12F, 13M
Mice were housed in an Optimice® caging system (Animal Care Systems, Centennial, CO, USA); each cage contained sani-chip bedding and was equipped with a nylabone for mice to chew and a nesting square. No more than three mice were housed in any single cage. All mice were maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle (08:00–20:00 lights on). Food and water were provided ad libitum .
At four weeks of age, mice in the mushroom dietary condition began to receive Lion’s Mane Mushroom Mycelium Powder that was mixed into wet food (Host Defense Mushrooms, Fungi Perfecti, LLC., Olympia, WA, USA)); this continued throughout the duration of the study for four months. Each cage in each of the groups was administered 150 g of wet food and 100 g of standard dry food pellets. Wet food was made by combining laboratory water and dry food, waiting for the dry pellets to soften, and mixing by hand. WT and tau mice supplemented with H. erinaceus received 1/3 teaspoon of powder containing 1000 mg of Lion’s Mane and approximately 550 mg of ( H. erinaceus ) mycelium polysaccharides mixed into the 150 g of wet food. WT and tau control mice received 150 g of wet food with no H. erinaceus powder. All mice were provided food ad libitum and weights of the wet food along with the dry food were taken every four days to measure average food consumption.
2.4.1. body weights and food consumption weights.
Body weights were collected throughout the duration of the experiment every eight days (after every second food weight collection) to assess weight gain as a result of maturation and dietary condition. Food weights were collected every four days to verify that mice were consuming a sufficient amount of wet food in accordance with their experimental condition, in comparison to the dry food provided ad libitum . Due to group housing of mice, the amount of wet food and dry food consumed was calculated by weighing the amount of wet food and dry food remaining in the cage after four days, subtracting that from the original amount (150 g for wet food; 100 g for dry food), and dividing that total by the number of mice in the cage to yield an average.
The Open Field Test (OFT) consists of a square enclosure that is used to assess general locomotor activity in rodents, exploratory behavior, mood, and anxiety [ 23 ]. The enclosure was a white plastic box that measures 45 × 45 × 40 cm. Mice were given a single five-minute trial while an overhead camera with SMART animal behavior software (Panlab, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) measured the following variables: distance traveled in the center of the OFT (cm), percent time spent in the center, and latency (s) to first enter into the center of the box. The OFT box was cleaned with 70% ethanol between mice to eliminate olfactory cues. The number of fecal boli was also counted manually at the end of each trial before cleaning.
The Elevated Zero Maze (EZM) is a behavioral test measuring anxiety-like behavior and approach/avoidance conflict in rodents [ 24 ]. It is elevated off the ground and consists of an elevated ‘0’ shaped platform with two enclosed arms and two open arms on opposite ends [ 25 ]. The mouse moves between the enclosed and open arms within a single five-minute trial. Mice were considered to be inside a given arm when all four paws were in that particular arm. Mice displaying higher levels of activity by exploring the open and exposed arms of the EZM are perceived as less anxious in comparison to those who spend more time in the enclosed and protected arms [ 24 ]. The following variables were measured: number of arm transitions, time spent in the open versus closed arms, and head dips assessing risk-taking behavior [ 26 ]. Between each mouse, the EZM apparatus was cleaned with 70% ethanol to eliminate olfactory cues. One mouse was removed from EZM data analysis due to falling off the maze.
The Morris Water Maze (MWM) is a behavioral test of spatial memory where rodents must use visual cues to locate a clear platform hidden just below opaque water [ 27 ]. During a five-day acquisition period, mice were run through three trials per day. Visual cues were placed onto a curtain hanging outside of the tub. These cues aid the mice in learning the location of the hidden platform which remains stationary during the test. Mice were placed into the MWM facing the wall and were given 60 s to find the hidden platform. If the mouse did not find the platform in the allotted time, the mouse was guided towards the platform and placed there for 10 s. Each day, mice were run through a different sequence of three cues; the sequence was the same for each mouse. During each trial, the following variables were measured: percent time spent in the target quadrant, latency to reach the platform (s), thigmotaxicity (time (s) spent swimming along the border of the pool), and total distance swam (cm). An overhead camera connected to SMART animal behavior tracking software (Panlab, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) recorded these variables. On day six, after the five 3-trial acquisition days, each mouse underwent a single probe trial where the platform was lowered for the animals to be unable to access it. This is meant to measure long-term memory. Mice began at a novel location (between two of the previous start locations). Target crosses when the platform was submerged, time spent in the target quadrant, and thigmotaxicity were measured on this probe day.
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) are common measures for studying noncognitive aspects of AD in rodents; these primarily include burrowing and nesting. These assess the tendency for mice to have normal activity levels and general animal welfare [ 28 ]. Burrowing was analyzed first. Burrowing was assessed by individually housing mice in a shoebox cage (Ancare, Bellmore, NY, USA) containing a PVC tube with one end closed, containing 250 g of pea-gravel (small rocks). The amount of removed pea gravel was measured after 2-h and the following morning. One mouse was removed from both ADL measures due to a water bottle spilling in the shoebox cage during the 2-h burrowing assessment, which could have potentially served as a stressor to the mouse and affected performance in the ADL measures.
Once the two burrowing measures were recorded, fresh sani-chip bedding was given to each cage along with 2.5 g of shredded white paper, which was sprinkled into the cage. The following morning, pictures were taken of each cage and its nest for scoring by a rater blind to condition. Two raters rated each nest on a scale of 1–5, with 1 being no nest was constructed and 5 being a complete nest was constructed [ 29 ]. After reliability in ratings was assessed, the scores were averaged and used for analysis.
A 2 (genotype) × 2 (diet) × 2 (sex) × 5 (time) mixed ANOVA was run to assess changes in body weights overtime and a 2 (genotype) × 2 (diet) × 2 (sex) × 4 (time) mixed ANOVA was run to assess differences in the consumption of dry and wet food over the course of the experiment.
Dependent variables in the OFT, EZM, and ADL measures (burrowing and nesting) were assessed through 2 (genotype) × 2 (diet) × 2 (sex) factorial ANOVAs.
A 2 (genotype) × 2 (diet) × 2 (sex) × 5 (acquisition days of the MWM paradigm) mixed ANOVA was run for the following dependent variables in the MWM: percent time spent in the target quadrant, latency to reach the platform (s), total distance (cm) and thigmotaxicity. Target crosses on the final probe trial (when the platform was submerged), thigmotaxicity, and time spent in the target quadrant were measured with a 2 (genotype) × 2 (diet) × 2 (sex) factorial ANOVA.
