Environmental Health volume 4 , Article number: 6 ( 2005 ) Cite this article
447k Accesses
227 Citations
760 Altmetric
Metrics details
On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to dissociate itself from legal responsibility. Eventually it reached a settlement with the Indian Government through mediation of that country's Supreme Court and accepted moral responsibility. It paid $470 million in compensation, a relatively small amount of based on significant underestimations of the long-term health consequences of exposure and the number of people exposed. The disaster indicated a need for enforceable international standards for environmental safety, preventative strategies to avoid similar accidents and industrial disaster preparedness.
Since the disaster, India has experienced rapid industrialization. While some positive changes in government policy and behavior of a few industries have taken place, major threats to the environment from rapid and poorly regulated industrial growth remain. Widespread environmental degradation with significant adverse human health consequences continues to occur throughout India.
Peer Review reports
December 2004 marked the twentieth anniversary of the massive toxic gas leak from Union Carbide Corporation's chemical plant in Bhopal in the state of Madhya Pradesh, India that killed more than 3,800 people. This review examines the health effects of exposure to the disaster, the legal response, the lessons learned and whether or not these are put into practice in India in terms of industrial development, environmental management and public health.
In the 1970s, the Indian government initiated policies to encourage foreign companies to invest in local industry. Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) was asked to build a plant for the manufacture of Sevin, a pesticide commonly used throughout Asia. As part of the deal, India's government insisted that a significant percentage of the investment come from local shareholders. The government itself had a 22% stake in the company's subsidiary, Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) [ 1 ]. The company built the plant in Bhopal because of its central location and access to transport infrastructure. The specific site within the city was zoned for light industrial and commercial use, not for hazardous industry. The plant was initially approved only for formulation of pesticides from component chemicals, such as MIC imported from the parent company, in relatively small quantities. However, pressure from competition in the chemical industry led UCIL to implement "backward integration" – the manufacture of raw materials and intermediate products for formulation of the final product within one facility. This was inherently a more sophisticated and hazardous process [ 2 ].
In 1984, the plant was manufacturing Sevin at one quarter of its production capacity due to decreased demand for pesticides. Widespread crop failures and famine on the subcontinent in the 1980s led to increased indebtedness and decreased capital for farmers to invest in pesticides. Local managers were directed to close the plant and prepare it for sale in July 1984 due to decreased profitability [ 3 ]. When no ready buyer was found, UCIL made plans to dismantle key production units of the facility for shipment to another developing country. In the meantime, the facility continued to operate with safety equipment and procedures far below the standards found in its sister plant in Institute, West Virginia. The local government was aware of safety problems but was reticent to place heavy industrial safety and pollution control burdens on the struggling industry because it feared the economic effects of the loss of such a large employer [ 3 ].
At 11.00 PM on December 2 1984, while most of the one million residents of Bhopal slept, an operator at the plant noticed a small leak of methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas and increasing pressure inside a storage tank. The vent-gas scrubber, a safety device designer to neutralize toxic discharge from the MIC system, had been turned off three weeks prior [ 3 ]. Apparently a faulty valve had allowed one ton of water for cleaning internal pipes to mix with forty tons of MIC [ 1 ]. A 30 ton refrigeration unit that normally served as a safety component to cool the MIC storage tank had been drained of its coolant for use in another part of the plant [ 3 ]. Pressure and heat from the vigorous exothermic reaction in the tank continued to build. The gas flare safety system was out of action and had been for three months. At around 1.00 AM, December 3, loud rumbling reverberated around the plant as a safety valve gave way sending a plume of MIC gas into the early morning air [ 4 ]. Within hours, the streets of Bhopal were littered with human corpses and the carcasses of buffaloes, cows, dogs and birds. An estimated 3,800 people died immediately, mostly in the poor slum colony adjacent to the UCC plant [ 1 , 5 ]. Local hospitals were soon overwhelmed with the injured, a crisis further compounded by a lack of knowledge of exactly what gas was involved and what its effects were [ 1 ]. It became one of the worst chemical disasters in history and the name Bhopal became synonymous with industrial catastrophe [ 5 ].
Estimates of the number of people killed in the first few days by the plume from the UCC plant run as high as 10,000, with 15,000 to 20,000 premature deaths reportedly occurring in the subsequent two decades [ 6 ]. The Indian government reported that more than half a million people were exposed to the gas [ 7 ]. Several epidemiological studies conducted soon after the accident showed significant morbidity and increased mortality in the exposed population. Table 1 . summarizes early and late effects on health. These data are likely to under-represent the true extent of adverse health effects because many exposed individuals left Bhopal immediately following the disaster never to return and were therefore lost to follow-up [ 8 ].
Immediately after the disaster, UCC began attempts to dissociate itself from responsibility for the gas leak. Its principal tactic was to shift culpability to UCIL, stating the plant was wholly built and operated by the Indian subsidiary. It also fabricated scenarios involving sabotage by previously unknown Sikh extremist groups and disgruntled employees but this theory was impugned by numerous independent sources [ 1 ].
The toxic plume had barely cleared when, on December 7, the first multi-billion dollar lawsuit was filed by an American attorney in a U.S. court. This was the beginning of years of legal machinations in which the ethical implications of the tragedy and its affect on Bhopal's people were largely ignored. In March 1985, the Indian government enacted the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster Act as a way of ensuring that claims arising from the accident would be dealt with speedily and equitably. The Act made the government the sole representative of the victims in legal proceedings both within and outside India. Eventually all cases were taken out of the U.S. legal system under the ruling of the presiding American judge and placed entirely under Indian jurisdiction much to the detriment of the injured parties.
In a settlement mediated by the Indian Supreme Court, UCC accepted moral responsibility and agreed to pay $470 million to the Indian government to be distributed to claimants as a full and final settlement. The figure was partly based on the disputed claim that only 3000 people died and 102,000 suffered permanent disabilities [ 9 ]. Upon announcing this settlement, shares of UCC rose $2 per share or 7% in value [ 1 ]. Had compensation in Bhopal been paid at the same rate that asbestosis victims where being awarded in US courts by defendant including UCC – which mined asbestos from 1963 to 1985 – the liability would have been greater than the $10 billion the company was worth and insured for in 1984 [ 10 ]. By the end of October 2003, according to the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Relief and Rehabilitation Department, compensation had been awarded to 554,895 people for injuries received and 15,310 survivors of those killed. The average amount to families of the dead was $2,200 [ 9 ].
At every turn, UCC has attempted to manipulate, obfuscate and withhold scientific data to the detriment of victims. Even to this date, the company has not stated exactly what was in the toxic cloud that enveloped the city on that December night [ 8 ]. When MIC is exposed to 200° heat, it forms degraded MIC that contains the more deadly hydrogen cyanide (HCN). There was clear evidence that the storage tank temperature did reach this level in the disaster. The cherry-red color of blood and viscera of some victims were characteristic of acute cyanide poisoning [ 11 ]. Moreover, many responded well to administration of sodium thiosulfate, an effective therapy for cyanide poisoning but not MIC exposure [ 11 ]. UCC initially recommended use of sodium thiosulfate but withdrew the statement later prompting suggestions that it attempted to cover up evidence of HCN in the gas leak. The presence of HCN was vigorously denied by UCC and was a point of conjecture among researchers [ 8 , 11 – 13 ].
As further insult, UCC discontinued operation at its Bhopal plant following the disaster but failed to clean up the industrial site completely. The plant continues to leak several toxic chemicals and heavy metals that have found their way into local aquifers. Dangerously contaminated water has now been added to the legacy left by the company for the people of Bhopal [ 1 , 14 ].
Lessons learned
The events in Bhopal revealed that expanding industrialization in developing countries without concurrent evolution in safety regulations could have catastrophic consequences [ 4 ]. The disaster demonstrated that seemingly local problems of industrial hazards and toxic contamination are often tied to global market dynamics. UCC's Sevin production plant was built in Madhya Pradesh not to avoid environmental regulations in the U.S. but to exploit the large and growing Indian pesticide market. However the manner in which the project was executed suggests the existence of a double standard for multinational corporations operating in developing countries [ 1 ]. Enforceable uniform international operating regulations for hazardous industries would have provided a mechanism for significantly improved in safety in Bhopal. Even without enforcement, international standards could provide norms for measuring performance of individual companies engaged in hazardous activities such as the manufacture of pesticides and other toxic chemicals in India [ 15 ]. National governments and international agencies should focus on widely applicable techniques for corporate responsibility and accident prevention as much in the developing world context as in advanced industrial nations [ 16 ]. Specifically, prevention should include risk reduction in plant location and design and safety legislation [ 17 ].
Local governments clearly cannot allow industrial facilities to be situated within urban areas, regardless of the evolution of land use over time. Industry and government need to bring proper financial support to local communities so they can provide medical and other necessary services to reduce morbidity, mortality and material loss in the case of industrial accidents.
Public health infrastructure was very weak in Bhopal in 1984. Tap water was available for only a few hours a day and was of very poor quality. With no functioning sewage system, untreated human waste was dumped into two nearby lakes, one a source of drinking water. The city had four major hospitals but there was a shortage of physicians and hospital beds. There was also no mass casualty emergency response system in place in the city [ 3 ]. Existing public health infrastructure needs to be taken into account when hazardous industries choose sites for manufacturing plants. Future management of industrial development requires that appropriate resources be devoted to advance planning before any disaster occurs [ 18 ]. Communities that do not possess infrastructure and technical expertise to respond adequately to such industrial accidents should not be chosen as sites for hazardous industry.
Following the events of December 3 1984 environmental awareness and activism in India increased significantly. The Environment Protection Act was passed in 1986, creating the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) and strengthening India's commitment to the environment. Under the new act, the MoEF was given overall responsibility for administering and enforcing environmental laws and policies. It established the importance of integrating environmental strategies into all industrial development plans for the country. However, despite greater government commitment to protect public health, forests, and wildlife, policies geared to developing the country's economy have taken precedence in the last 20 years [ 19 ].
India has undergone tremendous economic growth in the two decades since the Bhopal disaster. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita has increased from $1,000 in 1984 to $2,900 in 2004 and it continues to grow at a rate of over 8% per year [ 20 ]. Rapid industrial development has contributed greatly to economic growth but there has been significant cost in environmental degradation and increased public health risks. Since abatement efforts consume a large portion of India's GDP, MoEF faces an uphill battle as it tries to fulfill its mandate of reducing industrial pollution [ 19 ]. Heavy reliance on coal-fired power plants and poor enforcement of vehicle emission laws have result from economic concerns taking precedence over environmental protection [ 19 ].
With the industrial growth since 1984, there has been an increase in small scale industries (SSIs) that are clustered about major urban areas in India. There are generally less stringent rules for the treatment of waste produced by SSIs due to less waste generation within each individual industry. This has allowed SSIs to dispose of untreated wastewater into drainage systems that flow directly into rivers. New Delhi's Yamuna River is illustrative. Dangerously high levels of heavy metals such as lead, cobalt, cadmium, chrome, nickel and zinc have been detected in this river which is a major supply of potable water to India's capital thus posing a potential health risk to the people living there and areas downstream [ 21 ].
Land pollution due to uncontrolled disposal of industrial solid and hazardous waste is also a problem throughout India. With rapid industrialization, the generation of industrial solid and hazardous waste has increased appreciably and the environmental impact is significant [ 22 ].
India relaxed its controls on foreign investment in order to accede to WTO rules and thereby attract an increasing flow of capital. In the process, a number of environmental regulations are being rolled back as growing foreign investments continue to roll in. The Indian experience is comparable to that of a number of developing countries that are experiencing the environmental impacts of structural adjustment. Exploitation and export of natural resources has accelerated on the subcontinent. Prohibitions against locating industrial facilities in ecologically sensitive zones have been eliminated while conservation zones are being stripped of their status so that pesticide, cement and bauxite mines can be built [ 23 ]. Heavy reliance on coal-fired power plants and poor enforcement of vehicle emission laws are other consequences of economic concerns taking precedence over environmental protection [ 19 ].
In March 2001, residents of Kodaikanal in southern India caught the Anglo-Dutch company, Unilever, red-handed when they discovered a dumpsite with toxic mercury laced waste from a thermometer factory run by the company's Indian subsidiary, Hindustan Lever. The 7.4 ton stockpile of mercury-laden glass was found in torn stacks spilling onto the ground in a scrap metal yard located near a school. In the fall of 2001, steel from the ruins of the World Trade Center was exported to India apparently without first being tested for contamination from asbestos and heavy metals present in the twin tower debris. Other examples of poor environmental stewardship and economic considerations taking precedence over public health concerns abound [ 24 ].
The Bhopal disaster could have changed the nature of the chemical industry and caused a reexamination of the necessity to produce such potentially harmful products in the first place. However the lessons of acute and chronic effects of exposure to pesticides and their precursors in Bhopal has not changed agricultural practice patterns. An estimated 3 million people per year suffer the consequences of pesticide poisoning with most exposure occurring in the agricultural developing world. It is reported to be the cause of at least 22,000 deaths in India each year. In the state of Kerala, significant mortality and morbidity have been reported following exposure to Endosulfan, a toxic pesticide whose use continued for 15 years after the events of Bhopal [ 25 ].
Aggressive marketing of asbestos continues in developing countries as a result of restrictions being placed on its use in developed nations due to the well-established link between asbestos products and respiratory diseases. India has become a major consumer, using around 100,000 tons of asbestos per year, 80% of which is imported with Canada being the largest overseas supplier. Mining, production and use of asbestos in India is very loosely regulated despite the health hazards. Reports have shown morbidity and mortality from asbestos related disease will continue in India without enforcement of a ban or significantly tighter controls [ 26 , 27 ].
UCC has shrunk to one sixth of its size since the Bhopal disaster in an effort to restructure and divest itself. By doing so, the company avoided a hostile takeover, placed a significant portion of UCC's assets out of legal reach of the victims and gave its shareholder and top executives bountiful profits [ 1 ]. The company still operates under the ownership of Dow Chemicals and still states on its website that the Bhopal disaster was "cause by deliberate sabotage". [ 28 ].
