example literature reviews

• UWF Libraries

Literature Review: Conducting & Writing

• Sample Literature Reviews
• Steps for Conducting a Lit Review
• Finding "The Literature"
• Organizing/Writing
• APA Style This link opens in a new window
• Chicago: Notes Bibliography This link opens in a new window
• MLA Style This link opens in a new window

Sample Lit Reviews from Communication Arts

Have an exemplary literature review.

• Literature Review Sample 1
• Literature Review Sample 2
• Literature Review Sample 3

Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes?

Are you an instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post?

Please contact Britt McGowan at [email protected] for inclusion in this guide. All disciplines welcome and encouraged.

• << Previous: MLA Style
• Next: Get Help! >>
• Last Updated: Mar 22, 2024 9:37 AM
• URL: https://libguides.uwf.edu/litreview

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

15 Literature Review Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

Literature reviews are a necessary step in a research process and often required when writing your research proposal . They involve gathering, analyzing, and evaluating existing knowledge about a topic in order to find gaps in the literature where future studies will be needed.

Ideally, once you have completed your literature review, you will be able to identify how your research project can build upon and extend existing knowledge in your area of study.

Generally, for my undergraduate research students, I recommend a narrative review, where themes can be generated in order for the students to develop sufficient understanding of the topic so they can build upon the themes using unique methods or novel research questions.

If you’re in the process of writing a literature review, I have developed a literature review template for you to use – it’s a huge time-saver and walks you through how to write a literature review step-by-step:

Get your time-saving templates here to write your own literature review.

Literature Review Examples

For the following types of literature review, I present an explanation and overview of the type, followed by links to some real-life literature reviews on the topics.

1. Narrative Review Examples

Also known as a traditional literature review, the narrative review provides a broad overview of the studies done on a particular topic.

It often includes both qualitative and quantitative studies and may cover a wide range of years.

The narrative review’s purpose is to identify commonalities, gaps, and contradictions in the literature .

I recommend to my students that they should gather their studies together, take notes on each study, then try to group them by themes that form the basis for the review (see my step-by-step instructions at the end of the article).

Example Study

Title: Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations

Citation: Vermeir, P., Vandijck, D., Degroote, S., Peleman, R., Verhaeghe, R., Mortier, E., … & Vogelaers, D. (2015). Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. International journal of clinical practice , 69 (11), 1257-1267.

Source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijcp.12686  

Overview: This narrative review analyzed themes emerging from 69 articles about communication in healthcare contexts. Five key themes were found in the literature: poor communication can lead to various negative outcomes, discontinuity of care, compromise of patient safety, patient dissatisfaction, and inefficient use of resources. After presenting the key themes, the authors recommend that practitioners need to approach healthcare communication in a more structured way, such as by ensuring there is a clear understanding of who is in charge of ensuring effective communication in clinical settings.

Other Examples

• Burnout in United States Healthcare Professionals: A Narrative Review (Reith, 2018) – read here
• Examining the Presence, Consequences, and Reduction of Implicit Bias in Health Care: A Narrative Review (Zestcott, Blair & Stone, 2016) – read here
• A Narrative Review of School-Based Physical Activity for Enhancing Cognition and Learning (Mavilidi et al., 2018) – read here
• A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents (Dyrbye & Shanafelt, 2015) – read here

2. Systematic Review Examples

This type of literature review is more structured and rigorous than a narrative review. It involves a detailed and comprehensive plan and search strategy derived from a set of specified research questions.

The key way you’d know a systematic review compared to a narrative review is in the methodology: the systematic review will likely have a very clear criteria for how the studies were collected, and clear explanations of exclusion/inclusion criteria. 

The goal is to gather the maximum amount of valid literature on the topic, filter out invalid or low-quality reviews, and minimize bias. Ideally, this will provide more reliable findings, leading to higher-quality conclusions and recommendations for further research.

You may note from the examples below that the ‘method’ sections in systematic reviews tend to be much more explicit, often noting rigid inclusion/exclusion criteria and exact keywords used in searches.

Title: The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review  

Citation: Roman, S., Sánchez-Siles, L. M., & Siegrist, M. (2017). The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review. Trends in food science & technology , 67 , 44-57.

Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092422441730122X  

Overview: This systematic review included 72 studies of food naturalness to explore trends in the literature about its importance for consumers. Keywords used in the data search included: food, naturalness, natural content, and natural ingredients. Studies were included if they examined consumers’ preference for food naturalness and contained empirical data. The authors found that the literature lacks clarity about how naturalness is defined and measured, but also found that food consumption is significantly influenced by perceived naturalness of goods.

• A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018 (Martin, Sun & Westine, 2020) – read here
• Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology? (Yli-Huumo et al., 2016) – read here
• Universities—industry collaboration: A systematic review (Ankrah & Al-Tabbaa, 2015) – read here
• Internet of Things Applications: A Systematic Review (Asghari, Rahmani & Javadi, 2019) – read here

3. Meta-analysis

This is a type of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of several studies.

Due to its robust methodology, a meta-analysis is often considered the ‘gold standard’ of secondary research , as it provides a more precise estimate of a treatment effect than any individual study contributing to the pooled analysis.

Furthermore, by aggregating data from a range of studies, a meta-analysis can identify patterns, disagreements, or other interesting relationships that may have been hidden in individual studies.

This helps to enhance the generalizability of findings, making the conclusions drawn from a meta-analysis particularly powerful and informative for policy and practice.

Title: Cholesterol and Alzheimer’s Disease Risk: A Meta-Meta-Analysis

Citation: Sáiz-Vazquez, O., Puente-Martínez, A., Ubillos-Landa, S., Pacheco-Bonrostro, J., & Santabárbara, J. (2020). Cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease risk: a meta-meta-analysis. Brain sciences, 10(6), 386.

Source: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10060386  

O verview: This study examines the relationship between cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Researchers conducted a systematic search of meta-analyses and reviewed several databases, collecting 100 primary studies and five meta-analyses to analyze the connection between cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease. They find that the literature compellingly demonstrates that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels significantly influence the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

• The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research (Wisniewski, Zierer & Hattie, 2020) – read here
• How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis (Ritchie & Tucker-Drob, 2018) – read here
• A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling (Geiger et al., 2019) – read here
• Stress management interventions for police officers and recruits (Patterson, Chung & Swan, 2014) – read here

Other Types of Reviews

• Scoping Review: This type of review is used to map the key concepts underpinning a research area and the main sources and types of evidence available. It can be undertaken as stand-alone projects in their own right, or as a precursor to a systematic review.
• Rapid Review: This type of review accelerates the systematic review process in order to produce information in a timely manner. This is achieved by simplifying or omitting stages of the systematic review process.
• Integrative Review: This review method is more inclusive than others, allowing for the simultaneous inclusion of experimental and non-experimental research. The goal is to more comprehensively understand a particular phenomenon.
• Critical Review: This is similar to a narrative review but requires a robust understanding of both the subject and the existing literature. In a critical review, the reviewer not only summarizes the existing literature, but also evaluates its strengths and weaknesses. This is common in the social sciences and humanities .
• State-of-the-Art Review: This considers the current level of advancement in a field or topic and makes recommendations for future research directions. This type of review is common in technological and scientific fields but can be applied to any discipline.

How to Write a Narrative Review (Tips for Undergrad Students)

Most undergraduate students conducting a capstone research project will be writing narrative reviews. Below is a five-step process for conducting a simple review of the literature for your project.

• Search for Relevant Literature: Use scholarly databases related to your field of study, provided by your university library, along with appropriate search terms to identify key scholarly articles that have been published on your topic.
• Evaluate and Select Sources: Filter the source list by selecting studies that are directly relevant and of sufficient quality, considering factors like credibility , objectivity, accuracy, and validity.
• Analyze and Synthesize: Review each source and summarize the main arguments  in one paragraph (or more, for postgrad). Keep these summaries in a table.
• Identify Themes: With all studies summarized, group studies that share common themes, such as studies that have similar findings or methodologies.
• Write the Review: Write your review based upon the themes or subtopics you have identified. Give a thorough overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the current state of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what is lacking in the literature.

Literature reviews don’t have to be as scary as they seem. Yes, they are difficult and require a strong degree of comprehension of academic studies. But it can be feasibly done through following a structured approach to data collection and analysis. With my undergraduate research students (who tend to conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I encourage them to conduct a narrative literature review whereby they can identify key themes in the literature. Within each theme, students can critique key studies and their strengths and limitations , in order to get a lay of the land and come to a point where they can identify ways to contribute new insights to the existing academic conversation on their topic.

Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408.

Asghari, P., Rahmani, A. M., & Javadi, H. H. S. (2019). Internet of Things applications: A systematic review. Computer Networks , 148 , 241-261.

Dyrbye, L., & Shanafelt, T. (2016). A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Medical education , 50 (1), 132-149.

Geiger, J. L., Steg, L., Van Der Werff, E., & Ünal, A. B. (2019). A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling. Journal of environmental psychology , 64 , 78-97.

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & education , 159 , 104009.

Mavilidi, M. F., Ruiter, M., Schmidt, M., Okely, A. D., Loyens, S., Chandler, P., & Paas, F. (2018). A narrative review of school-based physical activity for enhancing cognition and learning: The importance of relevancy and integration. Frontiers in psychology , 2079.

Patterson, G. T., Chung, I. W., & Swan, P. W. (2014). Stress management interventions for police officers and recruits: A meta-analysis. Journal of experimental criminology , 10 , 487-513.

Reith, T. P. (2018). Burnout in United States healthcare professionals: a narrative review. Cureus , 10 (12).

Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological science , 29 (8), 1358-1369.

Roman, S., Sánchez-Siles, L. M., & Siegrist, M. (2017). The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review. Trends in food science & technology , 67 , 44-57.

Sáiz-Vazquez, O., Puente-Martínez, A., Ubillos-Landa, S., Pacheco-Bonrostro, J., & Santabárbara, J. (2020). Cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease risk: a meta-meta-analysis. Brain sciences, 10(6), 386.

Vermeir, P., Vandijck, D., Degroote, S., Peleman, R., Verhaeghe, R., Mortier, E., … & Vogelaers, D. (2015). Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. International journal of clinical practice , 69 (11), 1257-1267.

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology , 10 , 3087.

Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review. PloS one , 11 (10), e0163477.

Zestcott, C. A., Blair, I. V., & Stone, J. (2016). Examining the presence, consequences, and reduction of implicit bias in health care: a narrative review. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 19 (4), 528-542

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 101 Class Group Name Ideas (for School Students)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 19 Top Cognitive Psychology Theories (Explained)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 119 Bloom’s Taxonomy Examples
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ All 6 Levels of Understanding (on Bloom’s Taxonomy)

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Literature Review Guide: Examples of Literature Reviews

• What is a Literature Review?
• How to start?
• Search strategies and Databases
• Examples of Literature Reviews
• How to organise the review
• Library summary
• Emerald Infographic

All good quality journal articles will include a small Literature Review after the Introduction paragraph.  It may not be called a Literature Review but gives you an idea of how one is created in miniature.

Sample Literature Reviews as part of a articles or Theses

• Sample Literature Review on Critical Thinking (Gwendolyn Reece, American University Library)
• Hackett, G and Melia, D . The hotel as the holiday/stay destination:trends and innovations. Presented at TRIC Conference, Belfast, Ireland- June 2012 and EuroCHRIE Conference

Links to sample Literature Reviews from other libraries

• Sample literature reviews from University of West Florida

Standalone Literature Reviews

• Attitudes towards the Disability in Ireland
• Martin, A., O'Connor-Fenelon, M. and Lyons, R. (2010). Non-verbal communication between nurses and people with an intellectual disability: A review of the literature. Journal of Intellectual Diabilities, 14(4), 303-314.

Irish Theses

• Phillips, Martin (2015) European airline performance: a data envelopment analysis with extrapolations based on model outputs. Master of Business Studies thesis, Dublin City University.
• The customers’ perception of servicescape’s influence on their behaviours, in the food retail industry : Dublin Business School 2015
• Coughlan, Ray (2015) What was the role of leadership in the transformation of a failing Irish Insurance business. Masters thesis, Dublin, National College of Ireland.
• << Previous: Search strategies and Databases
• Next: Tutorials >>
• Last Updated: Jun 26, 2024 10:32 AM
• URL: https://ait.libguides.com/literaturereview

Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature

What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)

A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process. 

Table of Contents

• What is the purpose of literature review? 
• a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction: 
• b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes: 
• c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs: 
• d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts: 

How to write a good literature review 

• Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question: 
• Decide on the Scope of Your Review: 
• Select Databases for Searches: 
• Conduct Searches and Keep Track: 
• Review the Literature: 
• Organize and Write Your Literature Review: 
• How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal? 
• Frequently asked questions 

What is a literature review?

A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.

What is the purpose of literature review?

A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2  

1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge. 

2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field. 

Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal  

3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research. 

4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered. 

5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research. 

6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature. 

Literature review example

Let’s delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic. 

Literature Review on Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity:

Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies: 

a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:

Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements. 

b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:

Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources. 

c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:

The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. 

d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:

Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning. 

Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free!    

Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements. 

Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review. 

• Opening Statement: Begin with a general statement about the broader topic and its significance in the field. 
• Scope and Purpose: Clearly define the scope of your literature review. Explain the specific research question or objective you aim to address. 
• Organizational Framework: Briefly outline the structure of your literature review, indicating how you will categorize and discuss the existing research. 
• Significance of the Study: Highlight why your literature review is important and how it contributes to the understanding of the chosen topic. 
• Thesis Statement: Conclude the introduction with a concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or perspective you will develop in the body of the literature review. 

Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria. 

• Organize by Theme or Concept: Group studies that share common themes, concepts, or methodologies. Discuss each theme or concept in detail, summarizing key findings and identifying gaps or areas of disagreement. 
• Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study. Discuss the methodologies used, the quality of evidence, and the overall contribution of each work to the understanding of the topic. 
• Synthesis of Findings: Synthesize the information from different studies to highlight trends, patterns, or areas of consensus in the literature. 
• Identification of Gaps: Discuss any gaps or limitations in the existing research and explain how your review contributes to filling these gaps. 
• Transition between Sections: Provide smooth transitions between different themes or concepts to maintain the flow of your literature review. 

Write and Cite as you go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free.   

Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research. 

• Summary of Key Findings: Recap the main findings from the literature and restate how they contribute to your research question or objective. 
• Contributions to the Field: Discuss the overall contribution of your literature review to the existing knowledge in the field. 
• Implications and Applications: Explore the practical implications of the findings and suggest how they might impact future research or practice. 
• Recommendations for Future Research: Identify areas that require further investigation and propose potential directions for future research in the field. 
• Final Thoughts: Conclude with a final reflection on the importance of your literature review and its relevance to the broader academic community. 

Conducting a literature review

Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. It’s important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1  

Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:

• Select a topic that is relevant to your field of study. 
• Clearly define your research question or objective. Determine what specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore? 

Decide on the Scope of Your Review:

• Determine the timeframe for your literature review. Are you focusing on recent developments, or do you want a historical overview? 
• Consider the geographical scope. Is your review global, or are you focusing on a specific region? 
• Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. What types of sources will you include? Are there specific types of studies or publications you will exclude? 

Select Databases for Searches:

• Identify relevant databases for your field. Examples include PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. 
• Consider searching in library catalogs, institutional repositories, and specialized databases related to your topic. 

Conduct Searches and Keep Track:

• Develop a systematic search strategy using keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and other search techniques. 
• Record and document your search strategy for transparency and replicability. 
• Keep track of the articles, including publication details, abstracts, and links. Use citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to organize your references. 

Review the Literature:

• Evaluate the relevance and quality of each source. Consider the methodology, sample size, and results of studies. 
• Organize the literature by themes or key concepts. Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the existing research. 
• Summarize key findings and arguments from each source. Compare and contrast different perspectives. 
• Identify areas where there is a consensus in the literature and where there are conflicting opinions. 
• Provide critical analysis and synthesis of the literature. What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing research? 

Organize and Write Your Literature Review:

• Literature review outline should be based on themes, chronological order, or methodological approaches. 
• Write a clear and coherent narrative that synthesizes the information gathered. 
• Use proper citations for each source and ensure consistency in your citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). 
• Conclude your literature review by summarizing key findings, identifying gaps, and suggesting areas for future research. 

Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpal’s new Research feature!  

How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?

Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface with the option to save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.   

Here’s how to use the Research feature:  

• Ask a question: Get started with a new document on paperpal.com. Click on the “Research” feature and type your question in plain English. Paperpal will scour over 250 million research articles, including conference papers and preprints, to provide you with accurate insights and citations. 
• Review and Save: Paperpal summarizes the information, while citing sources and listing relevant reads. You can quickly scan the results to identify relevant references and save these directly to your built-in citations library for later access. 
• Cite with Confidence: Paperpal makes it easy to incorporate relevant citations and references into your writing, ensuring your arguments are well-supported by credible sources. This translates to a polished, well-researched literature review. 

The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself.  

Frequently asked questions

A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.

Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field.  

Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic. 

Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods. 

Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers.  Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved.  Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic.  Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings.  Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject.  It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.

The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review:  Introduction:   Provide an overview of the topic.  Define the scope and purpose of the literature review.  State the research question or objective.  Body:   Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology.  Critically analyze and evaluate each source.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies.  Highlight any methodological limitations or biases.  Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research.  Conclusion:   Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review.  Highlight the research gap.  Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction.  Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.

Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows: 

References 

• Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review.  Journal of criminal justice education ,  24 (2), 218-234. 
• Pan, M. L. (2016).  Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Taylor & Francis. 
• Cantero, C. (2019). How to write a literature review.  San José State University Writing Center . 

Paperpal is an AI writing assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and grammar correction. Trained on millions of research manuscripts enhanced by professional academic editors, Paperpal delivers human precision at machine speed.  

Try it for free or upgrade to  Paperpal Prime , which unlocks unlimited access to premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks and more. It’s like always having a professional academic editor by your side! Go beyond limitations and experience the future of academic writing.  Get Paperpal Prime now at just US$19 a month!

Related Reads:

• Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics 
• How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 Steps 
• How Long Should a Chapter Be?
• How to Use Paperpal to Generate Emails & Cover Letters?

6 Tips for Post-Doc Researchers to Take Their Career to the Next Level

Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, how to structure an essay, leveraging generative ai to enhance student understanding of..., what’s the best chatgpt alternative for academic writing, how to write a good hook for essays,..., addressing peer review feedback and mastering manuscript revisions..., how paperpal can boost comprehension and foster interdisciplinary..., what is the importance of a concept paper..., how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to ace grant writing for research funding....

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation
• What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples

Published on 22 February 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 7 June 2022.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarise sources – it analyses, synthesises, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.

Table of contents

Why write a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a dissertation or thesis, you will have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate

You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic.

The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.

Correct my document today

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research objectives and questions .

If you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your search. Unlike a dissertation research question, this question has to be answerable without collecting original data. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications.

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search:

Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out.

You probably won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on the topic – you’ll have to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your questions.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models and methods? Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic? What are its key insights and arguments?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can find out how many times an article has been cited on Google Scholar – a high citation count means the article has been influential in the field, and should certainly be included in your literature review.

The scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time).

Remember that you can use our template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using!

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct, consistent citations.

To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly-visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat – this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organising the body of a literature review. You should have a rough idea of your strategy before you start writing.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order.

Try to analyse patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

If you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”).

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, make sure to follow these tips:

• Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole.
• Analyse and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole.
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources.
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts.

In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise their significance.

If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. This can lead directly into your methodology section.

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a dissertation , thesis, research paper , or proposal .

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarise yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your  dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, June 07). What is a Literature Review? | Guide, Template, & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 24 June 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a dissertation proposal | a step-by-step guide, what is a theoretical framework | a step-by-step guide, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.

Reference management. Clean and simple.

What is a literature review? [with examples]

What is a literature review?

The purpose of a literature review, how to write a literature review, the format of a literature review, general formatting rules, the length of a literature review, literature review examples, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, related articles.

A literature review is an assessment of the sources in a chosen topic of research.

In a literature review, you’re expected to report on the existing scholarly conversation, without adding new contributions.

If you are currently writing one, you've come to the right place. In the following paragraphs, we will explain:

• the objective of a literature review
• how to write a literature review
• the basic format of a literature review

Tip: It’s not always mandatory to add a literature review in a paper. Theses and dissertations often include them, whereas research papers may not. Make sure to consult with your instructor for exact requirements.

The four main objectives of a literature review are:

• Studying the references of your research area
• Summarizing the main arguments
• Identifying current gaps, stances, and issues
• Presenting all of the above in a text

Ultimately, the main goal of a literature review is to provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can eventually make an intervention.

The format of a literature review is fairly standard. It includes an:

• introduction that briefly introduces the main topic
• body that includes the main discussion of the key arguments
• conclusion that highlights the gaps and issues of the literature

➡️ Take a look at our guide on how to write a literature review to learn more about how to structure a literature review.

First of all, a literature review should have its own labeled section. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature can be found, and you should label this section as “Literature Review.”

➡️ For more information on writing a thesis, visit our guide on how to structure a thesis .

There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. If you are working with a large amount of sources, it will be long. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, it will be short.

Take a look at these three theses featuring great literature reviews:

• School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist's Perceptions of Sensory Food Aversions in Children [ PDF , see page 20]
• Who's Writing What We Read: Authorship in Criminological Research [ PDF , see page 4]
• A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experience of Online Instructors of Theological Reflection at Christian Institutions Accredited by the Association of Theological Schools [ PDF , see page 56]

Literature reviews are most commonly found in theses and dissertations. However, you find them in research papers as well.

There is no set amount of words for a literature review, so the length depends on the research. If you are working with a large amount of sources, then it will be long. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, then it will be short.

No. A literature review should have its own independent section. You should indicate clearly in the table of contents where the literature review can be found, and label this section as “Literature Review.”

The main goal of a literature review is to provide the researcher with sufficient knowledge about the topic in question so that they can eventually make an intervention.

• UConn Library
• Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
• Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

• Getting Started
• How to Pick a Topic
• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

• A research paper assigned in a course
• A thesis or dissertation
• A grant proposal
• An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

• Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

• Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

• Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

• Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

• UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
• Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

The Sheridan Libraries

• Write a Literature Review
• Sheridan Libraries
• Find This link opens in a new window
• Evaluate This link opens in a new window

What Will You Do Differently?

Please help your librarians by filling out this two-minute survey of today's class session..

Professor, this one's for you .

Introduction

Literature reviews take time. here is some general information to know before you start.  .

•  VIDEO -- This video is a great overview of the entire process.  (2020; North Carolina State University Libraries) --The transcript is included --This is for everyone; ignore the mention of "graduate students" --9.5 minutes, and every second is important  
• OVERVIEW -- Read this page from Purdue's OWL. It's not long, and gives some tips to fill in what you just learned from the video.  
• NOT A RESEARCH ARTICLE -- A literature review follows a different style, format, and structure from a research article.  

Steps to Completing a Literature Review

• Next: Find >>
• Last Updated: Sep 26, 2023 10:25 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.jhu.edu/lit-review

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• CAREER FEATURE
• 04 December 2020
• Correction 09 December 2020

How to write a superb literature review

Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore.

