• Earth Science
  • Physics & Engineering
  • Science Kits
  • Microscopes
  • Science Curriculum and Kits
  • About Home Science Tools

Science Projects > Life Science Projects > Test for Starch in Plants  

Test for Starch in Plants

Photosynthesis is the process in which green plants (primarily) convert energy from the sun’s light into usable, chemical energy. Plants require energy for growth, reproduction, and defense. Excess energy, created from photosynthesis, is stored in plant tissue as starch. Starch is a white and powdery substance. It houses glucose, which plants use for food. The presence of starch in a leaf is reliable evidence of photosynthesis. That’s because starch formation requires photosynthesis.

( Adult supervision required. )

Starch Testing Experiment

What you need:.

  • Beaker or glass jar
  • Saucepan on the stove
  • Ethyl alcohol
  • Iodine solution

Test for starch in plants:

1. Place one of the plants in a dark room for 24 hours; place the other one on a sunny windowsill.

2. Wait 24 hours.

3. Fill the beaker or jar with ethyl alcohol.

4. Place the beaker or jar in a saucepan full of water.

5. Heat the pan until the ethyl alcohol begins to boil.

6. Remove from the heat.

7. Dip each of the leaves in the hot water for 60 seconds, using tweezers.

8. Drop the leaves in the beaker or jar of ethyl alcohol for two minutes (or until they turn almost white).

9. Set them each in a shallow dish.

10. Cover the leaves with some iodine solution and watch.

What Happened:

The hot water kills the leaf and the alcohol breaks down the chlorophyll, taking the green color out of the leaf. When you put iodine on the leaves, one of them will turn blue-black and the other will be a reddish-brown. Iodine is an indicator that turns blue-black in the presence of starch. The leaf that was in the light turns blue-black, which demonstrates that the leaf has been performing photosynthesis and producing starch.

Try the test again with a variegated leaf (one with both green and white) that has been in the sunlight. A leaf needs chlorophyll to perform photosynthesis — based on that information, where on the variegated leaf do you think you would find starch?

Buy Testing For Starch Experiment Kit

More Life Science Projects:

  •   Make a Leaf Skeleton
  •   Make a Butterfly Feeder
  •   Make Spore Print Art
  •   Make Spider Web Art

Welcome! Read other Chemistry articles or explore the rest of the Resource Center, which consists of hundreds of free science articles!

Shop for Chemistry Supplies!

Home Science tools offers a wide variety of Chemistry products and kits. Find affordable beakers, test tubes, chemicals, kits, and everything else you need for lab experiments.

Related Articles

Science Fair Projects for 8th Graders

Science Fair Projects for 8th Graders

Science Fair Projects for 8th Graders As kids reach the 8th grade, their exposure to science goes up a notch. Equipped with basic knowledge, they can begin to explore more complicated concepts and satisfy their curiosity for deeper answers to the 'whys' and 'hows' of...

Science Fair Projects for 7th Graders

Science Fair Projects for 7th Graders

Science Fair Projects for 7th Graders​​ Science fair projects for 7th graders are a step up in complexity. Because 7th graders have a better grasp of science concepts, they’re expected to practice the scientific method in the way they approach their experiments–which...

Home Science Experiments for Preschoolers

Home Science Experiments for Preschoolers

Home Science Experiments for Preschoolers Home science experiments for preschoolers are a great way to pique your child’s curiosity, teach them valuable knowledge, and allow them to have some fun in the comfort of their own home. There are plenty of activities your...

Easy Science Fair Projects for Kids

Easy Science Fair Projects for Kids

Easy Science Fair Projects for Kids Science fairs are a long-standing tradition that provide kids with the opportunity to better understand practical concepts in fun and innovative ways. The great thing about the experiments presented at these events is that they...

How to Make a Pollinator Hotel

How to Make a Pollinator Hotel

Have you ever wondered how you can help provide habitat for pollinators like honey bees and butterflies in your back yard? Learn how to make a pollinator hotel with this step-by-step guide and lesson. Pollinators are animals that help move pollen. Most pollinators are...

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY

Get project ideas and special offers delivered to your inbox.

should I learn computer coding

Practical Biology

A collection of experiments that demonstrate biological concepts and processes.

chlorophyll experiment starch

Observing earthworm locomotion

chlorophyll experiment starch

Practical Work for Learning

chlorophyll experiment starch

Published experiments

Testing leaves for starch: the technique, demonstration or class practical.

This procedure kills a leaf, disrupts the cell membranes and softens the cuticle and cell walls. This makes it possible to extract the chlorophyll with hot ethanol and also allows the iodine solution to penetrate the cells and react with any starch present.

Lesson organisation

You can run this as a teacher demonstration, or with students carrying out the procedure in pairs.

Apparatus and Chemicals

For each group of students:.

Eye protection

Beaker for boiling water, 250 cm 3

Boiling tube, 1 for each type of leaf used

Anti-bumping granules (optional)

For the class – set up by technician/ teacher:

Ethanol (IDA) ( Note 1 )

Kettles of boiling water ( Note 2 )

OR Electric water baths set at 90 °C containing a boiling tube rack

Iodine in potassium iodide, solution in dropper bottles ( Note 3 )

Beaker or jar (at least 250 cm 3 ), labelled ‘Waste ethanol’ ( Note 4 )

Leaves, different types, such as pelargonium (pot geranium) ( Note 5 )

Health & Safety and Technical notes

Ethanol (IDA), iodine solution and hot liquids require safety precautions to be taken. Wear eye protection.

Read our standard health & safety guidance

1 Ethanol (IDA) – refer to CLEAPSS Hazcard 40A and student safety sheet 60 – is highly flammable (flash point 13 °C) and harmful (because of the presence of methanol). The risks in this procedure are reduced by using hot water from kettles or in water baths rather than heating with a Bunsen burner flame. Some protocols recommend propanol (Hazcard 84A) in place of ethanol, as it removes chlorophyll more effectively. However, it has the additional risk of eye damage, its flashpoint is very similar to that of ethanol (IDA), and it may be more expensive.

2 Kettles are a safer source of hot water than heating with a Bunsen burner because of the presence of flammable ethanol (IDA) in this procedure. Students are familiar with the hazards of using kettles. Consider how to limit the movement of students around the laboratory with kettles or beakers of near-boiling water. Electrically-heated and thermostatically-controlled hot water baths may be a safer alternative.

3 Iodine solution – refer to CLEAPSS Hazcard 54B and Recipe card 39. A 0.01M solution is suitable for starch testing. Make this by 10-fold dilution of 0.1M solution. Once made, the solution is a low hazard but may stain skin or clothing if spilled, and may irritate the eyes.

4 Save the waste ethanol as a source of chlorophyll for future work. Make sure it cannot be tipped over and is in a safe place so it is not a fire hazard.

5 If the teacher or technician snips the leaves from the plants to give to the students, the plants are more likely to survive to be used again. Variegated Pelargonium (pot geranium) are good subjects for this experiment as are Tradescantia and Impatiens (busy lizzie).

6 Ensure that the plants have been well-illuminated for 24-48 hours. In winter, it might be worth using a halogen lamp to ensure the illumination is adequate.

Ethical issues

There are no ethical issues associated with this procedure.

SAFETY: Ensure the ethanol is kept away from naked flames. Students should wear eye protection when working with ethanol or iodine solution. Take care with hot liquids. Be aware that plant sap may irritate the skin.

Investigation a Collect leaves from the plants to be tested.

Use forceps to hold the leaf in a beaker of boiling water to kill it

Microbe Notes

Leaf Starch Test: Principle, Procedure, Results, Uses

Starch in a leaf can be easily detected in a lab with the help of iodine solution. This test is called the ‘Leaf Starch Test’ or ‘Iodine Test for Starch’.

Green leaves are the food factory of plants. Green leaves have abundant chloroplasts – special organelles where the photosynthesis process takes place – so, a large portion of photosynthesis occurs in the leaves of a plant. The glucose produced during photosynthesis is stored as an energy reserve in the form of starch in the leaf, stem, branches, roots, and fruits of a plant. Starch is one of the abundant natural carbohydrates consumed in the diet by humans and other animals as an energy source.

Starch is a complex polymeric carbohydrate (polysaccharide) stored as a reserve food material in plants. It is formed of glucose monomers joined together by a glycosidic bond. The glucose units exist in two forms in natural starch; amylose and amylopectin . Amylose is water insoluble straight-chain polymer of D-glucose subunits linked together by α-1,4 glycosidic bond. Amylopectin is a water-soluble branched chain polymer of D-glucose subunits linked together by α-1,6 glycosidic bond.

Table of Contents

Interesting Science Videos

Objectives of Leaf Starch Test

  • To detect the presence of starch in a leaf
  • To assess the extent of photosynthesis occurring in the leaf

Principle of Leaf Starch Test

Iodine is insoluble in water; but when potassium iodide is added, it dissociates into K + and I -, and the resulting I – reacts with molecular iodine (I 2 ) to form a triiodide complex (I 3 – ). The triiodide complex can further associate with molecular iodine and form pentaiodide complex (I 5 – ) and so on.

Principle of Leaf Starch Test

The amylose component of starch is arranged in the form of helical coils. When the iodine-iodide solution is added over starch molecules, the negatively charged polyiodide (mainly triiodide, I 3 – ) slips inside the helices of the amylose chain forming a charge transfer complex. Electrons in this charge transfer complex absorb light energy and get excited. This phenomenon is perceived by the human eye as intense blue-black color.

Hence, in the presence of starch, a blue-black colored complex is formed when the iodine-iodide solution is added over the starch. The intensity of the blue-black color is proportional to the quantity of amylose (or starch) but doesn’t give an exact quantitative (concentration) value. Hence, the test is a qualitative type test.

Requirements for Leaf Starch Test

Beaker
Petri plate
Test tube
Burner
Dropper
Forceps
Water
Ethanol
Lugol’s Iodine Solution
Freshly plucked leaf
(green leaf of an outdoor plant)

Procedure of Leaf Starch Test

  • Pluck a green leaf of any outdoor plant. A medium size leaf, preferably, a leaf recently exposed to sunlight is better for this test. 
  • Boil about 250 mL water in a beaker and put the leaf in the beaker and let it boil for a few minutes (2 to 5 minutes) till its waxy coat got off and it gets soft.
  • Using forceps, take out the leaf and spread it on a petri plate. 
  • Place the leaf in a test tube and pour ethanol (90% or more v/v) till the leaf submerses. 
  • Place the test tube in the beaker with boiling water (or in a water bath) and let the ethanol boil till the leaf decolorizes. Take out the leaf after 5 to 10 minutes if it doesn’t decolorize completely. 
  • Place the leaf on a petri plate and spread it properly and rinse with cold water. 
  • Using a dropper, add a few drops of iodine solution over the leaf to cover it. 
  • Examine the color of the leaf after 2 minutes of the addition of iodine solution.

Leaf Starch Test

Observation of Leaf Starch Test

  • The leaf will decolorize and become whitish after boiling in an ethanol solution. 
  • The leaf will turn dark blue-black color after the addition of iodine solution. 

Result and Interpretation of Leaf Starch Test

The development of a blue-black color over the surface of the leaf indicates the presence of starch in the leaf. It suggests that the leaf was undergoing a photosynthesis process and had starch within it. 

Precautions

  • Use forceps to place a leaf in and out of the boiling water and ethanol solution. 
  • Always use green leaves exposed to sunlight for better results. 
  • Do not direct the mouth of the test tube with ethanol towards your face while boiling it. 

Uses of Leaf Starch Test

  • In the assessment of the photosynthetic activity in leaves.
  • It is used to study photosynthesis patterns, starch accumulation, and depletion patterns in leaves, and assessment of environmental factors influencing photosynthesis and starch accumulation. 
  • It is used as a teaching tool for basic-level students to introduce them photosynthesis process in leaves and carbohydrate storage. 

Limitations of Leaf Starch Test

  • It is a qualitative test and hence only indicates the presence or absence of starch but doesn’t represent the quantity of starch present. 
  • This test can be easily influenced by exposure of the leaf to sunlight, condition of the leaf, and quality and quantity of iodine solution. 
  • https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zpcvbk7/revision/3
  • https://practicalbiology.org/standard-techniques/testing-leaves-for-starch-the-technique
  • https://www.wikihow.com/Test-for-Starch
  • https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Biological_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_(Biological_Chemistry)/Carbohydrates/Case_Studies/Starch_and_Iodine
  • https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/iodine-test
  • https://microbiologynote.com/iodine-test/
  • https://learning-center.homesciencetools.com/article/test-for-starch-photosynthesis/
  • https://science.cleapss.org.uk/resource-info/pp088-testing-leaves-for-starch.aspx

About Author

Photo of author

Prashant Dahal

2 thoughts on “Leaf Starch Test: Principle, Procedure, Results, Uses”

Wow it is so very good

This site is so helpful. Thank you a million

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Practical Science

Table of Contents

chlorophyll experiment starch

Exploring Photosynthesis Variables: A Comprehensive Leaf Starch Test Experiment

Introduction:.

Delve into the fascinating world of plant biology with this comprehensive practical experiment, designed to test the effects of different variables on the rate of photosynthesis in leaves. Photosynthesis, the process by which plants convert sunlight, carbon dioxide, and water into glucose and oxygen, is vital to life on Earth. By modifying variables such as light exposure and carbon dioxide availability, we can observe how these factors impact starch production in leaves and gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influence photosynthesis. Uncover the intricacies of plant life and the essential role that photosynthesis plays in the balance of our ecosystem.

Materials and Equipment:

  • Fresh green leaves from a plant exposed to sunlight for several hours (Geraniums work best)
  • Aluminum foil
  • Calcium oxide (quicklime)
  • Test tube or boiling tube
  • Forceps or tweezers
  • Bunsen burner or hot plate
  • Ethanol (alcohol)
  • Iodine solution
  • White tile or ceramic plate
  • Safety goggles
  • Lab coat or apron

Step-by-Step Method:

  • Safety first: Put on your safety goggles and lab coat or apron to protect your eyes and clothing from potential spills.
  • Choose a healthy green leaf from a plant that has been exposed to sunlight for several hours, ensuring the leaf has had ample time to undergo photosynthesis.
  • Modify the variables: a. Light exposure: Cover a portion of the leaf with aluminum foil, blocking sunlight from that area and preventing photosynthesis. b. Carbon dioxide availability: Place the plant in a container filled with calcium oxide (quicklime) to absorb carbon dioxide, thereby limiting the plant’s access to this essential component of photosynthesis.
  • Leave the plant under these modified conditions for a few hours.
  • Boil a beaker of water on a Bunsen burner or hot plate. Use the forceps or tweezers to hold the leaf and immerse it in the boiling water for approximately 1-2 minutes. This step will soften the leaf and kill the cells, halting further photosynthesis.
  • Carefully remove the leaf from the boiling water using the forceps or tweezers, and then immerse it in a test tube or boiling tube filled with ethanol (alcohol). Ensure the leaf is fully submerged.
  • Place the test tube or boiling tube containing the leaf and ethanol in the beaker of hot water. The ethanol will heat up and decolorize the leaf, removing its chlorophyll. This process should take around 5 minutes. Note: Ethanol is highly flammable, so ensure there are no open flames nearby.
  • Once the leaf is decolorized, carefully remove it from the ethanol using forceps or tweezers, and rinse it with cold water to remove any residual ethanol.
  • Place the leaf on a white tile or ceramic plate, and add a few drops of iodine solution. The iodine will react with any starch present in the leaf, turning it a blue-black color.
  • Observe the leaf for any blue-black coloration, which indicates the presence of starch. Compare the areas of the leaf that were exposed to different variables.

Safety and Troubleshooting:

  • Always wear safety goggles and a lab coat or apron to protect your eyes and clothing from potential spills.
  • Use caution when handling hot equipment and liquids to avoid burns.
  • Ethanol is highly flammable, so ensure there are no open flames nearby when heating the ethanol.

Test Questions:

  • What are the two variables being tested in this experiment, and how are they modified?
  • Why is it important to cover a portion of the leaf with aluminum foil during this experiment?
  • How does calcium oxide affect the rate of photosynthesis in the plant?
  • What conclusions can you draw from the blue-black coloration observed in different parts of the leaf?
  • Why is it important to study the effects of different variables on the rate of photosynthesis?

Answer Key:

  • The two variables being tested in this experiment are light exposure and carbon dioxide availability. Light exposure is modified by covering a portion of the leaf with aluminum foil, and carbon dioxide availability is altered by placing the plant in a container filled with calcium oxide.
  • Covering a portion of the leaf with aluminum foil is important because it blocks sunlight from that area, preventing photosynthesis from occurring and allowing us to observe the effects of light exposure on starch production.
  • Calcium oxide absorbs carbon dioxide, limiting the plant’s access to this essential component of photosynthesis, and thus affecting the rate of photosynthesis in the plant.
  • The blue-black coloration observed in different parts of the leaf indicates the presence of starch, which is a product of photosynthesis. Comparing the coloration in areas exposed to different variables helps us understand how these factors impact the rate of photosynthesis and starch production.
  • Studying the effects of different variables on the rate of photosynthesis is important because it helps us understand how environmental factors can influence plant growth and productivity, which has implications for agriculture, ecosystems, and climate change.

