systematic reviews importance in nursing

A high-quality systematic review is described as the most reliable source of evidence to guide clinical practice. The purpose of a systematic review is to deliver a meticulous summary of all the available primary research in response to a research question. A systematic review uses all the existing research and is sometime called 'secondary research' (research on research). They are often ...

Systematic Reviews as Topic*. Systematic reviews provide a synthesis of evidence for a specific topic of interest, summarising the results of multiple studies to aid in clinical decisions and resource allocation. They remain among the best forms of evidence, and reduce the bias inherent in other methods. A solid understanding of ….

Report of an overall certainty of evidence assessment in a systematic review is an important new reporting standard of the updated PRISMA 2020 guidelines . Systematic review authors are well acquainted with assessing RoB in individual primary studies, but much less familiar with assessment of overall certainty across an entire body of evidence.

A systematic review and meta‐analysis reported that positive nursing work environment was associated with a lower probability of mortality and higher patient satisfaction (Lake et al., 2019). Another systematic review found an association between strong working conditions and a reduction in the rate of mortality; however, there was no ...

Serious concerns regarding limitations in the study design, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias can decrease the certainty of the evidence. Using an example, this article describes and illustrates the importance and the steps for assessing the certainty of evidence and drawing accurate conclusions in a systematic review.

Implementing evidence into practice requires nurses to identify, critically appraise and synthesise research. This may require a comprehensive literature review: this article aims to outline the approaches and stages required and provides a working example of a published review. Literature reviews aim to answer focused questions to: inform professionals and patients of the best available ...

To decrease confusion between systematic reviews and other types of reviews, it is important to follow the existing well-established published methodology. ... How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and ... Jacqueline K. Owens, PhD, RN, CNE is a professor of nursing at Ashland University Schar College of Nursing and ...

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A comprehensive search of databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, Embase) was performed using applicable subject headings and keywords. ... These results provide evidence of the importance of continuity of nursing care, adequate consultation time ...

A systematic review aims to bring evidence together to answer a pre-defined research question. This involves the identification of all primary research relevant to the defined review question, the critical appraisal of this research, and the synthesis of the findings.13 Systematic reviews may combine data from different.

However, one way of pulling together unmanageable amounts of research is through a systematic review (2): 'A systematic- review is the process of systematically locating, appraising and synthesising evidence from scientific studies in order to obtain a reliable overview.'. Nurse Researcher. 4, 1, 15-26. doi: 10.7748/nr.4.1.15.s3.

The Importance of. Systematic Reviews in Nursing. Automate every stage of your literature review to produce evidence-based research faster and more accurately. Systematic reviews have become an invaluable resource in promoting evidence-based practice, especially in healthcare. Since medicine is a multifaceted field that requires critical ...

Systematic reviews are used in healthcare to present a comprehensive, policy-neutral, transparent and reproducible synthesis of evidence. This article provides a practical overview of the process of undertaking systematic reviews, explaining the rationale for each stage. It provides guidance on the standard methods applicable to every ...

A potent means of doing so is that of systematic reviews. The continuous growth of research, coupled with the demand to systematically summarize the available evidence to inform decisions from consumers and stakeholders, led to the formal development of systematic reviews (SRs) in the late 20th century 1-3.

This article describes the use of systematic literature reviews to recognise appropriate evidence and develop guidelines to inform nursing practice, thereby enabling safe, high quality nursing care. It uses an example from the literature to illustrate the process of systematic review. Keywords: Evidence-based practice; integrative review ...

AJN, American Journal of Nursing 114 (3):p 53-58, March 2014. | DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c. This article is the first in a new series on systematic reviews from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields.

This article is the third in a new series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review—one step at a time.

Abstract. Systematic reviews provide a synthesis of evidence for a specific topic of interest, summarising the results of multiple studies to aid in clinical decisions and resource allocation. They remain among the best forms of evidence, and reduce the bias inherent in other methods. A solid understanding of the systematic review process can ...

The Systematic Review Process. The essence of a systematic review lies in being systematic. A systematic review involves detailed scrutiny and analysis of a huge mass of literature. To ensure that your work is efficient and effective, you should follow a clear process: 1. Develop a research question.

a review can be a daunting and complex process; by fol-lowing the stages outlined and being systematic a robust review is achievable. The importance of literature reviews should not be underestimated—they help sum-marise and make sense of an increasingly vast body of research promoting best evidence-based practice.

In clinical medicine, systematic reviews receive significant attention, and clinical practice guidelines and their recommendations are of utmost importance to decision-makers. It is widely acknowledged that a living systematic review is essential for a living guideline process (Akl et al., 2017). We believe that across various scientific ...

With the view to address this challenge, the systematic review method was developed. Systematic reviews aim to inform and facilitate this process through research synthesis of multiple studies, enabling increased and efficient access to evidence.[1,3,4] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in healthcare settings.

Results. Eleven eligible studies were included in this review with a total of 1535 patients. Compared to usual care, palliative care interventions demonstrated statistically significant effects on improving generic health-related quality of life (SMD, 0.30 [95 % CI, 0.12 to 0.48]) and heart failure-specific quality of life (SMD, 0.17 [95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.31]).

A recent review demonstrated promising findings of VR psychosocial interventions for improving community functioning and quality of life for individuals with psychosis (Schroeder et al. 2022). Participants in this review also reported finding VR interventions enjoyable which may help support therapeutic engagement.

Data extraction and synthesis Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) evaluated the methodological quality of all the included studies. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses specification. In addition to sensitivity and specificity, other important parameters were explored in an analysis of CESM accuracy for breast ...

Major sources of systematic reviews for use by advanced practice nurses in acute and critical care are the Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis for Nursing, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Cochrane Library. This discussion describes systematic reviews as the pivotal point in today's paradigm of EBP and guides the advanced ...

Background Patient safety is a global health issue that affects patients worldwide. Providing safe care in the intensive care units (ICUs) is one of the most crucial tasks for nurses. Numerous factors can impact the capacity of nurses to deliver safe care within ICUs. Consequently, this study was undertaken with the aim of identifying the components of safe nursing care in ICUs. Methods The ...

Aims To synthesise evidence regarding organisational practice environment factors affecting healthcare workforce development, recruitment, and retention in the UK. Methods/data sources A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and PsycINFO yielded ten relevant studies published between 2018 and 2023 and conducted in the UK (the last search was conducted in March 2023). Adhering to ...

The neuropsychological instruments applied in the studies that were included in this systematic review vary, however, most reach the same conclusions. Conclusions: The present findings underscore the importance of incorporating cognitive assessments, particularly those focused on the memory domain, into routine childhood evaluations for ...

Systematic reviews that summarize the available information on a topic are an important part of evidence-based health care. There are both research and non-research reasons for undertaking a literature review. It is important to systematically review the literature when one would like to justify the need for a study, to update personal ...

While national curricula in science education highlight the importance of inquiry-based learning, assessing students' capabilities in scientific inquiry remains a subject of debate. Our study explored the construction, developmental trends and validation techniques in relation to assessing scientific inquiry using a systematic literature review from 2000 to 2024. We used PRISMA guidelines in ...