In general, you are fine to quote from copyrighted texts with proper attribution. Keep in mind that you should use only the amount of text necessary to support your argument or conduct your own analysis; this is good scholarship and best practice in adhering to copyright law. If you are conducting research in an archive or have access to unpublished texts, a good resource is the Society of American Archivists "Copyright and Unpublished Material" guide.
Using images & video.
As you incorporate images or video clips into your work, ask the following questions to decide whether or not you need to get permission:
Is the work in copyright? If you're using a video or recent image created within the past 40 years, it is very likely protected by copyright. If you're using older material, it may or may not be protected. This chart is a great starting point when deciding whether or not the image is copyrighted.
If it is protected, can you make the case for fair use? Fair use is a part of U.S. Copyright Law that supports limited uses of copyrighted materials for education and scholarship. In the context of theses and dissertations, you may be able to rely on fair use rather than obtaining specific permission from the copyright holder. As one way to assess this, ask yourself whether or not the image or video is necessary to your argument? For instance, are you analyzing the work in your writing or does it directly support a particular point you are trying to make? If yes, your use is more likely to be fair . If the image or video is mainly there to make your work more visually appealing, but without really adding anything crucial to your argument, that use is less likely to be fair .
Can you use an image that is in the public domain or royalty free? If you don't think your use of a specific image falls within fair use, consider using a free-to-use alternative. Most images created before the 20th century and many images created after that are in the public domain, meaning their copyright protections have expired or they were never protected in the first place. Many websites also post images labeled as "royalty free" or "openly licensed." For links to websites containing images and audio or video files that may be in the public domain or openly licensed, please visit our research guide: Finding and Using Public Domain and Openly Licensed Media .
Do you need permission? If you want to use a specific image or video, have determined your use isn't fair, and can't find a suitable alternative, you may be able to seek permission from the copyright holder or pay a licensing fee. If you know the name of the photographer, you may be able to find their contact information online. On YouTube, you can typically send a message by going to a user's "about" page (though keep in mind that many people upload videos without owning the copyright). Note that most archives and special collections do not own copyright to many of the materials that they own; staff at such institutions may be able to give you information about the creator but often cannot give you permission to use the item.
Using data, charts, & graphs.
U.S. Copyright Law excludes ideas or facts from copyright protection. This means that research data may receive little or no protection on its own; to hold copyright, a researcher would need to creatively organize, compile, or otherwise add value to the underlying factual data. So in many cases, you are fine from a copyright perspective to analyze or republish research data. You should still consider the privacy and ethical norms of your field, any terms of use or contracts you agree to with data providers, and the implications of patent or trade secret laws, since these might limit what you can do with the data.
Similarly, you may typically republish a chart or graph that conveys factual information in a straightforward, uncreative way (e.g. a simple bar graph, pie chart, etc.). If the chart or graph involves more creative design or infographic elements, annotation, etc., you will need to consider fair use, get permission from the publisher or author, or create your own illustration based on the underlying facts.
Using copyrighted content.
When using copyrighted material in your own work, determine whether you need permission.
In some cases your use may qualify as a fair use under the guidelines in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Code. Duquesne provides a fair use checklist you can use to document your fair use analysis.
Check for rights restrictions— Creative Commons licenses that specify allowable uses are becoming more common, especially for online resources and images.
Generally the author of a work owns the copyright, but there are special considerations for a dissertation. For example, the dissertation research may have been carried out in a lab with grant funding obtained by the faculty member advising the dissertation. Or, chapters within the dissertation may have been accepted or published as journal articles.
If your thesis or dissertation contains material that you have submitted to a publisher, make sure you follow the permission guidelines of the publisher. You may find a blanket permission for use in a dissertation on the publisher's website. See Gumberg Library's ETD Preparation Guidelines for more information.
These sites provide in-depth information on requesting permission.
Information to include in permission request:
Index last updated November 2023
Welcome to the U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index. This Fair Use Index is a project undertaken by the Office of the Register in support of the 2013 Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement of the Office of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator ( IPEC ). Fair use is a longstanding and vital aspect of American copyright law. The goal of the Index is to make the principles and application of fair use more accessible and understandable to the public by presenting a searchable database of court opinions, including by category and type of use (e.g., music, internet/digitization, parody).
The Fair Use Index tracks a variety of judicial decisions to help both lawyers and non-lawyers better understand the types of uses courts have previously determined to be fair—or not fair. The decisions span multiple federal jurisdictions, including the U.S. Supreme Court, circuit courts of appeal, and district courts. Please note that while the Index incorporates a broad selection of cases, it does not include all judicial opinions on fair use. The Copyright Office will update and expand the Index periodically.
The Fair Use Index is designed to be user-friendly. For each decision, we have provided a brief summary of the facts, the relevant question(s) presented, and the court’s determination as to whether the contested use was fair. You may browse all of the cases, search for cases involving specific subject matter or categories of work, or review cases from specific courts. The Index ordinarily will reflect only the highest court decision issued in a case. It does not include the court opinions themselves. We have provided the full legal citation, however, allowing those who wish to read the actual decisions to access them through free online resources (such as Google Scholar and Justia), commercial databases (such as Westlaw and LEXIS), or the federal courts’ PACER electronic filing system, available at www.pacer.gov .
