Specifies the number of studies evaluated orselected
Steps, and targets of constructing a good review article are listed in Table 3 . To write a good review article the items in Table 3 should be implemented step by step. [ 11 – 13 ]
Steps of a systematic review
Formulation of researchable questions | Select answerable questions |
Disclosure of studies | Databases, and key words |
Evaluation of its quality | Quality criteria during selection of studies |
Synthesis | Methods interpretation, and synthesis of outcomes |
It might be helpful to divide the research question into components. The most prevalently used format for questions related to the treatment is PICO (P - Patient, Problem or Population; I-Intervention; C-appropriate Comparisons, and O-Outcome measures) procedure. For example In female patients (P) with stress urinary incontinence, comparisons (C) between transobturator, and retropubic midurethral tension-free band surgery (I) as for patients’ satisfaction (O).
In a systematic review on a focused question, methods of investigation used should be clearly specified.
Ideally, research methods, investigated databases, and key words should be described in the final report. Different databases are used dependent on the topic analyzed. In most of the clinical topics, Medline should be surveyed. However searching through Embase and CINAHL can be also appropriate.
While determining appropriate terms for surveying, PICO elements of the issue to be sought may guide the process. Since in general we are interested in more than one outcome, P, and I can be key elements. In this case we should think about synonyms of P, and I elements, and combine them with a conjunction AND.
One method which might alleviate the workload of surveying process is “methodological filter” which aims to find the best investigation method for each research question. A good example of this method can be found in PubMed interface of Medline. The Clinical Queries tool offers empirically developed filters for five different inquiries as guidelines for etiology, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis or clinical prediction.
As an indispensable component of the review process is to discriminate good, and bad quality researches from each other, and the outcomes should be based on better qualified researches, as far as possible. To achieve this goal you should know the best possible evidence for each type of question The first component of the quality is its general planning/design of the study. General planning/design of a cohort study, a case series or normal study demonstrates variations.
A hierarchy of evidence for different research questions is presented in Table 4 . However this hierarchy is only a first step. After you find good quality research articles, you won’t need to read all the rest of other articles which saves you tons of time. [ 14 ]
Determination of levels of evidence based on the type of the research question
I | Systematic review of Level II studies | Systematic review of Level II studies | Systematic review of Level II studies | Systematic review of Level II studies |
II | Randomized controlled study | Crross-sectional study in consecutive patients | Initial cohort study | Prospective cohort study |
III | One of the following: Non-randomized experimental study (ie. controlled pre-, and post-test intervention study) Comparative studies with concurrent control groups (observational study) (ie. cohort study, case-control study) | One of the following: Cross-sectional study in non-consecutive case series; diagnostic case-control study | One of the following: Untreated control group patients in a randomized controlled study, integrated cohort study | One of the following: Retrospective cohort study, case-control study (Note: these are most prevalently used types of etiological studies; for other alternatives, and interventional studies see Level III |
IV | Case series | Case series | Case series or cohort studies with patients at different stages of their disease states |
Rarely all researches arrive at the same conclusion. In this case a solution should be found. However it is risky to make a decision based on the votes of absolute majority. Indeed, a well-performed large scale study, and a weakly designed one are weighed on the same scale. Therefore, ideally a meta-analysis should be performed to solve apparent differences. Ideally, first of all, one should be focused on the largest, and higher quality study, then other studies should be compared with this basic study.
In conclusion, during writing process of a review article, the procedures to be achieved can be indicated as follows: 1) Get rid of fixed ideas, and obsessions from your head, and view the subject from a large perspective. 2) Research articles in the literature should be approached with a methodological, and critical attitude and 3) finally data should be explained in an attractive way.
An article review is a critical assessment that aims to expand one’s knowledge by evaluating the original author’s research.
According to statistical research, 5.14 million research papers are published every year, including short surveys, article reviews, and conference proceedings.
The process of how to write an article review could be tricky, but a few expert tips and tricks can get you on the right track. So, ensure you read it till the end to make the most out of it.
Table of Contents
Learning how to write a review article is very important in order to present a comprehensive overview of the research paper. They tend to investigate the methodology, findings, current state of knowledge, and discuss future prospects of research on that topic.
They are also the indicators of how great and accurate an article is and pointing out what critical points the original writers have left.
The writer of this comprehensive guide shared, “Analyzing someone’s article seems easy at first but when you realize how comprehensive and analytical work is, it gets challenging. You need to have knowledge and practice of how to write an article review in order to do justice with someone’s years of research.”
Before you write an article review, you have to determine the industry or sector you are going to choose the article to review. It can be anything of your interest and you should have your interest resonate with the industry you are picking an article from.
We are sharing data of 3 decades from different industries to find out which industry publishes the most articles as per ResearchGate. Let’s take a look at which industry can give you more options for article review.
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 276,215 | 28.81 |
Technology Hardware & Equipment | 103,874 | 10.83 |
Electronic & Electrical Equipment | 79,406 | 8.28 |
General Industries | 75,002 | 7.82 |
Software & Computer Services | 69,606 | 7.26 |
Chemicals | 62,012 | 6.47 |
Oil & Gas Producers | 53,771 | 5.61 |
Automobiles & Parts | 45,379 | 4.73 |
Fixed Line Telecommunications | 35,267 | 3.68 |
Aerospace & Defence | 24,233 | 2.53 |
Industrial Metals & Mining | 18,710 | 1.95 |
Industrial Engineering | 17,795 | 1.86 |
Food Producers | 17,809 | 1.86 |
Leisure Goods | 16,247 | 1.69 |
Healthcare Equipment & services | 13,132 | 1.37 |
Electricity | 10,799 | 1.13 |
Master the art of how to write a review article with this step-by-step guide from professional paper help providers.
The first step is to pick a suitable article for a review. Choose a scholarly source that’s connected to your area of study. You can look for pieces printed in trustworthy journals or by respected authors.
For reviewing an article on climate change, consider selecting one from scientific journals like Nature or Science.
How to write an article review with complete accuracy? It’s super important to read and understand the article before writing your review. Read the article a few times and jot down the notes as you go.
No matter what is the length of a literature review , go through it and focus on the main arguments, major points, evidence, and how it’s structured.
Let’s say you’re looking at an article on how social media affects mental health. Ensure to take note of the following:
To start a solid review, start with an introduction that gives readers the background info they need. Must include the article’s title, the author, and where it was published. Also, write a summary of the main point or argument in the article.
“In the article ‘The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health by John Smith, published in the Journal of Psychology:
The author examines the correlation between excessive social media usage and adolescent mental health disorders.”
In this part of how to write an article review process, you’ll need to quickly go over the main points and arguments from the article. Make it short but must cover the most important elements and the evidence that backs them up. Leave your opinions and analysis out of it for now. Practice with a practice article review example to learn summarizing in a better way.
For instance, you could write:
“The author discusses various studies highlighting the negative effects of excessive social media usage on mental health.
Smith’s research reveals a significant correlation between increased social media consumption and higher rates of anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem among teenagers.
The article also explores the underlying mechanisms, such as social comparison and cyberbullying. All are contributing to the adverse mental health outcomes.”
Now that you’ve given a rundown of the article, it’s time to take a closer look. It will help you learn how to evaluate an article to discover what the author did well and what could have been done better. Most students confuse it but reviewing articles has a different process than how to write a reflection paper process.
Check out the proof they used and if it seems solid. Give a thorough assessment, and use examples from the text to support your thoughts.
“While the article presents compelling evidence linking social media usage to mental health issues, it is important to acknowledge some limitations in Smith’s study.
The sample size of the research was relatively small. It comprises only 100 participants, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the study primarily focused on one specific age group, namely adolescents. This way, there’s room for further research on other demographic groups.”
Here’s your chance to give your two cents and show off your smarts in learning how to write an article review process. Put your spin on the article by pointing out the pros, cons, and other potential improvements. Remember to back up your thoughts with facts and sound arguments.
Despite the limitations, Smith’s research offers valuable insights into the complex relationship between social media and mental health.
Future studies could expand the sample size and include a more diverse range of age groups. It is better to understand the broader impact of social media on mental well-being.
Furthermore, exploring strategies for developing digital literacy programs could be potential avenues for future research.
The final step of how to write an article review process is to wrap it up with a brief and powerful conclusion. Give a summary of your main points and overall thoughts about the article.
Point out its importance to the field and the impact of the study. Finish off with a thought-provoking conclusion. Give the reader a sense of finality and emphasize the need for additional research or discussion.
For instance
“In conclusion, John Smith’s article provides valuable insights into the detrimental effects of excessive social media usage on adolescent mental health.
While the research has limitations, it serves as a starting point for further investigation in this rapidly evolving field.
By addressing the research gaps and implementing targeted interventions:
We can strive to promote a healthier relationship between social media and mental well-being in our digitally connected society.”
Before submission, set aside some time for editing and proofreading. Make sure that you use a spell checker to maintain accuracy and everything makes sense and everything is correct. Check out how it reads and if your points come across clearly.
Get feedback from other people to get a different point of view and make it even better. Proofreading and ensuring the quality is one of the best practices to learn how to evaluate an article.
Before you learn how to write an article review, you need to have an understanding of it;s types. In college, you might be asked to write different types of review articles, including:
This type of review needs you to look into the author’s background and experiences. You have to go through the specialist’s theories and practices and compare them.
For the success of a narrative review, ensure that your arguments are qualitative and make sense.
We have some comprehensive narrative articles and narrative essay examples , you can go through them to understand the narrative approach in reviews.
For a solid evidence paper, you have to put in the work and study the topic. You’ll need to research the facts, analyze the author’s ideas, their effects, and more.
This task involves reviewing a bunch of research papers and summarizing the existing knowledge about a certain subject. A systematic paper type uses an organized approach and expects you to answer questions linked to the research.
Here are some expert tips you could use to write an exceptional article review:
Here’s an outline to write an excellent article review.
– Begin with a summary of the article
– Put in background knowledge of the topic
– State why you are writing the review
– Give an overview of the article’s main points
– Figure out why the author choose to write something
– Look at the article and consider what it does well and what it could have done better.
– Highlight the shortcomings in the article
– Restate why you are writing the review
– Sum up the main points in a few sentences
– Suggest what could be achieved in the future research
One of the biggest challenges faced by students in the process of how to write an article review effectively, is to find the best topic for it.
Not every article is suitable for review because of the research methodologies and the nature of the thesis statements of different articles.
Below we have shared some of the most popular journals that have thousands of quality published articles that you can shortlist according to your interest.
Jstor | A platform with thousands of quality articles. |
Google Scholar | An Easily accessible platform to search articles |
Journal of Health Communication | A place to find heath communication article |
Journal of American Society For Information Science and Technology | A leading forum for peer reviewed research articles and papers for information science. |
Research Gate | 160+ million publications for you to search for your topic with ease. |
How should i structure my article review.
When writing an article review, it’s best to go in with a plan. Start with the basics – title, author, date published, and what the article’s about.
Then, give a quick summary of the main points and note the main arguments and facts.
After that, point out the good and bad of the article. How it was written, any possible biases, etc.
Finally, wrap it up with your opinion on the article and what it might mean. Feel free to get help from professional college paper writers to go through the process without headache.
Article Review sample for Brene Brown’s Daring Greatly
How to write a good review article.
Think about different features of the article when you analyze it. Like its importance, the sources it uses, how it's put together, and if it's a good read.
Check out the arguments made by the author, looking at the facts they give. You should also look at the writing style, organization, and how it's communicated.
Give a fair review and back up what you say with examples and references to improve it.
Order Original Papers & Essays
Your First Custom Paper Sample is on Us!
Timely Deliveries
No Plagiarism & AI
100% Refund
Related blogs.
Connections with Writers and support
Privacy and Confidentiality Guarantee
Average Quality Score
Manisha Bahl, A Step-by-Step Guide to Writing a Scientific Review Article, Journal of Breast Imaging , Volume 5, Issue 4, July/August 2023, Pages 480–485, https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbad028
Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the scientific literature written by subject matter experts. The task of writing a scientific review article can seem overwhelming; however, it can be managed by using an organized approach and devoting sufficient time to the process. The process involves selecting a topic about which the authors are knowledgeable and enthusiastic, conducting a literature search and critical analysis of the literature, and writing the article, which is composed of an abstract, introduction, body, and conclusion, with accompanying tables and figures. This article, which focuses on the narrative or traditional literature review, is intended to serve as a guide with practical steps for new writers. Tips for success are also discussed, including selecting a focused topic, maintaining objectivity and balance while writing, avoiding tedious data presentation in a laundry list format, moving from descriptions of the literature to critical analysis, avoiding simplistic conclusions, and budgeting time for the overall process.
Personal account.
Sign in with a library card.
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above.
Don't already have a personal account? Register
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
May 2023 | 171 |
June 2023 | 115 |
July 2023 | 113 |
August 2023 | 5,013 |
September 2023 | 1,500 |
October 2023 | 1,810 |
November 2023 | 3,849 |
December 2023 | 308 |
January 2024 | 401 |
February 2024 | 312 |
March 2024 | 415 |
April 2024 | 361 |
May 2024 | 306 |
June 2024 | 283 |
July 2024 | 309 |
August 2024 | 129 |
Citing articles via.
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
An article review is an academic assignment that invites you to study a piece of academic research closely. Then, you should present its summary and critically evaluate it using the knowledge you’ve gained in class and during your independent study. If you get such a task at college or university, you shouldn’t confuse it with a response paper, which is a distinct assignment with other purposes (we’ll talk about it in detail below).
In this article, prepared by Custom-Writing experts, you’ll find:
So, if you wish to study our article review example and discover helpful writing tips, keep reading.
🔗 references.
An article review is an academic paper that summarizes and critically evaluates the information presented in your selected article.
The first thing you should note when approaching the task of an article review is that not every article is suitable for this assignment. Let’s have a look at the variety of articles to understand what you can choose from.
In most cases, you’ll be required to review a scholarly, peer-reviewed article – one composed in compliance with rigorous academic standards. Yet, the Web is also full of popular articles that don’t present original scientific value and shouldn’t be selected for a review.
Not sure how to distinguish these two types? Here is a comparative table to help you out.