Pairwise comparisons were assessed following significant main effects and simple effects analyses were run following any significant interactions with Bonferroni corrections. Greenhouse Geiser corrections were applied when sphericity was violated in mixed ANOVA analyses. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p < 0.10 was considered trending. All analyses were run through SPSS v.26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and graphs were made through GraphPad Prism (v.9.3.1) (San Diego, CA, USA).
There was a significant effect of day, F (1.679, 112.507) = 161.575, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.707; as the experiment progressed, mice gained weight ( Figure 1 A). There was also a significant day × diet × sex × genotype interaction, F (1.679, 112.507) = 3.745, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.053. In male WT mice, those given the control diet (no H. erinaceus in wet food) weighed significantly more than their mushroom counterparts only at 64 days ( p < 0.05) and 96 days ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 1 B). In female tau mice, those on the control diet weighed significantly more at each weighing time (baseline: p < 0.01; 32 days: p < 0.01; 64 days: p < 0.001; 96 days: p = 0.001; 128 days: p < 0.05) than those given H. erinaceus ( Figure 1 C). Finally, in control diet mice, female tau mice weighed significantly more than female WT mice at days 64 ( p = 0.01), 96 ( p < 0.05), and 128 ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 1 D).
Weights over time. ( A ) Mice on the control diet (no H. erinaceus ) weighed significantly more than those given H. erinaceus . ( B ) Male WT mice given the control diet weighed significantly more than their H. erinaceus counterparts at 64 days and 96 days; only male mice are graphed. ( C ) Female tau mice on the control diet weighed significantly more at each weighing point than female tau mice given H. erinaceus ; only female mice are graphed. ( D ) Female tau mice weighed significantly more than female WT mice. Female tau mice weighed more than female WT mice at days 64, 96, and 128; only control diet mice are graphed. 0 = baseline; error bars represent mean ± SEM. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
There was a significant between-subject effect of diet, F (1, 67) = 5.833, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.08; control diet mice weighed more than those given H. erinaceus ( Figure 1 A). There was also a significant diet × sex × genotype interaction, F (1, 67) = 10.291, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.133. In male mice, WT controls weighed significantly more than WT mushroom mice, p < 0.05 ( Figure 1 B). In female mice, tau mushroom mice weighed significantly less than tau control mice ( p = 0.001) ( Figure 1 C). In control mice (no H. erinaceus ), female tau mice weighed significantly more than female WT mice, p < 0.05 ( Figure 1 D).
There was a significant effect of time, F (2.689, 180.133) = 11.203, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.143, indicating that mice ate more wet food over the course of the experiment ( Figure 2 A). There were also significant time × diet × sex, F (2.689, 180.133) = 4.511, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.063, and time × diet × genotype, F (2.689, 180.133) = 3.831, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.054 interactions. Male control diet mice ate more wet food at 64 ( p < 0.01), 96 ( p < 0.001), and 128 ( p < 0.01) days than male mushroom mice ( Figure 2 B). Female mice given H. erinaceus ate more than male mice given H. erinaceus at 64 ( p < 0.05) and 96 ( p < 0.01) days ( Figure 2 C). Tau mice given the control diet ate more than tau mice given H. erinaceus at 32 ( p < 0.05) and 128 ( p < 0.01) days ( Figure 2 D).
Wet food consumption over time. ( A ) Mice on the control diet (no H. erinaceus ) ate more food than those given H. erinaceus . ( B ) Male control diet mice ate more wet food at day 64 ( p < 0.01), 96 ( p < 0.001), and 128 ( p < 0.01) than male mushroom mice. Tau control mice ate significantly more wet food than tau mushroom mice; only male mice graphed. ( C ) Female mice ate more than male mice at 64 ( p < 0.05) and 96 ( p < 0.01) days. Female tau mice ate significantly more than male tau mice, p < 0.001. Tau female mice ate significantly more wet food than WT female mice ( p = 0.001). WT male mice ate significantly more wet food than Tau male mice, p = 0.001; only H. erinaceus diet condition graphed. ( D ) Tau control mice ate more than tau mushroom mice at day 32 ( p < 0.05) and 128 ( p < 0.01). Female mice ate significantly more than male mice, p < 0.05. Male control mice ate significantly more wet food than male mushroom mice, p < 0.001. Female mushroom mice ate significantly more wet food than male mushroom mice, p < 0.001; only tau mice graphed. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
There were significant effects of diet, F (1, 67) = 6.251, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.085, and diet × sex, F (1, 67) = 8.399, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.111, genotype × sex, F (1, 67) = 9.179, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.120, and diet × sex × genotype, F (1, 67) = 13.792, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.171 interactions. Control mice ate significantly more wet food than those on the H. erinaceus diet, p < 0.05 ( Figure 2 A). Female mice given mushrooms ate significantly more than males given mushrooms, p < 0.05 ( Figure 2 C). Female tau mice ate significantly more than male tau mice, p < 0.05 and tau females ate significantly more wet food than WT females, p < 0.05. Male tau mice given the control diet ate significantly more than male tau mice given H. erinaceus , p < 0.001 ( Figure 2 B). Female tau mushroom mice ate significantly more than male tau mushroom mice, p < 0.001 ( Figure 2 C). Interestingly, wet food consumption in genotype was dependent on sex in the mushroom condition: tau female mushroom mice ate significantly more than WT female mushroom mice, p = 0.001 while WT male mushroom mice ate significantly more than tau male mushroom mice, p = 0.001 ( Figure 2 C).
There was a significant effect of time, F (1.795, 120.248) = 8.314, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.110; mice ate less dry food as the experiment progressed. There was a significant sex × genotype interaction, F (1, 67) = 4.497, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.063. Male tau mice ate significantly more dry food than male WT mice ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 3 ).
Dry food consumption over time. As the experiment progressed, mice ate less dry food, p < 0.01. Male tau mice consumed significantly more dry food than male WT mice ( p < 0.05). Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
3.4.1. latency to enter the center.
There was a significant diet × genotype interaction, F (1, 67) = 7.650, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.102. Simple effects analysis revealed that tau control mice had significantly longer latencies to enter the center of the OF compared to tau mice given H. erinaceus ( p < 0.05) and WT control mice ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 4 A). Analysis also revealed a trending diet × sex interaction, F (1, 67) = 3.217, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.046. Female mushroom mice (M = 8.630 s, SD = 11.875) took less time to enter the center of the OF than female control mice (M = 17.897 s, SD = 20.574). Male mushroom mice (M = 14.813 s, SD = 19.129) took longer to enter the center of the OF than male control mice (M = 10.216 s, SD = 16.930).
