Reduction
Many problems in the cities of the global South are often associated with a weak or inadequate SWM system, which leads to severe direct and indirect environmental and public health issues at every stage of waste collection, handling, treatment, and disposal [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Inadequate and weak SWM results in indiscriminate dumping of waste on the streets, open spaces, and water bodies. Such practices were observed in, for example, Pakistan [ 35 , 36 ], India [ 37 ], Nepal [ 38 ], Peru [ 39 ], Guatemala [ 40 ], Brazil [ 41 ], Kenya [ 42 ], Rwanda [ 43 ], South Africa [ 44 , 45 ], Nigeria [ 46 ], Zimbabwe [ 47 ], etc.
The problems associated with such practices are GHG emissions [ 37 , 48 ], leachates [ 40 , 44 , 49 ], the spread of diseases such as malaria and dengue [ 36 ], odor [ 35 , 38 , 50 , 51 ], blocking of drains and sewers and subsequent flooding [ 52 ], suffocation of animals in plastic bags [ 52 ], and indiscriminate littering [ 38 , 39 , 53 ].
Uncollected and untreated waste has socioeconomic and environmental costs extending beyond city boundaries. Environmental sustainability impacts of this practice include methane (CH 4 ) emissions, foul odor, air pollution, land and water contamination, and the breeding of rodents, insects, and flies that transmit diseases to humans. Decomposition of biodegradable waste under anaerobic conditions contributes to about 18% and 2.9% of global methane and GHG emissions, respectively [ 54 ], with the global warming effect of about 25 times higher than carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions [ 55 ]. Methane also causes fires and explosions [ 56 ]. Emissions from SWM in developing countries are increasing due to rapid economic growth and improved living standards [ 57 ].
Irregular waste collection also contributes to marine pollution. In 2010, 192 coastal countries generated 275 million metric tons of plastic waste out of which up to 12.7 million metric tons (4.4%) entered ocean ecosystems [ 58 ]. Moreover, plastic waste collects and stagnates water, proving a mosquito breeding habitat and raising the risks of dengue, malaria, and West Nile fever [ 56 ]. In addition, uncollected waste creates serious safety, health, and environmental consequences such as promoting urban violence and supporting breeding and feeding grounds for flies, mosquitoes, rodents, dogs, and cats, which carry diseases to nearby homesteads [ 4 , 19 , 59 , 60 ].
In the global South, scavengers often throw the remaining unwanted garbage on the street. Waste collectors are rarely protected from direct contact and injury, thereby facing serious health threats. Because garbage trucks are often derelict and uncovered, exhaust fumes and dust stemming from waste collection and transportation contribute to environmental pollution and widespread health problems [ 61 ]. In India’s megacities, for example, irregular MSW management is one of the major problems affecting air and marine quality [ 62 ]. Thus, irregular waste collection and handling contribute to public health hazards and environmental degradation [ 63 ].
Most municipal solid waste in the Global South goes into unsanitary landfills or open dumps. Even during the economic downturn during the COVID-19 pandemic, the amount of waste heading to landfill sites in Brazil, for example, increased due to lower recycling rates [ 64 ]. In Johor, Malaysia, landfilling destroys natural habitats and depletes the flora and fauna [ 65 ]. Moreover, landfilling with untreated, unsorted waste led to severe public health issues in South America [ 66 ]. Based on a study on 30 Brazilian cities, Urban and Nakada [ 64 ] report that 35% of medical waste was not properly treated before disposal, which poses a threat to public health, including the spread of COVID-19. Landfills and open dumps are also associated with high emissions of methane (CH 4 ), a major GHG [ 67 , 68 ]. Landfills and wastewater release 17% of the global methane emission [ 25 ]. About 29 metric tons of methane are emitted annually from landfills globally, accounting for about 8% of estimated global emissions, with 1.3 metric tons released from landfills in Africa [ 7 ]. The rate of landfill gas production steadily rises while MSW accumulates in the landfill emissions. Released methane and ammonia gases can cause health hazards such as respiratory diseases [ 37 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Since methane is highly combustible, it can cause fire and explosion hazards [ 72 ].
Open dumping sites with organic waste create the environment for the breeding of disease-carrying vectors, including rodents, flies, and mosquitoes [ 40 , 45 , 51 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]. Associated vector-borne diseases include zika virus, dengue, and malaria fever [ 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 ]. In addition, there are risks of water-borne illnesses such as leptospirosis, intestinal worms, diarrhea, and hepatitis A [ 80 , 81 ].
Odors from landfill sites, and their physical appearance, affect the lives of nearby residents by threatening their health and undermining their livelihoods, lowering their property values [ 37 , 38 , 68 , 82 , 83 , 84 ]. Moreover, the emission of ammonia (NH 3 ) from landfill sites can damage species’ composition and plant leaves [ 85 ]. In addition, the pollutants from landfill sites damage soil quality [ 73 , 84 ]. Landfill sites also generate dust and are sources of noise pollution [ 86 ].
Air and water pollution are intense in the hot and rainy seasons due to the emission of offensive odor, disease-carrying leachates, and runoff. Considerable amounts of methane and CO 2 from landfill sites produce adverse health effects such as skin, eyes, nose, and respiratory diseases [ 69 , 87 , 88 ]. The emission of ammonia can lead to similar problems and even blindness [ 85 , 89 ]. Other toxic gaseous pollutants from landfill sites include Sulphur oxides [ 89 ]. While less than 20% of methane is recovered from landfills in China, Western nations recover up to 60% [ 90 ].
Several studies report leachate from landfill sites contaminating water sources used for drinking and other household applications, which pose significant risks to public health [ 36 , 43 , 53 , 72 , 75 , 83 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. For example, Hong et al. [ 95 ] estimated that, in 2006, the amount of leachates escaping from landfill sites in Pudong (China) was 160–180 m 3 per day. On the other hand, a properly engineered facility for waste disposal can protect public health, preserve important environmental resources, prevent clogging of drainages, and prevent the migration of leachates to contaminate ground and surface water, farmlands, animals, and air from which they enter the human body [ 61 , 96 ]. Moreover, heat in summer can speed up the rate of bacterial action on biodegradable organic material and produce a pungent odor [ 60 , 97 , 98 ]. In China, for example, leachates were not treated in 47% of landfills [ 99 ].
Co-mingled disposal of industrial and medical waste alongside municipal waste endangers people with chemical and radioactive hazards, Hepatitis B and C, tetanus, human immune deficiency, HIV infections, and other related diseases [ 59 , 60 , 100 ]. Moreover, indiscriminate disposal of solid waste can cause infectious diseases such as gastrointestinal, dermatological, respiratory, and genetic diseases, chest pains, diarrhea, cholera, psychological disorders, skin, eyes, and nose irritations, and allergies [ 10 , 36 , 60 , 61 ].
Open burning of MSW is a main cause of smog and respiratory diseases, including nose, throat, chest infections and inflammation, breathing difficulty, anemia, low immunity, allergies, and asthma. Similar health effects were reported from Nepal [ 101 ], India [ 87 ], Mexico, [ 69 ], Pakistan [ 52 , 73 , 84 ], Indonesia [ 88 ], Liberia [ 50 ], and Chile [ 102 ]. In Mumbai, for example, open incineration emits about 22,000 tons of pollutants annually [ 56 ]. Mongkolchaiarunya [ 103 ] reported air pollution and odors from burning waste in Thailand. In addition, plastic waste incineration produces hydrochloric acid and dioxins in quantities that are detrimental to human health and may cause allergies, hemoglobin deficiency, and cancer [ 95 , 104 ]. In addition, smoke from open incineration and dumpsites is a significant contributor to air pollution even for persons staying far from dumpsites.
Composting is a biological method of waste disposal that entails the decomposing or breaking down of organic wastes into simpler forms by naturally occurring microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi. However, despite its advantage of reducing organic waste by at least half and using compost in agriculture, the composting method has much higher CO 2 emissions than other disposal approaches. In Korea, for example, composting has the highest environmental impact than incineration and anaerobic digestion methods [ 105 ]. The authors found that the environmental impact of composting was found to be 2.4 times higher than that of incineration [ 105 ]. Some reviews linked composting with several health issues, including congested nose, sore throat and dry cough, bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, and extrinsic allergic alveolitis [ 36 , 106 ].
As discussed in the section above, there are many negative impacts of unsustainable SWM practices on the people and the environment. Although all waste treatment methods have their respective negative impacts, some have fewer debilitating impacts on people and the environment than others. The following is the summary of key implications of such unsustainable SWM practices.
Therefore, measures toward more sustainable SWM that can mitigate such impacts must be worked out and followed. The growing complexity, costs, and coordination of SWM require multi-stakeholder involvement at each process stage [ 7 ]. Earmarking resources, providing technical assistance, good governance, and collaboration, and protecting environmental and human health are SWM critical success factors [ 47 , 79 ]. As such, local governments, the private sector, donor agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the residents, and informal garbage collectors and scavengers have their respective roles to play collaboratively in effective and sustainable SWM [ 40 , 103 , 107 , 108 ]. The following are key practical recommendations for mitigating the negative impacts of unsustainable SWM practices enumerated above.
First, cities should plan and implement an integrated SWM approach that emphasizes improving the operation of municipalities to manage all stages of SWM sustainably: generation, separation, transportation, transfer/sorting, treatment, and disposal [ 36 , 46 , 71 , 77 , 86 ]. The success of this approach requires the involvement of all stakeholders listed above [ 109 ] while recognizing the environmental, financial, legal, institutional, and technical aspects appropriate to each local setting [ 77 , 86 ]. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can likewise aid in selecting the method and preparing the waste management plan [ 88 , 110 ]. Thus, the SWM approach should be carefully selected to spare residents from negative health and environmental impacts [ 36 , 39 , 83 , 98 , 111 ].
Second, local governments should strictly enforce environmental regulations and better monitor civic responsibilities for sustainable waste storage, collection, and disposal, as well as health hazards of poor SWM, reflected in garbage littering observable throughout most cities of the Global South [ 64 , 84 ]. In addition, violations of waste regulations should be punished to discourage unsustainable behaviors [ 112 ]. Moreover, local governments must ensure that waste collection services have adequate geographical coverage, including poor and minority communities [ 113 ]. Local governments should also devise better SWM policies focusing on waste reduction, reuse, and recycling to achieve a circular economy and sustainable development [ 114 , 115 ].
Third, effective SWM requires promoting positive public attitudes toward sustainable waste management [ 97 , 116 , 117 , 118 ]. Therefore, public awareness campaigns through print, electronic, and social media are required to encourage people to desist from littering and follow proper waste dropping and sorting practices [ 36 , 64 , 77 , 79 , 80 , 82 , 91 , 92 , 119 ]. There is also the need for a particular focus on providing sorting bins and public awareness about waste sorting at the source, which can streamline and optimize subsequent SWM processes and mitigate their negative impacts [ 35 , 45 , 46 , 64 , 69 , 89 , 93 ]. Similarly, non-governmental and community-based organizations can help promote waste reduction, separation, and sorting at the source, and material reuse/recycling [ 103 , 120 , 121 , 122 ]. In Vietnam, for example, Tsai et al. [ 123 ] found that coordination among stakeholders and appropriate legal and policy frameworks are crucial in achieving sustainable SWM.
