- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
nuclear family
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- The Bowen Center for the Study of the Family - Nuclear Family Emotional Process
- BMC - Public Health - Factors associated with quality of life among joint and nuclear families: a population-based study
- Simply Psychology - Nuclear Family Functions In Sociology
- Academia - Joint and Nuclear Family
Recent News
nuclear family , in sociology and anthropology , a group of people who are united by ties of partnership and parenthood and consisting of a pair of adults and their socially recognized children. Typically, but not always, the adults in a nuclear family are married. Although such couples are most often a man and a woman, the definition of the nuclear family has expanded with the advent of same-sex marriage . Children in a nuclear family may be the couple’s biological or adopted offspring.
Thus defined, the nuclear family was once widely held to be the most basic and universal form of social organization. Anthropological research, however, has illuminated so much variability of this form that it is safer to assume that what is universal is a “nuclear family complex” in which the roles of husband, wife, mother, father, son, daughter, brother, and sister are embodied by people whose biological relationships do not necessarily conform to the Western definitions of these terms. In matrilineal societies, for example, a child may be the responsibility not of his biological genitor but of his mother’s brother, who fulfills the roles typical of Western fatherhood.
Closely related in form to the predominant nuclear-family unit are the conjugal family and the consanguineal family. As its name implies, the conjugal family is knit together primarily by the marriage tie and consists of mother, father, their children, and some close relatives. The consanguineal family, on the other hand, typically groups itself around a unilineal descent group known as a lineage , a form that reckons kinship through either the father’s or the mother’s line but not both. Whether a culture is patrilineal or matrilineal, a consanguineal family comprises lineage relatives and consists of parents, their children, and their children’s children. Rules regarding lineage exogamy , or out-marriage, are common in these groups; within a given community , marriages thus create cross-cutting social and political ties between lineages.
The stability of the conjugal family depends on the quality of the marriage of the husband and wife, a relationship that is more emphasized in the kinds of industrialized, highly mobile societies that frequently demand that people reside away from their kin groups. The consanguineal family derives its stability from its corporate nature and its permanence, as its relationships emphasize the perpetuation of the line.
- Books, Journals, Papers
- Guides & How To’s
- Life Around The World
- Research Methods
- Functionalism
- Postmodernism
- Social Constructionism
- Structuralism
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Sociology Theorists
- General Sociology
- Social Policy
- Social Work
- Sociology of Crime & Deviance
- Sociology of Art
- Sociology of Dance
- Sociology of Food
- Sociology of Sport
- Sociology of Disability
- Sociology of Economics
- Sociology of Education
- Sociology of Emotion
- Sociology of Family & Relationships
- Sociology of Gender
- Sociology of Health
- Sociology of Identity
- Sociology of Ideology
- Sociology of Inequalities
- Sociology of Knowledge
- Sociology of Language
- Sociology of Law
- Sociology of Anime
- Sociology of Film
- Sociology of Gaming
- Sociology of Literature
- Sociology of Music
- Sociology of TV
- Sociology of Migration
- Sociology of Nature & Environment
- Sociology of Politics
- Sociology of Power
- Sociology of Race & Ethnicity
- Sociology of Religion
- Sociology of Sexuality
- Sociology of Social Movements
- Sociology of Technology
- Sociology of the Life Course
- Sociology of Violence & Conflict
- Sociology of Work
- Sociology of Travel & Tourism
- Urban Sociology
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
The Nuclear Family
Table of Contents
Historical context of the nuclear family, theoretical perspectives on the nuclear family, functional roles of the nuclear family, criticisms of the nuclear family.
- Contemporary Relevance of the Nuclear Family
The concept of the nuclear family has been a cornerstone in sociological discussions, primarily within the contexts of family structures, socialization, and societal norms . The term “nuclear family” traditionally refers to a family unit consisting of two parents and their biological children living together. This essay will delve into the historical context, theoretical frameworks, functional roles, criticisms, and contemporary relevance of the nuclear family, providing a comprehensive understanding suitable for an undergraduate audience.
Early Origins
The origins of the nuclear family can be traced back to pre-industrial societies, where extended family structures were more common. However, the nuclear family as a distinct social unit became more pronounced during the industrial revolution. This period marked a significant shift in family structures, influenced by the changing economic landscape.
Industrialization and Urbanization
The industrial revolution brought about urbanization and the need for a mobile workforce. As a result, the extended family units, which were predominant in agrarian societies, began to fragment. The nuclear family emerged as a more functional unit in urban settings, where smaller households were easier to maintain and more adaptable to the demands of industrial work schedules.
From a functionalist perspective, the nuclear family is seen as a fundamental building block of society. Talcott Parsons , a prominent functionalist sociologist, argued that the nuclear family performs essential functions that contribute to societal stability. These functions include socialization of children, emotional support, and the stabilization of adult personalities. The nuclear family is viewed as a unit that adapts to the needs of an industrial society, providing a stable environment for its members.
Conflict Theory
Conflict theorists, such as Friedrich Engels , critique the nuclear family from a different angle. Engels argued that the nuclear family emerged alongside private property and capitalism, serving to perpetuate class inequalities . The family unit is seen as a site of power dynamics and economic disparity, where the roles within the family reflect broader societal hierarchies. This perspective highlights how the nuclear family can reinforce social stratification and limit individual freedoms.
Symbolic interactionists focus on the micro-level interactions within the nuclear family. This perspective emphasizes the meanings and definitions that family members attach to their roles and relationships. According to symbolic interactionism , the nuclear family is not a static institution but is constantly shaped and reshaped through daily interactions. This approach highlights the importance of understanding the subjective experiences of family members and how these experiences influence family dynamics.
Socialization
One of the primary functions of the nuclear family is the socialization of children. Socialization is the process through which individuals learn the norms, values , and behaviors necessary for functioning in society. Within the nuclear family, parents play a crucial role in transmitting cultural norms and values to their children, preparing them for participation in the broader social world.
