assignment of an obligation

• assignments basic law

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Read more about our firm

© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved  | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design

Assignment of Contract Rights: Everything You Need to Know

The assignment of contract rights happens when one party assigns the obligations and rights of their part of a legal agreement to a different party. 3 min read updated on September 19, 2022

The assignment of contract rights happens when one party assigns the obligations and rights of their part of a legal agreement to a different party. 

What Is an Assignment of Contract?

The party that currently holds rights and obligations in an existing contract is called the assignor and the party that is taking over that position in the contract is called the assignee. When assignment of contract takes place, the assignor usually wants to hand all of their duties over to a new individual or company, but the assignee needs to be fully aware of what they're taking on. 

Only tangible things like property and contract rights can be transferred or assigned . Most contracts allow for assignment or transfer of contract rights, but some will include a clause specifying that transfers are not permitted. 

If the contract does allow for assignments, the assignor isn't required to have the agreement of the other party in the contract but may transfer their rights whenever they want. Contract assignment does not affect the rights and responsibilities of either party involved in the contract. Just because rights are assigned or transferred doesn't mean that the duties of the contract no longer need to be carried out. 

Even after the assignor transfers their rights to another, they still remain liable if any issues arise unless otherwise noted in an agreement with the other party. 

The purpose for the assignment of contract rights is to change the contractual relationship, or privity , between two parties by replacing one party with a new party. 

How Do Contract Assignments Work?

Contract assignments are handled differently depending on certain aspects of the agreement and other factors. The language of the original contract plays a huge role because some agreements include clauses that don't allow for the assignment of contract rights or that require the consent of the other party before assignment can occur.

For example, if Susan has a contract with a local pharmacy to deliver her prescriptions each month and the pharmacy changes ownership, the new pharmacy can have Susan's contract assigned to them. As long as Susan continues to receive her medicine when she needs it, the contract continues on, but now Susan has an agreement with a new party. 

Some contracts specify that the liability of the agreement lies with the original parties, even if assignment of contract takes place. This happens when the assignor guarantees that the assignee will continue to perform  the duties required in the contract. That guarantee makes the assignor liable. 

Are Assignments Always Enforced?

Assignments of contract rights are usually enforceable, but will not be under these circumstances:

• Assignment is prohibited in the contract language, which is called an anti-assignment clause.
• Assignment of rights changes the foundational terms of the agreement.
• The assignment is illegal in some way.

If assignment of contract takes place, but the contract actually prohibits it, the assignment will automatically be voided. 

When a transfer of contract rights will somehow change the basics of the contract, assignment cannot happen. For instance, if risks are increased, value is decreased, or the ability for performance is affected, the assignment will probably not be enforced by the court. 

Basic Rights of Contract Assignments

Most contracts allow for assignments, but you'll want to double check a contract before signing if this is something you anticipate happening during the lifespan of your agreement. Contract law does impose strict rules and regulations regarding the assignment of contract rights, so it's important to be sure that any transfers of rights are fully legal before acting on them. 

Any business agreements should always outline provisions for contract assignments and be well-drafted to be sure that the agreement is effective and enforceable. 

Why Use Contract Assignments?

When an assignor hands over their contracts rights to an assignee, they are signing away their obligation to perform and putting that obligation on a new party. The other party involved in the contract should see no difference in how the agreement plays out. If performance is negatively affected by the assignment of rights, something is wrong. 

If a party in a contract can no longer perform their duties, it is better to assign their contractual rights to a party who can carry out the duties rather than breach contract. 

If you need help with the assignment of contract rights, you can  post your legal need  on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb. 

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

• Assignment of Rights Example
• Consent to Assignment
• Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
• Legal Assignment
• Assignment Contract Law
• Assignment Law
• Assignment Of Contracts
• Assignment and Novation Agreement: What You Need to Know
• Assignability Of Contracts
• What Is the Definition of Assigns

Understanding an assignment and assumption agreement

Need to assign your rights and duties under a contract? Learn more about the basics of an assignment and assumption agreement.

Get your assignment of agreement

by   Belle Wong, J.D.

Belle Wong, is a freelance writer specializing in small business, personal finance, banking, and tech/SAAS. She ...

Read more...

Updated on: November 24, 2023 · 3 min read

The assignment and assumption agreement

The basics of assignment and assumption, filling in the assignment and assumption agreement.

While every business should try its best to meet its contractual obligations, changes in circumstance can happen that could necessitate transferring your rights and duties under a contract to another party who would be better able to meet those obligations.

If you find yourself in such a situation, and your contract provides for the possibility of assignment, an assignment and assumption agreement can be a good option for preserving your relationship with the party you initially contracted with, while at the same time enabling you to pass on your contractual rights and duties to a third party.

An assignment and assumption agreement is used after a contract is signed, in order to transfer one of the contracting party's rights and obligations to a third party who was not originally a party to the contract. The party making the assignment is called the assignor, while the third party accepting the assignment is known as the assignee.

In order for an assignment and assumption agreement to be valid, the following criteria need to be met:

• The initial contract must provide for the possibility of assignment by one of the initial contracting parties.
• The assignor must agree to assign their rights and duties under the contract to the assignee.
• The assignee must agree to accept, or "assume," those contractual rights and duties.
• The other party to the initial contract must consent to the transfer of rights and obligations to the assignee.

A standard assignment and assumption contract is often a good starting point if you need to enter into an assignment and assumption agreement. However, for more complex situations, such as an assignment and amendment agreement in which several of the initial contract terms will be modified, or where only some, but not all, rights and duties will be assigned, it's a good idea to retain the services of an attorney who can help you draft an agreement that will meet all your needs.

When you're ready to enter into an assignment and assumption agreement, it's a good idea to have a firm grasp of the basics of assignment:

• First, carefully read and understand the assignment and assumption provision in the initial contract. Contracts vary widely in their language on this topic, and each contract will have specific criteria that must be met in order for a valid assignment of rights to take place.
• All parties to the agreement should carefully review the document to make sure they each know what they're agreeing to, and to help ensure that all important terms and conditions have been addressed in the agreement.
• Until the agreement is signed by all the parties involved, the assignor will still be obligated for all responsibilities stated in the initial contract. If you are the assignor, you need to ensure that you continue with business as usual until the assignment and assumption agreement has been properly executed.

Unless you're dealing with a complex assignment situation, working with a template often is a good way to begin drafting an assignment and assumption agreement that will meet your needs. Generally speaking, your agreement should include the following information:

• Identification of the existing agreement, including details such as the date it was signed and the parties involved, and the parties' rights to assign under this initial agreement
• The effective date of the assignment and assumption agreement
• Identification of the party making the assignment (the assignor), and a statement of their desire to assign their rights under the initial contract
• Identification of the third party accepting the assignment (the assignee), and a statement of their acceptance of the assignment
• Identification of the other initial party to the contract, and a statement of their consent to the assignment and assumption agreement
• A section stating that the initial contract is continued; meaning, that, other than the change to the parties involved, all terms and conditions in the original contract stay the same

In addition to these sections that are specific to an assignment and assumption agreement, your contract should also include standard contract language, such as clauses about indemnification, future amendments, and governing law.

Sometimes circumstances change, and as a business owner you may find yourself needing to assign your rights and duties under a contract to another party. A properly drafted assignment and assumption agreement can help you make the transfer smoothly while, at the same time, preserving the cordiality of your initial business relationship under the original contract.

You may also like

What Does 'Inc.' Mean in a Company Name?

'Inc.' in a company name means the business is incorporated, but what does that entail, exactly? Here's everything you need to know about incorporating your business.

October 9, 2023 · 10min read

How to Write a Will: A Comprehensive Guide to Will Writing

Writing a will is one of the most important things you can do for yourself and for your loved ones, and it can be done in just minutes. Are you ready to get started?

July 21, 2024 · 11min read

How to Start an LLC in 7 Easy Steps (2024 Guide)

2024 is one of the best years ever to start an LLC, and you can create yours in only a few steps.

July 29, 2024 · 22min read

Assignment Clauses: Transferring Contractual Rights and Obligations

Transferring contractual rights and obligations is a complex area of law that many find confusing.

This article will clearly explain assignment clauses, which allow the transfer of contractual rights and duties to third parties.

You'll learn the mechanics of how assignment works, the procedures and pitfalls to watch out for when assigning obligations, and practical guidance for drafting effective assignment provisions in your contracts.

Introduction to Assignment Clauses in Contracts

Assignment clauses allow parties to a contract to transfer their contractual rights and obligations to a third party. They provide a contractual basis for the assignment, detailing the terms and conditions under which it can occur.

Understanding the Contractual Basis of Assignment Clauses

Assignment clauses establish the permission and framework for transferring rights and duties under a contract. Key points:

• They provide the contractual grounds enabling assignments of a party's rights or delegation of their duties.
• Clauses outline requirements and restrictions , such as needing consent from the counterparty.
• They define the scope of transfer , clarifying what can and can't be assigned/delegated.
• Stipulate terms and conditions of assignment, like rights of original parties post-transfer.

