Organic Process Research and Development
Subject Area and Category
- Organic Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Publication type
10836160, 1520586X
Information
How to publish in this journal
The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.
Category | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|
Organic Chemistry | 1999 | Q3 |
Organic Chemistry | 2000 | Q3 |
Organic Chemistry | 2001 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2002 | Q3 |
Organic Chemistry | 2003 | Q3 |
Organic Chemistry | 2004 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2005 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2006 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2007 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2008 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2009 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2010 | Q2 |
Organic Chemistry | 2011 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2012 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2013 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2014 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2015 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2016 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2017 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2018 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2019 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2020 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2021 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2022 | Q1 |
Organic Chemistry | 2023 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 1999 | Q3 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2000 | Q3 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2001 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2002 | Q3 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2003 | Q3 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2004 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2005 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2006 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2007 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2008 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2009 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2010 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2011 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2012 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2013 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2014 | Q2 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2015 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2016 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2017 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2018 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2019 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2020 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2021 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2022 | Q1 |
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry | 2023 | Q1 |
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
Year | SJR |
---|---|
1999 | 0.529 |
2000 | 0.463 |
2001 | 0.623 |
2002 | 0.551 |
2003 | 0.436 |
2004 | 0.708 |
2005 | 0.862 |
2006 | 1.093 |
2007 | 1.017 |
2008 | 0.955 |
2009 | 1.063 |
2010 | 1.120 |
2011 | 1.213 |
2012 | 1.203 |
2013 | 1.135 |
2014 | 1.033 |
2015 | 1.301 |
2016 | 1.068 |
2017 | 1.405 |
2018 | 1.243 |
2019 | 1.090 |
2020 | 0.904 |
2021 | 1.006 |
2022 | 0.929 |
2023 | 0.900 |
Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.
Year | Documents |
---|---|
1999 | 79 |
2000 | 92 |
2001 | 94 |
2002 | 157 |
2003 | 161 |
2004 | 154 |
2005 | 138 |
2006 | 169 |
2007 | 171 |
2008 | 181 |
2009 | 210 |
2010 | 202 |
2011 | 193 |
2012 | 251 |
2013 | 195 |
2014 | 238 |
2015 | 232 |
2016 | 235 |
2017 | 231 |
2018 | 209 |
2019 | 296 |
2020 | 295 |
2021 | 261 |
2022 | 293 |
2023 | 282 |
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Cites per document | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 1999 | 0.823 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2000 | 0.866 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2001 | 0.973 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2002 | 1.102 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2003 | 1.040 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2004 | 1.440 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2005 | 1.631 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2006 | 2.182 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2007 | 1.854 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2008 | 1.992 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2009 | 2.124 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2010 | 2.321 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2011 | 2.560 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2012 | 3.253 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2013 | 2.637 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2014 | 2.599 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2015 | 2.692 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2016 | 2.952 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2017 | 3.046 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2018 | 3.245 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2019 | 3.587 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2020 | 3.681 