- General & Introductory Life Sciences
- Ecology & Organismal Biology
- Conservation Science
Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order
ISBN: 978-1-118-35422-3
Wiley-Blackwell
Richard J. Hobbs , Eric S. Higgs , Carol Hall
Land conversion, climate change and species invasions are contributing to the widespread emergence of novel ecosystems, which demand a shift in how we think about traditional approaches to conservation, restoration and environmental management. They are novel because they exist without historical precedents and are self-sustaining. Traditional approaches emphasizing native species and historical continuity are challenged by novel ecosystems that deliver critical ecosystems services or are simply immune to practical restorative efforts. Some fear that, by raising the issue of novel ecosystems, we are simply paving the way for a more laissez-faire attitude to conservation and restoration. Regardless of the range of views and perceptions about novel ecosystems, their existence is becoming ever more obvious and prevalent in today’s rapidly changing world. In this first comprehensive volume to look at the ecological, social, cultural, ethical and policy dimensions of novel ecosystems, the authors argue these altered systems are overdue for careful analysis and that we need to figure out how to intervene in them responsibly. This book brings together researchers from a range of disciplines together with practitioners and policy makers to explore the questions surrounding novel ecosystems. It includes chapters on key concepts and methodologies for deciding when and how to intervene in systems, as well as a rich collection of case studies and perspective pieces. It will be a valuable resource for researchers, managers and policy makers interested in the question of how humanity manages and restores ecosystems in a rapidly changing world. A companion website with additional resources is available at www.wiley.com/go/hobbs/ecosystems
Richard J. Hobbs is Professor of Restoration Ecology and Australian Laureate Fellow at the University of Western Australia, where he leads the Ecosystem Restoration and Intervention Ecology Research Group. His current research focuses on pulling together different disciplines including restoration ecology, conservation biology and landscape ecology to develop a more effective ecology for the 21 st century.
Eric S. Higgs is Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Victoria (Canada), and director of the Mountain Legacy research project. Author of Nature by Design: People, Natural Process and Ecological Restoration , he focuses on advancing principles and practice of ecological restoration in a rapidly changing world.
Carol Hall has worked on community conservation issues in North America and Africa during the past 15 years. She is a co-author of the World Commission on Protected Areas’ Ecological Restoration for Protected Areas: Principles, guidelines and best practices (in press, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN), and currently Program Director for the Restoration Institute, University of Victoria.
Offshore platforms as novel ecosystems: A case study from Australia’s Northwest Shelf
- University of Western Australia
- This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Abstract and Figures
Discover the world's research
- 25+ million members
- 160+ million publication pages
- 2.3+ billion citations
- J ENVIRON MANAGE
- Louise B. Firth
- ESTUAR COAST SHELF S
- Michael J. Marnane
- Vanessa Spielmann
- Richard D. Pillans
- S M Morrison
- J FISH BIOL
- Andrew Taylor
- Gregory W. Stunz
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Email citation, add to collections.
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
- Search in PubMed
- Search in NLM Catalog
- Add to Search
Offshore platforms as novel ecosystems: A case study from Australia's Northwest Shelf
Affiliation.
- 1 School of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Crawley WA Australia.
- PMID: 35169445
- PMCID: PMC8840881
- DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8496
The decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms typically involves removing some or all of the associated infrastructure and the consequent destruction of the associated marine ecosystem that has developed over decades. There is increasing evidence of the important ecological role played by offshore platforms. Concepts such as novel ecosystems allow stakeholders to consider the ecological role played by each platform in the decommissioning process. This study focused on the Wandoo field in Northwest Australia as a case study for the application of the novel ecosystem concept to the decommissioning of offshore platforms. Stereo-baited remote underwater video systems were used to assess the habitat composition and fish communities at Wandoo, as well as two control sites: a sandy one that resembled the Wandoo site pre-installation, and one characterized by a natural reef as a control for natural hard substrate and vertical relief. We found denser macrobenthos habitat at the Wandoo site than at either of the control sites, which we attributed to the exclusion of seabed trawling around the Wandoo infrastructure. We also found that the demersal and pelagic taxonomic assemblages at Wandoo more closely resemble those at a natural reef than those which would likely have been present pre-installation, but these assemblages are still unique in a regional context. The demersal assemblage is characterized by reef-associated species with higher diversity than those at the sand control and natural reef control sites, with the pelagic community characterized by species associated with oil platforms in other regions. These findings suggest that a novel ecosystem has emerged in the Wandoo field. It is likely that many of the novel qualities of this ecosystem would be lost under decommissioning scenarios that involve partial or complete removal. This study provides an example for classifying offshore platforms as novel ecosystems.
Keywords: de facto MPAs; decommissioning; offshore platform ecology; oil and gas; stereo‐BRUVS.
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PubMed Disclaimer
Conflict of interest statement
This project is funded by Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia (VOGA). VOGA has 100% operating interest in the Wandoo field where this work was conducted. VOGA did not participate in the design of the study, analysis of the data, or development of the manuscript.
Location of the three study…
Location of the three study sites, Wandoo, Control Reef and Control Sand, approximately…
Wandoo oil field schematic adapted…
Wandoo oil field schematic adapted from Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia (2014). The…
Percentage habitat composition for each…
Percentage habitat composition for each of the three sites. The habitat types are…
Mean values with standard errors…
Mean values with standard errors (SE) for taxonomic richness (TR), and logged values…
Canonical analysis of principal coordinates…
Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) for abundance of (a) demersal and (b)…
Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) for biomass of (a) demersal and (b)…
Similar articles
- Forecasting the legacy of offshore oil and gas platforms on fish community structure and productivity. Meyer-Gutbrod EL, Love MS, Schroeder DM, Claisse JT, Kui L, Miller RJ. Meyer-Gutbrod EL, et al. Ecol Appl. 2020 Dec;30(8):e02185. doi: 10.1002/eap.2185. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Ecol Appl. 2020. PMID: 32460380
- The influence of depth and a subsea pipeline on fish assemblages and commercially fished species. Bond T, Partridge JC, Taylor MD, Cooper TF, McLean DL. Bond T, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207703. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30475853 Free PMC article.
- Fish associated with a subsea pipeline and adjacent seafloor of the North West Shelf of Western Australia. Bond T, Partridge JC, Taylor MD, Langlois TJ, Malseed BE, Smith LD, McLean DL. Bond T, et al. Mar Environ Res. 2018 Oct;141:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4. Mar Environ Res. 2018. PMID: 30107887
- Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas structures - Environmental opportunities and challenges. Sommer B, Fowler AM, Macreadie PI, Palandro DA, Aziz AC, Booth DJ. Sommer B, et al. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25;658:973-981. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.193. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Sci Total Environ. 2019. PMID: 30583191 Review.
- Potential Impacts of Offshore Oil and Gas Activities on Deep-Sea Sponges and the Habitats They Form. Vad J, Kazanidis G, Henry LA, Jones DOB, Tendal OS, Christiansen S, Henry TB, Roberts JM. Vad J, et al. Adv Mar Biol. 2018;79:33-60. doi: 10.1016/bs.amb.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Mar 9. Adv Mar Biol. 2018. PMID: 30012276 Review.
- Aagard, P. M. , & Besse, C. P. (1973). A Review of the offshore environment ‐ 25 years of progress. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 25, 1355–1360. 10.2118/4699-PA - DOI
- Ajemian, M. J. , Wetz, J. J. , Shipley‐Lozano, B. , Dale Shively, J. , & Stunz, G. W. (2015). An analysis of artificial reef fish community structure along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico Shelf: potential impacts of ‘rigs‐to‐reefs’ programs. PLoS One, 10, 1–22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126354 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Anderson, M. J. (2017). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (pp. 1–15). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
- Anderson, M. J. , Gorley, R. N. , & Clarke, K. R. (2015). PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. PRIMER‐E.
- Anon (2019). Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks. Report for the Director of National Parks.
Associated data
- Dryad/10.5061/dryad.mpg4f4r1s
Related information
Linkout - more resources, full text sources.
- Europe PubMed Central
- PubMed Central
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Societal Attitudes to Urban Novel Ecosystems
NovelEco is a citizen science project that will measure, for the first time, societal attitudes towards urban wild spaces and species (or novel ecosystems) by working with citizens to study them and generate data on these unusual and perhaps overlooked urban ecosystems.
We value your opinion: what do YOU think about urban wild spaces and species? We need lots of information, so please complete our global SURVEY . Send us the location of wild spaces in your community and how you value them. The survey only takes about 20 minutes! See our NEWS section for more info.
We will take a citizen science approach to measure, for the first time, societal attitudes to urban wild spaces by asking citizens to study them. This will address a major gap in understanding whether human contact with nature, especially ‘wild’ nature, can have beneficial social and personal effects.
NovelEco will thus create a new awareness of the transformative potential of urban wild spaces while advancing frontier science in the fields of urban novel ecosystems and social-ecological systems science.
Novel ecosystems
Dr. marcus collier | tedx talk.
Many scientists contend that we are now in a human-created geological era called the Anthropocene . This is the era where the human footprint has altered all aspects of the Earth’s functions. Between 28-36% of the earth has been irreparably transformed by human activities. These areas are called novel ecosystems .
In his TEDx 2015 talk, Marcus talks about novel ecosystems theory, which is proving challenging for our goals of restoring damaged landscapes and conserving habitats and species.
Sign Up for Updates Join our newsletter and receive updates from the NovelEco team!
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
Article Menu
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
Comprehensive assessment of the relationship between metal contamination distribution and human health risk: case study of groundwater in marituba landfill, pará, brazil.
Share and Cite
Soares, R.C.d.O.; de Deus, R.J.A.; Silva, M.M.C.; Faial, K.R.F.; Medeiros, A.C.; Mendes, R.d.A. Comprehensive Assessment of the Relationship between Metal Contamination Distribution and Human Health Risk: Case Study of Groundwater in Marituba Landfill, Pará, Brazil. Water 2024 , 16 , 2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152146
Soares RCdO, de Deus RJA, Silva MMC, Faial KRF, Medeiros AC, Mendes RdA. Comprehensive Assessment of the Relationship between Metal Contamination Distribution and Human Health Risk: Case Study of Groundwater in Marituba Landfill, Pará, Brazil. Water . 2024; 16(15):2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152146
Soares, Roberta C. de O., Ricardo Jorge A. de Deus, Monia M. C. Silva, Kleber Raimundo F. Faial, Adaelson C. Medeiros, and Rosivaldo de A. Mendes. 2024. "Comprehensive Assessment of the Relationship between Metal Contamination Distribution and Human Health Risk: Case Study of Groundwater in Marituba Landfill, Pará, Brazil" Water 16, no. 15: 2146. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152146
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, supplementary material.
ZIP-Document (ZIP, 263 KiB)
Further Information
Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Climate and biodiversity impact of beef and lamb production – A case study in Sweden
- Ahlgren, Serina
- Wirsenius, Stefan
- Toräng, Per
- Carlsson, Annelie
- Seeman, Anett
- Behaderovic, Danira
- Kvarnbäck, Olle
- Parvin, Nargish
- Hessle, Anna
The climate impact of meat production is a hotly debated topic. What is less often highlighted is that grazing ruminants can have positive impacts on biodiversity. The aim of this study was to use a life cycle perspective to assess both the climate and biodiversity impact of different beef and lamb production systems in Sweden. Applying a life cycle perspective, a quantitative method to assess biodiversity was used, with a scoring system based on land use. For the climate impact calculations, the ClimAg biophysical systems model was used, including emissions from drained organic soils and carbon sequestration in mineral soils. The functional unit was 1 kg carcass weight. The results indicated large differences in biodiversity and climate impact between the production systems studied. Dairy bulls had relative low emissions of greenhouse gases, but also a low biodiversity score (a high score indicates higher level of biodiversity). Beef breed steers and heifers had higher emissions of greenhouse gases but a higher biodiversity score, suggesting a trade-off between climate and biodiversity impact. Also for lamb meat, greenhouse gas emissions vary among production systems. A system with winter born lambs slaughtered in spring, closely followed by spring born lambs slaughtered in autumn, had the lowest emissions, while spring born lambs slaughtered in winter had the highest emissions. Winter lambs on the other hand, had a relatively high biodiversity score, due to a long rearing period and an extensive land use with a high proportion of semi-natural grasslands. Climate impact was in all systems related to methane from enteric fermentation, emissions from manure storage, and emissions from organic soils. With the assumptions made in this study, soil carbon sequestration is suggested to reduce the climate impact by 5–7% of the total emissions. Biodiversity impact was in all systems positively related to the amount of grazing in permanent grasslands, in particular semi-natural grasslands. Because semi-natural grasslands are among the most species rich terrestrial ecosystems in Europe, a large surface area grazed resulted in high biodiversity scores in the present model. This study used a novel approach for biodiversity assessment, where the positive contribution of semi-natural grasslands to biodiversity was quantified and put in relation to the modelled climate impact.
- Life cycle assessment;
- Biodiversity;
- Climate impact
Innovative lake pollution profiling: unveiling pollutant sources through advanced multivariate clustering techniques
- Published: 29 July 2024
Cite this article
- Minakshi Mishra 1 , 2 ,
- Anupam Singhal 1 ,
- Srinivas Rallapalli 1 &
- Rishikesh Sharma 1
Explore all metrics
In many developed and developing nations, lakes are the primary source of drinking water. In the current scenario, due to rapid mobilization in anthropogenic activities, lakes are becoming increasingly contaminated. Such practices not only destroy lake ecosystems but also jeopardize human health through water-borne diseases. This study employs advanced hierarchical clustering through multivariate analysis to establish a novel method for concurrently identifying significantly polluted lakes and critical pollutants. A systematic approach has been devised to generate rotating component matrices, dendrograms, monoplots, and biplots by combining R-mode and Q-mode analyses. This enables the identification of contaminant sources and their grouping. A case study analyzing five lakes in Bengaluru, India, has been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. Additionally, one pristine lake from Jammu & Kashmir, India, has been included to validate the findings from the aforementioned five lakes. The study explored correlations among various physical, chemical, and biological characteristics such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, nitrates, biological oxygen demand (BOD), fecal coliform (FC), and total coliform (TC). Critical contaminants forming clusters included conductivity, nitrates, BOD, TC, and FC. Factor analysis identified four primary components that collectively accounted for 85% of the overall variance. Following identification of pollution hotspots, the study recommends source-based pollution control and integrated watershed management, which could significantly reduce lake pollution levels. Continuous monitoring of lake water quality is essential for identifying actual contaminant sources. These findings provide practical recommendations for maximizing restoration efforts, enforcing regulations on pollutant sources, and improving water quality conditions to ensure sustainable development of lakes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Ajayi O, Okeke OC (2024) Assessment of Quality of Surface Water Resources of Kolo Creek and Environs, Niger Delta, Nigeria, using Water Quality index and Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Sch J Sci Technol Res Dev 3(1):101–138
Google Scholar
Alam A, Singh A (2023) Groundwater quality assessment using SPSS based on multivariate statistics and water quality index of Gaya, Bihar (India). Environ Monit Assess 195(6):687
Article CAS Google Scholar
Aliyu AG, Jamil NRB, Adam MBB, Zulkeflee Z (2020) Spatial and seasonal changes in monitoring water quality of Savanna River system. Arab J Geosci 13:1–13
Article Google Scholar
Alvareda E, Lucas C, Paradiso M et al. (2020) Water quality evaluation of two urban streams in Northwest Uruguay: are national regulations for urban stream quality sufficient? Environ Monit Assess 192:661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08614-6
Andrabi S, Bakhtiyar Y, Yousuf T, Akhtar M, Nissar S (2024) Water quality assessment in relation to fish assemblage using multivariate analysis in Manasbal Lake. Kashmir Water Sci 38(1):92–108
Arora S, Keshari AK (2021) Pattern recognition of water quality variance in Yamuna River (India) using hierarchical agglomerative cluster and principal component analyses. Environ Monit Assess 193(8):494
Asgher MS, Sharma S, Singh R, Singh D (2021) Assessing human interactions and sustainability of Wetlands in Jammu, India using Geospatial technique. Modeling Earth Syst Environ 7:2793–2807
Aydin H, Ustaoğlu F, Tepe Y, Soylu EN (2021) Assessment of water quality of streams in northeast Turkey by water quality index and multiple statistical methods. Environ Forensics 22(1–2):270–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2020.1836074
Balcerowska-Czerniak G, Gorczyca B (2024) Rapid assessment of surface water quality using statistical multivariate analysis approach: Oder River system case study. Sci Total Environ 912:168754
Barroso GR, Pinto CC, Gomes LNL, Oliveira SC (2024) Assessment of water quality based on statistical analysis of physical-chemical, biomonitoring and land use data: Manso River supply reservoir. Sci Total Environ 912:169554
Batur E, Maktav D (2018) Assessment of surface water quality by using satellite images fusion based on PCA method in the Lake Gala, Turkey. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 57(5):2983–2989
Benkov I, Varbanov M, Venelinov T, Tsakovski S (2023) Principal Component Analysis and the Water Quality Index—A Powerful Tool for Surface Water Quality Assessment: A Case Study on Struma River Catchment,. Bulgaria Water 15(10):1961
CAS Google Scholar
Chethan N, Rajanna KB, Adarsha K, Amogha KR (2023) Impact of Water Quality on Production and Productivity in Varthur Lake, Karnataka. J Exp Zool India 26(1):279–283. https://doi.org/10.51470/jez.2023.26.1.279
Chidiac S, El Najjar P, Ouaini N, El Rayess Y, El Azzi D (2023) A comprehensive review of water quality indices (WQIs): History, models, attempts and perspectives. Rev Environ Sci Bio Technol 22(2):349–395
Cho YC, Im JK, Han J, Kim SH, Kang T, Lee S (2023) Comprehensive Water Quality Assessment Using Korean Water Quality Indices and Multivariate Statistical Techniques for Sustainable Water Management of the Paldang Reservoir. South Korea Water 15(3):509
CPCB (2016) Annual Report 2016-17. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). Retrieved from https://cpcb.nic.in/annual-report.php
CPCB (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021). Water Quality Data. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). Retrieved from https://cpcb.nic.in/nwmp-data-2016/
Cüce H, Kalipci E, Ustaoğlu F, Dereli MA, Türkmen M (2022) Multivariate statistical and spatial assessment of water quality from a dam threatened by drought at the mid-Anatolia, Cappadocia/Turkey. Arab J Geosci 15(5):441
Das CR, Das S, Panda S (2022) Groundwater quality monitoring by correlation, regression and hierarchical clustering analyses using WQI and PAST tools. Groundw Sustain Dev 16:100708
Das R, Chanakya HN, Rao L (2022) Study towards understanding foaming and foam stability in urban lakes. J Environ Manag 322:116111
Fadel A, Kanj M, Slim K (2021) Water Quality Index variations in a Mediterranean reservoir: a multivariate statistical analysis relating it to different variables over 8 years. Environ Earth Sci 80:1–13
Gani A, Pathak S, Hussain A, Ahmed S, Singh R, Khevariya A, … & Bahadur A (2023) Water quality index assessment of river ganga at haridwar stretch using multivariate statistical technique. Mol Biotechnol, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-023-00864-2
Gao Z, Han C, Yuan S, Liu J, Peng Y, Li C (2022) Assessment of the hydrochemistry, water quality, and human health risk of groundwater in the northwest of Nansi Lake Catchment, north China. Environ Geochem Health 44(3):961–977
Ghebremedhin SG, Gupta BS (2023) Spatio-temporal water quality assessment and pollution source apportionment of Lake Chamo using water quality index and multivariate statistical techniques. Eur J Environ Earth Sci 4(1):11–19
Gorain B, Parama VR, Paul S (2018) Impact of Idol Immersion Activities on the Water Quality ofHebbal and Bellandur Lakes of Bengaluru in Karnataka. J Soil Salin Water Qual 10(1):112–117
Gradilla-Hernández MS, de Anda J, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Meza-Rodríguez D, Yebra Montes C, Perfecto-Avalos Y (2020) Multivariate water quality analysis of Lake Cajititlán,. Mex Environ Monit Assess 192(1):5
Han Q, Tong R, Sun W, Zhao Y, Yu J, Wang G, Jin Y (2020) Anthropogenic influences on the water quality of the Baiyangdian Lake in North China over the last decade. Sci Total Environ 701:134929
Hatipoğlu Temizel E (2023) Assessment of the water quality using multivariate statistics and the water quality index: a case study of the Yağlıdere Stream (Giresun) in the Eastern Black Sea region, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 195(12):1484
He W, Xu Y, Zhang J, Zhu J, Dong H, Zhong F, Li H (2023) Characteristics analysis of water pollutants in Cihu Lake, China, based on a multivariate statistical analysis method. Environ Monit Assess 195(1):151
Hou X, Feng L, Tang J, Song XP, Liu J, Zhang Y, Bryan BA (2020) Anthropogenic transformation of Yangtze Plain freshwater lakes: Patterns, drivers and impacts. Remote Sens Environ 248:111998
Jamwal P, Carvalho L, Bhattacharyya S, Muttepawar P (2023) The benefits of restoring urban lakes in the tropics. Environ Monit Assess 195(11):1294
Jesi AA, Feisal NAS, Windusari Y, Samat NA, Kamaludin NH, Derahim N, … & Azhar TNBTI (2024). Klang river water quality assessment and its effects on human health using chemometric analysis. J Environ Health, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v16i2.2024.125-136
Khouri L, Al-Mufti MB (2022) Assessment of surface water quality using statistical analysis methods: Orontes River (Case study). Baghdad Sci J 19(5):0981–0981
Kükrer S, Mutlu E (2019) Assessment of surface water quality using water quality index and multivariate statistical analyses in Saraydüzü Dam Lake, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 191:1–16
Kumari R, Sharma RC (2019) Assessment of water quality index and multivariate analysis of high-altitude sacred Lake Prashar, Himachal Pradesh, India. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:6125–6134
Longchar L, Temjen W, Semy K, Lemla W (2023) Estimation of water quality of Dikhu River of Nagaland through a combination of water quality index and principal component analysis techniques. Karbala Int J Mod Sci 9(4):4
Lu J, Gu J, Han J, Xu J, Liu Y, Jiang G, Zhang Y (2023) Evaluation of Spatiotemporal Patterns and Water Quality Conditions Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis in the Yangtze River. China Water 15(18):3242
Lukusa C, Rajasekhar PV, Baloyi ND, Amina N (2024) Water Quality and Pollution Status using Principal Component Analysis of Lake Nsezi in Richards Bay, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Res J Chem Environ Vol 28:1
Maansi, Jindal R, Wats M (2022) Evaluation of surface water quality using water quality indices (WQIs) in Lake Sukhna, Chandigarh, India. Appl Water Sci 12:1–14
Masood A, Aslam M, Pham QB et al. (2022) Integrating water quality index, GIS and multivariate statistical techniques towards a better understanding of drinking water quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:26860–26876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17594-0
Mechal A, Fekadu D, Abadi B (2024) Multivariate and Water Quality Index Approaches for Spatial Water Quality Assessment in Lake Ziway, Ethiopian Rift. Water Air Soil Pollut 235:78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06882-9
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2015) Wetlands, Hoboken, New Jersey, John wiley & sons.