Emotional Support
The nuclear family provides a source of emotional support and stability for its members. This support is essential for the psychological well-being of individuals. The intimate relationships within a nuclear family offer a sense of belonging and security, which can be vital in navigating the complexities of modern life.
Economic Cooperation
Economically, the nuclear family functions as a cooperative unit. Traditionally, the division of labor within the nuclear family has been based on gender roles, with men typically taking on the role of breadwinner and women managing the household. However, these roles have evolved over time, with increasing numbers of dual-income households and more fluid gender roles .
Membership Required
You must be a member to access this content.
View Membership Levels
Mr Edwards has a PhD in sociology and 10 years of experience in sociological knowledge
Related Articles
Exogamy: A Sociological Exploration
Exogamy, derived from the Greek words "exo" (outside) and "gamos" (marriage), refers to the social practice of seeking a spouse...
The Neoliberal View of Family: An Outline and Explanation
In the field of sociology, the concept of the neoliberal view of family has gained significant attention and debate in...
Ethnicity: A Overview
Falsification in Sociology
Epistemological Anarchy: An Overview
Get the latest sociology.
Would you be interested in enrolling in courses from Easy Sociology?
Recommended
Understanding C. Wright Mills’ “The Sociological Imagination”
The Role of Desire in Sociology: Understanding Human Behavior, Relationships, and Societal Dynamics
24 hour trending.
The Role and Functions of the Education System: Exploring its Relationship to the Economy and Class Structure
Discourse: an introduction, the connection between education and social stratification, pierre bourdieu’s symbolic violence: an outline and explanation, functionalism: a sociological perspective.
Easy Sociology makes sociology as easy as possible. Our aim is to make sociology accessible for everybody. © 2023 Easy Sociology
© 2023 Easy Sociology
Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family Essay
- To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
- As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
- As a template for you assignment
There are many ways in which families are organized and no one way has ever been proven to be the ‘right’ or ‘best’ way. However, it is helpful to understand the various ways in which they operate, noticing the similarities and differences that occur among them. For example, there is the nuclear family, which usually consists of a father, mother, and children who are typically separated in some form, usually distance, from other relatives such as uncles and aunts or grandparents. Then there is the more traditional family which consists of a mother, father, and children all living in very close proximity to uncles, aunts, cousins, and grandparents, sometimes although not always living within the same house. While it might seem that these two family structures are incredibly different, there remain many similarities between them.
The most obvious difference between these two family structures is the proximity of the extended family. Often for reasons of vocation, the nuclear family is separated from having the close family ties enjoyed by a more traditional family unit, including missed barbeques, shared family events, and celebrations, and the option of playing with or getting to know cousins close in age. However, they usually have a greater luxury to participate only in those events which interest them and have the freedom of organizing their time around fewer family members’ schedules. The more traditional family can sometimes have too much closeness as several people attempt to live in a single living structure or live very close to each other, such as right next door. If they do not already share their meals together each night, they are still capable of joining together on short notice for various reasons – for everything from graduation and birthday celebrations to informal picnics or swimming pool parties. While this kind of togetherness can be very supportive and nurturing, it can also function to be very confining as family members find it necessary to work around the schedules of many other members, face conflicting celebrations, such as birthdays on the same weekend, and are unable to participate in activities without first obtaining the proper sanctions from the family group.
With all of these differences, though, there are many similarities. For example, in the traditional family, children are often cared for by the older members of the family while the parents go to work at outside offices and the older children attend school. Although older members of the family are not available to care for the children of the nuclear family, children continue to be cared for by someone other than the parents as they either attend child care facilities or in-home babysitting, typically provided by older women. Nuclear families separated from the extended group will also often form networks of friends in which the same sorts of activities enjoyed by the traditional family can be enjoyed with the advantage of a greater ability to opt-out of activities without causing offense. Since these groups are typically formed around the friendship groups of the children of the house, they have the added advantage of the similarity of age groups forming automatic interest groups within the greater group. These automatic divisions into smaller groups can also be seen within the traditional family, but these are usually organized around gender roles or expectations.
While both family structures can be seen to contain a high degree of sociability, the traditional family is nearly guaranteed of this outcome while the nuclear family must seek it. Relationships within the family are usually fairly stable regardless of the family structure (mother is still mother regardless of whether grandmother lives nearby or far away), but these relationships can vary greatly depending upon which woman is the primary caregiver within the home. As it can be seen, although the nuclear family and the traditional family are very different from each other, there are many ways in which they also remain the same.
- Romanian Families: Comparison to Canadian Ones
- Extended Family System
- US President vs. the Canadian Prime Minister
- Kelo vs. the City of New England
- The Dome of the Rock vs. the Umayyad Mosque of Damascus
- View of Abortion: The Question of Human Life and Death
- Anthropology: Kinship in Kyrgyzstan
- Care Plans for Healthy Pregnancy
- Family Legacies
- Family, Marriage, and Parenting Concepts Nowadays
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2021, September 16). Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-and-contrast-the-nuclear-family-vs-the-traditional-family/
"Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family." IvyPanda , 16 Sept. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-and-contrast-the-nuclear-family-vs-the-traditional-family/.
IvyPanda . (2021) 'Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family'. 16 September.
IvyPanda . 2021. "Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-and-contrast-the-nuclear-family-vs-the-traditional-family/.
1. IvyPanda . "Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-and-contrast-the-nuclear-family-vs-the-traditional-family/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Comparison and Contrast: The Nuclear Family vs. the Traditional Family." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/comparison-and-contrast-the-nuclear-family-vs-the-traditional-family/.
Essay on Nuclear Family
Students are often asked to write an essay on Nuclear Family in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.
Let’s take a look…
100 Words Essay on Nuclear Family
Introduction.
A nuclear family is a family unit that consists of two parents and their children. It is often contrasted with extended families, which include other relatives.
Benefits of a Nuclear Family
Nuclear families often provide a stable environment for children. They can focus on their individual needs, fostering personal growth.
