Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
We're an open-access journal publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research from across the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering.
We are delighted to announce that Scientific Reports is now expanding its scope to include engineering disciplines.
Advertisement
Physical sciences.
The prevalence and determinants of diabetes mellitus and thyroid disorder comorbidity in tabari cohort population.
Science jobs, postdoctoral researcher.
We work on the discovery of game-changing electrocatalysts by employing human-AI collaboration. Reference: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.3c01009
National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS)
Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru, India, IISc is India’s top-ranked research institution
Bangalore City, Bangalore (IN)
Indian Institute of Science (IISc)
The Department of Biology (D-BIOL, www.biol.ethz.ch) at ETH Zurich invites applications for the above-mentioned position.
Zurich, Switzerland
Top-notch talents, leading talents in science and technology, and young and middle-aged outstanding talents.
Xinxiang, Henan, China
Xinxiang Medical University
We are now seeking outstanding candidates in Physics, Chemistry and Physical Sciences.
Dongguan, Guangdong, China
Great Bay University, China (GBU)
This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
A reporting guide for qualitative studies.
Qualitative studies provide insight into complex phenomena. Unlike measurement-based studies which typically quantify what happens under experimental conditions, qualitative studies often help explain behaviors or perceptions under actual circumstances. Qualitative studies in the field of communicable diseases can be used to provide insight into why people choose high-risk behaviours and to identify the factors that influence their decisions. For example, a qualitative study may address why healthcare practitioners do not practice adequate hand hygiene and whether patients might help by reminding them to do so. The results can be surprising. For example, a recent study identified that inpatients in one hospital who were most dissatisfied with the care they received were also the least likely to ask healthcare professionals if they had washed their hands ( 1 ). Furthermore, the study identified that the decision not to pose this question was linked to patient awareness that staff satisfaction was low.
Qualitative research analyzes data from direct field observations, in-depth, open-ended interviews and written documents. Inductive analyses yield patterns and themes that generate hypotheses and offer a basis for future research. Although qualitative studies do not create generalizable evidence, well-reported studies provide enough information for readers to assess the applicability or transferability of findings to their own context ( 2 ).
There are a variety of checklists about how to report qualitative studies ( 3 - 6 ). The Canada Communicable Disease Report (CCDR) has developed a 24-item checklist that synthesizes these including the COREQ checklist noted on the EQUATOR Network ( 6 ). The CCDR checklist identifies the importance of describing how data was gathered and summarized, what trends were determined, exploring corroborative findings, offering alternative explanations and identifying possible next steps or further areas of inquiry ( Table 1 ).
Reporting item | No. | Description |
---|---|---|
Title/Abstract | ||
Title | 1 | Compose a title that includes the term “qualitative”, the population, condition, place and time. |
Abstract | 2 | Use a structured abstract format with the following section headings: Background, Objective, Methods, Findings and Conclusion. |
Introduction | ||
Issue identification | 3 | Identify the topic of the study and why it is important. |
Review of literature | 4 | Provide a summary of the literature relating to the topic and what gaps there may be. |
Rationale for study | 5 | Identify the rationale for the study. The rationale for the use of qualitative methods can be noted here or in the methods section. |
Objective | 6 | Clearly articulate the objective of the study. |
Ethics approval | 7 | Note here or in the methods section whether ethics board review was indicated, and if it was, where review and approval was obtained. |
Method | ||
Setting | 8 | Describe the setting of the study and the relationship of the researcher to study participants (if any). |
Approach | 9 | Identify the qualitative methods (e.g., interviews, participant observation) used in the study, any theoretical underpinnings if appropriate (e.g., grounded theory) and the rationale for their use. |
Populations | 10 | Describe the groups from which people were invited to participate in the study. |
Sampling | 11 | Identify the sampling strategies for the study (e.g., theoretical sampling, snowball technique). |
Data collection | 12 | Describe how data collection tools were developed (e.g., pilot testing of interview guides) and how the data were recorded (e.g., audio, audiovisual or field notes). |
Analysis | 13 | Identify how the data were managed and analyzed, including any software system used, and how information was assessed for credibility and transferability (e.g., member checking, inter-observer reliability and triangulation). |
Synthesis | 14 | Describe how the findings were synthesized (e.g., What were the principles and choices informing the recognition of patterns and formation of categories? How were major and minor themes developed?). |
Findings | ||
Sample | 15 | Identify the total sample size and non-participation rate. |
Population, time and place | 16 | Present the findings in context, i.e., with enough background and contextual detail to give a sense of the population, time and place (e.g., through appropriate use of quotes). |
Analysis | 17 | Present an analysis that is credible and compelling (i.e., themes flow logically from the findings; relations between data and theoretical models and perspectives are described; interpretations are insightful). |
Comparisons | 18 | Explore corroborative findings (e.g., triangulation) and consider contradictory or diverse opinions (e.g., negative cases). |
Synthesis | 19 | Present findings in such a way that they clearly address the research question(s). |
Discussion | ||
Summary of key findings | 20 | Summarize key findings and indicate how the findings are relevant to the objective of the study. |
Strengths and weaknesses | 21 | Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the study and consider alternative explanations for the findings when appropriate. |
Transferability | 22 | Explore the implications of the study considering the applicability or transferability of the findings. |
Next steps | 23 | Propose next steps or further areas of inquiry. |
Conclusion | 24 | Ensure the conclusion integrates the data and analysis and addresses the objective of the study. |
Abbreviation: No., Number
Reports of qualitative studies are usually around 2,500 words in length—excluding the abstract, tables and references. As with all submissions, check CCDR’s Information for authors , published at the beginning of each volume in January of each year for general manuscript preparation and submission requirements ( 7 ).
.pdf version of this page
This review covers the basic elements of a research report. This is a general guide for what you will see in journal articles or dissertations. This format assumes a mixed methods study, but you can leave out either quantitative or qualitative sections if you only used a single methodology.
This review is divided into sections for easy reference. There are five MAJOR parts of a Research Report:
1. Introduction 2. Review of Literature 3. Methods 4. Results 5. Discussion
As a general guide, the Introduction, Review of Literature, and Methods should be about 1/3 of your paper, Discussion 1/3, then Results 1/3.
Section 1 : Cover Sheet (APA format cover sheet) optional, if required.
Section 2: Abstract (a basic summary of the report, including sample, treatment, design, results, and implications) (≤ 150 words) optional, if required.
Section 3 : Introduction (1-3 paragraphs) • Basic introduction • Supportive statistics (can be from periodicals) • Statement of Purpose • Statement of Significance
Section 4 : Research question(s) or hypotheses • An overall research question (optional) • A quantitative-based (hypotheses) • A qualitative-based (research questions) Note: You will generally have more than one, especially if using hypotheses.
Section 5: Review of Literature ▪ Should be organized by subheadings ▪ Should adequately support your study using supporting, related, and/or refuting evidence ▪ Is a synthesis, not a collection of individual summaries
Section 6: Methods ▪ Procedure: Describe data gathering or participant recruitment, including IRB approval ▪ Sample: Describe the sample or dataset, including basic demographics ▪ Setting: Describe the setting, if applicable (generally only in qualitative designs) ▪ Treatment: If applicable, describe, in detail, how you implemented the treatment ▪ Instrument: Describe, in detail, how you implemented the instrument; Describe the reliability and validity associated with the instrument ▪ Data Analysis: Describe type of procedure (t-test, interviews, etc.) and software (if used)
Section 7: Results ▪ Restate Research Question 1 (Quantitative) ▪ Describe results ▪ Restate Research Question 2 (Qualitative) ▪ Describe results
Section 8: Discussion ▪ Restate Overall Research Question ▪ Describe how the results, when taken together, answer the overall question ▪ ***Describe how the results confirm or contrast the literature you reviewed
Section 9: Recommendations (if applicable, generally related to practice)
Section 10: Limitations ▪ Discuss, in several sentences, the limitations of this study. ▪ Research Design (overall, then info about the limitations of each separately) ▪ Sample ▪ Instrument/s ▪ Other limitations
Section 11: Conclusion (A brief closing summary)
Section 12: References (APA format)
About research rundowns.