Mohammed A, Mengistou S, Fetahi T (2024) Evaluation of water quality and trophic status in relation to seasonal water mixing in a highland Lake Ardibo, Ethiopia. Water Sci Technol, 89:2703–2715
Mokarram M, Saber A, Sheykhi V (2020) Effects of heavy metal contamination on river water quality due to release of industrial effluents. J Clean Prod 277:123380
Muniz DH, Oliveira-Filho EC (2023) Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Water Quality Assessment: A Review of Research Published between 2001 and 2020. Hydrology 10(10):196
Mutlu E, Tokatli C, Islam ARMT, Islam MS, Muhammad S (2023) Water quality assessment of Şehriban Stream (Kastamonu, Türkiye) from a multi-statistical perspective. Int J Environ Anal Chem 103(1):1–17
Nair B, Hemath Naveen KS (2022) Assessment of Lake Water Quality in Gudiyattam Region using Multivariate Statistical Techniques. J Environ Treat Tech 10(1):92–102. https://doi.org/10.47277/JETT/10(1)102
Ndungu J, Augustijn DC, Hulscher SJ, Fulanda B, Kitaka N, Mathooko JM (2014) A multivariate analysis of water quality in Lake Naivasha. Kenya Mar Freshw Res 66(2):177–186
Panseriya HZ, Gosai HB, Gavali DJ, Dave BP (2023) Assessment of surface water quality during different tides and an anthropogenic impact on coastal water at Gulf of Kachchh, West Coast of India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(10):28053–28065
Prusty P, Farooq SH (2020) Application of Water Quality Index and Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Assessing Coastal Water Quality. Environ Process 7:805–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00453-4
Rajanna KB (2023) Assessment of water quality of Bellandur Lake in Bengaluru, Karnataka, The Pharma Innovation Journal, India
Ramachandra TV, Asulabha KS, Sincy V (2021) Phosphate loading and foam formation in urban lakes. GP Globalize Res J Chem 5(1):33–52
Ramachandra TV, Sudarshan P, Vinay S, Asulabha KS, Varghese S (2020) Nutrient and heavy metal composition in select biotic and abiotic components of Varthur wetlands, Bangalore, India. SN Appl Sci 2:1–14
Ramachandra TV, Durga MM, Vinay S, Sincy V, Asulabha KS, Sudarshan B, Bharath HA (2017) Bellandur and Varthur Lakes Rejuvenation Blueprint, ENVIS Technical Report 116, Environmental Information System, CES, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012
Rao SM, Mogili NV (2021) New classification method to evaluate pollution levels of sewage contaminated lakes. Sustainability 13(7):3677
Salah S (2023) Water Quality Analysis of Hebbal Lake, Bangalore, Karnataka, India for the Survival of Fishes. J Surv Fisheries Sci 10:2565–2571
Samal NR, Saha P, Roy PK, Biswasroy M, Venkat Ramana R, Mazumdar A (2011) Limnological analysis of an urban polluted lake in Bangalore city in India. Desalination Water Treat 30(1-3):217–228
Santhanam H, Majumdar R (2022) Quantification of green-blue ratios, impervious surface area and pace of urbanisation for sustainable management of urban lake–land zones in India-a case study from Bengaluru city. J Urban Manag 11(3):310–320
Schreiber SG, Schreiber S, Tanna RN, Roberts DR, Arciszewski TJ (2022) Statistical tools for water quality assessment and monitoring in river ecosystems–a scoping review and recommendations for data analysis. Water Qual Res J 57(1):40–57
Sharma P, Bora PJ (2020) Water quality assessment using water quality index and principal component analysis: A case study of historically important lakes of Guwahati City, North-East India. Appl Ecol Environ Sci 8(5):207–217
Sikakwe GU, Nwachukwu AN, Uwa CU (2020) Geochemical data handling, using multivariate statistical methods for environmental monitoring and pollution studies. Environ Technol Innov 18:100645
Srinivas R, Singh AP, Gupta AA, Kumar P (2018) Holistic approach for quantification and identification of pollutant sources of a river basin by analyzing the open drains using an advanced multivariate clustering. Environ Monit Assess 190:1–24
Srinivas R, Singh AP, Jain V, Bhamra RS, Sharma P (2020) Evaluation and quantification of pollution caused by open drains in Ganges River basin using multivariate cluster analysis. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 17(1):75–82
Subramaniam P, Ahmed AN, Fai CM, Abdul Malek M, Kumar P, Huang YF, Elshafie A (2023) Integrated GIS and multivariate statistical approach for spatial and temporal variability analysis for lake water quality index. Cogent Eng 10(1):2190490
Sudarshan P, Mahesh MK, Ramachandra TV (2019) Assessment of seasonal variation in water quality and water quality index (WQI) of Hebbal Lake, Bangalore. India Environ Ecol 37(1B):309–317
Sudarshan P, Mahesh MK, Ramachandra TV (2020) Dynamics of metal pollution in sediment and macrophytes of Varthur Lake, Bangalore. Bull Environ Contamination Toxicol 104:411–417
Tibebe D, Zewge F, Lemma B, Kassa Y (2022) Assessment of spatio-temporal variations of selected water quality parameters of Lake Ziway, Ethiopia using multivariate techniques. BMC Chem 16(1):11
Uddin MG, Nash S, Rahman A, Olbert AI (2023) Performance analysis of the water quality index model for predicting water state using machine learning techniques. Process Saf Environ Prot 169:808–828
Unigwe CO, Egbueri JC (2023) Drinking water quality assessment based on statistical analysis and three water quality indices (MWQI, IWQI and EWQI): a case study. Environ Dev Sustain 25:686–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02076-7
Vaid M, Sarma K, Kala P, Gupta A (2022) The plight of Najafgarh drain in NCT of Delhi, India: assessment of the sources, statistical water quality evaluation, and fate of water pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(60):90580–90600
Vasistha P, Ganguly R (2020) Water quality assessment of natural lakes and its importance: An overview. Mater Today Proc 32:544–552
Wang J, Fu Z, Qiao H, Liu F (2019) Assessment of eutrophication and water quality in the estuarine area of Lake Wuli, Lake Taihu, China. Sci Total Environ 650:1392–1402
Wu Z, Lai X, Li K (2021) Water quality assessment of rivers in Lake Chaohu Basin (China) using water quality index. Ecol Indic 121:107021
Xiao J, Gao D, Zhang H, Shi H, Chen Q, Li H, Chen Q (2023) Water quality assessment and pollution source apportionment using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Laixi River Basin, China. Environ Monit Assess 195(2):287
Xie D, Li X, Zhou T, Feng Y (2023) Estimating the contribution of environmental variables to water quality in the postrestoration littoral zones of Taihu Lake using the APCS-MLR model. Sci Total Environ 857:159678
Zafar MM, Kumari A (2024) Spatio-temporal evaluation of the impact of anthropogenic stressors on physico-chemical characteristics and water quality of the River Ganga using GIS-based approach in the middle Gangetic Plains at Patna, Bihar, India. Water Sci Technol 1 89(5):1382–1400. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.053
Zhang Z, Guo Y, Wu J, Su F (2022) Surface water quality and health risk assessment in Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province (China). Exposure Health 14:1–16
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Rajasthan, 333031, India
Minakshi Mishra, Anupam Singhal, Srinivas Rallapalli & Rishikesh Sharma
REVA- University, Bengaluru, India
Minakshi Mishra
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
MM: Conceptualization, Methodology; Investigation; Data analysis; Writing- Original draft preparation, SoftwareAS: Writing- Original draft preparation; Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision SR: Conceptualization, Software, Writing- Original draft preparation; Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision RS: Conceptualization, Software, Writing- Original draft preparation.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Srinivas Rallapalli .
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary material, rights and permissions.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Mishra, M., Singhal, A., Rallapalli, S. et al. Innovative lake pollution profiling: unveiling pollutant sources through advanced multivariate clustering techniques. Environmental Management (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02020-1
Download citation
Received : 07 June 2024
Accepted : 14 July 2024
Published : 29 July 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02020-1
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Multivariate clustering
- Pollution sources
- Water quality
- Water pollution
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
- Get Involved
- my-undp-climate-demographic-final-report pdf (33.7 MB)
Transitioning Futures, Anticipating Change: Socio-economic Futures of Malaysia's Climate & Demographic Transition
my-undp-climate-demographic-final-report
July 30, 2024
The foresight report highlights the intersection between two megatrends — climate change and Malaysia’s changing demographic — and maps out the future implications of these shifts on two socio-economic areas; firstly, the nation’s economic structures and the labour market, and secondly, the well-being of the elderly and their families. Through collective foresight, engagement with experts and consultation with 540 stakeholders nationwide, 19 key intersections of climate and demographic change and 91 signals of change were identified, leading to 3 plausible futures. The report also highlights the result of wind- tunelling analysis of governance structure notably 49 acts and 61 policies — Malaysia’s future preparedness showcases areas of strength alongside notable gaps.
Document Type
Regions and countries, sustainable development goals, related publications, publications, enabling investments into the malaysian care economy.
This report summarizes the findings and recommendations made in a longer report “MALAYSIAN CARE ECONOMY: LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS” which was commissioned by the Unite...
Partnership in Action: Climate Action, Biodiversity Conse...
The Nature, Climate and Energy (NCE) team invites you to dive into the country office’s work over the past five years in this compilation of stories revolving a...
Anti-Corruption Policy Implementation: An Experience from...
This report presents key lessons learned from the experiences of the Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea in their anti-corruption...
Case Studies on Innovation in Islamic Finance
This report covers selected case studies in the Islamic finance and social finance ecosystem in Malaysia and Indonesia. These case studies document eco-building...
Ecosystem for Effective Solutions to Support MSME's Covid...
This report presents findings and analysis of the Malaysian experience in supporting the micro, small, and medium-sized enterprise (MSME) sector to (a) synthesi...
Economic Value of Ecosystem Services of the Taman Negara ...
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) reports under the UNDP-supported GEF-financed project titled Enhancing Effectiveness and Financial Sustainab...
Advertisement
Supported by
DealBook Newsletter
Why Is It So Hard for Olympic Host Cities to Control Costs?
An Oxford study estimates that despite cost-cutting efforts, Paris is spending more than $1 billion above the Games’ historical median cost.
- Share full article
By Vivienne Walt and Sarah Kessler
Follow live updates of the women’s gymnastics qualifying at the 2024 Paris Olympics.
Like every city that hosts the Olympics, Paris designed its opening ceremony to make a splash, with ethereal dance performances, athletes floating down the Seine and a blowout performance by Celine Dion. A big display is table stakes, and hundreds of thousands of people jammed the city’s bridges and riverbanks for hours to cheer the flotilla.
But to make these Olympics truly unique, Paris also had something quieter in mind: It vowed to buck the decades-long trend of spending a dizzying fortune on hosting them.
That vision for a budget-conscious Olympics does not seem to have panned out. The tab for the Games in Paris, the first city to fully test cost-cutting reforms that the International Olympic Committee introduced in 2019, is at least $8.87 billion. That isn’t an eye-popping bill compared with the $17 billion that London spent in 2012, the estimated $28 billion that Tokyo spent in 2021 or the $24 billion that Rio de Janeiro spent in 2016 — the three most expensive Summer Games to date. But the figure is more than $1 billion above the historical median cost of hosting the Games, according to a study by researchers at Oxford’s Said Business School published in May. And it is about 115 percent above Paris’s initial estimate.
“This is not the cheap Games that were promised,” the study concluded.
Figuring out how to keep host city expenses on budget is vital for the Olympics, which have struggled to find host cities in places where citizens have a say in the decision. When the I.O.C. voted on Wednesday to give the 2030 Winter Games to the French Alps and the 2034 Winter Games to Salt Lake City, both cities were the only candidates.
Repurposing buildings hasn’t necessarily solved the Games’ budgeting problem. Paris’s central argument in its bid for hosting rights was that reusing existing sporting facilities would help it avoid the steep capital investment that inflicted lasting economic pain on Olympic cities like Athens and Rio de Janeiro, as well as stave off anti-Olympic sentiment in the city. Los Angeles, host of the 2028 Summer Games, has promised no new Olympic buildings.
But while refurbishing buildings may be more sustainable , adapting old monuments for the Olympics has taken years — at a cost that has not been revealed. Take the 125-year-old Grand Palais, a soaring iron, glass-roofed exhibition hall in central Paris, where fencing and taekwondo competitions will take place. It shut down for renovations in March 2021 and was scheduled to be closed for so long that the city constructed a new Grand Palais near the Eiffel Tower.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- v.12(2); 2022 Feb
Offshore platforms as novel ecosystems: A case study from Australia’s Northwest Shelf
Sean van elden.
1 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA, Australia
Jessica J. Meeuwig
Richard j. hobbs, associated data.
Survey data can be accessed through Dryad ( https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mpg4f4r1s ).
The decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms typically involves removing some or all of the associated infrastructure and the consequent destruction of the associated marine ecosystem that has developed over decades. There is increasing evidence of the important ecological role played by offshore platforms. Concepts such as novel ecosystems allow stakeholders to consider the ecological role played by each platform in the decommissioning process. This study focused on the Wandoo field in Northwest Australia as a case study for the application of the novel ecosystem concept to the decommissioning of offshore platforms. Stereo‐baited remote underwater video systems were used to assess the habitat composition and fish communities at Wandoo, as well as two control sites: a sandy one that resembled the Wandoo site pre‐installation, and one characterized by a natural reef as a control for natural hard substrate and vertical relief. We found denser macrobenthos habitat at the Wandoo site than at either of the control sites, which we attributed to the exclusion of seabed trawling around the Wandoo infrastructure. We also found that the demersal and pelagic taxonomic assemblages at Wandoo more closely resemble those at a natural reef than those which would likely have been present pre‐installation, but these assemblages are still unique in a regional context. The demersal assemblage is characterized by reef‐associated species with higher diversity than those at the sand control and natural reef control sites, with the pelagic community characterized by species associated with oil platforms in other regions. These findings suggest that a novel ecosystem has emerged in the Wandoo field. It is likely that many of the novel qualities of this ecosystem would be lost under decommissioning scenarios that involve partial or complete removal. This study provides an example for classifying offshore platforms as novel ecosystems.
We assessed the marine communities at the Wandoo offshore oil platform in northwest Australia, and compared these communities with natural habitats. We found that the marine community at Wandoo more closely resembles that of a natural reef than the community that would have been present prior to the installation of the platform. The Wandoo platform can be classified as a novel ecosystem, which should be considered at the time of decommissioning.
1. INTRODUCTION
Offshore oil and gas platforms (hereafter offshore platforms) have been a feature of continental shelf waters for over 70 years, with nearly 12,000 of these structures currently installed around the world (Aagard & Besse, 1973 ; Ars & Rios, 2017 ). When an offshore platform is no longer economically viable, a decision is made on the fate of the structure through a process referred to as decommissioning. In most cases, decommissioning involves complete removal of the platform from the marine environment for scrapping or recycling on land (Schroeder & Love, 2004 ). Complete removal is legislated as the default decommissioning method in many countries and regions, including Australia and the North Sea, as well as internationally under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the 1996 Protocol to the London (Dumping) Convention (Chandler et al., 2017 ; Elizabeth, 1996 ; Techera & Chandler, 2015 ). However, the London Convention does permit in situ decommissioning for purposes other than disposal, and some regions have legislated such methods. In the Gulf of Mexico, platforms can be left either wholly or partially in place, or towed to a new location, under a program known as Rigs‐to‐Reefs (RTR, Reggio, 1987 ). Offshore platforms have been shown to form highly complex artificial reefs (Shinn, 1974 ), and RTR programs represent a method for preserving and maintaining these artificial reef communities that are established around offshore platforms over the decades they spend in the ocean, similar to the reefs formed by shipwrecks (Dauterive, 2000 ; Leewis et al., 2000 ). In situ decommissioning is a financially beneficial option for energy companies due to the excessive costs associated with complete removal (Dauterive, 2000 ), and this motivation is often used as an argument against rigs‐to‐reefs, particularly by environmental groups (Löfstedt & Renn, 1997 ).
Offshore platforms play various ecological roles, including acting as aggregation sites for marine megafauna (Haugen & Papastamatiou, 2019 ; Robinson et al., 2013 ), nurseries for juvenile fishes (Love et al., 2019 ; Nishimoto et al., 2019 ), and providing habitat for economically important and overfished species (Bond, Langlois, et al., 2018 ; Love et al., 2006 ). The presence of these offshore platforms creates new habitat, which can have a significant impact on fish production; platforms in California are some of the most productive fish habitats in the world, and platforms in Gabon have higher fish biomass than pristine reefs in the Pacific (Claisse et al., 2014 ; Friedlander et al., 2014 ). Fishing is excluded around offshore platforms in many countries, either by law as is the current case in Australia (Commonwealth of Australia, 2010 ), or by the presence of subsea infrastructure which can damage fishing equipment (de Groot, 1982 ). The partial or complete exclusion of fishing effectively creates de facto marine protected areas (MPAs) around offshore platforms (de Groot, 1982 ; Friedlander et al., 2014 ). The exclusion of fishing is particularly important in areas which are overfished, or where hard substrate is limited and infrastructure may be some of the only obstacles to trawling (de Groot, 1982 ; Fujii & Jamieson, 2016 ; Love et al., 2006 ; Schroeder & Love, 2002 ).
There is an increasing research focus around the world on the potential ecological importance of offshore platforms, and particularly on ensuring that the role of these platforms as ecosystems is considered in the decommissioning process (Bull & Love, 2019 ; Fowler et al., 2014 , 2018 ; Macreadie et al., 2012 ; Meyer‐Gutbrod et al., 2020 ). An ecological perspective of offshore platforms allows scientists to apply restoration principles to the decommissioning process, in a similar way to terrestrial restoration of abandoned mine sites (Koch & Hobbs, 2007 ). The presence of offshore platforms modifies communities and habitats to such an extent that returning the site to its pre‐installation state may no longer be feasible or preferable (Sommer et al., 2019 ), and as such, the benefits of in situ decommissioning must be evaluated.
This assertion is congruent with the concept of novel ecosystems, which is intended to complement existing restoration practices. A novel ecosystem is one which has been altered by human activity and where restoration is not feasible or would result in the loss of ecosystem value (Hobbs et al., 2013 ). Recently, there have been attempts to apply restoration management concepts to offshore platforms in terms of: establishing ecological baselines for restoring the ecosystem post‐decommissioning (Fortune & Paterson, 2020 ); the potential for restoration paradigms to shift the discourse surrounding RTR decommissioning (Ounanian et al., 2019 ); and direct application of novel ecosystems criteria to offshore platforms (Schläppy & Hobbs, 2019 ; van Elden et al., 2019 ).
There is still a significant knowledge gap around the ecology of these platforms, particularly outside of the major northern hemisphere oil and gas producing regions. In Australia, only a limited number of studies exist on the fish and shark communities around offshore infrastructure (Bond, Langlois, et al., 2018 ; Bond, Partridge, et al., 2018 ; Fowler & Booth, 2012 ; McLean et al., 2019 ; Pradella et al., 2014 ; Thomson et al., 2021 ). Information on how ecological value is retained under varying decommissioning scenarios is needed at a time when the Australian government is reviewing legislation to potentially allow in situ decommissioning options (Offshore Resources Branch, 2018 ; Taylor, 2020 ). It is critical that we understand the ecological role platforms play in a regional context before the associated ecosystems are potentially lost due to decommissioning and restoration activity.
The offshore oil and gas producing region of northwest Australia, the Northwest Shelf (NWS), is comprised of over 40 production facilities and over 2000 km of subsea pipelines (Bond, Partridge, et al., 2018 ; Geoscience Australia, 2009 ). This is not a large number of platforms when compared with other locations around the world. However, the NWS is largely devoid of any significant natural hard substrate, and therefore offshore platforms contribute a significant portion of such habitat regionally, along with its associated fishes. This area was historically characterized by established macrobenthos communities made up of sponges, gorgonians, and soft corals on flat, sand inundated pavement (Evans et al., 2014 ). These macrobenthos communities were largely removed by pair‐trawling operations in the 1960s and 1970s (Fromont et al., 2016 ; Sainsbury et al., 1997 ). Previous studies on both platforms and pipelines on the NWS have found significant macrobenthos habitat associated with these structures, and abundance and richness of fish was higher on pipelines than on nearby natural habitats (Bond, Langlois, et al., 2018 ; Bond, Partridge, et al., 2018 ; McLean et al., 2018 , 2019 ). These results suggest that the hard substrate provided by oil and gas infrastructure may modify the habitat and associated communities from their previously trawled state.
We investigate whether the presence of active offshore infrastructure at a site on the NWS has resulted in the emergence of a novel ecosystem, characterized by a shift in the structure of marine communities. Demersal and pelagic taxonomic assemblages, as well as macrobenthos communities, were documented around the infrastructure in the Wandoo oil field (Wandoo) over 3 years and six surveys and in contrast to two control sites: a sandy site (Control Sand) and a natural reef (Control Reef). Baseline (pre‐installation) ecological information for the Wandoo site was not collected, as has been the case for many older offshore platforms (Fortune & Paterson, 2020 ). As such, the Control Sand site acts as a proxy for the historical state of the Wandoo site. We determined historical state as the state of the environment immediately prior to the installation of the Wandoo infrastructure, and as such, this site would have been subject to trawling. Anthropogenic disturbance creates challenges in selecting historical baselines, and our baseline selection is congruent with the Anthropocene baseline concept (Kopf et al., 2015 ). The Control Reef site is characterized by a rocky substrate with significant physical relief, and similar in spatial extent to the infrastructure in the Wandoo field. Control Reef provides contrast to the Wandoo site in the form of a natural reef that is comparable in size (area) and depth (m). These two sites allowed us to both assess Wandoo as a novel ecosystem and predict how the marine communities would be altered under two different decommissioning scenarios. Specifically, complete removal may see the Wandoo site revert to a state more similar to the Control Sand site, and partial removal (topping) may lead to something more similar to the Control Reef site, due to the loss of the mid‐water hard substrate. We chose to use the post‐trawling state of the Northwest Shelf as our historical baseline, as if the Wandoo infrastructure were to be removed, this area would likely be exposed to trawling again. We used baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS) to determine how taxonomic richness, abundance, biomass, fork length, and community assemblage structure varied between these sites, as well as intra‐ and inter‐annually. We hypothesize that the demersal and pelagic assemblages at Wandoo would more closely resemble those at the control reef site than those at the control sand site with respect to diversity, abundance, and size. We then evaluated our findings on the Wandoo field against the criteria for testing whether an offshore platform can be classified as a novel ecosystem (van Elden et al., 2019 ).
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. study sites.
The three sites sampled are located in the NWS region of northwest Australia, approximately 75 km northwest of Dampier, Western Australia (Figure (Figure1). 1 ). The sites are all situated in waters approximately 50–60 m deep. The Wandoo site (WN) is an active oil field leased by Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia Pty Ltd (Vermilion). This site contains oil production infrastructure including: Wandoo A, an unmanned monopod wellhead platform with a 2.5‐m‐diameter shaft supporting a helideck and production infrastructure; Wandoo B, a concrete gravity structure (CGS) made up of a 114 m long by 69 m wide caisson and four shafts, each 11 m in diameter, supporting the superstructure approximately 18 m above the sea surface; and a catenary anchored leg mooring (CALM) buoy, with six moorings and a Pipeline End Manifold (PLEM) below the buoy (Figure (Figure2). 2 ). The infrastructure at the Wandoo site is surrounded by a 500 m exclusion zone, within which only authorized vessels are permitted to operate (Commonwealth of Australia, 2010 ). These exclusion zones are in place around all offshore platforms in Australia, and represent some of the only areas on the Northwest Shelf fully protected from commercial fishing activity. Two control sites, comparable in depth to Wandoo, were also sampled: a flat sand‐dominated site, Control Sand (CS) comparable to the Wandoo site prior to infrastructure installation in 1994; and a reef site, Control Reef (CR) that is a natural structure comparable in dimension to the Wandoo infrastructure.
Location of the three study sites, Wandoo, Control Reef and Control Sand, approximately 75 km north‐west of Dampier, Western Australia
Wandoo oil field schematic adapted from Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia ( 2014 ). The infrastructure at the Wandoo field includes the unmanned monopod Wandoo A, the concrete gravity structure Wandoo B, the pipeline end manifold (PLEM), and the catenary anchored leg mooring (CALM) Buoy. Not to scale
The CS site is situated approximately 15 km northeast of the Wandoo site (Figure (Figure1) 1 ) and is characterized by little to no physical relief and a dense, silty sand habitat. The CR site is located approximately 15 km west of the Wandoo site (Figure (Figure1) 1 ) and is characterized by a rocky reef, similar in spatial extent to the infrastructure in the Wandoo field, rising to approximately 20 m below the surface. Unlike the WN site, the CS and CR sites are accessible to commercial and recreational fishing.
2.2. Stereo‐baited underwater video systems
Stereo‐BRUVS are a non‐destructive, cost‐effective method for studying marine fauna (Cappo et al., 2006 ; Letessier et al., 2013 ; Letessier, Juhel, et al., 2015 ). They have been used to study abundance, biomass, diversity, distribution, and behavior in animals ranging from fish and sharks, to turtles, moray eels, and marine mammals (Barley et al., 2016 ; Letessier, Bouchet, et al., 2015 ; Spaet et al., 2016 ; Thompson et al., 2019 ; Whitmarsh et al., 2017 ). Seabed stereo‐BRUVS have been adapted to mid‐water environments, making them a useful tool for documenting highly mobile and elusive species (Bouchet et al., 2018 ; Letessier et al., 2013 ; Thompson et al., 2019 ). BRUVS‐derived data should be interpreted recognizing the potential impact of variable bait plumes (Whitmarsh et al., 2017 ), the potential higher representation of piscivores, and the relative nature of abundance estimates in contrast with density estimates generated by, for instance, underwater visual census (UVC, Langlois et al., 2010 ). Despite these constraints, BRUVS can be used to document clear signals in marine communities relative to other methods (Cappo et al., 2006 ; Lowry et al., 2012 ).
Seabed stereo‐BRUVS consist of two GoPro cameras mounted 80 cm apart on a horizontal base bar, each converging at an angle of four degrees to a common focal point. A galvanized steel mesh bait cage containing 800 g of crushed pilchards is attached to the end of a 1.5‐m‐long bait arm. Seabed stereo‐BRUVS are deployed at least 200 m apart for a minimum of 60 min.
Mid‐water stereo‐BRUVS consist of the same horizontal base bar as seabed stereo‐BRUVS, mounted on a 1.45‐m‐long steel upright to provide stability, and suspended 10 m below the surface. They are baited with 1 kg of crushed pilchards in a perforated bait canister on a 1.5‐m‐long bait arm, which acts as a rudder to keep the cameras facing down‐current for the duration of the deployment. Mid‐water stereo‐BRUVS are deployed for a minimum of 120 min, and in this study, are anchored to prevent entanglement with subsea infrastructure.
2.3. Data collection
Sampling was undertaken over 3 years, from 2017 to 2019, with twice‐yearly expeditions in the austral autumn and spring. Due to the significant tide range and variable weather conditions in the region, surveys were limited to a 10 day window over neap tides. In most of the surveys, it was only possible to sample two of the three study sites, and the three sites were therefore not sampled evenly between years and seasons. The WN site was sampled in both autumn and spring in all three years. The CR site was sampled in autumn and spring of 2017, autumn of 2018, and spring of 2019, while the CS site was sampled in autumn and spring of 2018 and autumn of 2019.
A total of 595 seabed stereo‐BRUVS and 530 mid‐water stereo‐BRUVS deployments were conducted over the 3‐year study period, using a random stratified sampling design. At the WN site, 14 sampling zones were established around the infrastructure, with seabed stereo‐BRUVS deployed in 10 zones around the structure, and mid‐water stereo‐BRUVS deployed 9 zones. All stereo‐BRUVS were deployed a minimum of 50 m away from any infrastructure at the Wandoo site so as to avoid collision and/or entanglement between the stereo‐BRUVS and the infrastructure. To ensure consistency in data collection, stereo‐BRUVS were deployed a minimum of 50 m away from the reef structure at the Control Reef site. All sampling was carried out during daylight hours to minimize the effect of crepuscular animal behavior. The sampling was conducted under UWA ethics permit RA/3/100/1484.
2.4. Data processing and treatment
Prior to each survey, individual stereo‐BRUVS were calibrated in an enclosed pool, according to standard protocols, using the CAL software (Harvey & Shortis, 1998 ; SeaGIS Pty Ltd, 2020 ). All video samples collected in the field were converted to AVI format using Xilisoft Video Converter Ultimate (Xilisoft Corporation, 2016 ) and videos were processed using the Eventmeasure software package (SeaGIS Pty Ltd, 2020 ). Processing commenced either once seabed stereo‐BRUVS had settled on the seabed, for a period of 60 min, or when the mid‐water stereo‐BRUVS had stabilized at 10 m depth following deployment, for a period of 120 min. All animals entering the field of view were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level, and abundance was estimated using the conservative abundance metric MaxN, which is the maximum number of individuals of a given taxon in a single frame (Cappo et al., 2006 ). The appropriate length metric (e.g., fork length FL, disc width DW, or carapace length CL) was measured in stereo with individuals measured where they were well positioned relative to the camera and not occluded by other individuals. For seabed stereo‐BRUVS, the habitat visible in the field of view was broadly categorized into three groups: sand (bare substrate with no visible macrobenthos or other marine growth); sparse macrobenthos (predominantly bare substrate with <50% biotic cover); and dense macrobenthos (the visible substrate was dominated by more than 50% biotic cover).
For seabed stereo‐BRUVS, a sample was an individual rig deployment. For mid‐water stereo‐BRUVS, samples consisted of each set of five BRUVS deployed in a zone. This method mitigates the potential effect of highly mobile pelagic species being observed on multiple mid‐water deployments.
The video analysis yielded identification, abundance, and length data for each stereo‐BRUVS deployment. These data were analyzed as taxonomic richness (TR), total abundance (TA), and fork length (FL), respectively. Total biomass (TB) was calculated as the sum of mean weight of a given taxa on a given sample. Weight was calculated based on FL using taxon‐specific length weight relationships (LWR) sourced from Fishbase (Froese et al., 2019 ). Where the LWR was not available for a particular taxon, the LWR based on total length (TL) for that taxon was used, in combination with taxon‐specific TL:FL conversions. Where an animal was identified to genus or family, the Bayesian LWR was sourced from Fishbase (Froese et al., 2014 ). Taxon‐specific biomass estimates were calculated by multiplying the abundance of each taxon by the mean weight of that taxon. Marine mammals were excluded from the biomass estimates as they were multiple orders of magnitude heavier than the largest observed fish and heavily skewed the estimates. These four univariate metrics, TR, TA, TB, and FL, were analyzed separately for each survey in order to ensure like‐for‐like comparisons between sites. Annual and seasonal variability were also assessed for each site to determine the variability in the demersal and pelagic communities at each site over time. These analyses were also carried out at the level of survey, comparing annual variability separately for autumn and spring at each site, and seasonal variability (i.e., between spring and autumn) for each year at each site.