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Literature reviews are important resources for scientists. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own research, as well as some practice in writing. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Even picking the appropriate software to use can be an involved decision (see ‘Tools and techniques’). So Nature asked editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips.

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03422-x

Interviews have been edited for length and clarity.

Updates & Corrections

Correction 09 December 2020 : An earlier version of the tables in this article included some incorrect details about the programs Zotero, Endnote and Manubot. These have now been corrected.

Hsing, I.-M., Xu, Y. & Zhao, W. Electroanalysis 19 , 755–768 (2007).

Article   Google Scholar  

Ledesma, H. A. et al. Nature Nanotechnol. 14 , 645–657 (2019).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Brahlek, M., Koirala, N., Bansal, N. & Oh, S. Solid State Commun. 215–216 , 54–62 (2015).

Choi, Y. & Lee, S. Y. Nature Rev. Chem . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w (2020).

Download references

Related Articles

• Research management

How to network with the brightest minds in science

Career Feature 26 JUN 24

What it means to be a successful male academic

Career Column 26 JUN 24

Is science’s dominant funding model broken?

Editorial 26 JUN 24

How I’m using AI tools to help universities maximize research impacts

World View 26 JUN 24

The strategy behind one of the most successful labs in the world

Comment 26 JUN 24

‘It can feel like there’s no way out’ — political scientists face pushback on their work

News Feature 19 JUN 24

How climate change is hitting Europe: three graphics reveal health impacts

News 18 JUN 24

Twelve scientist-endorsed tips to get over writer’s block

Career Feature 13 JUN 24

Osaka University Immunology Frontier Research Center Postdoctoral Researcher

IFReC, Osaka University in Japan offers Advanced Postdoc Positions for Immunology, Cell Biology, Bioinformatics and Bioimaging.

Suita Campus, Osaka University in Osaka, Japan

Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University

PostDoc Researcher, Magnetic Recording Materials Group, National Institute for Materials Science

Starting date would be after January 2025, but it is negotiable.

Tsukuba, Japan (JP)

National Institute for Materials Science

Tenure-Track/Tenured Faculty Positions

Tenure-Track/Tenured Faculty Positions in the fields of energy and resources.

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

School of Sustainable Energy and Resources at Nanjing University

Postdoctoral Associate- Statistical Genetics

Houston, Texas (US)

Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)

Senior Research Associate (Single Cell/Transcriptomics Senior Bioinformatician)

Metabolic Research Laboratories at the Clinical School, University of Cambridge are recruiting 3 senior bioinformatician specialists to create a dynam

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire (GB)

University of Cambridge

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Literature Review

• Steps for Conducting a Lit Review
• Finding "The Literature"
• Organizing/Writing
• Sample Literature Reviews
• FAMU Writing Center

Sample Lit Reviews from Communication Arts

• Literature Review Sample 1
• Literature Review Sample 2
• Literature Review Sample 3
• << Previous: MLA Style
• Next: FAMU Writing Center >>
• Last Updated: Oct 20, 2022 11:24 AM
• URL: https://library.famu.edu/literaturereview

Eugene McDermott Library

Literature review.

• Collecting Resources for a Literature Review
• Organizing the Literature Review
• Writing the Literature Review
• Examples of Literature Reviews

Examples of Literature Reviews in Book & Government Document Format

• Social and economic considerations for coastal and watershed restoration in the Puget Sound, Washington : a literature review by Stinchfield, Holly; Koontz, Lynne; and Sexton, Natalie
• A literature review of wipe sampling methods for chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals by prepared by Battelle Washington, DC : Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, [2007]
• Collaboration, technology, and outsourcing initiatives in higher education : a literature review by Kaganoff, Tessa Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1998

Examples of Literature Reviews in Dissertations and Journal Articles

• The stigma of childhood obesity: A literature review by Janel Swaye MacDermott

Journal Articles

Papastergiou, Marina. 2009. "Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review." Computers & Education 53, no. 3: 603-622.

de Campos, Ana Carolina, Nelci Adriana Cicuto Ferreira Rocha, and Geert J. P. Savelsbergh. "Reaching and grasping movements in infants at risk: A review." Research in Developmental Disabilities 30, no. 5 (September 2009): 819-826.

Dissertations

• A meta-analysis/literature review comparing the effectiveness of SSRI antidepressants, cognitive behavioral therapy, and placebo for the treatment of depression by John J Wagner
• << Previous: Writing the Literature Review
• Next: Books >>
• Last Updated: Mar 22, 2024 12:28 PM
• URL: https://libguides.utdallas.edu/literature-review

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

How To Write A Literature Review - A Complete Guide

Table of Contents

A literature review is much more than just another section in your research paper. It forms the very foundation of your research. It is a formal piece of writing where you analyze the existing theoretical framework, principles, and assumptions and use that as a base to shape your approach to the research question.

Curating and drafting a solid literature review section not only lends more credibility to your research paper but also makes your research tighter and better focused. But, writing literature reviews is a difficult task. It requires extensive reading, plus you have to consider market trends and technological and political changes, which tend to change in the blink of an eye.

Now streamline your literature review process with the help of SciSpace Copilot. With this AI research assistant, you can efficiently synthesize and analyze a vast amount of information, identify key themes and trends, and uncover gaps in the existing research. Get real-time explanations, summaries, and answers to your questions for the paper you're reviewing, making navigating and understanding the complex literature landscape easier.

In this comprehensive guide, we will explore everything from the definition of a literature review, its appropriate length, various types of literature reviews, and how to write one.

What is a literature review?

A literature review is a collation of survey, research, critical evaluation, and assessment of the existing literature in a preferred domain.

Eminent researcher and academic Arlene Fink, in her book Conducting Research Literature Reviews , defines it as the following:

“A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated.

Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have explored while researching a particular topic, and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within a larger field of study.”

Simply put, a literature review can be defined as a critical discussion of relevant pre-existing research around your research question and carving out a definitive place for your study in the existing body of knowledge. Literature reviews can be presented in multiple ways: a section of an article, the whole research paper itself, or a chapter of your thesis.

A literature review does function as a summary of sources, but it also allows you to analyze further, interpret, and examine the stated theories, methods, viewpoints, and, of course, the gaps in the existing content.

As an author, you can discuss and interpret the research question and its various aspects and debate your adopted methods to support the claim.

What is the purpose of a literature review?

A literature review is meant to help your readers understand the relevance of your research question and where it fits within the existing body of knowledge. As a researcher, you should use it to set the context, build your argument, and establish the need for your study.

What is the importance of a literature review?

The literature review is a critical part of research papers because it helps you:

• Gain an in-depth understanding of your research question and the surrounding area
• Convey that you have a thorough understanding of your research area and are up-to-date with the latest changes and advancements
• Establish how your research is connected or builds on the existing body of knowledge and how it could contribute to further research
• Elaborate on the validity and suitability of your theoretical framework and research methodology
• Identify and highlight gaps and shortcomings in the existing body of knowledge and how things need to change
• Convey to readers how your study is different or how it contributes to the research area

How long should a literature review be?

Ideally, the literature review should take up 15%-40% of the total length of your manuscript. So, if you have a 10,000-word research paper, the minimum word count could be 1500.

Your literature review format depends heavily on the kind of manuscript you are writing — an entire chapter in case of doctoral theses, a part of the introductory section in a research article, to a full-fledged review article that examines the previously published research on a topic.

Another determining factor is the type of research you are doing. The literature review section tends to be longer for secondary research projects than primary research projects.

What are the different types of literature reviews?

All literature reviews are not the same. There are a variety of possible approaches that you can take. It all depends on the type of research you are pursuing.

Here are the different types of literature reviews:

Argumentative review

It is called an argumentative review when you carefully present literature that only supports or counters a specific argument or premise to establish a viewpoint.

Integrative review

It is a type of literature review focused on building a comprehensive understanding of a topic by combining available theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence.

Methodological review

This approach delves into the ''how'' and the ''what" of the research question —  you cannot look at the outcome in isolation; you should also review the methodology used.

Systematic review

This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research and collect, report, and analyze data from the studies included in the review.

Meta-analysis review

Meta-analysis uses statistical methods to summarize the results of independent studies. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effects than those derived from the individual studies included within a review.

Historical review

Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, or phenomenon emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and identify future research's likely directions.

Theoretical Review

This form aims to examine the corpus of theory accumulated regarding an issue, concept, theory, and phenomenon. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories exist, the relationships between them, the degree the existing approaches have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested.

Scoping Review

The Scoping Review is often used at the beginning of an article, dissertation, or research proposal. It is conducted before the research to highlight gaps in the existing body of knowledge and explains why the project should be greenlit.

State-of-the-Art Review

The State-of-the-Art review is conducted periodically, focusing on the most recent research. It describes what is currently known, understood, or agreed upon regarding the research topic and highlights where there are still disagreements.

Can you use the first person in a literature review?

When writing literature reviews, you should avoid the usage of first-person pronouns. It means that instead of "I argue that" or "we argue that," the appropriate expression would be "this research paper argues that."

Do you need an abstract for a literature review?

Ideally, yes. It is always good to have a condensed summary that is self-contained and independent of the rest of your review. As for how to draft one, you can follow the same fundamental idea when preparing an abstract for a literature review. It should also include:

• The research topic and your motivation behind selecting it
• A one-sentence thesis statement
• An explanation of the kinds of literature featured in the review
• Summary of what you've learned
• Conclusions you drew from the literature you reviewed
• Potential implications and future scope for research

Here's an example of the abstract of a literature review

Is a literature review written in the past tense?

Yes, the literature review should ideally be written in the past tense. You should not use the present or future tense when writing one. The exceptions are when you have statements describing events that happened earlier than the literature you are reviewing or events that are currently occurring; then, you can use the past perfect or present perfect tenses.

How many sources for a literature review?

There are multiple approaches to deciding how many sources to include in a literature review section. The first approach would be to look level you are at as a researcher. For instance, a doctoral thesis might need 60+ sources. In contrast, you might only need to refer to 5-15 sources at the undergraduate level.

The second approach is based on the kind of literature review you are doing — whether it is merely a chapter of your paper or if it is a self-contained paper in itself. When it is just a chapter, sources should equal the total number of pages in your article's body. In the second scenario, you need at least three times as many sources as there are pages in your work.

Quick tips on how to write a literature review

To know how to write a literature review, you must clearly understand its impact and role in establishing your work as substantive research material.

You need to follow the below-mentioned steps, to write a literature review:

• Outline the purpose behind the literature review
• Search relevant literature
• Examine and assess the relevant resources
• Discover connections by drawing deep insights from the resources
• Structure planning to write a good literature review

1. Outline and identify the purpose of  a literature review

As a first step on how to write a literature review, you must know what the research question or topic is and what shape you want your literature review to take. Ensure you understand the research topic inside out, or else seek clarifications. You must be able to the answer below questions before you start:

• How many sources do I need to include?
• What kind of sources should I analyze?
• How much should I critically evaluate each source?
• Should I summarize, synthesize or offer a critique of the sources?
• Do I need to include any background information or definitions?

Additionally, you should know that the narrower your research topic is, the swifter it will be for you to restrict the number of sources to be analyzed.

2. Search relevant literature

Dig deeper into search engines to discover what has already been published around your chosen topic. Make sure you thoroughly go through appropriate reference sources like books, reports, journal articles, government docs, and web-based resources.

You must prepare a list of keywords and their different variations. You can start your search from any library’s catalog, provided you are an active member of that institution. The exact keywords can be extended to widen your research over other databases and academic search engines like:

• Google Scholar
• Microsoft Academic
• Science.gov

Besides, it is not advisable to go through every resource word by word. Alternatively, what you can do is you can start by reading the abstract and then decide whether that source is relevant to your research or not.

Additionally, you must spend surplus time assessing the quality and relevance of resources. It would help if you tried preparing a list of citations to ensure that there lies no repetition of authors, publications, or articles in the literature review.

3. Examine and assess the sources

It is nearly impossible for you to go through every detail in the research article. So rather than trying to fetch every detail, you have to analyze and decide which research sources resemble closest and appear relevant to your chosen domain.

While analyzing the sources, you should look to find out answers to questions like:

• What question or problem has the author been describing and debating?
• What is the definition of critical aspects?
• How well the theories, approach, and methodology have been explained?
• Whether the research theory used some conventional or new innovative approach?
• How relevant are the key findings of the work?
• In what ways does it relate to other sources on the same topic?
• What challenges does this research paper pose to the existing theory
• What are the possible contributions or benefits it adds to the subject domain?

Be always mindful that you refer only to credible and authentic resources. It would be best if you always take references from different publications to validate your theory.

Always keep track of important information or data you can present in your literature review right from the beginning. It will help steer your path from any threats of plagiarism and also make it easier to curate an annotated bibliography or reference section.

4. Discover connections

At this stage, you must start deciding on the argument and structure of your literature review. To accomplish this, you must discover and identify the relations and connections between various resources while drafting your abstract.

A few aspects that you should be aware of while writing a literature review include:

• Rise to prominence: Theories and methods that have gained reputation and supporters over time.
• Constant scrutiny: Concepts or theories that repeatedly went under examination.
• Contradictions and conflicts: Theories, both the supporting and the contradictory ones, for the research topic.
• Knowledge gaps: What exactly does it fail to address, and how to bridge them with further research?
• Influential resources: Significant research projects available that have been upheld as milestones or perhaps, something that can modify the current trends

Once you join the dots between various past research works, it will be easier for you to draw a conclusion and identify your contribution to the existing knowledge base.

5. Structure planning to write a good literature review

There exist different ways towards planning and executing the structure of a literature review. The format of a literature review varies and depends upon the length of the research.

Like any other research paper, the literature review format must contain three sections: introduction, body, and conclusion. The goals and objectives of the research question determine what goes inside these three sections.

Nevertheless, a good literature review can be structured according to the chronological, thematic, methodological, or theoretical framework approach.

Literature review samples

1. Standalone

2. As a section of a research paper

How SciSpace Discover makes literature review a breeze?

SciSpace Discover is a one-stop solution to do an effective literature search and get barrier-free access to scientific knowledge. It is an excellent repository where you can find millions of only peer-reviewed articles and full-text PDF files. Here’s more on how you can use it:

Find the right information

Find what you want quickly and easily with comprehensive search filters that let you narrow down papers according to PDF availability, year of publishing, document type, and affiliated institution. Moreover, you can sort the results based on the publishing date, citation count, and relevance.

Assess credibility of papers quickly

When doing the literature review, it is critical to establish the quality of your sources. They form the foundation of your research. SciSpace Discover helps you assess the quality of a source by providing an overview of its references, citations, and performance metrics.

Get the complete picture in no time

SciSpace Discover’s personalized suggestion engine helps you stay on course and get the complete picture of the topic from one place. Every time you visit an article page, it provides you links to related papers. Besides that, it helps you understand what’s trending, who are the top authors, and who are the leading publishers on a topic.

Make referring sources super easy

To ensure you don't lose track of your sources, you must start noting down your references when doing the literature review. SciSpace Discover makes this step effortless. Click the 'cite' button on an article page, and you will receive preloaded citation text in multiple styles — all you've to do is copy-paste it into your manuscript.

Final tips on how to write a literature review

A massive chunk of time and effort is required to write a good literature review. But, if you go about it systematically, you'll be able to save a ton of time and build a solid foundation for your research.

We hope this guide has helped you answer several key questions you have about writing literature reviews.

Would you like to explore SciSpace Discover and kick off your literature search right away? You can get started here .

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. how to start a literature review.

• What questions do you want to answer?

• What sources do you need to answer these questions?

• What information do these sources contain?

• How can you use this information to answer your questions?

2. What to include in a literature review?

• A brief background of the problem or issue

• What has previously been done to address the problem or issue

• A description of what you will do in your project

• How this study will contribute to research on the subject

3. Why literature review is important?

The literature review is an important part of any research project because it allows the writer to look at previous studies on a topic and determine existing gaps in the literature, as well as what has already been done. It will also help them to choose the most appropriate method for their own study.

4. How to cite a literature review in APA format?

To cite a literature review in APA style, you need to provide the author's name, the title of the article, and the year of publication. For example: Patel, A. B., & Stokes, G. S. (2012). The relationship between personality and intelligence: A meta-analysis of longitudinal research. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 16-21

5. What are the components of a literature review?

• A brief introduction to the topic, including its background and context. The introduction should also include a rationale for why the study is being conducted and what it will accomplish.

• A description of the methodologies used in the study. This can include information about data collection methods, sample size, and statistical analyses.

• A presentation of the findings in an organized format that helps readers follow along with the author's conclusions.

6. What are common errors in writing literature review?

• Not spending enough time to critically evaluate the relevance of resources, observations and conclusions.

• Totally relying on secondary data while ignoring primary data.

• Letting your personal bias seep into your interpretation of existing literature.

• No detailed explanation of the procedure to discover and identify an appropriate literature review.

7. What are the 5 C's of writing literature review?

• Cite - the sources you utilized and referenced in your research.

• Compare - existing arguments, hypotheses, methodologies, and conclusions found in the knowledge base.

• Contrast - the arguments, topics, methodologies, approaches, and disputes that may be found in the literature.

• Critique - the literature and describe the ideas and opinions you find more convincing and why.

• Connect - the various studies you reviewed in your research.

8. How many sources should a literature review have?

When it is just a chapter, sources should equal the total number of pages in your article's body. if it is a self-contained paper in itself, you need at least three times as many sources as there are pages in your work.

9. Can literature review have diagrams?

• To represent an abstract idea or concept

• To explain the steps of a process or procedure

• To help readers understand the relationships between different concepts

10. How old should sources be in a literature review?

Sources for a literature review should be as current as possible or not older than ten years. The only exception to this rule is if you are reviewing a historical topic and need to use older sources.

11. What are the types of literature review?

• Argumentative review

• Integrative review

• Methodological review

• Systematic review

• Meta-analysis review

• Historical review

• Theoretical review

• Scoping review

• State-of-the-Art review

12. Is a literature review mandatory?

Yes. Literature review is a mandatory part of any research project. It is a critical step in the process that allows you to establish the scope of your research, and provide a background for the rest of your work.

But before you go,

• Six Online Tools for Easy Literature Review
• Evaluating literature review: systematic vs. scoping reviews
• Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
• Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples

You might also like

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences

Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)

Literature Reviews

What this handout is about.

This handout will explain what literature reviews are and offer insights into the form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences.

Introduction

OK. You’ve got to write a literature review. You dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. Right?

Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any collection of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature” could be anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants you to give your personal opinion on whether or not you liked these sources.

What is a literature review, then?

A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period.

A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.

But how is a literature review different from an academic research paper?

The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper is likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support for a new insight that you contribute. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions.

Why do we write literature reviews?

Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.

Who writes these things, anyway?

Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Sometimes a literature review is written as a paper in itself.

Let’s get to it! What should I do before writing the literature review?

If your assignment is not very specific, seek clarification from your instructor:

• Roughly how many sources should you include?
• What types of sources (books, journal articles, websites)?
• Should you summarize, synthesize, or critique your sources by discussing a common theme or issue?
• Should you evaluate your sources?
• Should you provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history?

Find models

Look for other literature reviews in your area of interest or in the discipline and read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or ways to organize your final review. You can simply put the word “review” in your search engine along with your other topic terms to find articles of this type on the Internet or in an electronic database. The bibliography or reference section of sources you’ve already read are also excellent entry points into your own research.

Narrow your topic

There are hundreds or even thousands of articles and books on most areas of study. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. Your instructor will probably not expect you to read everything that’s out there on the topic, but you’ll make your job easier if you first limit your scope.

Keep in mind that UNC Libraries have research guides and to databases relevant to many fields of study. You can reach out to the subject librarian for a consultation: https://library.unc.edu/support/consultations/ .

And don’t forget to tap into your professor’s (or other professors’) knowledge in the field. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to read only one book from the 90’s on topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to find and determine quickly the most seminal pieces in the field.

Consider whether your sources are current

Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly changing according to the latest studies. Information even two years old could be obsolete. However, if you are writing a review in the humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be what is needed, because what is important is how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain time period. Try sorting through some other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to consider what is currently of interest to scholars in this field and what is not.

Strategies for writing the literature review

Find a focus.

A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized. This means that you will not just simply list your sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources together. Do they present one or different solutions? Is there an aspect of the field that is missing? How well do they present the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory? Do they reveal a trend in the field? A raging debate? Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your review.

Convey it to your reader

A literature review may not have a traditional thesis statement (one that makes an argument), but you do need to tell readers what to expect. Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader know what is your main organizing principle. Here are a couple of examples:

The current trend in treatment for congestive heart failure combines surgery and medicine. More and more cultural studies scholars are accepting popular media as a subject worthy of academic consideration.

Consider organization

You’ve got a focus, and you’ve stated it clearly and directly. Now what is the most effective way of presenting the information? What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc., that your review needs to include? And in what order should you present them? Develop an organization for your review at both a global and local level:

First, cover the basic categories

Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section; the body of the review containing the discussion of sources; and, finally, a conclusion and/or recommendations section to end the paper. The following provides a brief description of the content of each:

• Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern.
• Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or methodologically (see below for more information on each).
• Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?

Organizing the body

Once you have the basic categories in place, then you must consider how you will present the sources themselves within the body of your paper. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further.

To help you come up with an overall organizational framework for your review, consider the following scenario:

You’ve decided to focus your literature review on materials dealing with sperm whales. This is because you’ve just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that whale’s portrayal is really real. You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm whales in biology journals written in the 1980’s. But these articles refer to some British biological studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. So you check those out. Then you look up a book written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century used to do. This makes you wonder about American whaling methods during the time portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic articles published in the last five years on how accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling scene in his novel.

Now consider some typical ways of organizing the sources into a review:

• Chronological: If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. For instance, first you would talk about the British biological studies of the 18th century, then about Moby Dick, published in 1851, then the book on sperm whales in other art (1968), and finally the biology articles (1980s) and the recent articles on American whaling of the 19th century. But there is relatively no continuity among subjects here. And notice that even though the sources on sperm whales in other art and on American whaling are written recently, they are about other subjects/objects that were created much earlier. Thus, the review loses its chronological focus.
• By publication: Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on biological studies of sperm whales if the progression revealed a change in dissection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies.
• By trend: A better way to organize the above sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another trend, such as the history of whaling. Then your review would have subsections according to eras within this period. For instance, the review might examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-1799, and 1800-1899. Under this method, you would combine the recent studies on American whaling in the 19th century with Moby Dick itself in the 1800-1899 category, even though the authors wrote a century apart.
• Thematic: Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time. However, progression of time may still be an important factor in a thematic review. For instance, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the harpoon for whale hunting. While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized chronologically. The only difference here between a “chronological” and a “thematic” approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology.But more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. For instance, a thematic review of material on sperm whales might examine how they are portrayed as “evil” in cultural documents. The subsections might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their behaviors misunderstood. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point made.
• Methodological: A methodological approach differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art work. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed. Once you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out. They should arise out of your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period. A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue.

Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider:

• Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review.
• History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
• Methods and/or Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals.

Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

Begin composing

Once you’ve settled on a general pattern of organization, you’re ready to write each section. There are a few guidelines you should follow during the writing stage as well. Here is a sample paragraph from a literature review about sexism and language to illuminate the following discussion:

However, other studies have shown that even gender-neutral antecedents are more likely to produce masculine images than feminine ones (Gastil, 1990). Hamilton (1988) asked students to complete sentences that required them to fill in pronouns that agreed with gender-neutral antecedents such as “writer,” “pedestrian,” and “persons.” The students were asked to describe any image they had when writing the sentence. Hamilton found that people imagined 3.3 men to each woman in the masculine “generic” condition and 1.5 men per woman in the unbiased condition. Thus, while ambient sexism accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist language amplified the effect. (Source: Erika Falk and Jordan Mills, “Why Sexist Language Affects Persuasion: The Role of Homophily, Intended Audience, and Offense,” Women and Language19:2).

Use evidence

In the example above, the writers refer to several other sources when making their point. A literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence to show that what you are saying is valid.

Be selective

Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the review’s focus, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological.

Use quotes sparingly

Falk and Mills do not use any direct quotes. That is because the survey nature of the literature review does not allow for in-depth discussion or detailed quotes from the text. Some short quotes here and there are okay, though, if you want to emphasize a point, or if what the author said just cannot be rewritten in your own words. Notice that Falk and Mills do quote certain terms that were coined by the author, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. But if you find yourself wanting to put in more quotes, check with your instructor.

Summarize and synthesize

Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each paragraph as well as throughout the review. The authors here recapitulate important features of Hamilton’s study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study’s significance and relating it to their own work.

Keep your own voice

While the literature review presents others’ ideas, your voice (the writer’s) should remain front and center. Notice that Falk and Mills weave references to other sources into their own text, but they still maintain their own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with their own ideas and their own words. The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying.

Use caution when paraphrasing

When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words. In the preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in the text to the author of their source, such as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text when the ideas they are mentioning are not their own, for example, Gastil’s. For more information, please see our handout on plagiarism .

Revise, revise, revise

Draft in hand? Now you’re ready to revise. Spending a lot of time revising is a wise idea, because your main objective is to present the material, not the argument. So check over your review again to make sure it follows the assignment and/or your outline. Then, just as you would for most other academic forms of writing, rewrite or rework the language of your review so that you’ve presented your information in the most concise manner possible. Be sure to use terminology familiar to your audience; get rid of unnecessary jargon or slang. Finally, double check that you’ve documented your sources and formatted the review appropriately for your discipline. For tips on the revising and editing process, see our handout on revising drafts .

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial . We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

Anson, Chris M., and Robert A. Schwegler. 2010. The Longman Handbook for Writers and Readers , 6th ed. New York: Longman.

Jones, Robert, Patrick Bizzaro, and Cynthia Selfe. 1997. The Harcourt Brace Guide to Writing in the Disciplines . New York: Harcourt Brace.

Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete Guide to Everything You’ll Ever Write . Berkeley: Ten Speed Press.

Rosen, Leonard J., and Laurence Behrens. 2003. The Allyn & Bacon Handbook , 5th ed. New York: Longman.

Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers , 11th ed. London: Pearson.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

• Research Consultation
• How-to Guides
• People Search
• Library Databases
• Research Guides
• Find Periodicals
• Google Scholar
• Library Map
• Texts for Vets
• Interlibrary Loan - ILL
• Research & Instruction
• Computers and Laptops
• Services For...
• Reserve a Room
• APSU Records Management
• Library Collections
• Digital Collections
• Special Collections
• Veterans' Oral History
• Government Resources
• Subject Librarians
• Library Information
• Woodward Library Society
• New @ Woodward Library
• Celebration of Scholarship
• Join Woodward Library Society

Writing a Literature Review: Examples & Tutorials

• Phase 1: Scope of Review
• Phase 2: Finding Information
• Phase 3: Recording Information
• Phase 4: Evaluating Information
• Phase 5: Organizing the Review
• Phase 6: Writing the Review & Bibliography
• Tools & Resources
• Examples & Tutorials

Examples of Lit. Reviews

Sample Literature Review -Here is a sample literature review written by a librarian at American University Library.

Deshmukh, Marion F. " The Visual Arts and Cultural Migration in the 1930s and 1940s: A Literature Review. " Central European History (Cambridge University Press / UK) 41.4 (2008): 569-604. Dunjó, Jordi, et al. " Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) Analysis. A Literature Review ." Journal of Hazardous Materials 173.1-3 (2010): 19-32. Gibbons, Susan. " Understanding Empathy as a Complex Construct: A Review of the Literature ." Clinical Social Work Journal 39.3 (2011): 243-52.

Liddle, H. A. (2004). Family-based therapies for adolescent alcohol and drug use: Research contributions and future research needs.   Addiction , 99 (Suppl.2), 76-92.

Mayer, David J. " Acupuncture: An Evidence-Based Review of the Clinical Literature ." Annual Review of Medicine 51:1 (2000): 49-63.

Meyer, Sebastian, Bruno Glaser, and Peter Quicker. " Technical, Economical, and Climate-Related Aspects of Biochar Production Technologies: A Literature Review. " Environmental science & technology 45.22 (2011): 9473-83.

• Writing the Literature Review Part I Defines what a literature review is - and is not.
• Writing the Literature Review Part II Organizing sources, basic steps in the writing process.
• Literature Review Overview for Graduate Students Understand how studies relate to one another, how your own ideas fit within the existing literature.
• Interactive tutorial for literature reviews in Education & Behavioral Sciences • Understanding the Literature Review • Identifying Sources for the Literature Review • Finding Review and Research Articles • Putting it All Together

Literature Review Overview

Subject Guide

• << Previous: Tools & Resources
• Last Updated: Oct 17, 2023 12:56 PM
• URL: https://libguides.apsu.edu/litreview

Literature Review: Examples of Published Literature Reviews

• Sample Searches
• Examples of Published Literature Reviews
• Researching Your Topic
• Subject Searching
• Google Scholar
• Track Your Work
• Citation Managers This link opens in a new window
• Citation Guides This link opens in a new window
• Tips on Writing Your Literature Review This link opens in a new window
• Research Help

Ask a Librarian

Chat with a Librarian

Lisle: (630) 829-6057 Mesa: (480) 878-7514 Toll Free: (877) 575-6050 Email: [email protected]

Book a Research Consultation Library Hours

• Example of a Literature Review in History
• Comparing the Annotated Bibliography to the Literature Review
• Literature Review Guidelines Literature Review (Historiographic Essay): Making sense of what has been written on your topic.

To find examples of published literature reviews in your field or niche, try searching ProQuest Dissertations and Theses by keyword, advisor, or subject. 

• Dissertations & Theses Theses and dissertations from around the world covering all areas of study.
• << Previous: Sample Searches
• Next: Researching Your Topic >>
• Last Updated: Apr 25, 2024 3:34 PM
• URL: https://researchguides.ben.edu/lit-review

Kindlon Hall 5700 College Rd. Lisle, IL 60532 (630) 829-6050

Gillett Hall 225 E. Main St. Mesa, AZ 85201 (480) 878-7514

How To Structure Your Literature Review

3 options to help structure your chapter.

By: Amy Rommelspacher (PhD) | Reviewer: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | November 2020 (Updated May 2023)

Writing the literature review chapter can seem pretty daunting when you’re piecing together your dissertation or thesis. As  we’ve discussed before , a good literature review needs to achieve a few very important objectives – it should:

• Demonstrate your knowledge of the research topic
• Identify the gaps in the literature and show how your research links to these
• Provide the foundation for your conceptual framework (if you have one)
• Inform your own  methodology and research design

To achieve this, your literature review needs a well-thought-out structure . Get the structure of your literature review chapter wrong and you’ll struggle to achieve these objectives. Don’t worry though – in this post, we’ll look at how to structure your literature review for maximum impact (and marks!).

But wait – is this the right time?

Deciding on the structure of your literature review should come towards the end of the literature review process – after you have collected and digested the literature, but before you start writing the chapter. 

In other words, you need to first develop a rich understanding of the literature before you even attempt to map out a structure. There’s no use trying to develop a structure before you’ve fully wrapped your head around the existing research.

Equally importantly, you need to have a structure in place before you start writing , or your literature review will most likely end up a rambling, disjointed mess. 

Importantly, don’t feel that once you’ve defined a structure you can’t iterate on it. It’s perfectly natural to adjust as you engage in the writing process. As we’ve discussed before , writing is a way of developing your thinking, so it’s quite common for your thinking to change – and therefore, for your chapter structure to change – as you write. 

Need a helping hand?

Like any other chapter in your thesis or dissertation, your literature review needs to have a clear, logical structure. At a minimum, it should have three essential components – an  introduction , a  body   and a  conclusion . 

Let’s take a closer look at each of these.

1: The Introduction Section

Just like any good introduction, the introduction section of your literature review should introduce the purpose and layout (organisation) of the chapter. In other words, your introduction needs to give the reader a taste of what’s to come, and how you’re going to lay that out. Essentially, you should provide the reader with a high-level roadmap of your chapter to give them a taste of the journey that lies ahead.

Here’s an example of the layout visualised in a literature review introduction:

Your introduction should also outline your topic (including any tricky terminology or jargon) and provide an explanation of the scope of your literature review – in other words, what you  will   and  won’t   be covering (the delimitations ). This helps ringfence your review and achieve a clear focus . The clearer and narrower your focus, the deeper you can dive into the topic (which is typically where the magic lies). 

Depending on the nature of your project, you could also present your stance or point of view at this stage. In other words, after grappling with the literature you’ll have an opinion about what the trends and concerns are in the field as well as what’s lacking. The introduction section can then present these ideas so that it is clear to examiners that you’re aware of how your research connects with existing knowledge .

2: The Body Section

The body of your literature review is the centre of your work. This is where you’ll present, analyse, evaluate and synthesise the existing research. In other words, this is where you’re going to earn (or lose) the most marks. Therefore, it’s important to carefully think about how you will organise your discussion to present it in a clear way. 

The body of your literature review should do just as the description of this chapter suggests. It should “review” the literature – in other words, identify, analyse, and synthesise it. So, when thinking about structuring your literature review, you need to think about which structural approach will provide the best “review” for your specific type of research and objectives (we’ll get to this shortly).

There are (broadly speaking)  three options  for organising your literature review.

Option 1: Chronological (according to date)

Organising the literature chronologically is one of the simplest ways to structure your literature review. You start with what was published first and work your way through the literature until you reach the work published most recently. Pretty straightforward.

The benefit of this option is that it makes it easy to discuss the developments and debates in the field as they emerged over time. Organising your literature chronologically also allows you to highlight how specific articles or pieces of work might have changed the course of the field – in other words, which research has had the most impact . Therefore, this approach is very useful when your research is aimed at understanding how the topic has unfolded over time and is often used by scholars in the field of history. That said, this approach can be utilised by anyone that wants to explore change over time .

For example , if a student of politics is investigating how the understanding of democracy has evolved over time, they could use the chronological approach to provide a narrative that demonstrates how this understanding has changed through the ages.

Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you structure your literature review chronologically.

• What is the earliest literature published relating to this topic?
• How has the field changed over time? Why?
• What are the most recent discoveries/theories?

In some ways, chronology plays a part whichever way you decide to structure your literature review, because you will always, to a certain extent, be analysing how the literature has developed. However, with the chronological approach, the emphasis is very firmly on how the discussion has evolved over time , as opposed to how all the literature links together (which we’ll discuss next ).

Option 2: Thematic (grouped by theme)

The thematic approach to structuring a literature review means organising your literature by theme or category – for example, by independent variables (i.e. factors that have an impact on a specific outcome).

As you’ve been collecting and synthesising literature , you’ll likely have started seeing some themes or patterns emerging. You can then use these themes or patterns as a structure for your body discussion. The thematic approach is the most common approach and is useful for structuring literature reviews in most fields.

For example, if you were researching which factors contributed towards people trusting an organisation, you might find themes such as consumers’ perceptions of an organisation’s competence, benevolence and integrity. Structuring your literature review thematically would mean structuring your literature review’s body section to discuss each of these themes, one section at a time.

Here are some questions to ask yourself when structuring your literature review by themes:

• Are there any patterns that have come to light in the literature?
• What are the central themes and categories used by the researchers?
• Do I have enough evidence of these themes?

PS – you can see an example of a thematically structured literature review in our literature review sample walkthrough video here.

Option 3: Methodological

The methodological option is a way of structuring your literature review by the research methodologies used . In other words, organising your discussion based on the angle from which each piece of research was approached – for example, qualitative , quantitative or mixed  methodologies.

Structuring your literature review by methodology can be useful if you are drawing research from a variety of disciplines and are critiquing different methodologies. The point of this approach is to question  how  existing research has been conducted, as opposed to  what  the conclusions and/or findings the research were.

For example, a sociologist might centre their research around critiquing specific fieldwork practices. Their literature review will then be a summary of the fieldwork methodologies used by different studies.

Here are some questions you can ask yourself when structuring your literature review according to methodology:

• Which methodologies have been utilised in this field?
• Which methodology is the most popular (and why)?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the various methodologies?
• How can the existing methodologies inform my own methodology?

3: The Conclusion Section

Once you’ve completed the body section of your literature review using one of the structural approaches we discussed above, you’ll need to “wrap up” your literature review and pull all the pieces together to set the direction for the rest of your dissertation or thesis.

The conclusion is where you’ll present the key findings of your literature review. In this section, you should emphasise the research that is especially important to your research questions and highlight the gaps that exist in the literature. Based on this, you need to make it clear what you will add to the literature – in other words, justify your own research by showing how it will help fill one or more of the gaps you just identified.

Last but not least, if it’s your intention to develop a conceptual framework for your dissertation or thesis, the conclusion section is a good place to present this.

Example: Thematically Structured Review

In the video below, we unpack a literature review chapter so that you can see an example of a thematically structure review in practice.

Let’s Recap

In this article, we’ve  discussed how to structure your literature review for maximum impact. Here’s a quick recap of what  you need to keep in mind when deciding on your literature review structure:

• Just like other chapters, your literature review needs a clear introduction , body and conclusion .
• The introduction section should provide an overview of what you will discuss in your literature review.
• The body section of your literature review can be organised by chronology , theme or methodology . The right structural approach depends on what you’re trying to achieve with your research.
• The conclusion section should draw together the key findings of your literature review and link them to your research questions.

If you’re ready to get started, be sure to download our free literature review template to fast-track your chapter outline.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Literature Review Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

27 Comments

Great work. This is exactly what I was looking for and helps a lot together with your previous post on literature review. One last thing is missing: a link to a great literature chapter of an journal article (maybe with comments of the different sections in this review chapter). Do you know any great literature review chapters?

I agree with you Marin… A great piece

I agree with Marin. This would be quite helpful if you annotate a nicely structured literature from previously published research articles.

Awesome article for my research.

I thank you immensely for this wonderful guide

It is indeed thought and supportive work for the futurist researcher and students

Very educative and good time to get guide. Thank you

Great work, very insightful. Thank you.

Thanks for this wonderful presentation. My question is that do I put all the variables into a single conceptual framework or each hypothesis will have it own conceptual framework?

Thank you very much, very helpful

This is very educative and precise . Thank you very much for dropping this kind of write up .

Pheeww, so damn helpful, thank you for this informative piece.

I’m doing a research project topic ; stool analysis for parasitic worm (enteric) worm, how do I structure it, thanks.

comprehensive explanation. Help us by pasting the URL of some good “literature review” for better understanding.

great piece. thanks for the awesome explanation. it is really worth sharing. I have a little question, if anyone can help me out, which of the options in the body of literature can be best fit if you are writing an architectural thesis that deals with design?

I am doing a research on nanofluids how can l structure it?

Beautifully clear.nThank you!

Lucid! Thankyou!

Brilliant work, well understood, many thanks

I like how this was so clear with simple language 😊😊 thank you so much 😊 for these information 😊

Insightful. I was struggling to come up with a sensible literature review but this has been really helpful. Thank you!

You have given thought-provoking information about the review of the literature.

Thank you. It has made my own research better and to impart your work to students I teach

I learnt a lot from this teaching. It’s a great piece.

I am doing research on EFL teacher motivation for his/her job. How Can I structure it? Is there any detailed template, additional to this?

You are so cool! I do not think I’ve read through something like this before. So nice to find somebody with some genuine thoughts on this issue. Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This site is one thing that is required on the internet, someone with a little originality!

I’m asked to do conceptual, theoretical and empirical literature, and i just don’t know how to structure it

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Literature Reviews

• "How To" Books
• Examples of Literature Reviews
• Collecting Resources for a Literature Review
• Organizing the Literature Review
• Writing the Literature Review
• Endnote This link opens in a new window
• Evaluating Websites

Examples of Literature Reviews in Government Document and Book Format

• Social and economic considerations for coastal and watershed restoration in the Puget Sound, Washington : a literature review by Holly M. Stinchfield, Lynne Koontz, and Natalie R. Sexton Call Number: U.S. Government Documents Online
• A literature review of wipe sampling methods for chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals by Battelle Call Number: U.S.Government Documents Online Washington, DC : Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, [2007]
• Collaboration, technology, and outsourcing initiatives in higher education : a literature review by Tessa Kaganoff. Call Number: ebook Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1998

Examples of Literature Reviews in Journal Articles and Disserations

• The stigma of childhood obesity: A literature review by Janel Swaye MacDermott

Journal Articles

Papastergiou, Marina. 2009. "Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review." Computers & Education 53, no. 3: 603-622.

de Campos, Ana Carolina, Nelci Adriana Cicuto Ferreira Rocha, and Geert J. P. Savelsbergh. "Reaching and grasping movements in infants at risk: A review." Research in Developmental Disabilities 30, no. 5 (September 2009): 819-826.

Dissertations

• A meta-analysis/literature review comparing the effectiveness of SSRI antidepressants, cognitive behavioral therapy, and placebo for the treatment of depression by John J Wagner
• << Previous: "How To" Books
• Next: Collecting Resources for a Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: Nov 2, 2021 12:11 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.stonybrook.edu/literature-review
• Request a Class
• Hours & Locations
• Ask a Librarian
• Special Collections
• Library Faculty & Staff

Library Administration: 631.632.7100

• Stony Brook Home
• Campus Maps
• Web Accessibility Information
• Accessibility Barrier Report Form

Comments or Suggestions? | Library Webmaster

Except where otherwise noted, this work by SBU Libraries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .

A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Stellar Literature Review (with Help from AI)

Table of contents

Aren’t all of us mini versions of Sherlock Holmes when browsing data and archives for a research piece? As we go through the process, a comprehensive literature review is an essential toolkit to make your research shine.

A literature review consists of scholarly sources that validate the content. Its primary objective is to offer a concise summary of the research and to let you explore relevant theories and methodologies. Through this review, you can identify gaps in the existing research and bridge them with your contribution. 

The real challenge is how to write an excellent literature review. Let’s learn.

What is the purpose of a literature review?

A literature review is an introduction to your research. It helps you put your perspective to the table, along with a summary of the theme.

What does my literature review communicate?

• Explanation of your research: how the information was collected, the research method, the justification of the chosen data sources, and an overview of the data analysis.
• Framework: the journey from where the concept began and how it is presented.
• Connects the previous and current research: 

It presents the broader scope of your research by connecting it to the existing data and debates and underlining how your content fits the prevailing studies. 

In an era of information overload, a literature review must be well-structured. 

Let’s learn all about the structure and style of a literature review that’ll help you strengthen your research.

Literature review– structure and style

Begin with a question and end it with the solution– the key to structuring a literature review. It resembles an essay’s format, with the first paragraph introducing the readers to the topic and the following explaining the research in-depth.

The conclusion reiterates the question and summarizes the overall insights of your research. There’s no word count restriction. —it depends on the type of research. For example, a dissertation demands lengthy work, whereas a short paper needs a few pages. 

In a literature review, maintaining high quality is vital, with a focus on academic writing style. Informal language should be avoided in favor of a more formal tone. 

The content avoids contractions, clearly differentiating between previous and current research through the use of past and present tense. Wordtune assists in establishing a formal tone, enhancing your work with pertinent suggestions. This AI-powered tool ensures your writing remains genuine, lucid, and engaging. 

The option of refining the tonality offers multiple possibilities for rephrasing a single sentence. Thus, pick the best and keep writing.

Get Wordtune for free > Get Wordtune for free >

Your friendly step-by-step guide to writing a literary review (with help from AI)

Do you find it challenging to begin the literature review? Don’t worry! We’re here to get you started with our step-by-step guide.

1. Narrow down the research scope

Simply begin with the question: What am I answering through my research?

Whether it’s cooking or painting, the real challenge is the prep-up for it rather than performing the task. Once you’re done, it smoothly progresses. Similarly, for your literature review, prepare the groundwork by narrowing down the research scope.

Browse and scoop out relevant data inclining well with your research. While you can’t cover every aspect of your research, pick a topic that isn’t too narrow nor too broad to keep your literature review well-balanced. 

2. Hunt relevant literature

The next question: Does this data align with the issue I’m trying to address?

As you review sources of information, hunt out the best ones. Determine which findings help in offering a focused insight on your topic. The best way to pick primary sources is to opt for the ones featured in reliable publications. You can also choose secondary sources from other researchers from a reasonable time frame and a relevant background.

For example, if your research focuses on the Historical Architecture of 18th-century Europe, the first-hand accounts and surveys from the past would hold more weight than the new-age publications. 

3. Observe the themes and patterns in sources

Next comes: What is the core viewpoint in most of the research? Has it stayed constant over time, or have the authors differed in their points of view?

Ensure to scoop out the essential aspects of what each source represents. Once you have collected all this information, combine it and add your interpretations at the end. This process is known as synthesis.

Synthesize ideas by combining arguments, findings and forming your new version.

4. Generate an outline

The next question: How can I organize my review effectively? When navigating multiple data sources, you must have noticed a structure throughout the research. Develop an outline to make the process easier. An outline is a skeletal format of the review, helping you connect the information more strategically.

Here are the three different ways to organize an outline– Chronologically, Thematically, or by Methodology.You can develop the outline chronologically, starting from the older sources and leading to the latest pieces. Another way of organizing is to thematically divide the sections and discuss each under the designated sub-heading.

You can even organize it per the research methods used by the respective authors. The choice of outline depends on the subject. For example, in the case of a science paper, you can divide the information into sections like introduction, types of equipment, method, procedure, findings, etc. In contrast, it’s best to present it in divisions based on timelines like Ancient, Middle Ages, Industrial revolutions, etc., for a history paper.

If you’re confused about how to structure the data, work with Wordtune. 

With the Generate with AI feature, you can mention your research topic and let Wordtune curate a comprehensive outline for your study.

Having a precise prompt is the key to getting the best results.

5. Start filling!

Your next question must be: Am I ready to compose all the parts of the literature review?

Once you’re ready with the basic outline and relevant sources, start filling in the data. Go for an introductory paragraph first to ensure your readers understand the topic and how you will present it. Ensure you clearly explain the section in the first sentence.

However, if beginning from the first paragraph seems intimidating, don’t worry! Add the main body content to the sub-headings, then jump to the introduction. 

Add headings wherever possible to make it more straightforward and guide your readers logically through different sources. Lastly, conclude your study by presenting a key takeaway and summarizing your findings. To make your task easier, work with Wordtune. It helps align your content with the desired tone and refine the structure.

