Transact-SQL
Reinforcement Learning
R Programming
React Native
Python Design Patterns
Python Pillow
Python Turtle
Verbal Ability
Interview Questions
Company Questions
Artificial Intelligence
Cloud Computing
Data Science
Machine Learning
Data Structures
Operating System
Computer Network
Compiler Design
Computer Organization
Discrete Mathematics
Ethical Hacking
Computer Graphics
Software Engineering
Web Technology
Cyber Security
C Programming
Control System
Data Mining
Data Warehouse
Variable declaration assignment, net declaration assignment, assign deassign, force release.
An assignment has two parts - right-hand side (RHS) and left-hand side (LHS) with an equal symbol (=) or a less than-equal symbol (<=) in between.
Assignment type | Left-hand side |
---|---|
Procedural | |
Continuous | |
Procedural Continous |
The RHS can contain any expression that evaluates to a final value while the LHS indicates a net or a variable to which the value in RHS is being assigned.
Procedural assignments occur within procedures such as always , initial , task and functions and are used to place values onto variables. The variable will hold the value until the next assignment to the same variable.
The value will be placed onto the variable when the simulation executes this statement at some point during simulation time. This can be controlled and modified the way we want by the use of control flow statements such as if-else-if , case statement and looping mechanisms.
An initial value can be placed onto a variable at the time of its declaration as shown next. The assignment does not have a duration and holds the value until the next assignment to the same variable happens. Note that variable declaration assignments to an array are not allowed.
If the variable is initialized during declaration and at time 0 in an initial block as shown below, the order of evaluation is not guaranteed, and hence can have either 8'h05 or 8'hee.
Procedural blocks and assignments will be covered in more detail in a later section.
This is used to assign values onto scalar and vector nets and happens whenever there is a change in the RHS. It provides a way to model combinational logic without specifying an interconnection of gates and makes it easier to drive the net with logical expressions.
Whenever b or c changes its value, then the whole expression in RHS will be evaluated and a will be updated with the new value.
This allows us to place a continuous assignment on the same statement that declares the net. Note that because a net can be declared only once, only one declaration assignment is possible for a net.
This will override all procedural assignments to a variable and is deactivated by using the same signal with deassign . The value of the variable will remain same until the variable gets a new value through a procedural or procedural continuous assignment. The LHS of an assign statement cannot be a bit-select, part-select or an array reference but can be a variable or a concatenation of variables.
These are similar to the assign - deassign statements but can also be applied to nets and variables. The LHS can be a bit-select of a net, part-select of a net, variable or a net but cannot be the reference to an array and bit/part select of a variable. The force statment will override all other assignments made to the variable until it is released using the release keyword.
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Get early access and see previews of new features.
now I know in Verilog, to make a sequential logic you would almost always have use the non-blocking assignment (<=) in an always block. But does this rule also apply to internal variables? If blocking assignments were to be used for internal variables in an always block would it make it comb or seq logic?
So, for example, I'm trying to code a sequential prescaler module. It's output will only be a positive pulse of one clk period duration. It'll have a parameter value that will be the prescaler (how many clock cycles to divide the clk) and a counter variable to keep track of it.
I have count's assignments to be blocking assignments but the output, q to be non-blocking. For simulation purposes, the code works; the output of q is just the way I want it to be. If I change the assignments to be non-blocking, the output of q only works correctly for the 1st cycle of the parameter length, and then stays 0 forever for some reason (this might be because of the way its coded but, I can't seem to think of another way to code it). So is the way the code is right now behaving as a combinational or sequential logic? And, is this an acceptable thing to do in the industry? And is this synthesizable?
You should follow the industry practice which tells you to use non-blocking assignments for all outputs of the sequential logic. The only exclusion are temporary vars which are used to help in evaluation of complex expressions in sequential logic, provided that they are used only in a single block.
In you case using 'blocking' for the 'counter' will cause mismatch in synthesis behavior. Synthesis will create flops for both q and count . However, in your case with blocking assignment the count will be decremented immediately after it is being assigned the prescaled value, whether after synthesis, it will happen next cycle only.
