research titles in education in tanzania

Transforming Tanzania's Education Landscape

On November 24, 2023, a significant meeting transpired between the Heads of Agencies and Cooperations of the Education Development Partners Group (EdDPG) in Tanzania Mainland and the esteemed Hon. Prof. Adolf Mkenda, Minister for Education, Science and Technology, alongside high-level officials from the Ministry. The primary focus of this gathering was to address pivotal issues concerning the ongoing reform of the Education Sector in Tanzania Mainland. Since September 2022 UNESCO assumed the chairmanship of the EdDPG, a group of multilateral and bilateral agencies providing support to the Education Sector in Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar. Established in 2001, the primary objective of the EdDPG is to facilitate coordinated interventions and policy dialogue among development partners, aiming to support the Tanzania Education Sector in achieving learning outcomes aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals. 

During his address, Prof. Mkenda conveyed his deep appreciation to the Heads of Agencies and Cooperation for their proactive involvement in education reforms, underscoring his unwavering commitment to enhancing the education landscape in Tanzania. He approved the 2023 version of the National 2014 Education and Training Policy, providing insights into the new education structure and curriculum. Prof. Mkenda highlighted the critical challenge of insufficient teachers, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts to overcome this hurdle in implementing the approved policy. He called for sustained cooperation to ensure increased access to and quality education, leaving no one behind in pursuing educational excellence. UNESCO, UNICEF, SIDA, UNHCR, World Bank, IMF, Belgium Embassy, USAID, KOICA, the Swiss Agency for Development, FCD, Aga Khan Foundation, DVV International, and other Education Development Partners Group members attended the meeting.

On the other hand, the WFP Country Representative in Tanzania, Ms. Sarah Gordon-Gibson, representing the UN Resident Coordinator, emphasized that the UN family in Tanzania stands in solidarity with the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania. This shared commitment is rooted in the United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework (UNSDCF) 2022-2027, reflecting a joint dedication to transforming the Education Sector.

The UN family in Tanzania stands in solidarity with the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania in our shared commitment to transforming the education sector. This commitment is firmly rooted in the UNSDCF 2022-2027, launched by Vice President Phillip Mpango last year, that outlines our collective response to contribute more efficiently and effectively to achieve the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Tanzania. 

Mr. Michel Toto, Head of Office and Country Representative of UNESCO, and the Chair of the EdDPG, acknowledged the Government's positive strides in budget allocation for the education sector over the past few years on behalf of the EdDPG. He reiterated the need to increase the education budget from 18% to the recommended rate of 20% to accelerate improvements in education sector outcomes. Mr. Toto reaffirmed the Education Development Partners Group’s commitment to support Tanzania’s Education Sector reform and development. Furthermore, he highlighted UNESCO's available support through its specialized institutes including the International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP), the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), the International Bureau of Education (IBE), and the International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA).

We commend the Government's efforts in improving and increasing access to the quality of education at all levels. Globally, we are halfway through implementing Sustainable Development Goal 4 on Education, which seeks to ensure sustainable, inclusive, and equitable quality education, promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all. This goal is at the core of our collective mission.

Participants in group photo during the meeting with the Honourable Minister of Education, Science and Technology

Related items

• Priority Africa
• Country page: United Republic of Tanzania
• Region: Africa
• UNESCO Office in Dar es Salaam
• SDG: SDG 4 - Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
• See more add

This article is related to the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals .

More on this subject

Other recent news

• Corpus ID: 219618171

ICT in education in Tanzania

• Published 2007
• Education, Computer Science

Tables from this paper

16 Citations

Viewpoints to ict practices and hindrances from in tanzanian secondary schools and teacher training colleges: focus on classroom teachers, barriers teachers face in integrating ict during english lessons: a case study., teachers' attitudes towards the use of information communication technology (ict) as a pedagogical tool in secondary schools in tanzania: the case of kondoa district, teachers’ perceptions about icts for teaching, professional development, administration and personal use, availability of information and communication technology (ict) facilities in secondary schools, exploring the opportunities for integrating new digital technologies in tanzania’s classrooms.

