JAMB AND WAEC

DEBATE TOPIC: 10 Reasons Why Civilian Rule is Better than Military Rule ( Support and oppose the motion)

Write an argumentative essay on civilian rule is better than military rule.

Explore the debate on whether civilian rule is better than military rule . This article provides insights into the advantages of civilian governance, backed by expert opinions and historical examples.

Civilian rule and military rule are two contrasting forms of governance that have shaped the course of history and politics. The debate surrounding the effectiveness and suitability of these forms of rule has been ongoing for decades. In this article, we delve into the reasons why civilian rule is considered superior to military rule.

By examining key aspects, historical instances, and expert opinions, we aim to shed light on the strengths of civilian governance and why it is a preferred choice for societies striving for stability, development, and freedom.

FREE DOWNLOAD NOW

Debate on civilian rule is better than military rule

10 reasons why civilian rule is better than military rule

Civilian rule is a fundamental aspect of democratic governance, and it has several advantages over military rule. Here are 10 reasons why civilian rule is better than military rule:

  • Accountability : Civilian rule ensures that elected officials are accountable to the people, as they are chosen through free and fair elections. This accountability mechanism is absent in military rule, where the military leadership is not directly accountable to the public
  • Civilian control of the military : Civilian rule allows for the establishment of a clear chain of command, with civilians in control of the military. This ensures that the military is subordinate to the larger purposes of the nation, rather than the other way around
  • Protection of human rights : Civilian rule is more likely to protect human rights and uphold the rule of law, as it is based on democratic principles and the protection of individual freedoms
  • Economic development : Civilian rule is more conducive to economic development, as it fosters a stable political environment and encourages investment and growth
  • Peaceful transfer of power : Civilian rule allows for a peaceful transfer of power through elections, ensuring that political change occurs through democratic means rather than through force or violence
  • Respect for international law : Civilian rule is more likely to respect international law and cooperate with other nations, as it is based on diplomacy and cooperation rather than force and coercion
  • Promotion of democracy : Civilian rule promotes the spread of democracy and democratic values, as it demonstrates the benefits of democratic governance and encourages other nations to adopt similar systems
  • Protection of minority rights : Civilian rule is more likely to protect the rights of minority groups, as it is based on the protection of individual freedoms and the promotion of diversity
  • Reduction of corruption : Civilian rule is more likely to reduce corruption, as it promotes transparency and accountability in government
  • Promotion of peace and stability : Civilian rule is more likely to promote peace and stability, as it fosters a stable political environment and encourages dialogue and compromise rather than force and coercion.
  • JAMB Regularization for NYSC Registration & Mobilization 2024 Batch A, B and C PCMs
  • How To Contact JAMB For Complaints, Inquiries and Other issues

DEBATE TOPIC: Civilian Rule is Better than Military Rule

Civilian rule refers to a government led by individuals who are not affiliated with the military. It is characterized by a focus on democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Military rule, on the other hand, involves the direct control of a nation by the armed forces. While both forms of governance have been prevalent in various parts of the world, there are compelling reasons why civilian rule is widely regarded as the superior option.

Advantages of Civilian Rule

Democratic principles and representation.

Civilian rule inherently promotes democratic principles, ensuring that the government is accountable to the people it governs. Elected officials represent the interests of the citizens, creating a system where policies and decisions are made with the welfare of the populace in mind. This democratic process encourages transparency, participation, and a sense of ownership among citizens.

Protection of Human Rights

Under civilian rule, the protection of human rights is a fundamental priority. Constitutions and legal frameworks are designed to safeguard individual freedoms and prevent abuse of power. This commitment to human rights fosters an environment of equality and justice, allowing citizens to live without fear of oppression.

Sustainable Socioeconomic Development

Civilian governments are often better equipped to focus on long-term socioeconomic development. Policies can be formulated and executed based on comprehensive assessments of the nation’s needs and resources. Moreover, civilian rule promotes a stable environment that attracts foreign investments, encourages innovation, and supports economic growth.

Peaceful Conflict Resolution

Civilian governments emphasize diplomacy and negotiation in resolving conflicts, both domestically and internationally. Open dialogue and peaceful negotiations are preferred methods for resolving disputes, reducing the likelihood of armed conflicts that can arise under military rule.

Strengthening International Relations

Civilian rule tends to foster better diplomatic relations with other countries. International cooperation and collaboration are prioritized, contributing to a more interconnected world. Such interactions open doors for trade, cultural exchange, and mutual understanding.

  • APPLY: Farleigh Dickinson University, USA degree scholarship, 2024 (Up to $24,000 every year)

Historical Examples of Successful Civilian Rule

The united states: a beacon of democracy.

The United States stands as a prime example of the success of civilian rule. With a government founded on democratic principles, it has demonstrated how a system based on checks and balances, individual rights, and regular elections can lead to stable governance and widespread prosperity.

South Korea: A Transition to Democracy

South Korea’s transition from military rule to civilian rule marked a turning point in its history. The country’s journey toward democracy led to economic growth, improved human rights, and a vibrant civil society. This transformation underscores the positive impact of civilian governance.

  • APPLY: NNPC/SNEPCo University Undergraduate degree Scholarship

India: Diversity and Democracy

India, with its diverse population and complex social fabric, has embraced civilian rule since its independence. Despite challenges, the country’s democratic institutions have provided a platform for various voices to be heard and for peaceful power transitions to occur.

Expert Opinions on Civilian Rule

Renowned political scholars and experts overwhelmingly advocate for civilian rule as the preferred form of governance. Dr. Emily Carter, a political scientist, emphasizes, “Civilian governments are rooted in the aspirations of the people. They ensure inclusivity, progress, and a foundation for sustained development.”

  • YABATECH Change of Course Form 2024: How To do It?

FAQs (Civilian Rule is Better than Military Rule )

Q: Can military rule bring stability in times of crisis? A: While military rule might initially restore order, it often comes at the cost of human rights and long-term development. Civilian rule is better equipped to address crises while upholding democratic values.

Q: Are there instances where military rule led to positive outcomes? A: Some argue that military interventions have resulted in short-term stability. However, sustained progress requires civilian governance that prioritizes human rights and accountability.

Q: How does civilian rule prevent abuse of power? A: Civilian governments are structured with checks and balances, ensuring that power is distributed and decisions are made collectively. This reduces the risk of concentrated authority and its potential abuse.

Q: What role does civilian rule play in economic growth? A: Civilian rule fosters an environment conducive to sustainable economic development. Policies can be tailored to address economic challenges, attract investments, and promote innovation.

Q: Can military rule effectively handle diplomatic relations? A: Military regimes often lack the diplomatic finesse required for healthy international relations. Civilian governments engage in diplomatic dialogues, contributing to global stability and cooperation.

Q: Are there risks associated with civilian rule? A: Civilian rule can face challenges such as bureaucracy and political gridlock. However, these challenges can be addressed through effective leadership and democratic processes.

In the ongoing debate Civilian Rule is Better than Military Rule, the advantages of civilian governance stand out as crucial components of a thriving society. With a commitment to democratic principles, human rights, and sustainable development, civilian rule provides a platform for inclusive growth and progress. By examining historical examples, expert opinions, and the merits of this form of governance, it becomes evident that civilian rule is indeed better than military rule in fostering stability, prosperity, and a brighter future.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Welcome, : / / /
43377 members, 38256 topics. : Friday, 28th June 2024


» » » Debate: Civilian Rule Is Better Than Military Rule

by : On

Good morning, the chairman, the moderator the panel of judges, the time keeper, my co-debaters, and my attentive audience. The topic to be proposed this morning is “Civilian Rule is Better Than Military Rule”.

First, one has to give the meanings of key words in this topic – Civilian and military Rule. Civilian rule can be defined as a type of governance undertaken by the civil society. It can also be referred to as government by the people’s representatives. Military rule on the other hand is governance by members of the armed forces. They usually force themselves on the people. Civilian rule is referred to as democratic while military rule is tagged autocratic. The process of choosing the representatives of the people is most often done through voting while the military come to power through another process called coup d’etat.

At this juncture, I have to come out boldly by supporting the proposal, having these points to buttress my stance. One of the most important reasons why civilian rule is better is what we are doing today-debate. The freedom guaranteed all citizens to air their views. My opponents cannot deny the fact that you dare not publicly criticize a military regime. You will be rounded up by the state security agents if such happens.

The process of becoming the peoples’ representative is another reason for my preference of civilian rule to military rule. All intending participants will come out to campaign. They will give highlights of what they wish to accomplish if they are voted for. Nigerians. The most important of all these is the choice. The opportunity given to the electorate to vote for the best candidate.

In addition, civilian rulers tend to govern better than military rulers. This is simply  because of the fear of reprimand by the people who elected them. The civilian rulers know clearly that should they fail to perform, re-election will be difficult. It may even spell doom for their political party if they are elected through the platform of a political party. Above all, they live amongst us, they begged us to vote for them and they are our people. It seems logical that they are easily accessible to us than any group of people who forced themselves on us.

Moreover, there care checks and balances embedded in civilian rule to ensure smooth running of government. The legislative houses and the press oftentimes cry out to check the excesses of civilian rulers. My opponents can testify to the fact that there are no legislative houses during military regime. Again, the press is viewed by the military as their enemy, thus leading to the closure of medical houses and detention of journalists.

In conclusion, I wish to state categorically that the armed forces are established to defend the territorial integrity of the nation against internal and external aggression. They should face their job rather than rule.

Life is good

Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Click to print (Opens in new window)

You must or to post a comment.


Sections:
- Copyright @ 2016 - 2024 . All rights reserved. See . DMCA .
: Every member is for that he/she or on

Privacy Overview

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

Study Paragraphs

Argumentative Essay On Democracy Is Better Than Military Rule

The debate between democracy and military rule has long been a topic of contention in discussions about governance. In this essay, we will explore the advantages of democracy over military rule, focusing on representation, human rights, the rule of law, economic development, and peaceful transitions of power. Democracy, with its emphasis on citizen participation and protection of individual rights, has proven to be a better path to progress and prosperity for nations worldwide.

Table of Contents

Reasons Why Democracy Is Better Than Military Rule Essay

Representation and participation.

One of the fundamental pillars of democracy is representation and participation. In democratic societies, citizens have the opportunity to elect their leaders, granting them a voice in shaping policies that impact their lives. Elected representatives, who are accountable to the people, advocate for the interests of their constituents and secure various perspectives, are considered in decision-making processes. In contrast, military rule often leaves citizens without a voice, as a select group makes decisions of military leaders without the consent of the governed.

Protection (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); of Human Rights

Democracies are characterized by a commitment to protecting individual rights and freedoms. Constitutional frameworks and independent judiciary systems in democratic nations ensure that basic human rights, such as freedom of speech, assembly, and expression, are upheld. These rights are essential for fostering an environment of open dialogue, debate, and progress. In contrast, military rule may impose restrictions on civil liberties, leading to censorship and oppression, stifling societal growth and development.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is a cornerstone of democratic governance. In a democracy, laws apply to all citizens equally, regardless of their social or political standing. This principle ensures that those in power are held accountable for their actions, promoting transparency and fairness. In military rule, the rule of law may be undermined, leading to arbitrary decision-making and a lack of checks and balances, which can result in abuse of power.

Economic Development

Empirical evidence suggests that democracies tend to experience higher levels of economic development compared to countries under military rule. The stability and predictability of democratic systems create a favorable environment for investment, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Additionally, democratic governments prioritize policies that foster economic growth, social welfare, and education, leading to better economic outcomes and improved living standards for citizens.

Peaceful Transitions of Power

One of the significant advantages of democracy is its ability to facilitate peaceful transitions of power through regular elections. In democratic nations, leaders are elected for a fixed term, and power is peacefully transferred to the winning candidate after each election cycle. This ensures political stability and reduces the risk of violent conflicts that can arise from power struggles in military regimes.

Challenges and Counterarguments

While democracy offers numerous benefits, it is essential to acknowledge its challenges and consider counterarguments. Democracies can face issues such as political polarization, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the influence of money in politics. Furthermore, some argue that military rule can bring stability and decisive action in times of crisis. However, it is crucial to recognize that military rule often comes at the cost of human rights and undermines the principles of democratic governance.

In conclusion, democracy has proven to be a superior form of governance when compared to military rule. It ensures representation and citizen participation, protects human rights, upholds the rule of law, fosters economic development, and facilitates peaceful transitions of power. While it may face challenges, democracy remains the best path to progress and prosperity for nations worldwide. Embracing democracy’s core principles of inclusion, transparency, and accountability will continue to lead societies toward a brighter and more equitable future.

Paragraph Writing

Hello! Welcome to my Blog StudyParagraphs.co. My name is Angelina. I am a college professor. I love reading writing for kids students. This blog is full with valuable knowledge for all class students. Thank you for reading my articles.

Related Posts:

Paragraph About Democracy In 100 To 150 Words

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Servantboy

Is Military Rule Better Than The Civilian Rule Or Vice-Versa?

Photo of Bolarinwa Olajire

This article examines whether military rule is better than the civilian rule and vice-versa. It provides the advantages of each system of government and gives room for readers to build on any of the points highlighted.

Democratic Government

Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows people to participate equally—either directly or through elected representatives—in the laws’ proposal, development, and creation. i.e., A democratic government is ruled by civilians, usually elected by the people. Democracy is ruled by the constitution and reign of civil laws, which are reasonably justifiable in a democratic society with civilians exercising all legislative, executive, and judicial powers.

A democratic government contrasts two forms of government where power is either held by one, as in a monarchy, or where power is held by a small number of individuals, as in an oligarchy or aristocracy. Nevertheless, these oppositions, inherited from Greek philosophy, are now ambiguous because contemporary governments have mixed democratic, oligarchic, and monarchic elements. Several variants of democracy exist, but two primary forms concern how the whole body of citizens executes its will: direct democracy and representative democracy.

Read: Is democracy the best form of government?

Military Government

A military government is ruled by the armed forces, who do not come to power through election, but by force of arms. A military regime is a process, procedure, or system with expertise, adapted and rooted in war and combat. It is a system rooted in martial law and forces. It is also a system that demands obedience always and, in its purest essence, makes no room for debate and opposition.

Some of the features of military rule include Suspension of the constitution, absence of an election, use of decrees and edicts, lack of respect for fundamental human rights, no checks and balances, centralized form of government, no periodic election, etc.

Read: Causes and remedies to indiscipline in schools

Which is better?

Below are the advantages of civilian rule and military rule. Look at the advantages of the two and compare them to be sure which is better. Each of them has its cons and that must be considered too. This will help you give the essential points to defend the side you want to take.

Civilian Rule

  • There are ways to resolve different views and conflicts peacefully.
  • It is a government by the people and for the people
  • Respect for human dignity.
  • The freedom to act, speak, and think freely (as long as it does not stop others from doing the same).
  • Equality before the law.
  • Safe and secure community.
  • It is a system of government that is efficient, transparent, responsive, and accountable to citizens.
  • Ability to hold elected representatives accountable.
  • Opposition and criticism are tolerated.

Military Rule

  • The military has protocol and structure.
  • Protection of life and property is ensured in a military regime.
  • Decision-making is faster in military regimes than in civilian.
  • It instills discipline and brings about order and corporate living among people in society.
  • Control of corruption
  • It is cost-effective. Since the election is not conducted, billions spent on this process are avoided.
  • There is respect for authority
  • Criminal activities are minimal. Martial law can quickly illuminate all criminals.
  • Military naturally commands respect and fear which is enough to make everyone do what is right while the nation develops with people marginalizing one another.

Related posts:

  • Nigerian Military School JS1 Application Form 2024/2025
  • Nigerian Military School (NMS) Admission List 2023/2024
  • Nigerian Military School (NMS) Zaria School Fees 2023/2024
  • How to gain admission into Obafemi Awolowo University
  • How to know the type of course to study in the university

Photo of Bolarinwa Olajire

Bolarinwa Olajire

Leave a reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

♟️ Why we must understand civilian participation in military rule

Researchers of authoritarian politics and civil-military relations have long examined military rule. However, our understanding of civilian participation in military regimes remains limited and requires greater analytical attention, argues Salah Ben Hammou . Amid last year’s coup resurgence, researchers must begin to appreciate the subtle but salient differences among military dictatorships

When soldiers seize political power, our minds tend to conjure up assumptions about military rule. We might imagine officers in fatigues dictating legislation and the outlawing of political participation. In our vision, civilian leaders – civil society members and party leaders – might well be notably absent. But is this really what 'military rule' looks like?

When someone speaks of military rule, we might imagine officers in fatigues dictating legislation. But is that really what 'military rule' looks like?

Hager Ali recently called for greater analytical precision in the study of authoritarian regimes. The study of military regimes – particularly those with a significant civilian presence – is one area of research in need of such nuance. This is especially important in light of the 2021 military coups which toppled governments in Sudan , Mali , Guinea , and Myanmar . But rather than simply lumping all militarised governments together, researchers must do more to appreciate the subtle, but salient, differences.

Delineating (military) dictatorships

It's tempting to assume that all military governments share the same traits and behaviours. But this is not true. Moving beyond the archetype of ‘military rule’, we find great variation among militarised regimes. Researchers acknowledge a few of these distinctions. Most scholarship, for example, distinguishes between cases in which militaries govern through a collegial entity and those where a military officer ‘personalises’ political power.

Examples of the latter include Chile’s General Augusto Pinochet and Uganda’s Idi Amin . The former includes Brazil’s ruling junta 1964–1985 and the Derg in Ethiopia . Studies ( here , here , here , and here ) reveal these differences matter for a country’s foreign policy, political instability, and prospects of democratisation. Yet, despite receiving the most attention from researchers, the difference between collegial and personalist military rule is far from the only relevant distinction.

Scholars have done little to evaluate one key distinction across military regimes: civilian participation

Scholars have done little to evaluate one key distinction across military regimes: civilian participation. Some typologies, such as the Autocratic Breakdown dataset , classify certain governments as having a dominant military and political party. Yet we still lack a nuanced understanding of these types of arrangements. It is unclear, for example, how much relative power each institution wields, or how we might compare such systems to each other.

Further, collegial military rule and military-personalist systems can experience significant involvement by civilian political parties even if they don’t meet the criteria of a ‘dominant’ institution. For example, Sudan’s Colonel Jaafar Nimeiri (in power 1969–1985) is often categorised as a personalist military dictator. Yet Nimeiri's regime initially crafted legislation and policy hand-in-hand with the Communist Party . Likewise, Turkey’s collegial military government (1980–1983) worked alongside a constellation of civilian allies who had previously demanded the armed forces’ intervention.

Bringing civilian participation into the mix

Rather than treating civilian participation as negligible, researchers can use the varieties of this feature to uncover more general trends in military rule.

Soldiers and civilians come to govern together through a variety of avenues. As a result, each avenue comes with its own implications for a country’s civil-military relations. For example, military dictators can form their own civilian political parties. Through these, they can channel mass mobilisation, reduce their reliance on the armed forces, and discredit civilian opposition. Nimeiri’s Sudanese Socialist Union is one such example. The SUU was created in the aftermath of Nimeiri's dispute with his former civilian allies in the Communist Party . In this context, civilians lack significant autonomy from their military allies and merely serve at officers’ behest.

However, civilian parties can also have a great deal of agency. They can build a strong following within the armed forces and use their military partisans to seize power on their behalf. The Ba’ath party’s ascension via a military coup in 1968 Iraq is one such example. Though it began as a military regime, the Ba'athist government saw its officers increasingly lose influence to their civilian allies. And this, of course, paved the way for a civilian – Saddam Hussein – to consolidate political power.

Blurring the lines between 'civilian' and 'military'

In some cases, the outcome is the opposite: officers successfully subjugate their civilian partners. In Sudan, Hassan al-Turabi’s civilian National Islamic Front (NIF) initially dominated Omar al-Bashir’s military dictatorship throughout the 1990s. Indeed, Turabi is often referred to as the power behind the throne . However, al-Bashir and his associates gained full primacy in the regime. By the end of the decade, they had sacked Turabi and his associates. And this type of arrangement is still distinct from cases that emerge from armed anti-colonial resistance, blurring the lines between what it means to be a 'civilian' and a 'soldier'. Algeria's military regime is one such example.

Incorporating different dynamics into our analysis sheds a new light on military regimes, and helps us design our efforts to limit military intervention

These examples are by no means exhaustive of all the potential civil-military arrangements possible under military regimes. However, incorporating the different dynamics sheds light on processes researchers have previously ignored. Instead of erroneously assuming militaries and civilians operate in distinct spaces, we can work towards a nuanced typology that includes the varieties of relationships between civilians and soldiers, their origins, their changing features, and more.

Why civilian participation matters beyond research

Unpacking civilian participation in military regimes extends beyond theoretical concerns.

First, if officers have civilian allies – either willing participants for post-coup governments or instigators of coups themselves – efforts to limit military intervention in politics will be futile . Second, the international community’s recurring demand for a 'civilian' government after a coup overlooks the too-common strategy of handing power to an affiliated civilian party. Observers have raised similar concerns with the international community’s call for a civilian-led government in Sudan, pointing to the recent putschists’ move to form a government composed of civilian allies .

Ultimately, finding the language to describe situations in which civilians don fatigues and govern alongside officers clarifies what military rule can really look like. It also reminds us that civilians, too, have agency.

♟️ No.2 in The Loop's Autocracies with Adjectives series examining the nuanced differences between autocratic regimes around the world

photograph of Salah Ben Hammou

Salah's research focuses on civil-military relations, democratisation, and authoritarian politics in the Middle East and North Africa.

His work has been published in peer-reviewed journals including International Studies Review and Journal of Global Security Studies as well as in popular outlets such as The Washington Post , the Cairo Review , and Political Violence at a Glance .

Personal website

He tweets @poliscisbh

Share Article

Republish article, republish this article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .

by Salah Ben Hammou, The Loop May 11, 2022

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Republish This Story

Creative Commons License

Stay in the loop with our biweekly digest

* Provide your email address to subscribe, e.g. [email protected]

* I agree to receive your newsletters and accept the data privacy notice

Your email address is only used to send you The Loop Digest newsletter.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recently Published

If you care about ai, this is who you should vote for in the uk general election, ⛓️ edward said’s vision of a free university , a voice in favour of the hungarian eu council presidency.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

  • Publications
  • Our Methods
  • Short Reads
  • Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

  • Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy
  • 2. Democracy widely supported, little backing for rule by strong leader or military

Table of Contents

  • 1. Many unhappy with current political system
  • Acknowledgments
  • Methodology
  • Appendix: Political categorization

Governance can take many forms: by elected representatives, through direct votes by citizens, by a strong leader, the military or those with particular expertise. Some form of democracy is the public’s preference.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

[a representative democracy]

A global median of 78% back government by elected representatives. But the intensity of this support varies significantly between nations. Roughly six-in-ten Ghanaians (62%), 54% of Swedes and 53% of Senegalese and Tanzanians hold the view that representative democracy is very good. Just 8% of Brazilians and 9% of Mexicans agree. The only countries where there is significantly strong opposition to representative democracy are Colombia (24% say it is very bad) and Tunisia (23% very bad).

In many countries, skepticism of representative democracy is tied to negative views about economic conditions. In 19 countries, people who say their national economies are in bad shape are less likely to believe representative democracy is good for the country.

In 23 nations, the belief that representative democracy is good is less common among people who think life is worse today than it was 50 years ago. In Spain, for example, just 63% of those who believe life is worse than before consider representative democracy a good thing for their country, compared with 80% who support representative democracy among those who say life is better than it was a half century ago.

Similarly, pessimism about the next generation is related to negative views about representative democracy. In roughly half the nations surveyed those who think today’s children will be worse off financially than their parents are less likely than others to say representative democracy is a good form of government. Among Mexicans who believe the next generation will be worse off, only 52% say representative democracy is good for the country. Backing for government by elected representatives is at 72% among those who say children will be better off than their parents.

Attitudes toward representative democracy are also associated with opinions about diversity. In more than a third of the nations surveyed those who think that having people of many different backgrounds – such as different ethnic groups, religions and races – makes their country a worse place to live are less likely than others to support government by elected representatives. In South Africa, a country with a troubled history of racial oppression and conflict, 73% of those who embrace diversity describe representative democracy as a good thing for their country; just 54% agree among those who say diversity makes South Africa a worse place to live.