6. Give attention to detail and edit

The last question: Am I satisfied with the language and content written in the literature review? Is it easy to understand?

Once you’re done writing the first draft of a literature review, it’s time to refine it. Take time between writing and reading the draft to ensure a fresh perspective. It makes it easier to spot errors when you disconnect from the content for some time. Start by looking at the document from a bird's eye to ensure the formatting and structure are in order. 

After reviewing the content format, you must thoroughly check your work for grammar, spelling, and punctuation. One of the best approaches to editing and proofreading is to use Wordtune . It helps simplify complex sentences, enhance the content quality, and gain prowess over the tonality.

The dos and don’ts of writing a literature review

Writing a stellar literature review requires following a few dos and don'ts. Just like Sherlock Holmes would never overlook a hint, you must pay attention to every minute detail while writing a perfect narrative. To help you write, below are some dos and don'ts to remember.

Composing a literature review demands a holistic research summary, each part exhibiting your understanding and approach. As you write the content, make sure to cover the following points:

• Keep a historical background of the field of research. Highlight the relevant relation between the old studies and your new research.
• Discuss the core issue, question, and debate of your topic.
• Theories lay the foundation of research. While you’re writing a literature review, make sure to add relevant concepts and ideas to support your statements.
• Another critical thing to keep in mind is to define complex terminologies. It helps the readers understand the content with better clarity. 

Examples of comprehensive literature reviews

Aren’t good examples the best way to understand a subject? Let’s look into a few examples of literature reviews and analyze what makes them well-written.

1. Critical Thinking and Transferability: A Review of the Literature (Gwendolyn Reece)

An overview of scholarly sources is included in the literature review, which explores critical thinking in American education. The introduction stating the subject’s importance makes it a winning literature review. Following the introduction is a well-defined purpose that highlights the importance of research.

As one keeps reading, there is more clarity on the pros and cons of the research. By dividing information into parts with relevant subheadings, the author breaks a lengthy literature review into manageable chunks, defining the overall structure.

Along with other studies and presented perspectives, the author also expresses her opinion. It is presented with minimal usage of ‘I,’ keeping it person-poised yet general. Toward the conclusion, the author again offers an overview of the study. A summary is further strengthened by presenting suggestions for future research as well. 

2. The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review

This literature review is thematically organized on how technology affects language acquisition. The study begins with an introduction to the topic with well-cited sources. It presents the views of different studies to help readers get a sense of different perspectives. After giving these perspectives, the author offers a personalized opinion.

One of the critical aspects that makes this a good literature review is a dedicated paragraph for definitions. It helps readers proceed further with a clear understanding of the crucial terminologies. There’s a comparison of the modern and previous studies and approaches to give an overall picture of the research.

Once the main body is composed, the author integrates recommendations for action-based tips. Thus, the literature review isn’t just summarizing the sources but offering actions relevant to the topics. Finally, the concluding paragraph has a brief overview with key takeaways.

Wordtune: your writing buddy!

A literature review demands the right balance of language and clarity. You must refine the content to achieve a formal tone and clear structure. Do you know what will help you the most? Wordtune !. 

The real-time grammar checker leaves no scope for errors and lets you retain precision in writing. This writing companion is all you need for stress-free working and comprehensive literature review development.

Let the narrative begin

A literary review isn't just about summarizing sources; it's about seamlessly bringing your perspective to the table. Always remember to set a narrative for added interest and a brilliant composition. With structure and style being the pillars of a stellar literature review, work with Wordtune to ensure zero compromises on the quality.

Share This Article:

Grammarly Alternatives: Which Writing Assistant is the Best Choice for You?

The Dos and Don’ts of Using AI to Study

How to Use Modal Verbs for Clear Communication

Looking for fresh content, thank you your submission has been received.

Communicative Sciences and Disorders

• Online Learners: Quick Links
• ASHA Journals
• Research Tip 1: Define the Research Question
• Reference Resources
• Evidence Summaries & Clinical Guidelines
• Drug Information
• Health Data & Statistics
• Patient/Consumer Facing Materials
• Images/Streaming Video
• Database Tutorials
• Crafting a Search
• Cited Reference Searching
• Research Tip 4: Find Grey Literature
• Research Tip 5: Save Your Work
• Cite and Manage Your Sources
• Critical Appraisal
• What are Literature Reviews?
• Conducting & Reporting Systematic Reviews
• Finding Systematic Reviews
• Tutorials & Tools for Literature Reviews
• Point of Care Tools (Mobile Apps)

What are Systematic Reviews? (3 minutes, 24 second YouTube Video)

Systematic Literature Reviews: Steps & Resources

These steps for conducting a systematic literature review are listed below . 

Also see subpages for more information about:

• The different types of literature reviews, including systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis methods
• Tools & Tutorials

Literature Review & Systematic Review Steps

• Develop a Focused Question
• Scope the Literature  (Initial Search)
• Refine & Expand the Search
• Limit the Results
• Download Citations
• Abstract & Analyze
• Create Flow Diagram
• Synthesize & Report Results

1. Develop a Focused   Question 

Consider the PICO Format: Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome

Focus on defining the Population or Problem and Intervention (don't narrow by Comparison or Outcome just yet!)

"What are the effects of the Pilates method for patients with low back pain?"

Tools & Additional Resources:

• PICO Question Help
• Stillwell, Susan B., DNP, RN, CNE; Fineout-Overholt, Ellen, PhD, RN, FNAP, FAAN; Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek, PhD, RN, CPNP/PMHNP, FNAP, FAAN; Williamson, Kathleen M., PhD, RN Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical Question, AJN The American Journal of Nursing : March 2010 - Volume 110 - Issue 3 - p 58-61 doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368959.11129.79

2. Scope the Literature

A "scoping search" investigates the breadth and/or depth of the initial question or may identify a gap in the literature. 

Eligible studies may be located by searching in:

• Background sources (books, point-of-care tools)
• Article databases
• Trial registries
• Grey literature
• Cited references
• Reference lists

When searching, if possible, translate terms to controlled vocabulary of the database. Use text word searching when necessary.

Use Boolean operators to connect search terms:

• Combine separate concepts with AND  (resulting in a narrower search)
• Connecting synonyms with OR  (resulting in an expanded search)

Search:  pilates AND ("low back pain"  OR  backache )

Video Tutorials - Translating PICO Questions into Search Queries

• Translate Your PICO Into a Search in PubMed (YouTube, Carrie Price, 5:11) 
• Translate Your PICO Into a Search in CINAHL (YouTube, Carrie Price, 4:56)

3. Refine & Expand Your Search

Expand your search strategy with synonymous search terms harvested from:

• database thesauri
• reference lists
• relevant studies

Example: 

(pilates OR exercise movement techniques) AND ("low back pain" OR backache* OR sciatica OR lumbago OR spondylosis)

As you develop a final, reproducible strategy for each database, save your strategies in a:

• a personal database account (e.g., MyNCBI for PubMed)
• Log in with your NYU credentials
• Open and "Make a Copy" to create your own tracker for your literature search strategies

4. Limit Your Results

Use database filters to limit your results based on your defined inclusion/exclusion criteria.  In addition to relying on the databases' categorical filters, you may also need to manually screen results.  

• Limit to Article type, e.g.,:  "randomized controlled trial" OR multicenter study
• Limit by publication years, age groups, language, etc.

NOTE: Many databases allow you to filter to "Full Text Only".  This filter is  not recommended . It excludes articles if their full text is not available in that particular database (CINAHL, PubMed, etc), but if the article is relevant, it is important that you are able to read its title and abstract, regardless of 'full text' status. The full text is likely to be accessible through another source (a different database, or Interlibrary Loan).  

• Filters in PubMed
• CINAHL Advanced Searching Tutorial

5. Download Citations

Selected citations and/or entire sets of search results can be downloaded from the database into a citation management tool. If you are conducting a systematic review that will require reporting according to PRISMA standards, a citation manager can help you keep track of the number of articles that came from each database, as well as the number of duplicate records.

In Zotero, you can create a Collection for the combined results set, and sub-collections for the results from each database you search.  You can then use Zotero's 'Duplicate Items" function to find and merge duplicate records.

• Citation Managers - General Guide

6. Abstract and Analyze

• Migrate citations to data collection/extraction tool
• Screen Title/Abstracts for inclusion/exclusion
• Screen and appraise full text for relevance, methods, 
• Resolve disagreements by consensus

Covidence is a web-based tool that enables you to work with a team to screen titles/abstracts and full text for inclusion in your review, as well as extract data from the included studies.

• Covidence Support
• Critical Appraisal Tools
• Data Extraction Tools

7. Create Flow Diagram

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram is a visual representation of the flow of records through different phases of a systematic review.  It depicts the number of records identified, included and excluded.  It is best used in conjunction with the PRISMA checklist .

Example from: Stotz, S. A., McNealy, K., Begay, R. L., DeSanto, K., Manson, S. M., & Moore, K. R. (2021). Multi-level diabetes prevention and treatment interventions for Native people in the USA and Canada: A scoping review. Current Diabetes Reports, 2 (11), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-021-01414-3

• PRISMA Flow Diagram Generator (ShinyApp.io, Haddaway et al. )
• PRISMA Diagram Templates  (Word and PDF)
• Make a copy of the file to fill out the template
• Image can be downloaded as PDF, PNG, JPG, or SVG
• Covidence generates a PRISMA diagram that is automatically updated as records move through the review phases

8. Synthesize & Report Results

There are a number of reporting guideline available to guide the synthesis and reporting of results in systematic literature reviews.

It is common to organize findings in a matrix, also known as a Table of Evidence (ToE).

• Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews
• Download a sample template of a health sciences review matrix  (GoogleSheets)

Steps modified from: 

Cook, D. A., & West, C. P. (2012). Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach.   Medical Education , 46 (10), 943–952.

• << Previous: Critical Appraisal
• Next: What are Literature Reviews? >>
• Last Updated: Jun 26, 2024 3:00 PM
• URL: https://guides.nyu.edu/speech

WTO / Education / 39 Best Literature Review Examples (Guide with Samples)

39 Best Literature Review Examples (Guide with Samples)

A literature review is a compilation of current knowledge on a particular topic derived from the critical evaluation of different scholarly sources such as books, articles, and publications, which is then presented in an organized manner to relate to a specific research problem being investigated.

It highlights the methods, relevant theories, and gaps in existing research on a particular subject. It can be both a summary and synthesis of information on a specific topic. A summary reiterates key information from scholarly sources, while synthesis is a new interpretation or combination of new and old material. 

As a synthesis, it can outline the intellectual progression of knowledge in a particular field or topic, which might involve stating key debates throughout the advancement period.  

Literature Review Examples

Purpose of Literature Review

Literature reviews have different purposes in scholarly articles, research papers, and books, depending on the discipline at hand. First and foremost, reviews are generally meant to showcase the extensive research carried out by an author on a particular topic and their findings, which will form the foundation of the research. It then summarizes the information to show the author’s familiarity with the topic in question.

The review also demonstrates the relationship between the topic being investigated and other topics that were under consideration. Finally, it outlines the gaps in the previous works of other scholars, which create areas of research.

Literature reviews provide a new interpretation of previous scholarly publications and aim to resolve conflicting studies done in the past. In addition, identifying existing gaps in a particular research area illustrates the starting point of the research.

Literature Review vs. Academic Research Paper

A research paper presents new ideas, arguments, and approaches toward a particular topic. The conclusions of a research paper will be based on the analysis and interpretation of raw data collected by the author and an original study. On the other hand, a literature review is based on the findings of other publications. Thus, the review highlights the author’s understanding of a topic based on the previously conducted research. It is part of a research paper.

Where, When, and Why

The need for a literature review in a publication will vary from one situation to the other and the field/discipline of research. These two factors determine what is expected from the lit review. For example, a scientific review will be more analytical on the methods and results of previous research. In contrast, a philosophical review will be more argumentative, highlighting the discrepancies and correspondences between scholars.

It can either be part of a publication or a stand-alone document. As part of a research publication, it is often placed after the introduction to the topic outlining knowledge about a particular topic and critical sources that formed the foundation of the research. As an individual document, it is prepared by students as part of course study to aid the students in familiarizing themselves with different topics in their field of study.

Lit reviews also guide students to help them synthesize theoretical methodologies and frameworks to adopt in academic research. As a publication, literature reviews are used to document existing information about a topic for readers (other scholars) to go through for whatever reasons they may have. Published studies are essentially helpful to new scholars getting into any field of research.

Types of Literature Review

Before looking into how to write a literature review, it is vital to understand the different types. The type will usually depend on the objective approach of the author.

Common types are:  

Argumentative review

An argumentative review is adopted when the research paper or publication is meant to take a contrarian viewpoint on a particular subject. The review analyses an existing argument, philosophical problem, assumption, or conclusion outlined in different studies with an objective to either support or oppose the argument. 

Integrative review

An integrative review integrates secondary data to develop new perspectives and frameworks on a topic. This is more prevalent in research that does not involve primary data. In addition, integrative reviews are more familiar with social sciences.       

Historical review

Historical reviews are used when scholars or authors place a particular idea, concept, theory, or research in a historical context. It examines the idea, theory, or issue from the first time it was discussed and outlines its evolution throughout a given period.  

Methodological review

Methodological reviews look at how a specific theory, concept, results, or findings were developed. Therefore, methodological reviews will analyze the different methods used by different scholars to arrive at conclusions or knowledge about the topic being investigated.

Some of the methods scholars use in different disciplines to obtain information are interviewing, sampling, practical experiments/data collection, research approaches, critical thinking, social experiments, etc.

Methodological reviews are hence used to discuss tested methods of research and ethics that a researcher should be aware of before undertaking their investigations.  

Systematic review

A systematic review is a more detailed and comprehensive review compared to other types of lit reviews. It highlights any existing research evidence associated with a clearly defined research problem or question. The evidence is collected, analyzed, and reported in a summarized but detailed manner. Systematic reviews are popularly presented as a cause-and-effect structure.

Theoretical review

A theoretical review delves into the different theories regarding a particular issue, challenge, concept, or theory. It identifies their inadequacy in explaining the issue or concept at hand. The review then identifies the relationships between the identified theories, and the degree of research done and poses novel hypotheses to be investigated.

Organization of a Literature Review

How an author organizes a literature review will depend on what they aim to achieve. As a consequence, there are multiple ways of organizing it which are discussed below:

Chronological 

A chronological format outlines knowledge on a particular topic based on when the scholarly source of information was published. Starting with the earliest followed up to the most recent chronological order. This format should be used if there is a clear chronological order in the development of the information; therefore, it will not be applicable in some cases. Instead, key turning points, patterns, and events that impacted the direction of the knowledge should be outlined.  

By publication

It can be organized in the scholarly publications reviewed by the author, scholar, or student. The by-publication format should only improve the review and facilitate what the author aims to accomplish. 

Scholars or students can adopt a dominant trend in research, such as history, developmental stages, steps involved in a process, etc.

Methodological

A methodological format is based on the methods used by the researcher. Thus, the order of contents in the lit review will depend on the method they will use to carry out their research, knowledge obtained from the first method appears first, and the rest of the information follows in the same order according to the methods used by the author.  

Literature reviews organized in a thematic format revolve around the subject being investigated in no order. It is, therefore, ordinarily up to the researcher or author to determine how they intend to outline the information. A thematic format will crossover from one period and publication to another, but can sometimes incorporate a chronological order.

Theoretical

Literature reviews organized in a theoretical format have their contents organized in an abstract framework established by the author to discuss different concepts, theories, and concepts and how they relate to the research at hand.

Additional sections

Depending on the objective, other sections do not fit under conventional lit review formats that one may need to add. Below are some of the sections that authors or students can include in the lit review:

• Current situation: The review can have information about the current state of things regarding the topic at hand to facilitate further understanding.
• History: Researchers can summarize the subject under investigation, literature, or concept if the review is not already in chronological format.
• Selection methods: Lit reviews are known to outline the methods or criteria used in selecting the way to present information and scholarly sources referenced in the review.
• Standards: it can also include the standards used in choosing the format to present information in the review and the scholarly literature used in the research.
• Further questions for research: The review can include questions emanating from the review and how the researcher will further explore their research to address the queries raised.

Literature Review Samples

Considerations Before Writing a Literature Review

Preparation is essential when it comes to writing. The objective should be to come up with a review that satisfactorily explores the topic being discussed. The following considerations are steps towards that if incorporated into the writing process:

Authors should seek clarification from mentors or supervisors before commencing the writing process. First, determine what is expected from the lit review. The type and number of sources to be used, the assignment (summarize, synthesize, or critique), and the type of information provided should be clear.

Find models

You should review literature from other authors in the same discipline and evaluate how those authors presented their lit reviews. Previous lit reviews can be used as guides that point authors in the right direction when writing their lit reviews.

Narrow your topic

It is always advantageous to narrow down the research topic to a specific area of research; that way, the number of sources can also be reduced. Even though conducting research will usually involve extensive research on all available materials about a particular topic, having a well-defined topic simplifies the task at hand.

Current sources

Determine if the research project or discipline ought to be based on the most recent findings or information. It is common for knowledge to become obsolete, especially in disciplines where discoveries and new inventions are made fast. If the lit review should be based on current knowledge, limit the sources to the most recent literature. Some disciplines will typically have a limit on how old the sources should be.  

How to Write a Literature Review (Expert Guide)

Once all pre-writing considerations have been taken into account, it is time to write the document. At this point, you should already be aware of what you wish to accomplish with the literature review, and the steps to writing an exemplary lit review are mentioned below:

Problem formulation

First and foremost, clearly define the topic (research area) to be investigated. For students, this will sometimes be given as an assignment. However, the research could be an academic project, which means that the author has to come up with the problem and define it themselves.

Search for relevant studies

Once the problem is clearly expressed, you should search for studies related to the topic, concept, theory, or idea and questions surrounding the topic. Most stand-alone lit reviews will generally attempt to answer a more concentrated question. On the internet, literature can be searched using keywords related to the research area. In addition to keywords, include vital variables such as synonyms and associated terms. The inclusion of Boolean operators and, or not, is also used to narrow down results to more specific publications.

Familiar sources for publications are:

• Google Scholar
• Library catalogue
• Econ lit (economics)
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Inspec (physics, engineering, and computer science)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)

Before selecting relevant studies, go through their abstract and determine if they fit the scope needed in the investigation. Use a list to note down any chosen works. Select landmark sources in the discipline.

Evaluation of sources/data

The next step is the evaluation stage. Evaluation involves a lot of reading. Evaluation can be done in two stages; overall skimming and thorough reading. During the second stage of this step, be critical, ask questions, and take many notes.

Some of the questions authors or researchers should ask themselves are:

• What is the author’s objective? What problem, concept, or theory are they putting across?
• What are the main concepts?
• What are the methodologies used by the author to arrive at the results and conclusions?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the results and conclusions?

Use credible sources. Most cited sources are preferred as they indicate their influence in the field. Also, keep track of the citations to be later incorporated.

Identify themes, debates, and gaps

While reading the sources, identify key patterns, themes, debates/arguments, and gaps in each literature. These elements help tie the literature to the topic under investigation. Look for consistent patterns, themes, questions, challenges, methods, and inconsistencies in the same. Consistencies present critical information for consideration, while inconsistencies present opportunities for research areas.

Outline the structure

Formatting is part and parcel of a well-written work. Selecting the structure should start by creating an outline with all the information that will go into the lit review, then consider the different types of structures and select the most suitable. Next, take the basic structure of the introduction, body, and conclusion into consideration and start work from there. 

Analysis and interpretation 

Lastly, perform an in-depth analysis and interpretation of the information obtained from the scholarly research and put it into writing. The summarized, synthesized, and critically evaluated information is then written down in well-structured paragraphs that follow the chosen structure. Transition words are used to draw comparisons, connections, and contrasts.

Format 

Ordinarily, a literature review will have three key components: introduction, body, and conclusion. These components should appear in the document in the following order:

Introduction

An introduction should inform the reader which topic is being studied. It gives the reader an overall idea of the purpose and focus of the document. The introduction lets the reader know beforehand the key things that will be highlighted in the document. Therefore, the introduction should be brief and precise.

The next item is the body, where the primary purpose of the lit review is fulfilled. The body should take critical information from all the sources used and comprehensively present them. This is where the author reports the extensive analysis and interpretation results that they gathered from all the sources they reviewed. The body should be categorized into themes, ideas, and concepts within the main topic.

Lastly, a summary of what the lit review entails should be provided as a conclusion. The critical points obtained from examining the sources should be written down and linked to the primary subject of the review. Key points are those that have the most outstanding contribution to the research.

Studies used should be screened based on provenance (author’s credentials or credibility), methodology, objectivity, persuasiveness, and value related to the topic at hand.

Guidelines for Writing a Literature Review

To improve the delivery of information, there are certain elements that authors can incorporate. They are:

Use evidence

The lit review’s findings, interpretations, and general contents should be based on actual evidence or credible literature. Using citations is evidence of authentic information.

Be selective

There will always be a lot of information available from the reviewed sources. Authors should therefore be selective and discuss the key points that focus on the topic. Not all information must be included in the review.  

Word-for-word quotes are acceptable. This is even more so if a critical point or author-specific terminology or knowledge cannot be paraphrased. Quotes should, however, be used sparingly.

Summarize and synthesize

The information obtained from the sources should be summarized, and the author should use it to synthesize new arguments, concepts, or ideas related to their research.

Keep your voice

The literature review should reflect the author’s voice as it is a review of other people’s works. This can be done by starting and ending the paragraphs with an original voice, ideas, and wordings.

Use caution while paraphrasing

Any paraphrased information should be conveyed accurately and in the author’s words. A citation must always be done, even when paraphrasing has been done.

Proofread before submitting or publishing. Go through the document a few times and make the necessary changes. The review should be within the applicable guidelines. Check for language and any other errors and edit accordingly.

Do’s and Don’ts for a Literature Review 

Every researcher wants to introduce their readers to a particular topic in an informative and engaging manner. Below are tips that can be used to this effect.

The following things should be opted by the researcher when writing a lit review:

• Find a focus: Authors should take a direction, idea, concept, or argument and stick to it. The information conveyed should then be made to align with the chosen point of focus. Thus, the review is not simply a list of analyzed sources, but a detailed summary of how different sources have a focal point (intertwined).
• Well-chosen sources: The quality of the information will, to a great extent, be determined by the quality of sources used. Therefore, take time to select suitable sources and more value will be added to the review.
• Create an annotated bibliography: Creating an annotated bibliography is recommended as one reads their sources. The bibliography keeps track of sources and takes notes. This information can be used when writing the final lit review.
• Synthesize research: Information obtained from the relevant studies should be combined to come up with new or original ideas. You should present a new domain based on previous sources’ knowledge, not just restating the information.
• Argumentative approach: Well-written literature reviews will often argue to support an author’s stance on a particular topic. The author can choose to address how the author’s work is filling a particular gap or support one of the scholar’s arguments and perception towards a particular topic. However, this argumentative approach will not work in all situations; it is usually discipline-specific. 
• Convey it to the reader: It should let the reader know the document’s main idea, concept, or argument. This can be done by including a simple statement that compels the reader to think precisely and know what to expect.
• Break out your disciplinary box: The research will often be multi-disciplinary. Literature reviews should then collect interdisciplinary information from multiple sources as they add novel dynamics to the topic under investigation. It should be noted that this does not imply that the researcher should substitute the literature from the topic’s discipline with that from other disciplines. This is usually an improvement strategy that adds substance to the review.
• Look for repeated patterns: Be attentive to pick out repeated ideas, findings, and concepts from different scholars as they will often illustrate agreed research dead-end or a scholarly conclusion.
• Don’t just review for content: When reviewing the literature, examine the content and other writing and presentation techniques. Look out for unique ways information has been presented, methods used, consistent citations, and non-textual elements such as graphs, and figures used to present information. In addition, the researcher identifies theories used to predict, explain, or understand phenomena within the discipline.
• Search Web of Science and Google Scholar: Conduct citation tracking about the leading scholars already identified in the search process. Scholars cited by multiple scholars outside the principal discipline will generally indicate that there are no new publications on the topic.