Open field test measures. ( A ) Tau control mice had significantly longer latencies to enter the center compared to WT control mice. Tau mice supplemented with H. erinaceus had significantly shorter latencies in entering the center of the OF compared to tau control mice. ( B ) Male mice defecated more than females. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
There was a trending effect of diet, F (1, 67) = 2.873, p < 0.10, η p 2 = 0.041. Mice in the mushroom diet (M = 1033.89 cm, SD = 1534.67) traveled a greater total distance in the center of the OFT compared to mice in the control group (M = 480.23 cm, SD = 522.65).
There were no significant effects of diet, F (1, 67) = 2.464, p = 0.121, η p 2 = 0.035, sex, F (1, 67) = 0.001, p = 0.979, η p 2 = 0.000, or genotype, F (1, 67) = 0.085, p = 0.771, η p 2 = 0.001 for percent time spent in the center of the OF.
Analysis of fecal boli revealed a significant effect of sex, F (1, 67) = 10.227, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.132. Males left significantly more fecal boli than females during their time in the OFT ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 4 B). There were no significant effects of genotype, F (1, 67) = 0.049, p = 0.825. There were no differences between tau mice (M = 1.181, SD = 1.929) and WT mice (M = 1.283, SD = 2.162). Additionally, there were no significant effects of diet, F (1, 67) = 0.177, p = 0.734. There were no differences between mice administered H. erinaceus (M = 1.153, SD = 1.767) and mice consuming the control diet (M = 1.311, SD = 2.311).
3.5.1. head dips.
There was a significant effect of sex, F (1, 66) = 6.377, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.088, a significant effect of diet, F (1, 66) = 7.107, p = 0.010, η p 2 = 0.097, and a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 66) = 29.143, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.306. Female mice made significantly more head dips than male mice ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 A). Mice given H. erinaceus made significantly more head dips than control mice ( p = 0.010) ( Figure 5 B) and tau mice made significantly more head dips than WT mice ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 C).
Head Dips in the EZM. ( A ) Female mice made significantly more head dips than male mice. ( B ) Mice given H. erinaceus made significantly more head dips than control mice. ( C ) Tau mice made significantly more head dips than WT mice. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (* p < 0.05, ** p = 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
There was a trending effect of sex, F (1, 66) = 3.108, p = 0.083, η p 2 = 0.045. Female mice (M = 6.259, SD = 9.918) made more transitions compared to male mice (M = 3.127, SD = 4.993).
There was a significant effect of diet, F (1, 66) = 4.878, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.069, a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 66) = 10.054, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.132, and a significant diet × genotype interaction, F (1, 66) = 7.099, p = 0.010, η p 2 = 0.097. Mice given H. erinaceus spent significantly more time in the open arms compared to control mice ( p < 0.05). Tau mice spent significantly more time in the open arms compared to WT mice ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 6 ). Simple effects analysis revealed that tau mice given H. erinaceus spent significantly more time in the open arms compared to tau control mice ( p = 0.001) ( Figure 6 ).
Percent time spent in the open arms of the EZM. Tau mice given H. erinaceus spent significantly more time in the open arms compared to tau control mice and tau mice spent more time in the open arms compared to WT mice. Mice given H. erinaceus spent more time in the open arms compared to control mice. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p = 0.001).
3.6.1. latency to platform.
There was a significant effect of day, F (4, 268) = 23.470, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.259. As the days progressed, mice found the platform faster ( Figure 7 A). A between-subjects effect of genotype was also seen, F (1, 67) = 28.018, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.295. Tau mice had significantly longer latencies to find the platform compared to WT mice, p < 0.001 ( Figure 7 B).
Latency to find the platform in the MWM. ( A ) As the days progressed, mice spent less time finding the platform ( p < 0.001). ( B ) Tau mice had significantly longer latencies to find the platform compared to WT mice ( p < 0.001) Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
There was a significant effect of day, F (3.444, 230.780) = 10.059, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.131. As the days progressed, mice spent more time in the target quadrant ( Figure 8 A). There was also a significant day × diet × genotype × sex interaction, F (3.444, 230.780) = 2.567, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.037. Simple effects analysis revealed that Tau female control mice spent significantly more time in the target quadrant compared to tau male control mice on day three ( p < 0.05). A between-subjects effect of genotype was also seen, F (1, 67) = 4.926, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.068. WT mice spent significantly more time in the target quadrant compared to tau mice ( p = 0.03) ( Figure 8 B).
Percent time spent in the target quadrant of the MWM. ( A ) As the days progressed, mice spent more time in the target quadrant ( p < 0.001). ( B ) WT mice significantly spent more time in the target quadrant compared to tau mice ( p < 0.05). Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
There was a significant effect of day, F (3.024, 202.629) = 30.430, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.312. As the days progressed, mice spent less time swimming along the border of the pool. A significant day × genotype interaction was also seen, F (3.024, 202.629) = 3.651, p = 0.013, η p 2 = 0.052. Simple effects analysis revealed that WT mice spent significantly less time around the border than tau mice on days 2–4 ( p < 0.001) and 5 ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 9 ). A between-subjects effect of genotype was also seen, F (1, 67) = 17.424, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.206. Tau mice spent significantly more time along the border than WT mice ( p < 0.001).
MWM thigmotaxicity by genotype. As the days progressed, tau mice spent significantly more time around the border of the MWM compared to WT mice. Tau mice spent significantly more time along the border on days 2–4 and 5 compared to WT mice. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
There was a significant effect of day, F (4, 268) = 9.995, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.130. As the days progressed, mice swam shorter total distances. There was also a significant day × sex interaction, F (4, 268) = 2.724, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.039. While females did not show a significant decrease in total distance swam across the acquisition days, male mice did. Males swam significantly less total distance on days 3, 4, and 5 compared to day 1 ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 10 A). There was also a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 67) = 29.733, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.307. Tau mice traveled a significantly greater total distance than WT mice ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 10 B).
Total distance swam in the MWM. ( A ) As the days progressed, mice swam less total distance, with male mice specifically traveling shorter distances on days 3 through 5 compared to day 1 ( p < 0.001). Female mice did not show significant differences in distances throughout the training days. ( B ) As the days progressed, tau mice traveled a significantly greater distance than WT mice ( p < 0.001). Error bars represent mean ± SEM.
There was a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 67) = 13.264, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.165. Tau mice had a significantly longer latency to first reach where the platform would be than WT mice ( p = 0.001) ( Figure 11 A). There was also a significant genotype × sex interaction, F (1, 67) = 7.911, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.106. Female WT mice took significantly less time than female tau mice to first reach where the platform would be ( p < 0.001). Additionally, female tau mice had a longer latency in first reaching where the platform would be than male tau mice ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 11 B).