So, you need a non-blocking. BTW initializing 'count' within declaration might work in fpga synthesis, but does not work in schematic synthesis, so it is better to initialize it differently. Unless I misinterpreted your intent, it should look like the following.
You do not need temp vars there, but you for the illustration it can be done as the following:
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
I understand that with the following Verilog code
It uses non-blocking statements all in parallel and I understand that when this is synthesised, it's basically 3 registers in series and it takes 3 clock cycles for 1'b1 to reach r_Test_3.
But what about this,
This uses blocking statements and so, all of this code should be performed in series. How exactly will this be synthesised? I mean will it be the exact same? I'm confused.
What makes VHDL and verilog somewhat confusing is that they were originaly designed to describe hardware for simulation and later re-used to describe hardware for synthisis.
I understand that with the following Verilog code (snip code example using blocking assignments) It uses non-blocking statements all in parallel and I understand that when this is synthesised, it's basically 3 registers in series and it takes 3 clock cycles for 1'b1 to reach r_Test_3.
Remember the initial state of registers is undefined. As a result unless you have specified the initial state of the registers* it is very likely your synthisizer will optimise this to all your signals having a constant value of 1.
Lets for now pretend that you did set the initial state of the registers to zero and you just haven't included that in your example. In that case as you say there will be three registers set one after another on the first three clock edges.
But what about this, (snip code example using blocking assignments) This uses blocking statements and so, all of this code should be performed in series. How exactly will this be synthesised? I mean will it be the exact same? I'm confused.
As photon says that code is equivilent to.
But none of that really answers your real question which boils down to.
How are blocking statements in sequential always blocks synthesised?
How a blocking statement in a sequential always block behaves and hence how it is synthisized depends on where you read it. There are three cases.
In the first case, there is no need for a register (though one may be generated initially and then removed for having zero fanout). The signal just feeds through combinatorially.
In the second case the value needs to be stored from one clock cycle to the next, hence a register is needed.
Note that in some cases flow control may mean that a read is sometimes after a write and sometimes not, in that case the synthisis tool will need to generate a mux to either read from the register or directly from the logic as appropriate, just as it needs to generate muxes when a value is written on multiple different paths.
In the third case the behaviour is not well-defined. In simulation the results will depend on what order the always blocks are evaluated in. In synthisis the tool will probablly spit out a warning and do something, but what it does may not be what you wanted.
Hence you should avoid the third case, if you use blocking assignments in sequential always blocks you should only read the results of those assignments from within the same always block. Signals passing between different always blocks (or going out to the outside world) should always use nonblocking assignments.
* Unfortunately the ability to specify the initial state of registers is something that varies between tools (and versions of tools), some allow use of "initial" blocks for this purpose, some require tool-specific techniques, some don't support it at all.
Your second code block is equivalent to
It might be synthesized as 3 flip-flops, all with inputs tied to logic high.
Or it might just be synthesized as a single flip-flop, with all other logic that is connected to r_Test_1 , r_Test_2 , or r_Test_3 actually being connected to the same physical circuit net (assuming fan-out requirements can still be met this way).
That said, I agree with the comment by Oldfart. Stick to non-blocking assignment for synthesizable sequential logic.
You first block is equivalent to parallel blocks
Which synthesizes into a chain of flops
You second sysnthesizes to
Which is one flop. This assumes there are no other references to the other variables outside the block.
Sign up or log in, post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
Verilog is very important in the VLSI industry, particularly for designing and verifying digital circuits used in modern electronics. Verilog provides a standardized way to describe the functionality and structure of digital circuits. This allows engineers to create a clear and concise representation of the hardware before it’s physically built. Cracking your next Verilog interview can be a breeze with a strong understanding of these essential Verilog interview questions.
With Verilog being very important for the VLSI industry, the skills are highly sought after in the job market, particularly for ASIC/FPGA design and verification engineers. Having Verilog expertise can increase your competitiveness and open doors to new opportunities.
Enrolling in a comprehensive VLSI course can equip one with the knowledge and expertise needed. mastering these top Verilog interview questions will put you ahead of the competition.