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2021 | 3.743 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2022 | 3.613 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2023 | 3.576 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 1999 | 0.823 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2000 | 0.866 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2001 | 1.056 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2002 | 0.989 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2003 | 1.020 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2004 | 1.369 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2005 | 1.701 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2006 | 2.172 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2007 | 1.844 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2008 | 2.021 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2009 | 2.144 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2010 | 2.416 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2011 | 2.469 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2012 | 3.169 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2013 | 2.754 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2014 | 2.613 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2015 | 2.662 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2016 | 2.806 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2017 | 3.146 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2018 | 3.483 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2019 | 3.572 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2020 | 3.299 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2021 | 3.846 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2022 | 3.683 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2023 | 3.588 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 1999 | 0.823 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2000 | 0.986 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2001 | 0.912 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2002 | 0.935 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2003 | 0.932 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2004 | 1.399 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2005 | 1.813 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2006 | 2.209 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2007 | 1.792 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2008 | 1.991 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2009 | 2.196 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2010 | 2.202 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2011 | 2.388 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2012 | 3.291 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2013 | 2.755 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2014 | 2.563 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2015 | 2.557 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2016 | 2.753 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2017 | 3.548 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2018 | 3.479 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2019 | 3.050 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2020 | 3.154 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2021 | 3.976 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2022 | 3.664 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2023 | 3.166 |
Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Self Cites | 1999 | 2 |
Self Cites | 2000 | 28 |
Self Cites | 2001 | 45 |
Self Cites | 2002 | 33 |
Self Cites | 2003 | 58 |
Self Cites | 2004 | 83 |
Self Cites | 2005 | 74 |
Self Cites | 2006 | 88 |
Self Cites | 2007 | 69 |
Self Cites | 2008 | 72 |
Self Cites | 2009 | 107 |
Self Cites | 2010 | 168 |
Self Cites | 2011 | 149 |
Self Cites | 2012 | 243 |
Self Cites | 2013 | 208 |
Self Cites | 2014 | 204 |
Self Cites | 2015 | 234 |
Self Cites | 2016 | 280 |
Self Cites | 2017 | 233 |
Self Cites | 2018 | 213 |
Self Cites | 2019 | 319 |
Self Cites | 2020 | 327 |
Self Cites | 2021 | 360 |
Self Cites | 2022 | 411 |
Self Cites | 2023 | 470 |
Total Cites | 1999 | 107 |
Total Cites | 2000 | 181 |
Total Cites | 2001 | 244 |
Total Cites | 2002 | 262 |
Total Cites | 2003 | 350 |
Total Cites | 2004 | 564 |
Total Cites | 2005 | 803 |
Total Cites | 2006 | 984 |
Total Cites | 2007 | 850 |
Total Cites | 2008 | 966 |
Total Cites | 2009 | 1117 |
Total Cites | 2010 | 1358 |
Total Cites | 2011 | 1464 |
Total Cites | 2012 | 1917 |
Total Cites | 2013 | 1779 |
Total Cites | 2014 | 1670 |
Total Cites | 2015 | 1821 |
Total Cites | 2016 | 1866 |
Total Cites | 2017 | 2218 |
Total Cites | 2018 | 2431 |
Total Cites | 2019 | 2411 |
Total Cites | 2020 | 2428 |
Total Cites | 2021 | 3077 |
Total Cites | 2022 | 3138 |
Total Cites | 2023 | 3046 |
Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
External Cites per document | 1999 | 0.808 |
External Cites per document | 2000 | 0.732 |
External Cites per document | 2001 | 0.861 |
External Cites per document | 2002 | 0.864 |
External Cites per document | 2003 | 0.851 |
External Cites per document | 2004 | 1.167 |
External Cites per document | 2005 | 1.544 |
External Cites per document | 2006 | 1.978 |
External Cites per document | 2007 | 1.694 |
External Cites per document | 2008 | 1.870 |
External Cites per document | 2009 | 1.939 |
External Cites per document | 2010 | 2.117 |
External Cites per document | 2011 | 2.218 |
