how to present results and discussion in research paper

• Useful tips for scientists

How to write the Results and Discussion sections in a research paper

The results section content, the discussion section content, how to write good results section, choosing the proper format for presenting the results, recommendations for the effective use of tables and figures, how to write a good discussion section, what can you do and what cannot, the difference between the results and discussion sections.

The Results section is one of the most critical parts of your research paper. Here you present the main results of your research to your readers. While the Introduction presents the research question and the Methods section explains the data collection process, the Results section presents the actual data accumulated during your experiments. In essence, the Results section, presenting your results, answers the “what?” question (just as the Introduction answers the “why?” question and the Methods section answers the “how?” question). Thus, the Results section plays a crucial role in highlighting the significance of the study.

The purpose of the Results section is to present the data obtained after the study in an objective, systematic and concise manner, using text supplemented with illustrations. You should show results only; interpretations or conclusions should not be part of this section. Therefore, theoretically, this is one of the shortest sections, but it can also be one of the most challenging sections since it is often difficult for researchers to limit themselves to presenting solid facts: they tend to include the explanations and conclusions they have drawn from the results. The above can make the Results section subjective, ambiguous, and confusing for readers. The lack of novelty is one of the main reasons to reject a paper. Since the Results section shows the significance or novelty of the research, it is critical that you learn how to write this section correctly.

The Discussion section interprets the results presented in the paper. In other words, although it contains the introduction, methods, and results, you must also clarify the results for your audience. Thus, the task of the Discussion section is to answer the question “so what?” It should also explain the implications of the obtained results and how they relate to your research problem.

While interpreting your results, the Discussion section draws conclusions or inferences from your research. The Discussion explains your findings considering already discussed ones in the existing literature on this problem and new ideas based on your research findings.

Here are some tasks that the Discussion section accomplishes:

• Discussing a research question and whether the research paper has answered it based on the results;
• Highlighting unexpected and/or exciting findings and how they relate to the research question;
• Highlighting previous research and the difference in your research;
• Mentioning weaknesses, loopholes, or limitations of the study;
• A recommendation on how to use the research for promoting knowledge in your area.

A logically organized and written Results section is critical for a well-written paper. The Results section should present the data collected during the study as objectively, logically, and concisely as possible. Highlighting the most important results or organizing them into sections shows that you have considered all the necessary information. Proper use of visual elements, i.e., tables and figures, engages your readers.

So, essentially, in the Results section, you should do the following:

• State only the actual results: leave the explanations and comments for the Discussion section;
• Use the text, tables, and figures to highlight key findings in an orderly fashion;
• Ensure that the contents of the tables and figures do not repeat in the text.

Tables and figures play an essential role in presenting the results. Therefore, your tables and figures should be perfect, efficient, and attractive.

First, you decide which parts of your data you want to present in the text, tables, and figures. Often this is a difficult decision. The table below will help you make an informed decision:

Well-prepared tables and figures can effectively capture and present complex data concisely and visually appealing, which allows journal reviewers, editors, and readers to quickly gain an overview of your research findings. In contrast, poorly designed illustrations can confuse readers and reduce the efficiency of your paper. Here are some basic guidelines to help you understand how to use tables and figures effectively:

• Ensure that tables and figures do not require explanation.

Sometimes reviewers and journal editors may look at the tables and figures before reading the entire text, so they should make sense as separate elements.

• Do not repeat the content of tables and figures in the text.

You can use the text to highlight key points or trends based on the data used in the tables and figures, but do not repeat every element from a figure or table.

• Ensure that the values or information in the tables and text are consistent.

For example, ensure that the abbreviations, group names, interpretations, and others you used in the table are the same as those in the text.

• Use clear, informative names for tables and figures.

Don’t leave any table or figure without a title or legend; otherwise, readers won’t be able to understand the data values. Also, ensure that column names, axis and figure inscriptions, and others are clear and appropriate.

• Combine repetitive tables and figures.

Do not present the same data in a table and a figure. Check the titles of all tables and figures to determine if they say the same or similar things. If so, revise your presentation and combine or delete the tables or figures.

• Ensure that the data presented in the tables and figures are accurate.

Always double-check the tables and figures to make sure the numbers converge.

