a systematic literature research

A systematic review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesize all available evidence. It answers a clearly formulated research question and explicitly states the methods used to arrive at the answer. Example: Systematic review. In 2008, Dr. Robert Boyle and his colleagues published a systematic review in ...

Method details Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure [12].An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject [6].The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a ...

Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...

A literature review can broadly be described as a more or less systematic way of collecting and synthesizing previous research (Baumeister & Leary, 1997; Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003). An effective and well-conducted review as a research method creates a firm foundation for advancing knowledge and facilitating theory development ( Webster ...

The systematic, transparent searching techniques outlined in this article can be adopted and adapted for use in other forms of literature review (Grant & Booth 2009), for example, while the critical appraisal tools highlighted are appropriate for use in other contexts in which the reliability and applicability of medical research require ...

Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a systematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence in relation to a particular research question.

The systematic, transparent searching techniques outlined in this article can be adopted and adapted for use in other forms of literature review (Grant & Booth 2009), for example, while the critical appraisal tools highlighted are appropriate for use in other contexts in which the reliability and applicability of medical research require ...

Background. A systematic review, as its name suggests, is a systematic way of collecting, evaluating, integrating, and presenting findings from several studies on a specific question or topic.[] A systematic review is a research that, by identifying and combining evidence, is tailored to and answers the research question, based on an assessment of all relevant studies.[2,3] To identify assess ...

A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

Screen the literature. Assess the quality of the studies. Extract the data. Analyze the results. Interpret and present the results. 1. Decide on your team. When carrying out a systematic literature review, you should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and strengthen analysis.

A systematic review is a type of review that uses repeatable methods to find, select, and synthesise all available evidence. It answers a clearly formulated research question and explicitly states the methods used to arrive at the answer. Example: Systematic review. In 2008, Dr Robert Boyle and his colleagues published a systematic review in ...

Guidelines for writing a systematic review. 1. Introduction. A key feature of any academic activity is to have a sufficient understanding of the subject area under investigation and thus an awareness of previous research. Undertaking a literature review with an analysis of the results on a specific issue is required to demonstrate sufficient ...

Systematic literature reviews (SRs) are a way of synt hesising scientific evidence to answer a particular. research question in a way that is transparent and reproducible, while seeking to include ...

Systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and replicable methodology and presentation. They involve a comprehensive search to locate all relevant published and unpublished work on a subject; a systematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence in relation to a particular research question. The best reviews synthesize studies to ...

Image by TraceyChandler. Steps to conducting a systematic review. Quick overview of the process: Steps and resources from the UMB HSHSL Guide. YouTube video (26 min); Another detailed guide on how to conduct and write a systematic review from RMIT University; A roadmap for searching literature in PubMed from the VU Amsterdam; Alexander, P. A. (2020).

A systematic literature review (SLR) is an independent academic method that aims to identify and evaluate all relevant literature on a topic in order to derive conclusions about the question under consideration."Systematic reviews are undertaken to clarify the state of existing research and the implications that should be drawn from this."

Qualitative, narrative synthesis. Thematic analysis, may include conceptual models. Rapid review. Assessment of what is already known about a policy or practice issue, by using systematic review methods to search and critically appraise existing research. Completeness of searching determined by time constraints.

With the increased momentum of knowledge generation in the field of research, systematic reviews are essential to epitomise the state of extant literature and for theory building. In this article, we discuss the advantages of synthesising and reporting findings using a more impactful type of systematic review, the framework-based review.

According to the Cochrane Handbook, section 1.2.2, "a systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question.". The key characteristics of a systematic review are: a clearly stated set of objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies;

The Campbell Collaboration is an international research network that produces systematic reviews of the effects of social interventions in crime and justice, ... Conducting a successful systematic review of the literature, part 1. Nursing (Jenkintown, Pa.) (0360-4039), 44 (4), p. 13.

This article constitutes a systematic review of programs and practices with empirical support for improving school climate. It defines school climate and provides a methodology for identifying and evaluating relevant studies. ... Practices for improving secondary school climate: A systematic review of the research literature. American Journal ...

Systematic reviews that summarize the available information on a topic are an important part of evidence-based health care. There are both research and non-research reasons for undertaking a literature review. It is important to systematically review the literature when one would like to justify the need for a study, to update personal ...

Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure .An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject .The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a topic about research ...

This systematic literature review focuses on the research published on K-12 maker education in the early 2020s, providing a current picture of the field. Maker education is a hands-on approach to learning that encourages students to engage in collaborative and innovative activities, using a combination of traditional design and fabrication tools and digital technologies to explore real-life ...

The objective of this research is to provide a comprehensive understanding of work-life balance outcomes toward employees. The research adopts the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach.

PRISMA framework (Agnusdei et al., 2022) is used to perform a systematic literature review (SLR). The SLRs follow concise approach to identify the scattering and synthesize apprehension on a specific concern [3, 5].The relevant articles were collected from the Scopus database using a set of keywords as 'additive manufacturing' and 'sustainable development' or 'circular economy' or ...

Research method. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a practical approach for conducting theoretical reviews based on scientific evidence from published literature with systematic procedures so it can minimize bias (Cook, Mulrow, and Haynes Citation 1997; Tranfield, Denyer, and Smart Citation 2003).

1. INTRODUCTION. Evidence synthesis is a prerequisite for knowledge translation. 1 A well conducted systematic review (SR), often in conjunction with meta‐analyses (MA) when appropriate, is considered the "gold standard" of methods for synthesizing evidence related to a topic of interest. 2 The central strength of an SR is the transparency of the methods used to systematically search ...

This article employs a systematic literature review of a total of 111 publications from 2016 to 2023 on the consumer adoption/acceptance of FinTech products and services. It identifies seven research clusters from the extant literature to note the trends in adoption and enlist the challenges faced by the usage of FinTech along with emerging ...

This systematic literature review thoroughly analyzes the impact of mining on land rights in Ghana, revealing complex dynamics, challenges, and possible remedies. To achieve this, 183 of an initial pool of 495 academic journals, research papers, books, reports, policies, and legal documents were critically reviewed.