🗞️ Popular articles are: | 🎓 Scholarly articles are: |
---|---|
Written by a professional or non-professional author. | Written by someone with academic credentials. |
Meant for the general audience. | Published for the peer academic community. |
Featuring reader-friendly, simple language. | Containing professional jargon and vocabulary. |
Illustrated by simple and engaging visuals. | Illustrated by tables and graphs. |
Structured in a simple way. | Structured according to a scholarly publication’s standards. |
Checked by the magazine’s editorial staff only. | Thoroughly reviewed by peer researchers. |
Featuring no or scarce references. | Featuring a full list of references. |
Now, let’s consider the difference between an article review and a response paper:
The reason for such distinctions is the quality and structure of these two article types. Peer-reviewed, scholarly articles have clear-cut quality criteria, allowing you to conduct and present a structured assessment of the assigned material. Popular magazines have loose or non-existent quality criteria and don’t offer an opportunity for structured evaluation. So, they are only fit for a subjective response, in which you can summarize your reactions and emotions related to the reading material.
All in all, you can structure your response assignments as outlined in the tips below.
✔️ | Both a reaction paper and an article review will start with a content summary. |
✔️ | For scholarly material, you will present a structured review after the summary. |
✔️ | For popular magazine content, you will write a response that sums up your emotions, thoughts, and reactions that the material aroused. |
Here is a tried and tested algorithm for article review writing from our experts. We’ll consider only the critical review variety of this academic assignment. So, let’s get down to the stages you need to cover to get a stellar review.
As with any reviews, reports, and critiques, you must first familiarize yourself with the assigned material. It’s impossible to review something you haven’t read, so set some time for close, careful reading of the article to identify:
In terms of research type, your article will usually belong to one of three types explained below.
This type of research is the most common and highly valued in the scholarly community. It uses primary data collected by the author specifically for this article and offers original findings and insights into the discussed research area. | |
This research type examines a particular event, phenomenon, or object closely by considering its environment, details, and context. It’s a close-up of the research object that can be achieved via different observation and data collection techniques. | |
These articles address new research procedures or methods for testing hypotheses in a specific area of research. |
Now that you’ve read the text and have a general impression of the content, it’s time to summarize it for your readers. Look into the article’s text closely to determine:
As you study the article thoroughly, make notes on the margins or write these elements out on a sheet of paper. You can also apply a different technique: read the text section by section and formulate its gist in one phrase or sentence. Once you’re done, you’ll have a summary skeleton in front of you.
The next step of review is content evaluation. Keep in mind that various research types will require a different set of review questions. Here is a complete list of evaluation points you can include.
cover the article’s purpose comprehensively? | |
in data presentation? | |
After completing the critical review stage, it’s time to compose your article review.
The format of this assignment is standard – you will have an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. The introduction should present your article and summarize its content. The body will contain a structured review according to all four dimensions covered in the previous section. The concluding part will typically recap all the main points you’ve identified during your assessment.
It is essential to note that an article review is, first of all, an academic assignment. Therefore, it should follow all rules and conventions of academic composition, such as:
Finally, a vital rule for an article review is properly formatting the citations. We’ll discuss the correct use of citation styles in the following section.
When composing an article review, keep these points in mind:
You’ll need to understand the rules of your chosen citation style to meet all these requirements. Below, we’ll discuss the two most common referencing styles – APA and MLA.
When you need to compose an article review in the APA format , here is the general bibliographical entry format you should use for journal articles on your reference page:
Horigian, V. E., Schmidt, R. D., & Feaster, D. J. (2021). Loneliness, mental health, and substance use among US young adults during COVID-19. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 53 (1), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2020.1836435
Your in-text citations should follow the author-date format like this:
Note that your in-text citations should include “et al.,” as in the examples above, if your article has 3 or more authors. If you have one or two authors, your in-text citations would look like this:
Finally, in case you have to review a book or a website article, here are the general formats for citing these source types on your APA reference list.
Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). Publisher. | |
Author’s last name, First initial. Middle initial. (Year). . Name of Website. URL. |
If your assignment requires MLA-format referencing, here’s the general format you should use for citing journal articles on your Works Cited page:
Horigian, Viviana E., et al. “Loneliness, Mental Health, and Substance Use Among US Young Adults During COVID-19.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs , vol. 53, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1-9.
In-text citations in the MLA format follow the author-page citation format and look like this:
Like in APA, the abbreviation “et al.” is only needed in MLA if your article has 3 or more authors.
If you need to cite a book or a website page, here are the general MLA formats for these types of sources.
Author’s last name, First name. Publisher, Year. | |
Author’s last name, First name. “Webpage Title.” , Date, URL. Accessed Day Month Year. |
Here is a handy, universal article review template to help you move on with any review assignment. We’ve tried to make it as generic as possible to guide you in the academic process.
Frequently, assignment instructions will ask you to include a full citation of your chosen text at the top of the first page of your article review. | |
In the introduction, you should summarize the background information and purpose of the research under review. In addition, consider explaining why you chose it for your assignment. | |
Next, summarize the article. If you review the original research, consider including the following points: If you review a or a book, include the following in your summary: This section should be no more than a third of your total article review. | |
Then, you should critically evaluate the article. Consider answering these questions: | |
In the , share your reasoned opinion on the reviewed piece. Was it worth reading? Did you learn any lessons from it? Would you recommend it to someone else, and why? | |
In the end, add a separate page with bibliographic citations of your reviewed article and any other sources used in your paper. |
The theory is good, but practice is even better. Thus, we’ve created three brief examples to show you how to write an article review. You can study the full-text samples by following the links.
This article review examines a famous piece, “Men, Women & Money – How the Sexes Differ with Their Finances,” published by Amy Livingston in 2020. The author of this article claims that men generally spend more money than women. She makes this conclusion from a close analysis of gender-specific expenditures across five main categories: food, clothing, cars, entertainment, and general spending patterns. Livingston also looks at men’s approach to saving to argue that counter to the common perception of women’s light-hearted attitude to money, men are those who spend more on average.
This is a review of Jonathan Heidt’s 2016 article titled “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism,” written as an advocacy of right-wing populism rising in many Western states. The author illustrates the case with the election of Donald Trump as the US President and the rise of right-wing rhetoric in many Western countries. These examples show how nationalist sentiment represents a reaction to global immigration and a failure of globalization.
This is a review of the American Heart Association’s article titled “The Dangers of Sleep Deprivation.” It discusses how the national organization concerned with the American population’s cardiovascular health links the lack of high-quality sleep to far-reaching health consequences. The organization’s experts reveal how a consistent lack of sleep leads to Alzheimer’s disease development, obesity, type 2 diabetes, etc.
A high-quality article review should summarize the assigned article’s content and offer data-backed reactions and evaluations of its quality in terms of the article’s purpose, methodology, and data used to argue the main points. It should be detailed, comprehensive, objective, and evidence-based.
The purpose of writing a review is to allow students to reflect on research quality and showcase their critical thinking and evaluation skills. Students should exhibit their mastery of close reading of research publications and their unbiased assessment.
The content of your article review will be the same in any format, with the only difference in the assignment’s formatting before submission. Ensure you have a separate title page made according to APA standards and cite sources using the parenthetical author-date referencing format.
You need to take a closer look at various dimensions of an assigned article to compose a valuable review. Study the author’s object of analysis, the purpose of their research, the chosen method, data, and findings. Evaluate all these dimensions critically to see whether the author has achieved the initial goals. Finally, offer improvement recommendations to add a critique aspect to your paper.
High school and college students often face challenges when crafting a compare-and-contrast essay. A well-written paper of this kind needs to be structured appropriately to earn you good grades. Knowing how to organize your ideas allows you to present your ideas in a coherent and logical manner This article by...
If you’re a student, you’ve heard about a formal essay: a factual, research-based paper written in 3rd person. Most students have to produce dozens of them during their educational career. Writing a formal essay may not be the easiest task. But fear not: our custom-writing team is here to guide...
Narrative essays are unlike anything you wrote throughout your academic career. Instead of writing a formal paper, you need to tell a story. Familiar elements such as evidence and arguments are replaced with exposition and character development. The importance of writing an outline for an essay like this is hard...
A précis is a brief synopsis of a written piece. It is used to summarize and analyze a text’s main points. If you need to write a précis for a research paper or the AP Lang exam, you’ve come to the right place. In this comprehensive guide by Custom-Writing.org, you’ll...
A synthesis essay requires you to work with multiple sources. You combine the information gathered from them to present a well-rounded argument on a topic. Are you looking for the ultimate guide on synthesis essay writing? You’ve come to the right place! In this guide by our custom writing team,...
Do you know how to make your essay stand out? One of the easiest ways is to start your introduction with a catchy hook. A hook is a phrase or a sentence that helps to grab the reader’s attention. After reading this article by Custom-Writing.org, you will be able to...
A critical analysis essay is an academic paper that requires a thorough examination of theoretical concepts and ideas. It includes a comparison of facts, differentiation between evidence and argument, and identification of biases. Crafting a good paper can be a daunting experience, but it will be much easier if you...
Critical thinking is the process of evaluating and analyzing information. People who use it in everyday life are open to different opinions. They rely on reason and logic when making conclusions about certain issues. A critical thinking essay shows how your thoughts change as you research your topic. This type...
Process analysis is an explanation of how something works or happens. Want to know more? Read the following article prepared by our custom writing specialists and learn about: So, let’s start digging deeper into this topic! ♻️ What Is Process Analysis? A process analysis describes and explains the succession of...
A visual analysis essay is an academic paper type that history and art students often deal with. It consists of a detailed description of an image or object. It can also include an interpretation or an argument that is supported by visual evidence. In this article, our custom writing experts...
Want to know how to write a reflection paper for college or school? To do that, you need to connect your personal experiences with theoretical knowledge. Usually, students are asked to reflect on a documentary, a text, or their experience. Sometimes one needs to write a paper about a lesson...
A character analysis is an examination of the personalities and actions of protagonists and antagonists that make up a story. It discusses their role in the story, evaluates their traits, and looks at their conflicts and experiences. You might need to write this assignment in school or college. Like any...
Did you know that article reviews are not just academic exercises but also a valuable skill in today's information age? In a world inundated with content, being able to dissect and evaluate articles critically can help you separate the wheat from the chaff. Whether you're a student aiming to excel in your coursework or a professional looking to stay well-informed, mastering the art of writing article reviews is an invaluable skill.
In this article, our research paper writing service experts will start by unraveling the concept of article reviews and discussing the various types. You'll also gain insights into the art of formatting your review effectively. To ensure you're well-prepared, we'll take you through the pre-writing process, offering tips on setting the stage for your review. But it doesn't stop there. You'll find a practical example of an article review to help you grasp the concepts in action. To complete your journey, we'll guide you through the post-writing process, equipping you with essential proofreading techniques to ensure your work shines with clarity and precision!
A review article is a type of professional paper writing that demands a high level of in-depth analysis and a well-structured presentation of arguments. It is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison.
If you write a scientific review, you have to use database searches to portray the research. Your primary goal is to summarize everything and present a clear understanding of the topic you've been working on.
Writing Involves:
When it comes to article reviews, there's more than one way to approach the task. Understanding the various types of reviews is like having a versatile toolkit at your disposal. In this section, we'll walk you through the different dimensions of review types, each offering a unique perspective and purpose. Whether you're dissecting a scholarly article, critiquing a piece of literature, or evaluating a product, you'll discover the diverse landscape of article reviews and how to navigate it effectively.
Just like other types of reviews, a journal article review assesses the merits and shortcomings of a published work. To illustrate, consider a review of an academic paper on climate change, where the writer meticulously analyzes and interprets the article's significance within the context of environmental science.
Distinguished by its focus on research methodologies, a research article review scrutinizes the techniques used in a study and evaluates them in light of the subsequent analysis and critique. For instance, when reviewing a research article on the effects of a new drug, the reviewer would delve into the methods employed to gather data and assess their reliability.
In the realm of scientific literature, a science article review encompasses a wide array of subjects. Scientific publications often provide extensive background information, which can be instrumental in conducting a comprehensive analysis. For example, when reviewing an article about the latest breakthroughs in genetics, the reviewer may draw upon the background knowledge provided to facilitate a more in-depth evaluation of the publication.
Address to Our Writers and Get Assistance in Any Questions!
The format of the article should always adhere to the citation style required by your professor. If you're not sure, seek clarification on the preferred format and ask him to clarify several other pointers to complete the formatting of an article review adequately.
When you know the answers to these questions, you may start writing your assignment. Below are examples of MLA and APA formats, as those are the two most common citation styles.
Articles appear most commonly in academic journals, newspapers, and websites. If you write an article review in the APA format, you will need to write bibliographical entries for the sources you use:
Enhance your writing effortlessly with EssayPro.com , where you can order an article review or any other writing task. Our team of expert writers specializes in various fields, ensuring your work is not just summarized, but deeply analyzed and professionally presented. Ideal for students and professionals alike, EssayPro offers top-notch writing assistance tailored to your needs. Elevate your writing today with our skilled team at your article review writing service !
Facing this task for the first time can really get confusing and can leave you unsure of where to begin. To create a top-notch article review, start with a few preparatory steps. Here are the two main stages from our dissertation services to get you started:
Step 1: Define the right organization for your review. Knowing the future setup of your paper will help you define how you should read the article. Here are the steps to follow:
Step 2: Move on and review the article. Here is a small and simple guide to help you do it right:
These three steps make up most of the prewriting process. After you are done with them, you can move on to writing your own review—and we are going to guide you through the writing process as well.
As you progress with reading your article, organize your thoughts into coherent sections in an outline. As you read, jot down important facts, contributions, or contradictions. Identify the shortcomings and strengths of your publication. Begin to map your outline accordingly.
If your professor does not want a summary section or a personal critique section, then you must alleviate those parts from your writing. Much like other assignments, an article review must contain an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Thus, you might consider dividing your outline according to these sections as well as subheadings within the body. If you find yourself troubled with the pre-writing and the brainstorming process for this assignment, seek out a sample outline.
Your custom essay must contain these constituent parts:
You might wonder why we've dedicated a section of this article to discuss an article review sample. Not everyone may realize it, but examining multiple well-constructed examples of review articles is a crucial step in the writing process. In the following section, our essay writing service experts will explain why.
Looking through relevant article review examples can be beneficial for you in the following ways:
Why Have There Been No Great Female Artists?
Here is a guide with critique paper format on how to write a review paper:
First of all, you need to write a title that reflects the main focus of your work. Respectively, the title can be either interrogative, descriptive, or declarative.
