WMDs [ 7 , 19 ], rather than relying solely on providing training sessions to them or intervening only when abnormalities in vital signs are detected through WMDs by the older adults.
Because of the perception that they might be causing trouble to others, older adults tended not to actively seek help from health care professionals and peers even when they faced technical problems or when they did not comprehend the medical jargon displayed on the device [ 11 , 13 ]. They were also concerned about their health data being transferred from WMDs to health care professionals but not receiving regular feedback [ 20 ]. In view of this, this study was to have a nurse case manager (NCM) work with the older adults to identify factors that could facilitate or hinder their use of a smartwatch and recommended that the older adults use those features of the smartwatch that are linked with their health and social problems, provided suggestions on the duration and frequency of the use of the smartwatch, and provided instructions on how to use these features in their daily routines during the 3-month intervention period. Older adults had the autonomy to adjust or modify their own schedules to ensure that they could use the features of the smartwatch efficiently and effectively. The NCM also encouraged the family members or primary caregivers of the older adults to participate and provide feedback and support. This paper describes the perceptions and experiences of community-dwelling older adults after receiving our interventional program. More specifically, we explored the challenges that they experienced during their use of the WMD, the benefits of using the WMD, and suggestions on how to promote their sustained use of the WMD. The results may provide useful insights for developing a program that can promote the continued adoption of WMDs and, in turn, improve the long-term benefits of the WMDs on health self-management among older adults.
A qualitative descriptive design was adopted for this study [ 21 ]. This approach is not associated with any philosophical or theoretical orientation but draws on naturalistic inquiry to understand and describe how people experience a phenomenon [ 21 ]. The qualitative descriptive study is the method of choice when straight descriptions of phenomena are desired, which made it appropriate for this study. This study is reported according to the SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist [ 22 ].
This study was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023 in collaboration with 5 community centers run by a local nongovernmental organization in Hong Kong. Using a purposive sampling approach, the members of these community centers who were interested in this program were screened and recruited into this study if they (1) were aged ≥60 years [ 23 ], (2) owned a smartphone, (3) were able to communicate in Cantonese or Mandarin, and (4) had internet access. They were excluded if they (1) had been diagnosed with cognitive impairment, (2) were bedbound, (3) owned a smartwatch, and (4) were involved in other studies using WMDs.
Staff working at the collaborating community centers invited their members to join the program using Facebook Live. Those who were interested provided their name to the staff, and trained research assistants screened them via telephone. Eligible members were invited to meet the research assistants at the community centers to receive an explanation of the details of the study and to give their written consent to take part in it. All participants received a health monitoring package that included a smartwatch with an alarm setting, a prepaid SIM card, a blood pressure monitor, and a pulse oximeter.
Before the program, a 1-hour web-based training session and a practical test were delivered to all participants to explain the basic operation of the WMD. The number of a telephone manned during office hours by staff of the community center was provided to participants to call should they face any technical problems during use.
The participants were provided with a package that included a WMD (ProVista Care smartwatch), a prepaid SIM card, a blood pressure monitor, and a pulse oximeter. ProVista Care was selected as the WMD for this study due to its validated performance, affordability, and comparable functionality to other similar devices. These functions encompass fall detection; location and activity tracking; blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen saturation monitoring; medication and appointment reminders; and calls to preset numbers and SOS calls. This selection enhances the applicability of the study’s findings to real-world implementation. Data collected from ProVista Care can be synchronized and transferred to the server via the ProVista Care app installed on participants’ personal smartphones. The WMD was designed to be worn on the wrist, securely fastened with an elastic band. Participants were instructed to wear the WMD as frequently and for as long as possible throughout the study duration.
Ten trained community health workers (CHWs), NCMs, and social workers were the interventionists in this 3-month program. The participants in the intervention group received a home visit by a CHW and the NCM in the first month and biweekly telephone calls by the CHW from the 3rd to the 12th weeks. In the first home visit, using the Omaha System, the NCM explored the features of the smartwatch that each participant might find beneficial. The Omaha System is a comprehensive assessment-intervention-evaluation instrument for community-based practice [ 24 ]. There were 21 health and social problems listed in the Omaha System that were relevant to the features of the smartwatch used in this study; for example, the feature of fall detection in the smartwatch might help participants with musculoskeletal problems or lower limb weakness. The NCM empowered the participants to set goals and action plans in the first meeting, while the CHWs followed up, recalling the goals and action plans with the participants and, in subsequent telephone calls, motivating the participants to regularly use the smartwatch. The NCM also monitored the vital signs of the participants that were automatically uploaded by the smartwatches at the backend. When abnormal vital signs were detected by the smartwatch, the NCM would call the participants via telephone and provide appropriate interventions, such as a referral to a social worker, based on the validated protocols.