The Role of Assignment Clauses in Transferring Contractual Rights and Obligations

Assignment clauses facilitate the transfer of rights and duties under a contract:

• Enable flexibility - Parties can assign rights/duties to meet changing needs.
• Allow monetization - Rights under lucrative contracts can be sold.
• Improve creditworthiness - Income streams can be used as collateral.
• Permit specialization - Duties can be delegated to more capable third parties.

Well-drafted clauses enhance commercial usefulness of contracts while protecting original parties.

General Rule and Restrictions on Assignment

The default legal position allows assignment of rights without consent, but duties cannot be delegated without counterparty consent. However, clauses often override defaults:

• Commonly require consent for assigning rights.
• May prohibit assignment outright in some/all cases.
• Can stipulate conditions enabling assignments e.g. credit checks.
• Override restrictions by expressly permitting assignments without consent.

Assignment vs. Novation: Distinguishing the Mechanisms for Transferring Contractual Obligations

Assignment transfers rights/duties without changing the contract. Novation replaces a contract with a new one:

• Under assignment , original contractual terms continue unchanged. Under novation , old contract is discharged and replaced.
• In assignment, rights/duties transfer separately. In novation, all rights/duties transfer together by replacing entire contract.
• With assignment, original party may retain duties/rights. With novation, original party's involvement ends entirely.

So novation discharges original contract, while assignment preserves existing terms.

Can contract rights legally be transferred by an assignment?

Yes, contract rights can legally be transferred from one party to another through a process called assignment. This allows the original party, known as the assignor, to transfer rights, obligations, benefits or property to another party, known as the assignee.

There are some key things to know about legally transferring contract rights via an assignment:

General Rule : Unless the contract states otherwise, either party to a contract typically has the power to assign their rights to a third party. This general rule allows free assignability.

Prior Written Consent : Many contracts contain clauses requiring the counterparty's prior written consent before assignment is allowed. This restricts free assignability.

Continuing Obligations : When assigning rights, any continuing obligations under the contract must also be transferred to the assignee unless otherwise agreed. The assignor's obligations will generally terminate.

Novation : Assignment only transfers rights/obligations to the assignee. The original counterparty still remains a party to the contract. Novation is required to substitute the assignee entirely for the assignor.

So in summary, contractual rights can legally be assigned from one party to another with some limitations. Any restrictions on assignment freedom should be clearly spelled out in the contract language itself. Proper novation procedures may also be required for a complete transfer.

What is the assignment of rights and obligations clause?

An assignment clause allows one party to a contract (the assignor) to transfer the rights and obligations under the contract to a third party (the assignee). This transfers all rights and obligations to the new party.

Some key things to know about assignment clauses:

The assignor can only transfer rights and benefits, not burdens or liabilities. The original party still bears responsibilities.

Assignments usually require consent from the other original contracting party. Often the contract specifies the assignor must obtain prior written consent before assigning.

Rights refers to the right to enforce performance of obligations. Obligations refers to the responsibility to perform duties under the contract.

An assignment does not discharge the assignor of obligations unless there is a novation. The assignor remains liable in case the assignee defaults.

Certain rights and obligations can be specified to not transfer. These are called non-assignable rights and survive assignment.

So in summary, an assignment clause permits a contractual transfer of rights and obligations to a new party, with some limitations around consent, novation, non-assignable rights, etc. It is an important clause governing changes in parties bound by the contract.

What are assignments of contracts and what rights and obligations do they confer?

An assignment of contract allows one party to a contract to transfer their contractual rights and obligations to a third party. This transfers the benefits and burdens of the contract to the new party.

The key things to know about assigning contracts are:

The party wishing to assign the contract must get prior written consent from the other contracting party before assigning their rights and obligations.

Once assigned, the new party takes on all the rights and obligations under the contract. They step into the shoes of the original party.

The original party may still be liable under the contract if the new party doesn't fulfil the obligations. This depends on the specifics of the assignment agreement.

Certain rights and obligations can be drafted to not transfer through assignments. These include confidentiality clauses, non-compete clauses, etc.

So in summary, assigning a contract transfers a party's contractual rights and obligations to a new third party with the prior consent of the counterparty. The new party assumes those rights and obligations going forward.

What is the assignment of contractual obligations?

The assignment of contractual obligations refers to the transfer of rights and duties associated with a contract from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This allows the original party to the contract to essentially hand over their place in the agreement to a new party.

There are a few key things to know about assigning contracts:

The assignor must obtain consent from the other contracting party before assigning the contract. This is usually done through a prior written consent clause in the original agreement.

All rights and obligations under the contract transfer to the assignee. They step into the shoes of the assignor and take on those responsibilities.

The assignment does not terminate the contract. The agreement remains intact and binding upon the new assignee.

Certain service contracts may limit or prohibit assignment altogether if duties rely heavily on the identity, skills, or qualifications of the contracting parties.

Overall, assignment clauses allow for the flexible transfer of contractual rights and duties to new parties over the course of a contract term. However, consent and notification requirements should be strictly followed to ensure a smooth transition.

sbb-itb-e93bf99

The mechanics of assignment: transferring contractual rights, assignment of all rights: the scope and extent.

An assignment clause allows a party to a contract (the assignor) to transfer all or some of their rights under the contract to a third party (the assignee). The clause typically specifies the scope of rights that can be assigned.

For example, an assignment clause may state that the assignor has the right to assign "all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement". This broad language enables the assignor to transfer their entire bundle of contractual rights - including payment rights, intellectual property rights, access rights etc. - to the assignee.

On the other hand, a narrower assignment clause may limit transferrable rights to specific obligations, like payment collection. Defining the breadth of assignable rights is important for both parties to understand what can or cannot be transferred to a third party under the contract.

Prior Written Consent for Assignment: When and Why It's Necessary

Many assignment clauses require the assignor to obtain the other party's prior written consent before assigning contractual rights. This consent requirement enables the non-assigning party to vet and approve the assignee to ensure they can fulfill the contract satisfactorily.

Requiring prior written consent prevents unauthorized transfers that could allow an unsuitable third party to acquire rights without the other party's endorsement. For example, a software company may want to review a proposed assignee's technical capabilities before consenting for them to be assigned a complex software license.

However, prior consent requirements can deter free transferability of contractual rights. Consequently, the assignment clause may specify certain conditions where no consent is necessary for assignment - like transfers to corporate affiliates or subsidiaries.

The Impact of Assignment on Parties' Rights and Obligations

When an authorized assignment occurs, the assignor transfers all relevant rights and obligations defined in the assignment clause to the assignee. The assignee legally assumes those rights and duties previously held by the assignor.

Consequently, the assignee gains the contractual rights to any outstanding payments owed to the assignor by the other contracting party. The assignee can then collect those payments directly.

Moreover, the assignor remains obligated to complete any duties under the contract not transferred to the assignee. For complex contracts, an accompanying assignment and assumption agreement clearly delineates each party's specific ongoing rights and obligations after assignment.

Executing an Assignment and Assumption Agreement

Properly executing an assignment of contractual rights involves signing an assignment and assumption agreement that contractually transfers those rights from the assignor to the assignee.

Key steps include:

The assignor and assignee mutually agree to the proposed assignment in writing

All parties sign an assignment and assumption agreement detailing the rights and duties transferred from the assignor to the assignee

The other contracting party provides prior written consent to the assignment, if required under the contract

The executed agreement is properly delivered to the concerned parties

An assignment and assumption agreement clarifies each party's rights and obligations going forward. Recording the agreement provides legal documentation of the transfer should any dispute arise.

Following proper protocols for executing assignment agreements helps ensure smooth transitions of contractual rights between parties.

Assigning Contractual Obligations: Procedures and Pitfalls

Transferring contractual obligations from one party to another can be complex. Here are some key considerations when assigning obligations to ensure a smooth transition.

NOVATION: A Distinct Path for Transferring Contractual Obligations

Novation provides an alternative route to assign obligations, discharging the existing contract and creating a new one between the transferee and the other party. This requires consent from all involved. Novation releases the transferor from future liability, while assignment may not.

Agent May Assign: Delegating Duties and Responsibilities

An agent authorized to make contracts on behalf of another can delegate duties and responsibilities to a new agent, but only if the contract expressly permits it. The new agent assumes all delegated obligations. The original agent remains liable if the new agent fails to perform.

Continuing Rights and Obligations After Assignment

Some rights and duties may survive assignment. For example, confidentiality obligations often continue post-assignment. And if payment obligations transfer but breach later, the harmed party can still seek recourse from the original obligor.

The Requirement for Consent of the Other Party in Obligation Transfers

Generally, the other contract party must consent before obligations transfer to a new entity. Consent protects parties from being bound to unknown or unsuitable new obligors. If obligations shift without consent, the other party can sue for breach.

In summary, assigning obligations requires care to avoid legal pitfalls. Following proper procedures will ensure smooth transfers and prevent disputes. Key considerations include limitations on delegation, gaining consent, and managing continuing duties.