Some positive changes were seen following the Bhopal disaster. The British chemical company, ICI, whose Indian subsidiary manufactured pesticides, increased attention to health, safety and environmental issues following the events of December 1984. The subsidiary now spends 30–40% of their capital expenditures on environmental-related projects. However, they still do not adhere to standards as strict as their parent company in the UK. [ 24 ].
The US chemical giant DuPont learned its lesson of Bhopal in a different way. The company attempted for a decade to export a nylon plant from Richmond, VA to Goa, India. In its early negotiations with the Indian government, DuPont had sought and won a remarkable clause in its investment agreement that absolved it from all liabilities in case of an accident. But the people of Goa were not willing to acquiesce while an important ecological site was cleared for a heavy polluting industry. After nearly a decade of protesting by Goa's residents, DuPont was forced to scuttle plans there. Chennai was the next proposed site for the plastics plant. The state government there made significantly greater demand on DuPont for concessions on public health and environmental protection. Eventually, these plans were also aborted due to what the company called "financial concerns". [ 29 ].
The tragedy of Bhopal continues to be a warning sign at once ignored and heeded. Bhopal and its aftermath were a warning that the path to industrialization, for developing countries in general and India in particular, is fraught with human, environmental and economic perils. Some moves by the Indian government, including the formation of the MoEF, have served to offer some protection of the public's health from the harmful practices of local and multinational heavy industry and grassroots organizations that have also played a part in opposing rampant development. The Indian economy is growing at a tremendous rate but at significant cost in environmental health and public safety as large and small companies throughout the subcontinent continue to pollute. Far more remains to be done for public health in the context of industrialization to show that the lessons of the countless thousands dead in Bhopal have truly been heeded.
Fortun K: Advocacy after Bhopal. 2001, Chicago , University of Chicago Press, 259.
Shrivastava P: Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis. 1987, Cambridge, MA , Ballinger Publishing, 184.
Accident Summary, Union Carbide India Ltd., Bhopal, India: December 3, 1984. Hazardous Installations Directorate. 2004, Health and Safety Executive
MacKenzie D: Fresh evidence on Bhopal disaster. New Scientist. 2002, 19 (1):
Sharma DC: Bhopal: 20 Years On. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9454): 111-112. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17722-8.
Article Google Scholar
Cassells J: Sovereign immunity: Law in an unequal world. Social and legal studies. 1996, 5 (3): 431-436.
Dhara VR, Dhara R: The Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal: a review of health effects. Arch Environ Health. 2002, 57 (5): 391-404.
Kumar S: Victims of gas leak in Bhopal seek redress on compensation. Bmj. 2004, 329 (7462): 366-10.1136/bmj.329.7462.366-b.
Castleman B PP: Appendix: the Bhopal disaster as a case study in double standards. The export of hazards: trans-national corporations and environmental control issues. Edited by: Ives J. 1985, London , Routledge and Kegan Paul, 213-222.
Anderson N: Long-term effects of mthyl isocyanate. Lancet. 1989, 2 (8662): 1259-10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92347-7.
Chander J: Water contamination: a legacy of the union carbide disaster in Bhopal, India. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001, 7 (1): 72-73.
Tyagi YK, Rosencranz A: Some international law aspects of the Bhopal disaster. Soc Sci Med. 1988, 27 (10): 1105-1112. 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90305-X.
Carlsten C: The Bhopal disaster: prevention should have priority now. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003, 9 (1): 93-94.
Bertazzi PA: Future prevention and handling of environmental accidents. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999, 25 (6): 580-588.
Dhara VR: What ails the Bhopal disaster investigations? (And is there a cure?). Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002, 8 (4): 371-379.
EIA: India: environmental issues. Edited by: energy D. [ http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/indiaenv.html ]
CIA: The world factbook: India. [ http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/in.html#Econ ]
Rawat M, Moturi MC, Subramanian V: Inventory compilation and distribution of heavy metals in wastewater from small-scale industrial areas of Delhi, India. J Environ Monit. 2003, 5 (6): 906-912. 10.1039/b306628b.
Vijay R, Sihorwala TA: Identification and leaching characteristics of sludge generated from metal pickling and electroplating industries by Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Environ Monit Assess. 2003, 84 (3): 193-202. 10.1023/A:1023363423345.
Karliner J: The corporate planet. 1997, San Francisco , Sierra Club Books, 247.
Bruno KKJ: Earthsummit,biz:The corporate takeover of sustainable development. 2002, Oakland, Ca , First Food Books, 237.
Power M: The poison stream: letter from Kerala. Harper's. 2004, August, 2004: 51-61.
Joshi TK, Gupta RK: Asbestos in developing countries: magnitude of risk and its practical implications. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004, 17 (1): 179-185.
Joshi TK, Gupta RK: Asbestos-related morbidity in India. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003, 9 (3): 249-253.
Union Carbide: Bhopal Information Center. wwwbhopalcom/ucshtm. 2005
Corporate Watch UK: DuPont: A corporate profile. [ http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/profiles/dupont/dupont4.htm ]
Beckett WS: Persistent respiratory effects in survivors of the Bhopal disaster. Thorax. 1998, 53 Suppl 2: S43-6.
Misra UK, Kalita J: A study of cognitive functions in methyl-iso-cyanate victims one year after bhopal accident. Neurotoxicology. 1997, 18 (2): 381-386.
CAS Google Scholar
Irani SF, Mahashur AA: A survey of Bhopal children affected by methyl isocyanate gas. J Postgrad Med. 1986, 32 (4): 195-198.
Download references
Acknowledgements
J. Barab, B. Castleman, R Dhara and U Misra reviewed the manuscript and provided useful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 600 W, 168th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
Edward Broughton
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Edward Broughton .
Additional information
Competing interests.
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Authors’ original file for figure 1
Rights and permissions.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Broughton, E. The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review. Environ Health 4 , 6 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-4-6
Download citation
Received : 21 December 2004
Accepted : 10 May 2005
Published : 10 May 2005
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-4-6
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Bhopal Gas Tragedy – Case Study And Legal Consequences
Introduction:.
The industrial manufacturing sector is pivotal for the buoyancy of the Indian economy. Since this production sector extended its hands to facilitate economic sustainability, it has branched with diversified industries indulged and engaged in manufacturing automobiles, pieces of machinery, equipment, mental and electric appliance, mineral-extractions, so on. To utilize our demographic dividend, Indian is supposed to alleviate unemployment. The attainment of such an object necessitates the growth of the industrial sector, which is capable to create large-scale employment opportunities for youths. Consequently, millions of families will move out of poverty and fulfill their economic needs.
On the other hand, every single thing has its highlights and challenges. With having an eye on accomplishing economic and technological culmination, the human community is resting in a vain attempt to bring back or keep up the ecological footprint. The status quo industrial societies are pervaded with noxious or hazardous substances; indeed without the same nothing could be processed and produced. Negligence in treatment, usage, or disposal of such kinds of stuff has its ramifications in all walks of human life; even history tells us the same. India has witnessed countless industrial accidents; one of the notable incidents which have still deeply-rooted in the minds of Indians is the Bhopal gas leak tragedy.
Brief About the Incident:
To produce the pesticide named Sevin comprises the reagents, Methyl Isocyanate and Alpha Naphthol; the American enterprises entitled the Union Cambridge Corporation has established its subsidiary in Bhopal as qua the central place with excellent transport links. Later, the established Indian subsidiary was named The Union Cambridge India Limited (UCIL) since the Indian public had owned the ownership, nearly 40.1% share in the corporation.
The incident happened on the night of December 2 to 3, 1984, when the forty tons of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) was massively escaped from the Tank E106 at the UCC’s Indian subsidiary laid on at Bhopal. Since the plant has established in a crowded and inhabited area, within less than an hour, a great number of people and animals were befallen as victims and consequently died due to the toxicity of the leaked MIC. The estimated number of immediate death was 3500+, and the critical injury was 6+ lakh. Approximately, over the past decades since the incident, the death count has reached 20000. As per the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) estimation, 62.58% of the Bhopal population had suffered from inhalational toxicity, withal having survivors might have experienced and developed bodily morbidities.
Concerning the treatment and Medicare, due to lack of information about the gas ebullition, the doctors did not play an efficient role. One of the causes for such a ramification is that the UCC’s refusal to disclose the precise proportion of the escaped gas by relying on the trade secrecy as a reasonable exemption.
Following the mishap, the victims have gone on an endless travel quest for justice, who have either lost their lives or sustained permanent disability. The two-fold question presented before the law for consideration is that, on what basis, the parameters for quantifying the liabilities of the corporation engaged in processing such a dangerous substance with nullified safety standards will be fixed? And the further aspect was how the government is going to tackle and prevent future damages by the installation of necessary safety protocols.
Legal Consequences of Bhopal Gas Tragedy:
The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985:
Soon after the man-disaster, noticing the multitude of the suits arising out of the incident, the Indian parliament has passed the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act on 29th March 1985. This Act confers the government to file suit for damages in place as a representative of the victims (either survived or deceased). For the purpose of effective enforcement of the Act, Section 9 authorizes the central government to frame a scheme; amounts to the introduction of the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Registration and Processing of Claims) Scheme in 1985. The aforementioned government’s power to represent the affected party, both within and outside of India [1] , was predicated by the doctrine of parens patriae. However, the government has heavily criticized as, by enacting the Bhopal Act, it is attempting to smother the claimant from taking actions against the UCIL, since the government qua stakeholder at UCIL, is eligible to hold partially liable. Per contra, the government has managed to substantiate such enactment as, its quo animo is to secure the claims arising out of, or connected with, the Bhopal gas leak disaster, are dealt with speedily, effectively, equitably, and to the best advantage of the claimants and for matters incidental thereto . [2]
Does the Bhopal Act ultra vires the constitution:
Indeed, few allegations were brought before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Bhopal Act in relation to Article 14 , 19 and 21. It was confronted that Sections 3, 4 and 11 of the Bhopal Act violated the right of Indian citizens under the Constitution of India to choose their own counsel, and alleging a conflict of interest by the Indian government, for it could not represent the victims because of its shared responsibility for the disaster by failing to enforce safety regulations. [3] However, the Apex court rejected the appeal and upheld its constitutionality [4] .
Initial litigation:
Following the Act’s promulgation, in April 1985, the Indian government filed a suit against the UCC (the parent company of UCIL) in the Federal District Court of the southern district of New York, claiming 3.3 billion US dollars i.e. Rs. 3900 Crores. The skepticisms are that, why the Indian government does propose the American judiciary on behalf of the claimants, despite preferring the Indian judiciary system? Whether India has mistrusted its own judicature, or perhaps, it is strategically a ligation, which desires a significant sum of damages that the American judiciary could award? Nevertheless, the UCC fruitfully availed of the aforementioned issues under discussion and requested for the case dismissal on the grounds of forum non-conveniens. Withal, they pleaded that, since the accident was taken place in India (Bhopal), it might be more convenient to be tried in India.
Thus the litigation seeking both damages and punitive damages, invoking UCC’s liabilities such as absolute liability, strict liability, multinational enterprises liability theories, misrepresentation, negligence, and breach of warranty, was dismissed by the federal District Court after accepting the plea of UCC on May 12, 1986.
Rejection of settlement offers:
Since the parent company is responsible for the tortuous acts of the subsidiary company abroad, several efforts were taken by the UCC for outside court settlement but it went vain attempt after rejection by the Indian government. The negotiated settlement initiated by Union Carbide stood ready to provide 350 million dollars, which was accepted by the private lawyers representing the injured (both victims and the deceased) but dismissed by the Indian government.
Justice combats in Indian courts:
After getting rejected by the American Court, the suit pursued battle in India. In 1986 the Indian union brought this issue before the Bhopal District Court to recover 3.5 billion rupees damages. Subsequently, the same was reduced by 30% to 2.5 billion rupees by the high court of Madhya Pradesh. Later on, the Indian government appealed against the reduced interim award, rendered by the Madhya Pradesh high court before the apex court.
The five-judge bench heard the case, concerning the condition and status of victims, who were filled with hopelessness and experiencing the agony of despair. After four years of the chronicle’s worst industrial catastrophe, to end the wild goose chase and provide the immediate remedy, the Apex court rendered its judgment on 14th February 1989.
The matter of fact is that the people have lacked credibility since their collective thought was that the wrongdoer might get them self out of liabilities by invoking the exceptions of the doctrine of strict liability. Per contra, relying on the absolute liability Doctrine, the Apex Court [5] upheld the liabilities of UCC and ordered them to pay the sum of 470 million USD (approximately Rs. 700 crores) as compensation.
Although the Indian government has brought the golden justice by fixing the liability of the company to pay $470 million, it is deemed to be a bad move qua the fixed damages is hardly 15% of the original claim for $3.3 million. Lucidly, it is not a sufficient sum to compensate for all the damage caused in relation to the tragedy.
Concerning the distribution of the awarded compensation, Rs. 1 lakh was provided to the deceased person’s family, Rs. 50000 for persons suffering lasting damage and Rs. 25,000 for the temporarily injured.
Criticisms on the settlement:
As mentioned, firstly, it was assailed for the total sum of the compensation amount, as being the full and final settlement of all claims, rights, and liabilities arising out of that disaster, [6] the fixed amount leads to inadequacy of sum to compensate. Secondly, in terms of the final payment, vide its judgment ‘ this settlement shall finally dispose of all past, present and future claims, causes of action and civil and criminal proceedings (of any nature whatsoever wherever pending) by all Indian citizens’. Comprehensibly, it quashed the criminal proceedings and concluded all the civil proceedings, further limited the liabilities for the claims which were filed later.
Considering the aforesaid criticisms, in 1989, the Apex Court clubbed several petitions and revived the criminal proceedings, and held that if there is any shortage in the amount of compensation the state is bound to bridge the gap [7] .
In 1990, the Indian government sanctioned Rs. 258 crores funds to aid the victims for economic, social, environmental, and medical rehabilitation. Later in 2010, former UCIL chairman and other 6 Ex-employees were convicted for the term of 2 years with a 2000 USD fine for the offense of causing death by negligence.
Employed principle:
Absolute liability:.