External Cites per document | 2012 | 2.767 |
External Cites per document | 2013 | 2.432 |
External Cites per document | 2014 | 2.294 |
External Cites per document | 2015 | 2.320 |
External Cites per document | 2016 | 2.385 |
External Cites per document | 2017 | 2.816 |
External Cites per document | 2018 | 3.178 |
External Cites per document | 2019 | 3.099 |
External Cites per document | 2020 | 2.855 |
External Cites per document | 2021 | 3.396 |
External Cites per document | 2022 | 3.201 |
External Cites per document | 2023 | 3.034 |
Cites per document | 1999 | 0.823 |
Cites per document | 2000 | 0.866 |
Cites per document | 2001 | 1.056 |
Cites per document | 2002 | 0.989 |
Cites per document | 2003 | 1.020 |
Cites per document | 2004 | 1.369 |
Cites per document | 2005 | 1.701 |
Cites per document | 2006 | 2.172 |
Cites per document | 2007 | 1.844 |
Cites per document | 2008 | 2.021 |
Cites per document | 2009 | 2.144 |
Cites per document | 2010 | 2.416 |
Cites per document | 2011 | 2.469 |
Cites per document | 2012 | 3.169 |
Cites per document | 2013 | 2.754 |
Cites per document | 2014 | 2.613 |
Cites per document | 2015 | 2.662 |
Cites per document | 2016 | 2.806 |
Cites per document | 2017 | 3.146 |
Cites per document | 2018 | 3.483 |
Cites per document | 2019 | 3.572 |
Cites per document | 2020 | 3.299 |
Cites per document | 2021 | 3.846 |
Cites per document | 2022 | 3.683 |
Cites per document | 2023 | 3.588 |
International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Year | International Collaboration |
---|---|
1999 | 13.92 |
2000 | 9.78 |
2001 | 5.32 |
2002 | 14.01 |
2003 | 14.29 |
2004 | 16.88 |
2005 | 12.32 |
2006 | 14.20 |
2007 | 16.37 |
2008 | 23.20 |
2009 | 20.00 |
2010 | 20.30 |
2011 | 23.32 |
2012 | 23.90 |
2013 | 20.51 |
2014 | 24.37 |
2015 | 23.71 |
2016 | 25.53 |
2017 | 31.17 |
2018 | 30.14 |
2019 | 19.59 |
2020 | 27.46 |
2021 | 30.65 |
2022 | 27.65 |
2023 | 31.56 |
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Non-citable documents | 1999 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2000 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2001 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2002 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2003 | 7 |
Non-citable documents | 2004 | 17 |
Non-citable documents | 2005 | 28 |
Non-citable documents | 2006 | 30 |
Non-citable documents | 2007 | 29 |
Non-citable documents | 2008 | 26 |
Non-citable documents | 2009 | 29 |
Non-citable documents | 2010 | 35 |
Non-citable documents | 2011 | 37 |
Non-citable documents | 2012 | 37 |
Non-citable documents | 2013 | 40 |
Non-citable documents | 2014 | 48 |
Non-citable documents | 2015 | 64 |
Non-citable documents | 2016 | 62 |
Non-citable documents | 2017 | 48 |
Non-citable documents | 2018 | 23 |
Non-citable documents | 2019 | 9 |
Non-citable documents | 2020 | 10 |
Non-citable documents | 2021 | 14 |
Non-citable documents | 2022 | 15 |
Non-citable documents | 2023 | 14 |
Citable documents | 1999 | 130 |
Citable documents | 2000 | 209 |
Citable documents | 2001 | 231 |
Citable documents | 2002 | 265 |
Citable documents | 2003 | 336 |
Citable documents | 2004 | 395 |
Citable documents | 2005 | 444 |
Citable documents | 2006 | 423 |
Citable documents | 2007 | 432 |
Citable documents | 2008 | 452 |
Citable documents | 2009 | 492 |
Citable documents | 2010 | 527 |
Citable documents | 2011 | 556 |
Citable documents | 2012 | 568 |
Citable documents | 2013 | 606 |
Citable documents | 2014 | 591 |
Citable documents | 2015 | 620 |
Citable documents | 2016 | 603 |
Citable documents | 2017 | 657 |
Citable documents | 2018 | 675 |
Citable documents | 2019 | 666 |
Citable documents | 2020 | 726 |
Citable documents | 2021 | 786 |
Citable documents | 2022 | 837 |
Citable documents | 2023 | 835 |
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Uncited documents | 1999 | 82 |
Uncited documents | 2000 | 128 |
Uncited documents | 2001 | 122 |
Uncited documents | 2002 | 142 |
Uncited documents | 2003 | 172 |
Uncited documents | 2004 | 189 |
Uncited documents | 2005 | 217 |
Uncited documents | 2006 | 152 |
Uncited documents | 2007 | 183 |
Uncited documents | 2008 | 166 |
Uncited documents | 2009 | 189 |
Uncited documents | 2010 | 179 |
Uncited documents | 2011 | 177 |
Uncited documents | 2012 | 146 |
Uncited documents | 2013 | 206 |
Uncited documents | 2014 | 207 |
Uncited documents | 2015 | 223 |
Uncited documents | 2016 | 158 |
Uncited documents | 2017 | 204 |
Uncited documents | 2018 | 153 |
Uncited documents | 2019 | 152 |
Uncited documents | 2020 | 158 |
Uncited documents | 2021 | 135 |
Uncited documents | 2022 | 148 |
Uncited documents | 2023 | 169 |
Cited documents | 1999 | 48 |
Cited documents | 2000 | 81 |
Cited documents | 2001 | 109 |
Cited documents | 2002 | 123 |
Cited documents | 2003 | 171 |
Cited documents | 2004 | 223 |
Cited documents | 2005 | 255 |
Cited documents | 2006 | 301 |
Cited documents | 2007 | 278 |
Cited documents | 2008 | 312 |
Cited documents | 2009 | 332 |
Cited documents | 2010 | 383 |
Cited documents | 2011 | 416 |
Cited documents | 2012 | 459 |
Cited documents | 2013 | 440 |
Cited documents | 2014 | 432 |
Cited documents | 2015 | 461 |
Cited documents | 2016 | 507 |
Cited documents | 2017 | 501 |
Cited documents | 2018 | 545 |
Cited documents | 2019 | 523 |
Cited documents | 2020 | 578 |
Cited documents | 2021 | 665 |
Cited documents | 2022 | 704 |
Cited documents | 2023 | 680 |
Evolution of the percentage of female authors.