Challenges of a Nuclear Family
However, nuclear families can face issues. For instance, when both parents work, childcare can be a challenge.
Despite its challenges, a nuclear family can provide a nurturing environment for children. It plays a crucial role in shaping a child’s personality and values.
250 Words Essay on Nuclear Family
The nuclear family, often perceived as the traditional family unit, typically consists of two parents and their offspring. This model, prevalent in Western societies, has been a fundamental social unit for centuries.
Evolution of the Nuclear Family
The nuclear family emerged as a dominant structure in response to societal changes. Industrialization necessitated mobility, leading to families moving away from extended kinship networks. The consequent geographical and psychological distance resulted in the creation of self-contained, independent units.
Advantages of the Nuclear Family
The nuclear family offers several advantages. It encourages self-reliance and independence, as decisions are made without external interference. It also fosters closer parent-child relationships, ensuring children receive focused attention and care.
Challenges of the Nuclear Family
However, the nuclear family is not without its challenges. The absence of a broader support network can lead to isolation and increased pressure on parents. Furthermore, societal changes such as increasing divorce rates and single parenthood challenge the traditional nuclear family structure.
Emerging Alternatives
In response to these challenges, alternative family structures are gaining recognition. These include single-parent families, cohabiting couples, and blended families. These structures, while differing from the traditional nuclear family, still provide nurturing environments for children to grow and thrive.
In conclusion, while the nuclear family has been a fundamental social unit, it is not the only valid family structure. Society’s evolving needs and values necessitate a broader understanding and acceptance of diverse family forms. The essence of a family lies not in its structure, but in the love, support, and care it provides.
500 Words Essay on Nuclear Family
The nuclear family, often referred to as the “traditional” family unit, consists of two parents and their children, living together under one roof. This family structure is seen as the cornerstone of society in many cultures, and it has been the subject of extensive study and debate among sociologists, psychologists, and anthropologists.
The Evolution of the Nuclear Family
Historically, the nuclear family emerged as a social construct in response to the changing socio-economic conditions of the Industrial Revolution. The move from agrarian societies, where extended families often lived together to pool resources, to urban industrialized societies necessitated a more compact, mobile family unit. The nuclear family became the ideal, offering a balance of economic efficiency and emotional intimacy.
One of the primary advantages of the nuclear family is the level of autonomy it provides. Parents have the freedom to raise their children according to their values and beliefs without interference from extended family members. This autonomy can foster a strong bond between parents and children, leading to a more cohesive family unit.
Challenges Faced by the Nuclear Family
Despite its advantages, the nuclear family is not without its challenges. The isolation from the extended family can sometimes lead to a lack of support in times of crisis. Additionally, the nuclear family structure places a significant burden on parents, as they are solely responsible for the financial, emotional, and developmental needs of their children.
Furthermore, the traditional nuclear family model can perpetuate gender roles, with women often bearing the brunt of domestic duties and childcare, limiting their opportunities for career advancement.
The Nuclear Family in the 21st Century
These changes reflect the evolving societal norms and values, as well as the legal recognition of different family structures. Despite these changes, the nuclear family continues to be a significant social unit, valued for its potential to provide a nurturing and stable environment for raising children.
In conclusion, the nuclear family, while not without its challenges, remains an integral part of many societies. Its evolution reflects the changing socio-economic conditions and cultural norms. As society continues to evolve, so too will the concept of the nuclear family, adapting to meet the diverse needs of individuals and communities. Regardless of its form, the family remains at the heart of human social structures, providing support, love, and a sense of belonging to its members.
Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
The Nuclear Family Was No Mistake: A Response to David Brooks
We're growing more disconnected, but the nuclear familly isn't at fault..
Posted February 27, 2020 | Reviewed by Matt Huston
- Making Marriage Work
- Take our Relationship Satisfaction Test
- Find a marriage therapist near me
In a thought-provoking article covering an array of societal challenges, David Brooks declares that “ The Nuclear Family was a Mistake .” I share many of the concerns he articulates about social fragmentation, but I believe he errs by implying that—in a maelstrom of change and growing disconnection—the nuclear family is the villain in our story.
From the standpoint of biology, sociology, psychology, or of different faiths, it is widely accepted that little humans have advantages if they are looked after by two adults sharing a bond. Although scholars can argue the reasons why, and there are plenty of exceptions to the general case, a strong commitment between two parents is a fundamental good. That will often take the form of a nuclear family, which may or may not be further connected in a community. Further, I believe there is substantial evidence that the nuclear family has been around a lot longer than implied in Brook’s piece (e.g., see this brief overview by European historian, Peter Laslett). The nuclear family is one of the fundamental building blocks of family, extended families, and communities.
Brooks acknowledges the benefits of two-parent families and of marriage , refining his focus from the sweeping accusation of the title to detached nuclear families. Disconnection and isolation are his real targets, and those are deeply important problems. But, in his article, the nuclear family seems like a passenger along for the ride in a car leaving the scene of the crimes Brooks describes—when the car is driven by us. By us, I mean most all of us, motivated by our desires for autonomy and freedom.
In fact, Brooks states, “We’ve made life freer for individuals and more unstable for families.” That is a profound truth, and it describes what gets too little attention from Brooks. He says the market wants us to live in greater isolation, but maybe it’s us doing the wanting. He is especially disturbed that autonomy and separated living is so clearly displayed in countries with the most concentrated wealth. A lot of the problems we see may be caused by what most people want—even if those things also have downsides for individuals and society.
I remember being in a room of scholars 20 or more years ago when family historian Barbara Dafoe Whitehead argued that much of the increase in family fragmentation then observed was driven by growing affluence. She was not referring to wealth inequality but to the growing affluence across America that gave wings to autonomy.
