chapter three in research

• Welcome to Chapter 3

Chapter 3 Webinars

• Student Experience Feedback Buttons
• Developing the Quantitative Research Design
• Qualitative Descriptive Design
• Qualitative Narrative Inquiry Research
• SAGE Research Methods
• Alignment of Dissertation Components for DIS-9902ABC
• IRB Resources This link opens in a new window
• Research Examples (SAGE) This link opens in a new window
• Dataset Examples (SAGE) This link opens in a new window

Jump to DSE Guide

Need help ask us.

Was this resource helpful?

• Next: Developing the Quantitative Research Design >>
• Last Updated: Nov 2, 2023 10:17 AM
• URL: https://resources.nu.edu/c.php?g=1007179

© Copyright 2024 National University. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Consumer Information

How To Write The Methodology Chapter

The what, why & how explained simply (with examples).

By: Jenna Crossley (PhD) | Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | September 2021 (Updated April 2023)

So, you’ve pinned down your research topic and undertaken a review of the literature – now it’s time to write up the methodology section of your dissertation, thesis or research paper . But what exactly is the methodology chapter all about – and how do you go about writing one? In this post, we’ll unpack the topic, step by step .

Overview: The Methodology Chapter

• The purpose  of the methodology chapter
• Why you need to craft this chapter (really) well
• How to write and structure the chapter
• Methodology chapter example
• Essential takeaways

What (exactly) is the methodology chapter?

The methodology chapter is where you outline the philosophical underpinnings of your research and outline the specific methodological choices you’ve made. The point of the methodology chapter is to tell the reader exactly how you designed your study and, just as importantly, why you did it this way.

Importantly, this chapter should comprehensively describe and justify all the methodological choices you made in your study. For example, the approach you took to your research (i.e., qualitative, quantitative or mixed), who  you collected data from (i.e., your sampling strategy), how you collected your data and, of course, how you analysed it. If that sounds a little intimidating, don’t worry – we’ll explain all these methodological choices in this post .

Why is the methodology chapter important?

The methodology chapter plays two important roles in your dissertation or thesis:

Firstly, it demonstrates your understanding of research theory, which is what earns you marks. A flawed research design or methodology would mean flawed results. So, this chapter is vital as it allows you to show the marker that you know what you’re doing and that your results are credible .

Secondly, the methodology chapter is what helps to make your study replicable. In other words, it allows other researchers to undertake your study using the same methodological approach, and compare their findings to yours. This is very important within academic research, as each study builds on previous studies.

The methodology chapter is also important in that it allows you to identify and discuss any methodological issues or problems you encountered (i.e., research limitations ), and to explain how you mitigated the impacts of these. Every research project has its limitations , so it’s important to acknowledge these openly and highlight your study’s value despite its limitations . Doing so demonstrates your understanding of research design, which will earn you marks. We’ll discuss limitations in a bit more detail later in this post, so stay tuned!

Need a helping hand?

How to write up the methodology chapter

First off, it’s worth noting that the exact structure and contents of the methodology chapter will vary depending on the field of research (e.g., humanities, chemistry or engineering) as well as the university . So, be sure to always check the guidelines provided by your institution for clarity and, if possible, review past dissertations from your university. Here we’re going to discuss a generic structure for a methodology chapter typically found in the sciences.

Before you start writing, it’s always a good idea to draw up a rough outline to guide your writing. Don’t just start writing without knowing what you’ll discuss where. If you do, you’ll likely end up with a disjointed, ill-flowing narrative . You’ll then waste a lot of time rewriting in an attempt to try to stitch all the pieces together. Do yourself a favour and start with the end in mind .

Section 1 – Introduction

As with all chapters in your dissertation or thesis, the methodology chapter should have a brief introduction. In this section, you should remind your readers what the focus of your study is, especially the research aims . As we’ve discussed many times on the blog, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and research questions. Therefore, it’s useful to frontload this component to remind the reader (and yourself!) what you’re trying to achieve.

In this section, you can also briefly mention how you’ll structure the chapter. This will help orient the reader and provide a bit of a roadmap so that they know what to expect. You don’t need a lot of detail here – just a brief outline will do.

Section 2 – The Methodology

The next section of your chapter is where you’ll present the actual methodology. In this section, you need to detail and justify the key methodological choices you’ve made in a logical, intuitive fashion. Importantly, this is the heart of your methodology chapter, so you need to get specific – don’t hold back on the details here. This is not one of those “less is more” situations.

Let’s take a look at the most common components you’ll likely need to cover. 

Methodological Choice #1 – Research Philosophy

Research philosophy refers to the underlying beliefs (i.e., the worldview) regarding how data about a phenomenon should be gathered , analysed and used . The research philosophy will serve as the core of your study and underpin all of the other research design choices, so it’s critically important that you understand which philosophy you’ll adopt and why you made that choice. If you’re not clear on this, take the time to get clarity before you make any further methodological choices.

While several research philosophies exist, two commonly adopted ones are positivism and interpretivism . These two sit roughly on opposite sides of the research philosophy spectrum.

Positivism states that the researcher can observe reality objectively and that there is only one reality, which exists independently of the observer. As a consequence, it is quite commonly the underlying research philosophy in quantitative studies and is oftentimes the assumed philosophy in the physical sciences.

Contrasted with this, interpretivism , which is often the underlying research philosophy in qualitative studies, assumes that the researcher performs a role in observing the world around them and that reality is unique to each observer . In other words, reality is observed subjectively .

These are just two philosophies (there are many more), but they demonstrate significantly different approaches to research and have a significant impact on all the methodological choices. Therefore, it’s vital that you clearly outline and justify your research philosophy at the beginning of your methodology chapter, as it sets the scene for everything that follows.

Methodological Choice #2 – Research Type

The next thing you would typically discuss in your methodology section is the research type. The starting point for this is to indicate whether the research you conducted is inductive or deductive .

Inductive research takes a bottom-up approach , where the researcher begins with specific observations or data and then draws general conclusions or theories from those observations. Therefore these studies tend to be exploratory in terms of approach.

Conversely , d eductive research takes a top-down approach , where the researcher starts with a theory or hypothesis and then tests it using specific observations or data. Therefore these studies tend to be confirmatory in approach.

Related to this, you’ll need to indicate whether your study adopts a qualitative, quantitative or mixed  approach. As we’ve mentioned, there’s a strong link between this choice and your research philosophy, so make sure that your choices are tightly aligned . When you write this section up, remember to clearly justify your choices, as they form the foundation of your study.

Methodological Choice #3 – Research Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your research strategy (also referred to as a research design ). This methodological choice refers to the broader strategy in terms of how you’ll conduct your research, based on the aims of your study.