A total of 6 in-depth focus group discussions with 22 participants were conducted at the end of this program. In-depth focus group interviews are conducted to evaluate participants’ experiences after an intervention through group interactions [ 25 ]. For studies using focus group discussions, it has been suggested that groups ranging from 2 to 40 may be adequate to attain data saturation depending on the phenomenon under investigation [ 25 ]. Thus, 6 groups were considered adequate for this study to attain data saturation. All discussions were conducted with a guide developed by the research team. The focus group interviews were conducted in Cantonese and each session lasted for 25 to 65 minutes. All interviews were audio recorded with the consent of the participants. Interview transcripts were written up by members of the research team. To ensure the consistency of coding and interpretation of data, an audit trail was conducted, and all discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus.
All data collected from the focus group discussions were analyzed inductively using the approach to constant comparison analysis formulated by Maykut and Morehouse [ 26 ], who proposed a 4-step approach to the constant comparison of focus group data: inductive categorization, refinement of categories, exploring relationships across the categories, and integration of data [ 26 ]. In inductive categorization, AKCW and JB read and reread the interview transcripts in both English (JB) and Cantonese (AKCW) to identify recurring concepts independently. Next, overlapping concepts across the groups were categorized and combined by the 2 independent coders (AKCW and JB) to formulate provisional codes. In the second stage, that is, refining the categories of codes, the provisional list of codes was concurrently examined alongside a review of the interview transcripts. The process of categorization was undertaken through discussion with the wider research group to attain consensus. Subsequently, similar codes were grouped to formulate categories for each group. The emerging categories were then concurrently compared across the groups, with recurring categories further refined and grouped. For the third stage, we further refined the categories by grouping them under a distinct umbrella. Categories with common elements were grouped to make broader groups or emerging themes. With these themes, we worked through each group and the associated categories to attain a complete understanding and create patterns of meaning from the data.
The trustworthiness of this study was evaluated according to four criteria: (1) credibility, (2) dependability, (3) confirmability, and (4) transferability [ 27 ]. To enhance credibility and dependability, the summarized results were sent to those participants who had agreed to check them for further clarification and to give feedback on the researchers’ interpretation. Audit trails and peer debriefings were also conducted during the analysis of data to ensure the consistency of the interpreted data to achieve confirmability. A thick description was ensured in reporting the study to enhance transferability. To attain analytical rigor, we ensured that analyses were undertaken in both Cantonese and English and compared to ensure consistency. The authors responsible for this section were fluent in Cantonese and English. The iterative approach to analysis also ensured consistent coding, with an audit trail on the decisions on coding and categorization. In addition, the constant comparison approach ensured that our focus was not only on individual-level analyses but also on analyses within and across the groups.
This study was conducted under the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HSEARS20220429001). All eligible participants were given the right to refuse participation and the right to withdraw from the interview at any time. Written informed consent was collected from all participants. To protect the participants’ privacy, all data collected from this program were kept confidential and anonymized and were only accessible to the members of the research team.
A total of 22 community-dwelling older adults were involved in 6 focus group discussions. Of these, 5 (23%) were male, and 17 (77%) were female, with ages ranging from 62 to 78 years. Only 1 (5%) participant had experience in using a smartwatch before inclusion in the study. A total of 17 (77%) had a primary level of education, and 5 (23%) had a secondary level of education or higher. The clinical characteristics of the participants have been reported in a previous study [ 19 ].
Three themes and 7 categories emerged from the focus group data, as shown in Textbox 1 .
Challenges associated with the use of the wearable monitoring device (WMD)
Perceived benefits of using the WMD
Strategies to promote use of the WMD
This theme describes challenges and concerns that affected the participants’ use of the smartwatch. The emerging categories were (1) individual-related challenges and (2) system-related or technical challenges.