Termination of Rights and Obligations: Assignment Clauses and Contract Endings

Understanding termination of rights and obligations upon assignment.

When a party assigns their rights or obligations under a contract to a third party, it can impact when and how the contract terminates. Generally, an assignment itself does not automatically terminate the contract. However, many contracts include provisions detailing when rights and obligations will terminate, and these may be affected by an assignment.

For example, some contracts state that if a party assigns the agreement without consent, it constitutes a breach allowing the non-assigning party to terminate. Other agreements may specify certain rights and duties end upon assignment while others survive. Analyzing termination and survival clauses closely is key to understanding the interplay with assignments.

Survival of Rights and Obligations: What Persists Post-Assignment

Even after an assignment, some contractual rights and duties may continue rather than terminating entirely. Common examples include confidentiality, non-compete clauses, warranties, and indemnification. The contract may state these obligations survive assignment and continue to bind the original party or the assignee post-transfer.

When drafting assignment agreements, clearly specifying which rights and responsibilities will remain with the assignor versus shifting to the assignee is crucial. Without clarity, disputes may arise over who bears ongoing duties after an assignment. Careful contract wording can prevent this.

Assignment Subject to Clause: Ensuring Compliance with Existing Terms

Most contracts contain language stipulating assignment is "subject to terms and conditions herein." This means any assignment must comply with all clauses governing transferability per the original agreement. These generally include provisions requiring consent, restricting assignment, or allowing assignment only to approved entities.

Attempting to assign a contract while violating its internal clauses risks breach. Parties looking to assign must carefully analyze the original terms first, then structure the assignment to align. This maintains compliance and prevents disputes over nonconformant assignments.

The Effect of Assignment on Termination Triggers

Beyond endings stipulated in termination clauses, contracts may list events triggering optional or automatic termination. Common examples include bankruptcy, corporate dissolution, and change in control. Assigning a contract can impact these provisions.

For instance, an acquisition causing a change in control could enable the non-assigning party to terminate. Or assignment during bankruptcy proceedings could alter the application of related termination triggers. Understanding these interdependencies ensures parties can assess the full scope of assignment's effects.

Practical Guidelines for Assignment Clauses

How to secure the right to assignment: practical steps.

To secure the contractual right to assignment, parties should take the following key steps:

Explicitly state in the contract that each party has the right to assign all or part of the agreement. This establishes the baseline right to assign.

Specify any required consents needed for assignment, such as written consent from the non-assigning party. This clarifies the parameters around exercising the right.

Indicate when consent is not required , for instance, assignment to a subsidiary or affiliate. This carves out permissions.

Note any partial assignments that are allowed or prohibited. This prevents confusion on splitting up rights.

Outline notice procedures for informing the other party of an assignment. This enables proper communication.

Following these practical steps will ensure all parties understand and secure the rights around assignment.

Assignment Clauses: Binding Upon Successors and Assigns

Assignment clauses can bind both a party's successors and assigns to the contract terms through careful drafting. Here are two key methods:

Explicitly state the contract is "binding upon and inures to the benefit of the parties permitted successors and assigns." This directly binds them.

Include successors and assigns in the definition of the "parties", then note rights and obligations are "binding on the parties." This indirectly binds them.

However, successors have no obligations under the contract until they assume those obligations through a formal assumption agreement. So while they may be bound, explicit assignment and assumption is key.

Drafting an Assignment Clause: Essential Elements and Considerations

When drafting an assignment clause, four key elements require consideration:

Right to Assign - Define which rights can and cannot be assigned under the agreement. Be as explicit as possible.

Required Consents - Note any consents from the non-assigning party required to assign the rights. Detail notification procedures.

Binding Effect - State if successors and assigns will be bound by the terms. Specify any assumption procedures.

Exceptions - Carve out any scenario such as assignment to affiliates where consent is not needed.

Additionally, parties should align on governing laws, partial assignments, and continuing obligations in case of termination. Covering these elements will lead to a robust assignment clause.

Negotiating Assignment Clauses: Balancing Flexibility and Control

When negotiating assignment clauses, parties are balancing two competing interests - the assignor wants flexibility, while the assignee wants control. Here are two strategies to achieve both:

Consent Parameters - The assignee may request full consent rights over assignments. A compromise is only requiring consent in specified reasonable situations.

Notice Procedures - The assignor may not want burdensome consent procedures. A compromise is consent when given reasonable advance notice.

Additionally, limiting assignments to list of approved entities, requiring assumption agreements, or excluding select rights from assignment can provide more control.

Carefully negotiating these aspects can lead to clauses that provide flexibility while still giving parties oversight over assignments.

Conclusion: Embracing Assignment Clauses in Contractual Agreements

Summarizing the importance of assignment clauses.

Assignment clauses play a pivotal role in modern contractual agreements by enabling the transfer of contractual rights and obligations between parties. They provide flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances over the course of a contract. Key takeaways regarding the importance of assignment clauses include:

They facilitate transactions like mergers, acquisitions, or sales of business assets by transferring contracts to new owners. This promotes business growth and development.

They allow the original contracting party to bring in a more capable or specialized assignee to fulfill the contract. This optimizes contract performance.

They give parties an "exit strategy" to extract themselves from unwanted contracts through assignment. This mitigates risk.

They enable the continuation of contracts even when the original parties undergo significant corporate changes. This promotes stability.

In summary, embracing well-drafted assignment clauses generates significant strategic advantages for all contracting parties.

Reflecting on the Benefits and Risks of Transferring Rights and Obligations

The transfer of contractual rights and obligations certainly can yield major benefits, but also carries notable risks requiring careful evaluation, such as:

Potential Benefits

• Access specialized expertise or capabilities from assignee
• Flexibility to change course as circumstances evolve
• Facilitate major transactions and corporate changes

Potential Risks

• Breach of confidentiality by assignee
• Lack of consent from counterparty for assignment
• Assignee lacks competence to fulfill obligations

Ultimately, with proper risk assessment and mitigation, the benefits will generally outweigh the risks. But all parties must approach the transfer thoughtfully.

Ensuring Clarity and Compliance: Final Thoughts on Assignment Provisions

When drafting assignment clauses, clarity regarding rights, risks, and responsibilities is paramount. Key considerations include:

• Specifying any rights or obligations excluded from assignment
• Requiring prior written consent of counterparties for assignment
• Addressing legal and regulatory compliance issues
• Mitigating risks like confidentiality breaches or lack of competence

With well-crafted assignment provisions that address these areas, businesses can harness the flexibility and strategic power of contractual transfers with greater confidence and reduced risk.

Related posts

• Novation: Legal Concept Explained
• Severability Clauses: Ensuring Contract Validity
• Protecting Your Assets: Property Division Clauses in Divorce

Managing Vendors in Bill.com: A Simple Guide

PracticePanther vs SmokeBall: A Comparative Review

Top Financial Close Software for Accountants

Unlock the talent your business deserves.

Hire Accounting and Finance Professionals from South America.

• Start Interviewing For Free

Primary tabs

Assign is the act of transferring rights , property , or other benefits to another party (the assignee ) from the party who holds such benefits under contract (the assignor). This concept is used in both  contract  and property law . 

Contract Law  

Under contract law, when one party assigns a  contract , the assignment represents both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of  duties . 

• For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C. 
• Here, A has both: (1) assigned A’s rights under the contract to the $50; and (2) delegated A’s  duty  to teach guitar, to C. 
• In this example, A is both the “assignor” and the “delegee” who delegates  the duties to another (C), C is known as the “ obligor ” who must perform the  obligations  to the  assignee , and B is the assignee who is owed duties and is liable to the obligor.

Assigning of Rights/Duties Under Contract Law

There are a few notable rules regarding assignments under contract law. 

First, if an individual has not yet secured the contract to perform duties to another, they cannot assign their future right to an assignee. 

• That is, if A has not yet contracted with B to teach B guitar, A cannot assign their rights to C. 

Second, rights cannot be assigned when they  materially change the obligor’s duty and rights. 

Third, the obligor can sue the assignee directly if the assignee does not pay them. 

• Following the previous example, this means that C ( obligor ) can sue B ( assignee ) if C teaches guitar to B, but B does not pay C $50 in return.

Delegation of Duties

If the promised performance requires a rare genius or skill, then the delegee cannot delegate it to the obligor. It can only be delegated if the promised  performance  is more commonplace. Further, an obligee can sue if the  assignee  does not perform.  However, the delegee is  secondarily liable  unless there has been an  express   release  of the delegee. 

• Meaning if B does want C to teach guitar but C refuses to, then B can sue C. If C still refuses to perform, then B can compel A to fulfill the duties under secondary liability.

Lastly, a related concept is  novation , which is when a new obligor substitutes and releases an old obligor.  If novation occurs, then the original obligor’s duties are wiped out. Novation requires an original obligee’s  consent . 

Property Law

Under  property law , assignment typically arises in landlord-tenant situations.