By conducting this practical experiment, students can gain valuable insights into the factors that affect photosynthesis and explore the significance of these variables in plant biology. This hands-on approach encourages curiosity and appreciation for the natural world while reinforcing key scientific concepts.

Discovering Photosynthesis: Testing a Leaf for Starch – A Hands-On Practical Experiment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Type your email…

' src=

  • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
  • Copy shortlink
  • Report this content
  • View post in Reader
  • Manage subscriptions
  • Collapse this bar

Photosynthesis: testing a variegated leaf for starch

  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share via Email

Age Ranges:

This resource tackles the learning objective “Only areas of the plant with chloroplasts can make starch in photosynthesis”. This is activity 11 in the ‘Photosynthesis: A Survival Guide’ scheme and follows up from activity 10, ‘What are chloroplasts’.

Students carry out a starch test on a variegated leaf to demonstrate that only the parts containing chloroplasts are able to synthesise starch.

This resource is designed for 11-14 pupils but could be extended for use with older students as appropriate.

For a fun activity for an open evening or a science day, you can prepare ‘secret messages’ or hidden images on all-green pelargonium leaves for students to reveal by testing for starch, as shown in the video below.

You may wish to use  this video clip , showing 19th century scientist Julius von Sachs’ pioneering research into how plants form starch from the BBC’s ‘Botany: A Blooming History series, available from the SAPS website.

chlorophyll experiment starch

What's included?

  • SAPS - PSG11 - Which part of a leaf produces starch - teacher notes
  • SAPS - PSG11 - Which part of a leaf produces starch
  • SAPS - PSG11 - Which part of a leaf produces starch - student notes
  • Photosynthesis

Related content

Teaching resources.

  • Using Pelargoniums (Geraniums) in the Lab
  • Sugar, starch or cellulose? What carbohydrates do plants make?
  • Video clip - Light and starch production
  • Photosynthesis: what are chloroplasts?

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser.

Biology archive

Course: biology archive   >   unit 11.

  • Conceptual overview of light dependent reactions
  • Light dependent reactions actors
  • Photosynthesis: Overview of the light-dependent reactions

Light and photosynthetic pigments

  • The light-dependent reactions

chlorophyll experiment starch

Introduction

What is light energy, pigments absorb light used in photosynthesis, chlorophylls, carotenoids, what does it mean for a pigment to absorb light, attribution:.

  • “ The light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis ,” by OpenStax College ( CC BY 3.0 ). Download the original article for free at http://cnx.org/contents/f829b3bd-472d-4885-a0a4-6fea3252e2b2@11 .
  • " Bis2A 06.3 Photophosphorylation: the light reactions of photosynthesis ," by Mitch Singer ( CC BY 4.0 ). Download the original article for free at http://cnx.org/contents/c8fa5bf4-1af7-4591-8d76-711d0c1f05f9@2 .

Works cited:

  • Chlorophyll a. (2015, October 11). Retrieved October 22, 2015 from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorophyll_a .
  • Speer, B.R., (1997, July 9) Photosynthetic pigments. In UCMP glossary . Retrieved from http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/glossary/gloss3/pigments.html .
  • Bullerjahn, G. S. and A. F. Post. (1993). The prochlorophytes: are they more than just chlorophyll a/b-containing cyanobacteria? Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 19(1), 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408419309113522 .
  • Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., and Jackson, R. B. (2011). Photosynthesis. In Campbell biology (10th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson, 193.

Additional references:

Want to join the conversation.

  • Upvote Button navigates to signup page
  • Downvote Button navigates to signup page
  • Flag Button navigates to signup page

Great Answer

s Science Experiments
   







]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]


A is a green pigment found in most plants, algae, and cyanobacteria that allows the plant to absorb light - a process vital for photosynthesis.


is a green pigment found in most plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. Its name is derived from the Greek: chloros = "green" and phyllon = "leaf". Chlorophyll absorbs light most strongly in the blue and red but poorly in the green portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, hence the green colour of chlorophyll-containing tissues such as plant leaves. Chlorophyll was first isolated by Joseph Bienaim� Caventou and Pierre Joseph Pelletier in 1817.

Chlorophyll is vital for , which allows plants to obtain energy from light.

Chlorophyll molecules are specifically arranged in and around pigment protein complexes called photosystems which are embedded in the thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts. In these complexes, chlorophyll serves two primary functions. The function of the vast majority of chlorophyll (up to several hundred molecules per photosystem) is to absorb light and transfer that light energy by resonance energy transfer to a specific chlorophyll pair in the reaction center of the photosystems. Because of chlorophyll�s selectivity regarding the wavelength of light it absorbs, areas of a leaf containing the molecule will appear green.

The two currently accepted photosystem units are Photosystem II and Photosystem I, which have their own distinct reaction center chlorophylls, named P680 and P700, respectively. These pigments are named after the wavelength (in nanometers) of their red-peak absorption maximum. The identity, function and spectral properties of the types of chlorophyll in each photosystem are distinct and determined by each other and the protein structure surrounding them. Once extracted from the protein into a solvent (such as acetone or methanol), these chlorophyll pigments can be separated in a simple paper chromatography experiment, and, based on the number of polar groups between chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b, will chemically separate out on the paper.

The function of the reaction center chlorophyll is to use the energy absorbed by and transferred to it from the other chlorophyll pigments in the photosystems to undergo a charge separation, a specific redox reaction in which the chlorophyll donates an electron into a series of molecular intermediates called an electron transport chain. The charged reaction center chlorophyll (P680+) is then reduced back to its ground state by accepting an electron. In Photosystem II, the electron which reduces P680+ ultimately comes from the oxidation of water into O2 and H+ through several intermediates. This reaction is how photosynthetic organisms like plants produce O2 gas, and is the source for practically all the O2 in Earth's atmosphere. Photosystem I typically works in series with Photosystem II, thus the P700+ of Photosystem I is usually reduced, via many intermediates in the thylakoid membrane, by electrons ultimately from Photosystem II. Electron transfer reactions in the thylakoid membranes are complex, however, and the source of electrons used to reduce P700+ can vary

The electron flow produced by the reaction center chlorophyll pigments is used to shuttle H+ ions across the thylakoid membrane, setting up a chemiosmotic potential mainly used to produce ATP chemical energy, and those electrons ultimately reduce NADP+ to NADPH a universal reductant used to reduce CO2 into sugars as well as for other biosynthetic reductions.

Reaction center chlorophyll-protein complexes are capable of directly absorbing light and performing charge separation events without other chlorophyll pigments, but the absorption cross section (the likelihood of absorbing a photon under a given light intensity) is small. Thus, the remaining chlorophylls in the photosystem and antenna pigment protein complexes associated with the photosystems all cooperatively absorb and funnel light energy to the reaction center. Besides chlorophyll a, there are other pigments, called accessory pigments, which occur in these pigment-protein antenna complexes.

Chlorophyll is a chlorin pigment, which is structurally similar to and produced through the same metabolic pathway as other porphyrin pigments such as heme. At the center of the chlorin ring is a magnesium ion. For the structures depicted in this article, some of the ligands attached to the Mg2+ center are omitted for clarity. The chlorin ring can have several different side chains, usually including a long phytol chain. There are a few different forms that occur naturally, but the most widely distributed form in terrestrial plants is chlorophyll a. The general structure of chlorophyll a was elucidated by Hans Fischer in 1940, and by 1960, when most of the stereochemistry of chlorophyll a was known, Robert Burns Woodward published a total synthesis of the molecule as then known. In 1967, the last remaining stereochemical elucidation was completed by Ian Fleming, and in 1990 Woodward and co-authors published an updated synthesis.

, more accurate monovinyl protochlorophyllide, is an immediate precursor of chlorophyll a that lacks the phytol side chain of chlorophyll. Unlike chlorophyll, protochlorophyllide is highly fluorescent; mutants that accumulate it glow in red if irradiated by the blue light. In Angiosperms, the last step, conversion of protochlorophyllide to chlorophyll, is light - dependent and such plants are pale (etiolated) if grown in the darkness. Gymnosperms, algae, and photosynthetic bacteria additionally have another, light - independent enzyme and grow green in the darkness as well.

is a condition in which leaves produce insufficient chlorophyll. As chlorophyll is responsible for the green colour of leaves, chlorotic leaves are pale, yellow, or yellow-white. The affected plant has little or no ability to manufacture carbohydrates through photosynthesis and may die unless the cause of its chlorophyll insufficiency is treated, although some chlorotic plants, such as the albino Arabidopsis thaliana mutant ppi2 are viable if supplied with exogenous sucrose.

Chefs use chlorophyll to colour a variety of foods and beverages green, such as pasta and absinthe. Chlorophyll is not soluble in water and is first mixed with a small quantity of oil to obtain the desired result. Extracted Liquid Chlorophyll was considered unstable and always denatured, until 1997 when Frank S. & Lisa Sagliano used freeze-drying of liquid chlorophyll at the University of Florida and stabilized it as a powder, preserving it for future use.


are photosynthetic pigments that occur in various phototrophic bacteria. They are related to chlorophylls, which are the primary pigments in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. Groups that contain bacteriochlorophyll conduct photosynthesis, but do not produce oxygen. They use wavelengths of light not absorbed by plants. Different groups contain different types of bacteriochlorophyll.

, a food additive and alternative medicine, is a water-soluble, semi-synthetic sodium/copper derivative of chlorophyll.

A , or DCM, is a subsurface maximum in the concentration of chlorophyll in the ocean or in lakes. Throughout much of the tropical ocean, the DCM is a permanent feature. At higher latitudes, it occurs seasonally. The presence of a DCM may indicate a maximum in the abundance of phytoplankton, or it may result from the higher chlorophyll content of phytoplankton living in a darker environment.

A is an electric lamp designed to promote plant growth by emitting an electromagnetic spectrum appropriate for photosynthesis. The emitted light spectrum is similar to that from the sun, allowing indoor growth with outdoor conditions. Natural daylight has a high color temperature (approx. 6000 K) and appears bluish. Through the use of the color rendering index, it is possible to compare how much the lamp matches the natural color of regular sunlight. Recent advancements in LEDs have allowed for the production of relatively cheap, bright, and long lasting grow lights that emit only the wavelengths of light corresponding to chlorophyll's absorption peaks.

is a form of chlorophyll. Chlorophyll a is mainly used in light reactions used in photosynthesis. It loses excited electrons allowing them to move to the electron acceptor (redox reaction) which in turn moves it through the electron transport chain. It absorbs energy from the violet-blue and orange-red wavelengths. It has relatively high Kreft's dichromaticity index.Chlorophyll 'a' contains alternating single and double bonds, a phytol tail, and a central magnesium atom.

is a form of chlorophyll. Chlorophyll b helps in photosynthesis by absorbing light energy and it is more soluble than because of its carbonyl group.

Source: (All text is available under the terms of the and .)


              



chlorophyll experiment starch

Investigating the Need for Chlorophyll, Light & Carbon Dioxide ( Cambridge O Level Biology )

Revision note.

Naomi H

Investigating the Need for Chlorophyll

  • The occurrence of photosynthesis can be demonstrated by observing the presence of its products
  • Although plants make glucose in photosynthesis, leaves cannot be tested for its presence as the glucose is quickly used or converted into other substances
  • Starch is stored in chloroplasts, where photosynthesis occurs, so testing a leaf for starch is a reliable indicatorthat photosynthesis is taking place
  • A leaf is dropped in boiling water to kill the cells and break down cell membranes
  • Care must be taken at this stage as ethanol is extremely flammable ; the Bunsen burner should be turned off before any ethanol is poured into the boiling tube
  • A water bath could be used to avoid the need for naked flames
  • The leaf is dipped in boiling water to soften it
  • The leaf is spread out on a white tile and covered with iodine solution
  • In a green leaf, the entire leaf will turn blue-black as photosynthesis is occurring in all areas of the leaf
  • The areas that have no chlorophyll remain orange-brown as no photosynthesis is occurring here and so no starch is stored

Testing a leaf for starch diagram

Testing a variegated leaf for starch procedure

Iodine can be used to test for the presence of starch in different parts of a leaf

Investigating the Need for Light

  • This ensures that any starch already present in the leaves will be used up and will not affect the results of the experiment
  • Partially cover a leaf of the plant with aluminium foil and place the plant in sunlight for a further 24 hours
  • Remove the leaf and test for starch as shown above
  • The area of the leaf covered with aluminium foil will remain orange-brown , as it did not receive any sunlight and could not photosynthesise, while the area exposed to sunlight will turn blue-black
  • This demonstrates that light is necessary for photosynthesis and the production of starch

Investigating the Need for Carbon Dioxide

  • Remove starch from two plants by placing them in the dark for 24 hours
  • Sodium hydroxide will absorb carbon dioxide from the surrounding air
  • Water here acts as an experimental control , demonstrating that it is the presence of the sodium hydroxide, and not any other factor, that is affecting the plant
  • Place both plants in bright light for 24 hours
  • Test both plants for starch using iodine, as shown above
  • The leaf from the plant placed near sodium hydroxide will remain orange-brown , as a lack of carbon dioxide will prevent it from photosynthesising
  • The leaf from the plant placed near water should turn blue-black as it had all necessary materials for photosynthesis

Experiment that demonstrates the need for carbon dioxide in photosynthesis diagram

The experimental set-up to show that plants need carbon dioxide for photosynthesis

You've read 0 of your 0 free revision notes

Get unlimited access.

to absolutely everything:

  • Downloadable PDFs
  • Unlimited Revision Notes
  • Topic Questions
  • Past Papers
  • Model Answers
  • Videos (Maths and Science)

Join the 100,000 + Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Author: Naomi H

Naomi graduated from the University of Oxford with a degree in Biological Sciences. She has 8 years of classroom experience teaching Key Stage 3 up to A-Level biology, and is currently a tutor and A-Level examiner. Naomi especially enjoys creating resources that enable students to build a solid understanding of subject content, while also connecting their knowledge with biology’s exciting, real-world applications.

MyQuestionIcon

Write an experiment to show that chlorophyll is necessary for photosynthesis.

Experiment: take a potted plant with variegated leaves like croton and keep it in a dark region, away from sunlight for 3 days. this will halt photosynthesis and de-starch the plant. then keep the plant facing the sunlight for 6 to 8 hours the plant can now carry out photosynthesis and produce starch. mark the green areas in the leaf and trace them on a sheet of paper. mark the regions as green and yellow. the green areas contain chlorophyll which is absent in the yellow areas. immerse the leaf in boiling alcohol to decolorize it. the leaf slowly loses its green color, which goes into the alcohol. dip this decolorized leaf in iodine solution. now remove the leaf from the iodine solution and rinse it in distilled water. remove the leaf from distilled water and keep it on a petri dish. observation two - color regions are visible in the leaf. they are reddish-brown and blue-black. conclusion it can be concluded that the earlier green parts of the leaf turn blue-black whereas the yellow parts have become reddish-brown. green parts of the leaf possess chlorophyll; hence they carry out photosynthesis and produce starch, which turns blue-black with iodine..

flag

Is chlorophyll necessary for photosynthesis? How do we prove it with an experiment? [5 MARKS]

thumbnail

  • Open access
  • Published: 09 August 2024

RNA-seq reveals the gene expression in patterns in Populus × euramericana 'Neva' plantation under different precision water and fertilizer-intensive management

  • Zhou Wang 1 , 2   na1 ,
  • Weixi Zhang 1 , 2   na1 ,
  • Changjun Ding 1 , 2 ,
  • Yongxiu Xia 3 ,
  • Zhengsai Yuan 1 , 2 ,
  • Jiangtao Guo 4 ,
  • Jinjin Yu 1 , 2 ,
  • Bingyu Zhang 1 , 2 &
  • Xiaohua Su 1 , 2 , 5  

BMC Plant Biology volume  24 , Article number:  759 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Populus spp. is a crucial fast-growing and productive tree species extensively cultivated in the mid-latitude plains of the world. However, the impact of intensive cultivation management on gene expression in plantation remains largely unexplored.

Precision water and fertilizer-intensive management substantially increased key enzyme activities of nitrogen transport, assimilation, and photosynthesis (1.12–2.63 times than CK) in Populus × euramericana 'Neva' plantation. Meanwhile, this management approach had a significant regulatory effect on the gene expression of poplar plantations. 1554 differential expression genes (DEGs)were identified in drip irrigation (ND) compared with conventional irrigation. Relative to ND, 2761–4116 DEGs, predominantly up-regulated, were identified under three drip fertilization combinations, among which 202 DEGs were mainly regulated by fertilization. Moreover, drip irrigation reduced the expression of cell wall synthesis-related genes to reduce unnecessary water transport. Precision drip and fertilizer-intensive management promotes the synergistic regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism and up-regulates the expression of major genes in nitrogen transport and assimilation processes (5 DEGs), photosynthesis (15 DEGs), and plant hormone signal transduction (11 DEGs). The incorporation of trace elements further enhanced the up-regulation of secondary metabolic process genes. In addition, the co-expression network identified nine hub genes regulated by precision water and fertilizer-intensive management, suggesting a pivotal role in regulating the growth of poplar.