Participants across all groups emphasized that they were slow in learning to use the WMD and required a great deal of face-to-face instruction to be fully oriented to the device and its functionalities before being able to use it effectively. This issue particularly resonated with those who were using such a device for the first time. Some of the older adults either could not understand the instructions or needed more time to assimilate them. It took weeks to months for the older adults to become familiar with the device:
This is my first time wearing a smartwatch. When you wear the watch for the first time, you will definitely not know how to use all the functions. So, I wanted to ask everyone if they have experienced this situation before. [Participant 1]
Well...at first, it was difficult to use. But after using it for a while, it was basically okay, and we can use it on our own.... Hmm yes, actually, if someone teaches you face-to-face, you can learn it clearly first. [Participant 15]
How much time? I think three to four months to learn to use it well. [Participant 20]
For me, at first, it took a long time to use it. Sometimes, I just could not get it to work. But after a while, it became much better. For example, measuring blood oxygen and blood pressure readings became much easier for me with time. [Participant 4]
The first time I tried, I did not know how to turn on the device or turn it off. It was difficult at first. [Participant 7]
The participants also highlighted the issue of forgetfulness, which affected how well they used the device. They noted that with their increasing age, forgetfulness was a common occurrence. Some of the participants mentioned forgetting how to operate the device and the functions available during the initial period of use, although over time they were able to become better at using the device consistently:
I’m so dumb sometimes that I forget what I am doing. I sometimes cannot even figure out how to wrap a scarf around my head, not to mention how to use the watch. [Participant 13]
I am already in my late years. If you even ask me what I ate yesterday, I cannot remember. [Participant 2]
System-related or technical challenges were encountered across all groups. The size of the WMD was considered an issue. Participants described the WMD as big, which made it difficult to wear regularly. Occasionally, the size of the watch was considered a source of ridicule. Despite the potential for being ridiculed, some of the older adults noted that they were more concerned about the functionality and capacity of the watch than its size. In addition, the smooth, glass surface of the watch’s touchscreen became slippery and unresponsive when used by the older adults in cold weather, creating usability issues:
The watch can measure blood pressure and blood oxygen levels. Your watch looks much better and looks great. Our watches are big, like big turtles, and sometimes people make fun of it. [Participant 9]
You can see that your watch is smaller than ours. Our watch is bigger, and it obstructs a lot. But even if it’s still bulky and unattractive, I think we can still wear it because it will help us. [Participant 20]
It feels really troublesome to use during cold weather. There is no problem in hot weather. [Participant 7]
The power capacity of the WMD presented a significant challenge for the participants. Participants wanted to use the WMD, but the need for frequent charging made it rather inconvenient to do so. In some cases when they wanted to use it when going out, they noticed that the WMD was low on battery. Coupled with the previously mentioned issue of forgetfulness, this meant that they missed the opportunity to charge it before going out. The participants also reported that the need to frequently charge the WMD prevented them from using it for a longer period throughout the day. This issue deterred some of the older adults from using the WMD altogether on some occasions:
Hmmm, if you know everything, the main problem with the watch is the frequent charging. That battery needs to be charged frequently—like every day. If you don’t charge it, it will just run down fast. Yes, it is so fast and when there is no electricity, things will become difficult. The need to charge is too frequent for us. [Participant 5]
Oh, so you realize that the battery is down when you wear it and then you must put it back to charge for a while. Yes, that’s right. It is very troublesome to do this every day before going out. The battery runs out quickly all the time. [Participant 9]
Another technical issue that was identified was the fact that some of the participants felt that the WMD had several functions they did not know how to use. Interestingly, other older adults still struggled to navigate through even the few functions that they were taught to use, and they occasionally experienced digital fatigue after constant use:
There may be some functions we cannot use. The watch seems to have many functions, but we do not know them all and also don’t know how to use them all. [Participant 16]
But, I realized there are so many functions on that watch that we cannot use them all. Also, some functions that were possible to use before, people found it annoying to continue to use them. That is why we do not use them frequently anymore. [Participant 9]
All participants were enthusiastic about the ability of the device to count their steps as they walked about. However, the older adults mentioned that the device gave them incorrect step counts. In 1 group, the participants mentioned that the step count function also did not display correctly. Occasionally, they used their mobile phones to obtain correct step counts. In addition to this challenge, some of the participants reported occasional challenges with uploading or transmitting data on their vital parameters:
The pedometer was malfunctioning and gave incorrect figures. When you count how many steps you take yourself and then check the watch, it doesn’t match at all. The watch and the phone both have incorrect counts all the time. [Participant 8]
It shows only a few steps, even though I walked quite a lot. Yes, our watches cannot measure many steps. My phone shows 10,000 steps, but my watch shows 2000 or 3000 steps. To be honest, the watch is not accurate when it comes to the step count. The step count displayed on my phone is not the same as the one on my phone. Yes, that is how it is. There are some differences, yes. [Participant 1]
Actually the step count is important, but it is not accurate at all. I often check it myself. Usually, I check how many steps I have taken, especially since I sit in an office for most of the day. But it is not correct when I check the watch and the phone. [Participant 16]
I tell him about my blood pressure on that day. I tell him about my blood pressure and how many steps I took that day. Sometimes, the watch cannot display the values correctly. [Participant 9]
Some of the participants also found the device to be extremely sensitive, which occasionally caused discomfort because the alarm went off immediately when it sensed a slight movement:
But the watch is too sensitive. Sometimes when I move my hands or feet, it shakes and triggers the alarm. And then it keeps telling me how long it has been and what to do. [Participant 5]
Regardless of the notable challenges, participants highlighted the benefits of using the WMD. These were (1) self-monitoring and health promotion and (2) convenience.
