case study for occupational therapy

Case Studies for Contemporary OT Practice

Already purchased? Please sign in to view.

Do you need to re-use or reproduce this work?

current document all documents

Advanced search

Table of Contents

• Table of Contents v 6

Remember login

Enable two-factor authentication codes.

Forgot password

Please log in to view your account information. Don't have any account? You can register for one now.

You are here

Case study template.

Case Studies

Occupational therapy case studies.

We are delighted to share with you some successful stories from our occupational therapy team regarding specific conditions and disorders that many people are faced with, and organisations may need to accomodate for.

Our work helps people of all ages with all kinds of physical, mental or developmental conditions to develop, regain and maintain their living and working skills. We work in a wide range of environments and use a person-centred, recovery focused approach to occupational therapy.

ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION

November 13th, 2020|Mental Health Sidney is 62 years old with a first episode of agitated depression. He recently retired from work as a mechanic as [...]

NEURODIVERGENCY

January 15th, 2018|Education Ben is an 18-year-old with a neurodivergent diagnosis previously known as Asperger's Syndrome. He lives at home with his parents and [...]

AUTISM SPECTRUM CONDITION

November 13th, 2020|Education Ken is a 27-year-old man who is autistic. He lives in a respite centre for adults with disabilities. He is able [...]

BIPOLAR DISORDER

November 12th, 2020|Mental Health James is 60 years old and is divorced with two children in their late 20s. His life had undergone a lot [...]

EATING DISORDER

February 11th, 2020|Mental Health Katherine is 32 years old and has struggled with issues around eating since the age of 13. She left home at [...]

DOWN’S SYNDROME – ADULT

April 15th, 2020|Learning Disabilities Jane is 21 years old and has Downs Syndrome. She lives with her mother, father, older brother and pet dog. Her [...]

October 31st, 2020|Education Paul is an 18-year-old man who lives with his parents and attends a special needs college. He has a moderate learning disability [...]

CEREBRAL PALSY

November 18th, 2020|Learning Disabilities Tina is 20 years old, lives with her grandparents and attends a day centre five days a week. Tina has cerebral [...]

OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER

July 27th, 2020|Mental Health Paul is a 40-year-old man diagnosed with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. He has always lived with his parents and remains in the [...]

PERSONALITY DISORDER

September 13th, 2020|Mental Health Emma is 34 years old and lives with her son and daughter aged 11 and 8. She has experienced life-long difficulties [...]

March 15th, 2020|Mental Health Anna is a 45-year-old lady who experienced her first episode of Psychosis in her late 30s. She lives with her teenage [...]

POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

April 16th, 2020|Mental Health   Isobel is a 40-year-old lady with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. At the time of her referral to [...]

Get in Touch

01264 326308 [email protected]

Business Hours

Monday – Friday: 9am – 5pm

Explore our website

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Occupational Therapy Case Study

• identified the PICO components of your patient scenario,
• formulated a clinical question,
• found an appropriate article to answer your question,
• and critically appraised the article.

Now, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned to your patient.

For an accessible version of this activity, please refer to our document Step 4: Apply – Accessible Case Studies .

Evidence-Based Practice Copyright © by Various Authors - See Each Chapter Attribution is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Case study research: Building the occupational therapy evidence base one case at a time

Affiliation.

• 1 Department of Occupational Therapy Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
• PMID: 35171068
• DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2039758

Background: There is growing recognition in healthcare that evidence from randomised controlled trials may not be appropriate to answer the full spectrum of practice-based questions and a more pluralistic approach is needed.

Aim: To consider the use of case study research in contributing to the occupational therapy evidence base.

Material and methods: A critical discussion of the current state of evidence-based practice in occupational therapy and exploration of a viable approach to case study research is used.

Results: Case study research can capture the context and complexity of occupational therapy practice. Cases can then be pooled to make a substantial contribution to the evidence base.

Conclusions: Occupational therapists should consider the use of case study research to produce practice related, meaningful research. Journal editorial boards need to be mindful of the value of high-quality case study research when considering publication priorities in occupational therapy literature.

Significance: Highlights a changing landscape in the literature about how best to conduct research in health and social care, particularly for complex interventions and describes a pragmatic approach to case study research for occupational therapy.

Keywords: Case study research; evidence-based practice; occupational therapy; research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Exploring the contribution of case study research to the evidence base for occupational therapy: a scoping review. McQuaid L, Thomson K, Bannigan K. McQuaid L, et al. Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 31;12(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02292-4. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37525266 Free PMC article. Review.
• Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
• Research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation: an investigation of its implementation by physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Kristensen HK, Ytterberg C, Jones DL, Lund H. Kristensen HK, et al. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(26):2564-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1138550. Epub 2016 Mar 17. Disabil Rehabil. 2016. PMID: 26984455
• The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
• Pre-discharge home visits: A qualitative exploration of the experience of occupational therapists and multidisciplinary stakeholders. Godfrey M, Cornwell P, Eames S, Hodson T, Thomas T, Gillen A. Godfrey M, et al. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Jun;66(3):249-257. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12561. Epub 2019 Feb 10. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019. PMID: 30740713 Review.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Taylor & Francis

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Occupational Therapy Case Study Framework

Identify case study subject, determine subject's medical history, approval: medical history.

• Determine Subject's Medical History Will be submitted

Evaluate Occupation History and Hobbies

Identify occupation difficulties, determine goals for occupational therapy, plan for initial assessment, conduct initial assessment, document initial assessment findings, approval: initial assessment findings.

• Conduct Initial Assessment Will be submitted
• Document Initial Assessment Findings Will be submitted

Design Individualized Therapy Plan

Discuss therapy plan with subject, approval: therapy plan.

• Design Individualized Therapy Plan Will be submitted
• Discuss Therapy Plan with Subject Will be submitted

Implement Occupational Therapy Plan

Monitor progress and adjust plan as necessary, document progress and changes in plan, end of therapy evaluation, draft final report of the case study, approval: final report.

• Draft Final Report of the Case Study Will be submitted

Take control of your workflows today.

More templates like this.

This site uses essential cookies. We'd also like to set additional cookies . |  Manage preferences

Call for more information and costs or if you are enquiring for yourself or a family member you can use our online cost guide for individuals.

Case Study: Neurological rehabilitation

by Joanna Bresi-Ando

Lucas was a 49 year old male, who ran his own business as an IT consultant. He lived with his wife and 2 adult children in their own home. Lucas was previously fully independent with all his daily activities and had no significant past medical history.

Lucas fell down the stairs at work and sustained a sub arachnoid haemorrhage, a fractured skull, facial lacerations and 2 fractured ribs. He was admitted to the nearest hospital with a trauma centre, where he underwent surgery to debride and evacuate the depressed skull fracture and debride and repair the lacerations.

As a result of the brain injury, Lucas was left with the following impairments;

• Left sided lower limb weakness
• Reduced balance
• Cognitive difficulties - particularly working memory, reduced attention and executive function skills
• Expressive and receptive language difficulties
• Increased fatigue.

Following his acute admission, Lucas was transferred to a rehab unit, however his low mood deteriorated and he was increasingly agitated. Lucas made very little progress on the unit, so it was decided in his best interests for his rehab to be continued at home.

NHS community services in his borough did not provide neuro specific rehab and Lucas’ Case Manager began the search for a neuro Occupational therapist.

Reason for referral

Lucas was referred to occupational therapy for an assessment of his physical and cognitive needs, to allow him to reach his optimal level of function.

Initial assessment

Lucas was independently mobile indoors and short distances outdoors using a walking stick with supervision.

He was independent with personal care and able to prepare simple meals such as breakfast and a hot drink, however he struggled with complex meal prep tasks. He previously enjoyed cooking and this had been the main household task he would participate in prior to his accident. Lucas’ goal was be able to independently cook a complex meal for his family.

Lucas required support to manage his daily routine; he required supervision to access the community and was dependent for financial management. He fatigued easily and struggled to join in with group conversations, so was increasingly socially isolated.

Recommendations for occupational therapy intervention were to

• Develop meaningful roles and a routine focusing on productivity and structure.
• Develop fatigue management, pacing and energy conservation techniques.
• Use relaxation techniques to help manage his fatigue.
• Develop memory aid strategies, such as using his phone as a reminder and a notebook to write down prompts and lists.
• Explore vocational pursuits

Other recommendations were;

• To continue with physiotherapy treatment
• To be assessed by a speech and Language therapist for continuing communication issues.
• To be assessed by a neuropsychologist for further assessment of his cognitive function and work collaboratively with the occupational therapist in the areas of vocational rehab and mood management.

Goal setting

Lucas was able to come up with an overall cooking goal with support from the occupational therapist; he wished to prepare spaghetti bolognese safely and independently without getting distracted from the task.