• For example, A might be renting from landlord B but wants another party (C) to take over the property. 
• In this scenario, A might choose between  assigning  and  subleasing  the property to C. 
• If  assigning , A would give C the entire balance of the term , with no reversion to anyone; whereas if  subleasing , A would give C the property for a limited period of the remaining term.
• Under assignment, C would have  privity  of  estate  with the landlord while under a sublease, C would not. 

[Last updated in June of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team ]

• business law
• property & real estate law
• business sectors
• commercial transactions
• property law
• wex articles
• wex definitions

Choose Your Legal Category:

• Online Law Library
•   Bankruptcy Law
•   Business Law
•   Civil Law
•   Criminal Law
•   Employment Law
•   Family Law
•   Finance Law
•   Government Law
•   Immigration Law
•   Insurance Law
•   Intellectual Property Law
•   Personal Injury Law
•   Products & Services Law
•   Real Estate Law
•   Wills, Trusts & Estates Law
•   Attorney Referral Services
•   Top 10 Most Popular Articles
•   Legal Dictionary
• How It Works - Clients
• Legal Center
• About LegalMatch
• Consumer Satisfaction
• Editorial Policy
• Attorneys Market Your Law Practice Attorney Login Schedule a Demo Now Did LegalMatch Call You Recently? How It Works - Attorneys Attorney Resources Attorney Success Stories Attorney Success Story Videos Compare Legal Marketing Services Cases Heatmap View Cases
• Find a Lawyer
• Legal Topics
• Contract Law

Contract Assignments

(This may not be the same place you live)

  What is a Contract Assignment?

In a contract assignment, one of the two parties to a contract may transfer their right to the other’s performance to a third party. This is known as “contract assignment.” Generally, all rights under a contract may be assigned. A provision in the contract that states the contract may not be assigned usually refers to the delegation of the assignor’s (person who assigns) duties under that contract, not their rights under the contract. 

In modern law, the phrase “assignment of contract” usually means assignment of both rights and duties under a contract.

Who are the Various Parties Involved in a Contract Assignment?

How is a contract assignment created, when is a contract assignment prohibited, which parties are liable to each other in a contract assignment, are there issues with multiple assignments, should i hire a lawyer for contract assignments.

In a contract, there are two parties to the agreement, X and Y. The parties may agree to let X assign X’s rights to a third party . Once the third party enters the picture, each party has a special name. For instance, suppose X, a seller of bookmarks, contracts with Y, a purchaser of bookmarks. Y desires to have Y’s right to X’s performance (the sale of bookmarks on a monthly basis) to another person. 

This third person, Z, is called the assignee. X is called the obligor , and Y is called the assignor , since Y has assigned its right to X’s performance . X, the obligor, is obligated to continue to perform its duties under the agreement.

There are no “magic words” needed to create an assignment. The law simply requires that the would-be assignor have an intent to immediately and completely transfer their rights in the agreement. In addition, writing is typically not required to create an assignment. As long as X and Y both adequately understand what right is being assigned, an assignment is created. 

Words that indicate a transfer is to take place suffice, such as “I intend to transfer my rights under this agreement,” or, “I intend to give my rights to Z,” or “I intend to confer an assignment on Z.” In addition,consideration,which is a bargained-for exchange required for a contract to be valid, is not required for assignment.

In certain instances, an assignment of contract rights can be prohibited. If the contract contains a clause prohibiting assignment of “the contract,” without specifying more, the law construes this language as barring only delegation of the assignor’s duties, not their rights. If the assignment language states “assignment of contractual rights are prohibited,” the obligor may sue for damages if the assignor attempts to assign the agreement. If the contract language states that attempts to assign “will be void,” the parties can bar assignment.of rights.

Under modern contract law, the phrase “I assign the contract” is usually interpreted to mean that one is assigning rights and duties. What is an assignment of duties? An assignment of duties occurs where Y, called the obligor or delegator, promises to perform for X, the obligee. Y then delegates their duty to perform to Z, the delegate. Under the law, most duties can be delegated. 

There are exceptions to this rule. Delegation can be prohibited when:

• The duties to be performed involve personal judgment and special skill (e.g., a portrait, creation of a custom-made dress). 
• “Personal judgment” is the exercise of some kind of superior judgment when it comes to determining how, when, or where to do something. Examples of individuals who exercise personal judgment include talent scouts and financial advisors.  Special skill is the unique ability to create a good or perform a service. A delegator can be prohibited from delegating duties when it is that specific delegator’s services are sought. For example, if the services of a specific famous chef are sought, and the original agreement was entered into on the understanding that the chef was hired for their specific talent, the delegator may not delegate the services;
• The assignment fundamentally changes risks or responsibilities under the agreement;
• The assignment is over future rights associated with a future contract that does not currently exist;
• Delegation would increase the obligation of the obligee. For example, if a shoe manufacturer contracts to deliver soles to a store in the same town as the shoe factory, the other party cannot assign the delivery to a different store in another state. Doing so would impose a greater obligation on the obligee than was originally contemplated;
• The obligee had placed special trust in the delegator. For example, assume that you have hired a patent attorney, based on that attorney’s significant skill and expertise, to obtain a valuable patent. You have placed special trust in this person, hiring them instead of other patent attorneys, because of their unique expertise. In such a situation, the attorney may not delegate his duties to another attorney (delegate), since the attorney was hired because of one person’s special capabilities;
• The delegation is of a promise to repay a debt; or
• The contract itself restricts or prohibits delegation. If the contract states, “any attempt to delegate duties under this contract is void,” a delegation will not be permitted.

In a contract involving assignment of rights, the assignee may sue the obligor. This is because the assignee, once the assignee has been assigned rights, is entitled to performance under the contract. If the obligor had a defense that existed in the original contract between obligor and assignor, the obligor may assert that defense against the assignee. Examples of such defenses include the original contract was not valid because of lack of consideration, or because there was never a valid offer or acceptance).

An assignee may also sue an assignor. Generally, if an assignment is made for consideration,it is irrevocable. Assignments not made for consideration, but under which an obligor has already performed, are also irrevocable. If an assignor attempts to revoke an irrevocable assignment,the assignee may sue for “wrongful revocation.” 

In circumstances involving delegation of duties,an obligee must accept performance from the delegate of all duties that may be delegated. The delegator remains liable on the agreement. Therefore, the obligee may sue the delegator for nonperformance by the delegate. The obligee may sue the delegate for nonperformance, but can only require the delegate to perform if there has been an assumption by the delegate. An assumption by the delegate is a promise that the delegate will perform the delegated duty, which promise is supported by consideration. 

Assignments that are not supported by consideration are revocable. If an initial assignment is revocable, a subsequent assignment can revoke it. If a first assignment is irrevocable, because consideration was present,the first assignment will usually prevail over a subsequent assignment. This means the person who can claim the assignment was first made to them will prevail over someone who claims a subsequent assignment. 

If, however, the second person paid value for the assignment, and entered into the assignment without knowing of the first assignment, the “subsequent”assignee is entitled to proceeds the first judgment against the obligor (the original party who still must perform), in the event such a judgment is issued,

If you have an issue with assignment of rights or duties under a contract, you should contact a contract lawyer  for advice. An experienced business lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, advise you of your rights, and represent you in court proceedings.

Save Time and Money - Speak With a Lawyer Right Away

• Buy one 30-minute consultation call or subscribe for unlimited calls
• Subscription includes access to unlimited consultation calls at a reduced price
• Receive quick expert feedback or review your DIY legal documents
• Have peace of mind without a long wait or industry standard retainer
• Get the right guidance - Schedule a call with a lawyer today!

Need a Contract Lawyer in your Area?

• Connecticut
• Massachusetts
• Mississippi
• New Hampshire
• North Carolina
• North Dakota
• Pennsylvania
• Rhode Island
• South Carolina
• South Dakota
• West Virginia

Daniel Lebovic

LegalMatch Legal Writer

Original Author

Prior to joining LegalMatch, Daniel worked as a legal editor for a large HR Compliance firm, focusing on employer compliance in numerous areas of the law including workplace safety law, health care law, wage and hour law, and cybersecurity. Prior to that, Daniel served as a litigator for several small law firms, handling a diverse caseload that included cases in Real Estate Law (property ownership rights, residential landlord/tenant disputes, foreclosures), Employment Law (minimum wage and overtime claims, discrimination, workers’ compensation, labor-management relations), Construction Law, and Commercial Law (consumer protection law and contracts). Daniel holds a J.D. from the Emory University School of Law and a B.S. in Biological Sciences from Cornell University. He is admitted to practice law in the State of New York and before the State Bar of Georgia. Daniel is also admitted to practice before the United States Courts of Appeals for both the 2nd and 11th Circuits. You can learn more about Daniel by checking out his Linkedin profile and his personal page. Read More

Jose Rivera, J.D.