Year | Female Percent |
---|---|
1999 | 15.93 |
2000 | 14.49 |
2001 | 12.30 |
2002 | 13.98 |
2003 | 13.33 |
2004 | 15.86 |
2005 | 15.73 |
2006 | 19.60 |
2007 | 19.92 |
2008 | 19.95 |
2009 | 17.36 |
2010 | 20.43 |
2011 | 19.80 |
2012 | 18.73 |
2013 | 21.12 |
2014 | 19.51 |
2015 | 21.18 |
2016 | 21.74 |
2017 | 21.66 |
2018 | 22.18 |
2019 | 21.90 |
2020 | 24.11 |
2021 | 27.10 |
2022 | 25.89 |
2023 | 23.92 |
Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Overton | 1999 | 1 |
Overton | 2000 | 0 |
Overton | 2001 | 1 |
Overton | 2002 | 2 |
Overton | 2003 | 0 |
Overton | 2004 | 1 |
Overton | 2005 | 1 |
Overton | 2006 | 1 |
Overton | 2007 | 4 |
Overton | 2008 | 2 |
Overton | 2009 | 5 |
Overton | 2010 | 0 |
Overton | 2011 | 5 |
Overton | 2012 | 2 |
Overton | 2013 | 5 |
Overton | 2014 | 3 |
Overton | 2015 | 3 |
Overton | 2016 | 1 |
Overton | 2017 | 2 |
Overton | 2018 | 1 |
Overton | 2019 | 0 |
Overton | 2020 | 4 |
Overton | 2021 | 1 |
Overton | 2022 | 0 |
Overton | 2023 | 0 |
Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
SDG | 2018 | 22 |
SDG | 2019 | 34 |
SDG | 2020 | 40 |
SDG | 2021 | 51 |
SDG | 2022 | 32 |
SDG | 2023 | 52 |
Leave a comment
Name * Required
Email (will not be published) * Required
* Required Cancel
The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.
Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®
Cookie settings
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
Organic Process Research & Development
About the journal.
This journal is part of a pilot that enables researchers to search and browse over 70,000 articles in 35 journals from four other participating publishers alongside Elsevier-published content on ScienceDirect.
Article publishing charge for open access
Compare APC with another journal
Editor-in-chief, latest published, articles in press, most downloaded, most popular, more from organic process research & development, announcements, diversity & inclusion statement – organic process research & development, special issues and article collections, boyhood in 21st century educative contexts, rethinking educational practices and responsibilities in the light of digitalisation, neoliberalism, education inequity and improvement, motivation of higher education faculty: theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions, partner journals.
The Organic Process Research & Development is a companion title of the Organic Process Research & Development is an open access, peer-reviewed journal which draws contributions from a wide community of international and interdisciplinary researchers …
Related journals
Educational Research...
Educational Research Review
Learning and Instruc...
Learning and Instruction
Teaching and Teacher...
Teaching and Teacher Education
International Journa...
Learning, Culture an...
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
- News & Announcements
USDA Certified Organic: Understanding the Basics
Resources for consumers and retailers.
