The rhythm and rhyme scheme of the ballad form give the speaker’s story a traditional feel:
The traditional ballad form highlights the injustice suffered by the speaker:
were a common form of sharing news or political views in the nineteenth-centuryRossetti uses at the end of alternate lines, so that the poem is largely presented as a series of statements
This emphasises the effect of the speaker’s story:
The poem’s structure tells the story of the speaker’s downfall , returning every few lines to her current feelings of sadness, shame, anger and resentment towards her cousin. This movement between the past and present emphasises the cause-and-effect nature of events in the poem. This in turn suggests the inevitability of the outcome, as well as the lack of consequences for the nobleman who betrayed her trust.
|
|
|
| The rhythm and rhyme scheme of the ballad form give the speaker’s story a traditional feel: | The traditional ballad form highlights the injustice suffered by the speaker: were a common form of sharing news or political views in the nineteenth-century |
The poem uses (with a stress on every second syllable: de-DA), which emphasises certain words: more obvious, drawing attention to them | Rossetti uses the metre to emphasise particular words: less” and “ ful” (line 11), or “wore” (line 13) and “changed” (line 14) of evenness – the unfairness – between the the speaker and her cousin | |
Rossetti’s use of direct address (“I” and “you”) emphasises the tone of her conflict with her cousin | The continuous movement between “I” and “you” from the third stanza onwards emphasises the conflict between the speaker and her cousin: | |
| The speaker does not address the “great lord” directly, as she does her cousin Kate: | The speaker never uses “you” to address the nobleman: any blame for his actions |
Rossetti uses and in the first stanza when the speaker repeats her question: “Why did a great lord find me out?” | Rossetti uses these techniques to emphasise the speaker’s lack of power in her situation: | |
Rossetti uses repetition to draw attention to the inequalities between the speaker’s social disgrace and her cousin’s socially secure position: | The speaker’s repeated description of herself as a “thing” shows how her experiences have her: tone he reference to “the neighbours” suggests that Kate was more concerned about her reputation than her feelings for the nobleman of goodness |
Rossetti employs a range of metaphors and similes to convey her speaker’s situation. This is because her Victorian readers would have been shocked, or even alienated , by more direct descriptions of her speaker’s sexual relationship. They would have been capable of interpreting Rossetti’s language and its intended meaning. The poem also uses a number of language techniques to convey the speaker’s misery, disempowerment and sense of injustice.
|
|
|
| Rossetti uses animal metaphors to convey the speaker’s feelings of injustice: | The image of the dove has associations with purity and innocence: ; it uses the of an animal to characterise a person or object both the speaker and her lost virginity |
Rossetti also makes use of to convey her speaker’s emotional state | Rossetti uses the repeated “o” sounds of “woe”, “moan” and “howl” to emphasise the speaker’s sorrow: of the “cl” sounds to suggest both the speaker’s love for her child and her fear that she will lose him | |
| The poem presents the speaker’s unequal relationship with the nobleman through the use of similes: | These similes compare the speaker to an object that can be discarded without a second thought or any consequences: |
The way Rossetti uses verbs conveys the speaker’s – and her cousin’s – lack of power in their relationship with the nobleman | In interactions with the nobleman, his actions are described using active verbs, such as “find”, “lured”, “chose” and “watched”: | |
The use of contrast in the poem illustrates the speaker’s state of mind | The phrases “shameless shameful life” and “my shame, my pride” convey her conflicting emotions: sexual relationship nature of the social rules governing women’s behaviour, especially when they did not apply to men’s actions in the Victorian era |
Context offers you a different perspective on a poem and can enrich your engagement with it. However, you should aim to only use your knowledge of context to support your analysis of Rossetti’s ideas. Examiners don’t want to see chunks of information about Rossetti’s life or the times she lived in, unless they are supporting a response about the themes of the poem. The ideas explored in 'Cousin Kate' centre on the conflicts caused by injustice and inequality, especially for women. Therefore, this section has been bullet-pointed under the following themes:
Conflict and injustice
Conflict and inequality
Your response should show your understanding of the relationship between the poem and its context. Demonstrating your knowledge of contexts is a great way to add complexity to your analysis of the poem’s themes and ideas.
However, you should avoid including sections of information about Rossetti’s life or the Victorian Era without connecting them to the ideas she presents in 'Cousin Kate'. Aim to use your knowledge of contexts to support your analysis of Rossetti’s message. Your main focus should be on the poem’s key themes and how you can link them with the themes of other poems in your Conflict anthology.
In your exam, you are asked to compare the ideas and themes explored in two of the poems in your anthology. That means it’s a good idea to revise pairs of poems together, to understand the similarities and differences in how each poet presents their ideas about conflict in relation to each other. In 'Cousin Kate', Rossetti’s main themes are conflict and injustice , and conflict and inequality , so the following comparisons are the most appropriate:
'Cousin Kate' and 'A Poison Tree'
'Cousin Kate' and 'No Problem'
For each pair of poems, you will find:
Your comparison of 'Cousin Kate' with another poem should show your detailed understanding of both poems. You will need to compare how Rossetti uses language, form and structure to present her themes with the methods used by other writers. Therefore, it’s important that you have a thorough knowledge of all the poems, rather than just memorising a series of quotations.
Make sure your comparison includes the named poem and one other poem in the anthology. If you only write about the poem given on the paper, you will only achieve half the marks available. Writing a thorough comparison of two poems will achieve the highest marks. For instance, you could compare how Rossetti and Blake present anger, or how Zephaniah and Rossetti illustrate the effects of inequality.
Comparison in a nutshell:
Both William Blake’s 'A Poison Tree' and 'Cousin Kate' explore how deception can lead to acts of injustice in ordinary people’s lives. In both poems, there is a contrast between how people see themselves and how other people see them. Blake depicts how his speaker’s misrepresentation of his feelings leads to a tragedy, while Rossetti shows how her speaker’s tragedy has been caused by someone else’s deception. In 'Cousin Kate', the speaker’s bitterness and anger are caused by her sense of injustice, while in 'A Poison Tree', the speaker’s anger leads to the injustice of his enemy’s death.