MWM probe trial latency to first cross platform. ( A ) Tau mice had a significantly longer latency to first reach where the platform would be than WT mice. ( B ) Female WT mice took significantly less time than female tau mice to first cross where the platform would be and female tau mice had a significantly longer latency to first cross where the platform would be than male tau mice. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (** p < 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001).
There was a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 67) = 7.373, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.099. WT mice made significantly more crosses over the target than tau mice ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 12 A). There was also a significant genotype × sex interaction, F (1, 67) = 4.533, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.063. Female WT mice made significantly more target crosses than female tau mice ( p < 0.01).
Additional MWM Probe Trial measures. ( A ) WT mice crossed the target significantly more than tau mice. ( B ) WT mice spent significantly more time in the target quadrant on the probe day than tau mice. ( C ) Tau mice spent significantly more time in the border (greater thigmotaxicity) than WT mice. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Analysis revealed a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 67) = 5.267, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.073. WT mice spent significantly more time in the target quadrant on the probe day than tau mice ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 12 B). There was also a trending effect of diet, F (1, 67) = 3.616, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.051. Mushroom mice (M = 23.054, SD = 9.64) spent less time in the target quadrant compared to control mice (M = 26.974, SD = 8.09).
There was a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 67) = 10.724, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.138. Tau mice spent significantly more time in the border on the probe day compared to WT mice ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 12 C).
3.7.1. burrowing.
Analysis of pea-gravel burrowed after 2 h revealed a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 66) = 13.805, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.173. WT mice burrowed significantly more pea-gravel than tau mice ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 13 A). There was also a significant diet × genotype × sex interaction, F (1, 66) = 8.512, p < 0.01, η p 2 = 0.114. Female WT mushroom mice burrowed significantly more than male WT mushroom mice ( p < 0.05). Male tau mushroom mice burrowed significantly more than female tau mushroom mice ( p = 0.020). Female WT mushroom mice burrowed more than female tau mushroom mice ( p < 0.001). Male WT control mice burrowed significantly more than male tau control mice ( p = 0.020).
Burrowing assay measures. ( A ) Two-hour burrowing assessment. WT mice burrowed significantly more pea-gravel than tau mice after 2 h. ( B ) At the overnight measure, female WT mice burrowed significantly more than female tau mice. Male tau mice burrowed significantly more than female tau mice and male WT mice burrowed significantly more than male tau mice. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (* p < 0.05, *** p ≤ 0.001).
Analysis of overnight pea-gravel burrowed revealed a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 66) = 25.586, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.279, a significant genotype × sex interaction, F (1, 66) = 4.475, p = 0.038, η p 2 = 0.063, and a significant diet × genotype × sex interaction, F (1, 66) = 4.626, p = 0.035, η p 2 = 0.065. Male tau mice burrowed more than female tau mice ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 13 B). Female WT mice burrowed more than female tau mice ( p < 0.001). Male WT mice burrowed more than male tau mice ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 13 B). Male tau mushroom mice burrowed significantly more than female tau mushroom mice ( p < 0.001). Female tau control mice burrowed more than female tau mushroom mice ( p = 0.013). Female WT mushroom mice burrowed more than female tau mushroom mice ( p < 0.001).
Nests were scored by two raters blind to experimental conditions. There was a strong agreement between the scores of both raters, α = 0.950; analysis was conducted on the resulting average nest score. There was a significant effect of genotype, F (1, 66) = 25.222, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.276 ( Figure 14 A). WT mice built significantly better nests than tau mice ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 14 B).
Nesting behavior. ( A ) WT mice built significantly better nests than tau mice. ( B ) Representative nest by mushroom condition and genotype; numbers represent randomly assigned IDs for raters. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (*** p < 0.001).
This study sought to assess the effects of H. erinaceus on a tauopathy mouse model. We hypothesized that H. erinaceus would decrease anxiety-like behaviors, increase locomotor activity, decrease deficits in spatial memory, and improve performance in ADL measures. Overall, results indicate that H. erinaceus had significant anxiolytic effects and increased locomotor activity, in agreement with previous literature. However, H. erinaceus led to no improvements in spatial memory or activities of daily living.
Tau mice given H. erinaceus entered the center of the OFT apparatus faster than tau mice on the control diet, signaling decreased anxiety. Additionally, mice given H. erinaceus traveled a greater distance in the center of the OFT compared to control mice. These results are consistent with studies using WT mice and the OFT to assess the effects of H. erinaceus [ 30 , 31 ]. These studies showed that mice consuming H. erinaceus spent more time in the center of the OFT. Increased locomotor activity was also seen in mice consuming H. erinaceus; tau H. erinaceus mice entered the center significantly faster than tau control mice and H. erinaceus mice traveled a greater average distance in the center. This finding of increased locomotion is consistent with recent literature which showed that WT mice consuming H. erinaceus had increased locomotor activity in the Y maze [ 32 ] and longer exploration times in the emergence test, a variant assessment to the OFT [ 11 ].
Defecation is also a variable associated with emotionality, specifically stress and anxiety [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In the current study, males defecated significantly more than females, indicating higher levels of anxiety in males. This is a common finding consistent with past and current literature [ 33 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. In addition to defecation denoting stress responses, it has also been suggested that males defecate more than females as a “territory marking response” [ 33 , 36 ].
In the EZM, female mice made more head dips and total transitions than male mice. This is consistent with literature that has shown that females are typically more active than males in the EZM and elevated plus maze (EPM), a similar test to the EZM used to measure anxiety-like behaviors [ 24 , 39 ]. Head dips are typically indicative of risk-taking behavior and decreased anxiety [ 40 ], meaning that in this assessment females presented increased risk-taking behaviors than males. Overall, mice given H. erinaceus spent more time in the open arms than control mice. More importantly, tau mice given H. erinaceus spent the most time in the open arms of the EZM and made more head dips than tau control mice. This is an important finding, showing that H. erinaceus has anxiolytic effects in the rTg4510 tau mouse model. A recent study [ 30 ] also indicated that WT mice supplemented with H. erinaceus spent more time in the open arms of the EPM than control mice. Additionally, it has been shown that H. erinaceus significantly increased entries into the open arm and time spent in the open arm of the EPM in WT mice [ 41 ].