Many publics want a direct say

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Direct democracy, a governing system where citizens, not elected officials, vote directly on major national issues, is supported by roughly two-thirds of the public around the world, with little difference in views between regions.

The strongest support for governing through referenda is found in Turkey (84%), where 53% of the public say it would be very good to have citizens vote on major national issues. Lebanon (83%) and Kenya (80%) also show broad support for direct democracy.

There is also strong backing for such governance in Japan (65%) even though the country has not had a referendum in the post-World War II era.

In the U.S., Germany and the Netherlands, people with a high school education or less are more likely than those with more than a high school education to support direct democracy. Such differences are small in the U.S. (6 percentage points) and Germany (8 points) but there is a 17-point differential in the Netherlands (62% of those with less educational attainment back direct democracy, but only 45% of those with more education agree).

In six of seven Latin American nations surveyed, those with a secondary school education or above are more supportive of direct democracy than those with less than a high school education. This educational divide is 16 points in Chile and 14 points in Argentina and Colombia. In each of these countries, those with less education are less likely to hold an opinion of direct democracy.

In Latin America, there is also a generation gap in views of direct democracy. In Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Venezuela, those ages 18 to 29 are more supportive than those ages 50 and older of having citizens, not elected officials, vote directly on issues of major national importance.

Notably, in the U.S. it is people ages 30 to 49 who are most likely (73%) to back referenda.

In other countries there are sharp divisions along religious or ethnic lines. In Israel it is Arabs (83%) more than Jews (54%) who favor direct democracy, and in Nigeria it is Muslims (70%) more than Christians (55%).

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Supporters of some populist parties in Europe are particularly enthusiastic about direct democracy. In Spain, 88% of those who hold a favorable view of Podemos say citizens voting on national issues would be good for the country. In Germany, 84% of AfD backers agree, as do 77% of PVV supporters in the Netherlands.

Support for direct democracy can also be seen in other recent Pew Research Center findings in Europe. In the wake of the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union, a median of just 18% in nine continental EU member states say they want their country to exit the EU. But 53% support holding a national vote on their own country’s EU membership.

And such support is particularly strong among backers of Euroskeptic populist parties, many of whom have promised their supporters a referendum on EU membership. (For more on European’s attitudes about staying in the EU, see Post-Brexit, Europeans More Favorable Toward EU .)

And in six of the nine continental European nations surveyed, strong majorities of those who believe that direct democracy is a very good form of governance support their own EU membership referendum.

Technocracy has its champions

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

The value of expert opinion has been questioned in the eyes of the public in recent years. But when asked whether a governing system in which experts, not elected officials, make decisions would be a good or bad approach, publics around the world are divided: 49% say that would be a good idea, 46% think it would be a bad thing.

Europeans (a median of 43%) and Americans (40%) are the least supportive. But among Europeans, roughly two-thirds of Hungarians (68%) say leaving decision-making to experts would be a good way to govern.

Asian-Pacific publics generally back rule by experts, particularly people in Vietnam (67%), India (65%) and the Philippines (62%). Only Australians are notably wary: 57% say it would be a bad way to govern, and only 41% support governance by experts.

More than half of Africans surveyed also say governing by experts would be a good thing for their country. Nigerians (65%) are especially supportive. And it is Nigerian Muslims more than Christians who say this.

Young people in a number of advanced economies are particularly attracted to technocracy. In the U.S. the age gap is 10 percentage points – 46% of those ages 18 to 29 but only 36% of those ages 50 and older say it would be good if experts, not elected officials, made decisions. The young-old differential is even greater in Australia (19 points), Japan (18 points), the UK (14 points), Sweden (13 points) and Canada (13 points).

Some support for rule by strong leader

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Rule by a strong leader is generally unpopular, though minorities of a substantial size back it. A global median of 26% say a system in which a strong leader can make decisions without interference from parliament or the courts would be a good way of governing. Roughly seven-in-ten (71%) say it would be a bad type of governance.

Opposition is particularly widespread in Europe (a median of 86% oppose rule by a strong leader), with strong opposition in Germany (93%), Sweden (90%) and the Netherlands (89%).

But autocracy is not universally opposed. Roughly four-in-ten Italians (43%) who have a favorable view of Forza Italia, the political party founded by former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, and a similar share of the British (42%) who favor UKIP say a strong leader making decisions would be good for their country. Nearly half of Russians (48%) back governance by a strong leader.

In Asia, 55% of Indians, 52% of Indonesians and 50% of Filipinos favor autocracy. Such support is particularly intense in India, where 27% very strongly back a strong leader.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Public views of rule by a strong leader are relevant in countries that have experienced degrees of authoritarianism in recent years. Roughly eight-in-ten Venezuelans (81%) and 71% of Hungarians oppose a strong leader who makes decisions without interference of parliament or the courts.

Rule by a strong leader also appeals to older members of the public in some countries. More than a quarter of Hungarians (29%) and South Koreans (34%) ages 50 and older favor governance by a strong leader.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

In advanced economies there is little overall backing for autocracy. But, where such support does exist, it is often people with a secondary education or below who are more likely than those with more education to favor autocratic rule. This educational divide is particularly wide in the UK (19 percentage points), the U.S. (15 points), Poland and South Korea (both 13 points).

In a number of nations there is a significant division of opinion about strong leaders based on ideology. Those who place themselves on the right of the ideological spectrum are more likely than those who place themselves on the left to say a strong leader making decisions would be a good way of governing. The ideological gap is 20 percentage points in South Korea and Australia and 16 points in Italy and the UK. Notably, in Venezuela, which has been ruled by populist, left-wing strongmen, those on the left are more supportive of autocratic rule than those on the right.

Significant minorities support military rule

There is minority support for a governing system in which the military rules the country: a median of 24% in the 38 nations surveyed. At least four-in-ten Africans (46%) and Asians (41%) see value in a government run by the generals and admirals.

The strongest backing is in Vietnam (70%), where the army has long played a pivotal role in governance in close collaboration with the Communist Party, especially in the 1960s and 70s during the war with the United States. Some of this may be nostalgia for the past: By two-to-one (46% to 23%) Vietnamese ages 50 and older are more likely than those ages 18 to 29 to say military rule would be very good for their country.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Notably, roughly half of both Indians (53%) and South Africans (52%), who live in nations that often hold themselves up as democratic exemplars for their regions, say military rule would be a good thing for their countries. But in these societies, older people (those ages 50 and older) are the least supportive of the army running the country, and they are the ones who either personally experienced the struggle to establish democratic rule or are the immediate descendants of those democratic pioneers. In South Africa, blacks (55%) more than whites (38%) also favor the military making governance decisions.

Only one-in-ten Europeans back military rule. But some on the populist right of the political spectrum voice such support. Nearly a third of those who hold a favorable view of the National Front in France (31%) say a governing system in which the military rules the country would be a good thing, as do nearly a quarter of those who favor UKIP in the United Kingdom (23%).

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Support for a governing system in which the military rules the country enjoys backing among people with less education in at least half the countries surveyed, with some of the strongest support among those with less than a secondary education in Africa and Latin America.

More than half of Peruvians with less than a high school education (55%) prefer military rule. Only about a third (32%) of more educated Peruvians agree.

Particularly strong backing for military rule also exists among the less educated in Vietnam (76%), Nigeria (57%), Kenya (49%) and the Philippines (47%).

Notably, one-in-five of those ages 50 and older in the U.S. support military rule, as do roughly one-in-four Japanese (24%) ages 18 to 29.

Ideology also plays a role in public views of military rule. But it can cut both ways. In some countries, people on the right of the political spectrum are significantly more supportive of military governance than those on the left, especially in Chile. In Hungary and Venezuela, on the other hand, it is more likely to be individuals on the left who see value in military rule.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information

  • Authoritarianism
  • Trust in Government
  • Trust, Facts & Democracy

Support for democracy is strong in Hong Kong and Taiwan

Who likes authoritarianism, and how do they want to change their government, many across the globe are dissatisfied with how democracy is working, how countries around the world view democracy, military rule and other political systems, study on twins suggests our political beliefs may be hard-wired, most popular, report materials.

  • Explore global opinions on political systems by country
  • Spring 2017 Survey Data

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

  • Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

© 2024 Pew Research Center

Differences between Civilian Government and Military Government

In a civilian administration, authority is exerted and apportioned in a different way than in a military one. Elected officials in a civilian administration are normally in charge and answerable to the people they serve. The leaders of the armed forces in a military regime may or may not be answerable to the populace at large.

The military’s involvement in society is another major contrast between civilian and military rule. The military in a civilian administration is usually viewed as an independent institution that exists to defend the country from foreign aggression. On the other hand, with a military administration, the military is frequently prioritized above civilian leaders.

The third key distinction between civilian and military administrations concerns the decision-making process. Generally speaking, decisions in a civilian government are determined through a democratic process, with elected individuals acting as the people’s voice. It is common for a small number of military officers to make decisions in a military administration, with or without input from civilian authorities or the public.

The safeguarding of personal liberties is a fourth key distinction between civilian and military rule. Rights and liberties of citizens are safeguarded by an impartial court and guaranteed by a written constitution or other legal instrument in a civilian government. Freedoms and rights of citizens may be curtailed in the name of national security or other considerations under a military rule.

The fifth and final distinction is the method in which each type of government deals with foreign nations. The principal methods of dispute resolution under a government run by civilians are usually diplomacy and negotiation. However, with a military government, the use of force to settle disputes may be more common, perhaps leading to a more belligerent approach abroad.

Related Posts

See the Current Lists of Top Ranking Private Universities in Kenya

See the Current Lists of Top Ranking Private Universities in Kenya

The major ethnic groups in the gambia, cultural differences and similarities between south africa and zimbabwe.

WhatsApp us

paragraphon.com

Write an Argumentative Essay on the Topic Military Rule is Better Than Civilian Rule

Write an Argumentative Essay on the Topic Military Rule is Better Than Civilian Rule

The ongoing debate surrounding often centers on the choice between military rule and civilian rule. Advocates for military rule assert its merits in terms of efficiency, discipline, and stability. While supporters of civilian rule emphasize democratic values and individual rights, it is important to explore both perspectives. Here we are going to write an argumentative essay on the topic military rule is better than civilian rule. This essay aims to present a simplified argument favoring military rule, with a focus on aspects that may resonate with students.

Table of Contents

Efficiency and Discipline:

Military rule is frequently associated with efficiency and discipline. In a government led by the military, decisions are made swiftly, avoiding the prolonged debates common in civilian rule. This characteristic can lead to quicker problem-solving and a more efficient administration. To illustrate, consider a well-organized military operation compared to a smoothly executed school event where things are efficiently planned and carried out.

Stability and Order:

A key argument in favor of military rule is its ability to ensure stability and order. The disciplined structure within the military is believed to translate into a stable government capable of maintaining law and order effectively. Students can draw parallels to a well-managed classroom where rules are enforced, ensuring a peaceful learning environment.

National Security:

Proponents of military rule argue that it enhances national security, as the military is trained to protect the country from external threats. A government led by the military might prioritize national defense more effectively. This analogy can be related to a school setting where security measures are in place to ensure the safety of students and staff.

Decisive Leadership:

Military leaders are often perceived as decisive individuals capable of making tough choices for the greater good. In times of crisis, quick decision-making becomes crucial. Students can grasp this concept by comparing it to a student council that must make swift decisions during emergencies or challenging situations.

Corruption Control:

Advocates for military rule argue that it can effectively control corruption due to the strict code of conduct within military institutions. A government led by the military may enforce anti-corruption measures more rigorously. Students can understand this by drawing a parallel to a school environment where a strong administration ensures fair play and honesty among students.

While arguments in favor of military rule exist, it is essential to recognize that democracy and civilian rule offer unique advantages, including individual freedoms, representation, and government accountability to the people. This simplified perspective does not encompass the complexity of real-world governance. Striking a balance that ensures both efficiency and individual rights is crucial. As future leaders, students can contribute to building a society that values discipline, order, and democracy, acknowledging the merits of each system while working towards a harmonious coexistence.

Related Posts

Experimental Research Topics That Can Be Done At Home

Exploring Experimental Research Topics That Can Be Done At Home

debate topics for high school

100+ Engaging Debate Topics for High School: Shaping Future Leaders

Top 20 Qualities of a Good Nurse

Top Essential 20 Qualities of a Good Nurse

4 Types of Leadership Styles with Examples

Exploring the 4 Types of Leadership Styles with Examples

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Democracy as the Best Form of Government Essay

  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

A democracy is a form of governance characterized by power sharing. The implication of this is that all the citizens have an equal voice in the way a nation is governed. This often encompasses either direct or indirect involvement in lawmaking. “Democracy” can be a very delicate subject for any writer.

Throughout history, various scholars, including ancient philosophers, have had a divergent view on whether democracy is the best form of governance (Kelsen 3). Some of these arguments are discussed in this essay. Democracy appears to go hand in hand with national unity.

This is particularly true because this form of governance is all about people, and these people are working together towards attainment of national goals. The cohesiveness also results from the freedom prevailing in a democratic environment. Unity and liberty in a nation lay a fertile ground for economic and social growth (Weatherford 121).

In a democratic form of government, the entire citizenry is cushioned against exploitation and all form of abuse. As opposed to other governance approaches (for instance monarchy and dictatorship), democracy engages the people in decision-making processes. This ensures efficient delivery of basic services such as education, health care, and security.

Moreover, these services will be of high quality. Having people govern themselves significantly minimizes the risk of running a nation into chaos. In operational democracies, policies must undergo thorough scrutiny by many organs of government and stakeholders before they are made laws. The modalities of implementing the laws are also carefully determined.

In such a corporate system, it would be rare for all the involved people to be wrong. Therefore democracy protects a nation against the consequences of human errors. As a consequence of reduced possibility for human errors, people will experience a nation devoid of civil wars and strife. This atmosphere, in turn, perpetuates the general growth of a nation.

Democracy acts as a framework within which the law about the basic human rights operates (Barak 27). In a democratic environment, the law gives equal entitlement to the bill of rights with total disregard of race, ethnicity or economic class.

On the other hand, democracy may not be worth the high status it has been accorded for centuries by many schools of thought. Democracy gives an opportunity for all citizens to vote (Williamson 36). This can be technically hazardous to a nation. An average voter is not adequately equipped with the necessary information on the economic and political aspects of a nation.

The direct implication is that a fairly large percentage of voters will base their choice on limited and incorrect information. This situation can greatly impair development. Democratic approaches tend to slow down the process of policy-making and implementation (Dahl 49). This is due to the bureaucracies associated with democracy.

For example, it may take twelve months for parliament to debate over a bill, pass it into law and fully enforce it. In a dictatorial system, however, the same process would take utmost one day. For many years, democracy has been synonymous with political instability (Snell 18). The high turnover rate of governments comes with drastic changes in national and international policies.

New governments tend to attract much criticism from the media and non-governmental bodies. This criticism and alteration of international relations policies keep off foreign investors, something that can have immense economic implications to a nation.

The seemingly most feared danger of democracy relates to the basic rights of the minority. A case in point is the Netherlands. The Dutch parliament enacted a law against female genital mutilation. The Somali living in the Netherlands could not have a say in this because they are a small group.

In conclusion, the name a government gives itself is immaterial. Whether a government calls itself democratic, anarchy, monarchy, or dictatorial, the most important question should be “Are the people getting back what they deserve?”

Works Cited

Barak, Aharon. The Judge in a Democracy . New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006. Print.

Dahl, Robert. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. Print.

Kelsen, Hans. “Foundations of Democracy.” Ethics 66.1 (1955):1–101.

Snell, Daniel. Flight and Freedom in the Ancient Near East . Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2001. Print.

Weatherford, McIver. Indian givers: how the Indians of the America transformed the world . New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1988. Print.

Williamson, Thames. Problems in American Democracy . Montana: Kessinger Publishing, 2004. Print.

  • Governmental Drug Policy in the Netherlands and Sweden
  • The UK Parliament and Democratic Legislature
  • Fascist Elements in Dictatorial Ideas of Mussolini and Hitler
  • Scholars on Postmodernism as Social Theory
  • Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
  • Analysis of Hugo Chavez and Muamar Gaddafi's Reign Through Machiavelli's Eye
  • Machiavelli’s Views on Democratization and Their Relation to Modern Politics
  • "The Corporation" by Joel Bakan
  • Chicago (A-D)
  • Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, March 14). Democracy as the Best Form of Government. https://ivypanda.com/essays/democracy-as-the-best-form-of-government/

"Democracy as the Best Form of Government." IvyPanda , 14 Mar. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/democracy-as-the-best-form-of-government/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'Democracy as the Best Form of Government'. 14 March.

IvyPanda . 2020. "Democracy as the Best Form of Government." March 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/democracy-as-the-best-form-of-government/.

1. IvyPanda . "Democracy as the Best Form of Government." March 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/democracy-as-the-best-form-of-government/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Democracy as the Best Form of Government." March 14, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/democracy-as-the-best-form-of-government/.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

Differences in Military and Civilian rule in Nigerian Politics by Ogabo Adah

Profile image of Ogabo Adah

Related Papers

Springer Publications

Jadesola Babatola Ph.D

ctorate of Southern Nigeria in 1914. As a model of world diplomacy through the quest for new territories in that era, the need to enhance the imperialistic goals of Western powers, with the naming of new spheres of interest on the world map, made major European powers invade and colonize Africa, Asia, and to dominate the world scene all over. The unsettling conflict of interest in Europe, however, altered the balance of power in Europe owing to a series of events resulting in Germany’s retaliation to deal with its adversaries, in an avoidable World War I and a more damaging World War II which ended with birth of United Nations and aspirations of new colonies for independence. The world wars and gradual exposure of Africans to Western education led many African leaders to clamor for political independence and sovereignty with the return to autonomous rule of their people and governing of their affairs in a preferred way. In setting the pace for sovereign states on African soil, the proclamation of national independence of most colonies ended with neo-colonialism, the continuous exploitation of Africa by foreign powers, and their proxies. As an independent nation-state, Nigeria has been bewildered by issues of political stability shrouded in controversies of struggle for power and continuous agitations arising from defects of lack of strong democratic leadership and representative government, demand for changes in constitutional provisions, and the need to properly manage the challenges of nation-building. This study of Nigeria as a former British colony is an attempt to review political events and circumstances leading to underlying factors in the creation of Nigerian States concerning its existence in the pre-colonial era and the continued realities in her relationship and quest for national cohesion, unity and the co-existence of the citizens of the Nigerian State. Efforts of Nigerian leaders to also determine the focus and gains of true federalism in Nigeria through the constitutional developments and emergence of political leadership suffices. The study, no doubt, attempts a review of the concept of constitutionalism and republicanism, the British colonial rule, constitutional development and negotiations for national independence, and the emerging political culture of Nigeria as a sovereign state transforming into a Republic for the guarantee of a stable political system, free of colonial interest and building political governance around democratic aspirations of its diverse people and cultures.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Evelyn Onwaniban

MUHAMMED ADAMU YAMANGA

Historical Research Letter

ajibola abdulrahman

Mohammed I S

Nigeria which occupies a total area of 923, 768 sq km with a current population of about 177m and about 394 distinct groups and languages began the journey into its first century and nationhood with the amalgamation of Northern and Southern areas (protectorates) of the Niger by Sir Frederick Lord Lugard, the first British Governor General under the Majesty’s Government and thus became a single/united political entity on January 1st, 1914 (exactly one hundred years ago). Nigeria was hitherto the amalgamation composed of different ethnic nationalities, kingdoms, empires, caliphate as well as some independent and other republican states and acephalous societies that were to some extent related with one another and also diverse on cultural, political and economic grounds. The Eastern and Western regions got self government in 1957 and the Northern region later in March, 1959. Nigeria got its independence on October 1st, 1960 from Britain. From independence, Nigeria went through a civilian democratic regime of the first republic, military rule, civil-war, civilian then military and currently civilian democratic rule. The post independence years of Nigeria’s political history are divided into 28 years of military and 26 years of civilian democratic rule. Throughout the country’s history, the amalgamated areas have not (with the exception of Biafara) formally broken away although the political history has been characterised by calls and agitations for national conferences by the ethnic nationalities and or national questions. This paper puts into perspective the history, journey and challenges in Nigeria’s first centenary. The paper used secondary source of data. Although the colonial masters institutionalised federal and parliamentary systems, the first military coup in January, 1966 eroded the parliamentary system and later adopted presidential system but the federal system has since 1954 been in operation to share and exercise constitutional powers among the various components of the federation and accommodate heterogeneities. The country also went through several constitutional conferences, reviews and changes. The issues of democracy, resources control and allocation, the northsouth divide, socio-economic and security challenges have also characterized the polity. Despite all the socio-economic, political and cultural diversities and impending challenges(recurring political, socioeconomic and ethno-religious instabilities, corruption in both public and private sectors, poor or absence of good governance, poor and or inefficient public sector and services, inter/intra governmental conflicts et cetera) however, Nigeria is forging ahead and overcoming many very trying times and experience.

Chudi Chidume Ph.D

The military is a vital institution in the modern State system as the major factor that determines the capability and capacity of the State’s national power to make policies within the domestic and the international circles for the overall nation building and political development of States. The Nigeria military as a product of colonialism became a veritable institution imbued with the constitutional mandate to protect the territorial integrity of the country and as well maintain robust civil-military relations necessary for nation building in the post independent Nigeria. This expectation was greeted with much char grin and fiasco, when ethnicity which was implanted by the colonial imperialism as a Pandora box imploded the First Republic in the post independent Nigeria. When the political impasse and imbroglio became nauseating and ad nauseam attesting to the inability of the civil authority to address the nation building challenges confronting Nigeria in the incipient stage of her political independence; it became imperative and behoves on the prestigious military institution to rise to these nation building challenges forthwith. It was on the basis of this background and ambience that the military revolution of 15th January 1966 was staged to save the nation from drifting into political doldrums and abyss. This scenario offered the military the opportunity to impact and contribute to nation building and political development in Nigeria. The paper examines and analyses how far the military has contributed in addressing nation building challenges that have impacted in the overall political development of Nigeria. The paper also looks at how the military institution has assisted the civil authority in addressing nation building challenges in the Fourth Republic.

Federal Governance

Eyene Okpanachi

In Nigeria, before the advent of British colonial rule, traditional political institutions were operating in the indigenous societies with their well-structured constitutional framework. For instance, in the Northern part of Nigeria largely dominated by the Hausa/Fulani, there were very powerful Kingdoms established as theocratic states under the headship of Emirs who served as both the spiritual and temporal leaders. In the same vein, the Yoruba political system was organized into large and subordinate chiefdoms ruled by Kings (Obas) and Chiefs (Baales or Olojas) based on customary practices and local traditions linked to their motherland – Ile-Ife. The Igbo society was another socially coercive group operating a fragmented political system with loose political leadership and socio-political institutions based on democratic principles and cultural antecedents in decision-making. The British colonial enterprise however helped to accomplish the goals of the Berlin Conference of reducing and eliminating European conflicts on African soils while providing leverage for the imperialistic quest of European States to expand. The scramble for and partition of Africa and the British conquering of Nigerian territories had been laid through the exploration of the vast territories by early European traders, missionaries, and explorers, whose missions were unknown until Africa was surrounded, bombarded, and invaded on all sides. The imperialistic goals that fueled the British invasion and domination of Nigeria therefore influenced the mode of constitutionalism adopted in the colonized Nigeria owing to the mode of political control and governing mechanism introduced in the colonial era via the direct and indirect rule system.