Research Rundowns was made possible by support from the Dewar College of Education at Valdosta State University .
Blog at WordPress.com.
Frankline kibuacha | dec. 02, 2022 | 3 min. read.
A research report is a document that summarizes and provides an analysis of the findings of a research project. It is an important document that serves as a first-hand account of the research process, data, and findings of a research study, and it is typically considered an objective and accurate source of information.
There are a few questions a research report should answer:
A research report is normally organized into three broad sections. First, an introduction provides a brief background on the topic and introduces the reader to your perspective. The second section is the body of the report, which should include the research findings and supporting evidence. Finally, the conclusion, which summarizes your arguments and the implications of your study for future research.
Every year, GeoPoll carries out hundreds of research studies and produces reports on several topics, both for clients and internally commissioned studies. In this article, we highlight some tips for writing great reports from our experience.
GeoPoll conducts research worldwide on topics integral to the organizations we serve and the world. You can read and download our reports here for free. Sign up for our newsletter to receive GeoPoll reports as soon as we release them.
Contact us about your upcoming research project and learn how we can help.
Related Posts
How to Write and Design Effective Surveys
Who Owns the Media in Ghana; A Research Project
How to Run B2B Market Research Surveys
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
When you have to write a thesis or dissertation , it can be hard to know where to begin, but there are some clear steps you can follow.
The research process often begins with a very broad idea for a topic you’d like to know more about. You do some preliminary research to identify a problem . After refining your research questions , you can lay out the foundations of your research design , leading to a proposal that outlines your ideas and plans.
This article takes you through the first steps of the research process, helping you narrow down your ideas and build up a strong foundation for your research project.
Step 1: choose your topic, step 2: identify a problem, step 3: formulate research questions, step 4: create a research design, step 5: write a research proposal, other interesting articles.
First you have to come up with some ideas. Your thesis or dissertation topic can start out very broad. Think about the general area or field you’re interested in—maybe you already have specific research interests based on classes you’ve taken, or maybe you had to consider your topic when applying to graduate school and writing a statement of purpose .
Even if you already have a good sense of your topic, you’ll need to read widely to build background knowledge and begin narrowing down your ideas. Conduct an initial literature review to begin gathering relevant sources. As you read, take notes and try to identify problems, questions, debates, contradictions and gaps. Your aim is to narrow down from a broad area of interest to a specific niche.
Make sure to consider the practicalities: the requirements of your programme, the amount of time you have to complete the research, and how difficult it will be to access sources and data on the topic. Before moving onto the next stage, it’s a good idea to discuss the topic with your thesis supervisor.
>>Read more about narrowing down a research topic
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
See an example
So you’ve settled on a topic and found a niche—but what exactly will your research investigate, and why does it matter? To give your project focus and purpose, you have to define a research problem .
The problem might be a practical issue—for example, a process or practice that isn’t working well, an area of concern in an organization’s performance, or a difficulty faced by a specific group of people in society.
Alternatively, you might choose to investigate a theoretical problem—for example, an underexplored phenomenon or relationship, a contradiction between different models or theories, or an unresolved debate among scholars.
To put the problem in context and set your objectives, you can write a problem statement . This describes who the problem affects, why research is needed, and how your research project will contribute to solving it.
>>Read more about defining a research problem
Next, based on the problem statement, you need to write one or more research questions . These target exactly what you want to find out. They might focus on describing, comparing, evaluating, or explaining the research problem.
A strong research question should be specific enough that you can answer it thoroughly using appropriate qualitative or quantitative research methods. It should also be complex enough to require in-depth investigation, analysis, and argument. Questions that can be answered with “yes/no” or with easily available facts are not complex enough for a thesis or dissertation.
In some types of research, at this stage you might also have to develop a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses .
>>See research question examples
The research design is a practical framework for answering your research questions. It involves making decisions about the type of data you need, the methods you’ll use to collect and analyze it, and the location and timescale of your research.
There are often many possible paths you can take to answering your questions. The decisions you make will partly be based on your priorities. For example, do you want to determine causes and effects, draw generalizable conclusions, or understand the details of a specific context?
You need to decide whether you will use primary or secondary data and qualitative or quantitative methods . You also need to determine the specific tools, procedures, and materials you’ll use to collect and analyze your data, as well as your criteria for selecting participants or sources.
>>Read more about creating a research design
Finally, after completing these steps, you are ready to complete a research proposal . The proposal outlines the context, relevance, purpose, and plan of your research.
As well as outlining the background, problem statement, and research questions, the proposal should also include a literature review that shows how your project will fit into existing work on the topic. The research design section describes your approach and explains exactly what you will do.
You might have to get the proposal approved by your supervisor before you get started, and it will guide the process of writing your thesis or dissertation.
>>Read more about writing a research proposal
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
Statistics
Research bias
Other students also liked.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
Understanding research reports, financial analyst research reports, research report impact, conflicts of interest.
James Chen, CMT is an expert trader, investment adviser, and global market strategist.
A research report is a document prepared by an analyst or strategist who is a part of the investment research team in a stock brokerage or investment bank . A research report may focus on a specific stock or industry sector, a currency, commodity or fixed-income instrument, or on a geographic region or country. Research reports generally, but not always, have actionable recommendations such as investment ideas that investors can act upon.
Research reports are produced by a variety of sources, ranging from market research firms to in-house departments at large organizations. When applied to the investment industry, the term usually refers to sell-side research, or investment research produced by brokerage houses.
Such research is disseminated to the institutional and retail clients of the brokerage that produces it. Research produced by the buy-side, which includes pension funds, mutual funds, and portfolio managers , is usually for internal use only and is not distributed to external parties.
Financial analysts may produce research reports for the purpose of supporting a particular recommendation, such as whether to buy or sell a particular security or whether a client should consider a particular financial product. For example, an analyst may create a report in regards to a new offering being proposed by a company. The report could include relevant metrics regarding the company itself, such as the number of years they have been in operation as well as the names of key stakeholders , along with statistics regarding the current state of the market in which the company participates. Information regarding overall profitability and the intended use of the funds can also be included.
Enthusiasts of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) might insist that the value of professional analysts' research reports is suspect and that investors likely place too much confidence in the conclusions such analysts make. While a definitive conclusion about this topic is difficult to make because comparisons are not exact, some research papers do exist which claim empirical evidence supporting the value of such reports.
One such paper studied the market for India-based investments and analysts who cover them. The paper was published in the March 2014 edition of the International Research Journal of Business and Management. Its authors concluded that analyst recommendations do have an impact and are beneficial to investors at least in short-term decisions.
While some analysts are functionally unaffiliated, others may be directly or indirectly affiliated with the companies for which they produce reports. Unaffiliated analysts traditionally perform independent research to determine an appropriate recommendation and may have a limited concern regarding the outcome.
Affiliated analysts may feel best served by ensuring any research reports portray clients in a favorable light. Additionally, if an analyst is also an investor in the company on which the report is based, he may have a personal incentive to avoid topics that may result in a lowered valuation of the securities in which he has invested.
Create beautiful charts & infographics get started, 09.11.2023 by anete ezera.
Reports are great for conveying complex information and data in a structured and organized manner. And there are many different types of reports that are widely used in business, education, healthcare, and other sectors. For example, in business, reports are used for performance analysis, financial statements, and project updates. However, in education, reports are vital for research findings and academic assessments. Overall, reports enable effective decision-making and communication within organizations. However, not all types of reports are created equally. To create a truly compelling and useful report , it’s essential to understand the different types of reporting and best practices for creating and designing reports. Also, it’s helpful to recognize how Infogram can elevate your reports through engaging visualizations.
In this article, we’re going to explore what are the different types of reports and what are the best practices for each of them. Also, we’re going to discuss how Infogram can help you create reports faster and better.