This page provides consumers and retailers information on the organic label. Retailers can download a toolkit of displays they can use in their stores or online platforms to increase consumer awareness of, and trust in, the organic label.
Retailer Toolkit
- View the resource toolkit and individual graphics to use in stores or online marketplaces to increase consumer awareness and understanding of the USDA organic label.
What is organic?
Organic is a label that indicates that a food or agricultural product has been produced according to the USDA organic standards , which require operations to use practices that cycle resources, conserve biodiversity, and preserve ecological balance. The USDA’s National Organic Program develops and enforces the standards for organic crops, livestock, and agricultural products so consumers can feel confident purchasing organic goods.
The organic standards set specific requirements for different types of products. The following list provides an overview of requirements for different types of organic products.
View more information on organic practice standards . See below to learn how organic is protected by law, inspected by experts, traced from farm to store, and shaped by public input.
Organic is… Protected by law
- The USDA organic label is the only government-backed marketing claim for organic food sold in the United States. Only foods produced according to the USDA organic standards can display the organic seal.
- USDA develops and strictly enforces specific standards for organic food to clarify what practices and inputs can and cannot be used in organic production and handling.
- The USDA organic seal is a registered trademark, which allows USDA to enforce criminal penalties against uncertified operations falsely using the seal to misrepresent products as organic. This protects the integrity of the organic seal and keeps fraudulent products out of the U.S. organic market.
- NOP investigates complaints and takes action against businesses that violate the regulations.
Organic is… Inspected by experts
- Organic farms and business are certified and inspected by USDA-accredited certifiers .
- Specially trained organic inspectors visit organic farms and business yearly to confirm they still meet the organic standards. Every organic operation is also subject to additional, unannounced inspections and testing.
- USDA regularly audits certifiers to make sure that they are correctly inspecting farms and upholding the integrity of the organic label.
- To become certified organic, operations go through a rigorous process to show that their practices follow the organic standards.
Organic is… Traced from farm to store
- The Strengthening Organic Enforcement rule increases the USDA’s ability to oversee and enforce the organic standards and trace organic products from the store all the way back to the farm.
- Farms and businesses must keep detailed records of the organic products they produce, buy, and sell. This allows businesses to choose trusted suppliers and verify that what they sell is organic.
- Certifiers audit organic supply chains to detect and deter fraud before it reaches stores.
- NOP manages the Organic INTEGRITY Database , which contains up-to-date and accurate information about organic operations. These systems and processes confirm that what consumers buy is truly organic.
Organic is… Shaped by public input
- Stakeholders and the public can provide feedback (public comments) on proposed regulations to shape final policy decisions.
- The organic standards are developed with recommendations from an advisory board—the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB)—composed of volunteers from the organic community.
- Stakeholders and the public can attend bi-annual NOSB public meetings and provide input to the NOSB.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Exploratory Process Development of a High-Temperature Thermal (3 + 2) Cycloaddition in …. Kiran Matcha *. Andy Huygaerts. …. July 7, 2023. SEE MORE. Read current and featured research from the Organic Process Research & Development on ACS Publications, a trusted source for peer-reviewed journals.
A peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research on the development of organic molecules and processes. Browse the latest articles on topics such as total synthesis, drug discovery, and COVID-19 therapies.
ACS Publications Symposium: Catalysis for Organic Synthesis. Join Organic Process Research & Development this summer in Vienna, Austria for two days of innovative, scientific exchange with leading experts in organic chemistry and have the chance to present your own research through poster sessions and lightning talks. Invited Keynote Speakers.
Organic Process Research & Development, Articles ASAP (Article) Publication Date (Web): April 10, 2024. Abstract. Full text. PDF. ABSTRACT. Read the latest ASAP articles from the Organic Process Research & Development on ACS Publications, a trusted source for peer-reviewed journals.
Browse the latest research articles published in Organic Process Research & Development, a journal by Elsevier. Find topics such as drug substance drying, nitrite probes, electroorganic synthesis, and more.
Browse the latest articles of Organic Process Research & Development, a peer-reviewed journal covering organic synthesis and process development. Find issues from 2005 to 2024 on ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier.