Brooks gives the example of how many fewer elderly Americans now live with kin than in the past. An unasked question is, how many elderly Americans want to have less autonomy and live with their kin? Many elderly adults in America are isolated and at increased risk. More than a few want increased connection with family and a growing number simply have no kin . But many others cling to their autonomy and will fight to keep it until reality forces them to do otherwise. In the past, few people had the option to preserve autonomy in this way. Some forms of living that Brooks extols as better in the past were quite likely, and largely, driven by poverty, fear , and necessity.
I am not arguing that there is virtue in isolation and atomization. I do think we are losing, or letting go of, common spaces for connection in our lives. Many of us want what may not actually be best for us or those around us. Paul Amato and colleagues wrote an insightful book on the growing trend for couples to isolate and be Alone Together . It’s Bowling Alone for two. This trend toward isolation has many causes, and, as Brooks notes, the consequences are different for those with and without means. As Sarah Halpern-Meekin has written, those in poverty are not merely suffering from economic poverty but also from Social Poverty . She suggests this is a growing problem for all, with particular challenges for those struggling with economic hardship.
What do people seem to want? You can infer the most about what people truly desire when they have more options and fewer constraints. As a group, those with higher education and incomes—those with the most options—are now over-represented among those with stable marriages and nuclear families. Although it might have changed since they first wrote on the subject, Katherine Edin and Maria Kefalas found that the desire to marry exists among the poor despite barriers in reaching that goal. People have preferences, the expression of which is affected by their quality of opportunity.
Not only are those with more education choosing marriage, they are increasingly sorting into two-parent families with the best odds for a stable family life. Many scholars, including Andrew Cherlin and Brad Wilcox and Wendy Wang , have remarked on the resulting chasm between the haves and have nots. Not everyone wants marriage, and fewer adults than ever before desire to be parents, but those with the best options seem to be the most likely to choose a marriage-based, nuclear family. As Cherlin suggests and Brooks implies, this fact is becoming a multiplier of income and wealth inequality, but I do not think having fewer nuclear families is going to lead to having more extended families with connections. Brooks errs in making the nuclear family the fall guy for very real and complex problems in family inequality and individual opportunity.
I strongly agree with Brooks that isolation is winning out over community. Along with detailing various types of government efforts that he believes may help in the broader context, he brings his essay home by focusing on ways we can work toward creating more social connection, partly by forged families. This is, in part, the province of commitment on a personal level, where we can choose to connect and share our lives with others. While we naturally eschew constraints in favor of freedom, commitment is making a choice to give up some choices—it is choosing to be constrained for something better. There is more than one way to forge connectedness rooted in commitment.
Note: This essay is adapted slightly from one that was published as part of a series of article organized by the Institute of Family Studies in reaction to the article by Brooks.
Scott Stanley, Ph.D. , is a psychologist and a research professor at the University of Denver, where he conducts studies on marriage, cohabitation, and commitment.
- Find a Therapist
- Find a Treatment Center
- Find a Psychiatrist
- Find a Support Group
- Find Online Therapy
- United States
- Brooklyn, NY
- Chicago, IL
- Houston, TX
- Los Angeles, CA
- New York, NY
- Portland, OR
- San Diego, CA
- San Francisco, CA
- Seattle, WA
- Washington, DC
- Asperger's
- Bipolar Disorder
- Chronic Pain
- Eating Disorders
- Passive Aggression
- Personality
- Goal Setting
- Positive Psychology
- Stopping Smoking
- Low Sexual Desire
- Relationships
- Child Development
- Self Tests NEW
- Therapy Center
- Diagnosis Dictionary
- Types of Therapy
Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.
- Emotional Intelligence
- Gaslighting
- Affective Forecasting
- Neuroscience
Nuclear Family Functions In Sociology
Charlotte Nickerson
Research Assistant at Harvard University
Undergraduate at Harvard University
Charlotte Nickerson is a student at Harvard University obsessed with the intersection of mental health, productivity, and design.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
A nuclear family is a family unit consisting of an adult male and female and dependent children. It is regarded by some sociologists (in particular functionalists) as the basic universal form of family structure.
The (white) nuclear family is sometimes referred to as the cereal packet family, because of its frequent portrayal by advertisers as the norm.
The concept of the nuclear family is thought to have arisen in the Western world during the Industrial Revolution, when families left farms and moved to small towns and cities for work. During this time, young people began to delay marriage and childbearing, living instead with their parents until they had established a career.
Functionalists such as Parsons suggest that the nuclear family replaced the extended family as the dominant form in industrial societies because it provided a better “fit”, and more closely matched the needs of society.
Despite the fact that by 2000 only 21% of all house holds consisted of a married or cohabiting couple with dependent children, the notion of the nuclear family remains central to family ideology.
Sociologists and politicians of the New Right frequently suggest that many social problems in Britain stem from the fact that not enough children are being brought up in stable, two-parent families.
Key Takeaways
- A nuclear family is a family consisting of of 2 generations, husband and wife and immature children who constitute a unit from the rest of the community.
- The term “nuclear family” is commonly used in the United States, where it was first coined by the sociologist Talcott Parsons in 1955. It has been suggested that the nuclear family is a universal human social grouping.
- Nuclear family is not universal, the structure of the family changes as the needs of the society changes. Pre-industrial families were extended families with multiple generations living together, where as post industrial families needed to be
- However, some scholars argue that the nuclear family is not a natural or inevitable human institution but rather a product of specific historical and cultural circumstances.
- In sociology, the nuclear family has been historically treated as the basic unit of social organization, but this has come into question over the past several decades, as the structure of families has become more and more diverse.
Functions of the Nuclear Family
Marxists believe that the family is a tool of capitalism and its main function is to maintain capitalism and reinforce social inequalities.
According to Marxism, the monogamous nuclear family emerged with capitalism. Before capitalism, traditional and tribal societies were classless and did not have private property.
Instead, property was collectively owned, and this was reflected in family structures.
An isolated nuclear family means that men can confirm whether a child belongs to them and ensure that wealth remains in the family through private inheritance.