Click to jump ahead: Informative reports Analytical reports Research reports Progress reports Different types of reporting Elevating different types of reports with Infogram
Informative reports.
Informative reports represent one of the most prominent and essential types of documentation across various fields. These reports are structured to offer a clear and direct presentation of information, making them highly valuable in academic, scientific, and business contexts.
Objective presentation: Informative reports maintain objectivity by presenting information in a straightforward, unbiased manner. They avoid the use of opinion, focusing solely on verifiable facts and data.
Concise summarization: These reports aim to transform large amounts of information into a concise, easily digestible format. They are a valuable tool for shortening extensive research or complex data into a manageable form.
Structured format: Informative reports often follow a standardized structure, including sections such as an introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. This structure helps to locate and understand key information efficiently.
Supporting visuals: The inclusion of charts, graphs, tables, and other visual aids can improve the clarity and impact of an informative report. Visual elements help readers understand complex data more quickly.
Informative reports serve various purposes across different domains:
Academic: In education, informative reports are commonly used to present research findings, summarize experiments, or provide data analysis. Students and researchers use these reports to communicate their work to peers and the academic community.
Scientific: In science, informative reports are vital for sharing research results, observations, and discoveries. Scientific journals often feature these reports to showcase new knowledge and advancements within a particular field.
Business: In business, informative reports are instrumental in decision-making. Market research, financial analysis, and performance reports are all examples of informative reports that help business leaders make informed choices and strategies.
Government and policy: Government agencies use informative reports to share data and insights with the public, legislators, and policymakers. These reports can influence important decisions, laws, and policies.
Healthcare and medicine: In healthcare, informative reports are crucial for presenting clinical trial results, medical research, and patient data. These reports inform healthcare professionals, researchers, and the public about medical advancements and best practices.
Clear language: Use clear, jargon-free language that your target audience can easily understand. Avoid technical terms or jargon that might be unfamiliar to your readers.
Logical structure: Follow a well-defined structure, typically starting with an introduction, followed by the main body, conclusions, and any necessary appendices.
Visual aids: Incorporate relevant visuals, such as graphs, charts, or images, to illustrate key points and enhance comprehension. To create highly effective visuals, use Infogram .
Citations and references: Properly cite all sources and references used to maintain credibility and avoid plagiarism.
Proofreading: Thoroughly proofread your report to eliminate errors in grammar, spelling, and formatting.
Analytical reports delve deeper into data analysis to draw conclusions and offer recommendations. These reports are vital for decision-makers across different fields, providing a profound understanding of complex issues and the insights necessary for making informed choices.
Data examination: Analytical reports begin with a thorough examination of data, often involving complex datasets. The aim is to convey information, identifying patterns, trends, and relationships among variables.
Conclusions and recommendations: Unlike informative reports, analytical reports don’t just present facts and data; they go further to draw conclusions and offer recommendations. These recommendations are grounded in data analysis and are crucial for informing decision-makers.
Multiple perspectives: Analytical reports often present multiple perspectives on an issue. They consider various factors and viewpoints, offering a holistic understanding of the subject matter.
Actionable insights: The primary goal of an analytical report is to provide insights that can guide decision-making. These insights should be practical and actionable, empowering stakeholders to make informed choices.
Contextualization: Analytical reports often provide context for the data presented. They explain why certain findings are significant and how they relate to the broader context or problem under consideration.
Analytical reports serve a wide range of purposes across different sectors:
Business and management: In the corporate world, analytical reports are useful for assessing market trends, financial performance, and operational efficiencies. They provide management with the insights needed to improve processes and make strategic decisions.
Policy and government: Government agencies use analytical reports to inform policy decisions. These reports assess the impact of existing policies, explore potential alternatives, and recommend the best course of action for societal issues.
Healthcare and medicine: In healthcare, analytical reports help healthcare administrators and policymakers make informed decisions about resource allocation, patient care, and public health strategies.
Environmental and scientific research: Analytical reports play an important role in analyzing research findings and drawing scientific conclusions. They are crucial for peer-reviewed publications and for advancing scientific knowledge.
Education: Educational institutions and policymakers use analytical reports to assess the effectiveness of teaching methods, educational programs, and policies.
Data quality: Ensure that the data used in the report is accurate, reliable, and relevant. The analysis is only as good as the data it’s based on.
Clear structure: Organize the report logically, with a clear introduction, data analysis, conclusions, and actionable recommendations. Each section should flow smoothly, guiding the reader through the report.
Visual representation: Use visual aids, such as charts, graphs, and tables, to enhance data presentation and make complex information more accessible.
Causal relationships: If applicable, explore causal relationships and correlations within the data, providing a nuanced understanding of the subject matter.
Research reports play an important role in communicating the outcomes of a research process or scientific experiments. These reports serve as a reservoir of knowledge, storing the details of a research process, from methodology to data analysis, and ultimately leading to well-communicated conclusions.
Methodology detailing: Research reports outline the methods used in the research. This includes research design, data collection techniques, and any tools or instruments used. A clear methodology section is vital for understanding the study’s credibility and replicability.
Data analysis and interpretation: These reports offer a well-rounded analysis of the collected data. Researchers often use statistical or qualitative methods to interpret the information, providing insights into the relationships between variables and the significance of findings.
Conclusions and implications: Research reports present conclusions drawn from the data and analysis. These conclusions provide valuable insights into the research question or problem, shedding light on its implications for theory, practice, or further research.
Citations and references: Proper citations and references are crucial for the study. This enhances the credibility and scholarly integrity of the report.
Peer review and publication: Many research reports undergo rigorous peer review before being published in academic journals. Peer review ensures the quality and validity of the research, making it accessible to the wider scientific community.
Research reports serve a multitude of purposes across various domains:
Academic advancement: In academia, research reports are the backbone of knowledge. They contribute to the gathering of scientific knowledge, advance theories, and inform future research directions.
Scientific discovery: In the scientific community, research reports are crucial for documenting groundbreaking discoveries, experimental results, and innovations. These reports fuel scientific progress and underpin the development of new technologies.
Policy formation: Research reports provide evidence and insights that policymakers and government agencies use to formulate and revise policies. They inform decisions related to public health, education, environmental regulations, and more.
Corporate research and development: In the corporate world, research reports drive innovation and strategic decision-making. They help businesses identify market trends, improve products, and optimize operations.
Healthcare and medicine: Research reports in healthcare and medicine contribute to the development of medical treatments, inform clinical guidelines, and shape public health interventions.
Comprehensive methodology: Describe the research methodology in precise detail, ensuring that other researchers can replicate the study. Transparency is essential for the credibility of the report.
Data integrity: Ensure the data collected is reliable and that the analysis methods are appropriate for the research question.
Logical structure: Follow a structured format with sections for the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. This provides a clear path for readers to follow.
Contributions to knowledge: Clearly outline how the research contributes to the existing body of knowledge. Discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the findings.
Peer review: Consider submitting the research report to peer-reviewed journals or seeking feedback from colleagues and mentors. Peer review helps ensure the quality and accuracy of the research.
Progress reports are key in project management, offering a dynamic snapshot of ongoing activities, projects, or initiatives. These reports are instrumental in tracking and communicating the status of a venture, helping stakeholders stay informed and make informed decisions.
Regular updates: Progress reports are typically issued at regular intervals, such as weekly, monthly, or quarterly. They serve as a means of consistent communication, ensuring that stakeholders are well-informed throughout the project’s duration.
Status overview: These reports provide a comprehensive overview of the project’s status, summarizing achievements, challenges, and milestones reached during the reporting period.
Issues and challenges: Progress reports include information about any issues, bottlenecks, or challenges that have arisen during the project. This transparency is essential for addressing problems in a timely manner.
Next steps: They outline the planned actions and goals for the next reporting period. This helps to understand the project’s trajectory and future objectives.
Visual representation: Using charts, graphs, and visuals can make the report more engaging and help stakeholders quickly grasp key information.