The following don’ts should be avoided:

• Do not select studies that are not directly related to the topic being investigated.
• Avoid rushing when identifying and selecting sources to use to research the problem.
• Avoid the use of secondary analytical sources. Instead, opt to use sources with primary research studies or data. Secondary analytical sources will often cite primary analytical sources; research should refer to them instead.
• Do not accept other scholarly findings, theories, or interpretations without critically examining and critiquing them.
• Researchers should not outline the search procedures used to identify scholarly sources for reviewing purposes.
• Avoid including isolated statistical findings without illustrating how they were arrived at using chi-squared or meta-analytic methods.
• Do not review studies that only validate the assumptions, stances, and concepts of your thesis; consider contradicting works with alternative and conflicting stances.

Frequently Asked Questions

It is written by researchers, authors, and students who must study literature to gather knowledge on a particular topic they are interested in.

It should be placed right after the introduction of the dissertation. It places the research in a scholarly context by summarizing existing knowledge on the particular topic.

Researchers and authors are not limited in terms of how many sources they can review. Students will usually have a given number of sources to review as an assignment. However, the number of sources referenced in a lit review will vary from one topic or discipline to the other. Some topics have a vast catalog of available sources, while others have minimal sources, especially emerging issues. It is, however, advised that each key point discussed should have at least 2-3 references/sources. For example, a 10-page lit review will have an average of 30 references.

About This Article

Was this helpful?

Great! Tell us more about your experience

Not up to par help us fix it, keep reading.

12 Free Kindergarten Newsletter Templates

12 Perfect Examples of Salutatorian Speech

12 Free Yes No Flowchart Templates (PowerPoint)

10 Free Homeschool Report Card Templates

Thank you for your feedback.

Your Voice, Our Progress. Your feedback matters a lot to us.

The good, the bad, and the ugly: how counterfeiting is addressed in operations and supply chain management literature

• Published: 28 June 2024

Cite this article

• Raul Beal Partyka   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7941-2152 1 ,
• Rafael Teixeira   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-6084 2 ,
• Roger Augusto Luna   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2827-4719 1 &
• Ely Laureano Paiva   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-0584 1  

Explore all metrics

This article aims to identify counterfeiting state-of-the-art and expand the Operations and Supply chain Management (OSCM) field from the identified gaps and bottlenecks to understand the real-life phenomenon and critically evaluate the existing body of knowledge. This is a systematic literature review from 63 relevant articles identified from Scopus and Web of Science. This is a reflection exercise to identify gaps and bottlenecks to subsidy research opportunities. Clearly, the strategies for combating counterfeiting could be more reactive or proactive, for example, reactive in the purchasing/co-opting offenders and proactive by blockchain adoption and marketing communication with tips to identify fake products. Therefore, the results also identified some central aspects related to the evolution of counterfeiting studies in the OSCM field and relevant gaps. We provide theoretical evidence that an interesting and broad field exists to expand from the identified gaps and bottlenecks. We also present up-to-date, state-of-the-art literature on all the aspects and facets of counterfeiting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda

The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review

Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends

Data availability.

The author confirms that all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article, including the Supplementary File.

Agrawal TK, Koehl L, Campagne C (2018) A secured tag for implementation of traceability in textile and clothing supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2638-x

Article   Google Scholar  

Amaral NB (2020) What can be done to address luxury counterfeiting? An integrative review of tactics and strategies. J Brand Manage Palgrave Macmillan UK 27(6):691–709. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00206-6

Ames J, Souza DZ (2012) Counterfeiting of drugs in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 46(1):154–159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012005000005

Berman B (2008) Strategies to detect and reduce counterfeiting activity. Bus Horiz 51(3):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.01.002

Bian X, Moutinho L (2011) Counterfeits and branded products: effects of counterfeit ownership. J Prod Brand Manage 20(5):379–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111157900

Böhle C, Hellingrath B, Deuter P (2014) Towards process reference models for secure supply chains. J Transp Secur 7(3):255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-014-0142-6

Busby JS (2019) The co-evolution of competition and parasitism in the resource-based view: a risk model of product counterfeiting. Eur J Oper Res 276(1):300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.039

Cataldo A, Grieco A, Prete A, Del, Cannazza G, Benedetto E, De (2016) Innovative method for traceability of hides throughout the leather manufacturing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8489-4

Cho SH, Fang X, Tayur S (2015) Combating strategic counterfeiters in licit and illicit supply chains. Manuf Service Oper Manage 17(3):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0524

Choi TM, Feng L, Li R, Elsevier BV (2020) Vol. 221 No. July 2019, 107473, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.008

Cole R, Stevenson M, Aitken J (2019) Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Manage 24(4):469–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309

Cordell VV, Wongtada N, Kieschnick RL Jr. (1996) Counterfeit purchase intentions: role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. J Bus Res 35(95):41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7

Crettez B, Hayek N, Zaccour G (2018) Brand imitation: A dynamic-game approach, International Journal of Production Economics , Vol. 205 No. November, pp. 139–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.010

Danese P, Mocellin R, Romano P (2021) Designing blockchain systems to prevent counterfeiting in wine supply chains: a multiple-case study. Int J Oper Prod Manage 41:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2019-0781

Durach CF, Kembro JH, Wieland A (2021) How to advance theory through literature reviews in logistics and supply chain management. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manage ahead–of–p(No ahead–of–print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2020-0381

Falasca M, Dellana S, Rowe WJ, Kros JF (2021) The impact of counterfeit risk management on healthcare supply chain performance: an empirical analysis. Int J Productivity Perform Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2020-0426

Gao SY, Lim WS, Tang C (2017) The impact of the potential entry of copycats: Entry conditions, Consumer Welfare, and Social Welfare. Decis Sci 48(4):594–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12235

Garg P, Gupta B, Chauhan AK, Sivarajah U, Gupta S, Modgil S (2021) Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector, Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Elsevier Inc., Vol. 163 No. June 2020, p. 120407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120407

Ghadge A, Duck A, Er M, Caldwell N (2021) Deceptive counterfeit risk in global supply chains, Supply Chain Forum , Taylor & Francis, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 87–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1908844

Ghamat S, Pun H, Critchley G, Hou P (2021) Using intellectual property agreements in the presence of supplier and third-party copycatting, European Journal of Operational Research , Elsevier B.V., Lazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, 64 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C7, Canada, Vol. 291 No. 2, pp. 680–692, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.041

Gnezdova JV, Barilenko VI, Kozenkova TA, Chernyshev AV, Vasina NV (2018) evna. Food safety auditing in Russia in a climate of foreign sanctions and a policy of import substitution, Quality - Access to Success , Vol. 19 No. 167, pp. 155–158

Hoecht A, Trott P (2014) How should firms deal withcounterfeiting? A review of the success conditions of anti-counterfeiting strategies. Int J Emerg Markets 9(1):98–119

Itkis D, Daim T, Basoglu N (2009) Balancing efficiency and competitiveness in outsourcing decisions. Int J Serv Oper Manage 5(5):662–686. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2009.025120

Jaeger SR, Worch T, Phelps T, Jin D, Cardello AV (2021) Effects of ‘craft’ vs. ‘traditional’ labels to beer consumers with different flavor preferences: a comprehensive multi-response approach. Food Qual Prefer 87(No May 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104043

Jæger B, Menebo MM, Upadhyay A (2021) Identification of environmental supply chain bottlenecks: a case study of the Ethiopian healthcare supply chain. Manage Environ Quality: Int J 32(6):1233–1254. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0277

Kamenivskyy Y, Palisetti A, Hamze L, Saberi S (2022) A blockchain-based solution for COVID-19 vaccine distribution. IEEE Eng Manage Rev 50(1):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2022.3145656

Kasuma J, Noor NM, Abdurahman AZA, Sawangchai A, Jemari MA (2020) The influence of information susceptibility and normative susceptibility on counterfeit manufacturing products purchase intention. Int J Supply Chain Manage 9(2):234–239

Google Scholar  

Kros JF, Falasca M, Dellana S, Rowe WJ (2020) Mitigating counterfeit risk in the supply chain: an empirical study. TQM J 32(5):983–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2019-0054

Kumar S, Dieveney E, Dieveney A (2009) Reverse logistic process control measures for the pharmaceutical industry supply chain. Int J Productivity Perform Manage 58(2):188–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400910928761

Kwong KK, Yau OHM, Lee JSY, Sin LYM, Tse ACB (2003) The effects of Attitudinal and demographic factors on intention to Buy Pirated CDs: the case of Chinese consumers. J Bus Ethics 47(3):223–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026269003472

Leng J, Jiang P, Xu K, Liu Q, Zhao JL, Bian Y, Shi R (2019) Makerchain: a blockchain with chemical signature for self-organizing process in social manufacturing. J Clean Prod 234:767–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.265

Li Z, Xu X, Bai Q, Guan X, Zeng K (2021) The interplay between blockchain adoption and channel selection in combating counterfeits, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , Vol. 155 No. December 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102451

Lima FRP, Da de AL, Godinho Filho M, Dias EM (2018) Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines. Supply Chain Manage 23(2):117–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-04-2017-0155

Liu K, Li JA, Lai KK (2004) Single period, single product newsvendor model with random supply shock. Eur J Oper Res 158(3):609–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00382-5

Liu K, Li JA, Wu Y, Lai KK (2005) Analysis of monitoring and limiting of commercial cheating: a newsvendor model. J Oper Res Soc 56(7):844–854. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601913

Liu F, Liu K, Xie XL (2016) Monitoring and limiting deceptive counterfeiting: a two-stage model. J Oper Res Soc China 4(3):265–308. Operations Research Society of China10.1007/s40305-016-0130-6

Lohne J, Kjesbu NE, Engebø A, Young B, Lædre O (2019) Scoping Literature Review of Crime in the AEC industry. J Constr Eng Manag 145(6):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001648

Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A, d’Atri G, Forte M (2019) Blockchain-enabled supply chain: an experimental study. Computers Industrial Eng 136(No July):pp57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.026

Lu W, Jiang Y, Chen Z, Ji X (2022) Blockchain adoption in a supply chain system to combat counterfeiting, Computers and Industrial Engineering , Vol. 171 No. July, p. 108408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108408

Machado SM, Paiva EL, da Silva EM (2018) Counterfeiting: addressing mitigation and resilience in supply chains. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manage 48(2):139–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0004

Manchanda M, Deb M, Lomo-David E (2021) Scrutinizing the efficacy of branded apps quality to counter counterfeiting and restore trust in m-commerce, Quality Management Journal , Taylor & Francis, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 156–174, https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2021.1920869

Minchin RE, Cui S, Walters RC, Issa R, Pan J (2013) Sino-american opinions and perceptions of counterfeiting in the Construction Supply Chain. J Constr Eng Manag 139(1):1–8

Naderpajouh N, Hastak M, Gokhale S, Bayraktar ME, Iyer A, Arif F (2015) Counterfeiting risk governance in the Capital projects Supply Chain. J Constr Eng Manag 141(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000943

O’Leary DE (2017) Configuring blockchain architectures for transaction information in blockchain consortiums: the case of accounting and supply chain systems. Intell Syst Acc Finance Manage 24(4):138–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1417

OECD (2021) Global Trade in fakes: a worrying threat. OECD Publishing, Paris

Book   Google Scholar  

OECD (2022) Dangerous fakes: Trade in Counterfeit Goods that Pose Health, Safety and Environmental risks. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/117e352b-en

Pecht BM, Tiku S (2006) Bogus! IEEE Spectr 43(5):37–46

Pour PD, Nazzal MA, Darras BM (2022) The role of industry 4.0 technologies in overcoming pandemic challenges for the manufacturing sector. Concur Eng Res Appl 30(2):190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X221082681

Pun H, Swaminathan JM, Hou P (2021) Blockchain Adoption for combating deceptive counterfeits. Prod Oper Manage 30(4):864–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13348

Qian Y (2008) Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quart J Econ 123(4):1577–1609. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1577

Qian Y, Gong Q, Chen Y (2015) Untangling searchable and experiential quality responses to counterfeits. Mark Sci 34(4):522–538. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0867

Rogerson M, Parry GC (2020) Blockchain: case studies in food supply chain visibility. Supply Chain Manage 25:601–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2019-0300

Sandborn M, Olea C, White J, Williams C, Tarazaga PA, Sturm L, Albakri M et al (2021) Towards secure cyber-physical information association for parts, Journal of Manufacturing Systems , Vol. 59 No. October 2020, pp. 27–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.003

Scuderi A, Foti V, Timpanaro G (2019) The supply chain value of pod and pgi food products through the application of blockchain. Qual - Access Success 20(S2):580–587

Şerbancea F, Stănescu A, Lazăr V (2018) Ethics in Knowledge Management. Food Saf Manage 19(167):159–165

Shen B, Xu X, Yuan Q (2020) Selling secondhand products through an online platform with blockchain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , Elsevier, Vol. 142 No. August, p. 102066, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102066

Shen B, Cheng M, Dong C, Xiao Y (2023) Battling counterfeit masks during the COVID-19 outbreak: quality inspection vs. blockchain adoption. Int J Prod Res 61(11):3634–3650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1961038

Shi J, Zhou J, Zhu Q (2019) Barriers of a closed-loop cartridge remanufacturing supply chain for urban waste recovery governance in China. J Clean Prod 212:1544–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.114

Shultz CJ, Saporito B (1996) Protecting intellectual property: strategies and recommendations to Deter Counterfeiting and Brand Piracy in Global Markets. Columbia J World Bus 31(1):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5428(96)90003-4

Stevenson M, Busby J (2015) An exploratory analysis of counterfeiting strategies: towards counterfeit-resilient supply chains. Int J Oper Prod Manage 35(1):110–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2012-0174

Sun Z, Xu Q, Shi B (2022) Price and product quality decisions for a two-Echelon Supply Chain in the Blockchain era. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 39(1):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595921400169

Thaichon P, Quach S (2016) Dark motives-counterfeit purchase framework: Internal and external motives behind counterfeit purchase via digital platforms, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Elsevier, Vol. 33, pp. 82–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.003

Ting SL, Tsang AHC (2014) Using social network analysis to combat counterfeiting. Int J Prod Res 52:4456–4468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.861947

Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Urciuoli L (2010) Supply chain security-mitigation measures and a logistics multi-layered framework. J Transp Secur 3(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-009-0034-3

Urciuoli L, Paulraj A, Näslund D (2013) The role of the law enforcement agencies in transport security, a survey with Swedish operators. Logistics Res 6(4):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-013-0102-8

Wagner L, Gürbüz M, Ҫagri, Parlar M (2019) Is it fake? Using potentially low quality suppliers as back-up when genuine suppliers are unavailable, International Journal of Production Economics , Vol. 213 No. August 2018, pp. 185–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.016

Wang L, Kowk SK, Ip WH (2012) A radio frequency identification-based quality evaluation system design for the wine industry. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 25(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.562542

Wang Y, Lin J, Choi TM (2020) Gray market and counterfeiting in supply chains: A review of the operations literature and implications to luxury industries, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , Vol. 133 No. November 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.101823

Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26(2):xiii–xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319

Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: updated methodology, Journal of Advanced Nursing , John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Vol. 52 No. 5, pp. 546–553, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Wyld DC, Jones MA (2007) RFID is no fake: the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Int J Integr Supply Manage 3(2):156–171. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2007.011974

Xie D, Zhu W, Zhao X, Xie J (2021) An experimental study on the sale of counterfeit products under monitoring policies, Journal of the Operational Research Society , Taylor & Francis, Vol. 72 No. 1, pp. 93–108, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1650623

Yi Z, Yu M, Cheung KL (2022) Impacts of counterfeiting on a global supply chain. Manuf Service Oper Manage 24(1):159–178. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0912

Zhang J, Zhang RQ (2015) Supply chain structure in a market with deceptive counterfeits. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.041

Zhang J, Hong LJ, Zhang RQ (2012) Fighting strategies in a market with counterfeits. Ann Oper Res 192(1):49–66

Download references

This work was supported by the Coordination for the improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), foundations within The Brazilian Ministry of Education.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Fundação Getulio Vargas’s Sao Paulo, School of Business Administration (FGV EAESP), 474 Itapeva St, 8th Floor, Bela Vista, São Paulo, 01332-000, SP, Brazil

Raul Beal Partyka, Roger Augusto Luna & Ely Laureano Paiva

Department of Supply Chain and Information Management, School of Business, College of Charleston, 66 George St, Beatty 334, Charleston, SC, 29424, USA

Rafael Teixeira

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Beal Partyka .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Partyka, R.B., Teixeira, R., Luna, R.A. et al. The good, the bad, and the ugly: how counterfeiting is addressed in operations and supply chain management literature. Manag Rev Q (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00453-w

Download citation

Received : 18 July 2023

Accepted : 19 June 2024

Published : 28 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00453-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Counterfeiting
• Operations management
• Supply chain management
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Literature Review Outline

Ai generator.

Literature Review. We all been there, especially those who are currently in high school or college. We get to review different types of literary pieces ranging from short stories , poem , and novels just to name a few. It can be confusing when you have a lot of ideas but you have no idea how to formulate them into one clean thought. It can also be quite frustrating if you have to start from the beginning or back to square one if you forgot a single part of the whole, but don’t worry, here are some literature review outline examples you can download to help you with your problems. Let’s check them out.

What is a Literature Review Outline?

A literature review outline is a structured framework that organizes and summarizes existing research on a specific topic. It helps identify key themes, gaps, and methodologies in the literature. The outline typically includes sections such as introduction, major themes, sub-themes, methodologies, and conclusions, facilitating a clear and comprehensive review of the literature.

Literature Review Format

A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. It includes a systematic examination of scholarly article , book , and other sources relevant to the research area. Here’s a guide to structuring a literature review effectively:

Introduction

• Explain the purpose of the literature review.
• Define the scope of the review – what is included and what is excluded.
• State the research question or objective .
• Provide context or background information necessary to understand the literature review.
• Highlight the significance of the topic.
• Organize the literature review by themes, trends, or methodological approaches rather than by individual sources.
• Use headings and subheadings to categorize different themes or topics.
• For each theme or section, summarize the key findings of the relevant literature.
• Highlight major theories, methodologies, and conclusions.
• Note any significant debates or controversies.
• Critically evaluate the sources.
• Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the existing research.
• Identify gaps or inconsistencies in the literature.
• Compare and contrast different sources.
• Synthesize the information to provide a coherent narrative.
• Show how the different studies are related to one another.
• Summarize the main findings from the literature review.
• Highlight the most important insights and their implications.
• Identify any gaps in the existing research that require further investigation.
• Suggest areas for future research.
• Discuss the overall significance of the literature review.
• Explain how it contributes to the field of study and the specific research question.
• List all the sources cited in the literature review.
• Follow the appropriate citation style (APA, MLA , Chicago, etc.) as required by your academic institution.

Research Literature Review Outline Example

I. Introduction Background Information: Provide context and background on the research topic. Explain the importance of the topic in the current research landscape. Purpose of the Review: State the main objectives of the literature review. Clarify the research questions or hypotheses guiding the review. Scope of the Review: Define the scope, including time frame, types of studies, and key themes. Explain any limitations or boundaries set for the review. II. Search Strategy Databases and Sources: List the databases and other sources used to find relevant literature. Keywords and Search Terms: Detail the specific keywords and search terms employed. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Describe the criteria for including or excluding studies. III. Theoretical Framework Relevant Theories: Introduce and explain the key theories and models related to the research topic. Application of Theories: Discuss how these theories provide a foundation for understanding the literature. IV. Review of Literature Thematic Organization: Organize the literature into themes or categories based on common findings or approaches. Example Structure: Theme 1: Impact of Rising Temperatures Summarize key studies and findings. Compare and contrast different research approaches. Theme 2: Changing Precipitation Patterns Highlight significant studies and their results. Discuss any conflicting findings or perspectives. Theme 3: Socioeconomic Factors Review literature focusing on socioeconomic impacts. Analyze how these factors interact with environmental changes. V. Critical Analysis Strengths and Weaknesses: Evaluate the strengths and limitations of the reviewed studies. Discuss the reliability and validity of the methodologies used. Methodological Critique: Assess the methodologies for potential biases and gaps. VI. Discussion and Synthesis Integration of Findings: Synthesize the findings from the literature into a cohesive narrative. Highlight common themes, trends, and gaps. Research Gaps: Identify areas where further research is needed. Suggest potential future research directions. VII. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings: Summarize the key insights and conclusions drawn from the literature review. Importance of the Topic: Reiterate the significance of the research topic. Implications for Future Research: Outline the implications of the findings for future research. VIII. References Citation List: Provide a complete list of all sources cited in the literature review. Follow a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago). IX. Appendices (if applicable) Supplementary Material: Include tables, charts, or detailed methodological information that supports the review but is too extensive for the main text.