Ultimately, however, this arrangement served to reproduce inequality. As the children of the rich grew into wealth, the children of the poor remained. Thus, the nuclear family served to benefit the bourgeois more than the proletariat.
A nuclear family system, one in which nuclear families live by themselves independent from the families they grew up in, is thought to be particularly well adopted to the needs of the American, and many other western economies, for a fluid and mobile labor market (Sussman, 1958).
Patriarchal Ideology
Feminists are critical of the family as a social institutions. They believe that the family is a tool of female oppression and in particular the nuclear family serves the needs of men rather than women.
This is through issues such as unequal division of domestic labour and domestic violence.
Some feminists view the function of the nuclear family as a place where patriarchal values are learned by individuals, which in turn add to the patriarchal society .
Young girls may be socialized to believe that inequality and oppression is a normal part of being a woman and boys are socialized to believe that they are superior and have authority over women.
Feminists often believe that the nuclear family teaches children gender roles which translate to gender roles in wider society.
For instance, girls may learn to accept that being a housewife is the only possible or acceptable role for women. Some feminists also believe that the division of labor is unequal in nuclear families, with women and girls accepting subservient roles in the household.
Murdock: Four Universal Residual Functions
Murdock (1949) claimed that the nuclear family performs four functions that benefit society because they reduce the potential for chaos and conflict and consequently bring about relatively well ordered, structured and predictable societies
Socialization : The family is the primary socializing agent for children. Parents teach their children the norms and values of society.
Economic stability : The family provides economic stability for its members. In many families, both parents work to earn an income.
Reproductive/Procreative : The nuclear family provides new members of society, without which society would cease to exist.
Sexual relationships : The family as an institution also regulates sexual behavior. Many societies, for example, have historically forbidden sex outside the family-creating bond of marriage.
Primary Socialization
According to Parsons (1951), although the nuclear family performs functions that are reduced in comparison to what it did in the past, it is still the only institution that can perform the core functions of primary socialization and the stabilization of adult personalities.
Primary socialization refers to the early period in a person”s life where they learn and develop themselves through interactions and experiences around them. This results in a child learning the attitudes, values, and actions appropriate to individuals as members of a particular culture.
The Stabilization of Adult Personalities
The stabilization of adult personalities, otherwise known as “warm bath theory,” emphasizes the emotional security found within marital relationships.
This stabilization serves to balance out the stresses and strains of life faced by most adults.
In addition, the stabilization of adult personalities within marriage allows adults to act on the child-like dimension of their personality by playing with their children, using their toys, and so forth (Parsons, 1951).
Another factor that aids the stabilization of adult personalities is the sexual division of labor within nuclear families.
Within isolated nuclear families, people are allocated particular roles in order to allow the unit to function correctly. There are the aforementioned expressive and instrumental roles (Parsons, 1951).
Instrumental and Expressive Roles
Murdock argued that nuclear families consist of instrumental and expressive roles . Instrumental roles provide financial support and establish family status, while expressive roles involve providing emotional support and physical care.
In a 20th-century view of the nuclear family, the father is typically the head of the household and is responsible for providing for the family financially. The mother is typically responsible for taking care of the home and raising the children.
Parsons suggested that children needed to grow up in a family in which the instrumental and expressive roles are performed by the respective parents if the children were to develop “stable adult personalities”.
Parsons’ understanding of expressive and instrumental roles was derived from, and constituted a reflection of, middle-class American society in the 1950s.
Disadvantages of the Nuclear Family
Postmodernists have called the nuclear family an inherently fragile structure, prosporous only in a time marked by especially easy to come by home ownership and economic progress during the post-war boom.
Proponents of this view argue that the nuclear family is beset by a number of serious problems. They point to high rates of divorce and single parenthood, as well as to the difficulty many families have in maintaining close relationships (Bengtson, 2001).
Even dynamics as common as sibling rivalry and parent-child differences can place tension on a small family with little contact with other members of an extended family. The lack of a support network can make it difficult for nuclear families to deal with problems, leading to further isolation and feelings of loneliness or helplessness (Bengtson, 2001).
For children in particular, growing up in a nuclear family can be quite difficult. With both parents working full-time, many kids feel neglected or abandoned. In some cases, this can lead to serious behavioral problems.
However, not all families are functional. Some families may be considered dysfunctional due to a variety of factors such as alcoholism, drug addiction, mental illness, physical abuse, or simply a lack of love and communication.
When a family is dysfunctional, it can have a negative impact on the individuals involved as well as on society as a whole. Children from dysfunctional families are more likely to experience problems in school, mental health issues, and substance abuse problems. They may also be more likely to engage in criminal activity (Bertrand, 1962).
Additionally, children in nuclear families often don not have the benefit of learning from extended family members such as grandparents or cousins. They also miss out on the opportunity to develop close relationships with those relatives.
Researchers have denied the functionality of the nuclear family – in the sense of being isolated and socially mobile – since the 1960s (Cervantes, 1965).
Indeed, the family is not an isolated unit but one that is linked to other families through marriage, blood ties, and friendship networks. The family functions within a community of kin and neighbors where information, cultural values, and material resources are exchanged (Friedlander, 1963).
Even though the nuclear family has its own private domain – the home – its members cannot avoid interacting with people outside the immediate family. In reality, then, the nuclear family is embedded in a web of social relations.
The structure of the nuclear family has also been critiqued on economic grounds. Critics argue that the nuclear family is an inefficient way to organize society because it requires duplicating services that could be provided more efficiently by the government or businesses.
For example, instead of each family having its own washing machine, all the families in a neighborhood could share a laundromat. Similarly, daycare, eldercare, and schooling could be provided more efficiently on a community-wide basis rather than by individual families.
The nuclear family is also criticized for being too small to meet all an individual”s needs. In particular, it is argued that the nuclear family cannot provide the same level of emotional support as a larger extended family.