• Highly Influenced

USE OF ICT IN DISTANCE EDUCATION AT HANYANG CYBER UNIVERSITY: Possible Best practices for the Institute of Adult Education

Laptops-for- pupils project: challenges and opportunities in public primary schools in eldoret municipality, revitalizing education through ict: a short overview of japan's current landscape, a case study: obstructions encumbering the teacher’s incorporation of ict in english classrooms, 2 references, an approach to ict-based school education in tanzania, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Advertisement

Exploring Mathematics Teaching Approaches in Tanzanian Higher Education Institutions: Lecturers’ Perspectives

• Published: 01 February 2023
• Volume 9 , pages 269–294, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

• Mzomwe Yahya Mazana   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-7011 1 , 3 ,
• Calkin Suero Montero   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-7285 2 &
• Lembris Laayuni Njotto 3  

292 Accesses

Explore all metrics

The success of the teaching - learning process in terms of learning outcomes is determined by several factors, primarily the lecturer’s teaching approach used. Despite the importance of the teaching approach, little is known concerning the teaching approaches used by mathematics lecturers in Tanzanian higher education institutions. This study explores the lecturers’ perspectives regarding the teaching approaches they normally use in teaching mathematics, and what motivates their choices, within an emerging economy context. Data are collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 lecturers. Data are analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. The findings reveal that lecturers are more likely to choose teacher-centred approaches and that assurance of the right content , content coverage and time-saving aspects are associated with choosing this approach. These findings provide insights into the current state in mathematics classroom regarding teaching approaches, and the motivation behind lecturers’ teaching approach choices, complementing current findings in the literature. We categorise the teaching approaches for mathematics teaching – learning by describing the interactions between the different actors in the classroom (teachers, students, and content) in order to inform and influence successful mathematics teaching practices in emerging economies such as Tanzania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Impact of the course teaching and learning of mathematics on preservice grades 7 and 8 mathematics teachers in singapore.

Innovative and Powerful Pedagogical Practices in Mathematics Education

Does school teaching experience matter in teaching prospective secondary mathematics teachers? Perspectives of university-based mathematics teacher educators

Altogether there were 25 full time lecturers of business mathematics subject in these three HEIs.

Abdulwahed, M., Jaworski, B., & Crawford, A. R. (2012). Innovative approaches to teaching mathematics in higher education: a review and critique. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education , 17 (2), 49–68.

Google Scholar  

Adunola, O. (2011). The impact of teachers’ teaching methods on the academic performance of Primary School Pupils in Ijebu-Ode local cut area of Ogun State. Ogun State, Nigeria . Nigeria: Ogun State.

Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and Assessment Methods: STEM teachers’ perceptions and implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education , 17 (6), https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10882 . Article em1969.

Andrews, P. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ didactic strategies: examining the comparative potential of low inference generic descriptors. Comparative Education Review , 53 (4), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1086/603583 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Arora, S., Singhai, M., & Patel, R. (2011). Gender & education determinants of individualism—collectivism: a study of future managers. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations , 47 (2), 321–328. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23070579 .

Beausaert, S. A., Segers, M. S., & Wiltink, D. P. (2013). The influence of teachers’ teaching approaches on students’ learning approaches: the student perspective. Educational Research , 55 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.767022 .

Beck, C. R. (1998). A taxonomy for identifying, classifying, and interrelating teaching strategies. The Journal of General Education , 47 (1), 37–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27797363 .

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.

Davis, M. L., Witcraft, S. M., Baird, S. O., & Smits, J. A. (2017). Learning principles in CBT. In The science of cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 51–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803457-6.00003-9

Dawkins, P. C., Oehrtman, M., & Mahavier, W. T. (2019). Professor goals and student experiences in traditional IBL real analysis: a case study. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education , 5 (3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-01 .

Dennehy, E. (2015). Hofstede and learning in higher level education: an empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education , 9 (3), 323–339.

Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Dlamini, G. P. (2016). An Exploration of the Teaching Strategies Used by Mathematical Literacy Teachers: A Case Study of Grade 11 Teachers in UMlazi District.(Masters dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Edgewood) KwaZulu-Nata: University of KwaZulu-Natal, Edgewood. http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13825

Du Plessis, E. (2020). Student teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and challenges regarding learner-centred teaching. South African Journal of Education , 40 (1), https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n1a1631 .

Galperin, B. L., & Melyoki, L. L. (2018). Tanzania as an emerging entrepreneurial ecosystem: prospects and challenges. African entrepreneurship (pp. 29–58). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73700-3_3 .

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching methods and students academic performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention , 2 (9), 29–35.

Gehrig, B. (2018). Some Challenges to Building STEM Capacity in Emerging Economies: The Case of Namibia. ASEE Annual conference exposition Salt Lake City, Utah: American Society for Engineering education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30978

Hasanova, N., Abduazizov, B., & Khujakulov, R. (2021). The main differences between teaching approaches, methods, procedures, techniques. Styles And Strategies JournalNX , 7 (02), 371–375.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture , 2 (1), 2307–0919. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 .

Ishemo, R. (2021). Progress of the implementation of the learner centred approach in Tanzania. International Journal on Integrated Education , 4 (4), 55–72. https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/4028 .

Jambor, P. Z. (2005). Teaching Methodology in a” Large Power Distance” Classroom: A South Korean Context. Online Submission .