Next, create a proper citation for the reviewed article and input it following the title. At this step, the most important thing to keep in mind is the style of citation specified by your instructor in the requirements for the paper. For example, an article citation in the MLA style should look as follows:
Author's last and first name. "The title of the article." Journal's title and issue(publication date): page(s). Print
Abraham John. "The World of Dreams." Virginia Quarterly 60.2(1991): 125-67. Print.
After your citation, you need to include the identification of your reviewed article:
All of this information should be included in the first paragraph of your paper.
The report "Poverty increases school drop-outs" was written by Brian Faith – a Health officer – in 2000.
Your organization in an assignment like this is of the utmost importance. Before embarking on your writing process, you should outline your assignment or use an article review template to organize your thoughts coherently.
Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note any relevant facts and findings from the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section.
Present the strengths and weaknesses you have found in the publication. Highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed to the field. Also, write about any gaps and/or contradictions you have found in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not supporting the author's assertions, but back up your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to that area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person who wrote the article.
In this section, revisit the critical points of your piece, your findings in the article, and your critique. Also, write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Present a way forward for future research in the field of study. Before submitting your article, keep these pointers in mind:
Finally, when all of the parts of your article review are set and ready, you have one last thing to take care of — proofreading. Although students often neglect this step, proofreading is a vital part of the writing process and will help you polish your paper to ensure that there are no mistakes or inconsistencies.
To proofread your paper properly, start by reading it fully and checking the following points:
Afterward, take a moment to check for any unnecessary information in your paper and, if found, consider removing it to streamline your content. Finally, double-check that you've covered at least 3-4 key points in your discussion.
And remember, if you ever need help with proofreading, rewriting your essay, or even want to buy essay , our friendly team is always here to assist you.
Just send us the requirements to your paper and watch one of our writers crafting an original paper for you.
How to write an article review, how to write an article review in apa format.
Daniel Parker
is a seasoned educational writer focusing on scholarship guidance, research papers, and various forms of academic essays including reflective and narrative essays. His expertise also extends to detailed case studies. A scholar with a background in English Literature and Education, Daniel’s work on EssayPro blog aims to support students in achieving academic excellence and securing scholarships. His hobbies include reading classic literature and participating in academic forums.
is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.
For many kinds of assignments, like a literature review , you may be asked to offer a critique or review of a journal article. This is an opportunity for you as a scholar to offer your qualified opinion and evaluation of how another scholar has composed their article, argument, and research. That means you will be expected to go beyond a simple summary of the article and evaluate it on a deeper level. As a college student, this might sound intimidating. However, as you engage with the research process, you are becoming immersed in a particular topic, and your insights about the way that topic is presented are valuable and can contribute to the overall conversation surrounding your topic.
IMPORTANT NOTE!!
Some disciplines, like Criminal Justice, may only want you to summarize the article without including your opinion or evaluation. If your assignment is to summarize the article only, please see our literature review handout.
Before getting started on the critique, it is important to review the article thoroughly and critically. To do this, we recommend take notes, annotating , and reading the article several times before critiquing. As you read, be sure to note important items like the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, key findings, major conclusions, tone, and publication information. Depending on your writing context, some of these items may not be applicable.
To evaluate a source, consider some of the following questions. They are broken down into different categories, but answering these questions will help you consider what areas to examine. With each category, we recommend identifying the strengths and weaknesses in each since that is a critical part of evaluation.
Following, we have an example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. Note that in most literature review contexts, the summary and evaluation would be much shorter. This extended example shows the different ways a student can critique and write about an article.
Chik, A. (2012). Digital gameplay for autonomous foreign language learning: Gamers’ and language teachers’ perspectives. In H. Reinders (ed.), Digital games in language learning and teaching (pp. 95-114). Eastbourne, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Be sure to include the full citation either in a reference page or near your evaluation if writing an annotated bibliography .
In Chik’s article “Digital Gameplay for Autonomous Foreign Language Learning: Gamers’ and Teachers’ Perspectives”, she explores the ways in which “digital gamers manage gaming and gaming-related activities to assume autonomy in their foreign language learning,” (96) which is presented in contrast to how teachers view the “pedagogical potential” of gaming. The research was described as an “umbrella project” consisting of two parts. The first part examined 34 language teachers’ perspectives who had limited experience with gaming (only five stated they played games regularly) (99). Their data was recorded through a survey, class discussion, and a seven-day gaming trial done by six teachers who recorded their reflections through personal blog posts. The second part explored undergraduate gaming habits of ten Hong Kong students who were regular gamers. Their habits were recorded through language learning histories, videotaped gaming sessions, blog entries of gaming practices, group discussion sessions, stimulated recall sessions on gaming videos, interviews with other gamers, and posts from online discussion forums. The research shows that while students recognize the educational potential of games and have seen benefits of it in their lives, the instructors overall do not see the positive impacts of gaming on foreign language learning.
The summary includes the article’s purpose, methods, results, discussion, and citations when necessary.
This article did a good job representing the undergraduate gamers’ voices through extended quotes and stories. Particularly for the data collection of the undergraduate gamers, there were many opportunities for an in-depth examination of their gaming practices and histories. However, the representation of the teachers in this study was very uneven when compared to the students. Not only were teachers labeled as numbers while the students picked out their own pseudonyms, but also when viewing the data collection, the undergraduate students were more closely examined in comparison to the teachers in the study. While the students have fifteen extended quotes describing their experiences in their research section, the teachers only have two of these instances in their section, which shows just how imbalanced the study is when presenting instructor voices.
Some research methods, like the recorded gaming sessions, were only used with students whereas teachers were only asked to blog about their gaming experiences. This creates a richer narrative for the students while also failing to give instructors the chance to have more nuanced perspectives. This lack of nuance also stems from the emphasis of the non-gamer teachers over the gamer teachers. The non-gamer teachers’ perspectives provide a stark contrast to the undergraduate gamer experiences and fits neatly with the narrative of teachers not valuing gaming as an educational tool. However, the study mentioned five teachers that were regular gamers whose perspectives are left to a short section at the end of the presentation of the teachers’ results. This was an opportunity to give the teacher group a more complex story, and the opportunity was entirely missed.
Additionally, the context of this study was not entirely clear. The instructors were recruited through a master’s level course, but the content of the course and the institution’s background is not discussed. Understanding this context helps us understand the course’s purpose(s) and how those purposes may have influenced the ways in which these teachers interpreted and saw games. It was also unclear how Chik was connected to this masters’ class and to the students. Why these particular teachers and students were recruited was not explicitly defined and also has the potential to skew results in a particular direction.
Overall, I was inclined to agree with the idea that students can benefit from language acquisition through gaming while instructors may not see the instructional value, but I believe the way the research was conducted and portrayed in this article made it very difficult to support Chik’s specific findings.
Some professors like you to begin an evaluation with something positive but isn’t always necessary.
The evaluation is clearly organized and uses transitional phrases when moving to a new topic.
This evaluation includes a summative statement that gives the overall impression of the article at the end, but this can also be placed at the beginning of the evaluation.
This evaluation mainly discusses the representation of data and methods. However, other areas, like organization, are open to critique.
In today's information-rich world, mastering the skill of discerning valuable insights from the overwhelming noise is a game-changer. Whether you're a student striving for success or a professional aiming to stay sharp, knowing how to critique an article is your key.
Our article review writing service explains the intricacies of writing an article review, categorizes different types and shares insights into impactful formatting. It's not just theory – we'll guide you step by step, from pre-writing to a tangible review article example, and refine your abilities with essential proofreading tips.
An article review is more than a mere summary; it is a thoughtful analysis and critique that goes beyond the surface of the title. It's an intellectual exercise that challenges you to engage deeply with the author's ideas, question their methodology, and evaluate the significance of their findings.
Consider it as a journey through the landscape of someone else's thoughts. It's not just about where the writer takes you; it's about the path they choose, the landmarks they highlight, and the potential detours they overlook. An effective examination is a conversation with the author, a dialogue where you appreciate their insights, challenge assumptions, and perhaps even find alternative routes through the intellectual terrain they've explored.
As you start to understand how to review the article, encourage thought by asking questions.
At EssayHub, our book review writing service experts believe an article review is an opportunity not just to absorb information but to actively engage with it, to question, to ponder, and to contribute your own insights to the scholarly conversation.
When tackling article reviews, there isn't a one-size-fits-all approach; it's a task that allows for versatile strategies. Think of understanding the different types of reviews as having a multifaceted toolkit ready for use. In this part, we'll guide you through the varied types of a review article, each showing a unique viewpoint and serving a specific purpose. Whether you're analyzing a scholarly piece on your own or asking someone to 'write an article review for me,' you'll get valuable insights.
A journal article review involves critically evaluating and analyzing scholarly pieces published in an academic journal. It requires a thorough understanding of the author's research, methodology, results, and conclusions. The reviewer assesses the journal's contributions to the field, its theoretical framework, and the validity of the research methods employed. The goal is to provide a comprehensive summary and critique that highlights both the strengths and limitations of the piece.
A research article review focuses on the evaluation of a scientific or academic research paper. This type of examination involves examining the research question, experimental design, data collection methods, statistical analysis, and the interpretation of findings. For example, it can be research on teen vaping statistics , which includes all of above. The reviewer assesses the reliability and validity of the research, considers the implications of the study, and offers insights into its potential impact on the broader academic community.
A science article review encompasses a critical analysis of a piece in the field of science, covering disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, or any other scientific domain. This review type involves assessing the clarity of scientific concepts presented, the validity of experimental procedures, and the significance of the study's findings. According to our literature review writing service , reviewers may also consider the article's potential contributions to advancing scientific knowledge and its relevance to current scientific debates or issues.
Ensuring the proper formatting of an article examination is crucial, and it should consistently align with the citation style specified by your instructor. If you're uncertain, don't hesitate to ask us - write my article review for me, along with additional guidelines to effectively structure your piece.
Meanwhile, here are some questions to consider:
An APA review sticks to the rules of the American Psychological Association. When unsure how to write an article review in APA format, remember that it carefully cites the article, using a title page, intro, summary, critique, conclusion, and references. Citations follow the author-date format, focusing on being clear and objective. The review digs into the article's methods, results, and overall impact.
When you write an article review in APA, your in-text citation might read: (Anderson & Ramirez, 2019)
The corresponding entry in the reference list would be: Anderson, L., & Ramirez, C. (2019). Unveiling the Dynamics of Urban Green Spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 112-128.
For an MLA writing review, it follows the Modern Language Association's style. It's important to know how sources are cited in the text and in the Works Cited page. The structure usually has an intro, summary, critique, and conclusion. MLA citations often have the author's last name and page number in brackets in the text. This review might highlight the document's literary or humanities aspects, such as style, language, and cultural context.
In an MLA format publication, the citation within the text could look like: (Anderson and Ramirez 112)
The Works Cited entry for this publication: Anderson, Laura, and Carlos Ramirez. 'Exploring the Impact of Urban Green Spaces on Well-being.' Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 25, no. 3, 2019, pp. 112-128.
As you read your writing piece, organize your thoughts into sections in an outline. Note down key facts, contributions, and any contradictions. Identify strengths and weaknesses, and start mapping your outline.
If your professor doesn't want a summary or personal critique, skip those parts. Like other assignments, your examination needs an introduction, body, and conclusion. Consider dividing your outline accordingly, with subheadings in the body. If you need help starting, find a sample outline.
Your article assessment should have the following:
Use our essay writer service or move on to understanding how to write a review paper covering everything from creating the title to summarizing key points. This step-by-step guide breaks it down into seven simple steps, making the entire process more manageable.
The very first question you might have is how to start an article review. It's crucial to develop a title that not only captures the essence of the publication but also reflects your perspective. For instance, consider the title: ' Decoding Data: A Critical Exploration of Privacy Concerns in Online Health Platforms. ' This title not only introduces the main theme but also hints at the critical evaluation that will unfold in the writing. It sets the tone for your analysis and sparks interest from the outset.
In the second step, it's essential to ensure accurate citation by providing specific details. Take a look at this example:
By including these details, you not only acknowledge the authors and the publication but also provide your readers with the necessary information to locate and verify the article. This step lays the foundation for a credible and well-referenced examination.
Identify key elements of the publication, such as the writer's main argument, methodology, and key findings. Pinpoint any theoretical frameworks or models used in the title.
For example: The writing by Garcia and Kim examines the correlation between social media usage and mental health outcomes among adolescents. The authors employ a longitudinal study approach, utilizing surveys and interviews to gather data.
In your introduction, provide a brief overview of the title's subject and purpose. Capture the reader's attention and clearly state your thesis or main point related to the title. For instance, you might start your article review template like this.
In the digital age, the impact of social media on mental health has become a topic of increasing concern. Garcia and Kim's recent study delves into this issue, aiming to uncover the nuanced relationship between social media engagement and the psychological well-being of adolescents. This writing piece critically analyzes the methodology, findings, and implications of their research.
Summarize the main points of your assessment, highlighting key arguments, evidence, and results. Offer a concise overview without adding personal opinions.
Example: Garcia and Kim's study reveals a significant positive association between increased social media use and heightened levels of anxiety and depression among the adolescent population. The longitudinal study tracked participants over a two-year period, employing both quantitative and qualitative measures to assess mental health outcomes.
Critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the writing. Well, how to critique an article , you might wonder. Discuss aspects such as methodology, data interpretation, and potential biases.
Example: While the study offers valuable insights, the reliance on self-reported data may introduce response bias. Additionally, the research predominantly focuses on mainstream social media platforms, potentially overlooking the impact of emerging platforms. Despite these limitations, the study's comprehensive approach contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding the intersection of social media and mental health.
In the conclusion, summarize your overall assessment of the article and restate your main points. Offer insights into the broader implications of the research and suggest areas for future exploration.
For example: To conclude, Garcia and Kim's study sheds light on the complex relationship between social media use and adolescent mental health. Despite certain methodological limitations, the research underscores the need for continued investigation in this field. As we navigate the digital landscape, understanding these dynamics becomes crucial for devising effective interventions and support systems for the well-being of our youth.
Why are we taking the time to discuss article review examples in this article? It might not be immediately apparent, but exploring a well-crafted article review sample is a vital step in the writing process for the following reasons:
Is writing a review article worth it, how to write an apa format article review, how do you write an article review from the beginning, what is the proper article review format.
Ryan Acton is an essay-writing expert with a Ph.D. in Sociology, specializing in sociological research and historical analysis. By partnering with EssayHub, he provides comprehensive support to students, helping them craft well-informed essays across a variety of topics.