Additionally, because the nuclear family is so small, it is often unable to provide adequate financial support to its members during times of need. This can lead to feelings of insecurity and anxiety, particularly among children and older adults (Bengtson, 2001).
The nuclear family has been declining in prevalence since the late 20th century as a result of factors such as increased divorce rates, cohabitation, single-parent households, and same-sex marriage.
Economic stressors such as the Great Recession, stagnating wages, and the inflation of housing prices have also contributed to the decline of the nuclear family through reducing access to isolated housing.
Multigenerational, non-nuclear households are on the rise as a way to reduce costs and the burden of childcare distributed to one person in the household.
The rise of women in the workforce has also lessened a need for defined nuclear family roles, as there is less need for a husband to be the sole breadwinner. Another explanation is that people are delaying marriage and childbearing until later in life, allowing them to develop deeper ties within their birth families and communities. The median age of first marriage in the United States has risen from 20 for women and 23 for men in 1950 to 27 for women and 29 for men in 2018 (Hemez, 2020).
Alternative Family Structures
Non-nuclear families can take on many different forms, including single-parent households, same-sex parents, adoptive parents, childless couples, blended families, and more.
There are a variety of reasons why a family may not be considered nuclear. In some cases, one or both parents may be absent due to death, divorce, or other circumstances. In other instances, the family may simply choose not to live together in a traditional nuclear arrangement.
There are many advantages to non-nuclear families. For example, single-parent households often provide a more nurturing and supportive environment for children than two-parent homes, especially in cases where the family would have otherwise been affected by abuse.
Same-sex parents can provide role models of healthy relationships for their children, and adoptive parents often create tightly-knit bonds with their children that are just as strong as any biological connection.
One historical example of a non-nuclear family is the extensive nuclear family, which is common in many cultures around the world. In an extended family, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins all live together in one household.
This arrangement provides support and stability for all members of the family, and offers a built-in network of caretakers for children. Increasingly over the past few decades, a new family structure is taking shape: grandparents raising their grandchildren.
This may be necessary when parents are not available to care for their children, such as by mental or medical or substance abuse issues.
Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1970). Reading Capital (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left. (Original work published 1968) Brown, H. (2012). Marx on gender and the family: A critical study (Vol. 39). Brill.
Bales, R. F., & Parsons, T. (2014). Family: Socialization and interaction process. Routledge.
Bell, N. W. and E. F. Vogel (eds.) (1968). A Modern Introduction to the Family. Glencoe: Free Press.
Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds: the burgess award lecture. Journal of marriage and family, 63 (1), 1-16.
Bertrand, A. L. (1962). School attendance and attainment: Function and dysfunction of school and family social systems. Social Forces, 40 (3), 228-233.
Cervantes, L. F. (1965). Family background, primary relationships, and the high school dropout. Journal of Marriage and the Family , 218-223.
Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2014). Introduction: The field of social movement studies.
Friedlander, F. (1963). Underlying sources of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47 (4), 246.
Gamache, S. J. (1997). Confronting nuclear family bias in stepfamily research. Marriage & Family Review, 26 (1-2), 41-69.
Hemez, P. (2020). Distributions of age at first marriage, 1960-2018. Family Profiles, FP-20, 9.
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social Structure . Macmillan.
Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American anthropologist, 45 (1), 22-38.
Parsons, T. (1959). The Social Structure of the Family, in Ruth Anshen (ed.), The Family:Its Functions and Destiny . Harper.
Stern, B. J. (1948). Engels on the Family. Science & Society , 42-64.
Sussman, M. B. (1958). The isolated nuclear family: Fact or fiction. Soc. Probs. , 6, 333.
Zelditch, M. (1955). Role differentiation in the nuclear family: A comparative study. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, 307-351.
Essay Curve
Essay on Nuclear Family – Short Essay & Long Essay upto 1500 Words
Essay on Nuclear Family: The concept of the nuclear family has been a cornerstone of society for many years, but its relevance and impact have been increasingly questioned in recent times. In this essay, we will explore the definition and characteristics of a nuclear family, as well as the advantages and disadvantages associated with this family structure. By examining the role of the nuclear family in modern society, we can gain a better understanding of its significance and potential challenges.
Table of Contents
Nuclear Family Essay Writing Tips
1. Introduction: Start your essay by defining what a nuclear family is – a family unit consisting of two parents and their children living together in one household. Mention that this type of family structure has become increasingly common in modern society.
2. Discuss the advantages of a nuclear family: – Stability and consistency: Having two parents present in the household can provide a stable and consistent environment for children to grow up in. – Strong family bonds: The smaller size of a nuclear family can lead to stronger bonds between family members. – Financial security: With two parents contributing to the household income, nuclear families may have more financial stability. – Division of labor: In a nuclear family, responsibilities can be divided between the parents, making it easier to manage household tasks and childcare.
3. Address the disadvantages of a nuclear family: – Lack of extended family support: In a nuclear family, there may be limited support from extended family members, which can put more pressure on the parents. – Isolation: Nuclear families may feel isolated from extended family members and community support systems. – Parental stress: With only two parents responsible for all aspects of childcare and household management, there may be increased stress and pressure on the parents. – Limited perspectives: Children in nuclear families may have limited exposure to different family dynamics and ways of living.
4. Provide examples and anecdotes to support your points: Use real-life examples or personal anecdotes to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear families. This can make your essay more engaging and relatable to the reader.
5. Offer solutions or recommendations: Conclude your essay by suggesting ways to address the challenges faced by nuclear families. This could include seeking support from community resources, building strong relationships with extended family members, or finding ways to reduce parental stress.
6. Conclusion: Summarize your main points and reiterate the importance of understanding the complexities of family structures in today’s society. End with a thought-provoking statement or question to leave a lasting impression on the reader.