Several research strategies exist, including experimental , case studies , ethnography , grounded theory, action research , and phenomenology . Let’s take a look at two of these, experimental and ethnographic, to see how they contrast.

Experimental research makes use of the scientific method , where one group is the control group (in which no variables are manipulated ) and another is the experimental group (in which a specific variable is manipulated). This type of research is undertaken under strict conditions in a controlled, artificial environment (e.g., a laboratory). By having firm control over the environment, experimental research typically allows the researcher to establish causation between variables. Therefore, it can be a good choice if you have research aims that involve identifying causal relationships.

Ethnographic research , on the other hand, involves observing and capturing the experiences and perceptions of participants in their natural environment (for example, at home or in the office). In other words, in an uncontrolled environment.  Naturally, this means that this research strategy would be far less suitable if your research aims involve identifying causation, but it would be very valuable if you’re looking to explore and examine a group culture, for example.

As you can see, the right research strategy will depend largely on your research aims and research questions – in other words, what you’re trying to figure out. Therefore, as with every other methodological choice, it’s essential to justify why you chose the research strategy you did.

Methodological Choice #4 – Time Horizon

The next thing you’ll need to detail in your methodology chapter is the time horizon. There are two options here: cross-sectional and longitudinal . In other words, whether the data for your study were all collected at one point in time (cross-sectional) or at multiple points in time (longitudinal).

The choice you make here depends again on your research aims, objectives and research questions. If, for example, you aim to assess how a specific group of people’s perspectives regarding a topic change over time , you’d likely adopt a longitudinal time horizon.

Another important factor to consider is simply whether you have the time necessary to adopt a longitudinal approach (which could involve collecting data over multiple months or even years). Oftentimes, the time pressures of your degree program will force your hand into adopting a cross-sectional time horizon, so keep this in mind.

Methodological Choice #5 – Sampling Strategy

Next, you’ll need to discuss your sampling strategy . There are two main categories of sampling, probability and non-probability sampling.

Probability sampling involves a random (and therefore representative) selection of participants from a population, whereas non-probability sampling entails selecting participants in a non-random  (and therefore non-representative) manner. For example, selecting participants based on ease of access (this is called a convenience sample).

The right sampling approach depends largely on what you’re trying to achieve in your study. Specifically, whether you trying to develop findings that are generalisable to a population or not. Practicalities and resource constraints also play a large role here, as it can oftentimes be challenging to gain access to a truly random sample. In the video below, we explore some of the most common sampling strategies.

Methodological Choice #6 – Data Collection Method

Next up, you’ll need to explain how you’ll go about collecting the necessary data for your study. Your data collection method (or methods) will depend on the type of data that you plan to collect – in other words, qualitative or quantitative data.

Typically, quantitative research relies on surveys , data generated by lab equipment, analytics software or existing datasets. Qualitative research, on the other hand, often makes use of collection methods such as interviews , focus groups , participant observations, and ethnography.

So, as you can see, there is a tight link between this section and the design choices you outlined in earlier sections. Strong alignment between these sections, as well as your research aims and questions is therefore very important.

Methodological Choice #7 – Data Analysis Methods/Techniques

The final major methodological choice that you need to address is that of analysis techniques . In other words, how you’ll go about analysing your date once you’ve collected it. Here it’s important to be very specific about your analysis methods and/or techniques – don’t leave any room for interpretation. Also, as with all choices in this chapter, you need to justify each choice you make.

What exactly you discuss here will depend largely on the type of study you’re conducting (i.e., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods). For qualitative studies, common analysis methods include content analysis , thematic analysis and discourse analysis . In the video below, we explain each of these in plain language.

For quantitative studies, you’ll almost always make use of descriptive statistics , and in many cases, you’ll also use inferential statistical techniques (e.g., correlation and regression analysis). In the video below, we unpack some of the core concepts involved in descriptive and inferential statistics.

In this section of your methodology chapter, it’s also important to discuss how you prepared your data for analysis, and what software you used (if any). For example, quantitative data will often require some initial preparation such as removing duplicates or incomplete responses . Similarly, qualitative data will often require transcription and perhaps even translation. As always, remember to state both what you did and why you did it.

Section 3 – The Methodological Limitations

With the key methodological choices outlined and justified, the next step is to discuss the limitations of your design. No research methodology is perfect – there will always be trade-offs between the “ideal” methodology and what’s practical and viable, given your constraints. Therefore, this section of your methodology chapter is where you’ll discuss the trade-offs you had to make, and why these were justified given the context.

Methodological limitations can vary greatly from study to study, ranging from common issues such as time and budget constraints to issues of sample or selection bias . For example, you may find that you didn’t manage to draw in enough respondents to achieve the desired sample size (and therefore, statistically significant results), or your sample may be skewed heavily towards a certain demographic, thereby negatively impacting representativeness .

In this section, it’s important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study. There’s no use trying to hide them (your marker will be aware of them regardless). By being critical, you’ll demonstrate to your marker that you have a strong understanding of research theory, so don’t be shy here. At the same time, don’t beat your study to death . State the limitations, why these were justified, how you mitigated their impacts to the best degree possible, and how your study still provides value despite these limitations .

Section 4 – Concluding Summary

Finally, it’s time to wrap up the methodology chapter with a brief concluding summary. In this section, you’ll want to concisely summarise what you’ve presented in the chapter. Here, it can be a good idea to use a figure to summarise the key decisions, especially if your university recommends using a specific model (for example, Saunders’ Research Onion ).

Importantly, this section needs to be brief – a paragraph or two maximum (it’s a summary, after all). Also, make sure that when you write up your concluding summary, you include only what you’ve already discussed in your chapter; don’t add any new information.

Methodology Chapter Example

In the video below, we walk you through an example of a high-quality research methodology chapter from a dissertation. We also unpack our free methodology chapter template so that you can see how best to structure your chapter.

Wrapping Up

And there you have it – the methodology chapter in a nutshell. As we’ve mentioned, the exact contents and structure of this chapter can vary between universities , so be sure to check in with your institution before you start writing. If possible, try to find dissertations or theses from former students of your specific degree program – this will give you a strong indication of the expectations and norms when it comes to the methodology chapter (and all the other chapters!).

Also, remember the golden rule of the methodology chapter – justify every choice ! Make sure that you clearly explain the “why” for every “what”, and reference credible methodology textbooks or academic sources to back up your justifications.

If you need a helping hand with your research methodology (or any other component of your research), be sure to check out our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through every step of the research journey. Until next time, good luck!

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

55 Comments

highly appreciated.

This was very helpful!

This was helpful

Thanks ,it is a very useful idea.