The prevalence of each taxon at each site was calculated by determining the percentage of seabed deployments or mid‐water zones on which the particular taxa were observed of the total for that site. The prevalence data were then used to determine the number of unique demersal and pelagic taxa for each site, by extracting taxa that were only recorded at one site. We did not count taxa which were recorded on only one mid‐water zone or seabed deployment per site, in order to eliminate chance sightings and possible incorrect identifications. Within the lists of unique taxa, any taxon that was only identified to genus or family was removed if there was a record from that genus or family at another site.
2.5. Statistical analyses
The categorized habitat data were analyzed using a Chi‐square contingency test to determine whether habitat varied significantly by site (Zar, 1999 ). Variation in the fish assemblage was tested using PERMANOVA as it is robust to data heterogeneity (Anderson, 2017 ). The linear variables of TA, TB, and FL were log 10 transformed to stabilize variance (Zar, 1999 ). For each of these univariate measures, a Euclidean distance resemblance matrix was calculated and a PERMANOVA was applied based on unrestricted permutations (Anderson, 2017 ) with Site and Survey as fixed factors. Site was defined as Wandoo, Control Reef, or Control Sand, while Survey was defined as each of the six BRUVS surveys conducted in a particular season and year (e.g., Autumn 2017). Our main hypothesis was whether sites differed in their fish assemblages and the degree to which such differences varied temporally. To first determine whether sites differed, one‐way pairwise PERMANOVAs were applied within each survey period. We also similarly tested for differences between years and between seasons within sites. Repeated measures ANOVA was not used as the sampling through space and time varied randomly within the zones and seasons (Zar, 1999 ).
The assemblage composition data were treated differently from the univariate metrics. Species composition data were pooled across all surveys in preparation for the multivariate analyses for each sampling method. The data were analyzed by survey to ensure like‐for‐like comparisons between sites. Multivariate analyses were completed on the pelagic and demersal taxonomic assemblage data in terms of abundance and biomass to understand variations in species composition between sites as well as which variables explained this variation. We log( x + 1) transformed the assemblage data and calculated Bray–Curtis resemblance matrices for abundance and biomass of each species. Pairwise PERMANOVAs were applied to determine the differences between the demersal and pelagic species compositions of the three sites, across all surveys, in terms of both abundance and biomass. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) was used in order to visualize a constrained ordination of the data on the basis of distance or dissimilarity.
A database of physical, chemical, and biological variables was also compiled in order to understand the potential environmental effects on taxonomic assemblages. Distances to marine features (e.g., coral reefs and seamounts) were calculated using bathymetry data following Yesson et al. ( 2021 ). Environmental data were derived from the following datasets:
- Geoscience Australia (GA) 250 m bathymetry (Whiteway, 2009 );
- GA Australian submarine canyons (Huang et al., 2014 );
- CSIRO Atlas of Regional Seas (CARS) (Ridgway et al., 2002 ); and
- Australia's Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (IMOS, 2020 )
A number of anthropogenic variables, such as time to market and distance from nearest human population, were also calculated based on human accessibility calculations undertaken by Maire et al. ( 2016 ). However, the three sites are almost exactly the same distance from the coast, so distance‐based variables were similar for all sites, and fishing effort data were not fine scale enough to separate the three sites. As such, the anthropogenic variables were excluded.
A Pearson's correlation was run to identify highly correlated independent variables with a correlation coefficient >0.6 (Havlicek & Peterson, 1976 ). Analyses included only one of any highly correlated variables in a given test. A distance‐based linear model (DistLM) was used to determine the relationship between these variables and the assemblage data across all surveys. All analyses were completed using the Primer 7 software package with the PERMANOVA + add‐on (Anderson et al., 2015 ).
In the six surveys across 3 years, we counted 35,070 individuals from 358 taxa, representing 85 families (Appendices 4 and 5 ). The total biomass of these animals was 42.5 tons, excluding marine mammals. Of the 358 taxa, 252 (70%) were unique to the demersal samples, 44 (13%) were unique to the pelagic samples, and 62 (17%) of the taxa were common to both sets of samples. Fork length of demersal taxa ranged from a 2 cm unidentified juvenile to a 260.4 cm wedgefish Rhynchobatus sp. Three families accounted for 57% of all demersal animals recorded: jacks (Carangidae; 32%), threadfin breams (Nemipteridae; 14%), and damselfishes (Pomacentridae; 11%), while the most prevalent demersal species was the starry triggerfish Abalistes stellatus , occurring on 91% of deployments. Pelagic taxa ranged in fork length from a 0.86 cm juvenile leatherjacket Monacanthidae sp., to a 6.27 m northern minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata , with the largest fish being a 3.93 m tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier . Two families accounted for 79% of all pelagic animals recorded: herrings (Clupeidae; 40%) and jacks (Carangidae; 39%). The most prevalent pelagic taxon was scads Decapterus sp., occurring on 72% of deployments. Threatened species included two Critically Endangered taxa, wedgefishes Rhynchobatus sp. and great hammerhead Sphyrna mokarran , and two Endangered species, dusky shark Carcharhinus obscurus and zebra shark Stegostoma tigrinum (Dudgeon et al., 2019 ; Rigby et al., 2019a , 2019b ).
3.1. Environment
Observed habitats across the three sites, included sand, and macrobenthos which consisted of sponges, sea whips, crinoids, soft corals, and gorgonians. Macrobenthos coverage was both sparse (<50%) and dense (>50%). Habitat differed significantly across the three sites with the WN site characterized by a higher percentage of samples dominated by dense and sparse macrobenthos relative to the other two sites ( X 2 (2, N =417) = 91.1, p < .001). Macrobenthos was present on 57% of the deployments at WN, with sand dominating deployments at CR and CS (60% and 99%, respectively; Figure Figure3). 3 ). The highest percentage of dense macrobenthos also occurred at WN (22%), compared with 15% at CR and none at CS.
Percentage habitat composition for each of the three sites. The habitat types are sand (yellow), sparse macrobenthos (light green) and dense macrobenthos (dark green)
There was limited environmental variability between the sites (Appendix 1 ). As expected, based on sampling design, depth was not significantly different between WN and CR ( t 468 = 1.87, p = .06), although CS was significantly but only marginally deeper than WN and CR ( t 418 = 16.8, p < .001 and t 298 = 7.87, p < .001, respectively). Mean sea surface temperature (SST) in autumn was similar at WN and CR ( t 218 = 1.18, p = .26), but was approximately one degree higher at CS than at WN and CR ( t 218 = 6.15, p < .001 and t 148 = 6.19, p < .001, respectively; Appendix 1 ).
Mean SST in spring did not differ significantly between WN and CS ( t 198 = 1.30, p = .21), but was significantly higher at CR than at WN and CS ( t 248 = 2.08, p = .038 and t 148 = 2.75, p = .007, respectively). Mean chlorophyll concentration (Chl‐a) in autumn was higher at WN than CR and CS ( t 218 = 3.34, p = .003 and t 218 = 2.62, p = .002, respectively), with no difference between the latter two sites ( t 148 = 0.39, p = .71). In spring, mean Chl‐a was significantly higher at CR than both WN and CS ( t 248 = 7.84, p < .001 and t 148 = 4.55, p < .001, respectively), with no significant difference between WN and CS ( t 198 = 1.21, p = .22; Appendix 1 ).
3.2. Demersal richness, abundance, biomass, and fork length
The mean demersal richness was 13.1 ± 0.90 SE and ranged between 7.7 and 17.5 taxa per sample. There was significant variation in richness between sites in four of the six surveys, where richness was higher at WN than at the control site sampled in the same survey (Figure (Figure4a; 4a ; Table Table1). 1 ). The only seasonal variation was in 2018 at WN, when richness was higher in autumn than spring, and the only annual variation was at CS, where richness was higher in 2018 than 2019 (Appendix 2 ).
Mean values with standard errors (SE) for taxonomic richness (TR), and logged values of total abundance (TA), total biomass (TB) fork length (FL) by survey for demersal (left) and pelagic (right) communities at the three sites: Wandoo (green); Control Reef (dark blue) and Control Sand (light blue). Solid bars indicate autumn surveys while broken bars indicate spring surveys
Pairwise PERMANOVA tests comparing demersal and pelagic variation between sites for each survey, for taxonomic richness (TR), log total abundance (log 10 TA), log total biomass (log 10 TB), and log fork length (log 10 FL)
Survey × Site | Groups | df | TR | log TA | log TB | log FL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(perms) | (perms) | (perms) | (perms) | |||||||
Demersal | ||||||||||
Autumn 2017 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 58 | 1.94 | .059 (146) | 0.88 | .393 (997) | 1.91 | .063 (999) | 3.29 | (996) |
Autumn 2018 | Control Reef, Control Sand | 59 | 4.24 | (138) | 0.97 | .341 (996) | 1.37 | .175 (997) | 2.17 | (997) |
Autumn 2018 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 48 | 0.13 | .885 (168) | 0.07 | .936 (994) | 1.86 | .063 (995) | 3.39 | (997) |
Autumn 2018 | Control Sand, Wandoo | 71 | 6.99 | (142) | 1.31 | .176 (998) | 0.34 | .721 (997) | 2.27 | (996) |
Autumn 2019 | Control Sand, Wandoo | 62 | 5.82 | (131) | 5.04 | (999) | 2.78 | (998) | 1.42 | .173 (999) |
Spring 2017 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 71 | 2.14 | (162) | 1.80 | .082 (997) | 1.61 | .114 (996) | 0.81 | .432 (998) |
Spring 2018 | Control Sand, Wandoo | 66 | 4.09 | (132) | 1.07 | .298 (998) | 1.21 | .226 (998) | 1.09 | .287 (996) |
Spring 2019 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 76 | 0.33 | .742 (169) | 1.76 | .079 (996) | 0.07 | .939 (997) | 0.65 | .544 (998) |
Pelagic | ||||||||||
Autumn 2017 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 16 | 1.43 | .194 (39) | 2.59 | (981) | 0.20 | .839 (976) | 3.14 | (978) |
Autumn 2018 | Control Reef, Control Sand | 12 | 4.93 | (123) | 3.65 | (805) | 3.05 | (779) | 1.04 | .314 (762) |
Autumn 2018 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 12 | 4.10 | (375) | 3.47 | (768) | 1.55 | .159 (775) | 0.94 | .39 (775) |
Autumn 2018 | Control Sand, Wandoo | 16 | 0.48 | .65 (121) | 0.31 | .764 (981) | 1.52 | .154 (975) | 2.21 | (977) |
Autumn 2019 | Control Sand, Wandoo | 9 | 2.06 | .089 (68) | 0.74 | .511 (312) | 1.54 | .152 (318) | 0.75 | .462 (315) |
Spring 2017 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 16 | 1.44 | .182 (213) | 0.03 | .975 (972) | 0.92 | .37 (974) | 0.54 | .608 (976) |
Spring 2018 | Control Sand, Wandoo | 16 | 0.84 | .419 (128) | 0.38 | .697 (974) | 1.33 | .198 (974) | 0.58 | .578 (976) |
Spring 2019 | Control Reef, Wandoo | 16 | 1.49 | .179 (151) | 0.40 | .704 (910) | 0.14 | .88 (981) | 0.83 | .395 (984) |
Degrees of freedom (df) are reported. p ‐values in bold and with an asterisk are <.05, and the number of permutations (perms) are reported in parentheses.
Abundance ranged from 17.9 to 77.4 individuals per sample, with a mean of 43.5 ± 4.99 SE. Abundance was consistent between sites in most surveys, only differing in Autumn 2019 when abundance at WN was higher than at CS (Figure (Figure4b; 4b ; Table Table1). 1 ). In terms of annual variability at WN, abundance in autumn was higher in both 2017 and 2018 than in 2019. In spring, abundance was also higher in 2017 than both 2018 and 2019. There was more annual variability in abundance at WN than at CR or CS, and seasonal abundance followed the same pattern at all sites, with abundance generally being higher in autumn than spring (Appendix 2 ).
Mean biomass was 44.5 kg ± 3.31 SE, and ranged from 28.2 kg to 70.2 kg per sample. Similar to abundance, biomass was consistent between sites for all surveys except Autumn 2019, when biomass was higher at WN than CS (Figure (Figure4c; 4c ; Table Table1). 1 ). The only annual variation was at CS, where biomass was higher in 2018 than 2019. Biomass was consistent between seasons at WN but was higher in autumn than spring at the control sites (Appendix 2 ).
Fork length ranged from 24.8 cm to 38.5 cm per sample, with a mean of 32.6 cm ± 1.05 SE. Fork length was consistent between sites in most surveys, but was higher at WN in Autumn 2017 and Autumn 2018 (Figure (Figure4d; 4d ; Table Table1). 1 ). Fork length was generally higher in spring than autumn, and higher in 2019 at WN and CS (Appendix 2 ).
3.3. Pelagic richness, abundance, biomass, and fork length
Mean pelagic richness was 3.9 ± 0.15 SE, with a range of 1.3 to 8.4 taxa per zone. Richness in the Autumn 2018 survey was significantly higher at WN and CS than at CR, but was consistent between sites in all other surveys (Figure (Figure4e; 4e ; Table Table1). 1 ). Annual and seasonal richness was consistent in most surveys at both WN and CS, but there was significant annual and seasonal variation at CR (Appendix 3 ).
Abundance ranged from 1.3 to 271 individuals per zone, with a mean of 29.6 ± 4.7 SE. Abundance was consistent between sites in four of the six surveys, and was higher at WN than at CR in the other two surveys (Figure (Figure4f; 4f ; Table Table1). 1 ). Annual variability occurred at WN in spring, but at the control sites in autumn, and there was seasonal variability in abundance at WN and CS (Appendix 3 ).
Mean biomass was 48.5 kg ± 5.7 SE and ranged from 7.5 g to 429 kg per zone. Biomass was significantly lower at CR than CS in Autumn 2018, but was consistent between sites across all other surveys (Figure (Figure4g; 4g ; Table Table1). 1 ). The only annual or seasonal variation in biomass was at CR, where biomass was higher in Autumn 2017 than Autumn 2018 (Appendix 3 ).
Fork length ranged from 3.8 cm to 182 cm per zone, with a mean of 37.5 cm ± 3.3 SE. Fork length was higher in Autumn 2017 at WN than CR, and higher in Autumn 2018 at CS than WN. Fork length was consistent between sites in all other surveys (Figure (Figure4h; 4h ; Table Table2). 2 ). There was no annual or seasonal variability in fork length at the control sites, with annual variability in three of the six surveys at WN (Appendix 3 ).
Pairwise PERMANOVA results comparing abundance and biomass of the pelagic and demersal taxonomic assemblages among sites: Wandoo (WN); Control Sand (CS); and Control Reef (CR). Degrees of freedom (df) are reported. p ‐values in bold and with an asterisk are < .05, and the number of permutations (perms) are reported in parentheses
Abundance | Biomass | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | (df) | (perms) | Groups | (df) | (perm) | |
Demersal | CR, CS | 4.46 (218) | (998) | CR, CS | 4.85 (218) | (999) |
CR, WN | 3.48 (329) | (996) | CR, WN | 3.53 (329) | (998) | |
CS, WN | 6.76 (317) | (999) | CS, WN | 7.53 (317) | (997) | |
Pelagic | CR, CS | 1.86 (52) | (999) | CR, CS | 1.63 (52) | (998) |
CR, WN | 1.88 (82) | (998) | CR, WN | 2.20 (82) | (999) | |
CS, WN | 2.30 (72) | (999) | CS, WN | 2.44 (72) | (999) |
3.4. Community assemblages
There was strong separation of both demersal and pelagic taxonomic assemblages between sites, with abundance and biomass at each site characterized by unique species assemblages. Demersal and pelagic taxonomic assemblages were significantly different from each other at all sites, in terms of both abundance (Figure (Figure5) 5 ) and biomass (Figure (Figure6) 6 ) (Table (Table2). 2 ). The DistLM analysis showed that the three environmental variables, depth, SST, and Chl‐a, did not explain a sufficient proportion of the variance in the assemblage data, and as such, these analyses were excluded.
Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) for abundance of (a) demersal and (b) pelagic taxonomic assemblages at Wandoo (green); Control Reef (dark blue) and Control Sand (light blue). Species clockwise from top in (a) are: bluespotted emperor Lethrinus punctulatus , northwest blowfish Lagocephalus sceleratus , brushtooth lizardfish Saurida undosquamis , galloper Symphorus nematophorus , spot‐cheek emperor Lethrinus rubrioperculatus , bluespotted tuskfish Choerodon cauteroma , and turrum Carangoides fulvoguttatus . Taxa clockwise from top in (b) are: live sharksucker Echeneis naucrates , scads Decapterus sp., silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis , herrings Clupeidae sp., great barracuda Sphyraena barracuda , and rainbow runner Elegatis bipinnulata . Images © R. Swainston/anima.fish
Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) for biomass of (a) demersal and (b) pelagic taxonomic assemblages at Wandoo (green); Control Reef (dark blue) and Control Sand (light blue). Species clockwise from top in (a) are: bluespotted emperor Lethrinus punctulatus , milk shark Rhizoprionodon acutus , brushtooth lizardfish Saurida undosquamis , galloper Symphorus nematophorus , spot‐cheek emperor Lethrinus rubrioperculatus , bluespotted tuskfish Choerodon cauteroma , turrum Carangoides fulvoguttatus , and areolate grouper Epinephelus areolatus . Taxa clockwise from top in (b) are: great hammerhead Sphyrna mokarran , live sharksucker Echeneis naucrates , cobia Rachycentron canadum , silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis , rainbow runner Elegatis bipinnulata , and great barracuda Sphyraena barracuda . Images © R. Swainston/anima.fish
Demersal abundance (Figure (Figure5a) 5a ) and biomass (Figure (Figure6a) 6a ) at WN were driven by reef‐associated species, namely galloper Symphorus nematophorus and spot‐cheek emperor Lethrinus rubrioperculatus . Both species usually occurred in low abundance but were prevalent across deployments at WN (38% and 40%, respectively; Appendix 4 ). Abundance and biomass at CR were driven by different reef‐associated species than at WN, namely bluespotted emperor Lethrinus punctulatus (the name most commonly used for this unresolved species; Moore et al., 2020 ) and turrum Carangoides fulvoguttatus , both of which occurred in large schools, while biomass was also driven by areolate grouper Epinephelus areolatus , a more solitary species. There was some overlap in taxonomic assemblages between WN and CR, driven by bluespotted tuskfish Choerodon cauteroma . Abundance at CS was characterized by northwest blowfish Lagocephalus sceleratus , a species associated with offshore reefs and sandy habitats, and brushtooth lizardfish Saurida undosquamis , a sand or mud bottom–associated species. These species occurred in relatively low numbers but were highly prevalent on deployments at this site (51% and 80%, respectively; Appendix 4 ). Brushtooth lizardfish also characterized biomass at CS, along with the milk shark Rhizoprionodon acutus , also associated with sandy habitats. Habitat associations were sourced from Fishbase (Froese et al., 2019 ).