Managing Editor

Related Articles

• Acceleration Clause Lawyers
• What is Rescission of Contract?
• When Is a Contract Considered Void or Voidable?
• Illegal Contract Lawyers
• Nominal Damages in a Contracts Claim
• Breach of Contract Defense: Laches
• Breach of Contract Defenses: Unclean Hands
• Material Breach of Contract and Lawsuits
• Breaching vs. Non-Breaching Parties in a Contract
• What is a Contract?
• Fraudulent Inducement
• Contract Law: Fraud Cases
• Limitation of Liability Clauses in Construction Contracts
• Homeowners Hiring Unlicensed Contractors
• Business Licenses for Independent Contractors
• State Statute of Limitations for a Breach of Contract Action
• Email Contracts
• Employer Liability for Wage Violations of Subcontractors
• Employee or Independent Contractor?
• Tax Requirements for Independent Contractors
• Statutory Damages in Breach of Contract Cases
• Hiring an Independent Contractor
• Attorney's Fees in Breach of Contract Cases
• What Is the Proper Court for a Breach of Contract Lawsuit?
• Exclusive Dealing Contracts
• Defenses to Breach of Employment Contract
• Real Estate Contracts: Exclusive Right to Sell
• Exculpatory Clauses
• Exterminators Breach of Contract Liability
• Negligent Misrepresentation

Discover the Trustworthy LegalMatch Advantage

• No fee to present your case
• Choose from lawyers in your area
• A 100% confidential service

How does LegalMatch work?

Law Library Disclaimer

16 people have successfully posted their cases

Search for:

Jump straight to:

Please enter a search term

What sectors are you interested in?

We can use your selection to show you more of the content that you’re interested in.

Sign-up and we’ll remember your preferences

Sign-up to follow topics, sectors, people and also have the option to receive a weekly update of lastest news across your areas of interest.

Got an account already? Sign in

Want to speak to an advisor from your closest office?

Out-law / your daily need-to-know.

Out-Law Guide 4 min. read

Assignment and novation

19 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm

Assignment involves the transfer of an interest or benefit from one person to another. However the 'burden', or obligations, under a contract cannot be transferred.

Assignment in construction contracts

As noted above only the benefits of a contract can be assigned - not the burden. In the context of a building contract:

• the employer may assign its right to have the works constructed, and its right to sue the contractor in the event that the works are defective – but not its obligation to pay for the works;
• the contractor may assign its right to payment of the contract sum - but not its obligation to construct the works in accordance with the building contract or its obligation to meet any valid claims, for example for defects.

After assignment, the assignee is entitled to the benefit of the contract and to bring proceedings against the other contracting party to enforce its rights. The assignor still owes obligations to the other contracting party, and will remain liable to perform any part of the contract that still has to be fulfilled since the burden cannot be assigned. In practice, what usually happens is that the assignee takes over the performance of the contract with effect from assignment and the assignor will generally ask to be indemnified against any breach or failure to perform by the assignee.  The assignor will remain liable for any past liabilities incurred before the assignment.

In construction contracts, the issue of assignment often arises in looking at whether collateral warranties granted to parties outside of the main construction contract can be assigned.

Funders may require the developer to assign contractual rights against the contractor and the design team as security to the funder, as well as the benefit of performance bonds and parent company guarantees. The developer may assign such rights to the purchaser either during or after completion of the construction phase.

Contractual assignment provisions

Many contracts exclude or qualify the right to assignment, and the courts have confirmed that a clause which provides that a party to a contract may not assign the benefit of that contract without the consent of the other party is legally effective and will extend to all rights and benefits arising under the contract, including the right to any remedies. Other common qualifications on the right to assign include:

• a restriction on assignment without the consent of the other party, whether or not such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed;
• only one of the parties may assign;
• only certain rights may be assigned – for example, warranties and indemnities may be excluded;
• a limit on the number of assignments - as is almost always the case in respect of collateral warranties;
• a right to assign only to a named assignee or class of assignee.

Note that in some agreements where there is a prohibition on assignment, it is sometimes possible to find the reservation of specific rights to create a trust or establish security over the subject matter of the agreement instead.

Legal and equitable assignment

The Law of Property Act creates the ability to legally assign a debt or any other chose in action where the debtor, trustee or other relevant person is notified in writing. If the assignment complied with the formalities in the Act it is a legal assignment, otherwise it will be an equitable assignment.

Some transfers can only take effect as an equitable assignment, for example:

• an oral assignment;
• an assignment by way of charge;
• an assignment of only part of the chosen in action;
• an assignment of which notice has not been given to the debtor;
• an agreement to assign.

If the assignment is equitable rather than legal, the assignor cannot enforce the assigned property in its own name and to do so must join the assignee in any action. This is designed to protect the debtor from later proceedings brought by the assignor or another assignee from enforcing the action without notice of the earlier assignment.

Security assignments

Using assignment as a way of taking security requires special care, as follows:

• if the assignment is by way of charge, the assignor retains the right to sue for any loss it suffers caused by a breach of the other contract party;
• if there is an outright assignment coupled with an entitlement to a re-assignment back once the secured obligation has been performed, it is an assignment by way of legal mortgage.

Please see our separate Out-Law guide for more information on types of security.

Restrictions on assignment

There are restrictions on the assignment of certain types of interest on public policy grounds, as follows:

• certain personal contracts – for example, a contract for the employment of a personal servant or for the benefit of a motor insurance policy cannot be assigned;
• a bare cause of action or 'right to sue' where the assignee has no commercial interest in the subject matter of the underlying transaction cannot be assigned;
• certain rights conferred by statute – for example, a liquidator's powers to bring wrongful trading proceedings against a director – cannot be assigned;
• an assignment of a contract may not necessarily transfer the benefit of an arbitration agreement contained in the contract;
• the assignment of certain rights is regulated – for example, the assignment of company shares or copyright.

If you want to transfer the burden of a contract as well as the benefits under it, you have to novate. Like assignment, novation transfers the benefits under a contract but unlike assignment, novation transfers the burden under a contract as well.

In a novation the original contract is extinguished and is replaced by a new one in which a third party takes up rights and obligations which duplicate those of one of the original parties to the contract. Novation does not cancel past rights and obligations under the original contract, although the parties can agree to novate these as well.

Novation is only possible with the consent of the original contracting parties as well as the new party. Consideration (the 'price' paid, whether financial or otherwise, by the new party in return for the contract being novated to it) must be provided for this new contract unless the novation is documented in a deed signed by all three parties.

• Construction Contracts
• Construction
• Government and public sector
• Real Estate
• Technology, Science & Industry
• United Kingdom

Contact an adviser

Graham Alty

Latest News

Ico examines businesses’ gen-ai data protection responsibilities, dutch competition authority to take action against fake review sellers, banks in the netherlands allowed to cooperate in developing esg reporting standards, the impact of the new eu mass actions directive across europe, introduction to stamp duty, don't miss a thing.

Sign-up to receive the latest news, analysis and events direct to your e-mail inbox

You might also like

Out-Law News

UK Budget 2024: general election battle lines become clearer

The UK chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Budget speech on Wednesday, and the response of Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer to it, provide an insight into how the forthcoming UK general election campaign will be fought, an expert in public policy has said.

UK announces Energy Charter Treaty withdrawal, citing need to focus on net zero strategy

The UK has announced that it will leave the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), due to what it described as the failure of efforts to align the Treaty with its net zero commitments.

UK government calls for enhanced cyber security system governance

Announcements from the UK government and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) show aims of enhancing governance in cyber security control management systems with hopes of more appropriate protection for firms, an expert has said.

UK government plans to revamp holiday pay calculation for part-year workers

Out-Law Analysis

Pensions disputes: managing member expectations paramount

UK subsidy control post-Brexit: access to effective judicial remedies

'Steps of court' settlement was not negligent, court rules

'Vast majority' of companies not seeking to avoid tax

'World first' industrial decarbonisation strategy developed in the UK

3D printing: UK product safety issues

5G potential for business highlighted in UK funding programme

Sectors and what we do

Sectors we work in.

• Financial Services
• Infrastructure
• Your assets
• Your company
• Your finance
• Your legal team and resource
• Your people
• Your risks and regulatory environment

Your privacy matters to us

We use cookies that are essential for our site to work. To improve our site, we would like to use additional cookies to help us understand how visitors use it, measure traffic to our site from social media platforms and to personalise your experience. Some of the cookies that we use are provided by third parties. To accept all cookies click ‘accept all’. To reject all optional cookies click ‘reject all’. To choose which optional cookies to allow click ‘cookie settings’. This tool uses a cookie to remember your choices. Please visit our cookie policy for more information.

• Search Search Please fill out this field.
• Building Your Business
• Operations & Success

What Is an Assignment of Contract?

Assignment of Contract Explained

Hero Images / Getty Images

Assignment of contract allows one person to assign, or transfer, their rights, obligations, or property to another. An assignment of contract clause is often included in contracts to give either party the opportunity to transfer their part of the contract to someone else in the future. Many assignment clauses require that both parties agree to the assignment.

Learn more about assignment of contract and how it works.

What Is Assignment of Contract?