The trite English principle of strict liability was laid by the case of Ryland v. Fletcher [8] in 1868. The said principle states that the person will be held responsible for the leakage of any hazardous substance from his premises. Withal, it is noteworthy that, even though there is no negligence on his part, he will be held accountable for the act of keeping the dangerous things in his premises. Vide this case’s judgment; it elucidates the ingredients that are essential to invoke strict liability viz. there should be the possession of dangerous substances, it must be escaped from defendant’s premises, and it has been kept for non-natural use of the land. In addition, there are certain exceptions to this rule, which are as follows,
The fault of the plaintiff
Act of the third party
Consent of the party
Till the date of the MC Mehta v Union of India case, [9] the rule of strict liability has governed the Indian judicature in relation to the matter of fact in issue. But then, the rule of absolute liability was introduced in the said oleum gas leak case, wherein the oleum gas was escaped from the fertilizer plant of Shriram foods and fertilizers enterprises. Since the enterprises had engaged in an ultra-hazardous activity, it is their absolute and non-delegable duty to safeguard others from getting injured out of their industrial process. In the case of any failure in discharging the obliged duties, the enterprises will be held liable to pay damages under tort law regardless of the cited strict liability exceptions. Indeed, the same was held in this oleum gas leak gas. Thus, in simple words, the concept of absolute liability is the strict liability without any exceptions, which means under no grounds a person could escape the liabilities.
Conclusion and Analysis:
After analyzing the given circumstance, it is pretty evident that the legislative lacunae lasted at the time of tragedy. Though the factories Act, 1948 was propounded even before the Bhopal catastrophe, it prioritizes the welfare of the workers employed in industries and factories and there is no first place law to deal with the concerned situation. This incident led to breakthroughs in the Indian legislature, the catena of legislations related to the environmental safeguard and determination of penalties were enacted. The status quo is that any similar incident that occurs now will be tried before the National Green tribunal and fall under the ambit of the Environmental protection Act, 1986. Even though, under the provisions of the Public liability Act, 1991, the injured could claim damages for the caused injury because of the leaked hazardous chemicals. In addition, the said Act of 1991 out on the basis of the concept of ‘no-fault liability.
Concerning the disposal of hazardous wastes from industry, we have Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling, and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008, to govern the storage and disposal of such toxic substances with the aid of the pollution control board. Further, In the case of Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource policy v. Union of India, [10] the Apex court upholds the constitutionality of the Hazardous wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989, and the applicability of directions provided in the BASEL Convention. Prior to this, Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness, and Response) Rules, 1996 was legislated to address gas leaks and to monitor the industries handling those deadly chemicals .
Thus, the aftermath of the Bhopal gas leak tragedy has substantially informed us about the importance of environmental protection and the concept of sustainable development . The wider array of Article 21 of the Indian constitution in relation to the r ight to a clean and healthy environment [11] has also been obtained only after the catena of judicial decisions interpreted the same. Besides, the Indian constitution prescribes the state as well as citizens to protect the environment under its Article, 39(b), 47, 48, 49, 48 A, and 51 A (g).
Even we have sufficient legislations to address the gas leaks issue; it is an absolute challenge to measure the injuries sustained by a person. However, the injured will receive damages in the light of law (Ubi jus ibi remidium). But then, how far it recompenses their loss? What about the people who lost their lives or happened to suffer the morbidities. Their psychological and physiological distresses are immeasurable. Hence, prevention is always better than cure by the mean, the government, industries, and citizens are obliged to take reasonable care because, ultimately, this is our environment.
[2] THE BHOPAL GAS LEAK DISASTER (PROCESSING OF CLAIMS) ACT, 1985, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1855/1/A1985-21.pdf.
[3] Lewin, Carbide Is Sued in U.S. by India in Gas Disaster, N.Y. Times, April 9, 1985, at D2, col.4
[4] State of Madras v. V. G. Row, AIR 1952 SC 607.
[5] Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India, 1990 AIR 273.
[6] Supra note 5.
[7] Zia Modi, 10 Judgments that changed India, 44, {2013}
[8] Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330
[9] 1987 AIR 1086.
[10] AIR 2012 SC 2627.
[11] Subhash Kumar v. the State of Bihar, 1991 AIR 420, 1991 SCR (1) 5.
Share This Post
Related posts.
Snegapriya V S
A third-year student of law at Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT School of Law), budding first-generation lawyer cum legal researcher with multiple publications in various web journals and portals on different subject matters of law in issue. Being a zealous-natured person with thoughts enrooted in epistemophilia has boosted my passion for research writings by interpreting diversified legal facets. As a perceptive observer and reader, I pay greater attention to the overlooked legal fields where divergent challenges might arise, that include cyber law, environmental law, consumer law, and several constitutional provisions. Besides, I prioritize construing legal problems with social psychology. My dream and vision are to catch myself as a skilled legal adroit.
School Guide
Class 8 Syllabus
Maths Notes Class 8
Science Notes Class 8
History Notes Class 8
Geography Notes Class 8
Civics Notes Class 8
NCERT Soln. Class 8 Maths
RD Sharma Soln. Class 8
Math Formulas Class 8
CBSE Class 8 Civics Revision Notes
Chapter 2: Understanding Secularism
Secularism in India
Why is it Important to Separate Religion from State?
Chapter 3: Why do We Need a Parliament?
Why Should People Decide?
People and their Representatives
Chapter 4: Understanding Laws
Do Laws Apply To All?
Unpopular and Controversial Laws
Chapter 5: Judiciary
Independent Judiciary of India
Structure of Courts In India
Different Branches of Legal System
Access To the Courts
Chapter 6: Understanding Our Criminal Justice System
Role of Police in Investigating a Crime
Role of Public Prosecutor and Judge in Criminal Justice System
What is Fair Trial?
Chapter 7: Understanding Marginalisation
Development of Adivasis in India
Chapter 8: Confronting Marginalisation
Invoking Fundamental Rights
Laws For Marginalized - Overview and Examples
Protecting the Rights of Dalits and Adivasis
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Chapter 9: Public Facilities
Right to Clean Water as a Fundamental Right
What is the Role of Government in Public Facilities?
Do you think water in Chennai is available and affordable by all?
In Search of Alternatives of Public Facilities
Chapter 10: Law and Social Justice
What Is a Worker's Worth?
Environmental Laws in India
Bhopal Gas Tragedy : Causes, effects and aftermath
The Bhopal gas tragedy occurred at midnight of December 2nd- 3rd December 1984 at the Union Carbide India Ltd (UCIL) pesticide facility in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. This catastrophe affected around 500,000 people along with many animals. People who were exposed are still suffering as a result of the gas leak’s long-term health impacts. Chronic eye difficulties and respiratory problems were some issues due to it. Children who have been exposed have stunted growth and cognitive impairments.
Table of Content
Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Bhopal gas tragedy case study, causes of bhopal gas tragedy, effects of bhopal gas tragedy, aftermath of bhopal gas tragedy.
Union Carbide was an American company that produced pesticides. MIC – methyl isocyanide, a dangerous poisonous gas began to leak at midnight on 2nd December 1984 from the Union Carbide factory. This MIC caused the Bhopal gas tragedy. The Bhopal gas tragedy was a fatal accident. It was one of the world’s worst industrial accidents.
UCIL was a pesticide manufacturing plant that produced the insecticide carbaryl. Carbaryl was discovered by the American company Union Carbide Corporation, which owned a significant share in UCIL. As an intermediary, UCIL produced carbaryl using methyl isocyanate (MIC). Other techniques for producing the ultimate product are available, but they are more expensive. The very toxic chemical MIC is extremely dangerous to human health. Residents of Bhopal in the area of the pesticide plant began to feel irritated by the MIC and began fleeing the city.
Bhopal UCIL constructed three underground MIC storage tanks which were named E610, E611, and E619. On October 1984, E610 was not able to maintain its nitrogen gas pressure and so the liquid which is present inside the tank would not pump out, because of which 42 tons of MIC in E610 was wasted. The chemical in E610 was left unpumped as they were not able to re-establish its pressure, which later became responsible for Bhopal Gas Tragedy.
The main causes of Bhopal Gas Tragedy are as follows:
During the buildup to the spill, the plant’s safety mechanisms for the highly toxic MIC were not working. The alarm off tanks of the plant had not worked properly.
Many valves and lines were in disrepair, and many vent gas scrubbers were not working, as was the steam boiler that was supposed to clean the pipes.
The MIC was stored in three tanks, with tank E610 being the source of the leak. This tank should have held no more than 30 tonnes of MIC, according to safety regulations.
Water is believed to have entered the tank through a side pipe as technicians were attempting to clear it late that fatal night.
This resulted in an exothermic reaction in the tank, progressively raising the pressure until the gas was ejected through the atmosphere.
The main effects of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy are as follows:
Thousands had died as a result of choking, pulmonary edema, and reflexogenic circulatory collapse.
Neonatal death rates increased by 200 percent.
A huge number of animal carcasses have been discovered in the area, indicating the impact on flora and animals. The trees died after a few days. Food supplies have grown scarce due to the fear of contamination.
Fishing was also prohibited.
In March 1985, the Indian government established the Bhopal Gas Leak Accident Act, giving it legal authority to represent all victims of the accident, whether they were in India or abroad.
At least 200,000 youngsters were exposed to the gas.
Hospitals were overcrowded, and there was no sufficient training for medical workers to deal with MIC exposure.
In the United States, UCC was sued in federal court. In one action, the court recommended that UCC pay between $5 million and $10 million to assist the victims. UCC agreed to pay a $5 million settlement. The Indian government, however, rejected this offer and claimed $3.3 billion. In 1989, UCC agreed to pay $470 million in damages and paid the cash immediately in an out-of-court settlement.
Warren Anderson, the CEO and Chairman of UCC was charged with manslaughter by Bhopal authorities in 1991. He refused to appear in court and the Bhopal court declared him a fugitive from justice in February 1992. Despite the central government’s efforts in the United States to extradite Anderson, nothing happened. Anderson died in 2014 without ever appearing in a court of law.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy continues to be an important warning sign for industrialization, for developing countries and in particular India, with human, environmental, and economic pitfalls. The economy of India is growing at a fast rate but at the cost of environmental health as well as public safety.
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the reasons behind bhopal gas tragedy.
The reasons behind Bhopal gas tragedy was a large volume of water had been introduced into the MIC tank and has caused a chemical reaction which did force the pressure release valve, which allowed the gas to leak.
What is the name of Bhopal gas case law?
The name is Union Carbide Corporation v.
Which gas was leaked in the Bhopal Gas Tragedy?
The gas which was leaked in the Bhopal Gas Tragedy is methyl isocyanate.
Was Bhopal gas tragedy an accident or experiment?
Bhopal gas tragedy was the world’s most worst industrial accident.
How many people died in the Bhopal Gas?
A total of 3,787 deaths were registered related to the gas release in case of Bhopal Gas Tragedy.
What were the four main demands of the Bhopal Gas victims?
The 4 demands of Bhopal Gas victims include: Proper medical treatment. Adequate compensation. Fixation of criminal responsibility Steps for prevention of such disasters in future.
How was Bhopal Gas Tragedy fixed?
Bhopal Gas Tragedy was fixed with construction of a secure landfill for holding the wastes from the two on-site solar evaporation ponds.
Please Login to comment...
Similar reads.
Political Science-Class-8
School Learning
School Polity
Social Science
Improve your Coding Skills with Practice
What kind of Experience do you want to share?
Case Studies
Case study: bhopal gas tragedy (1983-84).
Dr. Rhyddhi Chakraborty Programme Leader (Health and Social Care), London Churchill College, UK Email: [email protected]
What follows is a synopsis of the full article found in featured articles.
Please read the featured article Lesson from Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1983-84) By Dr. Rhyddhi Chakraborty Programme Leader (Health and Social Care), London Churchill College, UK describes in detail the elements of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL)
In 1970, in the North adjacent to the slums and railway station, a pesticide plant was set up by Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL). From late 1977, the plant started manufacturing Sevin (Carbaryl) by importing primary raw materials, viz. alpha-naphtol and methyl isocyanate (MIC) in stainless steel drums from the Union Carbide's MIC plant in USA. However, from early 1980, the Bhopal plant itself started manufacturing MIC using the know-how and basic designs supplied by Union Carbide Corporation, USA (UCC). The Bhopal UCIL facility housed three underground 68,000 liters liquid MIC storage tanks: E610, E611, and E619 and were claimed to ensure all safety from leakage.
Time Line of Occupational Hazards of the Union Carbide India Limited Plant Leading Before the Disaster
• 1976: Local trade unions complained of pollution within the plant. • 1980: A worker was reported to have accidentally been splashed with phosgene while carrying out a regular maintenance job of the plant's pipes. • 1982 (January): A phosgene leak exposed 24 workers, all of whom were admitted to a hospital. Investigation revealed that none of the workers had been ordered to wear protective masks. • 1982 (February): An MIC leak affected 18 workers. • 1982 (August): A chemical engineer came into contact with liquid MIC, resulting in burns over 30 percent of his body. • 1982 (October): In attempting to stop the leak, the MIC supervisor suffered severe chemical burns and two other workers were severely exposed to the gases. • 1983-1984: There were leaks of MIC, chlorine, monomethylamine, phosgene, and carbon tetrachloride, sometimes in combination.
In early December 1984, most of the Bhopal plant's MIC related safety systems were not functioning and many valves and lines were in poor condition. In addition, several vent gas scrubbers had been out of service as well as the steam boiler, intended to clean the pipes. For the major maintenance work, the MIC production and Sevin were stalled in Bhopal plant since Oct. 22, 1984 and major regular maintenance was ordered to be done during the weekdays’ day shifts.
The Sevin plant, after having been shut down for some time, had been started up again during November but was still running at far below normal capacity. To make the pesticide, carbon tetrachloride is mixed with methyl isocyanate (MIC) and alpha-naphthol, a coffee-colored powder that smells like mothballs. The methyl isocyanate, or MIC, was stored in the three partly buried tanks, each with a 15,000-gallon capacity.
During the late evening hours of December 2, 1984, whilst trying to unclog, water was believed to have entered a side pipe and into Tank E610 containing 42 tons of MIC that had been there since late October. Introduction of water into the tank began a runaway exothermic reaction, which was accelerated by contaminants, high ambient temperatures and other factors, such as the presence of iron from corroding non-stainless steel pipelines.