There were 17 demersal taxa from 11 families observed only at WN, compared with five unique taxa from five families at CR and four taxa from four families at CS (Table (Table3). 3 ). Many of the demersal species unique to WN are reef‐associated species, and WN was the only site where unidentified larval‐stage juvenile fishes were present. Two demersal species recorded only at WN were observed on over 10% of deployments, namely the pickhandle barracuda Sphyraena jello , and giant sea catfish Netuma thalassina (Appendix 4 ).
Abundance, biomass, and prevalence of taxa observed at a single site at WN (16 demersal and 1 pelagic species), CR (5 demersal and 0 pelagic species), and CS (4 demersal and 0 pelagic species) based on demersal and pelagic sampling records. Species marked with an asterisk are commonly caught commercially and/or recreationally in the North Coast Bioregion (Rome & Newman, 2010 ).
Family | Binomial | Common names | Abundance | Biomass (g) | Prevalence (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demersal | ||||||
Wandoo | Apogonidae | sp. | Cardinalfishes | 41 | 37.65 | 1.4 |
Ariidae | Giant sea catfish | 2 | 4696.20 | 12.1 | ||
Blenniidae | sp. | Combtooth blennies | 2 | 22.33 | 0.9 | |
Carangidae | Shadow trevally | 2 | 1435.95 | 0.9 | ||
Carangidae | Island trevally | 1 | 1308.26 | 2.3 | ||
Carangidae | Bigeye trevally | 4 | 12604.88 | 1.4 | ||
Carangidae | * | Tille trevally | 1 | 4334.75 | 0.9 | |
Ginglymostomatidae | Tawny nurse shark | 1 | 5064.06 | 2.3 | ||
Juvenile | sp. | Unidentified juvenile | 1 | 0.05 | 0.9 | |
Lethrinidae | Paddletail seabream | 1 | 554.72 | 1.4 | ||
Pinguipedidae | sp. | Grubfishes | 1 | 18.09 | 2.3 | |
Pomacentridae | Blue‐scribbled damsel | 3 | 6.68 | 0.9 | ||
Serranidae | * | Tomato rockcod | 2 | 978.65 | 0.9 | |
Serranidae | * | Brownspotted grouper | 1 | 1024.97 | 0.9 | |
Serranidae | * | Malabar grouper | 1 | 4097.69 | 1.9 | |
Sphyraenidae | Pickhandle barracuda | 2 | 7637.25 | 10.7 | ||
Control Reef | Chaetodontidae | Threadfin butterflyfish | 2 | 445.78 | 1.7 | |
Labridae | Saddleback pigfish | 1 | 439.87 | 2.6 | ||
Lethrinidae | * | Yellowtail emperor | 2 | 1265.86 | 2.6 | |
Monacanthidae | Bluespotted leatherjacket | 1 | 822.73 | 1.7 | ||
Muraenidae | Undulated moray | 1 | 0.97 | 1.7 | ||
Control Sand | Carangidae | * | Highfin amberjack | 11 | 3280.25 | 1.9 |
Clupeidae | sp. | Herrings | 334 | 22240.67 | 1.9 | |
Congridae | sp. | Garden eels | 31 | 2525.02 | 2.9 | |
Lutjanidae | * | Goldband snapper | 1 | 3498.20 | 1.9 | |
Pelagic | ||||||
Wandoo | Carangidae | Rainbow runner | 22 | 112861.56 | 15.0 |
Pelagic assemblages followed similar patterns in terms of abundance (Figure (Figure5b) 5b ) and biomass (Figure (Figure6b) 6b ) to those observed in the demersal assemblages. Abundance and biomass at WN were driven by great barracuda Spyhraena barracuda and rainbow runner Elegatis bipinnulata . Great barracuda were usually solitary, but frequently observed at WN (60% of zones, Appendix 5 ), while rainbow runner was observed less frequently (15% of zones) but in large schools. There was some overlap in abundance between WN and CS, characterized by herrings (Clupeidae spp.), which were observed on 25% of zones at WN and 41% at CS. Abundance and biomass at CS was driven by silky sharks Carcharhinus falciformis and live sharksuckers Echeneis naucrates , and biomass was also characterized by cobia Rachycentron canadum . Abundance at CR was not strongly characterized by any particular species, while biomass was driven by great hammerheads Sphyrna mokarran , which was always solitary and only observed on 16% of zones. WN was the only site where any unique pelagic taxa were recorded, with rainbow runner not observed at either of the control sites (Table (Table3 3 ).
4. DISCUSSION
The demersal and pelagic community assemblages in the Wandoo field are distinct from those that would have existed prior to the installation of the infrastructure. The habitat around Wandoo is dominated by macrobenthos, in contrast to the sand‐dominated habitat that would have likely prevailed historically (Sainsbury et al., 1993 ). As a result, the Wandoo demersal assemblage is characterized by reef‐associated rather than sand‐associated taxa. The pelagic assemblage at Wandoo is different from the other two sites, driven by species associated with offshore platforms on the NWS as well as in other regions around the world (Friedlander et al., 2014 ; McLean et al., 2019 ; Reynolds et al., 2018 ). Overall, the demersal and pelagic assemblages more closely resemble a natural reef than the assemblages that would have existed pre‐installation, which is congruent with our hypothesis. However, the composition of these assemblages is still unique to Wandoo, suggesting the emergence of a novel ecosystem.
While the focus of our study was on the fish assemblages, we saw clear differences in the habitat at the three sites. The proliferation of macrobenthos at the otherwise flat WN site, in contrast to the barren sand habitat at CS, likely reflects the exclusion of seabed trawling at WN. The WN site also had higher demersal fish richness than the control sites in most surveys which suggests that habitat composition is a driver of diversity in these demersal communities, as has been found elsewhere on the NWS (Anon, 2019 ). The Pilbara Offshore mesoscale region, within which the study sites are located, is a biodiversity hotspot for sponges (Fromont et al., 2016 ). However, as much of the macrobenthos biomass was removed by seabed trawling (Sainsbury et al., 1993 ), most of the habitat in this region has been simplified. The impact of trawling is clear at CS and the area surrounding the reef at CR, with both sites dominated by bare sand. In contrast, WN excludes seabed trawling up to 500 m from the infrastructure, and exhibited similar macrobenthos communities to other oil and gas infrastructure on the NWS (Bond, Langlois, et al., 2018 ; McLean et al., 2019 ).
The demersal community at WN was more diverse and reef associated than the communities at the control sites. The higher demersal richness at WN is congruent with studies from Brazil, the Persian Gulf, and Gabon, which describe offshore platforms as diversity hotspots (Fonseca et al., 2017 ; Friedlander et al., 2014 ; Torquato et al., 2017 ). High diversity is often associated with structural complexity of hard substrate (Friedlander & Parrish, 1998 ), and this association was observed in ROV surveys of the Wandoo infrastructure (Tothill, 2019 ). This study sampled areas around the infrastructure with little to no hard substrate, suggesting a large area of influence or “ecological halo” around the Wandoo infrastructure. The species that characterized the demersal taxonomic assemblage at WN, namely galloper and spot‐cheek emperor, are both valued as fishing species: galloper is a prized sport fish, while spot‐cheek emperor is a food fish targeted by recreational and commercial fishers (Anon, 2019 ; Rome & Newman, 2010 ). These species occupy different habitats, with galloper inhabiting coral reefs and spot‐cheek emperor inhabiting sand/rubble areas (2019a). Spot‐cheek emperor was rarely observed at either control site, despite the habitat at CR arguably being more suitable than that found at WN. Fishing activity, which is excluded at WN, may be the reason for the lower prevalence of this species at the control sites.
The similarity in pelagic communities across sites in terms of all four metrics was expected, given the three sites are located relatively close to each other and the highly mobile nature of pelagic species. For example, great barracuda have been shown to travel 12 km in a day and can migrate over 100 km, while silky sharks can travel up to 60 km a day (Bonfil, 2008 ; O’Toole et al., 2011 ). While these species are highly mobile, there was still strong distinction in the taxonomic assemblages between the three sites. The two species which characterized the taxonomic assemblage at WN, great barracuda and rainbow runner, are often associated with offshore platforms. Great barracuda is a commonly recorded species around offshore platforms in the Gulf of Mexico (Reynolds et al., 2018 ; Wetz et al., 2020 ), accounting for 33.2% of the biomass at offshore platforms in Gabon (Friedlander et al., 2014 ), and was recorded in 100% of remotely operated vehicle (ROV) transects at another platform on the NWS (McLean et al., 2019 ). Rainbow runner have also been recorded around platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, Gabon, and Brunei (Chou et al., 1992 ; Friedlander et al., 2014 ; Reynolds et al., 2018 ). Great hammerheads characterized biomass at CR, which was attributed to the fact that these are large animals and would have a significant effect on biomass even if present in low numbers, especially as there was not a particularly high abundance of any other species at this site. The pelagic taxonomic assemblage at CS was characterized by silky sharks, which were observed within minutes of the vessel's arrival to conduct surveys at this site. This behavior and the associated high abundance and biomass of this species were attributed to the frequent commercial fishing activity that occurs at this site. There are commercial line, trap, and trawl fisheries operating throughout this area, including CS and, to a lesser extent, CR (WAFIC, 2020 ). This population of silky sharks is thought to be opportunistically targeting the discards from the commercial fishing vessels as a food source, which would explain their high abundance at a site otherwise scarce in the typical prey of this species, which includes scombrids, carangids, snappers, and groupers (Compagno, 1984 ).
A distinct marine community exists at WN with various taxa not observed at natural habitats. Many of the 17 unique demersal species at WN are reef associated, but species such as paddletail seabream Gymnocranius euanus and blue‐scribbled damsel Pomacentrus nagasakiensis are found in sandy areas adjacent to reefs (2019a). This suggests that the combination of sand and macrobenthos habitats around WN, itself a de facto artificial reef, is a key component of the high diversity and unique assemblage at this site. Reef‐associated species tend to have strong site fidelity and post‐settlement ranges of less than 50 m (Frederick, 1997 ). While it is possible that some species recruit to WN from natural sites, and certainly would have done when the platform was first installed, the high number of species unique to WN suggests that fish are being produced at the platform, rather than simply being attracted from natural habitats. Tothill ( 2019 ) observed juvenile fishes in the mid‐water (10–22 m) sections of Wandoo, providing further evidence of fish production. There was only one pelagic species unique to a single site, which may reflect the relatively mobile nature of pelagic animals. Rainbow runner were only observed at the WN site, which could be attributed to the association of this species with offshore platforms around the world (Chou et al., 1992 ; Reynolds et al., 2018 ). Offshore platforms can function as fish aggregation devices (FADs), aggregating fish by facilitating foraging and school formation (Dagorn et al., 2000 ; Haugen & Papastamatiou, 2019 ). Rainbow runner are thought to primarily aggregate around FADs to prey on small FAD‐associated pelagic fishes (Xuefang et al., 2013 ), and it is possible that the vertical hard structure at WN is providing enhanced foraging opportunity for this species.
The exclusion of fishing around WN has created a de facto MPA, as has been reported at other offshore platforms (Friedlander et al., 2014 ; Fujii & Jamieson, 2016 ; Love et al., 2006 ). Seabed trawling on the NWS in the 1970s not only removed much of the macrobenthos habitat but also resulted in a significant shift in fish composition (Sainsbury et al., 1993 ). The trawl catch shifted from being dominated by emperors ( Lethrinus sp.) and snappers ( Lutjanus sp.) to being dominated by lizardfish ( Saurida sp.) and threadfin bream ( Nemipterus sp.), with the abundance of lizardfishes greater by an order of magnitude (Sainsbury et al., 1993 ; Thresher et al., 1986 ). This relationship between habitat and species composition was also observed in this study: macrobenthos habitat was present at WN and CR, both of which were characterized by emperors. In contrast, at CS, the habitat was almost completely devoid of macrobenthos, and the species composition was characterized by brushtooth lizardfish. Lizardfishes feed on benthic fishes, particularly on juveniles of other species, and are estimated to collectively consume 4 × 10 7 fishes per day on the NWS (Thresher et al., 1986 ). Demersal communities dominated by lizardfish, such as CS, would therefore have been significantly impacted by the proliferation of this genus. The de facto MPA has also resulted in a large ecological halo around the WN infrastructure. The ecological halo around offshore platforms and artificial reefs is usually around 15–34 m, with abundance and diversity similar to natural habitats beyond this distance (Reeds et al., 2018 ; Scarcella et al., 2011 ; Stanley & Wilson, 1996 ). In contrast, diversity at WN was higher than natural habitats at more than 50 m from the infrastructure. It is likely that the larger ecological halo at WN is due to the 500 m exclusion zone which was not present around the infrastructure in other ecological halo studies. The WN ecological halo is driven by recovery of macrobenthos habitat due to the exclusion of trawling activity.
4.1. Wandoo as a novel ecosystem
The ecosystem in the Wandoo field clearly has novel attributes when compared with natural systems in the region; however, this assertion is not, on its own, sufficient to warrant labelling Wandoo a novel ecosystem. Van Elden et al. ( 2019 ) used the novel ecosystems definition developed by Hobbs et al. ( 2013 ) to establish three criteria for evaluating offshore platforms as novel ecosystems:
- The abiotic, biotic, and social components of the system differ from those that prevailed historically. The addition of hard substrate through the installation of the Wandoo infrastructure altered the abiotic component of the system. It is impossible to quantify the historical baseline of the biotic component, however, the findings of this study show that the biotic components of the Wandoo ecosystem, in terms of habitat and marine communities, are distinct from those found at a proxy of their pre‐installation (post‐trawling) historical state, i.e., the Control Sand site. The major social driver of this ecosystem is the exclusion of fishing activity, which has been detrimental to large areas of the NWS. The de facto MPA effect of Wandoo has been particularly important in providing a refuge for fishes and allowing macrobenthos communities to recover.
- The ecosystems have a tendency to self‐organize and manifest novel qualities without intensive human management. The Wandoo ecosystem, like those found at most other offshore platforms, is an unintended consequence of the installation of the platform and therefore is not subject to any human management. The only management undertaken is cleaning of sections of the subsea structure, but this activity only removes a small portion of the marine growth. The factors that allow this ecosystem to thrive, such as the exclusion of fishing and the provision of hard substrate, are artefacts of the presence of the platform.
- Novel ecosystems are prevented from returning to their historical states by practical limitations, in the form of ecological, environmental, and social considerations. Wandoo is due to remain operational for at least a further 10 years, which is a significant social consideration as the presence of the infrastructure is central to this ecosystem. When Wandoo is decommissioned, it is possible that complete removal will allow the ecosystem to return to its pre‐installation state due to exposure to trawling, but the evidence presented here on the unique ecology of Wandoo should provide an ecological consideration against complete removal, thereby preventing a return to the historical state of the site.
Based on these criteria, Wandoo may be classified as a novel ecosystem. The environment and ecology of the site have been altered, a self‐organizing ecosystem with novel qualities has emerged, and the presence of the platform prevents the ecosystem from returning to its post‐trawling state.
4.2. Implications for decommissioning
We have used proxies for different decommissioning scenarios, which can provide a broad idea of how the Wandoo ecosystem might look post‐decommissioning. We suggest that the Control Sand site is a proxy for complete removal, as this site is already a proxy for the Wandoo site without infrastructure. If the Wandoo infrastructure was completely removed, there would be a significant loss in diversity, particularly in terms of reef‐associated species. Pelagic species associated with mid‐water structure, such as great barracuda and rainbow runner, are also likely to no longer be present at this site. Commercial and recreational fishing activity would likely recommence in the field post‐decommissioning, as the petroleum safety zone would no longer be in effect and there would be no significant hard structure to prevent seabed trawling.
Topping, a second decommissioning scenario, would result in partial removal of Wandoo down to around 25 m below the surface. This method has been applied to shallow‐water platforms in the United States (Ajemian et al., 2015 ). The reef at the Control Reef site rises to around 30 m below the surface, making this a close approximation to a topped Wandoo. This scenario would also result in the loss of pelagic species associated with structure, but would result in the retention of more of the demersal community than complete removal. There would be some losses: the shallower portions of Wandoo are important for juveniles, exhibit higher richness and abundance than deeper portions, and are characterized by small reef fish such as damselfishes (Tothill, 2019 ). Indeed larval‐stage juveniles were absent from the Control Reef site, and abundance of small demersal species such as damselfishes was generally lower than at the Wandoo site. It is likely that even under a topping scenario there would no longer be any exclusion of fishing activity around the remaining part of the platform. Seabed trawling could still occur in the areas surrounding the infrastructure that were previously protected by the petroleum safety zone.
Partial or complete removal of the Wandoo platform will likely have adverse impacts on a number of taxa and alter the role of the infrastructure as a novel ecosystem, specifically in terms of the artificial reef and associated ecological halo. Partial removal would be less detrimental in that it would also still afford protection to the macrobenthos from seabed trawling. However, there is significant ecological benefit in retaining the mid‐water sections of the infrastructure, for both pelagic species and juvenile reef‐associated species, and leaving the platform standing in place would maintain these benefits. Additional aspects that should also be considered include the role of the infrastructure for seabirds, marine megafauna, and macrobenthos communities attached to the infrastructure, as have been reported from other offshore platforms around the world (Bond, Partridge, et al., 2018 ; Ronconi et al., 2015 ; Thomson et al., 2021 ; Todd et al., 2019 ). The exclusion of fishing is a critical component of the large ecological halo present at Wandoo; however, the petroleum safety zone would likely cease to exist post‐decommissioning. We would recommend that post‐decommissioning protection from fishing, in the form of a no‐take MPA, should be considered.