Participants across all groups stated that the WMDs offered them an opportunity to self-monitor some vital parameters, such as blood pressure and oxygen saturation levels. The older adults found this feature to be particularly helpful because it helped them to record their parameters, track them, and share them with health care professionals and to ascertain whether they were maintaining a good health status. Indeed, the use of the device boosted the confidence of older adults across all groups in their ability to actively participate in self-management, particularly because the NCM actively followed up to enable them to attain their health goals:
Um, measure blood pressure and blood oxygen levels at the same time. Well, we know now. We know our blood pressure and blood oxygen levels. It helps us to maintain our health by making us aware of the condition of our body and whether it is normal or not.... At night, I have a blood pressure machine and I can measure my blood pressure every night. [Participant 2]
Also, it gives a different perspective on managing your health with more information available to you. For instance, I know how much I walked today. [Participant 8]
Yes, definitely. Using the watch gave me a lot of confidence. I wear it at home and when I go out. The nurse also reminded me to walk a certain amount of time every day, and even though I forget, I still try my best to walk more. The most important thing is to try and walk more. [Participant 4]
And at home, I don’t know how high or low the blood sugar is. If I know, I can control it by myself at home. If it is high, I will eat less. It is good to be clear about the blood sugar. For the nurses, it would be helpful if they could find my place and remind me of something regularly. [Participant 14]
The best function would be to be able to monitor your health and detect any potential illnesses. [Participant 19]
The participants expressed a desire for more regular follow-ups by the nurses and an option to monitor their blood glucose levels in addition to blood pressure and blood oxygen levels:
I just think it would have been helpful if the device can also help you to monitor your blood sugar levels just like it helps to monitor blood pressure and blood oxygen levels. [Participant 5]
Oh, she sometimes follows up on us with home visits and phone interviews. Yes, but what about the rest of the time? If the nurse does not contact you, you won’t actively look for her, right? Besides, the nurse does not come to the center every day. The nurse is also busy with her work, so where would she have the time? So, in some instances, if you are not feeling better, you go and see a doctor. [Participant 13]
Although the step count feature of the WMD was described as inaccurate, the participants felt that it was still helpful to know how many steps they had taken because that motivated them to go out more often rather than stay at home. Being able to compare their step counts with others gave them a sense of accomplishment, especially if they found them to be higher than those of their colleagues:
But I don’t really care so much about how many steps I take in a day. However, it can still calculate something for you. For example, if the doctor tells you how many steps you need to take in a day, the watch can help you to keep track of it. Maybe we don’t really need it because our phones can also count the steps. [Participant 2]
I take so many steps every day. Many people can vouch for me. I am the best here; I take so many steps. After finishing my chores at home, I come down and do some healthy dancing, and walk around the center. According to them, I am the best. [Participant 14]
Because you can show off to others, like the person you are exercising with, and say, look I have burned this much fat, right? [Participant 9]
Participants also mentioned that the device helped them to not only record their vital parameters but also to view these records regularly. Regarding the promotion of health, the participants noted that the device helped them to participate in regular exercises and to build the confidence they need to meet health-related goals:
So, wearing a watch can make you want to do more exercise, right? Because when you wear a watch, you want to see how many steps you have taken, which makes you want to move more. [Participant 6]
For participants across the groups in this study, the WMD offered a sense of convenience in being able to monitor their vital parameters, record the values, track them, and share them with the nurse if required. The notion of convenience was also noted to be related to the ease with which the older adults navigated the device to inform their self-management strategies. In addition, that they did not have to be in a hospital to assess these basic vital parameters was something the older adults considered very convenient. In fact, they could monitor the basic vital parameters from the comfort of their home and even when moving about in the community:
With the watch, there is a guide, and I am afraid to be lazy about moving around and not walking around. But when I think about the watch, I have the confidence to do it. In the past, I just sat at home all day, talking on the mobile phone about how many thousands of steps I have to walk, and now I just go out and do it myself. [Participant 10]
In addition, the aspect of being able to reach out and interact with a nurse or having a nurse follow up on an older adult whose parameters were outside the normal range was considered to be convenient. This may be related to the fact that the participants felt that they were not only using the device but also being professionally supported by a nurse:
Yes, if the nurse thinks the blood oxygen is low, she will remind you to do it before and again. Then if something happens to you, you will know to see a doctor. [Participant 5]
At least, the blood pressure can be seen by the nurse. And the blood oxygen levels can be seen with a press of the finger. However, the step count is not accurate. [Participant 15]