Similarities:
|
| |
|
|
|
Rossetti uses a ballad form and regular quatrains to emphasise the universal nature of her theme: | Blake also uses a ballad form with regular quatrains to emphasise the poem’s universal quality: | |
Rossetti’s speaker is “fooled” by the “praise” of the “great lord” into becoming his “plaything”: | Blake’s speaker uses “soft deceitful ” to fool everyone about his “ ”: | |
Rossetti uses language, such as “Woe’s me for joy thereof”: | Blake also uses contradictory language when he describes watering the tree with his “tears” and his “fears” | |
Rossetti’s poem conveys about the injustice done to her speaker, and the identity of her enemy: for her outcast state | Blake’s poem conveys similar ambiguity about who is harmed by the injustice of the speaker’s deadly deception: by his on his own anger | |
In 'Cousin Kate', the nobleman’s deception leads to the speaker’s transgression: | In 'A Poison Tree', the metaphor of the tree and the apple link to the story of Satan’s deception of Eve: | |
The injustice suffered by Rossetti’s speaker results her anger and complete disempowerment: | Deception and anger cause a catastrophic injustice for the speaker’s foe: | |
Rossetti’s speaker ends the poem on a note of bitter triumph: | Blake’s speaker’s triumph at the end of his poem is similarly bitter: | |
Both poems show how deception leads to bitterness, destruction and injustice |
Differences:
|
| |
|
|
|
'Cousin Kate' employs a range of imagery to present the theme of injustice, but it tells the events of its story in a straightforward way | 'A Poison Tree' uses the of the tree and its fruit, which makes it feel more like an than a story | |
In Rossetti’s poem, the injustice is done to the speaker: | In Blake’s poem, the injustice is committed by the speaker: | |
Rossetti shows how her speaker is completely disempowered by the injustice she suffers: | Blake shows his speaker becoming increasingly fixated and apparently empowered by his anger: | |
Rossetti presents her speaker’s anger as a natural outcome of the injustice done to her | Blake shows how injustice is caused by the speaker’s unnaturally repressed anger, which leads to its fatal outcome | |
'Cousin Kate' presents injustice in a direct narrative form, while 'A Poison Tree' focuses on its speaker’s feelings, rather than the injustice itself |
Benjamin Zephaniah’s 'No Problem' and Rossetti’s 'Cousin Kate' focus on the theme of inequality. In 'Cousin Kate', the speaker’s unequal status is due to her being low-born – a “cottage-maiden” – and a woman. In 'No Problem', the speaker experiences inequality because he is Black. In both poems, the speakers are not the cause of inequality, but they suffer the consequences of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
Rossetti makes it clear that the speaker is not the source of her social rejection: and social situation | Zephaniah also makes it clear that his speaker is not the source of the racism he experiences at school: | |
The speaker identifies the source of the inequality that has ruined her life: | The speaker also identifies the source of the inequality that has impacted his life: | |
Rossetti uses the first and second person to address the contrast between the speaker and her cousin: | Zephaniah also uses the first and second person: | |
The poem illustrates how inequality has led to the speaker being treated in a particular way: | The poem demonstrates how inequality forms other people’s expectations of the speaker: | |
Rossetti demonstrates how the speaker’s experience of inequality has affected her entire life: by the inequalities of being low-born and a woman | Zephaniah also describes how racial inequality has affected his speaker’s life: by the use of the word “branded”, because of its associations with slavery | |
Rossetti shows how inequalities of gender and social class have led to her speaker’s suffering, while Zephaniah demonstrates the negative impact of racial inequality on his speaker’s early life |
|
| |
|
|
|
The ballad form of 'Cousin Kate' recounts the speaker’s downfall as a story: | The form of 'No Problem', with its uneven lines and subtle rhymes, is more conversational: “may” and the future perspective demonstrate the possibility of positive change for the speaker | |
The poem’s speaker adopts a passive attitude towards her suffering: her, and she has no | The poem’s speaker adapts to his circumstances with an active attitude: | |
The negative tone of the poem reflects the speaker’s lack of hope: | The poem adopts a positive tone towards the end: | |
Rossetti shows how her speaker’s experiences of inequality have left her feeling negative and permanently damaged: | Zephaniah shows his speaker’s defiance of racism and his pride in who he is: ”, he states, demonstrating his positivity and hopes for the future | |
Rossetti’s speaker is left bitter at the end of the poem: | Zephaniah ends his poem on a positive note: | |
While Rossetti’s speaker has been defeated by her experiences, and seems hopeless and bitter, Zephaniah shows his speaker looking towards the future with positivity and pride |
Get unlimited access.
to absolutely everything:
the (exam) results speak for themselves:
Did this page help you?
Jen studied a BA(Hons) in English Literature at the University of Chester, followed by an MA in 19th Century Literature and Culture. She taught English Literature at university for nine years as a visiting lecturer and doctoral researcher, and gained a Postgraduate Certificate in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in 2014. She now works as a freelance writer, editor and tutor. While teaching English Literature at university, Jen also specialised in study skills development, with a focus on essay and examination writing.
I was a cottage maiden Hardened by sun and air, Contented with my cottage mates, Not mindful I was fair. Why did a great lord find me out, And praise my flaxen hair? Why did a great lord find me out To fill my heart with care? He lured me to his palace home? Woe’s me for joy thereof? To lead a shameless shameful life, His plaything and his love. He wore me like a silken knot, He changed me like a glove; So now I moan, an unclean thing, Who might have been a dove. O Lady Kate, my cousin Kate, You grew more fair than I: He saw you at your father’s gate, Chose you, and cast me by. He watched your steps along the lane, Your work among the rye; He lifted you from mean estate To sit with him on high. Because you were so good and pure He bound you with his ring: The neighbours call you good and pure, Call me an outcast thing. Even so I sit and howl in dust, You sit in gold and sing: Now which of us has tenderer heart? You had the stronger wing. O cousin Kate, my love was true, Your love was writ in sand: If he had fooled not me but you, If you stood where I stand, He’d not have won me with his love Nor bought me with his land; I would have spit into his face And not have taken his hand. Yet I’ve a gift you have not got, And seem not like to get: For all your clothes and wedding-ring I’ve little doubt you fret. My fair-haired son, my shame, my pride, Cling closer, closer yet: Your father would give lands for one To wear his coronet.