Precision water and fertilizer-intensive management demonstrated the ability to regulate the expression of key genes and transcription factor genes involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism pathways, plant hormone signal transduction, and enhance the activity of key enzymes involved in related processes. This regulation facilitated nitrogen absorption and utilization, and photosynthetic abilities such as light capture, light transport, and electron transport, which faintly synergistically regulate the growth of poplar plantations. These results provide a reference for proposing highly efficient precision intensive management to optimize the expression of target genes.

Peer Review reports

Populus spp. stands as one of the foremost fast-growing and prolific tree species, commanding the largest intensive cultivation area in the mid-latitude plains worldwide [ 1 ]. Poplar is the most widely planted plantation species in China, with a planting area ranking first in the world. However, the potential production of poplar has not been fully exploited in China, which is much lower than at the international level. One of the key reasons for low production potential is the inefficient intensive management [ 2 ].

Water and nutrients complement and interact with each other throughout the entire process of plant growth and development [ 3 , 4 ], and irrigation and fertilization can cover the shortage of water and nutrients during the life cycle [ 5 ]. However, water deficit limits nitrogen uptake whereas over-supplement of water may cause nutrient losses through leaching, thus it is necessary to develop effective application regimes of water and fertilization [ 6 ]. Drip fertigation, a new technology combining drip irrigation and fertilization, ensures the simultaneous supply of water and fertilizers [ 7 ] and has now been widely applied in intensive agriculture, horticulture, and fruit planting in most developed or agricultural countries, to increase the production of them, as well as water and nutrient utilization efficiency [ 8 , 9 ]. With the growing awareness of sustainable development, drip fertigation has gained widespread adoption in intensively managed agroforestry, including plantation [ 3 , 8 , 10 , 11 ]. Yan et al. [ 12 , 13 ] have applied drip fertigation in an intensively managed poplar ( Populus × euramericana 'Guariento') plantation for several years, resulting in significant increases in both biomass and soil organic carbon content compared to conventional management. Specifically, over the three experimental years, the biomass increased by 4.3–52.2%, carbon storage increased by 76%, and the soil organic carbon content exhibited an annual increase of 12–21%. This suggests that applied drip fertigation in intensive management could significantly promote the productivity and increased carbon storage of poplar plantation, as well as the effectiveness of nitrogen and water in the surface soil. Mi et al. [ 14 , 15 ] analyzed the rules of uptake, consumption, and transport of water and nutrients in the soil, growth plasticity, as well and root spatial distribution of poplar plantation in sandy areas formulated a precision drip fertigation regimes, which could effectively promote the growth of diameter at breast height (DBH), height, and timber volume of poplar plantation, and then increase the productivity. Zhang et al. [ 16 ] demonstrated that long-term irrigation significantly increased the total branch xylem cross-sectional area in various canopy layers. This improvement enhanced the overall water-conducting area of the branches within the canopy and then enhanced the growth of Populus tomentosa Carr. effectively. Du et al. [ 17 ] indicated that the total biomass of Populus deltoides 'Danhong' and Populus simonii 'Tongliao1' increased 1.69 and 1.10 times, respectively, after fertilization compared with non-fertilization. However, the above studies were mainly concerned with the phenotypic level such as growth, physiology, and biochemistry, there is no study on the effects of cultivation managed on gene expression of plantation.

High-throughput sequencing technology can effectively investigate genome‑wide gene expression of plants, which benefits the explanation of the regulatory effects of different cultivation measures at the omics level, such as the transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome in the field. Based on this, it can clarify the response of gene expression to specific environmental conditions comprehensively, systematically, and realistically, and contribute to proposing a reasonable intensive management with real-time growth regulation technology systems, to achieve the optimal expression of target genes. In recent years, there have been studies reporting on the applications of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) technology in intensive agriculture, showing notable progress. Chen et al. [ 18 ] analyzed the effects of trace irrigation at different depths on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and plant responses in the field, and found that drip irrigation at 30 cm underground can significantly increase cotton yield, which was suitable for cotton irrigation in China’s Inner Mongolia. Nonetheless, drip irrigation at a depth of 50 cm led to a reduced cotton yield and differential expression of transcription factors (including bZIP , WARK , Myb , and NAC ) in response to drought stress. This implies that irrigation at a greater depth influenced cotton yield by inducing drought stress. Zhang et al. [ 19 ] found that stable soil water content (SW) conditions not only increased maize ( Zea mays L.) growth and yield significantly but also highly up-regulated expression of lots of DEGs in the photosynthesis (including PsbE , PsbF , PsbA , PsbD , etc.) and oxidative phosphorylation pathway (including atpE , atpB , ndhE , ndhG , etc.), compared with a soil moisture content of dry and wet alternation conditions, which indicates that the physiological mechanism of SW to increase maize yield may be the enhancement of photosynthetic capacity and energy metabolism. Ou et al. [ 20 ] studied the effects of different nitrogen fertilizer treatments on transcriptome variations of Panax notoginseng roots and found that ammonium and nitrate fertilizers are simultaneously used could increase the P. notoginseng root yield by promoting the TCA cycle, which activated by up-regulation of ACLA-3 and several key metabolites in this cycle. Fu et al. [ 21 ] researched how rice ( Oryza sativa L.) responded to the mixed provision of ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen(MPAN)and found that the amount and rate of nutrient (N, P, and K) uptake and their translocation in rice were highly enhanced under 75:25 MPAN with 25% of NO 3 − -N and shoot biomass was also increased significantly under 75:25 MPAN. Ultimately, 476 DEGs (288 up-regulated and 179 down-regulated) associated with nitrogen metabolism, carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, photosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, and zeatin biosynthesis were identified. These genes play a crucial role in enhancing nutrient uptake, translocation, and seedling growth. However, so far, there has been only one study on the different cultivation measure’s effects on gene expression of plantation forestry. That is the gene expression of plantation poplar ( Populus × euramericana ) regulated by different planting densities, first published by our research group. This study showed that there were significant changes in the expression of metabolism-related and stimulus-related genes in response to planting density. And number of genes related to plant light responses, photosynthesis, and carbon and nitrogen metabolism were observed, displaying upregulation under high-density [ 22 ].

Here, an 11-year-old Populus × euramericana 'Neva' plantation in the sandy area of the North China Plain was used as the research object, we analyzed the whole-genome expression patterns of leaves under different combine of water and fertilizer cultivation for several consecutive months by RNA-seq. Together with growth and the activity of enzymes related to carbon and nitrogen metabolism, to reveal the effects of precision water and fertilizer-intensive management on gene expression to identify the core related genes. This will provide a reference basis for the proposal of highly efficient precision intensive management to achieve the optimal expression of the target genes.

Materials and methods

Site description and sampling.

The experiment site is located in Yufa Town Forestry farm, Daxing District, Beijing, China, which belongs to the warm-temperate semi-humid continental monsoon climate. The region experiences an average annual sunshine duration of 2620.4 h, with an average annual temperature of 11.6 °C. Winters are characterized by an average temperature of -2.3 °C, while summers see an average temperature of 25.1 °C. Annual precipitation averages 552.9 mm, and evaporation ranges between 1800 and 2000 mm annually. The frost-free period spans 180–200 days each year. The soil in the experiment site is sandy soil alluvial from the old course of the Yongding River. The soil profile investigation shows that there is no obvious humus layer from the surface down to 1.2 m, with uniform texture of fine sand, poor comprehensive soil fertility, and low productivity.

Eleven-year-old Populus × euramericana 'Neva' were used as experimental materials. The plantation had a row spacing of 3 m × 5 m and was growing normally without pests or diseases. Two irrigation methods, three fertilization conditions, and two fertilization gradients were set up in the experiment. There are a total of 7 types of water and fertilizer treatments: no fertilization conventional irrigation (CK), no fertilization drip irrigation (ND), water and fertilizer coupling: controlled release fertilizer drip irrigation (CD, drip -fertilizer combine), water-soluble fertilizer drip irrigation (M1D, M2D, drip-fertilizer integration), formula fertilizer drip irrigation (F1D, F2D, drip-fertilizer with trace element integration). The fertilization rates under CD, M1D, M2D, F1D and F2D treatments were approximately 3:1:2 for the ratio of N, P, and K(The fertilizer formulas employed in the study are detailed in Table S1 ). Conventional irrigation is implemented three times annually, whereas drip irrigation is administered a total of 15 times throughout the year. Different irrigation methods ensure consistent soil moisture content at the same soil depth. Combining water-soluble fertilizer and formula fertilizer with drip irrigation, opening the fertilization system, and fertilizing with water; Controlled release fertilizer will be applied in one go in May.

Before sampling, 5 standard plants were selected for positioning in each treatment group, and side trees were removed. In mid-May (before fertilization), mid-July, mid-August, and mid-September, 3–4 pieces of functional leaves of the current year’s branches growing southward in the top 1/3 of the trees on each standard plant were collected, immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for quick-freezing and then stored at -80 °C in a freezer. 5 biological replicates were set up for the determination of physiological indicators, totaling 140 samples; 3 biological replicates were set up for transcriptome sequencing, totaling 84 samples.

Determination of physiological indicators

The activities of nitrate reductase (NR), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), glutamate synthase (GOGAT), ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (FBA) and the contents of soluble sugar (SS) and chlorophyll (Chl) in poplar leaves were determined using a micromethod. For details on the assay method, refer to the corresponding product instructions on the Solarbio website ( https://www.solarbio.com/index.php ).

RNA extraction, cDNA library construction, and RNA sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity was checked using the kaiaoK5500 ® Spectrophotometer (Kaiao, Beijing, China), RNA integrity and concentration were assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), transcriptome sequencing libraries were constructed after the samples were tested and approved. Transcriptome sequencing libraries were constructed according to the instructions of the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (#E7530L, NEB, USA). Sequencing was performed with the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, USA) platform with the sequencing strategy PE150. Raw reads from Illumina platform flat sequencing are processed to obtain high-quality sequences (Clean Reads) by removing low-quality sequences, decontaminating junctions, etc., and calculating Q20, Q30, and GC content of the Clean Data. The Eukaryotic Transcriptome (with reference genome) Sequencing was realized by Annoroad Gene Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China).

RNA-Seq data processing and analysis

Bowtie2 v2.2.3 was used for building the genome index and then Clean Data was compared to the Populus deltoides genome database ( https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/info/PdeltoidesWV94_v2_1 ) by HISAT2 v2.1.0 [ 23 ]. Reads Count for each gene in each sample was counted by HTSeq v0.6.0, and FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase Millon Mapped Reads) was then calculated to estimate the expression level of genes in each sample [ 24 ]. Genes with q  ≤ 0.05 and |log2_ratio| ≥ 1 are identified as DEGs [ 25 ]. Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed using the OmicShare tools ( https://www.omicshare.com/tools ) and Weighted correlation network analysis(WGCNA) analysis using the OE Cloud tool ( https://cloud.oebiotech.com ).

Quantitative real-time PCR verification

To verify the reliability of the RNA-seq results, 11 randomly selected genes were analyzed at the gene expression level. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using a Light Cycler 480 Instrument II system (Roche, Switzerland) and analyzed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara) using the following parameters: 95 °C for 30s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5s and 60 °C for 30s, followed by 95 °C for 5s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 95 °C with continuous acquisition mode at per 5 °C, with a final extension at 50 °C for 30s. The assay was repeated three times per sample after mixing. Actin (OX637672.1) was used as an internal reference gene. Gene-specific primers were designed (Table S2 ). The relative expression of genes was calculated using the 2 −∆∆Ct [ 26 ].

Impact of precision water and fertilizer-intensive management on physiological and biochemical indicators of poplar

To investigate the effects of precision water and fertilizer-intensive management on the physiological and biochemical indicators of poplar, the activities of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (FBA), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), glutamate synthase (GOGAT), nitrate reductase (NR), ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), as well as the content of soluble sugar (SS) and chlorophyll (Chl) in poplar leaves were measured under different water and fertilizer treatments (CK, ND, CD, M1D, M2D, F1D, and F2D). The findings revealed that the alterations in FBA, GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco activity, and SS content exhibited similar patterns under distinct water and fertilizer treatments (Fig.  1 ). Compared with CK, the activity of GOGAT, NR, and SS content under ND increased by 1.04, 1.10, and 1.02 times in July, respectively. In August, the GDH activity under ND was 1.03 times that of CK. In September, the activity of Rubisco under ND increased by 1.05 times. These above results indicated that although various physiological and biochemical indicators under ND increased compared to CK, the differences were not significant. Compared with ND, the activities of GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco, and SS content increased by 16.95 – 46.09% under CD treatment in August. M1D increased the activities of FBA, GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco, and SS content by 18.99 – 42.55% in July, August, and September. In September, the activities of FBA, GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco, and SS content under M2D and F1D treatments were approximately 1.30–2.32 times and 1.39–2.20 times that of ND, respectively. The activities of FBA, GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco, and SS content under F2D treatment increased by 11.76 – 46.94% and 23.81 – 61.95% in July and September, respectively. These findings suggest a significant increase in all the aforementioned physiological and biochemical indicators of poplars under water-fertilizer coupling (CD, M1D, M2D, F1D, and F2D) compared to ND. Comparing the differences between the same treatment in different months, it was found that various physiological and biochemical indicators after water and fertilizer treatment (July, August, and September) significantly increased compared to those before treatment (May). Compared with May, the activity of FBA in ND treatment increased by 1.1 times in July, August, and September; the activity of GDH increased by 1.1 times and 1.68 times under ND and M1D, respectively; the activity of GOGAT increased by about 18.76% and 32.92% in CD and F1D; the activity of Rubisco increased by 1.45–1.74 times and 2.14–2.78 times under M1D and F2D treatments, respectively; the content of SS increased by about 27.52%, 15.70%, and 24.08% under ND, CD, and M1D, respectively. Additionally, there was no discernible change pattern in the chlorophyll (Chl) content, but in August and September, the Chl content significantly increased under F1D and F2D, rising by 21.61–53.98% compared with ND. In summary, we believe that different irrigation methods have a relatively small impact on the physiological and biochemical indicators of poplar, but the coupling of water and fertilizer significantly increases physiological and biochemical indicators such as photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activity compared to drip irrigation, indicating that nutrient addition may be the main factor affecting the physiological and biochemical characteristics of poplar; The Chl content showed a significant increase in drip fertilization with trace element integration, indicating that the addition of trace elements may promote the increase of Chl content.

figure 1

Measurement of physiological and biochemical indicators of poplar leaves under different water and fertilizer treatments and months. a FBA activity. b Rubisco activity. c SS content. d Chl content. e NR activity. f GDH activity. g GOGAT activity. The error bar represents the standard deviation ( n  = 3). Capital letters indicate significance between months for the same treatment, lowercase letters indicate significance between treatments for the same month, and different letters indicate significant differences ( P  < 0.05)

Global analysis of RNA-Seq

To clarify the gene expression pattern of poplar plantation leaves under precision water and fertilizer management, RNA-seq analysis was performed, and a total of about 521.5 G clean data were obtained, with an average of about 6 G clean reads per sample, the percentage of Q30 was above 88%, and the GC contents were all around 45%, and the clean reads were compared to the PdeltoidesWV94_v2_1 reference genome, the matching rate per sample was above 82%, with the unique matching rate above 70% (Table S4). The FPKM method was employed for the quantitative estimation of gene expression values, revealing a total of 29,763 genes expressed in at least one sample (Table S5). The Pearson correlation coefficient (Fig. S1 ) was employed to assess the correlation between the biological replicates of each sample. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the biological repeats ranged from 0.90 to 0.99, indicating the high reliability of the RNA-seq data.

Differentially expressed genes and patterns under precision water and fertilizer-intensive management

Using | log2Fold change | ≥ 1, q < 0.05 as the screening threshold, perform DEGs analysis (Table  1 ). The number of DEGs was significantly higher in September (2344–5943) than in May, July, and August (1–222), indicating that genes may strongly respond to precision water and fertilizer-intensive management in September. The number of DEGs for the same fertilizer under different fertilization gradients (M1D and M2D, F1D and F2D) is 4–16, indicating that the study set fertilization gradients to regulate gene expression weakly. Therefore, we only conducted differential expression analysis on the genes of CK, ND, CD, MD (non-gradient water-soluble fertilizer), and FD (non-gradient formula fertilizer) treatments (Fig.  2 a). A total of 6259 DEGs (1365 up-regulated and 4894 down-regulated) were identified in ND vs. CK, suggesting that drip irrigation may negatively regulate the expression of genes. In CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND, there were 5443, 2761, and 4116 DEGs, respectively. The trends of gene expression were consistent across the three different water and fertilization treatments, with the DEGs being predominantly up-regulated in expression, compared to drip irrigation alone. In MD vs. CD (1190 DEGs; 355 up-regulated, 835 down-regulated), FD vs. CD (129 DEGs, 81 up-regulated, 48 down-regulated), and FD vs. MD (254 DEGs, 179 up-regulated, 75 down-regulated), the changes in gene expression were also observed.