Progress reports serve a range of purposes across different spheres:
Project management: In project management, these reports help project managers keep stakeholders updated on the progress of various tasks and activities. This, in turn, supports effective decision-making and the timely resolution of issues.
Business operations: Businesses use progress reports to monitor the development of strategic initiatives, product launches, and performance metrics. These reports help leadership teams assess the effectiveness of their strategies.
Government and public projects: Government agencies use progress reports to inform the public and policymakers about the advancement of infrastructure projects, public programs, and policy implementations.
Academic and research projects: In the academic world, progress reports are critical for tracking research projects, grant-funded studies, and academic initiatives. They help researchers and institutions remain accountable for their work.
Nonprofit and NGO activities: Nonprofit organizations and NGOs use progress reports to demonstrate the impact of their work to donors, volunteers, and the communities they serve.
Clarity: Ensure the report is clear, concise, and easily understood. Use plain language and avoid unnecessary jargon or technical details.
Timeliness: Deliver progress reports on schedule to maintain trust and accountability.
Transparent reporting: Be honest about challenges and setbacks. Transparency fosters trust and allows stakeholders to offer support and guidance when needed.
Visual aids: Incorporate visuals like Gantt charts , progress bars , or infographics to make data more visually appealing and digestible. Interested in discovering how Infogram can enhance your team’s work? Join a brief Zoom session with our Customer Success Manager to explore key features, get answers to your questions, and understand how we can assist. It’s quick, informative, and just like a coffee-break chat. Schedule your call now!
While reports themselves come in various formats depending on their content (informational, analytical, etc.), the way we deliver that information can also be categorized. Here’s a closer look at different types of reporting, along with examples:
Scheduled reporting: This is the bread and butter of reporting, delivering information at predefined intervals. Think of it like clockwork – you get your weekly sales report every Monday or your monthly inventory report on the first day of each month. For example, a company receives a quarterly financial performance report that analyzes revenue, expenses, and profitability.
Real-time reporting: This type of reporting provides up-to-the-minute insights, crucial for situations where immediate action is necessary. Imagine monitoring website traffic during a product launch – real-time reporting shows how many people are visiting and interacting with the site.
Internal reporting: Internal type of reporting keeps colleagues within an organization informed. It might include project updates for team members or departmental performance reviews for managers.
External reporting: This reporting disseminates information to people outside the organization, such as investors, regulators, or the public. External reports often adhere to stricter formatting guidelines and may require legal or financial disclosures.
Ad-hoc reporting: This type of reporting responds to specific needs or situations and isn’t tied to a predetermined schedule. For example, imagine needing to analyze data for a specific product launch – you’d generate an ad-hoc report to answer your questions.
Scheduled reporting (as mentioned above): This reporting delivers information at regular intervals, providing a consistent flow of data for analysis and decision-making.
The best reporting method depends on the information you’re presenting and who you’re presenting it to. Scheduled reports keep everyone on the same page, while real-time reporting allows for immediate action. Internal reports can be more informal, while external reports need to adhere to specific standards.
By understanding these different types of reporting, you can choose the method that ensures your information reaches the right people at the right time, ultimately leading to better communication and informed decisions.
Infogram is a powerful tool for creating visually appealing and engaging reports. Here’s how it can help:
Easy-to-use templates: Infogram offers a range of customizable templates for different report types, saving you time and ensuring a professional look. Also, make sure to take a look at the best report examples and get inspired to create your own!
Data visualization: Infogram enables you to create interactive and impactful data visualizations , including charts, maps , and infographics . The interactivity and visual appeal help convey complex information in a comprehensible and highly engaging manner.
Real-time updates: With real-time data integration , you can keep your reports up-to-date, making them even more valuable for decision-making.
Collaboration features: Collaborate with team members and stakeholders in real-time, streamlining the report creation process and ensuring input from all relevant parties.
Note: To collaborate in real-time, you’ll need to have a team or higher plan. Check out what other features you can easily unlock with Infogram plans.
Shareability: Infogram makes it easy to share your reports online, embed them in websites, or export them in various formats, improving their accessibility and reach.
Reports are vital tools for conveying information, insights, and data. Understanding the different types of reports and following best practices for creating and designing them is crucial for their effectiveness. Infogram takes report creation to the next level by offering tools for visually engaging and impactful data visualizations. By integrating Infogram into your report creation process, you can create reports that not only inform but also captivate your audience. So, harness the power of reports and elevate your data storytelling with Infogram. Start creating today!
New features, special offers, and exciting news about the world of data visualization.
How to choose the best ai tool to create infographics, guestographics: your key to seo success, olympic torch relay 2024: an interactive infographic.
JSTOR hosts a growing curated collection of more than 50,000 open research reports from 187 think tanks and research institutes from around the world. These publications are freely accessible to everyone on JSTOR and discoverable as their own content type alongside journals, books, and primary sources. We update research reports on our platform each month as they become available through contributing institutes.
Download the list (xlsx) of contributing policy institutes.
Research reports provide current analysis on many of today’s most discussed and debated issues from a diversity of ideological and international perspectives representing 40 countries and 29 languages. A sample of topics would include: climate change, border security, fake news, cybersecurity, electric vehicles, artificial intelligence, energy policy, gender issues, terrorism, remote learning, recent trends in business and economics, and various public health issues, including COVID-19.
Although the briefs, papers, and reports published by these institutes are not peer-reviewed, they are written by policy experts and members of the academic community who are fellows in residence. This is content that impacts policy, both foreign and domestic. It is also increasingly used by faculty in their classrooms for its currency, breadth, and accessibility.
JSTOR’s research reports cover seven Areas of Focus: Business & Economics, Critical Race & Ethnic Studies, Education, Gender & Sexuality, Public Health, Security Studies, and Sustainability.
Browse research reports
Input from faculty and librarians revealed that although research reports were for the most part freely available outside of JSTOR, they were hard to find and not easily discoverable alongside relevant material. It was also difficult for students to differentiate between the most credible research reports and a growing corpus of questionable sources on the Web.
JSTOR has attempted to redress these issues by centralizing a curated collection of think tank research reports on a single platform, making this content freely available to all JSTOR users, and enhancing its discoverability through comprehensive searching and the application of rich metadata.
3372 Accesses
A research report is one big argument how and why you came up with your conclusions. To make it a convincing argument, a typical guiding structure has developed. In the different chapters, distinct issues need to be addressed to explain to the reader why your conclusions are valid. The governing principle for writing the report is full disclosure: to explain everything and ensure replicability by another researcher.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Barros, L. O. (2016). The only academic phrasebook you’ll ever need. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
Google Scholar
Field, A. (2016). An adventure in statistics. The reality enigma . SAGE.
Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
Früh, M., Keimer, I., & Blankenagel, M. (2019). The impact of Balanced Scorecard excellence on shareholder returns. IFZ Working Paper No. 0003/2019. Retrieved June 09, 2021, from https://zenodo.org/record/2571603#.YMDUafkzZaQ .
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Wirtschaft/IFZ – Campus Zug-Rotkreuz, Hochschule Luzern, Zug-Rotkreuz, Zug , Switzerland
Stefan Hunziker & Michael Blankenagel
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Stefan Hunziker .
Reprints and permissions
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
Hunziker, S., Blankenagel, M. (2021). Writing up a Research Report. In: Research Design in Business and Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34357-6_4
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34357-6_4
Published : 10 November 2021
Publisher Name : Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN : 978-3-658-34356-9
Online ISBN : 978-3-658-34357-6
eBook Packages : Business and Economics (German Language)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Full Topic List
Read Our Research On:
57% of adults under 50 who say they’re unlikely to ever have kids say a major reason is they just don’t want to; 31% of those ages 50 and older without kids cite this as a reason they never had them, table of contents.
Pew Research Center conducted this study to better understand the experiences of two groups of U.S. adults who don’t have children: those ages 50 and older, and those younger than 50 who say they are unlikely to ever have children. It explores their reasons for not having children or being unlikely to do so, the perceived pros and cons of not having children, and the impact of not having children on their relationships.