• Tables should not contain redundant information.

Ensure that the tables in the paper are not too crowded. If the data you should present is extensive and make the tables too cluttered or long, consider including the tables in Appendices or supplemental material.

• Ensure the clarity of the images in the figures.

Make sure the images and all parts of the figures are clear. The inscriptions should be in a standard font and legible against the background.

• Follow the journal’s guidelines.

Familiarize yourself with the guidelines for authors of your target journal on such items as the number of tables and figures, numbering style, titles, image resolution, file formats, and others, and follow these guidelines carefully.

• Get permission to use illustrations from published literature.

If you use a table or figure in your manuscript from a previously published paper, always ask permission from the copyright holder (usually the publisher) and cite the source.

Although the fixed formula for writing a Discussion section is absent, you can follow a few simple steps to produce a finished, high-impact Discussion section for your readers. We list them below:

• Provide a very brief summary of the central topic.

A good Discussion section extends specific findings to their broader implications that you can then link to the overall background given in the Introduction to maximize the impact of the entire paper. So start the Discussion by providing the critical information that is already known about the research topic. You can then briefly restate the research problem to connect your Discussion section to the Introduction.

• Interpret your results.

Discuss the significance of your most important research findings with as much clarity as possible because not all of your readers will understand the topic in depth. Discuss the relationships between the observations: do the results indicate a pattern, and can they be generalized into totality? But don’t try imposing your interpretation on your readers – conduct an objective examination of the results. The publisher may reject the paper if you interpret the results not correctly and logically. Mention unexpected and insignificant results and do not manipulate the data.

• Report the results of previous research.

A thorough literature search is mandatory before conducting any study. Compare your results with previous studies to show how other studies support or differ from your results. Explain what is missing in previous studies and how those studies support your results.

• Discuss the significance of your research.

This part is probably the most important in the Discussion. The reader should clearly understand why your research is essential and how it has improved our understanding of a particular subject. You must describe the contribution of your research to existing knowledge and how it can stimulate future research.

• Specify the limitations of your study.

Specify the limitations of your study and discuss unanswered questions that you did not consider in the study. Such questions may be, for example, about whether you could probably have used a different data collection method or perhaps the sample size is unrepresentative of the target population. Self-criticism and acknowledging the study’s limitations will show that you know what your study could not cover.

• Finish by reporting what the readers should keep in mind.

Some journals have a separate Conclusion section after the Discussion one, while others present the conclusion in the last paragraph of the Discussion. Regardless of the format of your target journal, you should report to your readers what they should learn from your paper. You can offer a research perspective that would help remove any remaining doubts about the research question or test a new hypothesis that might develop from your results.

Writing the Discussion section is a little difficult difficult since you should combine your thoughts and bring a perspective to the entire study. However, it is not so difficult if you take some time and think it through. Here are some tips and guidelines to help you when writing the Discussion section:

Sometimes researchers get confused about what to include in the Results and Discussion sections. Although you may have understood what these two sections state, it is helpful to pay attention to the differences between them. A clear understanding of the differences will help you more effectively write the Results and Discussion sections.

Six differences between the Results and Discussion sections

The Results and Discussion sections of your research paper play different roles. You must understand the differences between them before you write them.

Checklist for the Results section

Objectives addressed in the Results section:

• The Results section answers the question “What?” i.e., what are the findings of your study?
• It states only the results and does not include comments and interpretations
• You should always present the results accurately and objectively
• Tables and figures attractively present results, but you should never present the same data once in table form and once in figure form and repeat data from the table or drawing in the text.

Here is a checklist that you can download and use when writing your Results section:

A checklist to help you write the Results section correctly

The Results section should present the results of your study in detail along with all data.

Checklist for the Discussion section

Objectives addressed in the Discussion section:

• The Discussion section answers the most critical question, “So what?” i.e., what of these results?
• This section explains the significance of the results and how important they are;
• Here, the results are compared to the results of previous studies;
• The section specifies the limitations of the study and suggests the future direction of the work;
• The section concludes with an important message for the readers that they should understand from your paper.

Below is a checklist that you can download and use when writing the Discussion section:

A checklist to help you write the Discussion section correctly

The Discussion section should interpret these results and discuss the possible implications of your research in this area.

Enter Your Information Details

Need to publish an article in a journal indexed in the scientometric database:

Web of Science

Attach article

Application Comments

You will receive a response within 1-2 days.

• Research Process
• Manuscript Preparation
• Manuscript Review
• Publication Process
• Publication Recognition
• Language Editing Services
• Translation Services

How to Write the Results Section: Guide to Structure and Key Points

• 4 minute read
• 94.7K views

Table of Contents

The ‘ Results’ section of a research paper, like the ‘Introduction’ and other key parts, attracts significant attention from editors, reviewers, and readers. The reason lies in its critical role — that of revealing the key findings of a study and demonstrating how your research fills a knowledge gap in your field of study. Given its importance, crafting a clear and logically structured results section is essential.   

In this article, we will discuss the key elements of an effective results section and share strategies for making it concise and engaging. We hope this guide will help you quickly grasp ways of writing the results section, avoid common pitfalls, and make your writing process more efficient and effective.  

Structure of the results section  

Briefly restate the research topic in the introduction : Although the main purpose of the  results section  in a research paper is to list the notable findings of a study, it is customary to start with a brief repetition of the research question. This helps refocus the reader, allowing them to better appreciate the relevance of the findings. Additionally, restating the research question establishes a connection to the previous section of the paper, creating a smoother flow of information.  

Systematically present your research findings : Address the primary research question first, followed by the secondary research questions. If your research addresses multiple questions, mention the findings related to each one individually to ensure clarity and coherence.  

Represent your results visually: Graphs, tables, and other figures can help illustrate the findings of your paper, especially if there is a large amount of data in the results. As a rule of thumb, use a visual medium like a graph or a table if you wish to present three or more statistical values simultaneously.  

Graphical or tabular representations of data can also make your results section more visually appealing. Remember, an appealing and well-organized results section can help peer reviewers better understand the merits of your research, thereby increasing your chances of publication.  

Practical guidance for writing an effective ‘Results’ section   

• Always use simple and plain language. Avoid the use of uncertain or unclear expressions.  
• The findings of the study must be expressed in an objective and unbiased manner.  While it is acceptable to correlate certain findings , it is best to avoid over-interpreting the results. In addition, avoid using subjective or emotional words , such as “interestingly” or “unfortunately”, to describe the results as this may cause readers to doubt the objectivity of the paper.  
• The content balances simplicity with comprehensiveness . For statistical data, simply describe the relevant tests and explain their results without mentioning raw data. If the study involves multiple hypotheses, describe the results for each one separately to avoid confusion and aid understanding. To enhance credibility, e nsure that negative results , if any, are included in this section, even if they do not support the research hypothesis.  
• Wherever possible, use illustrations like tables, figures, charts, or other visual representations to highlight the results of your research paper. Mention these illustrations in the text, but do not repeat the information that they convey ¹ .  

Difference between data, results, and discussion sections  

Data ,  results,  and  discussion  sections all communicate the findings of a study, but each serves a distinct purpose with varying levels of interpretation.   

In the  results section , one cannot provide data without interpreting its relevance or make statements without citing data ² . In a sense, the  results section  does not draw connections between different data points. Therefore, there is a certain level of interpretation involved in drawing results out of data.

(The example is intended to showcase how the visual elements and text in the results section complement each other ³ . The academic viewpoints included in the illustrative screenshots should not be used as references.)  

The discussion section allows authors even more interpretive freedom compared to the results section. Here, data and patterns within the data are compared with the findings from other studies to make more generalized points. Unlike the results section , which focuses purely on factual data, the discussion section touches upon hypothetical information, drawing conjectures and suggesting future directions for research.  

The ‘ Results’ section serves as the core of a research paper, capturing readers’ attention and providing insights into the study’s essence. Regardless of the subject of your research paper, a well-written results section can generate interest in your research. By following the tips outlined here, you can create a results section that effectively communicates your finding and invites further exploration. Remember, clarity is the key, and with the right approach, your results section can guide readers through the intricacies of your research.  

Professionals at Elsevier Language Services know the secret to writing a well-balanced results section. With their expert suggestions, you can ensure that your findings come across clearly to the reader. To maximize your chances of publication, reach out to Elsevier Language Services today !  

Type in wordcount for Standard Total: USD EUR JPY Follow this link if your manuscript is longer than 12,000 words. Upload

Reference  

• Cetin, S., & Hackam, D. J. (2005). An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. Journal of Surgical Research, 128(2), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.002  
• Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Zadeh-Vakili, A., Hosseinpanah, F., & Ghasemi, A. (2019). The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism/International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism., In Press (In Press). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.92113  
• Guo, J., Wang, J., Zhang, P., Wen, P., Zhang, S., Dong, X., & Dong, J. (2024). TRIM6 promotes glioma malignant progression by enhancing FOXO3A ubiquitination and degradation. Translational Oncology, 46, 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101999  

Writing a good review article

Why is data validation important in research?

You may also like.

Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?

Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!

A Must-see for Researchers! How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing

Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions

Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?

A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing

6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript

How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Results Section – Writing Guide and Examples

Research Results Section – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

The results section of a research paper is a crucial part of any academic study. It provides a structured and clear presentation of the findings, enabling readers to understand the outcomes of the research. This section focuses strictly on presenting the data, leaving analysis and interpretation for the discussion section. Writing this section effectively requires precision, clarity, and adherence to the research questions or hypotheses.

Research Results

The results section is where researchers present the findings of their study. It showcases the data collected during the research process, organized systematically for clarity. This section may include both qualitative and quantitative data, often supported by visual aids like tables, charts, and graphs. Importantly, this section avoids subjective interpretations and focuses solely on the objective presentation of data.

Key Characteristics

• Objectivity : Ensures that findings are reported without bias.
• Clarity : Structures information logically to help readers easily comprehend the results.
• Relevance : Includes only data that directly addresses the research questions or hypotheses.
• Conciseness with Detail : Summarizes key findings comprehensively without overloading with excessive information.

Purpose of the Results Section

The results section serves several important functions in a research paper. Its primary goals are to:

• Report the findings of the study systematically and without interpretation.
• Address the research questions or hypotheses explicitly, showing whether they were supported or rejected.
• Provide enough detail for other researchers to replicate the study if needed.
• Lay the groundwork for the discussion section, where implications and significance are explored.

Steps to Write an Effective Results Section

Provide an overview.

Begin with a brief summary of the research goals and the methods used to analyze the data. This introductory context helps readers understand the framework within which the results are presented.

“This section presents the outcomes of the study, which investigated the relationship between physical activity and mental well-being using a quantitative research design.”

Organize Findings Clearly

Organize the results in a logical sequence that aligns with your research questions, hypotheses, or the flow of data collection. Consider structuring the section by:

• Research Question or Hypothesis : Address each systematically.
• Themes or Categories : Group similar findings together, particularly in qualitative studies.
• Chronological Order : Present data as it was collected or analyzed.

Incorporate Visual Aids

Use tables, figures, and graphs to present numerical data, trends, and relationships clearly. Visual aids should complement the text and provide readers with an at-a-glance understanding of complex information.

• Label all visuals appropriately (e.g., “Figure 1: Trends in Weekly Exercise Habits”).
• Include explanatory captions to clarify what each visual represents.
• Reference visuals within the text to ensure readers understand their relevance.

“As shown in Table 2, there was a significant increase in mental well-being scores among participants engaging in daily exercise routines.”

Report Quantitative Findings

For quantitative studies, ensure that numerical data is reported accurately and with appropriate statistical detail. Include:

• Descriptive statistics like means, medians, and standard deviations.
• Inferential statistics, including tests performed (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA) and outcomes (e.g., p-values, effect sizes).

“The analysis revealed that participants who exercised for at least 30 minutes daily reported significantly higher well-being scores (M = 85.3, SD = 7.2) than those who did not (M = 68.4, SD = 8.9), t(78) = 5.67, p < .001.”

Summarize Qualitative Findings

For qualitative data, use themes or categories to organize your results. Include illustrative quotes or excerpts from participants to support your findings. Ensure these excerpts highlight the themes you identified during analysis.

“Participants frequently mentioned the stress-reducing benefits of exercise, with one respondent stating, ‘My morning walk helps me clear my mind and focus better throughout the day.'”

Avoid Interpretation

The results section must present data without any subjective analysis. Interpretation and implications should be saved for the discussion section.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Including too much raw data.

Excessive raw data can overwhelm readers. Instead, present summarized findings, and use appendices for detailed datasets if necessary.

Mixing Results and Discussion

Avoid combining interpretation with results. This can confuse readers and detract from the objective reporting of findings.

Lack of Organization

Disorganized findings can make it challenging for readers to follow your research outcomes. Use headings, subheadings, and logical flow to enhance readability.

Neglecting Negative Results

Report all findings, including those that do not support your hypotheses. Negative or unexpected results are equally important for a comprehensive understanding of your study.

Insufficient Detail

Provide enough context and detail for readers to evaluate your findings. Vague reporting can reduce the credibility of your research.

Examples of Results Section

Quantitative study example.

The survey findings showed that 65% of respondents preferred hybrid work models (n = 520), compared to 20% favoring in-office setups and 15% preferring fully remote work. A chi-square test revealed a significant association between preference and age group, χ²(2, N = 520) = 12.89, p < .001, with younger participants showing the strongest preference for hybrid models.

Qualitative Study Example

The thematic analysis identified three major themes: flexibility, productivity, and work-life balance. Flexibility was the most frequently cited benefit, with one participant noting, “Hybrid work allows me to be productive while still having time for my family.”

Mixed-Methods Study Example

Quantitative data revealed a 25% increase in productivity scores among employees using hybrid models (M = 80.2, SD = 10.5), compared to in-office setups (M = 64.8, SD = 9.3), t(150) = 4.21, p < .001. Qualitative interviews supported these findings, with participants describing hybrid models as “efficient” and “motivating.”

Checklist for the Results Section

• Are all findings relevant to the research questions or hypotheses?
• Is the section logically organized and easy to follow?
• Are visual aids used appropriately to enhance understanding?
• Are statistical details (if applicable) reported accurately and comprehensively?
• Are qualitative findings clearly summarized with evidence?
• Is the distinction between results and discussion maintained?

The results section is a cornerstone of any research paper. By presenting findings clearly and systematically, researchers provide the evidence upon which their conclusions are based. Whether using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, a well-written results section ensures the study’s credibility and clarity. Adhering to best practices, avoiding common errors, and employing effective organization will help you craft a results section that is both informative and impactful.

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . Sage publications.
• APA (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook . Sage.
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide . Sage.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Conceptual Framework – Types, Methodology and...

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

References in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Paper Abstract – Writing Guide and...

Research Questions – Types, Examples and Writing...

• Langson Library
• Science Library
• Grunigen Medical Library
• Law Library
• Connect From Off-Campus
• Accessibility
• Gateway Study Center

Email this link

Writing a scientific paper.

• Writing a lab report
• INTRODUCTION

Writing a "good" results section

Figures and Captions in Lab Reports

"Results Checklist" from: How to Write a Good Scientific Paper. Chris A. Mack. SPIE. 2018.

Additional tips for results sections.

• LITERATURE CITED
• Bibliography of guides to scientific writing and presenting
• Peer Review
• Presentations
• Lab Report Writing Guides on the Web

This is the core of the paper. Don't start the results sections with methods you left out of the Materials and Methods section. You need to give an overall description of the experiments and present the data you found.

• Factual statements supported by evidence. Short and sweet without excess words
• Present representative data rather than endlessly repetitive data
• Discuss variables only if they had an effect (positive or negative)
• Use meaningful statistics
• Avoid redundancy. If it is in the tables or captions you may not need to repeat it

A short article by Dr. Brett Couch and Dr. Deena Wassenberg, Biology Program, University of Minnesota

• Present the results of the paper, in logical order, using tables and graphs as necessary.
• Explain the results and show how they help to answer the research questions posed in the Introduction. Evidence does not explain itself; the results must be presented and then explained. 
• Avoid: presenting results that are never discussed;  presenting results in chronological order rather than logical order; ignoring results that do not support the conclusions; 
• Number tables and figures separately beginning with 1 (i.e. Table 1, Table 2, Figure 1, etc.).
• Do not attempt to evaluate the results in this section. Report only what you found; hold all discussion of the significance of the results for the Discussion section.
• It is not necessary to describe every step of your statistical analyses. Scientists understand all about null hypotheses, rejection rules, and so forth and do not need to be reminded of them. Just say something like, "Honeybees did not use the flowers in proportion to their availability (X2 = 7.9, p<0.05, d.f.= 4, chi-square test)." Likewise, cite tables and figures without describing in detail how the data were manipulated. Explanations of this sort should appear in a legend or caption written on the same page as the figure or table.
• You must refer in the text to each figure or table you include in your paper.
• Tables generally should report summary-level data, such as means ± standard deviations, rather than all your raw data.  A long list of all your individual observations will mean much less than a few concise, easy-to-read tables or figures that bring out the main findings of your study.  
• Only use a figure (graph) when the data lend themselves to a good visual representation.  Avoid using figures that show too many variables or trends at once, because they can be hard to understand.

From:  https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/guides/imrad-results-discussion

• << Previous: METHODS
• Next: DISCUSSION >>
• Last Updated: Sep 27, 2024 12:38 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uci.edu/scientificwriting

Off-campus? Please use the Software VPN and choose the group UCIFull to access licensed content. For more information, please Click here

Software VPN is not available for guests, so they may not have access to some content when connecting from off-campus.

Organizing Academic Research Papers: 7. The Results

• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Executive Summary
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tertiary Sources
• What Is Scholarly vs. Popular?
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Annotated Bibliography
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• How to Manage Group Projects
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Essays
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Acknowledgements

The results section of the research paper is where you report the findings of your study based upon the information gathered as a result of the methodology [or methodologies] you applied. The results section should simply state the findings, without bias or interpretation, and arranged in a logical sequence. The results section should always be written in the past tense. A section describing results [a.k.a., "findings"] is particularly necessary if your paper includes data generated from your own research.

Importance of a Good Results Section

When formulating the results section, it's important to remember that the results of a study do not prove anything . Research results can only confirm or reject the research problem underpinning your study. However, the act of articulating the results helps you to understand the problem from within, to break it into pieces, and to view the research problem from various perspectives.

The page length of this section is set by the amount and types of data to be reported . Be concise, using non-textual elements, such as figures and tables, if appropriate, to present results more effectively. In deciding what data to describe in your results section, you must clearly distinguish material that would normally be included in a research paper from any raw data or other material that could be included as an appendix. In general, raw data should not be included in the main text of your paper unless requested to do so by your professor.

Avoid providing data that is not critical to answering the research question . The background information you described in the introduction section should provide the reader with any additional context or explanation needed to understand the results. A good rule is to always re-read the background section of your paper after you have written up your results to ensure that the reader has enough context to understand the results [and, later, how you interpreted the results in the discussion section of your paper].

Bates College; Burton, Neil et al. Doing Your Education Research Project . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2008; Results . The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College.

Structure and Writing Style

I. Structure and Approach

For most research paper formats, there are two ways of presenting and organizing the results .

• Present the results followed by a short explanation of the findings . For example, you may have noticed an unusual correlation between two variables during the analysis of your findings. It is correct to point this out in the results section. However, speculating as to why this correlation exists, and offering a hypothesis about what may be happening, belongs in the discussion section of your paper.
• Present a section and then discuss it, before presenting the next section then discussing it, and so on . This is more common in longer papers because it helps the reader to better understand each finding. In this model, it can be helpful to provide a brief conclusion in the results section that ties each of the findings together and links to the discussion.

NOTE: The discussion section should generally follow the same format chosen in presenting and organizing the results.

II.  Content

In general, the content of your results section should include the following elements:

• An introductory context for understanding the results by restating the research problem that underpins the purpose of your study.
• A summary of your key findings arranged in a logical sequence that generally follows your methodology section.
• Inclusion of non-textual elements, such as, figures, charts, photos, maps, tables, etc. to further illustrate the findings, if appropriate.
• In the text, a systematic description of your results, highlighting for the reader observations that are most relevant to the topic under investigation [remember that not all results that emerge from the methodology that you used to gather the data may be relevant].
• Use of the past tense when refering to your results.
• The page length of your results section is guided by the amount and types of data to be reported. However, focus only on findings that are important and related to addressing the research problem.