The social aspect of the watch, such as being able to take pictures and share these with families and friends, was considered helpful and made life more convenient for the older adults. In other words, it added a bit of fun to using the device:
I discovered a new function or new feature. It is completely possible to use the watch to take a photo and share. Yes, so it is so much more convenient. [Participant 3]
It is best if there is nothing wrong with it. The best thing to do is to take a photo of that watch and the stick together after we finish the test, and it will be the most accurate. It is comfortable and makes life more convenient, I think. [Participant 5]
Another source of convenience was noted to be related to the fact that the wearable devices afforded older adults or their families a unique opportunity to track their whereabouts. The older adults found this feature particularly helpful because they considered themselves to be forgetful on occasion, and this feature helped them to retrace their steps to their original location or helped others to know where they were:
The best feature of the device is the tracking. Some people have a poor memory, or they may not be able to find their way home. In that case, their family members can locate them using the tracking feature. [Participant 21]
Mr Choi once tracked us. I got lost and could not find my way home. I got scared and started sweating. Mr Choi tracked my watch and found me at the Che Kung Temple. [Participant 2]
This is where technology has advanced. The most useful thing is when someone is lost. If he wears the watch, you can find him and track where he has been. Then you can find him using the tracking function. [Participant 14]
Sometimes when I go somewhere far, I don’t know where I am, and I cannot see clearly due to my glaucoma. One time, I had to go to the other side for the lunar new year, but I took the wrong bus and did not know where I was. Luckily, I was able to use the watch to track my way. [Participant 6]
This emerging theme discusses approaches observed in the data that highlight strategies to sustain continual use of the device. The following categories were captured: (1) availability of technical support, (2) ongoing follow-up professional support, and (3) peer and family support.
The plethora of technical issues emerging from the use of the device warrants ongoing availability of technical support. This great need was mentioned by participants in all groups and was particularly felt when the device developed a fault or broke down, or the participants needed more assistance in navigating through the functions:
The watch broke down and we did not know how to fix it. Someone at the center said he knew how to turn it back on. We tried for a while, but it still did not work. So, I said forget it. I did not wear it. I only wore it for ten days before, and just for measuring blood pressure at home. [Participant 14]
Although some of the participants sought assistance from the social workers, most older adults hesitated to disturb the personnel and therefore avoided seeking assistance altogether, regardless of the technical challenges that they were facing:
So, it is changed. Actually, you also changed and regarded it as a planned situation, and I did not dare to worry the nurse or the supervisor. So, if there is a problem with the watch, I must handle it on my own. [Participant 10]
In addition, the participants mentioned that they needed more technical support to access other functions on the watch because they found it difficult to perform this task:
And I don’t understand why so many functions need to be locked, except the panic button. I wondered if there was help for us to unlock these functions on the watch. [Participant 7]
We tried to figure it out but could not do it and we needed lots of help. In the end, it suddenly made a sound, and we could not figure out how long it had been, it just happened. [Participant 16]
There are too many things to handle. If you suddenly introduce ten functions for us to use, how can we remember them? You are not teaching a class, you won’t be able to remember them either. [Participant 11]
Although the device was helpful in various ways, the older adults still preferred to have nurses follow up actively with them. For the participants across all groups, this form of support was generally limited, and they wished that they had interacted more with the nurses to be able to interpret the values that they obtained and to seek more health-related information. Perhaps the nurse support centered on following up on older adults with abnormal readings. Thus, those who maintained readings within normal ranges had limited contact with the nurses. The participants also felt that the limited support that they received from the nurses might have affected how well they met their health-related goals:
They [the nurses] do a good job when they call or visit you. With the watch, you set a goal with the nurse, which motivates you to do more. But they are not always there. It is helpful if they can find my place so that they can remind me of something I don’t know. [Participant 19]
Aside from ongoing professional support from nurses to keep the participants motivated in meeting their health-related goals, support from social workers is equally important to promote their continued use of the devices. Social workers played critical roles in promoting the use of the device by offering troubleshooting support, helping the participants to navigate through the device, and offering encouragement. In fact, it seemed as though the older adults who participated in the study trusted the social workers more than they did the nurses and were willing to always seek assistance from them. The older adults seem to have built a strong relationship with the social workers, which made it easier for them to seek assistance from them if required:
They do help us a lot and encourage us. Whenever there is a problem, we always look for him to help us out. He is the most reliable. He is very responsible, and he is always willing to help us. [Participant 5]
I did not even know how to turn off my phone. He said to turn off my phone, do it this way. He really taught us a lot of things. [Participant 10]
Peer support from the CHWs also emerged as a critical factor to sustain the ongoing use of the WMD. These older adult volunteers or older adult ambassadors often offered encouragement to the participants to continue to use the device, record their values, and work toward meeting their health-related goals. Participants across the groups highlighted that it was occasionally difficult to gain access to a nurse; thus, the older adult volunteers or older adult ambassadors became the first point of call for assistance before reaching out to the social workers:
It is not so easy to find or see a nurse on some days. The volunteers have done this before, so we can reach out to them. There are days when you will forget to write the values, and they will remind you to do so. [Participant 16]
Aside from peer support, family support was also observed to be helpful in encouraging the older adults to use the WMD as required. Thus, older adults who resided alone with limited or no family support found it difficult to monitor and continually use the device to promote health:
They said that I fall frequently and have fallen several times before. I must be careful now that I am getting older. If anything happens to me, it would be troublesome because I live alone. [FG2]
Emerging technologies such as wearable devices are advancing care and support for older adults in communities across the globe. Despite the plethora of literature highlighting the importance of wearable devices, significant concerns remain about the decline in use after a period of time. The world’s aging population is booming, but only a limited amount of work has been done to unearth the experiences of older adults regarding the use of wearable devices. This critical gap informed this study, which was part of a large trial program. The findings bring to the fore the challenges experienced by older adults regarding the use of wearable devices, which were identified as individual- and system-related challenges. The findings of the study further highlight the perceived benefits of the devices, particularly in the areas of self-monitoring, health promotion, and convenience. In addition, the study identified a hierarchical pattern of health-seeking behaviors of older adults when using the devices. Put together, the findings highlight that ongoing use of the devices is possible, although there is a critical need to ensure the availability of technical support and ongoing active professional follow-up by the health care team (notably nurses and social workers) and to include older adult volunteers to support other older adults in such programs.
Previous studies have uncovered various technical issues associated with using wearable devices. In a recent study, the authors identified interoperability, battery issues, the bulky nature of the device, a lack of personalization, and a lack of support as key issues that affected the use of the device [ 28 ]. Similar to this finding, our study also noted similar technical issues that affected the use of the devices. By contrast, however, it was noted in our study that regardless of these issues, older adults were willing to continue using the device because they believed that doing so was to their benefit. Despite this, we observed that issues related to individuals can also affect the use of wearable devices among older adults. For most of the older adults included in this study, this was the first time they had to use a wearable device, and they needed more time to become acquainted with it. Although issues such as forgetfulness may be considered part of the aging process, these findings suggest that aside from intensive training on how to use the device, there is still a need for ongoing technical support to boost its use. In addition, instruction manuals need to be more user-friendly and easily comprehensible for older adults. Comprehensibility is essential; we observed in this study that the user manuals were unclear, which may have had an impact on how well the participants made use of the WMD.
The inclusion of professional and peer support in this study is particularly noteworthy. An existing study showed that it might be necessary to provide nursing or peer support throughout the duration of the health program to increase the intrinsic motivation of older adults to adapt to WMDs and to provide social support at the same time [ 17 ]. In our study, which combined both professional and peer support, we observed that older adults did not want to disturb the nurses. Rather, they felt more comfortable consulting the older adult volunteers first, before reaching out to the social workers and, last of all, to the nurses if necessary. This hierarchical pattern of health-seeking behaviors may be an indication that older adults viewed the older adult volunteers as peers sharing similar experiences and conditions, which made it easier to relate to them than to the professionals. Nurses were perceived by older adults to be busy professionals. Thus, the participants would rather resort to seeking support from social workers, although they wished they had more interactions with the nurses. Put together, the findings suggest that nurses may need to take an active role in reaching out to older adults and being available when needed, regardless of whether they are using the wearable device. The concept of peer support also needs to be promoted further by engaging other older adults as volunteers to support older adults who are transitioning to using wearable devices. A recent study has shown that peer-to-peer support for community-dwelling older adults has the potential to not only promote adherence to therapeutic regimens but also to improve their quality of life, which warrants further exploration [ 29 ].