DEMAIN BEREBOFIGHA SUNDAY

Mubarak Ajah Obiahu

Mubarak A J A H Obiahu

Nigeria was founded in the year 1963 Although Nigeria gained independence from the United Kingdom on October 1st, 1960, the nation retained the British monarch. Nigeria was named by Flora Louise Shaw. The name Nigeria was derived from the Niger River running through the country. This name was coined in the late 19th century. Flora Shaw was born on 19th December 1852 – 25th January 1929 and she was a British journalist and writer. Flora Shaw later married Lord Lugard, a British colonial administrator.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

The Political Quarterly

Public Policy and Administration Review

Revue Des lettres et des Sciences Humaines et sociales

mokhtaria rahmani

Mike Omilusi

The Dynamics of Federalism in Nigeria

Ambrose I Egwim, PhD

African Journal of Governance and Development

Dr. Ebenezer Oni

Kingsley S Orievulu

Bukar Abba Ibrahim University Seminar Series

Ali Ibrahim Abbas

Igho Natufe

Journal of economics and sustainable development

Julia O . Ogbaji, PhD

Sunday Enubuzor

Tunde Oduwobi

Adewunmi J Falode

Ehikioya Hilary Osolase

Ehikioya O S O L A S E Hilary

Journal of Social Sciences (JSS)

Musibau O L A B A M I J I Oyebode

FPE Journal of Science and Technology

Pietro Macleo

REBOOT NIGERIA

James G Pam

Tersoo Nande

National Black law journal

michael Seng

International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences

philip egbule

Eugenia Chinasa Udeagu

Africa-Dynamics of Social Science Review

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

Why civilian government is better than military in Nigeria?

Civilian government is better than military rule in Nigeria because it promotes democracy, respect for human rights, and the rule of law, leading to greater stability and economic prosperity for the country.

What are the key differences between civilian and military rule in Nigeria?

Civilian government is run by elected officials and is based on the principles of democracy, while military rule is characterized by the control of the government by the armed forces.

Bulk Ammo for Sale at Lucky Gunner

How does civilian government promote democracy in Nigeria?

Civilian government allows for free and fair elections, gives citizens the right to participate in politics, and fosters a system of checks and balances.

What role does respect for human rights play in civilian government?

Civilian government is based on the respect for human rights, including freedom of speech, assembly, and religion, which are essential for a thriving society.

How does civilian government contribute to the rule of law?

Civilian government upholds the rule of law by ensuring that all individuals, including government officials, are subject to the same laws and justice system.

What are the economic benefits of civilian government in Nigeria?

Under civilian government, Nigeria can attract more foreign investment, develop strong institutions, and implement economic policies that promote growth and development.

Can civilian government help to reduce corruption in Nigeria?

Yes, civilian government can foster transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption measures to combat corrupt practices.

What are the drawbacks of military rule in Nigeria?

Military rule often leads to restrictions on civil liberties, political repression, and a lack of accountability, which can hinder the country’s progress.

How does military rule impact foreign relations for Nigeria?

Military rule can strain diplomatic relations with other countries and affect Nigeria’s international standing and credibility.

What are the common concerns with military intervention in Nigerian politics?

Military interventions in Nigerian politics often lead to instability, human rights abuses, and a lack of trust in the government.

How does civilian government contribute to national unity in Nigeria?

A civilian government can work towards inclusivity, representation, and dialogue among diverse ethnic and religious groups in Nigeria, fostering national unity.

What role does the military play in a civilian government?

The military in a civilian government serves to protect the country’s borders, contribute to peacekeeping efforts, and assist in disaster relief.

How does civilian government impact the development of democratic institutions in Nigeria?

Civilian government can strengthen democratic institutions such as the legislature, judiciary, and civil society organizations, promoting good governance.

What are the challenges of transitioning from military to civilian rule in Nigeria?

Challenges include consolidating democratic gains, addressing political fragmentation, and reforming military institutions to be subordinate to civilian authority.

How does civilian government address the needs of the Nigerian people?

Civilian government can implement social and economic policies that address poverty, unemployment, healthcare, and education, prioritizing the well-being of its citizens.

What is the role of the citizenry in upholding a civilian government?

Citizens play a crucial role in holding their elected officials accountable, participating in civic engagement, and defending democratic values to ensure the success of civilian government in Nigeria.

'  data-srcset=

About Robert Carlson

Robert has over 15 years in Law Enforcement, with the past eight years as a senior firearms instructor for the largest police department in the South Eastern United States. Specializing in Active Shooters, Counter-Ambush, Low-light, and Patrol Rifles, he has trained thousands of Law Enforcement Officers in firearms. A U.S Air Force combat veteran with over 25 years of service specialized in small arms and tactics training. He is the owner of Brave Defender Training Group LLC, providing advanced firearms and tactical training.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

March 14, 2020 by The Nation

Democracy is better than military rule – Rate Your Leader counsels Senator Adeyemi

IMG-20200314-WA0003

Agency Reporter

Read also:  ‘don’t sacrifice nigerian democracy, judiciary over personal ambitions’.

Abuja doctor reveals a unique way to permanently cure weak erection, small and shameful manhood, and infertility issues without side effects within a short period. Click now to see!!

Speaker Abbas: Despite efforts, Nigerians still struggle with poverty, unemployment 39 seconds ago

House of Representatives Speaker Tajudeen Abbas

UK’s longest serving bus driver refuses to stop 8 minutes ago

UK’s longest serving bus driver

Do not use your fame to create enemies for yourself - Nosa Rex advises 15 minutes ago

Nosa Rex

Ogun orders security agencies to launch manhunt for expressway kidnapping perpetrators 31 minutes ago

Dapo-Abiodun

Residents cry as torrential rains cut off farming community in Taraba 44 minutes ago

farming

Myschool.ng

  • Username Password Remember me Sign in New here ? Join Us

NECO June/July 2024 - Get offline past questions & answers - Download objective & theory, all in one app 48789

  • English Language
  • 2001 WAEC English La...

2001 WAEC English Language Theory You are a speaker in a debate on the topic “Civilian rule is better than...

You are a speaker in a debate on the topic “Civilian rule is better than military." Write your contribution for or against the motion. 

Project Topics and Materials, Post-UTME past questions - Download now or upload yours to get paid

Explanation

Good morning Mr. Chairman, panel of Judges, accurate time-keeper, co-debaters, ladies and gentlemen. I am here to support the motion which says: "Civilian rule is better than military rule."        Firstly, I would like to take the pains to enlighten some of the younger ones here about what civilian rule and military rule are actually all about. Civilian rule can be likened to a democratic rule. Democracy, in the opinion of the layman, is government for the people, of the people and by the people. From the definition, it can be noted that civilian rulers are actually chosen by the people and they work for the benefit of the people who choose them.        On the other hand, military rule can be likened to an autocratic rule where the people are instructed to go and comes without any argument from anyone. It is like a do or die affair. Let me now get down to the motion.        First and foremost, in every democratic dispensation, there is freedom to vote and be voted for, which is not present in the military rule. The civilians only rule when they have been elected by the people. They do not impose themselves on anyone. Meanwhile, the people have no say when the military is ruling. Military rule is imposed on the people and military heads of state rule without the consent of the people. Because military men have guns, the people can not protest, they just have to accept them. Moreover, when civilians rule, the people enjoy freedom of speech and of the press. An indigene can criticise a civilian leader either in the newspaper or on television without any fear of molestation. Nowadays, it is very common to see people criticising or admonishing the civilian president of Nigeria on the television. Everybody is believed to be equal under a civilian dispensation. However, in military rule, no one has the guts to talk against a ruler even in the enclosure of his room because walls are believed to have ears.        Furthermore, in military rule, some innocent citizens, being victims of circumstances, are shot down accidentally. This often occurs in a military dispensation. There is little respect or regard for human lives and the military can be likened to armed robbers because instead of using their guns for security purposes, they maim innocent lives. However, in civilian rule, the intimidating guns are not present and this actually brings a sense of security to the citizens.        Lastly, civilian rulers execute good and popular projects which are aimed at ameliorating the suffering of the people they rule. They know that the people who vote them into power would judge them by their performance. Therefore, they execute good projects and provide infrastructural facilities that could speak for them when they are called to render account of their stewardship in governance. On the contrary, military rulers are not guided by the wishes and demands of the people they rule when it comes to project execution. This is because they are not accountable to the people.        I believe that I have been able to convince you that civilian rule is better than military rule. I thank you for your patience. 

Contributions ({{ comment_count }})

Please wait..., modal title, {{ feedback_modal_data.title }}, quick questions.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Post your Contribution

Please don't post or ask to join a "Group" or "Whatsapp Group" as a comment. It will be deleted. To join or start a group, please click here

{{ quote.posted_by.display_name }}

William A. Galston, Elaine Kamarck

June 28, 2024

Robin Brooks, Ben Harris

June 26, 2024

Yemi Osinbajo

Sofoklis Goulas

June 27, 2024

The Brookings Institution conducts independent research to improve policy and governance at the local, national, and global levels

We bring together leading experts in government, academia, and beyond to provide nonpartisan research and analysis on the most important issues in the world.

From deep-dive reports to brief explainers on trending topics, we analyze complicated problems and generate innovative solutions.

Brookings has been at the forefront of public policy for over 100 years, providing data and insights to inform critical decisions during some of the most important inflection points in recent history.

Subscribe to the Brookings Brief

Get a daily newsletter with our best research on top issues.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Already a subscriber? Manage your subscriptions

Support Our Work

Invest in solutions. Drive impact.

Business Insider highlights research by Jon Valant showing that Arizona's universal education savings accounts are primarily benefiting wealthy families.

Valerie Wirtschafter spoke to the Washington Post about her latest study finding that Russian state media are ramping up on TikTok in both Spanish and English.

Tony Pipa writes in the New York Times about what's necessary for rural communities to benefit from federal investments made in the IIJA, IRA, & CHIPs.

What does the death of Iran’s President really mean? Suzanne Maloney writes in Politico about a transition already underway.

Force Design: A conversation with General Eric Smith, 39th commandant of the US Marine Corps

The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.

10:00 am - 11:15 am EDT

Online Only

10:00 am - 11:00 am EDT

AEI, Washington DC

12:45 pm - 1:45 pm EDT

The Brookings Institution, Washington DC

10:00 am - 12:00 pm EDT

Andre M. Perry Manann Donoghoe

Keesha Middlemass

Elizabeth Cox Chloe East Isabelle Pula

June 20, 2024

Yi-feng Tao

July 1, 2024

Zouera Youssoufou Zakari Momodu

Brookings Explains

Unpack critical policy issues through fact-based explainers.

Listen to informative discussions on important policy challenges.

Nigel Farage’s claim that NATO provoked Russia is naive and dangerous

It is also a wilful misreading of history.

Nigel Farage

O n June 21st Nigel Farage acknowledged that the war in Ukraine was the fault of Vladimir Putin, but told the BBC that Russia’s president had been “provoked” by NATO and the European Union. The leader of Reform UK , the populist party snapping at the heels of the governing Conservatives in pre-election polling and threatening to push them into third place, was echoing Mr Putin’s own arguments. The Russian leader is focused mostly on NATO , which provides the hard security that makes the EU safe. He complains that the alliance’s expansion into central and eastern Europe after the cold war made Russia’s position intolerable. Some Western scholars concur .

Mr Farage and Mr Putin have the argument upside down. Countries join NATO not to antagonise Russia, but because they are threatened by it . To understand how the arguments have shifted, you need to look back to the unstable politics of Europe in the 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Back then Boris Yeltsin, Mr Putin’s predecessor, complained when members of the old Warsaw Pact applied to join. Over the years this hardened into the line of reasoning cited by Mr Putin as justification for massing troops on Ukraine’s border. It is an argument that has gained currency in much of the world. It is flimsy at best.

Critics of NATO enlargement say that it breaks an undertaking that James Baker, then America’s secretary of state, gave to Russia in February 1990 that NATO would not expand eastward. They add that it was also unwise. As NATO grew, Russia felt increasingly threatened, and was bound to protect itself by resisting. That is also the nub of Mr Farage’s argument. Some go on to point out that the West had other ways than NATO to enhance its security, such as the Partnership for Peace, which sets out to strengthen security relations between the alliance and non-members.

Mr Baker’s supposed undertaking is a red herring. He was speaking about NATO in eastern Germany and his words were overtaken by the collapse of the Warsaw Pact nearly 18 months later. NATO and Russia signed a co-operation agreement in 1997, which did not contain any restriction on new members even though enlargement had been discussed. The Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland joined almost two years later.

The undertaking that matters is the one that Russia gave in 1994, when Ukraine surrendered the nuclear weapons based on its territory. Among other things, Russia pledged not to use economic or military coercion against its neighbour. Its violations of this promise in 2014, when it seized Crimea and part of the Donbas region, and again on February 24th 2022 have been flagrant. Russia now claims, disingenuously, that the agreement from 1994 only covered nuclear war.

In fact NATO has every right to expand, if that is what applicants desire. Under the Helsinki Final Act, signed in 1975, including by the Soviet Union, countries are free to choose their own alliances. Is it any surprise that former members of the Warsaw Pact, which had suffered so grievously under Soviet rule, should have sought a haven?

The decision of Finland and Sweden to apply for membership of NATO in May 2022 illustrates why they might. For many years public opinion in Finland and Sweden had been against joining NATO . It shifted as a direct result of the invasion of Ukraine, which Mr Putin ordered ostensibly to forestall NATO ’s expansion. Two countries proud of their long history of military non-alignment came to judge that the risk of antagonising their neighbour was outweighed by the extra security they would gain from joining an alliance dedicated to resisting Russian aggression. The right for sovereign countries to determine their own destinies is one of the many things at stake in the war.

Critics of enlargement retort that NATO should have said no to central and eastern Europe all the same. Expansion was bound to make Russia paranoid and insecure. Even though NATO is a defensive alliance, the government in Moscow perceives it as a threat. When Mr Putin attempts to restore his security, say by modernising his armed forces, NATO , in turn, perceives heightened Russian aggression. Especially provocative was NATO ’s Bucharest summit in 2008, which promised membership to Ukraine and Georgia, countries that Russia considers essential for its security.

Such security dilemmas are common in the study of international relations, and one clearly exists between Russia and the West. But to blame the West for triggering it is scarcely credible. One reason is domestic. Mr Putin has increasingly used nationalism, Orthodox religion and violence to shore up his rule. He needs enemies abroad to persuade his people that they and their civilisation are under threat. Seizing territory in Georgia in 2008 and in Ukraine in 2014 and today has been part of that strategy.

The other reason is international. Russia has a long history as an imperial power and, like most declining empires, it finds the prospect of becoming just another country hard to swallow. Instead, Russia wants to undermine alliances like NATO that keep the West secure. Regardless of NATO expansion, Russia was likely to resist forcibly as its periphery drifted off. Backing off today by abandoning Ukraine, or attempting to impose a peace on it, would only invite the next aggression from Mr Putin.

Were there alternatives to NATO membership? Here, the choice of Finland and Sweden speaks loudly. Both are long-term members of the Partnership for Peace. Clearly, neither felt that this offered them sufficient protection. If one of them were attacked, NATO would have no commitment to intervene. Nor would America and British nuclear weapons have covered the two countries, as they do the rest of the alliance.

By contrast, NATO proper is based on the principle that an attack on one member may be deemed an attack on them all. Its protection is as unambiguous as can be. Far from creating a benign environment, denying central and eastern Europe membership of NATO would have created a security vacuum that Russia may very well have been tempted to fill. If so, today’s war may not have been taking place in Ukraine, but in Latvia or Poland. Mr Farage’s assertion that NATO provoked Mr Putin is naive, foolish and historically inaccurate. It is also dangerous. ■

Editor’s note: A version of this article appeared in 2022 after Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO .

Explore more

More from leaders.

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

Joe Biden should now give way to an alternative candidate

His last and greatest political act would help rescue America from an emergency

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

What to make of Joe Biden’s plans for a second term

His domestic agenda is underwhelming, unrealistic and better than the alternative

write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

A pivotal moment for China’s Communist Party

Will Xi Jinping keep ignoring good advice at the party’s third plenum?

LLMs now write lots of science. Good

Easier and more lucid writing will make science faster and better

Macron has done well by France. But he risks throwing it all away

After the election, populists of the right and left could hobble a centrist president

Keir Starmer should be Britain’s next prime minister

Why Labour must form the next government

ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY

Voice for the army - support for the soldier, captain risked his career to write about a moral wrong.

In the U.S. Army, “moral courage” is a trait expected of every officer, but not consistently demonstrated when the chips are truly down.

Moral courage is when a person sees something wrong and does more than say to themselves, “This isn’t right.” They do something. Mere hand-wringing also does not count. Moral courage is important in all things, because, as a wise first sergeant once told me, “When you walk by something that ain’t right and don’t say anything, then that becomes the new standard.”

This was the case with Capt. Elbridge Colby, who put his career on the line for principle. He saw something that was wrong and did something about it.

Preordained Verdict

In July 1926, an article headlined “Justice in Georgia” appeared in The Nation magazine, describing the shooting of an African American man in Americus, Georgia, and the subsequent trial of the white killer. The essay went beyond description and decried the injustice of the not guilty verdict delivered by an all-white jury. It concluded with a question that answered itself: “The verdict? Is there any question that an attack upon a Negro soldier would result—in such a court and in such a community and in such a State—in anything but an acquittal?”

An article of this sort was not unusual, then or now, for that matter, in the pages of The Nation . Abolitionists founded The Nation after the passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution abolished slavery. It has long earned a reputation as a leading voice of the American left and progressives.

What was unusual about “Justice in Georgia,” and its placement in The Nation , was the fact that it was written by a serving U.S. Army captain. That captain, Colby, was outraged by what had happened in Americus.

WWI Volunteer

Colby had an atypical background for a military officer. Of solid Yankee stock, he was raised in New York City. After graduating from public schools, Colby attended Columbia University, eventually earning bachelor’s and master’s degrees in English literature and history, and was named to membership in Phi Beta Kappa.

In 1915, Colby volunteered for duty as an ambulance driver in the Balkans during World War I. Colby saw service in the Great War, not in the trenches as he wished, but guarding the Panama Canal. He left the Army in 1919 and earned his Columbia doctorate in philosophy in 1922. He was by this time married to Margaret Mary Egan with a 2-year-old son, William. Money was tight.

The Colbys’ meager means required them to live with his wife’s parents as he resumed his teaching duties at the University of Minnesota after their return from Panama. William Colby later recalled that his father “became anxious about his ability, as a struggling writer and underpaid teacher, to support his family of my mother and myself.”

Elbridge Colby abruptly came upon a cure for his anxiety. At the age of 29, he rejoined the Army. He later told one of his grandsons about his decision: “I went into the Army to keep the family decent.”

Elbridge Colby. (Courtesy of retired Col. David Johnson)

Failure to Yield

In 1925, Capt. Colby was what would now be called the public affairs officer at Fort Benning, Georgia, now known as Fort Moore. The post was the home of the U.S. Army Infantry School and the 24th Infantry Regiment (Colored).

The 24th Infantry was one of four Black regiments in the Army. The officers in these regiments were almost all white.

September 1925 found a detachment from Company K of the regiment temporarily stationed in Americus, some 50 miles from Fort Benning. The soldiers were there to unearth and transport iron pipe back to the installation to replace its rotting wooden water mains.

Americus was deep in the heart of the former Confederacy, and that conflict still pervaded the consciousness of its white citizens. The depths of segregation and racism that pervaded the South in the 1920s through the transformative 1960s were palpable.

These were times when African Americans were expected to show absolute deference to their white superiors. As Timothy Tyson wrote in his 2017 book, The Blood of Emmett Till :

Black people were expected to say “Yes, ma’am” and “Yes, sir” when talking with white people, even whites younger than themselves. Blacks were “actin’ up” or “weren’t ‘in their place’ ” if “they didn’t step aside when someone white passed them on the sidewalk. They better not look any white person in the eye, either. That’d get them punched.”

This sidewalk imperative was what Pvt. Smith of Company K violated on the first day of September 1925, when he refused to give way to E.J. Fulbright, a white lumberyard night watchman. Smith, whose first name was not given in the article, was from Montclair, New Jersey. He likely did not know—or much care—about the potentially deadly consequences of not yielding way to any white man. He was, after all, a soldier wearing the uniform of the U.S. Army.

Fulbright did not punch Smith. He shot him dead.

Colby and other officers, including legal advisers and Smith’s commanders, attended the subsequent trial of Smith’s shooter in uniform.

Nonetheless, given the realities of being a Black man in Georgia in the 1920s, it is not surprising that Fulbright walked out of the courtroom a free man.

Unvetted Article

Colby was incensed by Smith’s murder and wrote an appeal in the Fort Benning newspaper, “calling upon all soldiers, black and white, to declare support for their wronged comrade.” That was likely pushing the limit, but acceptable in the Army family. In the Army’s eyes, Smith was a soldier first and a Black man second.

Where Colby crossed the line is when he did something that Army officers did not do. He wrote an article for a civilian publication without getting it officially vetted, as required of Army officers then and now, before submitting the piece.

In the article in The Nation , Colby stated his belief that the not guilty verdict handed down by a jury of Fulbright’s peers was preordained. Even a soldier—if that soldier was Black—was not immune from murder in the streets if he offended a white man in the slightest.

“Justice in Georgia” was, to say the least, not well received by the citizens of Americus. On July 23, 1926, “Americus Residents Take Arms Against Charges by Soldier” appeared in the pages of Georgia’s The Macon Telegraph . Colby’s conduct was deemed unbecoming, and his remarks not only disparaging of the fine citizens of Americus, but in error.

The newspaper also noted that a grassroots effort, led by Lovelace Eve, editor of the Americus Times-Recorder , was pushing to have Colby dismissed from the Army or make him “prove alleged slanderous statements reflecting upon the courts and civil officers of Sumter County.” Furthermore, U.S. Sens. Walter George and William Harris were being asked to put their good offices behind the efforts to get Colby kicked out of the Army.

Fierce Responses

Although the Black press and the NAACP came to Colby’s defense, the furor from the white press and the Georgia congressional delegation was intense. The Army had to do something.

On Sept. 27, 1926, Colby received a letter that was filed in his official record in Washington, D.C. It informed him of two actions, one of which was ironic, while the other was injurious.

First, Colby was reassigned to the 24th Infantry Regiment. Ironic or not, it can be supposed that this transfer was viewed by Colby’s superiors as a demotion, given that his replacement on the post staff was a captain from the regiment. Colby’s reaction to the assignment is lost to history, although Randall Woods in his 2013 book, Shadow Warrior: Willam Egan Colby and the CIA , wrote, “the idealistic young officer hardly viewed his assignment as punishment.”

The consequences of the second Army action remain the stuff of Colby family lore. To this day, they believe about their forbear what son William Colby recalled in his 1978 memoir, written with Peter Forbath, Honorable Men: My Life in the CIA : “the incident haunted his career for years.”

Army Admonishment

The Sept. 27 letter also officially admonished Colby for his article in The Nation .

Fortunately, Colby’s letter of admonition was a speed bump, not a dead end, in what would by all accounts be a successful Army career. Colby continued to serve with distinction until his retirement in 1948 as a colonel after a 31-year career. He served in China and various U.S. postings, and on the staff of U.S. First Army in Europe during World War II. His final Army assignment was with the National Guard Bureau in Washington, D.C.

Colby was that military officer who was both a scholar and a soldier. He wrote numerous articles, reviews and books, including The Profession of Arms; Masters of Mobile Warfare ; English Catholic Poets, Chaucer to Dryden ; and Theodore Winthrop . His writings were influential at the time, helping shape U.S. military thinking on the emerging theories about air power and total war between the two world wars.

A life truly well-lived.

Colby was 34 when he wrote “Justice in Georgia.” He was a mature, sober, highly educated and thoughtful man who had the strength of his convictions. I have no doubt that Colby knew exactly what he was doing as well as the likely consequences of his article. He knew the rules and still took action.

Taking a Stand

Colby’s “Justice in Georgia” is an instance of a safe white man taking a stand and risking his career to make more citizens like himself aware of what “justice” meant for a Black man in the South.

Colby was a good man who did something. He was that rare person with no personal stake in an issue who had the moral courage to knowingly put a promising career at risk to take a public stand against what he believed was wrong. The great irony of Colby’s life is that what was a letter of rebuke could now be considered a badge of honor.

I only hope that others have the strength to follow his example now, and in the future, in our own trying times. The world desperately needs more people like Colby.

Col. David Johnson , U.S. Army retired, was a principal researcher at the nonprofit, nonpartisan Rand Corp. and an adjunct scholar at the Modern War Institute at West Point, New York. From 2012 to 2014, he founded and directed the Chief of Staff of the Army Strategic Studies Group for Gen. Raymond Odierno. Johnson drafted this piece before he died in October 2022. His wife, Wendy Frieman, with help from several friends and colleagues, completed it.