Fourth, there is the need to use environmentally friendly technologies or upgrade existing facilities. Some researchers prefer incineration over other methods, particularly for non-recyclable waste [ 44 , 65 ]. For example, Xin et al. [ 124 ] found that incineration, recycling, and composting resulted in a 70.82% reduction in GHG emissions from solid waste in Beijing. In Tehran city, Iran, Maghmoumi et al. [ 125 ] revealed that the best scenario for reducing GHG emissions is incinerating 50% of the waste, landfilling 30%, and recycling 20%. For organic waste, several studies indicate a preference for composting [ 45 , 51 , 75 ] and biogas generation [ 15 , 42 , 68 ]. Although some researchers have advocated a complete ban on landfilling [ 13 , 42 ], it should be controlled with improved techniques for leak detection and leachate and biogas collection [ 126 , 127 ]. Many researchers also suggested an integrated biological and mechanical treatment (BMT) of solid waste [ 66 , 74 , 95 , 119 ]. In Kenya, the waste-to-biogas scheme and ban on landfill and open burning initiatives are estimated to reduce the emissions of over 1.1 million tons of GHG and PM2.5 emissions from the waste by more than 30% by 2035 [ 42 ]. An appropriately designed waste disposal facility helps protect vital environmental resources, including flora, fauna, surface and underground water, air, and soil [ 128 , 129 ].
Fifth, extraction and reuse of materials, energy, and nutrients are essential to effective SWM, which provides livelihoods for many people, improves their health, and protects the environment [ 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 ]. For example, recycling 24% of MSW in Thailand lessened negative health, social, environmental, and economic impacts from landfill sites [ 89 ]. Waste pickers play a key role in waste circularity and should be integrated into the SWM system [ 65 , 89 , 101 , 137 ], even to the extent of taking part in decision-making [ 138 ]. In addition, workers involved in waste collection should be better trained and equipped to handle hazardous waste [ 87 , 128 ]. Moreover, green consumption, using bioplastics, can help reduce the negative impacts of solid waste on the environment [ 139 ].
Lastly, for effective SWM, local authorities should comprehensively address SWM challenges, such as lack of strategic SWM plans, inefficient waste collection/segregation and recycling, insufficient budgets, shortage of qualified waste management professionals, and weak governance, and then form a financial regulatory framework in an integrated manner [ 140 , 141 , 142 ]. Effective SWM system also depends on other factors such as the waste generation rate, population density, economic status, level of commercial activity, culture, and city/region [ 37 , 143 ]. A sustainable SWM strives to protect public health and the environment [ 144 , 145 ].
As global solid waste generation rates increase faster than urbanization, coupled with inadequate SWM systems, local governments and urban residents often resort to unsustainable SWM practices. These practices include mixing household and commercial garbage with hazardous waste during storage and handling, storing garbage in old or poorly managed facilities, deficient transportation practices, open-air incinerators, informal/uncontrolled dumping, and non-engineered landfills. The implications of such practices include air and water pollution, land degradation, climate change, and methane and hazardous leachate emissions. In addition, these impacts impose significant environmental and public health costs on residents with marginalized social groups affected mostly.
Inadequate SWM is associated with poor public health, and it is one of the major problems affecting environmental quality and cities’ sustainable development. Effective community involvement in the SWM requires promoting positive public attitudes. Public awareness campaigns through print, electronic, and social media are required to encourage people to desist from littering and follow proper waste-dropping practices. Improper SWM also resulted in water pollution and unhealthy air in cities. Future research is needed to investigate how the peculiarity of each Global South country can influence selecting the SWM approach, elements, aspects, technology, and legal/institutional frameworks appropriate to each locality.
Reviewed literature on the impacts of SWM practices in Asia (compiled by authors).
Author | Study Area | Study Aim | Impacts on Humans | Impacts on the Environment | Recommendations/Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akmal & Jamil [ ] | Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan | Examines the relationship between residents’ health and dumpsite exposure. | |||
Hong et al. [ ] | Pudong, China | Assesses the environmental impacts of five SW treatment options | and acidification from NOx and SO | ||
Gunamantha [ ] | Kartamantul region, Yogyakarta, Indonesia | Compares five energetic valorization alternative scenarios and existing SW treatment. | and CO emissions from landfill sites produce adverse health effects such as skin, eyes, nose, and respiratory diseases. | and CO gases from landfill sites aggravated global warming challenges. | |
Abba et al. [ ] | Johor Bahru, Malaysia | Assesses stakeholder opinion on the existing and future environmental impacts of household solid waste disposal. | , N O, and NH increase climate change challenges. | ||
Fang et al. (2012) [ ] | Shanghai, China | Identifies different sources of MSW odor compounds generated by landfill sites. | cause harm to the respiratory tract, eyes, nose, lungs, etc. | damage species composition, plant leaves, etc. | |
Menikpura et al. [ ] | Nonthaburi municipality, Bangkok, Thailand | Explores recycling activities’ effects on the sustainability of SWM practices. | , NH , and NOx are associated with human toxicity and ailments. | ||
Mongkolnchaiarunya [ ] | Yala Manucipality, Thailand | Investigates the possibilities of integrating alternative SW solutions with local practices. | |||
De & Debnath [ ] | Kolkata, India | Investigates the health effects of solid waste disposal practices. | |||
Suthar & Sajwan [ ] | Dehradun city, India | Proposes a new solid waste disposal site | |||
Phillips & Mondal [ ] | Varanasi, India | Evaluates the sustainability of solid waste disposal options | and CO | ||
Ramachandra et al. [ ] | Bangalore, India | Assesses the composition of waste for its management and treatment | and CH cause likely adverse health effects. | ||
Pokhrel & Viraraghavan [ ] | Kathmandu Valley, Nepal | Evaluates SWM practices in Nepal. | |||
Dangi et al. [ ] | Tulsipur, Nepal | Investigates household SWM options. | |||
Islam (2016) [ ] | Dhaka, Bangladesh | Develops an effective SWM and recycling process for Dhaka city | and CH emissions pollute the environment. | ||
Das et al. [ ] | Kathmandu valley, Nepal | Estimates the amount of MSW burnt in five municipalities. | and CH emissions | ||
Usman et al. [ ] | Faisalabad, Pakistan | Investigates the impacts of open dumping on groundwater quality | and CH emissions from open-air burning. | ||
Nisar et al. (2008) [ ] | Bahawalpur City, Pakistan | Explores the sources and impacts of SWM practices | |||
Ejaz et al. (2010) [ ] | Rawalpindi city, Pakistan | Identifies the causes of illegal dumping of SWM. | |||
Batool & Chaudhry [ ] | Lahore, Pakistan | Evaluates the effect of MSW management practices on GHG emissions. | and CH emissions are causing associated health risks. | and CH emissions. | |
Hoang & Fogarassy [ ] | Hanoi, Vietnam | Explores the most sustainable MSW management options using MCDA. | |||
Ansari [ ] | Bahrain | Proposes an integrated and all-inclusive SWM system | |||
Clarke et al. [ ] | Qatar | To collect data about residents’ specific opinions concerning SW strategies. | |||
Ossama et al. [ ] | Saudi Arabia | Reviews municipal SWM practices in Saudi Arabia | causes infection in humans. | ||
Brahimi et al. [ ] | India | Explores the potential of waste-to-energy in India |
Reviewed literature on the impacts of SWM practices in South America (compiled by authors).
Author | Study Area | Aim | Impacts on Humans | Impacts on the Environment | Recommendations/Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
McAllister [ ] | Peru, South America | To conduct a comprehensive review on the impact of inadequate SWM practices on natural and human environments | |||
Bezama et al. [ ] | Concepción (Chile) province and the city of Estrela (Brazil) | To analyze the suitability of mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste in South America. | |||
Ansari [ ] | Guyana (South America) | To develop effective and low-cost technologies for organic waste recycling | |||
Hoornweg & Giannelli [ ] | Latin America and the Caribbean | To integrate the private sector to harness incentives in managing MS.W. in Latin America and the Caribbean. | gas released from landfills is detrimental to public health. | emissions from landfills | |
Olay-Romero et al. [ ] | Sixty-six Mexican municipalities, Mexico | To propose a basic set of indicators to analyze technical aspects of street cleaning, collection, and disposal. | |||
Urban & Nakada [ ] | Thirty Brazilian cities | Assess environmental impacts caused by shifts in solid waste production and management due to the COVID-19 pandemic. | |||
Gavilanes-Terán et al. [ ] | Ecuadorian province of Chimborazo, Ecuador. | Categorize organic wastes from the agroindustry and evaluate their potential use as soil amendments. | |||
Pérez et al. [ ] | City of Valdivia (Chile) | Holistic environmental assessment perspective for municipal SWM. | |||
Yousif & Scott [ ] | Mazatenango, Guatemala | Examines the problems of SWM concerning administration, collection, handling, and disposal | |||
Azevedo et al. [ ] | Rocinha, Brazil | To develop a SWM framework from the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) perspective. | |||
Penteado & de Castro [ ] | Brazil | Reviews the main SWM recommendations during the pandemic. | |||
Pereira & Fernandino [ ] | Mata de São João, Brazil | Evaluates waste management quality and tests the applicability of a system of indicators | |||
Buenrostro & Bocco [ ] | Mexico | Explores the causes and implications of MSW generation patterns | |||
Juárez-Hernández [ ] | Mexico City, Mexico | Evaluates MSW practices in the megacity. | |||
de Morais Lima & Paulo [ ] | Quilombola communities, Brazil | Proposes a new approach for SWM using risk analysis and complementary sustainability criteria | |||
Coelho & Lange [ ] | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. | Investigates sustainable SWM solutions | |||
Aldana-Espitia et al. [ ] | City of Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico. | Analyzes the existing municipal SWM process | |||
Silva & Morais [ ] | Craft brewery, the northeastern Brazilian city | Develops a collaborative approach to SWM. | |||
Morero et al. [ ] | Cities in Argentina | Proposes a mathematical model for optimal selection of municipal SWM alternatives | |||
Bräutigam et al. [ ] | Metropolitan Region of Santiago de Chile | Identifies the technical options for SWM to improve the sustainability of the system. | |||
Vazquez et al. [ ] | Bahia Blanca, Argentina. | Assesses the type and amount of MSW generated in the city | |||
Zarate et al. [ ] | San Mateo Ixtatán, Guatemala | Implements SWM program to address one of the public health needs | |||
Rodic-Wiersma & Bethancourt [ ] | Guatemala City, Guatemala | Evaluates the present situation of the SWM system | |||
Burneo et al. [ ] | Cuenca (Ecuador) | Evaluates the role of waste pickers and the conditions of their activities |
Reviewed literature on the impacts of SWM practices in Africa (compiled by authors).
