hershey chase experiment lab

The Hershey-Chase Experiments (1952), by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase

In 1951 and 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted a series of experiments at the Carnegie Institute of Washington in Cold Spring Harbor, New York, that verified genes were made of deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA. Hershey and Chase performed their experiments, later named the Hershey-Chase experiments, on viruses that infect bacteria, also called bacteriophages. The experiments followed decades of scientists’ skepticism about whether genetic material was composed of protein or DNA. The most well-known Hershey-Chase experiment, called the Waring Blender experiment, provided concrete evidence that genes were made of DNA. The Hershey-Chase experiments settled the long-standing debate about the composition of genes, thereby allowing scientists to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which genes function in organisms.

In the early twentieth century, scientists debated whether genes were made of DNA or protein. Genes control how organisms grow and develop and are the material basis for organisms’ ability to inherit traits like eye color or fur color from their parents. By 1900, scientists had identified the complete chemical composition, or building blocks, of DNA. They had also verified that all cells contained DNA, though DNA’s function remained ambiguous. Up until the 1940s, some scientists accepted the idea that genes were not made of DNA. Instead, those scientists supported the idea that DNA was a molecule that maintained cell structure. Scientists supported that idea in part because of a hypothesis called the tetranucleotide hypothesis. Phoebus Levene, a researcher at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York City, New York, proposed the tetranucleotide hypothesis for DNA in 1933. According to Levene and other proponents of the hypothesis, DNA consisted of repeating sets of four different building blocks, called nucleotides. Some scientists concluded that a repeating sequence of nucleotides in DNA limited potential for variability. Those scientists considered variability necessary for DNA to function as genetic material. In other words, genes needed to have the capacity for enough variation to account for the different traits scientists observe in organisms. Conversely, scientists found that proteins had many more building blocks and therefore more possible arrangements than DNA. From that, some scientists claimed that genes must have been made of protein, not DNA.

The Hershey-Chase experiments were not the first studies to oppose the prevailing theory in the early 1900s that genetic material was composed of proteins. In 1944, nearly a decade before Hershey and Chase’s work, scientists published sound evidence that genes were made of DNA rather than protein. Starting in 1935, Oswald Avery, another researcher at the Rockefeller Institute, with his research associates Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty, performed experiments that showed that DNA facilitated a genetic phenomenon in bacteria called bacterial transformation. Bacterial transformation is the process by which a bacterium can get and use new genetic material from its surroundings. During bacterial transformation, a non-disease-causing bacterium can transform into disease-causing bacteria if the non-disease-causing bacteria is exposed to a disease-causing bacteria. Transformation can occur even if the disease-causing-strain is dead, implying that bacterial transformation happens when the non-disease-causing bacteria inherits genetic material from the disease-causing bacteria. Avery and his colleagues found that the inherited factor that caused bacterial transformation contained DNA. However, Avery’s group did not discount the possibility that some non-DNA component in their sample caused bacterial transformation, rather than the DNA itself. Because of that, many scientists maintained the idea that proteins must govern the genetic phenomenon of bacterial transformation.

Starting in 1951, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted a series of experiments, later called the Hershey-Chase experiments, that verified the findings of Avery and his colleagues. Hershey was a researcher who studied viruses at the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Cold Spring Harbor, New York. He studied viruses that infect bacteria, also called bacteriophages, or phages. Chase became Hershey’s research technician in 1950.

In their experiments, Hershey and Chase analyzed what happened when phages infect bacteria. By the 1950s, scientists had evidence for how phages infected bacteria. They found that when phages infect a host bacterium, the phages first attach themselves to the outside of the bacterium. Then, a piece of the phage enters the bacterium and subsequently replicates itself inside the cell. After many replications, the phage causes the bacterium to lyse, or burst, thereby killing the host bacteria. Scientists classified the replicating piece as genetic material. Scientists also found that phages contained two classes of biological molecules: DNA and protein. Hershey and Chase sought to determine if the replicating piece of phages that entered bacteria during infection, the genetic parts, were solely DNA.

To perform their experiments, Hershey and Chase utilized a technique called radioactive isotope labeling. Chemical elements can exist in different structural forms called isotopes. Isotopes of the same element are nearly identical, but scientists can distinguish between them by experimental means. One way to differentiate between chemical elements with different isotopes is by analyzing their radiation. Some isotopes are less stable than others and give off radioactive signals that scientists can detect. Hershey and Chase marked phages by incorporating radioactive isotopes of phosphorus and sulfur in those phages. They allowed some phages to replicate by infecting bacteria, specifically Escherichia coli , or E. Coli , that scientists had grown in radioactive sulfur. The researchers let other phages infect and replicate in E. Coli that scientists had grown in radioactive phosphorus. DNA contains phosphorus, but not sulfur, whereas protein contains sulfur, but not phosphorus. Therefore, when Hershey and Chase marked phages with radioactive isotopes of those elements, they placed separate, distinguishable tags on the protein and DNA parts of the phages.

The first Hershey-Chase experiment aimed to confirm previous experimental findings that the DNA and protein components of phages were separable. In 1950, Thomas Anderson at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, showed that phages consisted of a protein shell, or coat, with DNA inside the shell. Anderson found that the phages could release their DNA and leave behind what he called a protein ghost. Hershey and Chase replicated Anderson’s experimental results using their radioactive isotope labeling method. Hershey and Chase were able to separate the phages into radioactive sulfur-containing protein ghosts and radioactive phosphorus-containing DNA. They found that the radioactive sulfur protein ghosts could attach to bacterial membranes while the radioactive phosphorus DNA could not. Hershey and Chase also tested if enzymes, molecules that facilitate chemical reactions in cells, could degrade DNA. They found that enzymes did not degrade the DNA of intact phages, but did degrade the DNA of separated phages. Those results indicated that in the intact phages, the protein coat surrounded the DNA and protected the DNA from degradation.

In another Hershey-Chase experiment, Hershey and Chase showed that when certain phages infected E. Coli , the phages injected their DNA into the host bacterium. In 1951, Roger Herriot at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, demonstrated that after phages infected bacteria, their protein ghosts remained attached to the outside of the bacterial cells while their DNA was released elsewhere. Hershey and Chase aimed to show where the phage DNA went when it exited the protein coat and entered the bacteria. The researchers allowed radioactive phosphorus-labeled phages to attach to bacterial cell membranes in a liquid solution and infect the bacteria. Using a centrifuge, Hershey and Chase rapidly spun the samples to separate the bacterial cells from the surrounding solution. After centrifugation, they found that most of the radioactive phosphorus was detected in the cells rather than in the surrounding solution, meaning that the phage DNA must have entered the cells when the phages infected the bacteria.