The installation of infrastructure in the Wandoo field has resulted in the emergence of a novel ecosystem with distinct ecological characteristics not found at natural sites in the region. The demersal and pelagic communities more closely resemble reef communities than those present pre‐installation, but are still unique from those found at natural habitats in the region. The novel ecosystem at Wandoo also acts as a refuge for these communities, functioning as a de facto MPA in a region impacted by historical and current fishing activity. This MPA not only protects fish communities but also has allowed the macrobenthos to recover from the impacts of seabed trawling. Many of the novel characteristics of the Wandoo ecosystem would be lost under decommissioning scenarios that involve partial or complete removal, and the impact of decommissioning on fauna such as seabirds is still unknown. Recognizing the Wandoo field as a novel ecosystem provides a mechanism for recognizing the ecological role played by the Wandoo infrastructure, and underlines the need to consider the ecological role of each offshore platform prior to decommissioning.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
This project is funded by Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia (VOGA). VOGA has 100% operating interest in the Wandoo field where this work was conducted. VOGA did not participate in the design of the study, analysis of the data, or development of the manuscript.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Sean van Elden: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). Jessica J. Meeuwig: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (equal). Richard J. Hobbs: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (equal).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our thanks to Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia (Pty) Ltd. for their support of this project. This manuscript forms part of the Ph.D. thesis of SVE. The Ph.D. is funded by the VOGA Ph.D. Scholarship in Rigs‐to‐Reefs Ecology, awarded by the University of Western Australia with funds donated by Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia (Pty) Ltd. We thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped improve and clarify this manuscript.
APPENDIX 1.
Environmental data for each survey used in the DistLM analyses, including start and end dates, depth, sea surface temperature (SST), and chlorophyll concentration (Chl‐a). Data were derived from: Geoscience Australia 250 m bathymetry (Whiteway, 2009 ) and Australia's Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (IMOS, 2020 ). The sites are as follows: Wandoo (WN); Control Reef (CR); and Control Sand (CS)
Survey | Start Date | End Date | Site | Depth (m) | SST (°C) | Chl‐a (mg/m ) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min | Max | Mean ± SD | Min | Max | Mean ± SD | Min | Max | Mean ± SD | ||||
Autumn 2017 | 4/05/2017 | 9/05/2017 | CR | 48.1 | 57.6 | 53.2 ± 2.02 | 27.8 | 27.9 | 27.9 ± 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.46 ± 0.02 |
WN | 48.9 | 55.2 | 52.4 ± 1.64 | 27.9 | 28.0 | 28 ± 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.49 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | |||
Autumn 2018 | 19/04/2018 | 26/04/2018 | CR | 47.3 | 56.7 | 53 ± 2.5 | 30.5 | 30.6 | 30.6 ± 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.17 ± 0.01 |
CS | 53.1 | 56.7 | 54.8 ± 0.78 | 30.5 | 30.7 | 30.6 ± 0.1 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | |||
WN | 50.3 | 55.7 | 52.5 ± 1.39 | 30.4 | 30.6 | 30.5 ± 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | |||
Autumn 2019 | 25/04/2019 | 30/04/2019 | CS | 53.0 | 55.0 | 54.1 ± 0.63 | 28.6 | 28.6 | 28.7 ± 0.01 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.75 ± 0.04 |
WN | 50.0 | 55.0 | 52.9 ± 1.31 | 28.4 | 28.6 | 28.5 ± 0.04 | 0.75 | 0.96 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | |||
Spring 2017 | 28/09/2017 | 4/10/2017 | CR | 43.1 | 56.6 | 52.7 ± 2.99 | 24.9 | 25.0 | 25 ± 0.04 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.64 ± 0.02 |
WN | 49.3 | 57.5 | 52.4 ± 1.39 | 24.8 | 24.9 | 24.9 ± 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | |||
Spring 2018 | 3/09/2018 | 19/09/2018 | CS | 53.3 | 57.2 | 55.3 ± 1.19 | 23.7 | 23.8 | 23.8 ± 0.02 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.31 ± 0.01 |
WN | 50.2 | 56.7 | 52.7 ± 1.5 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 23.6 ± 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | |||
Spring 2019 | 7/09/2019 | 11/09/2019 | CR | 43.0 | 56.0 | 52.6 ± 2.99 | 23.2 | 23.3 | 23.3 ± 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
WN | 50.0 | 54.0 | 52.3 ± 1.17 | 23.2 | 23.3 | 23.3 ± 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.26 ± 0.04 |
APPENDIX 2.
Pairwise PERMANOVA comparing demersal variation between years for autumn and spring at each site for taxonomic richness (TR), log total abundance (log 10 TA), log total biomass (log 10 TB), and log fork length (log 10 FL). Degrees of freedom (df) are reported. p ‐values in bold and with an asterisk are <.05, and the number of permutations (perms) are reported in parentheses
Groups | df | TR | log TA | log TB | log FL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(perms) | (perms) | (perms) | (perms) | |||||||
Wandoo | ||||||||||
Autumn | 2017, 2018 | 63 | 0.502 | .601 (161) | 0.256 | .805 (999) | 1.479 | .133 (995) | 0.145 | .875 (992) |
2017, 2019 | 71 | 0.679 | .496 (150) | 3.725 | (997) | 1.01 | .307 (999) | 4.908 | (997) | |
2018, 2019 | 68 | 1.24 | .226 (147) | 3.312 | (997) | 0.859 | .394 (999) | 4.685 | (998) | |
Spring | 2017, 2018 | 66 | 1.335 | .179 (159) | 2.268 | (996) | 1.706 | .089 (995) | 0.053 | .958 (998) |
2017, 2019 | 78 | 2.014 | .058 (190) | 3.53 | (997) | 1.462 | .124 (998) | 2.687 | (997) | |
2018, 2019 | 72 | 0.633 | .538 (161) | 1.206 | .211 (996) | 0.367 | .719 (997) | 3.07 | (995) | |
Seasonal | 2017 | 69 | 0.216 | .837 (168) | 0.792 | .436 (996) | 0.568 | .578 (995) | 2.204 | (997) |
2018 | 60 | 2.13 | (82) | 3.72 | (995) | 1.255 | .218 (995) | 2.356 | (997) | |
2019 | 80 | 1.86 | .053 (163) | 3.009 | (997) | 1.718 | .112 (998) | 1.265 | .222 (998) | |
Control Reef | ||||||||||
Autumn | 2017, 2018 | 43 | 1.498 | .149 (160) | 0.256 | .805 (999) | 1.262 | .224 (996) | 0.547 | .631 (999) |
Spring | 2017, 2019 | 69 | 0.449 | .672 (151) | 0.123 | .891 (998) | 0.154 | .876 (996) | 2.256 | (997) |
Seasonal | 2017 | 60 | 0.343 | .767 (131) | 2.44 | (997) | 4.344 | (998) | 0.236 | .825 (996) |
Control Sand | ||||||||||
Autumn | 2018, 2019 | 65 | 2.58 | (50) | 3.118 | (996) | 2.054 | (997) | 4.392 | (997) |
Seasonal | 2018 | 77 | 0.947 | .34 (74) | 3.72 | (995) | 3.058 | (992) | 2.143 | (997) |
APPENDIX 3.
Pairwise permanova comparing pelagic variation between years for autumn and spring at each site, in terms of taxonomic richness (TR), log total abundance (log 10 TA), log total biomass (log 10 TB), and log fork length (log 10 FL. Degrees of freedom (df) are reported. p ‐values in bold and with an asterisk are <.05, and the number of permutations (perms) are reported in parentheses
Groups | df | TR | log TA | log TB | log FL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(perms) | (perms) | (perms) | (perms) | |||||||
Wandoo | ||||||||||
Autumn | 2017, 2018 | 16 | 0.518 | .615 (130) | 1.476 | .161 (978) | 0.38079 | .689 (982) | 2.983 | (977) |
2017, 2019 | 14 | 1.257 | .234 (62) | 0.452 | .661 (952) | 0.96021 | .349 (958) | 0.028 | .98 (951) | |
2018, 2019 | 14 | 0.592 | .618 (212) | 1.843 | .092 (943) | 1.1664 | .281 (962) | 2.14 | .063 (952) | |
Spring | 2017, 2018 | 16 | 1.167 | .265 (218) | 3.397 | (973) | 0.13979 | .892 (974) | 1.147 | .256 (975) |
2017, 2019 | 16 | 0.452 | .677 (144) | 0.741 | .462 (957) | 1.8217 | .1 (972) | 4.45 | (973) | |
2018, 2019 | 16 | 1.398 | .179 (125) | 3.718 | (966 | 1.3543 | .192 (971) | 3.831 | (967) | |
Seasonal | 2017 | 16 | 4.49 | (262) | 4.621 | (975) | 0.45032 | .651 (980) | 2.064 | .059 (973) |
2018 | 16 | 1.534 | .149 (275) | 0.548 | .583 (981) | 0.81364 | .455 (980) | 1.507 | .181 (987) | |
2019 | 14 | 3.376 | .008 (146) | 5.363 | (942) | 1.0773 | .252 (963) | 5.734 | (955) | |
Control Reef | ||||||||||
Autumn | 2017, 2018 | 12 | 6.83 | (170) | 4.212 | (787) | 4.0458 | (804) | 1.016 | .319 (802) |
Spring | 2017, 2019 | 16 | 2.483 | (230) | 0.319 | .742 (961) | 2.081 | .052 (980) | 2.054 | .053 (975) |
Seasonal | 2017 | 16 | 6.932 | (393) | 5.712 | (977) | 0.75851 | .462 (983) | 1.729 | .09 (978) |
Control Sand | ||||||||||
Autumn | 2018, 2019 | 11 | 1.959 | .066 (83) | 0.627 | .528 (554) | 0.58776 | .591 (533) | 1.303 | .226 (543) |
Seasonal | 2018 | 16 | 0.663 | .525 (64) | 0.993 | .339 (980) | 0.34781 | .722 (983) | 1.123 | .279 (973) |
APPENDIX 4.
Prevalence (%) of demersal species recorded at WN, CR, and CS. Prevalence refers to the number of deployments on which a taxon was observed, out of the total number of deployments at that site
Binomial | WN | CR | CS |
---|---|---|---|
92.1 | 95.7 | 84.6 | |
0.5 | – | – | |
2.8 | 6.0 | – | |
0.9 | – | – | |
1.9 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 3.3 | 6.0 | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
0.9 | 5.2 | 1.0 | |
sp. | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
0.9 | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
1.4 | 3.4 | – | |
– | – | 1.0 | |
0.5 | – | 3.8 | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
sp. | 1.4 | – | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | – | 1.0 | |
0.9 | – | – | |
37.7 | 24.1 | 5.8 | |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
1.9 | 1.7 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | 5.2 | 1.0 |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
1.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |
sp. | 0.5 | 1.7 | – |
sp. | 0.9 | 0.9 | – |
– | 2.6 | – | |
10.2 | 16.4 | – | |
0.5 | 2.6 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
sp. | 2.8 | – | 4.8 |
sp. | 0.5 | – | 1.9 |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
sp. | 8.4 | 12.1 | 27.9 |
– | – | 1.0 | |
32.6 | 13.8 | 13.5 | |
69.8 | 43.1 | 17.3 | |
0.9 | – | – | |
58.6 | 57.8 | 4.8 | |
47.4 | 61.2 | 50.0 | |
0.5 | – | – | |
2.3 | – | – | |
sp. | 7.4 | 3.4 | 15.4 |
2.8 | 2.6 | 2.9 | |
0.5 | – | – | |
1.4 | 2.6 | – | |
1.4 | – | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
0.9 | – | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
5.1 | 1.7 | – | |
1.4 | – | 1.0 | |
– | – | 1.0 | |
0.5 | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
– | – | 1.9 | |
1.4 | 0.9 | 3.8 | |
– | – | 1.0 | |
sp. | 2.8 | 6.0 | 10.6 |
– | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
0.9 | – | – | |
sp. | 1.9 | – | 1.0 |
– | 1.7 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
23.7 | 15.5 | 1.0 | |
24.2 | 15.5 | 1.0 | |
sp. | – | 1.7 | – |
0.5 | 0.9 | – | |
1.4 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
47.0 | 44.8 | 1.9 | |
0.5 | 1.7 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
21.4 | 11.2 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
0.5 | – | – | |
13.0 | 3.4 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | 0.9 | – |
sp. | 3.3 | 1.7 | – |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
sp. | – | – | 1.9 |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
0.5 | 0.9 | – | |
0.9 | 2.6 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
16.7 | 2.6 | 2.9 | |
2.8 | – | – | |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
sp. | 0.9 | 8.6 | 1.0 |
2.3 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 4.2 | 0.9 | 2.9 |
sp. | 2.3 | 1.7 | 8.7 |
18.1 | 7.8 | 1.0 | |
2.3 | 5.2 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
32.1 | 38.8 | 49.0 | |
sp. | – | 0.9 | 2.9 |
sp. | 6.0 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
26.0 | 29.3 | – | |
24.7 | 20.7 | – | |
0.9 | – | – | |
1.9 | 1.7 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
1.9 | – | – | |
11.2 | 21.6 | 1.9 | |
0.5 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 7.0 | 8.6 | 1.0 |
– | 1.7 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
0.9 | 3.4 | 8.7 | |
0.9 | 2.6 | – | |
sp. | 1.9 | 0.9 | – |
0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
27.0 | 16.4 | 2.9 | |
sp. | 3.7 | 11.2 | 1.9 |
sp. | – | – | 2.9 |
1.4 | – | – | |
13.5 | 5.2 | – | |
18.1 | 6.9 | 1.0 | |
3.3 | – | – | |
sp. | 2.8 | 2.6 | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 1.4 | 1.7 | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
– | 1.7 | – | |
sp. | 1.4 | – | – |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
– | 0.9 | – | |
1.4 | 2.6 | – | |
0.9 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 0.9 | – |
– | – | 1.0 | |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
0.5 | – | – | |
– | 1.7 | – | |
sp. | 4.2 | 0.9 | – |
sp. | 0.5 | 0.9 | – |
0.5 | – | 3.8 | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
sp. | 10.2 | 1.7 | 1.0 |
14.0 | 5.2 | 1.0 | |
0.5 | 7.8 | 10.6 | |
12.6 | 32.8 | 51.0 | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | 4.8 |
3.3 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 2.6 | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
– | 2.6 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
9.3 | 11.2 | – | |
25.6 | 4.3 | – | |
17.2 | 10.3 | – | |
30.2 | 44.0 | 1.9 | |
40.5 | 12.1 | – | |
sp. | 2.8 | 3.4 | – |
1.4 | 1.7 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
10.2 | 6.0 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
1.9 | 4.3 | – | |
0.9 | 0.9 | 1.9 | |
0.5 | – | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
41.4 | 31.0 | 3.8 | |
sp. | 1.9 | 6.0 | 1.0 |
2.3 | 1.7 | 1.0 | |
0.9 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
sp. | 7.4 | 3.4 | 1.0 |
sp. | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
sp. | 7.4 | 0.9 | 1.9 |
0.5 | – | 2.9 | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 3.4 | 1.0 |
0.5 | – | – | |
2.3 | – | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 6.0 | 1.0 |
38.1 | 52.6 | 67.3 | |
sp. | 17.2 | 18.1 | 33.7 |
7.0 | 0.9 | 21.2 | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
12.1 | – | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 0.9 | – |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
sp. | 0.5 | – | 2.9 |
sp. | 0.5 | 0.9 | – |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
sp. | 7.9 | 11.2 | 20.2 |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
1.9 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
sp. | 2.3 | – | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
3.3 | 0.9 | – | |
8.8 | 5.2 | – | |
16.3 | 15.5 | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | 1.7 | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
6.0 | 1.7 | – | |
4.7 | 6.0 | – | |
sp. | 34.9 | 17.2 | 3.8 |
4.7 | – | 1.0 | |
sp. | 3.3 | 3.4 | – |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
7.4 | – | 1.0 | |
0.5 | – | – | |
– | 0.9 | – | |
0.5 | 2.6 | – | |
7.0 | 6.0 | – | |
0.5 | – | – | |
0.9 | – | – | |
18.1 | 16.4 | 1.0 | |
sp. | 19.1 | 11.2 | – |
sp. | 1.9 | – | 8.7 |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
3.7 | 9.5 | – | |
– | 5.2 | – | |
7.9 | 4.3 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
sp. | 9.8 | 3.4 | 4.8 |
0.9 | – | – | |
– | – | 1.9 | |
2.8 | 2.6 | – | |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
sp. | 1.9 | 2.6 | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
2.8 | 3.4 | 3.8 | |
– | – | 1.0 | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | 1.0 |
sp. | 0.5 | 2.6 | – |
7.9 | 31.0 | 52.9 | |
sp. | 3.7 | 11.2 | 2.9 |
– | 0.9 | 3.8 | |
0.5 | 0.9 | 3.8 | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | – |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
11.6 | 33.6 | 79.8 | |
sp. | 13.0 | 9.5 | 1.0 |
0.5 | – | – | |
1.9 | 4.3 | – | |
sp. | 7.0 | 1.7 | – |
32.6 | 15.5 | – | |
sp. | – | 2.6 | – |
– | 0.9 | – | |
1.9 | – | 1.0 | |
1.4 | – | – | |
sp. | 3.7 | 0.9 | – |
10.2 | 16.4 | 8.7 | |
sp. | 9.3 | 12.9 | 3.8 |
sp. | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
0.5 | – | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.9 |
0.5 | – | ‐ | |
– | – | 1.9 | |
2.8 | 19.8 | 38.5 | |
sp. | 2.3 | – | 1.0 |
0.5 | 2.6 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | 7.8 | – |
11.6 | 0.9 | 1.9 | |
10.7 | – | – | |
sp. | 4.2 | 0.9 | – |
1.9 | 0.9 | 2.9 | |
3.3 | 0.9 | 1.9 | |
11.2 | 3.4 | 4.8 | |
0.5 | – | – | |
0.9 | 0.9 | – | |
sp. | 0.5 | – | – |
32.6 | 39.7 | 1.0 | |
38.1 | 14.7 | – | |
sp. | 0.9 | – | 2.9 |
sp. | 1.9 | 5.2 | – |
0.5 | – | – | |
1.4 | – | – | |
sp. | – | 0.9 | – |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
sp. | – | – | 1.0 |
0.5 | – | – | |
0.9 | – | 1.0 | |
sp. | 0.9 | 0.9 | – |
– | 0.9 | – |
APPENDIX 5.