Thanks ,it is very useful idea.

Thank you so much, this information is very useful.

Thank you very much. I must say the information presented was succinct, coherent and invaluable. It is well put together and easy to comprehend. I have a great guide to create the research methodology for my dissertation.

Highly clear and useful.

I understand a bit on the explanation above. I want to have some coach but I’m still student and don’t have any budget to hire one. A lot of question I want to ask.

Thank you so much. This concluded my day plan. Thank you so much.

Thanks it was helpful

Great information. It would be great though if you could show us practical examples.

Thanks so much for this information. God bless and be with you

Thank you so so much. Indeed it was helpful

This is EXCELLENT!

I was totally confused by other explanations. Thank you so much!.

justdoing my research now , thanks for the guidance.

Thank uuuu! These contents are really valued for me!

This is powerful …I really like it

Highly useful and clear, thank you so much.

Highly appreciated. Good guide

That was helpful. Thanks

This is very useful.Thank you

Very helpful information. Thank you

This is exactly what I was looking for. The explanation is so detailed and easy to comprehend. Well done and thank you.

Great job. You just summarised everything in the easiest and most comprehensible way possible. Thanks a lot.

Thank you very much for the ideas you have given this will really help me a lot. Thank you and God Bless.

Such great effort …….very grateful thank you

Please accept my sincere gratitude. I have to say that the information that was delivered was congruent, concise, and quite helpful. It is clear and straightforward, making it simple to understand. I am in possession of an excellent manual that will assist me in developing the research methods for my dissertation.

Thank you for your great explanation. It really helped me construct my methodology paper.

thank you for simplifieng the methodoly, It was realy helpful

Very helpful!

Thank you for your great explanation.

The explanation I have been looking for. So clear Thank you

Thank you very much .this was more enlightening.

helped me create the in depth and thorough methodology for my dissertation

Thank you for the great explaination.please construct one methodology for me

I appreciate you for the explanation of methodology. Please construct one methodology on the topic: The effects influencing students dropout among schools for my thesis

This helped me complete my methods section of my dissertation with ease. I have managed to write a thorough and concise methodology!

its so good in deed

wow …what an easy to follow presentation. very invaluable content shared. utmost important.

Peace be upon you, I am Dr. Ahmed Khedr, a former part-time professor at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. I am currently teaching research methods, and I have been dealing with your esteemed site for several years, and I found that despite my long experience with research methods sites, it is one of the smoothest sites for evaluating the material for students, For this reason, I relied on it a lot in teaching and translated most of what was written into Arabic and published it on my own page on Facebook. Thank you all… Everything I posted on my page is provided with the names of the writers of Grad coach, the title of the article, and the site. My best regards.

A remarkably simple and useful guide, thank you kindly.

I real appriciate your short and remarkable chapter summary

Bravo! Very helpful guide.

Only true experts could provide such helpful, fantastic, and inspiring knowledge about Methodology. Thank you very much! God be with you and us all!

highly appreciate your effort.

This is a very well thought out post. Very informative and a great read.

THANKS SO MUCH FOR SHARING YOUR NICE IDEA

I love you Emma, you are simply amazing with clear explanations with complete information. GradCoach really helped me to do my assignment here in Auckland. Mostly, Emma make it so simple and enjoyable

Thank you very much for this informative and synthesised version.

thank you, It was a very informative presentation, you made it just to the point in a straightforward way .

Help me write a methodology on the topic “challenges faced by family businesses in Ghana

Well articulated, clear, and concise. I got a lot from this writings. Thanks

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Methods Section: Chapter Three

The methods section , or chapter three, of the dissertation or thesis is often the most challenging for graduate students.  The methodology section, chapter three should reiterate the research questions and hypotheses, present the research design, discuss the participants, the instruments to be used, the procedure, the data analysis plan , and the sample size justification.

Research Questions and Null Hypotheses

Chapter three should begin with a portion that discusses the research questions and null hypotheses.  In the research questions and null hypotheses portion of the methodology chapter, the research questions should be restated in statistical language.  For example, “Is there a difference in GPA by gender?” is a t-test type of question, whereas “Is there a relationship between GPA and income level?” is a correlation type of question.  The important thing to remember is to use the language that foreshadows the data analysis plan .  The null hypotheses are just the research questions stated in the null; for example, “There is no difference in GPA by gender,” or “There is no relationship between GPA and income level.”

Research Design

The next portion of the methods section, chapter three is focused on developing the research design.  The research design has several possibilities. First, you must decide if you are doing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods research. In a quantitative study, you are assessing participants’ responses on a measure.  For example, participants can endorse their level of agreement on some scale.  A qualitative design is a typically a semi-structured interview which gets transcribed, and the themes among the participants are derived.  A mixed methods project is a mixture of both a quantitative and qualitative study.

Participants

In the research methodology, the participants are typically a sample of the population you want to study.  You are probably not going to study all school children, but you may sample from the population of school children.  You need to include information about the characteristics of the population in your study (Are you sampling all males? teachers with under five years of experience?).  This represents the participants portion of your methods section, chapter three.

Need help with your methods section?

Schedule a time to speak with an expert using the calendar below.

Instruments

The instruments section is a critical part of the methodology section, chapter three.  The instruments section should include the name of the instruments, the scales or subscales, how the scales are computed, and the reliability and validity of the scales.  The instruments portion should have references to the researchers who created the instruments.

The procedure section of the methods chapter is simply how you are going to administer the instruments that you just described to the participants you are going to select.  You should walk the reader through the procedure in detail so that they can replicate your steps and your study.

Data Analysis Plan

The data analysis plan is just that — how you are going to analyze the data when you get the data from your participants.   It includes the statistical tests you are going to use, the statistical assumptions of these tests, and the justification for the statistical tests.

Sample Size Justification

Another important portion of your methods chapter three, is the sample size justification.  Sample size justification (or power analysis) is selecting how many participants you need to have in your study.  The sample size is based on several criteria:  the power you select (which is typically .80), the alpha level selected (which is typically .05), and the effect size (typically, a large or medium effect size is selected).  Importantly, once these criteria are selected, the sample size is going to be based on the type of statistic: an ANOVA is going to have a different sample size calculation than a multiple regression.

• 253,612 Views

HOW TO WRITE CHAPTER THREE OF YOUR RESEARCH PROJECT (RESEARCH METHODOLOGY) | ResearchWap Blog

• Posted: Friday, 17 April 2020
• By: ResearchWap Admin

How To Write Chapter Three Of Your Research Project (Research Methodology)

Methodology In Research Paper

Chapter three of the research project or the research methodology is another significant part of the research project writing. In developing the chapter three of the research project, you state the purpose of research, research method you wish to adopt, the instruments to be used, where you will collect your data, types of data collection, and how you collected it.