To analyze the co-expressed and specific genes under different treatments, a Venn analysis was performed. There were 1554 specifically DEGs in ND vs. CK with 342 up-regulated DEGs and 1212 down-regulated DEGs, which might be mainly down-regulated by drip irrigation. 2059 DEGs were co-expressed in ND vs. CK, CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND (1607 up-regulated, 452 down-regulated under water-fertilizer coupling) four comparison groups, which might be mainly up-regulated by water and fertilizer treatment. 202 DEGs were co-expressed in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND (125 up-regulated, 77 down-regulated), which suggests these genes may be positively regulated by nutrients (Fig.  2 b). In addition, we found that some DEGs were affected by different water and fertilizer treatment methods (Fig.  2 c), among which 1065 DEGs (294 up-regulated, 771 down-regulated in MD vs. CD) were regulated by drip-fertilizer integration, 129 DEGs (115 up-regulated, 14 down-regulated in FD vs. MD) might be regulated by trace elements.

figure 2

The number of DEGs and Venn diagram in different comparison groups in September. a The number of up- and down-regulated DEGs in different comparison groups in September. b Venn diagram of DEGs between ND vs. CK, CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND. c Venn diagram of DEGs between MD vs. CD, FD vs. MD, and FD vs. CD. The red arrow indicates up-regulation of gene expression, while the blue arrow indicates down-regulation of gene expression

Function annotation of the DEGs

To categorize the functional roles of DEGs, a GO analysis was conducted, classifying the DEGs based on their involvement in biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF). Genes in the biological process were enriched in the richest variety and number, and there were some unique GO terms (Fig.  3 ). DEGs regulated by drip irrigation were highly enriched in the plant cell wall and in the GO term occurring in the plant cell wall; in terms of MF, significant enrichment was observed in functions such as various enzyme activity and "FMN binding" (Fig.  3 a). Fertilizer-regulated DEGs were mainly enriched in BP such as "cell growth", "protein folding", and "response to heat"; in cellular components, they were significantly enriched in CC such as "amyloplasts" and "mitochondrial intermembrane space"; and in MF, more DEGs were enriched in "heme binding" and "tetrapyrrole binding" (Fig.  3 b). DEGs regulated under drip-fertilizer integration were notably enriched in various BPs, including "RNA modification" and "chemical homeostasis". In terms of CC, the primary enrichment was observed in "chloroplast nucleoid" and "plastid nucleoid". Regarding MF, the DEGs showed significant enrichment in functions such as "inorganic anion exchanger activity" and "glucose transmembrane transporter activity" (Fig.  3 c). The GO terms that were significantly enriched in DEGs regulated by trace elements included various secondary metabolic processes, in terms of CC, they were mainly enriched in the "apoplast" (Fig.  3 d). DEGs regulated by water and fertilizer treatment were significantly enriched in BP such as "ribosome biogenesis" and "rRNA processing", and were also enriched in components such as "mitochondrion" and "cytoskeleton" and molecular function such as "mitochondrial ribosome binding" and "snoRNA binding" (Fig.  3 e).

KEGG pathway analysis was used to further understand the biological functions of DEGs identified under precision water and fertilizer-intensive management (Fig.  4 ). The results indicated that common KEGG pathways affected by different water and fertilizer treatments included carbohydrate metabolic processes such as "fructose and mannose metabolism" and "starch and sucrose metabolism". In addition, there are some specific KEGG pathways, DEGs regulated by nutrients are highly enriched in "plant hormone transduction signaling" and "nitrogen metabolism"; DEGs regulated by trace elements are more enriched in "flavonoid biosynthesis" and "α-linolenic acid metabolism" and other pathways; DEGs significantly enriched in the pathways regulated by water and fertilizer treatment are mainly involved in the processing of genetic information, secondary metabolites, and nucleotide metabolism, including "Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes", "Flavonoid biosynthesis", etc.

figure 3

GO enrichment analysis of DEGs regulated by different treatments. Bars of different colors indicate different Categories. a The enriched GO terms of genes regulated by drip irrigation. b The enriched GO terms of genes regulated by fertilizers. c The enriched GO terms of genes regulated by drip-fertilizer integration. d The enriched GO terms of genes regulated by trace elements. e The enriched GO terms of genes regulated by water and fertilizer treatment

figure 4

Top 10 pathways of KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs regulated by different treatments. The bar with different colors represents the DEGs regulated by different water and fertilization treatments

DEGs related to photosynthesis

Photosynthesis, one of the fundamental biological processes in higher plants, plays a crucial role in converting the pure energy of light into the biochemical energy essential for life through a series of reactions [ 27 ]. We found 15 DEGs related to photosynthesis (Fig.  5 ), the important constitutive proteins in photosystem II PsbR (photosystem II 10 kDa protein, Podel.01G460200 and Podel.11G139400) and PsbC (photosystem II CP43 chlorophyll apoprotein, the Podel.13G173700), PsaN (photosystem I subunit PsaN, Podel.05G068900), an important constituent protein, and PetF (ferredoxin, Podel.05G068900), photosynthetic electron transport (Podel.04G224200) genes had similar expression trends, and they were both up-regulated in ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD and down-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND. On the other hand, the expression of PsaK (photosystem I subunit X, Podel.18G027500) in photosystem I was up-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND and FD vs. MD. In addition we found some genes of light-harvesting antenna complex (LHC), LHCA1 (Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 6, Podel.08G050100 and Podel.10G226100) in LHC I, LHCA4 (Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 4, Podel.15G064400), and LHCB1 (Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 40, Podel.11G078800), LHCB3 (Chlorophyll a-b binding protein 13, Podel.01G437500), LHCB4 (Chlorophyll a-b binding protein CP29.2, Podel.06G108400 and Podel.16G120900), LHCB6 (Chlorophyll a-b binding protein CP24 10 A. Podel.01G220400 and Podel.03G026000) were all up-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, FD vs. ND, and FD vs. MD, and down-regulated in ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD.

Thus, it is clear that the gene expression of precision water and fertilizer-intensive management has a significant role in regulating photosynthesis. The expression of related genes in the photosystem was up-regulated under drip irrigation and drip-fertilizer integration, so we hypothesized that these two treatments could drive photosynthesis and electron transfer reactions in poplar. Fertilization and addition of trace elements then up-regulated the expression of related genes in photosynthetic antenna proteins, indicating that the addition of fertilizer and trace elements facilitates the capture and utilization of light energy by poplar.

figure 5

Expression of DEGs related to photosynthesis. Citation guidelines: www.kegg.jp/kegg/ kegg1. html. The rectangles of different colors indicate the up-/down-regulated expression of genes, red indicates up-regulation, blue indicates down-regulation and the depth of the color indicates the level of up-and down-regulation, the darker the color, the more significant the up-/down-regulation, as below

DEGs related to nitrogen metabolism

Nitrogen metabolism refers to the whole process of uptake, assimilation, and utilization of nitrogen in plants, and is one of the basic metabolic pathways in plants [ 21 ]. Based on the functional annotation results, we found that 3 genes encoding NRT (Nitrate transporter, Podel.03G118100, Podel.12G073800 and Podel.14G167600) were significantly differentially expressed in ND vs. CK and CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND and FD vs. ND; the genes encoding NR (Nitrate reductase, Podel.02G096300) and GS (Glutamine synthetase, Podel.17G139700) were significantly differentially expressed in CD vs. ND and MD vs. ND and FD vs. ND. The genes for glutamine synthetase (GS) and nitrate reductase (NR) were found to be significantly differentially expressed in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND. Based on the significant regulation of these five genes by varying water and fertilizer treatments, we hypothesized that they are important for nitrogen metabolism (Fig.  6 ). NRTs were up-regulated in ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD expression and down-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, FD vs. ND, and FD vs. MD expression; and GS was up-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND expression and down-regulated in ND vs. CK, MD vs. CD, and FD vs. MD expression. It can be seen that the expression of genes related to the nitrogen metabolism process under drip irrigation and water-fertilizer coupling treatments had opposite regulation patterns and affected nitrate transport by regulating the expression of NRT, NR, and GS were significantly up-regulated under water-fertilizer coupling treatment, which indicated that water-fertilizer coupling could effectively promote the process of nitrogen uptake.

figure 6

Expression of DEGs related to nitrogen metabolism

DEGs related to plant hormone signal transduction

Plants have developed multiple mechanisms and complex signaling networks during their long-term evolutionary process to rapidly sense the external environment and regulate gene expression to adjust their growth and development, as well as to adapt to, resist, and tolerate various biotic and abiotic stresses [ 28 ]. Therefore, we analyzed the role of a total of 11 DEGs in plant hormone signal transduction (Fig.  7 ).

In the auxin signaling pathway, we found that genes encoding ARF (auxin response factor, Podel.11G054200), GH3 (auxin responsive GH3 gene family, Podel.09G095400), and SAUR (SAUR family protein, Podel.15G006700) were down-regulated in ND vs. CK comparison group, up-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND comparison groups, but the differential expression between MD vs. CD and FD vs. MD was not significant, indicating that fertilizer addition may be an important factor in enhancing the auxin signal transduction process; genes encoding AUX/IAA (auxin/indole-3-acetic acid, Podel.08G185600 and Podel.05G230900) were up-regulated in ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD comparison groups, down-regulated in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, and FD vs. ND, indicating that drip irrigation and drip-fertilizer integration may be beneficial to AUX/IAA expression.

In the brassinosteroid (BR) signaling pathway, we found that the expression trends of BSK (BR-signaling kinase, Podel.01G257100) and CYCD3 (cyclin D3, Podel.14G022600 and Podel.07G056700) were consistent, both down-regulating expression in ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD, and up-regulating expression in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, FD vs. ND, and FD vs. MD, indicating that the addition of fertilizer and trace elements may be beneficial to poplar’s response to BR signaling.

In the Cytokinin (CTK) signaling pathway, the expression of AHP (histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein, Podel.13G028500), B-ARR (two-component response regulator ARR-B family, Podel.02G169600 and Podel.06G276700) is consistent in CD vs. ND, MD vs. ND, FD vs. ND, and FD vs. MD, with up-regulation, while down-regulated in ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD, indicating that the CTK signaling pathway may be positively regulated by fertilizer and trace elements.

figure 7

Expression of DEGs related to plant hormone signal transduction

WGCNA analysis for mining hub genes associated with growth traits

To mine genes related to growth and other important traits, we used a total of 29,762 genes expressed in poplar leaves under different water and fertilizer treatments, combined with physiological indicators such as growth, photosynthesis, and nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activity, to perform WGCNA analysis [ 29 ] (Fig.  8 ). The median genes with standard deviation (SD) ≤ 0.05 were screened to eliminate genes with low expression variation, resulting in 3,984 genes. Highly related gene groups are categorized as a single module, and functionally equivalent genes typically exhibit the same expression trend when the module’s lower limit is set to 30 and the sensitivity of module formation to 26. Through pairwise correlation evaluation, these genes were divided into nine co-expression modules, with each highly correlated gene group corresponding to a branch of the tree (Fig.  8 a and b). Within the same module, there is often a high degree of topological overlap between genes, and these modules can be clustered into two highly interconnected clusters. Among all modules, the three modules with the largest number of characteristic genes are black module (1509 genes), blue module (1482 genes) and steelblue module (495 genes), while the three modules with the fewest characteristic genes are orange module (50 genes), sienna3 module (55 genes) and skyblue3 module (57 genes) (Fig.  8 c). To identify co-expression modules highly correlated with growth traits, Pearson correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation coefficient and p-value between module feature genes and traits. Modules associated with FBA, GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco activity, SS content, and DBH were screened using | r | ≥ 0.3 and P  < 0.05 as thresholds. The steelblue module and black module were significantly positively correlated (0.68 <  r  < 0.81) and negatively correlated (-0.79 <  r < -0.66), respectively, with the activity of FBA, GDH, GOGAT, NR, Rubisco, and SS content, while the darked module was only significantly positively correlated with DBH ( r  = 0.54) (Fig.  8 d). Thus, with careful water and fertilizer management, it is hypothesized that the genes in the steelblue and black modules may be genes that down-regulate markers like photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism enzyme activity. To explain the regulatory effects on growth traits for genes in the steelblue and black modules, further annotation was conducted using GO and KEGG enrichment analysis (Fig.  9 ). The enrichment results showed that the genes in the steelblue module mainly involved in the "sulfur compound metabolism" process, "glutathione metabolism", and cellular modified amino acid metabolic process, and participated in pathways such as "nitrogen metabolism" and "carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms" (Fig.  9 a and c). The majority of the black module’s genes are involved in "photosynthesis", "cell wall biogenesis", "light harvesting in photosystem I", "carbohydrate biosynthesis", and pathways like "photosynthesis - antenna proteins" (Fig.  9 b and d). The transcription factor (TF) annotation results showed that the characterized genes in the steelblue and black modules included 256 and 736 TFs, respectively, which accounted for 49.50% of the total number of characterized genes and involved 53 gene families (Table S6). The most abundant TF families in the steelblue module are Dof and Whirly, and in the black module are bHLH. According to previous reports, multiple homologs of these TFs are involved in some processes such as carbon and nitrogen metabolism, growth and development, and response to adversity in plants [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, we postulated that precision water and fertilizer management might regulate poplar growth by regulating the expression of related genes involved in processes such as carbon and nitrogen metabolism. This, in turn, could lead to alterations in the activity of enzymes related to photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism.

To further explore the genes for precision water and fertilizer regulation, the co-expression network was constructed for the genes with the top 50 weights in the steelblue and black modules. A total of 613 pairs of linear pairs were obtained (Table S7), and imported into Cytoscape 3.9.0 software for visualization (Fig.  10 , Table S8). Five and four genes exhibiting the highest connectivity were chosen as hub genes, respectively (Fig.  10 a.b). The hub genes within the steelblue module displayed up-regulation in response to both drip irrigation and water-fertilizer coupling. During water and fertilizer coupling treatment, gene expression was mainly down-regulated (Podel.12G072900, Podel.03G089000, and Podel.19G059800 were down-regulated, while Podel.02G006000 and Podel.15G149800 were up-regulated). Under the addition of trace elements, gene expression was mainly down-regulated (Podel.03G089000, Podel.02G006000, Podel.19G059800, and Podel.15G149800 were all down-regulated) (Fig.  10 c). The hub genes of the black module were all down-regulated by drip irrigation (Podel.13G008600, Podel.01G430600, and Podel.10G106600 were significantly downregulated), and were up-regulated when trace elements were added. The gene expression trend is similar during water and fertilizer coupling, mostly up-regulated, while the expression trend is exactly opposite under water and fertilizer integration (Podel.17G114400, Podel.13G008600, and Podel.01G430600 are up-regulated in water and fertilizer coupling, and down-regulated in water and fertilizer integration). Functional annotation results indicated that these hub genes included Podel.12G072900 (ABC transporter A family member 7, Nin-like), Podel.03G089000 (Beta-amylase 3, BES1), Podel.02G006000 (Monosaccharide-sensing protein 2), Podel.19G059800 (Taxadiene 5-alpha hydroxylase, B3), Podel.15G149800 (Protein DETOXIFICATION 35, ERF). Podel.17G114400 (Protein GLUTAMINE DUMPER 3), Podel.13G008600 (Protein of unknown function, DUF538), Podel.01G430600 (COP1-interacting protein 7) and Podel.10G106600 (Plasmodesmata-located protein 6, B3) (Table  2 ), which are hypothesized to be closely related to nutrient uptake and translocation in poplar.

figure 8

WGCNA analysis reveals modules associated with water and fertilization treatments. a Heatmap shows Pearson correlation between characterized genes in co-expressed gene modules. b Dendrogram for clustering different genes based on topological overlap with specified module colors. c Bar chart of the number of genes characterized in different modules. d Heatmap of the correlation between different modules and each indicator. Correlation coefficients are shown in different colors depending on the score

figure 9

Biological processes of significant GO terms and KEGG pathways for eigengenes of different modules. a GO terms of the steelblue module. b GO terms of the black module. c KEGG pathways of the steelblue module. d KEGG pathways of the steelblue module. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, and the y-axis represents the term/pathway. the size of each circle represents the number of genes, and the color represents the p-value, with a P  ≤ 0.05 indicating significant enrichment

figure 10

Co-expression networks and expression heatmap of hub genes. a steelblue module network. b black module network. c Heatmap of hub genes expression in steelblue module. d Heatmap of hub gene expression in the black module. The darker the node color, the higher the connectivity between the genes in the module. Triangles indicate transcription factors, and circles indicate structural genes

qRT-PCR validation

To verify the accuracy of the RNA-seq results, we randomly selected 11 genes for qRT-PCR to detect the expression levels of genes in poplar leaves, and the results showed that the expression trends of these 11 genes were consistent with the results of RNA sequencing, indicating that transcriptome sequencing data were reliable in this study (Fig.  11 ).

figure 11

Quantitative verification of eleven genes in four comparison groups. The x-axis represents 11 randomly selected genes, and the y-axis represents the log 2 Fold change value. a , b , c , and d indicate qRT-PCR validation results for genes in the ND vs. CK, CD vs. ND, M1D vs. ND, and F1D vs. ND comparison groups, respectively

Precision water and fertilizer-intensive management regulates the physiological characteristics of poplar

It has been shown that proper nitrogen fertilization can increase N uptake and utilization efficiency, by enhancing the activities of enzymes related to N metabolism, such as NR, NiR, GS, and GOGAT, and promote crop growth [ 33 ]. After 3 months of continuous observation of physiological indicators of poplar plantation, such as Rubisco, FBA, NR, GDH, and GOGAT activities, as well as SS and Chl contents of leaf tissues, under different precision water and fertilizer combines of intensive management. We found that drip irrigation has no significant impact on various physiological indicators, compared with conventional irrigation. However, the combined water and fertilizer can effectively promote the activities of photosynthesis- and nitrogen metabolism-related enzymes, especially under precision drip irrigation and fertilizer management in September. These results suggest that appropriate water and nutrient management can promote the photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism of poplar, which are beneficial to promote the growth and productivity of poplar plantations. Yin et al. [ 34 ] found that fertilization could increase the chlorophyll a/b content, intrinsic efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), and net photosynthetic rate of poplar leaves, which confirmed that fertilization can affect the related characteristics of photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism in plants. In addition, we found that the chlorophyll content of poplar leaves mainly increased in the middle and late stages of fertilization (mainly in August and September), particularly in the water-fertilizer integration management containing trace elements increased significantly. Therefore, we hypothesized that the inclusion of Fe, Mn, and Zn in the fertilizer could enhance chlorophyll synthesis, a hypothesis supported by findings in other crops such as cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var. capitata ) and soybeans [ 35 , 36 ].