Essay on Nuclear Family in 10 Lines – Examples
1. A nuclear family typically consists of two parents and their biological or adopted children living together in one household. 2. This family structure is considered the traditional or “ideal” family unit in many societies. 3. The nuclear family is often seen as providing stability, security, and emotional support for its members. 4. In nuclear families, parents are usually responsible for the upbringing and care of their children. 5. The size of a nuclear family can vary, but it typically includes parents and one or more children. 6. Nuclear families are common in Western cultures, where individualism and privacy are valued. 7. This family structure can also be found in other parts of the world, although extended families may be more prevalent in some cultures. 8. Nuclear families may face challenges such as balancing work and family responsibilities, financial pressures, and relationship issues. 9. Despite these challenges, many people view the nuclear family as a source of love, companionship, and shared experiences. 10. Overall, the nuclear family remains a popular and enduring family structure in many societies.
Sample Essay on Nuclear Family in 100-180 Words
A nuclear family is a family unit consisting of two parents and their children. This type of family structure is common in many Western societies and is characterized by its small size and close-knit relationships. In a nuclear family, the parents are typically responsible for raising and providing for their children, and the children are expected to obey and respect their parents.
One of the advantages of a nuclear family is the strong bond that can develop between family members. With fewer people in the household, there is often more time and attention available for each individual. This can lead to closer relationships and better communication between family members.
However, a nuclear family can also face challenges, such as the pressure on parents to balance work and family responsibilities, and the lack of extended family support. Despite these challenges, many people value the intimacy and stability that a nuclear family can provide.
Short Essay on Nuclear Family in 200-500 Words
The nuclear family is a family unit consisting of two parents and their children. This type of family structure has been the most common form of family in many societies around the world for centuries. In recent years, however, there has been a shift towards more diverse family structures, such as single-parent families, blended families, and extended families.
One of the main advantages of the nuclear family is the close-knit relationships that can develop between family members. With only a few people in the household, there is often more time and attention available for each family member. This can lead to stronger bonds and a greater sense of unity within the family. Additionally, the nuclear family is often more stable and secure, as there are fewer people involved in decision-making and conflict resolution.
Another advantage of the nuclear family is the division of labor that can occur within the household. With two parents present, responsibilities for childcare, household chores, and financial support can be shared more evenly. This can lead to a more efficient and harmonious family dynamic, as each family member has a clear role and contribution to make.
However, there are also some disadvantages to the nuclear family structure. One of the main criticisms of the nuclear family is that it can be isolating and lacking in support. Without extended family members living in the same household, nuclear families may struggle to provide emotional and practical support during times of need. This can be particularly challenging for single-parent families, who may feel overwhelmed by the demands of parenting without a partner to share the load.
Additionally, the nuclear family can be limiting in terms of diversity and exposure to different perspectives. With only a few family members present, there may be a lack of diversity in terms of age, gender, and cultural background. This can lead to a narrow worldview and limited opportunities for personal growth and development.
In conclusion, the nuclear family is a common and traditional family structure that has both advantages and disadvantages. While it can provide a strong sense of unity and stability, it may also be isolating and lacking in diversity. As society continues to evolve and change, it is important to recognize and celebrate the diversity of family structures that exist, and to support families in all their forms.
Essay on Nuclear Family in 1000-1500 Words
The nuclear family has been a predominant family structure in many societies around the world for centuries. It typically consists of a married couple and their biological or adopted children living together in the same household. This family unit is often considered the ideal family structure in many cultures, as it provides a stable and secure environment for children to grow and develop. In this essay, we will explore the characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of the nuclear family.
One of the key characteristics of the nuclear family is its small size. With only the parents and their children living together, the nuclear family is able to maintain close relationships and strong bonds among its members. This close-knit structure allows for effective communication and support within the family, fostering a sense of unity and togetherness. In addition, the nuclear family is often able to make decisions quickly and efficiently, as there are fewer individuals involved in the decision-making process.
Another characteristic of the nuclear family is its focus on the immediate family members. In a nuclear family, the primary relationships are between the parents and their children, with extended family members playing a secondary role in the family dynamics. This can lead to a strong sense of loyalty and commitment among the nuclear family members, as they prioritize each other’s needs and well-being above all else.
One of the main advantages of the nuclear family is its stability and security. With both parents present in the household, children are more likely to have a stable and consistent upbringing, which can have a positive impact on their emotional and psychological development. The nuclear family also provides a sense of security for its members, as they can rely on each other for support and guidance in times of need.
Furthermore, the nuclear family is often able to provide a higher standard of living for its members. With fewer individuals to support, the nuclear family can allocate its resources more efficiently, ensuring that each family member’s needs are met. This can lead to a higher quality of life for the family as a whole, as they are able to afford better housing, education, and healthcare for their children.
Despite its many advantages, the nuclear family also has its drawbacks. One of the main disadvantages of the nuclear family is its limited support system. With only the immediate family members living together, there may be a lack of emotional and practical support from extended family members. This can put a strain on the nuclear family, as they may feel isolated and overwhelmed by the demands of raising a family without the help of extended family members.
Another disadvantage of the nuclear family is the potential for conflict and tension within the household. With only a few individuals living together, disagreements and misunderstandings can arise more easily, leading to conflicts that may be difficult to resolve. This can create a stressful and hostile environment within the family, which can have a negative impact on the well-being of its members.
In addition, the nuclear family may also face challenges in terms of childcare and household responsibilities. With both parents working outside the home, there may be a lack of time and energy to devote to childcare and household tasks. This can lead to feelings of guilt and inadequacy among the parents, as they struggle to balance their work and family responsibilities.
Despite these challenges, the nuclear family continues to be a popular family structure in many societies around the world. Its small size, close relationships, and focus on the immediate family members make it an attractive option for many families seeking stability and security. While the nuclear family may not be perfect, it offers many advantages that can benefit its members in the long run.
In conclusion, the nuclear family is a prevalent family structure that has many advantages and disadvantages. Its small size, close relationships, and focus on the immediate family members make it an attractive option for many families seeking stability and security. While the nuclear family may face challenges in terms of support, conflict, and childcare, it continues to be a popular choice for families around the world. Ultimately, the nuclear family offers a strong foundation for children to grow and develop, providing them with the love, support, and guidance they need to thrive.