Analysis of poetic devices used in ‘cousin kate’.
I was a cottage maiden Hardened by sun and air, Contented with my cottage mates, Not mindful I was fair.
He’d not have won me with his love Nor bought me with his land; I would have spit into his face And not have taken his hand.
Post navigation.
I was a cottage maiden
Hardened by sun and air
Contented with my cottage mates,
Not mindful I was fair.
Why did a great lord find me out,
And praise my flaxen hair?
To fill my heart with care?
He lured me to his palace home –
Woe’s me for joy thereof-
To lead a shameless shameful life,
His plaything and his love.
He wore me like a silken knot,
He changed me like a glove;
So now I moan, an unclean thing,
Who might have been a dove.
O Lady Kate, my cousin Kate,
You grew more fair than I:
He saw you at your father’s gate,
Chose you, and cast me by.
He watched your steps along the lane,
Your work among the rye;
He lifted you from mean estate
To sit with him on high.
Because you were so good and pure
He bound you with his ring:
The neighbors call you good and pure,
Call me an outcast thing.
Even so I sit and howl in dust,
You sit in gold and sing:
Now which of us has tenderer heart?
You had the stronger wing.
O cousin Kate, my love was true,
Your love was writ in sand:
If he had fooled not me but you,
If you stood where I stand,
He’d not have won me with his love
Nor bought me with his land;
I would have spit into his face
And not have taken his hand.
Yet I’ve a gift you have not got,
And seem not like to get:
For all your clothes and wedding-ring
I’ve little doubt you fret.
My fair-haired son, my shame, my pride,
Cling closer, closer yet:
Your father would give lands for one
To wear his coronet.
A ‘maiden’ is an unmarried girl or woman. The past tense of this first line creates a reminiscent tone, suggesting something happened to her for the worse thereby turning her away from this seemingly picturesque existence. The ‘sun’ and the ‘air’ create a beautiful, natural tone.
This line describes how the girl wanted nothing more from life – not a man, or wealth, or anything. Instead, she was content with her lower-class life with her ‘cottage mates’.
This states that she was not aware of her own beauty.
This rhetorical question gives an insight into her regret as if she is lamenting the fact that the ‘lord’ found her and ‘praised [her] flaxen hair’. We would expect her to be elated at such compliments and look back at this recognition with pleasure.
The repetitive nature of the rhetorical questions heightens the tone of regret like she is mourning her previous life. The word ‘care’ may imply that she had feelings for the ‘Lord’ or, instead, she is reflecting on her carefree nature which he stole.
Rossetti’s use of the verb ‘lured’ makes the Lord sound sinister, predatory and animalistic. This menace juxtaposes the luxury of his ‘palace home’.
This line narrates how the Lord caused her great sorrow for his own joy. His use of her mirrors his predatory nature in the previous line – he is feeding off her for his own joy.
This oxymoron encapsulates the conflicting emotions of the woman. She’s ‘shameless’ because of her newfound life of wealth and attention but ‘shameful’ as she’s aware that she’s being taken advantage of. With contextual knowledge of Victorian times, this shame she feels becomes more significant as it links to the view that women were not allowed to have sex out of wedlock and were viewed as inpure if they did.
‘Plaything’ shows that the relationship was just temporary to the Lord and that, to him, she was nothing more than an object of his pleasure – he didn’t ‘love’ her just the pleasure she provided for him.
A ‘silken knot’ is a piece of jewellery worn like a brooch and its effect here is to signify that she was merely an accessory to him – a possession to flaunt with little underlying emotion.
This line is pivotal in the poem as it illustrates how the woman was permanently changed by the Lord’s selfish pursuits of pleasure. The image of the ‘glove’ repeats how she was just an accessory for the Lord to flaunt.
She is now viewed by society as ‘unclean’ as, in Victorian times, women who lost their virginity were viewed as in pure and having lost their innocence.
This line highlights just how much life the woman has to mourn. The pure, innocent image of the white ‘dove’ juxtaposes with how she is now ‘unclean’, and this contrast emphasises the extent of her loss.
O Lady kate, my cousin Kate,
The narrative shifts in this stanza as the speaker addresses her ‘cousin Kate’.
The speaker describes that whilst she was the Lord’s ‘plaything’ she lost her innocence as well as her beauty but her cousin’s beauty grew to become greater.
These two lines reveal why the speaker addressed Kate as ‘O Lady Kate’ at the start of this stanza. The ‘He’ is the ‘Lord’ and the speaker reveals how, upon seeing Kate, he cast the speaker away in favour of her.
These two lines narrate how the ‘Lord’ turned his attention towards Kate and became fixated on her and the attraction that he felt for her that the speaker could no longer offer.
There is a symmetry the Lord taking away Kate now as he did with the speaker in the events of the first stanza. The fact ‘he lifted’ her away creates a power imbalance in his favour just like previously. The height in the last line is a metaphor for her elevation in the social hierarchy.
The speaker implies that Kate refused to have sex with him out of wedlock, hence, retaining her purity. His attraction described in the last stanza motivated him to ‘bound [her] with his ring’ or propose to Kate. Ironically, Kate’s initial rejection of the Lord resulted in their marriage and the retention of her purity whilst still receiving the joys of living in luxury.
This line also offers us some contextual analysis as it shows that the view of society in Victorian England was held in great esteem. The perception of the ‘neighbours’ is a metaphor for the perception of the entire Victorian society/
The contrasting societal views of the two women becoming more evident with the contrast between ‘good and pure’ of Kate and the ‘outcast thing’ of the speaker. The pronoun ‘thing’ signifies her status as almost sub-human.
There juxtaposing comforts of life are now elaborated on. The animalistic imagery of the speaker howling in the dust links with the dehumanisation in the previous line and it brutally contrasts with the pleasantness of singing and the luxury of the ‘gold’, compared to the coarseness of the dust.
This rhetorical question implies that the speaker is questioning how easily moved Kate is in comparison to her. The inference is that the speaker believes her own heart has become more tender and compassionate as a result of her hardship, whilst Kate’s has become less due to her life of luxury.