A Three Hour Time Line of the Disaster
December 3, 1984 12:40 am: A worker, while investigating a leak, stood on a concrete slab above three large, partly buried storage tanks holding the chemical MIC. The slab suddenly began to vibrate beneath him and he witnessed at least a 6 inche thick crack on the slab and heard a loud hissing sound. As he prepared to escape from the leaking gas, he saw gas shoot out of a tall stack connected to the tank, forming a white cloud that drifted over the plant and toward nearby neighborhoods where thousands of residents were sleeping. In short span of time, the leak went out of control.
December 3, 1984 12:45 am: The workers were aware of the enormity of the accident. They began to panic both because of the choking fumes, they said, and because of their realization that things were out of control; the concrete over the tanks cracked as MIC turned from liquid to gas and shot out the stack, forming a white cloud. Part of it hung over the factory, the rest began to drift toward the sleeping neighborhoods nearby.
December 3, 1984 12:50 am: The public siren briefly sounded and was quickly turned off, as per company procedure meant to avoid alarming the public around the factory over tiny leaks. Workers, meanwhile, evacuated the UCIL plant. The control room operator then turned on the vent gas scrubber, a device designed to neutralize escaping toxic gas. The scrubber had been under maintenance; the flow meter indicated there was no caustic soda flowing into the device. It was not clear to him whether there was actually no caustic soda in the system or whether the meter was broken. Broken gauges were not unusual at the factory. In fact, the gas was not being neutralized but was shooting out the vent scrubber stack and settling over the plant. December 3, 1984 1: 15- 1:30 am: At Bhopal’s 1,200-bed Hamidia Hospital, the first patient with eye trouble reported. Within five minutes, there were a thousand patients. Calls to the UCIL plant by police were twice assured that "everything is OK", and on the last attempt made, "we don't know what has happened, sir". In the plant, meanwhile, MIC began to engulf the control room and the adjoining offices.
December 3, 1984 3:00 am: The factory manager, arrived at the plant and sent a man to tell the police about the accident because the phones were out of order. The police were not told earlier because the company management had an informal policy of not involving the local authorities in gas leaks. Meanwhile, people were dying by the hundreds outside the factory. Some died in their sleep. Others ran into the cloud, breathing in more and more gas and dropping dead in their tracks.
Immediate Consequences
With the lack of timely information exchange between Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) and Bhopal authorities, the city's Hamidia Hospital was first told that the gas leak was suspected to be ammonia, then phosgene. They were then told that it was methyl isocyanate (MIC), which hospital staff had never heard of, had no antidote for, and received no immediate information about. The gas cloud, composed mainly of materials denser than air, stayed close to the ground and spread in the southeasterly direction affecting the nearby communities. Most city residents who were exposed to the MIC gas were first made aware of the leak by exposure to the gas itself.
Subsequent Actions
Formal statements were issued that air, water, vegetation and foodstuffs were safe, but warned not to consume fish. The number of children exposed to the gases was at least 200,000. Within weeks, the State Government established a number of hospitals, clinics and mobile units in the gas-affected area to treat the victims.
Legal proceedings involving UCC, the United States and Indian governments, local Bhopal authorities, and the disaster victims started immediately after the catastrophe. The Indian Government passed the Bhopal Gas Leak Act in March 1985, allowing the Government of India to act as the legal representative for victims of the disaster, leading to the beginning of legal proceedings.
Initial lawsuits were generated in the United States federal court system in April 1985. Eventually, in an out-of-court settlement reached in February 1989, Union Carbide agreed to pay US$470 million for damages caused in the Bhopal disaster. The amount was immediately paid.
Post-settlement activity
UCC chairman and CEO Warren Anderson was arrested and released on bail by the Madhya Pradesh Police in Bhopal on 7 December 1984. Anderson was taken to UCC's house after which he was released six hours later on $2,100 bail and flown out on a government plane. Anderson, eight other executives and two company affiliates with homicide charges were required to appear in Indian court.
In response, Union Carbide said the company is not under Indian jurisdiction. In 1991, the local Bhopal authorities charged Anderson, who had retired in 1986, with manslaughter, a crime that carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. He was declared a fugitive from justice by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhopal on 1 February 1992 for failing to appear at the court hearings in a culpable homicide case in which he was named the chief defendant. Orders were passed to the Government of India to press for an extradition from the United States. From 2014, Dow is a named respondent in a number of ongoing cases arising from Union Carbide’s business in Bhopal.
A US Federal class action litigation, Sahu v. Union Carbide and Warren Anderson, had been filed in 1999 under the U.S. Alien Torts Claims Act (ATCA), which provides for civil remedies for "crimes against humanity." It sought damages for personal injury, medical monitoring and injunctive relief in the form of clean-up of the drinking water supplies for residential areas near the Bhopal plant. The lawsuit was dismissed in 2012 and subsequent appeal denied. Anderson died in 2014.
Long-term Health Effects
A total of 36 wards were marked by the authorities as being "gas affected," affecting a population of 520,000. Of these, 200,000 were below 15 years of age, and 3,000 were pregnant women. The official immediate death toll was 2,259, and in 1991, 3,928 deaths had been officially certified. The government of Madhya Pradesh confirmed a total of 3,787 deaths related to the gas release. Later, the affected area was expanded to include 700,000 citizens. A government affidavit in 2006 stated the leak caused 558,125 injuries including 38,478 temporary partial injuries and approximately 3,900 severely and permanently disabling injuries.
Ethical Negligence
The Corporate Negligence Argument: This point of view argues that management (and to some extent, local government) underinvested in safety, which allowed for a dangerous working environment to develop.
Safety audits: In September 1984, an internal UCC report on the West Virginia plant in the USA revealed a number of defects and malfunctions. It warned that "a runaway reaction could occur in the MIC unit storage tanks, and that the planned response would not be timely or effective enough to prevent catastrophic failure of the tanks". This report was never forwarded to the Bhopal plant, although the main design was the same.
The Disgruntled Employee Sabotage Argument: Now owned by Dow Chemical Company, Union Carbide maintains a website dedicated to the tragedy and claims that the incident was the result of sabotage, stating that sufficient safety systems were in place and operative to prevent the intrusion of water.
--------------------
As you read and analyze this case study, your reflective comments are requested on all of the following:
Who are the stakeholders and how are they impacted both positively and negatively?
What knowledge and skills are needed to implement sophisticated, appropriate, and workable solutions to the complex global problems facing the world today?
What interdisciplinary perspectives would help identify innovative and non-obvious solutions?
What insights can you articulate, based on your culture and other cultures with which you are familiar, to help understand your worldview and enable greater civic engagement?
What is your position on the right thing(s) to do? After you submit your comment, please view and evaluate the feedback to your response that is automatically provided on the screen. Also, please take a moment to submit a comment on someone else's comment.
You need to be a member of The Ethical Engineer to add comments!
Join The Ethical Engineer
Feedback On Your Comment
Your language style is reflected in the words you use.
Narrative
Analytic reflects elaborative thinking and cognitive complexity.
Narrative reflects people and their actions and is more personal.
Your Topic Coverage
Topic coverage is based on the words used in each sentence; click below to see how each word contributed.
Some Observations
Hover over sentence numbers or highlighted words to see estimated probabilities.
ID
Sentence
Give your feedback about the case study and automated feedback anonymously in this survey:
Hello, you need to enable JavaScript to use The Ethical Engineer.
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.
Revisiting the Bhopal Gas Tragedy: A Comprehensive Case Study on its Causes, Impacts, and Lessons Learned
Bhopal gas tragedy case study, the gas disaster, the international medical commission.
Environmental health
Respiratory medicine
Family Life
Epidemiology
Medical care
Drug Therapies
Accident Analysis
Immediate effects of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy The leak and its effects
The colorless liquid used for the creation of pesticides.
Is highly toxic.
Since it is extremely reactive to water, it requires good maintenance.
A small amount of water is sufficient to increase pressure for converting the liquid into a toxic gas.
An inspection team came from Danbury, the United States to the Bhopal plant and found 61 safety problems. Out of these 61 problems, 31 were major.
Main refrigeration and cooling system were closed down before 150 days of the accident. To lower the cost, the number of workers working were reduced.
Also, the specialized training was not given to the unskilled workers so that they could at least have an idea about the consequences of their actions.
As already mentioned, before this major tragedy, there had already been minor leakages which cost the life of one worker and others were injured.
No supervisor was there for his night shift.
The pressure control valve of the tank E610 had not been working properly for over a month.
Negligence on the part of the maintenance authorities.
There was no backup plan in case of emergencies.
Toxicology of MIC
Irritation in the eyes
Breathing problem
Irritation in the nose and throat
Burning of skin
Attributed diseases to the gas exposure
Ophthalmic Problems: The MIC gas irritated the eyes of the people. MIC gas caused burning, watering, and photophobia, redness of the eye, swelling of the eyelid.
Respiratory and Pulmonary Problems: Inhalation of MIC gas resulted in shortness of breath, suffocation and chest pain. When examined it was found that some victims had suffered necrotizing lesions in their respiratory organs.
Reproductivity Toxicity: Gas leak resulted in high-risk factors to the fetus and it not only the gas leak that increased risk but the factors like stress and ingestion of drugs by the mothers. Genotoxicity: The MIC gas had affected the genetic information of the victims within their cells which had increased their possibility of having cancer.
Neuromuscular Toxicity: It was found that the survivors of the accident had neuromuscular symptoms like numbness, pain, aches, and sensation of needles
Principle of Absolute Liability
The defendant paid the contractor to build a reservoir on his land.
The contractors while doing their work discovered old coal shafts in the ground.
They decided not to do anything and carried on with their work.
The defendant didn't know anything about this.
Later on, when the reservoir was filled with water the shaft broke and the water started bursting out of the reservoir.
As a result, the neighbor's mine was flooded.
The respondent (neighbor) then filed a suit against the defendant and claimed damages.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
The defendant, Shri Ram Food and Fertilizer Industry belonging to Delhi Cloth Mills Ltd. produced dangerous chemicals.
M.C. Mehta had already filed cases against this industry demanding closure of units of this industry.
On December 4, the oleum gas leaked from one of the units of the industry.
Many people lost their lives in this accident including an advocate practicing in the Tis Hazari Court.
It is believed that the leakage was caused because of mechanical and human errors.
Not even two days after the accident, there was another minor leakage of oleum gas from the connecting pipes.
The Environment Protection Act, 1986
The national green tribunal act, 2010, the factories act, the public liability insurance act, 1991, widened scope of article 21 of the constitution of india, introducing new legislative rules, chemical accident rules 1996, law article in india, please drop your comments, you may like.
Protecting Regional Special...
The Role of Geographical In...
The Importance of Geographi...
Understanding Trade Secrets...
Comparative Legal Analysis:...
The Manipur Story
Legal question & answers, lawyers in india - search by city.
Law Articles
How to file for mutual divorce in delhi.
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
Increased Age For Girls Marriage
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
Facade of Social Media
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly
Games & Quizzes
History & Society
Science & Tech
Biographies
Animals & Nature
Geography & Travel
Arts & Culture
On This Day
One Good Fact
New Articles
Lifestyles & Social Issues
Philosophy & Religion
Politics, Law & Government
World History
Health & Medicine
Browse Biographies
Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
Environment
Fossils & Geologic Time
Entertainment & Pop Culture
Sports & Recreation
Visual Arts
Demystified
Image Galleries
Infographics
Top Questions
Britannica Kids
Saving Earth
Space Next 50
Student Center
What are the oldest known civilizations of India?
What are the major holidays and festivals of India?
Bhopal disaster
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
The University of New Mexico - The Bhopal Disaster of 1984
University of Massachusetts Amherst - Bhopal Plant Disaster
National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review
University College London - The Bhopal gas tragedy 1984 to? The evasion of corporate responsibility
The New York Times - The Bhopal Disaster: How it happened
The Guardian - 'Bhopal’s tragedy has not stopped': the urban disaster still claiming lives 35 years on
Academia - The Bhopal Disaster and Its Ramifications: A Brief Overview
What was the Bhopal disaster?
The Bhopal disaster was a chemical leak that occurred on December 3, 1984, in the Indian city of Bhopal. It killed an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 people. At the time, it was the worst industrial accident in history.
What was the cause of the Bhopal disaster?
The Bhopal disaster occurred when about 45 tons of the gas methyl isocyanate escaped from a plant owned by a subsidiary of the U.S.-based Union Carbide Corporation. Investigations later established that substandard operating and safety procedures at the understaffed plant had led to the catastrophe.
What was the aftermath of Bhopal disaster?
An estimated 15,000 to 20,000 people died as a result of the Bhopal disaster, and some 500,000 survivors suffered respiratory problems, blindness, and other health problems. In 2010 several former executives of the company that operated the Bhopal plant—all Indian citizens—were convicted of negligence.
Bhopal disaster , chemical leak in 1984 in the city of Bhopal , Madhya Pradesh state, India . At the time, it was called the worst industrial accident in history.
On December 3, 1984, about 45 tons of the dangerous gas methyl isocyanate escaped from an insecticide plant that was owned by the Indian subsidiary of the American firm Union Carbide Corporation . The gas drifted over the densely populated neighbourhoods around the plant, killing thousands of people immediately and creating a panic as tens of thousands of others attempted to flee Bhopal. The final death toll was estimated to be between 15,000 and 20,000. Some half a million survivors suffered respiratory problems, eye irritation or blindness, and other maladies resulting from exposure to the toxic gas; many were awarded compensation of a few hundred dollars. Investigations later established that substandard operating and safety procedures at the understaffed plant had led to the disaster . In 1998 the former factory site was turned over to the state of Madhya Pradesh .
In the early 21st century more than 400 tons of industrial waste were still present on the site. Despite continued protests and attempts at litigation, neither the Dow Chemical Company , which bought out the Union Carbide Corporation in 2001, nor the Indian government had properly cleaned the site. Soil and water contamination in the area was blamed for chronic health problems and high instances of birth defects in the area’s inhabitants. In 2004 the Indian Supreme Court ordered the state to supply clean drinking water to the residents of Bhopal because of groundwater contamination. In 2010 several former executives of Union Carbide’s India subsidiary—all Indian citizens—were convicted by a Bhopal court of negligence in the disaster.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Publications
Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Advanced Search
Journal List
Environ Health
The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review
Edward broughton.
