For the general reader. Magazines typically have advertisements for popular consumer products like cars, perfume, or electronics. They rely on editors to determine the suitability of contributed works, rather than a peer-review process. Magazine articles are written by journalists or contributing writers, and they do not have to cite sources.
An editorial process most scholarly works go through. Other professionals working in the same field (peers) evaluate works to ensure quality, credibility, and accuracy.
Distinguishing content on the internet: The stylistic cues that make it relatively easy to distinguish different types of content vanish when presented on the web. It's easy to tell the difference between an analog newspaper and scholarly journal. They look and feel very different from each other. When using information from the internet it is important to develop the skills to critically analyze the information you're presented with, rather than rely on stylistic cues to determine the quality of information you're consuming.
How to Tell if an Article is Peer Reviewed
Search by ISSN, subject, publisher, or language. Over 300,000 journals with 900 subject specialties.
Provides data points such as ISSN, publisher, language, subject, abstracting & indexing coverage, full-text database coverage, tables of contents, and reviews written by librarians. You can narrow OA results by clicking on the "Open Access" option. OA journals are also indicated with the bright blue "unlocked" icon.
The Peer Review Process
Check out this video from Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Libraries on the differences between scholarly and non-scholarly sources.
Here is a handout which may help you distinguish academic/scholarly journals from popular magazines.
Macdonald-Kelce Library - The University of Tampa - 401 W. Kennedy Blvd. - Tampa, FL 33606 - 813 257-3056 - [email protected] - Accessibility
Article from a print magazine
Squatriglia, C. (2019, Winter). The song of the immortal violin. Popular Science , 291(4), 56-63.
Article from an online periodical
Mearian, L. (2018, April 9). How blockchain could solve the internet privacy problem. Computerworld . Retrieved from https:// www.computerworld.com/article/3267930/blockchain/how-blockchain-could-solve-the-internet-privacy-problem.html
Journal article from a library database
Gouveia, S., Villalobos, F., Dobrovolski, R., Beltrao-Mendes, R, & Ferrari, S. F. (2014, April 28). Forest structure drives global diversity of primates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83(6), 1523-1530. https://doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12241
Article with multiple authors (up to 20 authors)
Bowman, N. D., Kowert, R., & Cohen, E. (2015, December). When the ball stops, the fun stops too: The impact of social inclusion on video game enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior , 53, 131-139. https://doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.036
Article with unknown author
Are supplements safe? Current regulations don’t protect consumers. (2020, February). Consumer Reports On Health , 32(2), 2.
The 7th edition of APA's Publication Manual says that in most cases, it is not necessary to include the name of the database from which you accessed a work. It argues that there are usually numerous ways to access an electronic source. Leave the database information off of the reference, unless it is a database that publishes its own original content or provides access to works that have limited accessibility (e.g. dissertations).
You may have notices that the way dates are listed in citations differs from source to source. Sometimes you may see a citation that includes a year of publication only, and sometimes you may see a date listed out with the year, month, and day. A good rule of thumb is to include the date information as listed on the publication.
DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier. Many articles that are published electronically are assigned a DOI. The DOI is a unique string of alphanumeric characters that are assigned to to an article and help researchers find articles. APA style dictates that if an article is assigned a DOI, the DOI is included in the citation.
Author - This is the author of the article.
Title - In this case of a citation for a periodical article, title refers to the the title of the article.
Periodical Title - This is the title of the periodical. E.g. Newsweek, Washington Post, Journal of Experimental Psychology
Date of Publication - This is the date that the article was published.
Volume & Issue - Each time a periodical is published, it is assigned a volume number and an issue number. The volume usually refers to the number of years the periodical has been published, while the issue number refers to the number that have been published that year. However, not all periodical publishers supply volume and issue numbers.
Pages - This is the pages of the periodical on which you will find the article being cited.
DOI - The DOI is a unique alphanumeric string that identifies an electronically published document. DOI stands for Digital Object Identfier.
©2022 Houston Community College Libraries
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Girija Suri
http://www.ijila.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/V3-P1-Dr.-Girija-Suri.pdf Eighteenth-century England is marked by a resurgence in writing for the periodicals that were being written with the twin objectives of educating as well as entertaining the masses. The growth of the periodical essay in the 18th century is a story of the rise of the educated classes in England, women gaining centre-stage in the reading public, and the wave of public discussions and debate that animated the public sphere in England at the time. This essay traces the reasons and conditions for the growth of the periodical essay in 18th century England. It further discusses at the length the distinguishing features of the major periodical writers of the time including Addison, Steele, and Samuel Johnson and their contributions to the growth and refinement of English prose that paved the way for the novel form.
Bálint Gárdos
sathya kanth
John Richetti
First a talk at various places, then a published essay in about 2000 in Eighteenth-Century Fiction.
Writing and Victorianism
Laurel Brake
This was an invited paper given at the 'Inventions of the Text' seminar at Durham University in May 2018. The paper considers the relationship between empiricism and the familiar essay in the eighteenth century. It notes the emergence of scepticism, dialogue, and the idea of performative rationality as hallmarks of what might be termed a tradition of ‘socialised’, decentred empiricism that flourished in the mid-to-late eighteenth century in Britain. The essay was vital to this emergence because of the ways in which the genre drew together experience and communication, the philosophical and the social. By subordinating methodical 'dispositio' to dialogical 'complicatio', the essay offered an alternative model of order and rational thought to that implied by system. This model relied not upon a priori principle or even sensory data, but upon a blurry consensus underpinned by a mixture of doubt, dialogue and the performance of civic virtues. And yet, even as it celebrates an idea of truth that was underpinned by these activities and qualities, the familiar essay ultimately testifies to the passing of this idea.
Susanne Schmid
Journal of European Periodical Studies
Journal of the History of Ideas
Lucia Dacome
Cambridge History of Literary Criticism
James Basker
The rise of periodical literature changed the face of criticism between 1660 and 1800. To chart a course through this jungle of literary growth and its implications for the history of criticism, it is useful to look at three basic periods within which slightly different genres of periodical predominated and left their mark on literary culture. The first, from the mid- 1600s to 1700, saw the infancy of the newspaper and, from about 1665, the establishment of the learned journal; during the second, from 1700 to 1750, the periodical essay enjoyed its greatest influence, and the magazine or monthly miscellany, with all its popular appeal, came to prominence; in the third, from about 1750 to 1800, the literary review journal emerged in a recognizably modern form and rapidly came to dominate the practice of criticism.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Victorian Periodicals Review
Linda Hughes
Andrew King
Baskara T . Wardaya
Textual Cultures
Suzanne Gossett
Philological Quarterly
Richard Squibbs
Krzysztof Fordonski
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Claudia Claridge
Daniel Woolf
Katherine Wakely-Mulroney
Paul Trolander
Lorenzo Modia
The Critical Review, or Annals of Literature, 1756-1763 (London, Pickering & Chatto)
Modern Philology
Christine Woody
A Maturing Market: The Iberian Book World in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century
Esther M Villegas de la Torre
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies
Penelope J Corfield
Literature Compass
Corrinne Harol
Lodovica Braida
Lisa O'Connell
The Journal of Modern Periodical Studies
Print in Transition
24/7 writing help on your phone
To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Evolution of Periodical Essays: From Tatler to Spectator. (2018, Nov 23). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-periodical-essays-essay
"Evolution of Periodical Essays: From Tatler to Spectator." StudyMoose , 23 Nov 2018, https://studymoose.com/the-periodical-essays-essay
StudyMoose. (2018). Evolution of Periodical Essays: From Tatler to Spectator . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/the-periodical-essays-essay [Accessed: 19 Aug. 2024]
"Evolution of Periodical Essays: From Tatler to Spectator." StudyMoose, Nov 23, 2018. Accessed August 19, 2024. https://studymoose.com/the-periodical-essays-essay
"Evolution of Periodical Essays: From Tatler to Spectator," StudyMoose , 23-Nov-2018. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/the-periodical-essays-essay. [Accessed: 19-Aug-2024]
StudyMoose. (2018). Evolution of Periodical Essays: From Tatler to Spectator . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/the-periodical-essays-essay [Accessed: 19-Aug-2024]
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
Models and Stereotypes
Advanced Search
Anglophilia
British and American Constitutional Models
Entstehung des Sports in England
European Landscape Garden
Moral Weeklies
Shakespeare
Transfer des englischen Sports
"Dutch Century"
Dutch Anatomy
European Fashion
From the "Turkish Menace" to Orientalism
Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire
Church and 'Turkish Threat'
East West Literary Transfers
Islam and Islamic Law
Islam-Christian Transfers of Military Technology
Istanbul as a hub of early modern European diplomacy
Ottoman History of South-East Europe
Oriental Despotism
German Role Models
Deutsche Musik in Europa
Christian Frederik Emil Horneman
Kulturtransfer Leipzig Kopenhagen
Niels Wilhelm Gade
German Education and Science
Germanophilie im Judentum
Wertherfieber
Graecomania and Philhellenism
Christlicher Hellenismus
Model America
Americanisation of the Economy
"Amerika" in Deutschland und Frankreich
US-Film in Europa
Model Classical Antiquity
Idealisierung der Urkirche
Kongregation von Saint-Maur
Model Hercules
Rezeption der griechisch-römischen Medizin
Galen-Rezeption Melanchthons
Medizinische Humanisten
Roman Law and Reception
Translatio Imperii im Moskauer Russland
Model Europe
Concepts of Europe
Europa-Netzwerke der Zwischenkriegszeit
Homo Europaeus
Model Germania
Model Italy
Modernization
Russification / Sovietization
Economy and Agriculture
Wirtschaft und Landwirtschaft
Kultur und Gesellschaft
Culture and Society
"Spanish Century"
"Leyenda Negra"
The "West" as Enemy
Versailles Model
Enlightenment Philosophy
Französische Musik
Lingua Franca und Verkehrssprachen
Lingua Franca
The early eighteenth century witnessed the birth in England of the "Spectators", a journalistic and literary genre that developed in the wake of the Glorious Revolution (1688). Beginning in 1709 these newspapers and their fictitious narrators would influence the entire European continent. In the Anglophone world the "Spectators" were also called "periodical essays", whereas in German-speaking lands they were known as "Moralische Wochenschriften" or, in a re-translation into English, as "Moral Weeklies". These periodicals constituted a new public medium, aimed especially at a bourgeois audience and responsible for a brisk discursive transfer. They thus not only added further dimensions to public communication, but they also contributed decisively to the development of modern narrative forms.
The Spectator genre owed its development in England to the political and cultural events of the late 17th century. In the reigns of William III of Orange (1650–1702) and his successor Queen Anne Stuart (1665–1714) , new forms of democratic sensibility emerged that diverged from absolutist models and laid the foundation for the genesis and promotion of public communication. England had long since set its own course, one that was critically opposed to the traditional social forms of the European continent . Work in Parliament laid the foundation for English law, and new public structures arose; both processes were closely connected to the development of medial communication. The reigning moral code became that of the sober and pragmatic Protestant worldview, which underlay the national stereotype of the "practical Englishman".