Article Review
People also read
Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic
Best Tips on How to Avoid Plagiarism
How to Write a Movie Review - Guide & Examples
A Complete Guide on How to Write a Summary for Students
Write Opinion Essay Like a Pro: A Detailed Guide
Evaluation Essay - Definition, Examples, and Writing Tips
How to Write a Thematic Statement - Tips & Examples
How to Write a Bio - Quick Tips, Structure & Examples
How to Write a Synopsis – A Simple Format & Guide
How to Write a Comparative Essay – A Complete Guide
Visual Analysis Essay - A Writing Guide with Format & Sample
List of Common Social Issues Around the World
Writing Character Analysis - Outline, Steps, and Examples
11 Common Types of Plagiarism Explained Through Examples
A Detailed Guide on How to Write a Poem Step by Step
Detailed Guide on Appendix Writing: With Tips and Examples
Struggling to write a review that people actually want to read? Feeling lost in the details and wondering how to make your analysis stand out?
You're not alone!
Many writers find it tough to navigate the world of article reviews, not sure where to start or how to make their reviews really grab attention.
No worries!
In this blog, we're going to guide you through the process of writing an article review that stands out. We'll also share tips, and examples to make this process easier for you.
Let’s get started.
An article review is a critical evaluation and analysis of a piece of writing, typically an academic or journalistic article.
It goes beyond summarizing the content; it involves an in-depth examination of the author's ideas, arguments, and methodologies.
The goal is to provide a well-rounded understanding of the article's strengths, weaknesses, and overall contribution to the field.
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!
Article reviews come in various forms, each serving a distinct purpose in the realm of academic or professional discourse. Understanding these types is crucial for tailoring your approach.
Here are some common types of article reviews:
A journal article review involves a thorough evaluation of scholarly articles published in academic journals.
It requires summarizing the article's key points, methodology, and findings, emphasizing its contributions to the academic field.
Take a look at the following example to help you understand better.
Example of Journal Article Review
A research article review focuses on scrutinizing articles with a primary emphasis on research.
This type of review involves evaluating the research design, methodology, results, and their broader implications.
Discussions on the interpretation of results, limitations, and the article's overall contributions are key.
Here is a sample for you to get an idea.
Example of Research Article Review
A science article review specifically addresses articles within scientific disciplines. It includes summarizing scientific concepts, hypotheses, and experimental methods.
The type of review assesses the reliability of the experimental design, and evaluates the author's interpretation of findings.
Take a look at the following example.
Example of Science Article Review
A critical review involves a balanced critique of a given article. It encompasses providing a comprehensive summary, highlighting key points, and engaging in a critical analysis of strengths and weaknesses.
To get a clearer idea of a critical review, take a look at this example.
Critical Review Example
When crafting an article review in either APA or MLA format, it's crucial to adhere to the specific guidelines for citing sources.
Below are the bibliographical entries for different types of sources in both APA and MLA styles:
: Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Title. Retrieved from {link} : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Publication Year). Publication Title. Periodical Title, Volume(Issue), pp.-pp. : Author [last name], A.A [first and middle initial]. (Year, Month, Date of Publication). Publication Title. Magazine Title, pp. Xx-xx. |
: Last, First Middle Initial. “Publication Title.” Website Title. Website Publisher, Date Month Year Published. Web. Date Month Year Accessed. : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Newspaper Title [City] Date, Month, Year Published: Page(s). Print. : Last, First M. “Publication Title.” Journal Title Series Volume. Issue (Year Published): Page(s). Database Name. Web. Date Month Year Accessed. |
Writing an effective article review involves a systematic approach. Follow this step-by-step process to ensure a comprehensive and well-structured analysis.
Before diving into the review, carefully read and understand the assignment guidelines.
Pay attention to specific requirements, such as word count, formatting style (APA, MLA), and the aspects your instructor wants you to focus on.
Begin by thoroughly reading the article. Take notes on key points, arguments, and evidence presented by the author.
Understand the author's main thesis and the context in which the article was written.
Summarize the main points of the article. Highlight the author's key arguments and findings.
While writing the summary ensure that you capture the essential elements of the article to provide context for your analysis.
In this step, pinpoint the author's main thesis or central argument. Understand the purpose of the article and how the author supports their position.
This will serve as a foundation for your critique.
Examine the evidence provided by the author to support their thesis. Assess the reliability and validity of the methodology used.
Consider the sources, data collection methods, and any potential biases.
Evaluate the author's writing style and how effectively they communicate their ideas.
Consider the clarity of the language, the organization of the content, and the overall persuasiveness of the article.
Reflect on the article's contribution to its field of study. Analyze how it fits into the existing literature, its significance, and any potential implications for future research or applications.
Craft an introduction that includes the article's title, author, publication date, and a brief overview.
State the purpose of your review and your thesis—the main point you'll be analyzing in your review.
Organize your review by addressing specific aspects such as the author's thesis, methodology, writing style, and the article's contribution.
Use clear paragraphs to structure your analysis logically.
Summarize your main points and restate your overall assessment of the article.
Offer insights into its strengths and weaknesses, and conclude with any recommendations for improvement or suggestions for further research.
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!
Creating a well-organized outline is an essential part of writing a coherent and insightful article review.
This outline given below will guide you through the key sections of your review, ensuring that your analysis is comprehensive and logically structured.
|
Refer to the following template to understand outlining the article review in detail.
Article Review Format Template
Examining article review examples can provide valuable insights into the structure, tone, and depth of analysis expected.
Below are sample article reviews, each illustrating a different approach and focus.
Example of Article Review
Sample of article review assignment pdf
Crafting an effective article review involves a combination of critical analysis, clarity, and structure.
Here are some valuable tips to guide you through the process:
Kick off your article review by introducing the article's main points and mentioning the publication date, which you can find on the re-title page. Outline the topics you'll cover in your review.
Provide a short summary of the article, emphasizing its main ideas. Highlight any lingering questions, known as "unanswered questions," that the article may have triggered. Use a basic article review template to help structure your thoughts.
Use examples from the article to illustrate your points. If there are tables or figures in the article, discuss them to make your review more concrete and easily understandable.
Keep your review straightforward and well-organized. Begin with the start of the article, express your thoughts on what you liked or didn't like, and conclude with a summary section. This follows a basic plan for clarity.
When providing criticism, be constructive. If there are elements you don't understand, frame them as "unanswered questions." This approach shows engagement and curiosity.
Ensure your thoughts flow naturally throughout your review. Use simple words and sentences. If you have questions about the article, let them guide your review organically.
Before finishing, go through your review. Correct any mistakes and ensure it sounds clear. Check if you followed your plan, used simple words, and incorporated the keywords effectively. This makes your review better and more accessible for others.
In conclusion , writing an effective article review involves a thoughtful balance of summarizing key points, and addressing unanswered questions.
By following a simple and structured approach, you can create a review that not only analyzes the content but also adds value to the reader's understanding.
Remember to organize your thoughts logically, use clear language, and provide examples from the article to support your points.
Ready to elevate your article reviewing skills? Explore the valuable resources and expert assistance at MyPerfectWords.com.
Our team of experienced writers is here to help you with article reviews and other school tasks.
So why wait? Place your " write my essays online " request today!
Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!
Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!
An article review is a critical evaluation and analysis of a scholarly article. It goes beyond a simple summary, involving examining content, assessing the author’s arguments, and providing insights into its strengths and weaknesses.
Article reviews serve as a bridge between readers and scholarly articles. They help readers understand the article’s key points without diving into the entire piece. But more than that, article reviews offer a critical perspective. They help us gauge the research’s quality, the topic’s relevance, and the findings’ significance. They’re like a filter that helps us identify articles that truly matter in our field of interest.
When writing an article review, you start by summarizing the article’s main points – the who, what, when, where, and why. Then comes the critical part. You evaluate the article’s content, methodology, and arguments. You ask questions like: Is the research solid? Are the arguments convincing? Does it contribute something new? Your review becomes a thoughtful analysis that informs readers and engages them in a scholarly discussion.
In this blog post, you’ll find effective strategies and a step-by-step guide for analyzing any article.
When you’re asked to write an article review, it’s worth thoroughly reviewing the scholarly article and trying to understand it first. Let’s start with the basic tips that will be helpful as you are going through your article:
First, skim the title, abstract, headings, and conclusion. This gives you an overview of the article’s main points and structure.
Then, look for the thesis statement – the main argument the author is making. After that, identify topic sentences in each paragraph. These often indicate the paragraph’s main point and help you follow the author’s train of thought.
Also, notice concepts or arguments that are repeated throughout the article. Repetition often signals the author’s key points. It will grant a basic understanding of the article you’re about to review, which makes it a good start.
Note-taking can greatly enhance your ability to capture and retain information effectively. If you use one of the methods, you’ll have plenty of information to work with once you write a review of an article. Try out some of these methods that have proved to be helpful:
Divide your note page into three sections: a narrow left column for cues or questions, a wider right column for your main notes, and a bottom section for summarizing the key points. This method encourages you to engage with the material and review your notes later actively.
Source: Flexcil
Use arrows and boxes to create a flowchart that illustrates processes, cause-and-effect relationships, or step-by-step procedures. This approach is handy for subjects with sequences or interrelated concepts. You can draw it by hand or use applications such as Miro, using a template you can easily fill.
Source: Miro
Write concise summaries of each paragraph or section in your own words. This method encourages active reading and helps you distill the main ideas.
👀 Article review and article critique are terms often used in academia and research to discuss different ways of evaluating and analyzing scholarly articles. While they may seem similar, they actually have distinct purposes and approaches.
An article review typically involves summarizing a given article’s main points and key arguments. It aims to provide a concise overview of the article’s content, highlighting its main ideas, methodologies, and findings. The review focuses on presenting a clear picture of the article, making it useful for readers who want to quickly understand the article’s main contributions without delving into extensive details. It’s a way to capture the essence of the article and its significance in a condensed manner.
On the other hand, an article critique goes beyond mere summarization. It involves more in-depth analysis and evaluation of the article’s strengths and weaknesses. Article critique examines the quality of the research, the validity of the arguments presented, the soundness of the methodologies employed, and the overall effectiveness of the article in contributing to the field of study. In a critique, the reviewer provides their insights and assessments, highlighting areas where the article could be improved or where further research is needed. It’s a more comprehensive assessment that digs into the nuances of the article’s content and scholarly value, which is why it can be quite challenging to handle ─ turn to article critique assignment help i n this case.
In essence, an article review is a brief overview that captures the main points. In contrast, an article critique involves a thorough evaluation that includes analysis and the reviewer’s perspective on the article’s contributions and limitations. Both approaches have their place in academia and research, serving different purposes for readers and researchers.
A well-rounded critical analysis provides readers with a thorough understanding of the article’s content, methodology, and scholarly contribution. Let’s dive into each point and discover how to write a comprehensive critical analysis or article review:
To do an article review, begin with a concise summary of the article’s main points. Highlight the topic, research question, and key findings. This gives readers a solid foundation before they delve into deeper analysis.
Clearly state the main argument or thesis the author is presenting. Break down the argument into its components, highlighting how it’s structured and what claims are being made.
Explore the evidence the author uses to support their argument. Assess the quality and relevance of the cited examples, data, or sources. Are they convincing? Do they provide solid backing for the claims?
When you write an article review, examine the research methods employed by the author. Assess whether the chosen methods are appropriate for the research question. Consider the validity and reliability of the data collection and analysis techniques.
Offer criticism where warranted, but make it constructive. Point out weaknesses or gaps in the argument, but support your critique with evidence from the article. Avoid overly negative language and focus on opportunities for improvement. Here are some helpful tips:
Share your insights into the broader significance of the article. Does it contribute to a larger conversation in the field? Does it challenge or expand upon existing theories? Highlight how the article fits into the scholarly landscape.
Provide context by discussing how the article relates to other research in the field. Identify any gaps the article addresses or fills. This contextualization helps readers understand the article’s unique contribution.
Compare the article with other relevant works in the field. Discuss points of agreement, divergence, and any emerging patterns. This discussion adds depth to your analysis and shows your engagement with the subject matter.
Acknowledge the article’s strengths, whether in clear writing, thorough research, or compelling arguments. Recognizing positives helps balance your critique and shows your fair assessment.
Conclude your analysis by summarizing your main points. Emphasize the key takeaways from your review, reiterating the article’s strengths, weaknesses, and broader significance.
A well-crafted summary should provide readers with a clear understanding of the article’s main points, even if they haven’t read the full piece. By distilling complex ideas into a concise format, you’re making the article’s content accessible and digestible for a wider audience.
A concise summary of an article’s main points requires a blend of careful reading and effective communication. Here’s how to create a summary that captures the essence of the article:
Start by identifying the article’s main elements – the topic, research question, thesis, and key findings. These elements form the backbone of your summary.
Center your summary on the article’s central ideas. What is the core argument the author is presenting? Highlight the primary concepts that support this argument.
While reading, be mindful of details that contribute to the overall understanding and those that can be omitted. Stick to the essential information that encapsulates the article’s essence.
Paraphrase the author’s points using your own words. This demonstrates your comprehension and helps create a more concise summary.
Maintain the article’s structure in your summary. Summarize each section or major point logically, following the article’s flow.
Present the author’s points objectively without adding your interpretation or analysis. Focus on conveying what the author is saying.
Here are some extra tips to enhance your skills in writing concise and clear summaries:
This is a simplified example, and academic requirements may vary depending on your institution or field of study. Always be sure to follow any guidelines provided by your instructor or the journal to which you are submitting the review.
From understanding the article’s main arguments to providing constructive criticism, each stage of the article review plays a crucial role in crafting a thoughtful and insightful review.
Now, armed with these strategies, it’s time for you to put them into action. Take what you’ve learned and dive into the world of writing an article review. Practice makes perfect, and as you engage with more articles, your skills will sharpen, your insights will deepen, and your ability to contribute to scholarly discussions will grow.
A research essay introduction is one of the most important parts of a project, although it is often one of the places students put the least time and effort. Although other sections of a...
A research essay introduction is one of the most important parts of a...
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle created an immortal character of the outstanding inscrutable detective Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock’s birth in literature is dated by 1887, but he still remains...
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle created an immortal character of the...
Many pupils get frustrated when they have to write a 5th-grade book report because of two main aspects: 1) almost every fifth grader doesn’t like reading; 2) they rarely can handle such...