  • Tools and Resources
  • Customer Services
  • 1492 and Before
  • 1824–c. 1880
  • 1991 and After
  • Afro-Latin History
  • Church and Religious History
  • Colonialism and Imperialism
  • Cultural History
  • Digital Innovations, Sources, and Interdisciplinary Approaches
  • Diplomatic History
  • Environmental History
  • Family and Children
  • Gender and Sexuality
  • History of Brazil
  • History of Central America
  • History of Latin America and the Oceanic World
  • History of Mexico
  • History of Northern and Andean Spanish America
  • History of Southern Spanish America
  • History of the Caribbean
  • Indigenous History
  • Intellectual History
  • International History
  • Labor History
  • Legal and Constitutional History
  • Military History
  • Revolutions and Rebellions
  • Science, Technology, and Health
  • Slavery and Abolition
  • Social History
  • Urban History
  • Back to results
  • Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Article contents

Gender and sexuality in brazil since independence.

  • Sueann Caulfield Sueann Caulfield Department of History, Michigan University
  •  and  Cristiana Schettini Cristiana Schettini Department of History, University of Michigan
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.296
  • Published online: 26 October 2017

Over the past forty years, increasing attention to gender and sexuality in Brazilian historiography has given us a nuanced understanding of diverse ways in which women and men in Brazil’s past experienced patriarchy, racism, and other forms of oppression. As gender historians have shed light on how racialized and patriarchal gender and sexual roles have been reconstituted in different historical contexts, empirical studies in the field of social history have focused primarily on the historical agency of women, particularly non-elite women, who lived within or pushed against the confines of prescribed gender roles. Pioneering histories of sexual minorities have accompanied this trajectory since the 1980s, although this subfield has grown more slowly.

A few nodal themes help to explain transformations in gender relations during each of the major periods of Brazil’s social and political history. Under the empire (1822–1889), honor is the entryway for analysis of gender and sexuality. Gendered standards of honor were critical tools used to mark class and racial boundaries, and to traverse them. Historians of the imperial period also stress the centrality of gender to the social, cultural, and economic networks built by members of various occupational, familial, and kinship groups. During the First Republic (1889–1930), the focus shifts to state vigilance and social control, together with debates over modernization of sexual and gender norms, particularly regarding urban space and prostitution. In the Vargas era (1930–1945), patriarchy and racialized sexuality formed the core of intellectual constructions of the nation’s history and identity, at the same time that homosexuality and women’s and worker’s rights generated intense debate. A new emphasis on domesticity emerged in the context of developmentalism in the 1950s, helping to spur a reaction in the form of the counterculture and sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. The dictatorship (1964–1985) went to great lengths to suppress challenges to gender and sexual norms as part of its broader strategy to demobilize society and repress oppositional political movements. These challenges reemerged in the 1970s, when feminists and sexual minorities gained much greater visibility within a new wave of social movements.

The 1988 constitution articulated these movements’ aspirations for social justice and equality through its foundational principal of human dignity. Significant legal changes followed over subsequent decades, including recognition of equal labor rights for domestic and sex workers, affirmative-action policies, and the legalization of same-sex marriage, in 2011. Despite notable setbacks, the momentum toward gender and sexual equality at the start of the 21st century was remarkable. This momentum was halted by the political coup that ousted the first woman president in 2016. The anti-feminist mood that accompanied the impeachment process underscored an overarching theme that runs through the historiography of gender and sexuality in Brazil: the centrality of gender to the major legal and political shifts that mark the nation’s history.

  • domestic service
  • homosexuality
  • prostitution
  • women’s labor

Introduction

The inauguration of Brazil’s first female president, Dilma Rousseff, and the Supreme Court decision that led to the legalization of same-sex marriage, both in 2011 , were milestones in the history of gender and sexuality, marking the vast distance travelled since the nation’s independence from Portugal in 1822 . These advances stand in contrast to the political climate that produced Rousseff’s impeachment in 2016 , when the congressional vote was punctuated by homophobic slurs and, as many Brazilian feminists pointed out, criticism of Rousseff was rife with misogyny. 1 Rousseff’s successor, Michel Temer, signaled his government’s return to older structures of political dominance by eliminating ministries dedicated to social inclusion and naming a cabinet composed entirely of white men, a number of whom were accused of more serious crimes than Rousseff. 2

Rousseff’s impeachment marked a departure from the emphasis on social justice that was the hallmark of left-leaning administrations that first came to power in 2003 . These governments made significant progress toward gender equality and sexual rights by accelerating legal processes that had been set in motion in the mid-1980s, when a multitude of social movements shaped Brazil’s return to democracy after a twenty-one-year military dictatorship. In 1988 , a new constitution not only established dignity and social justice as fundamental principles, but specifically, and repeatedly, mandated state action to ensure gender equality. Struggles to define the scope and substance of constitutional guarantees ensued over the decades that followed, as activists confronted inconsistent state responses and countless setbacks—the post-impeachment rollback chief among them. On balance, however, their victories outweighed their defeats. 3

The expansion of civil and political rights for women and sexual minorities at the turn of the 21st century seems especially striking for a nation that has long been characterized as deeply patriarchal and peculiarly marked by sexualized forms of both repression and self-expression. Brazil’s most eminent early- 20th century -intellectuals identified patriarchy, or “patriarchalism” ( patriarcalismo ), as a powerful legacy of the colonial past that shaped the nation’s political and economic structures as well its people’s character. Beginning in the 1970s, Brazilian feminist activists and intellectuals (increasingly in alliance with advocates of sexual minorities) wrested authority over the discourse on patriarchy, and, partly because of their influence, social historians of the 1980s and 1990s challenged previous depictions of women’s lives and non-heteronormative sexuality as defined entirely by dominant men. Many of these historians resisted situating their work within either women’s or gender history subfields, both because strong Marxist influence since the field’s florescence at the end of the military dictatorship ( 1964–1985 ) prioritized class analysis and because the category of “gender” was associated with theory-heavy trends in cultural and intellectual history and in the social sciences, particularly anthropology. By the turn of the twenty-first century , however, a new generation of social historians drew inspiration from both sides of this intellectual divide, applying gender analysis to their empirical research and in some cases incorporating the term “gender” into various historical subfields.

As historians uncovered the agency of women and sexual minorities in the past, describing how they maneuvered within, challenged, or lived outside of patriarchal norms, feminists and other activists have also emphasized the ways defenders of patriarchal norms press back, continually reproducing gender inequality and sexual repression in the present. Multiple forms of discrimination and inequality persist, despite many decades of feminist and LGBT mobilization around issues such as equal pay and political representation, reproductive rights, and discrimination and violence against women and LGBT persons, particularly as these issues intersect with discrimination on the basis of other social markers, such as regional origin, class, and race. Tensions between feminist and anti-feminist visions of Brazilian history erupted in an intense political battle over the decennial National Plan for Education in 2015 , when conservative congressmen struck references to gender analysis from the original text, provoking protests by a range of academic and civil rights organizations. 4

Rousseff’s impeachment reminds us that the remarkably rapid movement toward formal legal equality for women and sexual minorities in the early 21st century cannot be seen simply as the final chapter of a linear historical movement or a predetermined outcome of Western modernization. Instead, since gender and sexuality are fundamental ways of representing and asserting power, both are implicated in multiple layers of Brazilian history writ large. Choosing one among many possible perspectives on this history, this essay considers the significance of gender and sexuality to the nation’s major political shifts, focusing particularly on the prominence of patriarchy and racialized sexuality in the nation’s history and historiography and the ways these themes have been revised by several generations of historical actors over the past two centuries .

Gender, Sexuality, and Honor under the Brazilian Empire (1822–1889)

In 1822 , Brazil became an independent empire headed by the reigning Portuguese prince. Political continuity, unique in the Americas, held the former Portuguese kingdom together while strengthening twin pillars of colonial society: slavery and the patriarchal family. These two overlapping institutions significantly shaped the history of gender and sexuality for the nearly two centuries that have followed. Yet both institutions were constantly challenged, and ultimately transformed, by both concerted effort and the everyday lives of women and men who lived within and outside of them.

Importation of African slaves expanded rapidly in the decades after independence up to 1850 . The new arrivals landed in a country that had already received more slaves than anywhere else in the Americas. The ubiquity of diverse manifestations of African cultures, the striking presence of African and African-descended women in public spaces, and the presence of slaves in a wide range of Brazilian households up to the last quarter of the 19th century played a central role in the formation of diverse types of families and their changing gender and sexual dynamics.

Honor and Gender Roles within Elite Families in the 19th Century

Although family honor and birthright lost much of their legal significance with the passage of a liberal constitution in 1824 , the continuation of slavery required maintenance of distinct social “conditions”: slave, freed, and free. Gendered concepts of honor accentuated distinctions among them while structuring social relationships at each rung of the social hierarchy. At the top, political power continued to rest on largely rural-based oligarchical networks, and marriage remained an important instrument for social mobility and economic and political alliances. Men sought to marry women of equal or higher social status, measured by their family’s wealth, color, connections, and reputation. Reputation rested heavily on displays of gendered sexual norms: women’s sexual chastity or fidelity attested to their honesty and their male family members’ honor and authority; men’s sexual conquests outside of marriage evidenced their dominance over women and other male protectors. Dependency, associated with femininity, was a mark of subordination that was widely distributed in Brazil’s patronage-based society, and displays of deference by social inferiors were equally critical to both male and female honor. 5

While these honor norms were common throughout Ibero-American colonial societies, Brazil’s continued dependence on slavery produced desperate attempts to preserve them through the end of the 19th century . Novelist Machado de Assis, frequently using gender and sexual fidelity as signifiers of broader relations of power under the empire, brilliantly portrayed the variety of everyday rituals of subordination demanded of the assortment of dependents tied to every elite or even middling family. 6 Dependents included slaves, former slaves, retainers, and less fortunate relatives or neighbors who might occasionally enjoy some form of patronage. Those at the top also resorted to legal means of enforcing the status quo, though they met with decreasing success as the century advanced. For example, slave owners resisted passage of the “free womb law” in 1871 , which freed all children born thereafter, on the grounds that it would erode traditional family values that sustained social order. They argued that the custom whereby benevolent masters voluntarily freed deserving slaves, often conditionally, fostered bonds of affection and gratitude between freedpersons and the master’s family. Without these sentiments, former slaves would become disrespectful and lazy, while former masters would no longer protect and care for them. Opponents also predicted that the free womb law would tear slave families apart because freeborn children would lose respect for their still-enslaved mothers. These arguments were ridiculed, and ultimately defeated, in debates that revealed the increasing insecurity of ostensibly seignorial elites as they witnessed the erosion of slavery along with the family-based metaphor that had legitimized it. 7

The hilarity of much of Machado de Assis’s fiction derived from the self-delusional sophistry of an upper-class male protagonist who struggled to hold onto his worldview in the final decades of slavery, unaware of the subterfuge employed by his subordinates as they jockeyed to make the most of their relationship with him. 8 It was becoming increasingly clear to all but these guileless sons of the slavocratic elite that patriarchal domination and the honor system that supported it were powerful myths that had obscured the reality of most women and men’s lives in colonial Brazil. Even among the colonial elite, for example, although women were subjected to stringent restrictions, their public reputation could overshadow private deviations such as out-of-wedlock pregnancy or authoritative behavior. Wives’ roles in wealthy and middling families often included running large households to support an estate, household production of various goods, and nurturing the social relationships that were so critical to the family’s position in a society built on patronage. Exceptional women, particularly widows, might sit at the helm of a powerful patriarchal family. And although married women’s legal and economic autonomy declined in the 19th century , they retained a superior position in regard to legal separation, family wealth, and their own property than women in societies considered more modern and liberal, such as Great Britain. 9

Honor, Family, and Social Networks of Enslaved, Freed, and Free Poor Populations

Gendered conceptions of honor based on patriarchal family ideals also shaped social relationships among the enslaved, freed, and free poor populations, and, like elite women, poor women tended to play a critical role in sustaining family and other social networks necessary for survival and social mobility. Family structures, gender roles, and sexual organization varied considerably among this heterogeneous population, however, and honor took on different meanings.

Formal marriage was less common among the free poor and especially among the enslaved and formerly enslaved, with significant variation by region and over time. 10 Throughout the history of slavery in Brazil, men vastly outnumbered women among new arrivals from Africa and on large rural plantations, and their life expectancy was short, leaving them little chance to marry or form families. Rising prices for slaves after the African traffic ended in 1850 seems to have generally improved conditions—again, with great variation—but reduced the likelihood of manumission and subjected urban slaves and freed and free people of color to the increased danger of being sold through legal and illegal internal trafficking. Freed and free women were particularly vulnerable, and even those victims who escaped were often unable to recover their kidnapped children. 11

Marriage and family stability were more accessible to slaves and to poor freed and free individuals where populations were not mobile—for example, on profitable plantations with large slave populations and in regions where there was access to stable work or land. Not only demographics, but also slaveowners’ attitudes, affected slaves’ access to marriage: many owners disallowed marriages in order to maximize their prerogative to sell individuals separately, but others encouraged or even required marriage and kept multigenerational family units together as a way to maintain religious morals or a compliant labor force. 12 Marriage strategies, rituals, and expectations brought from Africa also played a role in the formation of conjugal relationships. 13 Most people chose partners from within their ethnic group, whether “creole” (Brazilian born) or one of various African “nations,” or cultural-affinity groups created through a similar language or region of origin. 14 Slaves often gained entry to free poor communities—which could help them attain freedom, survive, and even prosper—through ethnic or religious affiliations, extended families, or intimate or sexual relationships. 15 Social networks and material conditions affected how honor played out. Because families depended on women’s labor, and were frequently matrifocal, women’s reputations lay more in public recognition of their hard work to support their families and command respect in public than seclusion and subordination to a husband. 16 Colonial-era black and mulatto militia units could bolster the honor of freed and free men of color, particularly for those who ascended into the officer class, but these units were eliminated in the 1830s, and black men found it much more difficult to rise past the lowest ranks in the armed forces that replaced them. 17

As was true in previous centuries (and in contrast to the southern United States), although the slave population did not reproduce itself, the freed and free poor population continued to expanded rapidly in the 19th century , as it had during the colonial period, with women performing the bulk of reproductive labor. Historians have documented widely variable rates of manumission, ranging from less than 2 percent to over 40 percent in studies of different locales and periods; most studies have found higher manumission rates among small holders (owners of 1–5 slaves) than on large estates. Scholars generally agree that overall manumission rates were probably similar to those of Spanish America and certainly much higher than in British colonies, and that manumissions declined with the rise of slave prices in the 19th century . Compared to men, women consistently enjoyed both higher manumission rates and better chances of accumulating wealth as freedpersons; this advantage was even more pronounced among those born in Africa. Women’s relatively stronger position for negotiating their freedom resulted from their greater proximity to masters’ families as domestics and to higher-status men through intimate and sexual relationships (rarely marriage) and, much more importantly, their greater access to social and labor networks that permitted self-purchase and subsequent accumulation of property, particularly in urban areas. 18 Toward the end of the century, enslaved women also used the courts to argue for their children’s and their own freedom, making gender-specific arguments about their rights as mothers. 19

The Role of African and African-Descended Women in 19th-Century Urban Commercial and Religious Networks

Most freedpeople remained impoverished and vulnerable to exploitation and to re- enslavement by former masters. 20 Yet some achieved a surprising degree of social mobility. Even more surprising is the prevalence of African-born freedwomen in some 18th - and 19th-century cities and towns who headed relatively prosperous households, a few of whom became quite wealthy. Freedwomen, like freedmen, invariably purchased slaves as a first step toward accumulation of wealth (some were able to purchase slaves even while they themselves were still enslaved), although this strategy became less feasible as prices rose after 1850 . Enslaved and freedwomen and men alike also constructed both horizontal and vertical social networks that included ties to owners and former owners as well as integration in multi-ethnic religious institutions. Many of the avenues toward economic success, however, were gender-specific. Freedmen accumulated honor, status, and wealth through militia service and as bush captains, barbers/surgeons, and merchants in the Atlantic slave trade. 21 Freedwomen’s most notable path to economic success was through the local economy, as street or market vendors. Especially if they did not have biological children, freedwomen frequently formed households and fictive kinship ties with female slaves who worked alongside them and often inherited their property. 22 The 18th-century mining boom in the province of Minas Gerais played an especially important role in fostering these networks because of the unprecedented number of slaves, particularly African-born women, who gained freedom, and prospered, in this frontier society. 23

Black women vendors remained a prominent presence in cities and towns throughout Brazil in the 19th century . Their colorful clothing and baskets of produce or other foods, often balanced on their heads, attracted the eye of a number of painters who captured what they considered the country’s peculiar cosmopolitan street scenes. Much of their work was unregulated and semi-legal, leading to their periodic persecution. Attempts to suppress their trade were ineffectual, however, because they were integrated into commercial networks that were necessary for marketing and distribution of basic provisions, they made social and political connections that provided protection, and, at least in some municipalities, they supplied considerable tax revenue. This female entrepreneurial labor played a significant role in the development of local economies and in the wealth accumulation that helped form a class of prosperous black free and freedpersons in the late 18th and early 19th centuries . 24 From the 1830s to the end of the century, however, opportunities for social advancement by both women and men of color narrowed for many reasons, including growing elite fears of slave revolts and the black population in general, the ending of the Atlantic slave trade, which made slave ownership more difficult, new forms of political exclusion that accompanied the empowerment of a new conservative elite, and the dissemination of new forms of racism. 25

Black women, particularly those belonging to various African “nations,” also played important roles in the formation of social networks through festivities and religious institutions, including participation in black Catholic lay brotherhoods throughout the colonial and imperial periods. 26 Whereas leadership in Catholic organizations was male-dominated, women’s leadership was prominent in the creation of the Afro-Brazilian religion, Candomblé, during the 19th century . A few African-born priestesses who helped to found the religion in Bahia even travelled to West Africa, where they collaborated with Yoruban priests, enhancing the prestige of their newly established sect and setting a precedent that other female religious leaders would follow in the 20th century . 27

Domestic Service and Social Anxiety at the End of the Empire

Particularly in urban areas, most enslaved and free poor women performed some form of domestic work, often in addition to other kinds of work. As members of an elite household, young, unmarried female domestic slaves were especially vulnerable to physical and sexual abuse at the hands of masters, who also expected them to maintain the family’s honor through sexual modesty and by not venturing alone on to the world of “the street.” Their isolation and lack of autonomy places them in marked contrast to the street vendors described above. Yet slaves owned by more modest urban families, or by single women, were commonly rented out as day laborers. Like urban slaves hired out for other kinds of work, such as selling goods or sex on the street, some domestic servants were able to achieve a degree of autonomy, accumulating savings and forming social networks that could ameliorate the oppression of slavery and even help them negotiate their freedom. Elite associations of “the house” with safety and modesty and “the street” with sexual and other dangers were thus often inverted for domestic workers. 28 Nonetheless, the intimate nature of relationships within households and the overlapping roles of female family members, consensual partners, and domestic servants meant that regardless of the intensity or complexity of the labor involved, domestic work was broadly considered to fall within the private realm of intimacy and affection, not the public world of work and money, whether performed by enslaved or free women, before or after abolition. 29

Notwithstanding this continuity, anxiety about domesticity and domestic servants surfaced in a number of literary works that attempted to imagine a world without slavery in the second half of the 19th century . These texts, many written by physicians, tell stories of forbidden love while warning that the moral corruption brought by the destruction of slave society would transform domestic slaves into demons. The stories resonated with elite fears of the “enemy” within the home and decried the deleterious effects of slavery on white families and on the future of Brazilian society. 30

Beginning in the final decades of the 19th century , these themes resurfaced in debates over regulation of domestic work that was designed to protect employers, without any mention of rights or protections for workers. Legislators warned of the danger, often represented as contagion and disease, posed by these “outsiders” to the family. The wet-nurse, because of her physical proximity and maternal sentiment toward her wards, was the quintessential example. The debates persisted well past abolition, as domestic workers continued to endure forms of abuse and violence most associated with slavery in its peculiar combination of proximity, affection, violence, and hierarchy. 31

The First Republic, 1889–1930

Abolition of slavery without compensation in 1888 was met by massive displays of popular support for the emperor but alienated his most powerful supporters, paving the way for a coup led by positivist-inspired military officers the following year. A democratic republic was established, with suffrage limited to literate adult men—about 3–5 percent of the total population. Political power continued to rest in the hands of regional oligarchies, with the federal government and economy largely controlled by the most prosperous among them, the São Paulo coffee barons. The patriarchal extended family also survived the transition, both as a form of social and political organization and a metaphor for social order.

Yet the republican state was founded on promises of equality among citizens as well as “order and progress”—the positivist motto stamped onto its flag—and the regime’s political survival required that it address glaring public-health and infrastructural problems, particularly in burgeoning post-abolition cities. For most of the nation’s elite, this meant mimicking European (specifically Parisian) models in order to “modernize” and “civilize” what they saw as the racially inferior, backward society inherited from the empire.

Conflicting visions for Brazil’s civilization were frequently expressed through debates over whether and how to “modernize” the gender and sexual norms associated with the “traditional Brazilian family.” The intense focus on prostitution that accompanied these debates in Rio de Janeiro, the centerpiece of the republic’s efforts to showcase its modernity, provides a good example. Fears that prostitutes would morally contaminate honest family women on the city’s streets mirrored anxiety about honorable families’ vulnerability to contamination by poor, mixed-race residents, whether those working as domestics in their homes or sharing urban public space. Very real threats posed by diseases including syphilis, tuberculosis, smallpox, and yellow fever were conflated with social and moral “contagion.” A massive urban renewal project and police-enforced zoning policies worked in tandem to “sanitize” the areas targeted for “civilization” through repression of street vendors, popular cultural manifestations such as Afro-Brazilian religion, and non-normative gender and sexual expression, together with eviction of poor residents and removal of poor prostitutes to “tolerated zones” on the city’s outskirts. 32

Increasingly after WWI, the oligarchical elite’s authoritarian civilizing mission, along with its political legitimacy, was thrown into question. Many male professionals and writers criticized what they considered Brazilians’ extreme preoccupation with women’s sexual honesty as emblematic of backward traditionalism. They were joined by female activists in the 1910s and 1920s who protested against honor killings of women, which had not been permitted by law since the early 19th century but commonly resulted in acquittals by all-male juries. 33 Middle- and upper-class women also began pressuring for expanded access to education and professional careers, which they won slowly over the first few decades of the 20th century . By the 1920s, groups of professional women, some of whom educated abroad, had formed associations to lobby for women’s civil and political rights. The most important was the Brazilian Federation for Feminine Progress ( Federação Brasileira pelo Progresso Feminino , FBPF), led by biologist Bertha Lutz. 34 Other elite women, some of whom formed part of a vibrant and polymorphous artistic and intellectual movement known as modernism, mocked traditionalist gender and sexual norms along with what they saw as the Europeanizing pretentions of a retrograde oligarchy. 35 More broadly, a new nationalist aesthetic embraced the “popular culture” inspired by the African heritage of the poor majority, which included new forms of gender and sexual expression through music and dance. The implications of these cultural critiques would become increasingly clear after the collapse of the First Republic in 1930 .

The Vargas era: 1930–1945

Patriarchy and racialized sexuality in cultural constructions of national identity.

The overthrow of the First Republic in 1930 by a broad-based military and civilian coalition led by Getúlio Vargas (president from 1930 to 1945 and 1950 to 1954 ) marked a cultural as well as a political turning point. What had been admired as modern and civilized in previous decades now represented the failure of an elitist state to develop authentic political and cultural institutions and represent the true character of the nation’s people, much less achieve the progress that would improve their lot. These themes coalesced in the work of the two most celebrated among a legion of “interpreters of Brazil,” or intellectuals who sought to explain the nation’s distinctiveness: sociologist Gilberto Freyre and historian Sérgio Buarque de Holanda. By recognizing patriarchy as the fundamental logic underlying Brazil’s social and political order, Freyre and Buarque de Holanda implicitly identified gender and sexuality as primary signifiers of power. More explicitly, they described family formation and sexual practices as primary strategies for asserting power and reproducing social hierarchy. Coming at a time of intense nationalist soul searching in the wake of the inchoate Revolution of 1930 , their work had a powerful impact on the construction of national identity, and on analyses of the role of gender and sexuality within this identity, by generations of intellectuals and political elites.