Thematic Literature Review Outline Example

I. Introduction Background Information: Provide context and background on the research topic. Explain the importance of the topic in the current research landscape. Purpose of the Review: State the main objectives of the literature review. Clarify the research questions or hypotheses guiding the review. Scope of the Review: Define the scope, including time frame, types of studies, and key themes. Explain any limitations or boundaries set for the review. II. Search Strategy Databases and Sources: List the databases and other sources used to find relevant literature. Keywords and Search Terms: Detail the specific keywords and search terms employed. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Describe the criteria for including or excluding studies. III. Thematic Review of Literature Theme 1: Impact of Rising Temperatures Summary of Key Studies: Summarize the findings of major studies related to rising temperatures. Example: “Smith et al. (2020) found that increasing temperatures have led to a 5% decline in crop yields globally.” Comparison of Research Approaches: Compare different methodologies and approaches used in the studies. Example: “While Jones (2018) used a longitudinal study, Brown (2019) employed a cross-sectional analysis.” Theme 2: Changing Precipitation Patterns Summary of Key Studies: Highlight significant studies and their results. Example: “Lee and Wang (2021) reported that altered precipitation patterns have increased the frequency of droughts.” Discussion of Conflicting Findings: Discuss any contradictory findings or differing perspectives. Example: “Contrary to Lee and Wang, Garcia (2020) found minimal impact of precipitation changes on crop health.” Theme 3: Socioeconomic Factors Summary of Key Studies: Review literature focusing on the socioeconomic impacts of climate change. Example: “Davis (2017) highlighted the disproportionate effects on small-scale farmers.” Analysis of Interactions: Analyze how socioeconomic factors interact with environmental changes. Example: “Economic instability exacerbates the vulnerability to climate impacts (Green, 2018).” IV. Critical Analysis Strengths and Weaknesses: Evaluate the strengths and limitations of the reviewed studies. Example: “Many studies provide robust data but often lack consideration of regional variability.” Methodological Critique: Assess the methodologies for potential biases and gaps. Example: “There is a notable reliance on regional data, limiting the generalizability of findings.” V. Discussion and Synthesis Integration of Findings: Synthesize the findings from the literature into a cohesive narrative. Example: “The review indicates a clear trend of climate change negatively impacting agriculture, though the extent varies regionally.” Identification of Gaps: Identify areas where further research is needed. Example: “There is a gap in research on adaptive farming practices and their effectiveness.” VI. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings: Summarize the key insights and conclusions drawn from the literature review. Example: “Overall, rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns are significantly affecting agricultural productivity.” Importance of the Topic: Reiterate the significance of the research topic. Example: “Understanding these impacts is crucial for developing effective adaptation strategies.” Implications for Future Research: Outline the implications of the findings for future research. Example: “Future research should focus on adaptive measures to mitigate the adverse effects on agriculture.” VII. References Citation List: Provide a complete list of all sources cited in the literature review. Example: Smith, J. et al. (2020). Impact of Rising Temperatures on Global Crop Yields . Journal of Environmental Studies, 45(3), 234-250. Lee, S. & Wang, H. (2021). Precipitation Patterns and Drought Frequency . Climate Research Journal, 29(2), 98-115. VIII. Appendices (if applicable) Supplementary Material: Include tables, charts, or detailed methodological information that supports the review but is too extensive for the main text. Example: “Appendix A includes a table of regional crop yield changes from 2000 to 2020.”

Literature Review Outline Example in APA Format

1. Title Page Title of the Review Author’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Name and Number Instructor’s Name Due Date 2. Abstract Summary of the Literature Review Brief overview of the main points Research question or thesis Key findings Implications 3. Introduction Introduction to the Topic General introduction to the subject area Importance of the topic Purpose of the Review Specific objectives of the literature review Research Questions or Hypotheses Main research question(s) or hypotheses guiding the review Organization of the Review Brief outline of the structure of the literature review 4. Theoretical Framework Relevant Theories and Models Description of key theories and models relevant to the topic Application of Theories Explanation of how these theories are applied to the research problem 5. Review of the Literature Historical Context Background and historical development of the research topic Current Research Summary of recent studies and their findings Methodologies Used Overview of research methods used in the studies Themes and Patterns Common themes and patterns identified in the literature Contradictions and Gaps Conflicting findings and gaps in the literature 6. Critical Analysis Evaluation of Key Studies Critical analysis of the most influential studies Strengths and limitations of these studies Comparison of Different Approaches Comparative analysis of different perspectives and methodologies 7. Synthesis of Findings Integration of Theories and Results How the findings integrate with the theoretical framework Overall Trends Summary of the major trends in the literature Gaps in the Research Identification of gaps and areas for further research 8. Conclusion Summary of Main Findings Recap of the most significant findings from the review Implications for Future Research Suggestions for future research directions Practical Applications Implications for practice or policy 9. References Complete Citation of Sources Proper APA format for all sources cited in the literature review 10. Appendices (if necessary) Additional Material Any supplementary material such as tables, figures, or questionnaires

Literature Review Outline Templates & Samples in PDF

1. literature review template.

3. Literature Review Outline Template

6. Preliminary Outline of Literature Review

7. Literature Review Outline Example

8. Printable Literature Review Outline

Types of Literature Review

A literature review is an essential part of academic research, providing a comprehensive summary of previous studies on a particular topic. There are various types of literature reviews, each serving a different purpose and following a unique structure. Here, we explore the main types:

1. Narrative Review

A narrative review, also known as a traditional or descriptive review, provides a comprehensive synthesis of the existing literature on a specific topic. It focuses on summarizing and interpreting the findings rather than conducting a systematic analysis.

2. Systematic Review

A systematic review follows a rigorous and predefined methodology to collect, analyze, and synthesize all relevant studies on a particular research question. It aims to minimize bias and provide reliable findings.

3. Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis is a subset of systematic reviews that statistically combines the results of multiple studies to arrive at a single conclusion. It provides a higher level of evidence by increasing the sample size and improving the precision of the results.

4. Scoping Review

A scoping review aims to map the existing literature on a broad topic, identify key concepts, theories, and sources, and clarify research gaps. It is often used to determine the scope of future research.

5. Critical Review

A critical review evaluates the quality and validity of the existing literature, often questioning the methodology and findings. It provides a critical assessment and aims to present a deeper understanding of the topic.

6. Theoretical Review

A theoretical review focuses on analyzing and synthesizing theories related to a specific topic. It aims to understand how theories have evolved over time and how they can be applied to current research.

7. Integrative Review

An integrative review synthesizes research on a topic in a more holistic manner, combining perspectives from both qualitative and quantitative studies. It aims to generate new frameworks and perspectives.

8. Annotated Bibliography

An annotated bibliography provides a summary and evaluation of each source in a list of references. It includes a brief description of the content, relevance, and quality of each source.

9. Rapid Review

A rapid review streamlines the systematic review process to provide evidence in a timely manner. It is often used in healthcare and policy-making to inform decisions quickly.

10. Umbrella Review

An umbrella review, or overview of reviews, synthesizes the findings of multiple systematic reviews on a particular topic. It provides a high-level summary and identifies broader patterns and trends.

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review is a critical component of academic research, serving multiple important purposes. It provides a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge on a topic, helps identify research gaps, and sets the context for new research. Here are the key purposes of a literature review:

1. Summarizing Existing Research

A literature review summarizes and synthesizes the findings of previous studies related to a specific topic. This helps researchers understand what is already known and what remains to be explored.

2. Identifying Research Gaps

By reviewing existing literature, researchers can identify gaps or inconsistencies in the current knowledge. This allows them to pinpoint areas where further investigation is needed and justify the need for their research.

3. Providing Context and Background

A literature review sets the context for new research by providing background information. It helps readers understand the broader landscape of the topic and how the current study fits into it.

4. Establishing the Theoretical Framework

Literature reviews often involve discussing various theories and models relevant to the topic. This helps establish a theoretical framework for the research, guiding the study’s design and methodology.

5. Demonstrating Researcher Knowledge

Conducting a thorough literature review demonstrates that the researcher is knowledgeable about the field. It shows that they are aware of the key studies, debates, and trends in their area of research.

6. Justifying Research Questions and Methodology

A literature review helps justify the research questions and methodology of a study. By showing how previous studies were conducted and what their limitations were, researchers can argue for their chosen approach.

7. Avoiding Duplication

Reviewing existing literature ensures that researchers do not duplicate previous studies unnecessarily. It helps them build on existing work rather than repeating it.

8. Highlighting Key Findings and Trends

A literature review highlights significant findings and trends in the research area. This helps researchers understand the development of the field and identify influential studies and seminal works.

9. Informing Practice and Policy

In applied fields, literature reviews can inform practice and policy by summarizing evidence on what works and what doesn’t. This helps practitioners and policymakers make evidence-based decisions.

10. Facilitating a Comprehensive Understanding

Overall, a literature review facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the topic. It integrates various perspectives, findings, and approaches, providing a well-rounded view of the research area.

Components of a Literature Review

A well-structured literature review is essential for providing a clear and comprehensive overview of existing research on a particular topic. The following components are typically included in a literature review:

1. Introduction

The introduction sets the stage for the literature review. It provides background information on the topic, explains the review’s purpose, and outlines its scope.

Example: “Over the past decade, research on climate change’s impact on agriculture has proliferated. This literature review aims to synthesize these studies, focusing on the effects of rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns on crop yields.”

2. Search Strategy

The search strategy describes how the literature was identified. This includes the databases and search engines used, search terms and keywords, and any inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Example: “The literature search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and JSTOR. Keywords included ‘climate change,’ ‘agriculture,’ ‘crop yields,’ and ‘precipitation patterns.’ Studies published between 2000 and 2023 were included.”

3. Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework presents the theories and models relevant to the research topic. This section provides a foundation for understanding the studies reviewed.

Example: “This review utilizes the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework to analyze the impact of climate change on agricultural communities, focusing on how environmental changes affect economic stability and food security.”

4. Review of Literature

The core of the literature review, this section summarizes and synthesizes the findings of the selected studies. It is often organized thematically, chronologically, or methodologically.

Example: “Studies from the early 2000s focused on temperature changes, while recent research has shifted to examining precipitation patterns. Common findings include a general decline in crop yields, with significant regional variations.”

5. Critical Analysis

A critical analysis evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing research. This involves assessing the methodology, data, and conclusions of the studies reviewed.

Example: “Many studies used longitudinal data to track changes over time, but few incorporated socioeconomic factors. Additionally, the reliance on regional data limits the generalizability of some findings.”

6. Discussion and Synthesis

The discussion and synthesis section integrates the findings from the literature review, highlighting common themes, trends, and gaps. It connects the reviewed studies to the current research question.

Example: “The literature consistently shows that rising temperatures negatively affect crop yields. However, there is a gap in understanding the role of adaptive farming practices, suggesting a need for further research in this area.”

7. Conclusion

The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the literature review. It reiterates the importance of the research topic and outlines the implications for future research.

Example: “In summary, climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural productivity. Future research should focus on adaptive strategies to mitigate these effects and ensure food security.”

8. References

The references section lists all the sources cited in the literature review. It should follow a specific citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago.

• Smith, J. (2021). Climate Change and Crop Yields . Journal of Environmental Science, 12(3), 45-60.
• Brown, A., & Jones, B. (2019). Precipitation Patterns and Agriculture . Climate Research, 8(2), 34-48.

9. Appendices (if applicable)

Appendices may include supplementary material that is relevant to the literature review but would disrupt the flow of the main text. This could include tables, charts, or detailed methodological information.

Example: “Appendix A includes a table of regional crop yield changes from 2000 to 2020. Appendix B provides a detailed description of the data collection methods used in the reviewed studies.”

How to Write a Literature Review

Writing a literature review involves several steps to ensure that you provide a comprehensive, critical, and coherent summary of existing research on a specific topic. Here is a step-by-step guide to help you write an effective literature review:

1. Define Your Topic and Scope

• Identify your research question or thesis.
• Decide on the scope (broad topic or specific aspect, time frame, types of studies).

2. Conduct a Comprehensive Literature Search

• Identify key sources (use academic databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, JSTOR).
• Use relevant keywords to search for literature.
• Select relevant studies by reviewing abstracts.

3. Organize the Literature

• Group studies by themes (methodology, findings, theoretical perspective).
• Create an outline to structure your review.

4. Summarize and Synthesize the Literature

• Summarize key findings for each study.
• Synthesize information by comparing and contrasting studies.

5. Write the Literature Review

• Introduce the topic.
• Explain the purpose of the review.
• Outline the scope.
• Discuss literature thematically or chronologically.
• Present summaries and syntheses.
• Highlight patterns, contradictions, and gaps.
• Evaluate methodologies and findings.
• Discuss strengths and weaknesses of studies.
• Summarize main findings.
• Reiterate the importance of the topic.

6. Cite Your Sources

• Use a consistent citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago).

7. Review and Revise

• Proofread for grammatical errors and clarity.
• Revise for coherence and logical flow.

How do I start a literature review?

Begin by defining your research question and scope, then conduct a comprehensive search for relevant literature using academic databases.

What is the purpose of a theoretical framework?

It provides a foundation for understanding the literature and guides the analysis of existing studies.

How should I organize the literature review?

Organize it thematically, chronologically, or methodologically, depending on what best suits your research question.

How do I choose which studies to include?

Use inclusion and exclusion criteria based on relevance, publication date, and quality of the studies.

What is the difference between a thematic and chronological organization?

Thematic organization groups studies by topics or themes, while chronological organization arranges them by the date of publication.

How do I critically analyze the literature?

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study, assess methodologies, and discuss biases or gaps.

What should be included in the introduction?

Provide background information, state the purpose of the review, and outline its scope.

How can I synthesize findings from different studies?

Integrate the results to highlight common themes, trends, and gaps, providing a cohesive narrative.

Why are references important in a literature review?

References provide evidence for your review, ensure academic integrity, and allow readers to locate the original sources.

What role do appendices play in a literature review?

Appendices include supplementary material like tables or detailed methodologies that support the review but are too extensive for the main text.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Business models used in smart cities—theoretical approach with examples of smart cities.

1. Introduction

• What business models are implemented in smart cities?
• How are business models implemented in most developed European smart cities?
• What are the advantages of implementation of particular business models in the analyzed smart cities?

2. Methodology

• Formulating the research objective and defining research questions.
• Identifying the literature set. At this stage, relevant research/studies related to the research objective and questions were located, selected, and accessed. The identification of the literature involved choosing a database (Scopus) and a set of purposefully selected scientific publications, serving as a source of knowledge in the key research area: “smart cities” and “business models”.
• Selection and preliminary assessment of the dataset. This stage involved a thorough content analysis of entire publications. At this stage, the authors made decisions regarding the presentation structure of the key research area “smart cities” and “business models” in sections: (1) Innovation in smart cities; (2) ICTs in smart cities; (3) Sustainable smart cities model; and (4) Business models implemented in smart cities.
• Data analysis and synthesis. At this stage, the publications—the final literature base—were fragmented into component parts to identify common, distinct, and complementary aspects, aiming to identify threads of connection between “smart cities” and “business models”. The research area, encompassing 153 papers ( Table 1 ), was expanded to include publications cited by the authors of the analyzed papers and repeated in multiple papers.
• Reporting the results. Our reporting went beyond the usual publication description by introducing a case study analysis. In Section 4 , the authors presented the application of previously selected business models used in smart cities for the cities of London, Amsterdam, and Berlin.