The most well-known Hershey-Chase experiment was the final experiment, also called the Waring Blender experiment, through which Hershey and Chase showed that phages only injected their DNA into host bacteria, and that the DNA served as the replicating genetic element of phages. In the previous experiment, Hershey and Chase found evidence that phages injected their DNA into host bacteria. In the Waring Blender experiment, the scientists found that the phages did not inject any part of their protein coats in the host bacteria and the protein coats remained outside the bacteria, adhered to the bacterial membranes. For their experiment, Hershey and Chase prepared two samples of infected E. Coli . They infected one sample with radioactive phosphorus-labeled phages, and the other sample with radioactive sulfur-labeled phages. Then, they stirred each sample in a Waring Blender, which was a conventional kitchen blender. They used a blender because centrifuges spun too fast and would destroy the bacterial cells. The shearing forces of the blender removed the phage particles that adhered to the bacterial membranes, but preserved the integrity of the cells and most of the phage material that entered the cell. In the phosphorus-labeled sample that marked DNA but not protein, the blender removed forty percent of the labeled particles. In the sulfur-labeled sample that marked protein but not DNA, the blender removed eighty percent of the labeled particles. Those results indicated that the blender removed much more of the protein parts of the phage than the DNA parts, suggesting that the protein likely remained adhered to the outside of the cell during infection. Since the protein remained outside the cell, it could not be the replicating genetic material.

The Waring Blender only removed eighty percent of the radioactive sulfur-labeled phage, so Hershey and Chase could not account for twenty percent of the phage protein material. To show that the missing twenty percent of the phage protein did not enter the bacterial cells and replicate, the researchers infected E. Coli with radioactive sulfur-labeled phage again so that only the protein parts of the phage were labeled. They prepared two samples. For one sample, Hershey and Chase stirred the cells in the blender to remove the phage particles adhered to the outer bacterial membrane. After stirring, they allowed the phages to cause the cells to lyse, releasing newly replicated phages. For the second sample, Hershey and Chase did not stir the cells in the blender and measured the resulting replicated phages after the bacterial cells lysed. In the blender-stirred sample, less than one percent of the replicated phages contained the radioactive sulfur label. However, in the sample that Hershey and Chase did not stir in the blender, almost ten percent of the phages contained the radioactive sulfur label. The blender maintains any phage material that entered the bacterial cell. If protein was genetic material that entered the cell and replicated, then Hershey and Chase would have found more sulfur-labeled protein in the sample they stirred with the blender. The sample that they did not stir had more of the sulfur-labeled protein because the protein coats remained on the outside of the cell. Hershey and Chase concluded that protein was not genetic material, and that DNA was genetic material.

Unlike Avery’s experiments on bacterial transformations, the Hershey-Chase experiments were more widely and immediately accepted among scientists. The Hershey-Chase experiments mostly ended scientists’ suspicions that genes were made of protein rather than DNA. However, historians have questioned the conclusiveness of the Hershey-Chase experiments. In all the Waring Blender experiments, some protein and DNA material remained unaccounted for. Even in the final experiment, when Hershey and Chase allowed the bacterial cells to lyse after stirring in the blender, the scientists still recovered a small amount of protein, implying that some protein entered the cells during infection. Furthermore, the amount of contaminating protein in the Hershey-Chase Experiments exceeded the amount of contaminating protein that Avery’s group found in their experiments.

Historians of science have studied why scientists more readily accepted the Hershey-Chase experiments than Avery’s experiments. Science historian Frederic Lawrence Holmes writes that scientists more readily accepted the results of the Hershey-Chase experiments because Hershey communicated directly with skeptical scientists. Hershey sent letters to his colleagues in which he detailed the experimental findings of the Hershey-Chase experiments. Another historian of science, Michel Morange, writes that the Hershey-Chase experiments were performed at a time when scientists were ready to accept that genetic material could be DNA. Avery’s group conducted their experiments when the tetranucleotide hypothesis was popular and few scientists held that genes contained DNA. According to Morange, because Hershey and Chase conducted their experiments years later, scientists had gathered more experimental evidence and were willing to seriously consider that genes contained DNA.

In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, two scientists at the University of Cambridge in Cambridge, England, modeled the three-dimensional structure of DNA and demonstrated how DNA might function as genetic material. In 1969, Hershey shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with two other scientists, Max Delbrück and Salvador Luria, partly for his work on the Hershey-Chase experiments.

• Avery, Oswald, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty. "Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types." The Journal of Experimental Medicine 79 (1944): 137–58.
• Fry, Michael. “Chapter 4 – Hershey and Chase Clinched the role of DNA as Genetic Material: Phage Studies Propelled the Birth of Molecular Biology.” In Landmark Experiments in Molecular Biology , 111–42. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2016.
• Hershey, Alfred D., and Martha Chase. “Independent Functions of Viral Protein and Nucleic Acid in Growth of Bacteriophage” The Journal of General Physiology 36 (1952): 39–56.
• Holmes, Frederic L. Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A History of “The Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology.” New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.
• Hopson, Janet L., and Norman K. Wessells. Essentials of Biology . New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
• Judson, Horace Freeland. The Eighth Day of Creation . Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1996.
• Morange, Michel. A History of Molecular Biology . Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1998.
• Olby, Robert Cecil. The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA . Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974.
• Stahl, Franklin W., and Alfred D. Hershey. We Can Sleep Later: Alfred D. Hershey and the Origins of Molecular Biology . Woodbury: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000.

How to cite

Articles rights and graphics.

Copyright Arizona Board of Regents Licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)  

Last modified

Share this page.

• school Campus Bookshelves
• menu_book Bookshelves
• perm_media Learning Objects
• login Login
• how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
• hub Instructor Commons

Margin Size

• Download Page (PDF)
• Download Full Book (PDF)
• Periodic Table
• Physics Constants
• Scientific Calculator
• Reference & Cite
• Tools expand_more
• Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

5.2: The Hershey - Chase Experiments

• Last updated
• Save as PDF
• Page ID 4740

• John W. Kimball
• Tufts University & Harvard

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

\( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

\( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

\( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

\( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

\( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

\( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

\( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

\( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

\( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

In 1952 (seven years after Avery's demonstration that genes were DNA), two geneticists: A. D. Hershey and Martha Chase, provided further proof. They worked with a DNA virus, called T2 , which infects E. coli (and so is a bacteriophage). Figure 5.2.1 shows the essential elements of the infective cycle of DNA bacteriophages like T2. The virions attach to the surface of their host cell (a) . The proteins of the capsid inject the DNA core into the cell (b) . Once within the cell, some of the bacteriophage genes (the "early" genes) are transcribed (by the host's RNA polymerase) and translated (by the host's ribosomes, tRNA, etc.) to produce enzymes that will make many copies of the phage DNA and will turn off (even destroy) the host's DNA.

As fresh copies of phage DNA accumulate, other genes (the "late" genes) are transcribed and translated to form the proteins of the capsid (c) . The stockpile of DNA cores and capsid proteins are assembled into complete virions (d) . Another "late" gene is transcribed and translated into molecules of lysozyme. The lysozyme attacks the peptidoglycan wall (from the inside, of course). Eventually the cell ruptures and releases its content of virions ready to spread the infection to new host cells (e) .

Bacteriophages produced within bacteria growing in radioactive culture medium will themselves be radioactive. If radioactive sulfur atoms ( 35 S) are present, they will be incorporated into the protein coats of the bacteriophages since two of the amino acids — cysteine and methionine — contain sulfur (Figure 5.2.2). However, the DNA will be nonradioactive because there are no sulfur atoms in DNA. If radioactive phosphorus ( 32 P) is used instead, the DNA become radioactive — because of its many phosphorus atoms — but not the proteins.