The occupational therapist then worked with Lucas and his family on the following short term goals:

• To be able to produce a shopping list with minimal assistance,
• To be able to access his local shops with distant supervision and
• To shop for the ingredients with distant supervision.

The short term goals were incorporated into a structured weekly timetable for Lucas to follow.

Assessment/Intervention

Assessment and treatment was completed simultaneously, through the use of functional tasks and repetitive practice of that task.

Although Lucas had an overall cooking goal, in order to achieve it, meant that he was required to work on other functional skills at the same time, such as searching for and locating items in his kitchen in order to work out what was missing and would need to go on a shopping list, safely accessing the community to get to the local shops and making his way around a supermarket, as well as paying for shopping and transporting it home.

Occupational therapists are very aware of how frustrating it can be for clients to achieve what seems to them to be the simplest of tasks and how this frustration can turn into a negative mind set and demoralise the client. In order to avoid this and empower the client to gain a sense of achievement, a graded approach to activities is often used.

In Lucas’ case he was initially given one step of the overall task to complete, i.e. cooking the mince independently and then would be assisted with the other steps. Over time he was encouraged to complete more of the steps on his own. Discussion with Lucas before starting a task and getting him to rate himself on how well he thought he would perform and then reflecting back at the end of the session on his actual performance also served as a method of encouraging self-monitoring and helped him to realise he could manage better than he thought.

Lucas was taught a strategy of using simple worded checklists for each step of the task and checking them off, before moving on to the next step.

The OT would intervene each time he deviated from the task and bring him back to the checklist.

To address attentional difficulties, the OT began to introduce distractions into the environment, i.e. radio on in the background or talking to Lucas when he was completing a task.

By the end of 12 weeks of rehab Lucas was able to make Spaghetti Bolognese with distant supervision.

Lucas had taken on board the strategies of using checklists to help him through the task, but was unable to recognise when he had deviated from a task and always required a prompt to return to his checklist. Lucas’ safety awareness during meal prep improved and family were happy for him to make them a meal with minimal support from themselves.

As Lucas had been required to regularly walk to his local shops, his confidence with community access improved along with confidence to speak with strangers and articulate his needs.

Lucas has not yet been able to return to work and is unsure of whether he wishes to do so, but he is interested in volunteering with a local charity as a means of further occupying his time and increasing his social interactions.

He continues to work with the occupational therapist on managing his fatigue.

Related topics

View articles by topic.

• Industry news
• Professional guides
• Press release
• Our clients
• Daily Living Skills
• Networking event
• Military charities
• Royal Visit
• Assistive technology
• Fatigue management
• Remote Services
• Catrin Pugh
• Educational Series for Charities
• Returning to work
• Clinical governance
• Paediatrics
• Educational Needs
• Psychological trauma
• pain-management
• Workplace assessments
• Recruitment
• Financial management
• Mental Health
• Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG)
• Speech and Language

Problems we solve

• Complex needs
• Self care skills
• Fine motor skills
• Gross motor skills
• Memory problems
• Planning activities
• Organisation skills
• Cooking & household activities
• Getting out & about
• Handwriting
• Seating & wheelchairs
• Moving around the home
• Personal care & dressing
• Access in & out of the home
• The work place
• Standing & self-support
• Mobility & falls

Conditions we treat

• Brain injury
• Motor Neurone Disease
• Multiple Sclerosis
• Developmental delay
• Sensory Processing Disorder
• Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
• Spinal injury
• Learning difficulties
• Scar management
• Amputations

A professional’s guide to functional rehabilitation

Manage your cookie preferences..

You can learn more about the cookies we set in our cookie policy .

Essential cookies

These cookies are essential for the website to function and are always on.

Analytics Cookies

These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our site.

Profile Cookies

Whilst we do not show advertising on our site, we may collect data to sign-post our services elsewhere.

• Occupational Therapy - Case Study Guidelines

QMU Occupational Therapy - Case Study Guidelines

Case Study Guidelines

Introduction 

This is a brief guide to the content of a case study.  The individual selected for case study may be considered in terms of an Occupational Therapy Model/ Approach to practice and also the wider environments and networks that play a role in a person’s life. 

This guide is created with an individual in mind but may also be used for a group, community or population that you have worked with. RCOT have an interesting case study template: Royal Collage of Occupational Therapy  which they used for one of their influencing campaigns.  You may find it useful if you are presenting work you have done with a group, community or population rather than an individual service user.

Mandatory for all case studies

Anonymity and confidentiality of the service user(s), service provider and all staff involved must be maintained through out the case study .  You are advised to use pseudonyms, delete the name of service and any geographical locations.

Consider how your case study will demonstrate or include the points below:

• Identify a main focus (why are you writing this, what do you want to learn from this?)
• Wider context - How does this impact on the OT process?
• Service user involvement – How did you facilitate them to work in partnership with you? What was important to them?
• Critical engagement - Rationales for choices/ decisions made throughout the OT process must be detailed, and include a balanced critique (i.e. pro’s and con’s)
• Evidence - Support your work with literature and other resources available to you i.e. reading, useful placement resources, theory, policy and other documents
• How will you present your case study to your team? Consider different media (PowerPoint, video diary, photo’s, end products).
• Consider facilitating the person to present their case with you.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• PMC10388505

Exploring the contribution of case study research to the evidence base for occupational therapy: a scoping review

Leona mcquaid.

Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

Katie Thomson

Katrina bannigan, associated data.

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the UK Data Service ReShare repository, [10.5255/UKDA-SN-855706].

Case study research is generating interest to evaluate complex interventions. However, it is not clear how this is being utilized by occupational therapists or how feasible it is to contribute to the evidence base. This scoping review explores case study research within occupational therapy in terms of how it is defined, the methodological characteristics adopted, such as data collection and analysis, and the range of practice contexts in which it is applied. We consider the viability of case study research for contributing to our evidence base.

Opinion, text and empirical studies within an occupational therapy practice context were included. A three-step extensive search following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was conducted in June 2020 and updated in July 2021 across ten databases, websites, peer-reviewed and grey literature from 2016 onwards. Study selection was completed by two independent reviewers. A data extraction table was developed and piloted and data charted to align with research questions. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer and a 10% sample cross checked by another.

Eighty-eight studies were included in the review consisting of ( n  = 84) empirical case study and ( n  = 4) non-empirical papers. Case study research has been conducted globally, with a range of populations across different settings. The majority were conducted in a community setting ( n = 48/84; 57%) with populations experiencing neurodevelopmental disorder ( n = 32/84; 38%), stroke ( n = 14/84;17%) and non-diagnosis specific ( n = 13/84; 15%). Methodologies adopted quantitative ( n = 42/84; 50%), mixed methods ( n = 22/84; 26%) and qualitative designs ( n = 20/84; 24%). However, identifying the methodology and ‘case’ was a challenge due to methodological inconsistencies.

Conclusions

Case study research is useful when large-scale inquiry is not appropriate; for cases of complexity, early intervention efficacy, theory testing or when small participant numbers are available. It appears a viable methodology to contribute to the evidence base for occupation and health as it has been used to evaluate interventions across a breadth of occupational therapy practice contexts. Viability could be enhanced through consistent conduct and reporting to allow pooling of case data. A conceptual model and description of case study research in occupational therapy is proposed to support this.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/PCFJ6.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02292-4.

Developing evidence informed occupational therapy practice is a priority across international practice standards and research agendas [ 1 , 2 ]. The challenge in achieving this, however, is multifaceted. Occupational therapists report a lack of research knowledge, time, resources and organizational support as barriers in the conduct of research [ 3 – 5 ]. Implementing findings from a research environment to the reality of clinical practice also presents a challenge despite knowledge translation and implementation strategies [ 6 ]. In practice, therapists use reasoning, experience and the client’s perspectives in addition to research [ 7 , 8 ]. This holistic approach to service provision can be difficult to capture, but the need to demonstrate impact and quality outcomes remains.

Arguably, the challenge in evidencing the value of occupational therapy reflects the complexity of practice where the ‘the active ingredient’ is difficult to stipulate [ 9 ]. This is comparable to the ‘complexity turn’ of wider health and social care which acknowledges that interventions are not always linear processes with predictable outcomes [ 10 ]. In recognition of this, debate exists in occupational therapy about how best to develop the evidence base [ 11 ]. Whilst the need for large-scale inquiry and randomized controlled trials is evident, there is also a growing perception that this may not be appropriate to answer the full spectrum of practice-based questions [ 10 ]. Instead, the research method adopted should respond appropriately to the question being asked and often a range of methods may be necessary. In particular for occupational therapy, researchers should consider designs carefully, particularly when testing interventions, so the holistic nature of practice is not compromised [ 11 ]. A shift to a pluralistic approach which best serves the decision-making needs of practitioners may be more appropriate [ 12 , 13 ].