The following are a few Verilog questions that can help aspiring engineers to crack their interview questions!
1. what is verilog and what is it used for.
Verilog is a hardware description language (HDL) used to describe the digital logic and behavior of electronic circuits. It operates at a register-transfer level (RTL), meaning it focuses on the functionality of the hardware rather than the exact transistor-level implementation. Verilog is widely used in the design and simulation of digital circuits, including microprocessors, FPGAs (Field-Programmable Gate Arrays), and other integrated circuits (ICs).
Both wire and reg are used to declare nets and variables in Verilog, but they have distinct purposes:
Verilog assignments can be categorized as blocking or non-blocking based on how they affect the simulation flow:
Both == and === are used for comparison in Verilog, but they differ in terms of handling unknown values (represented by x):
Here’s an example Verilog code for a D-latch:
module DLatch(
input clk,
output reg Q
always @(posedge clk) begin
Q <= D;
This code defines a module called DLatch with three ports: D (data input), clk (clock signal), and Q (output latch). The always block is triggered on the positive edge of the clock (posedge clk). Inside the block, the current value of the D input is assigned to the register Q using a non-blocking assignment (<=). This ensures that the latch updates its output value on the next clock cycle.
Syntax | Similar to C programming language. | Closer to Ada programming language. |
Usage | Common in the United States and Asia. | More prevalent in Europe. |
Conciseness | Tends to be more concise. | More verbose. |
Libraries | Extensive library of predefined primitives. | Rich set of built-in data types and standard libraries. |
Portability | Relatively more portable. | Can also be portable but may vary more between tools. |
Ecosystem | Larger ecosystem of tools and community support | Strong presence in academia and defense industries. |
Time to learn | Perceived as easier to learn. | May have a steeper learning curve. |
A continuous assignment in VHDL defines how a circuit’s output depends on its current inputs. It uses the ‘assign’ keyword and continuously evaluates an expression whenever an input changes. This is ideal for describing combinational logic (e.g., adders) where the output relies directly on the current input combination.
$monitor, $display, and $strobe are all VHDL system tasks for printing during simulation. Here’s a quick breakdown:
PLI (Programming Language Interface) in Verilog acts like a bridge. It lets you call C/C++ functions directly from your Verilog code. This expands Verilog’s abilities for complex tasks like:
A sensitivity list in Verilog is like a watchlist for an always block. It tells the simulator which signal changes trigger a re-evaluation of the block’s statements, ensuring the code runs only when necessary.
In Verilog, a signal will always be updated first compared to a variable within the same simulation delta cycle. This behavior stems from the fundamental differences between signals and variables:
Signals: Represent physical wires in the circuit. Assignments using the <= operator schedule the update for the next delta cycle. The actual value change occurs after all concurrent evaluations within that delta cycle are complete.
Variables: Represent temporary storage locations within a process. Assignments using the = operator update the variable’s value immediately.
A timescale declaration in Verilog (timescale) defines two key aspects of your simulation:
In Verilog, transport delay is a modeling concept used to represent the time it takes for a signal to propagate through a wire or gate within a digital circuit. It essentially introduces a latency between the change in an input signal and the corresponding change appearing at the output. Verilog uses the # symbol followed by a time value (e.g., #5ns) within an assignment statement to model transport delay. This delays the assignment of a new value to the target signal by the specified time.
Inertial delay is a more advanced concept compared to transport delay for modeling signal propagation. Inertial delay considers the stability of input signals before propagating the change to the output. It ensures the new output value reflects a stable input for a certain duration. Modeling inertial delay can be more complex compared to transport delay.
In Verilog, blocking assignments (=) and non-blocking assignments (<=) are used within always blocks. Blocking assignments evaluate the right-hand side and update the left-hand side immediately, affecting subsequent statements. Non-blocking assignments schedule updates to occur at the end of the current delta cycle, allowing multiple updates to be applied simultaneously. Blocking is used for sequential logic, and non-blocking is used for parallel updates to signals.