1 Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 600 W 168th St. New York, NY 10032 USA
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to dissociate itself from legal responsibility. Eventually it reached a settlement with the Indian Government through mediation of that country's Supreme Court and accepted moral responsibility. It paid $470 million in compensation, a relatively small amount of based on significant underestimations of the long-term health consequences of exposure and the number of people exposed. The disaster indicated a need for enforceable international standards for environmental safety, preventative strategies to avoid similar accidents and industrial disaster preparedness.
Since the disaster, India has experienced rapid industrialization. While some positive changes in government policy and behavior of a few industries have taken place, major threats to the environment from rapid and poorly regulated industrial growth remain. Widespread environmental degradation with significant adverse human health consequences continues to occur throughout India.
December 2004 marked the twentieth anniversary of the massive toxic gas leak from Union Carbide Corporation's chemical plant in Bhopal in the state of Madhya Pradesh, India that killed more than 3,800 people. This review examines the health effects of exposure to the disaster, the legal response, the lessons learned and whether or not these are put into practice in India in terms of industrial development, environmental management and public health.
In the 1970s, the Indian government initiated policies to encourage foreign companies to invest in local industry. Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) was asked to build a plant for the manufacture of Sevin, a pesticide commonly used throughout Asia. As part of the deal, India's government insisted that a significant percentage of the investment come from local shareholders. The government itself had a 22% stake in the company's subsidiary, Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) [ 1 ]. The company built the plant in Bhopal because of its central location and access to transport infrastructure. The specific site within the city was zoned for light industrial and commercial use, not for hazardous industry. The plant was initially approved only for formulation of pesticides from component chemicals, such as MIC imported from the parent company, in relatively small quantities. However, pressure from competition in the chemical industry led UCIL to implement "backward integration" – the manufacture of raw materials and intermediate products for formulation of the final product within one facility. This was inherently a more sophisticated and hazardous process [ 2 ].
In 1984, the plant was manufacturing Sevin at one quarter of its production capacity due to decreased demand for pesticides. Widespread crop failures and famine on the subcontinent in the 1980s led to increased indebtedness and decreased capital for farmers to invest in pesticides. Local managers were directed to close the plant and prepare it for sale in July 1984 due to decreased profitability [ 3 ]. When no ready buyer was found, UCIL made plans to dismantle key production units of the facility for shipment to another developing country. In the meantime, the facility continued to operate with safety equipment and procedures far below the standards found in its sister plant in Institute, West Virginia. The local government was aware of safety problems but was reticent to place heavy industrial safety and pollution control burdens on the struggling industry because it feared the economic effects of the loss of such a large employer [ 3 ].
At 11.00 PM on December 2 1984, while most of the one million residents of Bhopal slept, an operator at the plant noticed a small leak of methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas and increasing pressure inside a storage tank. The vent-gas scrubber, a safety device designer to neutralize toxic discharge from the MIC system, had been turned off three weeks prior [ 3 ]. Apparently a faulty valve had allowed one ton of water for cleaning internal pipes to mix with forty tons of MIC [ 1 ]. A 30 ton refrigeration unit that normally served as a safety component to cool the MIC storage tank had been drained of its coolant for use in another part of the plant [ 3 ]. Pressure and heat from the vigorous exothermic reaction in the tank continued to build. The gas flare safety system was out of action and had been for three months. At around 1.00 AM, December 3, loud rumbling reverberated around the plant as a safety valve gave way sending a plume of MIC gas into the early morning air [ 4 ]. Within hours, the streets of Bhopal were littered with human corpses and the carcasses of buffaloes, cows, dogs and birds. An estimated 3,800 people died immediately, mostly in the poor slum colony adjacent to the UCC plant [ 1 , 5 ]. Local hospitals were soon overwhelmed with the injured, a crisis further compounded by a lack of knowledge of exactly what gas was involved and what its effects were [ 1 ]. It became one of the worst chemical disasters in history and the name Bhopal became synonymous with industrial catastrophe [ 5 ].
Estimates of the number of people killed in the first few days by the plume from the UCC plant run as high as 10,000, with 15,000 to 20,000 premature deaths reportedly occurring in the subsequent two decades [ 6 ]. The Indian government reported that more than half a million people were exposed to the gas [ 7 ]. Several epidemiological studies conducted soon after the accident showed significant morbidity and increased mortality in the exposed population. Table Table1. 1 . summarizes early and late effects on health. These data are likely to under-represent the true extent of adverse health effects because many exposed individuals left Bhopal immediately following the disaster never to return and were therefore lost to follow-up [ 8 ].
Health effects of the Bhopal methyl isocyanate gas leak exposure [8, 30-32].
Impaired audio and visual memory, impaired vigilance attention and response time, Impaired reasoning and spatial ability, impaired psychomotor coordination.
Impaired associate learning, motor speed, precision
Immediately after the disaster, UCC began attempts to dissociate itself from responsibility for the gas leak. Its principal tactic was to shift culpability to UCIL, stating the plant was wholly built and operated by the Indian subsidiary. It also fabricated scenarios involving sabotage by previously unknown Sikh extremist groups and disgruntled employees but this theory was impugned by numerous independent sources [ 1 ].
The toxic plume had barely cleared when, on December 7, the first multi-billion dollar lawsuit was filed by an American attorney in a U.S. court. This was the beginning of years of legal machinations in which the ethical implications of the tragedy and its affect on Bhopal's people were largely ignored. In March 1985, the Indian government enacted the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster Act as a way of ensuring that claims arising from the accident would be dealt with speedily and equitably. The Act made the government the sole representative of the victims in legal proceedings both within and outside India. Eventually all cases were taken out of the U.S. legal system under the ruling of the presiding American judge and placed entirely under Indian jurisdiction much to the detriment of the injured parties.
In a settlement mediated by the Indian Supreme Court, UCC accepted moral responsibility and agreed to pay $470 million to the Indian government to be distributed to claimants as a full and final settlement. The figure was partly based on the disputed claim that only 3000 people died and 102,000 suffered permanent disabilities [ 9 ]. Upon announcing this settlement, shares of UCC rose $2 per share or 7% in value [ 1 ]. Had compensation in Bhopal been paid at the same rate that asbestosis victims where being awarded in US courts by defendant including UCC – which mined asbestos from 1963 to 1985 – the liability would have been greater than the $10 billion the company was worth and insured for in 1984 [ 10 ]. By the end of October 2003, according to the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Relief and Rehabilitation Department, compensation had been awarded to 554,895 people for injuries received and 15,310 survivors of those killed. The average amount to families of the dead was $2,200 [ 9 ].
At every turn, UCC has attempted to manipulate, obfuscate and withhold scientific data to the detriment of victims. Even to this date, the company has not stated exactly what was in the toxic cloud that enveloped the city on that December night [ 8 ]. When MIC is exposed to 200° heat, it forms degraded MIC that contains the more deadly hydrogen cyanide (HCN). There was clear evidence that the storage tank temperature did reach this level in the disaster. The cherry-red color of blood and viscera of some victims were characteristic of acute cyanide poisoning [ 11 ]. Moreover, many responded well to administration of sodium thiosulfate, an effective therapy for cyanide poisoning but not MIC exposure [ 11 ]. UCC initially recommended use of sodium thiosulfate but withdrew the statement later prompting suggestions that it attempted to cover up evidence of HCN in the gas leak. The presence of HCN was vigorously denied by UCC and was a point of conjecture among researchers [ 8 , 11 - 13 ].
As further insult, UCC discontinued operation at its Bhopal plant following the disaster but failed to clean up the industrial site completely. The plant continues to leak several toxic chemicals and heavy metals that have found their way into local aquifers. Dangerously contaminated water has now been added to the legacy left by the company for the people of Bhopal [ 1 , 14 ].
Lessons learned
The events in Bhopal revealed that expanding industrialization in developing countries without concurrent evolution in safety regulations could have catastrophic consequences [ 4 ]. The disaster demonstrated that seemingly local problems of industrial hazards and toxic contamination are often tied to global market dynamics. UCC's Sevin production plant was built in Madhya Pradesh not to avoid environmental regulations in the U.S. but to exploit the large and growing Indian pesticide market. However the manner in which the project was executed suggests the existence of a double standard for multinational corporations operating in developing countries [ 1 ]. Enforceable uniform international operating regulations for hazardous industries would have provided a mechanism for significantly improved in safety in Bhopal. Even without enforcement, international standards could provide norms for measuring performance of individual companies engaged in hazardous activities such as the manufacture of pesticides and other toxic chemicals in India [ 15 ]. National governments and international agencies should focus on widely applicable techniques for corporate responsibility and accident prevention as much in the developing world context as in advanced industrial nations [ 16 ]. Specifically, prevention should include risk reduction in plant location and design and safety legislation [ 17 ].
Local governments clearly cannot allow industrial facilities to be situated within urban areas, regardless of the evolution of land use over time. Industry and government need to bring proper financial support to local communities so they can provide medical and other necessary services to reduce morbidity, mortality and material loss in the case of industrial accidents.
Public health infrastructure was very weak in Bhopal in 1984. Tap water was available for only a few hours a day and was of very poor quality. With no functioning sewage system, untreated human waste was dumped into two nearby lakes, one a source of drinking water. The city had four major hospitals but there was a shortage of physicians and hospital beds. There was also no mass casualty emergency response system in place in the city [ 3 ]. Existing public health infrastructure needs to be taken into account when hazardous industries choose sites for manufacturing plants. Future management of industrial development requires that appropriate resources be devoted to advance planning before any disaster occurs [ 18 ]. Communities that do not possess infrastructure and technical expertise to respond adequately to such industrial accidents should not be chosen as sites for hazardous industry.
Following the events of December 3 1984 environmental awareness and activism in India increased significantly. The Environment Protection Act was passed in 1986, creating the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) and strengthening India's commitment to the environment. Under the new act, the MoEF was given overall responsibility for administering and enforcing environmental laws and policies. It established the importance of integrating environmental strategies into all industrial development plans for the country. However, despite greater government commitment to protect public health, forests, and wildlife, policies geared to developing the country's economy have taken precedence in the last 20 years [ 19 ].
India has undergone tremendous economic growth in the two decades since the Bhopal disaster. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita has increased from $1,000 in 1984 to $2,900 in 2004 and it continues to grow at a rate of over 8% per year [ 20 ]. Rapid industrial development has contributed greatly to economic growth but there has been significant cost in environmental degradation and increased public health risks. Since abatement efforts consume a large portion of India's GDP, MoEF faces an uphill battle as it tries to fulfill its mandate of reducing industrial pollution [ 19 ]. Heavy reliance on coal-fired power plants and poor enforcement of vehicle emission laws have result from economic concerns taking precedence over environmental protection [ 19 ].
With the industrial growth since 1984, there has been an increase in small scale industries (SSIs) that are clustered about major urban areas in India. There are generally less stringent rules for the treatment of waste produced by SSIs due to less waste generation within each individual industry. This has allowed SSIs to dispose of untreated wastewater into drainage systems that flow directly into rivers. New Delhi's Yamuna River is illustrative. Dangerously high levels of heavy metals such as lead, cobalt, cadmium, chrome, nickel and zinc have been detected in this river which is a major supply of potable water to India's capital thus posing a potential health risk to the people living there and areas downstream [ 21 ].
Land pollution due to uncontrolled disposal of industrial solid and hazardous waste is also a problem throughout India. With rapid industrialization, the generation of industrial solid and hazardous waste has increased appreciably and the environmental impact is significant [ 22 ].
India relaxed its controls on foreign investment in order to accede to WTO rules and thereby attract an increasing flow of capital. In the process, a number of environmental regulations are being rolled back as growing foreign investments continue to roll in. The Indian experience is comparable to that of a number of developing countries that are experiencing the environmental impacts of structural adjustment. Exploitation and export of natural resources has accelerated on the subcontinent. Prohibitions against locating industrial facilities in ecologically sensitive zones have been eliminated while conservation zones are being stripped of their status so that pesticide, cement and bauxite mines can be built [ 23 ]. Heavy reliance on coal-fired power plants and poor enforcement of vehicle emission laws are other consequences of economic concerns taking precedence over environmental protection [ 19 ].
In March 2001, residents of Kodaikanal in southern India caught the Anglo-Dutch company, Unilever, red-handed when they discovered a dumpsite with toxic mercury laced waste from a thermometer factory run by the company's Indian subsidiary, Hindustan Lever. The 7.4 ton stockpile of mercury-laden glass was found in torn stacks spilling onto the ground in a scrap metal yard located near a school. In the fall of 2001, steel from the ruins of the World Trade Center was exported to India apparently without first being tested for contamination from asbestos and heavy metals present in the twin tower debris. Other examples of poor environmental stewardship and economic considerations taking precedence over public health concerns abound [ 24 ].
The Bhopal disaster could have changed the nature of the chemical industry and caused a reexamination of the necessity to produce such potentially harmful products in the first place. However the lessons of acute and chronic effects of exposure to pesticides and their precursors in Bhopal has not changed agricultural practice patterns. An estimated 3 million people per year suffer the consequences of pesticide poisoning with most exposure occurring in the agricultural developing world. It is reported to be the cause of at least 22,000 deaths in India each year. In the state of Kerala, significant mortality and morbidity have been reported following exposure to Endosulfan, a toxic pesticide whose use continued for 15 years after the events of Bhopal [ 25 ].
Aggressive marketing of asbestos continues in developing countries as a result of restrictions being placed on its use in developed nations due to the well-established link between asbestos products and respiratory diseases. India has become a major consumer, using around 100,000 tons of asbestos per year, 80% of which is imported with Canada being the largest overseas supplier. Mining, production and use of asbestos in India is very loosely regulated despite the health hazards. Reports have shown morbidity and mortality from asbestos related disease will continue in India without enforcement of a ban or significantly tighter controls [ 26 , 27 ].
UCC has shrunk to one sixth of its size since the Bhopal disaster in an effort to restructure and divest itself. By doing so, the company avoided a hostile takeover, placed a significant portion of UCC's assets out of legal reach of the victims and gave its shareholder and top executives bountiful profits [ 1 ]. The company still operates under the ownership of Dow Chemicals and still states on its website that the Bhopal disaster was "cause by deliberate sabotage". [ 28 ].