Author | Study Area | Study Aim | Impacts on Humans | Environment Impacts | Recommendations/Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dianati et al. [ ] | Kisumu, Kenya | Explores the impact on PM and GHG emissions of the waste-to-biogas scheme | |||
Kabera et al. [ ] | Kigali, Rwanda, and Major cities of East Africa | Benchmarks and compares the performance of SWM and recycling systems | |||
Kadama [ ] | The North West Province of South Africa | Formulates a new approach to SWM based on the business process re-engineering principle. | |||
Owojori et al. [ ] | Limpopo Province, South Africa | Determines the differences among waste components. | |||
Ayeleru et al. [ ] | Soweto, South Africa | Evaluates the cost-benefit analysis of setting up a recycling facility. | |||
Friedrich & Trois [ ] | eThekwiniMunicipality, South Africa | Estimates the current and future GHG emissions from garbage. | |||
Nahmana & Godfreyb [ ] | South Africa | Explores the opportunities and constraints to implementing economic instruments for SWM | |||
Filimonau & Tochukwu [ ] | Lagos, Nigeria | Explores SWM practices in selected hotels in Lagos. | |||
Trois & Vaughan-Jones [ ] | Africa | Proposes a plan for sustainable SWM | |||
Parrot & Dia [ ] | Yaoundé, Cameroon | Assesses the state of MSW management and suggests possible solutions | |||
Dlamini et al. [ ] | Johannesburg, South Africa | Reviews waste-to-energy technologies and their consequence on sustainable SWM | |||
Serge Kubanza & Simatele [ ] | Johannesburg, South Africa | Evaluates solid waste governance in the city | |||
Kabera & Nishimwe [ ] | Kigali city, Rwanda | Analyzes the current state of MSWM. | |||
Muheirwe & Kihila [ ] | Sub-Saharan Africa | Examines the current SWM regulation by exploring the global and national agendas. | |||
Almazán-Casali & Sikra [ ] | Liberia | Proposes an effective SWM system. | |||
Imam et al. [ ] | Abuja, Nigeria | Develops an integrated and sustainable system for SWM in Abuja. | |||
Mapira [ ] | Masvingo, Zimbabwe | Assesses the current environmental challenges associated with SWM and disposal | |||
Adeleke et al. [ ] | South Africa | Evaluates the trend, shortcomings, progress, and likely improvement areas for each sustainable waste management component | |||
Muiruri & Karatu [ ] | Eastleigh Nairobi County, Kenya | Assesses the household level solid waste disposal methods |
This research received no external funding.
Conceptualization, I.R.A. and K.M.M.; methodology, I.R.A., K.M.M. and U.L.D.; validation, I.R.A., K.M.M. and U.L.D.; formal analysis, I.R.A. and K.M.M.; investigation, I.R.A., K.M.M., U.L.D., F.S.A., M.S.A., S.M.S.A. and W.A.G.A.-G.; resources, I.R.A., K.M.M., U.L.D., F.S.A., M.S.A., S.M.S.A., W.A.G.A.-G. and T.I.A.; data curation, U.L.D., F.S.A., M.S.A., S.M.S.A. and W.A.G.A.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R.A., K.M.M., U.L.D., F.S.A., M.S.A., S.M.S.A. and W.A.G.A.-G.; writing—review and editing, I.R.A., K.M.M. and U.L.D.; supervision, F.S.A. and T.I.A.; project administration, I.R.A.; funding acquisition, I.R.A., K.M.M., U.L.D., F.S.A., M.S.A., S.M.S.A., W.A.G.A.-G. and T.I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest in conducting this study.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The impact of environmental health on human well-being, enhancing environmental sustainability in virginia: a call to action, sustainable solutions for waste management in our community, waste management in chicago, the journey to sustainability, pollution prevention & control, plastic waste management in the u.k., beneficial aspects of microorganisms, a report on waste management strategies in gulf cooperation council states, waste management at music festivals, popular essay topics.
Essay Service Examples Environment Waste Management
Waste management’s importance: food, importance of waste management: economy, efficient waste manageme, waste reduction, reutilization of waste, waste recycling, energy recovery, understanding waste management’s importance.
Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.
Related essay topics.
Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.
Poor clinical waste management is a common problem in Africa and other developing parts of the...
Household consumption is a core issue in sustainable development and has been at the centre of...
Waste management is often regarded as an important components of proper resource management...
Poor solid waste management is a common environmental issue that not only affects developed, but...
Solid waste means any garbage, refuse, sludge from a wastewater treatment plant, water supply...
The law on hazardous waste management systems was published in the Federal Register on July 24,...
Recycling is the process of changing wastes into new usable products. The purpose of recycling...
Recycling is the process by which unwanted materials are processed into new and useful products....
The materials are drawn from natural resources. However, the Earth’s re-sources are not infinite,...
Fair Use Policy
EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].
We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.
Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!
By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Say goodbye to copy-pasting!
Get custom-crafted papers for you.
Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!
The conclusion of a Waste Management project or essay is a section that provides a recap of the primary discussions. It spotlights the accomplishments of the project, underscoring the significance of the waste management strategies that have been suggested. It emphasizes the crucial role that sustainable waste management plays in safeguarding the environment and ensuring public health.
It promotes additional investigation and action towards waste reduction and recycling initiatives. The conclusion serves as an instrument to underscore the importance of the project and stimulate action.
Proper waste management is essential for the health and sustainability of our planet. It is important for individuals and businesses to take responsibility for their waste and make efforts to reduce, reuse, and recycle as much as possible. We can reduce pollution, conserve natural resources, and protect ecosystems by properly managing waste. It is also important for governments to implement policies and regulations to ensure that waste is managed in a safe and environmentally friendly manner.
Waste management is key to maintaining a healthy and clean environment. Effective trash disposal ensures that waste materials do not affect our surroundings negatively. Implementing recycling processes can reduce the amount of waste produced, hence limiting environmental pollution. Each individual, community, and business should participate in proper waste disposal practices to protect our health and that of the environment. The use of renewable energy sources and technology should be encouraged to help in waste management. Cleanliness and recycling campaigns can educate the public about the importance of proper waste disposal. It’s high time we all commit to responsible waste management for a sustainable future.
Also Check: Conclusion of Sustainable Development
Solid waste management plays a vital role in protecting our environment and improving public health. By adopting sustainable waste management practices, we can mitigate the harmful effects of waste and contribute to a cleaner and healthier world. It is crucial for everyone to take responsibility for their waste and make conscious efforts to reduce, reuse, and recycle. We can work towards a more sustainable future and create a better world for ourselves and for generations to come, through collaboration and education. Let us all commit to making a positive impact on our environment through responsible waste management.
Also Check: Conclusion of Pollution
In conclusion, proper waste management is a critical element for sustainable growth and development for any society. It goes beyond the aesthetic appeal of a clean environment as it directly impacts human health, air and water quality, and contributes to global efforts to combat climate change. Embracing sustainable waste management practices from proper segregation, recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy initiatives is not only beneficial for the environment, but also economically viable for nations and corporations alike.
Both individuals and policy-makers have a shared responsibility to proactively participate in waste management strategies and raise awareness about their importance. With collective action, we can mitigate the damaging effects brought about by improper waste disposal, and create a cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable world for future generations.
Conclusion of earthquake example, conclusion of yoga and meditation, conclusion of social media, conclusion for assignment, conclusion of artificial intelligence | how to write | with example, how to write conclusion in research paper (with example), leave a reply cancel reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
Meghna Malhotra , Urban Management Centre -UMC , Manvita Baradi
Urban areas in India generate more than 1,00,000 MT of waste per day (CPHEEO, 2000). A large metropolis such as Mumbai generates about 7000 MT of waste per day (MCGM, 2014), Bangalore generates about 5000 MT (BBMP, 2014) and other large cities such as Pune and Ahmedabad generate waste in the range of 1600-3500 MT per day (PMC, 2014). Collecting, processing, transporting and disposing this municipal solid waste (MSW) is the responsibility of urban local bodies (ULBs) in India. The Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling) Rules notified in 2000 by the Ministry of Environment and Forest require ULBs to collect waste in a segregated manner with categories including organic/food waste, domestic hazardous waste, recyclable waste and undertake safe and scientific transportation management, processing and disposal of municipal waste. However, most ULBs in India are finding it difficult to comply with these rules, implement and sustain door-to-door collection, waste segregation, management, processing and safe disposal of MSW. The National and State Governments have provided an impetus to improve the solid waste management in urban areas under various programs and schemes. The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) funded 49 SWM projects in various cities between 2006 and 2009 (MoUD, 2014). Several cities in India have taken positive steps towards implementing sustainable waste management practices by involving the community in segregation, by enforcing better PPP contracts and by investing in modern technology for transportation, processing and disposal. The role of waste pickers/ informal sector in SWM is also increasingly being recognized. These interventions have great potential for wider replication in other cities in the country. This compendium documents eleven such leading practices from cities across India and highlights key aspects of the waste management programs including operational models, ULB- NGO partnerships, and innovative outreach and awareness campaigns to engage communities and private sector. The National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA) is the National Coordinator for the PEARL initiative (Peer Experience and Reflective Learning). It is a program that enables effective sharing of knowledge (related to planning; implementation; governance and; sustainability of urban reforms and other infrastructure projects) among the cities that are being supported by JnNURM (Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission). A number of tasks have been planned to achieve the objectives of the program. One of the key tasks encompassed by this program is Documentation of Good Practices in various thematic areas related to planning; governance and service delivery.
Urban Management Centre -UMC , Manvita Baradi , Meghna Malhotra
The National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA) is the National Coordinator for the PEARL initiative (‘Peer Experience and Reflective Learning’). It is a program that enables effective sharing of knowledge (related to planning; implementation; governance and; sustainability of urban reforms and other infrastructure projects) among the cities that are being supported by JNNURM (Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission). The PEARL initiative provides a platform for deliberation and knowledge exchange to Indian cities and towns as well as professionals working in the urban domain. Sharing of good practices is one of the most important means of Knowledge-Exchange and numerous innovative projects are available for reference on the PEARL portal/website. The ‘Knowledge Support for PEARL’ is a program supported by Cities Alliance that aims to qualitatively further this initiative. One of its components is to carry out a thematic and detailed documentation of good practices in various thematic areas related to planning; governance and service delivery. Urban Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd. in consortium with Centre for Environment Education (CEE) has been selected (through a competitive process) for the said task. The document focuses on the theme of ‘Urban Solid Waste Management’ (SWM), which includes planning; practices; projects and innovations in improving the quality and efficiency of solid waste management in Indian cities. The documentation includes good initiatives adopted and practiced by ULBs in collection and treatment of solid waste as well as the overall management of waste as a resource including aspects of recycling; environmental issues; disposal etc. of municipal waste. It also strives to study examples of people’s participation in these projects for overall enhancement of services and quality of life.