Jaworski, B., & Matthews, J. (2011, February). How we teach mathematics: Discourses on/in university teaching. In Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2022–2032). Poland: University of Rzeszów.

Kafyulilo, A. C. (2013). Professional development through teacher collaboration: an approach to enhance teaching and learning in science and Mathematics in Tanzania. Africa Education Review , 10 (4), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2013.853560 .

Kangalawe, R. (2019). Assessment used to measure practical skills in competence-based curriculum in secondary schools in Temeke district, Tanzania [Masters’ dissertation] The catholic university of eastern Africa.

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International journal of STEM Education , 5 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6 .

Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. (2018). Teacher AfL perceptions and feedback practices in mathematics education among secondary schools in Tanzania. Studies in Educational Evaluation , 59 , 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.01.004 .

MacVaugh, J., & Norton, M. (2012). Introducing sustainability into business education contexts using active learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education , 13 (1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211190326 .

Mali, A., & Petropoulou, G. (2017). Characterising undergraduate mathematics teaching across settings and countries: an analytical framework. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education , 22 (4), 23–42. http://ncm.gu.se/nomad-sokresultat-vy?brodtext=22_4_mali .

Mazana, Y. M., Montero, S., C., & Olifage, C. R. (2019). Investigating students’ attitude towards learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education , 14 (1), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3997

Mendes, I. A. (2019). Active methodologies as investigative practices in the mathematics teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education , 14 (3), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5752 .

Mesa, V., Celis, S., & Lande., E. (2014). Teaching approaches of community college mathematics faculty: do they relate to classroom practices? American Educational Research Journal , 51 (1), 117–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213505759 .

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training (MoEVT)(2014). Sera ya elimu na mafunzo[Education training and policy]. Dar es Salaam:MoEVT

Moate, R. M., & Cox, J. A. (2015). Learner-centered pedagogy: considerations for application in a didactic course. Professional Counselor , 5 (3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.15241/rmm.5.3.379 .

Mohamed, M., & Karuku, S. (2017). Implementing a competency-based curriculum in science education: A Tanzania mainland case study. In The World of Science Education (pp. 101–118). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-089-9_7

Mormina, M. (2019). Science,Technology and Innovation as Social Goods for Development: Rethinking Research Capacity Building from Sen’s capabilities Approach. Science And Engineering Ethics , 25 (1), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0037 .

Muganga, L., & Ssenkusu, P. (2019). Teacher-centered vs. Student-Centered: an examination of student teachers’ perceptions about pedagogical practices at Uganda’s Makerere University. Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry , 11 (2), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.187.

Mulenga, I. M., & Kabombwe, Y. M. (2019). A competency-based curriculum for zambian primary and secondary schools: learning from Theory and some countries around the World. International Journal of Education and Research , 7 (2), 117–130. http://dspace.unza.zm/handle/123456789/6571 .

National Council for Tectinical Education (NACTE) (2007–2020). NTA Competence Level Descriptors . Retrieved August 27 (2020). from The National Council for Technical Education (NACTE): https://www.nacte.go.tz/index.php/curriculum/competence-descriptor/

National Examinations Council of Tanzania (NECTA) (2018). Examination statistics . Dar Es Salaam: National Examination Council of Tanzania.

Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje (2020). Implementation of the competence-based learning in rwandan physics classrooms: first assessment based on the reformed teaching observation protocol. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education , 16 (9), em1880. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8395 .

Ní Ríordáin, M., Coben, D., & Miller-Reilly, B. (2015). What do we know about Mathematics teaching and learning of multilingual adults and why? Does it matter? Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal , 10 (1), 8–23. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11407 .

Olausson, E., Stafström, C., & Svedin, S. (2009). Cultural dimensions in organizations: A study in Tanzania urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-52294. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-52294

Owen, J. P. (1958). The role of economics in education for business administration. Southern Economic Journal , 353–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055067 .

Paoletti, T., Krupnik, V., Papadopoulos, D., Olsen, J., Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Weber, K. (2018). Teacher questioning and invitations to participate in advanced mathematics lectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 98 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9807-6 .

Päuler-Kuppinger, L., & Jucks, R. (2017). Perspectives on teaching: conceptions of teaching and epistemological beliefs of university academics and students in different domains. Active Learning in Higher Education , 18 (1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177.

Pera, A. T. (2015, February 13). Approaches Retrieved August 12, 2021, from Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/angelitopera/approaches-54936041

Petropoulou, G., Jaworski, B., Potari, D., & Zachariades, T. (2020). Undergraduate Mathematics teaching in first year lectures: can it be responsive to student learning needs? International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education , 6 (3), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00111-y .