Freeze and drive are concepts related to forcing signal values during Verilog simulation, but they’re not built-in Verilog commands. Freeze typically refers to forcing a signal to a specific value and keeping it constant throughout the simulation. The value remains frozen until explicitly released. Drive might imply forcing a signal to a specific value but potentially allowing it to change later based on the simulation flow.
Verilog is concurrent by nature. This means multiple always blocks, continuous assignments, and procedural blocks can execute seemingly “at the same time” within a simulation delta cycle. The simulator manages the order, ensuring proper evaluation based on dependencies. This allows modeling of parallel hardware behavior efficiently.
To handle asynchronous resets in Verilog designs:
Verilog is primarily a Hardware Description Langauge (HDL) for describing the structure and behavior of digital circuits. It works excellent for design implementation. SystemVerilog is a superset of Verilog, offering both HDL and Hardware Verification Language (HVL) capabilities. It expands on Verilog with features for advanced verification including object-oriented programming constructs, and advanced constructs for testbench development.
Here’s how to implement a simple RAM in Verilog (5 lines):
module RAM #(parameter ADDRESS_WIDTH=4, DATA_WIDTH=8) (
input we, // Write enable
input [ADDRESS_WIDTH-1:0] addr,
input [DATA_WIDTH-1:0] data_in,
output reg [DATA_WIDTH-1:0] data_out
reg [DATA_WIDTH-1:0] mem [2**ADDRESS_WIDTH-1:0];
if (we) mem[addr] <= data_in;
data_out <= mem[addr];
Verilog verification coverage analysis involves:
Generate blocks in Verilog offer two main functionalities:
Verilog’s casex and casez statements are used for bit-wise comparisons within conditional blocks. They allow matching patterns with “don’t care” conditions for unknown or unspecified bits during signal value comparisons.
Verilog loops provide a way to execute a block of code multiple times. This statement is executed only once at the beginning of the loop. It’s typically used to set up a loop counter variable. This statement is executed after each iteration of the loop body. It’s commonly used to increment or decrement the loop counter to control the number of repetitions.
The above Verilog interview questions will be very helpful in preparing for technical Verilog interview questions, as they cover a wide range of essential topics and concepts relevant to digital design and hardware description languages.
To learn more about Verilog interview questions and other important topics in VLSI take a look at VLSI online courses offered by ChipEdge, an established VLSI training institute in Bangalore .
Trending blogs, what is the role of formal verification in vlsi, what is polymorphism in system verilog, mbist in vlsi: ensuring better quality chips, enhancing security and efficiency: the significance of check points.
Subscribe to our blog.
COMMENTS
Non-blocking. Non-blocking assignment allows assignments to be scheduled without blocking the execution of following statements and is specified by a = symbol. It's interesting to note that the same symbol is used as a relational operator in expressions, and as an assignment operator in the context of a non-blocking assignment.
Blocking vs. Nonblocking in Verilog. The concept of Blocking vs. Nonblocking signal assignments is a unique one to hardware description languages. The main reason to use either Blocking or Nonblocking assignments is to generate either combinational or sequential logic. In software, all assignments work one at a time. So for example in the C ...
Evaluate b&(~c) but defer assignment of z 1. Evaluate a | b, assign result tox x 2. Evaluate a^b^c, assign result to y 3. Evaluate b&(~c), assign result to zz I. Blocking vs. Nonblocking Assignments • Verilog supports two types of assignments within always blocks, with subtly different behaviors. • Blocking assignment: evaluation and ...
was fairly sure that nonblocking assignments were sequential while blocking assignments were parallel. Blocking assignment executes "in series" because a blocking assignment blocks execution of the next statement until it completes. Therefore the results of the next statement may depend on the first one being completed.
Blocking and Non-blocking Assignment in Verilog. When working with behavioural modeling in Verilog, there are two types of assigment which is known as blocking and non blocking assigment and both of them there is a operator, '=' operator for blocking assignment and '=' operator for non blocking assigment.At short, blocking assignment executes one by one sequentially and non-blocking assignemnt ...