Expression pattern and functional analysis of DEGs under precision water and fertilizer-intensive management

The analysis of gene expression patterns under different precision water and fertilizer-intensive management showed that drip irrigation mainly has a negative regulatory effect on gene expression of poplar plantation, which was mainly related to cell wall synthesis, compared with conventional irrigation. This may be because the regimes of drip irrigation in this study are developed based on soil moisture content as an indicator, with more precision water requirements, which could reduce unnecessary water transport activities by down-regulating gene expression of cell wall synthesis [ 14 , 15 , 37 ]. Compared with drip irrigation without fertilizer, the gene expression pattern under different water-fertilizer combination management was consistent, which is mainly up-regulation. N, P, and K are the main elements added to fertilizers, which play an important role in promoting plant growth and productivity [ 38 ]. Thus we consider that nutrient addition may be the main reason for positive regulated gene expression in our study. Especially, up-regulated the genes involved in nitrogen metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism pathways. Studies showed that the low nitrogen supply could decrease the expression of photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII) genes [ 39 ], and DEGs related to photosynthetic biotic nitrogen metabolism, carbon fixation, photosynthesis, starch, and sucrose metabolism, and zeatin synthesis were up- or down-regulated in rice under the appropriate nutrient conditions [ 21 ], indicating that water-fertilizer combination management contributes to improving nutrient uptake and translocation in poplar. In addition, a comparison of gene expression patterns under different water-fertilizer combination management (water-soluble fertilizer, MD and controlled-release fertilizer, CD) revealed that water-fertilizer integration may negatively affect gene expression, such as down-regulated energy supply-related genes. The amount of fertilizer applied each time may be different from water-soluble fertilizer and controlled-release fertilizer. Meanwhile, the application of trace elements (FD) up-regulated the expression of genes participating in secondary metabolic processes and secondary metabolite synthesis, similar to a study on thyme ( Thymus Vulgaris L.) that, Fe foliar application increased the yield of secondary metabolites such as thymol oil and p-cymene [ 40 ].

Precision water and fertilizer-intensive management regulates the expression of DEGs in different metabolic pathways

  • Photosynthesis

Nitrogen (N) is an important macronutrient that promotes plant carbon metabolism and growth, playing a crucial role in photosynthesis [ 35 ]. In this study, 15 photosynthesis genes were identified. Among these 5 photosystem I/II and photosynthetic electron transport genes ( PsbC , PsbR , Psb28 , PsbN , and PsbF ), were up-regulated in comparison to ND vs. CK and MD vs. CD, suggests that drip irrigation and water-fertilizer integration management drive photosynthesis and electron transfer reactions of poplar. Nine DEGs encoding light-harvesting complex I/II chlorophyll a/b binding proteins (LHCA/B), which are membrane proteins in plant photosystem I, play a crucial role in the capture and transfer of energy during photosynthesis [ 41 ], up-regulated under drip-fertilization and drip-fertilization with trace elements application. In addition, the defects in Lhcb1/2 and Lhcb6, encoding peripheral light-trapping antennae, reduced light absorption [ 42 ] and inhibited the rate of electron transfer of Arabidopsis [ 43 ]. Thus, the application of nutrients and trace elements in drip irrigation can improve the photosynthesis ability of poplar by enhancing the capacities of light capture, light transport, and electron transport. This is confirmed by the significant increase in the activity of Rubisco and FBA, the key enzymes of photosynthesis, in precision water and fertilizer-intensive management.

  • Nitrogen metabolism

The uptake, transport, assimilation, and redistribution of N are influenced by multiple genes and environmental factors. NRT can effectively regulate and transport NO 3 − , improving nitrogen utilization efficiency [ 44 ]. Three NRT genes were up-regulated under drip irrigation alone and water-fertilizer integration (Fig. S2 ), we hypothesized that accurate water supply could effectively regulate the nitrate uptake of poplar. Nitrate is converted to Glutamine and Glutamate during primary assimilation after being absorbed in plants, which are used to synthesize other amino acids and nitrogenous compounds [ 45 ]. GS and NR are two key nitrogen-assimilating enzymes, known as important players in the primary assimilation of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen of plants [ 46 , 47 ]. One NR and one GS gene were up-regulated under drip-fertilization and drip-fertilization with trace elements management. This suggests that nutrients and trace elements play important roles in enhancing the nitrogen assimilation process of poplar. These results were consistent with the results of the activities determined by key enzymes of nitrogen metabolism, and the activities of NR, GDH, and GOGAT were significantly enhanced under drip-fertilizer combined.

Plant hormones

Plant hormones are considered important endogenous molecules that regulate plant growth, development, and tolerance to various stresses [ 22 ]. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) as an auxin, regulates plant development by inducing rapid cellular responses and changes in gene expression [ 48 ]. After auxin acts on plants, early auxin-responsive gene families such as Aux/IAA, GH3, and SAUR were rapidly induced and their gene expression was up-regulated, leading to ubiquitination and degradation of Aux/IAA, and activated ARF protein binding to exogenous promoter elements promotes growth hormone-responsive genes normalization [ 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Five auxin signal transduction-related genes were identified and all up-regulated under drip irrigation or drip-fertilizer combine management. Besides that, two Aux/IAA genes were significantly up-regulated in drip-fertilizer integration compared to CD, and one ARF , GH3 , and SAUR genes were significantly up-regulated under drip-fertilizer with trace element integration compared to drip-fertilizer integration. Studies reported that nitrogen-containing compounds are key factors in the IAA signaling transduction, and N acts as a signaling molecule inducing the production of growth hormone [ 52 ]. BR BSK and CYCD are key genes in BR signaling. BSK3 plays a bridging role in the BR signaling cascade from receptors to downstream genes, and it could enhance BR sensitivity and signaling to increase the extent of root under mild N deficiency [ 53 , 54 , 55 ]. CYCD3 as a key target of cytokinin in its regulation of the cell cycle, could promote cell division and be activated by BR signal [ 56 , 57 ]. AHPs, and the paired response regulators (ARRs) core consist of a phosphorelay system in cytokinin (CTK) signaling transduction, after CTK perception, Phosphorylated AHPs phosphorylate type A or type B ARRs to initiate the expression of CTK-responsive genes [ 58 , 59 , 60 ]. One BSK , two CYCD3 , one AHP , and two B-ARR genes were all up-regulated under different drip-fertilizer combines compared to drip irrigation. Above all, we conjecture that the drip-fertilizer combination or integration management benefited to interaction between plant hormones (IAA, BR, CTK) signal and nitrogen signal [ 61 ], and activated plant hormones signal transduction to regulate poplar growth.

Analysis of the molecular mechanism of precision water and fertilizer-intensive management in regulating the growth of poplar

TFs are crucial regulators in controlling plant metabolism, growth, and development, which can coordinate nitrogen assimilation, carbon fixation, and growth of plants, such as rice [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. In this study, two modules with significant positive (steelblue) or negative (black) correlations to carbon and nitrogen metabolism indicators were identified, including 992 genes, 49.5% of which were predicted as TFs, involving a total of 53 gene families. Co-expression network reveals nine hub genes were significantly up- or down-regulated expression under different drip fertilizer combines management (Fig.  10 ). Five out of them were predicted as TFs (Nin-like protein (NLP), BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR1 (BES1), B3, and ethylene-responsive element binding factor (ERF)). It is reported that NLP7 as a transcription activator and an intracellular nitrate sensor, is involved in coordinate transport, hormone signaling transduction, and root-shoot development [ 66 ]. BES1 TF is a key mediator, connected to the BR signaling under nitrate-deficient by regulating the NRT in plants [ 67 ]. B3 proteins, constituting one of the largest TF families in plants, encompass families such as LAV, RAV, ARF, and REM. These proteins are primarily associated with signaling pathways related to hormones, including auxin, ABA, and brassinosteroids [ 68 ]. AP2/ERF TFs play important roles in biological and physiological processes such as hormone signaling transduction, metabolite regulation, and stress response [ 69 ].

Therefore, we consider that precision drip fertilizer combined management could regulate the growth by activating the coordinated regulatory role of carbon and nitrogen metabolism (Fig.  12 ). After precision water and fertilizer is applied, it can activate the expression of NRT-related genes to promote nitrate transport, and then regulate the expression of N-assimilation enzymes such as NR and GS (Fig.  12 b) to increase the activity of NR, GDH, and GOGAT enzymes (increased by 1.28–2.63 times compared with drip irrigation) (Fig.  12 e), as well as enhance the process of nitrogen assimilation process to promote nitrogen absorption and utilization finally. Besides, after absorption, nitrate can activate TFs such as nitrate sensors, to activate plant hormone signal transduction (BR, IAA, and CTK), which is beneficial to regulate the growth of poplars (Fig.  12 c). In addition, amino acids converted from nitrogen assimilation were transported to organs such as leaves by transport proteins, which supporting the process of photosynthetic carbon assimilation. These factors could up-regulate the expression of several key photosynthesis genes ( Psbs , LHCs , Ftsh1 , Ftsh8 ), and increase the key enzyme activity of Rubisco (increased by 1.05–2.68 and 1.46–2.56 times compared with CK and ND, respectively) and FBA (increased by 1.11–2.09 and 1.12–1.89 times compared with CK and ND, respectively) enhancing the capabilities of light capture, light transport, and electron transport for photosynthesis. Ultimately, promoted the accumulation of photosynthetic products such as soluble sugars (increased by 0.96–1.34 and 1.12–1.89 times compared with CK and ND, respectively), thus accelerating poplar growth.

figure 12

Schematic model of poplar under precision water and fertilizer-intensive management. Important DEGs in Populus × euramericana 'Neva' under precision water and fertilizer-intensive management are involved in nitrogen metabolism, photosynthesis, and plant hormone transduction. The circles of different colors represent the size of the measured physiological and biochemical indicators. The bluer the color, the smaller the value, the redder the color, and the larger the value

Under the precision water and fertilizer-intensive management, the alterations in physiological and biochemical indicators and gene expression have revealed the response of poplar’s nitrogen metabolism and photosynthesis to specific water and fertilizer management strategies, offering a scientific foundation for understanding the impact of these management practices on the physiological and molecular levels of poplars; In conjunction with phenotype and gene expression data, this research delves into the relationships between gene expression and key traits affecting yield in plantations. It identifies key genes influencing yield-related traits, providing a scientific rationale and reference for developing effective and precision water and fertilizer management strategies, optimizing the expression of target genes, and offering theoretical guidance for enhancing forest production and management, as well as advancing forestry technology innovation capabilities and standards.

Precision drip and fertilizer combined management significantly affects the differential expression of numerous genes, the key enzyme activity of nitrogen assimilation and photosynthesis, as well as the accumulation of photosynthetic products in the leaves of Populus × euramericana plantation. In this study, precision water and fertilizer combined management could regulate the expression of core genes and TFs in multiple biological processes such as carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and plant hormone signal transduction, lead an increase in the activity of key enzymes in related processes and enhanced nitrogen absorption and utilization, and photosynthesis capacity, at last collaborative regulate the growth of poplar. Co-expression network identified nine hub genes regulated by precision drip and fertilizer combined management, which may play a crucial role in regulating the growth of poplar. These findings serve as a foundational reference for advocating highly efficient, precision intensive management to achieve the optimal expression of the target genes.

Data availability

The sequenced clean reads generated in this study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive [ 70 ] in National Genomics Data Center [ 71 ], China National Center for Bioinformation / Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GSA: CRA015045) that are publicly accessible at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa .

Abbreviations

Differential expression gene

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Gene Ontology

Fragments Per Kilobase Millon Mapped Reads

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

Fructose 1,6 bisphosphate aldolase

Nitrate transporters

Nitrate reductase

Glutamine synthetase

Glutamate Dehydrogenase

Glutamate synthase

Soluble sugar

Chlorophyll

Auxin-responsive protein IAA

Brassinosteroid

Wang Z, Ma LY, Jia ZK, Wei HX, Duan J. Interactive effects of irrigation and exponential fertilization on nutritional characteristics in Populus × euramericana cv. ‘74/76’ cuttings in an open-air nursery in Beijing, China. Journal of Forestry Research. 2016; 27, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0203-0 .

Xi BY, Li GD, Bloomberg M, Jia LM. The effects of subsurface irrigation at different soil water potential thresholds on the growth and transpiration of Populus tomentosa in the North China Plain. Australian Forestry. 2014;77:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2014.920552 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Li JS, Liu YC. Water and nitrate distributions as affected by layered-textural soil and buried dripline depth under subsurface drip fertigation. Irrig Sci. 2011;29(6):469–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0255-z .

Khalil MA, Jiang LP, Wang F, Chen S, Zhou XY, Pei XN, et al. Variation analysis of growth traits of four poplar clones under different water and fertilizer management. J Forestry Res. 2019;31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00888-y .

Van den Driessche R, Rude W, Martens L. Effect of fertilization and irrigation on growth of aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.) Seedlings over three seasons. For Ecol Manag. 2003;186(1):381–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00306-2 .

Dong WY, Qin JJ, Li JY, Zhao Y, Nie LS, Zhang ZY. Interactions between soil water content and fertilizer on growth characteristics and biomass yield of Chinese white poplar ( Populus tomentosa Carr.) Seedlings. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2011;57:303–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2010.549445 .

Morgan JA. Interaction of water supply and N in wheat. Plant Physiol. 1984;76(1):112–7. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.76.1.112 .

Fan JC, Liu XJ, Gu SH, Guo XY. Improving nutrient and water use efficiencies using water-drip irrigation and fertilization technology in Northeast China. Agric Water Manage. 2020;241:106352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106352 .

Shirazi SM, Yusop Z, Zardari NH, Ismail Z. Effect of Irrigation Regimes and Nitrogen Levels on the Growth and Yield of Wheat. Advances in Agriculture. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. 2014; 2014: 250874. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/250874 .

Stanturf JA, Oosten CV, Netzer DA. Ecology and silviculture of poplar plantations. Poplar culture in North America. 2001.

Rajput TBS, Patel N. Water and nitrate movement in drip-irrigated onion under fertigation and irrigation treatments. Agric Water Manage. 2006;79(3):293–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.009 .

Yan XL, Dai TF, Zhao DH, Jia LM. Combined surface drip irrigation and fertigation significantly increase biomass and carbon storage in a Populus × euramericana cv. Guariento plantation. J for Res. 2016;21(6):280–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-016-0540-7 .

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Yan XL, Dai TF, Jia LM. Evaluation of the cumulative effect of drip irrigation and fertigation on productivity in a poplar plantation. Ann for Sci. 2018;75:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0682-6 .

Bi HL, Lan ZP, Sun SW, Fu JP, Peng JJ, Ma X. Spatial distribution of fine Root in the Poplar Plantation under Drip Irrigation. For Res. 2017;30(6):946953. https://doi.org/10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.06.009 .

Bi HL, Lan ZP, Peng JJ, Ma X. Growth and fine Root characteristics of Poplar under Drip fertilization. J Irrig Drain. 2021;40(1):77–82. https://doi.org/10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021076 .