The speaker doesn’t answer her rhetorical question (the ambiguity, I think, suggests she feels it’s herself) but does conclude that Kate was stronger willed and surmises that it is this which has led to their juxtaposing outcomes in life.
The narrator reveals that her love for the Lord was real and, ultimately, this sincerity of her love brought about her tragic downfall.
The description of Kate’s love as ‘writ in sand’ is a metaphor for the lack of meaning and substance to her love, just as writing in the sand is insignificant and temporary because it gets washed away by the sea.
The tone of regret returns as the narrator once again laments how she was fooled by the lord. A tinge of contempt for her cousin is also evident here, as the narrator feels betrayed and envious of Kate who, in a way, benefitted from witnessing the demise of her relationship with the lord.
The narrator describes that if she was in Kate’s position having seen Kate be fooled like she was, she too, would not have been charmed and ‘bought’ by the Lord and his power.
The narrator follows the previous lines by reinforcing the fact that, had their roles been reversed, her love would have turned into contempt for the Lord.
The narrator makes another comparison between herself and her cousin. But this time she has the upper-hand – she previously mentions Kate’s life of luxury compared to her own life of poverty, but now she has a ‘gift’ that Kate may never have.
The language and structure here have an effect of belittling these material possessions and their importance. It is a touch ironic as this is what compelled the narrator to the Lord in the first place. But the main inference is that this ‘gift’ exceeds any material possession that Kate may have.
The narrator reveals that this incredible gift is a ‘son’. With contextual knowledge, we know the extent of the importance of having a son in Victorian times – to continue the family name and inheritance. Her son is her ‘shame’ because of the out-of-wedlock sex and loss of innocence he personifies, but his historical significance and the connection between mother and baby also make him her ‘pride’.
Your father would give his lands for one
Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy
Cousin kate lyrics.
How to Format Lyrics:
To learn more, check out our transcription guide or visit our transcribers forum
The poem is a dramatic monologue , directly addressed to the eponymous Cousin Kate, who is called “you” throughout, although she is clearly not present. As in all good dramatic monologues, the reader can track the gamut of emotions, contradictions and inconsistences in this unreliable narrator’s story. We are left with a fascinating picture of confused motives, injustice and self-delusion.
The emotional story is complex, and one can read into it possible comments about gender imbalance, class inequality and family strife. All this derives from a simple plot. A ‘great lord’ is able to pick and choose from the poor girls living nearby. The narrator and her cousin are comparable, but one, Kate, is fortunate to be raised to the position of his wife. The narrator is less lucky and becomes shunned and ruined as his sexual plaything. As in another comparable poem by Rosetti, ‘Sister Maude’, it also tells a story of bitter family rivalry.
It is worth noting that the dramatic nature of the stories that appealed to Victorian readers, especially women, were often histrionic and Gothic; an escape for those who lived dull, oppressive middle-class lives.
Structure It is written in a traditional ballad form. This means that it alternates 8 and 6 syllable lines — that is an unstressed and a stressed syllable called a iamb forming a metric foot — with a regular rhyme scheme. There are six stanzas, each of eight lines. Ballads are often narrative poems, like this one.
The rhyme scheme is complex. The first stanza forms ABCBDBDB. The other stanzas, when analysed, show slight variations on this basic pattern. This sounds confusing yet when read or spoken the poem flows naturally and is an indication of Rosetti’s ability to manipulate rhyme.
Language and Imagery This is written in the first person singular,‘ I’, a dramatic monologue in which the ‘cottage maiden’ tells her story. The language is that of a country girl with limited education, direct and without complex metaphors, but the effect is dramatic and moving.
Find answers to frequently asked questions about the song and explore its deeper meaning
This is an analysis of the poem Cousin Kate that begins with:
I was a cottage maiden Hardened by sun and air ... full text
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Cousin Kate by Christina Rossetti is a narrative poem that tells the story of a young woman who is seduced and abandoned by a wealthy lord. The speaker, Kate's cousin, reflects on her own past relationship with the lord and the consequences of his betrayal. Despite the speaker's love and loyalty, the lord chooses Kate over her, leaving the speaker feeling betrayed and abandoned. However, as the poem progresses, the speaker reveals that Kate's relationship with the lord has also brought her suffering, as she is now left alone with his child while the speaker has found love and happiness elsewhere. You can read the poem below and find analysis further down the page.
Cousin Kate by Christina Rossetti
I was a cottage-maiden
Hardened by sun and air,
Contented with my cottage-mates,
Not mindful I was fair.
Why did a great lord find me out
And praise my ‑ flaxen hair?
To fill my heart with care?
He lured me to his palace-home –
Woe’s me for joy thereof –
To lead a shameless shameful life,
His plaything and his love.
He wore me like a golden knot,
He changed me like a glove:
So now I moan an unclean thing
Who might have been a dove.
O Lady Kate, my Cousin Kate,
You grow more fair than I:
He saw you at your father’s gate,
Chose you and cast me by.
He watched your steps along the lane,
Your sport among the rye:
He lifted you from mean estate
To sit with him on high.
Because you were so good and pure
He bound you with his ring:
The neighbours call you good and pure,
Call me an outcast thing.
Even so I sit and howl in dust
You sit in gold and sing:
Now which of us has tenderer heart?
You had the stronger wing.
O Cousin Kate, my love was true,
Your love was writ in sand:
If he had fooled not me but you,
If you stood where I stand,
He had not won me with his love
Nor bought me with his land:
I would have spit into his face
And not have taken his hand.
Yet I’ve a gift you have not got
And seem not like to get:
For all your clothes and wedding-ring
I’ve little doubt you fret.
My fair-haired son, my shame, my pride,
Cling closer, closer yet:
Your sire would give broad lands for one
To wear his coronet.
Title and Subject Matter:
The title "Cousin Kate" immediately introduces the central characters of the poem: Kate and the speaker, who is Kate's cousin. The poem explores themes of love, betrayal, and societal expectations, particularly regarding the roles and expectations placed on women in Victorian society.
Structure and Form:
"Cousin Kate" is written in quatrains with a regular rhyme scheme (ABAB), creating a sense of rhythm and structure. The use of regular meter and rhyme scheme contributes to the poem's narrative flow and emotional impact.