Frank Palkovits
The mining operations conducted in Northern Ontario are generally considered to be among the richest deposits in the world. This extensive area includes multiple active mines, smelters, and refineries. A number of active waste dumps for tailings, slag, and waste rock also exist. It has been recognised that if current market conditions continue, and if the new reserve estimations are accurate, mining in this area could potentially continue for an additional 50 years. Operational difficulties for the organisations operating in this area arise from the fact that the mining operations are situated in some cases within the city limits and, in fact, also dominate a number of small communities around the mine sites. These organisations face a number of increasing regulatory and social demands which are a driving force behind many of the operational changes taking place within the mining community today. Rapidly, an environmentally conscious mining operation is becoming the norm. A solution...
GLORIA T . ANGURUWA
Waste generation is inevitable in every human society, although methods of disposal may differ from region to region especially developing and developed nations, yet waste disposal is generally necessary. This study therefore investigated waste disposal practices amongst residents of Oluyole local government area of Ibadan, Oyo State. It was observed that (44.4%) and (32.4%) of the residents dumped their household refuse with government and private waste collectors respectively, but majority utilized improper waste disposal methods such as dumping in rivers (10.3%), roadsides(14.8%), open dumpsites (20.4%), gutter (9.3%), and open-air burning(33.3%). Larger proportion (97.5%) of the respondents strongly agreed that indiscriminate waste dumping has inimical environmental implications such as flooding, disruption of aesthetic beauty, disease, river pollution amongst others. In order to bring the situation under control, the respondents prefer the full involvement of the government waste collection agency instead of private waste collectors. It is therefore recommended that government waste collector should be empowered to penetrate more traditional core areas for more effective waste collection.
Farhan Fendi
Academia Letters
Amer Hamad Issa Abukhalaf
Citation: Abukhalaf, A. H. I. (2021). Bridging the Gap: U.S Waste Management System. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL1680
Ruth Jaynann Del Rosario
proposal for waste management
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
hammad javaid
American Journal of Physical Sciences
Chinaza G Awuchi
Ignacio Manzanera
Geographical Journal
Lynne E Frostick , Pauline Deutz
Dr.Ihem chijioke Uchechi
Martin Skitmore
Joy Jacqueline Pereira
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
IJRASET Publication
Allen Herring
Helen Lingard
Olabode E Ogunmakinde
Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
Costas Velis
mamta grover
Blue Nile Ethiopia
Aravamudan Gopalan
Environmental Management in South Africa
Carin Bosman
Bob ` Ray , Meine Pieter van Dijk , Abdulkerim Ahmed Mohammed
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning & Economics, Thessaloniki, Greece, 25 – 30/06/2017
Konstantin Aravossis ΑΡΑΒΩΣΗΣ
International Journal of Business Excellence
Bikram Jit Singh
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management
Purva Tavri
Andi Pramawijaya Sar
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Environmental sustainability impacts of solid waste management practices in the global south.
2. materials and methods, 3. results and discussion, 3.1. solid waste management practices in the global south, 3.2. environmental and public health impacts of swm practices in the global south, 4. implications and recommendations.
Author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Author | Study Area | Study Aim | Impacts on Humans | Impacts on the Environment | Recommendations/Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akmal & Jamil [ ] | Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan | Examines the relationship between residents’ health and dumpsite exposure. | |||
Hong et al. [ ] | Pudong, China | Assesses the environmental impacts of five SW treatment options | and acidification from NOx and SO | ||
Gunamantha [ ] | Kartamantul region, Yogyakarta, Indonesia | Compares five energetic valorization alternative scenarios and existing SW treatment. | and CO emissions from landfill sites produce adverse health effects such as skin, eyes, nose, and respiratory diseases. | and CO gases from landfill sites aggravated global warming challenges. | |
Abba et al. [ ] | Johor Bahru, Malaysia | Assesses stakeholder opinion on the existing and future environmental impacts of household solid waste disposal. | , N O, and NH increase climate change challenges. | ||
Fang et al. (2012) [ ] | Shanghai, China | Identifies different sources of MSW odor compounds generated by landfill sites. | cause harm to the respiratory tract, eyes, nose, lungs, etc. | damage species composition, plant leaves, etc. | |
Menikpura et al. [ ] | Nonthaburi municipality, Bangkok, Thailand | Explores recycling activities’ effects on the sustainability of SWM practices. | , NH , and NOx are associated with human toxicity and ailments. | ||
Mongkolnchaiarunya [ ] | Yala Manucipality, Thailand | Investigates the possibilities of integrating alternative SW solutions with local practices. | |||
De & Debnath [ ] | Kolkata, India | Investigates the health effects of solid waste disposal practices. | |||
Suthar & Sajwan [ ] | Dehradun city, India | Proposes a new solid waste disposal site | |||
Phillips & Mondal [ ] | Varanasi, India | Evaluates the sustainability of solid waste disposal options | and CO | ||
Ramachandra et al. [ ] | Bangalore, India | Assesses the composition of waste for its management and treatment | and CH cause likely adverse health effects. | ||
Pokhrel & Viraraghavan [ ] | Kathmandu Valley, Nepal | Evaluates SWM practices in Nepal. | |||
Dangi et al. [ ] | Tulsipur, Nepal | Investigates household SWM options. | |||
Islam (2016) [ ] | Dhaka, Bangladesh | Develops an effective SWM and recycling process for Dhaka city | and CH emissions pollute the environment. | ||
Das et al. [ ] | Kathmandu valley, Nepal | Estimates the amount of MSW burnt in five municipalities. | and CH emissions | ||
Usman et al. [ ] | Faisalabad, Pakistan | Investigates the impacts of open dumping on groundwater quality | and CH emissions from open-air burning. | ||
Nisar et al. (2008) [ ] | Bahawalpur City, Pakistan | Explores the sources and impacts of SWM practices | |||
Ejaz et al. (2010) [ ] | Rawalpindi city, Pakistan | Identifies the causes of illegal dumping of SWM. | |||
Batool & Chaudhry [ ] | Lahore, Pakistan | Evaluates the effect of MSW management practices on GHG emissions. | and CH emissions are causing associated health risks. | and CH emissions. | |
Hoang & Fogarassy [ ] | Hanoi, Vietnam | Explores the most sustainable MSW management options using MCDA. | |||
Ansari [ ] | Bahrain | Proposes an integrated and all-inclusive SWM system | |||
Clarke et al. [ ] | Qatar | To collect data about residents’ specific opinions concerning SW strategies. | |||
Ossama et al. [ ] | Saudi Arabia | Reviews municipal SWM practices in Saudi Arabia | causes infection in humans. | ||
Brahimi et al. [ ] | India | Explores the potential of waste-to-energy in India |
Author | Study Area | Aim | Impacts on Humans | Impacts on the Environment | Recommendations/Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
McAllister [ ] | Peru, South America | To conduct a comprehensive review on the impact of inadequate SWM practices on natural and human environments | |||
Bezama et al. [ ] | Concepción (Chile) province and the city of Estrela (Brazil) | To analyze the suitability of mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste in South America. | |||
Ansari [ ] | Guyana (South America) | To develop effective and low-cost technologies for organic waste recycling | |||
Hoornweg & Giannelli [ ] | Latin America and the Caribbean | To integrate the private sector to harness incentives in managing MS.W. in Latin America and the Caribbean. | gas released from landfills is detrimental to public health. | emissions from landfills | |
Olay-Romero et al. [ ] | Sixty-six Mexican municipalities, Mexico | To propose a basic set of indicators to analyze technical aspects of street cleaning, collection, and disposal. | |||
Urban & Nakada [ ] | Thirty Brazilian cities | Assess environmental impacts caused by shifts in solid waste production and management due to the COVID-19 pandemic. | |||
Gavilanes-Terán et al. [ ] | Ecuadorian province of Chimborazo, Ecuador. | Categorize organic wastes from the agroindustry and evaluate their potential use as soil amendments. | |||
Pérez et al. [ ] | City of Valdivia (Chile) | Holistic environmental assessment perspective for municipal SWM. | |||
Yousif & Scott [ ] | Mazatenango, Guatemala | Examines the problems of SWM concerning administration, collection, handling, and disposal | |||
Azevedo et al. [ ] | Rocinha, Brazil | To develop a SWM framework from the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) perspective. | |||
Penteado & de Castro [ ] | Brazil | Reviews the main SWM recommendations during the pandemic. | |||
Pereira & Fernandino [ ] | Mata de São João, Brazil | Evaluates waste management quality and tests the applicability of a system of indicators | |||
Buenrostro & Bocco [ ] | Mexico | Explores the causes and implications of MSW generation patterns | |||
Juárez-Hernández [ ] | Mexico City, Mexico | Evaluates MSW practices in the megacity. | |||
de Morais Lima & Paulo [ ] | Quilombola communities, Brazil | Proposes a new approach for SWM using risk analysis and complementary sustainability criteria | |||
Coelho & Lange [ ] | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. | Investigates sustainable SWM solutions | |||
Aldana-Espitia et al. [ ] | City of Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico. | Analyzes the existing municipal SWM process | |||
Silva & Morais [ ] | Craft brewery, the northeastern Brazilian city | Develops a collaborative approach to SWM. | |||
Morero et al. [ ] | Cities in Argentina | Proposes a mathematical model for optimal selection of municipal SWM alternatives | |||
Bräutigam et al. [ ] | Metropolitan Region of Santiago de Chile | Identifies the technical options for SWM to improve the sustainability of the system. | |||
Vazquez et al. [ ] | Bahia Blanca, Argentina. | Assesses the type and amount of MSW generated in the city | |||
Zarate et al. [ ] | San Mateo Ixtatán, Guatemala | Implements SWM program to address one of the public health needs | |||
Rodic-Wiersma & Bethancourt [ ] | Guatemala City, Guatemala | Evaluates the present situation of the SWM system | |||
Burneo et al. [ ] | Cuenca (Ecuador) | Evaluates the role of waste pickers and the conditions of their activities |
Author | Study Area | Study Aim | Impacts on Humans | Environment Impacts | Recommendations/Implications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dianati et al. [ ] | Kisumu, Kenya | Explores the impact on PM and GHG emissions of the waste-to-biogas scheme | |||
Kabera et al. [ ] | Kigali, Rwanda, and Major cities of East Africa | Benchmarks and compares the performance of SWM and recycling systems | |||
Kadama [ ] | The North West Province of South Africa | Formulates a new approach to SWM based on the business process re-engineering principle. | |||
Owojori et al. [ ] | Limpopo Province, South Africa | Determines the differences among waste components. | |||
Ayeleru et al. [ ] | Soweto, South Africa | Evaluates the cost-benefit analysis of setting up a recycling facility. | |||
Friedrich & Trois [ ] | eThekwiniMunicipality, South Africa | Estimates the current and future GHG emissions from garbage. | |||
Nahmana & Godfreyb [ ] | South Africa | Explores the opportunities and constraints to implementing economic instruments for SWM | |||
Filimonau & Tochukwu [ ] | Lagos, Nigeria | Explores SWM practices in selected hotels in Lagos. | |||
Trois & Vaughan-Jones [ ] | Africa | Proposes a plan for sustainable SWM | |||
Parrot & Dia [ ] | Yaoundé, Cameroon | Assesses the state of MSW management and suggests possible solutions | |||
Dlamini et al. [ ] | Johannesburg, South Africa | Reviews waste-to-energy technologies and their consequence on sustainable SWM | |||
Serge Kubanza & Simatele [ ] | Johannesburg, South Africa | Evaluates solid waste governance in the city | |||
Kabera & Nishimwe [ ] | Kigali city, Rwanda | Analyzes the current state of MSWM. | |||
Muheirwe & Kihila [ ] | Sub-Saharan Africa | Examines the current SWM regulation by exploring the global and national agendas. | |||
Almazán-Casali & Sikra [ ] | Liberia | Proposes an effective SWM system. | |||
Imam et al. [ ] | Abuja, Nigeria | Develops an integrated and sustainable system for SWM in Abuja. | |||