The philosopher John Locke (1632–1704) , the founder of modern epistemology and the critique of knowledge, gladly returned to England after William ascended the throne (1688). With his works An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690) and Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693) he contributed decisively to both the reflection on the process of social renewal and the communication of knowledge in the modern sense. The time was slowly arriving for the successful English model to be exported to the European continent.
Philosophy was joined by freedom of the press, introduced in 1695, in promoting the notion of fairness and tolerance. This brought with it a trend towards liberalization that strengthened the middle class's sense of itself, giving rise to an appreciable feeling that change was in the air. At that time the gentry set the tone in English society, and its ideal of the gentleman served as the model for the emerging bourgeoisie, especially in the capital city of London . Critical observers, however, found fault with this code of behaviour, claiming that it was otiose, morally nonchalant and constituted a playing field for the increasing depravity of culture. At the turn of the century, numerous cries were heard for the comprehensive reform of morals and behavioural patterns. 1
The literary roots of the periodical essays can be found partly in French culture, which at the time still served as the model for wide social circles in Europe . Nicolas Boileau's (1636–1711) writings provided access to discussions about the reception of the hegemonic textual forms of Greek and Roman antiquity. In the foreground of this transfer stood literary forms like satire, the character portraits of Jean de la Bruyère (1645–1696) , and the dramas of Pierre Corneille (1606–1684) . Michel de Montaigne's (1533–1592) Essais (1580) also influenced the development of the Spectators , although the latter departed from the authentic first-person narrator of the French model and vanish behind the mask of a fictional narrator.
Cultural forerunners of the periodical essay can also be found in the literary forms of the Italian classics and the Spanish Golden Age, the Siglo de Oro (16th/17th century), which had had an early influence on English literature. One thinks, among the many possible examples, of Giovanni Boccaccio's (1313–1375) novellas, of the narrative forms of the Spanish picaresque novel, of the romance and its transcendence through Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra's (1547–1616) El ingenioso hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha (1605/1615), of the dream narratives of a Francisco Quevedo (1580–1645) , and of the masque, which spread to Spain by way of Italian culture.
The tatler (1709–1711).
This was the background for the journalistic enterprise of the Whig Richard Steele, who launched The Tatler. By Isaac Bickerstaff, Esq. on 12 April 1709. 2 After the first issues had appeared, Steele was joined by his longtime friend and confidant Joseph Addison. The paper ran on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Sundays, the days on which mail was delivered in the countryside. The rhythm suggested by the term "weekly" had not yet been established. It would first come into use in continental imitations, especially in connection with German papers. Thus a genre was created that in the course of the century would spread all over Europe in hundreds of different periodicals. The distinctive feature of this model lay in the fact that it did not just engage in the didactic moralism typical of Anglican devotional literature but rather presented moral considerations in a new, playful and informal way.
In his first "Spectatorial" enterprise Steele used the persona of Isaac Bickerstaff, a fictional character originally contrived by Jonathan Swift. This imaginary figure was well known in England and especially in London, and thus this first observer of contemporary society was in a certain sense "trustworthy." Steele created a fictional frame for Bickerstaff and used this perspective to observe the mercantile society of London. Many contemporaries might have guessed that Steele was behind the mask, but only in the final issue of the newspaper did the true author identify himself. 3 With issue 271 on 2 January 1711, the author brought his Tatler , in which Addison had come to play an increasingly important role, to an end. Nevertheless, in a letter to the editor Bickerstaff was prompted to continue his intellectual game. A sequel to the project was thus to be expected.
The third and last journalistic prototype was the short-lived magazine The Guardian , which first appeared on 12 March 1713 and reached 175 issues. 5 The narrator was now Nestor Ironside, a retired tutor living in the circle of his host family, whose patriarch had died. The septuagenarian Ironside possessed the necessary distance to the individual members of the family to portray their moral character and to interpret their conversations accordingly. Here, too, piety and virtue played a central role, as did the rational upbringing of youth and the observation of private discourse.
Periodical publication and reissues.
The periodical essays were characterized by their entertaining portrayal of moralizing contents. They were published in regular intervals, and after a certain period of time the folios were often collected and reissued in book form. Depending on the journal, they could appear in several editions over decades, sometimes even being printed in different cities. Thanks to their particular entertaining streak, these volumes tended to enjoy high sales. The economic factor could not be separated from "Spectatorial" enterprises. Thus it often happened that the economic success was reflected upon in the writings themselves or that reader reception was explicitly measured.
The valorisation of public communication brought with it the vitality that was essential to early liberal societies. Since reader expectations were always maintained, the regularly appearing issues became an event unto themselves and facilitated a kind of communication that was closely coupled (in Luhmann's terms) with the differentiation of functional social systems. This dynamic was all the more idiosyncratic, as the weeklies did not deal with issues of everyday politics but rather with life's basic moral-philosophical questions (and thus the same themes tended to recur). Repetition was one of the central traits of the papers, whose articles were self-contained and – with very few exceptions – could be exchanged with one another at will. The articles' timelessness is the reason that the papers could appear years later in anthologies and continue to be of interest to the inquiring readers of the evolving middle class.
The moralizing journalism pioneered by Steele was quick to win an audience and to give rise to adaptive imitations and translations. This type of reception occurred as early as regarding the Tatler itself. Soon after the journal's appearance several related titles hit the market. 6 Thus on 8 July 1709 – i.e. about three months later – a competing enterprise appeared in the dress of a cooperative union: The Female Tatler. By Mrs. Crackenthorpe, a Lady that knows every thing . The fictional editor Mrs. Crackenthorpe claimed to be a colleague of Bickerstaff and to operate her periodical as a complement to his. The true author of this paper, which ended on 31 March 1710 after 115 issues, has still not been identified. 7
As this example shows, the periodical essays and the later weeklies displayed another core trait: they were often aimed at a female audience, such that the first women's magazines on a larger scale can be found in this genre. 8 Gender roles were critically called into question, and problems dealing with the reigning order of the sexes were discussed. The impact could be more or less appreciable depending on the cultural context in which the journal appeared, such as in Italy or Spain. Female voices were often a disguise for male authors, some of whom were Catholic priests. This was the case in the weekly La Pensadora Gaditana (1763/1764) 9 which appeared under the pseudonym Beatriz Cienfuegos.
One of the most important traits of the genre was the introduction of fictional authors and editors. Relying on a masked, anonymous authority like Bickerstaff, Spectator or Ironside allowed the periodical essays to achieve a high degree of aesthetic appeal and to communicate moral arguments and observations. The observers were able to capture and comment on all the communication in their environment unnoticed and could therefore construct a moral code that accommodated bourgeois interests. Such characters, finally, provided the audience with innovative possibilities for self-identification. A game was developed with the readers, who felt that their own lifestyle was continually being addressed and that they were themselves being challenged. Many weeklies would later adopt this method, an excellent example of which can be seen in the introduction to the Spectator :
I have observed, that a Reader seldom peruses a Book with Pleasure 'till he knows whether the Writer of it be a black or a fair Man, of a mild or cholerick Disposition, Married or a Batchelor, with other Particulars of the like nature, that conduce very much to the right Understanding of an Author. To gratify this Curiosity, which is so natural to a Reader… 10
This clearly shows the significance of the communicative process between author and reader, in which the author's hidden identity increases the work's playful character. A complex interplay is developed between various types of observers, with opposite types mirroring and adroitly paired with each other, thus creating a reflexive composition of viewpoints. In this way, the anonymity and the mask produced a disjunction in the interaction between writer and reader, as it made it impossible for either one to ascribe anything to any specific individual. The advantage to this novel means of communicating information lay in the way it reduced prejudice to a minimum in the exchange of opinions. For it deactivated the influence that a specific author's name, age, appearance, and so forth might otherwise have on the reader. A similar technique would make its appearance in literature somewhat later in the works of Laurence Sterne (1713–1768) and Denis Diderot (1713–1748) . On the one hand this game between author and reader became typical of the communicative processes being developed in London at the time. On the other it served the transmission of moral teachings in the traditional sense.
These methods made their way into numerous translations and imitations in other European cultural spheres. As linguistic studies of some individual journals have already described in more detail, the fictional first-person narrator of the weeklies was given great importance everywhere. 11 At the same time, the personal narrative style of the disguised authors, which was based on the communicative form of the written letter and carried it forward in a new dress, also became evident. An example of the application of this style in the German context is provided by the introduction to the weekly Hypochondrist (Hypochondriac, 1762). Here the fictional narrator Zaccharias Jernstrupp sketches his hypochondriac symptoms as follows:
Ich würde vielleicht nicht einmal auf den Einfall gekommen seyn, ein Wochenblatt zu schreiben, wenn ich dieser Krankheit entbehren müsste, dass sie mir zu einem schönen Titel für meine Blätter verholfen hat. Ich habe nun alles, was zu einem wöchentlichen Autor erfordert wird. Ich bin eigensinnig, mürrisch, ein bischen eitel, eine Art von Philosoph… 12
The introduction of a fictional author was not the only prominent innovation of the weeklies; another was the involvement of readers in the genesis of the journal. It was common for many weeklies to invite readers to participate in discussions via letters to the editor and thus to transmit their texts to the editor or fictional author. This staging of sociability on the model of pragmatic communication strategies was probably one of the factors that contributed to the great success of such publications in the English metropolis.
The question just how much these letters, which were revised by the "fictional" editor, can still be ascribed to their "real", original authors provides a further difficulty for the reception and interpretation of such texts. Whether the letters were made up from the very beginning in order to get the communication process going, or whether they reflect what readers actually wrote, will remain a mystery for many weeklies and is a part of the hybridization that characterizes the genre. The tie to the readers is also strengthened by the original titles of the journals, which generally described their respective fictional observers. The broad spectrum spanned from the Matrone ("Matron" – 1728–1729), 13 the Braut ("Bride" – 1740) 14 and the Jüngling ("Youth" – 1747), 15 to the Vernünfftler ("Rationalist" – 1713/1714) 16 and the Patriot ("Patriot" – 1724–1726), 17 down to the Einsiedler ("Hermit" – 1740/1741), 18 the Duende (" Goblin" – 1787/1788), 19 the Misanthrope (1711/1712) 20 and even the Scannabue ("Oxen Butcher" – 1763–1765), 21 to name only a few. French scholarship has examined the entire collection of titles with the aim of elaborating a functional classification valid for all the journals. This research found five functional categories for the genre: réflexion, regard, bavardage, folie and collecte . 22
Another innovation is the essayistic, narrative treatment of everyday life. The "Tatler", like his much more famous successor, the "Spectator", acts as a reflection of the social discourse in which he participates as well, integrating everything he sees and hears into his texts. It is not only his self-portrayal that is important but also the way he depicts others together with the accompanying stories, conversations, and reports. The poetics of Horace (65–8 B.C.) with its dictum "prodesse et delectare" is the inspiration here. Many other elements of the periodical essays are likewise influenced by classical literature. Letters, dream narratives and allegories, fables and satirical portrayals, all relying on Greek and Roman models, shaped the perception of the genre. Exemplary quotations appear as mottos throughout the texts, aphoristically formulating the points they communicate.