Although the Fair Use Index should prove helpful in understanding what courts have to date considered to be fair or not fair, it is not a substitute for legal advice. Fair use is a judge-created doctrine dating back to the nineteenth century and codified in the 1976 Copyright Act. Both the fact patterns and the legal application have evolved over time, and you should seek legal assistance as necessary and appropriate.
We hope you find the Fair Use Index a helpful resource. If you are concerned as to whether a particular use is fair, however, or believe that someone has made an unauthorized use of a copyrighted work in a manner that is not fair, it is best to consult an attorney.
Please note that the Copyright Office is unable to provide specific legal advice to individual members of the public about questions of fair use. See 37 C.F.R. 201.2(a)(3) .
Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:
In addition to the above, other factors may also be considered by a court in weighing a fair use question, depending upon the circumstances. Courts evaluate fair use claims on a case-bycase basis, and the outcome of any given case depends on a fact-specific inquiry. This means that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined percentage or amount of a work—or specific number of words, lines, pages, copies—may be used without permission.
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
The Online Writing Lab at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue. Students, members of the community, and users worldwide will find information to assist with many writing projects. Teachers and trainers may use this material for in-class and out-of-class instruction.
The Purdue On-Campus Writing Lab and Purdue Online Writing Lab assist clients in their development as writers—no matter what their skill level—with on-campus consultations, online participation, and community engagement. The Purdue Writing Lab serves the Purdue, West Lafayette, campus and coordinates with local literacy initiatives. The Purdue OWL offers global support through online reference materials and services.
The Purdue OWL® is committed to supporting students, instructors, and writers by offering a wide range of resources that are developed and revised with them in mind. To do this, the OWL team is always exploring possibilties for a better design, allowing accessibility and user experience to guide our process. As the OWL undergoes some changes, we welcome your feedback and suggestions by email at any time.
Please don't hesitate to contact us via our contact page if you have any questions or comments.
All the best,
Facebook twitter.
Griner v. king for congress.
The case revolves around a copyright infringement claim brought by Laney Griner, the owner of the copyright to a popular internet meme template known as “Success Kid.” The meme was used by the King for Congress Committee, a political campaign committee, to solicit donations. Griner sued the Congressman and the Committee for copyright infringement. The jury found the Committee, but not the Congressman, liable for copyright infringement and awarded Griner $750, the statutory minimum. Both parties moved for costs and attorney’s fees, which the district court partially granted and denied to both parties, but denied all attorney’s fees.
The Committee appealed the decision, arguing that it had an implied license to use the meme and that its use constituted fair use. The Committee also contested the district court’s evidentiary rulings and the jury’s instruction regarding damages. The Defendants appealed the denial of attorney’s fees and some costs.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision. The court found that the Committee had waived its implied license defense and that the jury correctly concluded that the Committee’s use of the meme did not constitute fair use. The court also found no abuse of discretion in the district court’s evidentiary rulings and held that the Committee’s challenge to the jury instruction regarding damages was waived. The court affirmed the district court’s decision not to award attorney’s fees and its denial of additional costs. View “Griner v. King for Congress” on Justia Law
Comments are closed.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
If the work used is factual, that will weigh in favor of fair use. The outcome of this subfactor varies depending on the work used. If the work used is unpublished, that will weigh against fair use. However, the fair use statute explicitly states that the unpublished nature of a work will not bar fair use if the use is otherwise fair.
Use the delayed release (embargo) option if a patent application is or will be in process, noting the reason for the delay as "patent pending.". If you have any questions, please contact Cornell's Center for Technology Licensing at 607-254-4698 or [email protected]. 5.
Fair use is an affirmative defense (in other words, a person can still be sued for copyright violations even if the use is almost certainly a fair one--since fair use is an affirmative defense, the burden is on the person making the copy (the user of the work) to justify the use as a fair use.
may be fair use or need permission. o If you are in the middle of your graduate study and plan to publish some of your research, choose a publisher that will accommodate your dissertation plans, and study closely the terms of the publication agreement. o If you are completing your dissertation, evaluate and select the options about Creative
If the work used is factual, that will weigh in favor of fair use. The outcome of this subfactor varies depending on the work used. If the work used is unpublished, that will weigh against fair use. However, the fair use statute explicitly states that the unpublished nature of a work will not bar fair use if the use is otherwise fair.
Obtaining permission for use. If you determine that you should seek permission to reuse someone's work, here are some places to go: In general, MIT owns the copyright in MIT theses. If you want to reuse parts of a student's (or your own) MIT thesis, contact [email protected]. If you want to reuse a portion of a book or article, an ...
Images & Graphics. Our guidance about the use of images and graphics as fair use is affected significantly by the fourth fair use factor. It is often difficult or even impossible to get permission to use images and graphics. This situation is changing in some fields where it is now possible to license databases of quality images at reasonable ...