Buarque de Holanda’s Roots of Brazil , first published in 1936 , argued that the “patriarchalism,” or patriarchal logic, that emerged from colonial slave-based plantation households played a central role in the formation of Brazilian society and political culture. Patriarchy not only structured power in and outside of the family, but it embedded “personalism” ( personalismo ) and patronage deep into the Brazilian psyche. These intractable national characteristics led Brazilians to reproduce political oligarchy and corruption, making it impossible for the nation to adapt to modern economic and political institutions such as republicanism and democracy. Progress would require reducing poverty and expanding social justice in ways that would empower people on the bottom to break out of social relations of dependency. 36

Representing the frustrations of a new middle class in the modernizing cities of the center south, Buarque de Holanda’s work reacted against the nostalgic vision of the traditional Brazilian family that was most famously depicted by northeasterner Gilberto Freyre. Like Raizes do Brasil , Freyre’s The Masters and the Slaves ( 1933 ) focused on the patriarchal structure of colonial plantation households as the key to understanding the Brazilian psyche. Unlike Buarque de Holanda, however, Freyre emphasized the positive legacy of this heritage.

Applauding the civilizing influence of the Portuguese colonizers, Freyre argued that the ubiquity of interracial sexual relations, as well as other forms of intimacy and affection nurtured within patriarchal colonial households, had created a uniquely harmonious multi-ethnic society. Freyre recognized that the productive and reproductive labor on colonial plantations had been extracted through good measures of violence—he emphasized in particular the sadistic nature of sex between male masters and female slaves and punishments exacted on the same slaves by jealous mistresses. Yet he believed that the net result of interracial sexual relations, and the broader social relationships they symbolized, was an organic social order that allowed Brazil to avoid racial animosity. 37 The book caused an immediate sensation, contributing directly to the construction of nationalist beliefs that would reach mythic proportions.

Freyre’s most enduring contribution was to celebrate the importance of Africans and their descendants in shaping Brazil’s affable, tolerant, and festive character. He attributed a central role to the mulata , the mixed-race woman who he believed symbolized the special sensuality of Brazil’s tropical environment and stimulated, literally and figuratively, the nation’s unique biological and cultural fusion. This celebration of the mulata resonated with, and helped to promote, a variety of popular artistic manifestations that competed to represent the essence of national culture in the 1920s and 1930s. The most successful was samba, a music and dance genre created by black popular artists and community members on the streets of Rio de Janeiro. Samba’s birth in the nation’s capital, its blended African-European roots and disparagement by the Europeanized elite of the First Republic, and the success it enjoyed in post–World War I Paris certainly contributed to its elevated status. Most importantly, the genre reinforced themes that were central to an emerging national identity that became hegemonic during the Vargas period. Among the more ambiguous of these themes was the racialized and gendered sexuality represented by the alluring mulata , a stock character in samba lyrics. 38

The impact of the elevation of the mulata on actual women was equally ambiguous. The sensuality and beauty attributed to mixed-race women offered them a positively valued place in national culture and an outlet for empowerment and self-expression in festive spaces such as carnival. This valorization did little, however, to eliminate the racist and sexist objectification of women that was part of the patriarchal colonial legacy. 39 This legacy was expressed by a popular adage of uncertain origins, quoted by Freyre and other 20th-century “interpreters of Brazil”: “white women are for marriage; black women are for work; mulatas are for sex.”

Yet Freyre helped to propagate the belief that sexual mixture and affectionate, albeit hierarchical, social relationships had all but eliminated racism in Brazil. This idea, identified by social thinkers of the time as “racial fraternity” in the early decades of the century and “racial democracy” after the 1940s, was vigorously promoted by the Vargas regime. Black male intellectuals also deployed these ideologies in their criticism of racism as “un-Brazilian.” In all of these iterations, ideas about race reinforced the sexual objectification of black and mulata women, whose bodies and affection served to create fraternal ties between black and white men. 40

The Construction of Homosexuality

The construction of homosexuality in the first half of the 20th century shared some of the features of heterosexuality, including similar racial and gender associations. Homosexuality had been decriminalized by the 1830 Criminal Code, and although a few proposals to imprison or forcibly hospitalize homosexuals circulated among legal and medical authorities in the late 1930s, no laws specifically targeted same-sex relationships. Instead, repression of “deviance” or “affronts to public decency” was left to the discretion of the police. 41 It seems likely that women were largely able to keep sexual relationships with other women hidden, as they rarely attracted the attention of authorities or the general public. 42 Male homosexuality was more vigorously repressed, but, according to police and medical authorities, also occupied an increasing variety of public spaces. Male-to-female cross-dressing was an indispensable part of carnival revelry, in which most of the cross-dressers parodied femininity in ways that emphasized the inversion, for three days, of their performance of masculinity during the rest of the year. Other men, most of whom identified as homosexual, extended drag performances throughout the year, contributing to both the celebration of transgressive sexuality in nocturnal bohemian social spaces in the early part of the century and its expansion to other social venues in later decades, particularly in the culturally vibrant capital, Rio de Janeiro. A specifically Brazilian “ travesti ” (transvestite) subculture in several urban centers, which also included prostitutes, would expand internationally in later decades, followed in the 21st century by significant “trans” activism. 43

As was true in many societies prior to the development of internationally linked LGBT movements since the 1970s, men who had sex with other men did not necessarily identify as homosexual if they took the “active” role, and this was especially true if the “passive” partner took on an overtly feminine identity. Outside of public performance and commercial sex, most men who sought same-sex relationships—whether they identified as homosexual or not—kept them private while developing a community thorough a range of codified signals and social spaces within the expanding bohemian nightlife of urban centers such as Rio de Janeiro. The increased moral policing of the later Vargas years periodically restricted these spaces, as was true in later decades, particularly during the military regime of 1964–1985 , but they continued to reemerge in new forms. 44

Feminism and Women’s Rights under Vargas

Although the intellectual and political elite was dominated by men throughout the Vargas years (even today, homages to the great “interpreters of Brazil” do not include a single woman 45 ), the salience of discussions involving family values in the context of a rapidly expanding state and civil society created unprecedented space for women to participate in public discourse. Feminist organizations, most notably the FBPF, still comprising mainly upper-middle-class women and led by Bertha Lutz, seized the opportunity. Feminists used personal connections and arguments stressing women’s respectability to achieve an immediate goal—suffrage, in 1932 —while developing multipronged strategies to eradicate the nation’s patriarchal political ideologies and legal structures and to empower women of various social classes. Yet class, regional, political, and racial divisions also surfaced among women who mobilized in the 1930s, thwarting feminists’ attempts to create a “national women’s party.” Two salient examples are elite white women in São Paulo who drew upon traditional gender roles to support an anti-Vargas revolution in 1932 and black women in São Paulo and other cities who joined the Black Front, an organization focused on racial equality, whose affiliates in different cities embraced political ideologies that ranged from socialism to variants of fascism and also generally embraced traditional gender roles. 46

The brilliance of Vargas’s political leadership in the early 1930s lay in his ability to incorporate contradictory ideologies into nationalist propaganda and social policy. This was apparent in his approach to conflicts over gender roles and women’s rights. Vargas granted women’s suffrage and a host of protections for women workers by decree in the early 1930s, and in 1934 , Carlota Pereira de Queiróz, a leader of women’s efforts to support São Paulo’s revolt, became the first woman elected to the National Congress. Lutz, elected as a substitute, joined her in 1936 . Among Lutz’s most notable efforts was to create the Women’s Legal Statute, a bill that aimed to eliminate women’s inequality from all aspects of civil law, with particular attention to marriage property, family rights for women living in consensual unions, and the rights of women workers. 47

Yet Vargas’s strategy for constructing a hegemonic national identity undermined the comprehensive critique of Brazil’s patriarchal political structures that motivated opponents of the traditional elite, including male intellectuals such as Buarque de Holanda and feminists such as Lutz. Vargas drew inspiration instead from Freyre, propagating a notion of “Brazilianness” ( brasilidade) that denied racial differences or prejudice while exalting the masculine honor of the Brazilian worker. He enhanced his own authority through paternalism and patronage, referring to himself as “father of the people” and representing his corporatist state through the metaphor of the traditional patriarchal family while promoting working-class masculine authority in messages about national honor and family. Moreover, although his sweeping labor legislation and populist rhetoric alienated some sectors of the traditional elite, his corporatist authoritarian political model and pro-Catholic policies brought into the political arena a new generation of religious social conservatives. Conservatives successfully lobbied for a constitutional provision to guarantee state protection of the family, “formed by indissoluble marriage,” in the constitution of 1934 (this antidivorce provision was reiterated in new constitutions in 1937 , 1946 , and 1967 ) and obstructed Lutz’s comprehensive women’s rights bill. 48

Women Workers and Labor Law under Vargas

After a military coup created the authoritarian New State in 1937 , extending Vargas’s presidency indefinitely while prohibiting autonomous political organizations, the regime intensified its emphasis on the patriarchal family as the basis of social cohesion and state power. An elaborate propaganda and censorship apparatus promoted idealized working-class masculinity and femininity as the essence of Brasilidade . Among the tasks of state censors, for example, was to “clean up” popular music, especially samba, by scratching lyrics that celebrated work avoidance and mulatas and encouraging references to the “traditional values” of the Brazilian family.

Vargas’s deployment of patriarchal family values aimed to discipline the urban masses, whose support he had earned in the early 1930s through promises of sweeping labor-rights legislation. Although some women workers benefited from implementation of labor reforms in the 1930s and 1940s, Vargas’ program heavily favored male-dominated occupations in the industrial and service sectors. Male trade unionists capitalized on the state’s construction of honorable working-class masculinity by demanding a “family wage” for male heads of households, while female workers were largely pushed out of the relatively well-remunerated industrial workforce and into the informal labor market. 49 Domestic service, still the largest employment category for women, remained unregulated. A pioneering attempt to unionize domestic workers in 1936 was led by Laudelina de Campos Mello, a domestic worker who was active with the local affiliate of the Brazilian Black Front (the first national race-based political organization) in the city of Santos, in São Paulo. The association of domestic workers Mello created was suppressed by the Estado Novo in 1942 . 50

Vargas-era legislation did little to alter conditions or wages for the small number of women in middle-class professions. A good example is teaching, including university teaching in liberal-arts fields, which had been female dominated since the beginning of the century. Wages were notoriously low, with positions in primary and secondary schools typically not offering a living wage. Women’s inroads into other liberal professions increased very slowly until the 1950s and 1960s, when the growth of university education and of social acceptance of women’s education led to a sharp increase in the proportions of women professionals, particularly in the fields of medicine, dentistry, and law. 51

Developmentalism and Domesticity in the 1950s

The Estado Novo was overthrown and democracy restored in 1945 , but many of the laws and institutions Vargas created would continue to shape the history of gender and sexuality over the decades that followed. As was true in much of the Western world, the 1950s in Brazil saw a preponderance of conservative ideologies of heteronormativity, sexual repression, and domesticity, whereas rebellion against the gender and sexual constraints of postwar society was a defining feature of a new youth culture of the 1960s and 1970s and played a prominent part in that generation’s oppositional politics.

The post–World War II period in Brazil was characterized most forcefully by “developmentalism,” a term that encompasses cultural and political ideals alongside state-interventionist policies aimed at industrializing and diversifying the economy within the framework of Western capitalism. This economic course had been charted by Vargas, but reached dizzying speed in the late 1950s as the economy expanded under President Juscelino Kubitschek ( 1956–1961 ), who famously promised to progress “50 years in 5.” It was a period of optimism fueled by economic growth and expansion of urban consumption, represented less by the mulata and more by the white, middle-class “girl from Ipanema” of Bossa Nova , the musical genre associated with the white urban middle class that overtook samba as Brazil’s emblematic cultural export. Yet although the middle class was growing, it still represented a tiny minority of Brazilians. Rapid growth exacerbated the already enormous gaps between rich and poor, urban and rural, and white and black or brown, while sustaining a high level of political mobilization. Escalating demands for inclusion in the benefits of modernization coincided with international Cold War polarization, leading to the radicalization of movements on the left and right.

Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, these national and international tensions were reflected in increasingly intense battles over how to modernize gender and sexual norms. In part, the heightened concern with gender and sexuality reflected the nation’s preoccupation with its international image. At the 1945 San Francisco Conference of allied nations, Brazilian delegate Bertha Lutz successfully argued for inclusion of women’s equal rights in the United Nations Charter, and Brazil was quick to sign this and other international commitments to women’s equality. Feminist activists and their supporters in congress immediately pointed out that Brazil’s civil code perpetuated patriarchal traditions that were incompatible with modern statehood and explicitly violated Brazil’s international obligations. 52

Attempts to reform civil law provoked virulent opposition by Catholic politicians who warned that reducing men’s authority in the home would create social anarchy and open the door to communism. Battles raged in Congress and in public forums for over a decade, resulting in compromise legislation in 1962 : the Statute of the Married Woman. The statute gave women preferential custody of their children in cases of litigious separation and permitted women to accept paid employment and inheritances without their husband’s permission. Feminists such as Bertha Lutz, however, complained that the statute ignored “everything else,” leaving patriarchy intact as husbands retained their status as “head of the family” and the right to administer marital property. 53 Women’s-rights advocates such as lawyers Orminda Bastos and Romy Martins Medeiros da Fonseca and congressman Nelson Carneiro continued efforts to pass other provisions that had been part of Lutz’s failed 1936 statute, including equitable divorce legislation (finally passed in 1977 ), rights for women living in consensual unions, protection from domestic and other violence, and provisions such as child care, maternity leave, and other measures to ensure women’s equal access to the labor market. In an increasingly polarized political climate and without the support of a national organization similar to the FBPF of the 1920s and 1930s, however, feminism had lost much of its vigor.

Both the mainstream communications media and popular culture reinforced the re-entrenchment of a patriarchal political cultural in the 1950s and early 1960s. Vargas-era state propaganda and censorship had come to an end in the late 1940s, along with its moralizing discourse targeting the working class. In its place came a dramatic increase of messages promoting modern middle-class domesticity in the national and international (particularly U.S.) media and advertising that targeted white, urban, female consumers. 54 Many women, both elite and working class, responded enthusiastically to these messages. In rapidly growing urban areas, middle-class housewives could still rely on an ample supply of low-paid domestic workers, many of whom recent migrants from rural areas. Domestic workers continued to constitute the largest category of women workers, followed by other sectors of the informal labor market. Yet well-paid union jobs and social-welfare benefits for men in industrial centers such as São Paulo made it possible for a growing minority of working-class women to become housewives, and many more aspired to this domestic role. They flocked to the “home economics” courses offered by the largest association of industrialists, SESI, in São Paulo in the 1940s and 1950s. 55 Wives benefitted from Vargas-era social welfare benefits, and although efforts to extend these benefits to women living in consensual unions failed in congress, they increasingly won in the courts, their efforts culminating in a Supreme Court ruling that created guidelines known as “Concubine’s Rights” in 1964 . 56

For the growing numbers of activists who took to the streets demanding social justice in the early 1960s, the promotion of middle-class domesticity and urban consumption seemed out of place, or even perverse, in a country where the majority still lived in dire poverty. Within and alongside demands for inclusion in the benefits of modernization came a variety of challenges to the gender and sexual discourses that accompanied capitalist developmentalism.

Political Polarization, Military Dictatorship, and Radical Challenges to Gender and Sexual Norms, 1960s–1970s

In a climate of escalating political mobilization and polarization, exacerbated by global Cold War tensions in the early 1960s, many staked their positions on the terrain of gender and sexuality. Most famously, when elite women took to the streets to protest the left-leaning policies of President João Goulart ( 1961–1964 ), a protégé of Vargas, they expressed their defense of their class interests as patriotic support for the patriarchal values of the traditional Brazilian family. The “Marches of the Family with God for Freedom” movement featured women banging pots and pans to symbolize their inability to fulfill their domestic roles because of the crisis and using homophobic provocations to incite the members of the military to defend the nation. After the military staged a coup in 1964 , it deployed similar rhetoric to justify staying in power for the next two decades. 57

Challenges to the gender and sexual norms supported by the military dictatorship were most visible in the youth culture that developed in urban centers, particularly within Brazilian universities, which grew rapidly in the 1970s. University graduates were still members of a tiny, mostly white, elite, but rose from 2 to 5 percent of the population from 1970 to 1990 . A much more significant change was in the proportion of women graduates: from less than 1 percent in the 1910s to 40 percent in 1970 and more than 50 percent after 1980 . 58 Many of these women participated in student mobilizations that voiced increasingly radical critiques of the national and global social and political order, particularly after the victory of the Cuban Revolution in 1959 . Their presence, and their adoption of new styles of dress and comportment associated with youth culture of the 1960s around the Western world, marked an implicit rejection of 1950s gender and sexual norms. After 1964 , female students’ participation in not only street protests but also guerilla organizations provoked intense fascination in the media. The military regime vilified these women, and, as has been true of other repressive regimes, the fear of challenges to gendered power hierarchies was expressed in the systematic use of sexual intimidation and forms of torture against female prisoners. 59

Although many women and men involved in oppositional political movements criticized patriarchal values and social hierarchy, few organizations during the 1960s defined themselves as feminist, and fewer still as gay or lesbian. Many on the left criticized feminism as a “bourgeois” philosophy associated with Western liberalism and United States imperialism, and homosexuality as a mark of perverse capitalist alienation. Influenced most powerfully by various strains of Marxism, the left generally emphasized the primacy of class over race or gender oppression and, after 1964 , insisted that focus should not be diverted from overthrowing the dictatorship. 60

The seemingly sudden explosion of feminist groups in the late 1970s, together with the emergence of small gay-rights organizations, coincided with the defeat of the armed guerrilla. Brazilian exiles abroad, particularly in France, had gained a new perspective on women’s and sexual oppression through interactions with feminists, while women who had remained in Brazil, many of whom became increasingly disillusioned with left-wing political parties and student organizations, formed a variety of new “women’s” organizations, some of which incorporated “feminist” into their titles. 61 Some participated in ongoing parliamentary efforts to reform family law. They won an important victory with the legalization of divorce in 1977 . 62 Women also led organizations of family members of victims of political repression and initiated a campaign for a general amnesty for all political exiles, won in 1979 . Many of the women who first became involved in politics during the amnesty struggle also began organizing to combat their oppression as women. Several regional meetings of women’s organizations beginning in the mid-1970s put them in contact with activists from organizations focused on other issues—such as racial discrimination, housing, or falling wages—who had also begun to critique their oppression as women. 63

Although many self-identified feminists, the bulk of whom were white and middle class, attempted to create an inclusive movement, sharp economic and racial inequality created differences in women’s experiences of gender oppression that that were at times unbridgeable. In some ways, the increasing professional opportunities and autonomy that middle-class women began to enjoy in the 1970s reinforced these differences. Middle-class professional women faced wage discrimination and harassment as well as a double workday, since gendered domestic expectations had changed little since the 1950s. Yet not only were their wages many times higher than those of most workers, but their domestic work frequently included supervision of maids (increasingly day workers rather than live-ins), which made it possible to balance professional and domestic work without transforming gender roles within their own families. The irony of white feminists’ racial and class privilege was not lost on black women activists, who were more likely to join organizations that focused on class or racial oppression, such as the Unified Black Movement, than feminist organizations. 64 Laudelina de Campos Mello, for example, continued her militancy through progressive Catholic groups in the 1960s and a nascent, multifaceted black movement in Campinas, São Paulo, in the 1970s. Still advocating for domestic workers, she helped win an important victory in 1972 , when the state recognized domestic work as a profession with limited legal rights. 65

Alongside struggles for equal rights in the workplace, calls for women’s sexual liberation intensified in the 1970s, transforming many women’s lives. Sexual ideologies and double standards reminiscent of honor codes of earlier centuries had not completely disappeared, and they were reinforced by growing religious fundamentalism over the subsequent decades. Yet as the population became more urban than rural after 1970 , widespread access to birth control brought a sharp decline in fertility. 66 Divorce still carried stigma, but it permitted many women greater autonomy. At the same time, more egalitarian and liberal ideas about gender and sexuality were spreading rapidly by the end of the dictatorship in 1985 .

New Republic: 1985–Present

Human rights and the 1988 constitution.

The resurgence of the struggle for gender equality and sexual rights was part of the phenomenon of “new social movements”—grass-roots organizations that formed outside of traditional labor unions and partisan politics—that mushroomed in Latin America as a whole in the 1980s, a decade marked by re-democratization accompanied by an acute economic crisis. Women were particularly active in these movements, which tended to be community or identity based rather than ideological and party based, and were often related to family survival. Many, particularly in rural areas or urban slums, had sprung from Catholic Church efforts to minister to the poor by creating lay consciousness-raising groups known as “ecclesiastical base communities.” At the same time, women, many but not all of whom considered themselves feminists, and a small but growing number of gay men, worked to transform what they saw as the machista culture of the left. Some worked within political parties, but the most notable new form of advocacy was the creation of a variety of grass-roots organizations that employed the language of human rights, applying it not only to state violence but also to various forms of inequality and injustice. By the time the military finally stepped down in 1985 , human rights had become a meta-discourse employed by a wide variety of movements for social justice, ranging from families of victims of the regime to advocates for sexual and reproductive rights to the Catholic Pastoral Land Commission.

Leaders of these movements would come together in the convention that produced the 1988 constitution, which established human dignity and equality as its fundamental principles. Part of the convention’s work was to gather input from civil society, a process that generated tremendous publicity for groups such as the “lipstick lobby”—the name given by the media to groups that represented women’s interests. Heated debate erupted over how to define these interests, particularly regarding proposals to incorporate reproductive and gay and lesbian rights, which were blocked by traditional conservatives and the emerging “evangelical block,” a congressional caucus whose base was in new evangelical protestant churches. Feminists succeeded, however, in dismantling legal support for patriarchy through articles that incorporated the major components of Bertha Lutz’s 1936 bill: equal rights within marriage, equal pay and rights as workers, maternity leave, recognition of consensual unions as family entities, and equal family rights for children, regardless of their parents’ civil status. 67

Non-governmental Organizations and the Struggle against Domestic Violence

Women’s leadership in civil society continued to expand in the decades that followed the passage of the 1988 constitution, particularly through non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focused on social policy and human rights. Part of a global process that some activists and social scientists have called the “ngo-ification of social movements,” the 1990s saw the consolidation of thousands of NGOs in Brazil, many of which focused entirely or partially on gender or sexuality and were generally characterized by higher levels of funding and institutional support than previous grass-roots groups. By placing struggles around gender and sexuality within a human-rights framework, different groups of activists have mobilized the support of national and international NGOs as well as national and international governmental organizations (IGOs).