Organic Process Research & Development is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published since 1997 by the American Chemical Society. [1] Its publication frequency switched from bimonthly to monthly in 2012. It is indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service, Scopus, EBSCOhost, British Library, and Web of Science. The current editor-in-chief is Kai ...
Organic Process Research & Development. [...] 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-1,3,3-trimethyldipyrrin (1) is a crucial building block in the rational synthesis of chlorins and oxochlorins. The prior 5-step ...
The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to ...
Organic Process Research & Development is a Transformative Journal. Organic Process Research & Development has been certified as a transformative journal by cOAlition S, committing to a transition to 100% open access in the future. If your research funder has signed Plan S, your open access charges may be covered by your funder through December ...
A peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research on the development and scale-up of organic processes. Browse the latest articles on topics such as catalysis, flow chemistry, continuous synthesis, enzymatic reactions, and more.
The Organic Process Research & Development is a companion title of the Organic Process Research & Development is an open access, peer-reviewed journal which draws contributions from a wide community of international and interdisciplinary researchers …
The compression of development timelines necessitates the application of technology and automation to aid accelerated process design and optimization. McMullen and Jurica reported the development and application of a "machine-assisted process development workflow" to realize reaction optimization in 1 week ( React. Chem. Eng.
Aims & Scope. Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, OPR&D reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry and chemical engineering but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to scale up and industrial ...
The foci of Organic Process Research & Development are MEDLINE, Cancer, Internal medicine, Oncology and Combinatorial chemistry. Breast cancer, Clinical trial, Family medicine and Intensive care medicine are some topics wherein MEDLINE research discussed in the journal have an impact. Some problems in Cancer that were presented in the journal ...
A peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research and reviews on the development of organic processes and products. Browse the latest articles on topics such as N-nitroso compounds, diazonium salts, enzyme carriers, and more.
A new strategy to identify, assess, and mitigate the nitrosamine formation in APIs during storage was developed and demonstrated on sitagliptin hydrochloride monohydrate, in which an increase in nitrosamine content was observed during stability studies. Comprehensive stress tests and stability assessments were carried out to evaluate the influence of various internal and external stimuli. Air ...
Check out a complete list of issues for the Organic Process Research & Development on ACS Publications, a trusted source for peer-reviewed journals. Recently Viewed close modal. Pair your accounts. ... You've supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley! Continue. STEP 1: Login with ACS ID Logged in Success Click to create an ACS ID.
Read the latest articles of Organic Process Research & Development at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature. Skip to main content. Journals & Books ... Development of a Concise Process for the Synthesis of the Azaindazole Core of the CD73 Inhibitor AB680. Xiaopeng Yin, Zhiguo Jake Song, Jaroslaw ...
Local Food Research and Development; Market & Facility Design; Market Research & Analysis; Organic Certification & Accreditation; Packers & Stockyards; Plant Variety Protection; ... To become certified organic, operations go through a rigorous process to show that their practices follow the organic standards.
During large-scale anion exchange purification of a guanosine-rich oligonucleotide sequence, a 10% yield loss was observed. The elution profile showed an unwanted peak in the wash step of the gradient and was suspected as the cause of the specific loss. The primary oligonucleotide structure and the high-salt conditions hinted toward the formation of a higher-order structure, which, due to its ...
Organic Process Research & Development. Available online 5 August 2024. In Press, ... Process development of the four-step final assembly of lenacapavir sodium from four synthetic intermediates is described here. A bis-bromopyridine core is sequentially subjected to an alkynylation, an amide coupling with a chiral pyrazole carboxylic acid, and ...
A new strategy to identify, assess, and mitigate the nitrosamine formation in APIs during storage was developed and demonstrated on sitagliptin hydrochloride monohydrate, in which an increase in nitrosamine content was observed during stability studies. Comprehensive stress tests and stability assessments were carried out to evaluate the influence of various internal and external stimuli. Air ...
You've supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley! Continue. STEP 1: Login with ACS ID Logged in Success Click to create an ACS ID. ... Organic Process Research & Development. Cite this: Org. Process Res. Dev. 2024, XXXX, XXX, XXX-XXX. Click to copy citation Citation copied!