It did not take long for the periodical essays to make their way to continental Europe. The most important point of transfer for the genre was the Protestant Netherlands , especially Amsterdam and The Hague . A large group of emigrants moved north and settled in the area after the Edict of Nantes had been repealed (1685), contributing decisively to book production in French. English was also more used in this cultural context than in other parts of the continent.
Justus van Effen, the author of the Misanthrope , was born in Utrecht and played an important role in bringing English literature to Holland. He is known above all for his translations of the novel Robinson Crusoe (Daniel Defoe, 1719) and of texts by Jonathan Swift and Bernard de Mandeville (1670–1733) . His Misanthrope was published every Monday in The Hague. In a liberal adaptation of its English model, it successfully discussed moral questions of contemporary society. That two further editions 25 followed – in 1726 and 1742 – testifies to the auspicious reception of the enterprise.
Justus van Effen was the essential link in the transfer and further development of the genre on the continent. He initiated a communication process through which the texts, in the form of adaptations and translations, went from England to Holland and partly even to France . In the years following, the journals were exported to the rest of Europe via francophone connections. Van Effen was quick to recognize the journalistic and literary potential of the English prototypes and to provide for their brisk adaptation to other cultural contexts. He took clever advantage of the resulting dynamic for his own enterprise, and he might even have managed to have an indirect impact on the ongoing development of the Spectator . Likewise he exercised a dialogic influence on later French productions.
His impact can be measured in yet another way. On the one hand, he – like many subsequent European authors, especially in Romance areas – established translations of original texts as the authoritative means for replicating the English prototype. This can be seen in his treatment of the Guardian . On the other hand, from the very beginning he also promoted liberal imitation and thus the adaptation of the canon and relevant moralizing issues to suit specific national and regional characteristics. Typical features of his work were multilingualism, the promotion of cultural transposition, and his many insights into the various processes of national development, which especially helped him to contribute decisively to national adaptations of the prototype – for example in the Hollandsche Spectator . His rationalistic arguments in the interest of bettering the morals of a nation became models for many contemporaries.
Furthermore, he was especially dedicated to the weekly rhythm of publication, such that he became associated not only with the Spectator genre but also with that of the moral weeklies in general. It is thus no wonder, for example, that the first such Spanish journal, El Duende especulativo (1761), 30 was based no longer on the Tatler or Spectator of Steele and Addison but rather on Van Effen's Misanthrope .
The circulation of the English prototypes was exaggerated on the continent from the get-go, the idea clearly being to underline the economic attractiveness of this journalistic enterprise. In one of the first letters accompanying the Misanthrope , the Dutch bookdealer responsible for its publication claimed that 12,000 to 15,000 copies of the Tatler were printed daily – a technical impossibility for a small press. 31 In the foreword to the Spanish Filósofo a la moda ("The Fashionable Philosopher"), the circulation of the first issues was, in imitation of its Dutch model, even placed at 20,000. 32 All in all, the most important weeklies in Europe, depending on region, probably had an average circulation of between a few hundred (Italy, Spain, etc.) and two or three thousand (England, Germany , France, etc.) copies.
Further diffusion of the journals in Europe ensued rapidly, although the respective cultural milieus reacted differently. The journals' clearly formulated Protestant values determined their reception, and the genre initially enjoyed greater success in the North than in the South. Urban centres, in which bourgeois values were already more strongly developed, were more favourable than rural areas.
Although the weeklies blossomed in northern Lutheran lands, a few decades were necessary for the genre to develop in the Catholic South. In Romance areas, the Holland-based Spectateur was probably the most influential model.
Apart from a free, abridged translation of the Spectateur that appeared in Venice as early as 1728 under the title Il Filosofo alla Moda ("The Fashionable Philosopher"), 40 the genre did not make its way to Italy until the second half of the century. In 1752 La Spettatrice ("The Female Spectator") 41 appeared; it was followed closely by the Gazzetta Veneta ("Venetian Gazette" –1760/1761), 42 the Osservatore Veneto ("Venetian Observer" – 1761/1762) 43 (later Gli Osservatori Veneti ["The Venetian Observers"]), La Frusta Letteraria di Aristarco Scannabue ("The Literary Whip of Aristarcus the Oxen Butcher" – 1763–1765) and Il Caffè ("The Café" – 1764–1766). 44
In its transfer from the English context via Dutch-French mediation to other cultural milieus, the weekly genre took on national characteristics that could also show hints of local colour. Although the journals only seldom discussed events of the day, they were nevertheless integrated in narrative forms and modes of representing sociality that varied from nation to nation. It was common for internal matters of English politics, literature and culture to be left out of continental translations and adaptations or to be replaced or supplemented with issues relevant to the target culture. The fictional author or editor was usually given a local hue or was at least open to discussing cultural issues from his own milieu. Similar strategies were employed when French-language weeklies were adapted by authors of a different provenance. In this way French, German, Italian and Spanish authors enriched their writings with local characteristics and thus contributed to the development of a transnational network.
Journalistic and literary debates were often ignited by the question whether a given weekly was shaped by local cultural conditions or rather an import from the English, Dutch, French or German cultural sphere. A related question was to what extent Protestant ethics were being implanted in Catholic culture or, similarly, how much the liberal tendencies of a given weekly were responsible for bringing modernity to a given cultural milieu. It was, however, also possible for the defenders of a specific tradition to use the weekly as a means of combating the genre itself and the liberalisation it conveyed, as was the purpose behind the Spanish El Escritor sin título ("The Untitled Author", 1763). 47 In such cases, the author's true intention was usually kept hidden behind the weekly's satirical tone, and conflicts of interpretation were still highly likely.
From the very beginning the periodical essays were destined to be ephemeral. They faded more quickly in Protestant areas, giving way to the novel, whereas in the Catholic South, for example in cities like Vienna and Madrid, their moralizing conversational tone helped some to persevere into the nineteenth century. They also stayed alive in the form of supplements to informational bulletins like Justus Möser's (1720–1794) Wöchentliche Osnabrückische Intelligenzblätter ("Weekly Osnabrück Bulletins"). Their traces can also be found in many narrative works. Wolfgang Martens (1924–2000) , a scholar of German weeklies, has described their end quite aptly:
Die Wochenschrift alten Schlages, die die Verfasserfiktion beibehält und zugleich nach wie vor Vernunft und Tugend zum Zwecke der bürgerlichen Glückseligkeit zu fördern bestrebt ist, ist nach 1770 in den nördlichen Breiten selten geworden. Der Roman der Hermes, La Roche und Miller macht ihr das Publikum abspenstig. Sturm und Drang und der Hochsubjektivismus der Empfindsamkeit sind für die Nachfahren der Gattung kein gedeihliches Klima mehr. Das stärkere politische Interesse, das sich seit den 70er Jahren in Deutschland bemerkbar macht, ist ihr fremd, die Aufregungen der Französischen Revolution vollends verschlagen ihr die Rede und der Geist der Romantik ist ihrer bürgerlich-lehrhaften Haltung gänzlich fern. Stoffe, Themen, Motive, erbaulicher Sinn und redliche Absichten leben fort im bürgerlichen Unterhaltungsblatt des 19. Jahrhunderts …. 48
Klaus-Dieter Ertler
http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924091319503 [2021-07-26]
http://gams.uni-graz.at/mws [2021-07-26]
http://gazettes18e.fr/publications [06.01.2012].
English ( Periodical Essays ):
[Addison, Joseph / Budgell, Eustache / Tickell, Thomas]: The Spectator [2nd series], London [18 June] 1714–[20 December] 1714, nos. 556–635.
[Baker, Thomas]: The Female Tatler: By Mrs. Crackenthorpe, a Lady that Knows Everything, London [8 July] 1709–[31 March] 1710, nos.1–111.
Bond, Donald Frederic (ed.): The Spectator, Edited with an Introduction and Notes, Oxford 1965, vol. 1–5.
[Fowler Haywood, Eliza]: The Female Spectator, London 1745–1746 [first edition in instalments April 1744–March 1746]. URL: https://archive.org/details/femalespectator01haywgoog [2021-07-26]
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: The Spectator: To be continued every Day [1st series], London [1 March] 1711– [6 December] 1712, nos. 1–555.
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: The Tatler: By Isaac Bickerstaff, Esq., London [12 April] 1709–[2 January] 1711, nos. 1–271.
[Steele, Richard et al.]: The Guardian: To be Continued every Day, London [12 March] 1713–[1 October] 1713, nos. 1–175.
French ( Feuilles périodiques à forme personnelle ):
[Anonymus]: La Bagatelle, ou Discours Ironiques: où l'on prête des sophismes ingénieux au Vice & à l'Extravagance, pour en faire mieux sentir le ridicule, Amsterdam [5 May] 1718–[13 April] 1719, vol. 1–3.
[Anonymus]: La Spectatrice, Paris [29 March]–[January] 1728.
[Fowler Haywood, Eliza]: La Spectatrice: ouvrage traduit de l'anglois [von Jean- Arnold Trocheneau de La Berlière], Paris 1751, vol. 1–2.
[Marivaux, M. de]: Le Spectateur français, Paris [June/July] 1721–[Oct.] 1724. In: Frédéric Deloffre und Michel Gilot (ed.): Journaux et œuvres diverses, Paris 2001, pp. 107–267.
[Steele, Richard et al.]: Le Mentor Moderne: ou discours sur les mœurs de siècle [aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Justus van Effen], Den Haag et al. 1723, vol. 1–3. URL: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k57055088 [2021-07-26]
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: Le Spectateur, ou le Socrate moderne: Où l'on voit un Portrait naïf des Mœurs de ce Siècle: Traduit de l'anglois, Amsterdam et al., 1714–1726. URL: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k49666j [2021-07-26]
[van Effen, Justus]: Le Misanthrope: Contenant Des Réflexions Critiques, Satyriques & Comiques, sur les défauts des hommes, Den Haag [19. May] 1711–[26. December] 1712, reprint Oxford et al. 1986, ed. by James Lewis Schorr.
[van Effen, Justus]: Le Misanthrope: contenant différens discours sur les mœurs du siècle , Amsterdam 1742.
[van Effen, Justus]: Le Misanthrope: Nouvelle Edition revuë & augmentée de plusieurs Discours importans, Den Haag 1726.
[van Effen, Justus]: Recueil de toutes les feuilles de la Spectatrice qui ont paru et de celles qui n'ont pas paru, Paris 1730.
[van Effen, Justus]: Nouveau Spectateur François, Den Haag 1725–1726, vol. 1–2.