Language and Tone:
Rossetti uses simple, yet evocative language to convey the speaker's emotions and experiences in a direct and relatable manner.
The tone of the poem is melancholic and reflective, with the speaker lamenting the betrayal and abandonment she has experienced at the hands of the lord.
Characterisation and Point of View:
The poem is narrated from the perspective of the speaker, Kate's cousin, allowing readers to empathise with her feelings of betrayal and resentment. Through the speaker's reflections, Rossetti explores the complexities of relationships and the societal expectations placed on women during the Victorian era.
Love and betrayal: The poem explores the theme of love and betrayal, as the speaker recounts her past relationship with the lord and the subsequent betrayal by both him and Kate.
Social expectations and gender roles: Rossetti examines the societal expectations placed on women, particularly regarding relationships and marriage, highlighting the injustices and constraints faced by women in Victorian society.
Redemption and resilience: Despite the speaker's initial feelings of betrayal and abandonment, she ultimately finds redemption and happiness, showcasing her resilience and strength.
Key Quotes:
"O cousin Kate, my love was true, / Your love was writ in sand:"
"He changed me like a glove; / So now I moan, an unclean thing, / Who might have been a dove."
"Yet I've a gift you have not got, / And seem not like to get: / For all your clothes and wedding-ring, / I've little doubt you fret."
Conclusion:
Cousin Kate by Christina Rossetti is a poignant exploration of love, betrayal, and societal expectations in Victorian society. Through the speaker's reflections, Rossetti delves into the complexities of relationships and the injustices faced by women, particularly regarding the expectations placed on them by society. The poem's inclusion in the Edexcel GCSE English Literature Conflict Poetry Anthology provides students with an opportunity to explore themes of love, betrayal, and gender roles, as well as to engage with the social and historical context of Victorian society.
You can find analysis of all the Edexcel Conflict Poetry Anthology Poems here .
24/7 writing help on your phone
To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
I. structural analysis.
Iii. gender and power dynamics, iv. conclusion.
Power and Gender in Christina Rossetti's "Cousin Kate". (2016, Sep 14). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/a-poem-cousin-kate-by-christina-rossetti-essay
"Power and Gender in Christina Rossetti's "Cousin Kate"." StudyMoose , 14 Sep 2016, https://studymoose.com/a-poem-cousin-kate-by-christina-rossetti-essay
StudyMoose. (2016). Power and Gender in Christina Rossetti's "Cousin Kate" . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/a-poem-cousin-kate-by-christina-rossetti-essay [Accessed: 27 Aug. 2024]
"Power and Gender in Christina Rossetti's "Cousin Kate"." StudyMoose, Sep 14, 2016. Accessed August 27, 2024. https://studymoose.com/a-poem-cousin-kate-by-christina-rossetti-essay
"Power and Gender in Christina Rossetti's "Cousin Kate"," StudyMoose , 14-Sep-2016. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/a-poem-cousin-kate-by-christina-rossetti-essay. [Accessed: 27-Aug-2024]
StudyMoose. (2016). Power and Gender in Christina Rossetti's "Cousin Kate" . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/a-poem-cousin-kate-by-christina-rossetti-essay [Accessed: 27-Aug-2024]
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
Here’s a sample essay for Edexcel GCSE English Literature (Paper 2) – demonstrating a comparison between “Cousin Kate” by Christina Rosetti and “Poison Tree” by William Blake. These poems are both from the Edexcel GCSE Conflict anthology.
Have a read through this, and pretend you are marking the exam. What would you change about the essay and why? Have I met all the key marking criteria – and do you know what this is!?
Remember, you’ll have 35 minutes in the real thing – so why not have a go yourself, and write a comparison of another two poems in your anthology? But in the meantime, let’s get some inspiration…
Re-read “Cousin Kate”. Choose one other poem from the Conflict anthology. Compare how difficult emotions are presented in the two poems. In your answer, you should consider the: poets’ use of language, form and structure (AO2) influence of the contexts in which the poems were written (AO3)
In both Cousin Kate by Christina Rosetti and Poison Tree by William Blake, the poets present the destructive force of negative emotions and injustice in society. Whilst the two poems are contrastingly written from male and female perspectives, they both utilise conventional poetic forms and present narrators striving to regain personal agency and power (with varying degrees of success!).
The regular form and rhyme scheme of both poems (Blake using four quatrains formed of rhyming couplets and Rosetti utilising a traditional ballad form with an ABAB rhyme scheme) provides an outward illusion of regularity and control. Whilst these accessible forms allowed both poets to reach a wider audience with their didactic messages of social reform, they hide the deeply subversive actions of their narrators. Whilst Blake presents the shocking fact that his narrator is “glad” his foe has been poisoned, Rosetti’s narrator is similarly triumphant in her defeat of Cousin Kate; a family member she may have been expected to support in her marriage.
In both poems the volta comes early. In a Poison Tree, this comes after the first two lines when the focus switches from anger between friends to anger between enemies (“I told it not, my wrath did grow”). In Cousin Kate, the volta comes after the second stanza where the narrator’s focus shifts from her own treatment to Cousin Kate who had “grew more fair than I”. After this point, both poems deal with the jealousy and anger experienced by each narrator. Blake was a well known social reformer, and the ambiguous reference to “foe” (the reader never finds out the cause of the disagreement) could perhaps refer to the necessity of open communication to avoid anger and violence within society.
Despite the similarity of both poems depicting the destructive potential of unchecked anger – Rosetti’s narrator arguably has much more to be “angry” about. Rosetti’s own charitable work with “fallen women” at the St Mary Magdalene House of Charity informed her interest in women looked-down upon by Victorian Society. These were often prostitutes and single women with little power and agency in society. Indeed, she only utilises active verbs to describe the male character. The great lord “wore me”, “changed me” (with similes comparing her to inanimate knots and easily disposable gloves) and then “watched” and “lifted” fair Cousin Kate once he tired of the narrator. The narrator (just like Victorian women in a patriarchal society) was powerless to reject his advances which have now made her an “unclean thing” in the eyes of society.