Results do not reveal significant effects of H. erinaceus during the acquisition days of the MWM. However, mice did learn as the days progressed, which is consistent with literature using the MWM and transgenic mice of AD [ 42 , 43 ] and studies specifically assessing the effects of H. erinaceus on spatial memory with the MWM on AD rodent models [ 20 , 44 ]. Past literature has consistently shown spatial memory impairments in rTg4510 mice during the MWM assessment at 2.5, 3, and 5.5 months [ 21 , 45 ], and the Barnes Maze [ 46 ], with tau mice performing worse than their non-transgenic counterparts. It is also important to note that H. erinaceus has shown no effects on spatial memory in WT mice [ 32 ], which is consistent with the effects on the transgenic and non-transgenic mice used in this study. More research is warranted on assessing the effects of H. erinaceus on spatial memory in both WT and AD mouse models. Past research implying improvements on memory as an effect of the mushroom have done this with the Novel Object Recognition (NOR) task [ 11 , 15 ] which is used as a measure for short term memory rather than MWM which typically measures long term memory.
There were no significant effects of H. erinaceus on the probe day of the MWM; only significant effects of genotype were seen. This is indicative of the dietary condition having no effect on long-term memory. This contradicts previous studies assessing the effects of H. erinaceus in AD models, which have shown mice that consuming H. erinaceus performed better than mice not consuming H. erinaceus on the probe day [ 20 , 47 ]. As this is the first study assessing the effects of H. erinaceus on spatial memory in tau mice, it can help fill the gap and push further assessment of spatial memory in this mouse model by H. erinaceus supplementation.
H. erinaceus did not lead to improvements in ADL measures; only significant effects of genotype were noted. WT mice burrowed significantly more pea-gravel and built significantly better nests than tau mice. Interactions between diet, genotype, and sex were also seen. These results reveal that female WT mushroom mice burrowed significantly more than male WT mushroom mice, and that female tau mushroom mice burrowed significantly less than male tau mushroom mice in the 2-h burrowing measure. Despite no main effects of diet being seen, it is still worth reporting as not many studies assessing the effects of H. erinaceus have investigated ADL measures. Tsai-Teng et al. (2016) [ 16 ] conducted a nesting assessment with APP/PS1 mice consuming H. erinaceus . Results showed that AD mice presented more deficits in nesting activities compared to their WT counterparts; a result consistent with this study. However, in contrast with the results of the current study, researchers found that the administration of H. erinaceus was able to alleviate deficits in APP/PS1 mice in the nesting assessment [ 16 ].
Noncognitive assessments, such as ADL measures, are important to include as they can help determine non-cognitive deterioration in AD. More importantly, previous literature has shown that H. erinaceus improves non-cognitive deficits in humans consuming the mushroom in capsules 3 times a day for 49 weeks through the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) [ 5 ]. The IADL is a test of independent living skills in humans, a construct that is parallel to the ADL measure in rodent models.
Animal weights and wet food consumption increased over the course of the experiment. Tau and WT control mice weighed more than tau and WT mice given H. erinaceus . Throughout this experiment, tau and WT control mice consumed more wet food than tau and WT mice given H. erinaceus . It has been previously shown that tau mice consume more food but weigh less [ 45 ]. However, in the current study, tau mushroom mice ate less than tau control mice, indicating that not all tau mice ate more wet food. Additionally, tau female control mice weighed significantly more than WT female control mice, a finding inconsistent with previous research [ 48 ]. Female WT mice consuming H. erinaceus weighed significantly more than female tau mice consuming H. erinaceus although tau female mice ate more wet food than WT female mice. This, again, may be due to the progression of the disease in the tau mouse model as suggested by past literature [ 48 ]. Male tau mice supplemented with H. erinaceus weighed significantly more than male WT mice consuming H. erinaceus although male mice given H. erinaceus ate less throughout the experiment. Ryu et al. (2018) [ 31 ] found that the H. erinaceus did not have effects on the natural weight gain of the mice. This could be due to differences perhaps in how the diet was given; Ryu et al. (2018) [ 31 ] administered H. erinaceus by oral gavage while mice in the current study received H. erinaceus as a powder mixed into wet food. Further research is warranted on the causes of these weight differences, as a result of H. erinaceus consumption as well as sex. Additionally, when studying the effects of dietary manipulation, including food consumption and mouse weight data can be advantageous for future researchers to consider.
The hericenones and erinacines in H. erinaceus may play a role in the neurocognitive benefits seen in this mushroom [ 11 , 15 ]. More specifically, researchers have found that erinacine A is the biggest contributor to these neurological benefits out of fifteen total erinacines (A–K, P, Q, R, S) [ 5 , 19 ]. Researchers have also found that hericenones C, D, and E contribute to the synthesis of NGF, while hericenone F can reduce inflammation [ 49 ]. Thus, these hericenones and erinacines may be responsible for the anxiolytic effects seen in this study and several others [ 11 , 17 ]. Additional research into these components of H. erinaceus is certainly warranted.
There have been multiple methods of administering H. erinaceus to WT mice. Ratto et al. (2019) [ 50 ] used 21.5-month-old male WT mice. The mushroom was administered as a drink mixed with He1 mycelium and sporophore, which were ethanol extracts able to be solubilized in water for the mixture. Mice drank this ad libitum for two months. Researchers found that H. erinaceus improved recognition memory in aging mice. Ryu et al. (2018) [ 31 ] used two-month-old male WT mice and administered either 20 or 60 mg/kg of H. erinaceus powder by oral gavage for four weeks. Mice received the powder by oral gavage four times a day. It was found that the mice receiving 60 mg/kg of H. erinaceus exhibited anxiolytic and antidepressant behaviors.
There have also been multiple methods of administering H. erinaceus to transgenic mice. Mori et al. (2011) [ 15 ] used five-week-old male ICR (Institute of Cancer Research) mice with injected amyloid peptides. Fruiting bodies of H. erinaceus were turned into powder and mixed with a standard powdered diet, allowing the concentration of H. erinaceus to be 5%. The mushroom was administered to mice ad libitum for 23 days. H. erinaceus helped to ameliorate memory deficits in mice by improving recognition memory in the NOR test but did not improve exploratory behavior or locomotor activity in the Y-maze assessment. Tzeng et al. (2018) [ 20 ] used five-month-old female APP/PS1 mice, isolating H. erinaceus mycelium erinacine A and H. erinaceus mycelium erinacine S to assess the effects of each. The mushroom was administered at 10 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg a day, respectively, to experimental condition, for 100 days by oral gavage. Results indicate that erinacine A recovered cognitive impairments in spatial memory and activities of daily living (burrowing and nesting) [ 20 ]. Tsai-Teng et al. (2016) [ 16 ] also used five-month-old female APP/PS1 mice. Researchers administered 300 mg/kg per day of the mushroom for 30 days by oral gavage, isolating H. erinaceus mycelium containing erinacine A and H. erinaceus ethanol extracts. Tsai-Teng et al. (2016) [ 16 ] found that H. erinaceus mycelium recovered behavioral deficits in transgenic mice during nesting assessments.