Hershey and Chase found that when bacteriophages containing 32 P (radioactive), were allowed to infect nonradioactive bacteria, all the infected cells became radioactive and, in fact, much of the radioactivity was passed on to the next generation of bacteriophages. However, when the bacteria were infected with bacteriophages labeled with 35 S, and then the virus coats removed (by whirling them in an electric blender), practically no radioactivity could be detected in the infected cells. From these experiments, it was clear that the DNA component of the bacteriophages is injected into the bacterial cell while the protein component remains outside. However, it is the injected component — DNA — that is able to direct the formation of new virus particles complete with protein coats. So here is further proof that genes are DNA .

Microbe Notes

DNA Experiments (Griffith & Avery, McCarty, MacLeod & Hershey, Chase)

DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid, is the carrier of all genetic information. It codes genetic information passed on from one generation to another and determines individual attributes like eye color, facial features, etc. Although DNA was first isolated in 1869 by a Swiss scientist, Friedrich Miescher, from nuclei of pus-rich white blood cells (which he called nuclein ), its role in the inheritance of traits wasn’t realized until 1943. Miescher thought that the nuclein, which was slightly acidic and contained a high percentage of phosphorus, lacked the variability to account for its hereditary significance for diversity among organisms. Most of the scientists of his period were convinced by the idea that proteins could be promising candidates for heredity as they were abundant, diverse, and complex molecules, while DNA was supposed to be a boring, repetitive polymer. This notion was put forward as the scientists were aware that genetic information was contained within organic molecules.

Table of Contents

Interesting Science Videos

Griffith’s Transformation Experiment

In 1928, a young scientist Frederick Griffith discovered the transforming principle. In 1918, millions of people were killed by the terrible Spanish influenza epidemic, and pneumococcal infections were a common cause of death among influenza-infected patients. This triggered him to study the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae and work on designing a vaccine against it . It became evident that bacterial pneumonia was caused by multiple strains of S. pneumoniae, and patients developed antibodies against the particular strain with which they were infected. Hence, serum samples and bacterial isolates used in experiments helped to identify DNA as the hereditary material. 

He used two related strains of S. pneumoniae and mice and conducted a series of experiments using them. 

• When type II R-strain bacteria were grown on a culture plate, they produced rough colonies. They were non-virulent as they lacked an outer polysaccharide coat. Thus, when RII strain bacteria were injected into a mouse, they did not cause any disease and survived.
• When type I S-strain bacteria were grown on a culture plate, they produced smooth, glistening, and white colonies. The smooth appearance was apparent due to a polysaccharide coat around them that provided resistance to the host’s immune system. It was virulent and thus, when injected into a mouse, resulted in pneumonia and death. 
• In 1929, Griffith experimented by injecting mice with heat-killed SI strain (i.e., SI strain bacteria exposed to high temperature ensuing their death). But, this failed to harm the mice, and they survived.
• Surprisingly, when he mixed heat-treated SI cells with live RII cells and injected the mixture into the mice, the mice died because of pneumonia. Additionally, when he collected a blood sample from the dead mouse, he found that sample to contain live S-strain bacteria.

Conclusion of Griffith’s Transformation Experiment

Based on the above results, he inferred that something must have been transferred from the heat-treated S strain into non-virulent R strain bacteria that transformed them into smooth coated and virulent bacteria. Thus, the material was referred to as the transforming principle.

Following this, he continued with his research through the 1930s, although he couldn’t make much progress. In 1941, he was hit by a German bomb, and he died.

Avery, McCarty, and MacLeod Experiment

During World War II, in 1943, Oswald Avery, Maclyn McCarty, and Colin MacLeod working at Rockefeller University in New York, dedicated themselves to continuing the work of Griffith in order to determine the biochemical nature of Griffith’s transforming principle in an in vitro system. They used the phenotype of S. pneumoniae cells expressed on blood agar in order to figure out whether transformation had taken place or not, rather than working with mice. The transforming principle was partially purified from the cell extract (i.e., cell-free extract of heat-killed type III S cells) to determine which macromolecule of S cell transformed type II R-strain into the type III S-strain. They demonstrated DNA to be that particular transforming principle.

• Initially, type III S cells were heat-killed, and lipids and carbohydrates were removed from the solution.
• Secondly, they treated heat-killed S cells with digestive enzymes such as RNases and proteases to degrade RNA and proteins. Subsequently, they also treated it with DNases to digest DNA, each added separately in different tubes.
• Eventually, they introduced living type IIR cells mixed with heat-killed IIIS cells onto the culture medium containing antibodies for IIR cells. Antibodies for IIR cells were used to inactivate some IIR cells such that their number doesn’t exceed the count of IIIS cells. that help to provide the distinct phenotypic differences in culture media that contained transformed S strain bacteria.

Observation of Avery, McCarty, and MacLeod Experiment

The culture treated with DNase did not yield transformed type III S strain bacteria which indicated that DNA was the hereditary material responsible for transformation. 

Conclusion of Avery, McCarty, and MacLeod Experiment

DNA was found to be the genetic material that was being transferred between cells, not proteins.

Hershey and Chase Experiment

Although Avery and his fellows found that DNA was the hereditary material, the scientists were reluctant to accept the finding. But, not that long afterward, eight years after in 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase concluded that DNA is the genetic material. Their experimental tool was bacteriophages-viruses that attack bacteria which specifically involved the infection of Escherichia coli with T2 bacteriophage.

T2 virus depends on the host body for its reproduction process. When they find bacteria as a host cell, they adhere to its surface and inject its genetic material into the bacteria. The injected hereditary material hijacks the host’s machinery such that a large number of viral particles are released from them. T2 phage consists of only proteins (on the outer protein coat) and DNA (core) that could be potential genetic material to instruct E. coli to develop its progeny. They experimented to determine whether protein or DNA from the virus entered into the bacteria.

• Bacteriophage was allowed to grow on two of the medium: one containing a radioactive isotope of phosphorus( 32 P) and the other containing a radioactive isotope of sulfur ( 35 S).
• Phages grown on radioactive phosphorus( 32 P) contained radioactive P labeled DNA (not radioactive protein) as DNA contains phosphorus but not sulfur.
• Similarly, the viruses grown in the medium containing radioactive sulfur ( 35 S) contained radioactive 35 S labeled protein (but not radioactive DNA) because sulfur is found in many proteins but is absent from DNA.
• E. coli were introduced to be infected by the radioactive phages.
• After the progression of infection, the blender was used to remove the remains of phage and phage parts from the outside of the bacteria, followed by centrifugation in order to separate the bacteria from the phage debris.
• Centrifugation results in the settling down of heavier particles like bacteria in the form of pellet while those light particles such as medium, phage, and phage parts, etc., float near the top of the tube, called supernatant.

Observation of Hershey and Chase Experiment

On measuring radioactivity in the pellet and supernatant in both media, 32 P was found in large amount in the pellet while 35 S in the supernatant that is pellet contained radioactively P labeled infected bacterial cells and supernatant was enriched with radioactively S labeled phage and phage parts.