3. Literature Review

3.1. innovation in smart cities, 3.2. ict in smart cities, 3.3. sustainable smart cities models, 3.4. business models implemented in smart cities, 4. case studies analysis, 4.1. london, 4.2. amsterdam, 4.3. berlin, 5. discussion—comparison of the case studies, 6. conclusions, 6.1. main results of the study, 6.2. main scientific value of the study, 6.3. limitations of the study, 6.4. future research, 6.5. theoretical contribution, 6.6. managerial contribution, author contributions, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Florida, R. The Historic Link between Cities and Innovation. 2015. CityLab.com. Available online: http://www.citylab.com/design/2015/12/the-historic-link-between-cities-and-innovation/422226 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Yang, S.; Jahanger, A.; Usman, M. Examining the influence of green innovations in industrial enterprises on China’s smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2024 , 199 , 123031. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zamfiroiu, A.; Sharma, R.C.; Ciupercă, E.M. Educational Innovations Based on Metaverse in the Development of Smart Cities, Smart Innovation. Syst. Technol. 2023 , 367 , 85–96. [ Google Scholar ]
• Han, J. Open innovation in a smart city context: The case of Sejong smart city initiative. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2024; ahead-of-print . [ Google Scholar ]
• Polese, F.; Megaro, A. Overcoming the Tipping Point through Service Innovation. An Overview of the Smart City ; Springer Proceedings in Complexity; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 185–192. [ Google Scholar ]
• Guo, C.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Lai, X. Does smart city policy improve corporate green technology innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2024 , 67 , 1182–1211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Al-Kaff, A. Navigating the Future: AI Innovations for Intelligent Mobility in Smart Cities. SAE Tech. Pap. 2023 , 23 , 011901. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ayfantopoulou, G.; Touloumidis, D.; Mallidis, I.; Xenou, E. A Quantitative Model of Innovation Readiness in Urban Mobility: A Comparative Study of Smart Cities in the EU, Eastern Asia, and USA Regions. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 3337–3358. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mohammadzadeh, Z.; Saeidnia, H.R.; Lotfata, A.; Hassanzadeh, M.; Ghiasi, N. Smart city healthcare delivery innovations: A systematic review of essential technologies and indicators for developing nations. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2023 , 23 , 1180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dolmans, S.A.M.; van Galen, W.P.L.; Walrave, B.; Ouden, E.D.; Valkenburg, R.; Romme, A.G.L. A Dynamic Perspective on Collaborative Innovation for Smart City Development: The role of uncertainty, governance, and institutional logics. Organ. Stud. 2023 , 44 , 1577–1601. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, Z.; Zheng, C.; Lan, L. Smart city pilots, marketization processes, and substantive green innovation: A quasi-natural experiment from China. PLoS ONE 2023 , 18 , e0286572. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Bai, T.; Zhang, C. Smart city construction and green technology innovation: Evidence at China’s city level. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023 , 30 , 97233–97252. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deena Divya Nayomi, B.; Mallika, S.S.; Sowmya, T.; Laxmikanth, P.; Bhavsingh, M. A Cloud-Assisted Framework Utilizing Blockchain, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence to Countermeasure Phishing Attacks in Smart Cities. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng. 2024 , 12 , 313–327. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jyothi, V.; Sreelatha, T.; Thiyagu, T.M.; Sowndharya, R.; Arvinth, N. A Data Management System for Smart Cities Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Modeling Techniques to Enhance Privacy and Security. J. Internet Serv. Inf. Secur. 2024 , 14 , 37–51. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schnieder, M. Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to Predict the Influence of Weather on the Thermal Soaring Capabilities of Sailplanes for Smart City Applications. Smart Cities 2024 , 7 , 163–178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bahrepour, D.; Maleki, R. Benefit and limitation of using blockchain in smart cities to improve citizen services. GeoJournal 2024 , 89 , 57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mishra, S.; Chaurasiya, V.K. Hybrid deep learning algorithm for smart cities security enhancement through blockchain and internet of things. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024 , 83 , 22609–22637. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eltamaly, A.M. A novel energy storage and demand side management for entire green smart grid system for NEOM city in Saudi Arabia. Energy Storage 2024 , 6 , e515. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haque, A.; Bharath, K.V.S.; Mateen, S. Smart grid concept and technologies for smart cities. In Smart Cities: Power Electronics, Renewable Energy, and Internet of Things ; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 96–129. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rajkumar, Y.; Santhosh Kumar, S.V.N. A comprehensive survey on communication techniques for the realization of intelligent transportation systems in IoT based smart cities. Peer-Peer Netw. Appl. 2024 , 17 , 1263–1308. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vohra, S.K.; Kumar, V.S.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Soni, N.; Gupta, S.K. The 5G revolution: Tackling challenges in smart cities and intelligent transportation systems. J. Auton. Intell. 2023 , 7 , 1342. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gubareva, R.; Lopes, R.P. Literature Review on the Smart City Resources Analysis with Big Data Methodologies. SN Comput. Sci. 2024 , 5 , 152. [ Google Scholar ]
• Topcu, A.E.; Alzoubi, Y.I.; Karacabey, H.A. Text Analysis of Smart Cities: A Big Data-based Model. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 724–733. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sun, K.; Liu, N.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y. Design and implementation of big data analysis and visualisation platform for the smart city. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2023 , 22 , 373–385. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cong, W.; Yang, L. Big Data Analysis on Complex Network—With the example of smart city. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022 , 2425 , 012030. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manual, S. Using Information and Communication Technologies for Smart and Connected Cities. A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development in the 21st Century. 2012. Available online: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/susdevtopics/sdt_pdfs/shanghaimanual/Chapter%208%20-%20ICT%20for%20smart%20cities.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Cardullo, P.; Kitchin, R. Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environ. Plann. C Politics Space 2018 , 37 , 813–830. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deakin, M.; Al Waer, H. From intelligent to smart cities. Intell. Build. Int. 2011 , 3 , 133–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Giffinger, R. European Smart City Model (2007–2015), Vienna University of Technology. Available online: https://www.smart-cities.eu (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Harrison, C.; Donnelly, I.A. A Theory of Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS ; Curran Associates Inc.: Nice, France, 2011; pp. 521–535. Available online: http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/viewFile/1703/572 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Dhingra, M.; Chattopadhyay, S. Advancing smartness of traditional settlement-case analysis of Indian and Arab old cities. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2016 , 5 , 549–563. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lara, A.; Costa, E.; Furtlani, T.; Yugutcanlar, T. Smartness that matters: Comprehensive and human-cered characterization of smart cities. J. Open Innov. 2016 , 2 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dameri, R.P. Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensive proposal. Int. J. Comput. Technol. 2013 , 11 , 2544–2551. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Winslow, J.; Mont, O. Bicycle Sharing: Sustainable Value Creation and Institutionalisation Strategies in Barcelona. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 728. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Guo, Y.; Yang, L.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, R. Dockless bike-sharing as a feeder mode of metro commute? The role of the feeder-related built environment: Analytical framework and empirical evidence. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021 , 65 , 102594. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Komninos, N. Intelligent cities: Variable geometries of spatial intelligence. Intell. Build Int. 2011 , 3 , 172–188. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Embarak, O. Smart Cities New Paradigm Applications and Challenges. In Immersive Technology in Smart Cities ; EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing; Aurelia, S., Paiva, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Resis, J.; Marques, P.A.; Marques, P.C. Where Are Smart Cities Heading? A Meta-Review and Guidelines for Future Research. Appl. Sci. 2022 , 12 , 8328. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Esashika, D.; Masiero, G.; Mauger, Y. An investigation into the elusive concept of smart cities: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021 , 33 , 957–969. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qi, Y.; Tang, Y.; Bai, T. Impact of smart city pilot policy on heterogeneous green innovation: Micro-evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Econ. Chang. Restruct. 2024 , 57 , 67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chatti, W.; Khan, Z. Towards smart sustainable cities: Does technological innovation mitigate G7 CO2 emissions? Fresh evidence from CS-ARDL. Sci. Total Environ. 2024 , 913 , 169723. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• José, R.; Rodrigues, H. A Review on Key Innovation Challenges for Smart City Initiatives. Smart Cities 2024 , 7 , 141–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Z.; Xie, S.; Wei, Z. The Impact of China’s New Infrastructure Development on Urban Innovation Quality—A Quasi-Natural Experiment of Smart City Pilots. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 548. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• United Nations. 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 7 January 2023).
• Valencia-Arias, A.; Urrego-Marín, M.L.; Bran-Piedrahita, L. A Methodological Model to Evaluate Smart City Sustainability. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 11214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kourtit, K.; Nijkamp, P. Smart cities in the innovation age. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 2012 , 25 , 93–95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Trindade, E.P.; Hinnig, M.P.F.; da Costa, E.M.; Marques, J.S.; Bastos, R.C.; Yigitcanlar, T. Sustainable development of smart cities: A systematic review of the literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017 , 3 , 11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S.; Wieczorek, T. Sustainable Development and Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Identifying Key Scientific Problems of the Sustainable Industry 4.0. Energies 2020 , 13 , 4254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Jaciow, M.; Wolniak, R.; Wolny, R.; Grebski, W.W. Diagnosis of the Development of Energy Cooperatives in Poland—A Case Study of a Renewable Energy Cooperative in the Upper Silesian Region. Energies 2024 , 17 , 647. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Jaciow, M.; Wolniak, R.; Wolny, R.; Grebski, W.W. Energy Behaviors of Prosumers in Example of Polish Households. Energies 2023 , 16 , 3186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kunzmann, K.R. Smart cities: A new paradigm of urban development. Crios 2014 , 4 , 9–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shelton, T.; Zook, M.; Wiig, A. The ‘actually existing smart city’. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2014 , 8 , 13–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yigitcanlar, T.; Dizdaroglu, D. Ecological approaches in planning for sustainable cities: A review of the literature. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2015 , 1 , 71–94. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.D. Does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities? Land Use Policy 2018 , 73 , 49–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, C.-W. Can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development? Contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability. Dev. Built Environ. 2023 , 13 , 100108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Girardi, P.; Temporelli, A. Smartainability: A methodology for assessing the sustainability of the smart city. Energy Procedia 2017 , 111 , 810–816. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015 , 22 , 3–21. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharifi, A. A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 233 , 1269–1283. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vinod Kumar, T.M. (Ed.) Smart living for smart cities. In Smart Living for Smart Cities: Community Study, Ways and Means ; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 3–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Giffinger, R.; Gudrun, H. Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE—Archit. City Environ. 2010 , 4 , 7–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, J.H.; Phaal, R.; Lee, S. An integrated servicedevice-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013 , 80 , 286–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, T.M. Smart Economy in Smart Cities ; International Collaborative Research: Ottawa, ON, Canada; St Louis, MO, USA; New Delhi/Varanasi/Vijayawada, India; Kozhiode: Hong Kong; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, J.H.; Hancock, M.; Hu, M.-C. Towards an Effective Framework for Building Smart Cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bifulco, F.; Tregua, M. Service Innovation and Smart Cities: Linking the Perspectives. In Innovating in Practice. Perspectives and Experiences ; Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C., Nuutinen, M., Eds.; SpringerLink: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 261–287. [ Google Scholar ]
• Anttiroiko, A.-V.; Valkama, P.; Bailey, S.J. Smart Cities in the New Service Economy: Building Platforms for Smart Services. AI Soc. 2014 , 29 , 323–334. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lombardi, P.; Giordano, S.; Farouh, H.; Yousef, W. Modelling the smart city performance. Innov.—Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2012 , 25 , 137–145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van der Meer, A.; Van Vinden, W. E-governance in Cities: A Comparison of Urban Information and Communication Technology Policies. Reg. Stud. 2003 , 37 , 407–419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Smart City as Urban Innovation: Focusing on Management, Policy and Context. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Tallinn, Estonia, 26–29 September 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Crosby, B.C.; Hart, P.T.; Torfing, J. Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation. Public Manag. Rev. 2017 , 19 , 655–669. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Grebski, M.; Danel, R. Smart Cities with Smart Energy Systems ; Key Development Directions, Silesian University of Technology: Gliwice, Poland, 2024; Available online: https://delibra.bg.polsl.pl/dlibra/publication/87660/edition/77887?language=en (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Zhang, H.; Feng, X. Reliability improvement and landscape planning for renewable energy integration in smart Cities: A case study by digital twin. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024 , 64 , 103714. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, H.; Wang, Y. Smart Cities Net Zero Planning considering renewable energy landscape design in Digital Twin. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024 , 63 , 103629. [ Google Scholar ]
• Haque, A.; Bharath, K.V.S.; Amir, M.; Khan, Z. Role and applications of power electronics, renewable energy and IoT in smart cities. In Smart Cities: Power Electronics, Renewable Energy, and Internet of Things ; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 66–95. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sharma, H.; Haque, A. Integration of power electronics in renewable energy for smart cities. In Smart Cities: Power Electronics, Renewable Energy, and Internet of Things ; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 177–198. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hussain, D.I.; Elomri, D.A.; Kerbache, D.L.; Omri, D.A.E. Smart city solutions: Comparative analysis of waste management models in IoT-enabled environments using multiagent simulation. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024 , 103 , 105247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thakur, V.; Parida, D.J.; Raj, V. Sustainable municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in the smart cities in Indian context. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2024 , 73 , 361–384. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saptadi, N.S.T.; Suyuti, A.; Ilham, A.A.; Nurtanio, I. Literature Study on the Role of Artificial Intelligence Waste Management into Biomass Briquettes Toward Smart City Governance. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023 , 2680 , 020048. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, M.; Mao, J.; Zhao, W.; Sun, H.; Wang, K. Smart City Transportation: A VANET Edge Computing Model to Minimize Latency and Delay Utilizing 5G Network. J. Grid Comput. 2024 , 22 , 25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Walia, V.; Mahmood, M.R.; Maheshwari, V. Sustainable spectrum sharing 5G network antenna design for smart city. J. Auton. Intell. 2024 , 7 , 1115. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xicotencatl-Pérez, J.M.; Ramos-Fernández, J.C.; Marquez-Vera, M.A.; Díaz-Parra, O. Using the smart cities infrastructure for urban farming and z-farming. In Management, Technology, and Economic Growth in Smart and Sustainable Cities ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 146–155. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moghayedi, A.; Richter, I.; Owoade, F.M.; Francis, S.; Ekpo, C. Effects of Urban Smart Farming on Local Economy and Food Production in Urban Areas in African Cities. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 10836. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kretz, D.; Teich, T.; Franke, D.; Kraus, M.; Scharf, O.; Junghans, S.; Neumann, T. Interconnection of smart homes and smart buildings as a building block of smart cities. In Innovations and Challenges of the Energy Transition in Smart City Districts ; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2023; pp. 595–609. [ Google Scholar ]
• Apanavičienė, R.; Shahrabani, M.M.N. Key Factors Affecting Smart Building Integration into Smart City: Technological Aspects. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 1832–1857. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fatemi, S.; Ketabi, A.; Mansouri, S.A. A four-stage stochastic framework for managing electricity market by participating smart buildings and electric vehicles: Towards smart cities with active end-users. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023 , 93 , 104535. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Z. Virtual and Augmented Reality-Based Environmental Pollution Analysis in Smart City Using Wireless Sensor Network Enabled Hypertext System. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 2024 , 21 , 250–269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kaliappan, S.; Maranan, R. Implementation of cyber physical systems in smart cities through augmented reality networks in the mobility decade. In Cyber-Physical Systems and Supporting Technologies for Industrial Automation ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 215–228. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stecuła, K.; Wolniak, R.; Grebski, W.W. AI-Driven Urban Energy Solutions—From Individuals to Society: A Review. Energies 2023 , 16 , 7988. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stecuła, K. Virtual Reality Applications Market Analysis—On the Example of Steam Digital Platform. Informatics 2022 , 9 , 100. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chaudhary, D.; Soni, T.; Singh, S.; Gupta, S.M.C. A Construction of Secure and Efficient Authenticated Key Exchange Protocol for Deploying Internet of Drones in Smart Cit. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2024 , 1929 , 136–150. [ Google Scholar ]
• Maguluri, L.P.; Arularasan, A.N.; Boopathi, S. Assessing security concerns for ai-based drones in smart cities. In Effective AI, Blockchain, and E-Governance Applications for Knowledge Discovery and Management ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 27–47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bouramdane, A.-A. Optimal Water Management Strategies: Paving the Way for Sustainability in Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 2849–2882. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Davydenko, L.; Davydenko, N.; Deja, A.; Wiśnicki, B.; Dzhuguryan, T. Efficient Energy Management for the Smart Sustainable City Multifloor Manufacturing Clusters: A Formalization of the Water Supply System Operation Conditions Based on Monitoring Water Consumption Profiles. Energies 2023 , 16 , 4519. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ghosh, A. Time Series Transformer for Long Term Rainfall Forecasting Towards Water Distribution Management in Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, BigData, Sorrento, Italy, 15–18 December 2023; pp. 3380–3386. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gharehbaghi, K.; McManus, K.; Hurst, N.; Robson, K.; Pagliara, F.; Eves, C. Advanced rail transportation infrastructure as the basis of improved urban mobility: Research into Sydney as a smart city. Aust. Plan. 2023 , 59 , 101–116. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yan, S.; Wang, Y.; Mai, X.; Gao, S.; Zhang, W. Empower smart cities with sampling-wise dynamic facial expression recognition via frame-sequence contrastive learning. Comput. Commun. 2024 , 216 , 130–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yan, L.; Sheng, M.; Wang, C.; Gao, R.; Yu, H. Hybrid neural networks based facial expression recognition for smart city. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2022 , 81 , 319–342. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bhoi, S.K.; Mallick, C.; Mohanty, C.R.; Nayak, R.S. Analysis of Noise Pollution during Dussehra Festival in Bhubaneswar Smart City in India: A Study Using Machine Intelligence Models. Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput. 2022 , 2022 , 6095265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Awan, F.M.; Minerva, R.; Crespi, N. Using Noise Pollution Data for Traffic Prediction in Smart Cities: Experiments Based on LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks. IEEE Sens. J. 2021 , 21 , 20722–20729. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saeed, R.H. Improved System for Smart City Street-Lighting Controlling based on Web Technology Principles. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng. 2024 , 12 , 100–114. [ Google Scholar ]
• Babu, C.V.S.; Monika, R.; Dhanusha, T.; Vishnuvaradhanan, K.; Harish, A. Smart street lighting system for smart cities using IoT (LoRa). In Effective AI, Blockchain, and E-Governance Applications for Knowledge Discovery and Management ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 78–96. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mathaba, T.N.D.; Manyake, M.K. Assessing the Implementation of Smart Energy Efficient Street Lighting Projects Within Cities. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst. 2023 , 629 , 206–213. [ Google Scholar ]
• Anthony, B.; Anthony, B. Data enabling digital ecosystem for sustainable shared electric mobility-as-a-service in smart cities-an innovative business model perspective. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2023 , 51 , 101043. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van Oijstaeijen, W.; Silva, M.F.E.; Back, P.; Cools, J.; Van Passel, S. The Nature Smart Cities business model: A rapid decision-support and scenario analysis tool to reveal the multi-benefits of green infrastructure investments. Urban For. Urban Green. 2023 , 84 , 127923. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wolniak, R.; Jonek-Kowalska, I. The Creative Services Sector in Polish Cities. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022 , 8 , 17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bleja, J.; Kruger, T.; Neumann, S.; Engelmann, L.; Grossmann, U. Development of a Holistic Care Platform in the Smart City Environment: Implications for Business Models and Data Usage Concepts. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit, E-TEMS 2022—Conference Proceedings, Bilbao, Spain, 9–11 March 2022; pp. 24–29. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, J.; Yang, B. A smart city service business model: Focusing on transportation services. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 10832. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Uden, L.; Kumaresan, A. Sustainable Smart City Business Model Framework. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing, ICVISP 2021, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 18–20 December 2021; pp. 181–187. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kühne, B.; Muschkiet, M. Analyzing Actor Engagement in Data-Driven Business Models Innovation in the Context of Smart Cities by Creating a Common Understanding. Lect. Notes Netw. Syst. 2021 , 266 , 257–264. [ Google Scholar ]
• D‘Hauwers, R.; Walravens, N.; Ballon, P.; Borghys, K. Business model scenarios for engendering trust in smart city data collaborations. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2021, Online, 7–9 July 2021; pp. 67–75. [ Google Scholar ]
• McLoughlin, S.; Maccani, G.; Puvvala, A.; Donnellan, B. An Urban Data Business Model Framework for Identifying Value Capture in the Smart City: The Case of OrganiCity. Public Adm. Inf. Technol. 2021 , 37 , 189–215. [ Google Scholar ]
• Valter, P.; Lindgren, P.; Prasad, R. The Future Role of Multi-business Model Innovation in a World with Digitalization and Global Connected Smart Cities. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020 , 113 , 1651–1659. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lindgren, P. Multi Business Model Innovation in a World of Smart Cities with Future Wireless Technologies. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020 , 113 , 1423–1435. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Timeus, K.; Vinaixa, J.; Pardo-Bosch, F. Creating business models for smart cities: A practical framework. Public Manag. Rev. 2020 , 22 , 726–745. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gutiérrez-Leefmans, M. The role of business in the innovation ecosystem: The Case of smart cities as business models. In Handbook of Research on Smart Territories and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems for Social Innovation and Sustainable Growth ; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 19–36. [ Google Scholar ]
• Giourka, P.; Sanders, M.W.J.L.; Angelakoglou, K.; Tryferidis, A.; Tzovaras, D. The smart city business model canvas—A smart city business modeling framework and practical tool. Energies 2019 , 12 , 4798. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abbate, T.; Cesaroni, F.; Cinici, M.C.; Villari, M. Business models for developing smart cities. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of an IoT platform. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019 , 142 , 183–193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tanda, A.; De Marco, A. Business Model Framework for Smart City Mobility Projects. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019 , 471 , 092082. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Han, J.; Jin, H.-D. Smart city and business model with a focus on platform and circular economy. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2019 , 502 , 199–203. [ Google Scholar ]
• Popova, Y. Economic or financial substantiation for smart city solutions: A literature study. Econ. Ann.-XXI 2020 , 183 , 125–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haase, M.; Konstantinou, T. Current Business Model Practices in Energy Master Planning for Regions, Cities and Districts. In Green Energy and Technology ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 1–14. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ampa, A.T.; Widjaja, S.U.M.; Wahyono, H.; Utomo, S.H. Structural Model Effect of Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Motivation on Business Success for Mompreneurs in the City of Makassar. J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 2023 , 3 , 83–99. [ Google Scholar ]
• Santos, A.R. Critical success factors toward a safe city as perceived by selected medium enterprises in the province of Nueva Ecija: A crafted business development policy model. Asian Dev. Policy Rev. 2023 , 11 , 53–66. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kowalska, I.J.; Wolniak, R. Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development. Sustainability 2011 , 14 , 2064. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bencsik, B.; Palmié, M.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J.; Gassmann, O. Business models for digital sustainability: Framework, microfoundations of value capture, and empirical evidence from 130 smart city services. J. Bus. Res. 2023 , 160 , 113757. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Perätalo, S.; Ahokangas, P.; Iivari, M. Smart city business model approach: The role of opportunities, values, and advantages. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2023 , 2023 , 1–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haroon, N.H.; Saadon, H.B.; Abed, A.M.; Mohammed, M.Q.; Bafjaish, S.S. Developing a Smart Economy Using Statistical Framework-Based Business Models in Smart Cities. J. Intell. Syst. Internet Things 2023 , 9 , 194–205. [ Google Scholar ]
• Loia, F.; Basile, V.; Capobianco, N.; Vona, R. How About Value Chain in Smart Cities? Addressing Urban Business Model Innovation to Circularity. Springer Proc. Complex. 2023 , 2023 , 243–250. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kowalski, A.M.; Karaś, J. Smart cities through innovation clusters: Insights from Seoul, South Korea. In Smart Cities in Europe and Asia: Urban Planning and Management for a Sustainable Future ; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; pp. 124–135. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gore, S.; Dutt, I.; Dahake, R.P.; Dange, B.J.; Gore, S. Innovations in Smart City Water Supply Systems. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng. 2023 , 11 , 277–281. [ Google Scholar ]
• Senior, C.; Salaj, A.T.; Johansen, A. Students’ innovation for age-ready smart cities. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2023 , 56 , 9552–9557. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jonek-Kowalska, I.; Wolniak, R. Smart Cities in Poland: Towards Sustainability and a Better Quality of Life? Smart Cities in Poland: Towards Sustainability and a Better Quality of Life? Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–199. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wolniak, R. European Union Smart Mobility–Aspects Connected with Bike Road System’s Extension and Dissemination. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 1009–1042. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wolniak, R. Analysis of the Bicycle Roads System as an Element of a Smart Mobility on the Example of Poland Provinces. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 368–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anthopoulos, L.G.; Janssen, M. Business Model Canvas for Big and Open Linked Data in Smart and Circular Cities: Findings from Europe. Computer 2022 , 55 , 119–133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Parodos, L.; Tsolakis, O.; Tsoukos, G.; Xenou, E.; Ayfantopoulou, G. Business Model Analysis of Smart City Logistics Solutions Using the Business Model Canvas: The Case of an On-Demand Warehousing E-Marketplace. Future Transp. 2022 , 2 , 467–481. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Turoń, K.; Tóth, J. Innovations in Shared Mobility—Review of Scientific Works. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 1545–1559. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Turoń, K. Factors Affecting Car-Sharing Services. Smart Cities 2023 , 6 , 1185–1201. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bleja, J.; Neumann, S.; Krueger, T.; Grossmann, U. A Human-Centered Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Care Platform in a Smart City Environment: Implications for Business Models. In Proceedings of the WWW 2022—Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022, Lyon, France, 25–29 April 2022; pp. 1237–1244. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karam, E. General contractor business model for smart cities: Fundamentals and techniques. In General Contractor Business Model for Smart Cities: Fundamentals and Techniques ; Wiley-ISTE: London, UK, 2022; pp. 1–288. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ma, Z.; Pu, D.; Liang, H. Financing net-zero energy integration in smart cities with green bonds and public-private partnerships. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024 , 64 , 103708. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Milenković, M.; Rašić, M.; Vojković, G. Using Public Private Partnership models in smart cities—proposal for Croatia. In Proceedings of the 2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 22–26 May 2017. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, J.-H.; Kim, J.; Shin, S.; Lee, S.-y. Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies from the Republic of Korea, in Institutional Arrangements and Performance, Asian Development Bank, vol. 1, pp. XIX–XXI. 2011. Available online: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29032/ppp-kor-v1.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2024).
• Zhan, J.; Dong, S.; Hu, W. IoE-supported smart logistics network communication with optimization and security. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022 , 52 , 102052. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mousavi, P.; Ghazizadeh, M.S.; Vahidinasab, V. Optimal plug-in hybrid electric vehicle performance management using decentralized multichannel network design. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2024 , 18 , 999–1013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, P.; You, G. Secure application-centric service authentication with regression learning for security systems in smart city applications. Int. J. Glob. Energy Issues 2024 , 46 , 208–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• He, Y.; Tan, F.; Leong, C.; Huang, J.; Junio, D.R.O. Realizing innovation and sustainability: A case study of Macau SAR’s smart city development capabilities. J. Urban Aff. 2023 , 46 , 208–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maalsen, S.; Wolifson, P.; Dowling, R. Gender in the Australian innovation ecosystem: Planning smart cities for men. Gend. Place Cult. 2023 , 30 , 299–320. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamolov, S.; Teteryatnikov, K.; Podolskiy, V. High technologies for smart city development. In Post-Industrial Society: The Choice Between Innovation and Tradition ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 43–52. [ Google Scholar ]