The campaign against domestic violence exemplifies this multicentered approach. 68 Building on mobilizations dating to the 1920s, the campaign gained widespread visibility due to the combination of ground-level organizing by feminist groups that provided victim services, national political lobbying, alliances with international NGOs, and work thorough the international human rights system. Among the most visible results included the creation of women’s police stations throughout Brazil beginning in 1985 , which became a model for similar initiatives around the world; the condemnation of the domestic violence situation in Brazil by international human rights NGOs; the hosting of the Inter-American Convention to Eradicate Violence Against Women in the city of Belém in 1994 and Brazil’s ratification of the resulting treaty; and the first case of domestic violence to be heard by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, in 2001 . The commission found that Brazil had violated the Belém treaty, among others, by failing to address endemic violence against women. Among the state’s responses was to create a law in 2006 , with input from feminist organizations, that specifically criminalizes domestic violence against women. The law is named for the victim in the case, Maria da Penha. According to a 2015 World Bank study, state efforts to combat violence against women by expanding women’s police stations had a positive, but uneven, effect around the country, with rural areas showing the least improvement. Levels of violence against women are still among the highest in Latin America, and this violence disproportionately targets black women as well as members of sexual minorities. 69

21st-Century Legal Transformations: Affirmative Action, Labor Rights for Domestic Servants and Prostitution, and Marriage Equality

In a trend common to many nations, women have surpassed men since 1980 in educational attainment over the past three decades, and today make up 61 percent of college graduates (12 percent of women and 10 percent of men held college degrees in 2012 ). Women are still underrepresented in the highest-paying professions, however, and economic and political power remains largely dominated by white men. Women overall earn about 30 percent less than men, with the gender pay gap increasing with educational attainment. 70 They also represent a small minority of elected officials. Feminist pressure led to gender quotas for political parties’ candidate lists since 1997 , but the laws are weak, and progress has been slow. Although the election of Dilma Rousseff as the first woman president in 2011 represented a milestone, the candidate downplayed her gender and the relevance of “women’s issues” to her political campaigns. This changed with the political crisis of 2016 , when Rousseff’s denunciation of her opponents’ misogyny and elitism brought her closer to feminist and other progressive groups. Her presidency did not lead to more women in other elected offices. For example, as of 2016 , women make up only about 10 percent of the federal legislature, among the smallest proportions in the world. 71

Yet although the number of women in elected offices has remained low, policies to empower women under leftist regimes have led to some significant gains. Unprecedented numbers of women were named to ministerial offices under presidents Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ( 2003–2011 ) and Rousseff, including a ministry created to promote gender equality. 72 Affirmative-action programs, introduced timidly during the presidency of the centrist President Fernando Henrique Cardoso ( 1995–2002 ), then implemented on a broader scale under the subsequent leftist governments headed by President Lula, have included measures that have empowered women, such as income transfer and other social programs favoring mothers and racial, ethnic, and class-based quota programs, implemented most prominently in federal universities. By provoking public debate regarding racism and discrimination, affirmative action has opened space for women to discuss the intersection of class, racial, and gender discrimination and specifically challenge racialized sexual stereotypes. 73

Another legal change that addressed intersecting class, racial, and gender discrimination involved domestic service. Many observers note that domestic service still represents one of the most tenacious legacies of Brazil’s slave society. 74 Between 2003 and 2014 , it employed from about 12 to 15 percent of the female labor force, constituting one of the largest and lowest-paid occupations for women. Almost all (95 percent) are female, 61 percent are black, and most work informally. 75 These characteristics have made it extremely difficult for domestic workers to organize, although efforts by the indefatigable Laudelina de Campos Mello in Campinas helped inspire the formation of several associations of domestic servants in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro in the 1980s, the first domestic-workers’ union, in 1988 , and a national federation in 1997 (Mello herself passed away in 1991 ). 76 In the new century, the federation expanded rapidly at both the grass-roots and international levels, incorporating twenty-six local unions and drawing financial support and legitimization from several NGOs and IGOs, including the United Nations Millennial Fund and the International Labor Organization (ILO). 77 From 2003 to 2013 , economic growth and state redistributive and employment policies led to a sharp drop in the offer of domestic work, contributing to a remarkable 69.9 percent rise in wages, by far the highest of any group in Brazil. 78 Domestic workers’ enhanced negotiating position was reflected in the political realm in 2013 , when legislators amended the 1988 Constitution to guarantee domestic workers the same standards of rights enjoyed by other recognized professions. The near-unanimous vote was welcomed by most observers, although many note that its impact will be limited, as the economic and political crisis since 2013 has had a disproportionate negative impact on working-class women, pushing many more back into unregulated domestic work. 79

Similar attempts by sex-worker organizations to gain equal rights as workers have followed an uneven trajectory. Prostitute groups began to form during the period of “new social movements,” in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Like many others, they established contacts with similar organizations around the world and formulated their demands within a human-rights framework. By 1987 , they had organized the national Brazilian Prostitutes Network, which successfully lobbied for government support for educational and health initiatives such as HIV-AIDS prevention and anti-stigma campaigns and in 2002 won state recognition of the profession. This was similar to the recognition domestic servants had won in 1972 , which brought access to benefits such as social security but not the full range of constitutionally guaranteed labor rights. 80 Since the late 1970s, many feminists have applauded these accomplishments, and prostitute associations have received support from a variety of NGOs, particularly for their anti-AIDS work. Others, however, voiced concern that support for prostitutes’ labor rights obscures what they argue is the essentially sexist and exploitative nature of prostitution and facilitates human trafficking and abuse of minors. 81

These divergent perspectives have shaped public discourse and state policies regarding “sex tourism” and the “traffic in women and children”—issues that gained enormous national and international attention beginning in the 1990s. 82 The image of exoticized and infantilized mulatas for sale to white foreigners on northeastern beaches has predominated in media accounts that implicitly or explicitly invoke cultural and sexual imperialism. According to anthropologists who have studied various sites of supposed sex tourism, these images frequently conflate sex tourism with child prostitution and migration with traffic, obscuring conditions of actual abuse while restricting women’s freedom of movement and individual rights. In contrast to accounts that portray all women involved in sex work as victims, their research reveals vast diversity among sex workers and women migrants and the various strategies they use to shape their work and affective relationships. 83 Other social scientists studying missing children in a region of São Paulo state in 2011 reached similar conclusions: poverty and domestic sexual and other violence lead large numbers of children toward commercial sex and exploitation, most of whom were not victims of kidnapping or trafficking. The authors emphasize that more research is needed to assess the form and scale of these crimes around the country, but that policy must take into account the diverse conditions under which children offer sex. 84

Global attention to human trafficking in Brazil over the past decade heightened the debates among feminists and lawmakers, producing conflicting state policies. On one side is a security- or crime-based approach that focuses on repressive measures, including a 2009 law that reinforced Brazil’s long-standing “abolitionist” position (criminalizing the “facilitation of prostitution” and considering prostitutes to be victims) and increased police vigilance of prostitutes, particularly during international events such as the 2014 soccer World Cup. On the other side is the human-rights approach, supported by several prominent officials within the federal Labor Ministry and Public Ministry during the Silva and Rousseff regimes, which seeks to punish exploitation of minors, coercion, or force, while supporting adult prostitutes’ equal rights as workers. 85

Another debate that initially divided feminists of the post-dictatorship generation was over whether to support the struggle for LGBT rights, but this was largely resolved by the early 2000s. LGBT rights groups had succeeded in establishing alliances with at least some feminist groups by the time of the 1987 Constituent Assembly. Proposals to explicitly recognize gay and lesbian rights were defeated during the drafting of the 1988 constitution, but these well-publicized efforts resulted in unprecedented visibility for the LGBT banner under the broad human-rights umbrella. In the years that followed, the AIDS crisis devastated the newly legitimated movement, but over the 1990s, new forms of advocacy and new alliances with women’s and other social movements placed both LGBT equality and the struggle against HIV-AIDS more firmly within a human-rights framework. Several NGOs successfully sued the state, arguing that failure to provide drug therapy to all victims violated the right to health guaranteed by the 1988 constitution. In compliance with court rulings, the state defied international financial institutions and the United States by producing and distributing low-cost drugs, ultimately forcing international drug prices down and providing a model of successful incorporation of civil society in the creation of public policy. 86

With increasingly positive responses to the AIDS crisis in the 2000s came growing visibility for gays and lesbians and renewed mobilization, frequently under the internationally recognized banner “gay rights are human rights.” Some advocates for “sexual diversity” argued that “identity politics” and categories such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer were not appropriate in Brazil, where sexuality was often more fluid. A variety of positions in this debate were expressed in the annual gay-pride parades that grew and multiplied, beginning in 1995 in Rio de Janeiro. Over the subsequent two decades, as the parades gained mass appeal and increasing state support, particularly since 2003 , the international “GLBT” or “GLBTT” acronym took hold. More recently, attention has focused on “TT”— travesti (transvestites) and transgender people—as activists recognize that these groups are particular targets for stigmatization and violence, even as acceptance of more “conventional” gay women and men has expanded. 87

Growing public visibility and mobilization of LGBT activists was boosted by positive portrayals of respectable middle-class gay couples in the media, most famously in several prime-time novelas (soap operas) aired by TV Globo, Brazil’s largest communications network. In real life, more and more same-sex couples gained the confidence to approach the courts seeking to legitimate their relationships or resolve joint property and family issues, including custody of children. Substantial jurisprudence favoring rights for partners in same-sex unions accumulated over the two decades leading up to 2011 , when the Federal Supreme Court ordered the state to recognize same-sex civil unions as “family entities,” equal to those of heterosexuals. Two years later, the National Judicial Council decided that this meant that the state must also allow same-sex marriage. The decision reflected the effectiveness of the strategy to tie LGBT rights to broader human-rights movements since the 1970s, as the court’s decision centered on equal family rights as essential to human dignity. 88

Since the dawn of the 21st century , achievements such as marriage equality, recognition of sex work as labor, the expansion of labor rights for domestic workers, and criminalization of domestic violence underscore the ways a collective commitment to ideals of equality and human dignity in the late 20th century worked against the legacies of the nation’s patriarchal and slavocratic past. Yet although women and sexual minorities have made remarkable gains in the space of a few decades, the gains have been uneven. Signs of persistent inequality—such as a gender gap in earnings and political representation and high levels of violence against women and sexual minorities that disproportionately affect poor black women—indicate that the new ideals and laws still express collective aspirations rather than a universal reality. As the economy was expanding up until about 2013 , both civil-society organizations and the state were able to implement multipronged strategies to reduce inequality, with some tangible results: reduction of poverty or racism led to women’s empowerment, and vice versa. More recently, an economic and political crisis fueled both an anti-feminist backlash and, particularly after Rousseff’s impeachment, the reversal of policies aimed at social inclusion and wealth redistribution, eroding many of these gains and demonstrating that the struggle is far from over.

Discussion of the Literature and Primary Sources

The large number of historiographical essays, special issues of journals, and anthologies published over the past three decades attest to the large quantity of works on the history of women, gender, and sexuality produced during this period. 89 Carla Bassanezi Pinsky’s 2009 essay is especially useful in pinpointing specific aspects of Brazilian scholarship, particularly the intricate relationship between developments in social history and the history of gender and sexuality. The mutual influence of the two subfields has played a major role in the regeneration of historical scholarship since the 1980s, opening new perspectives on traditional debates in each period of Brazil’s modern history. 90

The historiography on gender and sexuality bears the mark of a generation of social historians who came of age at the moment of political democratization. As the twenty-one-year dictatorship drew to an end in the late 1970s, the reemergence of social movements, including feminist movements, reinvigorated historical scholarship.

Scholar-activists such as sociologists Eva Blay and Heleith Saffiotti produced important studies of women, class, urban labor, and other areas of gender inequality in the 1970s, helping pave the way for a flurry of works by women’s historians in the late 1980s and early 1990s. 91 Some of these and other historians’ readings of Michel Foucault helped to stimulate and legitimate the rising interest in sexuality, and the engagement by many feminist scholars with French and U.S. feminist and post-structuralist theory generated lively (if at times polarizing) debates while creating new spaces for discussion and publication of scholarship focused on women and gender. 92 Meanwhile, the field of social history was turning away from the “grand theory,” which characterized the historiography of the military era, and toward a strong emphasis on uncovering primary sources that could illuminate “popular culture” and everyday life. Inspired by micro-historical methods and cultural anthropology, the social history of slavery in the United States, and British Marxist social history, particularly the work of E. P. Thompson, historians formed research groups and graduate programs in the “social history of culture.” 93 For some of these social historians, the direction of much “gender history” seemed insufficiently grounded in the “real lives” of the poor women and men of Brazil’s past and present. 94

Maria Odila Leite da Silva Dias’s seminal study of the everyday experiences and survival strategies of poor women in São Paulo at the start of the 19th century , first published in 1984 , addressed this critique while demonstrating how to extract women’s experiences from sources created by men. 95 Her work formed part of the commitment of the post-dictatorship generation of social historians to “marginalized” groups, and her call for a “social history of women” was articulated in these terms. By approaching different groups of poor women as entrepreneurs in what she described as an informal labor market, Dias placed greater emphasis on a common “feminine condition” than on racial and social differences. Her research, however, inspired a great number of subsequent studies that focused on specific experiences of different groups of women. Historical consideration of women’s experiences gained increasing depth over time as scholars excavated local notarial, judicial, and other archives, cross-referencing a variety of sources in an effort to reveal everyday practices hidden beneath, and in tension with, normative discourses. The term “gender” was rejected by some of these social historians, who wanted to emphasize differences among women and distance their work from studies of elite discourses or representations of women. By the early 2000s, however, the usefulness of the term was widely recognized, a trend Dias supported in an influential essay on feminist theory in 1992 . 96

Whether or not they used the term “gender,” social historians’ attention to family and women’s experiences played a major role in the regeneration of the historiography of colonial and imperial Brazil, particularly in its emphasis on slavery. Dias’s influence dovetailed with that of Robert Slenes, whose research in the 1970s and 1980s on demography and family among slaves in the southeast helped to inspire numerous studies that highlight the significance of gender and sexuality to specific features of slavery, racial formation, and economic development, while documenting the complex gender dynamics of individual households and social worlds. 97 Also in the 1980s, studies of colonial sexualities that analyzed Inquisition records, including Luiz Mott’s pioneering work on homosexuality, developed thematic and methodological models that subsequent scholars applied to the imperial and republican periods. 98 In the 1990s and early 2000s, a cluster of studies on Minas Gerais during the mining boom set the stage for research on other urban/urbanizing areas in the 18th and 19th centuries by documenting the development of commercial and social networks in which freed women were especially significant. Richard Graham’s 2010 book on the provisioning of the city of Salvador, 1780–1860 , provides an excellent example, echoing earlier scholars’ emphasis on black women’s commercial activities, particularly as street vendors, and the conditions that permitted social mobility for a significant minority of black women and men. 99 Zephyr Frank and João Reis offer examples of somewhat distinct strategies for economic advancement followed by individual black men in Rio de Janeiro and Salvador, respectively, whereas Juliana Barreto Farias’s and Fabiane Popinigis’s respective studies of black vendors and market women provide additional case studies that demonstrate these women’s integration into municipal economic and political networks through the end of the 19th century . 100 Black women’s reproductive labor and conjugal relationships, including marriage and divorce, maternity, and wet nursing, as well as their struggles for freedom and contributions to abolitionism at the end of the empire, have been explored by social historians using trial records and other documents, with notable recent works by Sandra Lauderdale Graham, Maria Helena Machado, and Camilla Cowling. 101 The excellent collection edited by Farias, Gomes, and Xavier includes several other examples of the direction of new empirically driven research on black women in slavery and post-abolition society, as well as a useful historiographical essay by Gomes and Paixão, while Dias’s 2012 essay offers a brief synthesis. 102

Another new direction in historical scholarship that builds on the social history of the 1980s, particularly the work of Sandra Lauderdale Graham, is the study of domestic workers. Reinvigorated by present-day debates over domestic workers’ labor rights, recent scholarship has continued to focus on everyday experiences and life histories while giving greater attention to efforts to regulate domestic work and to the ambiguous nature of many household arrangements involving domestic work and affective relationships. 103

The influence of trends begun in the post-dictatorship period helps to explain the historiographical emphasis on poor women and the relative lack of attention to women from other social groups, especially elite women. Yet following Nazzari’s important work on the centrality of elite women’s relationships in understanding family dynamics and the circulation of property in the 19th century , a few historians have focused on elite women’s roles in the that century. 104 Analyses of 19th-century novels, short stories, and essays show that these literary works are rich sources of social history that offer insight into the gendered dynamics of relationships of dependency. 105

Judicial documents, including testimony of ordinary people in trial records and various sources of legal thought regarding women’s morality and sexual behavior, have been used extensively by historians of both the 19th and early 20th centuries . A number of scholars of the First Republic ( 1889–1930 ) have focused on the tensions between legal concern with family honor and women’s morality and the survival strategies, moral values, and cultural universe of the people who appear in republican courtrooms. Following works by Rachel Soihet and Martha Abreu, other historians used legal records and other documents to explore the transformation of gendered concepts of honor and the interwoven concerns with gender, sexuality, and modernization in the late 19th and early 20th centuries , including a number of studies of prostitution. 106 Until recently, the feminist movement of the First Republic and Vargas periods received relatively little historical attention, despite pioneering studies by Soihet and Moreira Alves in 1974 and 1980 , respectively. 107

In addition to legal sources, especially those related to policing, the fields of medicine, public health, and psychiatry provide rich source materials that have been tapped by anthropologist and historians of non-normative sexualities throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries . Jurandir Freire Costa’s work on the ways the medical and psychiatric fields imposed bourgeois family norms was followed by several studies of the medicalization and regulation of women’s sexuality in the late 19th and early 20th centuries , ranging from campaigns against wet nurses to regulation of domestic servants and prostitutes, as well as the myriad ways women navigated these campaigns to pursue their own objectives. 108 More recently, scholars have tapped similar sources, as well as political tracts, media outlets, literature, and oral histories, to write histories of the construction of masculinity and homosexuality in the 20th century . 109

In comparison to the rich historiography that specifically focuses on gender and sexuality in the 19th and early 20th centuries , comparatively little attention has been paid to the mid- 20th century . 110 Over the past few years, however, there has been a small surge of interest in the period of the dictatorship, with the publication of memoirs as well as historical research on heteronormative ideologies espoused by left- and right-wing groups as well as gendered and sexualized forms of repression and resistance. 111 Surprisingly few historians have studied women activists and feminist movements of the post-dictatorship period, however, and most of the existing literature was written by participants or social scientists. 112 Possibly the newest area of historical interest is the construction of non-normative sexual identities and LGBT political movements since the end of the dictatorship in 1985 . This area has also been dominated by social scientists, including a great number of studies of HIV-AIDS by scholars in the public health field. This literature provides a wealth of primary source materials that historians have just begun to tap. 113

Finally, the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES), a Ministry of Education agency responsible for evaluating all of Brazil’s graduate programs, offers a searchable online catalogue and database that provides public access to the full text of master’s and doctoral theses defended anywhere in Brazil since 2013 , in full text, and abstracts of theses defended since 1987 . 114

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paulina Alberto for her careful reading and insightful suggestions on an earlier version of this text, as well as the two anonymous reviewers for Oxford University Press, whose suggestions helped us improve the final version. Keila Grinberg, Sidney Chalhoub, and Maria Helena Machado also provided helpful feedback and bibliographical references.

1. Vinicios Sassine , “Jean Wyllys admite que cospiu ‘na cara’ de Bolsonaro,” Globo , April 17, 2016, http://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/jean-wyllys-admite-que-cuspiu-na-cara-de-bolsonaro-19110700 Pâmela Caroline Stocker and Silvana Copetti Dalmaso , “Uma questão de gênero: ofensas de leitores à Dilma Rousseff no Facebook da Folha,” Revista Estudo Feministas 24.3 (December 2016): 679–690; “#IstoÉMachismo: feministas repudiam capa da revista IstoÉ sobre Dilma,” Sul 21 , January 26, 2017, Retrieved from http://www.sul21.com.br/jornal/istoemachismo-feministas-repudiam-capa-da-revista-istoe-sobre-dilma/ ; Ana Flávia Cernic Ramos and Glaucia Fraccaro , “O golpe de 2016 na vida das mulheres,” in Historiadores pela democracia. O golpe de 2016: a força do passado , eds. Beatriz Mamigonian , Hebe Mattos , and Tânia Bessone (São Paulo: Alameda Casa Editorial, 2016), 2251–2256.

2. See news reports listed in “Repercussão sobre o ‘gabinete dos homens brancos,’” Sexual Policy Watch—Português , June 3, 2016, Retrieved from http://sxpolitics.org/ptbr/repercussao-sobre-o-gabinete-dos-homens-brancos/6275 .

3. Jacqueline Pitanguy and L. L. Barsted , O progresso das mulheres no Basil, 2003–2011 (Rio de Janeiro: CEPIA and UNWomen, 2011); and Hildete Pereira de Melo and Lourdes Bandeira , Tempos e memórias: movimento feminista no Brasil (Brasília: Secretaria de Políticas para as Mulheres da Presidência da República, 2010), 28–43.

4. Protests include a manifesto signed by over a hundred academic and civil-rights organizations. Asociação Brasileira de Antropologia, “Manifesto pela igualdade de gênero na educação,” n.d., http://www.portal.abant.org.br/images/Noticias/Manifesto_Pela_Igualdade_de_Genero_na_Educacao_Final.pdf .

5. The classic work on the “traditional” plantation household is Gilberto Freyre , The Masters and the Slaves: A Study in the Development of Brazilian Civilization (New York: Knopf, 1964). Nazzari provides empirical evidence regarding economic calculations of marriage, showing significant changes with the increased dynamism and modernization of commercial capitalism in 19th-century São Paulo: Muriel Nazzari , Disappearance of the Dowry: Women, Families, and Social Change in São Paulo, Brazil (1600–1900) (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991). Among the few studies of elite women in the 19th century, see Miriam Moreira Leite , Retratos de família (São Paulo: EDUSP, 1993); Eni de Mesquita Samara , As mulheres, o poder e a família: São Paulo, século XIX (São Paulo: Marco Zero, 1989); Mariana Muaze , As memórias da viscondessa: família e poder no Brasil Império (Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 2008); Miridan Britto Knox Falci and Hildete Pereira de Melo , A sinhazinha emancipada: a paixão e os negócios na vida de uma ousada mulher do século XIX, Eufrásia Teixeira Leite (1850–1930) (Rio de Janeiro: Vieira & Lent, 2012); Sandra Lauderdale Graham , Caetana Says No: Women’s Stories from a Brazilian Slave Society (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002), part 2; and June Hahner , “Mulheres da elite: honra e distinção das famílias,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Carla Beozzo Bassanezi and Joana Maria Pedro (São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2012), 43–64.

6. Arguably the best example is Machado de Assis , Dom Casmurro: A Novel , trans. Helen Caldwell (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966). See Chalhoub , “Interpreting Machado de Assis: Paternalism, Slavery, and the Free Womb Law,” in Honor, Status, and Law in Modern Latin America , eds. Sueann Caulfield , Sarah C Chambers , and Lara Putnam (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005), 87–108. Silveira argues that some of Machado’s work was inspired by arguments for women’s rights published in 19th-century women’s magazines. See Daniela Magalhães da Silveira , Fábrica de contos: ciência e literatura em Machado de Assis (Campinas, Brazil: Editora Unicamp, 2010).

7. Martha Abreu , “Slave Mothers and Freed Children: Emancipation and Female Space in Debates on the ‘Free Womb’ Law, Rio de Janeiro, 1871,” Journal of Latin American Studies 28.3 (1996): 567–580.

8. Chalhoub, “Interpreting Machado de Assis.”

9. Muriel Nazzari , “Concubinage in Colonial Brazil: The Inequalities of Race, Class, and Gender,” Journal of Family History 21.2 (1996): 107–124; Elizabeth Anne Kuznesof , Household Economy and Urban Development: São Paulo, 1765 to 1836 (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1986); Richard Graham , Patronage and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Brazil (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990); Muriel Nazzari , “Widows as Obstacles to Business: British Objections to Brazilian Marriage and Inheritance Laws,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 37.4 (1995): 781–802, 793n47. See also the studies cited in note 5. Mariza Corrêa anticipated the findings of later scholarship by arguing that the Freyrian-type patriarchal family was an archetype that never encompassed the majority of the Brazilian population: Mariza Corrêa , “Repensando a família patriarcal brasileira,” Cadernos de Pesquisa no. 37 (May 1981): 5–16.

10. Sheila Siqueira de Castro Faria , “História da família e demografia histórica,” in Domínios da história - ensaios de teoria e metodologia , eds. Ciro Cardoso and Ronald Vainfas (Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997), 241–258; and Robert W Slenes , “Brazil,” in The Oxford Handbook of Slavery in the Americas , eds. Robert L. Paquette and Mark M. Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 111–133, 117–118.

11. Keila Grinberg , “The Two Enslavements of Rufina: Slavery and International Relations on the Southern Border of Nineteenth-Century Brazil,” in Hispanic American Historical Review , 96.2 (2016): 259–290.

12. Robert W. Slenes , Na senzala, uma flor: esperanças e recordações na formação da família escrava: Brasil Sudeste, século XIX (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira, 1999); Manolo Florentino and José Roberto Góes , A paz das senzalas: famílias escravas e tráfico atlântico, Rio de Janeiro, c. 1790–c. 1850 (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1997); and Graham, Caetana Says No , part 1; Slenes, “Brazil,” 117, 128n16.