Phungphol, Y. (2005). Learner-centered teaching approach: a paradigm shift in thai education. ABAC journal , 25 (2), 5–16.

Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of Learning:learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Purity, W. N. (2019). Influence of culture on education in Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Comparative Studies and International Education (JCSIE) , 1 (1), 73–96.

Ramburuth, P., & Tani, M. (2009). The impact of culture on learning: exploring student perceptions. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal . https://doi.org/10.1108/17504970910984862 .

Reis, R. (2021). Teaching and Learning Theories:Tomorrow’s Teaching and Learning . Retrieved Jully 25, from Stanford University: https://tomprof.stanford.edu/posting/1505

Schmeisser, C., Krauss, S., Bruckmaier, G., Ufer, S., & Blum, W. (2013). Transmissive and Constructivist Beliefs of in-service Mathematics teachers and of beginning University students. Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching Mathematics , 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-299-0_5 .

Serin, H. (2018). A comparison of teacher-centered and student-centered approaches in educational settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies , 5 (1), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164 .

Sibomana, A. B., Ukobizaba, F., & Nizeyimana, G. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of their teaching strategies and their influences on students’ academic achievement in national examinations in Burundi: case of schools in Rumonge province. Rwandan Journal of Education , 5 (2), 153–166.

Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood , 3 (6), 375–387.

Tadesse, A., Eskelä-Haapanen, S., Posti-Ahokas, H., & Lehesvuori, S. (2021). Eritrean teachers’ perceptions of learner-centred interactive pedagogy. Learning Culture and Social Interaction , 28 , 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100451 .

Tambwe, M. A. (2017). Challenges facing the implementation of a competency-based education and training (CBET) system in Tanzanian technical institutions. Education Research Journal , 7 (11), 277–283. http://dspace.cbe.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/330 .

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher education , 27 (1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383761 .

Umugiraneza, O., Bansilal, S., & North, D. (2017). Exploring teachers’ practices in teaching Mathematics and Statistics in KwaZulu-Natal schools. South African Journal of Education , 37 (2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n2a1306 .

URT. (2011). Tanzania Education Sector Analysisi: Beyond Primary Education, the Quest for balanced and efficient policy choices for Human Development and Economic Growth . Dar Es Salaam: URT.

Van der Wal, G. (2015). Exploring teaching strategies to attain high performance in grade eight Mathematics: a case study of Chungcheongbuk Province, South Korea Doctoral dissertation. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss . 2014.v5n23p1106

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in Society , 6 , 52–58.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland

Mzomwe Yahya Mazana

School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland

Calkin Suero Montero

College of Business Education, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Mzomwe Yahya Mazana & Lembris Laayuni Njotto

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed to implement the study and to write this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mzomwe Yahya Mazana .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Mazana, M.Y., Montero, C.S. & Njotto, L.L. Exploring Mathematics Teaching Approaches in Tanzanian Higher Education Institutions: Lecturers’ Perspectives. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. 9 , 269–294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-023-00212-4

Download citation

Accepted : 16 January 2023

Published : 01 February 2023

Issue Date : August 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-023-00212-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Mathematics
• Teaching approaches
• Teaching strategies
• Higher education
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• United Republic of Tanzania
• Civil Society
• Document Centre
• Education NGOs and CSOs
• Education Suppliers
• Government Agencies
• Independent Schools
• Other Organisations
• Research Institutes
• Universities
• Universities and Colleges

Research Institutes in United Republic of Tanzania

There are several higher education institutions and independent research institutes in Tanzania involved in undertaking research across many disciplines. Notable among these are, the Institute of Kiswahili Research who undertake research into all aspects of the Kiswahili language, literature and culture and work to ensure that their findings are integrated into the development plans for the country; the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) is responsible for the administration of all health research institutions in Tanzania, working to develop better methods and techniques of enhancing disease management, prevention and control.

• All member countries
• Our network:
• Commonwealth Education Online
• Commonwealth Governance Online
• Commonwealth Health Online

• Where We Work

Yutaka Yoshino

You have clicked on a link to a page that is not part of the beta version of the new worldbank.org. Before you leave, we’d love to get your feedback on your experience while you were here. Will you take two minutes to complete a brief survey that will help us to improve our website?

Feedback Survey

Thank you for agreeing to provide feedback on the new version of worldbank.org; your response will help us to improve our website.

Thank you for participating in this survey! Your feedback is very helpful to us as we work to improve the site functionality on worldbank.org.

Misinformation and disinformation

Misinformation is false or inaccurate information—getting the facts wrong. Disinformation is false information which is deliberately intended to mislead—intentionally misstating the facts.