Conclusion of Hershey and Chase Experiment

Hershey and Chase deduced that it was DNA, not protein which got injected into host cells, and thus, DNA is the hereditary material that is passed from virus to bacteria.

• Fry, M. (2016). Landmark Experiments in Molecular Biology. Academic Press.
• https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_and_General_Biology/Book%3A_Introductory_Biology_(CK-12)/04%3A_Molecular_Biology/4.02%3A_DNA_the_Genetic_Material
• https://byjus.com/biology/dna-genetic-material/
• https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Genetics/Book%3A_Online_Open_Genetics_(Nickle_and_Barrette-Ng)/01%3A_Overview_DNA_and_Genes/1.02%3A_DNA_is_the_Genetic_Material
• https://www.toppr.com/guides/biology/the-molecular-basis-of-inheritance/the-genetic-material/
• https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/discovery-of-dna-as-the-hereditary-material-340/
• https://www.biologydiscussion.com/genetics/dna-as-a-genetic-material-biology/56216
• https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/discovery-of-the-function-of-dna-resulted-6494318/
• https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~mcclean/plsc411/DNA%20replication%20sequencing%20revision%202017.pdf
• https://www.britannica.com/biography/Frederick-Griffith
• https://ib.bioninja.com.au/higher-level/topic-7-nucleic-acids/71-dna-structure-and-replic/dna-experiments.html
• https://biolearnspot.blogspot.com/2017/11/experiments-of-avery-macleod-and.html
• https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/dna-as-the-genetic-material/dna-discovery-and-structure/a/classic-experiments-dna-as-the-genetic-material

About Author

Prakriti Karki

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

INTRODUCTION

In 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase published a convincing demonstration that DNA (not protein) was the genetic material. The Hershey–Chase experiment was carried out with a virus, called bacteriophage T2, that infects bacteria. Bacteriophage T2 consists of little more than a DNA core packed inside a protein coat. Thus, the virus is made of the two materials that were, at the time, the leading candidates for the genetic material.

In addition to the experiment described in this tutorial, Hershey and Chase performed similar but longer-term experiments, allowing the progeny (offspring) generation of viruses to reproduce in unlabeled bacteria. The resulting viruses contained almost no 35 S and none of the parental viral protein. They did, however, contain about one-third of the original 32 P—and thus, presumably, one-third of the original DNA. Because DNA was carried over in the viruses from generation to generation but protein was not, the logical conclusion was that the hereditary information was contained in the DNA.

View all the text for this animation

Textbook Reference: Concept 9.2 DNA Replicates Semiconservatively

In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.

How Did Scientists Prove That DNA Is Our Genetic Material?

Griffith experiment, avery, macleod and mccarty experiment, hershey and chase experiment.

Three seminal experiments proved, without doubt, that DNA was the genetic material, and not proteins. These experiments were the Griffith experiment, Avery, MacLeod, and McCarthy Experiment, and finally the Hershey-Chase Experiment.

DNA is the fundamental component of our being. The human body is merely the carrier for this genetic material, passing it down from generation to generation. Our purpose is to ensure the survival of the species. Humans are to DNA like a fruit is to a seed. We are just an outer covering to ensure the safe passage and protection of the source code of our existence through time. Makes you feel pretty useless, doesn’t it?

However, that’s not what I want you to focus on. The main focus is, how did we discover that DNA is the carrier of information? How did we determine that it wasn’t something else, like proteins? After all, proteins are also present in every cell.

For a long time this debate had been going on. Even after Gregor Mendel formed the 3 laws of inheritance , it wasn’t accepted by the scientific community for 45 years. The reason? There was no concept of DNA or genes being the information carriers! The whole debate was finally put to rest by 3 main experiments carried out by independent researchers, which formed the basis of all our evolutionary and molecular biology studies.

Recommended Video for you:

The first step was taken by Frederick Griffith in the year 1928. He was a bacteriologist who focused on epidemiology.  Griffith was studying how Streptococcus pneumoniae caused an infection. He was working with 2 strains of the bacteria called the S and R strains. S strain organisms, when cultured in the lab, gave rise to bacterial colonies with a smooth appearance. This was due to a shiny, polysaccharide coat, which is supposed to be their virulence factor. A virulence factor is any quality or factor of a pathogen that helps it in achieving its goal – causing a disease! The other strain was the R strain. This strain gave rise to colonies that didn’t possess the polysaccharide coat, and therefore had a ‘rough’ appearance. Therefore, the S strain was virulent and the R strain was avirulent.

Griffith took 4 mice and injected them with different solutions. The first one was injected with the S strain organisms; the second one was injected with the R strain organisms; the third mouse was injected with heat-killed S strain organisms; and the last one was injected with a mixture of heat-killed S strain and live R strain organisms. The result? The first and fourth mice died due to the infection, while the second and third mice survived. When he extracted the infectious agent from the dead mice, in both cases, he found S strain organisms.

Let’s break it down. The first 2 mice showed that S strain is the virulent strain, while the R strain is avirulent. The third mouse proved that heat-killed S strain organisms cannot cause an infection. Now here is where it gets interesting. The death of the 4 th mouse, and the retrieval of live S strain organisms showed that, somehow, the heat-killed S strain organisms had caused the transformation of live R strain organisms to live S strain organisms.

This was called the transformation experiment… not particularly creative in the naming department.

Also Read: Does Human DNA Change With Time?

While Griffith’s experiment had provided a surprising result, it wasn’t clear as to what component of the dead S strain bacteria were responsible for the transformation. 16 years later, in 1944, Oswald Avery, Colin Macleod and MacLynn McCarty solved this puzzle.

They worked with a batch of heat-killed S strain bacteria. They divided it into 5 batches. In the first batch, they destroyed the polysaccharide coat of the bacteria; in the second batch they destroyed its lipid content; they destroyed the RNA of the bacteria in the third batch; with the fourth batch, they destroyed the proteins; and in the last batch, they destroyed the DNA. Each of these batches was individually mixed with live R strain bacteria and injected into individual mice.

From all 5 mice, all of them died except the last mouse. From all the dead mice, live S strain bacteria was retrieved. This experiment clearly proved that when the DNA of the S strain bacteria were destroyed, they lost the ability to transform the R strain bacteria into live S strain ones. When other components, such as the polysaccharide coat, lipid, RNA or protein were destroyed, transformation still took place. Although the polysaccharide coat was a virulent factor, it wasn’t responsible for the transfer of the genetic matter.

Even after the compelling evidence provided by the Avery, Macleod and McCarty experiment, there were still a few skeptics out there who weren’t convinced. The debate still raged between proteins and DNA. However, the Hershey – Chase experiment permanently put an end to this long-standing debate.

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase in 1952, performed an experiment that proved, without a doubt, that DNA was the carrier of information. For their experiment, they employed the use of the bacteriophage T2. A bacteriophage is a virus that only infects bacteria. This particular virus infects Escherichia coli . T2 had a simple structure that consisted of just 2 components – an outer protein casing and the inner DNA. Hershey and Chase took 2 different samples of T2. They grew one sample with 32 P, which is the radioactive isotope of phosphorus, and the other sample was grown with 35 S, the radioactive isotope of sulphur!