Case study methodology—an in-depth analysis of a phenomenon within its real-world context [ 14 ]—has become increasingly popular in social sciences and is beginning to generate greater interest in occupational therapy [ 11 , 15 ]. Focus on a single case in context presents a familiar and therefore potentially feasible approach to research for practitioners. As a methodology, it relies on the collection of multiple sources of data to gain an in-depth understanding of the case [ 14 ], resembling multiple sources of evidence informing decision making in practice [ 11 ]. Flyvberg [ 16 ] argues this detailed contextual knowledge is necessary for understanding human behaviours when there can be no absolutes. It therefore provides an alternative methodology where large-scale inquiry is not appropriate or feasible [ 14 ].

Confusion surrounds case study methodology in terms of how it is conducted, reported and consequently identified in the literature. Previous reviews have noted inconsistencies between methodology and design, mislabeling of case study research and a lack of clarity defining the case and context boundaries [ 15 , 17 ]. It is often associated with qualitative origins, evolving from the natural and social sciences where disciplines such as anthropology, sociology and psychology demonstrate early application of the methodology and have since used it to grow their evidence base [ 18 , 19 ]. However, case study research can be shaped by paradigm, study design and selection of methods, either qualitative, quantitative or mixed. Its flexibility as a methodology and variation in approach by seminal authors may add to the confusion. For instance, Stake [ 20 ] and Merriam [ 21 ] align to a qualitative approach whereas Yin [ 14 ] adopts more of a positivist approach with a priori design to examine causality. The language around case studies can also be synonymous with ‘non-research’ case reports, anecdotes about practice or educational case studies which do not include data collection or analysis [ 22 ]. However, case study methodology is research involving systematic processes of data collection with the ability to draw rigourous conclusions [ 17 ]. Hence, there is a need to better understand this methodology and bring clarity in defining it for research use in occupational therapy practice.

There are misconceptions that case study research can provide only descriptive or exploratory data and it is regarded as poorer evidence in the effectiveness evidence hierarchy [ 10 ]. However, in a meta-narrative review of case study approaches to evaluate complex interventions, Paparini et al. [ 15 ] noted diversity in epistemological and methodological approaches from narrative inquiry to the more quasi-experimental. As such, case study research offers flexibility to answer a range of questions aiding a pluralistic approach to research. Yin [ 14 ] suggests three purposes of case study research; (i) descriptive; describes a phenomenon such as an intervention; (ii) explorative; explores situations where there is no single outcome, and (iii) explanatory; seeks to explain casual relationships. Stake [ 20 ] on the other hand describes case study research as (i) intrinsic; to understand a single case, (ii) instrumental; where the case is of secondary interest to facilitate understanding to another context and (iii) collective; when multiple cases are studied around a similar concept. Whilst it has been criticized for lack of rigour and external validity [ 22 ], one case can be sufficient to make causal claims, similar to a single experiment [ 15 ]. A particular case can disprove a theory and prompt further investigation or testing [ 16 ]. Furthermore, Yin [ 14 ] reasons the accumulation of case studies may offer greater rigour, reliability and external validity of findings as a larger dataset is created. Through case replication and organized accessible storage, there is potential for data to be mined to conduct rigourous practice-based research [ 11 , 23 ].

Some contention exists around the classification of single-case designs, including N-of-1 observational and experimental designs. Rice, Stein and Tomlin [ 24 ] argue the single-case experimental design (SCED) is not the same as a case study; however, Paparini [ 10 ] maintains this is coterminous with Yin’s explanatory case study aims. The International Collaborative Network of N-of-1 Trials and Single-Case Designs (ICN) articulates these designs broadly as the study of a single participant in a real-world clinical application [ 25 ]. This singular and contextual focus makes these designs appropriate to consider under the umbrella term case study research for the purposes of this review and exploring how N-of-1 may be a viable means to develop the occupational therapy evidence base.

Case study research has previously been advocated for in occupational therapy. Ottenbacher [ 26 ] originally described the small ‘N’ study as a tool for practitioners to address their responsibilities of documenting service provision effectiveness. Others have provided support for case study methodology to demonstrate clinical impact, overcome challenges of investigating complex phenomena and develop the occupational therapy evidence base [ 27 – 29 ]. It is presented as a good ‘fit’ for occupational therapy with untapped potential for contributing to the evidence base [ 11 , 30 ]. Whilst these studies offer a justification for the use of case study research in occupational therapy and call for greater uptake of the method, no extensive review of empirical case study methodology in occupational therapy practice has been conducted. It therefore remains unclear if, and how, the methodology is being utilized, or how feasible it is to contribute to the evidence base. A scoping review was deemed the most appropriate methodology for this review as it has recognized value for researching broader topics [ 31 ]. It will identify all available, eligible evidence and chart key information from the literature to answer the research questions and identify any gaps in the knowledge base.

A preliminary search of PROSPERO, MEDLINE, the Open Science Framework and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted. A similar scoping review was published in 2020 but focused solely on the use of qualitative case studies in occupational therapy, therefore providing a restricted view of case study methodologies [ 32 ]. Equally, the literature search was conducted in 2017 and interest in this methodology has grown since; hence, there may have been a change in the use of qualitative case study research methods within occupational therapy in recent years.

This scoping review explores case study research within occupational therapy in terms of how it is defined, the methodological characteristics adopted, such as data collection and analysis, and the range of practice contexts in which it is applied. By reviewing case study research within the field, it will be possible to assess the viability of case study research for contributing to the evidence base for occupation and health. The enriched understanding of case study research within occupational therapy could identify areas for future research and strategies to improve evidence-based clinical outcomes for those accessing services.

Review questions

This review aims to understand how case study research methodologies are used to contribute to the evidence base for occupational therapy practice. Specifically, it will identify and chart data to address the following sub-questions:

• How is ‘case study’ defined as a research methodology in occupational therapy literature?
• What are the methodological characteristics of case study research used in occupational therapy practice?
• What are the contexts and recorded implications of case study research undertaken in occupational therapy practice?

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews [ 33 ] and, in line with best practice, used the updated Preferred Reporting Items Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist (PRISMA-ScR)  (See Additional File 1 for PRISMA-ScR checklist) [ 34 – 36 ]. It was conducted in accordance with an a priori protocol [ 37 ], and any deviations from this are reported and justified.

Inclusion criteria

Participants.

This review considered studies where occupational therapy input is provided as the object of study or the ‘case’ within the case study; therefore, the inclusion criteria was not limited by participant characteristics. It is possible that included studies may not involve participants given the nature of case study research and non-empirical study types are also eligible for inclusion. This allowed the potential for a representative picture of who and what occupational therapists have studied using case study methodology.

Empirical studies using case study research methodology were included. Literature reviews, text or opinion pieces which discuss the value of case study research within occupational therapy practice were also included to ascertain how others have used or conceptualized the use of case study research to achieve evidence-based practice. Papers were excluded where a case study research design was not explicit, for example, a descriptive case report without data collection and analysis.

Any area of occupational therapy practice was considered which spans health and social care, criminal justice, education and other diverse areas [ 38 ]. An a priori decision was made to exclude studies where the occupational therapy context could not be clearly defined, for example, multidisciplinary input or where practice was not the focus of the study, for example, describing an occupation only. All geographical locations were considered; however, as only articles written in English language were included, this may have created a geographical restriction through language limitations.

Types of sources

This scoping review included studies, as well as thesis and book chapters, if they involved empirical quantitative, qualitative and mixed method case study designs. Opinion, text or other articles which discuss the use of case study research in an occupational therapy practice context were also included. Case studies that are descriptive with no data collection and analysis were excluded. This was identified through reviewing the methods undertaken rather than how a study self-identified.

Search strategy

The search strategy aimed to locate both published and unpublished primary studies, reviews and text and opinion papers. To support the development and accuracy of the search strategy, a health systems librarian and occupational therapy profession specialist librarian were consulted in the early development stages. As per the JBI recommended three-step approach, an initial limited search of MEDLINE (EBSCO) and CINAHL (EBSCO) was undertaken to identify articles on the topic. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles were used to develop a full search strategy. The scoping review process is iterative [ 33 ] so it was noted in the protocol that the search strategy may need to be adapted as the review evolved. As a result of the preliminary searches, a change was required through the addition of the search term ‘occupational science’. Without its inclusion, a valuable review on the use of case study research in occupational science which also included occupational therapy practice was missed [ 39 ]. Therefore, the addition of this term ensured a thorough search, recognizing the influence of occupational science on occupational therapy practice.

The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, was adapted for each included information source and a second search was undertaken in June 2020 and updated on 7th July 2021. The full search strategies are provided in Additional file 2 . The reference lists of articles included in the review were screened for additional papers plus a key author search to ensure all relevant studies were identified [ 33 ]. Studies published in English were included as the resources for translation were not available within the scope of this review.