The spread of misinformation and disinformation has affected our ability to improve public health, address climate change, maintain a stable democracy, and more. By providing valuable insight into how and why we are likely to believe misinformation and disinformation, psychological science can inform how we protect ourselves against its ill effects.

APA resolution

Combating misinformation and promoting psychological science literacy

Approved by APA Council of Representatives, February 2024

Using psychological science to understand and fight health misinformation

This report describes the best available psychological science on misinformation, particularly as it relates to health.

It offers eight specific recommendations to help scientists, policymakers, and health professionals respond to the ongoing threats posed by misinformation.

Is it safe to get health advice from influencers?

Eight specific ways to combat misinformation

Factors that make people believe misinformation

How and why does misinformation spread?

Magination Press children’s book

True or False? The Science of Perception, Misinformation, and Disinformation

Written for preteens and young teens in lively text accompanied by fun facts, this book explores what psychology tells us about development and persistence of false perceptions and beliefs and the difficulty of correcting them, plus ways to debunk misinformation and think critically and factually about the world around us.

Advice to stem misinformation

What employers can do to counter election misinformation in the workplace

Using psychological science to fight misinformation: A guide for journalists

More from APA

Psychology is leading the way on fighting misinformation

This election year, fighting misinformation is messier and more important than ever

Stopping the spread of misinformation

The anatomy of a misinformation attack

Webinars and presentations

Tackling Misinformation Ahead of Election Day

APA and the Civic Alliance collaborated to address the impact of mis- and disinformation on our democracy. APA experts discussed the psychology behind how mis- and disinformation occurs, and why we should care.

Building Back Trust in Science: Community-Centered Solutions

APA collaborated with American Public Health Association, National League of Cities, and Research!America to host a virtual national conversation about the psychology and impact of misinformation on public health.

Fighting Misinformation With Psychological Science

Psychological science is playing a key role in the global cooperative effort to combat misinformation and change the course on how we’re tackling critical societal issues.

Studying misinformation

Explore the latest psychological research on misinformation and disinformation

How long does gamified psychological inoculation protect people against misinformation?

Perceptions of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration

Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation

Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking

Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses

It might become true: How prefactual thinking licenses dishonesty

Federal resources

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention How to address Covid -19 vaccine misinformation
• U.S. Surgeon General Health misinformation

Resources from other organizations

• AARP Teaching students how to spot misinformation
• American Public Health Association Podcast series: Confronting our disease of disinformation Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4
• News Literacy Project Webinar: Your brain and misinformation: Why people believe lies and conspiracy theories
• NPC Journalism Institute Webinar: Disinformation, midterms & the mind: How psychology can help journalists fight misinformation

To find a researcher studying misinformation and disinformation, please contact our press office .

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

• The State of the American Middle Class

Who is in it and key trends from 1970 to 2023

Table of contents.

• Acknowledgments

This report examines key changes in the economic status of the American middle class from 1970 to 2023 and its demographic attributes in 2022. The historical analysis is based on U.S. Census Bureau data from the Annual Social and Economic Supplements (ASEC) of the Current Population Survey (CPS). The demographic analysis is based on data from the American Community Survey (ACS). The data is sourced from IPUMS CPS and IPUMS USA , respectively.  

The CPS, a survey of about 60,000 households, is the U.S. government’s official source for monthly estimates of unemployment . The CPS ASEC, conducted in March each year, is the official source of U.S. government estimates of income and poverty . Our analysis of CPS data starts with the 1971 CPS ASEC, which records the incomes of households in 1970. It is also the first year for which data on race and ethnicity is available. The latest available CPS ASEC file is for 2023, which reports on household incomes in 2022.

The public-use version of the ACS is a 1% sample of the U.S. population, or more than 3 million people. This allows for a detailed study of the demographic characteristics of the middle class, including its status in U.S. metropolitan areas. But ACS data is available only from 2005 onward and is less suitable for long-term historical analyses. The latest available ACS data is for 2022.

Middle-income households are defined as those with an income that is two-thirds to double that of the U.S. median household income, after incomes have been adjusted for household size. Lower-income households have incomes less than two-thirds of the median, and upper-income households have incomes that are more than double the median. When using American Community Survey (ACS) data, incomes are also adjusted for cost of living in the areas in which households are located.

Estimates of household income are scaled to reflect a household size of three and expressed in 2023 dollars. In the Current Population Survey (CPS), household income refers to the calendar year prior to the survey year. Thus, the income data in the report refers to the 1970-2022 period, and the share of Americans in each income tier from the CPS refers to the 1971-2023 period.

The demographic attributes of Americans living in lower-, middle- or upper-income tiers are derived from ACS data. Except as noted, estimates pertain to the U.S. household population, excluding people living in group quarters.

The terms middle class and middle income are used interchangeably in this report.