• Correia, D.; Teixeira, L.; Marques, J.L. Last-mile-as-a-service (LMaaS): An innovative concept for the disruption of the supply chain. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021 , 75 , 103310. [ Google Scholar ]
• Razin, Y.; Feigh, K. Toward interactional trust for humans and automation: Extending interdependence. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation, SmartWorld/UIC/ATC/SCALCOM/IOP/SCI, Leicester, UK, 19–23 August 2019; pp. 1348–1355. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fan, Z.; Jiang, R.; Shibasaki, R. Metropolitan-scale Mobility Digital Twin. In Proceedings of the WSDM 2023—Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Singapore, 27 February–3 March 2023; pp. 1301–1302. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pahuja, N. Partnering with technology firms to train smart city workforces. Smart Cities Policies Financ. Approaches Solut. 2022 , 2022 , 169–180. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sánchez-Muñoz, D.; Domínguez-García, J.L.; Martínez-Gomariz, E.; Stevens, J.; Pardo, M. Electrical grid risk assessment against flooding in Barcelona and Bristol cities. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 1527. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R. Framework for R&D&I Activities in the Steel Industry in Popularizing the Idea of Industry 4.0. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022 , 8 , 133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Europe’s Top 10 Cities Prepared for a ‘Smart City’ Future, 2023, Europe’s Top 10 Cities Prepared for a ‘Smart City’ Future. Available online: https://www.iotinsider.com/industries/smart-cities/europes-top-10-cities-prepared-for-a-smart-city-future/ (accessed on 19 March 2024).
• Glaister, S. Lessons from London Underground Public Private Partnership and UK High-speed Rail. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2023 , 57 , 379–401. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nicolopoulou, K.; Karataş-Özkan, M.; Vas, C.; Nouman, M. An incubation perspective on social innovation: The London Hub—A social incubator. R D Manag. 2017 , 47 , 368–384. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. The emerging data–driven Smart City and its innovative applied solutions for sustainability: The cases of London and Barcelona. Energy Inform. 2020 , 3 , 5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shamsuzzoha, A.; Niemi, J.; Piya, S.; Rutledge, K. Smart city for sustainable environment: A comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities 2021 , 114 , 103194. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Šulyová, D.; Vodák, J. The impact of cultural aspects on building the smart city approach: Managing diversity in Europe (London), North America (New York) and Asia (Singapore). Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 9463. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anisetti, M.; Ardagna, C.; Bellandi, V.; Cremonini, M.; Frati, F.; Damiani, E. Privacy-aware Big Data Analytics as a service for public health policies in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018 , 39 , 68–77. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zygiaris, S. Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. J. Knowl. Econ. 2013 , 4 , 217–231. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Robinson, J.; Harrison, P.; Shen, J.; Wu, F. Financing urban development, three business models: Johannesburg, Shanghai and London. Prog. Plan. 2021 , 154 , 100513. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pozdniakova, A.M. Smart city strategies “London-Stockholm-Vienna-Kyiv”: In search of common ground and best practices. Acta Innov. 2018 , 27 , 31–45. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chu, T. A comparative study on smart city construction paths of London and Shanghai. World Reg. Stud. 2021 , 30 , 1163–1174. [ Google Scholar ]
• Voorwinden, A.; van Bueren, E.; Verhoef, L. Experimenting with collaboration in the Smart City: Legal and governance structures of Urban Living Labs. Gov. Inf. Q. 2023 , 40 , 101875. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pintossi, N.; Ikiz Kaya, D.; van Wesemael, P.; Pereira Roders, A. Challenges of cultural heritage adaptive reuse: A stakeholders-based comparative study in three European cities. Habitat Int. 2023 , 136 , 102807. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Veenstra, T. The Amsterdam model for control of tattoo parlours and businesses. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2015 , 48 , 218–222. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ma, Z.; Augustijn, K.D.; De Esch, I.J.P.; Bossink, B.A.G. Micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities to facilitate university technology transfer. PLoS ONE 2023 , 18 , e0283777. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mulder, M.; Oude Aarninkhof, C. Designing Productive Urban Landscapes. In Contemporary Urban Design Thinking, Part F1266 ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 227–238. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mello Rose, F.; Thiel, J.; Grabher, G. Selective inclusion: Civil society involvement in the smart city ecology of Amsterdam. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 2022 , 29 , 369–382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• D’Amico, A.; Marozzo, V.; Schifilliti, V. How to Improve Universal Accessibility of Smart Tourism Destinations: The Case of Amsterdam City, Tourism on the Verge ; Part F1052; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 89–102. [ Google Scholar ]
• Voorwinden, A. Regulating the Smart City in European Municipalities: A Case Study of Amsterdam. Eur. Public Law 2022 , 28 , 155–180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mello Rose, F. Activity types, thematic domains, and stakeholder constellations: Explaining civil society involvement in Amsterdam’s smart city. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2022 , 30 , 975–993. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Noori, N.; Hoppe, T.; de Jong, M. Classifying pathways for smart city development: Comparing design, governance and implementation in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 4030. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Monachesi, P. Shaping an alternative smart city discourse through Twitter: Amsterdam and the role of creative migrants. Cities 2020 , 100 , 102664. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mancebo, F. Smart city strategies: Time to involve people. Comparing Amsterdam, Barcelona and Paris. J. Urban. 2020 , 13 , 133–152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vasilenko, I.A.; Mikhailova, E.V. European experience forming a socio-political concept of a smart city (Comparative analysis of the smart strategy of Amsterdam, London and Barcelona). World Econ. Int. Relat. 2020 , 64 , 83–95. [ Google Scholar ]
• Faber, S. Exploring modern urbanity through the public-private dichotomy. The case of a divided Berlin. Balt. Worlds 2021 , 14 , 73–75. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bank, N.; Fichter, K.; Klofsten, M. Sustainability-profiled incubators and securing the inflow of tenants—The case of Green Garage Berlin. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 157 , 76–83. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Corbo, L. In search of business model configurations that work: Lessons from the hybridization of Air Berlin and JetBlue. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2017 , 64 , 139–150. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barquet, A.P.; Seidel, J.; Buchert, T.; Rozenfeld, H.; Seliger, G. Sustainable Product Service Systems—From Concept Creation to the Detailing of a Business Model for a Bicycle Sharing System in Berlin. Procedia CIRP 2016 , 40 , 524–529. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sydow, J.; Schmidt, T.; Braun, T. Business model change and network creation: Evidence from Berlin start-ups, 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2015 , 2015 , 17548. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gorelova, I.; Savastano, M.; Spremic, M.; Dedova, M. Region-specific institutional context for citizen-driven entrepreneurship in smart cities: Evidence from Rome and Berlin. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference—Europe, TEMSCON-EUR, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 17–20 May 2021; p. 9488635. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zvolska, L.; Lehner, M.; Voytenko Palgan, Y.; Mont, O.; Plepys, A. Urban sharing in smart cities: The cases of Berlin and London. Local Environ. 2019 , 24 , 628–645. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mikucki, J. Media w smart city: Berlin i Warszawa ; ASPRA-JR: Warsow, Poland, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pollak, A.; Gupta, A.; Gohlich, D. Optimized Operation Management With Predicted Filling Levels of the Litter Bins for a Fleet of Autonomous Urban Service Robots. IEEE Access 2024 , 12 , 7689–7703. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harrison, A.L. Feral Surfaces: Building Envelopes as Intelligent Multi-species Habitats. Archit. Des. 2024 , 94 , 38–45. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Osipova, M.; Hornecker, E. Exploring the potential for Smart City technology for Women’s Safety. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Tampere, Finland, 3–6 October 2023; pp. 245–256. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. Key socio-economic megatrends and trends in the context of the Industry 4.0 framework. Forum Sci. Oeconomia 2021 , 9 , 5–21. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. A Theoretical Framework for Industry 4.0 and Its Implementation with Selected Practical Schedules. Energies 2021 , 14 , 940. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R. Influence of Industry 4.0 Projects on Business Operations: Literature and Empirical Pilot Studies Based on Case Studies in Poland. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022 , 8 , 44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nagaj, R.; Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Grebski, W.W. The Impact of Deep Decarbonization Policy on the Level of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the European Union. Energies 2024 , 17 , 1245. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paraschiv, L.S.; Paraschiv, S. Contribution of renewable energy (hydro, wind, solar and biomass) to decarbonization and transformation of the electricity generation sector for sustainable development. Energy Rep. 2023 , 9 , 535–544. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yan, C.; Murshed, M.; Ozturk, I.; Ghardallou, W.; Khudoykulov, K. Decarbonization blueprints for developing countries: The role of energy productivity, renewable energy, and financial development in environmental improvement. Resour. Policy 2023 , 83 , 103674. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Nagaj, R.; Grebski, W.W.; Romanyshyn, T. Barriers to Renewable Energy Source (RES) Installations as Determinants of Energy Consumption in EU Countries. Energies 2023 , 16 , 7364. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Nagaj, R.; Žuromskaitė-Nagaj, B.; Grebski, W.W. The Influence of the Global Energy Crisis on Energy Efficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis. Energies 2024 , 17 , 947. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Przeybilovicz, E.; Cunha, M.A.; Macaya, J.F.M.; de Albuquerque, J.P. A tale of two “smart cities”: Investigating the echoes of new public management and governance discourses in smart city projects in Brazil. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI, USA, 3 January 2018; pp. 2486–2495. [ Google Scholar ]
• Utomo, R.G.; Andrian, R.; Wills, G. An overview on information assurance framework for smart government in Indonesia. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023 , 2654 , 020023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Elbashir, M.Z.; Sutton, S.G.; Arnold, V.; Collier, P.A. Leveraging business intelligence systems to enhance management control and business process performance in the public sector. Meditari Account. Res. 2022 , 30 , 914–940. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Berardi, M.; Ziruolo, A. A Lack of Smart Governance in the Public Sector: The Italian Case Study. Lect. Notes Inf. Syst. Organ. 2021 , 50 , 219–232. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leroux, E.; Pupion, P.-C. Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022 , 174 , 121195. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Briedienė, S. The perspectives of small and medium-sized enterprises on participation in public procurement of innovation. Public Policy Adm. 2021 , 20 , 271–283. [ Google Scholar ]
• Xu, J.; XU, W. Financing sustainable smart city Projects: Public-Private partnerships and green Bonds. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2024 , 64 , 103699. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abdel-Basset, M.; Gamal, A.; Hezam, I.M.; Sallam, K.M. Sustainability assessment of optimal location of electric vehicle charge stations: A conceptual framework for green energy into smart cities. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024 , 26 , 11475–11513. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nguyen, T.; Hallo, L.; Gunawan, I. Investigating risk of public–private partnerships (PPPs) for smart transportation infrastructure project development. Uilt Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2024 , 14 , 74–91. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nelischer, K. Evaluating Collaborative Public–Private Partnerships: The Case of Toronto’s Smart City. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2024 , 90 , 261–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pianezzi, D.; Mori, Y.; Uddin, S. Public–private partnership in a smart city: A curious case in Japan. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2023 , 89 , 632–647. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Almarri, K. The value for money factors and their interrelationships for smart city public–private partnerships projects. Constr. Innov. 2023 , 23 , 815–832. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Laine, J.; Minkkinen, M.; Mäntymäki, M. Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders. Inf. Manag. 2024 , 61 , 103969. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Amegavi, G.B.; Nursey-Bray, M.; Suh, J. Exploring the realities of urban resilience: Practitioners’ perspectives. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024 , 103 , 104313. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carr Kelman, C.; Brady, U.; Raschke, B.A.; Schoon, M.L. A Systematic Review of Key Factors of Effective Collaborative Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2023 , 36 , 1452–1470. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• French, M.; Hesselgreaves, H.; Wilson, R.; Hawkins, M.; Lowe, T. Harnessing Complexity for Better Outcomes in Public and Non-profit Services. In Harnessing Complexity for Better Outcomes in Public and Non-Profit Services ; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2023; pp. 1–132. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gancarczyk, M.; Rodil-Marzábal, Ó. Fintech framing financial ecologiesConceptual and policy-related implications, Journal of Entrepreneurship. Manag. Innov. 2022 , 18 , 7–44. [ Google Scholar ]
• Green, B.N.; Johnson, C.D.; Adams, A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. J. Chiropr. Med. 2006 , 5 , 101–117. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ferrari, R. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Med. Writ. 2015 , 24 , 230–235. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dehkordi, A.H.; Mazaheri, E.; Ibrahim, H.A.; Dalvand, S.; Gheshlagh, R.G. How to write a systematic review: A narrative review. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2021 , 12 , 27. [ Google Scholar ] [ PubMed ]
• Díaz-Díaz, R.; Muñoz, L.; Pérez-González, D. Business model analysis of public services operating in the smart city ecosystem: The case of SmartSantander. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2017 , 76 , 198–214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kruhlov, V.; Dvorak, J.; Moroz, V.; Tereshchenko, D. Revitalizing Ukrainian Cities: The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Smart Urban Development. Cent. Eur. Public Adm. Rev. 2024 , 22 , 85–107. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cifuentes-Faura, J. Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction: Building smart cities and governments through a sustainability-based reconstruction plan. J. Clean. Prod. 2023 , 419 , 138323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Azkuna, I. Smart Cities Study: International study on the situation of ICT, innovation and Knowledge in cities. In Proceedings of the Committee of Digital and Knowledge Based Cities of UCLG, Bilbao, Spain, 3 January 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cocchia, A. Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review. In Smart City, Progress in IS ; Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing Switzerland: London, UK, 2014; pp. 13–43. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zeemering, E.S. Sustainability Management, Strategy and Reform in Local Government. Public Manag. Rev. 2018 , 20 , 136–153. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Perera, C.; Zaslavsky, A.; Christen, P.; Georgakopoulos, D. Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Eur. Trans. Telecommun. 2014 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Komninos, N. Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks. 2008. Available online: https://stellenboschheritage.co.za/wp-content/uploads/Intelligent-Cities-and-Globalisation-of-Innovation-Networks.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Grebski, W. Process of Transformation to Net Zero Steelmaking: Decarbonisation Scenarios Based on the Analysis of the Polish Steel Industry. Energies 2023 , 16 , 3384. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Drożdż, W.; Kinelski, G.; Czarnecka, M.; Wójcik-Jurkiewicz, M.; Maroušková, A.; Zych, G. Determinants of decarbonization—How to realize sustainable and low carbon cities? Energies 2021 , 14 , 2640. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, H.H.; Malik, M.N.; Zafar, R.; Goni, F.A.; Chofreh, A.G.; Klemeš, J.J.; Alotaibi, Y. Challenges for sustainable smart city development: A conceptual framework. Sustain. Dev. 2020 , 28 , 1507–1518. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haughton, G.; Hunter, C. Sustainable Cities ; Routledge: Abingdon/Oxon, UK, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prata, J.; Arsenio, E.; Pontes, J.P. Moving towards the sustainable city: The role of electric vehicles, renewable energy and energy efficiency. Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2014 , 179 , 871–883. [ Google Scholar ]
• UN-Habitat. Ericsson the Role of ICT in the Proposed Urban Sustainable Development Goal and the New Urban Agenda 2015. Available online: http://unhabitat.org/the-role-of-ict-in-the-proposed-urban-sustainable-development-goal-and-the-new-urban-agenda/ (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Drapalova, E.; Wegrich, K. Who governs 4.0? Varieties of smart cities. Public Manag. Rev. 2020 , 22 , 668–686. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pevcin, P. Smart city label: Past, present, and future. Zb. Rad. Ekon. Fak. U Rij. 2019 , 37 , 801–822. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kagermann, H.; Lukas, W.-D.; Wahlster, W. Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution. VDI Nachrichten. 3 May 2011, p. 2. Available online: https://www.dfki.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DFKI/Medien/News_Media/Presse/Presse-Highlights/vdinach2011a13-ind4.0-Internet-Dinge.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2022).
• Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group ; Research Union of the German Government: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution ; Crown Publishing Group: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Popescu, A.I. Long-term city innovation trajectories and quality of urban life. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 10587. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Toppeta, D. The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT Can Build Smart, “Liveable”, Sustainable Cities ; THINK! REPORT 005/2010; The Innovation Knowledge Foundation: Milano, Italy, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hollands, R.G. Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? City 2008 , 12 , 303–320. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arun, M. Smart Cities: The Singapore Case. Cities 1999 , 16 , 13–18. [ Google Scholar ]
• Benevolo, C.; Dameri, R.; D’Auria, B. Smart mobility in Smart City. In Action Taxonomy, ICT Intensity and Public Benefits ; Torre, T., Braccini, A.M., Spinelli, R., Eds.; Empowering Organizations, Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 13–28. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meijer, A.; Bolívar, M.P.R. Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2016 , 82 , 392–408. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barań, M.; Kłos, M.; Marchlewska-Patyk, K. Adaptacja miasta warszawa do koncepcji smart city w oparciu o model odporności (resiliency model). Przegląd Organ. 2022 , 4 , 20–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dashkevych, O.; Portnov, B.A. How can generative AI help in different parts of research? An experiment study on smart cities’ definitions and characteristics. Technol. Soc. 2024 , 77 , 102555. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caragliu, A.; Del Bo, C.; Nijkamp, P. Smart Cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 2001 , 18 , 1–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mergel, I. Open Innovation in the Public Sector: Drivers and Barriers for the Adoption of Challenge.gov. Public Manag. Rev. 2018 , 20 , 726–745. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kitchin, R. The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. Geo J. 2014 , 79 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gotlibowska, K. An attempt to create a smart city model. The role of information and communication technologies in the city’s development. Rozw. Reg. I Polityka Reg. 2018 , 42 , 67–80. [ Google Scholar ]
• Komninos, N. Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Space ; Spon Press: London, UK, 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hall, P. Creative Cities and Economic Development. Urban Stud. 2000 , 37 , 639–649. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L. City indicators on social sustainability as standardization technologies for smarter (citizen–centered) governance of cities. Soc. Indic. Res. 2016 , 128 , 1193–1216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tatiana, B. Risks of Smart City Projects: Definition, Typology, Management. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023 , 2791 , 050043. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ferrara, R. The smart city and the green economy in Europe: A critical approach. Energies 2015 , 8 , 4724–4734. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baran, M.; Kłos, M.; Chodorek, M.; Marchlewska-Patyk, M. The Resilient Smart City Model—Proposal for Polish Cities. Energies 2022 , 15 , 1818. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khatibi, H.; Wilkinson, S.; Baghersad, M.; Dianat, H. The Resilient—Smart City Development: A Literature Review and Novel Frameworks Exploration. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2021 , 11 , 493–510. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hancke, G.P.; de Carvalho e Silva, B.; Hancke, G.P., Jr. The Role of Advanced Sensing in Smart Cities. Sensors 2013 , 13 , 393–425. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Meijer, A.J.; Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Bolívar, M.P.R. Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2016 , 34 , 647–656. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hejduk, S. Smart City Model and Urban Spatial Management. Pol. J. Econ. 2020 , 2 , 123–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stawasz, D.; Sikora-Fernandez, D. Koncepcja Smart City na tle Procesów i Uwarunkowań Rozwoju Współczesnych Miast ; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego: Łódź, Poland, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ju, Z.; Wang, H.; Luo, J.; Sun, F. Enhancing human–robot communication with a comprehensive language-conditioned imitation policy for embodied robots in smart cities. Comput. Commun. 2024 , 222 , 177–187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chiu, K.T.; Vasant, P.; Liu, R.W. Smart city is a safe city: Information and communication technology–enhanced urban space monitoring and surveillance systems: The promise and limitations. Chapter 7. In Smart Cities: Issues and Challenges Mapping Political, Social and Economic Risks and Threats ; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 111–124. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sroka, W.; Cygler, J.; Gajdzik, B. The Transfer of Knowledge in Intra-Organizational Networks: A Case Study Analysis. Organ. Feb. 2014 , 47 , 24–34. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cygler, J.; Gajdzik, B.; Sroka, W. Coopetition as a development stimulator of enterprises in the networked steel sector. Metalurgija 2014 , 53 , 383–386. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R. Smart Production Workers in Terms of Creativity and Innovation: The Implication for Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022 , 8 , 68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, Y.; Peng, Y. Design of Intelligent City Communication Network Based on Internet of Things. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2024 , 9 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schaffers, H.; Komninos, N.; Pallot, M.; Trousse, B.; Nilsson, M.; Oliveira, A. Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation. In The Future Internet Assembly ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 432–435. Available online: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-20898-0_31.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Vanli, T. Ranking of Global Smart Cities Using Dynamic Factor Analysis. Soc. Indic. Res. 2024 , 171 , 405–437. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Glasmeier, A.; Christopherson, S. Thinking about smart cities. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2015 , 8 , 3–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R. Digitalisation and Innovation in the Steel Industry in Poland-Selected Tools of ICT in an Analysis of Statistical Data and a Case Study. Energies 2021 , 14 , 3034. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Sroka, W.; Vveinhardt, J. Energy Intensity of Steel Manufactured Utilising EAF Technology as a Function of Investments Made: The Case of the Steel Industry in Poland. Energies 2021 , 14 , 5152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B.; Sroka, W. Resource Intensity vs. Investment in Production Installations—The Case of the Steel Industry in Poland. Energies 2021 , 14 , 443. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gajdzik, B. Environmental aspects, strategies and waste logistic system based on the example of metallurgical company. Metalurgija 2009 , 48 , 63–67. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meyer, W.B. The Environmental Advantages of Cities: Countering Commonsense Antiurbanism ; MIT Press: London, UK, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gascó, M. What Makes a City Smart? Lessons from Barcelona. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Kauau, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Höjer, M.; Wangel, J. Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 310 ; Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Zurich, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 333–350. [ Google Scholar ]
• ECE/INF/2020/3 ; UNEP People-Smart Sustainable Cities. United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
• Thornbush, M.; Golubchikov, O. Sustainable Urbanism in Digital Transitions. In From Low Carbon to Smart Sustainable Cities ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Foth, M.; Sabatini-Marques, J.; Da-Costa, E.; Ioppolo, G. Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019 , 45 , 348–365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kanter, R.M.; Litow, S.S. Informed and Interconnected: A Manifesto for Smarter Cities, Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper 2009, 9–141. Available online: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/09-141.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Khansari, N.; Mostashari, A.; Mansouri, M. Impacting Sustainable Behaviour and Planning in Smart City. Int. J. Sustain. Land Use Urban Plan. 2013 , 1 , 46–61. Available online: https://www.sciencetarget.com/Journal/index.php/IJSLUP/article/viewFile/365/104 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Castelnovo, W.; Misuraca, G.; Savoldelli, A. Smart Cities Governance: The Need for a Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2016 , 34 , 1–16. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284859012_Smart_Cities_Governance_The_Need_for_a_Holistic_Approach_to_Assessing_Urban_Participatory_Policy_Making (accessed on 10 June 2024). [ CrossRef ]
• Rodriguez Garzon, S.; Küpper, A. Pay-Per-Pollution: Towards an Air Pollution-Aware Toll System for Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things (SmartIoT), Wuhan, China, 31 May–2 June 2019; pp. 361–366. Available online: http://www.doi.org/10.1109/SmartIoT.2019.00063 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Rutherford, J.; Coutard, O. Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processus and Politics of Socio-technical Change. Urban Stud. 2014 , 51 , 1353–1377. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Toli, A.M.; Murtagh, N. The Concept of Sustainability in Smart City Definitions. Front. Built Environ. 2020 , 6 , 77. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gao, C.; Wang, F.; Hu, X.; Martinez, J. Research on Sustainable Design of Smart Cities Based on the Internet of Things and Ecosystems. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 6546. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lapinskaitė, I.; Stasytytė, V.; Skvarciany, V. Assessing the European Union capitals in the context of smart sustainable cities. Open House Int. 2022 , 47 , 763–785. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, J. Smart city trends: A focus on 5 countries and 15 companies. Cities 2022 , 123 , 103551. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/ (accessed on 25 March 2023).
• Smart London Together. 2018. Available online: https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/smarter_london_together_v1.66_-_published.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• London for Smart Cities. 2024. Available online: https://www.grow.london/set-up-in-london/sectors/urban (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• London’s Future as a Smart City. 2022. Available online: https://centreforlondon.org/blog/londons-future-as-a-smart-city/ (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• Hi-Tech London, or the Making of a Smart City. 2024. Available online: https://www.webuildvalue.com/en/megatrends/smart-city-london.html (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• How London’s Smart City Credentials Boost Its Tech Prowess. 2023. Available online: https://www.uktech.news/partnership/london-smart-cities-20231106 (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• London the Best City in the World. 2016. Available online: https://smartnet.niua.org/sites/default/files/resources/gla_smartlondon_report_web_4.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2024).
• Tekin, H.; Dimken, I. Inclusive Smart Cities: An Exploratory Study on the London Smart City Strategy. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 485. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mora, L.; Bolici, R. How to Become a Smart City: Learning from Amsterdam ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Amsterdam Smart City: A World Leader in Smart City Development. 2022. Available online: https://www.beesmart.city/en/smart-city-blog/smart-city-portrait-amsterdam (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Amsterdam Smart City. 2024. Available online: https://amsterdamsmartcity.com/ (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Transforming Amsterdam into a Smart City. 2023. Available online: https://www.iamsterdam.com/en/business/transforming-amsterdam-into-a-smart-city (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Cities as Living Laboratories: The Smart City Projects of Amsterdam, Singapore, and Barcelona. 2023. Available online: https://www.archdaily.com/1001628/cities-as-living-laboratories-the-smart-city-projects-of-amsterdam-singapore-and-barcelona (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Amsterdam Smart City: The Creation of New Partnerships for a Smart City. 2014. Available online: https://www.citego.org/bdf_fiche-document-883_en.html (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Organising Smart City Projects, Lessopns, from Amsterdam. 2016. Available online: https://www.hva.nl/binaries/content/assets/subsites/kc-be-carem/assets_11/organising_smart_city_projects.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Smart City Berlin. 2024. Available online: https://smart-city-berlin.de/en/ (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Berlin’s Roadmap to Becoming a Smart City. 2024. Available online: https://citylab-berlin.org/en/projects/smart_city/ (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Smart City Projects in Berlin. 2024. Available online: https://smart-city-berlin.de/en/competencies-solutions/projects (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Smart City Berlin. 2023. Available online: https://www.businesslocationcenter.de/en/business-location/business-location/smart-city-berlin (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Partnerships for Smart City Berlin. Available online: https://www.stromnetz.berlin/en/for-berlin/smart-city/ (accessed on 10 June 2024).
• Spil, T.A.M.; Effing, R.; Kwast, J. Smart City Participation: Dream or Reality? A Comparison of Participatory Strategies from Hamburg, Berlin & Enschede. In Digital Nations—Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability ; Kar, A.K., Ilavarasan, P.V., Gupta, M.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Janssen, M., Simintiras, A., Al-Sharhan, S., Eds.; I3E 2017; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 10595. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Joyce, A.; Javidroozi, V. Smart city development: Data sharing vs. data protection legislations. Cities 2024 , 148 , 104859. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grasselt, N.; Sölle, M. Market development strategies for Smart Cities: How can an open innovation policy make Berlin a testbed for automated, connected and electrified passenger transport? In Proceedings of the EVS 2017—30th International Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition, Sttutgart, Germany, 9–11 October 2017. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Wolniak, R.; Gajdzik, B.; Grebski, M.; Danel, R.; Grebski, W.W. Business Models Used in Smart Cities—Theoretical Approach with Examples of Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2024 , 7 , 1626-1669. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040065

Wolniak R, Gajdzik B, Grebski M, Danel R, Grebski WW. Business Models Used in Smart Cities—Theoretical Approach with Examples of Smart Cities. Smart Cities . 2024; 7(4):1626-1669. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040065

Wolniak, Radosław, Bożena Gajdzik, Michaline Grebski, Roman Danel, and Wiesław Wes Grebski. 2024. "Business Models Used in Smart Cities—Theoretical Approach with Examples of Smart Cities" Smart Cities 7, no. 4: 1626-1669. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040065

Article Metrics

Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals