We want to hear from you! Send us a message and help improve Slidesgo
Top searches
Trending searches
135 templates
9 templates
35 templates
13 templates
21 templates
18 templates
Welcome to our curated collection of the best earthquake-themed google slides themes and powerpoint templates whether you're creating a presentation for an academic conference, a school project, or just need to educate your audience about seismic activity, we've got you covered. discover now this selection and take the first step towards creating a powerful and memorable presentation about earthquakes..
Create your presentation create personalized presentation content, writing tone, number of slides, premium template.
Unlock this template and gain unlimited access
Earthquake prevention plan project proposal.
Download the "Earthquake Prevention Plan Project Proposal" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A well-crafted proposal can be the key factor in determining the success of your project. It's an opportunity to showcase your ideas, objectives, and plans in a clear and concise manner, and to convince others to invest...
Do you know how you should react if there was an earthquake? Is it better to run away from buildings or to stay in them? Where should you hide? Knowing the answer to these questions can be a lifesaver when in a life-threatening situation like an earthquake. Speak about it...
In some parts of the world, being prepared for an earthquake is a life-changing skill. That’s why making drills at school is such an important thing! What if, after a drill, you prepared a presentation for your students where you explained what happened, what they did well and what could...
You have to be prepared for any situation, regardless of the location. What if there is an earthquake at school? What if the children are home alone during the earthquake? In order for your students to be prepared for this situation, having some recommendations in advance will be very useful....
What to do in case of an earthquake? Stay calm and try to cover yourself under a solid table if you're indoors, or go to an open area without buildings nearby if you're outdoors. There are more recommendations, and you can teach them to your middle school students with the...
In the realm of academia, preparing for a thesis defense can feel just as daunting as facing a seismic event. But much like building earthquake-resistant structures, the key to a successful defense is solid preparation. Get ready to defend your research on natural disasters with this editable template. Its slides...
An earthquake—the mysterious rumbling and shaking that seems to arise out of nowhere can cause disruption of the planet's surface and sometimes even change the course of history. Albeit destructive, earthquakes have fascinated researchers for centuries. Get ready to teach students how and why earthquakes happen. This ready-made template has...
Download the Earthquakes and Volcanoes presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides and start impressing your audience with a creative and original design. Slidesgo templates like this one here offer the possibility to convey a concept, idea or topic in a clear, concise and visual way, by using different graphic resources....
An earthquake has devastating consequences. However, with charity campaigns you can raise money, get food and other aid to help people who have suffered from the earthquake. So, if you're organizing a campaign, make the necessary preparations with this minimalist template! You'll find all the required sections for the campaign,...
Our planet is constantly changing, and nowhere is this more evident than in the study of plate tectonics and earthquakes. "Wait, did you say 'plate tectonics'? Isn't it 'tectonic plates'?" Almost! Plate tectonics is a theory that states that Earth's litosphere has been in constant movement for billions of years...
We have designed for you the perfect printable template to present your research on earthquakes and inner Earth movements. In it you will find the structure, images, graphs and icons to explain in detail your hypothesis, objectives, methodology, analysis and conclusions. It is designed in earth tones and contains different...
Download the Causes of Earthquakes presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. The education sector constantly demands dynamic and effective ways to present information. This template is created with that very purpose in mind. Offering the best resources, it allows educators or students to efficiently manage their presentations and engage audiences....
The strong sound of applause you’ll receive after presenting this template might feel like a real earthquake… Hopefully your building has the perfect structure so it doesn’t crumble down. If you have studied the earthquake resistance of building structures you probably know how this works… So why don’t you explain...
Download the Countries Most Prone to Earthquakes presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides and start impressing your audience with a creative and original design. Slidesgo templates like this one here offer the possibility to convey a concept, idea or topic in a clear, concise and visual way, by using different...
Earthquakes can be a scary and daunting topic for elementary school-aged children. However, preparation and knowledge of what to do in the event of an earthquake can make all the difference. You can do the following: combine these new editable infographics (which contain illustrated backgrounds) with the parent template "Earthquake...
The earth is angry but you’re prepared! Not to make light of earthquakes; on the contrary knowing what to do in case of one is of utmost importance and may save your life at some point. But earthquake drills don’t need to be dreary and scary. You can use this...
Pete’s PowerPoint Station
Earthquakes
Understanding Earthquakes
Earthquakes and Faults
Earthquakes – Understanding Geology
Earthquakes – Preventing Disasters in Japan
Earthquakes – How Often Do They Occur?
Earthquakes and Building Safety
Earthquakes – What Causes Them?
Earthquakes and volcanoes
Earthquakes and Architecture
Earthquake Waves (salem)
See Also: Plate Tectonics , Ocean Motion , Natural Hazards
Free Online Earthquake GAMES & Kids Sites
Free Flash Presentations
Lots of Lessons – Earthquakes
Free Video Clips/Mini Movies
Free Online Science Games for Kids
Free Clipart for Science
Need a catchy title for an earthquake essay? Earthquakes can take place almost everywhere. That is why this problem is so exciting to focus on.
🎓 good essay topics on earthquake, 📌 catchy titles for earthquake essay, 👍 research titles about earthquake, ❓ essay questions about earthquake.
In your earthquake essay, you might want to compare and contrast various types of this natural disaster. Another option is to talk about your personal experience or discuss the causes and effects of earthquakes. In a more serious assignment like a thesis or a term paper, you can concentrate on earthquake engineering or disaster management issues. In this article, we’ve gathered best research titles about earthquake and added top earthquake essay examples for more inspiration!
IvyPanda. (2024, February 26). 143 Earthquake Essay Topics & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/earthquake-essay-topics/
"143 Earthquake Essay Topics & Examples." IvyPanda , 26 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/earthquake-essay-topics/.
IvyPanda . (2024) '143 Earthquake Essay Topics & Examples'. 26 February.
IvyPanda . 2024. "143 Earthquake Essay Topics & Examples." February 26, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/earthquake-essay-topics/.
1. IvyPanda . "143 Earthquake Essay Topics & Examples." February 26, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/earthquake-essay-topics/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "143 Earthquake Essay Topics & Examples." February 26, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/earthquake-essay-topics/.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Nature Communications volume 12 , Article number: 4761 ( 2021 ) Cite this article
21k Accesses
68 Citations
49 Altmetric
Metrics details
A new generation of earthquake catalogs developed through supervised machine-learning illuminates earthquake activity with unprecedented detail. Application of unsupervised machine learning to analyze the more complete expression of seismicity in these catalogs may be the fastest route to improving earthquake forecasting.
The past 5 years have seen a rapidly accelerating effort in applying machine learning to seismological problems. The serial components of earthquake monitoring workflows include: detection, arrival time measurement, phase association, location, and characterization. All of these tasks have seen rapid progress due to effective implementation of machine-learning approaches. They have proven opportune targets for machine learning in seismology mainly due to the large, labeled data sets, which are often publicly available, and that were constructed through decades of dedicated work by skilled analysts. These are the essential ingredient for building complex supervised models. Progress has been realized in research mode to analyze the details of seismicity well after the earthquakes being studied have occurred, and machine-learning techniques are poised to be implemented in operational mode for real-time monitoring. We will soon have a next generation of earthquake catalogs that contain much more information. How much more? These more complete catalogs typically feature at least a factor of ten more earthquakes (Fig. 1 ) and provide a higher-resolution picture of seismically active faults.
a Real-time catalog, available at http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/ and ( b ) machine-learning catalog 16 are shown for event magnitudes above their respective magnitude of completeness 12 , 16 Mc = 2.2 and Mc = 0.5.
This next generation of earthquake catalogs will not be the single, static objects seismologists are accustomed to working with. For example, less than 2 years after the 2019 Ridgecrest, California earthquake sequence there already exist four next-generation catalogs, each of which were developed with different enhanced detection techniques. Now, and in the future, this will be the norm, and earthquake catalogs will be updated and improved—potentially dramatically—with time. Second-generation deep learning models 1 that are specifically designed based on earthquake signal characteristics and that mimic the manual processing by analysts, can lead to performance increases beyond those offered by earlier models that adapted neural network architectures from other fields. Those interested in using earthquake catalogs for forecasting can anticipate a shifting landscape with continuing improvements.
While these improvements are impressive, the value of the extra information they provide is less clear. What will we learn about earthquake behavior from these deeper catalogs and how might it improve the prospects for the stubbornly difficult problem of earthquake forecasting?
Short-term deterministic earthquake prediction remains elusive and is perhaps impossible; however, probabilistic earthquake forecasting is another matter. It remains the subject of focused and sustained attention and it informs earthquake hazard characterization 2 and thus both policy and earthquake risk reduction. A key assumption is that what we learn from the newly uncovered small earthquakes in AI-based catalogs, will inform earthquake forecasting for events of all magnitudes. The observed scale invariance of earthquake behavior suggests this is a reasonable expectation.
Empirical seismological relationships have played a key role in the development of earthquake forecasting. These include Omori’s law 3 that describes the temporal decay of aftershock rate, the magnitude-frequency distribution, with the b-value describing the relative numbers of small vs. large earthquakes 4 , and the Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model 5 in which earthquakes are treated as a self-exciting process governed by Omori’s law for their frequency of occurrence and Gutenberg–Richter statistics for their magnitude. These empirical laws continue to prove their utility. Just in the past few years, the time dependence of the b-value has been used to try to anticipate the likelihood of large earthquakes during an ongoing earthquake sequence 6 and the ETAS model has been improved to better anticipate future large events 7 . So it appears that there is value in applying these longstanding relationships to improved earthquake catalogs, but our opinion is that much more needs to be done.
The relationships cited above date from 127, 77, and 33 years ago. The oldest of them, Omori’s Law, was developed based on felt reports without the benefit of instrumental measurements. We suggest that a fresh approach using more powerful techniques is warranted. Earthquake catalogs are complex, high-dimensional objects and as Fig. 1 makes clear, that is even more true for the deeper catalogs that are being developed through machine learning. Their high dimensionality makes them challenging for seismologists to explore, and the conventional approaches noted above seem unlikely to be taking advantage of the wealth of new information available in the new generation of deeper catalogs. We suggest that, having first enabled the development of these catalogs, the statistical-learning techniques of data science are now poised to play an important role in uncovering new relationships within them. The obvious next step is to apply the techniques of machine learning in discovery mode 8 to discern new relationships encoded in the seismicity.
There are tantalizing indications that such an approach may lead to new insights. In double-direct-shear experiments, background signals that were thought to be uninformative random noise have instead been shown to encode information on the state of friction and the eventual time of failure of faults in a laboratory setting 9 . Well-controlled laboratory analogs to faults lack the geologic complexity of the Earth, yet, weak natural background vibrations of a similar sort, that again were thought to be random noise, have been shown to embody information that can be used to predict the onset time of slow slip events in the Cascadia subduction zone 10 . Finally, unsupervised deep learning, in which algorithms are used to discern patterns in data without the benefit of prior labels, applied to seismic waveform data uncovered precursory signals preceding the large and damaging 2017 landslide and tsunami in Greenland 11 .
These examples are compelling but come with the caveat that they are not representative of the typical fast rupture velocity earthquakes on tectonic faults that are of societal concern. For such earthquakes, however, there are also indications from state-of-the-art forecasting approaches that next-generation earthquake catalogs may contain information that will lead to progress. Physics-based forecasting models, which account for changes in the Coulomb failure stress due to antecedent earthquakes that favor the occurrence of subsequent earthquakes, have shown increasing skill such that they are competitive with, and are beginning to outperform, statistical models. Coulomb failure models benefit particularly from deeper catalogs because they include many more small magnitude earthquakes. These small earthquakes add predictive power through their secondary triggering effects tracking the evolution of the fine-scale stress field that ultimately controls earthquake nucleation in foreshock and aftershock sequences. They can also be used to define the emerging active structures that comprise fault networks and by doing so clarify the relevant components of stress that would act to trigger earthquakes 12 . Secondary triggering and background stress heterogeneity were shown to improve stress triggering models 13 but were most effective when they incorporated near‐real‐time aftershock data from the sequence as it unfolded 14 . We note that there is no reason why more complete earthquake catalogs, developed with pre-trained neural network models, cannot be created in real time as an earthquake sequence unfolds. Finally, despite the disappointing history of the search for precursors, due diligence requires that seismologists consider the pursuit of signals that might be precursory.
We conclude that it is now possible to image the activity on active fault systems with unprecedented spatial resolution. This will enable experimentation with familiar hypotheses and enable the formulation of new hypotheses. It seems certain that the underlying processes that drive earthquake occurrence are encoded in this next generation of earthquake catalogs, but we may not find them unless we put new effort into searching for them. Unsupervised learning methods 15 are particularly well-suited tool for that effort.
Mousavi, S. M. et al. Earthquake Transformer - an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nat. Commun. 11 , 3952, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w (2020).
Field, E. H. et al. A synoptic view of the third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast model. Seismological Res. Lett. 88 , 1259–1267, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170045 (2017).
Omori, F. J. On the aftershocks of earthquakes. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 7 , 111–200 (1894).
Google Scholar
Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34 , 185–188 (1944).
Article Google Scholar
Ogata, Y. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83 , 9–27 (1988).
Gulia, L. & Wiemer, S. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks. Nature 574 , 193–199, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1606-4 (2019).
Shcherbakov, R. et al. Forecasting the magnitude of the largest expected earthquake. Nat. Commun. 10 , 4051, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11958-4 (2019).
Bergen, K. J. et al. Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid earth geoscience. Science 363 , eaau0323, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0323 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rouet-Leduc, B. et al. Machine learning predicts laboratory earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett . 44 , 9276–9282 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074677 (2017).
Hulbert, C. et al. An exponential build-up in seismic energy suggests a months-long nucleation of slow slip in Cascadia. Nat. Commun. 11 , 4139, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17754-9 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seydoux, L. et al. Clustering earthquake signals and background noises in continuous seismic data with unsupervised deep learning. Nat. Commun. 11 , 3972, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17841-x (2020).
Mancini, S. et al. Improving physics-based aftershock forecasts during the 2016-2017 Central Italy earthquake cascade. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124 , https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017874 (2019).
Segou, M., & Parsons, T. A new technique to calculate earthquake stress transfer and to probe the physics of aftershocks. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am . 110 , 863–873, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190033 (2020).
Mancini, S. et al. The predictive skills of elastic Coulomb rate-and-state aftershock forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 110 , 1736–1751, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200028 (2020).
Mousavi, S. M., et al. Unsupervised clustering of seismic signals using deep convolutional autoencoders. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 16 , 1693–1697, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2909218 (2019).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Tan, Y. J. et al. Machine-learning-based high-resolution catalog reveals how complex fault structures were activated during the 2016-2017 Central Italy sequence. Seismic Rec. 1 , 11–19, https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210001 (2021).
Download references
This work is supported by the NERC-NSFGEO 13 funded project The Central Apennines Earthquake Sequence under a New Microscrope (NE/R0000794/1). G.C.B. was supported by Department of Energy (Basic Energy Sciences; Award DE-SC0020445). Thanks to Dr. Simone Mancini for preparing the figure.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Gregory C. Beroza & S. Mostafa Mousavi
British Geological Survey, Research Avenue South, Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, UK
Margarita Segou
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
All authors contributed to the development of this comment, and all were involved in revising it.
Correspondence to Gregory C. Beroza .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Beroza, G.C., Segou, M. & Mostafa Mousavi, S. Machine learning and earthquake forecasting—next steps. Nat Commun 12 , 4761 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24952-6
Download citation
Received : 28 May 2021
Accepted : 12 July 2021
Published : 06 August 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24952-6
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
An all-in-one seismic phase picking, location, and association network for multi-task multi-station earthquake monitoring.
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
Scientific Reports (2024)
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering (2024)
Neural Computing and Applications (2024)
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Chapter: 5 conclusions - achieving earthquake resilience.
5 Conclusions— Achieving Earthquake Resilience
The advent of NEHRP in 1977, together with its subsequent reauthorizations, added substantial resources for research in seismology, earthquake engineering, and social sciences with the goal of increasing knowledge for understanding the causes of earthquakes and reducing their impacts. In addition, the program improved coordination among federal government agencies with responsibilities in those areas and promoted integration of research and applications. Moreover, although NEHRP covers only four federal agencies, the program provides a focus for earthquake-related activities of many other federal, state, regional, and local government agencies, and—to some extent—the private sector.
Efforts to understand the causes of earthquakes and to counter their effects certainly did not begin with NEHRP. In the United States, the landmark study of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake (Lawson, 1908) furthered the elastic rebound hypothesis, whereby accumulated strain energy is released suddenly by fault slip, and demonstrated the vulnerability of structure built on soft sediments. Advances in other countries, especially Japan, also contributed new knowledge. Most importantly, developments of plate tectonics concepts in the mid-1960s established an overall framework for understanding the occurrence of earthquakes (and volcanoes) worldwide.
Nevertheless, NEHRP stimulated substantial earthquake research in the United States and, most significantly, integrated the efforts of the various earthquake-related disciplines and organizations toward the goal of reducing earthquake losses. The degree of success of these endeavors is reflected in the impressive list of accomplishments summarized in the
introduction to this report. In view of the important stimulus to earthquake mitigation activities provided by NEHRP and its substantial record of achievements, the committee endorses the 2008 NEHRP Strategic Plan and identifies 18 specific task elements required to implement that plan and materially improve national earthquake resilience.
Defining Earthquake Resilience
A critical requirement for achieving national earthquake resilience is, of course, an understanding of what constitutes earthquake resilience. In this report, we have interpreted resilience broadly so that it incorporates engineering/science (physical), social/economic (behavioral), and institutional (governing) dimensions. Resilience is also interpreted to encompass both pre- and post-disaster actions that, in combination, will enhance the robustness and the capabilities of all earthquake-vulnerable regions of our nation to function well following likely, significant earthquakes. The committee is also cognizant that it is cost-prohibitive to achieve a completely seismically resistant nation. Instead, we see our mission as helping set performance targets for improving the nation’s seismic resilience over the next 20 years and, in turn, developing a more detailed roadmap and program priorities for NEHRP. With these considerations in mind, the committee recommends that NEHRP adopt the following working definition for “national earthquake resilience”:
A disaster-resilient nation is one in which its communities, through mitigation and pre-disaster preparation, develop the adaptive capacity to maintain important community functions and recover quickly when major disasters occur.
No standard metric exists for measuring disaster resilience, and it is clear that standardized methods would be helpful for gauging improvements in resilience as a result of disaster risk reduction planning and mitigation. However, because the concept of resilience is specific to the context of the specific community and its goals, it can be expected that no single measure will be able to capture it sufficiently. No one resilience indicator can suit all purposes, and different measurement approaches may be appropriate in different contexts for assessing current levels of disaster resilience and incremental progress in developing resilience.
Elements and Costs of a Resilience Roadmap
To provide a sound basis for future activities, the NEHRP agencies—under the leadership of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) as lead agency—developed a Strategic Plan ( Appendix A ). The plan, with three major goals and 14 objectives, constitutes a comprehensive, integrated approach to reducing earthquake losses. The committee endorses the elements of the strategic plan—the goals and objectives—and embraces the integrated, comprehensive, and collaborative approach among the NEHRP agencies reflected in the plan. The committee set out to build on the Strategic Plan by specifying focused activities that would further implementation of the plan. In the end, 18 tasks were selected, ranging from basic research to community-oriented applications, which, in our view, comprise a “roadmap” for furthering NEHRP goals and implementing the Strategic Plan. The committee recommends that these tasks be undertaken.
In estimating costs to implement the roadmap, the committee recognizes that there is a high degree of variability among the 18 tasks—some (e.g., deployment of the Advanced National Seismic System Network [ANSS], the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation [NEES] earthquake engineering simulation laboratories) are under way or are in the process of being implemented, whereas others are only at the conceptual stage. Costing each task required a thorough analysis to determine scope, implementation steps, and linkages or overlaps with other tasks. For some of the tasks, the necessary analysis had already been completed in workshops or other venues, and realistic cost estimates were available as input to the committee. For other tasks, the committee had nothing more to go on than its own expert opinion, in which case implementing the task may require some degree of additional detailed analysis. In summary, the annualized cost for the first 5 years of the roadmap for national earthquake resilience is $306.5 million/year (2009$), made up of the following tasks:
1. Physics of Earthquake Processes. Conduct additional research to advance the understanding of earthquake phenomena and generation processes and to improve the predictive capabilities of earthquake science; 5-year annualized cost of $27 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $585 million.
2. Advanced National Seismic System. Complete deployment of the remaining 75 percent of the Advanced National Seismic System; 5-year annualized cost of $66.8 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $1.3 billion. On-going operations and maintenance costs after the initial 20-year period of $50 million/year.
3. Earthquake Early Warning. Evaluation, testing, and deployment of earthquake early warning systems; 5-year annualized cost of $20.6 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $283 million.
4. National Seismic Hazard Model. Complete the national coverage
of seismic hazard maps and create urban seismic hazard maps and seismic risk maps for at-risk communities; 5-year annualized cost of $50.1 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $946.5 million.
5. Operational Earthquake Forecasting. Develop and implement operational earthquake forecasting, in coordination with state and local agencies; 5-year annualized cost of $5 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $85 million. On-going operations and maintenance costs after the initial 20-year period are unknown.
6. Earthquake Scenarios. Develop scenarios that integrate earth science, engineering, and social science information and conduct exercises so that communities can visualize earthquake and tsunami impacts and mitigate their potential effects; 5-year annualized cost of $10 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $200 million.
7. Earthquake Risk Assessments and Applications. Integrate science, engineering, and social science information in an advanced GIS-based loss estimation platform to improve earthquake risk assessments and loss estimations; 5-year annualized cost of $5 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $100 million.
8. Post-earthquake Social Science Response and Recovery Research. Document and model the mix of expected and improvised emergency response and recovery activities and outcomes to improve pre-disaster mitigation and preparedness practices at household, organizational, community, and regional levels; 5-year annualized cost of $2.3 million/year, reviewed after the initial 5-years.
9. Post-earthquake Information Management. Capture, distill, and disseminate information about the geological, structural, institutional, and socioeconomic impacts of specific earthquakes, as well as post-disaster response, and create and maintain a repository for post-earthquake reconnaissance data; 5-year annualized cost of $1 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $14.6 million. On-going operations and maintenance costs after the initial 20-year period are unknown, but are likely to be small.
10. Socioeconomic Research on Hazard Mitigation and Recovery. Support basic and applied research in the social sciences to examine individual and organizational motivations to promote resilience, the feasibility and cost of resilience actions, and the removal of barriers to successful implementation; 5-year annualized cost of $3 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $60 million.
11. Observatory Network on Community Resilience and Vulnerability. Establish an observatory network to measure, monitor, and model the disaster vulnerability and resilience of communities, with a focus on resilience and vulnerability; risk assessment, perception, and management strategies; mitigation activities; and reconstruction and recovery; 5-year
annualized cost of $2.9 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $57.3 million. On-going operations and maintenance costs after the initial 20-year period are unknown.
12. Physics-based Simulations of Earthquake Damage and Loss. Integrate knowledge gained in Tasks 1, 13, 14, and 16 to enable robust, fully coupled simulations of fault rupture, seismic wave propagation through bedrock, and soil-structure response, to compute reliable estimates of financial loss, business interruption, and casualties; 5-year annualized cost of $6 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $120 million.
13. Techniques for Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Develop analytical methods that predict the response of existing buildings with known levels of reliability based on integrated laboratory research and numerical simulations, and improve consensus standards for seismic evaluation and rehabilitation; 5-year annualized cost of $22.9 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $543.6 million.
14. Performance-based Earthquake Engineering for Buildings. Advance performance-based earthquake engineering knowledge and develop implementation tools to improve design practice, inform decision-makers, and revise codes and standards for buildings, lifelines, and geo-structures; 5-year annualized cost of $46.7 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $891.5 million.
15. Guidelines for Earthquake-Resilient Lifeline Systems. Conduct lifelines-focused collaborative research to better characterize infrastructure network vulnerability and resilience as the basis for the systematic review and updating of existing lifelines standards and guidelines, with targeted pilot programs and demonstration projects; 5-year annualized cost of $5 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $100 million.
16. Next Generation Sustainable Materials, Components, and Systems. Develop and deploy new high-performance materials, components, and framing systems that are green and/or adaptive; the 5-year annualized cost of $8.2 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $334.4 million.
17. Knowledge, Tools, and Technology Transfer to/from the Private Sector. Initiate a program to encourage and coordinate technology transfer across the NEHRP domain to ensure the deployment of state-of-the-art mitigation techniques across the nation, particularly in regions of moderate seismic hazard; 5-year annualized cost of $8.4 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $168 million.
18. Earthquake-Resilient Community and Regional Demonstration Projects. Support and guide community-based earthquake resiliency pilot projects to apply NEHRP-generated and other knowledge to improve awareness, reduce risk, and improve emergency preparedness and recovery capacity; 5-year annualized cost of $15.6 million/year, for a total 20-year cost of $1 billion.
Timing of Roadmap Components
The committee recommends that all the tasks identified here be initiated immediately, contingent on the availability of funds, and suggests that such an approach would represent an appropriate balance between practical activities to enhance national earthquake resilience and the research that is needed to provide a sound basis for such activities. The committee also notes that the two “observatory” elements of the roadmap, Task 2 and Task 11, will provide fundamental information to be used by numerous other tasks.
However, at a lower component level within individual tasks, there are some elements that should be implemented and/or initiated immediately whereas others will have to await the results of earlier activities. The need for sequencing individual task components is most clearly expressed in the detailed breakdowns for Tasks 13, 14, and 16, as described in Tables E.5 , E.7 , and E.9 respectively. For example, the component to develop reliable tools for collapse computations within Task 13 includes scoping studies, a workshop, and development of a work-plan in year 3 that would be followed by experimentation using NEES facilities on critical components of framing systems in years 4-7, experimentation using NEES facilities and E-Defense on multiple framing systems to collapse in years 6-10, and concurrent development of improved hysteretic models of structural components through failure in years 4-20, understanding of the triggers for collapse of framing systems in years 6-10, improved system-level collapse computations and FE codes in years 6-15, validation of improved computational procedures using NEES facilities and E-Defense in years 11-20, as well as 5-yearly syntheses of results and preparation of technical briefs.
Earthquake Resilience and Agency Coordination
It is important to recognize that the four NEHRP agencies, although comprising a critical core group for building earthquake knowledge, constitutes only part of the national research and application enterprise. For example, the National Science Foundation (NSF) part of NEHRP includes only earthquake engineering and social sciences, viewed by NSF as “directed” research, whereas highly relevant earthquake knowledge also comes from “non-directed” research programs in NSF. In the applications area, virtually every agency that builds or operates facilities contributes to the goals of NEHRP by adopting practices or codes to reduce earthquake impacts. These agencies include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Departments of Transportation, Energy, and Housing and Urban Development. Beyond the role of the federal agencies, government agencies at all levels similarly play a critical role in application of earthquake
knowledge, as does the private sector, especially in the area of building design. Altogether, the contributors to reducing earthquake losses constitute a complex enterprise that goes far beyond the scope of NEHRP. But NEHRP provides an important focus for this far-flung endeavor. The committee considers that an analysis to determine whether coordination among all organizations that contribute to NEHRP could be improved would be useful and timely.
Implementing NEHRP Knowledge
The United States had not experienced a great earthquake since 1964, when Alaska was struck by a magnitude-9.2 event. The damage in Alaska was relatively light because of the sparse population. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake was the most recent truly devastating U.S. shock, as recent destructive earthquakes have been only moderate in size. Consequently, a sense has developed that the country can cope effectively with the earthquake threat and is, in fact, “resilient.” However, coping with moderate events may not be a true indicator of preparedness for a great one, as demonstrated by Hurricane Katrina. The central United States last experienced a devastating sequence of great earthquakes in 1811-1812 in the Mississippi Valley area centered on New Madrid, MO. The East Coast was shocked in 1886 by an earthquake near magnitude-7 at Charleston, SC. These events are now far from the consciousness of the public, and little has been done to prepare for similar events in these regions in the future. The committee believes that efforts should be expanded to anticipate the effects and disruptions that could be caused by a great U.S. earthquake, especially an event in the central or eastern United States where little preparation has been undertaken.
Most critical decisions that reduce earthquake vulnerability and manage earthquake risk are made in the private sector by individuals and companies. The information provided by NEHRP, if made available in an understandable format, and accompanied by diffusion processes, can greatly assist citizens in their decision-making. For example, maps of active faults, unstable ground, and historic seismicity can influence where people choose to live, and maps of relative ground shaking can guide building design.
NEHRP will have accomplished its fundamental purpose—an earthquake-resilient nation—when those responsible for earthquake risk and for managing the consequences of earthquake events use the knowledge and services created by NEHRP and other related endeavors to make our communities more earthquake resilient. Resiliency requires awareness of earthquake risk, knowing what to do in response to that risk, and doing it. But providing information is not enough to achieve resilience—the
diffusion of NEHRP knowledge and implementation of that knowledge are necessary corollaries. Successfully diffusing NEHRP knowledge into communities and among the earthquake professionals, state and local government officials, building owners, lifeline operators, and others who have the responsibility for how buildings, systems, and institutions respond to and recover from earthquakes, will require a dedicated and strategic effort. This diffusion role reflects the limited authority that resides with federal agencies in addressing the earthquake threat. Local and state governments have responsibility for public safety and welfare, including powers to regulate land use to avoid hazards, enforce building codes, provide warnings to threatened communities, and respond to an event. The goals and objectives of NEHRP are aimed at supporting and facilitating measures to improve resilience through private owners and businesses, and supporting local and state agencies in carrying out their duties. Although implementing NEHRP knowledge must move ahead expeditiously, it is also essential that the frontiers of knowledge be advanced in concert, requiring that improving understanding of the earthquake threat, reducing risk, and developing the processes to motivate implementation actions, should all be continuing endeavors.
The United States will certainly be subject to damaging earthquakes in the future. Some of these earthquakes will occur in highly populated and vulnerable areas. Coping with moderate earthquakes is not a reliable indicator of preparedness for a major earthquake in a populated area. The recent, disastrous, magnitude-9 earthquake that struck northern Japan demonstrates the threat that earthquakes pose. Moreover, the cascading nature of impacts-the earthquake causing a tsunami, cutting electrical power supplies, and stopping the pumps needed to cool nuclear reactors-demonstrates the potential complexity of an earthquake disaster. Such compound disasters can strike any earthquake-prone populated area. National Earthquake Resilience presents a roadmap for increasing our national resilience to earthquakes.
The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) is the multi-agency program mandated by Congress to undertake activities to reduce the effects of future earthquakes in the United States. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-the lead NEHRP agency-commissioned the National Research Council (NRC) to develop a roadmap for earthquake hazard and risk reduction in the United States that would be based on the goals and objectives for achieving national earthquake resilience described in the 2008 NEHRP Strategic Plan. National Earthquake Resilience does this by assessing the activities and costs that would be required for the nation to achieve earthquake resilience in 20 years.
National Earthquake Resilience interprets resilience broadly to incorporate engineering/science (physical), social/economic (behavioral), and institutional (governing) dimensions. Resilience encompasses both pre-disaster preparedness activities and post-disaster response. In combination, these will enhance the robustness of communities in all earthquake-vulnerable regions of our nation so that they can function adequately following damaging earthquakes. While National Earthquake Resilience is written primarily for the NEHRP, it also speaks to a broader audience of policy makers, earth scientists, and emergency managers.
READ FREE ONLINE
You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.
Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?
Show this book's table of contents , where you can jump to any chapter by name.
...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.
Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.
Switch between the Original Pages , where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.
To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter .
Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.
View our suggested citation for this chapter.
Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.
Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free ? Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released.
Earthquake focus and epicenter
Mar 16, 2012
1.04k likes | 5.11k Views
Earthquake focus and epicenter. What is an earthquake. Earthquakes and faults Movements that produce earthquakes are usually associated with large fractures in Earth’s crust called faults Most of the motion along faults can be explained by the plate tectonics theory.
What is an earthquake • Earthquakes and faults • Movements that produce earthquakes are usually associated with large fractures in Earth’s crust called faults • Most of the motion along faults can be explained by the plate tectonics theory
Displacement produced by the 1906 San Francisco earthquake
Seismology • The study of earthquake waves, seis-mology, dates back almost 2000 years to the Chinese • Seismographs, instruments that record seismic waves • Records the movement of Earth in relation to a stationary mass on a rotating drum or magnetic tape
A seismograph designed to record vertical ground motion
Seismology • Seismographs • More than one type of seismograph is needed to record both vertical and horizontal ground motion • Records obtained are called seismograms • Types of seismic waves • Surface waves • Travel along outer part of Earth
A seismogram records wave amplitude vs. time
Seismology • Types of seismic waves • Surface waves • Complex motion • Cause greatest destruction • Waves exhibit greatest amplitude and slowest velocity • Waves have the greatest periods (time in-terval between crests)
Seismology • Types of seismic waves • Body waves • Travel through Earth’s interior • Two types based on mode of travel • Primary (P) waves • Push-pull (compress and expand) motion, changing the volume of the intervening material • Travel through solids, liquids, and gases
Seismology • Types of seismic waves • Body waves • Primary (P) waves • Generally, in any solid material, P waves travel about 1.7 times faster than S waves • Secondary (S) waves • Shake" motion at right angles to their direction of travel • Travel only through solids
Primary (P) waves
Seismology • Types of seismic waves • Body waves • Secondary (S) waves • Slower velocity than P waves • Slightly greater amplitude than P waves
Secondary (S) waves
Locating the source of earthquakes • Terms • Focus - the place within Earth where earthquake waves originate • Epicenter – location on the surface directly above the focus • Epicenter is located using the difference in velocities of P and S waves
Locating the source of earthquakes • Locating the epicenter of an earthquake • Three station recordings are needed to locate an epicenter • Each station determines the time interval between the arrival of the first P wave and the first S wave at their location • A travel-time graph is used to determine each station’s distance to the epicenter
A time-travel graph is used to find the distance to the epicenter
Locating the source of earthquakes • Locating the epicenter of an earthquake • A circle with a radius equal to the distance to the epicenter is drawn around each station • The point where all three circles intersect is the earthquake epicenter
The epicenter is located using three or more seismograph
Locating the source of earthquakes • Earthquake belts • About 95 percent of the energy released by earthquakes originates in a few rela-tively narrow zones that wind around the globe • Major earthquake zones include the Circum-Pacific belt, Mediterranean Sea region to the Himalayan complex, and the oceanic ridge system
Distribution of magnitude 5 or greater earthquakes, 1980 - 1990
Locating the source of earthquakes • Earthquake depths • Earthquakes originate at depths ranging from 5 to nearly 700 kilometers • Earthquake foci arbitrarily classified asshallow (surface to 70 kilometers), intermediate (between 70 and 300 kilometers), and deep (over 300 kilometers)
Locating the source of earthquakes • Earthquake depths • Definite patterns exist • Shallow focus occur along the oceanic ridge system • Almost all deep-focus earthquakes occur in the circum-Pacific belt, particularly in regions situated landward of deep-ocean trenches
Relationship of earthquake depth to subduction zones
Measuring the size of earthquakes • Two measurements that describe the size of an earthquake are • Intensity – a measure of the degree of earthquake shaking at a given locale based on the amount of damage • Magnitude – estimates the amount of energy released at the source of the earthquake
Measuring the size of earthquakes • Intensity scales • Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale was developed using California buildings as its standard • The drawback of intensity scales is that destruction may not be a true measure of the earthquakes actual severity
Measuring the size of earthquakes • Magnitude scales • Richter magnitude - concept introduced by Charles Richter in 1935 • Richter scale • Based on the amplitude of the largest seismic wave recorded • Accounts for the decrease in wave amplitude with increased distance
Measuring the size of earthquakes • Magnitude scales • Richter scale • Largest magnitude recorded on a Wood-Anderson seismograph was 8.9 • Magnitudes less than 2.0 are not felt by humans • Each unit of Richter magnitude increase corresponds to a tenfold increase in wave amplitude and a 32-fold energy increase
Measuring the size of earthquakes • Magnitudes scales • Other magnitude scales • Several “Richter-like” magnitude scales have been developed • Moment magnitude was developed because none of the “Richter-like” magnitude scales adequately estimates the size of very large earthquakes • Derived from the amount of displacement that occurs along a fault
Earthquake destruction • Amount of structural damage attribu-table to earthquake vibrations depends on • Intensity and duration of the vibrations • Nature of the material upon which the structure rests • Design of the structure
Earthquake destruction • Destruction from seismic vibrations • Ground shaking • Regions within 20 to 50 kilometers of the epicenter will experience about the same intensity of ground shaking • However, destruction varies considerably mainly due to the nature of the ground on which the structures are built
Damage caused by the 1964 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake
Earthquake destruction • Destruction from seismic vibrations • Liquefactionof the ground • Unconsolidated materials saturated with water turn into a mobile fluid • Seiches • The rhythmic sloshing of water in lakes, reservoirs, and enclosed basins • Waves can weaken reservoir walls and cause destruction
Earthquake destruction • Tsunamis, or seismic sea waves • Destructive waves that are often inappropriately called “tidal waves” • Result from vertical displacement along a fault located on the ocean floor or a large undersea landslide triggered by an earth-quake
Earthquake destruction • Tsunamis, or seismic sea waves • In the open ocean height is usually less than 1 meter • In shallower coastal waters the water piles up to heights that occasionally exceed 30 meters • Can be very destructive • Landslides and ground subsidence
Formation of a tsunami
The composition and mechanical layers of Earth
Locating the Epicenter of an Earthquake. The Triangulation Method. Earthquake. In an earthquake, stored energy is suddenly released through a movement along a fault.
1.82k views • 24 slides
M7.2 VAN, TURKEY EARTHQUAKE (with epicenter in Tabanli) PART 1: DAMAGE AND INITIAL SEARCH AND RESCUE . Dr. Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction. THE TECTONIC SETTING. DIFFERENT FROM THAT OF THE 1999 KOCALEI EARTHQUAKE.