Mapira [ ] | Masvingo, Zimbabwe | Assesses the current environmental challenges associated with SWM and disposal | |||
Adeleke et al. [ ] | South Africa | Evaluates the trend, shortcomings, progress, and likely improvement areas for each sustainable waste management component | |||
Muiruri & Karatu [ ] | Eastleigh Nairobi County, Kenya | Assesses the household level solid waste disposal methods |
Click here to enlarge figure
Activity | Low-Income Countries | Middle-Income Countries | High-Income Countries |
---|---|---|---|
Source Reduction | Low per capita waste generation rates, no organized SWM program, high reuse rate. | Some source reduction elements but rarely incorporated into an organized SWM program. | SWM programs emphasize the three “Rs”: reduce, reuse, and recycle. More producer responsibility. |
Collection | Infrequent and inefficient. Serves mainly high visibility areas, the wealthy, and businesses willing to pay. A high fraction of inert and compostable waste impact collection. The overall collection is less than 50%. | Improved collection and transportation in residential areas. Large vehicle fleet and mechanization. The overall collection rate is from 50% to 80%. Transfer stations are gradually incorporated into the SWM system. | More than 90% collection rate. Compactor and well-mechanized trucks, and transfer stations are common. Waste volume is a major consideration. Aging collection workers are often considered in system design. |
Recycling | Informal sector recycling by scavengers is dominant. High recycling rates for local and international markets. Imports of materials for recycling, including hazardous goods such as e-waste and shipbreaking. Recycling markets are unregulated and include several “middlemen”. Large price fluctuations. | Informal recycling, high technology sorting, and processing facilities. Relatively high recycling rates. Materials are often imported for recycling. Recycling markets are mostly regulated. Material prices fluctuate considerably. | Recyclable material collection, high-technology sorting, and processing facilities are common and regulated. Increased attention towards long-term markets. Overall, recycling rates are higher than in middle- and low-income countries. Informal recycling still exists (e.g., collecting aluminum cans). Extended product responsibility is common. |
Composting | It is rarely performed formally, albeit the waste consists of a high percentage of organic material. Markets for, and awareness of, compost are lacking. | It is not widespread. Largescale composting facilities are mostly unsuccessful because of contamination and operating costs (little waste separation); some small-scale composting projects at the community/neighborhood level are more sustainable than the large-scale. Growing use of anaerobic digestion. | It is widespread in backyard and large-scale facilities. The waste consists of smaller portions of organic matter than low- and middle-income countries. More source segregation makes composting easier. Anaerobic digestion is gaining popularity. Odor control is critical. |
Incineration | It is uncommon and mostly unsuccessful due to high capital, technical, and operation costs, the high moisture content in the waste, and the high proportion of inert waste. | A few incinerators operate but experience financial and operational difficulties. Air pollution control equipment is not advanced and is often bypassed. Lack of emissions monitoring. Facilities are often driven by subsidies as construction and operation costs are prohibitive. | Predominant in areas where land is scarce or expensive (e.g., islands). It is mostly subjected to environmental control to regulate and monitor emissions. It recovers energy but it is about at least three-folds the cost of landfilling per ton. |
Landfilling and open dumping | Open dumping of waste and low-technology landfill sites. High pollution to nearby aquifers, water bodies, and communities. Regularly receive medical waste. Waste is often burned. Significant health impacts on workers and residents. | Sanitary landfills with some environmental controls often exist. Open dumping of garbage is widespread. Projects for landfill gas collection under clean development mechanism are commonplace. | Sanitary landfills combined with liners, leak detection, and leachate collection systems. Gas collection and treatment systems. It is often problematic to open new landfills due to concerns of neighboring residents. Post-closure use of sites is increasingly important, e.g., golf courses and parks. |
Costs | Waste collection costs represent 80–90% of the municipal SWM budget. Local governments regulate waste fees, but the fee collection system is inefficient. Only a small proportion of the budget is allocated toward disposal. | Collection costs represent 50% to 80% of the municipal SWM budget. Some local and national governments regulate waste fees and more innovation in fee collection, e.g., included in electricity or water bills. More mechanized collection fleets and disposal expenditures are higher than in low-income countries. | Collection costs can represent less than 10% of the budget. Large budget allocations to intermediate waste treatment facilities. Upfront community participation reduces costs and increases options available to waste planners (e.g., recycling and composting). |
MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Abubakar, I.R.; Maniruzzaman, K.M.; Dano, U.L.; AlShihri, F.S.; AlShammari, M.S.; Ahmed, S.M.S.; Al-Gehlani, W.A.G.; Alrawaf, T.I. Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 12717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912717
Abubakar IR, Maniruzzaman KM, Dano UL, AlShihri FS, AlShammari MS, Ahmed SMS, Al-Gehlani WAG, Alrawaf TI. Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2022; 19(19):12717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912717
Abubakar, Ismaila Rimi, Khandoker M. Maniruzzaman, Umar Lawal Dano, Faez S. AlShihri, Maher S. AlShammari, Sayed Mohammed S. Ahmed, Wadee Ahmed Ghanem Al-Gehlani, and Tareq I. Alrawaf. 2022. "Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 19: 12717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912717
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
How can you contribute to a sustainable and zero waste future? Read the winning pieces of the students from Davao, Cagayan de Oro, and Quezon City who joined PHINLA’s recently concluded essay-writing contest in celebration of Zero Waste Month.
By: Aya Shikinah F. Hibaler
“The goal of life is living in agreement with nature.”
— Zeno (450 BC)
Pollution and environmental degradation are not new phenomena. Pollution, in reality, has been a concern since the time of our forefathers. God gave nature to His children to utilize and take care of it, not abuse it. We understand that all created things belong to God and that as stewards of the creation, we are responsible to Him. To fulfill the objectives God intended for all of creation, He has given us the task of ruling over everything in a way that supports, protects, and enhances His handiwork. Though, this has been ignored by many. We are too focused on our own desires that we turn a blind eye to the commands of our Lord and the issues of the world. We must manage the environment for the glory of God, not just for our own advantage.
“Zero waste” is a way of living that promotes the objective of lowering the quantity of stuff we throw away. It is an advocacy effort aimed at assisting people ethically, economically, and efficiently transforming their lifestyles and habits toward sustainable systems, as well as ensuring that wastes become beneficial for other purposes [1] . A systematic design and management of products and processes are required to reduce the amount of waste created, eliminate toxicity in the resulting waste, and conserve and recover resources. When it comes to nature, there is no such thing as “waste.” When one system produces a by-product, it becomes feedstock for another. This item called “waste” has solely been created by mankind [2] .
The century’s worth of waste we dumped in this world cannot be cleaned up in a couple of days by a handful of people. It is better for every single one of us as a united community to be sustainable and perform actions that can improve the environment and the lives of every individual.
With their young mind, body, and energy, the youth can do numerous actions to help contribute to the zero-waste lifestyle. They can adapt the habit of using less plastic, recycling old materials, reusing things, and using environmentally-friendly products as an alternative for materials that create more harm to the surroundings. They can also use their creativity to upcycle old garments into something that suits them. This is crucial since the fast fashion industry has created a massive impact on the environment. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the textile industry is responsible for 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions [3] , and according to McKinsey research, the fashion industry contributed 2.1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2018, accounting for 4% of global total emissions [4] . Since fashion takes a big part in how the youth present their personality, it is important that they know how to use them responsibly.
Moreover, the young generation is knowledgeable about technology and can utilize it to spread awareness, as well as innovate. They can conduct experiments, explore, and discover new things that can help nature.
Young individuals, like other people no matter the age, like to have fun. They can utilize their creative minds and active body to make programs and challenges that advocate for caring nature and promote a zero-waste lifestyle. This could include activities like “14 days No plastic challenge”, recycling activities, or “1 week zero waste challenge.” After this, they will reflect on how it changed their lives and how it can help the environment. Leaders and environmentalists will help assist these activities and will assess the youth on how environmentally healthy their lifestyle is.
The young members might also work on reuse projects and assist in the redistribution of usable commodities to people in need, such as surplus food donated to shelters, furniture for refugees, and business clothing for job seekers. Additionally, they can create a compost pit, not just in their home but in the community where they can plant a garden for everyone to use and take care of.
When it comes to the youth’s abilities, the possibilities are limitless. Allowing them to start young will offer them more time to think, invent, act, and leave a legacy of healthy change and wisdom for the subsequent generations to benefit from.
The future of the world is in the hands of the youth- the younger generation and the hope of tomorrow. Teach and lead them at the present, and with the wisdom they accumulated, they will work and change the future for the generations to come. Teach them to love the gifts and blessings God gave to His children, and they’ll take care of the environment- the plants, trees, and animals. Their minds are vast and creative, full of ideas and knowledge. They are problem solvers, inquisitive, and imaginative, and they have the ability to create hundreds of possibilities. These minds need to be fed about the significance of sustainability and nurturing nature since they can live long enough to take a glimpse and live in the future.
Reference: [1] Practice Zero Waste Lifestyle Everyday [Internet]. Wwf.org.ph. 2022 [cited 18 January 2022]. Available from: https://wwf.org.ph/resource-center/story-archives-2020/zero-waste-lifestyle/ [2] How Communities Have Defined Zero Waste | US EPA [Internet]. US EPA. 2022 [cited 18 January 2022]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/transforming-waste-tool/how-communities-have-defined-zero-waste#:~:text=%22Zero%20Waste%22%20is%20a%20way,as%20%22waste%22%20in%20Nature [3] [Internet]. Unfccc.int. 2022 [cited 14 January 2022]. Available from: https://unfccc.int/news/un-helps-fashion-industry-shift-to-low-carbon [4] Berg A, Granskog A, Lee L, Magnus K-H. Fashion on climate [Internet]. McKinsey & Company. McKinsey & Company; 2020 [cited 2022 Jan12]. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/fashion-on-climate
By: Odessa Decano
There is no doubt that the current state of our planet is at its worst right now. From climate change, pollution, contaminated water systems to people dumping garbage on the streets, we can’t deny that we as a society largely contributed to our planet’s declining environmental health. But we, as youth members of our society, have a lot of things to offer. As Dr. Jose Rizal once said, the youth is the hope of the nation. Not just for the future of our country, but also for the future of the whole wide world. And now is the time to start.