Assignment of contract means the contract and the property, rights, or obligations within it can be assigned to another party. An assignment of contract clause can typically be found in a business contract. This type of clause is common in contracts with suppliers or vendors and in intellectual property (patent, trademark , and copyright) agreements.

How Does Assignment of Contract Work?

An assignment may be made to anyone, but it is typically made to a subsidiary or a successor. A subsidiary is a business owned by another business, while a successor is the business that follows a sale, acquisition, or merger.

Let’s suppose Ken owns a lawn mowing service and he has a contract with a real estate firm to mow at each of their offices every week in the summer. The contract includes an assignment clause, so when Ken goes out of business, he assigns the contract to his sister-in-law Karrie, who also owns a lawn mowing service.

Before you try to assign something in a contract, check the contract to make sure it's allowed, and notify the other party in the contract.

Assignment usually is included in a specific clause in a contract. It typically includes transfer of both accountability and responsibility to another party, but liability usually remains with the assignor (the person doing the assigning) unless there is language to the contrary.

What Does Assignment of Contract Cover?

Generally, just about anything of value in a contract can be assigned, unless there is a specific law or public policy disallowing the assignment.

Rights and obligations of specific people can’t be assigned because special skills and abilities can’t be transferred. This is called specific performance.   For example, Billy Joel wouldn't be able to transfer or assign a contract to perform at Madison Square Garden to someone else—they wouldn't have his special abilities.

Assignments won’t stand up in court if the assignment significantly changes the terms of the contract. For example, if Karrie’s business is tree trimming, not lawn mowing, the contract can’t be assigned to her.

Assigning Intellectual Property

Intellectual property (such as copyrights, patents, and trademarks) has value, and these assets are often assigned. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) says patents are personal property and that patent rights can be assigned. Trademarks, too, can be assigned. The assignment must be registered with the USPTO's Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS) .  

The U.S. Copyright Office doesn't keep a database of copyright assignments, but they will record the document if you follow their procedure.

Alternatives to Assignment of Contract

There are other types of transfers that may be functional alternatives to assignment.

Licensing is an agreement whereby one party leases the rights to use a piece of property (for example, intellectual property) from another. For instance, a business that owns a patent may license another company to make products using that patent.  

Delegation permits someone else to act on your behalf. For example, Ken’s lawn service might delegate Karrie to do mowing for him without assigning the entire contract to her. Ken would still receive the payment and control the work.

Do I Need an Assignment of Contract?

Assignment of contract can be a useful clause to include in a business agreement. The most common cases of assignment of contract in a business situation are:

• Assignment of a trademark, copyright, or patent
• Assignments to a successor company in the case of the sale of the business
• Assignment in a contract with a supplier or customer
• Assignment in an employment contract or work for hire agreement

Before you sign a contract, look to see if there is an assignment clause, and get the advice of an attorney if you want to assign something in a contract.

Key Takeaways

• Assignment of contract is the ability to transfer rights, property, or obligations to another.
• Assignment of contract is a clause often found in business contracts.
• A party may assign a contract to another party if the contract permits it and no law forbids it.

Legal Information Institute. " Assignment ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

Legal Information Institute. " Specific Performance ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. " 301 Ownership/Assignability of Patents and Applications [R-10.2019] ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

Licensing International. " What is Licensing ." Accessed Jan. 2, 2021.

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

Table of Contents

• What is a Deed of Novation? 
• What is a Deed of Assignment? 

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Need a deed of novation or assignment key factors to consider, selecting the right assignment clause for your contract – helping you make the right choice, what is a deed of novation.

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

What is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

• Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
• Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
• Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
• Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

• Nature of the Contract:  The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
• Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
• Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
• Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

Authored By Raea Khan

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need

Share this article, book a 15-min consultation​, rated 5-star by our clients, latest insights & practical guides.

Guide to Owners Corporation Insurance Requirements in Strata Properties

For strata managers and owners corporations, insurance is a critical

Visitor Parking Spaces, Strata Parking Rules and Parking Levies in NSW

Parking in strata properties can be a complex and contentious

Proving Systemic Building Defects in Strata – The Owners v SPS Building Contractors

Systemic defects in strata buildings can be a hidden yet

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

How can our expert lawyers help.

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Get In Touch

Helpful links, site information, how we can help.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Copyright © 2024 PBL Law Group. All Rights Reserved

Built by Commersion.Legal

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

Assignment and Novation

What are assignment and novation clauses.

The two main legal tools for the transfer of the rights and/or obligations under a contract to another party are: assignment, for the transfer of benefits; and novation, for the transfer of rights/benefits and obligations. Each has unique features that must be taken into account when deciding which is the preferred option.

Assignment and novation clauses

Assignment, novation and other dealings boilerplate clauses, non-assignment clauses, withholding consent to an assignment.

The two main legal tools for the transfer of the rights and/or obligations under a contract to another party are:

• assignment, for the transfer of benefits; and
• novation, for the transfer of rights/benefits and obligations

Each has unique features that must be taken into account when deciding which is the preferred option.

Assignment clauses

A contracting party at common law has a general right to assign its rights without any consent or approval from the other party (unless by its very nature the right is personal). An assignment clause may be included in an agreement to exclude or limit this common law right. In order for the assignment of rights by one party to not be exercised unilaterally without the knowledge of the other party, it is common for contracts to include a provision that a party can only assign its rights under the contract with the consent of the other party.

After assignment, the assignee is entitled to the benefit of the contract and to bring proceedings (either alone or by joining the assignor depending in whether the assignment is legal or equitable) against the other contracting party to enforce its rights. The assignee does not become a party to the contract with the promisor. As the burden or obligations of the contract cannot be assigned, the assignor remains liable post assignment to perform any part of the contract that has not yet been performed.

Novation clauses

By executing a novation, a party can transfer both its rights/benefits and obligations. At common law, the obligations under a contract can only be novated with the consent of all original contracting parties, as well as the new contracting parties. This is because the novation extinguishes the old contract by creating a new contract.

A novation clause will usually provide that a party cannot novate a contract without the prior written consent of existing parties. Including a novation clause in an agreement is designed to prevent oral consent to a novation, or consent being inferred from a continuing party’s conduct. However, a court will look to the substance of what has occurred, and such a clause is not effective in all situations.

It is possible for a novation clause to prospectively authorise a novation to be made by another party unilaterally to a party chosen by the novating party. The courts will give effect to a novation made in this manner provided it is authorised by the proper construction of the original contract.

Option 1 – Assignment, novation and other dealings – consent required

A party must not assign or novate this [deed/agreement] or otherwise deal with the benefit of it or a right under it, or purport to do so, without the prior written consent of each other party [which consent is not to be unreasonably withheld/which consent may be withheld at the absolute discretion of the party from whom consent is sought].

Option 2 – Assignment, novation and other dealings – specifies circumstances in which consent can reasonably be withheld

(a)   [ Insert name of Party A ] may not assign or novate this [deed/agreement] or otherwise deal with the benefit of it or a right under it, or purport to do so, without the prior written consent of [ insert name of Party B ], which consent is not to be unreasonably withheld . 

(b) [ Insert name of Party A ] acknowledges that it will be reasonable for [ insert name of Party B ] to withhold its consent under this clause if:

(i)      [ Insert name of Party B ] is not satisfied with the ability of the proposed assignee to perform [ insert name of Party A ]’s obligations under this [deed/agreement];

(ii)      [ Insert name of Party B ] is not satisfied with the proposed assignee’s financial standing or reputation;

(iii)     the proposed assignee is a competitor of [ insert name of Party B ]; or

(iv)       [ Insert name of Party B ] is in dispute with the proposed assignee .

Click  here  for information on how to use this boilerplate clause.

A non-assignment clause prevents a party or parties from assigning the benefit of the contract. Non-assignment clauses are generally effective if they have been clearly drafted.

Contracts commonly provide for assignment with the consent of the other party. Such provisions usually provide that consent must not be unreasonably withheld and, where there is no such proviso, one may be implied. Accordingly, if it is intended that a party may withhold its consent to an assignment for any reason whatsoever (including on unreasonable grounds) clear contractual language should be used.

A purported assignment that contravenes such contractual restriction may constitute a breach of contract and result in an ineffective assignment.

The ‘reasonableness’ of withholding consent to an assignment is assessed by an objective standard and given a broad and common sense meaning.

The relevant factors in assessing reasonableness will differ in each case and heavily depend on the particular circumstances, including the nature and object of the specific contract and the purpose of the non-assignment clause.  Relevant factors may include any defaults in obligations under the contract and the solvency and identity of the assignee.

A party’s actions in withholding consent will generally be considered unreasonable if the grounds relied upon to support the withholding are:

• extraneous or disassociated from the subject matter of the contract;
• materially inconsistent with any provision(s) of the contract; or
• based on collateral or improper considerations.

It is advisable, where withholding consent to an assignment, to clearly set out the reasons for withholding consent in a letter to the other party.

• Practical Law

Assessing Assignability: Transferring Contractual Rights or Obligations

Practical law legal update 5-546-6326  (approx. 7 pages).