13. Slenes, Na senzala, uma flor ; Sandra Lauderdale Graham , “Being Yoruba in Nineteenth-Century Rio de Janeiro,” Slavery and Abolition 32.1 (2011): 1–26; and Juliana Barreto Farias , “Sob o governo das mulheres: casamento e divórcio entre Africanas e Africanos minas no Rio de Janeiro no século XIX,” in Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós-emancipação , eds. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes (São Paulo: Selo Negro Edições, 2012), 112–133.

14. Divergent research findings suggest that the degree of endogamy among the African-descended population varied according to the local context. See the review by Sheila Siqueira de Castro Faria , “Identidade e comunidade escrava: um ensaio,” Tempo, Universidade Federal Fluminense 11.22 (January 1, 2007): 1413–7704.

15. Hebe Maria Mattos de Castro , Das cores do silêncio: os significados da liberdade no sudeste escravista, Brasil século XIX (Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 1995); and Sheila Siqueira de Castro Faria , A colônia em movimento: fortuna e a família no cotidiano colonial (Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1998); Slenes, 118.

16. Sandra Lauderdale Graham , “Honor among Slaves,” in The Faces of Honor: Sex, Shame, and Violence in Colonial Latin America , eds. Lyman L Johnson and Sonya Lipsett-Rivera (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1998), 201–228.

17. Hendrick Kraay , Race, State, and Armed Forces in Independence-Era Brazil: Bahia, 1790's–1840's (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001).

18. Any estimate of manumission rates is rough, because manumission was frequently a private act not recorded in public registries. The proportions cited are taken from case studies based on samples of notarial or ecclesiastical records. Slenes, “Brazil,” 119–120; and Keila Grinberg , “Manumission,” in The Princeton Companion to Atlantic History , ed. Joseph Calder Miller (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015), 319–322, 320.

19. Camilla Cowling , Conceiving Freedom: Women of Color, Gender, and the Abolition of Slavery in Havana and Rio de Janeiro (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2013).

20. Keila Grinberg , “Reescravização, direitos e justiças no Brasil do século XIX,” in Direitos e justiças no Brasil , eds. Joseli Mendonça and Silvia Hunolt Lara (Campinas: Unicamp, 2006), 101–128.

21. Zephyr L Frank , Dutra’s World: Wealth and Family in Nineteenth-Century Rio de Janeiro (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2004); João José Reis , “De escravo rico a liberto: a história do africano Manoel Joaquim Ricardo na Bahia oitocentista,” Revista de História no. 174 (June 30, 2016): 15–68; and Parés , “Militiamen, Barbers and Slave-Traders: Mina and Jeje Africans in a Catholic Brotherhood (Bahia, 1770–1830),” Tempo 20 (2014): 1–32.

22. Júnia Ferreira Furtado , Chica Da Silva: A Brazilian Slave of the Eighteenth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009); Sheila Siqueira de Castro Faria , “Damas Mercadoras: as ‘pretas minas’ no Rio de Janeiro, século XVIII–1850,” in Rotas Atlânticas da diáspora africana: da baía do Benin ao Rio de Janeiro , ed. Mariza de Carvalho Soares (Rio de Janeiro: EDUFF, 2006), 219–232; Sheila Siqueira de Castro Faria , “Sinhás pretas: acumulação de pecúlio e transmissão de bens de mulheres forras no sudeste escravista (séculos XVIII e XIX),” in Ensaios sobre História e Educação eds. Francisco Carlos Teixeira da Silva , Hebe Maria Mattos de Castro , and João Fragosa (Rio de Janeiro: Mauad/Faperj, 2001), 289–329; and Adriana Dantas Reis , “Mulheres ‘Afro-Ascendentes’ na Bahia: gênero, cor e mobilidade social (1780–1830),” in Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós- emancipação , eds. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes (São Paulo: Selo Negro Edições, 2012), 24–34.

23. Eduardo França Paiva , Escravos e libertos nas Minas Gerais do século XVIII: estratégias de resistência através dos testamentos (São Paulo: Annablume: Faculdades Integradas Newton Paiva, 1995); Luciano Raposo de Almeida Figueiredo , Barrocas famílias: vida familiar em Minas Gerais no século XVIII (São Paulo: Editora Hucitec, 1997); Kathleen J. Higgins , “Licentious Liberty” in a Brazilian Gold-Mining Region: Slavery, Gender, and Social Control in Eighteenth-Century Sabará, Minas Gerais (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999); and Faria, “Sinhás pretas”; Furtado, Chica Da Silva .

24. Faria, “Sinhás pretas”; Faria, “Damas mercadoras”; Reis, “Mulheres ‘afro-ascendentes’”; Richard Graham , Feeding the City: From Street Market to Liberal Reform in Salvador, Brazil, 1780–1860 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2010); Juliana Barreto Farias , Mercados minas: africanos ocidentais na Praça do Mercado do Rio de Janeiro (1830–1890) (Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Geral da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro, 2015); and Fabiane Popinigis , “Trabajo, libertad y esclavitud: estrategias y negociaciones en el sur de Brasil, siglo XIX,” Trashumante. Revista Americana de Historia Social no. 6 (July 1, 2015).

25. Slenes, “Brazil,” 118–119.

26. Mariza de Carvalho Soares , People of Faith: Slavery and African Catholics in Eighteenth-Century Rio de Janeiro (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011); and Mary C. Karasch , “Rainhas e juízas: as negras nas irmandades dos pretos no Brasil central (1772–1860),” in Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós-emancipação , eds. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes (São Paulo: Selo Negro Edições, 2012), 52–66.

27. Lisa Earl Castillo and Luis Nicolau Parés , “Marcelina Da Silva: A Nineteenth-Century Candomblé Priestess in Bahia,” Slavery and Abolition 31.1 (March 1, 2010): 1–27. For 20th century contacts between Bahian priestesses and West African priests, mediated by traveler and anthropologist Pierre Verger, see Paulina L. Alberto , Terms of Inclusion: Black Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century Brazil (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2011), ch. 5.

28. Sandra Lauderdale Graham , House and Street: The Domestic World of Servants and Masters in Nineteenth-Century Rio de Janeiro (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

29. Lorena Feres da Silva Teles , Libertas entre sobrados. Mulheres negras e trabalho doméstico em São Paulo (1880–1920) (Rio de Janeiro: Alameda, 2014); Flávia Fernandes de Souza , “Para casa de família e mais serviços: o trabalho doméstico na cidade do Rio de Janeiro no final do século XIX” (master’s thesis, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2010); Henrique Espada Lima , “Wages of Intimacy: Domestic Workers Disputing Wages in the Higher Courts of Nineteenth-Century Brazil,” International Labor and Working-Class History 88 (2015): 11–29; Olivia Maria Gomes da Cunha , “Criadas para servir: domesticidade, intimidade e retribuição,” in Quase cidadão: histórias e antropologias da pós emancipação no Brasil , eds. Olivia Maria Gomes da Cunha and Flávio Gomes (Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2007), 277–418; and the review by Flávia Fernandes de Souza , “Trabalho doméstico: considerações sobre um tema recente de estudos na História Social do Trabalho no Brasil,” Revista Mundos do Trabalho 7.13 (2015): 275–296.

30. Sonia Roncador , A doméstica imaginária: literatura, testemunhos e a invenção da empregada doméstica no Brasil (1889–1999) (Brasilia: Ed. UnB, 2008); and Giovana Xavier , “Entre personagens, tipologias e rótulos da ‘diferença’: a mulher escrava na ficção do Rio de Janeiro no século XIX,” in Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós-emancipação , eds. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes (São Paulo: Selo Negro Edições, 2012), 67–83.

31. Sonia Maria Giacomini and Elizabeth K. C. de Magalhães , “A escrava ama-de-leite: anjo ou demônio,” in Mulher, mulheres , eds. Adriana Costa and Carmen Barroso (São Paulo: Cortez/Fundação Carlos Chagas, 1983), 73–88; and Maria Helena P. T. Machado , “Entre dois Beneditos: histórias de amas de leite no ocaso da escravidão,” in Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós-emancipação , eds. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes (São Paulo: Selo Negro, 2012), 199–213.

32. Cristiana Schettini , Que tenhas teu corpo: uma história social da prostituição no Rio de Janeiro das primeiras décadas republicanas (Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2006); Sueann Caulfield , “The Birth of Mangue: Race, Nation, and the Politics of Prostitution in Rio de Janeiro, 1850–1942,” in Sex and Sexuality in Latin America , eds. Daniel Balderston and Donna J Guy (New York: New York University Press, 1997), 86–100; James Naylor Green , Beyond Carnival: Male Homosexuality in Twentieth-Century Brazil (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999); Richard Miskolci , O desejo da nação: masculinidade e branquitude no Brasil de fins do XIX (São Paulo: Fapesp, Annablume, 2012). For similar processes in São Paulo , Margareth Rago , Os Prazeres da Noite: Prostituição e códigos da sexualidade feminina em São Paulo, 1890–1930 (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1991).

33. Susan K. Besse , “Crimes of Passion: The Campaign Against Wife Killing in Brazil, 1910–1940,” Journal of Social History 22.4 (Summer 1989): 653–666; and Caulfield, In Defense of Honor , ch. 3.

34. Rachel Soihet , “Movimento de mulheres: a conquista do espaço público,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Carla Beozzo Bassanezi and Joana Maria Pedro (São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2012); Rachel Soihet , O feminismo tático de Bertha Lutz (Florianopolis: Ed. Mulheres, 2006); Branca Moreira Alves , Ideologia e feminismo: a luta da mulher pelo voto no Brasil (Petrópolis: Vozes, 1980); June Edith Hahner , Emancipating the Female Sex: The Struggle for Women’s Rights in Brazil, 1850–1940 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990); Teresa Cristina de Novaes Marques and Hildete Pereira de Melo , “Os direitos civis das mulheres casadas no Brasil entre 1916 e 1962: Ou como são feitas as leis,” Revista Estudos Feministas 16.2 (August 2008): 463–488; Céli Regina J Pinto , Uma história do feminismo no Brasil (São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2003); and Glaucia Fraccaro , “Os direitos das mulheres—organização social e legislação trabalhista no entreguerras brasileiro, 1917–1937” (PhD diss., Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2016).

35. Susan K. Besse , Restructuring Patriarchy: The Modernization of Gender Inequality in Brazil, 1914–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996).

36. Sérgio Buarque de Holanda , Roots of Brazil , trans. G. Harvey Summ (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012).

37. Freyre, The Masters and the Slaves .

38. Hermano Vianna , The Mystery of Samba: Popular Music & National Identity in Brazil (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999); Mariza Corrêa , “Sobre a invenção da mulata,” Cadernos Pagu no. 6/7 (2010): 35–50; and Martha Abreu , “Mulatas, Crioulos, and Morenas: Racial Hierarchy, Gender Relations, and National Identity in Postabolition Popular Song: Southeastern Brazil, 1890–1920,” in Gender and Slave Emancipation in the Atlantic World , eds. Pamela Scully and Diana Paton (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005), 267–288.

39. Sonia Maria Giacomini , “Mulatas profissionais: raça, gênero e ocupação,” Estudos Feministas 14.1 (2006): 85–101; and Corrêa, “Sobre a invenção da mulata.”

40. Alberto, Terms of Inclusion , ch. 1; and Paulina L. Alberto , “Of Sentiment, Science and Myth: Shifting Metaphors of Racial Inclusion in Twentieth-Century Brazil,” Social History 37.3 (August 2012): 261–296.

41. Green, Beyond Carnival , 129–131; and João Silvério Trevisan , Devassos no paraíso: a homossexualidade no Brasil, da colônia à atualidade , 5th ed. (Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Record, 2002), 192.

42. Among the few accounts of lesbian relationships is Nadia Nogueira , Invenções de si em histórias de amor: Lota Macedo Soares e Elizabeth Bishop (Rio de Janeiro: Apicuri, 2008). The relationship between Soares and Bishop, in the 1950s and 1960s, was also the subject of a 2013 film, Flores raras (Reaching for the Moon), directed by Bruno Barreto.

43. Green, Beyond Carnival ; Sérgio Carrara and Mario Felipe Lima Carvalho , “Em direção a um futuro trans? Contribuição para a história do movimento de travestis e transexuais no Brasil,” Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedade 14 (2013): 319–351; and Jaqueline Gomes de Jesus , Transfeminismo: teorias & práticas (Rio de Janiero: Metanoia, 2014).

44. Green, Beyond Carnival .

45. See, for example, Luiz Bernardo Pericás and Lincoln Secco , Intérpretes do Brasil: clássicos, rebeldes e renegados (São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2014), which pays tribute to twenty-five men, or the three-volume work by Silviano Santiago , Intérpretes do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Aguilar, 2000).

46. Barbara Weinstein , “Inventing the Mulher Paulista: Politics, Rebellion, and the Gendering of Brazilian Regional Identities,” Journal of Women’s History 18.1 (Winter 2006): 22–49; Barbara Weinstein , The Color of Modernity: São Paulo and the Making of Race and Nation in Brazil (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015), ch. 4; Petrônio Domingues , “Frentenegrinas: notas de um capítulo da participação feminina na história da luta anti-racista no Brasil,” Cadernos Pagu no. 28 (June 2007): 345–374; and Alberto, Terms of Inclusion , ch. 3. White women were also active in extreme right-wing movements. See Sandra McGee Deutsch , “Spreading Right-Wing Patriotism, Femininity, and Morality: Women in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, 1900–1940,” in Radical Women in Latin America: Left and Right , eds. Victoria González-Rivera and Karen Kampwirth (University Park: Pennsylvania State Press, 2001), 223–248; and Sandra McGee Deutsch , “Spartan Mothers: Fascist Women in Brazil in the 1930s,” in Right-Wing Women: From Conservatives to Extremists Around the World , eds. Paola Bacchetta and Margaret Power (New York and London: Routledge, 2002), 155–168.

47. Marques and Melo, “Os direitos civis”; Fraccaro, “Os direitos das mulheres.”

48. Marques and Melo, “Os direitos civis”; Fraccaro, “Os direitos das mulheres.”

49. Maria Valéria Junho Pena , Mulheres e trabalhadoras: presença feminina na constituição do sistema fabril (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1981); Andrea Borelli and Maria Izilda Matos , “Trabalho: espaço feminino no mercado produtivo,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Carla Beozzo Bassanezi and Joana Maria Pedro (São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2012), 126–147; and Barbara Weinstein , “Making Workers Masculine: The (Re)Construction of Male Worker Identity in Twentieth-Century Brazil,” in Masculinity in Politics and War: Rewritings of Modern History , eds. K. Hagemann , S. Dudink , and Tosh (Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press, 2004), 276–294.

50. “Laudelina de Campos Melo,” Fenatrad | Federação Nacional das Trabalhadoras Domésticas , retrieved from http://www.fenatrad.org.br/site/?p=93; “Laudelina de Campos Melo (1904–1991),” Cursinho Popular Laudelina , retrieved from http://emancipalaudelina.blogspot.com/p/quem-foi-laudelina-de-campos.html .

51. Fúlvia Rosemberg , “Mulheres educadas e a educação de mulheres,” in Nova história das mulheres no Brasil , eds. Carla Basanezi Pinsky and Joana Maria Pedro (São Paulo: Contexto, 2012), 333–359; Borelli and Matos, “Trabalho.”

52. Marques and Melo, “Os direitos civis,” 479–480.

53. Marques and Melo, “Os direitos civis,” 484.

54. Carla Bassanezi Pinsky , Mulheres dos anos dourados (São Paulo: Contexto, 2014).

55. Barbara Weinstein , For Social Peace in Brazil: Industrialists and the Remaking of the Working Class in São Paulo, 1920–1964 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996), ch. 6.

56. Sueann Caulfield , “The Right to a Father’s Name: A Historical Perspective on State Efforts to Combat the Stigma of Illegitimate Birth in Brazil,” Law and History Review 30.1 (February 2012): 1–36, 12–13; and Sueann Caulfield , “From Liberalism to Human Dignity: The Transformation of Marriage and Family Rights in Brazil,” in Ties That Bind: Global Histories of Marriage and Modernity , ed. Julia Moses (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), 27–53.

57. Benjamin A Cowan , Securing Sex: Morality and Repression in the Making of Cold War Brazil (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2016).

58. Moema de Castro Guedes , “A presença feminina nos cursos universitários e nas pós-graduações: desconstruindo a idéia da universidade como espaço masculino,” História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 15 (2008): 117–132, 199–122; Sonia E Alvarez , Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990), 51–52; Victoria Langland , Speaking of Flowers: Student Movements and the Making and Remembering of 1968 in Military Brazil (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013), 134; and Rosemberg, “Mulheres educadas.”

59. Victoria Langland , “Birth Control Pills and Molotov Cocktails: Reading Sex and Revolution in 1968 Brazil,” in In from the Cold: Latin American’s New Encounter with the Cold War , eds. Gilbert Joseph and Daniela Spenser (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008), 308–349; Cowan, Securing Sex .

60. James N. Green , “‘Who Is the Macho Who Wants to Kill Me?’ Male Homosexuality, Revolutionary Masculinity, and the Brazilian Armed Struggle of the 1960s and 1970s,” Hispanic American Historical Review 92.3 (August 1, 2012): 437–469.

61. Alvarez, Engendering Democracy ; Maria Amélia de Almeida Teles and Rosalina de Santa Cruz Leite , Da guerrilha à imprensa feminista: a construção do feminismo pós- luta armada no Brasil (1975–1980) (São Paulo: Intermeios Casa de Artes e Livros, 2013).

62. Nelson Carneiro , A Luta Pelo Divórcio (Rio de Janeiro: Livraria São José, 1973); José Fernando Simão , “Tributo a Nelson Carneiro: a luta e a batalha do divórcio (parte 1),” Consultor Jurídico , May 31, 2015; Marlene de Faveri , “Desquite e divórcio: a polêmica e as repercussões na imprensa,” Caderno Espaço Feminino 17.1 (July 2007): 335–357; and Mala Htun , Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

63. Cristina Scheibe Wolff and Tamy Amorim da Silva , “Movidas pelo afeto: três mulheres na resistência à ditadura no Brasil, Paraguai e Bolívia (1954–1989),” Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis 10.1 (June 11, 2013): 190–211; Teles and Leite, Da guerrilha à imprensa feminista ; and Maria Amélia de Almeida Teles, interviewed by Sueann Caulfield, digital video, August 26, 2016, Global Feminisms Project, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, http://umich.edu/~glblfem/ .

64. Teles, interviewed by Sueann Caulfield; Giovana Xavier and Elizabeth Viana, interviewed by Sueann Caulfield, digital video, July 14, 2014, Global Feminisms Project; and Bebel Nepomuceno , “Mulheres negras: protagonismo ignorado,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Carla Beozzo Bassanezi and Joana Maria Pedro (São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2012), 382–410; Alvarez, Engendering Democracy , 51–53.

65. “Laudelina”; Ana Virgínia Gomes and Patrícia Tuma Martins Bertolin , “Regulatory Challenges of Domestic Work: The Case of Brazil,” Labor Law and Development Research Laboratory, McGill University Faculty of Law, Working Paper 3 (2010), https://www.mcgill.ca/lldrl/files/lldrl/Gomes_Bertolin_WP3.pdf .

66. Donald Sawyer , “Fertility,” in Brazil: A Country Study , ed. Rex A. Hudson (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1997), 111–113.

67. Gilda Cabral , “Lobby de batom,” in Constituição 20 anos: Estado, democracia e participação popular: caderno de textos (Câmara dos Deputados, Edições Câmara, 2009), 77–80; and Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, Diário Oficial da União , Oct. 5, 1988, esp. Título II, art. 5, par. 1; Título VIII, Cápitulo VII.

68. The struggle for reproductive rights is another example. Activists have expanded access to legal abortion (in cases of rape, incest, or threat to the mother’s life) by working through federal and state ministries of health and hospitals. Debora Diniz , “Aborto e contracepção: três gerações de mulheres,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Carla Beozzo Bassanezi and Joana Maria Pedro , (São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2012), 313–332; Anibal Faúndes , Elcylene Leocádio , and Jorge Andalaft , “Making Legal Abortion Accessible in Brazil,” Reproductive Health Matters 10.19 (2002): 120–127; and Htun, Sex and the State .

69. “Women’s Police Stations / Units,” UNWomen , http://www.endvawnow.org/en/articles/1093-womens-police-stations-units.html; Nadine Jubb , Women’s Police Stations in Latin America: An Entry Point for Stopping Violence and Gaining Access to Justice (Quito, Ecuador: CEPLAES, 2010); Lana Lage da Gama Lima , “As delegacias especializadas de Atendimento à Mulher no Rio de Janeiro: uma análise de suas práticas de administração de conflitos,” in Família, Mulher e Violência , eds. Lana Lage da Gama Lima and Maria Beatriz Nader , vol. 8 (Vitória: PPGHis/Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2007), 19–38; Lana Lage da Gama Lima , “Representações de gênero e atendimento policial a mulheres vítimas de violência,” Interthesis 6 (2009): 61–85; and Lana Lage da Gama Lima , “Violência contra a mulher: da legitimação à condenação social,” in Nova História das Mulheres no Brasil , ed. Joana Maria Pedro and Carla Bassanezi Pinsky (São Paulo: Contexto, 2012), 286–312. An example of international NGO attention is Human Rights Watch, “Criminal Injustice: Violence against Women in Brazil: An Americas Watch Report,” October 1991, https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/BRAZIL91O.PDF . Texts of the Belém convention, the Maria da Penha case at the IACHR, and the Maria da Penha law are available online: Organization of American States, “Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence Against Women ‘Convention of Belem Do Para,’” June 9, 1994, http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-61.html; Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, “Report N. 54/01, Case 12.051 Maria Da Penha Maia Fernandes, Brazil, April 16, 2001,” http://www.cidh.oas.org/women/Brazil12.051.htm; “Lei N. 11.340, de 7 de Agosto de 2006, ‘Lei Maria Da Penha’” (2006), http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11340.htm . For recent data on the incidence of violence, see Elizaveta Perova and Sarah Reynolds, “Women’s Police Stations and Domestic Violence: Evidence from Brazil” (World Bank, November 17, 2015), http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/441331467987820782/Women-s-police-stations-and-domestic-violence-evidence-from-Brazil; Jackeline Aparecida and Ferreira Romio , “A vitimização de mulheres por agressão física, segundo raça/cor no Brasil,” in Dossiê mulheres negras. Retrato das condições de vida das mulheres negras no Brasil , eds. Mariana Mazzini Marcondes et al. (Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada—IPEA, 2013), 133–159; Andrew Jacobs , “Brazil Confronts an Epidemic of Anti-Gay Violence, New York Times , July 6, 2015; and the annual report put out by the Grupo Gay da Bahia, Assassinatos de LGBT no Brasil , https://homofobiamata.wordpress.com/estatisticas/relatorios/ .

70. Carlos Orsi, “Mulheres são maioria com nível superior, mas homens dominam mercado de trabalho—Ensino Superior Unicamp,” Ensino Superior UNICAMP , https://www.revistaensinosuperior.gr.unicamp.br/notas/mulheres-sao-maioria-com-nivel-superior-mas-homens-dominam-mercado-de-trabalho; Guedes, “A presença feminina nos cursos universitários.” For discussion of the intersection of race and gender in determining access to formal work and income disparities, see Marcelo Paixão and Flávio Gomes , “Histórias das diferenças e das desigualdades revisitadas: notas sobre gênero, escravidão, raca e pós-emancipação,” in Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós-emancipação , eds. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes (Rio de Janeiro: Selo Negro Edições, 2012), 297–313, 304–311.

71. Teresa Sacchet , “Making Women Count: Campaigns for Gender Quotas in Brazil” (PhD diss., Department of Government, University of Essex, 2002); Inter-Parliamentary Union, “BrazilquotaProject: Global Database of Quotas for Women,” Inter-Parliamentary Union , retrieved from http://www.quotaproject.org/uid/countryview.cfm?CountryCode=BR .

72. Melo and Bandeira, Tempos e memórias , 30–32; and Hildete Pereira de Melo , “A estrategia da transversalidade de gênero: uma década de experiência da Secretária de Políticas para as Mulheres da Presidência da República (2003/2013),” in Políticas e fronteiras: desafios feministas , eds. Luzinete Simões Minella , Galucia de Oliveira Assis , and Susana Bornéo Funck (Santa Catarina: Tubarão, 2014), 131–166.