The databases searched included MEDLINE (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid), PsychINFO (ProQuest) and Web Of Science. Sources of unpublished studies and grey literature searched included OpenGrey, Google and Google Scholar, OTDBASE, EthOS and OADT. To identify occupational therapy-specific literature, the content pages of practice publications Occupational Therapy News (UK), Occupational Therapy Now (Canada) and Occupational Therapy Practice (USA) were also screened from 2016.

Despite running preparatory searches, an unmanageable amount of papers were returned and on inspection many were dated in their approach to practice and language. For example, Pinkney [ 40 ] referred to ‘senile dementia’ and Pomeroy [ 41 ] referred to ‘handicap goals’. Therefore, to keep the review feasible as well as contemporary, a decision was made by the team to limit date parameters to 2016 onwards. This also meant that the OTSeeker database was omitted as a change from a priori as it has not remained comprehensive from this date due to lack of funding.

Study/source of evidence selection

Following the search, all identified records were collated and uploaded into Mendeley V1.19.4 (Mendeley Ltd., Elsevier, Netherlands) and duplicates removed. A decision was made not to use the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI; Adelaide, Australia) as JBI SUMARI does not offer modifiable data extraction templates which was needed for this review [ 33 ]. Instead, studies were transferred to Rayyan QCRI (Qatar Computing Research Institute [Data Analytics], Doha, Qatar), a systematic review web application to manage the independent relevance checking process [ 42 ].

A screening tool was developed and piloted on a sample of studies by all three reviewers (LMQ; KT; KB) and adjusted until consensus reached to enhance clarity before continuing the full screening process. The screening tool served as a memory aid to ensure reviewers were being consistent in how the inclusion criteria was applied and all decisions were recorded on Rayyan QCRI. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria (LMQ; KT and KB reviewed half each). Due to the broad nature of the question and a lack of clarity in reporting case study research methodology in the title or abstract, where there was doubt, articles were included for full-text review to be as inclusive as possible. Potentially relevant papers were retrieved in full and assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers (LMQ; KT and KB reviewed half each). Full-text studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded, and reasons for their exclusion recorded. Any disagreements that arose between reviewers were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Where required, the screening tool was refined following these discussions to create an audit trail and further enhance consistency in how inclusion criteria was applied in the screening process. Studies were not quality assessed, as per scoping review guidance [ 33 ], as the purpose of this scoping review was to map available existing evidence rather than consider methodological quality.

Data extraction

Data were extracted from papers using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Redmond, Washington, USA). The tool was piloted by two independent reviewers initially on fourteen papers, an increase from the suggestion at protocol stage given the high number of included studies, and subsequently modified and revised. This clarified that only study designs stated, rather than conjected, would be extracted to reflect how authors self-categorize and define case study methodology. Additionally, it presented the need for a separate data extraction tool for non-empirical papers as some of the detail in the original tool was not relevant to review or discursive paper designs. The new tool captured details on reported strengths, limitations and explanations of data collection/analysis for the use of this methodology in occupational therapy practice. The updated data extraction tools are presented in Additional files 3 and 4 .

Data extraction was completed by the first author and a 10% sample checked by a second reviewer. As recommended in the data extraction process [ 34 ], multiple reports from the same study were linked. The data extracted for empirical studies included specific details about the definitions, justification and citations of case study research, the methodological characteristics, the context in terms of practice setting and population and key findings and implications relevant to the review question [ 37 ]. Authors of papers were contacted to request missing or additional data, where required.

Data presentation

As specified in the protocol and recommended in the JBI scoping review guidance, the extracted data is presented in diagrammatic and tabular form. A narrative summary accompanies the charted results and describes how the results relate to the scoping review questions. A mapping approach to analysis was adopted as the objective of this scoping review was to collate the range of existing evidence and describe the methodological characteristics of case study research, rather than synthesis or appraise the evidence.

In total, database and secondary searching returned 8382 studies (Fig.  1 ). After duplicates were removed, 5280 underwent title and abstract screening with 4080 articles excluded at this stage. Full-text screening and application of the updated 2016 date parameters led to a further 1108 articles excluded. This left 92 articles eligible for inclusion. This included seven reports linked to three studies which were subsequently combined [ 43 ] and four non-empirical papers consisting of a discussion piece and three literature reviews. Three of these reviewed the use of case study research in occupational therapy and/or occupational science prior to 2016, further justifying the decision to provide a more contemporary review. A final total of 88 records were included in the review; 84 empirical studies, and four non-empirical papers. The characteristics of included studies are presented in Additional files 5 and 6 . The majority of studies were excluded due to not having an occupational therapy practice focus, for example, multidisciplinary or a description of the meaning of an occupation rather than in a practice context (see Additional File 7 for more detail).

Search results and study selection and inclusion process [ 34 ]

After an initial dip from 2016, publication of empirical case study research shows a consistent trend from 2017 onwards; the lower number in 2021 is attributed to the search stopping mid-way through the year (July 2021) (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). Across the 88 included studies, there is greater representation of the Global North with the USA ( n  = 24/88; 27%), Canada ( n  =12/88; 14%) and UK ( n  = 11/88; 13%) publishing the most case study research. Case study research has been adopted to address exploratory and explanatory aims, and as such, it has been used to understand the outcomes of interventions, to explore elements of practice such as theoretical models, and to understand occupation and occupational science concepts to inform practice. Empirical case study research was identified in journal articles ( n  = 77/88; 87%), predominantly in occupational therapy-specific journals ( n  = 56/88; 63%), theses ( n  = 6/88; 7%), abstracts ( n  = 4/88; 5%) and a book chapter ( n  = 1/88; 1%). The majority of case study research adopted a multiple case design ( n  = 64/84; 76%); however, single-case designs were also published ( n  = 19/84; 23%). Included studies have used multiple data collection methods including interviews, observation and outcome data and have been used in a range of practice settings across the life span. The empirical studies will now be mapped to answer each question of this review followed by mapping of the non-empirical studies.

Summary of included studies

Mapping of empirical studies

There did not appear to be a consistent approach adopted across studies to define case study methodology. Figure  2 captures the various ways studies self-reported their methodological design (the more prominent the text, the more a word or phrase was featured in the data). Of the 84 empirical studies, 57% ( n  = 48/84) provided a definition or justification for the chosen case study research methodology. The most common cited explanations for adopting case study methodology were as follows: (i) to gain a deep understanding of the case ( n  = 28/84; 33%); (ii) to achieve this using multiple data sources, perspectives or baseline measures ( n  = 21/84; 25%) and (iii) to study the case in the real-world environment or context ( n  = 17/84; 20%). A need for comprehensive understanding was linked to the complexity of the case, such as a social interaction or human behaviour, e.g. Carrol [ 44 ] and Soeker & Pape [ 45 ]. Case study methodology was also justified as more suitable or practical when the phenomena was too complex or too little was already known for other data collection approaches, such as experiments or surveys to be used, e.g. Nilsson et al. [ 46 ] and Stickley & Hall [ 47 ]. Consequently, 10 studies specifically justified case study research as appropriate for early efficacy and feasibility studies, e.g. Peters et al. [ 48 ]. Case study methodology was described as a form of empirical enquiry or research by a small number of studies ( n  = 13/84; 15%), and in some instances, this was justified as being closely aligned to the principles of occupational therapy practice or a way to provide clinically relevant information, e.g. Kearns Murphy & Sheil [ 49 ] and Verikios et al. [ 50 ]. To a lesser extent ( n  = 6/84; 7%), case study methodology was described as a way to test theory.

Phrase cloud illustration of study design as self-identified in included empirical studies. Size of the word illustrates frequency of use

Less than half of studies ( n  = 41/84; 48%) referred to seminal authors or included relevant case study methodological citations. Table ​ Table2 2 provides a summary of cited author explanation of case study research. Yin’s work was most commonly cited followed by Stake and Merriam whom were more associated, but not limited to, qualitative case studies. Dibsdall [ 51 ] and Hurst [ 52 ] justified their choice of Yin’s approach to case study methodology because it provided a clearer structure to follow.

• a Study design.

Summary of cited author explanation of case study research

Congruence between description of study design and the methods undertaken was not always consistent, and reporting of ethical approval to distinguish case study research from case reports was not always reliable. For example, two studies classified as case reports by the American Journal of Occupational Therapy [ 56 , 57 ] include a methods section with data collection and analysis and have received ethical approval which would be more consistent with case study research methodology rather than a descriptive, non-research case report [ 14 ]. In contrast, Longpre et al. [ 58 ] documented that, after seeking guidance from three university review boards, ethics was not required for a case study approach despite including interview and document review data collection and an appropriate research citation.