The protein coat has sulphur and no phosphorus, while the DNA material has phosphorus but no sulphur. Thus, the 2 samples were labelled with 2 different radioactive isotopes.

The viruses were then allowed to infect the E. coli . Once the infection was done, the experimental solution was subjected to blending and centrifugation. The former removed the ghost shells, or empty shells of the virus from the body of the bacteria. The latter separated the bacteria from everything else. The bacterial solution and the supernatant were then checked for their radioactivity .

In the first sample, where 32 P was used, the bacterial solution showed radioactivity, whereas the supernatant barely had any radioactivity. In the sample where 35 S was used, the bacterial solution didn’t show any radioactivity, but the supernatant did.

This experiment clearly showed that DNA was transferred from the phage to the bacteria, thus establishing its place as the fundamental carrier of genetic information.

Until the final experiment performed by Hershey and Chase, DNA was thought to be a rather simple and boring molecule. It wasn’t considered structured enough to perform such a complicated and extremely important function. However, after this experiment, scientists started paying much more attention to DNA, leading us to where we are in research today!

Also Read: A History Of DNA: Who Discovered DNA?

• How was DNA shown to be the genetic material?. The University of Texas at Austin
• The Genetic Material - DNA - CSUN. California State University, Northridge
• Home - Books - NCBI. National Center for Biotechnology Information

Mahak Jalan has a BSc degree in Zoology from Mumbai University in India. She loves animals, books and biology. She has a general assumption that everyone shares her enthusiasm about the human body! An introvert by nature, she finds solace in music and writing.

What Is DNA And How Does It Work?

Where Did Viruses Come From?

What Does RNA Do In A Cell?

Chromatin: Structure And Function Within A Cell

Is 98% Of Our DNA Really Junk?

Mendel’s Laws Of Inheritance: The Law Of Segregation

Why Do Some People Look More Like Their Grandparents Than Their Parents?

Photosynthesis: The Biochemistry Behind How Plants Make Their Food

What are Mutations and what are the different types of Mutations?

What are GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms)?

What is Evolution: A REALLY SIMPLE and Brief Explanation

Can We Bring Back Dinosaurs (Just Like In Jurassic Park)?

• Biotechnology
• Biochemistry
• Microbiology
• Cell Biology
• Cell Signaling
• Diversity in Life Form
• Molecular Biology
• DNA as Genetic Material - Hershey And Chase Experiment
• Griffith Experiment - Transformation in Bacteria, DNA as Genetic Material
• How do the Traits and Characters get expressed?
• Genetic Code and Mutations
• Search For Genetic Material - Molecular Basis Of Inheritance
• JP Morgan Chase and Co Interview Experience
• JP Morgan Chase Internship Experience 2019 (On Campus)
• JPMorgan Chase & Co. Interview Experience (On-Campus)
• JP Morgan Chase Interview Experience
• JP Morgan Chase & Co. Internship Interview Experience (On-Campus 2020)
• JP Morgan Chase & Co. Interview Experience (On-Campus) 2022
• JP Morgan Chase & Co Interview Experience | Set 3 (Internship)
• JP Morgan Chase & Co. Interview Experience (Off-Campus Internship drive 2020)
• JPMorgan Chase Code For Good Interview Experience 2021
• JP Morgan and Chase Interview Experience | On-Campus for Software Developer Profile
• Walmart Interview Experience Aug-2020 (On-Campus)
• Samsung R&D Bangalore Interview Experience for Internship 2021 (On-Campus)
• Amazon Interview Experience | Set 311 ( On Campus for Internship and FTE)
• JP Morgan Chase Interview Experience for Software Engineer 2021

DNA as Genetic Material – Hershey And Chase Experiment

The Hershey and Chase Experiment , conducted in 1952 by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase, demonstrated that DNA contains genetic information. They accomplished this by investigating viruses that infect bacteria, known as bacteriophages. In these tests, scientists labelled the virus’s DNA with a radioactive marker while labelling the protein coat independently with another marker.

When the viruses infected bacteria, researchers discovered that only the DNA identifier, not the protein marker, was passed along to the next generation of viruses. This helped to demonstrate that DNA, not protein, is the molecule that conveys genetic instructions. We will read about the Hershey and Chase Experiment in detail in this article.

Table of Content

Hershey and Chase Experiment

Dna as genetic material, what is the pulse and chase experiment, conclusion -dna as genetic material: hershey and chase experiment.

• FAQs on DNA As Genetic Material – Hershey And Chase Experiment

In 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase investigated bacteriophage, a virus that destroys bacteria . Their research focused on T2 bacteriophage that infects the bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli). Their goal was to determine whether the T2 phage’s genetic instructions or information required for life, were stored in its DNA or protein coat. They wanted to show that the DNA, not the protein , contained this important genetic information.

There were three steps in the experiment:

• Centrifugation

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase used two forms of radioactive material, phosphorus-32 (32P) and sulfur-35 (35S), to designate the bacteriophages differently. Phosphorus is a component of DNA, the genetic material, whereas sulphur is present in proteins but not DNA.

They inserted these radioactive isotopes into the bacteriophages DNA (genetic material) and protein coat (capsid) separately. This enabled them to determine which parts of the virus entered the bacterial cell during infection. They then allowed the labelled viruses to infect E. coli bacterial cells.

Hershey and Chase Experiment Diagram

Following a brief time of infection, they mixed the liquid to separate the viral protein coatings from the bacteria. This blending phase ensured that any viral proteins that were not bound to bacterial cells were eliminated. They next centrifuged the mixture, causing the heavier bacterial cells to sink at the bottom of the tube while the lighter viral protein coatings (if present) remained in the liquid above, known as the supernatant.

The results demonstrated that bacterial cells infected with phages labelled with phosphorus-32 (32P) exhibited radioactivity. This suggested that the phages’ DNA entered the cells during infection. In contrast, bacterial cells infected with phages labelled with sulfur-35 (35S) exhibited little to no radioactivity, indicating that the phages’ protein coat (also known as capsid) did not enter the cells.

Based on these findings, Hershey and Chase concluded that DNA, rather than protein, serves as the genetic material transmitting bacteriophages’ hereditary information. This experiment offered solid proof that DNA is the chemical responsible for conveying genetic information in living beings.

Scientists discovered that DNA is the primary factor in defining the characteristics of most living organisms . However, some viruses use RNA instead. So, for something to be genetic material, it must:

• Be able to create clones of itself (self replicable).
• Be stable structurally and chemicaly.
• Allow for mutations, which can lead to evolution.
• Be able to pass on traits according to Mendel’s inheritance principles.

Most other compounds, such as proteins, carbohydrates , and lipids, did not meet the previously listed criteria. While RNA could meet those requirements, DNA was favoured over RNA for genetic material for a number of reasons:

• DNA has more structural stability than RNA.
• DNA has higher chemical stability than RNA.
• DNA has a double-stranded structure that allows it to effectively repair replication faults.
• RNA is required for protein production because DNA cannot directly code for them.