Discussing mushroom administration in past literature is important because numerous labs and researchers may not always use the same methods, and this may perhaps be why results differ. This is the first study to administer mushroom powder mixed into wet food ad libitum to mice, with a standard rodent diet also available for the mice to feed on ad libitum . The goal was to mimic voluntary dietary supplementation in humans and eliminate stress factors which might accompany administration through techniques such as oral gavage. In each study, different quantities of H. erinaceus mycelium and respective components of the mushroom were used. All studies showing behavioral improvements, including this study, used H. erinaceus mycelium. The results of this study indicate anxiolytic effects and increased locomotor activity, but no improvements in spatial memory and noncognitive behaviors. Thus, it is important to explore the effects of different doses, erinacines, and extracts on future models of AD, including those models solely expressing tau.
One limitation in this study was the administration of the wet food. Each cage was administered 150 g of wet food for the mice to eat ad libitum . Other studies assessing the effects of H. erinaceus on WT and AD mouse models have administered the mushroom by oral gavage [ 16 , 20 , 31 ]. However, we chose to allow mice to eat ad libitum to eliminate potential stress and more closely resemble humans’ voluntary consumption of food. Due to this type of administration, we were unable to calculate the exact amount of wet food consumed by each individual mouse. Instead, the amount of wet food consumed was calculated as an average (see Section 2.4.1 ). We also collected animals’ body weights throughout the course of the experiment every 8 days to assess maturation and whether food was being consumed.
Another limitation may be the rTg4510 mouse model itself. In this specific regulatable model, the P301L tau mutation and CaMKIIa promoter system result in progressive neurofibrillary tangle pathology within the forebrain and memory deficits over time, which can be lessened when given doxycycline [ 21 , 51 ]. However, as Gamache et al. (2019) [ 52 ] report, this phenotype may not be caused solely by the expressed tau. Gamache et al. (2019) [ 52 ] report that in this model, disruptions in genes, including fibroblast growth factor 14 (Fgf14) caused by insertion of the transgene itself may be responsible for the particular phenotypes reported. While this model still allows for researchers to assess tangle pathology and behavioral deficits as a function of age, when applying an intervention aimed at alleviating behavioral or biochemical deficits, researchers must consider other factors which may be causing the deficits in the first place, beyond simply the tau mutation.
This is the first study demonstrating that H. erinaceus has anxiolytic effects in the rTg4510 tau mouse model. Previous research has shown this in relation to amyloid and WT mouse models but has not demonstrated it in a strictly tau mouse model [ 11 , 16 , 50 , 53 ]. Many other studies have assessed the cognitive effects of H. erinaceus in other models of AD or cognitive decline/aging such as APP/swePS1dE9 [ 16 , 20 ], SAMP8 [ 54 ], ICR (Institute of Cancer Research) mice with injected amyloid peptides [ 15 ], and Sprague Dawley rats injected with d-galactose [ 44 ]. This is also one of the first studies to assess the effects of H. erinaceus on both female and male mice. Previous literature assessing the effects of H. erinaceus has only used either male [ 11 , 50 , 53 ] or female mice [ 16 ], and has not assessed both sexes, with the majority of studies primarily assessing the effects on male mice.
The effects of H. erinaceus on tau mouse models have not been as consistently analyzed as those in amyloid models. Because amyloid and tau both contribute to the development of AD, it is important to study both markers and note the behavioral differences found in each model. Research has shown that tau may be a stronger underlying factor in the development of AD than Aβ [ 55 ]. By studying the effects of H. erinaceus in this rTg4510 tau mouse model, we aim to help bridge the gap between results solely seen in amyloid models; these results provide new views on differences in behavior that can be seen when using amyloid vs. tau models.
Future biochemical assessments on the effects of H. erinaceus would be informative to help understand the mechanisms by which this mushroom improves behavior. Tsai-Teng et al. (2016) [ 16 ] assessed Insulin-degrading Enzyme (IDE), NGF, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), and APP through Western Blot analysis. Results showed that H. erinaceus increased IDE levels which ameliorated Aβ plaques, increased the ratio of NGF and proNGF, decreased levels of GFAP and, interestingly, did not affect levels of APP. Future research could use immunoblots to assess levels of tau species, SOD-1, GFAP, NGF, glucocorticoid, and BDNF in this tau mouse model. Analyzing these proteins could provide information about the mushroom’s effects on tau levels, oxidation, astrocyte activity and inflammation, fiber growth and survival, and maintenance of nerve cells. As the current study demonstrated anxiolytic effects of H. erinaceus in this tau mouse model, analyzing proteins such as glucocorticoid receptors could provide a more detailed connection between the brain and behavior.
Overall, this study demonstrated that supplementation of H. erinaceus through wet food for four months has anxiolytic effects on the rTg4510 tau mouse model but leads to no improvements in spatial memory nor activities of daily living. Although no improvements were found in spatial memory, the anxiolytic effects may serve a great benefit for caretakers or those living with AD seeking to add a supplement that can help lower anxiety.
We would like to thank the Angelo State University Psychology department and the Archer College of Health & Human Services for their support. We would also like to show our gratitude to Amy Howard who was the animal welfare/lab manager throughout this project. Additional thanks go to the third cohort of graduate students in the Experimental Psychology M.S. program (Abishag Porras, Garett Parrish, Amy Howard), Jisele Olivarez, and Psychology undergraduates (Kaitlyn Huizar, Cassidy Martin, and Danielle Mullen) who volunteered their time to assist with this research. We are additionally appreciative of Kristen Craven, who read over the manuscript prior to final submission.
This research received no external funding.
Conceptualization, M.N.R. and S.L.P.L.; methodology, M.N.R. and S.L.P.L.; formal analysis, M.N.R.; investigation, M.N.R.; data curation, M.N.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.R.; writing—review and editing, S.L.P.L.; visualization, M.N.R. and S.L.P.L.; supervision, S.L.P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
All procedures were approved by the Angelo State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (protocol # 21-204) and were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals.
Not applicable.
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliation.
A double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was performed on 50- to 80-year-old Japanese men and women diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment in order to examine the efficacy of oral administration of Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus), an edible mushroom, for improving cognitive impairment, using a cognitive function scale based on the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R). After 2 weeks of preliminary examination, 30 subjects were randomized into two 15-person groups, one of which was given Yamabushitake and the other given a placebo. The subjects of the Yamabushitake group took four 250 mg tablets containing 96% of Yamabushitake dry powder three times a day for 16 weeks. After termination of the intake, the subjects were observed for the next 4 weeks. At weeks 8, 12 and 16 of the trial, the Yamabushitake group showed significantly increased scores on the cognitive function scale compared with the placebo group. The Yamabushitake group's scores increased with the duration of intake, but at week 4 after the termination of the 16 weeks intake, the scores decreased significantly. Laboratory tests showed no adverse effect of Yamabushitake. The results obtained in this study suggest that Yamabushitake is effective in improving mild cognitive impairment.