Whilst the nobleman stole the woman’s potential to have remained an innocent “dove” – Blake’s antagonist also attempts to steal from the narrator. Even though he “knew that it was mine”, he tries to steal the “apple bright” from the narrator’s garden. The image of the apple is an allusion to the fruit eaten by Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden – destroying their innocence and bringing sin into the world. Despite these negative religious connotations, it also represents the moment of triumph for the narrator, who had been obsessively growing this trap (and “sunned it with smiles” and “soft deceitful wiles”) to entice his foe. The sibilance of “sunned it with smiles” enhances the threatening tone, leaving the reader in little doubt that the foe “outstretched beneath the tree” has met an untimely end.
Just as Blake’s narrator enjoyed ultimate triumph over their enemy, Rosetti’s narrator also revels a strange “revenge” on Cousin Kate and the Great Lord. With the alliterative phrase “I’ve a gift you have not got, and seem not like to get” she introduces her son (likely begot from the Lord himself). The juxtaposition of “my shame, my pride” reflects the opinions of society more generally (shame at a child born out of wedlock), as well as the woman’s personal love for her child. A legitimate son is what the man deeply desires – and would “give lands” for one to “wear his coronet”. It becomes the only thing the female narrator has the power to keep from him.
In conclusion, both Cousin Kate by Christina Rosetti and Poison Tree by William Blake…
How would you conclude this essay!? Remember to make sure this matches both your introduction and the things you’ve talked about during the essay as a whole. How are they similar, and how are they different? Have a go at writing a few sentences to summarise the key points – and good luck! 😊
N.B. If you struggled with knowing what to mark in the essay – here’s the things Edexcel say you’ll need for top marks:
The writing is informed by perceptive comparisons and contrasts, with a varied and comprehensive range of similarities and/or differences between the poems considered. There is perceptive grasp of form and structure and their effect. The response offers a cohesive evaluation of the poets’ language and its effect on the reader. Relevant subject terminology is integrated and precise. There is excellent understanding of context, and convincing understanding of the relationship between poems and context is integrated into the response.
Have you found this post helpful? By making a contribution, you’ll help me create free study materials for students around the country. Thank you!
Cousin kate, other works by christina georgina rossetti....
If the sun could tell us half That he hears and sees, Sometimes he would make us laugh, Sometimes make us cry: Think of all the birds that make
Promise me no promises, So will I not promise you: Keep we both our liberties, Never false and never true: Let us hold the die uncast,
If stars dropped out of heaven, And if flowers took their place, The sky would still look very fair… And fair earth’s face. Winged angels might fly down to us
I said of laughter: it is vain. Of mirth I said: what profits it? Therefore I found a book, and wri… Therein how ease and also pain, How health and sickness, every one
What are heavy? Sea—sand and sorr… What are brief? To—day and to—mor… What are frail? Spring blossoms a… What are deep? The ocean and trut…
Hope is like a harebell trembling… Love is like a rose the joy of all… Faith is like a lily lifted high a… Love is like a lovely rose the wor… Harebells and sweet lilies show a…
Minnie and Mattie And fat little May, Out in the country, Spending a day. Such a bright day,
The horses of the sea Rear a foaming crest, But the horses of the land Serve us the best. The horses of the land
The summer nights are short Where northern days are long: For hours and hours lark after lar… Trills out his song. The summer days are short
The sunrise wakes the lark to sing… The moonrise wakes the nightingale… Come darkness, moonrise, everythin… That is so silent, sweet, and pale… Come, so ye wake the nightingale.
‘Kookoorookoo! kookoorookoo!’ Crows the cock before the morn; ‘Kikirikee! kikirikee!’ Roses in the east are born. ‘Kookoorookoo! kookoorookoo!’
My baby has a mottled fist, My baby has a neck in creases; My baby kisses and is kissed, For he’s the very thing for kisses…
Rosy maiden Winifred, With a milkpail on her head, Tripping through the corn, While the dew lies on the wheat In the sunny morn.
If hope grew on a bush, And joy grew on a tree, What a nosegay for the plucking There would be! But oh! in windy autumn,
There is but one May in the year, And sometimes May is wet and cold… There is but one May in the year Before the year grows old. Yet though it be the chilliest Ma…
Temel Adil 10TA
My essay is going to be about comparing and contrasting the two poems: ‘Cousin Kate’ and ‘The Seduction’. I have read the two poems thoroughly and researched the authors. ‘Cousin Kate’ is about a young maid who serves the Lord. The Lord leads on the maid and has sex with her for his own pleasure. The maid thinks the Lord is going to marry her but he does not. The maid’s cousin – Kate marries the Lord instead. The maid becomes pregnant and has a child out of wedlock. This makes her a social outcast. ‘The Seduction’ is about a teenage girl who has one night-stand with a boy after an all night party. The teenage girl becomes pregnant and everyone in the neighbourhood sees her as a social outcast.
These poems have many things in common. For example they both have female authors. In both poems, the maid and the girl both feel betrayed because the girl in ‘The Seduction’ says that she feels betrayed by her magazines and I quote ‘And she ripped up all her My Guy magazines and her Jackie photo comics until they were just bright paper like confetti’. In ‘Cousin Kate’ the maid feels betrayed by the Lord because the Lord uses her and dumps her for her cousin Kate, ‘you grew more fairer than I: He saw you at your father’s gate, chose you and pass me by’. Further more, both of the women have a child out of wedlock. In Christina Rossetti’s time, it was wrong to have a child out of wedlock and I can prove this by ‘The neighbours call you good and pure and call me an outcast thing’. In Eileen McAuley’s time, it isn’t that bad because there are teenagers having babies all over the place. I know that in ‘The Seduction’ had a child out of wedlock and that she hated it because she said it was ‘better to starve yourself that to walk through town with a belly huge and ripe’.
The two poems are also different in many ways. One of the differences is that the protagonist in ‘The Seduction’ is a sixteen year old girl doing her O levels ‘was the summer of her sixteenth year’ and ‘about her O levels she’d be sitting in June’. Whereas the protagonist in ‘Cousin Kate’ is a maid for the Lord. I know this because the poem reads ‘I was a cottage maiden’. Furthermore, there is another difference. The girl in ‘The Seduction’ hates her baby whereas the maid in ‘Cousin Kate’ accepts her child. I back this up by ‘better to starve yourself, like a sick precious child than to walk through town with a belly huge and ripe’ this is what the protagonist thinks of her baby in ‘The Seduction’. In ‘Cousin Kate’ the protagonist says her child is ‘my shame, my pride’. There is also another difference between the two poems. The two poems were written in different times. ‘The Seduction’ was written in the 20 th century whereas ‘Cousin Kate’ was written in the 19 th century. This can create different views towards the poems.