Many pupils get frustrated when they have to write a 5th-grade book...
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
Ai generator.
Article reviews are an essential part of academic article writing , providing an opportunity to evaluate and analyze published research . A well-written review can help readers understand the simple subject matter and determine the value of the article . In this article, we’ll cover what is an article review, provide step-by-step guidance on how to write one, and answer some common questions.
An article review is a critical assessment of a scholarly article or research paper. It involves analyzing the content, methodology, and findings of the article and providing an evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses. The review typically includes a summary of the article’s main points, an evaluation of its contribution to the subject, and suggestions for improvement.
1. literary analysis of “the great gatsby”.
Title : “The American Dream in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s ‘The Great Gatsby'” Summary : This article delves into the theme of the American Dream in “The Great Gatsby”. It explores how the characters of Jay Gatsby, Daisy Buchanan, and Tom Buchanan each represent different facets of this dream. The review highlights the contrast between Gatsby’s idealistic pursuit of wealth and love, and the moral decay of society depicted in the novel. Evaluation : The article offers a thorough and insightful analysis, drawing on specific passages to support its claims. However, it occasionally lacks depth in exploring secondary characters. Recommendation : Overall, this article is a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of the American Dream in Fitzgerald’s work. It is recommended for students and literary enthusiasts.
Title : “Impact of Global Warming on Arctic Ice Melting Rates” Summary : This article examines recent research on the accelerated melting of Arctic ice due to global warming. The study uses satellite data and climate models to project future ice loss and its implications for global sea levels. Evaluation : The article presents data in a clear and accessible manner, making complex scientific concepts understandable for a general audience. The visual aids, such as graphs and maps, effectively complement the text. Recommendation : This article is highly recommended for anyone interested in climate science and environmental studies. It provides a comprehensive overview of current research and its global significance.
Title : “A Comprehensive Review of the iPhone 14 Pro” Summary : The article provides an in-depth review of the iPhone 14 Pro, covering its design, performance, camera capabilities, and new features. It compares the latest model with previous versions and other smartphones on the market. Evaluation : The review is detailed and well-organized, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses of the device. However, it could benefit from more user testimonials to provide a broader perspective. Recommendation : This review is a must-read for potential buyers considering the iPhone 14 Pro. It offers valuable insights into the device’s capabilities and overall performance.
Title : “The Health Benefits of Practicing Yoga Daily” Summary : This article explores the various physical and mental health benefits of incorporating yoga into a daily routine. It discusses how yoga can improve flexibility, reduce stress, and enhance overall well-being. Evaluation : The article is informative and engaging, backed by scientific research and expert opinions. It includes practical tips for beginners and links to additional resources. Recommendation : This article is highly recommended for individuals seeking to improve their health through yoga. It provides a comprehensive guide to the benefits and practice of yoga.
Title : “The Role of Codebreakers in World War II” Summary : The article examines the critical role that codebreakers played in the Allied victory during World War II. It focuses on the efforts at Bletchley Park and the breaking of the Enigma code. Evaluation : The article is well-researched and presents a compelling narrative of the contributions of codebreakers. It includes firsthand accounts and historical documents to support its analysis. Recommendation : This article is recommended for history buffs and students. It offers a fascinating insight into a lesser-known aspect of World War II and highlights the importance of intelligence work in warfare.
Review of “the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance”.
Title : The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Cognitive Performance: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s investigation into how lack of sleep affects cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and problem-solving skills. Summary : The article explores various studies showing that sleep deprivation significantly impairs cognitive performance, leading to reduced attention spans, poor memory retention, and slower reaction times. Critique : The article is thorough in its examination of the negative effects of sleep deprivation. However, it could include more information on the long-term consequences and potential mitigation strategies. Some studies cited have small sample sizes, which could limit the findings’ reliability. Conclusion : Overall, the article effectively highlights the critical impact of sleep on cognitive functions, though it would benefit from more comprehensive data and solutions to counteract sleep deprivation.
Title : Renewable Energy Sources and Their Impact on the Environment: An In-Depth Review Introduction : This review analyzes the article discussing the environmental impacts of various renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. Summary : The article covers the benefits of renewable energy in reducing carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. It also examines potential environmental concerns such as habitat disruption and resource consumption. Critique : The article provides a balanced view of renewable energy’s benefits and challenges. However, it lacks detailed case studies and comparative analysis with non-renewable energy sources. The discussion on environmental impacts could be more nuanced. Conclusion : The article is informative and highlights the importance of renewable energy, though it would be stronger with more specific examples and a deeper environmental impact analysis.
Title : The Influence of Advertising on Consumer Behavior: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s exploration of how advertising affects consumer purchasing decisions and behavior. Summary : The article examines various advertising techniques and their psychological effects on consumers, including the use of emotional appeal, repetition, and celebrity endorsements. Critique : The article effectively discusses different advertising strategies and their impact on consumers. However, it could include more recent examples and data to reflect current trends. Additionally, it would benefit from a broader range of perspectives, including consumer psychology. Conclusion : The article provides a solid overview of advertising’s influence on consumer behavior, but it needs more up-to-date examples and a wider scope of analysis.
Title : The Role of Nutrition in Child Development: An Analytical Review Introduction : This review analyzes the article’s discussion on the critical role of nutrition in children’s physical and cognitive development. Summary : The article highlights the importance of a balanced diet for children’s growth, emphasizing nutrients such as proteins, vitamins, and minerals. It also examines the consequences of malnutrition and dietary deficiencies. Critique : The article is well-researched and presents a comprehensive view of the subject. However, it could benefit from more practical dietary recommendations and a discussion on the challenges faced by different socioeconomic groups. Conclusion : The article effectively underscores the importance of nutrition in child development, though it would be improved by including practical advice and addressing socioeconomic disparities.
Title : Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s exploration of the potential benefits and obstacles of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Summary : The article discusses various AI applications in healthcare, such as diagnostic tools, personalized medicine, and administrative support. It also addresses ethical concerns, data privacy issues, and the need for regulatory frameworks. Critique : The article provides a balanced and insightful analysis of AI in healthcare. However, it could include more case studies and examples of successful AI implementations. The discussion on ethical concerns is somewhat limited and could be expanded. Conclusion : The article offers a thorough overview of AI’s potential in healthcare, but it would benefit from more real-world examples and a deeper exploration of ethical issues.
Review of “the impact of remote work on employee productivity”.
Title : The Impact of Remote Work on Employee Productivity: A Research Review Introduction : This review assesses the research article’s investigation into how remote work influences employee productivity, examining both positive and negative aspects. Summary : The research article explores various factors affecting productivity in remote work settings, such as flexible schedules, work-life balance, and the use of digital communication tools. It presents data from surveys and case studies to support its findings. Critique : The article provides a comprehensive analysis backed by empirical data. However, it could benefit from a more detailed exploration of the long-term impacts of remote work and potential industry-specific variations. Additionally, the research could include a larger, more diverse sample size. Conclusion : The research article effectively highlights the key factors influencing productivity in remote work environments, though it would be strengthened by broader data and long-term impact analysis.
Title : Climate Change and Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Current Research Introduction : This review evaluates the research article’s examination of the relationship between climate change and agricultural sustainability, focusing on crop yields and farming practices. Summary : The article discusses the effects of changing weather patterns, increased CO2 levels, and extreme weather events on agricultural productivity. It includes case studies and statistical models to illustrate potential future scenarios. Critique : The research is thorough and well-supported by data. However, it could include more practical recommendations for farmers and policymakers. The article would also benefit from a more detailed discussion of regional differences and adaptation strategies. Conclusion : The research article provides valuable insights into the challenges posed by climate change to agriculture, though it would be improved by offering actionable solutions and considering regional variations.
Title : The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Healthcare: A Comprehensive Research Review Introduction : This review analyzes the research article’s exploration of AI’s applications in healthcare, including diagnostic tools, patient care, and administrative efficiency. Summary : The article outlines various AI technologies used in healthcare, such as machine learning algorithms for diagnostics, robotic surgeries, and AI-driven patient management systems. It presents data from clinical trials and expert opinions to support its claims. Critique : The research is well-rounded and provides a clear overview of AI’s potential in healthcare. However, it could address more of the ethical considerations and data privacy issues associated with AI implementation. Additionally, more real-world examples of AI applications would enhance the article’s relevance. Conclusion : The research article effectively showcases AI’s transformative potential in healthcare, though it could be strengthened by a deeper exploration of ethical issues and more practical examples.
Title : The Psychological Effects of Social Media Use on Adolescents: A Research-Based Review Introduction : This review evaluates the research article’s examination of how social media affects adolescents’ mental health, focusing on anxiety, depression, and self-esteem. Summary : The article presents data from longitudinal studies and surveys to show the correlation between social media use and various psychological issues. It discusses the impact of online interactions, cyberbullying, and the pressure to conform to social norms. Critique : The research is detailed and presents significant findings. However, it could benefit from a more balanced view that includes positive aspects of social media, such as support networks and educational content. Additionally, the sample sizes in some studies are limited, which may affect the generalizability of the results. Conclusion : The research article provides a comprehensive overview of the negative psychological effects of social media on adolescents, though it would be improved by a more balanced perspective and larger sample sizes.
Title : The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Programs: A Research Review Introduction : This review analyzes the research article’s evaluation of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) programs and their impact on mental health and well-being. Summary : The article reviews various studies on MBSR, highlighting its benefits for reducing stress, anxiety, and depression. It includes meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials to provide a robust evidence base. Critique : The research is comprehensive and well-supported by empirical data. However, it could explore more on the long-term benefits and potential limitations of MBSR programs. The article would also benefit from discussing the accessibility and applicability of these programs across different populations. Conclusion : The research article effectively demonstrates the benefits of MBSR programs for mental health, though it could be enhanced by addressing long-term effects and broader applicability.
Review of “the impact of social media on academic performance”.
Title : The Impact of Social Media on Academic Performance: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review evaluates the journal article’s investigation into the relationship between social media usage and academic performance among students. Summary : The article discusses various studies that explore how social media affects students’ academic outcomes. It highlights both positive effects, such as improved communication and resource sharing, and negative impacts like distraction and reduced study time. Critique : The article is thorough, providing a balanced view supported by empirical data. However, it could benefit from more longitudinal studies to understand long-term effects. Additionally, the article does not address differences in impact based on the type of social media platform used. Conclusion : The journal article effectively highlights the dual impact of social media on academic performance. To strengthen the research, including more long-term studies and platform-specific analyses would be beneficial.
Title : Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: An Analytical Review Introduction : This review analyzes the journal article’s discussion on how urban areas are adapting to climate change, focusing on infrastructure and policy changes. Summary : The article examines various adaptation strategies employed by cities worldwide, such as green infrastructure, zoning laws, and disaster preparedness programs. It presents case studies from different regions to illustrate successful adaptation efforts. Critique : The article is well-researched and provides a comprehensive overview of adaptation strategies. However, it could include more data on the effectiveness of these strategies over time. Additionally, the article would benefit from a discussion on the socio-economic challenges that hinder adaptation in less developed areas. Conclusion : The journal article provides valuable insights into urban climate change adaptation strategies. It would be strengthened by including long-term effectiveness data and addressing socio-economic barriers.
Title : The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Medicine: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review evaluates the journal article’s exploration of AI applications in personalized medicine, including diagnostics and treatment plans. Summary : The article discusses how AI technologies, such as machine learning and data analytics, are revolutionizing personalized medicine. It highlights examples where AI has improved diagnostic accuracy and tailored treatment plans to individual patient needs. Critique : The article is insightful and well-supported by clinical data. However, it could delve deeper into the ethical considerations and potential biases in AI algorithms. Additionally, more real-world examples of AI implementation in diverse healthcare settings would enhance the article’s applicability. Conclusion : The journal article effectively demonstrates the transformative potential of AI in personalized medicine. To improve, it should include a more detailed discussion on ethics and practical applications across different healthcare systems.
Title : The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers: A Research Review Introduction : This review analyzes the journal article’s investigation into the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers. Summary : The article presents data from surveys and interviews with healthcare professionals, highlighting increased levels of stress, anxiety, and burnout due to the pandemic. It discusses the factors contributing to these psychological impacts, such as workload, exposure risk, and lack of support. Critique : The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the psychological challenges faced by healthcare workers during the pandemic. However, it could benefit from more longitudinal studies to understand long-term mental health outcomes. Additionally, the article would be improved by offering more detailed recommendations for institutional support and intervention strategies. Conclusion : The journal article effectively sheds light on the mental health struggles of healthcare workers during COVID-19. To strengthen the research, including long-term studies and detailed support recommendations would be beneficial.
Title : Sustainable Agriculture Practices and Food Security: An In-Depth Review Introduction : This review evaluates the journal article’s discussion on the role of sustainable agriculture practices in enhancing food security. Summary : The article explores various sustainable agriculture techniques, such as crop rotation, organic farming, and agroforestry, and their impact on food security. It presents case studies demonstrating how these practices can increase crop yields and improve resilience to climate change. Critique : The article is well-researched and provides a detailed analysis of sustainable agriculture practices. However, it could include more quantitative data on the economic viability of these practices for small-scale farmers. Additionally, the article would benefit from discussing the policy frameworks needed to support widespread adoption of sustainable agriculture. Conclusion : The journal article effectively highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture for food security. It would be enhanced by including more economic data and policy recommendations to support these practices.
Review of “the effects of sleep deprivation on academic performance”.
Title : The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Academic Performance: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review assesses the article’s exploration of how sleep deprivation impacts college students’ academic performance, focusing on cognitive functions and overall well-being. Summary : The article examines studies showing that insufficient sleep negatively affects memory, concentration, and problem-solving skills, leading to lower grades and academic achievement. It also discusses the role of stress and lifestyle factors contributing to sleep deprivation. Critique : The article provides a thorough analysis supported by empirical data. However, it could benefit from a broader range of studies, including different demographic groups. Additionally, practical solutions for improving sleep habits among students are not adequately addressed. Conclusion : The article effectively highlights the critical relationship between sleep and academic performance but would be strengthened by more diverse studies and practical recommendations for students.