• An intended transfer is of the type that is prohibited by law or public policy (see Practice Note, Assignability of Commercial Contracts: Statutory and Public Policy Exceptions ).
• The parties expressly agree to restrict transferability (see Practice Note, Assignability of Commercial Contracts: Contractual Anti-assignment and Anti-delegation Clauses ).
• Breaching the contract.
• Making an ineffective and invalid transfer.

Distinguishing Between Assignment and Delegation

• The assignment of rights to receive performance.
• The delegation of duties to perform.

Characteristics of Assignments

• The right to receive performance from the assignor.
• Its remedies against the assignor for any failure to perform.

Characteristics of Delegation

The general rule governing assignment and delegation.

• Most assignments of contractual rights.
• Many delegations of contractual performance.
• Assignments and delegations that violate public policy or law.
• Assignments of rights or delegations of performance that are personal in nature.
• Contracts with anti-assignment or anti-delegation clauses.

Contracts That Present the Greatest Challenges

• Personal services contracts (see Personal Services Contracts ).
• Non-exclusive intellectual property licenses (see Intellectual Property Licenses ).
• Contracts with anti-assignment and anti-delegation clauses (see Contracts With Anti-assignment and Anti-delegation Contract Clauses ).

Personal Services Contracts

Intellectual property licenses, contracts with anti-assignment and anti-delegation clauses, is a change of control an assignment.

• Contains an anti-assignment and anti-delegation clause expressly restricting a change of control.
• States that a change in management or equity ownership of the contracting party is deemed to be an assignment.

When Does an Involuntary Transfer Trigger a Restricted Transfer?

• A contractual anti-assignment and anti delegation clause applies to a specific type or transfer.
• The transfer is permissible, with or without a contractual anti-assignment and anti-delegation provision.

Drafting and Negotiating Anti-assignment and Anti-delegation Clauses

• Directly addressing assignment of rights and delegation of performance.
• Clarifying the universe of restricted transfers.
• Designating the non-transferring party's consent rights.
• Specifying any exceptions to non-transferability.
• Requiring notification of a permitted transfer.
• Including a declaration that impermissible transfers are void.
• Adding a novation to the anti-assignment and anti-delegation provision.
• General Contract and Boilerplate
• General Commercial

Assignment And Assumption Agreement: Definition & Sample

Jump to section, what is an assignment and assumption agreement.

An assignment and assumption agreement transfers one party's rights and obligations to a third party. The party making the assignment is called the assignor, while the third party accepting the assignment is known as the assignee.

The assignor assigns their rights and duties under the contract to the assignee and the assignee accepts, or "assumes," those rights and duties.

The other party to the initial contract must also consent to the transfer of rights and obligations to the assignee. For a valid assignment and assumption agreement, the initial contract must provide for the possibility of assignment by one of the initial contracting parties.

Common Sections in Assignment And Assumption Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignment And Assumption Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment And Assumption Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-99.D.13 3 d416323dex99d13.htm ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT , Viewed October 6, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment And Assumption Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment and assumption agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment and assumption agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment and assumption agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Meet some of our Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers

General practitioner since 2005, general practice; civil disputes, torts.... logo Call us: (410) 878-7006 Menu Services Maryland Mobile Last Will & Testament Services All Maryland Legal Services Susan C. Trimble Attorney at Law WHAT WE ARE ABOUT Susan C. Trimble, is an established attorney in the Maryland area. Her work is infused with commitment to her community and family. is tailored to your wants and needs. Here you will find an approachable, personable and conscientious advocate. EDUCATION: Juris Doctorate (JD). University of Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2006. Bachelor of Science (BS), English Literature. Towson University, 1989. Associate in Claims, (AIC) certification. Fraud Claims Law Associate, (FCLS) certification.

I have been practicing law since 2018. I used to be a litigator at a nationwide practice before going in-house at a fintech company. I have experience drafting NDAs, SaaS contracts, service agreements, and stock purchase agreements.

Ann R. Dougherty, Esquire practices in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey with over 25 years of experience and has taught legal writing at the Delaware Law School of Widener University. Ann’s experience includes general liability, commercial property and bad faith insurance coverage litigation. Ann has successfully represented corporations in declaratory judgment matters concerning environmental and asbestos exposure, handled excess recoveries, comprehensive claim reviews and negotiated cost sharing agreements. She has also represented religious organizations including risk management strategies. In addition to practicing law, Ann also teaches introductory Philosophy and Ethics courses. Ann is a member of the Philanthropic Educational Organization for Women and the Daughters of the American Revolution. She has served on the Boards of the American Lung Association of the Mid-Atlantic for Delaware and the Wilmington Ballet Academy.

Lissette E.

Lissette's legal career, spanning over a decade, is distinguished by her significant achievements in civil litigation and her versatile practice in immigration and corporate law. She has demonstrated a formidable presence in the courtroom, securing a verdict of over two million dollars for a client and settling claims totaling more than three million dollars against insurance companies. She is proficient in complex litigation and corporate matters, assisting corporations with entity formation and regulatory compliance. Her work ensures that businesses not only start on a solid legal foundation but also maintain adherence to legal standards as they grow and evolve. Lissette's tenure at the Department of Justice has also been particularly influential. Working directly with immigration judges, she has developed a nuanced understanding of immigration policies and law, enabling her to craft winning strategies that address the unique challenges faced by her clients. Her career is further enriched by her previous teaching engagements at the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, where she shared her comprehensive knowledge and experience with aspiring lawyers. Lissette's multifaceted expertise underscores her deep-rooted commitment to legal advocacy and excellence, making her a valued counselor and advocate. Known for her tailored client solutions, Lissette achieves successful outcomes across various legal domains.

My name is Deborah Schwab, and I am an experienced attorney with a background in real estate, contract negotiation, and corporate governance. Currently, I am a transactional counsel with Priscott Legal, LLC, the partner law firm of Ontra.ai. In this remote role, I represent private equity and VC firms and negotiate a high volume of non-disclosure agreements, joinders, and other legal contracts. Prior to this, I served as legal counsel for PennTex Ventures, LLC, where I was responsible for negotiating, drafting, and reviewing contracts and agreements for sales and acquisition of real estate, lease negotiation, and resolving issues involving ancillary transactions. As the first in-house counsel for PTV, I was responsible for all legal and compliance matters and managed outside legal counsel. Before joining PennTex Ventures, I worked as real estate counsel for 84 Lumber & Nemacolin Woodlands, Inc., where I acquired eleven properties with a portfolio value in excess of $15 million. Prior to this, I spent several years as an attorney and supervisor at CNX/Consol Energy, where I worked as a title attorney, trained and managed a team of title attorneys/analysts, conducted due diligence for large land transactions, and identified business/legal risk exposure for multi-state projects. I received my Juris Doctor from Duquesne University and hold a Post Baccalaureate Paralegal Certificate from the same institution. Additionally, I earned a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Pittsburgh. I am also a court-appointed special advocate working as a volunteer with children who are in the foster care system. Thank you for taking the time to view my profile. I am always open to new opportunities and would be happy to connect with you.

Education: Georgetown Law (83), Yale (75- BA in Economics), Hotchkiss School (1970). Practice areas have included commercial litigation, individual litigation, and securities litigation and arbitration.

V. Yvette S.

I am a highly skilled attorney, fluent in English and Spanish with 20 years of legal experience and 8 additional years of real estate, project finance, banking, financial, securities, and start-up company experience. I worked 6 years with 2 international law firms and handled extremely complex work for all types of clients, 3 years with a Federal Government Regulator, and 5 years in various compliance management positions at national and international financial institutions. I am licensed in New York and North Carolina. I will handle federal litigation on a non-contingency basis. I also practice Appellate Advocacy for constitutional, employment, consumer, and corporate laws. I am skilled in many different NY and NC laws. I have successfully represented clients with state and federal regulatory investigations. I can help you with the FDA, SEC, OCC, CFPB, FDIC, FR and certain state regulators.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Business lawyers by top cities

• Austin Business Lawyers
• Boston Business Lawyers
• Chicago Business Lawyers
• Dallas Business Lawyers
• Denver Business Lawyers
• Houston Business Lawyers
• Los Angeles Business Lawyers
• New York Business Lawyers
• Phoenix Business Lawyers
• San Diego Business Lawyers
• Tampa Business Lawyers

Assignment And Assumption Agreement lawyers by city

• Austin Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Boston Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Denver Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Houston Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• New York Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment And Assumption Agreement Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Trademark Assignment: Legal Insights

Trademark assignment is a nuanced process involving the transfer of ownership rights, titles, and interests in a trademark or service mark from one party to another. A thorough understanding of the legal implications and requirements is vital to facilitate a seamless and legally binding transfer. Key considerations include conducting thorough trademark searches, drafting an exhaustive agreement, and understanding key clauses and provisions such as jurisdiction, trademark scope, and warranties. Failure to address these aspects can lead to common pitfalls, including hidden liabilities and inconsistent ownership records. By grasping these complexities, parties can navigate the assignment process with confidence and precision, harnessing the full potential of their trademark assets.