Zhang YW, Ding CJ, Liu Y, Shan L, Li XM, Xi BY, et al. Xylem anatomical and hydraulic traits vary within crown but not respond to water and nitrogen addition in Populus tomentosa . Agric Water Manage. 2023;278:108169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108169 .

Du CJ, Zhang M, Zhang L, Hu JJ. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism of Two Poplar Varieties. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica. 2023;43(6):988–95. https://doi.org/10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2023.06.0988 .

Chen LY, Zhang LF, Lu ZY, Xian F, Zhang JZ, Cheng YC, et al. Effects of trace irrigation at different depths on transcriptome expression pattern in cotton ( G. hirsutum L.) leaves. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:7248513. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7248513 .

Zhang JL, Wang P, Ji JF, Long HY, Wu X. Transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of yield increases in maize under stable soil water supply. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257756 .

Ou XH, Li SP, Liao PR, Cui XM, Zheng BL, YeY, et al. The transcriptome variations of Panax notoginseng roots treated with different forms of nitrogen fertilizers. BMC Genomics. 2020;20(9):965. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6340-7 .

Fu YQ, Zhong XH, Lu CS, Liang KM, Pan JF, Hu XY, et al. Growth, nutrient uptake and transcriptome profiling of rice seedlings in response to mixed provision of ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen. J Plant Physiol Ger. 2023;284:153976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2023.153976 .

Ning K, Ding CJ, Huang QJ, Zhang WX, Yang CC, Liang DJ, et al. Transcriptome profiling revealed diverse gene expression patterns in poplar ( Populus × euramericana ) under different planting densities. PloS One. 2019;14(5):e0217066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217066 .

Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci. 2012;131(4):281–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3 .

Article   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wang LK, Feng ZX, Wang XW, Zhang XG. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):136–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp612 .

Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.73 .

Blankenship RE. The Basic Principles of Photosynthetic Energy Storage. In Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis. 2002; 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758472.ch1 .

Yang YY, Gao SW, Su YC, Lin ZL, Guo JL, Li MJ, et al. Transcripts and low nitrogen tolerance: Regulatory and metabolic pathways in sugarcane under low nitrogen stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2019;163:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.04.010 .

Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):559. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 .

Wang YL, Fu B, Pan LF, Chen LM, Fu XH, Li KZ, Overexpression. of Arabidopsis Dof1 , GS1 and GS2 Enhanced Nitrogen Assimilation in Transgenic Tobacco Grown Under Low-Nitrogen Conditions. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2013; 31(4): 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-013-0561-8 .

Huang DM, Lan W, Ma WB, Huang RL, Lin WF, Li MS, et al. WHIRLY1 recruits the histone deacetylase HDA15 repressing leaf senescence and flowering in Arabidopsis. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64(7):1411–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13272 .

Quan XY, Meng C, Zhang N, Liang XL, Li JL, Li HM, et al. Genome-wide analysis of barley bHLH transcription factors and the functional characterization of HvbHLH56 in low nitrogen tolerance in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(11):9740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119740 .

Huang LL, Li MJ, Zhou K, Sun TT, Hu LY, Li CY, et al. Uptake and metabolism of ammonium and nitrate in response to drought stress in Malus prunifolia . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;127:185–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.031 .

Yin CY, Pang XY, Chen K. The effects of water, nutrient availability and their interaction on the growth, morphology and physiology of two poplar species. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;67:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.003 .

Murgueitio-Herrera E, Falconí CE, Cumbal L, Gómez J, Yanchatipán K, Tapia A, et al. Synthesis of Iron, Zinc, and Manganese Nanofertilizers, using Andean Blueberry Extract, and their effect in the growth of Cabbage and Lupin plants. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12111921 .

Vaghar MS. Foliar application of iron, zinc, and manganese nano-chelates improves physiological indicators and soybean yield under water deficit stress. Appl Biology. 2022;12(46):105–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1793180 .

Niu ZM, Li GT, Hu HY, Lv JJ, Zheng QW, Liu JQ, et al. A gene that underwent adaptive evolution, LAC2 (LACCASE), in Populus Euphratica improves drought tolerance by improving water transport capacity. Hortic Res. 2021;8(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00518-x .

Liu J, Zhu K, Zhao H, Li Y, Liu S, Song X, et al. Transcriptome Analysis of Maize Ear Leaves under Long-Term applications of Nitrogen Fertilizer and its combinations with Phosphorus and Potassium fertilizers. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2022;22(1):112–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00637-3 .

Mu X, Chen Q, Chen F, Yuan L, Mi G, et al. A RNA-Seq analysis of the response of Photosynthetic System to Low Nitrogen Supply in Maize Leaf. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122624 .

Jabbari AR, Dehaghi MA, Sanavi AMM, Agahi K. Nitrogen and iron fertilization methods affecting essential oil and chemical composition of thyme ( Thymus Vulgaris L.) medical plant. Adv Environ Biol. 2011;5(2):433–8.

Gao Y, Xu Z, Zhang L, Li S, Wang S, Yang H, et al. MYB61 is regulated by GRF4 and promotes nitrogen utilization and biomass production in rice. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19019-x .

Jenny A, Mark W, Robin GW, Caroline AH, Alexander VR, Peter H, et al. Absence of the Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 proteins of the light-harvesting complex of photosystem II – effects on photosynthesis, grana stacking and fitness. Plant J. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01811.x .

De Bianchi S, Dall’Osto L, Tognon G, Morosinotto T, Bassi R. Minor antenna proteins CP24 and CP26 affect the interactions between photosystem II subunits and the electron transport rate in grana membranes of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20(4):1012–28. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.055749 .

Vos J, Putten PELVD, Birch CJ. Effect of nitrogen supply on leaf appearance, leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity in maize ( Zea mays L.). Field Crops Res. 2005;93(1):64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.09.013 .

Pratelli R, Pilot G. Regulation of amino acid metabolic enzymes and transporters in plants. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(19):5535–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru320 .

Kazuhiro F, Soichi K, Mayumi TK, Yuki S, Yosuke N, Toshihiko H, et al. Cytosolic glutamine Synthetase1;2 is responsible for the primary assimilation of ammonium in Rice roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54(6):934–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct046 .

Foyer CH, Noctor G, Lelandais M, Lescure JC, Valadier MH, Boutin JP, et al. Short-term effects of nitrate, nitrite and ammonium assimilation on photosynthesis, carbon partitioning and protein phosphorylation in maize. Planta. 1994;192(2):211–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089037 .

Wang Y, Wang N, Xu H, Jiang SH, Fang HC, Su MY, et al. Auxin regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis through the Aux/IAA–ARF signaling pathway in apple. Hortic Res. 2018;5(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0068-4 .

Hagen G. Auxin signal transduction. Essays Biochem. 2015;58:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0580001 .

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Woodward AW, Bonnie B, Auxin. Regulation, Action, and Interaction. Annals of botany. 2005; 95: 707–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci083 .

Leyser O, Auxin, Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2018;176(1):465–79. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00765 .

Meng L, Dong JX, Wang SS, Song K, Ling AF, Yang JG, et al. Differential responses of root growth to nutrition with different ammonium/nitrate ratios involve auxin distribution in two tobacco cultivars. J Integr Agric. 2019;18(12):2703–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(19)62595-5 .

Tang W, Kim TW, Osesprieto JA, Sun Y, Deng Z, Zhu S, et al. BSKs mediate signal transduction from the receptor kinase BRI1 in Arabidopsis. Science. 2008;321:557–60. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156973 .

Jia Z, Giehl RFH, Meyer RC, Altmann T, Wirén N. Natural variation of BSK3 tunes brassinosteroid signaling to regulate root foraging under low nitrogen. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10331-9 .

Ren H, Willige BC, Jaillais Y, Geng S, Park MY, Gray WM, et al. BRASSINOSTEROID-SIGNALING KINASE 3, a plasma membrane-associated scaffold protein involved in early brassinosteroid signaling. Public Libr Sci. 2019;15(1):e1007904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007904 .

Menges M, Samland AK, Planchais S, Murray JAH. The D-type cyclin CYCD3; 1 is limiting for the G1-to-S-phase transition in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2006;18(4):893–906. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.039636 .

Schaller GE, Street IH, Kieber JJ. Cytokinin and the cell cycle. SI: Cell Signal gene Regul. 2014;21:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.015 .

Hwang I, Sheen J. Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature. 2001;413(6854):383–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/35096500 .

To JPC, Kieber JJ. Cytokinin signaling: two-components and more. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13(2):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.005 .

Zhang WJ, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Su YH, Xu TD. Protein phosphorylation: a molecular switch in plant signaling. Cell Rep. 2023;42(7):112729. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELREP.2023.112729 .

Toman SS, Al-Taey DKA, Al-Tawaha AR, Sirajuddin SN, Hassan AH. Effect of foliar application and mineral fertilizer on growth parameters and content auxins, GA and CK in cucumber leaves. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;492(1):012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012009 .

Kaufmann K, Airoldi CA. Master regulatory transcription factors in plant development: a blooming perspective. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1830:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8657-6_1 .

Burgess SJ, Reyna-Llorens I, Stevenson SR, Singh P, Hibberd JM. Genome-wide transcription factor binding in leaves from C3 and C4 grasses. Plant Cell. 2019;31(10):2297–314. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00078 .

Ueda Y, Ohtsuki N, Kadota K, Tezuka A, Nagano AJ, Kadowaki T, et al. Gene regulatory network and its constituent transcription factors that control nitrogen-deficiency responses in rice. New phytol. 2020;227(5):1434–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16627 .

Wei S, Li X, Lu Z, Zhang H, Ye X, Zhou Y, et al. A transcriptional regulator that boosts grain yields and shortens the growth duration of rice. Science. 2022;377(6604):eabi8455. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi8455 .

Liu KH, Liu M, Lin Z, Wang ZF, Chen B, Liu C, et al. NIN-like protein 7 transcription factor is a plant nitrate sensor. Science. 2022;377(6613):1419–25. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add1104 .

Wang T, Li M, Yang J, Li M, Zhang Z, Gao H, et al. Brassinosteroid transcription factor BES1 modulates nitrate deficiency by promoting NRT2.1 and NRT2.2 transcription in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2023;114(6):1443–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16203 .

Wei M, Li H, Wang Q, Liu R, Yang L, Li Q. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of B3 transcription factor genes in Populus alba × Populus glandulosa . Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1193065–1193065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1193065 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Feng K, Hou XL, Xing GM, Liu JX, Duan AQ, Xu ZS, et al. Advances in AP2/ERF super-family transcription factors in plant. Crit Reviews Biotechnol Taylor Francis. 2020;40(6):750–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1768509 .

Chen TT, Chen X, Zhang SS, Zhu JW, Tang BX, Wang A, et al. The genome sequence archive family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data types. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2021;19(4):578–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.001 (2021).

CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D27–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab951 .

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD2201201).

Author information

Zhou Wang and Weixi Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China

Zhou Wang, Weixi Zhang, Changjun Ding, Zhengsai Yuan, Jinjin Yu, Bingyu Zhang & Xiaohua Su

Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China

Experimental Center of Forestry in North China, National Permanent Scientific Research Base for Warm Temperate Zone Forestry of Jiulong Mountain in Beijing, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100023, P.R. China

Yongxiu Xia

Heibei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071001, P.R. China

Jiangtao Guo

Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhou Wang: conducted experiments, analyzed the sequencing data, wrote the manuscript and performed the sampling and collected the material. Weixi Zhang: wrote the manuscript, supervised the study, performed the sampling and collected the material and revised the manuscript. Changjun Ding: provided ideas for data analysis in this study and revised the manuscript. Zhengsai Yuan: provided ideas for data analysis in this study. Yongxiu Xia and Jiangtao Guo: provided the experimental site. Jinjin Yu: performed the sampling, collected the material and modify manuscript format. Bingyu Zhang and Xiaohua Su: conceived and designed the research and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bingyu Zhang or Xiaohua Su .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This study has been approved by the Chinese government and carried out with the laws of the People’s Republic of China. The experimental material used in this study have been formally identified by the State Forestry and Grassland Administration, People’s Republic of China, under the identification number National R-SC-PE-028-2002, which are publicly accessible at the National Center for Forestry and Grassland Genetic Resources ( http://www.nfgrp.cn/static/web/r/database_t1.jsp ), and the study complies with local and national regulations. The experimental material was collected at Daxing District Forest plantation, which obtained permission from Daxing District Forest plantation and Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry for sampling.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary material 2, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Wang, Z., Zhang, W., Ding, C. et al. RNA-seq reveals the gene expression in patterns in Populus × euramericana 'Neva' plantation under different precision water and fertilizer-intensive management. BMC Plant Biol 24 , 759 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05427-4

Download citation

Received : 07 February 2024

Accepted : 16 July 2024

Published : 09 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05427-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Populus × euramericana
  • Precision water and fertilizer-intensive management
  • Transcriptome

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

chlorophyll experiment starch

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

applsci-logo

Article Menu

chlorophyll experiment starch

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Comprehensive evaluation of 65 leafy mustard cultivars for chilling tolerance to low temperature stress at the seedling stage.

chlorophyll experiment starch

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. plant materials and treatments, 2.2. determination of chlorophyll content, 2.3. determination of soluble sugar content, 2.4. determination of malondialdehyde content, 2.5. determination of proline content, 2.6. determination of defence enzyme activities, 2.7. determination of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, 2.8. chilling tolerance evaluation and data analysis, 3.1. effect of chilling stress on the physiological indices of leafy mustard, 3.2. chilling tolerance coefficients of various indices and correlation analysis in different leafy mustard cultivars, 3.3. principal component analysis of the chilling tolerance coefficients of the indicators, 3.4. membership function analysis and cluster analysis of comprehensive index chilling tolerance coefficient, 3.5. establishment of regression equations and screening of identification indices, 3.6. physiological differences between most chilling-tolerant and least chilling-tolerant cultivars of mustard, 4. discussion, 4.1. response of leafy mustard to chilling stress, 4.2. evaluation of the chilling tolerance of leafy mustard cultivars, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