Some positive changes were seen following the Bhopal disaster. The British chemical company, ICI, whose Indian subsidiary manufactured pesticides, increased attention to health, safety and environmental issues following the events of December 1984. The subsidiary now spends 30–40% of their capital expenditures on environmental-related projects. However, they still do not adhere to standards as strict as their parent company in the UK. [ 24 ].
The US chemical giant DuPont learned its lesson of Bhopal in a different way. The company attempted for a decade to export a nylon plant from Richmond, VA to Goa, India. In its early negotiations with the Indian government, DuPont had sought and won a remarkable clause in its investment agreement that absolved it from all liabilities in case of an accident. But the people of Goa were not willing to acquiesce while an important ecological site was cleared for a heavy polluting industry. After nearly a decade of protesting by Goa's residents, DuPont was forced to scuttle plans there. Chennai was the next proposed site for the plastics plant. The state government there made significantly greater demand on DuPont for concessions on public health and environmental protection. Eventually, these plans were also aborted due to what the company called "financial concerns". [ 29 ].
The tragedy of Bhopal continues to be a warning sign at once ignored and heeded. Bhopal and its aftermath were a warning that the path to industrialization, for developing countries in general and India in particular, is fraught with human, environmental and economic perils. Some moves by the Indian government, including the formation of the MoEF, have served to offer some protection of the public's health from the harmful practices of local and multinational heavy industry and grassroots organizations that have also played a part in opposing rampant development. The Indian economy is growing at a tremendous rate but at significant cost in environmental health and public safety as large and small companies throughout the subcontinent continue to pollute. Far more remains to be done for public health in the context of industrialization to show that the lessons of the countless thousands dead in Bhopal have truly been heeded.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
J. Barab, B. Castleman, R Dhara and U Misra reviewed the manuscript and provided useful suggestions.
Fortun K. Advocacy after Bhopal. Chicago , University of Chicago Press; 2001. p. 259. [ Google Scholar ]
Shrivastava P. Managing Industrial Crisis. New Delhi , Vision Books; 1987. p. 196. [ Google Scholar ]
Shrivastava P. Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis. Cambridge, MA , Ballinger Publishing; 1987. p. 184. [ Google Scholar ]
Hazardous Installations Directorate. Health and Safety Executive; 2004. Accident Summary, Union Carbide India Ltd., Bhopal, India: December 3, 1984. [ Google Scholar ]
MacKenzie D. Fresh evidence on Bhopal disaster. New Scientist. 2002; 19 [ Google Scholar ]
Sharma DC. Bhopal: 20 Years On. Lancet. 2005; 365 :111–112. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17722-8. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Cassells J. Sovereign immunity: Law in an unequal world. Social and legal studies. 1996; 5 :431–436. [ Google Scholar ]
Dhara VR, Dhara R. The Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal: a review of health effects. Arch Environ Health. 2002; 57 :391–404. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Kumar S. Victims of gas leak in Bhopal seek redress on compensation. Bmj. 2004; 329 :366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7462.366-b. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Castleman B PP. Appendix: the Bhopal disaster as a case study in double standards. In: Ives J, editor. The export of hazards: trans-national corporations and environmental control issues. London , Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1985. pp. 213–222. [ Google Scholar ]
Mangla B. Long-term effects of methyl isocyanate. Lancet. 1989; 2 :103. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90340-1. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Varma DR. Hydrogen cyanide and Bhopal. Lancet. 1989; 2 :567–568. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90695-8. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Anderson N. Long-term effects of mthyl isocyanate. Lancet. 1989; 2 :1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92347-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Chander J. Water contamination: a legacy of the union carbide disaster in Bhopal, India. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001; 7 :72–73. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Tyagi YK, Rosencranz A. Some international law aspects of the Bhopal disaster. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27 :1105–1112. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90305-X. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Carlsten C. The Bhopal disaster: prevention should have priority now. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9 :93–94. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Bertazzi PA. Future prevention and handling of environmental accidents. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999; 25 :580–588. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Dhara VR. What ails the Bhopal disaster investigations? (And is there a cure?) Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8 :371–379. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
EIA . In: India: environmental issues. energy D, editor. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/indiaenv.html [ Google Scholar ]
CIA The world factbook: India http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/in.html#Econ
Rawat M, Moturi MC, Subramanian V. Inventory compilation and distribution of heavy metals in wastewater from small-scale industrial areas of Delhi, India. J Environ Monit. 2003; 5 :906–912. doi: 10.1039/b306628b. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Vijay R, Sihorwala TA. Identification and leaching characteristics of sludge generated from metal pickling and electroplating industries by Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Environ Monit Assess. 2003; 84 :193–202. doi: 10.1023/A:1023363423345. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Karliner J. The corporate planet. San Francisco , Sierra Club Books; 1997. p. 247. [ Google Scholar ]
Bruno KKJ. Earthsummit,biz:The corporate takeover of sustainable development. Oakland, Ca , First Food Books; 2002. p. 237. [ Google Scholar ]
Power M. The poison stream: letter from Kerala. Harper's. 2004; August, 2004 :51–61. [ Google Scholar ]
Joshi TK, Gupta RK. Asbestos in developing countries: magnitude of risk and its practical implications. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004; 17 :179–185. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Joshi TK, Gupta RK. Asbestos-related morbidity in India. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9 :249–253. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Union Carbide Bhopal Information Center. wwwbhopalcom/ucshtm. 2005.
Corporate Watch UK. DuPont: A corporate profile. http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/profiles/dupont/dupont4.htm
Beckett WS. Persistent respiratory effects in survivors of the Bhopal disaster. Thorax. 1998; 53 Suppl 2 :S43–6. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Misra UK, Kalita J. A study of cognitive functions in methyl-iso-cyanate victims one year after bhopal accident. Neurotoxicology. 1997; 18 :381–386. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Irani SF, Mahashur AA. A survey of Bhopal children affected by methyl isocyanate gas. J Postgrad Med. 1986; 32 :195–198. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Law of torts – Complete Reading Material
Weekly Competition – Week 4 – September 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 1 October 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 2 – October 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 3 – October 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 4 – October 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 5 October 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 1 – November 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 2 – November 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 3 – November 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 4 – November 2019
Weekly Competition – Week 1 – December 2019
Sign in / Join
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case Study
This article is written by Ayushma Sharma of Faculty of Law, Aligarh Muslim University where she has discussed the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The night of 2-3 December 1984, was the most unfortunate night for the Bhopal, in fact not only for Bhopal but for the whole world. Thousands of people lost their lives that night and many are suffering the consequences of the tragedy even now. The incident was caused because of the leakage of Methyl Isocyanate (MiC) gas from the Union Carbide India Ltd (UCIL) plant.
Background
The Union Carbide Corporation, an American enterprise established a pesticide plant in India because of its central location. The plant was supposed to produce Sevin, a pesticide. Union Carbide and the Indian Government had a deal, and under this idea, the Union Carbide had a 50.9% share and the Indian Investors had a 40.1% share. The plant was named as The Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL).
UCIL started its production of pesticide in 1979. While this pesticide was produced, a toxic liquid was also produced i.e., Methyl Isocyanate (MIC). Since MIC is a very toxic chemical it required great maintenance.
Around 1:00 a.m on 4th December 1984, when the MIC gas started swallowing up the whole of Bhopal people who were sleeping peacefully started feeling the change in the air. They ran for their lives but couldn’t escape their death. Some who were able to save their lives weren’t able to save themselves from the coming disabilities. All this happened because of leakage of the MIC gas from the tank E106.
Earlier, too, complaints were being made about the maintainability of the plant, of how MIC was leaking in small amounts. The previous incidents of leakage had also caused the death of some people and left others severely injured. But, the authorities paid no attention to it. The machines were worn out but no replacement was there.
The Gas Disaster
Around midnight on 3-4 December 1984, the MIC gas got leaked from the plant and got mixed with the fresh air in Bhopal. Suddenly, people started feeling uneasy, started vomiting, were having trouble while breathing, people started dying within a few minutes of inhaling the toxic gas. It was not only the human beings that suffered but animals, too, suffered and lost their lives.
People, in large numbers, were rushed to the hospital but at that time no doctor knew about the actual cause of death. No one knew about the leakage of the MIC. They just had a hunch about some leakage but exactly didn’t know about the leakage of MIC gas. Since doctors couldn’t operate properly without knowing the exact cause of the accident, so many people lost their lives.
It was reported that nearly 3000 people lost their lives and more than 6 lacs were severely injured. The survivors survived with permanent respiratory problems, and other complications. Children who weren’t even born at that time were born with some health issues.
The International Medical Commission
After the tragedy took place there was no proper health aid provided to the victims. The company was involved in lawsuits and was on the verge of closing down its business. On the other hand, the Indian Government had to face the wrath of the families of the victims and the other people all over India on a lack of carrying out an investigation and providing medical aid to the sufferers.
For the medical personnel to provide correct medical treatment to the victims they had to know the exact cause of the tragedy. So that based on the cause they could start their operation. A connection had to be established between the cause of the accident and the health attributes caused by the accident.
In 1992, Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal suggested the formation of an international commission to provide better medical treatment to the victims of the Bhopal tragedy. Later on, in 1993 Bhopal Group for Information and Action laid down a proposal for the same.
Finally, in the year 1993 International Medical Commission on Bhopal (IMCB) was organized to provide medical assistance to the survivors of the Bhopal tragedy of 1984. IMCB was a constitution of 15 professionals from 12 countries having expertise in the field of:
Environmental health
Respiratory medicine
IMCB had co-chairpersons and they were, Dr. Rosalie Bertell and Gianni Tognoni. The main aim of the International Medical Commission on Bhopal was to provide some relief to the victims and to suggest some ways to prevent such disasters in the future.
The work was divided into 8 areas, and they are:
Family Life
Epidemiology
Medical care
Drug Therapies
Accident Analysis
Review of published literature
A plan was laid out for investigation to know the actual cause of the exposure. This plan has three phases.
First Phase – In this phase, the symptom report was analyzed and distance was used as a substitute for exposure. It stated that respiratory and neurologic problems were the aftermath health effects of the exposure.
Second Phase – Lung function and respiratory organs were assessed. According to the report, there were excessive respiratory issues and the functioning capability of the lungs was reduced with each passing minute.
It was noticed that to know the exact level of risk factors involved it was necessary to analyze the exposure accurately. Also, to provide long-term care and medical aid it was mandatory for them to know exactly what they were dealing with.
Third Phase – This was the last phase of the process. In this phase, the victims were assessed individually based on exposure time, location and distance. Finally, the reports were compared to the findings from the distance surrogate to determine whether their association is better than that of distance alone.
Immediate effects of the Bhopal Gas Tragedy
The leak and its effects.
Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) :
The colorless liquid used for the creation of pesticides.
Is highly toxic.
Since it is extremely reactive to water, it requires good maintenance.
A small amount of water is sufficient to increase pressure for converting the liquid into a toxic gas.
The UCIL had to store three tanks of MIC and its temperature was to be maintained below zero degrees celsius. Also, it was to be kept under pressure with the help of inert nitrogen. But, before the few days of the accident the tank, E106, in which the MIC was kept couldn’t hold the pressure any longer resulting in stopping of production for some time.
The tank even after being worn out couldn’t stop the production for a much longer time. The production process resumed after some time. But, on the night of 2-3 December 1984, because of a lack of maintainability, the water broke out from the connecting pipe and started getting mixed with the MIC liquid. This resulted in a strong heating reaction because of which pressure at a splitting pace was created and the MIC gas got released.
People who were leaving nearby started getting affected by the harmful gas. They started having a breathing problem, irritation in eyes, chemical burns on the skin, contraction of lungs. They were then taken to the hospital but without the main reason for the accident, the doctors couldn’t operate correctly.
Cause of Leakage
Though the main reason for the tragedy was the mixing of water with the Methyl Isocyanate because of leaks in the connecting pipes yet it was not the only reason that contributed towards the happening of the tragedy. There are many other reasons which contributed to this unfortunate event. All these small reasons are because of the lack of proper maintenance.
Following are the reasons that, too, have contributed to the Bhopal tragedy:
An inspection team came from Danbury, the United States to the Bhopal plant and found 61 safety problems. Out of these 61 problems 31 were major.
Main refrigeration and cooling system were closed down before 150 days of the accident
To lower the cost number of workers working were reduced.
Also, the specialized training was not given to the unskilled workers so that they could at least have an idea about the consequences of their actions.
As already mentioned, before this major tragedy there had already been minor leakages which cost the life of one worker and others were injured.
No supervisor was there for his night shift.
The pressure control valve of the tank E610 had not been working properly for over a month.
Negligence on the part of the maintenance authorities.
There was no backup plan in case of emergencies.
Another important thing to notice is that if the fire or the rescue squad had an idea of how to prevent the gas from spreading, or if there was any antidote chemical that could have been used to bring down the effects of MIC gas then, maybe some lives could have been saved.
The root cause was the lack of management on the part of the authorities. Also, it’s been said that the company had not informed all the concerned authorities about the emission of MIC gas. Had some authorities known about the gas maybe they could have prepared some backup strategies in case of a crisis.
Toxicology of MIC
Methyl Isocyanate is highly toxic. The American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists stated that the level up to which a worker could be exposed to MIC without any harmful effects is 0.02ppm. As soon as the level is 0.4ppm it is toxic by inhalation, or by ingestion. At 5ppm, most people cannot detect it but because of symptoms, they get a warning.
The symptoms of exposure includes:
Irritation in the eyes
Breathing problem
Irritation in the nose and throat
Burning of skin
When exposure level is above 21ppm it can result in:
Bronchial Pneumonia – A condition that causes inflammation of the lungs
Lung edema – A condition caused by the accumulation of excessive fluid in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe
Emphysema – It means damage to the air sacs in the lungs resulting in shortness of breath
Therefore, storing methyl isocyanate requires proper care and caution, and especially when comes to water extra precautions must be taken. Methyl Isocyanate is very sensitive to water. It can be stored in glass or stainless steel, and temperature should be below 40-degree celsius or 104-degree Fahrenheit.