(c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Share this:.
Visitors brave the rain and dreary weather to see the three young cubs lounging with their father, Jabari, and other lions on heated rocks on, May 1, 2023, at Lincoln Park Zoo. The cubs turned 4 months old on May 9. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)
One of the young lion cubs bathes his brother Pilipili on May 1, 2023, at Lincoln Park Zoo. Cassella/Chicago Tribune)
Visitors brave the rain on a dreary spring day to see the lions, including three young cubs, lounging on heated rocks on May 1, 2023, at Lincoln Park Zoo. The cubs turned four months old on May 9. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)
Several of the lions, including the young cubs, watch visitors brave the rain and dreary weather on May 1, 2023, at Lincoln Park Zoo. (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune)
Shanna Madison / Chicago Tribune
Three lion cubs make their debut at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center on April 14, 2023, at the Lincoln Park Zoo in Chicago.
The first of three cubs gingerly enters the enclosure alongside its mother, Zari, for first time at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center on April 14, 2023, at the Lincoln Park Zoo. The cubs, all males, were born at the zoo Jan. 9 but have stayed behind the scenes, zoo officials said, with minimal human intervention. Three 3-month-old cubs named Pesho, Sidai and Lomelok will be on view to the public and exploring their habitat beginning April 15.
Lion cubs explore their new home at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center on April 14, 2023, at the Lincoln Park Zoo.
A child watches as three lion cubs are introduced to the Pepper Family Wildlife Center at the Lincoln Park Zoo.
Lion cubs explore their new home at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center at the Lincoln Park Zoo.
Jabari, the father of the three cubs, walks around the Pepper Family Wildlife Center on April 14, 2023, at the Lincoln Park Zoo.
People watch three lion cubs make their debut at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center on April 14, 2023, at the Lincoln Park Zoo in Chicago.
A lion cub explores its new home at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center.
Lomelok was born with a spinal defect that’s caused mobility challenges since he was a few weeks old, zoo officials said. He had an operation in March — the first of its kind on a lion cub — to reduce his pain and treat a herniated disc.
Lomelok’s recovery from the surgery was “slow and steady,” officials said, but he wasn’t “thriving” as he should. When veterinary staff detected a gastrointestinal obstruction that would have required another intensive surgery and a lengthy recovery, they made the “difficult but responsible decision” to euthanize Lomelok on Saturday.
“We have been overwhelmed by the support from the community for Lomelok throughout his health journey,” said Cassy Kutilek, the curator of mammals, in a Monday news release. “Lomelok’s name means ‘sweet’ in the Maa language, and that was the best way to describe him. There are no words to articulate how deeply he will be missed.”
Lomelok, who was roughly 2 pounds at birth , grew to more than 250 pounds. Zoo officials said he had started growing a thick adolescent mane. One of his favorite activities, officials said, was laying upside down and showing his white belly fur. His care team is “still processing this incredibly tough loss,” a zoo spokesperson said.
Lomelok and his two brothers, Pesho and Sidai, were born Jan. 9, 2023, at the Pepper Family Wildlife Center. His mother, Zari, gave birth after five hours of labor, earning her the title of “rock star” among zoo staff.
Lomelok’s family also included his older brother, Pilipili, his father, Jabari, and aunts Hasira and Cleo. Both of Zari’s pregnancies were part of the African Lions Species Survival Plan, a population management effort across accredited zoos within the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.
Zari “immediately attended to the cubs, started grooming them, and then, within hours of their birth, she started nursing them and feeding them,” the zoo’s curator of mammals and behavioral husbandry Mike Murray told the Tribune after the three cubs’ birth.
After some private time with little human intervention, the cubs made their public debut in April 2023, with much fanfare . Pictures and videos of Lomelok’s young life, from his birth to his first playful steps in a new home to his antics with a tree , circulated across the internet.
When Lomelok started to grow, staff were concerned about his rear limbs and lower-than-normal activity levels. He was eventually diagnosed with stenosis, which zoo officials said is the narrowing of channels that carry nerves from the spine to the legs.
“You can think of the spinal cord as a highway, carrying nerve signals from your brain out to the rest of your body,” Lomelok’s veterinarian Dr. Kate Gustavsen said in March. “Between every set of vertebrae, there are exits that the nerves leave from.”
“In Lomelok’s case, the last two exits all the way at the end of the highway have a lane closed in each direction — they’re too narrow, everybody’s irritated, the traffic is moving slowly,” she continued. “That’s causing what we see physically as his muscles not developing completely appropriately and him being clumsy in his gate, and it also causes some discomfort.”
In the wild, it’s unlikely that Lomelok would have survived very long with this condition, according to Craig Packer, a professor at the University of Minnesota and director of the Lion Research Center.
When a lion is small, its mother carries it in its mouth with its teeth around its nape. But as the cub ages, the mother would have stopped carrying it, he said. Packer estimated that Lomelok had at least an extra year of life because of his care in captivity.
“That cub would have been left behind. That cub would have either starved to death or been killed by a leopard or hyena or another lion from a neighboring pride,” Packer said. “So that animal had a much longer life than you ever would have seen in the wild.”
The challenges of surviving with this condition in the wild make it hard to know how common spinal birth defects are in lions, Packer said. Mothers keep their cubs hidden for the first few weeks of their lives, and he said some research suggests they will abandon one member of their litter.
“I’m not saying they are deliberately leaving behind disabled cubs, but I can’t say that’s impossible,” he said. “We have some evidence that they don’t always keep every single one of their cubs.”
The opportunity to see Lomelok, or any lion cub, in a zoo is a fairly rare treat because zoos have to carefully control breeding, Packer said.
“If you had a female lion who had the maximum number of surviving cubs, which would be four, and they can start breeding especially in captivity by the time they’re just a little over 2 years old, after about 37 years, the descendants would need to eat the population of Chicago every week,” Packer said.
“You can’t let them breed at their maximum, so it’s a special thing in captivity,” he added.
Trending nationally.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
1. Introduction. Hericium erinaceus (lion's mane) is an edible mushroom, that belongs to the Hericiaceae family, order Russulales, class Agaricomycete and phylum Basidiomycota [1,2].It is extensively found in East Asian countries including Japan and China [].The mature mushroom is easily identifiable, consisting of a number of single, long, dangling fleshy spines which are white in colour [].