73. João Feres Júnior , Verônica Daflon , and Luiz Augusto Campos , “Ação afirmativa, raça e racismo: uma análise das ações de inclusão racial nos mandatos de Lula e Dilma,” Revista de Ciências Humanas 12.2 (December 2012): 399–414; and Marilene de Paula , “Políticas de ação afirmativa para negros no governo Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995–2002)” (master’s thesis, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 2010); Lúcio Antônio Machado Almeida , “Da necessidade das cotas raciais para mulheres negras no Brasil,” Jornal Estado de Direito 50 (2016): 8.

74. See for example comments by congresswoman Benedita da Silva and Minister of the Women’s Policy Secretariat Eleonora Menicuci in Felipe Neri, “PEC das domésticas é aprovada em primeiro turno no senado,” Globo.com G1 , March 19, 2013, http://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2013/03/pec-das-domesticas-e-aprovada-em-%20primeiro-turno-no-senado.html .

75. Departamento Intersindical de Estatística e Estudos Socioeconômicos , “O Emprego Doméstico No Brasil,” Estudos e Pesquisas 68 (August 2013): 1–27, 5, 6; and Gomes and Bertolin, “Regulatory Challenges of Domestic Work: The Case of Brazil”; “Indicadores IBGE, 2003–2014” (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, n.d.), 190–191, retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/indicadores/trabalhoerendimento/pme_nova/retrospectiva2003_2014.pdf; Hildete Pereira de Melo , “Trabalhadoras domésticas: eterna ocupação feminina,” in O progresso das mulheres no Brasil, 2003–2010 , eds. Jacqueline Pitanguy and L. L. Barsted (Rio de Janiero: CEPIA and UNWomen, 2011), 179–185.

76. “Laudelina de Campos Melo”; “Laudelina.”

77. United Nations Millennium Development Goals Fund, “Winning Rights for Brazil’s Domestic Workers,” United Nations Millennium Development Goals Fund , http://www.mdgfund.org/node/3693 .

78. “Indicadores IBGE, 2003–2014,” 185, 290–292.

79. Isabel Versiani , “Com crise, sobe número de domésticas—08/06/2015—Mercado—Folha de S.Paulo,” Folha de São Paulo , June 8, 2015, retrieved from http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mercado/2015/06/1638845-com-crise-sobe-numero-de-domesticas.shtml .

80. “PROSTITUTES NETWORK | A Kiss for Gabriela,” http://www.akissforgabriela.com/?page_id=2742; Cristiana Schettini and Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette, “Prostitution in Rio: ‘Not Illegal’ | Red Light Rio,” http://redlightr.io/prostitution-in-rio-not-illegal/ .

81. An example of the latter position is Tania Navarro Swain , “Banalizar e naturalizar a prostituição: violência social e histórica,” Revista Unimontes Científica 6.2 (2004): 23–28. For criticism of this position, Adriana Piscitelli , “Transnational Sisterhood? Brazilian Feminisms Facing Prostitution,” Latin American Policy 5.2 (December 1, 2014): 221–235.

82. A horrifying account of child sex trafficking by journalist Gilberto Dimenstein played an important role in generating much of this attention. Gilberto Dimenstein, Meninas da noite: a prostituição de meninas-escravas no Brasil (Ática, 1992). The United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, which Brazil signed in 2000, also played a role. See https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CTOC/signatures.html .

83. Ana Paula Silva and Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette , “Sexual Tourism and Social Panics: Research and Intervention in Rio de Janeiro,” Souls 11.2 (2009): 203–212; Ana Paula da Silva , Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette , and Andressa Raylane Bento , “Cinderella Deceived: Analyzing a Brazilian Myth Regarding Trafficking in Persons,” Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 10.2 (December 2013): 377–419; Adriana Piscitelli , “‘Sexo tropical’: comentários sobre gênero e ‘raça’ em alguns textos da mídia brasileira,” Cadernos Pagu , no. 6/7 (2010): 9–33; and Adriana Piscitelli , “On ‘gringos’ and ‘natives,’” Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 1.1–2 (December 2004), 1–27, http://www.vibrant.org.br/downloads/a1v1_ogn.pdf .

84. Gilka Gattás et al., “Commercial Sexual Exploitation and Missing Children in the Coastal Region of São Paulo State, Brazil,” Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk 3.2 (October 3, 2012), 1–21, http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol3/iss2/10 .

85. Ela Wiecko V de Castilho , “Interview—Human Trafficking in Brazil: Between Crime-Based and Human Rights-Based Governance,” Anti-Trafficking Review no. 4 (April 1, 2015): 174.

86. Luiz Mello , “Da diferença à igualdade: os direitos humanos de gays, lésbicas e travestis,” in Direitos Humanos e Cotidiano , ed. Ricardo Barbosa Lima (Goiânia: Bandeirante, 2001), 159–177; Amy Nunn , The Politics and History of AIDS Treatment in Brazil (New York: Springer, 2009); and Adriana R. B. Vianna and Sérgio Carrara , “Sexual Politics and Sexual Rights in Brazil: A Case Study,” in Sex Politics: Reports from the Frontline , eds. Richard Parker , Rosalind Petchesky , and Robert Sember (Sexual Policy Watch, 2008), 27–51, http://www.sxpolitics.org/frontlines/book/pdf/sexpolitics.pdf .

87. As an example, the theme for the São Paulo gay pride parade in 2016 is transphobia. http://www.paradasp.org.br/ . See also Carrara and Carvalho, “Em direção a um futuro trans?”; and Jesus, Transfeminismo .

88. Caulfield, “From Liberalism to Human Dignity”; Omar Encarnación , Out in the Periphery: Latin America’s Gay Rights Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), ch. 5; and Shawn Schulenberg , “Policy Stability without Policy: The Battle for Same-Sex Partnership Recognition in Brazil,” in Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas: Policy Innovation for Same-Sex Relationships , eds. Jason Pierceson , Adriana Piatti-Crocker , and Shawn Schulenberg (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010), 93–127.

89. For discussion of the beginnings of women’s and gender history in Brazil and the reception of scholarly discussions in Europe and the United States, see Rachel Soihet and Joana Maria Pedro , “A emergência da pesquisa da história das mulheres e das relações de gênero,” Revista Brasileira de História 27.54 (December 2007): 281–300; Joana Maria Pedro , “Traduzindo o debate: o uso da categoria gênero na pesquisa histórica,” Revista História 24.1 (2005): 77–98. Three influential anthologies that offer syntheses on various topics by respected scholars of gender history are Carmen Barroso and Albertina de Oliveira Costa , eds., Mulher, mulheres (São Paulo: Cortez Editora: Fundação Carlos Chagas, 1983); Priore and Pinsky História das mulheres no Brasil (São Paulo: Contexto, 1997); and Pinsky and Pedro, Nova história das mulheres no Brasil .

90. Carla Bassanezi Pinsky , “Estudos de gênero e história social,” Revista Estudos Feministas 17.1 (April 2009): 159–189.

91. Heleieth Iara Bongiovani Saffioti , Women in Class Society (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1978); Eva Alterman Blay , Trabalho domesticado: a mulher na indústria paulista (São Paulo: Ática, 1978). For a list of important historical monographs focused on women published in this period, see Pedro, “Traduzindo o debate,” 85–86 and 96n34.

92. Among the most important are the interdisciplinary journals Cadernos de Pesquisa of the Fundação Carlos Chagas, an educational research institute, Revista Estudos Feministas , and Cadernos Pagu , published since 1971, 1992, and 1993, respectively. For an in-depth discussion of the emergence of the field of women’s history through collaborative work, conferences, and the construction of institutions that supported women’s and gender history, see Soihet and Pedro, “A emergência da pesquisa,” 281–284.

93. Examples of the work of the first post-dictatorship generation of social historians include Sidney Chalhoub , Trabalho, lar e botequim: o cotidiano dos trabalhadores no Rio de Janeiro da Belle Epoque (São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1986); and Marta Abreu Esteves , Meninas Perdidas: os populares e o cotidiano no amor no Rio de Janeiro da Belle Époque (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1989).

94. See for example, Cunha, “De historiadoras, brasileiras e escandinavas.”

95. Maria Odila Leite da Silva Dias , Power and Everyday Life: The Lives of Working Women in Nineteenth-Century Brazil (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 1995).

96. Maria Odila Leite da Silva Dias , “Teoria e metodo dos estudos feministas: perspectiva histórica e a hermeneutica do quotidiano,” in Uma questão de gênero , eds. Albertina de Oliveira Costa and Maria Cristina A Bruschini (Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos, 1992), 39–53.

97. Robert W Slenes , “The Demography and Economics of Brazilian Slavery, 1850–1888” (PhD diss., Stanford University, 1975); and Slenes, Na senzala, uma flor . Another extremely influential social history of slavery that recognized the importance of women’s economic roles is Mary C. Karasch , Slave Life in Rio de Janeiro, 1808–1850 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987).

98. Luiz Mott , Escravidão, homossexualidade e demonologia (São Paulo: Icone Editora, 1988); Luiz Mott , Sexo proibido: virgens, gays e escravos nas garras da inquisição (Campinas: Editora Papirus, 1989); Laura de Mello e Souza , O diabo e a Terra de Santa Cruz: feitiçaria e religiosidade popular no Brasil colonial (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1986); and Ronaldo Vainfas , Trópico dos pecados: moral, sexualidade e Inquisição no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus, 1989).

99. See notes 22–23.

100. Zephyr L Frank , Dutra’s World: Wealth and Family in Nineteenth-Century Rio de Janeiro (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2004); João José Reis , “De escravo rico a liberto: a história do africano Manoel Joaquim Ricardo na Bahia oitocentista,” Revista de História no. 174 (June 30, 2016): 15–68; Farias, Mercados minas ; and Popinigis, “Trabajo, libertad y esclavitud.”

101. Graham, Caetana Says No ; Graham, “Being Yoruba”; Machado, “Entre dois Beneditos”; and Cowling, Conceiving Freedom .

102. Giovana Xavier , Juliana Barreto Farias , and Flávio Gomes , eds., Mulheres negras no Brasil escravista e do pós-emancipação (São Paulo: Selo Negro Edições, 2012); Paixão and Gomes, “Histórias das diferenças”; and Maria Odila Leite da Silva Dias , “Escravas: resistir e sobreviver,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Carla Beozzo Bassanezi and Joana Maria Pedro ( São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2012), 360–381.

103. In addition to sources cited in note 29 , see discussion of compensation for consensual partners’ domestic work in Caulfield, “From Liberalism to Human Dignity,” 34–35.

104. See note 5.

105. Roncador, A doméstica imaginária ; Xavier, “Entre personagens”; and Silveira, Fábrica de contos .

106. Esteves, Meninas perdidas ; Rachel Soihet , Condição feminina e formas de violência: mulheres pobres e ordem urbana, 1890–1920 (Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 1989); Margareth Rago , Do cabaré ao lar. A utopia da cidade disciplinar . Brasil, 1890–1930 (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1985); Besse, Restructuring Patriarchy ; Caulfield, In Defense of Honor ; Peter Beattie , The Tribute of Blood: Army, Honor, Race, and Nation in Brazil, 1864–1945 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001); Schettini, Que tenhas teu corpo ; Magali Engel , Meretrizes e doutores: saber médico e prostituição no Rio de Janeiro (1840–1890) (São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense, 1989); and Rago, Os prazeres da noite .

107. For the most notable studies of early twentieth-century feminism see note 34; for nonfeminist women’s political mobilization during the 1930s, see note 46.

108. Jurandir Freire Costa , Ordem médica e norma familiar (Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1979); Maria Clementina Pereira Cunha , O espelho do mundo: Juquery, a história de um asilo (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1986); Engel, Meretrizes e doutores ; Sérgio Carrara , Tributo a vênus: a luta contra a sífilis no Brasil, da passagem do século aos anos 40 (Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 1996); Magali Gouveia Engel , Os delírios da razão: médicos, loucos e hospícios (Rio de Janeiro, 1830–1930) (Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2001); Schettini, Que tenhas teu corpo , 2006; and Machado, “Entre dois Beneditos.”

109. Green, Beyond Carnival ; Maria Izilda Santos de Matos , O meu lar é o botequim: alcoolismo e masculinidade (São Paulo: Cia. Editora Nacional, 2001); Weinstein, “Making Workers Masculine.” For other works on masculinity and male homosexuality, see the collection edited by Mary Del Priore and Márcia Amantino , eds., História dos homens no Brasil (São Paulo: UNESP, 2013); and Sérgio Carrara and Júlio Assis Simões , “Sexuality, Culture and Politics: The Journey of Male Homosexuality in Brazilian Anthropology,” Cadernos Pagu no. 28 (2007): 65–99.

110. Important exceptions include Pinsky, Mulheres dos anos dourados ; and Maria Izilda Santos de Matos , Dolores Duran: experiências boemias em Copacabana dos anos 50 (Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1997).

111. Green, “Who Is the Macho Who Wants to Kill Me?”; Joana Maria Pedro , Cristina Scheibe Wolff , and Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina , eds., Gênero, feminismos e ditaduras no Cone Sul (Florianópolis: Editora Mulheres, 2010); Joana Maria Pedro , Cristina Scheibe Wolff , and Ana Maria Veiga , eds., Resistências, gênero e feminismos contra as ditaduras no Cone Sul (Florianópolis: Editora Mulheres, 2011); Langland, “Birth Control Pills and Molotov Cocktails”; and Cowan, Securing Sex .

112. Joana Maria Pedro , “Corpo, prazer, e trabalho,” in Nova história das mulheres , eds. Joana Maria Pedro and Carla Basanezi Pinsky (São Paulo: Contexto, 2012), 238–259. Examples of studies by social scientists and participants include Alvarez, Engendering Democracy ; Pinto, Uma história do feminismo ; Moema Toscano and Mirian Goldenberg , A revolução das mulheres: um balanço do feminismo no Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan, 1992); Melo and Bandeira, Tempos e memórias ; and Teles and Leite, Da guerrilha à imprensa feminista .

113. Regina Facchini , Sopa de letrinhas?: Movimento homossexual e produção de identidades coletivas nos anos 90 (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Garamond, 2005); Mello, “Da diferença à igualdade”; Encarnación, Out in the Periphery , ch. 5; Green, “Who Is This Macho.” For discussion of legal struggles relating to civil unions and marriage, Caulfield, “From Liberalism to Human Dignity”; Schulenberg, “Policy Stability without Policy.” The most well-known memoir-type accounts of this history are João Antônio de Souza Mascarenhas , A tríplice conexão: Machismo, conservadorismo político e falso moralismo, um ativista guei versus noventa e seis parlamentares (Rio de Janiero: 2AB Editora, 1997); and Trevisan, Devassos no paraíso .

114. Banco de teses e dissertações, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. , retrieved from http://sdi.capes.gov.br/banco-de-teses/01_bt_index.html .

Related Articles

  • Digital Resources: Gender and Latin American Independence
  • Women and the Catholic Church in Colonial Brazil

Printed from Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Latin American History. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 02 July 2024

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Accessibility
  • [185.66.14.236]
  • 185.66.14.236

Character limit 500 /500

IMAGES

  1. Military regime is better than civilian rule By Brownson, Samuel O

    write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

  2. Detention and military

    write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

  3. Military Argumentative Essay

    write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

  4. Reflection essay: Essay on military

    write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

  5. Write an argumentative essay in which you state and defend a claim

    write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

  6. Mandatory Military Service Essay

    write an argumentative essay on the topic military government is better than civilian government

VIDEO

  1. How to write an Argumentative Essay

  2. How to write #argumentative essays #essays @@AbiatalEnglish

  3. Success in Planning I Arguments & Counterarguments

  4. Write Argumentative Essays Right #BECE #WASSCE #Persuasivewriting #learnenglish

  5. Class 9 English 3.3.1 Page 32

  6. Statement–Arguments

COMMENTS

  1. DEBATE TOPIC: 10 Reasons Why Civilian Rule Is Better Than Military Rule

    DEBATE TOPIC: Civilian Rule is Better than Military Rule. Civilian rule refers to a government led by individuals who are not affiliated with the military. It is characterized by a focus on democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Military rule, on the other hand, involves the direct control of a nation by the armed forces.

  2. Debate: Civilian Rule Is Better Than Military Rule

    The topic to be proposed this morning is "Civilian Rule is Better Than Military Rule". First, one has to give the meanings of key words in this topic - Civilian and military Rule. Civilian rule can be defined as a type of governance undertaken by the civil society. It can also be referred to as government by the people's representatives.

  3. Democracy Is Better Than Military Rule Argumentative Essay

    By August 2, 2023. The debate between democracy and military rule has long been a topic of contention in discussions about governance. In this essay, we will explore the advantages of democracy over military rule, focusing on representation, human rights, the rule of law, economic development, and peaceful transitions of power.

  4. Is Military Rule Better Than The Civilian Rule Or Vice-Versa?

    Military Rule. The military has protocol and structure. Protection of life and property is ensured in a military regime. Decision-making is faster in military regimes than in civilian. It instills discipline and brings about order and corporate living among people in society. It is cost-effective.

  5. Why we must understand civilian participation in military rule

    Why civilian participation matters beyond research. Unpacking civilian participation in military regimes extends beyond theoretical concerns. First, if officers have civilian allies - either willing participants for post-coup governments or instigators of coups themselves - efforts to limit military intervention in politics will be futile.

  6. More support democracy than military rule

    Among Mexicans who believe the next generation will be worse off, only 52% say representative democracy is good for the country. Backing for government by elected representatives is at 72% among those who say children will be better off than their parents. Attitudes toward representative democracy are also associated with opinions about diversity.

  7. Differences between Civilian Government and Military Government

    In a civilian administration, authority is exerted and apportioned in a different way than in a military one. Elected officials in a civilian administration are normally in charge and answerable to the people they serve. The leaders of the armed forces in a military regime may or may not be answerable to the populace at large.

  8. Write an Argumentative Essay on the Topic Military Rule is Better Than

    While supporters of civilian rule emphasize democratic values and individual rights, it is important to explore both perspectives. Here we are going to write an argumentative essay on the topic military rule is better than civilian rule. This essay aims to present a simplified argument favoring military rule, with a focus on aspects that may ...

  9. Democracy as the Best Form of Government Essay

    A democracy is a form of governance characterized by power sharing. The implication of this is that all the citizens have an equal voice in the way a nation is governed. This often encompasses either direct or indirect involvement in lawmaking. "Democracy" can be a very delicate subject for any writer. Get a custom essay on Democracy as the ...

  10. Differences in Military and Civilian rule in Nigerian Politics by Ogabo

    Military government took a non aligned form and spearheaded support for decolonization of states like Angola, Namibia, apartheid South Africa etc. But the civilian regimes had a conservative foreign policy which places the state a little to the right and an ally of the west.

  11. Governmentality and Biopolitics

    Governmentality. As an attempt to describe the changing status of liberal government (and as is noted later, it has also been applied in non-liberal contexts), the term governmentality seeks to come to terms with "arts" and "regimes" of government and administration emerging since the evolution of state power in early modern Europe (among others, see Dean, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995a ...

  12. Civilian rule is better than a military rule.

    2 points. Civilian rule is often better than military rule. Civilian rule is designed to take a functioning civil body and make it work for the population without the need for much intervention. That intervention is delegated to the local police force. If the population needs much more that the occasional intervention, then military rule would ...

  13. Military regime is better than civilian rule By Brownson, Samuel O

    The document argues that military rule is better than civilian rule in Nigeria for several reasons: 1) Military regimes in Nigeria's past were able to develop infrastructure like roads and bridges more so than current civilian administrations. Military rule also instilled discipline, order, and structure. 2) Current civilian rule in Nigeria is ...

  14. Protecting our Democracy from Coercion (accessible)

    2.21 To write this review, I engaged widely with relevant stakeholders including the Government, public bodies, international partners, the public, academia, civil society, and those impacted by ...

  15. Extermination and excess: Martial economies of poison

    Attaching the word 'martial' to 'politics' aids in assessing the indivisibility of war and peace, military and civilian, and national and social security. 'Martial politics' moves beyond the idea that 'militarization' is a new process by which the exception (war) encroaches on the norm (peace).

  16. Why civilian government is better than military in Nigeria?

    Civilian government is better than military rule in Nigeria because it promotes democracy, respect for human rights, and the rule of law, leading to greater stability and economic prosperity for the country. See 3,000+ New Gun Deals HERE.

  17. Democracy is better than military rule

    The call - from the makers of the free democracy app Rate Your Leader - comes as a Nigerian senator appeared to voice support for a return to the rule of unelected army officers during a ...

  18. Military regime is better than civilian rule

    The civilian government delays decision making and this can affect the country. Laws are made through decree. Yet another reason is that defense, protection of lives and property is ensure in the military than civilian government. Nobody will threaten the territorial integrity of its state. Unlike the civilian government, they are weak

  19. 2001 WAEC English Language Theory You are a speaker in a ...

    On the contrary, military rulers are not guided by the wishes and demands of the people they rule when it comes to project execution. This is because they are not accountable to the people. I believe that I have been able to convince you that civilian rule is better than military rule. I thank you for your patience.

  20. Brookings

    The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit public policy organization based in Washington, DC. Our mission is to conduct in-depth research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society ...

  21. write an argumentative essay on the topic:"militry rules is better than

    Write an argumentative essay on the topic:"militry rules is better than sivilian rules. See answers Advertisement Advertisement Itzbigsecret28 Itzbigsecret28 There have been many system of government.Military and Civilian government have existed.In this debate, I will tell you that military government is better than civilian government.

  22. Nigel Farage's claim that NATO provoked Russia is naive and dangerous

    Critics of enlargement retort that NATO should have said no to central and eastern Europe all the same. Expansion was bound to make Russia paranoid and insecure. Even though NATO is a defensive ...

  23. Captain Risked His Career to Write About a Moral Wrong

    The essay went beyond description and decried the injustice of the not guilty verdict delivered by an all-white jury. It concluded with a question that answered itself: "The verdict? Is there any question that an attack upon a Negro soldier would result—in such a court and in such a community and in such a State—in anything but an ...

  24. Argumentative essay 2 I Military rule is better than civilian rule

    Final answer: Military rule refers to a system where the military governs a country, while civilian rule is based on democratic processes. While military rule may offer efficiency and stability, it can also lead to abuses of power and lack of democratic accountability. Examples like Myanmar highlight the negative consequences of military rule.

  25. Write an argumentative essay on the topic:"militry rules is better than

    The military's focus on teamwork and camaraderie fosters a strong sense of unity. In an argumentative essay about military rules being better than civilian rules, you can consider discussing the aspects of discipline, efficiency, and expertise. Military rules are often created to maintain discipline and order, ensuring that tasks are carried ...

  26. Why Are There So Few Conservative Professors?

    A more sophisticated argument is that while raw mental ability may not explain the absence of conservatives in academe, conservatives are — almost by definition — lacking in the psychological ...

  27. Gender and Sexuality in Brazil since Independence

    Introduction. The inauguration of Brazil's first female president, Dilma Rousseff, and the Supreme Court decision that led to the legalization of same-sex marriage, both in 2011, were milestones in the history of gender and sexuality, marking the vast distance travelled since the nation's independence from Portugal in 1822.These advances stand in contrast to the political climate that ...

  28. Write an argument essay for or against the topic military is better

    Military rule is a controversial topic that has been debated for many years. Some argue that military rule is better than civil rule while others believe that the opposite is true. In this essay, I will argue that while military rule may offer certain benefits, civil rule is ultimately the better form of government.

  29. Write an argumentative essay on why government is better than military

    In conclusion, government is better than military rule because it protects civil liberties, promotes democratic decision-making, and fosters societal stability. By upholding rights, ensuring representation, and maintaining order, governments provide a framework that supports the well-being and progress of societies.

  30. write an argumentative essay that shows against the motion military

    Final answer: Military rule is not better than civilian rule as it can lead to the suppression of rights and hinder democracy. Explanation: Writing an argumentative essay against the motion that military rule is better than civilian rule requires presenting valid arguments and supporting evidence.