• b Methods of data collection

Quantitative data collection methods accounted for the majority of methods ( n  = 42/84; 50%), but mixed methods ( n  = 22/84; 26%) and qualitative ( n  = 20/84; 24%) approaches were also used. As such, studies appeared to represent different research paradigms, although the authors positioning is only stated in two studies; critical realism [ 52 ] and constructivism [ 59 ]. Data collection methods varied dependent on practice setting with quantitative methods dominant in inpatient and outpatient settings whereas third sector only used qualitative methods (Fig.  3 ). Community settings used a mixture of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods.

Number of studies per practice setting and data collection approach

Quantitative data was used to evaluate effectiveness with testing pre and post intervention, and as such, they adopted explanatory, N-of-1, single-case experimental or observational designs. In contrast, qualitative designs were used in studies with an exploratory or descriptive purpose. Here, qualitative data added further understanding of the effects or acceptability of an intervention from a variety of perspectives. Data collection methods across qualitative studies included the use of semi-structured interviews, observation, document review, field diaries and focus groups. Observation was also evident in quantitative methods but for the purpose of gathering performance data and applying objective measures rather than descriptive or thematic purposes. Mixed methods case study research included a range of designs such as the single-case experimental design [ 60 ], multiple case study [ 61 ] and descriptive case study [ 62 ].

• iii Outcome measures.

None of the included quantitative studies used exactly the same measures. However, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was the most commonly used occupation-based outcome measure ( n  = 20/84; 23%) and to a lesser extent, the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) was used ( n  = 3/84; 4%). The Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) was also used ( n  = 5/84; 6%) and Kearns Murphy and Sheil [ 50 ] in particular advocated for its use in occupational therapy case study research, particularly in mental health settings. Non-occupation-specific measures of function were also used such as Range of Movement, Fugl-Meyer assessment, Sensory profiles and other condition-specific measures, e.g. Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale [ 63 ], Stroke Impact Scale [ 64 ] and Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [ 65 ].

• iv Methods of analysis.

Descriptive analysis and visual analysis to compare data graphed over time was used in quantitative experimental designs. Statistical analysis in the form of Rasch and frequency analysis was also employed in some instances [ 66 – 68 ] but this was largely in conjunction with visual analysis. Both Gustaffson et al. [ 69 ] and Gimeno et al. [ 70 ] suggested in their studies that visual analysis is preferable for single-case designs rather than statistical hypothesis testing due to the small number of participants. Thematic and content analyses were commonly used in qualitative studies in addition to descriptive statistics. For multiple case designs, within and cross case analysis was described [ 59 , 64 , 71 – 74 ]. Specifically, Yin’s approach to pattern matching [ 51 , 73 , 75 , 76 ], explanation building [ 45 ] and matrix coding [ 77 ] was used. Two studies referred specifically to Stake’s approach to data analysis [ 59 , 78 ].

• e The case.

Few studies ( n  = 10/84; 11%) made the case explicit in terms of description, selection or boundaries. In particular, quantitative case study designs appeared not to define the case; therefore, the participant receiving occupational therapy was assumed to be the case. In these studies, the inclusion criteria, time and location of intervention appear to be the boundary. Alternatively, the provision of occupational therapy input as a process could be the case of interest. Fields [ 78 ] and Pretorious [ 79 ] exemplify a clearly defined case as an individual and both were bounded by the context of time and location. Haines et al. [ 78 ] and Hyett et al. [ 59 ] demonstrate a defined case as a process, occupational therapy provision and a social network respectively. Across the studies, the case, either stated or conjected, was predominately an individual ( n  = 72/84; 85%). Groups, namely families ( n  = 5/84; 6%) and organizations were also identified as the case ( n  = 4; 5%). The case was stated as a process in a small number of studies ( n  = 3/84; 4%); however, without a clear description of the case and boundary, it is challenging to accurately identify this within the included studies.

• a Practice contexts

Occupational therapy case study research were conducted with various client groups across a range of practice settings (Additional files 8 and 9 ). The majority were based in the community ( n  = 48/84; 57%); however, the practice context or setting where the research was carried out was not always clearly reported ( n  = 11/84; 13%). Interventions adopting therapeutic use of occupation and activity were apparent, such as feeding [ 80 ], gaming [ 81 , 82 ], gardening [ 83 ] and play [ 84 – 86 ]. This was more prevalent in outpatient or community settings with inpatient settings adopting more of a compensatory approach [ 87 ] to facilitate engagement in occupations as an end, rather than the therapeutic use of occupation itself as a means. Across all practice settings, the most common occupational therapy interventions were sensory-based interventions ( n  = 10/84; 12%) for example Giencke Kimball et al. [ 88 ], Go & Lee [ 89 ] Hejazi-Shirmard et al. [ 90 ], and provision of assistive equipment ( n  = 9/88; 11%) for example Cruz et al. [ 91 ], Golisz et al. [ 92 ] and Teixeira & Alves [ 93 ]. In other instances ( n  = 4/84; 5%), provision of occupational therapy was described as the intervention, subsequently involving a range of input rather than a single defined intervention, for example Kearns Murphy & Sheil [ 49 ], Haines et al. [ 78 ] and Pretorius [ 79 ].

Although all studies had a practice focus, not all were intervention specific but investigated a broader aspect of practice and so did not always include participants ( n  = 11/84; 13%). For example, Carey et al. [ 94 ] conducted an instrumental case study on the case of occupational therapy practice in the broad context of mental health services in Saskatchewan, Canada. This involved reviewing documentation and records from practice rather than including a population group or specific intervention. Others focused on particular assessments used in practice [ 95 , 96 ] using conceptual frameworks in practice [ 52 , 59 ] and practice at the organization or community level [ 47 , 71 , 97 , 98 ].

For studies that included a population group, case study methodology was used across the life span; adults ( n  = 27/84; 32%) children ( n = 24/84; 29%) and to a lesser extent, older adults ( n  = 6/84; 7%). It was also used with mixed age populations ( n  = 21/84; 25%) for instance, with families. Across all age groups, case study research was conducted largely with populations experiencing neurodevelopmental disorder ( n  = 32/84; 38%), stroke ( n  = 14/84; 17%) and ill mental health ( n  = 9/84; 11%) but was not always diagnosis specific ( n  = 13/84; 15%) (Additional file  9 ). For example, in Dibsdall’s [ 51 ] case study of a reablement service, occupational therapists provided a service to individuals with a range of diagnoses. Similarly, Fischl et al. [ 72 ] supported older adults with digital technology-mediated occupations irrelevant to a particular diagnosis.

• b Recorded implications for practice.

As the majority of studies had an intervention focus ( n  = 73/84; 87%), they were able to draw conclusions in terms of how and why an intervention works. However, implications for practice in terms of intervention efficacy were often presented as preliminary or pilot with recommendations for further research including larger sample size studies. Through multiple data collection methods, some studies incorporated participant, family or therapist views to triangulate data and draw conclusions about the acceptability of an intervention [ 50 , 62 , 99 ]. As an example, Peny-Dahlstand et al. [ 99 ] includes a clear diagram illustrating how multiple data sources are collected from the patient, the therapist and the organizational perspective to analyse feasibility in terms of acceptability, efficacy, adaptation and expansion. Details of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance intervention are aligned to a protocol giving the reader a sense of how this can be implemented in practice. Similarly, a detailed description of the intervention, case and/or context can aid transferability [ 14 ] as in Carlsedt et al.’s [ 64 ] overview of the BUS TRIPS intervention.

The remaining studies ( n  = 11/84; 13%) added to the understanding of non-intervention aspects of practice such as the use of models, frameworks and assessment tools within the practice context or recommended policy changes. For example, Soeker and Pape [ 45 ] explored the experiences of individuals with a brain injury of the Model of Self-Efficacy (MOOSE) as it was used by occupational therapists to support their return to work journey. Using an exploratory multiple case design, the authors were able to conclude that the MOOSE is a useful model in this area of practice as well as increasing understanding of how and why it supported work retraining.

Mapping of non-empirical papers

Four non-empirical papers that reviewed the use of case study research related to occupational therapy were included in this review. These were integrative reviews of case study research in occupational therapy [ 100 ], occupational science [ 39 ] and a scoping review of qualitative case study research [ 32 ] together with a discussion of the applicability of single-case experimental designs to occupational therapy [ 101 ]. The literature review searches were conducted in either 2016 or 2017 and identified 32 [ 100 ], 27 [ 32 ] and 18 studies [ 39 ]. Results reflect the findings of the empirical studies in the current review, suggesting a global uptake of case study research in occupational therapy across a diversity of practice settings used to understand interventions as well as broader concepts related to practice.