Living a Zero Waste Lifestyle – This could sound intimidating and impossible at first, but adding a sprinkle of fun to your zero waste lifestyle will definitely help you big time. For example, you can use your recycled stuff as materials for arts and crafts. Old magazines and newspapers can turn a piece of paper into a beautiful scrapbook page. Plastic bottles and cans can be turned into pencil cases, flower vases, or even lamps. Junk food wrappers and juice packs can be turned into bags, wallets, and even accessories like hairbands, bracelets, and rings. It is cheap, creative, and eco-friendly. A dash of creativity goes a long way, and you can even earn profit from selling these goods made from recycled items. Especially during this pandemic, being able to help with your family’s financial needs while doing what you love, sounds incredible and fun at the same time.
Reusing and avoiding buying “one-time use only” items – Aside from you saving the environment, you also save money by reusing and purchasing items that can be used over and over again. According to Zero Waste Scotland, “A lot of energy goes into the production of new items, so by re-using unwanted items first, we can help reduce the need to produce a new one.” Considering how pollution from factories making new products greatly affects our environment day by day, it is vital that we are aware of the consequences of us not having second thoughts when purchasing unnecessary stuff. Practicality is important during these times, and we can achieve that by reusing items that are still functional and safe to use. For example, buying real silverware such as spoons, forks, and plates is a lot cheaper and more waste-free than buying plastic ones.
Using your voice to influence other people – You can utilize your social media accounts as vessels for your advocacies. As the majority of the world’s population has access to the internet, it is not impossible to voice out and influence your friends or followers to be more environment-friendly. Of course, you don’t have to be yelling and preaching at random people on the internet about your zero waste lifestyle, but being able to share factual information, tips and ideas with others that are interested or curious about your cause are essential when you want people to take your advocacies seriously. Participating in trends, hashtags, and groups that are related to saving the environment can also help you be more educated and even make friends with others who have the same mindset and way of living. While it is good to influence others, what matters most is the impact you make on the lives of the people around you. Communicate with your parents, siblings, relatives, and neighbors. Show them the benefits of living a zero-waste life. There is power in number.
There might come a time when our planet will give up on us, the same way we gave up on it. It’s just a matter of when and how that will happen. But that doesn’t mean that we should just abandon all hope for the future of humanity. As youth, it is our responsibility to contribute to our nation, even in the form of living a zero-waste lifestyle. We should always remember how the generations before us made our lives a lot easier, and we should also do the same for the next generations. Don’t let the future suffer the consequences of the mistakes done by the past and the present.
By: Niña Mae Bahian
Environmental problems are always an issue. There will always be news about environmental issues like climate change, global warming, and the ozone layer. Seeing the news about environmental issues always makes us hopeless and miserable thinking we can’t solve them anymore. But if we implement a zero-waste lifestyle, we can help avoid or decrease the chances of these problems getting worse. A Zero-Waste lifestyle promotes the goal of reducing the amount of waste. Even the youth can help us gain a zero-waste environment. All of us making a small change will make a big change in our environment.
Many landfills are filled with waste more than their capacity. A landfill is a well-managed facility for the disposal of solid waste. We live in a world where we just consume so much then don’t know what to do with it after. The landfills release methane which, in turn, results in contaminating bodies of water which damages ecosystems and also our health.
The 5Rs create an important role in solving environmental problems; they are Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Rot and Refuse. First off, reduce. We need to reduce using plastics too much. Instead, we should use some alternatives like Tupperware or wooden utensils. Also, if buying groceries or going to the market, we should bring something like an eco-bag, to reduce waste. Second, reuse. Reuse some items. If some plastics can still be used, well, use it but not for quite too long since it’s also bad for us. Next time, buy reusable utensils or items like metal or wood items since these can be washed and used again. Buy a reusable bottle instead of buying a plastic one every day. Try pausing on tissue paper and instead go with handkerchiefs. Third, recycle. Recycle plastic in a way it can be used for something or be decorative like making D.I.Y or do-it-yourself flower pots or decorations. Fourth, Rot. Many vegetables, fruit, and leaf scraps can be thrown or made into compost. A compost also acts out something like a fertilizer for the soil so, if done right, it is actually good for the environment. Many households have compost pits in them. Even our family has a compost so, I encourage everyone including children to do the same. Last but not the least, refuse. Refuse using plastics. Use some reusable alternatives. In these times, we can mostly find some reusable wood and metal utensils. Many restaurants nowadays don’t use plastic anymore, like cups and straws. Some use paper cups and straws. The straws may be uncomfortable, it’s better that way than polluting the environment. Also, if the straws are uncomfortable, we can always just sip from the cup. There are also a lot of other options aside from the 5R’s.
An example is avoiding using too much Styrofoam since we all know it’s toxic for the environment. Separate different wastes from each other; biodegradable with biodegradable and non-biodegradable with non-biodegradable. Donate old clothes to charity. Make your own cleaning supply from scratch. Try cooking or reusing leftovers or give them to someone.
Little efforts can make a huge difference. Clean oceans, save marine life. Don’t throw trash anywhere. With these simple yet powerful things, we can surely achieve a long-awaited goal–to live a zero-waste life.
You have been subscribed to our Weekly Devotion.
We are eager to know more about your company’s priorities and services and how we can partner together to help poor Filipino children. Kindly use this form to send us your enquiry.
Please expect an email from our corporate partnerships team very soon.
You can see how this popup was set up in our step-by-step guide: https://wppopupmaker.com/guides/auto-opening-announcement-popups/
Not only does it help in reducing operational costs, but it also enhances a company’s reputation and contributes to the broader goal of environmental sustainability. Efficient waste management is not merely a regulatory requirement but a strategic imperative that can drive business growth and sustainability.
In this context, services like selma roll off dumpster rentals are pivotal in ensuring small businesses can manage their waste effectively. By partnering with professional waste management providers, companies can ensure compliance with environmental regulations, enhance operational efficiency, and position themselves as responsible corporate citizens.
Effective waste disposal should also be paramount to small business establishments since it can lead to many savings. This, in turn, will help reduce the cost of disposing of waste and acquiring more raw materials to cover up for the waste produced. For example, introducing a recycling policy for items can help cut the amount of garbage that must be dumped, hence lowering the disposal cost. However, recycling can generate revenue through the recovery of recyclable material.
Moreover, waste management can also positively impact the organization’s revenue through better resource use. This concept helps businesses define areas that require optimization as they seek to use fewer resources with the aim of achieving the same or better results. For instance, streamlining manufacturing methods to reduce waste can result in significant cost savings. These savings can be invested back into the business for new development or into other realms of the company.
Additionally, sectors that can effectively manage their waste stand to be more capable of meeting the requirements of environmental laws. Failure to adhere to waste management laws can lead to fines and legal consequences that are expensive and disastrous for any company, especially small-scale ones. It thus implies that these financial risks are eliminated through compliance with the set rules and regulations, allowing businesses to operate efficiently.
Evaluating today’s consumer and stakeholder demands for products and services, sustainability and environmental consciousness are highly sought after. Companies that have embraced environmental standards can help build their brand image and attract consumers with green values. Having a proper waste management system in place is a measurable way for organizations to demonstrate their environmental stewardship.
Sustainability can be an essential factor that distinguishes a firm from other firms and influences consumers’ brand perception. Customers tend to be loyal and give their patronage to businesses that have the correct values as they do, and with sustainability, more people are willing to give their business to organizations with sustainable policies. Ensuring efficiency in waste management can also help organizations gain credibility with consumers to establish healthier and more productive relationships.
Additionally, product differentiation can be achieved through a sustainable image, which creates new business opportunities. Many firms and organizations tend to select their business partners based on sustainability. This can create new sales, contracts, and business relations that help grow and expand the firm.
Generally, effective waste management’s impacts are apparent in improving the environment. A company can, therefore, reduce wastage and improve its recycling standards to help minimize the extent of harm it causes to the environment. Waste management should be undertaken properly to reduce the amount of waste that is dumped into landfills since this is detrimental to the environment in the following ways: Recycling of such materials as papers, plastics, and metals helps to minimize the usage of raw materials and therefore helps to save energy and limit pollution.
Waste management also ensures that the ecosystem and the biodiversities of the particular region are well-conserved. Littering can result in the fouling of water, soil, and air through pollution, negatively impacting the animals and ecosystems. The general idea is that by effective waste management, businesses will help protect the immediate environment and support the existence of more species.
Additionally, proper waste management can help implement other environmental enhancement strategies and objectives. Most governments and various organizations have defined lofty goals for waste reduction and recycling. Organizations can adapt their processes to these goals and work towards achieving the laid-down targets to foster sustainability worldwide.
Here are some guidelines that small business owners should follow to implement an effective waste management program in their businesses. First, it is necessary to perform a waste audit to recognize the types and amounts of waste generated by the enterprise. This could be useful in identifying the main areas of waste and formulating possible measures to combat them.
When the various wastes are established, appropriate ways of managing them, possibly through reduction, reuse, or even recycling, can be put in place. This may involve establishing an organized program for collecting waste and recycling it or using materials that can be reused and looking for other ways through which waste materials can be effectively used.
Other notable factors include employee training and engagement, which are paramount in determining the effectiveness of waste management interventions. In addition, having a waste management policy involving all the employees can help change the organizational culture by promoting the idea of sustainable waste management.
Organo-consulting with professional waste management services can further boost the effectiveness of waste management practices. Waste Removal USA is an example of a specialized service providers in the industry; it offers roll-off dumpster rentals to firms. These services can help in disposing of waste while at the same time observing the set measures as per the laws of the land.
Waste management is a crucial key success factor that should be considered, especially in a small business. The advantages include cost reduction and compliance with rules and requirements, strengthening the company’s image, and the positive influence on the natural environment, which has been revealed as a crucial activity for businesses irrespective of their size.
Effective waste management and cooperation with Selma roll-off dumpster rentals from professional services allow small businesses to stimulate growth, enhance the concept of sustainability, and promote the development of a healthier living environment. Waste management is necessary for any organization, and the right strategy would pay off in both the short and long terms for any company and society.
Ever since the Industrial Revolution, we’ve consumed products in largely the same way. A company will extract or collect the resources to create a product, which consumers then buy, use, and ultimately throw away. This is known as a linear model of mass consumption.
Clarisse Magnin-Mallez is a senior partner in the Paris office; Danielle Bozarth and Humayun Tai are senior partners in the New York office; Jukka Maksimainen is a senior partner in the Helsinki office; Rob Bland is a senior partner in the Bay Area office; Stefan Helmcke is a senior partner in the Vienna office; Tjark Freundt is a senior partner in the Hamburg office; and Tomas Nauclér is a senior partner in the Stockholm office.
We know now that this model of consumption has contributed to the changes in our climate that, if left unaddressed, threaten to make life much more difficult in coming decades. Every year, some $2.6 trillion worth of material in fast-moving consumer goods—80 percent of the material value—is thrown away and never recovered .