Furthermore, we observed that the ongoing availability of technical support and family support is also essential to promoting the use of wearable devices. It is possible that technical support may be available but unknown to the older adults or that they may not want to disturb others. Thus, older adults need to be encouraged to seek help if needed and should know where to obtain this help. Regarding family support, it remains a major cornerstone of support for older adults [ 30 ]. The absence of this form of critical support may lead to loneliness, which can exacerbate health issues and interfere with therapeutic regimens, including the use of wearable devices [ 31 ]. Undoubtedly, expanding on the notion of family support is beyond the scope of this study, but it is possible to recommend that older adults with limited or no family support need to be identified and appropriate strategies devised to assist them.
Moreover, we identified both individual- and system-related issues that can adversely impact the use of WMDs. Individual-related factors such as slow learning patterns and forgetfulness were highlighted by the participants as impacting how they initially navigated the WMD. Undoubtedly, aging is not a disease, although it can be associated with forgetfulness, which can impact activities of daily living [ 32 ]. Forgetfulness coupled with the slow learning patterns emphasize the need for continuous, gradual education to enable older adults to use WMDs effectively [ 33 ]. System-related challenges such as the size of the WMD and its limited power capacity are concerns that need to be addressed in subsequent design studies. In addition, concerns regarding the WMD generating incorrect readings also emerged as a system-related challenge. Previous studies have reported that a common problem with wearable devices is the likelihood of experiencing automatic loss of synchronization, making it difficult or impossible to update data or resulting in an incorrect report [ 34 , 35 ]. Although loss of synchronization was not examined in this study, it may have potentially contributed to the incorrect readings observed by the older adults in this study.
The strength of this study lies in the use of a rigorous approach to collecting and analyzing data with a focus on individual, within-group, and across-group variations to attain a thick description of what it means to experience the use of a wearable device. This strength notwithstanding, some limitations are noteworthy. First, the experiences of the participants are related to the use of a particular wearable device with distinct features. Thus, the findings may not necessarily be transferable to all wearable devices, although they may offer a useful resource on how older adults are likely to experience using the devices. Second, the study was undertaken in a region with distinct sociocultural features. The findings should therefore be interpreted taking these unique features into consideration. In addition, the nature of the program was such that the older adults were required to have some technological abilities. Thus, the findings may not be transferable to older adults who find it difficult to use technological applications.
Emerging technologies, such as wearable devices, for supporting community-dwelling older adults warrant more work on how users are experiencing these devices. The findings from this study bring to the fore the barriers and benefits of wearable devices and offer insight into strategies that can be considered to improve use. Because of issues that might emerge, it may be helpful to consider the availability of ongoing technical support, professional follow-up support, peer support, and family support. In fact, a personalized approach is needed to promote the use of wearable devices among older adults.
The authors would like to thank Hong Kong Lutheran Social Service for providing the smartwatches and participating in and contributing to this study. The study was funded by the Departmental General Research Fund, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (G-UAQ2).
The data sets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
AKCW and FKYW conceptualized the interventional program. AKCW, JB, JJS, FKYW, KKSC, BPW, SMW, and AYLL provided intellectual input on the study design, methodology, and evaluation. AKCW and JB drafted the manuscript. AKCW analyzed the data. All authors contributed to, reviewed, and approved the manuscript.
None declared.
community health worker |
nurse case manager |
Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research |
wearable monitoring device |
Edited by T de Azevedo Cardoso; submitted 27.05.23; peer-reviewed by M Keivani, I Madujibeya, A AL-Asadi; comments to author 06.12.23; revised version received 14.01.24; accepted 24.05.24; published 07.08.24.
©Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Jonathan Bayuo, Jing Jing Su, Karen Kit Sum Chow, Siu Man Wong, Bonnie Po Wong, Athena Yin Lam Lee, Frances Kam Yuet Wong. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 07.08.2024.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (ISSN 1438-8871), is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Qualitative market research is an open ended questions (conversational) based research method that heavily relies on the following market research methods: focus groups, in-depth interviews, and other innovative research methods. It is based on a small but highly validated sample size, usually consisting of 6 to 10 respondents.
Qualitative market research is an open-ended research method that looks at the reasons and motivations behind customer behavior, at the micro level. Qualitative market research gives you actionable insights you can use to improve everything from your customer service strategies to your products and services.
A guide to qualitative market research methods with examples. Grab a free template, and learn how to choose the right type for your research.
Qualitative market research is defined as a systematic and open-ended market research method used to gain understanding of consumer behaviour, perceptions, preferences, and motivations. Learn more about qualitative market research methods, examples, types and best practices.
What is qualitative research? Qualitative research studies the motives that determine consumer behavior by employing observation methods and unstructured questioning techniques, such as individual in-depth interviews and group discussions. The approach involves the collection and analysis of primary and secondary non-numerical data.