White, Black, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander include people who identified with a single major racial group and who are not Hispanic. Multiracial includes people who identified with more than one major racial group and are not Hispanic. Hispanics are of any race.

U.S. born refers to individuals who are U.S. citizens at birth, including people born in the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories, as well as those born elsewhere to at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen. The terms foreign born and immigrant are used interchangeably in this report. They refer to people who are not U.S. citizens at birth.

Occupations describe the broad kinds of work people do on their job. For example, health care occupations include doctors, nurses, pharmacists and others who are directly engaged in the provision of health care. Industries describe the broad type of products companies produce. Each industry encompasses a variety of occupations. For example, the health care and social assistance industry provides services that are produced by a combination of doctors, managers, technology and administrative staff, food preparation workers, and workers in other occupations.

The share of Americans who are in the middle class is smaller than it used to be. In 1971, 61% of Americans lived in middle-class households. By 2023, the share had fallen to 51%, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of government data.

As a result, Americans are more apart than before financially. From 1971 to 2023, the share of Americans who live in lower-income households increased from 27% to 30%, and the share in upper-income households increased from 11% to 19%.

Notably, the increase in the share who are upper income was greater than the increase in the share who are lower income. In that sense, these changes are also a sign of economic progress overall.

But the middle class has fallen behind on two key counts. The growth in income for the middle class since 1970 has not kept pace with the growth in income for the upper-income tier. And the share of total U.S. household income held by the middle class has plunged.

Moreover, many groups still lag in their presence in the middle- and upper-income tiers. For instance, American Indians or Alaska Natives, Black and Hispanic Americans, and people who are not married are more likely than average to be in the lower-income tier. Several metro areas in the U.S. Southwest also have high shares of residents who are in the lower-income tier, after adjusting for differences in cost of living across areas.

• Change in income
• Share of total U.S. household income
• Race and ethnicity
• Marital status
• Veteran status
• Place of birth
• Employment status
• Metropolitan area of residence

Our report focuses on the current state of the American middle class. First, we examine changes in the financial well-being of the middle class and other income tiers since 1970. This is based on data from the Annual Social and Economic Supplements (ASEC) of the Current Population Survey (CPS), conducted from 1971 to 2023.

Then, we report on the attributes of people who were more or less likely to be middle class in 2022. Our focus is on their race and ethnicity , age , gender, marital and veteran status , place of birth , ancestry , education , occupation , industry , and metropolitan area of residence . These estimates are derived from American Community Survey (ACS) data and differ slightly from the CPS-based estimates. In part, that is because incomes can be adjusted for the local area cost of living only with the ACS data. (Refer to the methodology for details on these two data sources.)

This analysis and an accompanying report on the Asian American middle class are part of a series on the status of America’s racial and ethnic groups in the U.S. middle class and other income tiers. Forthcoming analyses will focus on White, Black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander and multiracial Americans, including subgroups within these populations. These reports are, in part, updates of previous work by the Center . But they offer much greater detail on the demographic attributes of the American middle class.

Following are some key facts about the state of the American middle class:

In our analysis, “middle-income” Americans are those living in households with an annual income that is two-thirds to double the national median household income. The income it takes to be middle income varies by household size, with smaller households requiring less to support the same lifestyle as larger households. It also varies by the local cost of living, with households in a more expensive area, such as Honolulu, needing a higher income than those in a less expensive area, such as Wichita, Kansas.

We don’t always know the area in which a household is located. In our two data sources – the Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) and the American Community Survey (ACS) – only the latter provides that information, specifically the metropolitan area of a household. Thus, we aren’t able to adjust for the local cost of living when using the CPS to track changes in the status of the middle class over time. But we do adjust for the metropolitan area cost of living when using the ACS to determine the demographic attributes of the middle class in 2022.

In the 2023 CPS ASEC data , which reports income for 2022, middle-income households with three people have incomes ranging from about $61,000 to $183,000 annually. “Lower-income” households have incomes less than $61,000, and “upper-income” households have incomes greater than $183,000.

In the 2022 ACS data , middle-income households with three people have incomes ranging from about $62,000 to $187,000 annually, with incomes also adjusted for the local area cost of living. (Incomes are expressed in 2023 dollars.)

The boundaries of the income tiers also vary across years as the national median income changes.

The terms “middle income” and “middle class” are used interchangeably in this report for the sake of exposition. But being middle class can refer to more than just income , be it education level, type of profession, economic security, home ownership or social and political values. Class also could simply be a matter of self-identification .

Households in all income tiers had much higher incomes in 2022 than in 1970, after adjusting for inflation. But the gains for middle- and lower-income households were less than the gains for upper-income households .