Most of the analysis in this report is based on a survey of 2,542 adults ages 50 and older who have never had children and 770 adults ages 18 to 49 who don’t have children and say they are not too or not at all likely to have them. The survey was conducted April 29 to May 19, 2024. Most of the respondents who took part are members of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This survey also included an oversample of adults ages 50 and older who have never had children from Ipsos’ KnowledgePanel, another probability-based online survey web panel recruited primarily through national, random sampling of residential addresses.
Address-based sampling ensures that nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .
The report also includes an analysis comparing the demographic characteristics and economic outcomes of adults ages 50 and older who do not have children with those of parents in the same age group. The data for this analysis comes from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2021 and 2022 Surveys of Income and Program Participation (SIPP).
Here are the questions we asked adults ages 50 and older who don’t have children and adults younger than 50 who don’t have children and say they’re unlikely to have them, along with responses, and the survey’s methodology .
In this report, we do not use the terms “childless” or “child-free” to refer to adults who don’t have children. The Associated Press Stylebook , a resource we use often, recommends against using these terms.
In the survey findings featured in Chapters 1-3, references to adults who do not have children include those who indicated they have never been a parent or guardian to any children, living or deceased, including biological or adopted children.
In the analysis of government data in Chapter 4, references to those who do and do not have children include those who have or have not had biological children.
References to college graduates or people with a college degree comprise those with a bachelor’s degree or more education. “Some college” includes those with an associate degree and those who attended college but did not obtain a degree.
The U.S. fertility rate reached a historic low in 2023 , with a growing share of women ages 25 to 44 having never given birth .
And the share of U.S. adults younger than 50 without children who say they are unlikely to ever have kids rose 10 percentage points between 2018 and 2023 (from 37% to 47%), according to a Pew Research Center survey .
In this report, we explore the experiences of two groups of U.S. adults :
About four-in-ten of those in the older group (38%) say there was a time when they wanted to have children. A smaller but sizable share (32%) say they never wanted children, and 25% say they weren’t sure one way or the other. Few say they frequently felt pressure to have children from family, friends or society in general.
Reasons for not having children – or being unlikely to ever have them – differ between the older and younger groups. The top response for those ages 50 and older is that it just didn’t happen. Meanwhile, those in the younger group are most likely to say they just don’t want to have kids. Women younger than 50 are especially likely to say they just don’t want to have children (64% vs. 50% of men in this group).
Majorities in both groups say not having kids has made it easier for them to afford the things they want, have time for hobbies and interests, and save for the future. In the younger group, about six-in-ten also say not having kids has made it easier for them to be successful in their job or career and to have an active social life.
Still, majorities in both groups say parents have it easier when it comes to having someone to care for them as they age. Large shares in both groups say having a fulfilling life doesn’t have much to do with whether someone does or doesn’t have children.
These are among the key findings from a new Pew Research Center survey of 2,542 adults ages 50 and older who don’t have children and 770 adults ages 18 to 49 who don’t have children and say they are not too or not at all likely to have them. The survey was conducted April 29 to May 19, 2024.
Jump to read more about:
The study explores reasons U.S. adults give for not having children, among those ages 50 and older who haven’t had kids and those under 50 who say they’re unlikely to ever become parents.
By margins of at least 10 points, those in the younger group are more likely than those ages 50 and older to say each of the following is a major reason:
In turn, a larger share of those in the older group say a major reason they didn’t have kids is that they didn’t find the right partner (33% vs. 24% of those in the younger group).
There are no significant differences between the two groups in the shares pointing to infertility or other medical reasons (their own or their spouse’s or partner’s) or to a spouse or partner who didn’t want to have children as major reasons.
Among those in their 40s, 22% say infertility or other medical reasons are a major factor in why they’re unlikely to ever have children. About one-in-ten of those ages 18 to 39 (9%) say the same.
Majorities of adults ages 50 and older who don’t have kids and those under 50 who say they’re unlikely to do so see some benefits to not having children.
But by margins ranging from 17 to 23 points, those in the younger group are more likely than those ages 50 and older to say each of the following has been easier for them because they don’t have children:
We also asked those who are employed about the impact not having children has had on their work lives.
Experiences are mixed. For example, 45% of those in the younger group and 35% of those in the older group say they’ve had more opportunities to network outside of work hours because they don’t have kids. At the same time, about a third in each group say they’ve been expected to take on extra work or responsibilities, and many also say they’ve been given less flexibility than those who have children.
The survey also asked adults ages 50 and older without children about certain concerns they may have as they age .
About one-in-five or more say they worry extremely or very often about:
A smaller share (11%) say they frequently worry about having someone who will carry on their values and traditions when they’re gone.
In a separate survey , 46% of parents ages 50 and older said they frequently worry about having enough money as they age. Smaller shares said the same about having someone who will provide care for them as they age (20%), having someone who will carry on their values and traditions (17%) and being lonely as they age (15%).
For the most part, the experiences of adults without children and the reasons they give for not having them don’t vary much by gender. This is the case across both age groups.
Still, there are some questions on which men and women without kids differ considerably.
Among those ages 50 and older, women are more likely than men to say:
Among those ages 18 to 49, women are more likely than men to say each of the following is a major reason they’re unlikely to have children:
Women in the younger group are also more likely than their male counterparts to say the topic of whether they’ll have children comes up in conversation with their friends at least sometimes (41% vs. 26%).
In addition to the survey findings, this report includes an analysis of government data to show how the demographic characteristics and economic outcomes of adults ages 50 and older who don’t have children differ from those ages 50 and older who are parents.
Among adults in this age group, those who don’t have children are less likely to have ever been married. They are more likely to have a bachelor’s degree or more education. This difference in educational attainment is especially pronounced among women.
Older women who don’t have children have higher median monthly wages than mothers. The opposite is true among older men; those without children tend to earn less than fathers.
Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings
Weekly updates on the world of news & information
Americans overwhelmingly say access to ivf is a good thing, few east asian adults believe women have an obligation to society to have children, among parents with young adult children, some dads feel less connected to their kids than moms do, how teens and parents approach screen time, most popular, report materials.
901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
© 2024 Pew Research Center
Country —Please choose an option— China India United States Indonesia Brazil Pakistan Nigeria Bangladesh Russia Japan Mexico Philippines Vietnam Ethiopia Egypt Germany Iran Turkey Democratic Republic of the Congo Thailand France United Kingdom Italy Burma South Africa South Korea Colombia Spain Ukraine Tanzania Kenya Argentina Algeria Poland Sudan Uganda Canada Iraq Morocco Peru Uzbekistan Saudi Arabia Malaysia Venezuela Nepal Afghanistan Yemen North Korea Ghana Mozambique Taiwan Australia Ivory Coast Syria Madagascar Angola Cameroon Sri Lanka Romania Burkina Faso Niger Kazakhstan Netherlands Chile Malawi Ecuador Guatemala Mali Cambodia Senegal Zambia Zimbabwe Chad South Sudan Belgium Cuba Tunisia Guinea Greece Portugal Rwanda Czech Republic Somalia Haiti Benin Burundi Bolivia Hungary Sweden Belarus Dominican Republic Azerbaijan Honduras Austria United Arab Emirates Israel Switzerland Tajikistan Bulgaria Hong Kong (China) Serbia Papua New Guinea Paraguay Laos Jordan El Salvador Eritrea Libya Togo Sierra Leone Nicaragua Kyrgyzstan Denmark Finland Slovakia Singapore Turkmenistan Norway Lebanon Costa Rica Central African Republic Ireland Georgia New Zealand Republic of the Congo Palestine Liberia Croatia Oman Bosnia and Herzegovina Puerto Rico Kuwait Moldov Mauritania Panama Uruguay Armenia Lithuania Albania Mongolia Jamaica Namibia Lesotho Qatar Macedonia Slovenia Botswana Latvia Gambia Kosovo Guinea-Bissau Gabon Equatorial Guinea Trinidad and Tobago Estonia Mauritius Swaziland Bahrain Timor-Leste Djibouti Cyprus Fiji Reunion (France) Guyana Comoros Bhutan Montenegro Macau (China) Solomon Islands Western Sahara Luxembourg Suriname Cape Verde Malta Guadeloupe (France) Martinique (France) Brunei Bahamas Iceland Maldives Belize Barbados French Polynesia (France) Vanuatu New Caledonia (France) French Guiana (France) Mayotte (France) Samoa Sao Tom and Principe Saint Lucia Guam (USA) Curacao (Netherlands) Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Kiribati United States Virgin Islands (USA) Grenada Tonga Aruba (Netherlands) Federated States of Micronesia Jersey (UK) Seychelles Antigua and Barbuda Isle of Man (UK) Andorra Dominica Bermuda (UK) Guernsey (UK) Greenland (Denmark) Marshall Islands American Samoa (USA) Cayman Islands (UK) Saint Kitts and Nevis Northern Mariana Islands (USA) Faroe Islands (Denmark) Sint Maarten (Netherlands) Saint Martin (France) Liechtenstein Monaco San Marino Turks and Caicos Islands (UK) Gibraltar (UK) British Virgin Islands (UK) Aland Islands (Finland) Caribbean Netherlands (Netherlands) Palau Cook Islands (NZ) Anguilla (UK) Wallis and Futuna (France) Tuvalu Nauru Saint Barthelemy (France) Saint Pierre and Miquelon (France) Montserrat (UK) Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha (UK) Svalbard and Jan Mayen (Norway) Falkland Islands (UK) Norfolk Island (Australia) Christmas Island (Australia) Niue (NZ) Tokelau (NZ) Vatican City Cocos (Keeling) Islands (Australia) Pitcairn Islands (UK)
BFSI uses cookies on this site. We use cookies to enable faster and easier experience for you. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies.