Prevalence (%) of pelagic species recorded at WN, CR, and CS. Prevalence refers to the number of deployments on which a taxon was observed, out of the total number of deployments at that site
Binomial | WN | CR | CS |
---|---|---|---|
– | – | 5 | |
5.8 | 3 | 18 | |
3.8 | 3 | – | |
1.9 | – | – | |
sp. | 19 | 31 | – |
1.9 | – | – | |
27 | 28 | 18 | |
65 | 47 | 41 | |
sp. | 7.7 | – | 32 |
sp. | 1.9 | 3 | – |
40 | 41 | 55 | |
– | – | 5 | |
1.9 | 3 | – | |
sp. | 1.9 | – | – |
9.6 | 6 | 5 | |
1.9 | – | – | |
sp. | 37 | 44 | 50 |
12 | 6 | 36 | |
– | – | 5 | |
3.8 | – | – | |
3.8 | – | 5 | |
sp. | 9.6 | 3 | 27 |
1.9 | – | – | |
1.9 | 6 | – | |
sp. | 3.8 | – | – |
sp. | 1.9 | – | – |
21 | – | – | |
9.6 | 28 | 50 | |
3.8 | 6 | – | |
15 | 3 | 50 | |
1.9 | – | – | |
1.9 | 6 | 14 | |
21 | 6 | – | |
40 | 28 | 36 | |
54 | 47 | 50 | |
13 | 6 | 23 | |
sp. | 58 | 53 | 59 |
1.9 | – | – | |
9.6 | – | 18 | |
sp. | 5.8 | – | 5 |
sp. | 25 | 13 | 41 |
– | – | 5 | |
1.9 | 3 | 5 | |
– | – | 5 | |
sp. | 69 | 66 | 86 |
sp. | 1.9 | – | – |
1.9 | – | – | |
sp. | – | 3 | – |
48 | 63 | 86 | |
15 | – | – | |
sp. | 15 | 9 | 5 |
sp. | – | 6 | – |
3.8 | 6 | 9 | |
sp. | 9.6 | 6 | 18 |
5.8 | 9 | 5 | |
5.8 | 3 | 5 | |
1.9 | – | 5 | |
sp. | 1.9 | 3 | 9 |
sp. | 37 | 13 | 18 |
3.8 | 3 | 18 | |
sp. | – | 3 | – |
7.7 | 3 | – | |
sp. | 37 | 13 | 18 |
1.9 | – | – | |
– | – | 5 | |
1.9 | – | – | |
3.8 | 3 | 23 | |
1.9 | – | – | |
– | – | 5 | |
– | – | 5 | |
sp. | 3.8 | 6 | 5 |
sp. | 27 | 6 | 14 |
1.9 | – | – | |
– | – | 5 | |
sp. | 1.9 | – | 5 |
sp. | – | 3 | 9 |
1.9 | – | – | |
sp. | 1.9 | – | 9 |
sp. | 3.8 | 6 | 32 |
1.9 | 6 | 32 | |
– | 3 | 5 | |
sp. | – | – | 5 |
sp. | 1.9 | – | – |
3.8 | – | – | |
23 | – | – | |
sp. | 9.6 | – | 5 |
sp. | 3.8 | 6 | – |
sp. | 42 | 25 | 27 |
1.9 | – | – | |
sp. | 1.9 | 3 | – |
sp. | 1.9 | – | – |
sp. | 17 | 31 | – |
31 | 38 | 68 | |
60 | 6 | 23 | |
sp. | – | – | 5 |
1.9 | 16 | 18 | |
sp. | – | 3 | – |
van Elden, S. , Meeuwig, J. J. , & Hobbs, R. J. (2022). Offshore platforms as novel ecosystems: A case study from Australia’s Northwest Shelf . Ecology and Evolution , 12 , e8496. 10.1002/ece3.8496 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
- Aagard, P. M. , & Besse, C. P. (1973). A Review of the offshore environment ‐ 25 years of progress . Journal of Petroleum Technology , 25 , 1355–1360. 10.2118/4699-PA [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Ajemian, M. J. , Wetz, J. J. , Shipley‐Lozano, B. , Dale Shively, J. , & Stunz, G. W. (2015). An analysis of artificial reef fish community structure along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico Shelf: potential impacts of ‘rigs‐to‐reefs’ programs . PLoS One , 10 , 1–22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126354 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Anderson, M. J. (2017). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (pp. 1–15). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. [ Google Scholar ]
- Anderson, M. J. , Gorley, R. N. , & Clarke, K. R. (2015). PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods . PRIMER‐E. [ Google Scholar ]
- Anon (2019). Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks . Report for the Director of National Parks. [ Google Scholar ]
- Ars, F. , & Rios, R. (2017). Decommissioning: a call for a new approach. In Offshore Technology Conference (pp. 1–4). Offshore Technology Conference. [ Google Scholar ]
- Barley, S. C. , Mehta, R. S. , Meeuwig, J. J. , & Meekan, M. G. (2016). To knot or not? Novel feeding behaviours in moray eels . Marine Biodiversity , 46 , 703–705. 10.1007/s12526-015-0404-y [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Bond, T. , Langlois, T. J. , Partridge, J. C. , Birt, M. J. , Malseed, B. E. , Smith, L. , & McLean, D. L. (2018). Diel shifts and habitat associations of fish assemblages on a subsea pipeline . Fisheries Research , 206 , 220–234. 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.05.011 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Bond, T. , Partridge, J. C. , Taylor, M. D. , Langlois, T. J. , Malseed, B. E. , Smith, L. D. , & McLean, D. L. (2018). Fish associated with a subsea pipeline and adjacent seafloor of the North West Shelf of Western Australia . Marine Environmental Research , 141 , 53–65. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.08.003 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Bonfil, R. (2008). The biology and ecology of the silky shark, Carcharhinus falciformis . In Camhi M. D., Pikitch E. K., & Babcock E. A. (Eds.), Sharks of the open ocean: Biology, fisheries and conservation (pp. 114–127). Blackwell Publishing. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bouchet, P. , Meeuwig, J. , Huveneers, C. , Langlois, T. , Lowry, M. , Rees, M. , Santana‐garcon, J. , Scott, M. , Taylor, M. , Thompson, C. , & Vigliola, L. (2018). Marine sampling field manual for pelagic stereo‐BRUVS (baited remote underwater videos) . National Environmental Science Programme. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bull, A. S. , & Love, M. S. (2019). Worldwide oil and gas platform decommissioning: a review of practices and reefing options . Ocean and Coastal Management , 168 , 274–306. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.024 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Cappo, M. , Harvey, E. S. , & Shortis, M. (2006). Counting and measuring fish with baited video techniques ‐ an overview . Australian Society for Fish Biology. [ Google Scholar ]
- Chandler, J. , White, D. , Techera, E. J. , Gourvenec, S. , & Draper, S. (2017). Engineering and legal considerations for decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure in Australia . Ocean Engineering , 131 , 338–347. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.030 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Chou, L. M. , Lim, G. S. Y. , & Leng, C. B. (1992). Fish communities in natural reef and artificial habitats in the coastal waters of Brunei Darussalam . Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Industry and Primary Resources. [ Google Scholar ]
- Claisse, J. T. , Pondella, D. J. , Love, M. , Zahn, L. A. , Williams, C. M. , Williams, J. P. , & Bull, A. S. (2014). Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 111 , 15462–15467. 10.1073/pnas.1411477111 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Commonwealth of Australia (2010). Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2010 . Commonwealth of Australia. [ Google Scholar ]
- Compagno, L. J. V. (1984). FAO species catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 1 ‐ Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes . FAO. [ Google Scholar ]
- Dagorn, L. , Josse, E. , & Bach, P. (2000). Individual differences in horizontal movements of yellowfin tuna ( Thunnus albacares ) in nearshore areas in French Polynesia, determined using ultrasonic telemetry . Aquatic Living Resources , 13 , 193–202. [ Google Scholar ]
- Dauterive, L. (2000). Rigs‐to‐reefs policy, progress, and perspective . American Academy of Underwater Sciences. [ Google Scholar ]
- de Groot, S. J. (1982). The impact of laying and maintenance of offshore pipelines on the marine environment and the North Sea fisheries . Ocean Management , 8 , 1–27. 10.1016/0302-184X(82)90011-7 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Dudgeon, C. L. , Simpfendorfer, C. , & Pillans, R. (2019). Stegostoma fasciatum (amended version of 2016 assessment) . The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019 e.T41878A1. [ Google Scholar ]
- Elizabeth, A. K. (1996). Protocol to the London dumping convention and the Brent Spar . International & Comparative Law Quarterly , 46 , 957–964. [ Google Scholar ]
- Evans, R. D. , Wilson, S. K. , Field, S. N. , & Moore, J. A. Y. (2014). Importance of macroalgal fields as coral reef fish nursery habitat in north‐west Australia . Marine Biology , 161 , 599–607. 10.1007/s00227-013-2362-x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fonseca, V. P. , Pennino, M. G. , de Nóbrega, M. F. , Oliveira, J. E. L. , & de Figueiredo, M. L. (2017). Identifying fish diversity hot‐spots in data‐poor situations . Marine Environmental Research , 129 , 365–373. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.06.017 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fortune, I. S. , & Paterson, D. M. (2020). Ecological best practice in decommissioning: a review of scientific research . ICES Journal of Marine Science , 77 , 1079–1091. 10.1093/icesjms/fsy130 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fowler, A. M. , & Booth, D. J. (2012). Evidence of sustained populations of a small reef fish on artificial structures. Does depth affect production on artificial reefs? Journal of Fish Biology , 80 , 613–629. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03201.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fowler, A. M. , Jørgensen, A.‐M. , Svendsen, J. C. , Macreadie, P. I. , Jones, D. O. B. , Boon, A. R. , Booth, D. J. , Brabant, R. , Callahan, E. , Claisse, J. T. , Dahlgren, T. G. , Degraer, S. , Dokken, Q. R. , Gill, A. B. , Johns, D. G. , Leewis, R. J. , Lindeboom, H. J. , Linden, O. , May, R. , … Coolen, J. W. P. (2018). Environmental benefits of leaving offshore infrastructure in the ocean . Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 16 ( 10 ), 571–578. 10.1002/fee.1827 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fowler, A. M. , Macreadie, P. I. , Jones, D. O. B. , & Booth, D. J. (2014). A multi‐criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure . Ocean and Coastal Management , 87 , 20–29. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.10.019 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Frederick, J. L. (1997). Post‐settlement movement of coral reef fishes and bias in survival estimates . Marine Ecology Progress Series , 150 , 65–74. 10.3354/meps150065 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Friedlander, A. M. , Ballesteros, E. , Fay, M. , & Sala, E. (2014). Marine communities on oil platforms in Gabon, West Africa: high biodiversity oases in a low biodiversity environment . PLoS One , 9 , 1–15. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Friedlander, A. M. , & Parrish, J. D. (1998). Habitat characteristics affecting fish assemblages on a Hawaiian coral reef . Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology , 224 , 1–30. 10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00164-0 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Froese, R. , & Pauly, D. (Eds.) (2019). FishBase . www.fishbase.org , version (12/2019) [ Google Scholar ]
- Froese, R. , Thorson, J. T. , & Reyes, R. B. (2014). A Bayesian approach for estimating length‐weight relationships in fishes . Journal of Applied Ichthyology , 30 , 78–85. 10.1111/jai.12299 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Fromont, J. , Wahab, M. A. A. , Gomez, O. , Ekins, M. , Grol, M. , & Hooper, J. N. A. (2016). Patterns of sponge biodiversity in the Pilbara, Northwestern Australia . Diversity , 8 , 14–16. [ Google Scholar ]
- Fujii, T. , & Jamieson, A. J. (2016). Fine‐scale monitoring of fish movements and multiple environmental parameters around a decommissioned offshore oil platform: A pilot study in the North Sea . Ocean Engineering , 126 , 481–487. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Geoscience Australia (2009). Oil and gas resources of Australia ‐ 2009 . http://www.ga.gov.au/data‐pubs/data‐and‐publications‐search/publications/oil‐gas‐resources‐australia/2009/production/table‐7 [ Google Scholar ]
- Harvey, E. S. , & Shortis, M. R. (1998). Calibration stability of an underwater stereo‐video system: implications for measurement accuracy and precision . Marine Technology Society Journal , 32 , 3–17. [ Google Scholar ]
- Haugen, J. B. , & Papastamatiou, Y. (2019). Observation of a porbeagle shark Lamna nasus aggregation at a North Sea oil platform . Journal of Fish Biology , 95 , 1496–1499. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Havlicek, L. L. , & Peterson, N. L. (1976). Robustness of the Pearson correlation against violations of assumptions . Perceptual and Motor Skills , 43 , 1319–1334. 10.2466/pms.1976.43.3f.1319 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Hobbs, R. J. , Higgs, E. S. , & Hall, C. M. (2013). Defining novel ecosystems. In Hobbs R. J., Higgs E. S., & Hall C. M. (Eds.), Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order (pp. 58–60). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ Google Scholar ]
- Huang, Z. , Nichol, S. , Harris, P. , & Caley, M. (2014). Classification of submarine canyons of the Australian continental margin . Marine Geology , 357 , 362–383. 10.1016/j.margeo.2014.07.007 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- IMOS (2020). https://www.imos.org.au/
- Koch, J. M. , & Hobbs, R. J. (2007). Synthesis: is Alcoa successfully restoring a jarrah forest ecosystem after bauxite mining in Western Australia? Restoration Ecology , 15 , 137–144. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00301.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Kopf, R. K. , Finlayson, C. M. , Humphries, P. , Sims, N. C. , & Hladyz, S. (2015). Anthropocene baselines: Assessing change and managing biodiversity in human‐dominated aquatic ecosystems . BioScience , 65 , 798–811. 10.1093/biosci/biv092 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Langlois, T. J. , Harvey, E. S. , Fitzpatrick, B. , Meeuwig, J. J. , Shedrawi, G. , & Watson, D. L. (2010). Cost‐efficient sampling of fish assemblages: Comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects . Aquatic Biology , 9 , 155–168. 10.3354/ab00235 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Leewis, R. , Van Moorsel, G. , & Waardenburg, H. (2000). Shipwrecks on the Dutch continental shelf as artificial reefs. In Jensen A., Collins K., & Lockwood A. (Eds.), Artificial reefs in European seas . (pp. 419–434). Springer. [ Google Scholar ]
- Letessier, T. B. , Bouchet, P. J. , Reisser, J. , & Meeuwig, J. J. (2015). Baited videography reveals remote foraging and migration behaviour of sea turtles . Marine Biodiversity , 45 , 609–610. 10.1007/s12526-014-0287-3 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Letessier, T. B. , Juhel, J. B. , Vigliola, L. , & Meeuwig, J. J. (2015). Low‐cost small action cameras in stereo generates accurate underwater measurements of fish . Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology , 466 , 120–126. 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.02.013 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Letessier, T. B. , Meeuwig, J. J. , Gollock, M. , Groves, L. , Bouchet, P. J. , Chapuis, L. , Vianna, G. M. S. , Kemp, K. , & Koldewey, H. J. (2013). Assessing pelagic fish populations: the application of demersal video techniques to the mid‐water environment . Methods in Oceanography , 8 , 41–55. 10.1016/j.mio.2013.11.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Löfstedt, R. E. , & Renn, O. (1997). The Brent Spar controversy: an example of risk communication gone wrong . Risk Analysis , 17 , 131–136. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00852.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Love, M. S. , Claisse, J. T. , & Roeper, A. (2019). An analysis of the fish assemblages around 23 oil and gas platforms off California with comparisons with natural habitats . Bulletin of Marine Science , 95 , 477–514. 10.5343/bms.2018.0061 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Love, M. S. , Schroeder, D. M. , Lenarz, W. , MacCall, A. , Bull, A. S. , & Thorsteinson, L. (2006). Potential use of offshore marine structures in rebuilding an overfished rockfish species, bocaccio ( Sebastes paucispinis ) . Fishery Bulletin , 104 , 383–390. [ Google Scholar ]
- Lowry, M. , Folpp, H. , Gregson, M. , & Suthers, I. (2012). Comparison of baited remote underwater video (BRUV) and underwater visual census (UVC) for assessment of artificial reefs in estuaries . Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology , 416–417 , 243–253. 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.01.013 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Macreadie, P. I. , Fowler, A. M. , & Booth, D. J. (2012). Rigs‐to‐reefs policy: can science trump public sentiment? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment , 10 , 179–180. 10.1890/12.WB.013 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Maire, E. , Cinner, J. , Velez, L. , Huchery, C. , Mora, C. , Dagata, S. , Vigliola, L. , Wantiez, L. , Kulbicki, M. , & Mouillot, D. (2016). How accessible are coral reefs to people? A global assessment based on travel time . Ecology Letters , 19 , 351–360. 10.1111/ele.12577 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- McLean, D. L. , Taylor, M. D. , Giraldo Ospina, A. , & Partridge, J. C. (2019). An assessment of fish and marine growth associated with an oil and gas platform jacket using an augmented remotely operated vehicle . Continental Shelf Research , 179 , 66–84. 10.1016/j.csr.2019.04.006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- McLean, D. L. , Taylor, M. D. , Partridge, J. C. , Gibbons, B. , Langlois, T. J. , Malseed, B. E. , Smith, L. D. , & Bond, T. (2018). Fish and habitats on wellhead infrastructure on the North West Shelf of Western Australia . Continental Shelf Research , 164 , 10–27. 10.1016/j.csr.2018.05.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Meyer‐Gutbrod, E. L. , Love, M. S. , Schroeder, D. M. , Claisse, J. T. , Kui, L. , & Miller, R. J. (2020). Forecasting the legacy of offshore oil and gas platforms on fish community structure and productivity . Ecological Applications , 30 , 1–16. 10.1002/eap.2185 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Moore, G. I. , Morrison, S. M. , & Johnson, J. W. (2020). The distribution of shallow marine fishes of the Kimberley, Western Australia, based on a long‐term dataset and multiple methods . Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement , 85 , 105. [ Google Scholar ]
- Nishimoto, M. M. , Washburn, L. , Love, M. S. , Schroeder, D. M. , Emery, B. M. , & Kui, L. (2019). Timing of juvenile fish settlement at offshore oil platforms coincides with water mass advection into the Santa Barbara Channel, California . Bulletin of Marine Science , 95 , 559–582. 10.5343/bms.2018.0068 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- O’Toole, A. C. , Danylchuk, A. J. , Goldberg, T. L. , Suski, C. D. , Philipp, D. P. , Brooks, E. , & Cooke, S. J. (2011). Spatial ecology and residency patterns of adult great barracuda ( Sphyraena barracuda ) in coastal waters of The Bahamas . Marine Biology , 158 , 2227–2237. 10.1007/s00227-011-1728-1 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Offshore Resources Branch (2018). Discussion paper ‐ decommissioning offshore petroleum infrastructure in Commonwealth waters . Offshore Resources Branch. [ Google Scholar ]