This chapter explains the different methods to be used in the research project. Here you mention the procedures and strategies you will employ in the study such as research design, study design in research, research area (area of the study), the population of the study, etc.

You also tell the reader your research design methods, why you chose a particular method, method of analysis, how you planned to analyze your data. Your methodology should be written in a simple language such that other researchers can follow the method and arrive at the same conclusion or findings.

You can choose a survey design when you want to survey a particular location or behavior by administering instruments such as structured questionnaires, interviews, or experimental; if you intend manipulating some variables.

The purpose of chapter three (research methodology) is to give an experienced investigator enough information to replicate the study. Some supervisors do not understand this and require students to write what is in effect, a textbook.

A research design is used to structure the research and to show how all of the major parts of the research project, including the sample, measures, and methods of assignment, work together to address the central research questions in the study. The chapter three should begin with a paragraph reiterating the purpose of research.

It is very important that before choosing design methods, try and ask yourself the following questions:

Will I generate enough information that will help me to solve the research problem by adopting this method?

Method vs Methodology

I think the most appropriate in methods versus methodology is to think in terms of their inter-connectedness and relationship between both. You should not beging thinking so much about research methods without thinking of developing a research methodology.

Metodologia or methodology is the consideration of your research objectives and the most effective method  and approach to meet those objectives. That is to say that methodology in research paper is the first step in planning a research project work. 

Design Methodology: Methodological Approach                

Example of methodology in research paper, you are attempting to identify the influence of personality on a road accident, you may wish to look at different personality types, you may also look at accident records from the FRSC, you may also wish to look at the personality of drivers that are accident victims, once you adopt this method, you are already doing a survey, and that becomes your  metodologia or methodology .

Your methodology should aim to provide you with the information to allow you to come to some conclusions about the personalities that are susceptible to a road accident or those personality types that are likely to have a road accident. The following subjects may or may not be in the order required by a particular institution of higher education, but all of the subjects constitute a defensible in metodologia or methodology chapter.

 READ ALSO:  HOW TO WRITE EFFECTIVE RESEARCH PROJECT ABSTRACT

Methodology

A  methodology  is the rationale for the research approach, and the lens through which the analysis occurs. Said another way, a methodology describes the “general research strategy that outlines the way in which research is to be undertaken” The methodology should impact which method(s) for a research endeavor are selected in order to generate the compelling data.

Example Of Methodology In Research Paper :

• Phenomenology: describes the “lived experience” of a particular phenomenon
• Ethnography: explores the social world or culture, shared beliefs and behaviors
• Participatory: views the participants as active researchers
• Ethno methodology: examines how people use dialogue and body language to construct a world view
• Grounding theory*: assumes a blank slate and uses an inductive approach to develop a new theory

A  method  is simply the tool used to answer your research questions — how, in short, you will go about collecting your data.

Methods Section Of Research Paper Example :

• Contextual inquiry
• Usability study
• Diary study

If you are choosing among these, you might say “what method should I use?” and settle on one or more methods to answer your research question.

 READ ALSO:  HOW TO DEVELOP EFFECTIVE AND UNIQUE PROJECT TOPICS

Research Design Definition: WRITING A RESEARCH DESIGN

A qualitative study does not have variables. A scientific study has variables, which are sometimes mentioned in Chapter 1 and defined in more depth in Chapter 3. Spell out the independent and dependent, variables. An unfortunate trend in some institutions is to repeat the research questions and/or hypotheses in both Chapter 1 and Chapter 3. Sometimes an operational statement of the research hypotheses in the null form is given to set the stage for later statistical inferences. In a quantitative study, state the level of significance that will be used to accept or reject the hypotheses.

Pilot Study

In a quantitative study, a survey instrument that the researcher designed needs a pilot study to validate the effectiveness of the instrument, and the value of the questions to elicit the right information to answer the primary research questions in. In a scientific study, a pilot study may precede the main observation to correct any problems with the instrumentation or other elements in the data collection technique. Describe the pilot study as it relates to the research design, development of the instrument, data collection procedures, or characteristics of the sample.

Instruments

In a research study, the instrument used to collect data may be created by the researcher or based on an existing instrument. If the instrument is the researcher created, the process used to select the questions should be described and justified. If an existing instrument is used, the background of the instrument is described including who originated it, and what measures were used to validate it.

If a Likert scale is used, the scale should be described. If the study involves interviews, an interview protocol should be developed that will result in a consistent process of data collection across all interviews. Two types of questions are found in an interview protocol: the primary research questions, which are not asked of the participants, and the interview questions that are based on the primary research questions and are asked of the participants.

In a qualitative study, this is the section where most of the appendices are itemized, starting with letters of permission to conduct the study and letters of invitation to participate with the attached consent forms. Sample: this has to do with the number of your participants or subjects as the case may be. Analysis (how are you planning to analyze the results?)

ALSO READ:  TRENDING PROJECT TOPICS FOR FINAL YEAR STUDENTS AT A GLANCE

EFFECTIVE GUIDE AND METHODOLOGY SAMPLES

This chapter deals effectively with the research methods to be adopted in conducting the research, and it is organized under the following sub-headings:

• Research Design
• Area of Study

The population of the Study

• Sample and Sampling Techniques
• Instruments for Data Collection

The validity of the Instrument

Reliability of the Instrument

• Administration of the instruments
• Scoring the instruments

Method of Data Collection

Method of Data Analysis

Research Design:

This has to do with the structure of the research instrument to be used in collecting data. It could be in sections depending on different variables that form the construct for the entire topic of the research problems. A reliable instrument with a wrong research design will adversely affect the reliability and generalization of the research. The choice of design suitable for each research is determined by many factors among which are: kind of research, research hypothesis, the scope of the research, and the sensitive nature of the research.

Area of Study:

Research Area; this has to do with the geographical environment of the study area where the places are located, the historical background when necessary and commercial activities of that geographical area. For example, the area of the study is Ebonyi State University. At the creation of Ebonyi State in 1996, the Abakaliki campus of the then ESUT was upgraded to Ebonyi State University College by Edict no. 5 of Ebonyi State, 1998 still affiliated to ESUT with Prof. Fidelis Ogah, former ESUT Deputy Vice-Chancellor as the first Rector. In 1997, the Faculty of Applied and Natural Sciences with 8 departments was added to the fledging University, and later in 1998 when the ESUT Pre-Science Programme was relocated to Nsukka, the EBSUC Pre-Degree School commenced lectures in both Science and Arts in replacement of the former. This study focused on the students of the Business Education department in Ebonyi state university.