Costs and administrative burdens top list, although employers may overestimate both.
Navigate to:
New companion reports by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and The Pew Charitable Trusts demonstrate that high costs make it hard for small businesses to offer retirement benefits to their employees , and also that high fees can significantly reduce savers’ nest eggs, potentially by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Indeed, smaller firms are much less likely than larger firms to offer retirement plans to their workers.
According to Pew’s research, small employers view retirement savings plans as valuable tools for attracting and retaining talent and enhancing their employees’ financial well-being and say that offering a plan could reduce significant expenses from employee turnover. But many small businesses struggle to offer such plans for various reasons, chief among them the cost concerns .
The costs associated with offering retirement plans include startup costs, administrative services, regulatory and compliance services, investment management, and employer contributions such as matching or nonelective contributions. While some of these costs are borne directly by employers, others—such as investment management fees—are passed on to plan participants. These fees, which are assessed as a percentage of plan assets, can have a significant impact on overall returns to participants’ savings.
The primary reason that small companies often incur higher costs for sponsoring retirement plans than larger firms is the smaller companies’ inability to spread fixed costs, such as fees for administrative and compliance services, over a larger asset base. Smaller employers’ plans also tend to have fewer assets in index funds, which cost less to manage—with fewer or lower fees borne by plan participants and employers—than actively managed funds. In addition, smaller companies have weaker bargaining power than larger firms to negotiate fees for investment management, record-keeping, and other services, and they have fewer resources or less expertise to devote to administering the plan.
However, many small employers overestimate the financial costs and administrative burdens associated with offering retirement plans, suggesting their lack of awareness of cost-effective options in the marketplace.
In fact, survey research shows that many small employers are unaware of various retirement plan options that are designed to reduce administrative and compliance burdens and the associated costs. Pew’s report describes several such options, including traditional 401(k)s, solo 401(k)s, SIMPLE plans, and Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) individual retirement account (IRA) plans—many of which have lower administrative and compliance requirements than other retirement plans. Additionally, innovative solutions such as automated savings programs and multiple employer plans (MEPs) can leverage employers’ collective resources and streamline administrative processes.
The CFA’s report, meanwhile, demonstrates that workers participating in small plans with less than $10 million in assets, which typically have relatively high investment management fees, could retire with hundreds of thousands of dollars less in savings compared with workers in low-fee plans of a similar size—potentially requiring employees to work several additional years to make up for the shortfall. That’s because plan participants don’t just lose the money they pay in higher fees than participants in plans with lower fees pay; they also lose the returns they could have received if they had put their money to work elsewhere instead.
Using information from ICI/BrightScope and Pew’s interactive fee calculator , the CFA calculated that a worker who contributes $500 a month to a small (less than $1 million in assets) retirement plan with average investment management fees for a plan of that size and receives an average 7% real annual rate of return would retire with approximately $289,000 less after a 40-year career than if the same worker had participated in an average-cost plan with more than $1 billion in assets. That’s because administrative and investment management fees decrease, on average, as plan size grows. In this example, the employee would need to work an additional 5.6 years to make up the difference.
(Annual cost 1.26% plan-weighted average) | $81,147 | $224,911 | $479,606 | $930,832 |
(Annual cost 1.01% plan-weighted average) | $82,277 | $231,736 | $503,231 | $996,407 |
(Annual cost 0.27% plan-weighted average) | $85,739 | $253,455 | $581,528 | $1,220,000 |
Comprehensive data about small firm retirement plans are not generally publicly available, but it’s likely that hundreds of thousands of plans and millions of retirement savers are adversely affected by excessive fees. And while average investment management fees decline as plan size increases, fees also range much more widely among small plans than among large plans. Some small plan participants may be in plans with very high fees; some may be in plans with very low fees.
Survey data indicates that a significant portion of retirement plan participants struggle to understand fee disclosures and their implications. Many small-business owners and managers also lack awareness of the fees associated with their retirement plans, or of the fact that SIMPLE, SEP, and MEP plans have lower fees than other retirement plans.
And high fees in small-company retirement plans can sometimes negate the tax benefits that employees receive from participating in a tax-deferred retirement plan. Once they’ve saved enough in their company’s retirement plan to earn an employer match (if any), some participants may be better off saving any additional money in a low-cost index fund in a taxable brokerage account.
By providing perspectives on fees from employers and employees’ viewpoints, these two reports highlight the importance of education and outreach efforts aimed at individual investors and at small employers. The Department of Labor should require detailed fee reporting and should also ensure that participant fee disclosures provide information that employers and savers can understand, including displaying the impact of fees on portfolios over time.
To maximize retirement savings for their employees, small employers should reduce plan costs as much as possible. And retirement savers need to be vigilant about their plans’ fees—and demand lower-cost options from their employers.
Alison Shelton works on The Pew Charitable Trusts’ retirement savings project.
Whether an employer provides its employees access to retirement savings hinges on the employer’s willingness or ability to sponsor a retirement plan. That’s especially true for small-business employers, usually defined as employers with 100 employees or fewer.
Eight in 10 small-business owners in Massachusetts support creation of a state-facilitated retirement savings program that would help private sector workers who don’t have plans through their jobs put money away for retirement, according to a survey conducted from July to September 2023 for The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Three-quarters of small-business owners in Pennsylvania support creation of a state-facilitated retirement savings program that would help private sector workers who don’t have plans through their jobs put money away for retirement, according to a survey fielded from June to September 2023 for The Pew Charitable Trusts.
Get monthly data and expert policy recommendations aimed at advancing Americans’ financial security.
The clarity of Lake Tahoe’s famed blue waters in 2023 continued its years-long trend of improving during the winter and deteriorating during the summer. The annual clarity report, released today by the University of California, Davis – Tahoe Environmental Research Center, found that winter lake conditions were the clearest observed since 1983, with visibility of 91.8 feet under the surface, compared with 72.2 feet in 2022.
Summer months tell a different story, marking the fifth murkiest on record with an average of 53.5 feet, compared with 68.9 feet in 2022. Overall, the annual average for lake clarity dropped to 68.2 feet from its 2022 value of 71.9 feet.