Circularity presents an alternative to the linear model. In a circular economy, resources can be used over and over again, often for the same or similar purposes.
Three major principles govern a circular economy:
A circular economy is a worthy goal in itself. But it also presents an opportunity for organizations to gain a competitive edge. One McKinsey study estimates that a circular economy could represent a revenue opportunity of more than $1 trillion in Europe alone in 2050. Another McKinsey analysis estimates that shifting to circular business models may help European consumer goods companies access a value pool worth up to €500 billion by 2030. Companies, particularly consumer goods companies, which commit themselves to environmental, social, and governmental ( ESG ) metrics, stand to become the leaders of the future.
For more on circular economies, and how companies can reap the potential rewards, read on.
Learn more about McKinsey’s Consumer Packaged Goods and Operations Practices.
On a country scale, productivity can mean the difference between good and not-so-good standards of living. For a company, productivity can determine whether it can afford to increase wages for its employees or even if it can continue operating. Stagnating or contracting productivity can signal serious trouble ahead for individuals, organizations, and nations alike.
But the truth is plain to see: to reduce the massive waste our societies are currently producing, we must drastically slow emissions-heavy productive activity. In the past, the idea of slowing productivity might have been shocking for both governments and consumer goods companies. How can consumer goods companies survive in a world where customers are buying fewer new things?
The clear business potential of circular consumer goods can help answer that question. Consumer goods companies should see circularity as an opportunity, not a threat; as we’ll see, circular business models can create a valuable link between business logic and sustainability.
Increasing consumer demand for sustainable products is probably the biggest driver of circularity. But other factors will also play a role. These include regulation, technological progress, infrastructure, supply-side activity, and the macroeconomic environment.
Let’s start with regulation. Some governments are already pushing hard for circularity. Under the European Green Deal, the European Union has adopted the Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP), which pledges billions of euros to net-zero enablers until 2032. Several European nations have also implemented extended-producer responsibility, presenting significant financial incentives to companies looking to transition to circular business models.
But regulation, as well as company efforts to lean into more sustainable business models, can be significantly impacted by the macroeconomic environment. An economic downturn, inflation, or geopolitical instability could make organizations more reluctant to invest in circular business models. Equally, a downturn could drive consumers toward secondary markets of upcycled products.
Learn more about McKinsey’s Consumer Packaged Goods Practice .
Looking ahead, there are significant opportunities for consumer goods organizations in a variety of sectors to shift their business models toward lucrative circular opportunities. The following are the key drivers of potential growth across several segments:
Selling more circular products is one opportunity—but circularity is also about servicing products. McKinsey anticipates circular services to be a growth area as well. The maintenance and repair service market, including services like fashion mending, battery replacement, and sports equipment servicing, is estimated to be worth up to €70 billion by 2030. This growth will be primarily driven by providers acting at scale.
Learn more about McKinsey’s Engineering, Construction, and Building Materials Practice .
In a circular economy in both B2B and B2C settings, product users should be encouraged to take the following steps (exhibit) :
Despite the options provided to consumers in a B2B or B2C circular economy, getting consumers to change their behaviors is not an easy—or inexpensive—task. Extensive investment and outreach will be required to support each of these steps.
Learn more about McKinsey’s Operations Practice .
McKinsey has delineated four critical moves for consumer goods companies looking to pursue circular business models:
Learn more about McKinsey’s Consumer Packaged Goods Practice . Also check out circularity-related job opportunities if you’re interested in working at McKinsey.
Articles referenced:
Related articles.
Degree Level
FINANCIAL AID
STUDENT SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
June 18th, 2024 by JWU
If you’re interested in sustainable practices in the restaurant industry, you may be wondering how to deal with food waste in restaurants as well. What is food waste, and what practices can restaurants adopt to curb it? Read on to gain a better understanding of restaurant food waste and get some inspiring ideas to offset it and make restaurant management more sustainable.
The Economic Research Service (ERS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture defines food waste as a subcomponent of overall food loss that covers “discarded” food items. “Examples include edible food discarded by retailers due to color or appearance and plate waste thrown away by consumers,” according to the ERS. Both of these examples of food waste are prevalent among U.S. restaurants.
Americans ultimately waste roughly 40 percent of their food . Putting a monetary value on this food waste, the domestic costs come out to roughly $218 billion each year.
Resulting in bigger orders of necessary ingredients and increased sanitation/disposal fees, food waste can impact a restaurant’s financial bottom line in countless ways. Additionally, it can also lead to higher operating costs.
Beyond its immediate financial costs, food waste contributes to wasted energy, water, and other essential resources up and down the food supply chain. The rotting of organic materials in local landfills also causes dangerous methane deposits.
After considering its resounding costs, you are probably wondering how to reduce food waste in restaurants. Inventory management, supply storage, kitchen prep, menu design, and customer outreach are just a few general areas of restaurant operations that can keep food waste to a minimum .
When restaurants keep too much perishable food stock, that food will inevitably go to waste. The following practices are essential for restaurants that want to avoid waste by always keeping the right amount of inventory on hand.
To ensure that they can feed their customers without overordering supplies, restaurants must pay close attention to sales records and other relevant data to predict future demand using reliable forecast models. This practice helps in minimizing waste and optimizing inventory management.
From the timeliness of their deliveries to the range of their shipment sizes, suppliers can impact a restaurant’s ability to manage inventory in a variety of ways. At the very least, restaurant owners/managers should look for suppliers that stress sustainable practices and allow for the adjustment of orders as needed.
FIFO, which stands for “first in, first out,” is an inventory management approach that prioritizes using older stock or supplies before newer ones. Perishable food items, in particular, can benefit from FIFO’s emphasis on rapid turnover.
Even if you take great care to order the right amount of inventory for your restaurant, your efforts will amount to very little if you fail to effectively store your food for maximum freshness.
Heat, by and large, leads to spoilage. After researching the ideal storage conditions for all the food items in your restaurant inventory, you must strive to meet those conditions through appropriate refrigeration and freezing.
Clearly visible food supply labels with accurate dating can do wonders for your FIFO efforts. Use these labels to move supplies that will expire sooner toward the front to prevent them from getting misplaced and forgotten about.
You cannot overestimate the value of choosing containers that maintain optimum food quality and prevent spoilage. While food products made of grain and fiber may benefit from an airtight container, fruits and vegetables often require a container with ventilation.
Offering meals with customizable portions and preparing them accordingly, restaurants can provide the precise amount of food that customers demand and reduce the likelihood that uneaten food will be thrown away. This not only helps in minimizing food waste but also allows customers to tailor their meals to their specific dietary needs and preferences. Additionally, it can lead to greater customer satisfaction and repeat business.
From dicing tomatoes to removing excess fat from cuts of meat, waste trimming processes offer significant opportunities to combat food waste. Restaurant managers/owners are wise to teach their kitchen staff members techniques to consider all usable parts of the food they prepare.
For many restaurants, effective food prep means preparing batches of raw ingredients ahead of time. This pre-prepping approach can help you use only the ingredients needed based on data-driven forecasting.
Beyond allowing customers to order the same menu item in two or more sizes, restaurant owners/managers should closely observe customer eating habits and adjust meal portions accordingly.
Creating a sustainable menu goes beyond adjusting portion sizes. A comprehensive approach involves thoughtful ingredient selection, innovative preparation methods, and an emphasis on seasonal availability. By integrating these elements, you can minimize waste and enhance both the sustainability and profitability of your menu. For instance, sourcing locally grown, in-season produce not only reduces food miles but also ensures fresher, longer-lasting ingredients. Additionally, innovative cooking techniques can transform lesser-used parts of ingredients into gourmet dishes, reducing overall waste.
Incorporating seasonal ingredients into your menu is a powerful strategy for sustainability. Seasonal produce is often at its peak in flavor and nutritional value, making dishes more appealing to customers. Additionally, in-season items tend to be more abundant and less expensive, allowing restaurants to reduce costs. By planning menus around seasonal availability, you can also ensure a fresher supply chain and minimize the environmental impact associated with transporting out-of-season produce.
Maximizing the use of every ingredient in your kitchen can significantly cut down on food waste. This practice, known as whole food utilization, involves finding creative ways to use parts of ingredients that are typically discarded. For example, meat scraps can be turned into rich stocks, and vegetable stems can be blended into vibrant pestos or sauces. Embracing this approach not only reduces waste but also adds unique flavors and textures to your menu, enhancing the dining experience.
Daily or weekly specials are an excellent way to manage surplus ingredients effectively. Instead of letting excess produce or proteins go to waste, turn them into featured dishes that highlight your kitchen’s creativity. This not only helps in reducing waste but also keeps the menu dynamic and exciting for regular patrons. Planning these specials around surplus ingredients ensures that nothing goes to waste, while also offering customers new and varied options to enjoy.
While restaurants can do much to reduce food waste on their own, they can stretch their efforts even further by enlisting their customers in the fight. With that in mind, it makes sense to partner with your customers in the name of waste reduction. When it comes to how to reduce food waste in restaurants, you will find that many conscientious people are eager to understand and happy to help.
Take the time to carefully and diligently explain the ways that smaller serving sizes can reduce plate waste while at the same time boosting, rather than reducing, overall customer satisfaction. Customers mindful of their calorie intake can better manage their portions with smaller plates, and tablemates can more easily sample and share a variety of menu items.
Beyond educating customers on portion sizes to minimize leftovers, you can provide suitable takeout containers and enthusiastically suggest that your customers bring their leftovers home.
There is virtually no end to the ways that a restaurant can inform its customer base about the value of food waste reduction. Consider including subtle messaging about food conservation problems and solutions on restaurant menus or promotional table tents.
From environmental factors that lead to unexpected crop yield production to a sudden loss of refrigeration power during supply-chain storage, countless factors contribute to food waste that is frankly unavoidable. Fortunately, a restaurant can make the most of its spoiled and uneaten food items so they don’t go entirely to waste.
Like many private homeowners and other businesses, restaurants can compost their organic waste to create nutrient-rich soil that can support all kinds of plant life. Beyond onsite composting measures, restaurants also commonly partner with local farms and other organizations that accept compostable food waste.
While it isn’t always feasible and safe, restaurants can connect with food banks and shelters to donate surplus edible food. Among other large restaurant chains, Panera has successfully controlled food waste using this approach.
Modern technology can serve a powerful tool to help restaurants find practical uses for food that would otherwise go to waste. The free digital app Too Good To Go gives users access to unsold food from restaurants and cafes as well as grocery stores.
Regarding how to deal with food waste in restaurants, it’s wise to take the first step toward restaurant food waste reduction by adhering to a few actionable guidelines. Let’s dive into them!
To curb your food waste, you must first identify and measure it. Start by recording your baseline food waste data by calculating your incoming and outgoing inventory. You should also consider physically collecting, sorting, and weighing your wasted food items during a designated audit period.