Attributed diseases to the gas exposure
The attributed diseases to gas exposure are as follows:
Ophthalmic Problems – The MIC gas irritated the eyes of the people. MIC gas caused burning, watering, and photophobia, redness of the eye, swelling of the eyelid.
Respiratory and Pulmonary Problems – Inhalation of MIC gas resulted in shortness of breath, suffocation and chest pain. When examined it was found that some victims had suffered necrotizing lesions in their respiratory organs
Reproductivity Toxicity – Gas leak resulted in high-risk factors to the fetus and it not only the gas leak that increased risk but the factors like stress and ingestion of drugs by the mothers.
Genotoxicity – The MIC gas had affected the genetic information of the victims within their cells which had increased their possibility of having cancer.
Neuromuscular Toxicity – It was found that the survivors of the accident had neuromuscular symptoms like numbness, pain, aches, and sensation of needles
The victims suffered many other health problems like carcinogenicity, immunotoxicity, psychological and neurobehavioral toxicity.
After the accident, many cases were filed on behalf of the victims since there was a problem in claiming compensation, and many people, especially the ones having low financial status, couldn’t afford to fight the case for a long time. These cases were filed against UCC in Bhopal as well as in the USA. An effort was also made to settle the matter outside of the court but it wasn’t successful.
Then, after some time passed, the Indian Parliament passed The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985 . According to Section 3 of the Act, the government of India had the power to file cases on behalf of every citizen who was entitled to claim the compensation. The government by Section 9 of the Act introduced “The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Registration And Processing of Claims) Scheme, 1985”.
The Indian Government filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court of NewYork against UCC. But, the UCC pleaded that filing the lawsuit in an American Court was not convenient. They pleaded on the grounds of forum inconvenient (it means that the Court can refuse to take jurisdiction when the parties have more convenient forums to go to). UCC said that since the accident took place in Bhopal and all the evidence was there only so it was more convenient to try in Indian Courts.
So, Keenon J. accepted the plea of UCC and a new case was filed in the District Court of Bhopal. The District Court ordered UCC to pay a sum of Rs 350 crore to the victims. Next, UCC filed an appeal in the Madhya Pradesh High Court against the judgment of Bhopal District Court. This resulted in a decrease in the “interim compensation” from Rs 350 crore to Rs 250 crore. Simultaneously UCC tried to settle the matter directly with the gas victims outside the court. But, M.W. Deo J. of Bhopal District Court put an interim order on UCC to not to make any settlement with any victim until further orders of the Court.
Finally, after the propagation of the rule of Absolute liability, the Court held UCC liable for the Bhopal tragedy. Though people had their doubts that the Indian Judiciary won’t be able to handle the situation. They thought that the wrongdoers would escape from their liability under the rule of Strict liability but it didn’t happen. The Indian Judiciary brought fair justice to the victims.
On 14th and 15th February 1989, the Supreme Court in Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India [1] ordered UCC to pay a sum of $470 million (Rs 750 crores) to the victims.
Principle of Absolute Liability
This liability is also known as “No-Fault Liability”.
Absolute liability is a liability where the accused is held liable but without any exception of getting excused from the liability. Normally, a person can be held liable only when he had mens rea (guilty mind) but in the case of absolute liability, a person can be held liable even if he had no intention of committing the offense.
The principle of absolute liability is similar to strict liability. In the case of strict liability, a person keeps something dangerous with him, and he knows that even the slightest mistake would cause a release of that thing resulting in the death of human beings. So, even if he took proper care and caution but still the thing escaped resulting in the death of a man, he can be held liable under strict liability.
The principle of strict and absolute liability differ only at one point. While on one hand under strict liability, a person is having options to escape the lability so arisen but, on the other hand under absolute liability a person has no such options available.
Rylands v. Fletcher
This doctrine of Strict liability was laid down in Rylands v. Fletche r [2] by Justice Blackburn.
The defendant paid the contractor to build a reservoir on his land.
The contractors while doing their work discovered old coal shafts in the ground.
They decided not to do anything and carried on with their work.
The defendant didn’t know anything about this.
Later on, when the reservoir was filled with water the shaft broke and the water started bursting out of the reservoir.
As a result, the neighbor’s mine was flooded.
The respondent (neighbor) then, filed a suit against the defendant and claimed damages.
The House of Lords propounded the Doctrine of Strict Liability in this case stating that even if the accused did not have any intention of causing any harm to others yet he would be held liable for the same. This was so because of his mistake harm was caused.
Following are the words used by Blackburn J. while propounding the rule: [3]
“We think that the rule of law is, that the person who for his own purposes brings on his lands and keeps there anything likely to do mischief if it escapes, must keep it in at his peril, and if he does not do so, prima facie answerable for all the damage which is the natural consequence of its escape. He can excuse himself by showing that the escape was owing to the plaintiff’s default; or perhaps that the escape was the consequence of vis major, or the act of God: but as nothing of this sort exists here, it is unnecessary to inquire what excuse would be sufficient.”
Another important feature of Strict liability is that for the applicability of this rule the use of land should be non-natural.
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
The Doctrine of Absolute Liability was introduced in this case [4] by P.N. Bhagwati J.
The defendant, Shri Ram Food and Fertilizer Industry belonging to Delhi Cloth Mills Ltd. produced dangerous chemicals.
M.C. Mehta had already filed cases against this industry demanding closure of units of this industry.
On December 4 the oleum gas leaked from one of the units of the industry.
Many people lost their lives in this accident including an advocate practicing in the Tis Hazari Court.
It is believed that the leakage was caused because of mechanical and human errors.
not even two days after the accident there was another minor leakage of oleum gas from the connecting pipes.
District Court ordered Shriram industry to stop their production of lethal gases and chemicals.
M.C. Mehta filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution.
It was the second case of leakage of toxic gas after the leakage of MIC gas from the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal within one year. The Supreme Court knew that if they applied the Doctrine of Strict liability which was laid down in Rylands v. Fletcher case then the industries involved in hazardous work will escape liability by using an exception to the rule of the strict article.
Therefore, the Apex Court decided to introduce a new rule which will align the Indian circumstances. It laid down the rule of Absolute liability which did not have exceptions available to a person under strict liability. The court held the defendant was liable under the rule of absolute liability.
The Court held that the petitioners could claim compensation for the same on behalf of the victims after filing an action in an appropriate court.
The Court, while justifying the rule gave the following two reasons:
An industry knows all about its operations that are being carried out while producing commodities. It is, therefore, the industry’s responsibility to have resources and safeguards in case of any danger.
When an industry is involved in a dangerous or hazardous activity for profit then it owes an obligation towards the public for their safeguard. Therefore, in case of an accident, it has to compensate for the sufferers.
Bhagwati C.J. while laying down the new principal gave the following statement: [5]
“We are of the view that an enterprise which is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous industry which poses a potential threat to the health and safety of the persons working in the factory and residing in the surrounding areas owes an absolute and non-delegable duty to the community to ensure that no harm results to anyone on account of hazardous or inherently dangerous activity which it has undertaken. The enterprise must be held to be under an obligation to provide that the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity in which it is engaged must be conducted with the highest standards of safety and if any harm results on account of such activity, the enterprise must be absolutely liable to compensate for such harm and it should be no answer to the enterprise to say that it had taken all reasonable care and that the harm occurred without any negligence on its part.”
The Court gave the following statement as well: [6]
“Where an enterprise is engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activity and harm results to anyone on account of an accident in the operation of such hazardous or inherently dangerous activity resulting, for example, in the escape of toxic gas, the enterprise is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-a-vis the tortious principle of strict liability under the rule of Rylands v. Fletcher.”
Enactment of Acts
Even after so many years of the accident people living in Bhopal, especially in the places near the plant, are still being affected till date. They haven’t escaped from the consequences of the accident yet. Even now, children who are being born have some kind of problem which is about the accident.
The Government to prevent future environmental hazards caused because of the actions of human beings has decided to implement laws that would protect the environment. Laws that would ensure that in case of disputes some authority is there for a speedy trial.
The Environment Protection Act, 1986
The Environment Protection Act was enacted in the year 1986 after 2 years of the Bhopal tragedy. The main purpose of the Act is to safeguard the environment and prevent future hazards. It is said to be implemented based on the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in June 1972.
The Act contains five chapters and twenty-six sections. This Act is concerned with the protection of the environment, human beings, plants and animals, and prevention of any kind of future hazard like Bhopal tragedy.
This Act is also known as an Umbrella Act because it makes the Union and the State work in coordination for the various other laws like the Water Act and the Air Act.
The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
This Act provides speedy trial to the cases related to matters concerned with environmental protection. In case of any violation of environmental law, or case human beings require protection against the use of hazardous chemicals this Act is applicable. The main purpose of The National Green Tribunal Act is to provide speedy disposal of cases.
This Act has five chapters and thirty-eight sections. This owns its established to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution which provides for “Right to a healthy environment”.
The Factories Act
The Factories Act, 1948 was enacted before the Bhopal accident. But, the provisions of this Act are in favor of the workers involved in factories, industries, and mines. The main purpose of this Act is to ensure the welfare of the workers, to improve the working conditions for the workers and also, it provides special provisions for women and children involved in the factories.
The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
According to the Public Liability Insurance Act,1991 , a person can claim relief in case of an accident caused because of keeping any hazardous chemicals. The Act provides public liability insurance. This Act is based on “No-Fault Liability”. This means that it is the responsibility of the person to compensate for another irrespective of the fact that he was careful enough to avoid any kind of accident.
Widened scope of Article 21 of the Constitution of India
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states that every person has a right to life and personal liberty. Unless a court order, a person cannot be deprived of this right. This Article is considered as the “mini-constitution”. It includes many other rights within itself like, Right to Privacy, Right to Shelter, Right to Information. The Apex Court of India has widened the scope of Article 21 from time to time and by making ‘Right to a clean and healthy environment’ a fundamental right it added more to its dimensions.
The Supreme Court in Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar [7] held that the citizens of India have a fundamental right of living in a free pollution environment for their full enjoyment of life. This even compelled the local authorities to take measures to decrease the rate of pollution in their areas.
In Rural Litigation and Environment Kendra, Dehradun v. State of Uttar Pradesh [8] the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution and ordered some limestone quarries to close down their quarries. It was held that only those quarries which were fit for operating their business and caused less adverse effect could carry out their work. The fitness of a quarry was decided after an inspection.
Initially, there was no provision regarding the protection of the environment but with time, the Supreme Court realized its importance and incorporated it as a fundamental right. There are other provisions, too, in the Indian Constitution that direct the State and the citizens to protect the environment. These provisions include Article 39(b) , 47 , 48 , 49 , 48 A and 51 A (g) .
Amendment in Penalty
According to Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 if a person violates any provision of the Environment Protection Act then he shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5 years, or with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both. And, in case the offender continues to violate the Act then he has to pay an additional fine of Rs 5000 every day from the date of conviction till he stops violating it.
Section 15(2) states that in case the violation continues beyond a period of one year then he can be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years.
Introducing New Legislative Rules
Hazardous rules, 2008.
The Hazardous Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989 was enacted under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 . Later on, it was amended in 2000 and then in 2003.
In 2008, the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling & Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008 superseded the Hazardous Wastes, 1989 and its amendments.
The Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling & Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008 is concerned with the proper management in handling storing, collecting, and disposing of the ‘hazardous wastes’. The Schedule 1, 2 and 3 of the Rule divides hazardous wastes into different categories. The definition of ‘hazardous wastes’ under this Rule does not include exhaust gases, biomedical wastes, wastewater, etc.
Chemical Accident Rules 1996
The production process of different commodities involves dealing with many dangerous chemicals. The use of these chemicals, if proper care and caution is not taken, involves a high-level risk in case of any mishap. Therefore, the government of India introduced Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness, and Response) Rules, 1996 , so that in case of any emergency people would know exactly what to do.
Under these rules a Central Crisis Group, State Crisis Group and a District Crisis Group were to be formed, and these groups would deal with chemical mishaps and provide guidance in dealing with the issue. A list of hazardous chemicals has also been mentioned in the Chemical Accident Rules, 1996 .
Conclusion
No matter how many years have passed, the aftermath of the Bhopal tragedy can still be seen today. Even after holding UCC liable the loss of those people who lost their lives and the ones who are still suffering cannot be measured. Though it is important for the government to promote globalization it should ensure that there are no risks involved. Also, it is the need of the hour that the laws made are implemented in the best way possible because nothing is more important than the lives of the people.
References
A.I.R. 1990 S.C. 273 .
(1868) LR 3 HL 330 .
A.I.R. 1987 S.C. 1086 .
(1991) 1 SCC 598 .
1985 A.I.R. 652, 1985 SCR (3) 169 .
RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR
Sharda vs. dharmpal (2003), g. v. k. industries ltd. vs. income tax officer (2011), difference between guardianship and custody, leave a reply cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
How Indian lawyers can grow their practice with digital marketing and personal branding (absolutely ethically, legally. NO solicitation.)
Register now
Thank you for registering with us, you made the right choice.
Congratulations! You have successfully registered for the webinar. See you there.
Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues Case Study
To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
As a template for you assignment
The Bhopal incident of 1984 is an excellent example of what adverse consequences may multinational corporations bring if they decide to ignore both the environmental and safety regulations. It is also an instance of how companies from developed and industrialized countries export risk to underdeveloped nations. Thousands were injured, and more than 3000 people died as a result of the release of 40 tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC). The incident took place at the Union Carbide Plant in Bhopal in India. This plant was operated by Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), headquartered in West Virginia.
The incident happened because of UCC’s decision to neglect its moral responsibilities. Knowing that it would be financially infeasible to meet environmental standards in the United States, they decided to export the risk to India. However, they continuously ignored India’s requirements as well, exploiting the weaknesses of the local government by manipulating them with financial incentives. With the decrease of the fiscal budget dedicated to employee education, most of the personnel did not receive the necessary knowledge on handling MIC. On the one hand, it made personnel unprofessional because they were incompetent, and on the other, it was an act of paternalism from UCC. By intentionally depriving employees of training, the company divested the workers of information on potential health and life-safety implications of MIC.