Together, the reviews present the defining features of case study methodology as investigating a phenomenon (i) in depth, (ii) in its real-life natural context, and (iii) using multiple sources of data for triangulation. Jonasdittor et al. [ 39 ] and Carey [ 100 ] both suggest case study methodology can cross research paradigms and therefore can be qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods in nature. Lane [ 101 ] somewhat contradicts this stating that case studies are a form of descriptive qualitative inquiry and therefore described the quantitative single-case experimental design (SCED) as distinct and separate from case study research. However, Lane [ 101 ] also acknowledged that multiple sources of data may be used including narrative records but this should be considered secondary to observing trends in data because the primary focus is to determine the effect of the intervention. In the SCED, multiple data collection points are used for in-depth understanding to measure change and make appropriate intervention responses. Hercegovac et al. [ 32 ] did not make a distinction about data collection methods but sought only qualitative case study research. Reflective of this, the majority of studies identified by Jonasdottir et al.’s [ 39 ] and Hercegovac et al.’s [ 32 ] reviews were qualitative but in Carey’s review [ 100 ] they were mixed methods. Quantitative studies were less common.

All four papers comment that generalizations cannot be made from a single case. Instead, providing a thick description of characteristics and information about the case was deemed necessary to help the reader understand the context and determine transferability of the case. Collecting and comparing across cases was also noted to provide greater validity [ 101 ]. Despite this, Hercegovac et al. [ 32 ] identified only 18% of studies that had adequately defined the case. All review and discussion papers conclude that case study or single-case experimental designs are appropriate in the study of occupation and health. They support the wider adoption of this methodology to advance the occupational therapy evidence base because it offers a rigourous but flexible approach to study complexity in the real-world practice environment. It is presented as a ‘familiar, appropriate tool’ ([ 100 ]; p.1293) to develop evidence informed practice.

The findings of this review, in conjunction with the wider literature knowledge base, are integrated in Fig.  4 as a proposed conceptual model to illustrate how case study research can be applied in occupational therapy practice. It highlights the three important elements of the methodology as the ‘Case’ of interest, the rationale for the ‘Study’ design and that it is a ‘Research’ method. Central to the application of this methodology is the aim to achieve an in-depth understanding of a phenomenon within the occupational therapy practice context. To compliment Fig.  4 , a description of case study research within occupational therapy is proposed as;

‘a flexible methodology that can cross research paradigms where the focus is to gain an in-depth understanding of a case in the real-life practice context. The case and context can reflect any aspect of occupational therapy, but must be clearly defined and described within a given boundary. A comprehensive understanding of the case or cases should be gained through triangulation of data collection either through multiple data sources or multiple time points.’

Proposed conceptual model describing case study research in occupational therapy practice

This scoping review explored the use of case study research within the occupational therapy evidence base from 2016 to 2021. A large number of studies ( N  = 88) were identified across a variety of practice settings and following a dip after 2016, publication trends appeared consistent over this period. This suggests that case study research has potential viability for contributing to the evidence base of occupation and health. However, the findings of this review identified inconsistencies in how case study research was defined and variation in the methodologies adopted. Therefore, to maximize its potential as an evidence building tool, further clarity on case study methodology is needed. It is hoped that this review, in particular the proposed definition and conceptual model, will help achieve this.

A key issue highlighted was the lack of consistent or easily identifiable terms used to describe the methodology. Some studies defined the design by number of cases (e.g. single/multiple), by purpose (e.g. exploratory, descriptive, experimental) or by data collection (e.g. quantitative, qualitative, mixed). Other terms were also used such as ‘almost experimental’, ‘case series’, ‘changing criterion’ and ‘case report’. Hyett [ 17 ] suggested case study, as a research approach, has been confused with the non-research-based case report and this is supported by the findings of the current review. Self-identified ‘case studies’ were excluded, in line with the inclusion criteria, if they did not report data collection or analysis. In addition, journal classification of study type was at times incongruent with the methodology taken, e.g. Proffitt et al. [ 57 ]. Alpi & Evans [ 102 ] highlight this lack of distinction not only in journal classification but also in database indexing. They propose that case study is a rigourous qualitative research methodology and case report is a patient or event description. Based on this, the Journal of Medical Library Association updated classification of descriptive manuscripts previously known as case studies to case reports and case studies as a research methodology are now identified as original investigations. Despite this effort at clarification, there is still room for debate. Where Alpi & Evans [ 102 ] suggest N-of-1 single subject studies fit the case report label, Paparini et al. [ 10 ] aligns this to the explanatory case study. Therefore, this review adopted Yin’s [ 14 ] term ‘case study research’ as a common language that can be used by occupational therapists in the conduct and reporting of this methodology. It is suggested this will make the distinction clear from case report or non-research.

The issues highlighted in this review reflect current debate about case study research methodology. A key issue identified with empirical case study research was the inadequate description of the case and boundary so that it could be easily identified by the reader. Other reviews of case study research in occupational therapy included in this review [ 32 , 39 , 100 ] also identified this as a concern pre-2016 and Hyett [ 17 ] identified this more broadly in the literature, but particularly a concern for health and social science case studies. A clearly identifiable case, with detailed description including the boundary and context, is necessary for practitioners to understand how it may translate to their own practice. A case is not synonymous with participant and, whilst it can be an individual of interest, it can also take a more intangible form of a process such as intervention delivery, practice networks or other practice areas of interest such as theory.

As a form of inquiry, case study research provides context-specific, practice-based evidence, so the practice context must be understood. This in-depth, contextual understanding provides an alternative to studies seeking breadth of knowledge or generalizations and is thus the unique characteristic of case study research [ 11 ]. For this reason, ‘in-depth’ inquiry and ‘occupational therapy practice context’ are positioned at the core of the proposed descriptive model, encapsulated by the ‘case and context boundary’ as essential elements to case study research methodology (Fig.  4 ).

Case study research has been shown to be a flexible methodology both in design and purpose. Of particular interest to evidence building is its use to explore the efficacy and feasibility of an intervention in the real-life practice context. These findings support the assertions of previous authors who have suggested that case study research can be used to demonstrate clinical impact of interventions and to investigate complex multifactorial phenomena [ 11 , 27 – 29 ]. Particularly in areas of innovative or emerging practice, case study research can provide a way to capture impact when participant numbers or resources are not available to conduct larger-scale inquiry. Stickley and Hall [ 47 ], for instance, specifically state that their study is the first known investigation into social enterprise in occupational therapy. As a first step to building evidence, a descriptive or single-case account can therefore provide an important grounding on which to build upon. The need for timely evidence during the Covid-19 pandemic demonstrated an acute awareness of this but it has also been recognized as a process of cumulative evidence building in occupational science [ 103 ] and more broadly across other disciplines [ 104 ]. Of note however is Flyvbjerg’s [ 16 ] argument that the case study holds value beyond pilot or preliminary data. Whilst it may be difficult to generalize from a case study, particularly in terms of process, the outcomes can contribute to knowledge when used to test a theory or data pooled across cases.

By mapping the findings of this review, case study research appears to mirror the broad and varying nature of occupational therapy. It reflects occupational therapy as a direct service provided to individuals or groups, but also to others on a client’s behalf [ 105 ]. Organization, population and system-level practice is also recognized as an important aspect of occupational therapy practice [ 38 ] and was reflected in the included cases [ 71 , 97 ]. Case study research therefore not only has the potential to evidence impact through intervention outcomes, but also has wider health and well-being impact potential by exploring and advocating for occupational therapy across the full spectrum of practice including diverse areas.

Occupational therapy was provided in a range of settings including hospital, community and industry sectors. Interventions adopted illustrate the global variation in occupational therapy practice. For instance, compression bandaging [ 69 , 106 ] and electrical stimulation [ 107 , 108 ] are not aspects of standard practice in the UK but reflect other international practice standards [ 109 , 110 ]. Interventions were wide ranging and reflective of those described in the American Occupational Therapy Process and Domain Framework [ 38 ]. This included therapeutic use of occupation [ 83 ], interventions to support occupation [ 111 ], education and training-based [ 112 ], advocacy-based [ 76 ], group-based [ 113 ] and virtual interventions [ 114 ]. Narrowing the intervention to a single entity was not always possible or appropriate reflecting the complexity of occupational therapy practice and several authors, for example Kearns Murphy & Sheil [ 49 ] and Pretorious [ 79 ] instead reported occupational therapy as the intervention involving a range of activities and approaches that were meaningful and goal directed for the client.

A suggested strength of case study research identified by the findings is the similarity between the research process and clinical practice. Fleming [ 115 ] had suggested that practitioners generate hypothesis in clinical practice to test theory and problem solve elements of the therapy process for example, why an intervention may not be working as expected. Similarly, case study research has been used to test theory in evaluative or explanatory designs. Methods of data collection (e.g. observation, outcome measurement, document review, interview, client feedback) and analysis (e.g. descriptive, visual, pattern-matching outcomes) bear resemblance to how evidence is collected in practice to inform the intervention process [ 116 ]. The term ‘pattern matching’ is an analytic strategy adopted by Yin [ 14 ] in case study research to compare patterns in collected data to theory. However, pattern matching is also evident in occupational therapy clinical reasoning literature, particularly in relation to how practitioners utilize tacit knowledge to inform decision making [ 117 , 118 ]. This insight into case study research supports the perspective that it may be a more familiar and therefore achievable approach to evidence building for practitioners.