“It’s important to understand the short-term changes but even more important to be thinking about how this lies in the context of the longer-term trends,” said Alexander Forrest, interim director of the UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center.
The clarity report attributes 2023’s clearer winter months (December 2022 through March 2023) to deep mixing events that brought clear water to the surface from the bottom of Lake Tahoe. After the clear winter months, the report highlighted the role of runoff and plankton in the observed low summer clarity values.
Runoff from the heaviest winter snowfall in 70 years brought an influx of inorganic particles and a rapid drop in clarity in May. The report said the dominant phytoplankton species, Cyclotella, has decreased since 2017, while another, slightly larger algae, Synedra, is increasing. Changes among the phytoplankton and zooplankton communities within the lake also have the potential to impact clarity.
Phytoplankton are microscopic plants, while zooplankton are microscopic animals that often eat phytoplankton. These planktonic assemblages play critical roles in lake food webs and ecology, and their interplay with lake clarity presents ongoing research questions and opportunities.
“Phytoplankton assemblages have been changing in Lake Tahoe over the last decade, and we need further research to understand the full implications of this on Tahoe clarity,” Forrest said. Meanwhile, nonnative Mysis shrimp are beginning to return, while zooplankton species are also experiencing changes to their populations.
While algae and particles are known to influence clarity, less is known about the potential impact of microplastics.
“Research has confirmed the presence of microplastics in Tahoe, and we know small pieces of plastic have the potential to affect clarity, but we don’t know their relative contribution to Lake Tahoe,” Forrest said.
UC Davis has been measuring clarity and other health indicators at Lake Tahoe since 1968 . Clarity is measured as the depth to which a 10-inch white disk, called a Secchi disk, remains visible when lowered into the water. Lake Tahoe’s clarity is just one measure of the health of the watershed, but measurements of clarity loss in the 1950s and 1960s by the UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center became central to efforts to protect the watershed from pollution and unplanned development.
UC Davis works with the Tahoe Science Advisory Council and partners across the Tahoe Basin to help inform policymakers and the community on strategies to protect the lake and stabilize the decline in clarity that occurred following the mid-20th century development boom. In 1969, the states of Nevada and California created the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) to lead the collaborative effort to protect and restore Lake Tahoe, set environmental standards, and better manage growth and development in the region. Under the Lake Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program, or EIP, the states of California and Nevada along with more than 80 public and private organizations are actively working to restore lake clarity to its historic 97.4 feet. EIP partners have implemented hundreds of projects to restore the filtering function of wetlands and treat stormwater runoff.
“Thanks to the bi-state partnership, Lake Tahoe is one of the most protected watersheds in the nation,” TRPA Executive Director Julie Regan said. “The science community has played a pivotal role in the drive toward environmental restoration, and we’re proud of the progress we’ve collectively made on Lake Tahoe’s clarity over the decades. What happens on the land here affects the lake, and we continue to look to science to inform and prioritize Tahoe’s restoration projects.”
In 2023, UC Davis scientists took 25 individual readings at Lake Tahoe’s long-term index station. View the historic clarity readings from 1968-2023 in the clarity report at https://tahoe.ucdavis.edu/terc-publications .
Read the 2023 Lake Tahoe Clarity Report .
Press kit of images for download, with credit (in file.)
Media Contacts
Secondary categories.
Notification: View the latest site access restrictions, updates, and resources related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) »
An NREL study shows there are multiple pathways to 100% clean electricity by 2035 that would produce significant benefits exceeding the additional power system costs.
For the study, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, NREL modeled technology deployment, costs, benefits, and challenges to decarbonize the U.S. power sector by 2035, evaluating a range of future scenarios to achieve a net-zero power grid by 2035.
The exact technology mix and costs will be determined by research and development, among other factors, over the next decade. The results are published in Examining Supply-Side Options To Achieve 100% Clean Electricity by 2035 .
To examine what it would take to achieve a net-zero U.S. power grid by 2035, NREL leveraged decades of research on high-renewable power systems, from the Renewable Electricity Futures Study , to the Storage Futures Study , to the Los Angeles 100% Renewable Energy Study , to the Electrification Futures Study , and more.
NREL used its publicly available flagship Regional Energy Deployment System capacity expansion model to study supply-side scenarios representing a range of possible pathways to a net-zero power grid by 2035—from the most to the least optimistic availability and costs of technologies.
The scenarios apply a carbon constraint to:
For each scenario, NREL modeled the least-cost option to maintain safe and reliable power during all hours of the year.
Technology deployment must rapidly scale up.
In all modeled scenarios, new clean energy technologies are deployed at an unprecedented scale and rate to achieve 100% clean electricity by 2035. As modeled, wind and solar energy provide 60%–80% of generation in the least-cost electricity mix in 2035, and the overall generation capacity grows to roughly three times the 2020 level by 2035—including a combined 2 terawatts of wind and solar.
To achieve those levels would require rapid and sustained growth in installations of solar and wind generation capacity. If there are challenges with siting and land use to be able to deploy this new generation capacity and associated transmission, nuclear capacity helps make up the difference and more than doubles today’s installed capacity by 2035.
Across the four scenarios, 5–8 gigawatts of new hydropower and 3–5 gigawatts of new geothermal capacity are also deployed by 2035. Diurnal storage (2–12 hours of capacity) also increases across all scenarios, with 120–350 gigawatts deployed by 2035 to ensure demand for electricity is met during all hours of the year.
Seasonal storage becomes important when clean electricity makes up about 80%–95% of generation and there is a multiday to seasonal mismatch of variable renewable supply and demand. Across the scenarios, seasonal capacity in 2035 ranges about 100–680 gigawatts.
Significant additional research is needed to understand the manufacturing and supply chain associated with the unprecedent deployment envisioned in the scenarios.
In all scenarios, significant transmission is also added in many locations, mostly to deliver energy from wind-rich regions to major load centers in the eastern United States. As modeled, the total transmission capacity in 2035 is one to almost three times today’s capacity, which would require between 1,400 and 10,100 miles of new high-capacity lines per year, assuming new construction starts in 2026.
NREL finds in all modeled scenarios the health and climate benefits associated with fewer emissions offset the power system costs to get to 100% clean electricity.
Decarbonizing the power grid by 2035 could total $330 billion to $740 billion in additional power system costs, depending on restrictions on new transmission and other infrastructure development. However, there is substantial reduction in petroleum use in transportation and natural gas in buildings and industry by 2035. As a result, up to 130,000 premature deaths are avoided by 2035, which could save between $390 billion to $400 billion in avoided mortality costs.
When factoring in the avoided cost of damage from floods, drought, wildfires, and hurricanes due to climate change, the United States could save over an additional $1.2 trillion—totaling an overall net benefit to society ranging from $920 billion to $1.2 trillion.
The transition to a 100% clean electricity U.S. power system will require more than reduced technology costs. Several key actions will need to take place in the coming decade:
Failing to achieve any of the key actions could increase the difficulty of realizing the scenarios outlined in the study.
Full report, supporting materials.
Download the technical report, Examining Supply-Side Options To Achieve 100% Clean Electricity by 2035 .
Download the report overview infographic and a 1-slide summary brief deck or a 10-slide summary brief deck .
Paul Denholm
Principal Energy Analyst
Your personal data will only be used for as long as you are subscribed. For more information, review the NREL security and privacy policy .
Sign up here.
Reporting by Max A. Cherney in San Francisco; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Varun H K
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab
Samsung Electronics forecasted strong artificial intelligence-driven demand for chips in the second half of this year, as it reported a more than 15-fold rise in its second-quarter operating profit.
To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.
Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .
For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.
BELLEVUE, WASH. – July 25, 2024: Apptio, an IBM Company, today announced IBM Cloudability has been named a Leader by Forrester Research, an independent research firm, in The Forrester Wave™: Cloud Cost Management and Optimization (CCMO), Q3 2024.