The population is regarded in research work as the type of people and the group of people under investigation. It has to be specific or specified. For example educational study teachers in Lagos state. Once the population is chosen, the next thing is to choose the samples from the population.

According to Uma (2007), the population is referred to as the totality of items or object which the researcher is interested in. It can also be the total number of people in an area of study. Hence, the population of this study comprised of all the students in the department of Business Education, Ebonyi State University which is made up of year one to four totaling 482. The actual number for the study was ascertained using Yaro-Yamane's formula which stated thus:

n   =        N

N is the Population

1 is constant

e is the error margin

Then, n   =         482

1+482(0.05)2

= 214.35 approximately 214

Sample and sampling technique:

It may not be possible to reach out to the number of people that form the entire population for the study to either interview, observe, or serve them with copies of the questionnaire. To be realistic, the sample should be up to 20% of the total population. Two sampling techniques are popular among all the sampling techniques. These are random and stratified random sampling techniques. (A). in Random Sampling, the writers select any specific number from a place like a school, village, etc. (B). In Stratified Random Sampling, one has to indicate a specific number from a stratum which could be a group of people according to age, qualification, etc. or different groups from different locations and different considerations attached.

Instruments for Data Collection:

This is a device or different devices used in collecting data. Example: interview, questionnaire, checklist, etc. instrument is prepared in sets or subsections, each set should be an entity thus asking questions about a particular variable to be tested after collecting data. The type of instrument used will determine the responses expected. All questions should be well set so as to determine the reliability of the instrument.

This has to do with different measures in order to determine the validity and reliability of the research instrument. For example, presenting the drafted questionnaire to the supervisor for scrutiny. Giving the questionnaire to the supervisor for useful comments and corrections would help to validate the instrument.

The test-retest reliability method is one of the simplest ways of testing the stability and reliability of an instrument over time. The test-retest approach was adopted by the researcher in establishing the reliability of the instrument. In doing this 25 copies of the questionnaire were administered on twenty-five selected respondents. After two weeks another 25 copies of the same questionnaire were re-administered on the same group. Their responses on the two occasions were correlated using Parsons Product Moment Correlation. A co-efficient of 0.81 was gotten and this was high enough to consider the instrument reliable.

Administration of the instruments:

Here, the writer states whether he or she administers the test personally or through an assistant. He also indicates the rate of return of the copies of the questionnaire administered.

Scoring the instruments:

Here items on the questionnaire or any other device used must be assigned numerical values. For example, 4 points to strongly agree, 3 points to agree, 2 points to disagree, and 1 point to strongly disagree.

Table of Analysis

The researcher collected data using the questionnaire. Copies of the questionnaire were administered by the researcher on the respondents. All the respondents were expected to give maximum co-operation, as the information on the questionnaire is all on things that revolve around their study. Hence, enough time was taken to explain how to tick or indicate their opinion on the items stated in the research questionnaire.

In this study, the mean was used to analyze the data collected. A four (4) point Likert scale was used to analyze each of the questionnaire items.

The weighing was as follows:

VGE—————- Very Great Extent (4 points)

GE—————– Great Extent (3 points)

LE—————– Little Extent (2 points)

VLE—————- Very Little Extent (1 point)

SA—————– Strongly Agree (4 points)

A——————- Agree (3 points)

D—————— Disagree (2 points)

SD—————- Strongly Disagree (1 point)

The mean of the scale will then be determined by summing up the points and dividing their number as follows with the formula:

Where; x= mean

f= frequency

X= Nominal value of the option

∑= summation

N= Total Number

Therefore, the mean of the scale is 2.5.

This means that any item statement with a mean of 2.50 and above is considered agreed by the respondents and any item statement below 2.5 is considered disagreed.

EDITORS SOURCE: How To Write Chapter Three Of Your Research Project (Research Methodology)

Tags: Research project, chapter three, methodology, project topics,

Project Categories

• AFRICAN LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTIC
• ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
• ACTUARIAL SCIENCE
• ADULT EDUCATION
• AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
• AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
• ANIMAL SCIENCE
• ARCHITECTURE
• BANKING AND FINANCE
• BIBLICAL AND THEOLOGY
• BIOCHEMISTRY
• BREWING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
• BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
• BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
• BUSINESS EDUCATION

SEE MORE PROJECT CATEGORIES

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved researchwap.com - Free Project Topics, Research Materials, and Educational Resources

Physical Activity and Health Through Physical Education

• First Online: 25 August 2024

Cite this chapter

• Adrià Muntaner-Mas 2 , 3  

47 Accesses

3 Altmetric

Physical education (PE) is an academic subject that provides the opportunity for students to learn the knowledge and skills needed to establish and maintain physically active lifestyles throughout their lifetime. Unequivocally, PE play a crucial role in augmenting physical activity (PA) daily levels, which are linked to a myriad of health benefits. One of the aims of this chapter is to provide an overview of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have explored PE’s influence on youth health, highlighting its impact on physical fitness, academic performance, cognition, and obesity-related factors within the educational framework. Despite the necessity of additional research, PE via PA programs has revealed improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and academic outcomes and has shown a positive effect on obesity-related factors. The chapter emphasizes that PE offer unique opportunities for enhancing health in the school environment, which are not offered by other academic subjects. The chapter concludes by highlighting the necessity for ongoing research to better understand and advocate for PE’s importance in both public health and educational contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Quennerstedt M. Healthying physical education—on the possibility of learning health. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2019;24(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1539705 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Fernandez-Rio J. Health-based physical education: a model for educators. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. 2016;87(8):5–7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07303084.2016.1217123

Ladwig MA, Vazou S, Ekkekakis P. “My Best memory is when I was done with it”: PE memories are associated with adult sedentary behavior. Transl J Am Coll Sport Med. 2018;3(16):119–29. https://journals.lww.com/01933607-201808150-00001

Google Scholar  

Rhodes RE, Kates A. Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(5):715–31. https://academic.oup.com/abm/article/49/5/715/4562772

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Quennerstedt M. Exploring the relation between physical activity and health—a salutogenic approach to physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2008;13(3):267–83.