Title : The Impact of Technology on Modern Education: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s discussion on the integration of technology in higher education and its effects on teaching and learning processes. Summary : The article explores various technological tools used in education, such as online learning platforms, interactive simulations, and digital resources. It discusses the benefits, including increased accessibility and personalized learning, as well as challenges like digital divide and technological distractions. Critique : The article is well-researched and balanced, highlighting both positive and negative aspects of technology in education. However, it could include more recent data and specific examples of successful technology implementations in colleges. Additionally, the article should address potential long-term impacts on traditional teaching methods. Conclusion : The article provides valuable insights into the role of technology in education, though it would be enhanced by including more up-to-date examples and long-term impact analysis.
Title : Mental Health Awareness Among College Students: An Analytical Review Introduction : This review analyzes the article’s exploration of mental health awareness programs in colleges and their effectiveness in addressing student mental health issues. Summary : The article examines various initiatives aimed at improving mental health awareness, such as workshops, counseling services, and peer support groups. It highlights the importance of early intervention and the role of campus resources in supporting student well-being. Critique : The article provides a comprehensive overview of mental health awareness programs and their benefits. However, it could benefit from more quantitative data on program effectiveness and student outcomes. Additionally, the article should discuss the barriers to accessing mental health services, such as stigma and resource limitations. Conclusion : The article effectively underscores the significance of mental health awareness in colleges, but it would be improved by including more data on program effectiveness and addressing access barriers.
Title : The Role of Extracurricular Activities in Student Development: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s discussion on how participation in extracurricular activities impacts college students’ personal and academic development. Summary : The article explores various benefits of extracurricular activities, such as improved social skills, leadership development, and enhanced academic performance. It includes case studies and survey data to support its findings. Critique : The article is well-rounded and provides clear evidence of the positive impacts of extracurricular activities. However, it could include more diverse examples from different types of colleges and regions. Additionally, the article should address potential negative aspects, such as time management challenges and academic pressure. Conclusion : The article effectively highlights the importance of extracurricular activities in student development, though it would benefit from a more diverse range of examples and a balanced discussion of potential drawbacks.
Title : The Influence of Social Media on College Students’ Mental Health: A Research Review Introduction : This review analyzes the article’s investigation into how social media usage affects the mental health of college students, focusing on both positive and negative impacts. Summary : The article discusses various studies showing that social media can lead to increased anxiety, depression, and feelings of isolation among students. It also highlights positive aspects, such as enhanced communication, social support, and access to mental health resources. Critique : The article provides a balanced view, supported by empirical data and real-world examples. However, it could benefit from more recent studies and a deeper exploration of how different social media platforms uniquely impact mental health. Additionally, the article should include practical advice for students on managing social media use. Conclusion : The article effectively addresses the complex relationship between social media and mental health among college students, but it would be strengthened by including more recent research and practical recommendations.
Review of “the effects of microplastics on marine life”.
Title : The Effects of Microplastics on Marine Life: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review assesses the scientific article’s investigation into the impact of microplastics on marine organisms, focusing on ingestion, toxicity, and ecological consequences. Summary : The article presents various studies showing that microplastics are ingested by a wide range of marine species, leading to physical harm and chemical toxicity. It discusses how microplastics affect growth, reproduction, and survival rates of marine life. Critique : The article is well-researched, providing detailed evidence of the harmful effects of microplastics. However, it could benefit from a broader geographic scope, including more diverse marine environments. Additionally, the article lacks a discussion on potential mitigation strategies to reduce microplastic pollution. Conclusion : The article effectively highlights the detrimental impact of microplastics on marine life, but it would be strengthened by including a wider range of environments and discussing mitigation measures.
Title : The Role of CRISPR-Cas9 in Gene Editing: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review evaluates the scientific article’s exploration of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology and its applications in gene editing, focusing on its potential and ethical considerations. Summary : The article discusses the mechanism of CRISPR-Cas9 and its use in various fields such as medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology. It highlights successful case studies, including the treatment of genetic disorders and the development of disease-resistant crops. Critique : The article is insightful and provides a comprehensive overview of CRISPR-Cas9. However, it could delve deeper into the ethical issues and potential unintended consequences of gene editing. Additionally, the article would benefit from more recent examples of CRISPR applications. Conclusion : The article effectively demonstrates the potential of CRISPR-Cas9 in gene editing, though it could be enhanced by addressing ethical considerations and providing more up-to-date examples.
Title : Climate Change and Its Impact on Global Food Security: An Analytical Review Introduction : This review analyzes the scientific article’s examination of how climate change affects global food security, focusing on crop yields, food supply, and nutrition. Summary : The article explores various factors influenced by climate change, including temperature changes, altered precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events. It discusses how these factors affect agricultural productivity and food availability. Critique : The article is thorough and supported by extensive data. However, it could include more case studies from different regions to provide a global perspective. Additionally, the article would benefit from discussing adaptation strategies and policy recommendations to mitigate the impact of climate change on food security. Conclusion : The article provides valuable insights into the effects of climate change on food security, but it would be improved by including more regional case studies and discussing mitigation strategies.
Title : The Advancements in Renewable Energy Technologies: A Research Review Introduction : This review evaluates the scientific article’s discussion on the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies, including solar, wind, and bioenergy. Summary : The article highlights recent innovations in renewable energy, such as improved solar panel efficiency, advanced wind turbine designs, and sustainable bioenergy production methods. It presents data on the cost-effectiveness and environmental benefits of these technologies. Critique : The article is well-researched and presents a clear overview of advancements in renewable energy. However, it could benefit from a more detailed analysis of the challenges and limitations associated with each technology. Additionally, the article should include projections on the future adoption of these technologies. Conclusion : The article effectively showcases the progress in renewable energy technologies, though it would be enhanced by addressing challenges and providing future adoption projections.
Title : The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review analyzes the scientific article’s exploration of AI’s impact on healthcare, focusing on diagnostic tools, patient care, and administrative efficiency. Summary : The article discusses various AI applications in healthcare, such as machine learning algorithms for disease diagnosis, robotic surgeries, and AI-driven patient management systems. It highlights the potential benefits and challenges of AI integration in healthcare. Critique : The article is insightful and supported by clinical data. However, it could delve deeper into the ethical considerations and data privacy issues associated with AI in healthcare. Additionally, more real-world examples and case studies would enhance the article’s relevance. Conclusion : The article effectively demonstrates AI’s transformative potential in healthcare, but it would be strengthened by addressing ethical concerns and including more practical examples.
Review of “the influence of parenting styles on child development”.
Title : The Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Development: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s investigation into how different parenting styles affect children’s psychological and emotional development. Summary : The article explores various parenting styles—authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful—and their impacts on children’s behavior, self-esteem, academic performance, and social skills. It presents data from longitudinal studies and surveys. Critique : The article is thorough and well-supported by empirical data. However, it could benefit from more recent studies and a broader demographic scope. Additionally, practical recommendations for parents based on the findings are not adequately addressed. Conclusion : The article effectively highlights the significant role of parenting styles in child development. It would be strengthened by including more up-to-date research and practical advice for parents.
Title : The Effects of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health: A Detailed Review Introduction : This review analyzes the article’s exploration of the psychological effects of social media use on adolescents, focusing on issues like anxiety, depression, and self-esteem. Summary : The article discusses various studies that show a correlation between social media use and increased rates of mental health issues among adolescents. It examines factors such as cyberbullying, social comparison, and screen time. Critique : The article provides a balanced view supported by empirical data. However, it could include more recent studies and a deeper exploration of positive aspects of social media, such as support networks and educational content. Additionally, practical strategies for managing social media use are not sufficiently addressed. Conclusion : The article effectively discusses the negative impacts of social media on adolescent mental health but would benefit from more recent research and practical recommendations.
Title : Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treating Depression: An Analytical Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s discussion on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating depression, focusing on clinical outcomes and patient experiences. Summary : The article reviews various studies demonstrating CBT’s effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms and preventing relapse. It discusses CBT’s core components, including cognitive restructuring and behavioral activation. Critique : The article is well-researched and provides a comprehensive overview of CBT’s effectiveness. However, it could benefit from more detailed comparisons with other therapeutic approaches and a discussion on the accessibility and scalability of CBT. Additionally, the article should address potential limitations and criticisms of CBT. Conclusion : The article effectively showcases CBT’s effectiveness in treating depression, though it would be enhanced by including comparisons with other therapies and addressing accessibility issues.
Title : The Role of Mindfulness Meditation in Stress Reduction: A Research Review Introduction : This review analyzes the article’s examination of mindfulness meditation as a technique for reducing stress and improving mental health. Summary : The article discusses various studies that show how mindfulness meditation can reduce stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. It explains the underlying mechanisms, such as increased self-awareness and emotional regulation. Critique : The article is insightful and supported by empirical data. However, it could include more longitudinal studies to understand the long-term effects of mindfulness meditation. Additionally, the article should address potential barriers to practicing mindfulness, such as time constraints and individual differences in response to meditation. Conclusion : The article effectively highlights the benefits of mindfulness meditation for stress reduction but would be improved by including long-term studies and discussing barriers to practice.
Title : The Impact of Sleep on Cognitive Function: A Comprehensive Review Introduction : This review evaluates the article’s investigation into the relationship between sleep and cognitive function, focusing on memory, attention, and problem-solving skills. Summary : The article presents various studies demonstrating that adequate sleep is crucial for optimal cognitive performance. It discusses how sleep deprivation negatively affects cognitive functions and the underlying biological mechanisms involved. Critique : The article is thorough and well-supported by empirical data. However, it could benefit from a more detailed exploration of the differences in sleep needs across different age groups and a discussion on strategies to improve sleep quality. Additionally, practical recommendations for individuals suffering from sleep disorders are not adequately addressed. Conclusion : The article effectively highlights the critical role of sleep in cognitive function but would be strengthened by including more age-specific research and practical advice for improving sleep quality.
Article reviews are critical assessments of scholarly articles, often used to evaluate the quality, relevance, and significance of the research. Understanding the different types of article reviews helps in identifying the purpose and approach suitable for various academic and professional needs. Here are the main types of article reviews:
A narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of literature on a specific topic. It focuses on discussing the findings of the research studies and offers a narrative explanation of the trends and themes.
Characteristics:
Example: Reviewing literature on the impact of social media on mental health.
A systematic review is a methodical and comprehensive literature review that aims to answer a specific research question. It uses systematic methods to collect secondary data, critically appraise research studies, and synthesize findings.
Example: Evaluating the effectiveness of different interventions for reducing hypertension.
A meta-analysis is a statistical technique that combines the results of multiple studies to identify overall trends and determine the effectiveness of interventions.
Example: Combining data from various studies on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety.
A critical review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of a scholarly article. It involves analyzing the methodology, arguments, evidence, and contributions of the article.
Example: Critiquing the research design and conclusions of a study on climate change impacts on agriculture.
A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works.
Example: Reviewing literature on renewable energy sources and their environmental impacts.
A scoping review maps the key concepts underpinning a research area and the main sources and types of evidence available. It aims to provide an overview of the range of research activity.
Example: Exploring the range of studies on artificial intelligence applications in healthcare.
An integrative review synthesizes theoretical and empirical literature to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a specific phenomenon or healthcare problem.
Example: Integrating research on patient-centered care models in nursing.
A conceptual review focuses on theories and concepts in a particular field. It examines how these concepts are defined, measured, and applied in the literature.
Example: Reviewing the evolution of the concept of resilience in psycholog
1. formal article review.
An article review involves evaluating and summarizing a scholarly article, presenting critical insights, and reflecting on its implications. Understanding the essential components helps in crafting a thorough and insightful review. Here are the key components:
Example: “Review of ‘The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health’ by John Smith”
The article “The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health” by John Smith explores the relationship between social media usage and mental health outcomes. This review aims to critically evaluate the article’s findings and discuss its implications for future research.
The article investigates both positive and negative effects of social media on mental health. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study finds that while social media can enhance social support and community building, it also contributes to anxiety, depression, and cyberbullying.
The article provides a balanced view of social media’s impact, effectively synthesizing current research. However, it lacks in-depth analysis of the methodologies used, which could affect the validity of the findings. Future research should include longitudinal studies to better understand causal relationships.
In conclusion, Smith’s article offers valuable insights into the complex relationship between social media and mental health. While the study is comprehensive, addressing methodological limitations in future research would enhance our understanding of this important issue.
As a student, I find the article’s discussion on the negative impacts of social media particularly relevant. It underscores the importance of mindful social media use to maintain mental well-being. This review has deepened my understanding of the subject and will inform my future research.
Example: Smith, J. (2023). The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health. Journal of Psychological Studies, 45(2), 123-145.
Writing an article review involves summarizing and critically evaluating a scholarly article. This process helps in understanding the article’s contributions and limitations, and it enhances critical thinking skills. Follow these steps to write an effective article review:
The article “The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health” by John Smith explores the relationship between social media usage and mental health outcomes. This review aims to critically evaluate Smith’s findings and discuss their implications for future research.
Smith’s article investigates both positive and negative effects of social media on mental health. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study finds that social media can enhance social support and community building but also contributes to anxiety, depression, and cyberbullying.
The article provides a balanced view of social media’s impact, effectively synthesizing current research. However, it lacks an in-depth analysis of the methodologies used, which could affect the validity of the findings. Future research should include longitudinal studies to better understand causal relationships.
Smith, J. (2023). The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health. Journal of Psychological Studies, 45(2), 123-145.
Begin with a brief introduction that provides context, states the purpose of your review, and mentions the article’s title and author.
Summarize the main points of the article, including the research question, methodology, findings, and conclusions without inserting personal opinions.
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the article, analyze the methodology and evidence, and discuss the significance and implications of the findings.
The length varies, but typically an article review is 2-4 pages, balancing summary, critical analysis, and personal reflection.
Summarize the key points of your review, restate the article’s significance, and provide final thoughts and suggestions for future research.
A summary restates the article’s main points objectively, while a critique evaluates the article’s strengths, weaknesses, and overall contribution.
Discuss how the article relates to your own experiences or studies and describe how it influenced your understanding of the topic.
Use direct quotes sparingly, only when they enhance your analysis. Always explain their relevance to your critique.
Follow the appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) to include a full citation of the article at the end of your review.
Yes, but primarily in the critical analysis and personal reflection sections. Ensure your opinions are supported by evidence from the article.
Text prompt
10 Examples of Public speaking
20 Examples of Gas lighting
Service Alert
Text: 336-308-8801
Email: [email protected]
Call: 336-633-0204
Schedule: Book-a-Librarian
Like us on Facebook
Links on this guide may go to external web sites not connected with Randolph Community College. Their inclusion is not an endorsement by Randolph Community College and the College is not responsible for the accuracy of their content or the security of their site.