Using Non-textual Elements

• Either place figures, tables, charts, etc. within the text of the result, or include them in the back of the report--do one or the other but never do both.
• In the text, refer to each non-textual element in numbered order [e.g.,  Table 1, Table 2; Chart 1, Chart 2; Map 1, Map 2].
• If you place non-textual elements at the end of the report, make sure they are clearly distinguished from any attached appendix materials, such as raw data.
• Regardless of placement, each non-textual element must be numbered consecutively and complete with caption [caption goes under the figure, table, chart, etc.]
• Each non-textual element must be titled, numbered consecutively, and complete with a heading [title with description goes above the figure, table, chart, etc.].
• In proofreading your results section, be sure that each non-textual element is sufficiently complete so that it could stand on its own, separate from the text.

III. Problems to Avoid

When writing the results section, avoid doing the following :

• Discussing or interpreting your results . Save all this for the next section of your paper, although where appropriate, you should compare or contrast specific results to those found in other studies [e.g., "Similar to Smith [1990], one of the findings of this study is the strong correlation between motivation and academic achievement...."].
• Reporting background information or attempting to explain your findings ; this should have been done in your Introduction section, but don't panic! Often the results of a study point to the need to provide additional background information or to explain the topic further, so don't think you did something wrong. Revise your introduction as needed.
• Ignoring negative results . If some of your results fail to support your hypothesis, do not ignore them. Document them, then state in your discussion section why you believe a negative result emerged from your study. Note that negative results, and how you handle them, often provides you with the opportunity to write a more engaging discussion section, therefore, don't be afraid to highlight them.
• Including raw data or intermediate calculations . Ask your professor if you need to include any raw data generated by your study, such as transcripts from interviews or data files. If raw data is to be included, place it in an appendix or set of appendices that are referred to in the text.
• Be as factual and concise as possible in reporting your findings . Do not use phrases that are vague or non-specific, such as, "appeared to be greater or lesser than..." or "demonstrates promising trends that...."
• Presenting the same data or repeating the same information more than once . If you feel the need to highlight something, you will have a chance to do that in the discussion section.
• Confusing figures with tables . Be sure to properly label any non-textual elements in your paper. If you are not sure, look up the term in a dictionary.

Burton, Neil et al. Doing Your Education Research Project . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2008;  Caprette, David R. Writing Research Papers . Experimental Biosciences Resources. Rice University; Hancock, Dawson R. and Bob Algozzine. Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers . 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2011; Introduction to Nursing Research: Reporting Research Findings. Nursing Research: Open Access Nursing Research and Review Articles. (January 4, 2012); Reporting Research Findings. Wilder Research, in partnership with the Minnesota Department of Human Services. (February 2009); Results . The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the Results . Thesis Writing in the Sciences. Course Syllabus. University of Florida.

Writing Tip

Why Don't I Just Combine the Results Section with the Discussion Section?

It's not unusual to find articles in social science journals where the author(s) have combined a description of the findings from the study with a discussion about their implications. You could do this. However, if you are inexperienced writing research papers, consider creating two sections for each element in your paper as a way to better organize your thoughts and, by extension, your  paper. Think of the results section as the place where you report what your study found; think of the discussion section as the place where you interpret your data and answer the "so what?" question. As you become more skilled writing research papers, you may want to meld the results of your study with a discussion of its implications.

• << Previous: Quantitative Methods
• Next: Using Non-Textual Elements >>
• Last Updated: Jul 18, 2023 11:58 AM
• URL: https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803
• QuickSearch
• Library Catalog
• Databases A-Z
• Publication Finder
• Course Reserves
• Citation Linker
• Digital Commons
• Our Website

Research Support

• Ask a Librarian
• Appointments
• Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
• Research Guides
• Databases by Subject
• Citation Help

Using the Library

• Reserve a Group Study Room
• Renew Books
• Honors Study Rooms
• Off-Campus Access
• Library Policies
• Library Technology

User Information

• Grad Students
• Online Students
• COVID-19 Updates
• Staff Directory
• News & Announcements
• Library Newsletter

My Accounts

• Interlibrary Loan
• Staff Site Login

FIND US ON