Cairney J, Dudley D, Kwan M, Bulten R, Kriellaars D. Physical literacy, physical activity and health: toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sport Med. 2019;49(3):371–83. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3

Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. Physical education’s role in public health. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991;62(2):124–37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.1991.10608701

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hills AP, Dengel DR, Lubans DR. Supporting public health priorities: recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(4):368–74. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S003306201400142X

Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin H, Lee S. Physical education’s role in public health. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012;83(2):125–35. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599842

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Martins J, Marques A, Gouveia ÉR, Carvalho F, Sarmento H, Valeiro MG. Participation in physical education classes and health-related behaviours among adolescents from 67 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):955. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/955

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Lister NB, Baur LA, Felix JF, Hill AJ, Marcus C, Reinehr T, et al. Child and adolescent obesity. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2023;9(1):24. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41572-023-00435-4

Corbin CB. Conceptual physical education: a course for the future. J Sport Heal Sci. 2021;10(3):308–22. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095254620301435

Kingston Ú, Adamakis M, Lester D, Costa J. A scoping review on quality physical education programmes and their outcomes on primary-level pupils. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3575. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3575

Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom Ö, Andersson G, Wallin P, Ekblom B. Physical education and leisure-time physical activity in youth are both important for adulthood activity, physical performance, and health. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(9):661–70. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/15/9/article-p661.xml

Bandeira A da S, Ravagnani FC de P, Barbosa Filho VC, de Oliveira VJM, de Camargo EM, Tenório MCM, et al. Mapping recommended strategies to promote active and healthy lifestyles through physical education classes: a scoping review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):36. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-022-01278-0

Ramires VV, dos Santos PC, Barbosa Filho VC, Bandeira A da S, Marinho Tenório MC, de Camargo EM, et al. Physical education for health among school-aged children and adolescents: a scoping review of reviews. J Phys Act Heal. 2023;20(7):586–99. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/20/7/article-p586.xml

Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World health. Organization. 2020:104.

Chaput JP, Willumsen J, Bull F, Chou R, Ekelund U, Firth J, et al. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):141. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z

Tapia-Serrano MA, Sevil-Serrano J, Sánchez-Miguel PA, López-Gil JF, Tremblay MS, García-Hermoso A. Prevalence of meeting 24-hour movement guidelines from pre-school to adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries. J Sport Heal Sci. 2022;11(4):427–37. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095254622000205

Aubert S, Barnes JD, Demchenko I, Hawthorne M, Abdeta C, Abi Nader P, et al. Global matrix 4.0 physical activity report card grades for children and adolescents: results and analyses from 57 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19(11):700–28. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/19/11/article-p700.xml

McKenzie TL, Lounsbery MAF. The pill not taken: revisiting physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014;85(3):287–92. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2014.931203

United Nations Educational S and CO. Quality Physical Education (QPE): Guidelines for policy makers. 2015. 4–82 p. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/

World Health Organization. Promoting physical activity through schools: a toolkit. Geneva; 2021.

Ramirez Varela A, Salvo D, Pratt M, Milton K, Siefken K, Bauman A, et al. Worldwide use of the first set of physical activity country cards: the global Observatory for Physical Activity—GoPA! Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):29. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-018-0663-7

Martins J, Onofre M, Hallal PC. Launch of the Global Observatory for Physical Education (GoPE!). J Phys Act Health. 2023;20(7):573–4. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/20/7/article-p573.xml

Cale L. Physical education’s journey on the road to health. Sport Educ Soc. 2021;26(5):486–99. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13573322.2020.1740979

Meyer U, Roth R, Zahner L, Gerber M, Puder JJ, Hebestreit H, et al. Contribution of physical education to overall physical activity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(5):600–6. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01425.x

da Silva DJ, Barbosa AO, Barbosa Filho VC, de Farias Júnior JC. Is participation in physical education classes related to physical activity and sedentary behavior? A systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19(11):786–808. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/19/11/article-p786.xml

de Jesus GM, de Oliveira Araujo RH, Dias LA, Barros AKC, dos Santos Araujo LDM, de Assis MAA. Attendance in physical education classes, sedentary behavior, and different forms of physical activity among schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1461. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-13864-9

Uddin R, Salmon J, Islam SMS, Khan A. Physical education class participation is associated with physical activity among adolescents in 65 countries. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22128. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79100-9

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

García-Hermoso A, Ezzatvar Y, López-Gil JF. Association between daily physical education attendance and meeting 24-hour movement guidelines in adolescence and adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2023;73(5):896–902. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1054139X23003245

Hobbs M, Daly-Smith A, McKenna J, Quarmby T, Morley D. Reconsidering current objectives for physical activity within physical education. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(19):1229–30. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097328

Arenas D, Vidal-Conti J, Muntaner-Mas A. Gender differences in students’ moderate to vigorous physical activity levels during primary school physical education lessons: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Teach Phys Educ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2024-0027

Iglesias D, Fernandez-Rio J, Rodríguez-González P. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in physical education: a review of reviews. J Teach Phys Educ. 2023;42(4):640–6. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/42/4/article-p640.xml

Hollis JL, Williams AJ, Sutherland R, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in elementary school physical education lessons. Prev Med (Baltim). 2016;86:34–54. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009174351500345X

Wang L, Zhou Y. A systematic review of correlates of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity of students in elementary school physical education. J Teach Phys Educ. 2021:1–16. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/aop/article-10.1123-jtpe.2020-0197/article-10.1123-jtpe.2020-0197.xml

Hollis JL, Sutherland R, Williams AJ, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):52. http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0

Kerr C, Smith L, Charman S, Harvey S, Savory L, Fairclough S, et al. Physical education contributes to total physical activity levels and predominantly in higher intensity physical activity categories. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2018;24(2):152–64. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X16672127

Alderman BL, Benham-Deal T, Beighle A, Erwin HE, Olson RL. Physical education’s contribution to daily physical activity among middle school youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24(4):634–48. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/pes/24/4/article-p634.xml

Mayorga-Vega D, Martínez-Baena A, Viciana J. Does school physical education really contribute to accelerometer-measured daily physical activity and non sedentary behaviour in high school students? J Sports Sci. 2018;36(17):1913–22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2018.1425967

Lonsdale C, Rosenkranz RR, Peralta LR, Bennie A, Fahey P, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons. Prev Med (Baltim). 2013;56(2):152–61. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743512006068

Wong LS, Gibson AM, Farooq A, Reilly JJ. Interventions to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in elementary school physical education lessons: systematic review. J Sch Health. 2021;91(10):836–45.