519 views • 34 slides
The Epicenter. Jen Sebolka, Jenn Dalia, Pam Dulny, Justin Tortorella, Dylan Kautz. What is E-Commerce. Definitions of Commerce: Sexual Intercourse….WHAT! Social Intercourse: Interchange of Ideas, Opinions or Sentiments Exchange of Goods and Services For Money Include Buyers Sellers
456 views • 22 slides
Earthquake overview and Earthquake Engineering activity . What is an Earthquake?. Pattern of earthquakes defines the boundaries of tectonic plates There are about 23 major plates.
470 views • 25 slides
The point within Earth where rock under stress breaks is called the focus The point directly above the focus on the surface is the epicenter. The Focus and Epicenter of an Earthquake. What are Seismic Waves?.
5.35k views • 21 slides
Start here. Locating the Epicenter. Seismic Waves. Seismogram. Measuring Lag Time. Finding the Epicenter. Seismic Waves. There are three seismic waves. Video of P-wave and S-wave. Continue to Seismogram. P-Wave and S-Wave Movement. Back. How the P and S Waves Move.
740 views • 24 slides
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments. Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014. Risk = Probable Loss (lives & dollars) = Hazard × Exposure × Fragility ÷ Resilience. Extent & density of built environment.
348 views • 18 slides
Earthquake. Hazards and. Safety. Inside Earth Chapter 2.3 Pages 72-77. How Earthquakes Damage. Severe shaking produced by seismic waves can damage or destroy buildings and bridges Topple utility poles. Fracture gas and water mains
888 views • 25 slides
Earthquake. What to do…. Before an earthquake. Preparing Your Home. Before an Earthquake: Secure furniture to walls and floor Place large or heavy objects on lower floors Store valuable or easily breakable items in latched cabinets Keep house in good condition
599 views • 15 slides
epicenter. Scientist have to look for the epicenter of an earthquake so the know were it started. noun 1. The point of the earth's surface directly above the focus of an earthquake. 2. A focal point:. mincing. The chef was mincing the basil put in the spaghetti sauce. . Adjective.
414 views • 10 slides
Earthquake and Tsunami. Kevin Gwinn and Kari Schumacher. A Brief History. Subduction Zone India and Burma Plates 10 years before tsunami, 40 events larger than magnitude 5.5 in the area but no tsunami
478 views • 13 slides
Locating the Epicenter of an Earthquake. The Triangulation Method. Earthquake. In an earthquake, stored energy is suddenly released through a movement along a fault. Earthquake.
948 views • 19 slides
258 views • 12 slides
Aim: How can we locate the epicenter of an Earthquake?. Although a seismogram tells scientists the distance between the seismograph station and the earthquake epicenter; it does not actually give scientists enough information on how to locate the epicenter.
604 views • 16 slides
Locating an Epicenter. Fastest. P-Waves - S-Waves - L-Waves - (surface waves). Used to locate an earthquake. Slower. Slowest. Different waves, different speeds. Measuring Seismic Waves. 1. Laser Geodimeter. 2. Creep Meter. 3. Seismograph. 3 Instruments:. 1. Laser Geodimeter.
847 views • 32 slides
Finding an Epicenter. -DeMarco. What is an Epicenter?. A point on the surface of the Earth directly above the FOCUS of the earthquake. The point within the Earth from which earthquake waves originate. Seismograph Print-outs. Use the data from the recording stations:.
477 views • 12 slides
Earthquake overview and Earthquake Engineering activity. What is an Earthquake?. Pattern of earthquakes defines the boundaries of tectonic plates There are about 23 major plates.
481 views • 25 slides
Instructions for Locating an Earthquake Epicenter. Earthquake Waves. By determining the time of arrival for both the P and S waves at a location we can determine how far away the Earthquakes epicenter is from the seismograph. This does NOT tell us what direction the waves are coming from.
853 views • 16 slides
LEQ: How are multiple seismograph stations used to determine the exact epicenter of an earthquake?. Key Term: Epicenter. Locating the Epicenter. Please turn to page 116 in your textbook. Epicenter The point on Earth’s surface directly above the focus of the earthquake.
89 views • 7 slides
The surface of the Earth is made up of tectonic plates that lie beneath both the land and oceans of our planet. The movements of these plates can build mountains or cause volcanoes to erupt. The clash of these plates can also cause violent earthquakes, where Earth’s surface shakes. Earthquakes are more common in some parts of the world than others, because some places, like California, sit on top of the meeting point, or fault, of two plates. When those plates scrape against each other and cause an earthquake, the results can be deadly and devastating.
Learn more about earthquakes with this curated collection of classroom resources.
Geology, Geography, Physical Geography
Discover the world's research
Simply speaking, Earthquake means the shaking of the Earth’s surface. It is a sudden trembling of the surface of the Earth. Earthquakes certainly are a terrible natural disaster. Furthermore, Earthquakes can cause huge damage to life and property. Some Earthquakes are weak in nature and probably go unnoticed. In contrast, some Earthquakes are major and violent. The major Earthquakes are almost always devastating in nature. Most noteworthy, the occurrence of an Earthquake is quite unpredictable. This is what makes them so dangerous.
Tectonic Earthquake: The Earth’s crust comprises of the slab of rocks of uneven shapes. These slab of rocks are tectonic plates. Furthermore, there is energy stored here. This energy causes tectonic plates to push away from each other or towards each other. As time passes, the energy and movement build up pressure between two plates.
Therefore, this enormous pressure causes the fault line to form. Also, the center point of this disturbance is the focus of the Earthquake. Consequently, waves of energy travel from focus to the surface. This results in shaking of the surface.
Volcanic Earthquake: This Earthquake is related to volcanic activity. Above all, the magnitude of such Earthquakes is weak. These Earthquakes are of two types. The first type is Volcano-tectonic earthquake. Here tremors occur due to injection or withdrawal of Magma. In contrast, the second type is Long-period earthquake. Here Earthquake occurs due to the pressure changes among the Earth’s layers.
Collapse Earthquake: These Earthquakes occur in the caverns and mines. Furthermore, these Earthquakes are of weak magnitude. Undergrounds blasts are probably the cause of collapsing of mines. Above all, this collapsing of mines causes seismic waves. Consequently, these seismic waves cause an Earthquake.
Explosive Earthquake: These Earthquakes almost always occur due to the testing of nuclear weapons. When a nuclear weapon detonates, a big blast occurs. This results in the release of a huge amount of energy. This probably results in Earthquakes.
Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas
First of all, the shaking of the ground is the most notable effect of the Earthquake. Furthermore, ground rupture also occurs along with shaking. This results in severe damage to infrastructure facilities. The severity of the Earthquake depends upon the magnitude and distance from the epicenter. Also, the local geographical conditions play a role in determining the severity. Ground rupture refers to the visible breaking of the Earth’s surface.
Another significant effect of Earthquake is landslides. Landslides occur due to slope instability. This slope instability happens because of Earthquake.
Earthquakes can cause soil liquefaction. This happens when water-saturated granular material loses its strength. Therefore, it transforms from solid to a liquid. Consequently, rigid structures sink into the liquefied deposits.
Earthquakes can result in fires. This happens because Earthquake damages the electric power and gas lines. Above all, it becomes extremely difficult to stop a fire once it begins.
Earthquakes can also create the infamous Tsunamis. Tsunamis are long-wavelength sea waves. These sea waves are caused by the sudden or abrupt movement of large volumes of water. This is because of an Earthquake in the ocean. Above all, Tsunamis can travel at a speed of 600-800 kilometers per hour. These tsunamis can cause massive destruction when they hit the sea coast.
In conclusion, an Earthquake is a great and terrifying phenomenon of Earth. It shows the frailty of humans against nature. It is a tremendous occurrence that certainly shocks everyone. Above all, Earthquake lasts only for a few seconds but can cause unimaginable damage.
Q1 Why does an explosive Earthquake occurs?
A1 An explosive Earthquake occurs due to the testing of nuclear weapons.
Q2 Why do landslides occur because of Earthquake?
A2 Landslides happen due to slope instability. Most noteworthy, this slope instability is caused by an Earthquake.
Which class are you in.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
What to do before an earthquake.
COMMENTS
All About Earthquakes: The Science Behind Earthquakes. What is an earthquake? An earthquake is what happens when two blocks of the earth suddenly slip past one another. The surface where they slip is called the fault or fault plane. The location below the earth's surface where the earthquake starts is called the hypocenter, and the location ...
115 Earthquake Essay Topic Ideas & Examples. Earthquakes are a natural phenomenon that can have devastating effects on communities and infrastructure. For students studying geology, geography, or environmental science, writing an essay on earthquakes can provide a deeper understanding of the causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies associated ...
Explore the world of earthquakes and faults with our interactive middle school science lesson. Engage, learn, and create - all fully customizable and completely free to use.
Earthquakes. Parts of the Earth are always moving, usually so slowly that we do not feel anything. Most earthquakes happen when parts of the Earth move quickly: rocks break and slip along a fault (a crack in the Earth's surface). Aftershocks are the shocks that people feel for hours or even days after an earthquake. San Andreas Fault, California.
The Science of Earthquakes - the basics in brief. This Dynamic Earth: The Story of Plate Tectonics - comprehensive overview of plate tectonics with excellent graphics. This Dynamic Planet - World Map of Volcanoes, Earthquakes, Impact Craters, and Plate Tectonics. EQ101 Presentation - the basics with lots of images.
Can you give a brief overview of what your scientific work looks like and from what angle you approach Earthquakes? Bertrand: My research on earthquakes is focused on the topics of earthquake ...
Earth Science Education Activities — a wealth of excellent hands-on activities for teaching about earthquakes, volcanoes, seismic waves, plate tectonics, earth structure, seismic waves, convection, seismometers and more! (Purdue Univ.) Earthquakes — PodCasts, presentations and fact sheets on the basics of earthquakes. (The Geological Society)
This lecture and associated animations give a strong introduction to earthquakes--including earthquake waves, magnitude, intensity, USArray seismic data, and resulting hazards such as landslides, liquefaction, and building failure. It also includes some information on seismically resilient building design. It uses Alaska as the case study site. A similar lecture featuring the USA's ...
Earthquakes presentation Teacher's NotesEar. Key concepts: • To understand that the Earth is made from 4 different layers. • To understand why earthquakes happen. • To understand why earthquakes usually happen at plate boundaries. • To understand that earthquakes release seismic waves which can be measured using seismographs.
A multi-disciplinary view on earthquake science. Earthquakes are a natural hazard affecting millions of people globally every year. Researchers are working on understanding the mechanisms of ...
The presentation about earthquakes is divided into 2 separate discussions: The first covers the basics of earthquakes and seismology. The second presentation covers earthquake hazards and tsunamis.
Earthquake Presentation templates Welcome to our curated collection of the best earthquake-themed Google Slides themes and PowerPoint templates! Whether you're creating a presentation for an academic conference, a school project, or just need to educate your audience about seismic activity, we've got you covered.
Pete's PowerPoint Station is your destination for free PowerPoint presentations for kids and teachers about Earthquakes, and so much more.
Need a catchy title for an earthquake essay? ⚡ Here we've gathered best 143 research titles about earthquake added 🔝 earthquake essay examples for more inspiration.
A new generation of earthquake catalogs developed through supervised machine-learning illuminates earthquake activity with unprecedented detail. Application of unsupervised machine learning to ...
Conclusions— Achieving Earthquake Resilience The advent of NEHRP in 1977, together with its subsequent reauthorizations, added substantial resources for research in seismology, earthquake engineering, and social sciences with the goal of increasing knowledge for understanding the causes of earthquakes and reducing their impacts. In addition, the program improved coordination among federal ...
Earthquake focus and epicenter. What is an earthquake. Earthquakes and faults Movements that produce earthquakes are usually associated with large fractures in Earth's crust called faults Most of the motion along faults can be explained by the plate tectonics theory.
Earthquake. The surface of the Earth is made up of tectonic plates that lie beneath both the land and oceans of our planet. The movements of these plates can build mountains or cause volcanoes to erupt. The clash of these plates can also cause violent earthquakes, where Earth's surface shakes. Earthquakes are more common in some parts of the ...
A reliable and accurate method for earthquake prediction has the potential to save countless human lives. With that objective in mind, this paper looks into various methods to predict the ...
Simply speaking, Earthquake means the shaking of the Earth's surface. It is a sudden trembling of the surface of the Earth. Earthquakes certainly are a terrible natural disaster. Read Earthquake Essay here.
What to Do Before an Earthquake Make sure you have a fire extinguisher, first aid kit, a battery-powered radio, a flashlight, and extra batteries at home. Learn first aid. Learn how to turn off the gas, water, and electricity. Make up a plan of where to meet your family after an earthquake. Don't leave heavy objects on shelves (they'll fall during a quake). Anchor heavy furniture, cupboards ...