Although there are countless ways to manage food waste, a wise restaurant owner/manager will start small by making one or two highly manageable changes. Focusing on too many areas at once may result in oversights. It’s also important to consider seasonality and other factors that could impact the outcome.
Effective staff training and open lines of employer/employee communication are key elements for any restaurant that seeks to reduce food waste. By fostering a culture of awareness and responsibility, restaurants can ensure that all team members are actively contributing to waste reduction efforts.
Eager to learn more about food waste control and other aspects of sensible restaurant management? At Johnson & Wales University, you can pursue a Bachelor of Science in Culinary Arts and Food Service Management or a Master of Science in Food Safety entirely online. Both programs take a comprehensive look at restaurant effective restaurant operations and food supply chain issues. For more information about completing your degree online, complete our Request Info form , call 855-JWU-1881, or email [email protected] .
By clicking Get Started below, I consent to receive recurring marketing/promotional e-mails, phone calls, and SMS/text messages from Johnson & Wales University (JWU) about any educational/programmatic purpose (which relates to my inquiry of JWU) at the e-mail/phone numbers (landline/mobile) provided, including calls or texts made using an automatic telephone dialing system and/or artificial/prerecorded voice messages. My consent applies regardless of my inclusion on any state, federal, or other do-not-call lists. Consent is not a condition for receipt of any good or service. Carrier charges may apply. Terms and conditions apply .
Now accepting applications
The explosive growth of China's express delivery industry has greatly increased plastic waste, with low-value plastics not effectively utilized, such as PE packaging bags, which are often not recycled and end up in landfills or incinerators, causing significant resource waste and severe plastic pollution. A gate -to- grave life cycle assessment was adopted to assess the impacts of express delivery plastic waste (EDPW) management models (S1, landfill; S2, incineration; S3, mechanical pelletization), with Suzhou, China as a case. Results showed that mechanical pelletization, was the most environmentally advantageous, exhibiting a comprehensive environmental impact potential of ‑215.54 Pt, significantly lower than that of landfill (S1, 78.45 Pt) and incineration (S2, -121.77 Pt). The analysis identified that the end-of-life disposal and sorting stages were the principal contributors to environmental impacts in all three models, with transportation and transfer stages of residual waste having minimal effects. In terms of all environmental impact categories, human carcinogenic toxicity (HTc) emerged as the most significant contributor in all three scenarios. Specifically, S1 exhibited the most detrimental effect on human health, while S2 and S3 showed positive environmental impacts. Based on these findings, it is recommended that the application and innovation in mechanical recycling technologies be enhanced, the promotion of the eco-friendly transformation of packaging materials be pursued, and a sustainable express delivery packaging recycling management system be established. These strategies are essential for achieving more eco-friendly management of EDPW, reducing its environmental pollution, and moving towards more sustainable express delivery management practices.
There’s a widespread understanding that managing corporate culture is key to business success. Yet few companies articulate their culture in such a way that the words become an organizational reality that molds employee behavior as intended.
All too often a culture is described as a set of anodyne norms, principles, or values, which do not offer decision-makers guidance on how to make difficult choices when faced with conflicting but equally defensible courses of action.
The trick to making a desired culture come alive is to debate and articulate it using dilemmas. If you identify the tough dilemmas your employees routinely face and clearly state how they should be resolved—“In this company, when we come across this dilemma, we turn left”—then your desired culture will take root and influence the behavior of the team.
To develop a culture that works, follow six rules: Ground your culture in the dilemmas you are likely to confront, dilemma-test your values, communicate your values in colorful terms, hire people who fit, let culture drive strategy, and know when to pull back from a value statement.
Start by thinking about the dilemmas your people will face.
The problem.
There’s a widespread understanding that managing corporate culture is key to business success. Yet few companies articulate their corporate culture in such a way that the words become an organizational reality that molds employee behavior as intended.
How to fix it.
Follow six rules: Ground your culture in the dilemmas you are likely to confront, dilemma-test your values, communicate your values in colorful terms, hire people who fit, let culture drive strategy, and know when to pull back from a value.
At the beginning of my career, I worked for the health-care-software specialist HBOC. One day, a woman from human resources came into the cafeteria with a roll of tape and began sticking posters on the walls. They proclaimed in royal blue the company’s values: “Transparency, Respect, Integrity, Honesty.” The next day we received wallet-sized plastic cards with the same words and were asked to memorize them so that we could incorporate them into our actions. The following year, when management was indicted on 17 counts of conspiracy and fraud, we learned what the company’s values really were.
COMMENTS
Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas. Methods for Waste Management. Recycling - Above all the most important method is the recycling of waste. This method does not need any resources. Therefore this is much useful in the management of waste. Recycling is the reusing of things that are scrapped of.
Thus, the topic of this essay is the assessment of the current problem of e-waste management, the current levels of competence about e-waste management, and the methods of addressing the problem at hand. Sustainability and Industrial Waste Management. It should be mandatory to use the EPA transport certificates.
To help you get started, here are 115 waste management essay topic ideas and examples that you can use as inspiration for your own writing: The importance of proper waste management in protecting the environment. The impact of waste management on public health. Strategies for reducing household waste.
Essay on Waste Management in 300 Words. The basic mantra of waste management is" Refuse, Reuse, Reduce, Repurpose, and Recycle". Waste management is basically the collection or accumulation of waste and its disposal. This process involves the proper management of waste including recycling waste generated and even generating useful renewable ...
Proper waste management involves reducing, recycling, and responsibly disposing of waste to adopt environment-friendly practices. As our societies grow and urbanize, efficient waste management becomes increasingly vital in mitigating improper waste disposal's ecological and health challenges. In this essay, we will delve into the significance ...
And that's just 12% of the total waste generated each year. In addition to global trends, What a Waste 2.0 maps out the state of solid waste management in each region. For example, the East Asia and Pacific region is the region that currently generates most of the world's waste at 23%. And although they only account for 16% of the world's ...
An Introduction. Waste Management or disposal includes processing and disposing of Waste starting right from its point of inception to complete disposal. Waste can be solid or liquid and sometimes even gas. It can be domestic, industrial, biomedical, municipal or radioactive Waste. Each different type of Waste has a specific disposal method and ...
These essays cover various topics related to waste management, such as the types of waste, its environmental impact, waste reduction and recycling methods, and government policies and regulations. They are helpful for students, researchers, and professionals who seek to understand the challenges and solutions associated with waste management.
Additionally, there are other methods of deriving energy from waste. For example, one can mention pyrolysis, thermal depolymerization, or plasma arc classification (Letcher 2008, p. 151). These processes can produce fuel-cell hydrogen, biodiesel, bioethanal, or crude oil that are necessary for the generation of energy (Letcher 2008, p. 151).
A key principle of waste management is the three R's: reduce, reuse, and recycle. "Reduce" means using fewer resources and generating less waste in the first place. "Reuse" encourages finding new uses for items instead of throwing them away. "Recycle" involves turning waste into new products. These principles guide us in making ...
Introduction to Waste Management. Waste disposal leads to direct an d in direct environmental impacts, such as land. occupation, resource depletion, a mplification of global warming due to methane ...
1. Efficient waste management practices: A review. George Halkos and Kle oniki Natalia Petrou. Laboratory of Operations Research, Department of Economics, University of Thessaly. Abstract ...
Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a global emergency and also has raised issues with waste management practices. This study emphasized the challenges of increased waste disposal during the COVID-19 crisis and its response practices. Data obtained from the scientific research papers, publications from the governments and multilateral ...
Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South. Global municipal solid waste (MSW) generation rose from 1.3 billion tons in 2012 to 2.1 billion tons (0.74 kg/capita/day) as of 2016, which by 2050 is expected to increase by 70% to reach a total of 3.40 billion tons or 1.42 kg/capita/day [ 19 ].
The call for responsible waste management reverberates in the heart of Chicago, where urban dynamism meets environmental challenges. For the Windy City, where 4 Million tons of waste goes to landfills, call for an effective strategy to be implemented. This essay seeks to present a lifeline—community-wide—recycling initiative designed for ...
from in-dep th reading and analysis of all selected articles individually to provide an overall . and s impli ed perspective on the available research on sustainable waste management. The . classi ...
The rate of generation of e-waste at the global level has increased substantively in recent years. While previous estimates suggested an annual growth rate of 3-4 % (ASSOCHAM-NEC, 2018; Balde et al., 2017, 2015), by the year 2019, the growth rate of global e-waste generation has increased to around 6% (Forti et al., 2020).The global e-waste generated in 2019 is estimated comprising 17.4 Mt ...
The Importance of Waste Management. Waste management is important as it saves the environment from the toxic effects of inorganic and biodegradable element present in waste. Mismanagement of waste can cause water contamination, soil erosion and air contamination. Waste can be recycled if collected and managed efficiently.
Conclusion for Waste Management Essay. In conclusion, proper waste management is a critical element for sustainable growth and development for any society. ... Embracing sustainable waste management practices from proper segregation, recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy initiatives is not only beneficial for the environment, but also ...
Zero waste encompasses more than eliminating waste through recycling and reuse; it focuses on restructuring production and distribution systems to reduce waste (C.Y. Young et al., 2010). An important consideration of the zero waste philosophy is that it is more of a goal, or ideal rather than a hard target.
Solid waste management (SWM) is one of the key responsibilities of city administrators and one of the effective proxies for good governance. Effective SWM mitigates adverse health and environmental impacts, conserves resources, and improves the livability of cities. However, unsustainable SWM practices, exacerbated by rapid urbanization and financial and institutional limitations, negatively ...
A systematic design and management of products and processes are required to reduce the amount of waste created, eliminate toxicity in the resulting waste, and conserve and recover resources. When it comes to nature, there is no such thing as "waste.". When one system produces a by-product, it becomes feedstock for another.
Organo-consulting with professional waste management services can further boost the effectiveness of waste management practices. Waste Removal USA is an example of a specialized service providers in the industry; it offers roll-off dumpster rentals to firms.
This study intends to assess the waste management practices in the selected Public Schools in Cebu City and to recommend improvement in their waste management system. Sub-Problems 1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of: 2.1. Age; 2.2.
The Swedish recycling company Renewcell partnered with retailer Beyond Retro to launch a new plant that will recycle 30,000 metric tons of textile waste per year. Learn more about McKinsey's Consumer Packaged Goods Practice. Also check out circularity-related job opportunities if you're interested in working at McKinsey. Articles referenced:
This practice helps in minimizing waste and optimizing inventory management. Smart Supplier Relationships. ... Maximizing the use of every ingredient in your kitchen can significantly cut down on food waste. This practice, known as whole food utilization, involves finding creative ways to use parts of ingredients that are typically discarded ...
The explosive growth of China's express delivery industry has greatly increased plastic waste, with low-value plastics not effectively utilized, such as PE packaging bags, which are often not recycled and end up in landfills or incinerators, causing significant resource waste and severe plastic pollution. A gate -to- grave life cycle assessment was adopted to assess the impacts of express ...
Summary. There's a widespread understanding that managing corporate culture is key to business success. Yet few companies articulate their culture in such a way that the words become an ...