White RL, Bennie A, Vasconcellos D, Cinelli R, Hilland T, Owen KB, et al. Self-determination theory in physical education: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;99:103247. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X20314384

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Prochaska JJ, Rodgers MW, Sallis JF. Association of parent and peer support with adolescent physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(2):206–10. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609010

Sun H, Li W, Shen B. Learning in physical education: a self-determination theory perspective. J Teach Phys Educ. 2017;36(3):277–91. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/36/3/article-p277.xml

Zhan X, Clark CCT, Bao R, Duncan M, Hong JT, Chen ST. Association between physical education classes and physical activity among 187,386 adolescents aged 13–17 years from 50 low- and middle-income countries. J Pediatr. 2021;97(5):571–8. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021755721000231

Raghuveer G, Hartz J, Lubans DR, Takken T, Wiltz JL, Mietus-Snyder M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness in youth: an important marker of health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(7) https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000866

Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. 2008;32(1):1–11.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Ortega FB, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Lee D, Chul, Ruiz J, Blair S, Sui X. Fitness and fatness as health markers through the lifespan: an overview of current knowledge. Prog prev med. 2018;3(2):e0013. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=ovftt&NEWS=N&AN=01960908-201804000-00001

García-Hermoso A, Alonso-Martínez AM, Ramírez-Vélez R, Pérez-Sousa MÁ, Ramírez-Campillo R, Izquierdo M. Association of physical education with improvement of health-related physical fitness outcomes and fundamental motor skills among youths. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(6):e200223. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2763829

Peralta M, Henriques-Neto D, Gouveia ÉR, Sardinha LB, Marques A. Promoting health-related cardiorespiratory fitness in physical education: a systematic review. Clemente FM, editor. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237019. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237019

Lander N, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Salmon J, Barnett LM. Characteristics of teacher training in school-based physical education interventions to improve fundamental movement skills and/or physical activity: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2017;47(1):135–61. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-016-0561-6

Costigan SA Eather N, Plotnikoff RC, Taaffe DR, Lubans DR. High-intensity interval training for improving health-related fitness in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 2014(April):1–9. http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2015/06/18/bjsports-2014-094490.full%5Cn ; http://bjsm.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094490

Jurić P, Dudley DA, Petocz P. Does incorporating high intensity interval training in physical education classes improve fitness outcomes of students? A cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Reports. 2023:102127. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211335523000189

Duncombe SL, Barker AR, Bond B, Earle R, Varley-Campbell J, Vlachopoulos D, et al. School-based high-intensity interval training programs in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Harnish C, editor. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0266427. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266427

Bauer N, Sperlich B, Holmberg HC, Engel FA. Effects of high-intensity interval training in school on the physical performance and health of children and adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sport Med—Open. 2022;8(1):50. https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-022-00437-8

Lloyd RS, Oliver JL. The youth physical development model. Strength Cond J. 2012;34(3):61–72. https://journals.lww.com/00126548-201206000-00008

García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Campillo R, Izquierdo M. Is muscular fitness associated with future health benefits in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sport Med. 2019;49(7):1079–94. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-019-01098-6

Faigenbaum AD, Ratamess NA, Kang J, Bush JA, Rebullido TR. May the force be with youth: Foundational strength for lifelong development. 2023;22(12):414–22.

Till K, Bruce A, Green T, Morris SJ, Boret S, Bishop CJ. Strength and conditioning in schools: a strategy to optimise health, fitness and physical activity in youths. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(9):479–80. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104509

Villa-González E, Barranco-Ruiz Y, García-Hermoso A, Faigenbaum AD. Efficacy of school-based interventions for improving muscular fitness outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022:1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2022.2029578

Cox A, Fairclough SJ, Kosteli MC, Noonan RJ. Efficacy of school-based interventions for improving muscular fitness outcomes in adolescent boys: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2020;50(3):543–60. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-019-01215-5

Stricker PR, Faigenbaum AD, McCambridge TM, LaBella CR, Brooks MA, Canty G, et al. Resistance training for children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6) https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/145/6/e20201011/76942/Resistance-Training-for-Children-and-Adolescents

Smith JJ, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Faigenbaum AD, Lubans DR. The health benefits of muscular fitness for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2014;44(9):1209–23. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-014-0196-4

Martin-Martinez C, Valenzuela PL, Martinez-Zamora M, Martinez-de-Quel Ó. School-based physical activity interventions and language skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Sci Med Sport. 2023;26(2):140–8. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1440244022005047

Masini A, Marini S, Gori D, Leoni E, Rochira A, Dallolio L. Evaluation of school-based interventions of active breaks in primary schools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(4):377–84. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S144024401930800X

Sneck S, Viholainen H, Syväoja H, Kankaapää A, Hakonen H, Poikkeus AM, et al. Effects of school-based physical activity on mathematics performance in children: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):109. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0866-6

Watson A, Timperio A, Brown H, Best K, Hesketh KD. Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):114. http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9

Norris E, van Steen T, Direito A, Stamatakis E. Physically active lessons in schools and their impact on physical activity, educational, health and cognition outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(14):826–38. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100502

Visier-Alfonso ME, Sánchez-López M, Álvarez-Bueno C, Ruiz-Hermosa A, Nieto-López M, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Mediators between physical activity and academic achievement: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sms.14107

Donnelly JE, Hillman CH, Castelli D, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2016;48(6):1197–222. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005768-201606000-00027

Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, et al. Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: a review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2019;51(6):1242–51.

Singh AS, Saliasi E, van den Berg V, Uijtdewilligen L, de Groot RHM, Jolles J, et al. Effects of physical activity interventions on cognitive and academic performance in children and adolescents: a novel combination of a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(10):640–7. http://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098136

Marqu es A, Santos DA, Hillman CH, Sardinha LB. How does academic achievement relate to cardiorespiratory fitness, self-reported physical activity and objectively reported physical activity: a systematic review in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(16):1039–9. http://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097361

Rasberry CN, Lee SM, Robin L, Laris BA, Russell LA, Coyle KK, et al. The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: a systematic review of the literature. Prev Med (Baltim). 2011;52:S10–20. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743511000557

Dudley D, Burden R. What effect on learning does increasing the proportion of curriculum time allocated to physical education have? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2020;26(1):85–100. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X19830113

Hattie J. Visible learning. Routledge; 2008.

Book   Google Scholar  

García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Lubans DR, Izquierdo M. Effects of physical education interventions on cognition and academic performance outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(21):1224–32. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104112

Cho O, Choi W, Shin Y. The effectiveness of school physical education on students’ cognitive competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022;62(4) https://www.minervamedica.it/index2.php?show=R40Y2022N04A0575

Zach S, Shoval E, Lidor R. Physical education and academic achievement—literature review 1997–2015. J Curric Stud. 2017;49(5):703–21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220272.2016.1234649

Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(1):10. http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-5-10

Lambert K, Ford A, Jeanes R. The association between physical education and academic achievement in other curriculum learning areas: a review of literature. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2024;29(1):51–81. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17408989.2022.2029385

García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Saavedra JM. Exercise, health outcomes, and pædiatric obesity: a systematic review of meta-analyses. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(1):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.006 .