The mood of the poems are depressing yet interesting. At the start of ‘The Seduction’ the mood is a hopeful mood. Sentences like this make the mood hopeful – ‘she had met him at the party and he had danced with her all night’. Later on in ‘The Seduction’ the mood became depressing and betrayal came into the poem. The protagonist in ‘The Seduction’ felt betrayed, ‘full of glossy horoscopes and glamour with a stammer; full of fresh diets – hoe did she feel betrayed’. In ‘Cousin Kate’, the begging of the poem, the maid sleeps with the Lord thinking that he is going to marry her ‘He lured me to his palace home – woe’s me for joy thereof’. The Lord ended up marrying her cousin. The maid felt used in ‘Cousin Kate’, ‘He wore me like a silken knot, He changed me like a glove’.
The languages in the two poems are both different. I think because ‘Cousin Kate’ was written in the 19 th century and ‘The Seduction’ was written in the 20 th century so the language was more modern in ‘The Seduction’. Christina Rossetti used words such as ‘changed me like a glove’ to describe how the Lord used her in ‘Cousin Kate’. I found this effective because it is a good metaphor and it makes the Lord sound like a user. The language used in ‘The Seduction’ was not as standard as the language used in ‘Cousin Kate’. The language used in ‘The Seduction’ paints a bleak picture of the night events. The poet Eileen McAuley uses settings such as ‘Birkenhead Docks’ to create the image that the setting is not romantic. The language makes me feel interested in the poem and allows me to get into the poem thoroughly.
‘The Seduction’ was a much longer poem than ‘Cousin Kate’. ‘The Seduction’ has 16 stanzas whereas ‘Cousin Kate’ has 5 stanzas. The stanzas in ‘The Seduction’ has 4 lines that every other line rhymed. ‘Cousin Kate’ has random lines in each stanza and a random rhyming pattern.
Finally I come to my conclusion. To be honest I preferred ‘The Seduction’ it reflects how teenagers get pregnant so easily. These days teenage pregnancies are at a record high and people do not take any notice anymore whereas in Christina Rossetti’s day it was a disgrace to have a child out of wedlock. It can also depend on the situation. That concludes my essay.
By christina rossetti, cousin kate quotes and analysis.
He changed me like a glove; So now I moan, an unclean thing, Who might have been a dove. Speaker
The speaker uses two very different metaphorical comparisons to describe the possible roles she might have fit into, and in doing so critiques the harshly delineated roles available to women of her social class. Currently she is treated like a fashionable accessory. The lord physically uses her like a piece of clothing, treating her as a useful but ultimately dispensable object. Moreover, the word "unclean" insinuates that, according to the sexual norms of her society, she becomes sullied and less-valued because of this objectification. The object with which she metaphorically contrasts the glove is not an object at all but a living thing, capable of flight and therefore of agency. Doves are also symbolically resonant. They mate for life, suggesting that the speaker might have been a valued companion of the lord. They are also associated with peace, hinting that, had she married the lord, the speaker would not have allowed such intense social discord to occur.
O Lady Kate, my cousin Kate, You grew more fair than I: Speaker
This neat quatrain demonstrates the arbitrary standards and capricious decisions that have led to the speaker's downfall. In the space of just three quick iambs, the speaker chronicles the process by which her own previously mentioned fairness becomes irrelevant. She is outstripped by her cousin in a process outside of either girl's control, and both of their lives change as a result. This strange shift from an equal relationship to an unmatched one, leaving a bizarre tension between Kate and the speaker, is summarized in the first of these two lines. The speaker addresses her cousin as both "O lady" and "my cousin," the first title distant and worshipful, the second familiar and proprietary.
Because you were so good and pure He bound you with his ring: The neighbors called you good and pure, Call me an outcast thing. Speaker
Here, the speaker highlights the impossible trap she finds herself in. She was initially rejected by the lord in favor of Kate, as a result of her perceived promiscuity relative to her cousin's perceived morality and purity. However, rejection alone is not the only price she has to pay. The lord puts her in a purely sexual role, which only increases her reputation for promiscuity, causing society as a whole to turn on her. Her divergence from gender norms places her in a cycle, by which she is forced into increasingly non-normative roles, leading to harsher and harsher rejection. Furthermore, the speaker's initial sin was not any particular act of promiscuity, but only a failure to be judged as pure as her cousin. A scarcity of opportunities means that Kate's success results in disproportionate punishment for the speaker.
Even so I sit and howl in dust, You sit in gold and sing: Now which of us has tenderer heart? You had the stronger wing. Speaker
Here, Rossetti makes use of the ballad form to emphasize the contrast between the two girls. Lines one and three match both in length and in end-rhyming sound. The same is true of lines two and four. Rossetti chooses to focus on Kate in lines two and four, emphasizing her happiness, comfort, and success. In lines one and three, meanwhile, the speaker receives more focus. The contrast between the speaker and Kate is heightened by the contrasts between line length and end rhyme. By interspersing lines focusing on Kate with those focusing on the speaker, Rossetti has readers pivot between the two, the sudden juxtapositions causing an awareness of the simultaneous closeness and extreme difference between the women.
My fair-haired son, my shame, my pride Speaker
The word "fair" holds a great deal of significance in this line and in the revelation of the son. The speaker is described early in the poem as being "flaxen-haired," meaning that both she and her son have blond hair. This underscores the closeness between herself and her child, establishing him as the one thing she still has some degree of ownership over. At the same time, this mark of their relatedness makes the child an even more potent reminder of the speaker's experiences of exploitation by the lord. For this reason, the child is indeed both her "shame" and her "pride," representing both her loss of control and the little control she maintains. Moreover, the word "fair" has previously cropped up to describe both Kate and the speaker. In these earlier instances, "fair" meant "beautiful" rather than "light-colored." Nevertheless, fairness was the metric by which the lord chose Kate over the speaker, and its use here subtly suggests that the son will win his father's affection.