The Forrester Wave™ evaluated 12 cloud cost management and optimization solutions based on 25 criteria. IBM Cloudability received fives, the highest score, in 20 of the 25 criteria. IBM Cloudability received the highest score possible, defined as superior relative to others in the evaluation, in the cloud platform support, monitoring, reporting, recommendations, capacity planning and assessment, vision, innovation, roadmap, and partner ecosystem and eleven other criteria.
As stated in the report, “IBM provides the most complete full-stack CCMO solution. IBM is known for the acquisition of its two strong CCMO solutions: Cloudability and Turbonomic. The combination of these two solutions has the potential to create the deepest and widest CCMO solution in capability. Its strategic strength is in its ambitious roadmap where it plans to integrate Cloudability and Turbonomic in a single portal.”
“Our pacing of innovation is accelerating to meet the expanding demands of our customers looking to maximize their investment in AI and cloud. Throughout the years our commitment to innovation is evident in what we believe is our clear competitive differentiation and leadership” said Ajay Patel, General Manager, Apptio (an IBM Company) & IT Automation. “Through IBM’s acquisition of Apptio, we have significantly expanded our capability to meet our customers’ evolving needs as they navigate the growing complexities of the technology landscape.”
IBM Cloudability enables organizations to bring financial accountability to cloud, enabling IT, finance and DevOps teams to tune cloud deployments for speed, cost, and quality. It is built to help businesses improve the unit economics of cloud and translate cost and operational data into performance indicators that reveal the business value of cloud investments.
Download the full report here .
To learn more about IBM Cloudability visit: https://www.apptio.com/products/cloudability/
About Apptio, an IBM Company
Apptio, an IBM company, is a leading technology spend and value management software provider. Apptio’s AI-powered data insights empower leaders to make smarter financial and operational decisions across Information Technology (IT), multi-cloud FinOps, and digital product development. Apptio’s mission is to deliver business value with every technology investment and team. Powered by Apptio’s cloud platform, Apptio’s SaaS applications help translate technology spend into clear business outcomes and financial ROI. As a pioneer and category leader in Technology Business Management (TBM), FinOps, and Agile Portfolio Management, Apptio works with thousands of customers, partners, and community members worldwide.
Media Contact:
Jas McDonald IBM [email protected]
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Research Report. Definition: Research Report is a written document that presents the results of a research project or study, including the research question, methodology, results, and conclusions, in a clear and objective manner.
Research reports are recorded data prepared by researchers or statisticians after analyzing information gather by conducting organized research. Learn all about research reports definition, components, and tips on writing research reports.
Research reports can unify and direct a company's focus toward the most appropriate strategic action. Of course, spending resources on a report takes up some of the company's human and financial resources.
One of the reasons for carrying out research is to add to the existing body of knowledge. Therefore, when conducting research, you need to document your processes and findings in a research report.
3 Use short, descriptive labels. If your report includes two or more treatments (or conditions, or measurements, or groups of students, etc.), try to identify each one by a short descriptive label of
An abstract is a concise summary that helps readers to quickly assess the content and direction of your paper. It should be brief, written in a single paragraph and cover: the scope and purpose of your report; an overview of methodology; a summary of the main findings or results; principal conclusions or significance of the findings; and recommendations made.
What this handout is about. This handout provides a general guide to writing reports about scientific research you've performed. In addition to describing the conventional rules about the format and content of a lab report, we'll also attempt to convey why these rules exist, so you'll get a clearer, more dependable idea of how to approach this writing situation.
Research Report Definition. According to C. A. Brown, "A report is a communication from someone who has information to someone who wants to use that information.". According to Goode and Hatt, "The preparation of report is the final stage of research, and it's purpose is to convey to the interested persons the whole result of the study, in sufficient detail and so arranged as to enable ...
A research report is one big argument about how and why you came up with your conclusions. To make it a convincing argument, a typical guiding structure has developed. In the different chapters, there are distinct issues that need to be addressed to explain to the...
Scientific Reports is a multidisciplinary, open access journal that publishes original research with high impact and global reach. Learn more about its aims, scope and costs.
Qualitative studies provide insight into complex phenomena. Unlike measurement-based studies which typically quantify what happens under experimental conditions, qualitative studies often help explain behaviors or perceptions under actual circumstances.
Section 2.4.2. Research Reports. Research reports present the results of formal investigations into the properties, behavior, structures, and principles of material and conceptual entities.
.pdf version of this page This review covers the basic elements of a research report. This is a general guide for what you will see in journal articles or dissertations. This format assumes a mixed methods study, but you can leave out either quantitative or qualitative sections if you only used a single methodology. This…
A research report is a document that summarizes and provides an analysis of the findings of a research project. It is an important document that serves as a first-hand account of the research process, data, and findings of a research study, and it is typically considered an objective and accurate source of information.
Step 1: Choose your topic. First you have to come up with some ideas. Your thesis or dissertation topic can start out very broad. Think about the general area or field you're interested in—maybe you already have specific research interests based on classes you've taken, or maybe you had to consider your topic when applying to graduate school and writing a statement of purpose.
Research Report: A research report is a document prepared by an analyst or strategist who is a part of the investment research team in a stock brokerage or investment bank . A research report may ...
Use cases . Informative reports serve various purposes across different domains: Academic: In education, informative reports are commonly used to present research findings, summarize experiments, or provide data analysis. Students and researchers use these reports to communicate their work to peers and the academic community.
Preparing a report of a research trial is a special type of medical writing. The experienced author of research reports follows the IMRAD model: introduction, methods, results, and discussion, although this scheme is often expanded to include subheadings such as participants, randomization and intervention, data collection, outcomes, and statistical analysis.
The top 25 most-used research reports from 2022. Artificial Intelligence, COVID-19, fake news, and more. Download the list (xlsx)
3 STEP 3 Do the Research Steps 1 and 2 will guide your research for this report. You may need to report on other research on a particular topic or do some research of your own.
A research report is one big argument how and why you came up with your conclusions. To make it a convincing argument, a typical guiding structure has developed. In the different chapters, distinct issues need to be addressed to explain to the reader why your...
The U.S. fertility rate reached a historic low in 2023, with a growing share of women ages 25 to 44 having never given birth.. And the share of U.S. adults younger than 50 without children who say they are unlikely to ever have kids rose 10 percentage points between 2018 and 2023 (from 37% to 47%), according to a Pew Research Center survey.. In this report, we explore the experiences of two ...
Latest Research by our Team. For the latest discoveries in cyber research for the week of 29th July, please download our Threat Intelligence Bulletin.. TOP ATTACKS ...
New companion reports by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and The Pew Charitable Trusts demonstrate that high costs make it hard for small businesses to offer retirement benefits to their employees, and also that high fees can significantly reduce savers' nest eggs, potentially by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Indeed, smaller firms are much less likely than larger firms to offer ...
The clarity of Lake Tahoe's famed blue waters in 2023 continued its years-long trend of improving during the winter and deteriorating during the summer. The annual clarity report, released today by the University of California, Davis - Tahoe Environmental Research Center, found that winter lake conditions were the clearest observed since 1983, with visibility of 91.8 feet under the surface ...
For the study, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, NREL modeled technology deployment, costs, benefits, and challenges to decarbonize the U.S. power sector by 2035, evaluating a range of future scenarios to achieve a net-zero power grid by 2035.
Apple relied on chips designed by Google rather than industry leader Nvidia to build two key components of its artificial intelligence software infrastructure for its forthcoming suite of AI tools ...
JPMorgan Chase & Co. has launched a generative artificial intelligence tool and told employees to think of it as a research analyst that can offer information, solutions and advice, according to ...
BELLEVUE, WASH. - July 25, 2024: Apptio, an IBM Company, today announced IBM Cloudability has been named a Leader by Forrester Research, an independent research firm, in The Forrester Wave™: Cloud Cost Management and Optimization (CCMO), Q3 2024. The Forrester Wave™ evaluated 12 cloud cost management and optimization solutions based on 25 criteria.
Wary of the political scrutiny, researchers held back from publicly airing some of their insights on the spate of conspiracy theories erupting online after the July 13 assassination attempt on ...