The Complete Guide to Qualitative Market Research Qualitative research is one of the most prominent research methods in the ever-increasing research sphere. Running counter to quantitative research, qualitative research encompasses a distinct set of differentiating qualities (no pun intended). These attributes prove that these two methods ought not to be used interchangeably.
Qualitative research helps marketers understand the pain points of their customers, which is important for product design and development. By incorporating insights from qualitative research into product design, businesses can ensure they are creating products that meet customer needs and exceed expectations.
Understand essential qualitative market research methods and how to use them for high-value consumer insights.
Qualitative Marketing Research clearly explains the use and importance of qualitative methods, clarifying the theories behind the methodology and providing concrete examples and exercises which illustrate its application to Management Studies and Marketing.
It should consequently be invaluable reading to a wide readership, from social research methods students (particularly those in sociology, business, psychology, education, marketing and market research) to worldwide practitioners of qualitative research, both clients and consultants.
Qualitative market research helps you understand your customers. In this guide, we share 7 types of qualitative research, as well as 6 practical methods.
Qualitative marketing research. Qualitative marketing research involves a natural or observational examination of the philosophies that govern consumer behavior. The direction and framework of the research is often revised as new information is gained, allowing the researcher to evaluate issues and subjects in an in-depth manner.
Qualitative research methods focus on the thoughts, feelings, reasons, motivations, and values of a participant, to understand why people act in the way they do. In this way, qualitative research can be described as naturalistic research, looking at naturally-occurring social events within natural settings.
The Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing is an edited book that provides innovative methodological and theoretical guidance to researchers across a vast array of substantive domain...
Qualitative market research, qualitative research, or qual research is a primary market research method that collects and analyzes non-numerical data and uses observation methods, as well as unstructured questioning techniques to provide actionable insights to researchers.
Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research. Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research, which involves collecting and ...
Qualitative research is an excellent way to gain insight into real-world problems. This research type can explain various aspects of individuals in a target group, such as their traits, behaviors, and motivations. Qualitative research involves gathering and evaluating non-numerical information to comprehend concepts, perspectives, and experiences.
Guide to Qualitative Market Research. While quantitative research can reveal hard data about the state of a business, qualitative research aims to explain the factors that led to that state. Qualitative market research focuses on the reasons and motivations behind customers' behaviors, opinions, desires and expectations.
Qualitative research is a type of research methodology that focuses on exploring and understanding people's beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences through the collection and analysis of non-numerical data. It seeks to answer research questions through the examination of subjective data, such as interviews, focus groups, observations ...
How to Conduct Qualitative Market Research: Analyze the Collected Data. A qualitative study may take one day or three weeks for the data collection and up to six weeks in total for the final ...
As a journal that aims to further our understanding of qualitative market research, papers can use a variety of inter-disciplinary applications, such as cultural studies, economics and sociology; and from related fields in discourse analysis, ethnography, semiotics and grounded theory, phenomenology and psycho-analysis.
Qualitative data analysis methods come with scaling issues. Qualitative data collection can indeed be tricky to scale and generalize across a broader market. But who said you can only do qualitative research with in-person interviews?
Qualitative data can't easily be cleaned, sliced, and diced like its numerical sister. So researchers use specific qualitative data analysis methods to understand the information they collect. The field of research recognizes five qualitative data analysis methods. We'll quickly define each one.
We explore the essence of Demand Spaces and how qualitative research methods can capture these insights.
Marketing research can be broadly categorized into two main types: "qualitative research" and "quantitative research." Each of these methods has its own strengths and applicable scenarios. Additionally, desk research is effective as a supplementary information-gathering method. In this article, we will introduce the characteristics and ...
Quantitative data and qualitative data are two fundamental types of information used in research and analysis, each serving distinct purposes and represented in different forms. Quantitative data is numeric and measurable.
Marketing Research Analyze in-depth interviews, focus groups, and other qualitative research. ... The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods enhances the overall understanding of consumer behavior and market trends. Some essential techniques include surveys, focus groups, and interviews. ...
This study employed a mixed-methods research design, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to investigate the architectural design and service factors influencing consumer choices in three-star hotels in Hua Hin District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province.
CPC led the design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation of qualitative data about the processes and mechanisms of LEAP impact collected from caregivers in an embedded, longitudinal qualitative cohort of LEAP participants and provided technical support to the quantitative evaluation implemented by UNICEF.
Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive approach in this study. Older adults who had taken part in an interventional study involving the use of smartwatches and who were receiving regular health and social support were invited to participate in focus group discussions at the end of the trial.