The median income of middle-class households increased from about $66,400 in 1970 to $106,100 in 2022, or 60%. Over this period, the median income of upper-income households increased 78%, from about $144,100 to $256,900. (Incomes are scaled to a three-person household and expressed in 2023 dollars.)

The median income of lower-income households grew more slowly than that of other households, increasing from about $22,800 in 1970 to $35,300 in 2022, or 55%.

Consequently, there is now a larger gap between the incomes of upper-income households and other households. In 2022, the median income of upper-income households was 7.3 times that of lower-income households, up from 6.3 in 1970. It was 2.4 times the median income of middle-income households in 2022, up from 2.2 in 1970.

The share of total U.S. household income held by the middle class has fallen almost without fail in each decade since 1970 . In that year, middle-income households accounted for 62% of the aggregate income of all U.S. households, about the same as the share of people who lived in middle-class households.

By 2022, the middle-class share in overall household income had fallen to 43%, less than the share of the population in middle-class households (51%). Not only do a smaller share of people live in the middle class today, the incomes of middle-class households have also not risen as quickly as the incomes of upper-income households.  

Over the same period, the share of total U.S. household income held by upper-income households increased from 29% in 1970 to 48% in 2022. In part, this is because of the increase in the share of people who are in the upper-income tier.

The share of overall income held by lower-income households edged down from 10% in 1970 to 8% in 2022. This happened even though the share of people living in lower-income households increased over this period.

The share of people in the U.S. middle class varied from 46% to 55% across racial and ethnic groups in 2022. Black and Hispanic Americans, Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islanders, and American Indians or Alaska Natives were more likely than others to be in lower-income households .

In 2022, 39% to 47% of Americans in these four groups lived in lower-income households. In contrast, only 24% of White and Asian Americans and 31% of multiracial Americans were in the lower-income tier.

At the other end of the economic spectrum, 27% of Asian and 21% of White Americans lived in upper-income households in 2022, compared with about 10% or less of Black and Hispanic Americans, Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islanders, and American Indians or Alaska Natives.

Not surprisingly, lower-income status is correlated with the likelihood of living in poverty. According to the Census Bureau , the poverty rate among Black (17.1%) and Hispanic (16.9%) Americans and American Indians or Alaska Natives (25%) was greater than the rate among White and Asian Americans (8.6% for each). (The Census Bureau did not report the poverty rate for Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islanders.)

Children and adults 65 and older were more likely to live in lower-income households in 2022. Adults in the peak of their working years – ages 30 to 64 – were more likely to be upper income. In 2022, 38% of children (including teens) and 35% of adults 65 and older were lower income, compared with 26% of adults ages 30 to 44 and 23% of adults 45 to 64.

The share of people living in upper-income households ranged from 13% among children and young adults (up to age 29) to 24% among those 45 to 64. In each age group, about half or a little more were middle class in 2022.

Men were slightly more likely than women to live in middle-income households in 2022 , 53% vs. 51%. Their share in upper-income households (18%) was also somewhat greater than the share of women (16%) in upper-income households.

Marriage appears to boost the economic status of Americans. Among those who were married in 2022, eight-in-ten lived either in middle-income households (56%) or upper-income households (24%). In contrast, only about six-in-ten of those who were separated, divorced, widowed or never married were either middle class or upper income, while 37% lived in lower-income households.

Veterans were more likely than nonveterans to be middle income in 2022, 57% vs. 53%. Conversely, a higher share of nonveterans (29%) than veterans (24%) lived in lower-income households.

Immigrants – about 14% of the U.S. population in 2022 – were less likely than the U.S. born to be in the middle class and more likely to live in lower-income households. In 2022, more than a third of immigrants (36%) lived in lower-income households, compared with 29% of the U.S. born. Immigrants also trailed the U.S. born in the shares who were in the middle class, 48% vs. 53%.

There are large gaps in the economic status of American residents by their region of birth. Among people born in Asia, Europe or Oceania, 25% lived in upper-income households in 2022. People from these regions represented 7% of the U.S. population.

By comparison, only 14% of people born in Africa or South America and 6% of those born in Central America and the Caribbean were in the upper-income tier in 2022. Together they accounted for 8% of the U.S. population.

The likelihood of being in the middle class or the upper-income tier varies considerably with the ancestry of Americans. In 2022, Americans reporting South Asian ancestry were about as likely to be upper income (38%) as they were to be middle income (42%). Only 20% of Americans of South Asian origin lived in lower-income households. South Asians accounted for about 2% of the U.S. population of known origin groups in 2022.

At least with respect to the share who were lower income, this was about matched by those with Soviet, Eastern European, other Asian or Western European origins. These groups represented the majority (54%) of the population of Americans whose ancestry was known in 2022.