The verilog simulator treats = and <= quite differently. Blocking assignments mean 'assign the value to the variable right away this instant'. Nonblocking assignments mean 'figure out what to assign to this variable, and store it away to assign at some future time'.
The blocking assignment statements are executed sequentially by evaluating the RHS operand and finishes the assignment to LHS operand without any interruption from another Verilog statement. Hence, it blocks other assignments until the current assignment completes and is named as "blocking assignment".
Blocking And Nonblocking In Verilog. Blocking Statements: A blocking statement must be executed before the execution of the statements that follow it in a sequential block. In the example below the first time statement to get executed is a = b followed by. Nonblocking Statements: Nonblocking statements allow you to schedule assignments without ...
Blocking assignments. Blocking assignments (=) are done sequentially in the order the statements are written. A second assignment is not started until the preceding one is complete. i.e, it blocks all the further execution before it itself gets executed. Example: Non-Blocking assignments.
Blocking vs Non-Blocking Assignments • Blocking (=) and non-blocking (<=) assignments are provided to control the execution order within an always block. • Blocking assignments literally block the execution of the next statement until the current statement is executed. - Consequently, blocking assignments result in ordered statement ...
Blocking assignment blocks the execution of the next statement until the completion of the current assignment execution. Blocking assignment example. In Below Example, a and b is initialized with value 10 and 15 respectively, after that b is being assigned to a (a value will become 15), and value 20 is assigned to b. After assignment value of a ...
An edge-sensitive intra-assignment timing control permits a special use of the repeat loop. The edge sensitive time control may be repeated several times before the delay is completed. Either the blocking or the non-blocking assignment may be used. always always @(IN) @(IN) OUT OUT <= <= repeat.
end. There are now two extra states and an else. The else is needed because two dependent blocking assign-ments happen in the first clock cycle, except when the input is 2. In that case, there is only one assignment (of the input to the output). As discussed earlier, equiva-lent non-blocking code requires an if else.
The significance of blocking and non-blocking assignments in Verilog coding cannot be overstated. These elements serve as the foundation for precise and effective digital circuit design, offering ...
There are two types of procedural assignments called blocking and non-blocking. Blocking assignment, as the name says, gets executed in the order statements are specified. The "=" is the symbol used for blocking assignment representation. Non-blocking assignment allows scheduling of assignments. It will not block the execution.
20 October 2020. Blocking / Non-Blocking assignment rules. The main reason to use either Blocking or Non-Blocking assignments is to generate either combinational or sequential logic. In non-blocking assignments (<=), all registers inside the always block are updated at the end. In blocking assignments (=), the registers are updated immediately.
Verilog supports blocking and non-blocking assignments statements within the always block with their different behaviors. The blocking assignment is similar to software assignment statements found in most popular programming languages. The non-blocking assignment is the more natural assignment statement to describe many hardware systems ...
This is used to assign values onto scalar and vector nets and happens whenever there is a change in the RHS. It provides a way to model combinational logic without specifying an interconnection of gates and makes it easier to drive the net with logical expressions. // Example model of an AND gate. wire a, b, c;
I understand that blocking assignments execute in a sequential manner,whereas it is possible to assign values concurrently using non-blocking statements. My question is, why was non-blocking assignments included in Verilog. I can think of the following example to give weight to my statement. Using blocking assignment: always@(posedge) a = b ...
1. You should follow the industry practice which tells you to use non-blocking assignments for all outputs of the sequential logic. The only exclusion are temporary vars which are used to help in evaluation of complex expressions in sequential logic, provided that they are used only in a single block. In you case using 'blocking' for the ...
I understand that with the following Verilog code (snip code example using blocking assignments) It uses non-blocking statements all in parallel and I understand that when this is synthesised, it's basically 3 registers in series and it takes 3 clock cycles for 1'b1 to reach r_Test_3. Careful. Remember the initial state of registers is undefined.
In Verilog, blocking assignments (=) and non-blocking assignments (<=) are used within always blocks. Blocking assignments evaluate the right-hand side and update the left-hand side immediately, affecting subsequent statements. Non-blocking assignments schedule updates to occur at the end of the current delta cycle, allowing multiple updates to ...