A critique asks you to evaluate an article and the author’s argument. You will need to look critically at what the author is claiming, evaluate the research methods, and look for possible problems with, or applications of, the researcher’s claims.
Introduction
Give an overview of the author’s main points and how the author supports those points. Explain what the author found and describe the process they used to arrive at this conclusion.
Body Paragraphs
Interpret the information from the article:
Try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.
From the Center for Academic Excellence (opens in a new window), University of Saint Joseph Connecticut
Additional Resources
All links open in a new window.
Writing an Article Critique (from The University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center)
How to Critique an Article (from Essaypro.com)
How to Write an Article Critique (from EliteEditing.com.au)
Table of Contents
As a young researcher, you might wonder how to start writing your first review article, and the extent of the information that it should contain. A review article is a comprehensive summary of the current understanding of a specific research topic and is based on previously published research. Unlike research papers, it does not contain new results, but can propose new inferences based on the combined findings of previous research.
Review articles are typically of three types: literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
A literature review is a general survey of the research topic and aims to provide a reliable and unbiased account of the current understanding of the topic.
A systematic review , in contrast, is more specific and attempts to address a highly focused research question. Its presentation is more detailed, with information on the search strategy used, the eligibility criteria for inclusion of studies, the methods utilized to review the collected information, and more.
A meta-analysis is similar to a systematic review in that both are systematically conducted with a properly defined research question. However, unlike the latter, a meta-analysis compares and evaluates a defined number of similar studies. It is quantitative in nature and can help assess contrasting study findings.
Here are a few practices that can make the time-consuming process of writing a review article easier:
Writing review articles, especially systematic reviews or meta-analyses, can seem like a daunting task. However, Elsevier Author Services can guide you by providing useful tips on how to write an impressive review article that stands out and gets published!
You may also like.
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
Maintenance work is planned from 21:00 BST on Sunday 18th August 2024 to 21:00 BST on Monday 19th August 2024, and on Thursday 29th August 2024 from 11:00 to 12:00 BST.
During this time the performance of our website may be affected - searches may run slowly, some pages may be temporarily unavailable, and you may be unable to log in or to access content. If this happens, please try refreshing your web browser or try waiting two to three minutes before trying again.
We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.
Advancing flexible thermoelectrics for integrated electronics.
* Corresponding authors
a School of Chemistry and Physics, ARC Research Hub in Zero-emission Power Generation for Carbon Neutrality, and Centre for Materials Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia E-mail: [email protected]
With the increasing demand for energy and the climate challenges caused by the consumption of traditional fuels, there is an urgent need to accelerate the adoption of green and sustainable energy conversion and storage technologies. The integration of flexible thermoelectrics with other various energy conversion technologies plays a crucial role, enabling the conversion of multiple forms of energy such as temperature differentials, solar energy, mechanical force, and humidity into electricity. The development of these technologies lays the foundation for sustainable power solutions and promotes research progress in energy conversion. Given the complexity and rapid development of this field, this review provides a detailed overview of the progress of multifunctional integrated energy conversion and storage technologies based on thermoelectric conversion. The focus is on improving material performance, optimizing the design of integrated device structures, and achieving device flexibility to expand their application scenarios, particularly the integration and multi-functionalization of wearable energy conversion technologies. Additionally, we discuss the current development bottlenecks and future directions to facilitate the continuous advancement of this field.
Download citation, permissions.
X. Shi, L. Wang, W. Lyu, T. Cao, W. Chen, B. Hu and Z. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. , 2024, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D4CS00361F
To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page .
If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.
If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page .
Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content .
Search articles by author.
This article has not yet been cited.
Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.
Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024
Suggested citation for this article
Measles in persons with secondary vaccination failure (SVF) may be less infectious than cases in unvaccinated persons. Our systematic review aimed to assess transmission risk for measles after SVF. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception dates. Inclusion criteria were articles describing persons who were exposed to measles-infected persons who had experienced SVF. Across the included 14 studies, >3,030 persons were exposed to measles virus from SVF cases, of whom 180 were susceptible, indicating secondary attack rates of 0%–6.25%. We identified 109 cases of SVF from the studies; 10.09% (n = 11) of case-patients transmitted the virus, resulting in 23 further cases and yielding an effective reproduction number of 0.063 (95% CI 0.0–0.5). These findings suggest a remarkably low attack rate for SVF measles cases, suggesting that, In outbreak situations, public health management of unvaccinated persons could be prioritized over persons with SVF.
Measles virus is one of the most infectious pathogenic agents and has a basic reproduction number (R 0 ) of 12–18, indicating that each infected person could infect 12–18 other susceptible persons ( 1 ). In 2022, measles caused an estimated 136,000 deaths globally and predominantly affected unvaccinated persons and undervaccinated children < 5 years of age ( 1 ). Despite the number of deaths, measles vaccination has averted an estimated 57 million deaths in the 22 years since 2000 ( 1 ). Because of exclusive interhuman transmission, the existence of an effective and safe live attenuated vaccine, and the absence of healthy carriers, measles is inherently an eradicable disease. By 2023, a total of 82 countries had achieved measles elimination through high immunization coverage ( 2 ).
Despite the effectiveness of measles-containing vaccines, infection remains possible in immunized persons. This phenomenon has come to be known as vaccination failure. Two types of vaccination failure have been documented. Primary vaccination failure (PVF) results from a person’s failure to produce any humoral response to viral antigen (nonseroconversion) and is thought to occur in 5% of vaccinees ( 3 ). Secondary vaccination failure (SVF) seems to occur 6–26 years after the last vaccine dose and is a result of waning or incomplete immunity. SVF occurs in 2%–10% of vaccinated persons ( 4 ).
Measles infection after SVF, also known as modified measles, is generally milder (i.e., less cough, coryza, conjunctivitis, or fever), is associated with lower viral loads, and has lower risk for complicated disease ( 5 ). This form of measles is thought to occur because of insufficient but not absent immune response. Stated differently, immunity is sufficient to curtail symptoms and viral replication but insufficient to prevent infection. Muted symptoms in this scenario makes identification of measles cases on the basis of classical features unreliable.
In the postelimination setting, cases of measles after vaccination failure make up a higher proportion of total cases. This situation occurs when fewer unvaccinated persons exist to acquire the infection and the only remaining susceptible persons are those experiencing vaccination failure ( 6 ). In addition, in settings where measles does not commonly circulate, vaccinated persons are not exposed to wild virus and hence do not receive a natural booster ( 7 ). In the endemic setting, vaccinated persons make up 3%–8% of measles cases ( 4 ), in contrast to 14%–57% of cases in postelimination settings ( 4 ). This gap is likely the product of SVF because of waning immunity and the absence of natural immune boosters, rather than a primary vaccination failure, which would not be affected by the prevalence of circulating virus.
No universally agreed upon definition for measles SVF exists; however, several methods of classification have been suggested. The best methods remain the serum detection of IgG after vaccination but before infection and the avidity enzyme immunoassay. Measles IgG develops later in the course of infection (typically 7–10 days postinfection) and persists for long periods (generally for life) ( 8 ). IgG avidity index can determine recent (low avidity IgG, <40%) or past (high avidity, IgG >60%) exposure to the measles virus ( 9 ). Persons experiencing SVF are characterized by early production of IgG (before day 7 of infection) with a high avidity index ( 10 ). IgM may be produced in both novel and breakthrough measles infections. However, the absence of IgM in the presence of IgG within 7 days of infection is indicative of prior exposure and is another indicator of SVF ( 9 ).
Persons with SVF cases have lower measles viral loads in bodily fluids than do unvaccinated persons. Cycle threshold (Ct) values of real-time reverse transcription PCR are a semiquantitative measure of measles RNA loads ( 11 ). Higher Ct values equate to lower numbers of measles RNA copies in a sample and hence lower transmissibility ( 11 ).
It has been hypothesized that, because of reduced symptomatology and lower viral loads, SVF patients are less likely to transmit the measles virus ( 11 – 14 ). Our review aimed to determine the risk for transmission by persons with SVF for 2 key reasons: measles occurring post-SVF will increasingly make up a greater proportion of total cases in the postelimination setting, and an understanding of the different transmission dynamics in preelimination versus postelimination settings will enable more precise design and implementation of outbreak responses.
This systematic review followed a study protocol registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews before the date of first search. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analyses guidelines for reporting ( 15 ).
This review included original, nonreview articles, published in English or French. The report must have described a person or cohort of persons who were exposed to a laboratory-confirmed measles-infected person who had had experienced SVF. We defined confirmed measles through 3 methods: PCR detection of measles virus, detection of a > 4-fold increase in measles IgG titer in the absence of recent vaccination with a measles-containing vaccine, or detection of measles IgM in the absence of recent vaccination with a measles-containing vaccine. We defined recent vaccination as administration of a measles-containing vaccine within the preceding 8 days–8 weeks. Given the unreliable nature of clinical signs and symptoms in measles SVF cases, we did not include signs and symptoms in the case definition for the purpose of this analysis.
We defined SVF as measles infection despite serologic immunity after documented or reported immunization with a measles-containing vaccine. Evidence of serologic immunity included documentation of a positive measles IgG result before exposure, high avidity measles IgG postinfection (>60%), concurrent positive IgG and negative IgM results within 7 days of infection, or early positive IgG alone within 7 days of infection. For inclusion we required that the report specify the number of exposed persons who then had a laboratory-confirmed case of measles within the next 21 days.
The original study protocol sought only to included articles that reported an attack rate post-SVF. However, to ensure transmission risk was fully reviewed, we completed an amendment to the study protocol to include any study that discussed onward transmission.
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their respective dates of inception through May 31, 2023, when the search was conducted ( Appendix 1 ). We also searched citation lists of review articles and studies that met inclusion criteria for articles not already included. We also sought input from subject matter experts to minimize the chances of relevant studies being missed. We uploaded all articles found through these search processes to Covidence software ( https://www.covidence.org ), and 2 authors (I.T. and A.D.) screened titles and abstracts and then full texts. We resolved conflicts through collaborative discussion and referral to a third reviewer when required.
One author (I.T.) extracted data from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The data extracted included study setting, location, SVF case definition, SVF case numbers, onward transmissions, exposure population sizes, and susceptible population size (i.e., persons who had not received > 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, had not received postexposure prophylaxis [PEP], were immunocompromised, or had unknown vaccination status). In addition, we recorded data on the administration of PEP with either measles-containing vaccine or measles immunoglobulin to all contacts involved in the outbreak rather than only those in contact with the SVF case-patient. We used PEP data to serve as a proxy for the strength of public health response taken. We recorded Ct value and IgG avidity data, where available, as the mean value of SVF cases in the dataset. A second author (A.D.) checked extracted data; we resolved discrepancies through discussion.
We used Joanna Briggs Institute methodological quality of case series studies critical appraisal tool to assess both quality and risk for bias of the studies included ( Appendix 2 Table 1). We assessed publication bias by using a quasi-funnel plot with the point estimate of effective reproduction number (R eff ) on the x-axis and total cases of SVF on the y-axis. We assessed the presence of bias on the basis of distribution of results.
R eff calculation.
R eff is the expected number of secondary cases produced by a typical infected person during their entire infectious period. R eff is used in situations where the exposed population has a nonzero proportion of nonsusceptible persons (by natural immunity or vaccination) or public health measures are in place (e.g., movement restrictions and PEP requirements) ( 16 ). This situation is often observed in the SVF studies performed in high-income countries with high vaccination rates.
We estimated R eff after SVF by using the direct calculation approach. To ensure this estimate was robust, we demonstrated that this methodology is equivalent to traditional methods of estimating reproductive numbers (e.g., survivor function and ordinary differential equations) ( Appendix 1 ). We calculated the direct R eff by using simple division of the total number of secondary measles cases by the total number of primary SVF cases.
We calculated the direct R eff from each study in which SVF cases and total transmissions were reported. We then obtained the estimated R eff by using bootstrapped median and bootstrapped 95% CIs (2.5%–97.5%). We used that method because there is no known sampling distributions for the direct R eff and the intervals were not expected to be symmetric.
We calculated the secondary attack rate by using the number of new measles cases arising from exposure to an SVF case-patient as the numerator. We used the susceptible population exposed to this SVF case-patient as the denominator.
Figure 1 . Flowchart of retrieved, excluded, and included items during systemic review of cases of onward virus transmission after measles SVF, as of March 31, 2023 ( 15 ). SVF, secondary vaccination...
The search yielded 1,327 articles, of which we removed 18 duplicates ( Figure 1 ). We screened a total of 1,309 articles for inclusion, of which we excluded 1,295. We included a total of 14 studies in the final analysis. Three articles reported sufficient information from which to derive an attack rate ( 17 – 19 ). An additional 11 articles discussed transmission after measles SVF ( Appendix 2 Table 2).
Nine studies were conducted in the healthcare setting, 1 in a military environment ( 20 ), and 4 in a community setting ( 13 , 18 , 21 , 22 ); 1 made reference to household contacts ( 12 ). All 14 studies were conducted in high-income or upper-middle–income countries.
Seven studies reported the administration of PEP with either measles-containing vaccine or measles immunoglobulin. Four of those studies reported administration of measles-containing vaccine ( 12 , 13 , 20 , 23 ), 3 studies reported measles immunoglobulin ( 12 , 13 , 17 ), and 2 studies reported administration of PEP but did not specify type ( 18 , 19 ).
Across the 14 studies, 109 cases of measles SVF had been identified ( 4 , 12 , 13 , 17 – 27 ). Of those cases, 11 (10.09%) were in persons who transmitted the virus, resulting in a total of 23 further measles cases (1–8 onward infections per transmitting case-patient) ( 12 , 18 – 22 , 28 ). Through the direct calculation method, those data yielded an R eff of 0.211. The estimated R eff was 0.063 (95% CI 0.0–0.5).
In the 6 studies that reported exposure population data, >3,030 persons were exposed to an SVF-affected person with measles during the infectious period ( 17 – 20 , 23 , 27 ); of those, 180 were considered susceptible ( 17 – 19 ). From the susceptible population, 5 infections occurred ( 17 – 19 ). We calculated a secondary attack rate from the 3 studies for which sufficient data were provided. The attack rate ranged from 0% (0/68) ( 17 ) to 6.25% (1/16) ( 19 ).