Approximate content of DNA in few organisms is given below:

Pulse-Chase Analysis is similar to a time-lapse camera for investigating what happens inside cells . In this procedure, cells are first exposed to a labelled chemical (the “pulse”) that identifies certain molecules. Then they are given an unlabeled chemical (the “chase”) to observe what occurs. This allows scientists to track how molecules migrate and change over time.

Researchers have utilised this method to analyse a variety of proteins, including protein kinase C and ubiquitin, as well as to better understand processes such as Okazaki fragment production during DNA replication. For example, George Palade used pulse-chase with radioactive amino acids to study how cells release chemicals.

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted to confirm DNA as the genetic substance. The Hershey-Chase investigations was crucial then as at that time many scientists believed that proteins contained genetic information rather than DNA. Hershey and Chase discovered that when viruses called bacteriophages infect bacteria, a small amount of their protein enters the bacterial cell. This suggested that DNA, not protein, was responsible for carrying genetic instructions. These findings, coupled with previous and subsequent discoveries, strongly showed that DNA was the genetic material. Later they received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their contributions to genetics.

Also Read: Search For Genetic Material – Molecular Basis Of Inheritance DNA Replication Difference Between Gene and DNA

FAQs on DNA as Genetic Material – Hershey And Chase Experiment

What are the 3 steps of hershey and chase experiment.

Hershey and Chase carried their experiment in three steps : infection, blending, centrifugation.

What was the Hershey and Chase Experiment Class 12?

The Hershey and Chase experiment, conducted in 1952 by Martha Chase and Alfred Hershey, demonstrated that DNA, rather than protein, is the genetic material of viruses. They used bacteriophages to track the transmission of genetic information.

How did the Hershey and Chase Experiment Work?

In the experiment, bacteriophages were labeled with radioactive isotopes: sulfur-35 for proteins and phosphorus-32 for DNA. The phages were allowed to infect bacterial cells. After infection, the phage protein coats were removed by agitating the mixture in a blender, separating them from the bacterial cells.

What is the Principle of Hershey and Chase Experiment?

Hershey and Chase experiment proving DNA as the genetic material was based on the principle Transduction which is the process by which DNA is transferred from one bacterium to another by a virus.

Why was the Hershey and Chase Experiment Significant?

The Hershey and Chase experiment provided crucial evidence supporting the idea that DNA carries genetic information. This discovery was instrumental in shaping our understanding of genetics and laid the foundation for subsequent research in molecular biology, including the elucidation of the structure of DNA by Watson and Crick.

Is DNA the only Genetic Material?

There are three types of genetic materials: DNA, RNA, and genes.

Why was E.coli used in Hershey and Chase Experiment?

E. coli was used in the Hershey and Chase Experiment because it is easily grown and reproduces quickly, making it ideal for genetic research.

What Virus did Chase and Hershey Study?

Chase and Hershey studied the T2 bacteriophage virus in their experiment.

What was the Radioactive in the Hershey and Chase Experiment?

They used radioactive sulfur (S35) to label protein and radioactive phosphorus (P32) to label DNA.

What was the Conclusion of Hershey and Chase Experiment?

The conclusion of Hershey and Chase experiment was that DNA and not protein is the genetic material passed from viruses to bacteria.

How did Hershey and Chase Modify the Virus?

Hershey and Chase modified the virus by labeling its DNA with radioactive phosphorus to track its transmission into bacterial cells.

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• School Biology
• School Learning

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Hershey and Chase Experiment

Hershey and Chase experiment give practical evidence in the year 1952 of DNA as genetic material using radioactive bacteriophage . Griffith also explained the transformation in bacteria and concluded that the protein factor imparts virulence to the rough strain, but it was not proved to be genetic material.

Avery , Macleod and McCarthy further studied the Griffith experiment and concluded that the DNA was the genetic material responsible for transforming the avirulent rough strain to the virulent strain. To resolve the query of genetic material, many researchers were engaged to know whether the cause of inheritance is protein or DNA.

Many assessments then led to the discovery of “ DNA ” as genetic material or the cause of inheritance . One of the best experiments that provide DNA evidence as genetic material is the “ Hershey and Chase experiment ”. We will study the definition, steps (radioactive labelling, infection, blending and centrifugation) and observation of the Hershey and Chase experiment in this context.

Content: Hershey and Chase Experiment

Radioactive labelling of bacteriophage, centrifugation, observation, definition of hershey and chase experiment.

Hershey and Chase’s experiment has demonstrated the DNA is the genetic material where they have taken the radioactive T2-bacteriophage (Viruses that infect E.coli bacteria). T2-bacteriophage or Enterobacteria phage T2 belongs to the Group-I bacteriophage.

Video: Hershey and Chase Experiment

Hershey and Chase Experiment Steps

Hershey and Chase gave full evidence of the DNA being a genetic material by their experiments. To perform the experiment, Hershey and Chase have taken T-2 bacteriophages (invaders of E.coli bacteria). The experiment includes the following steps:

Hershey and Chase have grown T-2 bacteriophages in the two batches. In batch-1, we need to grow the bacteriophages in the medium containing radioactive sulphur (S 35 ) and radioactive phosphorus (P 32 )  in batch-2. After incubation, we could see that the radioactive sulphur (S 35 ) will tag the phage protein. The radioactive phosphorus (P 32 ) will tag the phage DNA.

After radioactive labelling of the phage DNA and protein, Hershey and Chase infected the bacteria, i.e. E.coli by using the radioactively labelled T-2 phage. In batch-1, T-2 phage tagged with S 35 and in batch-2 T-2 phage labelled with P 32 were allowed to infect the bacterial cells of E.coli .

After the attachment of  T-2 bacteriophage to the E.coli , the phage DNA will enter the cytoplasm of E.coli . The phage DNA will take up the host cell machinery. Degradation of the bacterial genome occurs by the T2-phages where they use the ribosomes to form structural proteins of the capsid, tail fibres, base plate etc.

At the time of blending or agitation, the bacterial cells are agitated to remove the viral coats . As a result of the agitation, we get a solution containing bacterial cells and viral particles like capsid, tail fibres, base plate, DNA etc.

After the centrifugation, we could observe the results to identify the heritable factor . The phage DNA labelled with P 32  will transfer the radioactivity in the host cell. Thus, the radioactive P 32  enters a bacterial cell and exists in the form of “Pellets”. The phage protein tagged with S 35 will not transfer its radioactivity in the host cell. As a result, radioactive S 35 will appear in the form of  “Supernatant” in the solution.

The P 32 labelled phage DNA will transfer its radioactivity to the host cell DNA, while S 35 labelled phage protein will not do so. The P 32 labelled phage DNA will remain inside the E.coli cell even after blending and centrifugation. According to the Hershey and Chase experiment, we can conclude that the DNA is the genetic material because the P 32 tagged T2-phage DNA will transfer the radioactivity to the host cell ( E.coli ) not the S 35 labelled T2-phage protein.