Table of Contents

Understanding Trademark Assignment

As a vital aspect of intellectual property law, trademark assignment refers to the process of transferring ownership of a trademark or service mark from one party to another. This process involves the assignment of rights, titles, and interests in a trademark or service mark, allowing the assignee to utilize the mark for commercial purposes. In essence, trademark assignment enables businesses to buy, sell, or merge their brand portfolios, thereby expanding their market presence.

Conducting thorough trademark searches is crucial in the assignment process to ensure that the mark is not infringing on existing trademarks. This due diligence helps to mitigate potential legal risks and ensures a smooth transfer of ownership. A comprehensive brand portfolio analysis is also essential to identify potential conflicts and opportunities for growth. By understanding the intricacies of trademark assignment, businesses can strategically manage their intellectual property assets, unlock new revenue streams, and strengthen their competitive edge in the market.

Types of Trademark Transfers

In the context of trademark transfers, there are various types of agreements and transactions that facilitate the transfer of ownership. Two common forms of trademark transfers are asset purchase agreements, which involve the transfer of specific assets, including trademarks, from one party to another. Another type of transfer is merger and consolidation, where two or more entities combine to form a new entity, leading to the transfer of trademarks and other intellectual property rights.

Asset Purchase Agreements

An asset purchase agreement is a type of trademark transfer that occurs when a buyer acquires specific assets, including trademarks, from a seller as part of a larger transaction. This type of transfer is commonly used when a buyer is interested in acquiring a specific business unit or division of the seller, rather than the entire company.

In an asset purchase agreement, the buyer typically assumes only those liabilities that are specifically identified in the agreement. This is in contrast to a stock purchase agreement, where the buyer assumes all liabilities of the seller. As such, the buyer must conduct thorough Due Diligence to identify any potential liabilities associated with the acquired trademarks.

Some key considerations in an asset purchase agreement include:

• Seller Liabilities : The agreement should clearly outline which liabilities the buyer is assuming, and which will remain with the seller.
• Trademark Ownership : The agreement should specify how the trademark ownership will be transferred, including any necessary documentation and filings.
• Licensing Agreements : The agreement should address any existing licensing agreements related to the acquired trademarks.
• Post-Closing Obligations : The agreement should outline any post-closing obligations of the seller, such as providing transitional support or assistance.

Merger and Consolidation

Merger and consolidation agreements involve the transfer of trademarks as a consequence of two or more companies combining to form a new entity, or one company absorbing the assets and liabilities of another. This type of trademark transfer is often a consequence of corporate restructuring efforts aimed at achieving financial synergies and improving operational efficiency.

In a merger or consolidation, the parties involved must verify that all trademarks are properly transferred and registered in the name of the new entity. This may involve updating trademark registrations, assigning trademark licenses, and notifying relevant parties of the change in ownership. Failure to do so can lead to the loss of trademark rights, which can have significant consequences for the new entity's brand identity and reputation.

Drafting a Comprehensive Agreement

When drafting a thorough trademark assignment agreement, it is vital to clearly define key provisions and negotiate assignment terms that accurately reflect the parties' intentions. This involves specifying the scope of the assignment, including the mark's registration details, and outlining the rights and obligations of the assignor and assignee. By carefully crafting these provisions, parties can guarantee a smooth transfer of ownership and minimize potential disputes.

Key Provisions Defined

Typically, a well-drafted trademark assignment agreement includes several key provisions that outline the terms and conditions of the assignment, securing a thorough and enforceable transfer of rights. These provisions are vital in defining the scope and limitations of the assignment, making certain that both parties are aware of their rights and obligations.

The following key provisions are commonly included in a trademark assignment agreement:

• Trademark Scope : A clear definition of the trademark(s) being assigned, including the mark itself, any variations, and relevant registrations or applications.
• Jurisdictional Limits : Specification of the geographic territory in which the assignment is applicable, limiting the assignee's rights to the agreed-upon jurisdiction.
• Assignment of Goodwill : Provision for the assignment of goodwill associated with the trademark, which is vital for the assignee to capitalize on the mark's reputation and customer loyalty.
• Warranties and Representations : Statements made by the assignor regarding the validity, ownership, and freedom from encumbrances of the trademark, which can impact the assignee's ability to use the mark, thereby guaranteeing that the assignee is properly informed.

Assignment Terms Negotiated

In drafting a comprehensive trademark assignment agreement, the negotiation of assignment terms is a crucial step that requires careful consideration and precision to ensure a seamless transfer of rights. The parties involved must engage in good faith negotiations to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. The assignment terms should clearly outline the rights and obligations of the assignor and assignee, including the scope of the assignment, payment terms, and any conditions precedent to the transfer.

It is essential to address potential third-party interests, such as licenses or security interests, to ensure that the assignee is aware of any encumbrances on the mark. The agreement should also specify the procedures for handling disputes or breaches, including the jurisdiction and governing law applicable to the agreement. Furthermore, the parties should consider including provisions for confidentiality, non-compete, and intellectual property protection to safeguard their interests. By carefully negotiating and drafting the assignment terms, the parties can minimize the risk of disputes and ensure a successful transfer of the trademark rights.

Key Clauses and Provisions

A well-drafted trademark assignment agreement typically includes several key clauses and provisions that address the critical aspects of the assignment, securing a thorough and enforceable transfer of rights. These clauses clarify that the assignor and assignee are clear on their respective obligations and responsibilities, minimizing the risk of disputes and litigation .

Some vital provisions to include are:

• Jurisdiction and Governing Law : Specify the jurisdiction and governing law that will apply in case of disputes, making certain that both parties are aware of the applicable laws and regulations.
• International Compliance : Address the assignor's obligations to comply with international trademark laws and regulations, verifying that the assignment is valid and enforceable globally.
• Representations and Warranties : Include representations and warranties from the assignor regarding the validity and ownership of the trademark, as well as any potential liabilities or disputes.
• Dispute Resolution : Establish a process for resolving disputes, such as arbitration or mediation, to provide a clear and efficient mechanism for addressing any issues that may arise.

Post-Assignment Obligations

Following the assignment of a trademark, the assignor and assignee often have ongoing obligations to secure the successful handover of rights and minimize potential liabilities. One such obligation is the provision of ongoing assistance by the assignor to facilitate a seamless shift. This may involve the assignor providing information, documentation, and guidance to facilitate the assignee's continued use of the trademark. Additionally, the assignee may require ongoing assistance to address potential issues that may arise during the handover period.

Another critical post-assignment obligation is the assumption of successor liability by the assignee. This means that the assignee becomes responsible for any liabilities or disputes associated with the trademark prior to the assignment. The assignee must verify that they have the necessary resources and infrastructure to handle any potential claims or legal actions that may arise. By understanding and fulfilling these post-assignment obligations, parties to a trademark assignment can secure a smooth handover of rights and minimize the risk of disputes or legal issues arising in the future.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Despite the importance of fulfilling post-assignment obligations, trademark assignments can still be vulnerable to pitfalls that may compromise the integrity of the transfer. These pitfalls can lead to costly disputes, reputational damage, and even the invalidation of the assignment.

To avoid these consequences, it is crucial to be aware of the following common pitfalls:

• Failure to conduct thorough due diligence : Overlooking hidden liabilities or misconceptions about the trademark's history can lead to unforeseen issues.
• Inadequate documentation : Poorly drafted assignment agreements or incomplete documentation can create ambiguity and disputes.
• Inconsistent trademark ownership records : Failing to update records with the relevant authorities can lead to confusion and challenges in enforcing trademark rights.
• Neglecting to address pending trademark applications : Failing to consider the impact of pending applications on the assignment can result in unexpected consequences.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a trademark assignment be revoked or terminated?.

A trademark assignment can be revoked or terminated upon a material breach of the agreement, as specified in breach clauses, or through judicial intervention, which may declare the assignment invalid, void, or unenforceable due to legal deficiencies or contractual violations.

Do I Need to Record My Assignment With the Uspto?

To maintain the integrity of your trademark ownership, it is vital to record your assignment with the USPTO, especially for International Filings, leveraging Online Systems such as the Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS) to guarantee accuracy and timely notifications.

What Is the Role of Due Diligence in Trademark Assignment?

In trademark assignment, due diligence plays a vital part in mitigating risks through thorough Risk Assessment, enabling informed Deal Structuring and facilitating a smooth transfer of ownership, thereby protecting the assignor's and assignee's interests.

Can I Assign a Trademark That Is Still Pending Registration?

Prior to registration, a pending trademark can be assigned, but doing so poses pending risks. Employing pre-registration strategies, such as drafting conditional assignment agreements, can mitigate these risks and facilitate a smoother transfer of ownership.

Are There Any Tax Implications for Trademark Assignments?

When transferring trademark ownership, tax implications arise. Assignors may incur Capital Gains tax on the sale, while assignees may claim Tax Deductions for amortization of the acquired intangible asset over its useful life.

UNLOCK YOUR COPY