- Ounanian, K. , van Tatenhove, J. P. M. , & Ramírez‐Monsalve, P. (2019). Midnight at the oasis: does restoration change the rigs‐to‐reefs debate in the North Sea? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning , 22 , 211–225. 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1697657 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Pradella, N. , Fowler, A. M. , Booth, D. J. , & Macreadie, P. I. (2014). Fish assemblages associated with oil industry structures on the continental shelf of north‐western Australia . Journal of Fish Biology , 84 , 247–255. 10.1111/jfb.12274 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Reeds, K. A. , Smith, J. A. , Suthers, I. M. , & Johnston, E. L. (2018). An ecological halo surrounding a large offshore artificial reef: Sediments, infauna, and fish foraging . Marine Environmental Research , 141 , 30–38. 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.07.011 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Reggio, V. C. Jr (1987). Rigs‐to‐Reefs . Fisheries , 12 , 2–7. [ Google Scholar ]
- Reynolds, E. M. , Cowan, J. H. Jr , Lewis, K. A. , & Simonsen, K. A. (2018). Method for estimating relative abundance and species composition around oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A . Fisheries Research , 201 , 44–55. 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.01.002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Ridgway, K. , Dunn, J. , & Wilkin, J. (2002). Ocean interpolation by four‐dimensional weighted least squares—application to the waters around Australasia . Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology , 19 , 1357–1375. [ Google Scholar ]
- Rigby, C. L. , Barreto, R. , Carlson, J. , Fernando, D. , Fordham, S. , Francis, M. P. , Herman, K. , Jabado, R. W. , Liu, K. M. , Marshall, A. , Pacoureau, N. , Romanov, E. , Sherley, R. B. , & Winker, H. (2019a). Carcharhinus obscurus . IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [ Google Scholar ]
- Rigby, C. L. , Barreto, R. , Carlson, J. , Fernando, D. , Fordham, S. , Francis, M. P. , Herman, K. , Jabado, R. W. , Liu, K. M. , Marshall, A. , Pacoureau, N. , Romanov, E. , Sherley, R. B. , & Winker, H. (2019b). Sphyrna mokarran . The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [ Google Scholar ]
- Robinson, D. P. , Jaidah, M. Y. , Jabado, R. W. , Lee‐Brooks, K. , Nour El‐Din, N. M. , Al, M. A. A. , Elmeer, K. , McCormick, P. A. , Henderson, A. C. , Pierce, S. J. , & Ormond, R. F. G. (2013). Whale sharks, Rhincodon typus , aggregate around offshore platforms in Qatari waters of the Arabian Gulf to feed on fish spawn . PLoS One , 8 , e58255. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Rome, B. M. , & Newman, S. (2010). North Coast fish identification guide. In Fisheries Occasional Publication (pp. 1–72). Department of Fisheries. [ Google Scholar ]
- Ronconi, R. A. , Allard, K. A. , & Taylor, P. D. (2015). Bird interactions with offshore oil and gas platforms: Review of impacts and monitoring techniques . Journal of Environmental Management , 147 , 34–45. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.031 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Sainsbury, K. J. , Campbell, R. A. , Lindholm, R. , & Whitelaw, A. W. (1997). In Experimental management of an Australian multi‐species fishery: examining the possibility of trawl‐induced habitat modification . American Fisheries Society. [ Google Scholar ]
- Sainsbury, K. J. , Campbell, R. A. , & Whitelaw, A. W. (1993). Effects of trawling on the marine habitat on the North West Shelf of Australia and implications for sustainable fisheries management. In Hancock D. A. (Ed.), Sustainable fisheries through sustaining fish habitat (pp. 137–145). Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop. Australian Government Publishing Service. [ Google Scholar ]
- Scarcella, G. , Grati, F. , & Fabi, G. (2011). Temporal and spatial variation of the fish assemblage around a gas platform in the northern Adriatic Sea, Italy . Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences , 11 , 433–444. [ Google Scholar ]
- Schläppy, M.‐L. , & Hobbs, R. J. (2019). A triage framework for managing novel, hybrid, and designed marine ecosystems . Global Change Biology , 25 , 3215–3223. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Schroeder, D. M. , & Love, M. S. (2002). Recreational fishing and marine fish populations in California . California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations , 43 , 182–190. [ Google Scholar ]
- Schroeder, D. M. , & Love, M. S. (2004). Ecological and political issues surrounding decommissioning of offshore oil facilities in the Southern California Bight . Ocean and Coastal Management , 47 , 21–48. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.03.002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- SeaGIS Pty Ltd (2020). SeaGIS Pty, Ltd. [ Google Scholar ]
- Shinn, E. A. (1974). Oil structures as artificial reefs . Texas A&M University. [ Google Scholar ]
- Sommer, B. , Fowler, A. M. , Macreadie, P. I. , Palandro, D. A. , Aziz, A. C. , & Booth, D. J. (2019). Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas structures – environmental opportunities and challenges . Science of the Total Environment , 658 , 973–981. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.193 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Spaet, J. L. Y. , Nanninga, G. B. , & Berumen, M. L. (2016). Ongoing decline of shark populations in the Eastern Red Sea . Biological Conservation , 201 , 20–28. 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.018 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Stanley, D. R. , & Wilson, C. A. (1996). Abundance of fishes associated with a petroleum platform as measured with dual‐beam hydroacoustics . ICES Journal of Marine Science , 53 , 473–475. 10.1006/jmsc.1996.0067 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Taylor, A. (2020). Shaping the decommissioning landscape of tomorrow . The APPEA Journal , 60 , 537–539. 10.1071/AJ19029 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Techera, E. J. , & Chandler, J. (2015). Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment? Marine Policy , 59 , 53–60. [ Google Scholar ]
- Thompson, C. D. H. , Bouchet, P. J. , & Meeuwig, J. J. (2019). First underwater sighting of Shepherd’s beaked whale ( Tasmacetus shepherdi ) . Marine Biodiversity Records , 12 , 1–6. 10.1186/s41200-019-0165-6 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Thomson, P. G. , Pillans, R. , Jaine, F. R. A. , Harcourt, R. G. , Taylor, M. D. , Pattiaratchi, C. B. , & McLean, D. L. (2021). Acoustic telemetry around western Australia’s oil and gas infrastructure helps detect the presence of an elusive and endangered migratory giant . Frontiers in Marine Science , 8 , 1–9. 10.3389/fmars.2021.631449 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Thresher, A. R. E. , Sainsbury, K. J. , Gunn, J. S. , & Whitelaw, A. W. (1986). Life history strategies and recent changes in population structure in the lizardfish genus, Saurida , on the Australian Northwest Shelf . Copeia , 1986 , 876–885. [ Google Scholar ]
- Todd, V. L. G. , Williamson, L. D. , Cox, S. E. , Todd, I. B. , & Macreadie, P. I. (2019). Characterizing the first wave of fish and invertebrate colonization on a new offshore petroleum platform . ICES Journal of Marine Science , 77 , 1127–1136. 10.1093/icesjms/fsz077 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Torquato, F. , Jensen, H. M. , Range, P. , Bach, S. S. , Ben‐Hamadou, R. , Sigsgaard, E. E. , Thomsen, P. F. , Møller, P. R. , & Riera, R. (2017). Vertical zonation and functional diversity of fish assemblages revealed by ROV videos at oil platforms in The Gulf . Journal of Fish Biology , 91 , 947–967. 10.1111/jfb.13394 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Tothill, T. (2019). The vertical distribution of fish species on two offshore oil platforms . University of Western Australia. [ Google Scholar ]
- van Elden, S. , Meeuwig, J. J. , Hobbs, R. J. , & Hemmi, J. M. (2019). Offshore oil and gas platforms as novel ecosystems: A global perspective . Frontiers in Marine Science , 6 , Article 548. [ Google Scholar ]
- Vermilion Oil and Gas Australia (2014). Wandoo Facility Environmental Plan Summary.
- WAFIC (2020). North Coast demersal scalefish fisheries . https://www.wafic.org.au/fishery/north‐coast‐demersal‐scalefish‐fisheries/ [ Google Scholar ]
- Wetz, J. J. , Ajemian, M. J. , Shipley, B. , & Stunz, G. W. (2020). An assessment of two visual survey methods for documenting fish community structure on artificial platform reefs in the Gulf of Mexico . Fisheries Research , 225 , 105492. 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105492 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Whiteway, T. (2009). Australian bathymetry and topography grid . Geoscience Australia. [ Google Scholar ]
- Whitmarsh, S. K. , Fairweather, P. G. , & Huveneers, C. (2017). What is Big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video . Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries , 27 , 53–73. 10.1007/s11160-016-9450-1 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Xilisoft Corporation (2016). Xilisoft video convert ultimate . Xilisoft Corporation. [ Google Scholar ]
- Xuefang, W. , Xiaojie, D. , Liuxiong, X. , & Zhenhua, W. (2013). Preliminary results on fishery biology for rainbow runner Elagatis bipinnulata associated with drifting fish aggregation devices in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean . Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. [ Google Scholar ]
- Yesson, C. , Letessier, T. B. , Nimmo‐Smith, A. , Hosegood, P. J. , Brierley, A. S. , Harouin, M. , & Proud, R. (2021). Improved bathymetry leads to 4000 new seamount predictions in the global ocean . UCL Open: Environment Preprint , In review, 1–12. [ Google Scholar ]
- Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis . Pearson Education India. [ Google Scholar ]
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Part II. What are Novel Ecosystems? 11. Chapter 2. Case Study: Hole-in-the-Donut, Everglades. John J. Ewel. Department of Biology, University of Florida, USA. sold their lands to the government in the early 1970s. At that point it was still a donut, but the hole was now abandoned soil, much of it rock-plowed, to which fertilizer had been ...
Context Anthropogenic changes (e.g., climate change, land-use change, species introductions, etc.) are reshaping ecosystems processes and patterns and causing an intense reorganization of the Earth's biotic systems. As a result, unprecedented combinations of species are emerging, forming "novel ecosystems". Objectives The goals of this work are: (1) to examine the history and relevance of ...
This book brings together researchers from a range of disciplines together with practitioners and policy makers to explore the questions surrounding novel ecosystems. It includes chapters on key concepts and methodologies for deciding when and how to intervene in systems, as well as a rich collection of case studies and perspective pieces.
Recent studies have focused on the degradation and restoration of such woodlands in the context of threshold dynamics and alternative stable states [53]. ... We propose the following criteria as a starting point in considering whether a novel ecosystem is a suitable case for conservation, or a worthwhile target of restoration: ...
This framework, derived from recent research on novel ecosystems (Hobbs et al. 2009, 2013), helps to identify the relative values of ecosystems in different conditions and the management options available in each case. As seen from a landscape perspective, this framework provides a comprehensive approach to decision making and management ...
Thus, the term novel ecosystem is not only used to classify certain ecosystems that differ in biotic and abiotic conditions from historic ones, ... Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosystem Services, 30 (2018), pp. 327-338.
case study of a novel ecosystem (Box 2). DEFINITIONS Human agency Human agency, i.e., the direct alteration of ecosystem characteristics by humans, whether intentional or unintentional, is the essential element in creating novel ecosystems and is central to our definition and those proposed earlier (Hobbs et al. 2006, 2013).
25 Case study: Novelty measurement in pampean grasslands, 205 PEDRO M. TOGNETTI. 26 Plant materials for novel ecosystems, 212 THOMAS A. JONES. 27 Case study: Management of novel ecosystems in the Seychelles, 228 CHRISTOPH KUEFFER, KATY BEAVER AND JAMES MOUGAL. 28 Perspective: Moving to the dark side, 239 PATRICIA L. KENNEDY
The book grew out of a 2011 workshop that asked how managers should deal with these novel ecosystems. It has 20 main chapters, which explore the major issues, as well as several shorter case studies and perspectives. Most of the main chapters are good and surprisingly well integrated, thanks to file-sharing technology.
Article preview. OpinionNovel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Many ecosystems are rapidly being transformed into new, non-historical configurations owing to a variety of local and global changes. We discuss how new systems can arise in the face of primarily biotic change (extinction and/or invasion), primarily abiotic ...
The next major refinement of the term novel ecosystem _ was a result of a real-world example documented by Ariel E Lugo in 2004 (Lugo 2004). In this case study, Puerto Rico ecosystem novelty was quantified by the rising percentage of nonnative tree species on the island. This example of a novel ecosystem does not use the specific terminology ^novel
This essay explores the Salton Sea as a case study for the entwined relationship between human history and environmental context. In telling the inseparable histories of the Salton Sea and development in the Imperial Valley since the late-19 th century, we are better able to understand three challenges posed by novel ecosystems: 1. Where to ...
Our two case studies represent two extremes on the novelty spectrum: (1) urban gardens in the metropolitan region of Perth, Western Australia, which are designed ecosystems that vary in the percentage of native plantings; and (2) the Zumwalt Prairie in northeastern Oregon where native grassland plants still dominate the ecosystem but non-native ...
To appreciate the story of Seychelles' novel ecosystems, the chapter first summarizes some information on the biogeography and environmental history of the granitic Seychelles islands. It introduces three habitat types that are of particular importance for nature conservation in Seychelles, and discusses for each of them how the novel ecosystem ...
Our two case studies represent two extremes on the novelty spectrum: (1) urban gardens in the metropolitan region of Perth, Western Australia, which are designed ecosystems that vary in the percentage of native plantings; and (2) the Zumwalt Prairie in northeastern Oregon where native grassland plants still dominate the ecosystem but non-native ...
39 Ecosystem stewardship as a framework. for conservation in a directionally changing. world, 326. TIMOTHY R. SEASTEDT, KATHARINE N. SUDING. AND K SWART CHAP1N III. 40 Case study: Novel socio-ecological systems in the. North: Potential pathways toward ecological and. societal resilience, 334. /• STUART CHAP1N III, MARTIN D. ROBARDS,
This study provides an example for classifying offshore platforms as novel ecosystems. Location of the three study sites, Wandoo, Control Reef and Control Sand, approximately 75 km north‐west of ...
Concepts such as novel ecosystems allow stakeholders to consider the ecological role played by each platform in the decommissioning process. This study focused on the Wandoo field in Northwest Australia as a case study for the application of the novel ecosystem concept to the decommissioning of offshore platforms.
This should encourage us to re-assess the questions we ask about wolf impacts in novel systems. A promising direction for future studies is exploring what novel interactions establish and under what conditions wolves can exert their ecosystem impacts (context dependence) in the human-modified ecosystems wolves are recolonizing. Policy ...
Concepts such as novel ecosystems allow stakeholders to consider the ecological role played by each platform in the decommissioning process. This study focused on the Wandoo field in Northwest Australia as a case study for the application of the novel ecosystem concept to the decommissioning of offshore platforms. Stereo-baited remote ...
NovelEco is a citizen science project that will measure, for the first time, societal attitudes towards urban wild spaces and species (or novel ecosystems) by working with citizens to study them and generate data on these unusual and perhaps overlooked urban ecosystems. See our NEWS section for more about the work we are doing.
This paper aims to reveal the impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services and to guide sustainable development decisions by modelling the future land use/land cover pattern and its ecosystem services in the case of Aydın province, Turkey. In this context, the study examined land use/land cover changes in Aydın province, predicted future land use/land cover patterns with ...
The Open Knowledge Repository provides access to thousands of publications and research on global development issues.
Effective management of urban solid waste in the Metropolitan Region of Belém, State of Pará, Brazil is essential for conserving ecosystems and public health in eight cities, emphasizing the municipality of Marituba. Considering the vulnerability of underground water resources in Marituba to pollution due to the possible impact of leachate percolation from the landfill, this study evaluates ...
The climate impact of meat production is a hotly debated topic. What is less often highlighted is that grazing ruminants can have positive impacts on biodiversity. The aim of this study was to use a life cycle perspective to assess both the climate and biodiversity impact of different beef and lamb production systems in Sweden. Applying a life cycle perspective, a quantitative method to assess ...
In many developed and developing nations, lakes are the primary source of drinking water. In the current scenario, due to rapid mobilization in anthropogenic activities, lakes are becoming increasingly contaminated. Such practices not only destroy lake ecosystems but also jeopardize human health through water-borne diseases. This study employs advanced hierarchical clustering through ...
The foresight report highlights the intersection between two megatrends — climate change and Malaysia's changing demographic — and maps out the future implications of these shifts on two socio-economic areas; firstly, the nation's economic structures and the labour market, and secondly, the well-being of the elderly and their families.
Concepts such as novel ecosystems allow stakeholders to consider the ecological role played by each platform in the decommissioning process. This study focused on the Wandoo field in Northwest Australia as a case study for the application of the novel ecosystem concept to the decommissioning of offshore platforms. Stereo-baited remote ...
An Oxford study estimates that despite cost-cutting efforts, Paris is spending more than $1 billion above the Games' historical median cost. By Vivienne Walt and Sarah Kessler Follow live ...
This study focused on the Wandoo field in Northwest Australia as a case study for the application of the novel ecosystem concept to the decommissioning of offshore platforms. Stereo‐baited remote underwater video systems were used to assess the habitat composition and fish communities at Wandoo, as well as two control sites: a sandy one that ...