World Health Organization. Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity. World Health Organization; 2016. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/204176

UNICEF. UNICEF advocacy strategy guidance for the prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. New York: UNICEF; 2020.

Doak CM, Visscher TLS, Renders CM, Seidell JC. The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a review of interventions and programmes. Obes Rev. 2006;7(1):111–36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00234.x

Katz DL, O’Connell M, Njike VY, Yeh MC, Nawaz H. Strategies for the prevention and control of obesity in the school setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2008;32(12):1780–9. https://www.nature.com/articles/ijo2008158

Khambalia AZ, Dickinson S, Hardy LL, Gill T, Baur LA. A synthesis of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of school-based behavioural interventions for controlling and preventing obesity. Obes Rev. 2012;13(3):214–33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00947.x

Hodder RK, O’Brien KM, Lorien S, Wolfenden L, Moore THM, Hall A, et al. Interventions to prevent obesity in school-aged children 6-18 years: an update of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from 2015–2021. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;54:101635. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537022003650

Kirk D. The ‘obesity crisis’ and school physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2006;11(2):121–33. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13573320600640660

Cale L, Harris J. ‘Every child (of every size) matters’ in physical education! Physical education’s role in childhood obesity. Sport Educ Soc. 2013;18(4):433–52. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13573322.2011.601734

Jacob CM, Hardy-Johnson PL, Inskip HM, Morris T, Parsons CM, Barrett M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions with health education to reduce body mass index in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1–22.

Liu Z, Xu HM, Wen LM, Peng YZ, Lin LZ, Zhou S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the overall effects of school-based obesity prevention interventions and effect differences by intervention components. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):1–12.

Klakk H, Chinapaw M, Heidemann M, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N. Effect of four additional physical education lessons on body composition in children aged 8–13 years—a prospective study during two school years. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):170. http://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2431-13-170

Learmonth YC, Hebert JJ, Fairchild TJ, Møller NC, Klakk H, Wedderkopp N. Physical education and leisure-time sport reduce overweight and obesity: a number needed to treat analysis. Int J Obes. 2019;43(10):2076–84. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-018-0300-1

Menschik D, Ahmed S, Alexander MH, Blum RW. Adolescent physical activities as predictors of young adult weight. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(1):29. http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.14

Dabravolskaj J, Montemurro G, Ekwaru JP, Wu XY, Storey K, Campbell S, et al. Effectiveness of school-based health promotion interventions prioritized by stakeholders from health and education sectors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med Reports. 2020;19:101138. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221133552030098X

Jurić P, Jurak G, Morrison SA, Starc G, Sorić M. Effectiveness of a population-scaled, school-based physical activity intervention for the prevention of childhood obesity. Obesity. 2023;31(3):811–22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23695

Ekwaru JP, Ohinmaa A, Dabravolskaj J, Maximova K, Veugelers PJ. Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of school-based health promotion programmes for chronic disease prevention. Eur J Pub Health. 2021;31(6):1183–9. https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/31/6/1183/6342860

Kahan D, McKenzie TL. The potential and reality of physical education in controlling overweight and obesity. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(4):653–9. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302355

Clark H, Coll-Seck AM, Banerjee A, Peterson S, Dalglish SL, Ameratunga S, et al. A future for the world’s children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):605–58. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673619325401

Dudley D, Beighle A, Erwin H, Cairney J, Schaefer L, Murfay K. Physical education-based physical activity interventions. In: The Routledge handbook of youth physical activity. Routledge; 2020. p. 489–503. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781000050660/chapters/10.4324/9781003026426-30 .

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Corbin CB. Implications of physical literacy for research and practice: a commentary. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(1):14–27. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02701367.2016.1124722

Bailey R. Defining physical literacy: making sense of a promiscuous concept. Sport Soc. 2022;25(1):163–80. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17430437.2020.1777104

Edwards LC, Bryant AS, Keegan RJ, Morgan K, Jones AM. Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2017;47(1):113–26. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7

Lundvall S. Physical literacy in the field of physical education—a challenge and a possibility. J Sport Heal Sci. 2015;4(2):113–8. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095254615000228

Luan H, Geczy P, Lai H, Gobert J, Yang SJH, Ogata H, et al. Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Front Psychol. 2020:11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820/full

Zhang B, Jin H, Duan X. Physical education movement and comprehensive health quality intervention under the background of artificial intelligence. Front Public Heal. 2022;10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947731/full

McKay H, Naylor PJ, Lau E, Gray SM, Wolfenden L, Milat A, et al. Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):102. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4

Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–48. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673616307280

Lang JJ, Zhang K, Agostinis-Sobrinho C, Andersen LB, Basterfield L, Berglind D, et al. Top 10 international priorities for physical fitness research and surveillance among children and adolescents: a twin-panel Delphi study. Sport Med. 2023;53(2):549–64. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-022-01752-6

Hall A, Lane C, Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Sutherland R, McCarthy N, et al. Evaluating the scaling up of an effective implementation intervention (PACE) to increase the delivery of a mandatory physical activity policy in primary schools. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023;20(1):106. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-023-01498-y

Wiklander P, Fröberg A, Lundvall S. Searching for the alternative: a scoping review of empirical studies with holistic perspectives on health and implications for teaching physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2023;29(3):351–68. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X221147813

N. M, J T. Quality physical education (QPE): guidelines for policy makers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2015.

Solmon MA. Optimizing the role of physical education in promoting physical activity: a social-ecological approach. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015;86(4):329–37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02701367.2015.1091712

Lewallen TC, Hunt H, Potts-Datema W, Zaza S, Giles W. The whole school, whole community, whole child model: a new approach for improving educational attainment and healthy development for students. J Sch Health. 2015;85(11):729–39. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4606766&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Burns RD, Brusseau TA, Fu Y, Myrer RS, Hannon JC. Comprehensive school physical activity programming and classroom behavior. Am J Health Behav. 2016;40(1):100–7. http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=1087-3244&volume=40&issue=1&spage=100

Brusseau TA, Hannon J, Burns R. The effect of a comprehensive school physical activity program on physical activity and health-related fitness in children from low-income families. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(8):888–94.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

GICAFE “Physical Activity and Exercise Sciences Research Group,” Faculty of Education, University of Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain

Adrià Muntaner-Mas

PROFITH “PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity” Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrià Muntaner-Mas .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

Antonio García-Hermoso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Muntaner-Mas, A. (2024). Physical Activity and Health Through Physical Education. In: García-Hermoso, A. (eds) Promotion of Physical Activity and Health in the School Setting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65595-1_7

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65595-1_7

Published : 25 August 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-65594-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-65595-1

eBook Packages : Medicine Medicine (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research