Related Essays
Essay on A Visit To A Fair – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words
Value of Games And Sports – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words
Essay on Importance of Teacher – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words
Essay on A Visit To A Museum – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words
Essay on Effect of Social Media On Youth
Essay on Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji – Short & Long Essay Examples
Essay on Anudeep Durishetty – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words
Essay on Non Violence – Samples, 10 Lines to 1500 Words
Covid 19 Responsive School – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words
Essay on My Dreamdoctor – Short Essay & Long Essay upto 1500 Words
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
February 22, 2020
The nuclear family is still indispensable.
- Communities are stronger and safer when they include lots of committed married couples. Tweet This
- It takes a village—of married people—to raise the odds that a poor child will have a shot at the American dream. Tweet This
Editor’s Note : The following essay from IFS senior fellow W. Bradford Wilcox, which was published today at The Atlantic , is the eighth response in the Institute for Family Studies' symposium on David Brooks' essay on the nuclear family .
The nuclear family is disintegrating—or so Americans might conclude from what they watch and read. The quintessential nuclear family consists of a married couple raising their children. But from Oscar-winning Marriage Story ’s gut-wrenching portrayal of divorce or the Harvard sociologist Christina Cross’s New York Times op-ed in December, “The Myth of the Two-Parent Home,” discounting the importance of marriage for kids , one might draw the conclusion that marriage is more endangered than ever—and that this might not be such a bad thing.
Meanwhile, the writer David Brooks recently described the post–World War II American concept of family as a historical aberration—a departure from a much older tradition in which parents, grandparents, siblings, and cousins all look out for the well-being of children. In an article in The Atlantic bearing the headline “The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake,” Brooks argued that the “nuclear family has been crumbling in slow motion for decades.” He sees extended families and what he calls “forged families”—single parents, single adults, and others coming together to support one another and children—as filling the vacuum created by the breakdown of the nuclear family.
Yet the search for alternate forms of family has two major flaws. First, there’s evidence indicating that the nuclear family is, in fact, recovering. Second, a nuclear family headed by two loving married parents remains the most stable and safest environment for raising children.
There are, of course, still reasons for legitimate concern about the state of the American family. Marriage today is less likely to anchor family life in many poor and working-class communities. While a majority of college-educated men and women between 18 and 55 are married, that’s no longer true for the poor (only 26 percent are married) and the working class (39 percent). What’s more, children from these families are markedly less likely to live under the same roof as their biological parents than their peers from better-off backgrounds are.
But there is also ample good news—especially for kids.
Continue reading at The Atlantic . . . .
Related Posts
Who cheats more the demographics of infidelity in america, eight reasons women stay in abusive relationships, male sexlessness is rising but not for the reasons incels claim, counterintuitive trends in the link between premarital sex and marital stability, the u.s. divorce rate has hit a 50-year low, does having children make people happier in the long run, join the ifs mailing list.
Sign up for our mailing list to receive ongoing updates from IFS.
© 2024 Institute for Family Studies
- Our Mission
- Books & Articles
- Get Married
- Success Sequence
- Public Education
Interested in learning more about the work of the Institute for Family Studies? Please feel free to contact us by using your preferred method detailed below.
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1502 Charlottesville, VA 22902
(434) 260-1048
Media Inquiries
For media inquiries, contact Chris Bullivant ( [email protected] ).
We encourage members of the media interested in learning more about the people and projects behind the work of the Institute for Family Studies to get started by perusing our "Media Kit" materials.
Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Society — Talcott Parson’s nuclear family argument
Talcott Parson’s Nuclear Family Argument
- Categories: Society
About this sample
Words: 508 |
Published: Dec 12, 2018
Words: 508 | Page: 1 | 3 min read
Cite this Essay
Let us write you an essay from scratch
- 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
- Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Get high-quality help
Prof. Kifaru
Verified writer
- Expert in: Sociology
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
Related Essays
1 pages / 624 words
2 pages / 1007 words
3 pages / 1413 words
2 pages / 1069 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Still can’t find what you need?
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
Related Essays on Society
In her thought-provoking and poignant essay, "On Compassion," Barbara Lazear Ascher explores the concept of compassion and its implications for society. Through vivid storytelling and compelling examples, Ascher challenges [...]
The significance of history is a topic that has been debated by various individuals, including actors, musicians, politicians, writers, and other public figures. While some may deny its importance, others argue that history is [...]
As a prospective student, I am excited to express my interest in pursuing my academic goals at Liberty University. I am confident that the rigorous academic programs and supportive community at Liberty will provide me with the [...]
Informal deviance refers to behaviors that violate social norms but are not necessarily illegal. These behaviors may include things like talking loudly in a movie theater, cutting in line, or wearing inappropriate attire to a [...]
Nowadays, current society is familiar with music more than in any other time in history because of the youth. A big percentage of the young listen to music everyday while performing their daily activities for many of the [...]
Schemas are theory-driven: Because schemas are based on our prior expectations and social knowledge, they have been described as ‘theory-driven’ structures that provide organization to social experience. We use these background [...]
Related Topics
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
- Instructions Followed To The Letter
- Deadlines Met At Every Stage
- Unique And Plagiarism Free
Home / Essay Samples / Sociology / Modern Society / The Nuclear Family in Sociology: Perspectives and Challenges
The Nuclear Family in Sociology: Perspectives and Challenges
- Category: Sociology , Life
- Topic: Family Relationships , Family Values , Modern Society
Pages: 4 (1654 words)
- Downloads: -->
--> ⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.
Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?
are ready to help you with your essay
You won’t be charged yet!
Hate Speech Essays
Journalism Essays
Conflict Resolution Essays
Gossip Essays
Conversation Essays
Related Essays
We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Your essay sample has been sent.
In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.
samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->