SVF was defined differently between studies. The most common method was high IgG avidity (77 persons) ( 12 , 13 , 18 – 22 , 26 – 28 ), followed by an IgM-negative or IgG-positive serologic profile (18 persons) ( 24 , 25 ). Thirteen persons had recorded measles IgG positivity before illness onset ( 12 , 23 , 26 ), and 1 person was classified on the basis of an early measles IgG result (day 2) ( 17 ).
Four studies reported Ct values from oropharyngeal samples, which ranged from 30.3 to 33.7 ( 4 , 13 , 25 , 26 ). Ten studies used IgG avidity to characterize SVF; 7 of those reported avidity values of 70.83%–88.6% ( 12 , 13 , 18 – 20 , 22 , 26 ).
Figure 2 . Study-specific effect size by total reported measles SVF cases identified during systemic review of cases of onward virus transmission after measles SVF, as of March 31, 2023. R eff ,...
We demonstrated the potential presence of publication bias as reviewed visually in the form of a quasi-funnel plot ( Figure 2 ). Underreporting of outbreaks with large numbers of SVF cases with multiple transmission events may have occurred.
Figure 3 . Sensitivity analysis of measles SVF cases identified during systemic review of cases of onward virus transmission after measles SVF, as of March 31, 2023. Error bars indicate 95% CIs. R...
Sensitivity analyses ( Figure 3 ), in which the SVF case definition, measles case definition and report type were varied, yielded similar results to the main analysis. Isolation of studies where PEP was provided to susceptible populations also yielded similar results to the main analysis.
This systematic review reports the attack rate and R eff after measles SVF. We found 14 studies that reported the risk for measles infection after exposure to a person who experienced SVF. All included studies reported a very low attack rate (0%–6.25%) and R eff (0.063 [95% CI 0.0–0.5]). Those findings suggests that persons with measles SVF have a very low risk for transmitting the disease.
Our findings are in keeping with the results of Gastañaduy et al. ( 14 ), who looked at the factors associated with measles transmission. Although they did not disaggregate PVF and SVF, they found an R eff of 0.17 for persons who had received 1 dose of a measles-containing vaccine and an R eff of 0.27 for those who received > 2 doses of a measles-containing vaccines. That finding was in contrast to a R eff of 0.76 for unvaccinated persons ( 14 ).
Although the overall attack rate for persons exposed to SVT case-patients appears to be low, prolonged exposure and confined settings probably result in higher risk for transmission. The presence of acutely unwell patients in healthcare settings appears to be the most likely scenario to result in infection ( 12 , 13 , 17 – 19 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 ). This probability stands to reason given the close and prolonged exposure that medical and nursing staff have with their patients, proximity to other patients, and the highly aerosolizing symptoms (i.e., cough) that brought those patients to seek medical care. Moreover, having household contacts, living in confined housing situations (e.g., military barracks, residential dormitories) ( 12 , 20 , 29 ), and being in educational settings (e.g., schools, universities) have also been documented as potentially high risk for transmission ( 29 , 30 ).
Ct values attained from our review compare appropriately with those found in other studies. Pacenti et al. ( 31 ) found vaccination failure (both PVF and SVF) Ct values of 27.6 (SD + 4.8), whereas other authors reported median values of 32 ( 13 ). When comparing our result and those of other authors with unvaccinated controls (Ct 19.0–22.7) ( 13 , 31 ), we found that incidents of vaccine failure are more likely to have higher Ct values. These lower viral loads may be part of the explanation for the low attack rates attributable to SVF patients.
Another implication of this review is the observation that the attack rate after SVF appears to be exceptionally low. Although maintaining vigilance and appropriate measures remains crucial, the exceedingly low attack rate suggests that public health responses after SVF in high vaccination coverage regions could be implemented by using a transmission risk stratification approach. Because SVF case-patients are much less likely to transmit the virus, outbreak-control resources could be directed toward vaccine-naive and PVF-affected persons as a matter of priority. Public health follow-up will still be required for SVF-affected persons; however, such follow-up could occur once high transmission risk case-patients are managed. This approach would ensure the efficient use of resources, particularly during large outbreaks.
However, to properly inform any future public health responses, enhanced data collection and reporting surrounding the transmission dynamics after SVF is needed. Our study shows that data in this area are limited. To strengthen the evidence base, we advocate first for the development of a robust measles SVF case definition, then routine reporting of cases that meet that definition ( 9 ). In addition, reporting of exposed populations and attack rates is essential to create a more nuanced understanding of measles transmission from SVF case-patients. Standardizing data collection in this manner will render future research endeavors better equipped to analyze and interpret the implications of SVF, ultimately contributing to more effective and efficient public health strategies.
A key limitation of our study is potential publication bias. Underreporting of outbreaks that have high numbers of SVF but few or no reported transmission events is possible ( Figure 2 ). This likelihood is consistent with investigators failing to report typical outbreaks (i.e., where persons with SVF transmit like persons without SVF). Another limitation of our analysis is the small sample size of studies available for analysis, which can make generalizability and confidence in the findings difficult and may not fully capture the variability and nuances of transmission after SVF. The lack of standardized criteria for defining SVF resulted in the exclusion of several potentially relevant studies from our analysis. The standard for defining SVF is the use of IgG avidity testing or preinfection serologic testing ( 9 ). Unfortunately, not all included studies had access to those diagnostic tools, instead relying on early infection course serologic test. Moreover, the reporting of exposed populations was deficient in many studies, limiting our ability to calculate an accurate attack rate. Of the studies that did report data on exposure populations, prior vaccination status was difficult to attain. In those instances, we classified persons who were unimmunized, were immunocompromised, or had any unknown vaccination status as susceptible. Thus, persons with unknown vaccinations status might have been vaccinated and therefore nonsusceptible, which could have led to an overestimation of this susceptible population size and an underestimation of the calculated attack rate. Furthermore, the studies included in our analysis were predominantly conducted in postelimination settings, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to measles-endemic settings. On the other hand, this fact may also be a strength, given that SVF is far more common in the postelimination setting, meaning those studies may more accurately reflect real-world scenarios.
Our findings suggest that the risk for onward transmission from persons with measles SVF is very low but not zero. In large outbreak situations, public health management of measles cases in unvaccinated persons could be prioritized before SVF cases. In postelimination settings, routine serologic testing for SVF, in addition to the standard PCR tests, may be a useful adjunct for risk stratification during outbreak management.
Dr. Tranter is a general practitioner and public health registrar at the University of Queensland. His primary research interests include qualitative and quantitative research methods that support communicable disease control.
Suggested citation for this article : Tranter I, Smoll N, Lau CL, Williams D-L, Neucom D, Barnekow D, et al. Onward virus transmission after measles secondary vaccination failure. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Sep [ date cited ]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3009.240150
DOI: 10.3201/eid3009.240150
Original Publication Date: August 09, 2024
Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024
EID Search Options |
---|
– Search articles by author and/or keyword. |
– Search articles by the topic country. |
– Search articles by article type and issue. |
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Isaac Tranter, University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Level 2, Mayne Medical Building, 288 Herston Rd, Herston QLD 4006, Australia
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
There was an unexpected error. Message not sent.
Article views: 401.
Data is collected weekly and does not include downloads and attachments. View data is from .
The Altmetric Attention Score for a research output provides an indicator of the amount of attention that it has received. The score is derived from an automated algorithm, and represents a weighted count of the amount of attention Altmetric picked up for a research output.
In the wake of the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, lawmakers and advocates focused significant attention towards reforming the Electoral Count Act—an 1887 law that governs the counting of Electoral College votes in Congress. After almost two years, Congress passed reforms to the Act that will make it more difficult for partisan actors to manipulate the outcome of future presidential elections. While this achievement is no doubt critical to prevent another insurrection, partisan attacks on election outcomes remain most likely to occur at the state and local level where the bulk of election administration takes place, long before Congress meets to ratify the Electoral College results. The 2022 election cycle previewed one such attack with alarming frequency: Rogue officials in several states refused to certify election results or attempted to otherwise interfere with certification—the statutory process by which election officials attest to the accuracy and completeness of election results.
While efforts to impede certification are not new, never before have they been deployed on such a large and coordinated scale. For this reason, little academic attention has been paid to the mechanics of state certification frameworks. This Article fills that gap to demonstrate why, and how, state certification frameworks can combat the ongoing threats against them. It begins by providing a detailed overview of how election certification works and how recent attacks on the process have targeted and disrupted certification using false claims of widespread election fraud. It then delves into the rich but often overlooked history of certification as a non-discretionary duty to demonstrate that those attacks flouted hundreds of years of well-established American legal history; recognizing that discretion created opportunities for crises and election fraud, early courts and legislatures purposefully shaped certification into a mandatory, non-discretionary duty. The Article concludes with a roadmap for election officials, candidates, and advocates to resolve future attacks on the certification process in eight key battleground states likely to play significant roles in the 2024 election cycle.
To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.
Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .
For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.
COMMENTS
Start your review by referring to the title and author of the article, the title of the journal, and the year of publication in the first paragraph. For example: The article, "Condom use will increase the spread of AIDS," was written by Anthony Zimmerman, a Catholic priest. 4. Write the introduction.
2. Read the article thoroughly: Carefully read the article multiple times to get a complete understanding of its content, arguments, and conclusions. As you read, take notes on key points, supporting evidence, and any areas that require further exploration or clarification. 3. Summarize the main ideas: In your review's introduction, briefly ...
Here is a basic, detailed outline for an article review you should be aware of as a pre-writing process if you are wondering how to write an article review. Introduction. Introduce the article that you are reviewing (author name, publication date, title, etc.) Now provide an overview of the article's main topic.
Writing a review article is a skill that needs to be learned; it is a rigorous but rewarding endeavour as it can provide a useful platform to project the emerging researcher or postgraduate student into the gratifying world of publishing. Thus, the reviewer must develop the ability to think critically, spot patterns in a large volume of ...
An important role of a review article is to introduce researchers to a field. For this, schematic figures can be useful to illustrate the science being discussed, in much the same way as the first ...
Read the Article Thoroughly. The first step in writing an article review is to read the article carefully and thoroughly. This may seem obvious, but it is crucial to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the work before attempting to critique it. During the initial reading, focus on grasping the main arguments, key points, and the overall ...
A well-written review article must summarize key research findings, reference must-read articles, describe current areas of agreement as well as controversies and debates, point out gaps in current knowledge, depict unanswered questions, and suggest directions for future research ( 1 ). During the last decades, there has been a great expansion ...
A review article can also be called a literature review, or a review of literature. It is a survey of previously published research on a topic. It should give an overview of current thinking on the topic. And, unlike an original research article, it will not present new experimental results. Writing a review of literature is to provide a ...
The fundamental rationale of writing a review article is to make a readable synthesis of the best literature sources on an important research inquiry or a topic. This simple definition of a review article contains the following key elements: The question (s) to be dealt with.
A good review article provides readers with an in-depth understanding of a field and highlights key gaps and challenges to address with future research. Writing a review article also helps to expand the writer's knowledge of their specialist area and to develop their analytical and communication skills, amongst other benefits. Thus, the ...
An article review is a critical assessment that aims to expand one's knowledge by evaluating the original author's research. According to statistical research, 5.14 million research papers are published every year, including short surveys, article reviews, and conference proceedings.
Abstract. Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the scientific literature written by subject matter experts. The task of writing a scientific review article can seem overwhelming; however, it can be managed by using an organized approach and devoting sufficient time to the process.
For an article review, your task is to identify, summarize, and evaluate the ideas and information the author has presented. You are being asked to make judgments, positive or negative, about the content of the article. The criteria you follow to do this will vary based upon your particular academic discipline and the parameters of your ...
A journal article review is written for a reader who is knowledgeable in the discipline and is interested not just in the coverage and content of the article being reviewed, but also in your critical assessment of the ideas and argument that are being presented by the author. Your review might be guided by the following questions:
Article Review vs. Response Paper . Now, let's consider the difference between an article review and a response paper: If you're assigned to critique a scholarly article, you will need to compose an article review.; If your subject of analysis is a popular article, you can respond to it with a well-crafted response paper.; The reason for such distinctions is the quality and structure of ...
Journal Article Review. Just like other types of reviews, a journal article review assesses the merits and shortcomings of a published work. To illustrate, consider a review of an academic paper on climate change, where the writer meticulously analyzes and interprets the article's significance within the context of environmental science.
For many kinds of assignments, like a literature review, you may be asked to offer a critique or review of a journal article.This is an opportunity for you as a scholar to offer your qualified opinion and evaluation of how another scholar has composed their article, argument, and research.That means you will be expected to go beyond a simple summary of the article and evaluate it on a deeper ...
A science article review encompasses a critical analysis of a piece in the field of science, covering disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, or any other scientific domain. This review type involves assessing the clarity of scientific concepts presented, the validity of experimental procedures, and the significance of the study's ...
Article reviews come in various forms, each serving a distinct purpose in the realm of academic or professional discourse. Understanding these types is crucial for tailoring your approach. Here are some common types of article reviews: Journal Article Review. A journal article review involves a thorough evaluation of scholarly articles ...
An article review is a critical evaluation and analysis of a scholarly article. It goes beyond a simple summary, involving examining content, assessing the author's arguments, and providing insights into its strengths and weaknesses. Crafting an Insightful Article Review: Everything You Need to Know.
An article review is a critical assessment of a scholarly article or research paper. It involves analyzing the content, methodology, and findings of the article and providing an evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses. The review typically includes a summary of the article's main points, an evaluation of its contribution to the subject ...
Article Summaries, Reviews & Critiques. Writing an article SUMMARY; Writing an article REVIEW; Writing an article CRITIQUE; Citing Sources This link opens in a new window; ... A critique asks you to evaluate an article and the author's argument. You will need to look critically at what the author is claiming, evaluate the research methods ...
Here are a few practices that can make the time-consuming process of writing a review article easier: Define your question: Take your time to identify the research question and carefully articulate the topic of your review paper. A good review should also add something new to the field in terms of a hypothesis, inference, or conclusion.
Review Article. Submitted 09 Jun 2024. First published 15 Aug 2024. Download Citation. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2024, Advance Article ... If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given.
Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released. Volume 30, Number 9—September 2024 ... This review included original, nonreview articles, published in English or French. The report must have described a person or ...
This Article fills that gap to demonstrate why, and how, state certification frameworks can combat the ongoing threats against them. It begins by providing a detailed overview of how election certification works and how recent attacks on the process have targeted and disrupted certification using false claims of widespread election fraud.
Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world