On the other hand, only 7% of Americans with Central and South American or other Hispanic ancestry were in the upper-income tier, and 44% were lower income. The economic statuses of Americans with Caribbean, sub-Saharan African or North American ancestry were not very different from this.

Education matters for moving into the middle class and beyond, and so do jobs. Among Americans ages 25 and older in 2022, 52% of those with a bachelor’s degree or higher level of education lived in middle-class households and another 35% lived in upper-income households.

In sharp contrast, 42% of Americans who did not graduate from high school were in the middle class, and only 5% were in the upper-income tier. Further, only 12% of college graduates were lower income, compared with 54% of those who did not complete high school.

Not surprisingly, having a job is strongly linked to movement from the lower-income tier to the middle- and upper-income tiers. Among employed American workers ages 16 and older, 58% were in the middle-income tier in 2022 and 23% were in the upper-income tier. Only 19% of employed workers were lower income, compared with 49% of unemployed Americans.

In some occupations, about nine-in-ten U.S. workers are either in the middle class or in the upper-income tier, but in some other occupations almost four-in-ten workers are lower income. More than a third (36% to 39%) of workers in computer, science and engineering, management, and business and finance occupations lived in upper-income households in 2022. About half or more were in the middle class.

But many workers – about one-third or more – in construction, transportation, food preparation and serving, and personal care and other services were in the lower-income tier in 2022.

About six-in-ten workers or more in education; protective and building maintenance services; office and administrative support; the armed forces; and maintenance, repair and production were in the middle class.

Depending on the industrial sector, anywhere from half to two-thirds of U.S. workers were in the middle class, and the share who are upper income or lower income varied greatly.

About a third of workers in the finance, insurance and real estate, information, and professional services sectors were in the upper-income tier in 2022. Nearly nine-in-ten workers (87%) in public administration – largely filling legislative functions and providing federal, state or local government services – were either in the middle class or the upper-income tier.

But nearly four-in-ten workers (38%) in accommodation and food services were lower income in 2022, along with three-in-ten workers in the retail trade and other services sectors.

The share of Americans who are in the middle class or in the upper- or lower-income tier differs across U.S. metropolitan areas. But a pattern emerges when it comes to which metro areas have the highest shares of people living in lower-, middle- or upper-income households. (We first adjust household incomes for differences in the cost of living across areas.)

The 10 metropolitan areas with the greatest shares of middle-income residents are small to midsize in population and are located mostly in the northern half of the U.S. About six-in-ten residents in these metro areas were in the middle class.

Several of these areas are in the so-called Rust Belt , namely, Wausau and Oshkosh-Neenah, both in Wisconsin; Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Michigan; and Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Two others – Dover and Olympia-Tumwater – include state capitals (Delaware and Washington, respectively).

In four of these areas – Bismarck, North Dakota, Ogden-Clearfield, Utah, Lancaster and Wausau – the share of residents in the upper-income tier ranged from 18% to 20%, about on par with the share nationally.

The 10 U.S. metropolitan areas with the highest shares of residents in the upper-income tier are mostly large, coastal communities. Topping the list is San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, California, a technology-driven economy, in which 40% of the population lived in upper-income households in 2022. Other tech-focused areas on this list include San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward; Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue; and Raleigh, North Carolina.

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, Connecticut, is a financial hub. Several areas, including Washington, D.C.-Arlington-Alexandria and Boston-Cambridge-Newton, are home to major universities, leading research facilities and the government sector.

Notably, many of these metro areas also have sizable lower-income populations. For instance, about a quarter of the populations in Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk; Trenton, New Jersey; Boston-Cambridge-Newton; and Santa Cruz-Watsonville, California, were in the lower-income tier in 2022.

Most of the 10 U.S. metropolitan areas with the highest shares of residents in the lower-income tier are in the Southwest, either on the southern border of Texas or in California’s Central Valley. The shares of people living in lower-income residents were largely similar across these areas, ranging from about 45% to 50%.

About 40% to 50% of residents in these metro areas were in the middle class, and only about one-in-ten or fewer lived in upper-income households.

Compared with the nation overall, the lower-income metro areas in Texas and California have disproportionately large Hispanic populations. The two metro areas in Louisiana – Monroe and Shreveport-Bossier City – have disproportionately large Black populations.

Note: For details on how this analysis was conducted,  refer to the methodology .

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information

• Income, Wealth & Poverty
• Middle Class

The State of the Asian American Middle Class

Black and hispanic americans, those with less education are more likely to fall out of the middle class each year, how the american middle class has changed in the past five decades, covid-19 pandemic pinches finances of america’s lower- and middle-income families, are you in the global middle class find out with our income calculator, most popular, report materials.

• Methodology

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

© 2024 Pew Research Center