Neurotrophic factors are important in promoting the growth and differentiation of neurons. Nerve growth factor (NGF) is essential for the maintenance of the basal forebrain cholinergic system. Hericenones and erinacines isolated from the medicinal mushroom Hericium erinaceus can induce NGF synthesis …
Lab research shows that the anti-inflammatory effects and antioxidant properties of lion's mane may help minimize inflammation and guard your cells against damage. "Anytime we can add an anti ...
Among all culinary mushrooms, Hericium erinaceus (most commonly known as lion's mane) has been widely reported to have therapeutic activities related to the promotion of nerve and brain health. Different compounds isolated from this mushroom inducing the expression of neurotrophic factors such as nerve growth factors (NGF) have been actively ...
Researchers from The University of Queensland have discovered the active compound from an edible mushroom that boosts nerve growth and enhances memory.. Professor Frederic Meunier from the Queensland Brain Institute said the team had identified new active compounds from the mushroom, Hericium erinaceus. "Extracts from these so-called 'lion's mane' mushrooms have been used in ...
Active compounds in the edible Lion's Mane mushroom can help promote neurogenesis and enhance memory, a new study reports. Preclinical trials report the compound had a significant impact on neural growth and improved memory formation. Researchers say the compound could have clinical applications in treating and preventing neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease.
Background: Given the bioactive properties and limited work to date, Hericium erinaceus (Lion's mane) shows promise in improving cognitive function and mood. However, much of the human research has concentrated on chronic supplementation in cognitively compromised cohorts. Objective: The current pilot study investigated the acute and chronic (28-day) cognitive and mood-enhancing effects of ...
Background: Given the bioactive properties and limited work to date, Hericium erinaceus (Lion's mane) shows promise in improving cognitive function and mood. However, much of the human research has concentrated on chronic supplementation in cognitively compromised cohorts. Objective: The current pilot study investigated the acute and chronic (28-day) cognitive and mood-enhancing effects of ...
Hericium erinaceus is an edible and medicinal mushroom with potential neuroprotective effects. The study of H. erinaceus has attracted considerable attention during the past 10 years, particularly with regard to its potential utility in the treatment of motor dysfunction, Alzheimer disease, and othe …
Among these, the neurohealth properties of Hericium erinaceus (Bull.:Fr.) Pers., or its common names Lion's mane or Monkey's head mushroom, have been most extensively studied. Hericenones and erinacines are the two important classes of constitutes isolated from the fruiting body and mycelium of H. erinaceus , respectively ( Kawagishi et al ...
Hericium erinaceus (Lion's Mane, Stamets Host Defense, 2 grams/day): Lion's mane may produce significant improvements in cognition and function in healthy people over 50 and in MCI patients compared to placebo . Super Bifido Plus Probiotic (Flora, 1 tablet/day). ... All data from research participants described in this paper is de ...
Lion's mane mushrooms are rich in vitamins such as thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin. They are also a good source of essential minerals such as manganese, zinc, and potassium. Research suggests ...
Lion's mane extract may improve heart health, but the research to date has primarily used animal subjects. Research on rats showed that the mushroom extracts might have a cholesterol-lowering ...
Lion's mane mushroom extract may have a significant impact on the growth of brain cells and improving memory, which could inspire treatments against disorders such as Alzheimer's disease.
Lion's Mane. Lion's mane, Hericium erinaceus, is a culinary and medicinal mushroom. Lion's mane appears to have neuroprotective and antioxidant properties in the brain. Lion's Mane is most often used for Brain Health. The Examine Database covers Alzheimer's Disease,Anxiety, and 3 other conditions and goals.
Lion's mane may help ease stress, according to Best, and a 2010 study in Biomedical Research provides some evidence to support this theory. The study examines the effects of lion's mane on ...
Research to date suggests that lion's mane may help alleviate depression and anxiety. For example, a 2020 review of the literature called lion's mane "a potential alternative medicine for the treatment of depression." Likewise, a 2021 research review detailed several studies that showed significant anti-anxiety effects. Lion's mane appears to ...
Mane Research. The lion's mane has long been an iconic symbol, yet there has been no clear answer as to why lions have manes, or what function they serve. Charles Darwin was the first to suggest that the mane may be a result of sexual selection, meaning that the mane increases reproductive success. The mane may protect a male's neck during ...
Hericium erinaceus is a medicinal-culinary mushroom widely found in East Asian countries and is commonly known as lion's mane mushroom, Yamabushitake, or monkey's head mushroom . ... Recently, the present research on H. erinaceus has been focused on its antidepressant-like effects for the treatment of depressive disorder [31,32,33].
Hericium erinaceus, also known as Lion's Mane Mushroom or Hedgehog Mushroom, is an edible fungus, which has a long history of usage in traditional Chinese medicine. This mushroom is rich in some physiologically important components, especially β-glucan polysaccharides, which are responsible for anti-cancer, immuno-modulating, hypolipidemic ...
Some of these benefits include symptom improvement of sleep disorders, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's disease. One animal study even found lion's mane to assist in neurotransmission and recognition memory. As already mentioned above, this edible fungi is also a champion for gut health. Many of the functional mushrooms, including lion's ...
Lion's mane (Hericium erinaceus) is a mushroom that grows on trunks of dead hardwood trees such as oak. It has a long history of use in East Asian medicine. Lion's mane mushroom might improve ...
Supporting cognitive function. These mushrooms contain the compounds hericenones and erinacines, which help stimulate nerve growth factor production - this contributes to brain health, memory and focus. In one study, lion's mane dietary supplements appeared to help recognition memory in mice, while another suggested the mushrooms may help ...
It noted that during the week of May 21 to 28, Google Trends showed search volumes for the phrase 'lion's mane mushroom powder' increased by 450%. And in the following week, Google searches for "benefits of lion's mane" increased by a further 120% while "what does lion's mane do" rose by 200%. Luke O'Reily, CEO at the UK-based nootropic ...
This is the first study demonstrating that H. erinaceus has anxiolytic effects in the rTg4510 tau mouse model. Previous research has shown this in relation to amyloid and WT mouse models but has not demonstrated it in a strictly tau mouse model [ 11, 16, 50, 53 ].
As more research emerges supporting the efficacy of these supplements, and as public awareness continues to grow, the adoption of NMN, NAD boosters, Lion's Mane, and LongevityPlus products is ...
A double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was performed on 50- to 80-year-old Japanese men and women diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment in order to examine the efficacy of oral administration of Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus), an edible mushroom, for improving cognitive impairment, using a cognitive function scale based on the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R).
June 7, 2024 at 5:00 a.m. A 17-month-old African lion cub at the Lincoln Park Zoo, known for his sweet and laid-back personality that captured the hearts of thousands in Chicago and on social ...