The challenge of capturing the complexity of practice has previously been cited as a barrier to research engagement and evidence-based practice in occupational therapy [ 11 ]. In contrast to this, case study research was largely justified as the chosen methodology because it allowed for individual tailoring of the intervention to the case and context [ 72 , 74 , 75 ]. The ability to provide a narrative description of the case, context, intervention and how it was implemented or adapted was seen across case study research, including single-case experimental designs (SCED). This idea of ‘individualization’ of treatment is also noted by Fleming [ 119 ] to differentiate occupational therapy clinical reasoning from medical procedural reasoning. The effectiveness of occupational therapy is not solely based on a prescriptive treatment, but is also influenced by the interactions between the therapist and service user and the particulars of that context. Therefore, if thinking on clinical reasoning has evolved to capture the important nuances of interactive reasoning [ 115 ] and furthermore embodied practice [ 118 ] then it would seem appropriate that the research approach to building evidence should also. A pluralistic approach whereby there is a valued position for both case study research and larger-scale inquiry to capture both the depth and breadth of practice would seem fitting. Collecting and pooling case study research data from practice can capture these important elements and allow for pattern matching or synthesis. In this way, case study research can hold value for evidence building, just as the randomized controlled trial, or other larger-scale inquiry, does for generalizability with the potential to inform policy and practice.

Based on the findings from this review, collecting case studies from practice to develop an evidence base is potentially viable given its uptake across practice areas and relatively consistent publication. In psychotherapy, Fishman [ 23 ] advocated for a database of cases which follow a systematic structure so they can be easily understood, recognized and data compared. Journals dedicated to publishing case data using a methodical format have since evolved in psychotherapy [ 120 ]. In occupational therapy, the Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists [ 121 ] collects practical case reports from members using dedicated computer software to host a collective description of occupational therapy practice. There is potential then to adopt this even on an international basis, where occupational therapy practice can be shared and measured. The challenge however is in achieving a systematic approach to how case study research data is collected and recorded to allow for meaningful comparisons and conclusions to be drawn.

In this review, quantitative and mixed method designs used a range of different outcome measures which is not conducive to pooling cross case data. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is an outcome measure that defines individualized goals and relative outcomes to determine therapeutic effectiveness [ 122 ]. It is a measure advocated for its applicability across areas of practice but also for research, both large-scale inquiry and case study research [ 123 ]. In this review, it was used across age groups, in the community, outpatient settings and schools and in the areas of neurodevelopmental disorder, stroke, brain injury and ill mental health.

Kearns-Murphy & Sheil [ 49 , 123 , 124 ] adopted Goal Attainment Scaling in their longitudinal case study and explored the different methods of analysis of the measure. They concluded that charting GAS scores at multiple timepoints is beneficial to case study research as it adds to the ‘in-depth’ analysis providing insight into the fluctuations of therapy and outcomes in the real-life context. Visual analysis of charted scores is then an appropriate analytic technique for intervention-based case study research. Two time points, before and after, are more suited to large-scale inquiry for generalization but in the case study, only the performance of an individual on a particular day is highlighted which may be influenced by several contextual factors. Given these assertions, adopting a consistent outcome measure across practice such as GAS, would allow for in-depth, case and context-specific understanding that could also be comparable and pooled across cases.

Strengths and limitations of the scoping review

This review searched published and grey literature using a variety of terms that have been used interchangeably with case study research with the aim of conducting a comprehensive overview. It followed a peer-reviewed protocol with systematic and transparent processes. JBI methodology for the conduct of scoping reviews was followed and bibliographic software (Mendeley) and systematic review software (Rayyan) was used to manage citations and the screening process. Additionally, an updated search was completed in July 2021 to enhance the timeliness and relevance of findings.

Ten databases were searched and no further relevant articles were identified through websites or citation searching, affirming that a thorough search had been conducted. However, to balance a comprehensive search with the practicality of resources, some decisions were made which may impact the inclusivity of the review. Western dominant databases and English language limits were applied because of translation resource availability within the research team. The search algorithm was developed and tested with an academic health librarian at the protocol stage; however, as case study methodology was not always clear from the title and abstract, an unmanageable amount of data was presented at full-text stage. To manage the number of records, inclusion criteria was changed to provide a contemporary overview from 2016 rather than 1990. This may introduce some bias to the review, where relevant articles pre-2016 or in other languages were omitted. However, the narrower focus allowed for in-depth data mapping to maximize the value of findings for informing future practice and research. Without taking this step, the output would likely have been more superficial. As a large number of 88 studies were still included in total, it was felt an appropriate balance had been achieved.

Findings suggest that case study research is a viable methodology to contribute to the evidence base for occupation and health as it has been used to evaluate interventions across a range of occupational therapy practice contexts. It has been used for cases of complexity, early intervention efficacy and feasibility, theory testing or when small participant numbers are available, in other words, when large-scale inquiry is not appropriate.

Inconsistencies were identified that mirror findings of case study research methodology in other disciplines. In particular, case study design and description of the case and boundary were poorly reported. Therefore, this review proposes that a common language is used—case study research—to define this flexible methodology. A description and conceptual model are proposed to assist in clarifying how case study research can be applied and reported in occupational therapy. Consistent reporting as a research form of inquiry improved description of the case and boundary and reference to seminal authors would help differentiate research from non-research cases and enhance viability for pooling cases together through more consistent, systematic conduct and reporting.

Implications for research and practice

There is a need to distinguish case study as a research method, separate from the illustrative case report and from purely qualitative inquiry, for it to be identifiable in the literature to reduce confusion and capability concerns. Therefore, the term ‘case study research’ is proposed when referring to the research methodology specifically. Citation of seminal authors alongside this description of study design would aid visibility of case study research as distinct from non-research and could also support appropriate journal classification. Greater clarity in reporting case description, including a narrative summary of the case, context and boundary of study is also an area for development. The development of a systematic template for the collection and reporting of case study data, ideally mirrored internationally, would likely be an ideal solution. This would potentially build capability for the conduct of rigourous case study research, help make it more identifiable in the literature and support pooling data across studies for synthesis and generalization, thereby overcoming the criticisms of case study research. Through accurate and detailed description of case context and boundary, practitioners would more easily be able to identify if the information is relevant to their own practice context.

Case study research has been shown to be appropriate for use across settings and populations, therefore pooling data could enable services to benchmark. Practitioners seeking to explore research within their practice are encouraged to consider the case study approach for its flexible nature and suitability to the person-centred values of occupational therapy. Use of a consistent outcome measure would support pooling of data and, as GAS is specific to the individual rather than practice setting, services may want to explore it as a measure suitable for intervention-based case study research.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements and thanks are extended to the Elizabeth Casson Trust for individual funding awarded to the corresponding author and to the Case Study International Think Tank for their professional support.

Abbreviation

Authors’ contributions

All authors (LMQ; KT; KB) were involved in the conceptualization of the idea for this review. LMQ developed the search strategy and conducted database searching. All authors contributed to the screening and selection of studies and piloted the data extraction tool. LMQ completed data extraction and KT cross checked a 10% sample of these. LMQ charted the results and completed the first draft of the paper with input from the other authors. LMQ critically revised the draft paper and all authors read and approved the final draft before submission.

No grant funding has been provided for this review.

Availability of data and materials

Declarations.

Not applicable.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia 2024-25: Fees, Ranking, Courses, Admission etc.

Kabardino Balkarian State University was known as KBSU Russia. It was founded in the year 1957. The University is situated at Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkaria, Russia and is one of the largest universities in the North Caucasus to Pursue MBBS in Russia. Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia is a comprehensive university offering a wide range of undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate programs in various fields. The University is Approved by the National Medical Commission of India and the World Health Organization.

Presently, 15,000 students are studying here. Every year, thousands of students enrol in different courses. Moreover, this is an institute offering international education as well. It is quite interesting to note that the students coming for MBBS in Russia at this university get an environment they did not expect.

[Page Index]

College summary.

Before we complete the college summary, let us look at the essential details of Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia .

Wants to Study MBBS Abroad from a top Country with low tution Fees? Subscribe Now!

Affiliation and Recognition

These are the renowned bodies that’ve given a reputation to the Ural State Medical University Russia.

• NMC (National Medical Commission of India).
• WHO (World Health Organization).
• Ministry of Science & Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

The faculties at Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia differ from one department to another, encompassing various disciplines and specialities.

Courses Offered

Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia Courses offer quality medical programs under highly qualified faculty and state-of-the-art infrastructure. KBSU Russia is famous for its undergraduate medical programs if you want more details about the MBBS course .