While no use is always "fair," some uses are looked upon more favorably by the congress and the courts than others. A transformative use of a work - using an existing work for a new purpose or in an unexpected way - has weighed in favor of fair use in many court cases decided in recent decades. Even highly commercial uses have been judged "fair" by the U.S. Supreme Court, demonstrating the ...
However, attention to copyright can help avoid pitfalls and reveal opportunities to further your scholarly goals. Given the way that the law operates, copyright law most certainly protects your dissertation as well as the quotations, photographs, music, diagrams, and many other works that you have included in your doctoral study.
When writing a thesis or a dissertation, you have two sets of copyrights you should bear in mind. Your own copyright as author of the thesis or dissertation; and; The copyright owned by others in the material you incorporate into your thesis or dissertation. This guide will discuss both issues.
An explanation of the "four factors" that determine whether an intended reuse counts as fair use or not under U.S. copyright law and a searchable index of past cases decided on the topic. A checklist to help authors determine how the four factors apply to the reuse of a work and whether or not that use is, indeed, fair use.
Below, is a checklist of activities to conduct before and during the writing of your thesis or dissertation. If you have any questions or need assistance, please contact Fondren Library Publishing Services using this webform or email [email protected]. Familiarize yourself with the basics of U.S. copyright law, including the public domain and fair use.
Fair use is determined on a case-by-case basis and will require you to evaluate how and why you are including copyrighted works in your thesis or dissertation; using only the amount of the work needed to support your scholarship will help to strengthen your fair use defense.
Fair use favors uses that do not affect the original works. It is necessary to weigh all four factors to decide whether a fair use exemption seems to apply to a proposed reuse. Courts take a holistic approach -- they do not simply "add up" a positive or negative for each factor.
A fair use checklist is a tool you can use to help you decide if your use is fair. A fair use checklist is a decision-making tool; in the end, you still have to make your own determination. What the checklist can do is let you know what kinds of things favor fair use and what kinds of things oppose it, giving you a framework for thinking about ...
What is Fair Use? "Fair use" refers to the specific uses of copyrighted material that are allowed under copyright protection without requiring permission from the copyright owner ( 17 U.S.C. §107 ). These uses include criticism, parody, commentary, journalism, education and research. The ability to claim use of something under "fair use ...
Answers: 1)You would need permission from me and should credit the photograph elsewhere in the manuscript, for example, on the copyright page; 2)You would need permission; 3)I completely understand this, but you still need to receive permission; 4)Congratulations! You have a strong case for fair use because your critical analysis of the photo ...
Use of works protected by copyright in your dissertation or thesis will need either permission or a fair use justification. Fair use is an exception to the copyright holder's exclusive rights. In order to use copyrighted works under a claim of fair use, the following factors must be weighed: (1) the purpose and character of the use, including ...
Using Quotations and Text. In general, you are fine to quote from copyrighted texts with proper attribution. Keep in mind that you should use only the amount of text necessary to support your argument or conduct your own analysis; this is good scholarship and best practice in adhering to copyright law. If you are conducting research in an ...
Duquesne provides a fair use checklist you can use to document your fair use analysis. Check for rights restrictions—Creative Commons licenses that specify allowable uses are becoming more common, especially for online resources and images. Dissertation Research. Generally the author of a work owns the copyright, but there are special ...
Legal use, without permission, of copyrighted work is limited to "fair use" of the work. Educational and research use is not necessarily "fair use", especially if the work is published, as your dissertation or thesis will be with ProQuest and as (hopefully) many of your future journal articles or books will be. You may be better off acquiring
The Fair Use Index tracks a variety of judicial decisions to help both lawyers and non-lawyers better understand the types of uses courts have previously determined to be fair—or not fair. The decisions span multiple federal jurisdictions, including the U.S. Supreme Court, circuit courts of appeal, and district courts.
A searchable index of the copyright renewal records for books published in the US between 1923 and 1963. Information on Visual Resources and Digital Image Use Statement on the Fair Use of Images for Teaching, Research, and Study (Visual Resources Association)
A searchable index of the copyright renewal records for books published in the US between 1923 and 1963. Information on Visual Resources and Digital Image Use Statement on the Fair Use of Images for Teaching, Research, and Study (Visual Resources Association)
Mission. The Purdue On-Campus Writing Lab and Purdue Online Writing Lab assist clients in their development as writers—no matter what their skill level—with on-campus consultations, online participation, and community engagement. The Purdue Writing Lab serves the Purdue, West Lafayette, campus and coordinates with local literacy initiatives.
King for Congress. Judge: Benton. Opinion Date: June 7, 2024. The case revolves around a copyright infringement claim brought by Laney Griner, the owner of the copyright to a popular internet meme template known as "Success Kid.". The meme was used by the King for Congress Committee, a political campaign committee, to solicit donations.
A lawsuit accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of violating the New York Times's copyright. But the law is anything but clear. By Will Oremus. and. Elahe Izadi. January 4, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. EST. (Dado ...
By Vogue. May 8, 2024. Photo: Getty Images. The 2024 Met Gala red carpet has officially closed at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and fashion's biggest night has come to an end. This year's ...