Related Topics:

• Citrus Canker Disease
• Microbial Food Spoilage
• Acetic Acid Production
• Activated Sludge Treatment

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start typing and press enter to search

• Biology Article
• Dna Genetic Material

DNA As Genetic Material - Hershey And Chase Experiment

Even though researchers discovered that the factor responsible for the inheritance of traits comes from within the organisms; they failed to identify the hereditary material. The chromosomal components were isolated but the material which is responsible for inheritance remained unanswered. Griffith’s experiment was a stepping stone for the discovery of genetic material. It took a long time for the acceptance of DNA as genetic material. Let’s go through the discovery of DNA as genetic material.

Experiments of Hershey and Chase

We know about Griffith’s experiment and experiments that followed to discover the hereditary material in organisms. Based on Griffith’s experiment, Avery and his team isolated DNA and proved DNA to be the genetic material. But it was not accepted by all until Hershey and Chase published their experimental results.

In 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase took an effort to find the genetic material in organisms.  Their experiments led to an unequivocal proof to DNA as genetic material. Bacteriophages (viruses that affect bacteria) were the key element for Hershey and Chase experiment.

The virus doesn’t have their own mechanism of reproduction but they depend on a host for the same. Once they attach to the host cell, their genetic material is transferred to the host. Here in case of bacteriophages, bacteria are their host. The infected bacteria are manipulated by the bacteriophages such that bacterial cells start to replicate the viral genetic material. Hershey and Chase conducted an experiment to discover whether it was protein or DNA that acted as the genetic material that entered the bacteria.

DNA as Genetic Material

Experiment: The experiment began with the culturing of viruses in two types of medium. One set of viruses (A) was cultured in a medium of radioactive phosphorus whereas another set (B) was cultured in a medium of radioactive sulfur. They observed that the first set of viruses (A) consisted of radioactive DNA but not radioactive proteins . This is because DNA is a phosphorus-based compound while protein is not. The latter set of viruses (B) consisted of radioactive protein but not radioactive DNA.

The host for infection was E.coli bacteria. The viruses were allowed to infect bacteria by removing the viral coats through a number of blending and centrifugation.

Observation:  E.coli bacteria which were infected by radioactive DNA viruses (A) were radioactive but the ones that were infected by radioactive protein viruses (B) were non-radioactive.

Conclusion: Resultant radioactive and non-radioactive bacteria infer that the viruses that had radioactive DNA transferred their DNA to the bacteria but viruses that had radioactive protein didn’t get transferred to the bacteria. Hence, DNA is the genetic material and not the protein.

For more video lessons on DNA as genetic material, visit  BYJU’S.

Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!

Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz

Visit BYJU’S for all Biology related queries and study materials

Your result is as below

Request OTP on Voice Call

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post My Comment

Byju’s is best

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

Register with byju's & watch live videos.

• The Hershey-Chase Experiments (1952), by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase
• Hershey-Chase Experiments

In 1951 and 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted a series of experiments at the Carnegie Institute of Washington in Cold Spring Harbor, New York, that verified genes were made of deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA. Hershey and Chase performed …

In 1951 and 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted a series of experiments at the Carnegie Institute of Washington in Cold Spring Harbor, New York, that verified genes were made of deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA. Hershey and Chase performed their experiments, later named the Hershey-Chase experiments, on viruses that infect bacteria, also called bacteriophages. The experiments followed decades of scientists’ skepticism about whether genetic material was composed of protein or DNA. The most well-known Hershey-Chase experiment, called the Waring Blender experiment, provided concrete evidence that genes were made of DNA. The Hershey-Chase experiments settled the long-standing debate about the composition of genes, thereby allowing scientists to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which genes function in organisms.

• Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
• Hernandez, Victoria (Author)
• Dhein, Kelle (Editor)
• Arizona State University. School of Life Sciences. Center for Biology and Society. Embryo Project Encyclopedia. (Publisher)
• Arizona Board of Regents (Publisher)
• Bacteriophages
• Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
• Protein Precursors
• Amino Acid Sequence
• Messenger RNA
• Escherichia coli
• Information storage and retrieval systems--Nucleotide sequence
• Nucleotide sequence
• Experiments
• Meselson, Matthew
• Hershey, A. D. (Alfred Day), 1908-
• Carnegie Institute
• Hershey-Chase experiments

View full metadata

Machine-readable links

• OAI Dublin Core

Quick actions

Alfred D. Hershey, Ph.D.

 Brief Bio

Alfred Day Hershey was born on December 4, 1908, in Owosso, Michigan. He attended Michigan State College, where he earned his B.S. in 1930 and his Ph.D. in bacteriology in 1934. His doctoral dissertation examined the chemical makeup of  Brucella , the bacterium responsible for brucellosis. After completing his degree, Hershey accepted a position as an instructor of bacteriology and immunology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, where he worked closely with department head Jacques Bronfenbrenner (AAI '20, president 1942–46). Since the early 1920s, Bronfenbrenner had focused his research on the physical and lysogenic properties of bacteriophages, and he encouraged his new faculty member to begin studying the viruses. During the late 1930s, Hershey and Bronfenbrenner studied the growth of bacterial cultures, but his own experiments in the early 1940s focused on the phage-antiphage immunologic reaction and other factors that influenced phage infectivity. Looking back over them 60 years later, Stahl wrote that these studies "appear original, thoughtful, and quantitative, especially those on the use of phage inactivation to permit the study of the antigen-antibody reaction at 'infinite' dilution of antigen."

In late January 1943, Delbrück invited Hershey to Nashville to discuss his phage experiments with him and his close friend Luria. Together, the three formed the nucleus of the "phage group," an informal network of the growing number of scientists devoted to studying the bacteriophage. In 1946, Hershey and Delbrück, working independently, found that different strains of bacteriophage can exchange genetic material when both have infected the same bacterial cell, creating a bacteriophage that is a hybrid of the two, a process Hershey referred to as genetic recombination. By the mid-1940s, Hershey's research with bacteriophage began to shift away from immunology to genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology.

In 1950, Hershey became a staff member in the Department of Genetics of the Carnegie Institution of Washington at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island. It was here that he and Chase conducted the blender experiment. In 1962, Hershey was named head of the Genetics Research Unit at Cold Spring Harbor, a position he held until his retirement in 1972.

Hershey died on May 22, 1997, in Syosset, New York, at the age of 88.

 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

 lasker award,  aai service history,  nobel prize in science.

Alfred D. Hershey was awarded the 1969 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine jointly with Max Delbrück and Salvador E. Luria (AAI '58) for "their discoveries concerning the replication mechanism and the genetic structure of viruses." As leading figures in the study of viruses that infect bacteria, known as bacteriophage, Hershey, Delbrück, and Luria pioneered the fields of microbiology and genetics. Hershey's unique contribution was the discovery that DNA, and not protein, was the genetic material in bacteriophage, a discovery based on evidence from the legendary "blender experiment" undertaken with Martha Chase in 1952.