German ( Moralische Wochenschriften ):
[Anonymus]: Die Braut: wöchentlich an das Licht gestellet in Dreßden, nebst vollständigem Register, Dresden 1742 [first edition in instalments 1740].
[Anonymus]: Der Einsiedler, Königsberg 1740/1741.
[Anonymus]: Der Patriot, vom Jahre 1724, 1725 und 1726 mit einem Register über alle drey Jahre: Patriotens CLVI Stuck über die Sitten der Welt worin nebst der Verbesserung der Sitten seiner Mitbürger so wohl ins gemein als insonderheit allerhand Moralische Neuigkeiten eine ausbündige Sprache und Schreib-Art und viele auserlesene Stuck gelehrter Leuten ausgestellet werden. Zu leichterer Anschaffung und Gebrauch dieser höchst-nützlichen Arbeit zum Druck befördert, o. O. 1726. URL: https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10614892-7 (vol. 1) / https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10614893-3 (vol. 2) / https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10614894-8 (vol. 3) [2021-07-26]
[Bode, Johann Joachim Christoph]: Der Denker: Eine Wochenschrift aus dem Spanischen des Herrn Joseph Clavijo y Faxardo auszugsweise übersetzt, Bremen 1781.
Bodmer, Johann Jakob / Breitinger, Johann Jakob: Die Discourse der Mahlern, Zürich [1 May] 1721– [end of January] 1723, reissue with notes Frauenfeld 1887–1891, ed. by Theodor Vetter.
Cramer, Johann Andreas / Giseke, Nikolaus Dietrich: Der Jüngling, Leipzig 1747.
[Fowler Haywood, Eliza]: Die Zuschauerin, aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Christian Bernhard Kayser, Hannover et al. 1747–1748.
Gerstenberg, Heinrich Wilhelm von et al. (ed.): Der Hypochondrist: Eine hollsteinsche Wochenschrift, Schleswig 1762.
[Gottsched, Johann Christian]: Der Biedermann, Leipzig [01 May] 1727–[04 April] 1729.
[Gottsched, Johann Christian]: Die Vernünfftigen Tadlerinnen, Frankfurt am Main et al. 1725–1727. URL: https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb11045809-2 (vol. 1) / https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb11045810-5 (vol. 2) [2021-07-26]
Hamann, Johann Georg: Die Matrone, Hamburg 1728–1729.
[Lange, Samuel G.]: Der Gesellige: eine moralische Wochenschrift Halle 1748–1750, reprint Hildesheim 1987, ed. by Wolfgang Martens, vol. 1–6.
Riegel, Christoph: Der Spectateur: Oder Vernünftige Betrachtungen über die verderbten Sitten der heutigen Welt, Frankfurt et al. 1719 and 1725, vol. 1–2.
Sonnenfels, Joseph von: Der Mann ohne Vorurteil, Vienna 1765.
[Steele, Richard]: Der Schwätzer: Eine Sittenschrift, aus dem Englischen des Herrn Richard Steele. Übersetzt von J. D. Tietze. Leipzig 1756, vol. 1–2. URL: https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10616552-5 (vol. 1) / https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10616553-1 (vol. 2) [2021-07-26]
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: Der Getreue Hofmeister, sorgfältige Vormund, neue Mentor, oder einige Diskurse über die Sitten der gegenwärtigen Zeit: welche unter dem Namen des Guardian von Herrn Addison, Steele und anderen Verfassern des Spectator aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Ludwig Ernst von Faramund, Frankfurt am Main et al.1725. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:urmel-79dbea6b-4825-409e-bc40-bf9297f7527f3 [2021-07-26]
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: Der Vernünfftler: Das ist: Ein teutscher Auszug aus den Engeländischen Moral-Schriften des Tatler und Spectator vormahls verfertiget; mit etlichen Zugaben versehen und auf Ort und Zeit gerichtet von Joanne Mattheson, Hamburg 1721, nos. 1–101 [first edition in instalments 31 May 1713–30 May 1714].
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: Der Zuschauer. Aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Luise Adelgunde Victorie Gottsched, Leipzig 1739–1743, vol. 1–8.
[Steele, Richard / Addison, Joseph]: Englischer Zuschauer [abridged], nach einer neuen Übersetzung von Johann Lorenz Benzler / Carl Wilhelm Ramler, Berlin 1782–1783, vol. 1–8.
[Steele, Richard u. a.]: Der Engländische Guardian oder Aufseher, ins Deutsche übersetzt von Luise Adelgunde Victorie Gottschedin, Leipzig 1749.
Spanish ( Prensa moralista ):
[Anonymus]: El Apologista Universal: Obra periódica que manifestará no sólo la instrucción, exactitud y belleza de las obras de los autores cuitados que se dejan zurrar de los semicríticos modernos, sino también el interés y utilidad de algunas costumbres y establecimientos de moda, Madrid [July] 1786–[February] 1788. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-apologistauniversal&locale=de [2021-07-26]
[Anonymus]: El Corresponsal del Apologista, Madrid 1786. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-corresponsaldelapologista&locale=en [2021-07-26]
[Anonymus]: El Filósofo a la moda o el Maestro universal: Obra periódica que se distribuye al público los lunes y los jueves de cada semana: Sacada de la obra francesa intitulada Le Spectateur ou le Socrate moderne, Madrid 1788. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-filosofoalamoda&locale=de [2021-07-26]
[Bueno de Castilla, Don Patricio]: El Belianís literario: Discurso andante (dividido en varios papeles periódicos) en defensa de algunos puntos de nuestra Bella Literatura, contra todos los críticos partidarios del Buen Gusto y la Reformación, Madrid 1765. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-belianisliterario&locale=de [2021-07-26]
[Celis y Noriega, Manuel Rubín de]: El Corresponsal del Censor, Madrid 1786–1788. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-corresponsaldelcensor&locale=de [2021-07-26], reprint Madrid / Frankfurt am Main 2009, ed. by Klaus-Dieter Ertler, Renate Hodab, Inmaculada Urzainqui.
Cienfuegos, Doña Beatriz: La Pensadora Gaditana, Bd. I/II: Madrid 1763, Bd. III/IV: Madrid 1764 [14 July 1763–1762 July 1764]. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-pensadoragaditana&locale=de [2021-07-26], reprint et al. Cádiz 1996, ed. by Cinta Canterla.
[Clavijo y Fajardo, José]: El Pensador por Don Joseph Álvarez de Valladares, Madrid 1762–1767. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-pensador&locale=de [2021-07-26], critical edition Las Palmas 1999, ed. by Yolanda Arencibia.
[Freyre da Silva, Fray Manuel]: El Duende político que da cuenta de los más presentes negocios, y anuncia los más críticos futuros desta Monarquía en los años de 1735 y 1736, Biblioteca del Instituto Feijoo de Estudios del Siglo XVIII (unprinted manuscript).
[García del Cañuelo, Luis / Marcelino Pereira, Luis]: El Censor: Obra periódica, Madrid 1781–1788, vol. 1–8, 167 Diskurse. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-censor&locale=de [2021-07-26], critical edition Oviedo 1989, ed. by José Miguel Caso González.
[Garrido, Antonio Mauricio]: El Amigo y Corresponsal del Pensador, Madrid 1763. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-amigodelpensador&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Habela Patiño, Eugenio: El Teniente del Apologista Universal, por Eugenio Habela Patiño, cliente y comisionado especial suyo, Madrid 1788. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-tenientedelapologista&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Mercadal, Juan Antonio (ed.): El Duende especulativo sobre la Vida Civil, dispuesto por Don Juan Antonio Mercadàl, Madrid [9 June]–[26 September] 1761. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-duendeespeculativo&locale=de [2021-07-26], reprint Frankfurt am Main 2011, ed. by Klaus-Dieter Ertler.
[Nipho y Cagigal, Don Francisco Mariano]: El Murmurador imparcial y observador desapasionado de las locuras y despropósitos de los hombres: Obra periódica que ofrece en obsequio de las personas de buen gusto, Madrid 1761. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-murmurador&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Romea y Tapia, Cristóbal: El Escritor sin título: Discurso primero dirigido al autor de las Noticias de moda, sobre lo que nos ha dado a luz en los días 3, 10 y 17 de Mayo: Traducido del español al castellano por el licenciado don Vicente Serraller y Aemor, Madrid 1763, nos. 1–11. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-escritorsintitulo&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Trullench, Pedro Pablo: El Duende de Madrid, Madrid 1787/1788. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-duendedemadrid&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Italian ( Fogli moralistici ):
[Anonymus]: La Spettatrice, Venice 1752.
[Baretti, Giuseppe]: La frusta letteraria di Aristarco Scannabue, Milan [1 October] 1763–1765. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-lafrustaletteraria&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Frasponi, Cesare: Il Filosofo alla Moda, ovvero Il Maestro universale di quanto e oggidi proprio ad istruire, e divertire: Ricavato dall'opera di varij scrittori anonimi, intitolato Le Spectateur, ou Le Socrate moderne, Venice 1728. URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-filosofoallamoda-it&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Gozzi, Gasparo / Pietro Chiari (ed.): Gazzeta Veneta: che contiene tutto quello ch'è da vendere, da comperare, da darsi a fitto, le cose ricercare, le perdute, le trovate, in Venezia o fuori di Venezia, il prezzo delle merci, il valore de' cambi ed altre noticie, parte dilettevoli e parte utili al Pubblico, Venice [6 February] 1760–[31. January] 1761; continued as Nuova Veneta Gazzetta until [10 March] 1762, nos. 1–104, critical edition Milan 1943, ed. by Bruno Romani, vol. 1–2.
[Gozzi, Gasparo]: L'Osservatore Veneto, Venice [4 February] 1761–[18. August] 1762 (since February 1762: Gli Osservatori Veneti). URL: http://www-gewi.uni-graz.at/cocoon/mws/container?pid=mws-osservatoreveneto&locale=de [2021-07-26]
Verri, Pietro e Alessandro: Il Caffè: ossia brevi e vari discorsi distribuiti in fogli periodici, Milan [1 June] 1764 –[31 May] 1766, critical edition Torino 1998: Il Caffè, 1764–1766, ed. by Gianni Francioni and Sergio Romagnoli, 2nd ed.
Dutch ( Spectatoriale Geschriften ):
[van Effen, Justus]: De Hollandsche Spectator, Amsterdam [20 August] 1731–[8 April] 1735, nos. 1–360, vol. 1–12, reprint Amsterdam 1998/1999, ed. by Susanne Gabriëls, vol. 1–4.
Blassneck, Marce: Frankreich als Vermittler englisch-deutscher Einflüsse im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, Leipzig 1934.
Bolufer Peruga, Mónica / Haidt, Rebecca: Mujeres e Ilustración: La construcción de la femenidad en la España del siglo XVIII, Valencia 1998.
Bond, Richmond Pugh: The Making of a Literary Journal, Cambridge, MA 1971.
Bony, Alain: Joseph Addison et la création littéraire: Essai périodique et modernité, Paris 1985.
Böning, Holger: Bibliographie der deutschsprachigen Presse von den Anfängen bis 1815, Tübingen 1992.
Böning, Holger: Der Musiker und Komponist Johann Mattheson als Hamburger Publizist: Studie zu den Anfängen der Moralischen Wochenschriften und der deutschen Musikpublizistik, Bremen 2011.
Böning, Holger: Periodische Presse, Kommunikation und Aufklärung: Hamburg und Altona als Beispiel, Bremen 2002.
Böning, Holger et al.: Biobibliographische Handbücher zur Geschichte der deutschsprachigen periodischen Presse von den Anfängen bis 1815, Stuttgart et al. 1996, vol. 1–6.
Böning, Holger / Jäger, Ulrich Johannes (eds.): Kultur der Kommunikation, Berlin 2007.
Borinski, Ludwig: Der englische Roman des 18. Jahrhunderts, 2nd ed., Wiesbaden 1978.
Buijnsters, Pieter Jacob: Spectatoriale Geschriften, Utrecht 1991.
Buijnsters, Pieter Jacob: Justus van Effen (1684–1735) leven en werk, Utrecht 1992.
Bosch Carrera, María Dolores: Costumbres y opinión en el periodismo del siglo XVIII, Barcelona 1988.
Cameron, Ruth Allen: The Prose Style of Addison and Steele in the Periodical Essay, Ann Arbour, MA 1972.
Cantos Casenave, Marieta (ed.): Redes y espacios de opinión pública: XII Encuentros de la Ilustración al Romanticismo: 1750–1850: Cádiz, América y Europa ante la Modernidad, Cadiz 2006.
Colombo, Rosa Maria: Lo Spectator e i giornali veneziano del settecento, Bari 1966.
Connery, Willard: Sir Richard Steele, London 1934.
Egido López, Teófanes: Prensa clandestina española del siglo XVIII: El Duende crítico, Valladolid 2002.
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter: Kleine Geschichte der spanischen Aufklärungsliteratur, Tübingen 2003.
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter: Die Spectators in der Romania – eine paneuropäische Gattung? Frankfurt am Main 2011.
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter: Die moralischen Wochenschriften in Spanien: José Clavijo y Fajardos El Pensador, Tübingen 2003.
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter: Tugend und Vernunft in der Presse der spanischen Aufklärung: El Censor, Tübingen 2004.
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter / Hodab, Renate / Humpl, Andrea Maria: Die spanische Presse des 18. Jahrhunderts: La Pensadora Gaditana von Beatriz Cienfuegos, Hamburg 2008.
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter / Köhldorfer, Jessica: Die Spectators in Spanien: El Duende Especulativo sobre la Vida Civil von Juan Antonio Mercadal, Frankfurt am Main et al. 2010.
Evans, James E. / Wall, John Nelson: A Guide to Prose Fiction in the Tatler and the Spectator, New York, NY et al. 1977.
Fischer, Ernst (ed.): Von Almanach bis Zeitung: ein Handbuch der Medien in Deutschland: 1700–1800, Munich 1999.
Fitzmaurice, Susan: The world of the periodical essay: Social networks and discourse communities in eighteenth century, London 2007 (Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 7).
Gelz, Andreas: Tertulia: Literatur und Soziabilität im Spanien des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main et al. 2006.
Graeber, Wilhelm: 'Ces songes méthodiques qu'on ne trouve que dans les livres': Le rêve dans les hebdomadaires moraux, in: Bernard Dieterle et al. (eds.): The Dream and the Enlightenment / Le rêve et les Lumières, Paris 2003, S. 207–223.
Graeber, Wilhelm: Moralistik und Zeitschriftenliteratur im frühen 18. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt am Main et al. 1986.
Graeber, Wilhelm / Roche, Geneviève: Englische Literatur des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts in französischer Übersetzung und deutscher Weiterübersetzung: Eine kommentierte Bibliographie, Tübingen 1988.
Haßler, Gerda: Die Moralischen Wochenschriften aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht: narrative und begriffliche Darstellungsformen, in: Klaus-Dieter Ertler: Die Spectators in der Romania – eine paneuropäische Gattung? Frankfurt am Main 2011, pp. 13–35.
Hodab, Renate / Ertler, Klaus-Dieter: Die Presse der spanischen Aufklärung: El Corresponsal del Censor, Vienna et al. 2008.
Jacobs, Helmut C. et al. (eds.): Die Zeitschrift Il Caffè: Vernunftprinzip und Stimmenvielfalt in der italienischen Aufklärung, Frankfurt am Main 2003.
Jacobs, Helmut C.: Schönheit und Geschmack: Die Theorie der Künste in der spanischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main et al. 1996.
Jacobs, Jürgen: Aporien der Aufklärung: Studien zur Geistes- und Literaturgeschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts, Tübingen 2001.
Jacobs, Jürgen: Prosa der Aufklärung: moralische Wochenschriften, Autobiographie, Satire, Roman: Kommentar zu einer Epoche, Munich 1976.
Jäger, Hans-Wolf: "Öffentlichkeit" im 18. Jahrhundert, Göttingen 1997.
Junge, Bettina: Richard Steeles Tatler und Spectator: Untersuchungen zum Periodical Essay als neuer Form der kulturellen Selbstverständigung im England des 18. Jahrhunderts, Hamburg 2008.
Jüttner, Siegfried (ed.): Anfänge des Wissenschaftsjournalismus in Spanien: Der Diario de los literatos de España – Horizonte des Kulturtransfers, Frankfurt am Main et al. 2006.
Kay, Donald: Short Fiction in The Spectator, Alabama 1975.
Ketcham, Michaël G.: Transparent Designs: Reading, Performance, and Form in the Spectator Papers, Athens, GA 1985.
Kilian, Elena: Bildung, Tugend, Nützlichkeit – Geschlechterentwürfe im spanischen Aufklärungsroman des späten 18. Jahrhunderts, Würzburg 2002.
Kleinau, Elke / Opitz, Claudia et al.: Geschichte der Mädchen- und Frauenbildung, Frankfurt am Main 1996, vol. 1: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Aufklärung.
Labrosse, Claude / Rétat, Pierre: L'Instrument périodique, la fonction de la presse au XVIII e siècle, Lyon 1985.
Larriba, Elisabel: Le Public de la presse en Espagne à la fin du XVIII e siècle (1781–1808), Paris 1998.
Lévrier, Alexis: Les journaux de Marivaux et le monde des 'spectateurs', Paris 2007.
Maar, Elke: Bildung durch Unterhaltung: Die Entdeckung des Infotainment in der Aufklärung: Hallenser und Wiener Moralische Wochenschriften in der Blütezeit des Moraljournalismus, Pfaffenweiler 1995. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-86226-306-6 [2021-07-26]
Martens, Wolfgang: Die Botschaft der Tugend: Die Aufklärung im Spiegel der deutschen Moralischen Wochenschriften, Stuttgart 1968. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-99659-6 [2021-07-26]
Martín Gaite, Carmen: Usos amorosos del dieciocho en España, Barcelona 1988.
Moureau, François: La Plume et le plomb: espaces de l'imprimé et du manuscrit au siècle des Lumières, Paris 2006.
Moureau, François: Le Mercure galant de Dufresny (1710–1714) ou le Journalisme à la mode, Oxford 1982.
Niefanger, Susanne: Schreibstrategien in Moralischen Wochenschriften – formalstilistische, pragmatische und rhetorische Untersuchungen am Beispiel von Gottscheds "Vernünfftigen Tadlerinnen", Tübingen 1977.
Okel, Hugo Sebastiaan: Der Bürger, die Tugend und die Republik: "Bürgerliche Leitkultur" in den Niederlanden im 18. Jahrhundert im Spiegel der Moralischen Wochenschriften, PhD Thesis Trier 2004. URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:385-2982 [2021-07-26]
Opitz, Claudia: Aufklärung der Geschlechter, Revolution der Geschlechterordnung: Studien zur Politik- und Kulturgeschichte des 18. Jahrhunderts, Münster 2002.
Pallares-Burke, Maria Lucia G.: A Spectator of the Spectators: Jacques-Vincent Delacroix, in: Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink et al. (eds.): Enlightenment, Revolution and the periodical press, Oxford 2004, pp. 145–157.
Papenheim, Wilhelm: Die Charakterschilderungen im Tatler, Spectator und Guardian: Ihr Verhältnis zu Theophrast, La Bruyère und den englischen Character-Writers des 17. Jahrhunderts, Leipzig 1930.
Peterson, H.: Notes on the Influence of Addison's Spectator and Marivaux' Spectateur français upon El Pensador, in: Hispanic Review IV (1936), pp. 256–263. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/469916 [2021-07-26]
Rau, Fritz: Zur Verbreitung und Nachahmung des Tatler und Spectator, Heidelberg 1980.
Rétat, Pierre (ed.): Le Journalisme d'Ancien Régime: Questions et propositions, Lyon 1982. URL: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3323205j [2021-07-26]
Riebe, Wolfgang: Thematische und formale Aspekte des periodical essay im Tatler, Erlangen 1966.
Rodin-Pucci, Suzanne R.: Sites of the Spectator: Emerging literary and cultural practice in eighteenth-century France, Oxford 2001.
Schmidt-Haberkamp, Barbara et al. (eds.): Europäischer Kulturtransfer im 18. Jahrhundert: Literaturen in Europa – Europäische Literatur? Berlin 2003.
Schneider, Ulrich Johannes (ed.): Kulturen des Wissens im 18. Jahrhundert, Berlin 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110212402 [2021-07-26]
Schneider, Ute: Der moralische Charakter: ein Mittel aufgeklärter Menschendarstellungen in den deutschen Wochenschriften, Stuttgart 1976.
Schorr, James L.: Justus van Effen and the Enlightenment, Ann Arbour, MA et al. 1981.
Sermain, Jean-Paul: Métafictions (1670–1730): La réflexivité dans la littérature d'imagination, Paris 2002.
Sgard, Jean (ed.): Dictionnaire des journaux: 1680–1789, Paris et al. 1991, vol. 1–2.
Sgard, Jean (ed.): Dictionnaire des journalistes: 1680–1789, Paris et al. 1999, vol. 1–2.
Stürzer, Volker: Journalismus und Literatur im frühen 18. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt am Main 1984.
Ter-Nedden, Gisbert: Buchdruck und Aufklärung, Hagen 1999.
Urzainqui, Inmaculada: Autocreación y formas autobiográficas en la prensa crítica del siglo XVIII, in: Anales de la literatura española, Alicante, no. 11 (1995), pp.193–226. URL: http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmcdj5t1 [2021-07-26]
Urzainqui, Inmaculada: Un nuevo instrumento cultural: La prensa periódica, in: Joaquín Álvarez Barrientos et al. (eds.): La república de las letras en la Espana del siglo XVIII, Madrid 1995, pp. 125–216.
Urzainqui, Inmaculada / Álvaro Ruiz de la Peña: Periodismo e ilustración en Manuel Rubín de Celis, Oviedo 1983.
Uzcanga Meinecke, Fernando: Sátira en la Ilustración española. Análisis de la publicación periódica El Censor (1781–1787), Frankfurt am Main et al. 2004.
Van Delft, Louis: Les Spectateurs de la vie: Généalogie du regard moraliste, Laval 2005.
Vellusig, Robert: Schriftliche Gespräche: Briefkultur im 18. Jahrhundert, Vienna et al. 2000.
Tschilschke, Christian von: Aufklärung der Identität – Identität der Aufklärung: Literatur- und Identitätsdiskurs im Spanien des 18. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main u. a. 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.31819/9783954879076 [2021-07-26]
Wildermuth, Mark E.: Print, chaos and complexity: Samuel Johnson and the Eighteenth Century Media Culture, Newark 2008.
Witthaus, Jan-Henrik (ed.): Beiträge zur Nationalisierung der Kultur im Spanien des aufgeklärten Absolutismus, Frankfurt am Main 2010.
Übersetzt von: Translated by: Patrick Baker Fachherausgeber: Editor: Jürgen Wilke Redaktion: Copy Editor: Christina Müller
Ertler, Klaus-Dieter : Moral Weeklies (Periodical Essays) , in: Europäische Geschichte Online (EGO), hg. vom Leibniz- Institut für Europäische Geschichte (IEG), Mainz European History Online (EGO), published by the Leibniz Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz 2012-06-28 . URL: https://www.ieg-ego.eu/ ertlerk-2012 - en URN: urn:nbn:de:0159-2012062800 [JJJJ-MM-TT] [YYYY-MM-DD] .
Bitte setzen Sie beim Zitieren dieses Beitrages hinter der URL-Angabe in Klammern das Datum Ihres letzten Besuchs dieser Online-Adresse ein. Beim Zitieren einer bestimmten Passage aus dem Beitrag bitte zusätzlich die Nummer des Textabschnitts angeben, z.B. 2 oder 1-4.
When quoting this article please add the date of your last retrieval in brackets after the url. When quoting a certain passage from the article please also insert the corresponding number(s), for example 2 or 1-4.
The rise of the leisure press after 1690 caused the appearance of new forms of middle-class sociability. The tea-table is a case in point, around which the two sexes gathered, read periodical essays together, which provided subject matter to polite conversation. Periodicals, however, also staged new forms of sociability in their columns, constructing communities of readers which they endeavoured to instruct and educate. Periodical essayists promoted a Whig reformist agenda, which dictated new forms of sociability along gender lines. They projected an ideal of reasonable femininity which largely restricted female sociability to the domestic sphere. This model proved so hegemonic that it became difficult for later female journalists to discard it.
Practices > Reading & Writing
Practices > Communication
Concepts > Literary & Artistic genres
Concepts > Taste & Manners
While seventeenth-century English newspapers and the political press were largely associated with male coffeehouse sociability – customers could read the papers for the price of a cup of coffee – the leisure press which emerged after 1689 in the form of the periodical essay and prevailed in the first half of the eighteenth century, staged and gave birth to new forms of mixed sociability based on gender balance and politeness.
Essay periodicals , which could be dailies like The Spectator (1711-1712/1714) or The Guardian (1713), bi-weeklies like The Free-Thinker (1718-1721), or yet triweeklies like The Tatler (1709-1711) or The Lover (1714) were not only available in coffeehouses but also through private subscriptions. Women, who were barred access to coffeehouses, could therefore read them at home. Their literacy and purchasing power were improving fast. The Spectator for instance invited female readers to devote a daily quarter of an hour to reading the paper, claiming that it would later conveniently ‘furnish tea table talk.’ 1
The phrase itself shows the intimate relationship the Spectator ’s authors wished to establish between reading such ephemeral prints and shaping people’s social behaviours. Reading periodicals was conceived as an essentially collective activity. It was often performed aloud to a small audience whether in the coffeehouse or at home. First and foremost, each issue was expected to be commented upon and therefore served to popularize and redefine emerging, fashionable group activities such as tea or coffee drinking. Taking tea was a genteel form of sociability which became increasingly associated with femininity as the eighteenth-century unfolded. Its prestige was derived from the material cost and exoticism of tea and of tea sets. Yet, writers of essay periodicals often blamed it for encouraging idleness. They endeavoured to upgrade it to a more highbrow and moral form of sociability ; one which, thanks to their essays, combined entertainment and moral didacticism. It included literary and aesthetic conversation, as opposed to gossip. The Free-Thinker (1718-1721), a bi-weekly essay paper coedited by the poet Ambrose Philips and a circle of Hanoverian Whigs, typically ambitioned to teach the readers of both sexes how to ‘philosophize’, 2 a term which meant both to ponder philosophically but also to exchange about philosophy with other people. It therefore popularised the Cartesian and Lockean philosophies, claiming that they constituted the core principles of polite conversation understood as sociability.
The move was in itself paradoxical. Periodicals claimed to improve upper-class forms of sociability by displacing their value from the luxurious material objects which had occasioned them, – the tea sets – to cheap yet enlightening prints 3 which would turn each tea /coffee table assembly into exclusive circles reminiscent of the seventeenth-century French salons . Doing so, they highlighted that the core tenets of sociability – politeness and conversation 4 – could in fact be practised without the luxurious parapharnelia of tea by the upper and middling ranks and could be a popular pedagogical instrument.
That papers favoured mixed sociability is confirmed by the very format of the journals. Periodical essays were commonly headed by untranslated Latin and Greek mottos, which created a sense of belonging to a reading community sharing the same culture. At the same time, since the mottos offered a further comment on the essays’ topics, they introduced several levels of understanding of the essays. They reflected the subtle distinctions of ranks and intellectual authority. While male readers had easy access to all levels of meanings and could discuss them, female readers, who were rarely literate in the classical languages, constituted a separate community of readers who could socialise with the main group only up to a certain extent. Yet, the lack of translation could also be a strategy to trigger and cement social relationships between the less educated and the more enlightened readers, with the latter explaining the meaning to the former.
The community of readers was doubled by the creation of a mixed community of correspondents who were invited to write to the editors either to respond to the topics developped by the journals or to offer new essays. Epistolarity was one way of staging and enforcing harmonious sociability. The journals often mixed genuine letters and forged ones ; The Spectator banned gossip and personal satire 5 while The Free-Thinker fixed the rules of controversy and debates by forbidding personal abuses and misuse of words. 6
In addition, some of the papers were explicitly fashioned as the produce of polite sociability: some personas – fictional editors like Isaac Bickerstaff in The Tatler - allegedly wrote their columns from coffeehouses and used coffeehouse conversation topics and rumours as a source of inspiration. Other papers like The Female Tatler (1709-1710) or The Lover could transcribe the conversations of a fictitious team of writers meeting in a club.
It is noteworthy that translating the sociability of clubs onto paper could eventually serve as a pedagogical model for European elite sociability. This is evidenced by the Swiss Société du comte de la Lippe, a club of erudites meeting every saturday in Lausane in the 1740s in order to perfect the education of the young German Count of Lippe Detmold. Its distinguished members commented on various political and philosophical works, which included some of the essays of The Spectator and Guardian. 7
Many of the most famous early leisure essay periodicals (those of Addison and Steele and their circle of friends) promoted an ideal of sociability which, they claimed, was essentially commercial. Essay journals were commercial ventures offering guidance about how to interact harmoniously with others. They spread the idea that the language of social harmony and virtue was intimately related to that of credit and exchange. Defining sociability as a commercial activity was therefore a political move. Papers suggested that those who had contributed to turning Britain into a modern and prosperous parliamentary monarchy after the 1689 revolution were mostly the urban, professional, banking, upper and middle ranks which had financially supported the new regime. In other words they claimed that true male sociability was socially mixed, British, urban, and Whig. 8
Essay periodical also defined commercial sociability in a broader sense that included moral and social issues. Following the moral agenda of the emerging Societies for the Reformation of Manners, journals had an Augustinian vision of society. They believed it to be corrupt and in need of moral reformation. Purporting to improve manners by promoting heightened morality, the periodicals dictated what the acceptable forms of sociability were and which ones should be banned. New forms of public sociability such as masquerading were repeatedly described as dangerous and scandalous because disguise gave too many freedoms to the sexes. The Spectator consistently satirised lower-rank male clubbing in essays on the two-penny club, 9 the ugly club, 10 etc., laughing at the aspirations and vanity of their members who foolishly aped elite and political institutions like the Kit Cat or the October clubs.
On the whole, the Whig journals’ prescriptive agenda tended to frame sociability along gender lines. In The Spectator , men’s and women’s sociabilities were dictated by what was believed to be their respective and complementary nature. Masculinity was defined as strong, learned and public while femininity was largely characterised as beautiful, fragile, sensitive and naturally caring. Combined with natural good sense, these respective qualities would enable men to socialise outside the family and manage their affairs in the coffeehouses or in the parliament, while ‘Fair sexing it’ 11 enabled journals to construct ideal feminine sociability as essentially domestic, private and rural ; ladies were expected to exercise their social skill within the narrow family sphere with their spouse, children and servants. The household was depicted as a sort of happy and apolitical commonwealth. 12
The papers often relied on character sketches to condemn the fashionable forms of sociability of upper-class women. For example, Fulvia ‘thinks life lost in her own Family, and fancies her self out of the World when she is not in the Ring, the Play-House, or the Drawing-Room. […] The missing of an Opera the first Night, would be more afflicting to her than the Death of a Child.’ 13
Such forms of public sociability were also condemned for encouraging women to confuse sociability with publicity and ultimately with political proselytism. Ladies who displayed their political opinions on their fans or with their face patches 14 at the opera were charged with renouncing their natural qualities of meekness and with being animated by their passions. Their inadequate public sociability threatened the new political order because they would often end up adopting anti-social behaviours (losing their temper in public over political issues, or becoming coquettes in order to gain admirers to their cause).
The papers promised to be particularly useful to women readers by enlightening them on how to achieve polite, domestic sociability, and by offering them, a semi-private safe space where to socialise through epistolarity and where to find moral guidance.
The construction of sociability in and by The Tatler , The Spectator and their followers was therefore ambiguous because it was both an instrument of intellectual empowerment likely to soften and enrich social interaction, and, at least for women, a tool meant to restrict female social practice within private, apolitical bounds.
This Whig ideal of polite sociability was so influential that it made it difficult for women journalists to offer an alternative definition. The main reason was that the ideal of female domestic sociability deprived women writers who sought to deal with matters unrelated with the private sphere of their authority. Since respectable ladies were not expected to be in contact with political or even economic forms of sociability, those who did were considered abnormal, unnatural females whose sociability was flawed from the start. This explains why by 1740 there were only three short-lived essay periodicals which used a female persona ; the two Female Tatlers 15 and the Parrot (1728) by Mrs Prattle. The latter, who declared ‘Scandal is the woman’s weapon’ 16 and vindicated women’s right to write scathing political satires against Walpole’s government clearly challenged the conversational model of virtuous female sociability promoted by Whig essay periodicals. It is highly meaningful that these three Tory journals sought to subvert the Whig doctrine precisely by assaulting the journalistic rhetoric of female virtuous sociability. They thus debunked the hypocritical foundation of Whig politeness and sociability which was so powerfully staged by the press.
T he model of polite female sociability was so hegemonic that when, later, female journalists like Eliza Haywood in her Female Spectator (1744-1746) sought to gain authorial authority by heading their magazines with a female persona, one essential precondition was to construct their journal as spaces promoting and defending private respectable female sociability.
Bloom, Edward A. & Lilian D., Addison’s sociable Animal, in the Market Place, on the Hustings, in the Pulpit (Providence: Brown University Press, 1971).
Boulard, Claire, Presse et socialisation féminine, Conversations à l’heure du thé (Paris : L’Harmattan, 2000)/
Bowers, Terence, ‘Universalizing Sociability. The Spectator , Civic Enfranchisement, and the Rule(s) of the Public Sphere’, in Donald J Newman (ed.), The Spectator, Emerging Discourse , (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005), p. 150-174.
Ezell, Margaret, ‘The Gentleman’s Journal and the Commercialization of Restoration Coterie Literary Practices', Modern Philology (vol. 89, n° 3, 1992), p. 323-340.
Klein, Lawrence E., ‘Gender, Conversation, and the Public Sphere in Early Eighteenth-Century England’, in Still, Judith and Worton, Michael (eds.), Textuality and Sexuality : Reading Theories and Practices (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993), p. 100-115.
Mackie, Erin (ed.), The Commerce of Everyday Life , Selections from the Tatler and the Spectator (Boston: Bedford, 1998).
Markman, Ellis, ‘Sociability and polite Improvement in Addison’s Periodicals’ in Davis, Paul (ed.), Joseph Addison , Tercentenary Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).
Philipson, Nicholas, ‘Politeness and Politics in the reign of Anne and the early Hanoverians’, in Pocock, JGA, Schochet, Gordon J. and Schwoerer, Lois S. (eds.), The Varieties of British Political Thought, 1500-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 211-245.
Shevelow, Kathryn, Women and Print Culture: The Construction of Femininity in the Ea rly Periodical (London: Routledge, 1989).
Writing the college essay
How do you write a letter to a friend that shows you’re a good candidate for the University of Pennsylvania? What reading list will help the Columbia University admissions committee understand your interdisciplinary interests? How can you convey your desire to attend Yale by inventing a course description for a topic you’re interested in studying?
These are the challenges students must overcome when writing their supplemental essays . Supplemental essays are a critical component of college applications—like the personal statement, they provide students with the opportunity to showcase their authentic voice and perspective beyond the quantitative elements of their applications. However, unlike the personal essay, supplemental essays allow colleges to read students’ responses to targeted prompts and evaluate their candidacy for their specific institution. For this reason, supplemental essay prompts are often abstract, requiring students to get creative, read between the lines, and ditch the traditional essay-writing format when crafting their responses.
While many schools simply want to know “why do you want to attend our school?” others break the mold, inviting students to think outside of the box and answer prompts that are original, head-scratching, or downright weird. This year, the following five colleges pushed students to get creative—if you’re struggling to rise to the challenge, here are some tips for tackling their unique prompts:
University of Chicago
Prompt: We’re all familiar with green-eyed envy or feeling blue, but what about being “caught purple-handed”? Or “tickled orange”? Give an old color-infused expression a new hue and tell us what it represents. – Inspired by Ramsey Bottorff, Class of 2026
What Makes it Unique: No discussion of unique supplemental essay prompts would be complete without mentioning the University of Chicago, a school notorious for its puzzling and original prompts (perhaps the most well-known of these has been the recurring prompt “Find x”). This prompt challenges you to invent a new color-based expression, encouraging both linguistic creativity and a deep dive into the emotional or cultural connotations of color. It’s a prompt that allows you to play with language, think abstractly, and show off your ability to forge connections between concepts that aren’t typically linked—all qualities that likewise demonstrate your preparedness for UChicago’s unique academic environment.
Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024.
How to Answer it: While it may be easy to get distracted by the open-ended nature of the prompt, remember that both the substance and structure of your response should give some insight into your personality, perspective, and characteristics. With this in mind, begin by considering the emotions, experiences, or ideas that most resonate with you. Then, use your imagination to consider how a specific color could represent that feeling or concept. Remember that the prompt is ultimately an opportunity to showcase your creativity and original way of looking at the world, so your explanation does not need to be unnecessarily deep or complex—if you have a playful personality, convey your playfulness in your response; if you are known for your sarcasm, consider how you can weave in your biting wit; if you are an amateur poet, consider how you might take inspiration from poetry as you write, or offer a response in the form of a poem.
The goal is to take a familiar concept and turn it into something new and meaningful through a creative lens. Use this essay to showcase your ability to think inventively and to draw surprising connections between language and life.
Harvard University
Prompt: Top 3 things your roommates might like to know about you.
What Makes it Unique: This prompt is unique in both form and substance—first, you only have 150 words to write about all 3 things. Consider using a form other than a traditional essay or short answer response, such as a bullet list or short letter. Additionally, note that the things your roommate might like to learn about you do not necessarily overlap with the things you would traditionally share with an admissions committee. The aim of the prompt is to get to know your quirks and foibles—who are you as a person and a friend? What distinguishes you outside of academics and accolades?
How to Answer it: First and foremost, feel free to get creative with your response to this prompt. While you are producing a supplemental essay and thus a professional piece of writing, the prompt invites you to share more personal qualities, and you should aim to demonstrate your unique characteristics in your own voice. Consider things such as: How would your friends describe you? What funny stories do your parents and siblings share that encapsulate your personality? Or, consider what someone might want to know about living with you: do you snore? Do you have a collection of vintage posters? Are you particularly fastidious? While these may seem like trivial things to mention, the true creativity is in how you connect these qualities to deeper truths about yourself—perhaps your sleepwalking is consistent with your reputation for being the first to raise your hand in class or speak up about a cause you’re passionate about. Perhaps your living conditions are a metaphor for how your brain works—though it looks like a mess to everyone else, you have a place for everything and know exactly where to find it. Whatever qualities you choose, embrace the opportunity to think outside of the box and showcase something that admissions officers won’t learn about anywhere else on your application.
University of Pennsylvania
Prompt: Write a short thank-you note to someone you have not yet thanked and would like to acknowledge.
What Makes it Unique: Breaking from the traditional essay format, this supplement invites you to write directly to a third party in the form of a 150-200 word long letter. The challenge in answering this distinct prompt is to remember that your letter should say as much about you, your unique qualities and what you value as it does about the recipient—all while not seeming overly boastful or contrived.
How to Answer it: As you select a recipient, consider the relationships that have been most formative in your high school experience—writing to someone who has played a large part in your story will allow the admissions committee some insight into your development and the meaningful relationships that guided you on your journey. Once you’ve identified the person, craft a thank-you note that is specific and heartfelt—unlike other essays, this prompt invites you to be sentimental and emotional, as long as doing so would authentically convey your feelings of gratitude. Describe the impact they’ve had on you, what you’ve learned from them, and how their influence has shaped your path. For example, if you’re thanking a teacher, don’t just say they helped you become a better student—explain how their encouragement gave you the confidence to pursue your passions. Keep the tone sincere and personal, avoid clichés and focus on the unique role this person has played in your life.
University of Notre Dame
Prompt: What compliment are you most proud of receiving, and why does it mean so much to you?
What Makes it Unique: This prompt is unique in that it invites students to share something about themselves by reflecting on someone else’s words in 50-100 words.
How to Answer it: The key to answering this prompt is to avoid focusing too much on the complement itself and instead focus on your response to receiving it and why it was so important to you. Note that this prompt is not an opportunity to brag about your achievements, but instead to showcase what truly matters to you. Select a compliment that truly speaks to who you are and what you value. It could be related to your character, work ethic, kindness, creativity, or any other quality that you hold in high regard. The compliment doesn’t have to be grand or come from someone with authority—it could be something small but significant that left a lasting impression on you, or it could have particular meaning for you because it came from someone you didn’t expect it to come from. Be brief in setting the stage and explaining the context of the compliment—what is most important is your reflection on its significance and how it shaped your understanding of yourself.
Stanford University
Prompt: List five things that are important to you.
What Makes it Unique: This prompt’s simplicity is what makes it so challenging. Stanford asks for a list, not an essay, which means you have very limited space (50 words) to convey something meaningful about yourself. Additionally, the prompt does not specify what these “things” must be—they could be a physical item, an idea, a concept, or even a pastime. Whatever you choose, these five items should add depth to your identity, values, and priorities.
How to Answer it: Start by brainstorming what matters most to you—these could be values, activities, people, places, or even abstract concepts. The key is to choose items or concepts that, when considered together, provide a comprehensive snapshot of who you are. For example, you might select something tangible and specific such as “an antique telescope gifted by my grandfather” alongside something conceptual such as “the willingness to admit when you’re wrong.” The beauty of this prompt is that it doesn’t require complex sentences or elaborate explanations—just a clear and honest reflection of what you hold dear. Be thoughtful in your selections, and use this prompt to showcase your creativity and core values.
While the supplemental essays should convey something meaningful about you, your values, and your unique qualifications for the university to which you are applying, the best essays are those that are playful, original, and unexpected. By starting early and taking the time to draft and revise their ideas, students can showcase their authentic personalities and distinguish themselves from other applicants through their supplemental essays.
Use discount code STYLEBLOG15 for 15% off APA Style print products with free shipping in the United States.
We, the APA Style team, are not robots. We can all pass a CAPTCHA test , and we know our roles in a Turing test . And, like so many nonrobot human beings this year, we’ve spent a fair amount of time reading, learning, and thinking about issues related to large language models, artificial intelligence (AI), AI-generated text, and specifically ChatGPT . We’ve also been gathering opinions and feedback about the use and citation of ChatGPT. Thank you to everyone who has contributed and shared ideas, opinions, research, and feedback.
In this post, I discuss situations where students and researchers use ChatGPT to create text and to facilitate their research, not to write the full text of their paper or manuscript. We know instructors have differing opinions about how or even whether students should use ChatGPT, and we’ll be continuing to collect feedback about instructor and student questions. As always, defer to instructor guidelines when writing student papers. For more about guidelines and policies about student and author use of ChatGPT, see the last section of this post.
If you’ve used ChatGPT or other AI tools in your research, describe how you used the tool in your Method section or in a comparable section of your paper. For literature reviews or other types of essays or response or reaction papers, you might describe how you used the tool in your introduction. In your text, provide the prompt you used and then any portion of the relevant text that was generated in response.
Unfortunately, the results of a ChatGPT “chat” are not retrievable by other readers, and although nonretrievable data or quotations in APA Style papers are usually cited as personal communications , with ChatGPT-generated text there is no person communicating. Quoting ChatGPT’s text from a chat session is therefore more like sharing an algorithm’s output; thus, credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation.
When prompted with “Is the left brain right brain divide real or a metaphor?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that although the two brain hemispheres are somewhat specialized, “the notation that people can be characterized as ‘left-brained’ or ‘right-brained’ is considered to be an oversimplification and a popular myth” (OpenAI, 2023).
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
You may also put the full text of long responses from ChatGPT in an appendix of your paper or in online supplemental materials, so readers have access to the exact text that was generated. It is particularly important to document the exact text created because ChatGPT will generate a unique response in each chat session, even if given the same prompt. If you create appendices or supplemental materials, remember that each should be called out at least once in the body of your APA Style paper.
When given a follow-up prompt of “What is a more accurate representation?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that “different brain regions work together to support various cognitive processes” and “the functional specialization of different regions can change in response to experience and environmental factors” (OpenAI, 2023; see Appendix A for the full transcript).
The in-text citations and references above are adapted from the reference template for software in Section 10.10 of the Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020, Chapter 10). Although here we focus on ChatGPT, because these guidelines are based on the software template, they can be adapted to note the use of other large language models (e.g., Bard), algorithms, and similar software.
The reference and in-text citations for ChatGPT are formatted as follows:
Let’s break that reference down and look at the four elements (author, date, title, and source):
Author: The author of the model is OpenAI.
Date: The date is the year of the version you used. Following the template in Section 10.10, you need to include only the year, not the exact date. The version number provides the specific date information a reader might need.
Title: The name of the model is “ChatGPT,” so that serves as the title and is italicized in your reference, as shown in the template. Although OpenAI labels unique iterations (i.e., ChatGPT-3, ChatGPT-4), they are using “ChatGPT” as the general name of the model, with updates identified with version numbers.
The version number is included after the title in parentheses. The format for the version number in ChatGPT references includes the date because that is how OpenAI is labeling the versions. Different large language models or software might use different version numbering; use the version number in the format the author or publisher provides, which may be a numbering system (e.g., Version 2.0) or other methods.
Bracketed text is used in references for additional descriptions when they are needed to help a reader understand what’s being cited. References for a number of common sources, such as journal articles and books, do not include bracketed descriptions, but things outside of the typical peer-reviewed system often do. In the case of a reference for ChatGPT, provide the descriptor “Large language model” in square brackets. OpenAI describes ChatGPT-4 as a “large multimodal model,” so that description may be provided instead if you are using ChatGPT-4. Later versions and software or models from other companies may need different descriptions, based on how the publishers describe the model. The goal of the bracketed text is to briefly describe the kind of model to your reader.
Source: When the publisher name and the author name are the same, do not repeat the publisher name in the source element of the reference, and move directly to the URL. This is the case for ChatGPT. The URL for ChatGPT is https://chat.openai.com/chat . For other models or products for which you may create a reference, use the URL that links as directly as possible to the source (i.e., the page where you can access the model, not the publisher’s homepage).
You may have noticed the confidence with which ChatGPT described the ideas of brain lateralization and how the brain operates, without citing any sources. I asked for a list of sources to support those claims and ChatGPT provided five references—four of which I was able to find online. The fifth does not seem to be a real article; the digital object identifier given for that reference belongs to a different article, and I was not able to find any article with the authors, date, title, and source details that ChatGPT provided. Authors using ChatGPT or similar AI tools for research should consider making this scrutiny of the primary sources a standard process. If the sources are real, accurate, and relevant, it may be better to read those original sources to learn from that research and paraphrase or quote from those articles, as applicable, than to use the model’s interpretation of them.
We’ve also received a number of other questions about ChatGPT. Should students be allowed to use it? What guidelines should instructors create for students using AI? Does using AI-generated text constitute plagiarism? Should authors who use ChatGPT credit ChatGPT or OpenAI in their byline? What are the copyright implications ?
On these questions, researchers, editors, instructors, and others are actively debating and creating parameters and guidelines. Many of you have sent us feedback, and we encourage you to continue to do so in the comments below. We will also study the policies and procedures being established by instructors, publishers, and academic institutions, with a goal of creating guidelines that reflect the many real-world applications of AI-generated text.
For questions about manuscript byline credit, plagiarism, and related ChatGPT and AI topics, the APA Style team is seeking the recommendations of APA Journals editors. APA Style guidelines based on those recommendations will be posted on this blog and on the APA Style site later this year.
Update: APA Journals has published policies on the use of generative AI in scholarly materials .
We, the APA Style team humans, appreciate your patience as we navigate these unique challenges and new ways of thinking about how authors, researchers, and students learn, write, and work with new technologies.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
Comments are disabled due to your privacy settings. To re-enable, please adjust your cookie preferences.
Subscribe to the APA Style Monthly newsletter to get tips, updates, and resources delivered directly to your inbox.
Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.
Browse APA Style writing guidelines by category
Full index of topics
IMAGES
COMMENTS
A periodical essay is an essay (that is, a short work of nonfiction) published in a magazine or journal--in particular, an essay that appears as part of a series. The 18th century is considered the great age of the periodical essay in English. Notable periodical essayists of the 18th century include Joseph Addison, Richard Steele, Samuel ...
Periodical Essay Writing Tips. 1. Choose a specific periodical to focus on: When writing an essay on periodical writing, it is important to choose a specific periodical to analyze. This could be a magazine, newspaper, journal, or any other publication that is published at regular intervals. 2.
A periodical essay is a type of prose non- fiction published in a periodical. A periodical is a type of serial publication such as a magazine or newspaper that appears at regular intervals. It ...
The Causes of the Rise of Periodical Literature. There were a number of causes which led to the emergence or the periodical essay in the eighteenth century: 1. Political Rivalry and Growth of Political Parties. The eighteenth century saw the emergence of the two major political parties, the Whigs and the Tories.
The periodical essay appeared in the early 1700s and reached its highest popularity in the middle of the eighteenth century. It is a type of writing that is issued on a regular basis as a part of a series in editions such as journals, magazines, newspapers or comic books. ... For example, the May 1711 publication of a monthly journal that was ...
Before The Taller there had been periodicals and there had been essays, but there had been no periodical essays. The example of The Taller was followed by a large number of writers of the eighteenth century till its very end, when with the change of sensibility; the periodical essay disappeared along with numerous other accompaniments of the age.
The periodical essay was a very popular form of literature and communication and recreation in the eighteenth century because it was the mirror of the Augustan age in England" (A. R. Humphreys). It was the social chronicler of the time. It was particularly suited to the genius of the new patrons, because it was the literature of the bourgeoisie.
How To Write a Periodical Essay. Periodical essay papers are a journey or journal through one's eye or characters develop based on series of events accordingly. Essay papers based on periodical is affected by century, culture, language and belief of the community, showing the mirror of their age, the reflection of their thinking.
Example of a Great Essay | Explanations, Tips & Tricks. Published on February 9, 2015 by Shane Bryson . Revised on July 23, 2023 by Shona McCombes. This example guides you through the structure of an essay. It shows how to build an effective introduction, focused paragraphs, clear transitions between ideas, and a strong conclusion.
Works cited entries for periodical sources include three main elements—the author of the article, the title of the article, and information about the magazine, newspaper, or journal. MLA uses the generic term "container" to refer to any print or digital venue (a website or print journal, for example) in which an essay or article may be ...
Joseph Addison and Richard Steele began the trend of periodical magazines and journals in the 18th century. In 1709, Steele began publishing The Tatler which...
The following two sample papers were published in annotated form in the Publication Manual and are reproduced here as PDFs for your ease of use. The annotations draw attention to content and formatting and provide the relevant sections of the Publication Manual (7th ed.) to consult for more information.. Student sample paper with annotations (PDF, 5MB)
A periodical is anything that comes out periodically. Magazines, newspapers, and journals are all periodicals. They may come out daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly or annually, but new issues are released on a fixed schedule. ... They also have advertisements directed to that profession. For example, a trade journal for dentists may advertise ...
A periodical literature (also called a periodical publication or simply a periodical) is a published work that appears in a new edition on a regular schedule. The most familiar example is a newspaper, but a magazine or a journal are also examples of periodicals. These publications cover a wide variety of topics, from academic, technical, trade ...
For a monthly periodical, you may list the month and year of publication. For a seasonal periodical, you may list the year and the season. For example, (2019, Summer). If you see a date of publication that includes the year, month, and day, you may list the full date in your ciation. For example, (2019, April 9).
The growth of the periodical essay in the 18th century is a story of the rise of the educated classes in England, women gaining centre-stage in the reading public, and the wave of public discussions and debate that animated the public sphere in England at the time. This essay traces the reasons and conditions for the growth of the periodical ...
#periodicalessays #addison #steele #spectator #tatler #tutorialsofenglishliteratureIn this video, I have discussed the genre of periodical essay that develop...
Essay Sample: The Tatler was a single-sheet paper that came out three times a week and in the beginning, consisted of short paragraphs on topics related to domestic, ... The popularity of the periodical essay eventually started to wane, however, and essays began appearing more often in periodicals that included other material. By the mid ...
The End of the Periodical Essays. From the very beginning the periodical essays were destined to be ephemeral. They faded more quickly in Protestant areas, giving way to the novel, whereas in the Catholic South, for example in cities like Vienna and Madrid, their moralizing conversational tone helped some to persevere into the nineteenth century.
Hey guys,welcome back to my channel.In this video ,I have discussed about the Periodical Essay..Essay & Types of Essay | VIDEO LINK..https://youtu.be/KCKbqtY...
Essay periodicals, which could be dailies like The Spectator (1711-1712/1714) or The Guardian (1713), bi-weeklies like The Free-Thinker (1718-1721), or yet triweeklies like The Tatler (1709-1711) or The Lover (1714) were not only available in coffeehouses but also through private subscriptions. Women, who were barred access to coffeehouses ...
Abstract. This chapter examines Johnson's achievements as an essayist in relation to the established conventions of the periodical essay. With the Rambler, Johnson restored the periodical essay to its once-prominent place in English literary culture by elevating its moral seriousness and emphasizing its aptness as a vehicle for literary criticism.. The success of the series spurred a revival ...
How to Answer it: While it may be easy to get distracted by the open-ended nature of the prompt, remember that both the substance and structure of your response should give some insight into your ...
The in-text citations and references above are adapted from the reference template for software in Section 10.10 of the Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020, Chapter 10). Although here we focus on ChatGPT, because these guidelines are based on the software template, they can be adapted to note the use of other large ...