After experiencing a decrease in sales volumes and learning that it was financially infeasible to commit to environmental and workplace safety, UCC should have shut down the plant instead of exploiting the vulnerabilities of this less-developed country. Such a decision would not only have saved thousands of lives but would also keep the corporation from spoiling its image in front of people and the global engineering community.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy: What Had Happened?
Bhopal Disaster: Main Causes and Response Measures
Bhopal Disaster Response and Impacts
Hazard Preparedness and Mitigation for Miami, Florida
Draft Disaster/Emergency Plan for the Qatar Civil Defence Department’s Response to Stadium Disaster
The Ras Laffan Emergency and Safety College: Fire Safety Management Plan
Qatar Civil Defence Preparing for a Major Incident
Ladbroke Grove Rail Crash: Causes and Stakeholders
Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2021, August 2). Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bhopal-gas-incident-of-1984-ethical-issues/
"Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues." IvyPanda , 2 Aug. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/bhopal-gas-incident-of-1984-ethical-issues/.
IvyPanda . (2021) 'Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues'. 2 August.
IvyPanda . 2021. "Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues." August 2, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bhopal-gas-incident-of-1984-ethical-issues/.
1. IvyPanda . "Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues." August 2, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bhopal-gas-incident-of-1984-ethical-issues/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues." August 2, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/bhopal-gas-incident-of-1984-ethical-issues/.
BP's Deepwater Horizon Disaster: The Cost of Corporate Negligence #BPDisaster
Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Bhopal Gas Tragedy
5 లక్షల మంది పైగా జీవితాలను నాశనం చేసిన
Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 in Tamil
Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Smt. Sushma Swaraj: 11.08.2010
COMMENTS
The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review
On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to dissociate itself from legal responsibility. Eventually it reached ...
PDF Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study
The Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study Omar Basha Jawaher Alajmy Tahira Newaz. Outline •Introduction •Background •The leak •Bhopal: Investigations and Lessons •Observations from Bhopal •Conclusion •References. The Tragedy • On December 3 1984, Bhopal: MIC, a major component for the production of the pesticide Sevin escaped ...
PDF Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study
1. Introduction. On December 3 1984, in the city of Bhopal, a highly toxic cloud of methyl isocyanate(MIC) vapor burst from the Union Carbide pesticide plant. Of the 800,000 people living in Bhopal at the time, 2,000 died immediately, and as many as 300,000 were injured1.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Legal Consequences of Bhopal Gas Tragedy: The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985: Soon after the man-disaster, noticing the multitude of the suits arising out of the incident, the Indian parliament has passed the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act on 29th March 1985. This Act confers the government to ...
Bhopal Gas Tragedy : Causes, effects and aftermath
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case Study. Bhopal UCIL constructed three underground MIC storage tanks which were named E610, E611, and E619. ... Conclusion. Bhopal Gas Tragedy continues to be an important warning sign for industrialization, for developing countries and in particular India, with human, environmental, and economic pitfalls. ...
Case Study: Bhopal Gas Tragedy (1983-84)
In fact, the gas was not being neutralized but was shooting out the vent scrubber stack and settling over the plant. December 3, 1984 1: 15- 1:30 am: At Bhopal's 1,200-bed Hamidia Hospital, the first patient with eye trouble reported. Within five minutes, there were a thousand patients.
PDF Case Study of the Bhopal Incident
JAPI 36, 1285-1296. Union Carbide Corporation (1985) Bhopal methyl isocyanate incident investigation team report. Union Carbide, Danbury, Connecticut. Vijayan VK, Pandey VP, Sankaran K, Mehrotra Y, Darbari BS, and Misra NP (1989) Bronchoalveolar lavage study in victims of toxic gas leak at Bhopal.
(PDF) Case study for Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Page 1 of 5. Case study for Bhopal Gas Tragedy. Amina Sharif. 19SCO3PH015. 1.0 Introduction: Bhopal disaster, chemical leak in 1984 in the city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh state, India. At the time ...
PDF Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Clears
10 Chapter 6: Conclusion and Discussion 104 11 References 111 12 Appendix 128 13 Glossary 135 . iii ... This report aims to study the Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 through the conceptual framework of Environmental Justice. The relationship has been established by researching the impact of the event in three domains - Policy, Media, and Culture. ...
Revisiting the Bhopal Gas Tragedy: A Comprehensive Case Study on its
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case Study ... Conclusion No matter how many years have passed, the aftermath of the Bhopal tragedy can still be seen today. Even after holding UCC liable the loss of those people who lost their lives and the ones who are still suffering cannot be measured. Though it is important for the government to promote globalization it ...
Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study
Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study. This report provides an overview of the Bhopal Gas disaster which occurred at the Union Carbide pesticide production plant in India in 1984. A large amount of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) was released from tank 610 within the facility, a failure of safety and alarm systems allowed the gas cloud spread and ...
Bhopal disaster
Bhopal disaster, chemical leak in 1984 in the city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh state, India.At the time, it was called the worst industrial accident in history.. On December 3, 1984, about 45 tons of the dangerous gas methyl isocyanate escaped from an insecticide plant that was owned by the Indian subsidiary of the American firm Union Carbide Corporation. ...
PDF Case Study
BHOPAL AS A CASE STUDY Ashok S. Kalelkar Arthur D. Little, Inc. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Presented At The Institution of Chemical Engineers Conference On Preventing Major Chemical Accidents London, England May 1988 ABSTRACT The investigation of large-magnitude incidents is fraught with difficulties and the process of
The Bhopal disaster and its aftermath: a review
Abstract. On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to ...
Bhopal disaster
The Bhopal disaster or Bhopal gas tragedy was a chemical accident on the night of 2-3 December 1984 at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.In what is considered the world's worst industrial disaster, over 500,000 people in the small towns around the plant were exposed to the highly toxic gas methyl isocyanate (MIC).
Bhopal Disaster: Main Causes and Response Measures Case Study
Background. Bhopal gas tragedy is an industrial accident happened in India in December of 1984. The significant release of such a hazardous gas as methyl isocyanate at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) plant in Bhopal led to deaths of about 3,000 people during the first week after the accident. The water entered the tank with the chemicals ...
Bhopal Gas Tragedy: What Had Happened? Case Study
Case Study. The Bhopal gas tragedy occurred on 3 December 1984 in the city of Bhopal, India. The plant had been designed to produce Carbaryl chemical, which is used as an insecticide. The cause of the tragedy became controversial and it provoked two distinct lines of debate.
Conclusion the bhopal disaster has lessons for the
Conclusion The Bhopal disaster has lessons for the developing and developed countries. The developing countries need modern technologies to meet the needs of the population and reach par with the developed countries. Developments requiring chemical and nuclear plants can never be absolutely safe. However, if these plants are to be employed, utmost care should be taken to ensure safety.
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy Report
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy: A Case Study The Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 is a haunting chapter in the history of industrial disasters, revealing the catastrophic consequences of corporate negligence and inadequate safety measures. This case study delves into the events leading up to the tragedy, its immediate impacts, long-term effects on survivors ...
Everything you need to know about the Bhopal Gas Tragedy
The night of 2-3 December 1984, was the most unfortunate night for the Bhopal, in fact not only for Bhopal but for the whole world. Thousands of people lost their lives that night and many are suffering the consequences of the tragedy even now. The incident was caused because of the leakage of Methyl Isocyanate (MiC) gas from the Union Carbide ...
Bhopal Gas Incident of 1984: Ethical Issues Case Study
Thousands were injured, and more than 3000 people died as a result of the release of 40 tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC). The incident took place at the Union Carbide Plant in Bhopal in India. This plant was operated by Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), headquartered in West Virginia. The incident happened because of UCC's decision to neglect ...
Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study
Metadata. This report provides an overview of the Bhopal Gas disaster which occurred at the Union Carbide pesticide production plant in India in 1984. A large amount of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) was released from tank 610 within the facility, a failure of safety and alarm systems allowed the gas cloud spread and kill thousands of people resulting ...
Case Study For Bhopal Gas Tragedy
The document describes the 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy in India, where a toxic gas leak from a Union Carbide pesticide plant killed thousands. There had been prior warnings of safety issues at the plant from 1976 onward. On the night of the leak, water entered a tank of methyl isocyanate during a cleaning procedure, likely due to poor maintenance and unsafe practices. This caused a reaction that ...
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to dissociate itself from legal responsibility. Eventually it reached ...
The Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study Omar Basha Jawaher Alajmy Tahira Newaz. Outline •Introduction •Background •The leak •Bhopal: Investigations and Lessons •Observations from Bhopal •Conclusion •References. The Tragedy • On December 3 1984, Bhopal: MIC, a major component for the production of the pesticide Sevin escaped ...
1. Introduction. On December 3 1984, in the city of Bhopal, a highly toxic cloud of methyl isocyanate(MIC) vapor burst from the Union Carbide pesticide plant. Of the 800,000 people living in Bhopal at the time, 2,000 died immediately, and as many as 300,000 were injured1.
Legal Consequences of Bhopal Gas Tragedy: The Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985: Soon after the man-disaster, noticing the multitude of the suits arising out of the incident, the Indian parliament has passed the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act on 29th March 1985. This Act confers the government to ...
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case Study. Bhopal UCIL constructed three underground MIC storage tanks which were named E610, E611, and E619. ... Conclusion. Bhopal Gas Tragedy continues to be an important warning sign for industrialization, for developing countries and in particular India, with human, environmental, and economic pitfalls. ...
In fact, the gas was not being neutralized but was shooting out the vent scrubber stack and settling over the plant. December 3, 1984 1: 15- 1:30 am: At Bhopal's 1,200-bed Hamidia Hospital, the first patient with eye trouble reported. Within five minutes, there were a thousand patients.
JAPI 36, 1285-1296. Union Carbide Corporation (1985) Bhopal methyl isocyanate incident investigation team report. Union Carbide, Danbury, Connecticut. Vijayan VK, Pandey VP, Sankaran K, Mehrotra Y, Darbari BS, and Misra NP (1989) Bronchoalveolar lavage study in victims of toxic gas leak at Bhopal.
Page 1 of 5. Case study for Bhopal Gas Tragedy. Amina Sharif. 19SCO3PH015. 1.0 Introduction: Bhopal disaster, chemical leak in 1984 in the city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh state, India. At the time ...
10 Chapter 6: Conclusion and Discussion 104 11 References 111 12 Appendix 128 13 Glossary 135 . iii ... This report aims to study the Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 through the conceptual framework of Environmental Justice. The relationship has been established by researching the impact of the event in three domains - Policy, Media, and Culture. ...
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case Study ... Conclusion No matter how many years have passed, the aftermath of the Bhopal tragedy can still be seen today. Even after holding UCC liable the loss of those people who lost their lives and the ones who are still suffering cannot be measured. Though it is important for the government to promote globalization it ...
Bhopal gas Tragedy: A safety case study. This report provides an overview of the Bhopal Gas disaster which occurred at the Union Carbide pesticide production plant in India in 1984. A large amount of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) was released from tank 610 within the facility, a failure of safety and alarm systems allowed the gas cloud spread and ...
Bhopal disaster, chemical leak in 1984 in the city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh state, India.At the time, it was called the worst industrial accident in history.. On December 3, 1984, about 45 tons of the dangerous gas methyl isocyanate escaped from an insecticide plant that was owned by the Indian subsidiary of the American firm Union Carbide Corporation. ...
BHOPAL AS A CASE STUDY Ashok S. Kalelkar Arthur D. Little, Inc. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Presented At The Institution of Chemical Engineers Conference On Preventing Major Chemical Accidents London, England May 1988 ABSTRACT The investigation of large-magnitude incidents is fraught with difficulties and the process of
Abstract. On December 3 1984, more than 40 tons of methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, immediately killing at least 3,800 people and causing significant morbidity and premature death for many thousands more. The company involved in what became the worst industrial accident in history immediately tried to ...
The Bhopal disaster or Bhopal gas tragedy was a chemical accident on the night of 2-3 December 1984 at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.In what is considered the world's worst industrial disaster, over 500,000 people in the small towns around the plant were exposed to the highly toxic gas methyl isocyanate (MIC).
Background. Bhopal gas tragedy is an industrial accident happened in India in December of 1984. The significant release of such a hazardous gas as methyl isocyanate at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) plant in Bhopal led to deaths of about 3,000 people during the first week after the accident. The water entered the tank with the chemicals ...
Case Study. The Bhopal gas tragedy occurred on 3 December 1984 in the city of Bhopal, India. The plant had been designed to produce Carbaryl chemical, which is used as an insecticide. The cause of the tragedy became controversial and it provoked two distinct lines of debate.
Conclusion The Bhopal disaster has lessons for the developing and developed countries. The developing countries need modern technologies to meet the needs of the population and reach par with the developed countries. Developments requiring chemical and nuclear plants can never be absolutely safe. However, if these plants are to be employed, utmost care should be taken to ensure safety.
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy: A Case Study The Bhopal Gas Tragedy of 1984 is a haunting chapter in the history of industrial disasters, revealing the catastrophic consequences of corporate negligence and inadequate safety measures. This case study delves into the events leading up to the tragedy, its immediate impacts, long-term effects on survivors ...
The night of 2-3 December 1984, was the most unfortunate night for the Bhopal, in fact not only for Bhopal but for the whole world. Thousands of people lost their lives that night and many are suffering the consequences of the tragedy even now. The incident was caused because of the leakage of Methyl Isocyanate (MiC) gas from the Union Carbide ...
Thousands were injured, and more than 3000 people died as a result of the release of 40 tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC). The incident took place at the Union Carbide Plant in Bhopal in India. This plant was operated by Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), headquartered in West Virginia. The incident happened because of UCC's decision to neglect ...
Metadata. This report provides an overview of the Bhopal Gas disaster which occurred at the Union Carbide pesticide production plant in India in 1984. A large amount of Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) was released from tank 610 within the facility, a failure of safety and alarm systems allowed the gas cloud spread and kill thousands of people resulting ...
The document describes the 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy in India, where a toxic gas leak from a Union Carbide pesticide plant killed thousands. There had been prior warnings of safety issues at the plant from 1976 onward. On the night of the leak, water entered a tank of methyl isocyanate during a cleaning procedure, likely due to poor maintenance and unsafe practices. This caused a reaction that ...