Why Study MBBS at Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia?

• Kabardino Balkarian State Medical University offers all students a multicultural and multiethnic environment.
• The Kabardino Balkarian State Medical University has the perfect environment to study.
• KBSU Russia has well-experienced staff members who are there to help students anytime.
• There is no need to qualify for the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) or Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) for MBBS admission at Kabardino Balkarian State Medical University.
• The Kabardino Balkarian State University medical students are awarded globally accepted degrees.

Advantages of MBBS in Russia

Admission Procedure

To get admission to Kabardino Balkarian State University in 2024, Indian students must qualify for the National Eligibility Entrance Exam (NEET).

To secure admission at Kabardino Balkarian State University, prospective students should adhere to the following steps:

• Complete the college’s admission form accurately, ensuring all information is provided correctly.
• Submit essential documents, including scanned copies of 10th and 12th-grade mark sheets, a NEET scorecard, a medical certificate copy, and a passport copy.
• Upon submission, applicants can expect to receive an invitation letter from the college within 10-15 days.
• Once in possession of the invitation letter, students are required to pay the tuition fee using online banking methods.
• Using the original payment receipt and university invitation letter, students can commence the student visa application process, which typically takes around 10 days to process.

Eligibility Criteria

In this section, students can check the Kabardino Balkarian State University eligibility criteria for Russia.

Graphical Representation of Eligibility Criteria

Documents Required

Before admission to Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia, please carry all these related documents.

• Passport (Minimum 18 months validity).
• 10th Certificate & Mark sheet.
• 12th Certificate & Mark sheet.
• Birth Certificate.
• 10 passport-size Photographs
• Official Invitation letter from the Medical University of Russia.
• Authorization of all documents from the Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi.
• Legalization of all documents from the Russian Embassy.
• Bank receipt of 1st Year of Kabardino Balkarian State University Tuition fees (required for some Universities).
• HIV test documents.

Fee Structure 2024-25

In this section, all the MBBS Students get information about the Kabardino-Balkarian State University MBBS Fees for Indian Students. Check all the relevant queries regarding fees following this page:  Low fees for MBBS Colleges in Russia .

Ranking 2024-25

According to Unirank, the Kabardino Balkarian State University University ranking in Russia and all over the world:

Why take a look at the university ranking?

Looking at university ranking one can easily gather some important insights about the university, therefore ranking of the university becomes an important factor for students. Here is some of the details one can infer by looking at the university’s ranking.

• Kabardino Balkarian State University’s ranking and its world ranking help students assess the university’s academic standing both nationally and globally.
• By looking at Kabardino Balkarian State University world ranking one can guess the quality of education offered at the university.
• The university’s world ranking also indicates that the college has got recognition worldwide. Therefore a good global ranking can enhance the value of their degree on the international job market.
• By looking at Kabardino Balkarian State University ranking, researchers can identify if the university is capable of bringing collaboration in their field.
• The university ranking also reveals metrics related to staff and student life within the campus, university campus environment and resources available.

About Nalchik City

• Nalchik is the capital city of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Russia, situated at an altitude of 550 meters.
• Nalchik is a balneological and mountain climatotherapy resort with several sanatoriums.
• It also serves as an industrial centre of the republic (non-ferrous metallurgy, light industry, construction materials manufacturing, machine building).
• Nalchik has a hot-summer humid continental climate with hot summers and no dry season.

Temperature

Contact Details

Kabardino Balkarian State University Russia Address: Ulitsa Chernyshevskogo, 173, Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Russia, 360004 Contact Number : +91 7827-804-741

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can i practise medicine in india.

Yes, you can practice in your country after completing your course. You need to clear the NEXT exam for practising medicine in India.

Where is Kabardino Balkarian State University located?

Kabardino Balkarian State Medical University Address is Ulitsa Chernyshevskogo, 173, Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Russia, 360004.

Can poor Indian students study abroad?

Of course, there is no rich and poor when it comes to education; it is all about knowledge. Several scholarships are open to students, and the government of India also provides a scholarship option for academically intelligent students.

• Admission Updates,
• Top Collages

You may like to read

• Kazan State Medical University Russia 2024-25: Admission, Fees, Courses, Ranking etc.
• Bashkir State Medical University Russia 2024-25: Admission, Courses, Fees, Eligibility, Ranking etc.
• Kazan Federal University Russia 2025-26: Fees, Ranking, Admission, Courses etc.
• Kursk State Medical University Russia 2024-25: Admission, Eligibility, Courses, Fees, Ranking etc.

About Rahul Kumar

Hi, I'm Rahul Kumar, with a year of expertise in MBBS and Ayush courses. I have detailed knowledge of various colleges' fee structures, cutoffs, and intake procedures. If you're looking for insights or assistance in pursuing MBBS or BAMS courses, feel free to comment below—I'm here to help!

Comments (2)

High I am Dinesh. I want yo take admission in mbbs for abroad . And I want to know about best college and in median budget. Please gelp me by choosing the best college for me in median range

Ofcourse, we are here to assist you in finding the best MBBS colleges abroad within your budget. Call now at +91 88596 37232.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Notify me via e-mail if anyone answers my comment.

Abroad MBBS Update 2024 : Admission Dates, Top College, Fees, Location, Scholarship etc.

Get admission to Top Overseas Universities with Affordable Fees.

Poor Economic Outlook and Lack of Security Undermine Kabardino-Balkaria’s Governor

Aims and Scope

Journal information, ethics and policies, peer review policy, article submission.

• Submission Guidelines
• Author Style Guide

Register for Content Alerts

Author support services, promote your research.

• Publications

KnE Life Sciences

• International Scientific and Practical Conference “AgroSMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture”
• Pages 920–928

ISSN: 2413-0877

The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.

Biodiversity of pests in grain agrocenosis in kabardino-balkaria.

Published date: Nov 25 2019

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Scientific and Practical Conference “AgroSMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture”

Pages: 920–928

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i14.5690

L M Khromova - [email protected]

A Kh Malkandueva

B R Shomakhov

Z L Shipsheva

A Kh Shabatukov

The article studies the issues of resistance of winter wheat varieties selected by the State Center of grain n.a. P.P. Lukyanenko and the Institute of Agriculture of the KBRC of the RAS to pests. The studies were conducted in the steppe zone of Kabardino-Balkaria in the conditions of insufficient moisture in 2017-2018. Main diseases of winter wheat were identified, a valuable source material resistant to the main pathogens was isolated, and dominant diseases were established. The most adaptive, highly productive varieties of winter wheat were identified. The most ecologically plastic and stable varieties of winter wheat which can be used as donors were identified. Phytosanitary monitoring of the cotton moth was carried out in corn areas; phytophagous plants and the damage share were determined; progressive diseases were assessed; the species composition and frequency of pathogens were identified in grain areas.

References:

[1] Dospekhov, B.A. (1985). Methods of field experience. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 352 p. [2] Peresypkin, V.F., Shelestova, S.S., Asatur, M.K. (1989). Workshop on the methodology of experimental work in plant protection. Moscow: Agropromizdat, pp. 17–20. [3] Chumakov, A.I., Zakharova, T.I. (1990). Harmfulness of crop diseases. Moscow, pp. 18–19. [4] Akhremevich, M.B., Batiashvili, I.D., Bey -- Bienko. (1976). Determinant of agricultural pests for damage to cultivated plants. Leningrad, pp. 38–48. [5] Khokhryakov, M.K., Potlaychuk V.I. et al. (1984). Key to diseases of agricultural crops. Moscow, pp. 121–134. [6] Ivanov, A.L., Molchanov, E.N., Chochaev, M.M. et al. Features of the adaptive -- landscape system of agriculture of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. Nalchik, 2013, pp. 17–53. [7] Woods, T.S. (1999). Product Firms for Modern Agriculture. The Food Environment. Royal Society of Chemistry, pp.121–153. [8] Zakharenko, V.A. (2009). The tendency of development of nanofytosanitary in plant protection. Protection and quarantine of plants, vol. 5, pp. 13–17. [9] Bespalova, L.A., Romanenko, A.A., Kolesnikov, F.A. (2018). Varieties of wheat and triticale Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution. Krasnodar: NPTs im. P. Lukyanenko, 164 p. [10] Edwards, H.H. (2002). Development of primary germ tubes by conidia of Blumeria graminis f.sp.hordei on leaf epidermal cells of Hordeum vulgare. Can. J. Bot., vol. 80, pp. 1121–1125. [11] Vechet, L. (2003). Development of povdery mildew and red rust epidemics in winter wheat cultivars. Plant, Soil and Envirion, vol. 49, pp. 439–442. [12] Pests of agricultural crops. Pests of grain crops, vol. I. Moscow: Printed City, 2012, pp. 344–347.

182 Abstract Views

225 PDF Downloads