The Question and Answer section for Cousin Kate is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel.
Cousin Kate study guide contains a biography of Christina Rossetti, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Powered by LitCharts content and AI. "Cousin Kate" is a dramatic monologue by the British poet Christina Rossetti. Rossetti wrote "Cousin Kate" while she was a volunteer at the St. Mary Magdalene house for "fallen women," a derogatory 19th-century term for supposedly unchaste women (such as unmarried mothers and sex workers). The poem ...
Poem Analyzed by Allisa Corfman. The time period in which this poem, 'Cousin Kate,' was written makes the message all the more meaningful. The writer, Christina Rossetti, was a woman of the Victorian era. Born in 1830, Rossetti lived during a time when women had no choice but to be chaste. Anything else was to be outcasted from society.
Cousin Kate Study Guide. "Cousin Kate" is a mid-nineteenth-century poem by Christina Rossetti, in which a suffering woman tells the tale of her subjugation at the hands of a powerful lord and her betrayal by a cousin. Throughout the work, Rossetti plays with readers' trust in the speaker, at times suggesting that she is not an altogether ...
Cousin Kate. Your Edexcel GCSE English Literature Poetry Anthology contains 15 poems, and in your exam you will be given one poem - printed in full - and asked to compare it to another one from the anthology. As this is a "closed book" exam, you will not have access to the second poem, so you will need to know it from memory.
Next, addressing a woman named Kate as "cousin," the speaker remembers how Kate became the more beautiful of the two, attracting the lord's attention. The speaker was left by the wayside as the lord turned to Kate, first watching her from a distance and then inviting her into his house and his life. Kate's reputation for morality and purity ...
Analysis of Poetic Devices Used in 'Cousin Kate'. literary devices are literary nuts and bolts that poets have at their disposal to beautify their poems. The analysis of these devices in the poem is as follows. Anaphora: It means to repeat the first part of a clause of a sentence, such as "Why did a great lord…" in the first stanza.
O Lady Kate, my cousin Kate, You grew more fair than I: He saw you at your father's gate, Chose you, and cast me by. He watched your steps along the lane, Your work among the rye; He lifted you from mean estate. To sit with him on high. Because you were so good and pure.
O cousin Kate, my love was true, Your love was writ in sand: If he had fooled not me but you, If you stood where I stand, He'd not have won me with his love. Nor bought me with his land; I would ...
Cousin Kate study guide contains a biography of Christina Rossetti, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. Best summary PDF, themes, and quotes. More books than SparkNotes.
The author used lexical repetitions to emphasize a significant image; his, you, have, my are repeated. The poet used anaphora at the beginnings of some neighboring lines. The same words he, if are repeated. If you write a school or university poetry essay, you should Include in your explanation of the poem: summary of Cousin Kate; central theme;
Cousin Kate by Christina Rossetti is a narrative poem that tells the story of a young woman who is seduced and abandoned by a wealthy lord. The speaker, Kate's cousin, reflects on her own past relationship with the lord and the consequences of his betrayal. Despite the speaker's love and loyalty, the lord chooses Kate over her, leaving the speaker feeling betrayed and abandoned.
O Lady kate, my cousin Kate, You grew more fair than I: He saw you at your father's gate, Chose you, and cast me by. He watched your steps along the lane, Your work among the rye;
Christina Rossetti's Victorian poem, "Cousin Kate," explores themes of power, gender, and societal expectations through the perspective of a fallen woman. In this ballad, the female speaker recounts her journey from a contented life in humble surroundings to her entanglement with the local Lord of the Manor, who subsequently abandons her for ...
Here's a sample essay for Edexcel GCSE English Literature (Paper 2) - demonstrating a comparison between "Cousin Kate" by Christina Rosetti and "Poison Tree" by William Blake. These poems are both from the Edexcel GCSE Conflict anthology. Have a read through this, and pretend you are marking the exam.
Cousin Kate Summary and Analysis of Stanzas 1-2. Summary. The speaker explains that she used to be a simple innocent girl, living a rural lifestyle and unaware of her own beauty. She asks, lamentingly, why a "great lord" discovered her and praised her for her blonde hair before inviting her back to his grand house, ultimately ending her ...
O Lady Kate, my cousin Kate, You grew more fair than I: He saw you at your father's gate, Chose you, and cast me by. He watched your steps along the lane, Your work among the rye; He lifted you from mean estate To sit with him on high. "Rye" - type of grain. "Mean estate" - humble, lower class life.
O Lady kate, my cousin Kate, You grew more fair than I: He saw you at your father's gate, Chose you, and cast me by. He watched your steps along the lane, Your work among the rye; He lifted you from mean estate. To sit with him on high. Because you were so good and pure.
Kate was swept into his home as she was years ago. He tempts Kate same way as she was when she was younger and he took interest in her. In the last two verses, She returns to her own feelings, she talks about what she would have done had she been cousin Kate's position then ends the poem talking about her one victory, her pride and her shame.
My essay is about two poems one called the seduction by Eileen McAuley and cousin Kate by Christina Rossetti. Both poems are about a woman's life that changed because of a man. At first, I am going to discuss the poem Cousin Kate is it is the older one.
Cousin Kate study guide contains a biography of Christina Rossetti, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. Best summary PDF, themes, and quotes. More books than SparkNotes.
Essay My essay is going to be about comparing and contrasting the two poems: 'Cousin Kate' and 'The Seduction'. I have read the two poems thoroughly and researched the authors. 'Cousin Kate' is about a young maid who serves the Lord. The Lord leads on the maid and has sex with her for his own pleasure.
Cousin Kate Essay Questions. 1. Analyze one instance of figurative language in this poem. When describing the lord's marriage to the speaker's cousin, the speaker uses the metaphor "he bound you with his ring." This is a line full of rich figurative language on several levels. Firstly, the ring is used metonymically to describe marriage.
This strange shift from an equal relationship to an unmatched one, leaving a bizarre tension between Kate and the speaker, is summarized in the first of these two lines. The speaker addresses her cousin as both "O lady" and "my cousin," the first title distant and worshipful, the second familiar and proprietary. Because you were so good and pure.