  • Yang, Y.; Cai, L.; Liu, S.J.; Yao, P.J.; Wang, Z.J. Identification and evaluation of resistance to Turnip mosaic virus in germplasm resources of mustard ( Brassica juncea ). J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 2019 , 38 , 65–72. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chen, C.L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, G.F.; Chen, X.Q.; Fan, Y.H. Discussion on the origin of mustard ( Brassica juncea ) in China. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 1992 , 3 , 6–11. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu, P. Brassica juncea ; China Agricultural Ture Press: Beijing, China, 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lim, H.S.; Yoo, E.J.; Choi, M.R. Changes of physiological activity of mustard leaf during its fermentation period. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000 , 10 , 43–47. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Jaiswal, S.K.; Prakash, R.; Acharya, R.; Reddy, A.V.; Prakash, N.T. Selenium content in seed, oil and oil cake of Se hyperaccumulated Brassica juncea ( Indian mustard ) cultivated in a seleniferous region of India. Food Chem. 2012 , 134 , 401–404. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Campbell, B.; Han, D.; Triggs, C.M.; Fraser, A.G.; Ferguson, L.R. Brassicaceae: Nutrient analysis and investigation of tolerability in people with Crohn’s disease in a New Zealand study. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2012 , 2 , 460–486. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, Y.X.; Yao, P.J.; Yuan, Y.H.; Yang, W.J.; Wan, Z.J. Analysis of Physiological Differences of Leaf Mustard with Different Cold Tolerance under Low Temperature Stress. China Veg. 2021 , 6 , 74–79. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sehgal, A.; Reddy, K.R.; Walne, C.H.; Barickman, T.C.; Brazel, S.; Chastain, D.; Gao, W. Climate stressors on growth, yield, and functional biochemistry of two Brassica species, Kale and Mustard. Life 2022 , 12 , 1546. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Sinha, S.; Raxwal, V.K.; Joshi, B.; Jagannath, A.; Katiyar-Agarwal, S.; Goel, S.; Kumar, A.; Agarwal, M. De novo transcriptome profiling of cold-stressed siliques during pod filling stages in Indian mustard ( Brassica juncea L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2015 , 6 , 165503. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Qiu, X.; Sun, G.; Liu, F.; Hu, W. Functions of Plant Phytochrome Signaling Pathways in Adaptation to Diverse Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 , 24 , 13201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Aslam, M.; Fakher, B.; Ashraf, M.A.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, B.; Qin, Y. Plant low-temperature stress: Signaling and response. Agronomy 2022 , 12 , 702. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Theocharis, A.; Clément, C.; Barka, E.A. Physiological and molecular changes in plants grown at low temperatures. Planta 2012 , 235 , 1091–1105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Šola, I.; Gmižić, D.; Pinterić, M.; Tot, A.; Ludwig-Müller, J. Adjustments of the Phytochemical Profile of Broccoli to Low and High Growing Temperatures: Implications for the Bioactivity of Its Extracts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024 , 25 , 3677. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Sun, C.; Zhang, R.; Yuan, Z.; Cao, H.; Martin, J.J.J. Physiology response and resistance evaluation of twenty coconut germplasm resources under low temperature stress. Horticulturae 2021 , 7 , 234. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shi, L.; Dong, X.; Fu, H.; Chai, X.; Bao, S.; Ren, Y.; Hu, K.; Li, Q.; Chen, Z. Differences in physiological characteristics of green prickly ash germplasm resources in response to low-temperature Stress. Horticulturae 2023 , 9 , 1242. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, T.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Hu, X. Exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid pretreatment ameliorates oxidative stress triggered by low-temperature stress of Solanum lycopersicum. Acta Physiol. Planta-Rum 2018 , 40 , 210. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wu, Y.; Cai, X.; Tang, Y. Outcomes of low-temperature stress on biological alterations within pothos ( Epipremnum aureum ) leaves. Life 2022 , 12 , 1432. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Zhang, F.; Lu, K.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Li, Z. Effects of low-temperature stress and brassinolide application on the photosynthesis and leaf structure of tung tree seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2020 , 10 , 497266. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Cao, H.X.; Lei, X.T.; Liu, Y.J.; Sun, C.X.; Zhang, R.L. Identification and comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance indexes of coconut. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2016 , 43 , 49–54. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhang, H.; Jiang, C.J.; Yin, D.M.; Dong, J.L.; Ren, J.Y.; Zhao, X.H.; Zhong, C.; Wang, X.G.; Yu, H.Q. Establishment of comprehensive evaluation system for cold tolerance and screening of cold-tolerance germplasm in peanut. CABI Databases 2021 , 47 , 1753–1767. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Hu, J. Establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for chilling tolerance in melon seedlings based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2017 , 52 , 520. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cao, X.; Jiang, F.; Wang, X.; Zang, Y.; Wu, Z. Comprehensive evaluation and screening for chilling-tolerance in tomato lines at the seedling stage. Euphytica 2015 , 205 , 569–584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, Z.L.; Wu, D.; Hui, M.; Wang, Y.; Han, X.; Yao, F.; Cao, X.; Li, Y.H.; Li, H.; Wang, H. Screening of cold hardiness-related indexes and establishment of a comprehensive evaluation method for grapevines ( V. vinifera ). Front. Plant Sci. 2022 , 13 , 1014330. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Zhao, Q.; Guo, S.; Feng, J.; Li, D.; Yang, S.; Zhou, X. Suitable Water–Fertilizer Management and Ozone Synergy Can Enhance Substrate-Based Lettuce Yield and Water–Fertilizer Use Efficiency. Agronomy 2024 , 14 , 1619. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, X.Z. Determination of plant chlorophyll content—Acetone-ethanol mixture method. Liaoning Agric. Tural Sci. 1986 , 3 , 26–28. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wang, X.K. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiments ; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wang, J.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, X. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of yellow horn ( Xanthoceras sorbifolia ) in response to cold stress. PLoS ONE 2020 , 15 , e0236588. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Khaliq, G.; Mohamed, M.T.M.; Ghazali, H.M.; Ding, P.; Ali, A. Influence of gum arabic coating enriched with calcium chloride on physiological, biochemical and quality responses of mango ( Mangifera indica L.) fruit stored under low temperature stress. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016 , 111 , 362–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Keunen, E.; Peshev, D.; Vangronsveld, J.; Van Den Ende, W.; Cuypers, A. Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: Extending the traditional concept. Plant Cell Environ. 2013 , 36 , 1242–1255. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Li, R.Q.; Wang, J.B. Plant Adversity Cells and Physiology ; Wuhan University Press: Wuhan, China, 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kaplan, F.; Kopka, J.; Sung, D.Y.; Zhao, W.; Popp, M.; Porat, R.; Guy, C.L. Transcript and metabolite profiling during cold acclimation of Arabidopsis reveals an intricate relationship of cold-regulated gene expression with modifications in metabolite content. Plant J. 2007 , 50 , 967–981. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Wang, D.; Li, L.; Xu, Y.; Limwachiranon, J.; Li, D.; Ban, Z.; Luo, Z. Effect of exogenous nitro oxide on chilling tolerance, polyamine, proline, and γ-aminobutyric acid in bamboo shoots ( Phyllostachys praecox f. prevernalis ). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017 , 65 , 5607–5613. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Xu, G.X.; Zhou, J.; Lü, D.G.; Qin, S.J. Cold resistance evaluation of four apple varieties. J. Fruit Sci. 2023 , 669–679. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kaur, G.; Asthir, B. Proline: A key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Biol. Plant. 2015 , 59 , 609–619. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, R.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, C. Influence of modified atmosphere treatment on post-harvest reactive oxygen metabolism of pomegranate peels. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020 , 34 , 740–744. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Meethaworn, K.; Luckanatinwong, V.; Zhang, B.; Chen, K.; Siriphanich, J. Off-flavor caused by cold storage is related to induced activity of LOX and HPL in young coconut fruit. Lwt 2019 , 114 , 108329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Garg, N.; Manchanda, G. ROS generation in plants: Boon or bane? Plant Biosyst. 2009 , 143 , 81–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Roychoudhury, A.; Basu, S.; Sengupta, D.N. Antioxidants and stress-related metabolites in the seedlings of two indica rice varieties exposed to cadmium chloride toxicity. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012 , 34 , 835–847. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Radyuk, M.; Domanskaya, I.; Shcherbakov, R.; Shalygo, N. Effect of low above-zero temperature on the content of low-molecular antioxidants and activities of antioxidant enzymes in green barley leaves. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2009 , 56 , 175–180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Upchurch, R.G. Fatty acid unsaturation, mobilization, and regulation in the response of plants to stress. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008 , 30 , 967–977. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Aazami, M.A.; Asghari-Aruq, M.; Hassanpouraghdam, M.B.; Ercisli, S.; Baron, M.; Sochor, J. Low temperature stress mediates the antioxidants pool and chlorophyll fluorescence in Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Plants 2021 , 10 , 1877. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Liu, D.L.; Zhang, B.Y.; Sun, H.M.; Peng, S.B.; Zhu, H.L. Comprehensive evaluation on cold resistance of early fruiting walnut cultivars. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2015 , 42 , 545. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cao, J.; Chen, B.; Wang, L.; Mao, J.; Zhao, X. Cold resistance indexes identification and comprehensive evaluation of grape varieties. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2010 , 30 , 2232–2239. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hasan, B.M.S.; Abdulazeez, A.M. A review of principal component analysis algorithm for dimensionality reduction. J. Soft Comput. Data Min. 2021 , 2 , 20–30. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Li, C.C.; Wu, Q.C.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.H.; Zang, D.K. Physiological responses and evalution of cold resistance of six Osmanthus fragrans cultivars under low temperature stress. J. Zhejiang AF Univ. 2021 , 38 , 828–836. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Li, C.; Peng, T.; Zhu, Y. A novel approach for acoustic signal processing of a drum shearer based on improved variational mode decomposition and cluster analysis. Sensors 2020 , 20 , 2949. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]

Click here to enlarge figure

No.CultivarOriginNo.CultivarOrigin
1TCKJShenzhen, Guangdong34ZJSBeijing, China
2MQDFuzhou, Fujian35XYJTShanghai, China
3MQDGFuzhou, Fujian36TCDNNYibin, Sichuan
4KYHRXingning, Guangdomg37ZHQCMianyang, Sichuan
5XYXLHWuhan, Hubei38KJ2Beijing, China
6KROKNanning, Guangxi39HYQCBeijing, China
7TWTaiwan, China40YYGGGuangzhou, Guangdong
8ZZ1Zhangzhou, Fujian41DJCZGuangzhou, Guangdong
9LYCJZhuzhou, Hunan42JXSDGuangzhou, Guangdong
10LJ3Longyan, Fujian43ZYLinyi, Shandong
11LJ2Longyan, Fujian44GLTJTNanning, Guangxi
12LJ1Longyan, Fujian45GLHBTNanning, Guangxi
13LYCJ2Longyan, Fujian46JS2Shantou, Guangdong
14PHZhangzhou, Fujian47CTNS1Longyan, Fujian
15ZZ2Zhangzhou, Fujian48CTNS2Longyan, Fujian
16FZKGFuzhou, Fujian49AJQTFuzhou, Fujian
17588Guangzhou, Guangdong50HNHBTNanning, Guangxi
18ZBTJYLongyan, Fujian51GCKRDNanning, Guangxi
19GDJNGuangzhou, Guangdong52H19-10Wuhan, Hubei
20YDJYLongyan, Fujian53JC2Longyan, Fujian
21YDKJQLongyan, Fujian54WHYLWuhan, Hubei
22LCXQZLongyan, Fujian55QCHuanggang, Hubei
23LCXQLongyan, Fujian56YSJY1Longyan, Fujian
242951Longyan, Fujian57YSJY2Longyan, Fujian
25SS1Longyan, Fujian58DXTaizhou, Zhejiang
26SCZigong, Sichuan59YSJY3Longyan, Fujian
272952Longyan, Fujian60PK2Longyan, Fujian
28MBDXShaoguan, Guangdong61CSJY1Chishui, Guizhou
29SS2Longyan, Fujian62CSJY2Chishui, Guizhou
30ZYJLongyan, Fujian63XSLongyan, Fujian
31YDKJTLongyan, Fujian64XYLongyan, Fujian
32AJKDNanning, Guangxi65SJTKJXingning, Guangdomg
33GRChongqing, Sichuan
IndexTreatmentMinimumMaximumMeanStandard DeviationCoefficient of Variation%
Chl5 °C0.372.651.14 0.47 41.07
25 °C0.082.23 0.94 0.45 47.89
SS5 °C0.173.420.99 0.70 70.58
25 °C0.072.51 0.54 0.51 92.93
Pro5 °C17.01303.5356.84 61.42 108.06
25 °C16.38253.47 27.28 29.41 107.81
SOD5 °C155.04350.83251.39 42.26 16.81
25 °C54.78300.2134.02 60.05 44.81
POD5 °C1027.394327.891953.05 702.05 35.95
25 °C1316.393843.672604.16 681.63 26.17
CAT5 °C66.42861.33379.14 194.27 51.24
25 °C78.42790254.16 151.65 59.67
MDA5 °C0.7368.926.00 13.60 226.85
25 °C0.4226.882.94 4.48 152.36
Fv/Fm5 °C0.600.840.79 0.04 5.22
25 °C0.660.850.80 0.04 4.71
Fv′/Fm′5 °C0.530.790.70 0.05 6.53
25 °C0.610.790.73 0.04 5.73
ΦPSII5 °C0.070.540.25 0.10 40.42
25 °C0.060.450.30 0.09 29.52
NPQ5 °C0.171.670.66 0.32 48.26
25 °C0.181.540.51 0.20 39.18
qP5 °C0.110.710.36 0.14 39.42
25 °C0.090.60 0.41 0.11 27.23
Rfd5 °C0.402.951.30 0.59 45.02
25 °C0.392.10 1.21 0.35 29.03
No.ChlSSProSODPODCATMDAFv/FmFv′/Fm′ΦPSIINPQqPRfd
1 1.08 1.35 1.58 2.06 1.06 1.36 2.33 1.03 0.96 1.62 2.00 1.67 1.88
2 1.04 0.91 1.01 3.36 0.60 0.20 1.41 0.95 0.95 1.07 0.90 1.16 0.97
3 1.14 0.95 5.44 1.28 0.75 1.14 0.70 0.90 0.92 0.37 0.67 0.42 0.53
4 0.65 10.18 1.19 3.75 0.59 0.45 0.54 0.99 0.87 0.76 3.26 0.91 2.41
5 0.33 24.43 2.87 4.22 0.58 0.49 2.10 0.90 0.77 0.85 2.04 1.09 1.65
6 0.65 4.64 1.41 2.99 0.60 0.95 0.89 1.00 0.91 0.38 2.76 0.43 1.17
7 1.73 6.13 1.10 3.22 0.41 1.14 0.44 1.00 0.97 0.70 1.92 0.73 1.27
8 0.79 7.94 1.21 1.86 0.67 1.55 1.10 1.01 0.92 0.85 2.17 0.97 1.56
9 1.08 8.99 1.52 1.44 0.68 3.49 1.30 1.09 1.04 0.76 2.23 0.73 0.96
10 1.29 10.53 1.31 3.38 0.63 2.22 1.71 1.01 1.00 0.63 1.31 0.64 0.86
11 0.42 17.43 1.13 3.44 0.40 0.92 2.06 0.95 0.92 0.36 1.09 0.39 0.61
12 2.27 1.52 1.33 1.38 0.70 2.47 0.77 1.01 1.10 0.46 0.34 0.41 0.27
13 0.99 1.01 2.31 1.41 0.70 1.55 0.76 1.01 1.06 0.55 0.53 0.52 0.51
14 1.27 1.10 1.37 1.05 0.72 0.50 0.61 0.95 1.04 0.59 0.40 0.57 0.53
15 1.06 11.21 0.99 1.39 0.85 1.29 0.58 0.94 0.90 0.60 1.27 0.65 0.74
16 0.78 5.07 1.01 1.15 0.36 1.42 1.03 0.95 0.93 0.83 0.99 0.87 0.86
17 1.22 17.19 1.51 1.08 1.02 1.91 0.96 0.95 0.87 0.70 2.18 0.79 1.28
18 1.22 7.71 1.70 0.89 0.47 0.89 0.62 0.98 0.99 1.23 0.75 1.25 1.27
19 0.84 1.36 1.33 1.46 0.52 0.48 1.31 1.15 1.10 1.26 2.55 1.16 3.27
20 1.31 2.84 2.18 1.57 0.38 0.46 0.88 0.98 0.96 0.59 0.95 0.60 0.62
21 3.62 9.16 1.34 1.57 0.65 1.11 1.25 0.98 0.90 0.69 2.29 0.77 1.24
22 1.12 4.30 1.81 1.51 0.77 0.93 4.43 0.95 0.87 0.87 2.07 1.00 1.44
23 14.98 0.65 1.25 1.27 1.15 3.39 0.54 0.95 0.99 0.66 0.59 0.66 0.77
24 4.80 2.58 1.63 1.62 0.88 1.68 1.04 0.99 0.99 0.77 0.92 0.78 0.90
25 0.70 1.03 2.87 1.47 0.71 3.10 0.45 1.05 1.01 0.63 1.63 0.62 0.80
26 2.16 1.45 2.42 1.23 0.81 1.87 1.32 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.88 0.96 0.99
27 1.72 4.27 1.44 0.95 1.07 2.37 0.80 0.99 0.97 1.57 1.18 1.60 1.61
28 1.25 1.60 1.34 1.38 0.67 1.92 1.16 0.99 0.88 0.82 2.49 0.95 1.34
29 1.11 1.49 1.31 2.10 0.81 1.18 0.79 0.99 0.99 1.23 0.85 1.21 1.00
30 0.91 1.09 13.24 1.94 0.66 0.46 4.45 1.00 1.00 1.12 0.93 1.11 0.98
31 1.15 1.43 1.56 1.68 1.58 2.32 2.37 1.05 1.06 1.04 1.26 1.00 1.24
32 0.88 0.74 0.98 1.06 0.90 1.01 1.26 0.98 0.97 0.59 1.02 0.63 0.63
33 1.28 0.48 1.58 1.91 0.41 0.73 3.13 1.08 1.10 1.27 1.19 1.19 1.35
34 1.65 9.32 8.08 1.50 0.48 1.99 3.23 0.96 0.96 1.20 0.81 1.23 1.13
35 0.49 0.91 6.95 1.44 0.63 0.38 1.38 0.93 0.88 0.75 1.07 0.88 0.83
36 0.88 9.59 1.52 2.11 0.61 0.51 1.26 0.98 0.81 1.00 2.53 1.20 2.02
37 1.17 9.26 2.79 2.28 0.85 0.50 2.60 0.99 0.92 1.11 1.56 1.21 1.81
38 2.14 2.44 0.94 2.73 0.66 1.43 1.08 0.99 0.92 1.75 2.19 2.00 2.57
39 3.06 3.80 8.74 3.32 0.75 3.82 1.26 0.98 0.93 1.03 1.40 1.13 1.60
40 1.19 2.29 9.52 4.12 1.03 3.77 1.50 0.99 0.90 1.06 1.77 1.20 2.16
41 0.59 11.06 1.32 3.26 0.39 4.42 9.19 0.99 0.87 0.62 2.07 0.71 1.27
42 0.63 1.63 1.82 4.03 0.94 1.28 1.61 0.99 0.92 0.84 1.86 0.90 1.08
43 1.12 1.09 5.94 1.83 0.67 0.43 3.57 0.90 0.85 1.29 1.35 1.50 1.39
44 0.79 1.40 3.74 1.57 0.78 4.69 2.80 0.98 0.86 0.70 2.18 0.80 1.46
45 0.77 0.49 3.07 1.30 1.36 4.56 1.29 0.98 0.96 0.93 1.06 0.97 0.83
46 1.10 0.36 1.44 2.59 1.15 1.50 1.79 1.01 1.04 0.50 0.80 0.50 0.56
47 2.49 0.39 1.21 3.78 1.50 4.89 3.64 1.03 1.07 0.55 0.67 0.52 0.53
48 1.29 0.53 1.51 1.53 0.62 2.47 1.75 0.97 0.95 0.68 1.52 0.71 0.81
49 3.81 1.64 4.86 2.19 0.94 1.93 1.21 1.05 1.00 1.15 1.95 1.18 2.62
50 1.79 8.26 1.32 3.24 0.76 1.94 2.23 1.05 1.03 1.09 1.31 1.04 1.21
51 0.93 1.55 0.55 2.28 0.58 4.24 1.88 1.00 1.03 0.70 0.96 0.70 0.70
52 1.90 0.49 0.54 1.27 0.71 3.33 1.90 1.01 1.04 0.70 0.71 0.65 0.56
53 1.16 0.34 0.73 3.01 0.95 0.65 1.11 1.00 1.06 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.38
54 1.40 2.52 14.30 2.89 0.55 1.09 1.33 1.01 0.97 0.90 1.43 0.91 1.01
55 1.59 0.47 4.44 2.42 0.43 1.08 0.51 1.14 1.09 0.72 2.34 0.67 1.07
56 2.51 0.88 0.50 1.74 0.96 0.74 1.47 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.19 1.00 0.67
57 3.77 0.34 0.58 4.16 0.95 9.49 1.39 0.88 0.87 0.35 0.83 0.38 0.53
58 1.31 0.98 0.63 1.80 0.79 1.44 0.80 0.92 0.95 0.31 0.52 0.33 0.40
59 0.77 0.70 5.22 3.96 1.04 1.40 1.08 0.88 0.87 0.68 0.94 0.78 0.74
60 1.12 4.51 0.36 2.15 0.61 1.51 0.56 1.04 0.97 1.00 2.35 1.03 1.20
61 1.80 0.51 0.52 2.37 1.17 3.88 0.53 0.85 0.85 1.40 0.78 1.70 0.87
62 1.00 3.24 1.46 2.00 0.92 0.53 0.42 1.07 1.10 1.17 1.05 1.05 1.48
63 1.60 12.94 0.90 3.88 0.78 4.62 1.83 0.94 1.00 1.14 0.44 1.16 0.60
64 1.40 2.24 0.90 4.51 1.47 7.26 1.29 0.99 0.99 1.17 1.12 1.15 0.91
65 1.44 1.09 0.69 2.90 0.94 2.48 1.32 1.04 1.00 2.67 1.95 2.44 1.87
IndexPrincipal ComponentTotal LoadRanking of Best Indicators
123456
Chl−0.0960.1210.156−0.052−0.2910.7130.03912
SS0.096−0.291−0.0630.162−0.181−0.143−0.04813
Pro0.048−0.0500.024−0.3530.5390.4900.05510
SOD0.047−0.1460.2480.3720.167−0.0610.0687
POD−0.0730.1690.3580.099−0.091−0.0510.0618
CAT−0.1000.0080.3700.3320.0560.1020.0765
MDA0.055−0.1190.0830.1630.550−0.0130.0696
Fv/Fm0.0880.283−0.2510.3910.1480.1280.0942
Fv′/Fm′−0.0970.353−0.1720.1980.175−0.1110.04211
ΦPSII0.2460.2110.177−0.1660.010−0.2440.0853
NPQ0.243−0.099−0.1120.287−0.1600.3230.0589
qP0.2640.1430.207−0.214−0.026−0.2160.0764
Rfd0.3000.0400.0050.076−0.0950.2820.0941
Eigenvalue2.9622.2361.8481.2631.1930.905
Variance contribution%22.78417.214.2179.7189.1756.963
Cumulative contribution rate%22.78439.98454.20163.91873.09380.056
RankingU (X1)U (X2)U (X3)U (X4)U (X5)U (X6)DNo.
11.00 1.00 0.76 0.41 0.37 0.01 0.73 65
20.87 0.93 0.03 0.77 0.41 0.41 0.63 19
30.93 0.73 0.58 0.38 0.26 0.25 0.62 38
40.65 0.55 0.73 0.50 0.63 0.51 0.61 40
50.77 0.80 0.55 0.47 0.42 0.18 0.61 1
60.68 0.80 0.45 0.53 0.40 0.58 0.61 49
70.34 0.72 1.00 0.90 0.44 0.13 0.60 64
80.39 0.89 0.55 0.66 0.48 0.18 0.55 31
90.52 0.56 0.63 0.39 0.57 0.54 0.54 39
100.10 0.74 0.73 0.97 0.64 0.24 0.53 47
110.56 0.16 0.50 1.00 0.87 0.28 0.53 41
120.61 0.82 0.57 0.27 0.28 0.14 0.53 27
130.55 0.84 0.18 0.54 0.62 0.17 0.52 33
140.50 0.66 0.40 0.73 0.48 0.19 0.51 50
150.51 0.61 0.37 0.08 1.00 0.42 0.50 30
160.37 0.95 0.25 0.63 0.44 0.19 0.50 56
170.48 0.89 0.26 0.54 0.40 0.14 0.50 62
180.79 0.34 0.28 0.75 0.21 0.39 0.50 4
190.65 0.53 0.42 0.44 0.43 0.23 0.49 37
200.46 0.79 0.00 0.75 0.53 0.46 0.49 55
210.47 0.46 0.50 0.56 0.49 0.42 0.49 44
220.47 0.52 0.50 0.64 0.45 0.21 0.48 42
230.49 0.55 0.33 0.17 0.81 0.57 0.48 54
240.29 0.72 0.66 0.45 0.43 0.20 0.48 45
250.44 0.66 0.19 0.83 0.39 0.30 0.47 9
260.64 0.47 0.56 0.00 0.59 0.25 0.47 43
270.56 0.64 0.25 0.62 0.29 0.25 0.47 60
280.76 0.38 0.34 0.44 0.23 0.31 0.46 36
290.43 0.59 0.94 0.11 0.22 0.03 0.46 61
300.57 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.49 0.28 0.46 22
310.35 0.50 0.70 0.63 0.44 0.00 0.46 63
320.53 0.51 0.42 0.15 0.67 0.29 0.45 34
330.58 0.51 0.28 0.56 0.29 0.27 0.45 8
340.44 0.73 0.43 0.32 0.38 0.09 0.45 29
350.53 0.53 0.32 0.46 0.29 0.35 0.44 28
360.00 0.85 0.75 0.31 0.00 1.00 0.44 23
370.01 0.37 0.99 0.81 0.36 0.40 0.43 57
380.35 0.71 0.39 0.31 0.41 0.25 0.43 26
390.45 0.57 0.43 0.33 0.43 0.08 0.42 2
400.24 0.63 0.38 0.66 0.49 0.17 0.42 51
410.30 0.69 0.23 0.59 0.43 0.31 0.42 25
420.35 0.47 0.32 0.75 0.44 0.20 0.42 10
430.46 0.49 0.23 0.63 0.32 0.30 0.42 7
440.26 0.70 0.42 0.39 0.30 0.40 0.41 24
450.16 0.69 0.39 0.62 0.50 0.18 0.41 46
460.73 0.00 0.48 0.53 0.29 0.16 0.41 5
470.47 0.45 0.28 0.49 0.21 0.45 0.41 21
480.44 0.39 0.18 0.72 0.32 0.38 0.40 6
490.18 0.72 0.33 0.53 0.46 0.20 0.40 52
500.50 0.66 0.26 0.19 0.32 0.10 0.40 18
510.29 0.39 0.66 0.27 0.49 0.22 0.39 59
520.32 0.56 0.33 0.44 0.42 0.27 0.39 48
530.49 0.35 0.38 0.50 0.16 0.26 0.38 17
540.12 0.68 0.31 0.56 0.47 0.11 0.37 53
550.38 0.46 0.33 0.02 0.53 0.30 0.36 35
560.23 0.63 0.28 0.36 0.38 0.17 0.35 32
570.15 0.70 0.19 0.42 0.47 0.18 0.35 13
580.04 0.74 0.22 0.50 0.44 0.22 0.34 12
590.36 0.50 0.23 0.25 0.34 0.14 0.33 16
600.31 0.41 0.33 0.38 0.22 0.16 0.32 15
610.27 0.53 0.14 0.30 0.40 0.23 0.32 20
620.14 0.66 0.21 0.24 0.38 0.13 0.30 14
630.31 0.18 0.22 0.64 0.41 0.11 0.30 11
640.13 0.45 0.32 0.10 0.45 0.30 0.28 3
650.06 0.49 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.17 0.28 58
Wj0.280.210.180.120.110.09--
IndexCorrelation Coefficientp-Value
Chl0.0690.585
SS−0.1330.292
Pro0.0950.452
SOD0.3240.008
POD0.3190.010
CAT0.2580.038
MDA0.2420.052
Fv/Fm0.4860.001
Fv′/Fm′0.1360.279
ΦPSII0.7370.001
NPQ0.4350.001
qP0.7030.001
Rfd0.6930.001
IndexSJTKJ DX
5 °C25 °C5 °C25 °C
Chl content mg/g1.50 1.04 0.93 0.71
SS content %0.29 0.27 0.25 0.27
Pro content μg/g17.89 25.84 23.90 38.14
SOD activity U/g288.69 99.80 257.44 143.65
POD activity U/(g·min)3068.11 3264.39 2963.72 3776.50
CAT activity U/(g·min)558.92 225.67 607.58 422.92
MDA content nmol/g1.91 1.46 1.37 1.72
Fv/Fm0.790.760.680.74
Fv′/Fm′0.720.720.630.66
ΦPSII0.160.060.080.26
NPQ0.430.220.230.44
qP0.220.090.130.39
Rfd0.730.390.401.01
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Huang, Y.; Ma, H.; Liao, S.; Xue, Z.; Chen, Y. Comprehensive Evaluation of 65 Leafy Mustard Cultivars for Chilling Tolerance to Low Temperature Stress at the Seedling Stage. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 6971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166971