Bacteriophages were known to be comprised of DNA and protein, and Hershey wanted to determine which of these components was the heritable material passed on to bacteria to form bacteriophage progeny. To trace each of these components separately, Hershey and Chase first prepared one batch of bacteriophage with radioactive phosphorus to label DNA and another with radioactive sulfur to label protein. They then infected different bacterial batches with each of these labeled bacteriophages. Using a Waring blender to shear off the surface-attached bacteriophage from infected bacteria, they were able to analyze the radioactive content of the bacteria and identify the transferred genetic material.

Infected bacteria contained radioactive phosphorus and were also capable of producing bacteriophage progeny, whereas radioactive sulfur was not associated with the bacterial DNA. These results indicated that DNA was transferred from the bacteriophage to the bacteria and that the genetic material in bacteriophage is DNA. These observations enabled Hershey and Chase to confirm that DNA, and not protein, contained genetic information.

Hershey next turned his attention to understanding the infection cycle of bacteriophage at a molecular level and was the first to detect a unique nucleic acid fraction that was later identified as messenger RNA. The consummate experimenter, Hershey continued to develop new laboratory methods for handling, fractioning, and measuring DNA. "There is nothing more satisfying to me than developing a method," he once told a colleague. "Ideas come and go, but a method lasts."

Hershey was renowned for his ingenuity in the lab and was praised by molecular biologist and geneticist Franklin W. Stahl, among other titans, for being "fearless" in the laboratory and "impeccable" in analysis. Stahl lauded Hershey for his humility and absence of pretension: "He talked to the reader, explaining things as he saw them, but never letting us forget that he was transmitting provisional understanding. We got no free rides, no revealed truths, no invitation to surrender our own judgment. And we could never skim, since every word was important. I think this style reflected his verbal reticence, which in turn mirrored his modesty."

 Awards and Honors

• Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award , 1958
• Member, National Academy of Sciences, 1958
• Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1959
• Kimber Genetics Award, 1965
• Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine , 1969

 Institutional/Biographical Links

• Nobel Prize biography
• The National Academy of Sciences biographical memoir
• New York Times obituary
• Alfred D. Hershey papers at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
• History Articles
• Oral History
• History of Immunology and Science Timeline
• Nobel Laureates
• Lasker Awardees
• Distinguished Scientific Awards
• AAAS Fellows
• NAS Electees
• In Memoriam
• Past Presidents and Officers
• Past Presidents' Messages
• History Projects

DNA Detectives: The Case of the Radioactive Phosphorus

Once upon a time in the 1950s, there were two clever scientists named Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase. They were like the dynamic duo of science, on a mission to unlock the secrets of life itself. Their quest? To figure out what exactly carries the instructions for life from one generation to the next.

Now, at the time, scientists were hot on the trail of this mystery. They knew there had to be something special inside cells that carried these instructions, but they weren't quite sure what it was. Some thought it might be proteins, while others believed it could be DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid).

Alfred and Martha decided to put on their detective hats and conduct an experiment to crack the case once and for all. They chose to work with a type of virus called a bacteriophage, which infects bacteria. These sneaky viruses inject their genetic material into bacteria, hijacking them to make more virus particles.

First, Alfred and Martha labeled the viral DNA with radioactive phosphorus-32 (P-32). Why radioactive? Well, it's like putting a tracking device on the DNA, allowing them to follow its every move. Next, they labeled the protein coat of the virus with radioactive sulfur-35 (S-35). With these clever labels in place, they were ready to set their experiment in motion.

They let the viruses infect the bacteria, and then came the moment of truth. Alfred and Martha knew that if DNA was the hereditary material, then the radioactive P-32 would end up inside the bacteria, carrying the genetic instructions. But if it was the proteins, then the radioactive S-35 would be the ones smuggled into the bacteria.

They got to work, spinning the infected bacteria in a blender (yes, you read that right, a blender!) to separate the virus particles from the bacteria. Then, they checked to see which radioactive label ended up inside the bacteria.

Drumroll, please... the results were clear! It was the radioactive P-32, indicating that the DNA, not the proteins, carried the genetic instructions. Hershey and Chase had cracked the case wide open!

Their groundbreaking experiment provided solid evidence that DNA is indeed the hereditary material, laying the foundation for our modern understanding of genetics and DNA. Their work paved the way for countless discoveries in biology and medicine, making them true heroes in the world of science.

And so, the dynamic duo of Hershey and Chase rode off into the scientific sunset, their experiment forever etched in the annals of history as one of the greatest discoveries of all time.

• What were Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase trying to discover?
• What did Alfred and Martha label the viral DNA with, and why?
• How did they label the protein coat of the virus?
• What did Alfred and Martha hope to determine with their experiment?
• Describe the process Alfred and Martha used to separate the virus particles from the bacteria.
• What were the results of their experiment, and what did it indicate about the hereditary material?

The Hershey Chase Experiment - CER

Image Source: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OSC_Microbio_10_01_HersheyChase.jpg

7. What CLAIM can be made from the experiment?

8. What EVIDENCE supports the claim?

9. Provide REASONING that connects the evidence to the claim. Consider wording your statement in an IF-THEN format.

Related Materials

Quiz: DNA Dectectives - The Hershey Chase Experiment

Quiz: Viruses

The Historical Background of the Discovery of DNA

DNA Coloring

Bacteriophage T4 Plush Toy

Post comment

or continue as guest

• Bahasa Indonesia
• Eastern Europe
• Moscow Oblast

Elektrostal

Elektrostal Localisation : Country Russia , Oblast Moscow Oblast . Available Information : Geographical coordinates , Population, Altitude, Area, Weather and Hotel . Nearby cities and villages : Noginsk , Pavlovsky Posad and Staraya Kupavna .

Information

Find all the information of Elektrostal or click on the section of your choice in the left menu.

• Update data

Elektrostal Demography

Information on the people and the population of Elektrostal.

Elektrostal Geography

Geographic Information regarding City of Elektrostal .

Elektrostal Distance

Distance (in kilometers) between Elektrostal and the biggest cities of Russia.

Elektrostal Map

Locate simply the city of Elektrostal through the card, map and satellite image of the city.

Elektrostal Nearby cities and villages

Elektrostal Weather

Weather forecast for the next coming days and current time of Elektrostal.

Elektrostal Sunrise and sunset

Find below the times of sunrise and sunset calculated 7 days to Elektrostal.

Elektrostal Hotel

Our team has selected for you a list of hotel in Elektrostal classified by value for money. Book your hotel room at the best price.

Elektrostal Nearby

Below is a list of activities and point of interest in Elektrostal and its surroundings.

Elektrostal Page

• Information /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#info
• Demography /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#demo
• Geography /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#geo
• Distance /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#dist1
• Map /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#map
• Nearby cities and villages /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#dist2
• Weather /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#weather
• Sunrise and sunset /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#sun
• Hotel /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#hotel
• Nearby /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#around
• Page /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#page
• Terms of Use
• Copyright © 2024 DB-City - All rights reserved
• Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data

• Moscow Oblast
•  » 
• Elektrostal

State Housing Inspectorate of the Moscow Region

Phone 8 (496) 575-02-20 8 (496) 575-02-20

Phone 8 (496) 511-20-80 8 (496) 511-20-80

Public administration near State Housing Inspectorate of the Moscow Region