Wang T, Zhang S, Huang Y, Ma H, Liao S, Xue Z, Chen Y. Comprehensive Evaluation of 65 Leafy Mustard Cultivars for Chilling Tolerance to Low Temperature Stress at the Seedling Stage. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(16):6971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166971

Wang, Tao, Shuangzhao Zhang, Yuyan Huang, Huifei Ma, Shuilan Liao, Zhuzheng Xue, and Yongkuai Chen. 2024. "Comprehensive Evaluation of 65 Leafy Mustard Cultivars for Chilling Tolerance to Low Temperature Stress at the Seedling Stage" Applied Sciences 14, no. 16: 6971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14166971

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

  1. Leaf Chlorophyll Test. School Scientific Experiment Proves

    chlorophyll experiment starch

  2. EXPERIMENT TO DETECT STARCH,CHLOROPHYLL AND SUN LIGHT

    chlorophyll experiment starch

  3. Explain the process of testing the presence of starch in leaves

    chlorophyll experiment starch

  4. Is chlorophyll necessary for photosynthesis? How do we prove it with an

    chlorophyll experiment starch

  5. Photosynthesis

    chlorophyll experiment starch

  6. Boojho wanted to test the presence of starch in leaves. He performed

    chlorophyll experiment starch

COMMENTS

  1. Testing a leaf for starch

    This lesson covers the required practical - how to test a leaf for starch, and the investigation into whether chlorophyll is needed for photosynthesis, part of Unit 2e - Plant Nutrition At the end ...

  2. Testing a Leaf for Starch

    Chlorophyll is a green pigment and so masks the colour change of the iodine test for starch. Chlorophyll needs to be removed from the leaf i.e. the leaf needs to be ' decolourized' for changes to be observed. A decolourized leaf is pale yellow or green. Ethanol is an organic solvent and so extracts chlorophyll from the leaf.

  3. Starch Test for Plants

    Our starch test for plants is a life science experiment that looks for signs of photosynthesis. See HST's Learning Center article for more!

  4. Testing leaves for starch: the technique

    In the leaf, excess glucose is rapidly converted to starch, so we test leaves for starch to show that photosynthesis has happened, rather than testing for glucose.

  5. Use iodine to test a leaf for starch

    Here we learn how to prove that the leaves of plants contain starch, which is created as a result of photosynthesis? Remove a plant leaf and heat it in an alcohol bath as shown in the video.

  6. Discovering Photosynthesis: Testing a Leaf for Starch

    Dive into the captivating world of plant biology with our hands-on practical experiment, designed to demonstrate the process of photosynthesis by testing a leaf for starch. By examining starch production in leaves, we can explore the incredible process through which plants convert sunlight into energy, producing the oxygen we breathe and the food we eat.…

  7. Lab Experiment on Light and Starch Production in Photosynthesis

    Lab Experiment on Light and Starch Production in Photosynthesis. ... The chloroplast contains green pigments called chlorophyll, which capture the energy in sunlight. ... In doing an experiment scientists often begin to think about other questions.

  8. Photosynthesis Experiments (starch leaf and pond weed)

    This includes the starch leaf test and how to adapt it to show the need for cholorphyll and carbon dioxide in photosynthesis. Also explained is the pond weed experiment using Elodea or cobumba.

  9. Leaf Starch Test: Principle, Procedure, Results, Uses

    Uses of Leaf Starch Test. In the assessment of the photosynthetic activity in leaves. It is used to study photosynthesis patterns, starch accumulation, and depletion patterns in leaves, and assessment of environmental factors influencing photosynthesis and starch accumulation. It is used as a teaching tool for basic-level students to introduce ...

  10. Exploring Photosynthesis Variables: A Comprehensive Leaf Starch Test

    Discover the fascinating world of plant biology by conducting a comprehensive practical experiment that tests the effects of different variables on photosynthesis in leaves. This hands-on activity modifies light exposure and carbon dioxide availability, allowing students to observe the impact of these factors on starch production in leaves.

  11. Investigating the Need for Chlorophyll, Light & Carbon Dioxide

    Investigating the Need for Chlorophyll Although plants make glucose in photosynthesis, leaves cannot be tested for its presence as the glucose is quickly used, converted into other substances and transported or stored as starch. Starch is stored in chloroplasts where photosynthesis occurs so testing a leaf for starch is a reliable indicator of which parts of the leaf are photosynthesising ...

  12. Photosynthesis: testing a variegated leaf for starch

    Age Ranges: 11-14. This resource tackles the learning objective "Only areas of the plant with chloroplasts can make starch in photosynthesis". This is activity 11 in the 'Photosynthesis: A Survival Guide' scheme and follows up from activity 10, 'What are chloroplasts'. Students carry out a starch test on a variegated leaf to ...

  13. Practical: Investigating Photosynthesis

    Learn how to conduct a practical experiment on photosynthesis with clear steps and diagrams. Revision notes for Edexcel IGCSE Biology syllabus.

  14. Light and photosynthetic pigments

    The set of wavelengths absorbed by a pigment is its absorption spectrum. In the diagram below, you can see the absorption spectra of three key pigments in photosynthesis: chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and β-carotene. The set of wavelengths that a pigment doesn't absorb are reflected, and the reflected light is what we see as color.

  15. Chlorophyll K-12 Experiments and Background Information

    Chlorophyll K-12 experiments & background information for lesson plans, class activities & science fair projects for elementary, middle and high school students and teachers.

  16. Investigating the Need for Chlorophyll, Light & Carbon Dioxide

    Investigating the Need for Chlorophyll The occurrence of photosynthesis can be demonstrated by observing the presence of its products Although plants make glucose in photosynthesis, leaves cannot be tested for its presence as the glucose is quickly used or converted into other substances Starch is stored in chloroplasts, where photosynthesis occurs, so testing a leaf for starch is a reliable ...

  17. Write an experiment to show that chlorophyll is necessary for

    Experiment: Take a potted plant with variegated leaves like croton and keep it in a dark region, away from sunlight for 3 days. This will halt photosynthesis and de-starch the plant.

  18. Investigation of photosynthetic effects, carbohydrate and starch

    As a matter of fact, red light is required for the development of photosynthetic apparatus and starch accumulation, while blue light is useful for chlorophyll formation, chloroplast development, and stomatal opening ( Heo et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2007 ), in rcress, based on the observed results, the presence of red light treatment increased the ...

  19. Is Chlorophyll Necessary for Starch Production? Experiment

    Glucose is what is stored as starch in the mitochondria which is broken down later as energy. It is believed that most plants need light, CO 2, chlorophyll and water to produce starch through photosynthesis. We need to only use 2 different solutions to discover if Chlorophyll is necessary for the formation of starch; Ethanol (methylated spirits ...

  20. RNA-seq reveals the gene expression in patterns in Populus ×

    In addition, we found that the chlorophyll content of poplar leaves mainly increased in the middle and late stages of fertilization (mainly in August and September), particularly in the water-fertilizer integration management containing trace elements increased significantly.

  21. Applied Sciences

    Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters can be used to evaluate the function of photosynthetic mechanisms and the response of plants to low-temperature stress. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters reflect the photosynthetic potential of plants, their ability to convert light energy into chemical energy, and their level of photosynthetic activity.