quantitative research topics grade 12 stem

189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

Quantitative research is an essential part of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields. It involves collecting and analyzing numerical data to answer research questions and test hypotheses.

In 2023, STEM students have a wealth of exciting research opportunities in various disciplines. Whether you’re an undergraduate or graduate student, here are quantitative research topics to consider for your next project.

If you are looking for the best list of quantitative research topics for stem students, then you can check the given list in each field. It offers STEM students numerous opportunities to explore and contribute to their respective fields in 2023 and beyond.

Whether you’re interested in astrophysics, biology, engineering, mathematics, or any other STEM field.

Also Read: Most Exciting Qualitative Research Topics For Students

What Is Quantitative Research

Table of Contents

Quantitative research is a type of research that focuses on the organized collection, analysis, and evaluation of numerical data to answer research questions, test theories, and find trends or connections between factors. It is an organized, objective way to do study that uses measurable data and scientific methods to come to results.

Quantitative research is often used in many areas, such as the natural sciences, social sciences, economics, psychology, education, and market research. It gives useful information about patterns, trends, cause-and-effect relationships, and how often things happen. Quantitative tools are used by researchers to answer questions like “How many?” and “How often?” “Is there a significant difference?” or “What is the relationship between the variables?”

In comparison to quantitative research, qualitative research uses non-numerical data like conversations, notes, and open-ended surveys to understand and explore the ideas, experiences, and points of view of people or groups. Researchers often choose between quantitative and qualitative methods based on their research goals, questions, and the type of thing they are studying.

How To Choose Quantitative Research Topics For STEM

Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to choose quantitative research topics for STEM:

Step 1:- Identify Your Interests and Passions

Start by reflecting on your personal interests within STEM. What areas or subjects in STEM excite you the most? Choosing a topic you’re passionate about will keep you motivated throughout the research process.

Step 2:- Review Coursework and Textbooks

Look through your coursework, textbooks, and class notes. Identify concepts, theories, or areas that you found particularly intriguing or challenging. These can be a source of potential research topics.

Step 3:- Consult with Professors and Advisors

Discuss your research interests with professors, academic advisors, or mentors. They can provide valuable insights, suggest relevant topics, and guide you toward areas with research opportunities.

Step 4:- Read Recent Literature

Explore recent research articles, journals, and publications in STEM fields. This will help you identify current trends, gaps in knowledge, and areas where further research is needed.

Step 5:- Narrow Down Your Focus

Once you have a broad area of interest, narrow it down to a specific research focus. Consider questions like:

What specific problem or phenomenon do you want to investigate?
Are there unanswered questions or controversies in this area?
What impact could your research have on the field or society?

Step 6:- Consider Resources and Access

Assess the resources available to you, including access to laboratories, equipment, databases, and funding. Ensure that your chosen topic aligns with the resources you have or can access.

Step 7:- Think About Practicality

Consider the feasibility of conducting research on your chosen topic. Are the data readily available, or will you need to collect data yourself? Can you complete the research within your available time frame?

Step 8:- Define Your Research Question

Formulate a clear and specific research question or hypothesis. Your research question should guide your entire study and provide a focus for your data collection and analysis.

Step 9:- Conduct a Literature Review

Dive deeper into the existing literature related to your chosen topic. This will help you understand the current state of research, identify gaps, and refine your research question.

Step 10:- Consider the Impact

Think about the potential impact of your research. How does your topic contribute to the advancement of knowledge in your field? Does it have practical applications or implications for society?

Step 11:- Brainstorm Research Methods

Determine the quantitative research methods and data collection techniques you plan to use. Consider whether you’ll conduct experiments, surveys, data analysis, simulations, or use existing datasets.

Step 12:- Seek Feedback

Share your research topic and ideas with peers, advisors, or mentors. They can provide valuable feedback and help you refine your research focus.

Step 13:- Assess Ethical Considerations

Consider ethical implications related to your research, especially if it involves human subjects, sensitive data, or potential environmental impacts. Ensure that your research adheres to ethical guidelines.

Step 14:- Finalize Your Research Topic

Once you’ve gone through these steps, finalize your research topic. Write a clear and concise research proposal that outlines your research question, objectives, methods, and expected outcomes.

Step 15:- Stay Open to Adjustments

Be open to adjusting your research topic as you progress. Sometimes, new insights or challenges may lead you to refine or adapt your research focus.

Following are the most interesting quantitative research topics for stem students. These are given below.

Quantitative Research Topics In Physics and Astronomy

Quantum Computing Algorithms : Investigate new algorithms for quantum computers and their potential applications.
Dark Matter Detection Methods : Explore innovative approaches to detect dark matter particles.
Quantum Teleportation : Study the principles and applications of quantum teleportation.
Exoplanet Characterization : Analyze data from telescopes to characterize exoplanets.
Nuclear Fusion Modeling : Create mathematical models for nuclear fusion reactions.
Superconductivity at High Temperatures : Research the properties and applications of high-temperature superconductors.
Gravitational Wave Analysis : Analyze gravitational wave data to study astrophysical phenomena.
Black Hole Thermodynamics : Investigate the thermodynamics of black holes and their entropy.

Quantitative Research Topics In Biology and Life Sciences

Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) : Conduct GWAS to identify genetic factors associated with diseases.
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics : Study drug interactions in the human body.
Ecological Modeling : Model ecosystems to understand population dynamics.
Protein Folding : Research the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein folding.
Cancer Epidemiology : Analyze cancer incidence and risk factors in specific populations.
Neuroimaging Analysis : Develop algorithms for analyzing brain imaging data.
Evolutionary Genetics : Investigate evolutionary patterns using genetic data.
Stem Cell Differentiation : Study the factors influencing stem cell differentiation.

Engineering and Technology Quantitative Research Topics

Renewable Energy Efficiency : Optimize the efficiency of solar panels or wind turbines.
Aerodynamics of Drones : Analyze the aerodynamics of drone designs.
Autonomous Vehicle Safety : Evaluate safety measures for autonomous vehicles.
Machine Learning in Robotics : Implement machine learning algorithms for robot control.
Blockchain Scalability : Research methods to scale blockchain technology.
Quantum Computing Hardware : Design and test quantum computing hardware components.
IoT Security : Develop security protocols for the Internet of Things (IoT).
3D Printing Materials Analysis : Study the mechanical properties of 3D-printed materials.

Quantitative Research Topics In Mathematics and Statistics

Following are the best Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students in mathematics and statistics.

Prime Number Distribution : Investigate the distribution of prime numbers.
Graph Theory Algorithms : Develop algorithms for solving graph theory problems.
Statistical Analysis of Financial Markets : Analyze financial data and market trends.
Number Theory Research : Explore unsolved problems in number theory.
Bayesian Machine Learning : Apply Bayesian methods to machine learning models.
Random Matrix Theory : Study the properties of random matrices in mathematics and physics.
Topological Data Analysis : Use topology to analyze complex data sets.
Quantum Algorithms for Optimization : Research quantum algorithms for optimization problems.

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics In Science and Earth Sciences

Climate Change Modeling : Develop climate models to predict future trends.
Biodiversity Conservation Analysis : Analyze data to support biodiversity conservation efforts.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) : Apply GIS techniques to solve environmental problems.
Oceanography and Remote Sensing : Use satellite data for oceanographic research.
Air Quality Monitoring : Develop sensors and models for air quality assessment.
Hydrological Modeling : Study the movement and distribution of water resources.
Volcanic Activity Prediction : Predict volcanic eruptions using quantitative methods.
Seismology Data Analysis : Analyze seismic data to understand earthquake patterns.

Chemistry and Materials Science Quantitative Research Topics

Nanomaterial Synthesis and Characterization : Research the synthesis and properties of nanomaterials.
Chemoinformatics : Analyze chemical data for drug discovery and materials science.
Quantum Chemistry Simulations : Perform quantum simulations of chemical reactions.
Materials for Renewable Energy : Investigate materials for energy storage and conversion.
Catalysis Kinetics : Study the kinetics of chemical reactions catalyzed by materials.
Polymer Chemistry : Research the properties and applications of polymers.
Analytical Chemistry Techniques : Develop new analytical techniques for chemical analysis.
Sustainable Chemistry : Explore green chemistry approaches for sustainable materials.

Computer Science and Information Technology Topics

Natural Language Processing (NLP) : Work on NLP algorithms for language understanding.
Cybersecurity Analytics : Analyze cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.
Big Data Analytics : Apply quantitative methods to analyze large data sets.
Machine Learning Fairness : Investigate bias and fairness issues in machine learning models.
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) : Study user behavior and interaction patterns.
Software Performance Optimization : Optimize software applications for performance.
Distributed Systems Analysis : Analyze the performance of distributed computing systems.
Bioinformatics Data Mining : Develop algorithms for mining biological data.

Good Quantitative Research Topics Students In Medicine and Healthcare

Clinical Trial Data Analysis : Analyze clinical trial data to evaluate treatment effectiveness.
Epidemiological Modeling : Model disease spread and intervention strategies.
Healthcare Data Analytics : Analyze healthcare data for patient outcomes and cost reduction.
Medical Imaging Algorithms : Develop algorithms for medical image analysis.
Genomic Medicine : Apply genomics to personalized medicine approaches.
Telemedicine Effectiveness : Study the effectiveness of telemedicine in healthcare delivery.
Health Informatics : Analyze electronic health records for insights into patient care.

Agriculture and Food Sciences Topics

Precision Agriculture : Use quantitative methods for optimizing crop production.
Food Safety Analysis : Analyze food safety data and quality control.
Aquaculture Sustainability : Research sustainable practices in aquaculture.
Crop Disease Modeling : Model the spread of diseases in agricultural crops.
Climate-Resilient Agriculture : Develop strategies for agriculture in changing climates.
Food Supply Chain Optimization : Optimize food supply chain logistics.
Soil Health Assessment : Analyze soil data for sustainable land management.

Social Sciences with Quantitative Approaches

Educational Data Mining : Analyze educational data for improving learning outcomes.
Sociodemographic Surveys : Study social trends and demographics using surveys.
Psychometrics : Develop and validate psychological measurement instruments.
Political Polling Analysis : Analyze political polling data and election trends.
Economic Modeling : Develop economic models for policy analysis.
Urban Planning Analytics : Analyze data for urban planning and infrastructure.
Climate Policy Evaluation : Evaluate the impact of climate policies on society.

Environmental Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Water Quality Assessment : Analyze water quality data for environmental monitoring.
Waste Management Optimization : Optimize waste collection and recycling programs.
Environmental Impact Assessments : Evaluate the environmental impact of projects.
Air Pollution Modeling : Model the dispersion of air pollutants in urban areas.
Sustainable Building Design : Apply quantitative methods to sustainable architecture.

Quantitative Research Topics Robotics and Automation

Robotic Swarm Behavior : Study the behavior of robot swarms in different tasks.
Autonomous Drone Navigation : Develop algorithms for autonomous drone navigation.
Humanoid Robot Control : Implement control algorithms for humanoid robots.
Robotic Grasping and Manipulation : Study robotic manipulation techniques.
Reinforcement Learning for Robotics : Apply reinforcement learning to robotic control.

Quantitative Research Topics Materials Engineering

Additive Manufacturing Process Optimization : Optimize 3D printing processes.
Smart Materials for Aerospace : Research smart materials for aerospace applications.
Nanostructured Materials for Energy Storage : Investigate energy storage materials.
Corrosion Prevention : Develop corrosion-resistant materials and coatings.

Nuclear Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Nuclear Reactor Safety Analysis : Study safety aspects of nuclear reactor designs.
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Analysis : Analyze the nuclear fuel cycle for efficiency.
Radiation Shielding Materials : Research materials for radiation protection.

Quantitative Research Topics In Biomedical Engineering

Medical Device Design and Testing : Develop and test medical devices.
Biomechanics Analysis : Analyze biomechanics in sports or rehabilitation.
Biomaterials for Medical Implants : Investigate materials for medical implants.

Good Quantitative Research Topics Chemical Engineering

Chemical Process Optimization : Optimize chemical manufacturing processes.
Industrial Pollution Control : Develop strategies for pollution control in industries.
Chemical Reaction Kinetics : Study the kinetics of chemical reactions in industries.

Best Quantitative Research Topics In Renewable Energy

Energy Storage Systems : Research and optimize energy storage solutions.
Solar Cell Efficiency : Improve the efficiency of photovoltaic cells.
Wind Turbine Performance Analysis : Analyze and optimize wind turbine designs.

Brilliant Quantitative Research Topics In Astronomy and Space Sciences

Astrophysical Simulations : Simulate astrophysical phenomena using numerical methods.
Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization : Optimize spacecraft trajectories for missions.
Exoplanet Detection Algorithms : Develop algorithms for exoplanet detection.

Quantitative Research Topics In Psychology and Cognitive Science

Cognitive Psychology Experiments : Conduct quantitative experiments in cognitive psychology.
Emotion Recognition Algorithms : Develop algorithms for emotion recognition in AI.
Neuropsychological Assessments : Create quantitative assessments for brain function.

Geology and Geological Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Geological Data Analysis : Analyze geological data for mineral exploration.
Geological Hazard Prediction : Predict geological hazards using quantitative models.

Great Quantitative Research Topics In Cybersecurity

Network Intrusion Detection : Develop quantitative methods for intrusion detection.
Cryptocurrency Analysis : Analyze blockchain data and cryptocurrency trends.

Mathematical Biology Quantitative Research Topics

Epidemiological Modeling : Model disease spread and control in populations.
Population Genetics : Analyze genetic data to understand population dynamics.

Quantitative Research Topics In Chemical Analysis

Analytical Chemistry Methods : Develop quantitative methods for chemical analysis.
Spectroscopy Analysis : Analyze spectroscopic data for chemical identification.

Mathematics Education Quantitative Research Topics

Mathematics Curriculum Analysis : Analyze curriculum effectiveness in mathematics education.
Mathematics Assessment Development : Develop quantitative assessments for mathematics skills.

Quantitative Research Topics In Social Research

Social Network Analysis : Analyze social network structures and dynamics.
Survey Research : Conduct quantitative surveys on social issues and trends.

Quantitative Research Topics In Computational Neuroscience

Neural Network Modeling : Model neural networks and brain functions computationally.
Brain Connectivity Analysis : Analyze functional and structural brain connectivity.

Best Topics In Transportation Engineering

Traffic Flow Modeling : Model and optimize traffic flow in urban areas.
Public Transportation Efficiency : Analyze the efficiency of public transportation systems.

Good Quantitative Research Topics In Energy Economics

Energy Policy Analysis : Evaluate the economic impact of energy policies.
Renewable Energy Cost-Benefit Analysis : Assess the economic viability of renewable energy projects.

Quantum Information Science

Quantum Cryptography Protocols : Develop and analyze quantum cryptography protocols.
Quantum Key Distribution : Study the security of quantum key distribution systems.

Human Genetics

Genome Editing Ethics : Investigate ethical issues in genome editing technologies.
Population Genomics : Analyze genomic data for population genetics research.

Marine Biology

Coral Reef Health Assessment : Quantitatively assess the health of coral reefs.
Marine Ecosystem Modeling : Model marine ecosystems and biodiversity.

Data Science and Machine Learning

Machine Learning Explainability : Develop methods for explaining machine learning models.
Data Privacy in Machine Learning : Study privacy issues in machine learning applications.
Deep Learning for Image Analysis : Develop deep learning models for image recognition.

Environmental Engineering

Robotics and automation, materials engineering, nuclear engineering, biomedical engineering, chemical engineering, renewable energy, astronomy and space sciences, psychology and cognitive science, geology and geological engineering, forensic science, cybersecurity, mathematical biology, chemical analysis, mathematics education, quantitative social research, computational neuroscience, quantitative research topics in transportation engineering, quantitative research topics in energy economics, topics in quantum information science, amazing quantitative research topics in human genetics, quantitative research topics in marine biology, what is a common goal of qualitative and quantitative research.

A common goal of both qualitative and quantitative research is to generate knowledge and gain a deeper understanding of a particular phenomenon or topic. However, they approach this goal in different ways:

1. Understanding a Phenomenon

Both types of research aim to understand and explain a specific phenomenon, whether it’s a social issue, a natural process, a human behavior, or a complex event.

2. Testing Hypotheses

Both qualitative and quantitative research can involve hypothesis testing. While qualitative research may not use statistical hypothesis tests in the same way as quantitative research, it often tests hypotheses or research questions by examining patterns and themes in the data.

3. Contributing to Knowledge

Researchers in both approaches seek to contribute to the body of knowledge in their respective fields. They aim to answer important questions, address gaps in existing knowledge, and provide insights that can inform theory, practice, or policy.

4. Informing Decision-Making

Research findings from both qualitative and quantitative studies can be used to inform decision-making in various domains, whether it’s in academia, government, industry, healthcare, or social services.

5. Enhancing Understanding

Both approaches strive to enhance our understanding of complex phenomena by systematically collecting and analyzing data. They aim to provide evidence-based explanations and insights.

6. Application

Research findings from both qualitative and quantitative studies can be applied to practical situations. For example, the results of a quantitative study on the effectiveness of a new drug can inform medical treatment decisions, while qualitative research on customer preferences can guide marketing strategies.

7. Contributing to Theory

In academia, both types of research contribute to the development and refinement of theories in various disciplines. Quantitative research may provide empirical evidence to support or challenge existing theories, while qualitative research may generate new theoretical frameworks or perspectives.

Conclusion – Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

So, selecting a quantitative research topic for STEM students is a pivotal decision that can shape the trajectory of your academic and professional journey. The process involves a thoughtful exploration of your interests, a thorough review of the existing literature, consideration of available resources, and the formulation of a clear and specific research question.

Your chosen topic should resonate with your passions, align with your academic or career goals, and offer the potential to contribute to the body of knowledge in your STEM field. Whether you’re delving into physics, biology, engineering, mathematics, or any other STEM discipline, the right research topic can spark curiosity, drive innovation, and lead to valuable insights.

Moreover, quantitative research in STEM not only expands the boundaries of human knowledge but also has the power to address real-world challenges, improve technology, and enhance our understanding of the natural world. It is a journey that demands dedication, intellectual rigor, and an unwavering commitment to scientific inquiry.

What is quantitative research in STEM?

Quantitative research in this context is designed to improve our understanding of the science system’s workings, structural dependencies and dynamics.

What are good examples of quantitative research?

Surveys and questionnaires serve as common examples of quantitative research. They involve collecting data from many respondents and analyzing the results to identify trends, patterns

What are the 4 C’s in STEM?

They became known as the “Four Cs” — critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity.

13 Best Tips To Write An Assignment

Whenever the new semester starts, you will get a lot of assignment writing tasks. Now you enter the new academic…

How To Do Homework Fast – 11 Tips To Do Homework Fast

Homework is one of the most important parts that have to be done by students. It has been around for…

Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

In today’s rapidly evolving world, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields have gained immense significance. For STEM students, engaging in quantitative research is a pivotal aspect of their academic journey. Quantitative research involves the systematic collection and interpretation of numerical data to address research questions or test hypotheses. Choosing the right research topic is essential to ensure a successful and meaningful research endeavor.

In this blog, we will explore 151+ quantitative research topics for STEM students. Whether you are an aspiring scientist, engineer, or mathematician, this comprehensive list will inspire your research journey. But we understand that the journey through STEM education and research can be challenging at times. That’s why we’re here to support you every step of the way with our Engineering Assignment Help service.

What is Quantitative Research in STEM?

Table of Contents

Quantitative research is a scientific approach that relies on numerical data and statistical analysis to draw conclusions and make predictions. In STEM fields, quantitative research encompasses a wide range of methodologies, including experiments, surveys, and data analysis. The key characteristics of quantitative research in STEM include:

Data Collection: Systematic gathering of numerical data through experiments, observations, or surveys.
Statistical Analysis: Application of statistical techniques to analyze data and draw meaningful conclusions.
Hypothesis Testing: Testing hypotheses and theories using quantitative data.
Replicability: The ability to replicate experiments and obtain consistent results.
Generalizability: Drawing conclusions that can be applied to larger populations or phenomena.

Importance of Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Quantitative research plays a pivotal role in STEM education and research for several reasons:

1. Empirical Evidence

It provides empirical evidence to support or refute scientific theories and hypotheses.

2. Data-Driven Decision-Making

STEM professionals use quantitative research to make informed decisions, from designing experiments to developing new technologies.

3. Innovation

It fuels innovation by providing data-driven insights that lead to the creation of new products, processes, and technologies.

4. Problem Solving

STEM students learn critical problem-solving skills through quantitative research, which are invaluable in their future careers.

5. Interdisciplinary Applications

Quantitative research transcends STEM disciplines, facilitating collaboration and the tackling of complex, real-world problems.

Also Read: Google Scholar Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Now, let’s explore important quantitative research topics for STEM students:

Biology and Life Sciences

Here are some quantitative research topics in biology and life science:

1. The impact of climate change on biodiversity.

2. Analyzing the genetic basis of disease susceptibility.

3. Studying the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing infectious diseases.

4. Investigating the ecological consequences of invasive species.

5. Examining the role of genetics in aging.

6. Analyzing the effects of pollution on aquatic ecosystems.

7. Studying the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

8. Investigating the relationship between diet and lifespan.

9. Analyzing the impact of deforestation on wildlife.

10. Studying the genetics of cancer development.

11. Investigating the effectiveness of various plant fertilizers.

12. Analyzing the impact of microplastics on marine life.

13. Studying the genetics of human behavior.

14. Investigating the effects of pollution on plant growth.

15. Analyzing the microbiome’s role in human health.

16. Studying the impact of climate change on crop yields.

17. Investigating the genetics of rare diseases.

Let’s get started with some quantitative research topics for stem students in chemistry:

1. Studying the properties of superconductors at different temperatures.

2. Analyzing the efficiency of various catalysts in chemical reactions.

3. Investigating the synthesis of novel polymers with unique properties.

4. Studying the kinetics of chemical reactions.

5. Analyzing the environmental impact of chemical waste disposal.

6. Investigating the properties of nanomaterials for drug delivery.

7. Studying the behavior of nanoparticles in different solvents.

8. Analyzing the use of renewable energy sources in chemical processes.

9. Investigating the chemistry of atmospheric pollutants.

10. Studying the properties of graphene for electronic applications.

11. Analyzing the use of enzymes in industrial processes.

12. Investigating the chemistry of alternative fuels.

13. Studying the synthesis of pharmaceutical compounds.

14. Analyzing the properties of materials for battery technology.

15. Investigating the chemistry of natural products for drug discovery.

16. Analyzing the effects of chemical additives on food preservation.

17. Investigating the chemistry of carbon capture and utilization technologies.

Here are some quantitative research topics in physics for stem students:

1. Investigating the behavior of subatomic particles in high-energy collisions.

2. Analyzing the properties of dark matter and dark energy.

3. Studying the quantum properties of entangled particles.

4. Investigating the dynamics of black holes and their gravitational effects.

5. Analyzing the behavior of light in different mediums.

6. Studying the properties of superfluids at low temperatures.

7. Investigating the physics of renewable energy sources like solar cells.

8. Analyzing the properties of materials at extreme temperatures and pressures.

9. Studying the behavior of electromagnetic waves in various applications.

10. Investigating the physics of quantum computing.

11. Analyzing the properties of magnetic materials for data storage.

12. Studying the behavior of particles in plasma for fusion energy research.

13. Investigating the physics of nanoscale materials and devices.

14. Analyzing the properties of materials for use in semiconductors.

15. Studying the principles of thermodynamics in energy efficiency.

16. Investigating the physics of gravitational waves.

17. Analyzing the properties of materials for use in quantum technologies.

Engineering

Let’s explore some quantitative research topics for stem students in engineering:

1. Investigating the efficiency of renewable energy systems in urban environments.

2. Analyzing the impact of 3D printing on manufacturing processes.

3. Studying the structural integrity of materials in aerospace engineering.

4. Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in autonomous vehicles.

5. Analyzing the efficiency of water treatment processes in civil engineering.

6. Studying the impact of robotics in healthcare.

7. Investigating the optimization of supply chain logistics using quantitative methods.

8. Analyzing the energy efficiency of smart buildings.

9. Studying the effects of vibration on structural engineering.

10. Investigating the use of drones in agricultural practices.

11. Analyzing the impact of machine learning in predictive maintenance.

12. Studying the optimization of transportation networks.

13. Investigating the use of nanomaterials in electronic devices.

14. Analyzing the efficiency of renewable energy storage systems.

15. Studying the impact of AI-driven design in architecture.

16. Investigating the optimization of manufacturing processes using Industry 4.0 technologies.

17. Analyzing the use of robotics in underwater exploration.

Environmental Science

Here are some top quantitative research topics in environmental science for students:

1. Investigating the effects of air pollution on respiratory health.

2. Analyzing the impact of deforestation on climate change.

3. Studying the biodiversity of coral reefs and their conservation.

4. Investigating the use of remote sensing in monitoring deforestation.

5. Analyzing the effects of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems.

6. Studying the impact of climate change on glacier retreat.

7. Investigating the use of wetlands for water quality improvement.

8. Analyzing the effects of urbanization on local microclimates.

9. Studying the impact of oil spills on aquatic ecosystems.

10. Investigating the use of renewable energy in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.

11. Analyzing the effects of soil erosion on agricultural productivity.

12. Studying the impact of invasive species on native ecosystems.

13. Investigating the use of bioremediation for soil cleanup.

14. Analyzing the effects of climate change on migratory bird patterns.

15. Studying the impact of land use changes on water resources.

16. Investigating the use of green infrastructure for urban stormwater management.

17. Analyzing the effects of noise pollution on wildlife behavior.

Computer Science

Let’s get started with some simple quantitative research topics for stem students:

1. Investigating the efficiency of machine learning algorithms for image recognition.

2. Analyzing the security of blockchain technology in financial transactions.

3. Studying the impact of quantum computing on cryptography.

4. Investigating the use of natural language processing in chatbots and virtual assistants.

5. Analyzing the effectiveness of cybersecurity measures in protecting sensitive data.

6. Studying the impact of algorithmic trading in financial markets.

7. Investigating the use of deep learning in autonomous robotics.

8. Analyzing the efficiency of data compression algorithms for large datasets.

9. Studying the impact of virtual reality in medical simulations.

10. Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in personalized medicine.

11. Analyzing the effectiveness of recommendation systems in e-commerce.

12. Studying the impact of cloud computing on data storage and processing.

13. Investigating the use of neural networks in predicting disease outbreaks.

14. Analyzing the efficiency of data mining techniques in customer behavior analysis.

15. Studying the impact of social media algorithms on user behavior.

16. Investigating the use of machine learning in natural language translation.

17. Analyzing the effectiveness of sentiment analysis in social media monitoring.

Mathematics

Let’s explore the quantitative research topics in mathematics for students:

1. Investigating the properties of prime numbers and their distribution.

2. Analyzing the behavior of chaotic systems using differential equations.

3. Studying the optimization of algorithms for solving complex mathematical problems.

4. Investigating the use of graph theory in network analysis.

5. Analyzing the properties of fractals in natural phenomena.

6. Studying the application of probability theory in risk assessment.

7. Investigating the use of numerical methods in solving partial differential equations.

8. Analyzing the properties of mathematical models for population dynamics.

9. Studying the optimization of algorithms for data compression.

10. Investigating the use of topology in data analysis.

11. Analyzing the behavior of mathematical models in financial markets.

12. Studying the application of game theory in strategic decision-making.

13. Investigating the use of mathematical modeling in epidemiology.

14. Analyzing the properties of algebraic structures in coding theory.

15. Studying the optimization of algorithms for image processing.

16. Investigating the use of number theory in cryptography.

17. Analyzing the behavior of mathematical models in climate prediction.

Earth Sciences

Here are some quantitative research topics for stem students in earth science:

1. Investigating the impact of volcanic eruptions on climate patterns.

2. Analyzing the behavior of earthquakes along tectonic plate boundaries.

3. Studying the geomorphology of river systems and erosion.

4. Investigating the use of remote sensing in monitoring wildfires.

5. Analyzing the effects of glacier melt on sea-level rise.

6. Studying the impact of ocean currents on weather patterns.

7. Investigating the use of geothermal energy in renewable power generation.

8. Analyzing the behavior of tsunamis and their destructive potential.

9. Studying the impact of soil erosion on agricultural productivity.

10. Investigating the use of geological data in mineral resource exploration.

11. Analyzing the effects of climate change on coastal erosion.

12. Studying the geomagnetic field and its role in navigation.

13. Investigating the use of radar technology in weather forecasting.

14. Analyzing the behavior of landslides and their triggers.

15. Studying the impact of groundwater depletion on aquifer systems.

16. Investigating the use of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) in land-use planning.

17. Analyzing the effects of urbanization on heat island formation.

Health Sciences and Medicine

Here are some quantitative research topics for stem students in health science and medicine:

1. Investigating the effectiveness of telemedicine in improving healthcare access.

2. Analyzing the impact of personalized medicine in cancer treatment.

3. Studying the epidemiology of infectious diseases and their spread.

4. Investigating the use of wearable devices in monitoring patient health.

5. Analyzing the effects of nutrition and exercise on metabolic health.

6. Studying the impact of genetics in predicting disease susceptibility.

7. Investigating the use of artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis.

8. Analyzing the behavior of pharmaceutical drugs in clinical trials.

9. Studying the effectiveness of mental health interventions in schools.

10. Investigating the use of gene editing technologies in treating genetic disorders.

11. Analyzing the properties of medical imaging techniques for early disease detection.

12. Studying the impact of vaccination campaigns on public health.

13. Investigating the use of regenerative medicine in tissue repair.

14. Analyzing the behavior of pathogens in antimicrobial resistance.

15. Studying the epidemiology of chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease.

16. Investigating the use of bioinformatics in genomics research.

17. Analyzing the effects of environmental factors on health outcomes.

Quantitative research is the backbone of STEM fields, providing the tools and methodologies needed to explore, understand, and innovate in the world of science and technology . As STEM students, embracing quantitative research not only enhances your analytical skills but also equips you to address complex real-world challenges. With the extensive list of 155+ quantitative research topics for stem students provided in this blog, you have a starting point for your own STEM research journey. Whether you’re interested in biology, chemistry, physics, engineering, or any other STEM discipline, there’s a wealth of quantitative research topics waiting to be explored. So, roll up your sleeves, grab your lab coat or laptop, and embark on your quest for knowledge and discovery in the exciting world of STEM.

I hope you enjoyed this blog post about quantitative research topics for stem students.

How to write the best quality programming assignment?

Here in this blog, Codeavail programming assignment help experts will help you know the best steps of how to write assignment and explain to you…

How to do my assignment | Good Assignment Writing Tips

When you ask CodeAvail experts how to do my assignment, Our assignment writing experts will motivate you and provide the best ways to do the…

110+ Best Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Explore engaging quantitative research topics for STEM students. This guide covers the basics, popular areas, and tips for success to help you make an impact.

Quantitative research uses data and numbers to uncover insights. Whether you’re into computer science, engineering, or natural sciences, it’s a powerful tool for discovery.

Ready to get started? Let’s dive in!

Table of Contents

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students PDF

Understanding quantitative research.

Quantitative research uses numerical data and statistical methods to find patterns and draw conclusions.

Key Characteristics

Objectivity: Minimizes personal bias.
Numerical Data: Focuses on measurable data.
Generalizability: Makes broad conclusions from samples.
Structured Design: Follows a set research plan.
Statistical Analysis: Uses statistics to analyze data.

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research

Quantitative: Deals with numbers and statistical analysis.
Qualitative: Explores non-numerical data like text and images.

The Research Process

Identify the Problem: Define the research question.
Formulate Hypotheses: Create testable statements.
Collect Data: Use surveys, experiments, or observations.
Analyze Data: Apply statistical methods.
Interpret Findings: Draw conclusions based on results.

These basics help in designing and conducting effective quantitative research.

Popular Quantitative Research Methods

Check out popular quantitative research methods:-

Description: Collect data via questionnaires or interviews.
Use: Measure attitudes, opinions, or behaviors.
Example: Assessing student satisfaction with online learning.

Experiments

Description: Manipulate variables to see effects.
Use: Determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Example: Testing a new drug’s effectiveness.

Correlational Studies

Description: Examine relationships between variables.
Use: Identify patterns and trends.
Example: Linking air pollution to respiratory issues.

Causal-Comparative Research

Description: Compare groups without random assignment.
Use: Explore cause-and-effect when experiments aren’t possible.
Example: Comparing student performance across socioeconomic backgrounds.

Observational Studies

Description: Observe and record behavior in natural settings.
Use: Study behaviors not suitable for experiments.
Example: Observing animal behavior in the wild.

Content Analysis

Description: Analyze text or visual content for data.
Use: Study media or document content.
Example: Analyzing trends in scientific papers.

Longitudinal Studies

Description: Collect data from the same group over time.
Use: Track changes and developments.
Example: Monitoring plant growth under various conditions.

These methods help researchers choose the best approach for their questions.

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Check out quantitative research topics for STEM students:-

Friction : Compare friction on different surfaces.
Light Diffraction : Measure light patterns through slits.
Heat Engines : Test efficiency with different fluids.
Magnetism : Study magnetic field strength in wires.
Quantum : Analyze electron patterns in a slit experiment.
Sound Absorption : Test materials for sound absorption.
Gravity : Study forces in planetary motion.
Fluid Flow : Measure flow rates in different conditions.
Radioactivity : Compare decay rates of isotopes.
Metal Expansion : Measure how metals expand when heated.
Reaction Rates : Study catalysts’ effect on reaction speed.
Gas Solubility : Test gas dissolving in liquids at different temps.
Battery Efficiency : Compare power in different battery types.
Reaction Yield : Measure product yield in reactions.
Buffer Solutions : Test buffers’ ability to resist pH changes.
Organic Reactions : Study reaction speed in organic compounds.
Equilibrium : Analyze shifts in chemical equilibrium.
Adsorption : Test adsorption on solid surfaces.
Heat Changes : Measure energy in chemical reactions.
Polymer Size : Compare sizes of different polymers.
Gene Linkage : Study gene inheritance patterns.
Antibiotics : Test bacteria growth with antibiotics.
Invasive Species : Measure impact on native species.
BMI vs Heart Rate : Compare BMI with heart rates.
Blood Glucose : Measure blood sugar before/after meals.
Photosynthesis : Test plant growth under various light.
Reaction Times : Compare responses to visual and sound stimuli.
Cell Growth : Measure cell growth under different nutrients.
Vaccine Response : Test antibody production after vaccines.
Animal Behavior : Study stress effects on animal behavior.

Environmental Science

Soil Pollution : Measure heavy metals in soil.
Glacier Melt : Track glacier melting rates.
Energy Use : Compare renewable energy in homes.
Composting : Test compost methods for waste reduction.
Water Oxygen : Measure oxygen in water bodies.
Air Pollution : Compare urban and rural air quality.
Species Richness : Measure species diversity in forests.
Carbon Storage : Compare carbon storage in trees.
Soil Erosion : Measure soil loss in farms.
Solar Panels : Test solar efficiency in different weather.

Engineering

Material Strength : Test building materials’ strength.
Power Loss : Measure power loss in transmission lines.
Gear Efficiency : Compare efficiency of gear types.
Road Surfaces : Study effects of road materials on fuel use.
Software Bugs : Count bugs in different coding languages.
Chemical Reactors : Test reactor yields at various temps.
Airfoil Lift : Measure lift in different wing designs.
Prosthetics : Compare materials used in prosthetics.
Water Treatment : Test effectiveness of water treatment.
Robot Accuracy : Measure precision in robotic arms.

Mathematics

Probability : Analyze outcome probabilities in experiments.
Cooling Rates : Measure cooling rates using calculus.
Cryptography : Study algebra in encryption methods.
Shape Geometry : Calculate area and perimeter of shapes.
Population Models : Model population growth rates.
Prime Numbers : Analyze prime number distribution.
Graphics : Test matrix operations in computer graphics.
Combinations : Study combinations in optimization problems.
Game Strategy : Analyze game strategies mathematically.
Resource Allocation : Optimize resources in production.

Computer Science

Data Patterns : Analyze data clusters in large datasets.
AI Accuracy : Test machine learning models’ precision.
Cyber-Attacks : Measure attack frequency on networks.
Algorithm Performance : Compare sorting algorithm speeds.
User Interface : Test user satisfaction in different designs.
Object Detection : Measure accuracy in computer vision.
Sentiment Analysis : Test algorithms in sentiment detection.
Blockchain Speed : Measure transaction speeds in blockchain.
Encryption : Test security of different encryption methods.
Big Data : Analyze performance in big data systems.

Medicine and Health

Disease Spread : Study disease spread in dense populations.
Drug Dosage : Measure drug effectiveness at different doses.
Vaccine Impact : Test vaccine success rates.
Diet Impact : Measure diet effects on cholesterol.
Imaging Accuracy : Compare diagnostic imaging methods.
Heart Rate : Study heart rate variability in stress.
Cancer Treatment : Compare effectiveness of cancer treatments.
Surgery Recovery : Measure recovery time in joint surgeries.
Mental Health : Study anxiety and depression rates.
Gene Expression : Analyze gene activity in disorders.

Astronomy and Space Science

Star Brightness : Measure star brightness and distance.
Impact Craters : Study craters and asteroid sizes.
Universe Expansion : Analyze cosmic background radiation.
Space Propulsion : Test deep space propulsion systems.
Binary Stars : Study orbits in binary star systems.
Exoplanet Detection : Measure planet detection accuracy.
Dark Matter : Analyze dark matter in galaxies.
Solar Radiation : Track solar radiation changes.
Solar Flares : Study effects of solar flares on satellites.
Space Chemistry : Measure chemicals in space clouds.

These topics are now more concise while still providing a clear focus for quantitative research.

Tips for Choosing a Research Topic

After brainstorming research topics, refine your ideas with these steps:

Narrow Your Topic

Define specific research questions.
Determine the scope and depth of your study.
Identify key variables to measure.

Literature Review

Explore existing research to find gaps.
Review how previous studies were done.
Identify relevant theories to support your work.

Feasibility Assessment

Check if you have access to necessary data.
Evaluate time and resource requirements.
Secure any needed approvals or permissions.

Following these steps will help turn a broad idea into a focused research project.

Conducting Quantitative Research

Check out the best tips for coducting quantitative research:-

Data Collection Methods

Surveys: use questionnaires or interviews..

Pros: Efficient for large data.
Cons: Risk of bias, less detail.

Experiments: Change variables to see effects.

Pros: Shows cause-and-effect.
Cons: Time-consuming, costly, ethical issues.

Observations: Record behavior systematically.

Pros: Natural data, captures unexpected behavior.
Cons: Observer bias, time-consuming.

Data Analysis Techniques

Use: Stats analysis, hypothesis testing.
Use: Data manipulation, visualization, machine learning.

Research Ethics and Data Privacy

Informed Consent: Ensure participants agree voluntarily.
Data Privacy: Protect confidentiality.
Data Integrity: Maintain accuracy and avoid misconduct.

Writing a Research Paper

Clear Writing: Use concise academic language.
Structure: Follow standard format (intro, methods, results, discussion).
Data Visualization: Use graphs and charts.
Citation Style: Follow APA or MLA.
Proofreading: Check for clarity and grammar.

These steps help ensure rigorous, ethical research and clear communication.

Ethical Considerations in Quantitative Research

Ethical conduct is essential in research for protecting participants, ensuring integrity, and building trust.

Importance of Ethical Research

Protects Participants: Avoids harm and privacy issues.
Ensures Integrity: Keeps findings reliable.
Builds Trust: Gains public confidence.

Informed Consent

Clear Info: Explain the study clearly.
Voluntary: Participation should be free of pressure.
Right to Withdraw: Participants can leave anytime.

Data Privacy

Confidentiality: Keep identities and data secure.
Anonymity: Use data without personal identifiers when possible.
Security: Protect data from unauthorized access.

Research Integrity

Honesty: Report findings accurately.
Avoid Plagiarism: Credit sources properly.
Manage Data: Keep records organized and complete.

Adhering to these principles ensures ethical and trustworthy research.

Challenges and Opportunities in Quantitative Research

Quantitative research has its challenges but can be highly effective with the right approach.

Data Quality: Ensure accuracy and handle errors.
Sample Size: Find the right balance—avoid too small or too large.
Causality: Correlation doesn’t equal causation.
Generalizability: Ensure findings apply broadly.

Big Data and Advanced Analytics

Vast Datasets: Discover new patterns.
Advanced Analytics: Use AI and machine learning for insights.
Predictive Modeling: Forecast trends and guide decisions.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Diverse Perspectives: Gain fresh insights.
Complementary Expertise: Combine strengths from different fields.
Real-World Impact: Increase practical applications.

By tackling these challenges and leveraging new tools, researchers can achieve meaningful results.

Overcoming Challenges in Quantitative Research

Quantitative research can face challenges, but these strategies can help:

Data Quality

Clean Data: Fix errors and inconsistencies.
Handle Missing Data: Use statistical methods for imputation.
Validate Data: Cross-check with other sources.

Sample Size

Power Analysis: Determine the right sample size.
Sampling Techniques: Use probability methods.
Combine Data: Aggregate data from various sources.
Randomization: Randomly assign participants.
Control Factors: Manage confounding variables.
Longitudinal Studies: Track changes over time.

Generalizability

Representative Sample: Reflect the target population.
Replicate Studies: Test across different settings.
Strong Framework: Base findings on solid theory.

Big Data and Analytics

Manage Data: Efficiently store and access data.
Mine Data: Extract valuable insights.
Apply Machine Learning: Discover patterns and make predictions.

Using these strategies can help address challenges and improve research outcomes.

Real-world Examples of Successful Quantitative Research Projects

Quantitative research drives progress in many fields. Here are some examples:

Medicine and Healthcare

Clinical Trials: Test new treatments.
Epidemiological Studies: Find disease risk factors.
Health Economics: Assess healthcare costs and benefits.

Business and Economics

Market Research: Study consumer behavior.
Financial Modeling: Forecast market trends.
Operations Research: Improve supply chains.

Social Sciences

Education Research: Evaluate teaching methods .
Political Science: Analyze voting and public opinion.
Sociology: Examine social trends.

Natural Sciences

Physics: Test scientific theories.
Chemistry: Study chemical reactions.
Biology: Research genetic patterns.
Product Testing: Check product performance.
Structural Analysis: Assess building strength.
Process Optimization: Enhance manufacturing efficiency.

These examples highlight the diverse applications and impact of quantitative research.

Collaborate with Other Researchers

Collaboration is crucial in research. Here’s how to do it effectively:

Finding Collaborators

Shared Interests: Look for those with similar research topics.
Different Skills: Seek out varied expertise.
Institutional Links: Partner within or outside your institution.
Online Networks: Use research sites and social media.

Building Collaborations

Communicate Clearly: Keep discussions open and honest.
Set Goals: Define objectives and expectations.
Define Roles: Outline each person’s responsibilities.
Handle Conflicts: Plan for resolving disagreements.
Build Trust: Foster respectful relationships.

Challenges to Address

Manage Time: Balance joint and solo work.
Clarify Ownership: Agree on who owns the research.
Respect Differences: Manage cultural and background differences.
Authorship Rules: Decide on publication credit.

Tools to Use

Collaboration Software: Use Google Drive, Slack , or Teams.
Project Management: Organize with Trello or Asana.
Video Calls: Meet via Zoom or Skype.

Effective collaboration leads to productive research.

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Check out quantitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines

Agriculture and Food Science

Climate Impact on Rice : Study how climate change affects rice yields.
Organic vs. Soil Health : Compare soil health in organic and conventional farming.
Extension Programs : Evaluate agricultural extension program effectiveness.
Aquaculture Benefits : Assess economic benefits of aquaculture.
Sustainable Farming : Develop sustainable crop management methods.
Organic Pest Control : Test organic pest control methods.
Water Efficiency : Study water usage in farming.
Fertilizer Effects : Compare soil health with different fertilizers.
Food Security : Improve food security strategies.
Agri-Tech : Explore technology in farming.

Information and Communications Technology (ICT)

Digital Skills and Jobs : Study how digital skills affect jobs.
Internet and Education : Analyze internet access and education.
E-Learning Impact : Evaluate e-learning platforms.
Digital Divide : Examine the digital divide’s effect on rural areas.
Cybersecurity Education : Increase cybersecurity awareness.
Social Media and Studies : Study social media’s impact on learning.
Tech Access and Jobs : Compare tech access and job prospects.
Learning Apps : Assess mobile learning apps.
E-Governance : Investigate benefits of e-governance.
Digital Training : Evaluate digital skills training.
Deforestation and Wildlife : Study deforestation’s effect on wildlife.
Pollution and Health : Analyze air pollution and health issues.
Renewable Energy : Evaluate renewable energy’s effect on emissions.
Climate and Erosion : Study climate change and coastal erosion.
Biodiversity : Develop strategies to conserve biodiversity.
Water Pollution : Investigate water pollution sources.
Soil Erosion : Study land use and soil erosion.
Plastic Waste : Analyze plastic waste impact on marine life.
Renewable Adoption : Assess renewable energy adoption.
Climate Adaptation : Explore climate adaptation strategies.
Local Materials : Test local materials in earthquakes.
Housing Efficiency : Evaluate energy efficiency in housing.
Infrastructure Impact : Assess infrastructure’s effect on poverty.
Energy Costs : Analyze costs of renewable energy projects.
Building Materials : Research sustainable materials.
Water Tech : Develop water conservation technologies.
Smart Grids : Investigate smart grid benefits.
Transportation Solutions : Explore urban transportation improvements.
Disaster-Resistant Structures : Design structures for disasters.
Green Certifications : Study green building certifications.

Medical and Health Sciences

Disease Prevalence : Study non-communicable disease rates.
Maternal Health : Evaluate programs reducing maternal deaths.
Malnutrition Impact : Investigate malnutrition’s effect on growth.
Healthcare Access : Analyze access based on socioeconomic status.
Vaccination Impact : Assess vaccination’s role in disease prevention.
Mental Health : Improve mental health awareness.
Chronic Disease : Study chronic disease management.
Health Tech : Explore healthcare technology.
Nutrition Programs : Evaluate nutritional intervention effects.
Health Education : Study health education program effectiveness.

Quantitative research is crucial in STEM fields, offering a structured way to study complex phenomena. By choosing a focused topic, using rigorous methods, and analyzing data effectively, students can make impactful contributions.

Success in quantitative research comes from curiosity, perseverance, and a drive to discover new knowledge. Embrace challenges as chances for growth and innovation.

Combining theory with practical application, your research can push the boundaries of knowledge and benefit society.

270+ Unique Cyber Security Research Topics For Students

250+ Best Cloud Computing Research Topics for students 2024

100+ Quantitative Research Topics For Students

Quantitative research is a research strategy focusing on quantified data collection and analysis processes. This research strategy emphasizes testing theories on various subjects. It also includes collecting and analyzing non-numerical data.

Quantitative research is a common approach in the natural and social sciences , like marketing, business, sociology, chemistry, biology, economics, and psychology. So, if you are fond of statistics and figures, a quantitative research title would be an excellent option for your research proposal or project.

How to Get a Title of Quantitative Research

How to make quantitative research title, what is the best title for quantitative research, amazing quantitative research topics for students, creative quantitative research topics, perfect quantitative research title examples, unique quantitative research titles, outstanding quantitative research title examples for students, creative example title of quantitative research samples, outstanding quantitative research problems examples, fantastic quantitative research topic examples, the best quantitative research topics, grade 12 quantitative research title for students, list of quantitative research titles for high school, easy quantitative research topics for students, trending topics for quantitative research, quantitative research proposal topics, samples of quantitative research titles, research title about business quantitative.

Finding a great title is the key to writing a great quantitative research proposal or paper. A title for quantitative research prepares you for success, failure, or mediocre grades. This post features examples of quantitative research titles for all students.

Putting together a research title and quantitative research design is not as easy as some students assume. So, an example topic of quantitative research can help you craft your own. However, even with the examples, you may need some guidelines for personalizing your research project or proposal topics.

So, here are some tips for getting a title for quantitative research:

Consider your area of studies
Look out for relevant subjects in the area
Expert advice may come in handy
Check out some sample quantitative research titles

Making a quantitative research title is easy if you know the qualities of a good title in quantitative research. Reading about how to make a quantitative research title may not help as much as looking at some samples. Looking at a quantitative research example title will give you an idea of where to start.

However, let’s look at some tips for how to make a quantitative research title:

The title should seem interesting to readers
Ensure that the title represents the content of the research paper
Reflect on the tone of the writing in the title
The title should contain important keywords in your chosen subject to help readers find your paper
The title should not be too lengthy
It should be grammatically correct and creative
It must generate curiosity

An excellent quantitative title should be clear, which implies that it should effectively explain the paper and what readers can expect. A research title for quantitative research is the gateway to your article or proposal. So, it should be well thought out. Additionally, it should give you room for extensive topic research.

A sample of quantitative research titles will give you an idea of what a good title for quantitative research looks like. Here are some examples:

What is the correlation between inflation rates and unemployment rates?
Has climate adaptation influenced the mitigation of funds allocation?
Job satisfaction and employee turnover: What is the link?
A look at the relationship between poor households and the development of entrepreneurship skills
Urbanization and economic growth: What is the link between these elements?
Does education achievement influence people’s economic status?
What is the impact of solar electricity on the wholesale energy market?
Debt accumulation and retirement: What is the relationship between these concepts?
Can people with psychiatric disorders develop independent living skills?
Children’s nutrition and its impact on cognitive development

Quantitative research applies to various subjects in the natural and social sciences. Therefore, depending on your intended subject, you have numerous options. Below are some good quantitative research topics for students:

The difference between the colorific intake of men and women in your country
Top strategies used to measure customer satisfaction and how they work
Black Friday sales: are they profitable?
The correlation between estimated target market and practical competitive risk assignment
Are smartphones making us brighter or dumber?
Nuclear families Vs. Joint families: Is there a difference?
What will society look like in the absence of organized religion?
A comparison between carbohydrate weight loss benefits and high carbohydrate diets?
How does emotional stability influence your overall well-being?
The extent of the impact of technology in the communications sector

Creativity is the key to creating a good research topic in quantitative research. Find a good quantitative research topic below:

How much exercise is good for lasting physical well-being?
A comparison of the nutritional therapy uses and contemporary medical approaches
Does sugar intake have a direct impact on diabetes diagnosis?
Education attainment: Does it influence crime rates in society?
Is there an actual link between obesity and cancer rates?
Do kids with siblings have better social skills than those without?
Computer games and their impact on the young generation
Has social media marketing taken over conventional marketing strategies?
The impact of technology development on human relationships and communication
What is the link between drug addiction and age?

Need more quantitative research title examples to inspire you? Here are some quantitative research title examples to look at:

Habitation fragmentation and biodiversity loss: What is the link?
Radiation has affected biodiversity: Assessing its effects
An assessment of the impact of the CORONA virus on global population growth
Is the pandemic truly over, or have human bodies built resistance against the virus?
The ozone hole and its impact on the environment
The greenhouse gas effect: What is it and how has it impacted the atmosphere
GMO crops: are they good or bad for your health?
Is there a direct link between education quality and job attainment?
How have education systems changed from traditional to modern times?
The good and bad impacts of technology on education qualities

Your examiner will give you excellent grades if you come up with a unique title and outstanding content. Here are some quantitative research examples titles.

Online classes: are they helpful or not?
What changes has the global CORONA pandemic had on the population growth curve?
Daily habits influenced by the global pandemic
An analysis of the impact of culture on people’s personalities
How has feminism influenced the education system’s approach to the girl child’s education?
Academic competition: what are its benefits and downsides for students?
Is there a link between education and student integrity?
An analysis of how the education sector can influence a country’s economy
An overview of the link between crime rates and concern for crime
Is there a link between education and obesity?

Research title example quantitative topics when well-thought guarantees a paper that is a good read. Look at the examples below to get started.

What are the impacts of online games on students?
Sex education in schools: how important is it?
Should schools be teaching about safe sex in their sex education classes?
The correlation between extreme parent interference on student academic performance
Is there a real link between academic marks and intelligence?
Teacher feedback: How necessary is it, and how does it help students?
An analysis of modern education systems and their impact on student performance
An overview of the link between academic performance/marks and intelligence
Are grading systems helpful or harmful to students?
What was the impact of the pandemic on students?

Irrespective of the course you take, here are some titles that can fit diverse subjects pretty well. Here are some creative quantitative research title ideas:

A look at the pre-corona and post-corona economy
How are conventional retail businesses fairing against eCommerce sites like Amazon and Shopify?
An evaluation of mortality rates of heart attacks
Effective treatments for cardiovascular issues and their prevention
A comparison of the effectiveness of home care and nursing home care
Strategies for managing effective dissemination of information to modern students
How does educational discrimination influence students’ futures?
The impacts of unfavorable classroom environment and bullying on students and teachers
An overview of the implementation of STEM education to K-12 students
How effective is digital learning?

If your paper addresses a problem, you must present facts that solve the question or tell more about the question. Here are examples of quantitative research titles that will inspire you.

An elaborate study of the influence of telemedicine in healthcare practices
How has scientific innovation influenced the defense or military system?
The link between technology and people’s mental health
Has social media helped create awareness or worsened people’s mental health?
How do engineers promote green technology?
How can engineers raise sustainability in building and structural infrastructures?
An analysis of how decision-making is dependent on someone’s sub-conscious
A comprehensive study of ADHD and its impact on students’ capabilities
The impact of racism on people’s mental health and overall wellbeing
How has the current surge in social activism helped shape people’s relationships?

Are you looking for an example of a quantitative research title? These ten examples below will get you started.

The prevalence of nonverbal communication in social control and people’s interactions
The impacts of stress on people’s behavior in society
A study of the connection between capital structures and corporate strategies
How do changes in credit ratings impact equality returns?
A quantitative analysis of the effect of bond rating changes on stock prices
The impact of semantics on web technology
An analysis of persuasion, propaganda, and marketing impact on individuals
The dominant-firm model: what is it, and how does it apply to your country’s retail sector?
The role of income inequality in economy growth
An examination of juvenile delinquents’ treatment in your country

Excellent Topics For Quantitative Research

Here are some titles for quantitative research you should consider:

Does studying mathematics help implement data safety for businesses
How are art-related subjects interdependent with mathematics?
How do eco-friendly practices in the hospitality industry influence tourism rates?
A deep insight into how people view eco-tourisms
Religion vs. hospitality: Details on their correlation
Has your country’s tourist sector revived after the pandemic?
How effective is non-verbal communication in conveying emotions?
Are there similarities between the English and French vocabulary?
How do politicians use persuasive language in political speeches?
The correlation between popular culture and translation

Here are some quantitative research titles examples for your consideration:

How do world leaders use language to change the emotional climate in their nations?
Extensive research on how linguistics cultivate political buzzwords
The impact of globalization on the global tourism sector
An analysis of the effects of the pandemic on the worldwide hospitality sector
The influence of social media platforms on people’s choice of tourism destinations
Educational tourism: What is it and what you should know about it
Why do college students experience math anxiety?
Is math anxiety a phenomenon?
A guide on effective ways to fight cultural bias in modern society
Creative ways to solve the overpopulation issue

An example of quantitative research topics for 12 th -grade students will come in handy if you want to score a good grade. Here are some of the best ones:

The link between global warming and climate change
What is the greenhouse gas impact on biodiversity and the atmosphere
Has the internet successfully influenced literacy rates in society
The value and downsides of competition for students
A comparison of the education system in first-world and third-world countries
The impact of alcohol addiction on the younger generation
How has social media influenced human relationships?
Has education helped boost feminism among men and women?
Are computers in classrooms beneficial or detrimental to students?
How has social media improved bullying rates among teenagers?

High school students can apply research titles on social issues or other elements, depending on the subject. Let’s look at some quantitative topics for students:

What is the right age to introduce sex education for students
Can extreme punishment help reduce alcohol consumption among teenagers?
Should the government increase the age of sexual consent?
The link between globalization and the local economy collapses
How are global companies influencing local economies?

There are numerous possible quantitative research topics you can write about. Here are some great quantitative research topics examples:

The correlation between video games and crime rates
Do college studies impact future job satisfaction?
What can the education sector do to encourage more college enrollment?
The impact of education on self-esteem
The relationship between income and occupation

You can find inspiration for your research topic from trending affairs on social media or in the news. Such topics will make your research enticing. Find a trending topic for quantitative research example from the list below:

How the country’s economy is fairing after the pandemic
An analysis of the riots by women in Iran and what the women gain to achieve
Is the current US government living up to the voter’s expectations?
How is the war in Ukraine affecting the global economy?
Can social media riots affect political decisions?

A proposal is a paper you write proposing the subject you would like to cover for your research and the research techniques you will apply. If the proposal is approved, it turns to your research topic. Here are some quantitative titles you should consider for your research proposal:

Military support and economic development: What is the impact in developing nations?
How does gun ownership influence crime rates in developed countries?
How can the US government reduce gun violence without influencing people’s rights?
What is the link between school prestige and academic standards?
Is there a scientific link between abortion and the definition of viability?

You can never have too many sample titles. The samples allow you to find a unique title you’re your research or proposal. Find a sample quantitative research title here:

Does weight loss indicate good or poor health?
Should schools do away with grading systems?
The impact of culture on student interactions and personalities
How can parents successfully protect their kids from the dangers of the internet?
Is the US education system better or worse than Europe’s?

If you’re a business major, then you must choose a research title quantitative about business. Let’s look at some research title examples quantitative in business:

Creating shareholder value in business: How important is it?
The changes in credit ratings and their impact on equity returns
The importance of data privacy laws in business operations
How do businesses benefit from e-waste and carbon footprint reduction?
Organizational culture in business: what is its importance?

We Are A Call Away

Interesting, creative, unique, and easy quantitative research topics allow you to explain your paper and make research easy. Therefore, you should not take choosing a research paper or proposal topic lightly. With your topic ready, reach out to us today for excellent research paper writing services .

STEM Research Topics for an Educational Paper

STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. It is essential for learning and discovery, helping us understand the world, solve problems, and think critically. STEM research goes beyond classroom learning, allowing us to explore specific areas in greater detail. But what is a good topic for research STEM?

Here are a few examples to get you thinking:

Can computers be used to help doctors diagnose diseases?
How can we build houses that are strong and don't hurt the environment?
What are the mysteries of space that scientists haven't figured out yet?

Why is STEM important? STEM is everywhere—from the phones we use to the medicine that keeps us healthy. Learning about these fields helps us build a better future by developing new technologies, protecting our environment, and solving critical problems.

Now that you understand the basics, let's dive into some of the most interesting and important research topics you can choose from.

The List of 260 STEM Research Topics

The right topic will keep you engaged and motivated throughout the writing process. However, with so many areas to explore and problems to solve, finding a unique topic can seem a bit tough. To help you with this, we have compiled a list of 260 STEM research topics. This list aims to guide your decision-making and help you discover a subject that holds significant potential for impact. And if you need further help writing about your chosen topic, feel free to hire someone to write a paper on our professional platform!

Feeling Overwhelmed by Your STEM Research Paper?

Don't go it alone! Our team of seasoned STEM Ph.D.s is here to be your assistant!

Physics Research Topics

Physics, the study of matter, energy, and their interactions, is the foundation for understanding our universe. Here are 20 topics to ignite your curiosity:

Can we develop more efficient solar panels to capture and utilize solar energy for a sustainable future?
How can we further explore the fundamental building blocks of matter, like quarks and leptons, to understand the nature of our universe?
How can we detect and understand dark matter and dark energy, which make up most of the universe's mass and energy but remain a mystery?
What happens to matter and energy when they enter a black hole?
How can we reconcile the theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity to understand gravity at the atomic level?
How can materials with zero electrical resistance be developed and used for more efficient power transmission and next-generation technologies?
What were the conditions of the universe moments after the Big Bang?
How can we manipulate and utilize sound for applications in areas like medical imaging and communication?
How does light behave as both a wave and a particle?
Can we harness the power of nuclear fusion, the process that powers stars, to create a clean and sustainable energy source for the future?
How can physics principles be used to understand and predict the effects of climate change and develop solutions to mitigate its impact?
Can we explore new physics concepts to design more efficient and sustainable aircraft?
What is the fundamental nature of magnetism?
How can we develop new materials with specific properties like superconductivity, high strength, or self-healing capabilities?
How do simple toys like pendulums or gyroscopes demonstrate fundamental physics concepts like motion and energy transfer?
How do physics principles like aerodynamics, momentum, and force transfer influence the performance of athletes and sports equipment?
What is the physics behind sound waves that allow us to hear and appreciate music?
How do technologies like X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans utilize physics principles to create images of the human body for medical diagnosis?
How do waves, currents, and tides behave in the ocean?
How do basic physics concepts like friction, gravity, and pressure play a role in everyday activities like walking, riding a bike, or playing sports?

Use our physics helper to write a paper on any of these topics of your choice!

Chemistry Research Topics

If you're curious about the world around you at the molecular level, here are 20 intriguing topic questions for you:

Can we create chemical reactions that are kinder to the environment?
How can we design new drugs to fight diseases more effectively?
Is it possible to develop materials with properties never seen before?
Can we store energy using chemical reactions for a sustainable future?
What's the chemistry behind creating delicious and nutritious food?
Can chemistry help us analyze evidence and solve crimes more efficiently?
Are there cleaner ways to power our vehicles using chemistry?
How can we reduce plastic pollution with innovative chemical solutions?
What chemicals influence our brain function and behavior?
What exciting new applications can we discover for versatile polymers?
What's the science behind the fascinating world of scents?
How can we develop effective methods for purifying water for safe consumption?
Can we explore the potential of nanochemistry to create revolutionary technologies?
What chemicals are present in the air we breathe, and how do they affect our health?
Why do objects have different colors? Can we explain it through the lens of chemistry?
Do natural catalysts like enzymes hold the key to more efficient chemical processes?
Can we use chemistry to analyze historical objects and uncover their stories?
What's the science behind the beauty products we use every day?
Are artificial sweeteners and flavors safe for consumption?
What chemicals are present in space, and how do they contribute to our universe's composition?

Engineering Research Topics

The world of engineering is all about applying scientific knowledge to solve practical problems. Here are some thought-provoking questions to guide you:

Can we design robots that can assist us in complex surgeries?
How can we create self-driving cars that are safe and reliable?
Is it possible to build sustainable cities that minimize environmental impact?
What innovative materials can we develop for stronger and more resilient buildings?
How can we harness renewable energy sources like wind and solar more efficiently?
Can we design more sustainable and eco-friendly water treatment systems?
What technologies can improve communication and connectivity, especially in remote areas?
How can we create next-generation prosthetics that provide a natural feel and function?
Is it possible to engineer solutions for food security and sustainable agriculture?
What innovative bridges and transportation systems can we design for smarter cities?
How can we engineer safer and more efficient methods for space exploration?
Can we develop robots that can perform hazardous tasks in dangerous environments?
Is it possible to create new manufacturing processes that minimize waste and pollution?
How can we engineer smarter and more efficient power grids to meet our energy demands?
What innovative solutions can we develop to mitigate the effects of climate change?
Can we design more accessible technologies that improve the lives of people with disabilities?
How can we engineer better disaster preparedness and response systems?
Is it possible to create sustainable and efficient methods for waste management?
What innovative clothing and protective gear can we engineer for extreme environments?
Can we develop new technologies for faster and more accurate medical diagnostics?

Mathematics Research Topics

Mathematics, the language of patterns and relationships, offers endless possibilities for exploration. While you ask us to do my math homework for me online , you can choose the topic for your math paper below.

Can we develop new methods to solve complex mathematical problems more efficiently?
Is there a hidden mathematical structure behind seemingly random events?
How can we apply mathematical models to understand and predict real-world phenomena?
Are there undiscovered prime numbers waiting to be found, stretching the boundaries of number theory?
Can we develop new methods for data encryption and security based on advanced mathematical concepts?
How can we utilize game theory to understand competition, cooperation, and decision-making?
Can we explore the fascinating world of fractals and their applications in various fields?
Is it possible to solve long standing mathematical problems like the Goldbach conjecture?
How can we apply topology to understand the properties of shapes and spaces?
Can we develop new mathematical models for financial markets and risk analysis?
What role does cryptography play in the future of secure communication?
How can abstract algebra help us solve problems in other areas of mathematics and science?
Is it possible to explore the connections between mathematics and computer science for groundbreaking discoveries?
Can we utilize calculus to optimize processes and solve problems in engineering and physics?
How can mathematical modeling help us understand and predict weather patterns?
Is it possible to develop new methods for solving differential equations?
Can we explore the applications of set theory in various branches of mathematics?
How can mathematical logic help us analyze arguments and ensure their validity?
Is it possible to apply graph theory to model complex networks like social media or transportation systems?
Can we explore the fascinating world of infinity and its implications for our understanding of numbers and sets?

STEM Topics for Research in Biology

Biology is the amazing study of living things, from the tiniest creatures to giant ecosystems. If you're curious about the world around you, here are 20 interesting research topics to explore:

Can we change plants to catch more sunlight and grow better, helping us get food in a more eco-friendly way?
How do animals like whales or bees use sounds or dances to chat with each other?
Can tiny living things in our gut be used to improve digestion, fight sickness, or even affect our mood?
How can special cells called stem cells be used to repair damaged organs or tissues, leading to brand-new medical treatments?
What happens inside our cells that makes us age, and can we possibly slow it down?
How do internal clocks in living things influence sleep, how their body works, and overall health?
How does pollution from things like tiny plastic pieces harm sea creatures and maybe even us humans?
Can we understand how our brains learn and remember things to create better ways of teaching?
Explore the relationships between different species, like clownfish and anemones, where both creatures benefit.
Can we use living things like bacteria to make new, eco-friendly materials like bioplastics for different uses?
How similar or different are identical twins raised in separate environments, helping us understand how genes and surroundings work together?
Can changing crops using science be a solution to hunger and not having enough healthy food in some countries?
How do viruses change and spread, and how can we develop better ways to fight new viruses that appear?
Explore how amazing creatures like fireflies make their own light and see if there are ways to use this knowledge for other things.
What is the purpose of play in animals' lives, like helping them grow, socialize, or even learn?
How can tools like drones, special cameras from a distance, or other new technology be used to help protect wildlife?
How can we crack the code of DNA to understand how genes work and their role in different diseases?
As a new science tool called CRISPR lets us change genes very precisely, what are the ethical concerns and possible risks involved?
Can spending time in nature, like forests, improve how we feel mentally and physically?
What signs could we look for to find planets with potential life on them besides Earth?

STEM Topics for Research in Robotics

Robotics is a great area for exploration. Here is the topics list that merely scratches the surface of the exciting possibilities in robotics research.

How can robots be programmed to make their own decisions, like self-driving cars navigating traffic?
How can robots be equipped with sensors to "see" and understand their surroundings?
How can robots be programmed to move with precision and coordination, mimicking human actions or performing delicate tasks?
Can robots be designed to learn and improve their skills over time, adapting to new situations?
How can multiple robots work together seamlessly to achieve complex tasks?
How can robots be designed to assist people with disabilities?
How can robots be built to explore the depths of oceans and aid in underwater endeavors?
How can robots be designed to fly for tasks like search and rescue or environmental monitoring?
Can robots be built on an incredibly tiny scale for medical applications or super-precise manufacturing?
How can robots be used to assist surgeons in operating rooms?
How can robots be designed to explore space and assist astronauts?
How can robots be used in everyday life, helping with chores or providing companionship?
How can robots be designed by mimicking the movement and abilities of animals?
What are the ethical considerations in the development and use of robots?
How can robots be designed to interact with humans in a safe and user-friendly way?
How can robots be used in agriculture to automate tasks?
How can robots be used in educational settings to enhance learning?
How will the rise of robots impact the workforce?
How can robots be made more affordable and accessible?
What exciting advancements can we expect in the future of robotics?

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students

Here are some great topics that can serve as your starting point.

Test how different light intensities affect plant growth rate.
Compare the effectiveness of compost and fertilizer on plant growth.
Experiment with different materials for water filtration and compare their efficiency.
Does playing specific types of music affect plant growth rate?
Test the strength of different bridge designs using readily available materials.
Find the optimal angle for solar panels to maximize energy production.
Compare the insulating properties of different building materials.
Test the effectiveness of different materials (straw, feathers) in absorbing oil spills.
Explore the impact of social media algorithms on user behavior.
Evaluate the effectiveness of different cybersecurity awareness training methods.
Develop and test a mobile app for learning a new language through interactive exercises.
Experiment with different blade shapes to optimize wind turbine energy generation.
Test different techniques to improve website loading speed.
Build a simple air quality monitoring system using low-cost sensors.
Investigate how different light wavelengths affect the growth rate of algae.
Compare the effectiveness of different food preservation methods (drying, salting) on food spoilage.
Test the antibacterial properties of common spices.
Investigate the impact of sleep duration on learning and memory retention.
Research the development of biodegradable packaging materials from natural resources like cellulose or mushroom mycelium.
Compare the effectiveness of different handwashing techniques in reducing bacteria.

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Qualitative research delves into the experiences, perceptions, and opinions surrounding STEM fields.

How do stellar STEM teachers inspire students to become scientists, engineers, or math whizzes?
As artificial intelligence advances, what are people's biggest concerns and hopes?
What are the hurdles women in engineering face, and how can we make the field more welcoming?
Why do some students freeze up during math tests, and how can we build their confidence?
How do different cultures approach protecting the environment?
What makes scientists passionate about their work, and what keeps them motivated?
When creating new technology, what are the ethical dilemmas developers face?
What are the best ways to explain complex scientific concepts to everyday people?
What fuels people's fascination with exploring space and sending rockets beyond Earth?
How are STEM jobs changing, and what skills will be crucial for the future workforce?
Would people be comfortable with robots becoming our companions, not just machines?
How can we create products that everyone can use, regardless of their abilities?
What makes some people hesitant about vaccines while others readily get them?
What motivates people to volunteer their time and contribute to scientific research?
Does learning to code early on give kids an edge in problem-solving?
Can games and activities make learning math less intimidating and more enjoyable?
What are people's thoughts on the ethical implications of using new technology to change genes?
What motivates people to adopt sustainable practices and protect the environment?
What are people's hopes and anxieties about using technology in medicine and healthcare?
Why do students choose to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, or math?

Consider using our research paper writer online to create a perfectly-researched and polished paper.

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Quantitative research uses data and statistics to uncover patterns and relationships in STEM fields.

Does the type of music played affect plant growth rate?
Investigate the relationship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis in plants.
Test the impact of bridge design on its weight-bearing capacity.
Analyze how the angle of solar panels affects their energy production.
Quantify the impact of different website optimization techniques on loading speed.
Explore the correlation between social media use and user engagement metrics (likes, shares).
Test the effectiveness of various spices in inhibiting bacterial growth.
Investigate the relationship between sleep duration and memory retention in students.
Compare the effectiveness of different handwashing techniques in reducing bacterial count.
Quantify the impact of play-based learning on children's problem-solving skills.
Measure the efficiency of different materials in filtering microplastics from water samples.
Compare the impact of compost and traditional fertilizer on plant growth yield.
Quantify the insulating properties of various building materials for energy efficiency.
Evaluate the effectiveness of a newly designed learning app through user performance data.
Develop and test a low-cost sensor system to measure air quality parameters.
Quantify the impact of different light wavelengths on the growth rate of algae cultures.
Compare the effectiveness of different food preservation methods (drying, salting) on food spoilage rates.
Analyze the impact of a website redesign on user engagement and retention metrics.
Quantify the effectiveness of different cybersecurity awareness training methods through simulated hacking attempts.
Investigate the relationship between website color schemes and user conversion rates (purchases, sign-ups).

Environmental Sciences Research Topics for STEM students

These environmental science topics explore the connections between our planet's ecosystems and the influence of humans.

Can we track microplastic movement (water, soil, organisms) to understand environmental accumulation?
How can we seamlessly integrate renewable energy (solar, wind) into existing power grids?
Green roofs, urban forests, permeable pavements: their impact on cityscapes and environmental health.
Sustainable forest management: balancing timber production with biodiversity conservation.
Rising CO2: impact on ocean acidity and consequences for marine ecosystems.
Nature's clean-up crew: plants/microbes for decontaminating polluted soil and water.
Evaluating conservation strategies (protected areas, patrols) for endangered species.
Citizen science: potential and limitations for environmental monitoring and data collection.
Circular economy: reducing waste, promoting product reuse/recycling in an eco-friendly framework.
Water conservation strategies: rainwater harvesting, wastewater treatment for a sustainable future.
Agricultural practices (organic vs. conventional): impact on soil health and water quality.
Lab-grown meat: environmental and ethical implications of this alternative protein source.
A potential solution for improving soil fertility and carbon sequestration.
Mangrove restoration: effectiveness in mitigating coastal erosion and providing marine habitat.
Air pollution control technologies: investigating efficiency in reducing emissions.
Climate change and extreme weather events: the link between a warming planet and weather patterns.
Responsible disposal and recycling solutions for electronic waste.
Environmental education: effectiveness in fostering pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors.
Sustainable fashion: exploring alternatives like organic materials and clothing recycling.
Smart cities: using technology to improve environmental sustainability and resource management.

Check out more science research topics in our special guide!

Health Sciences Research Topic Ideas for STEM Students

If you're curious about how the body works and how to stay healthy, these research topics are for you:

Can changing your diet affect your happiness by influencing gut bacteria?
Can your genes help doctors create a treatment plan just for you?
Can viruses that attack bacteria be a new way to fight infections?
Does getting enough sleep help students remember things better?
Can listening to music help people feel less pain during medical procedures?
Can wearable devices warn people about health problems early?
Can doctors use technology to treat people who live far away?
Can meditation techniques help people feel calmer?
Can staying active keep your brain healthy as you age?
Can computers help doctors make better diagnoses?
Can looking at social media make people feel bad about their bodies?
Why are some people hesitant to get vaccinated, and how can we encourage them?
Can scientists create materials for implants that the body won't reject?
Can we edit genes to cure diseases caused by faulty genes?
Does dirty air make it harder to breathe?
Can therapy offered online be just as helpful as in-person therapy?
Can what you eat affect your chances of getting cancer?
Can we use 3D printing to create organs for transplant surgeries?
Do artificial sweeteners harm the good bacteria in your gut?
Can laughter actually be good for your body and mind?

Interdisciplinary STEM Research Topics

Here are 20 thought-provoking questions that explore the exciting intersections between different areas of science, technology, engineering, and math:

Can video games become educational tools, boosting memory and learning for all ages?
Can artificial intelligence compose music that evokes specific emotions in listeners?
Could robots be designed to assist surgeons in complex operations with greater precision?
Does virtual reality therapy hold promise for treating phobias and anxiety?
Can big data analysis predict and prevent natural disasters, saving lives?
Is there a link between dirty air and the rise of chronic diseases in cities?
Can we develop strong, eco-friendly building materials for a sustainable future?
Could wearable tech monitor athletes' performance and prevent injuries?
Will AI advancements lead to the creation of conscious machines, blurring the line between humans and technology?
Can social media platforms be designed to promote positive interactions and reduce online bullying?
Can personalized learning algorithms improve educational outcomes for all students?
Could neuroimaging technologies unlock the secrets of human consciousness?
Will advancements in gene editing allow us to eradicate inherited diseases?
Is there a connection between gut bacteria and mental health issues like depression?
Can drones be used for efficient and safe delivery of medical supplies in remote areas?
Is there potential for using artificial intelligence to design life-saving new drugs?
Could advances in 3D printing revolutionize organ transplantation procedures?
Will vertical farming techniques offer a sustainable solution to food security concerns?
Can we harness the power of nanotechnology to create self-cleaning and self-repairing materials?
Will advancements in space exploration technology lead to the discovery of life on other planets?

STEM Topics for Research in Technology

These research topics explore how technology can solve problems, make life easier, and unlock new possibilities:

How can self-driving cars navigate busy roads safely, reducing accidents?
In what ways can robots explore the deep ocean and unlock its mysteries?
How might technology automate tasks in our homes, making them more efficient and comfortable?
What advancements are possible for directly controlling computers with our thoughts using brain-computer interfaces?
How can we develop stronger cybersecurity solutions to protect our online information and devices from hackers?
What are the methods for harnessing natural resources like wind and sun for clean energy through renewable energy sources?
How can wearable translators instantly translate languages, breaking down communication barriers?
In what ways can virtual reality allow us to explore amazing places without leaving home?
How can games and apps make learning more engaging and effective through educational tools?
What technologies can help us reduce the amount of food that gets thrown away?
How can online platforms tailor education to each student's needs with personalized learning systems?
What new technologies can help us travel farther and learn more about space?
How can desalination techniques turn saltwater into clean drinking water for everyone?
What are the ways drones can deliver aid and supplies quickly and efficiently in emergencies?
How can robots allow doctors to remotely examine and treat patients in distant locations?
What possibilities exist for 3D printers to create customized medical devices and prosthetics?
How can technology overlay information onto the real world, enhancing our learning and experiences with augmented reality tools?
What methods can we use for secure access to devices and information with biometric security systems?
How can AI help us develop strategies to combat climate change?
In what ways can we ensure technology benefits everyone and is used ethically?

While you're researching these STEM topics, learn more about how to get better at math in our dedicated article.

How Do You Choose a Research Topic in STEM?

Choosing research topics for STEM students can be an exciting task. Here are several tips to help you find a topic that is both unique and meaningful:

Identify Your Interests: Start by considering what areas of STEM excite you the most. Do you have a passion for renewable energy, artificial intelligence, biomedical engineering, or environmental science? Your interest in the subject will keep you motivated throughout the research process.
Review Current Research: Conduct a thorough review of existing research in your field. Read recent journal articles, attend seminars, and follow relevant news. This will help you understand what has already been studied and where there might be gaps or opportunities for new research.
Consult with Experts: Talking to professors, advisors, or professionals in your field can provide valuable insights. They can help you identify important research questions, suggest resources, and guide you toward a feasible and impactful topic.
Consider Real-World Problems: Think about the practical applications of your research. Focus on real-world problems that need solutions. This not only makes your research more relevant but also increases its potential impact.
Narrow Down Your Focus: A broad topic can be overwhelming and difficult to manage. Narrow down your focus to a specific question or problem. This will make your research more manageable and allow you to delve deeper into the subject.
Assess Feasibility: Consider the resources and time available to you. Ensure that you have access to the necessary equipment, data, and expertise to complete your research. A feasible topic will help you stay on track and complete your project successfully.
Stay Flexible: Be open to adjusting your topic as you delve deeper into your research. Sometimes, initial ideas may need refinement based on new findings or practical constraints.

These research topics have shown us a glimpse of the exciting things happening in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). From understanding our planet to figuring out how the human body works, STEM fields are full of new things to learn and problems to solve.

Don't be afraid to challenge ideas and work with others to find answers. The future of STEM belongs to people who think carefully, try new things, and want to make the world a better place. Remember the famous scientist Albert Einstein, who said, "It is important never to stop asking questions. Curiosity has its own reason for existing."

Drowning in Data Analysis or Struggling to Craft a Strong Argument?

Don't let a challenging STEM research paper derail your academics!

What is STEM in Research?

What are the keys to success in stem fields, what should women in stem look for in a college.

is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.

Trending Topic Research: STEM . (n.d.). Www.aera.net. Retrieved July 15, 2024, from https://www.aera.net/Newsroom/Trending-Topic-Research-Files/Trending-Topic-Research-STEM

Astronomy Research Topics: 200 Best Choices

200 Quantitative Research Title for Stem Students

Are you a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) student looking for inspiration for your next research project? You’re in the right place! Quantitative research involves gathering numerical data to answer specific questions, and it’s a fundamental part of STEM fields. To help you get started on your research journey, we’ve compiled a list of 200 quantitative research title for stem students. These titles span various STEM disciplines, from biology to computer science. Whether you’re an undergraduate or graduate student, these titles can serve as a springboard for your research ideas.

Biology and Life Sciences

The Impact of pH Levels on Microbial Growth
Examining the Impact of Temperature on Enzyme Activity.
Investigating the Relationship Between Genetics and Obesity
Exploring the Diversity of Microorganisms in Soil Samples
Quantifying the Impact of Pesticides on Aquatic Ecosystems
Studying the Effect of Light Exposure on Plant Growth
Analyzing the Efficiency of Antibiotics on Bacterial Infections
Investigating the Relationship Between Blood Type and Disease Susceptibility
Evaluating the Effects of Different Diets on Lifespan in Fruit Flies
Evaluating the Influence of Air Pollution on Respiratory Health.
Determining the Kinetics of Chemical Reactions
Investigating the Conductivity of Various Ionic Solutions
Analyzing the Effects of Temperature on Gas Solubility
Studying the Corrosion Rate of Metals in Different Environments
Quantifying the Concentration of Heavy Metals in Water Sources
Evaluating the Efficiency of Photocatalytic Materials in Water Purification
Examining the Thermodynamics of Electrochemical Cells
Investigating the Effect of pH on Acid-Base Titrations
Analyzing the Composition of Natural and Synthetic Polymers
Assessing the Chemical Properties of Nanoparticles
Measuring the Speed of Light Using Interferometry
Studying the Behavior of Electromagnetic Waves in Different Media
Investigating the Relationship Between Mass and Gravitational Force
Analyzing the Efficiency of Solar Cells in Energy Conversion
Examining Quantum Entanglement in Photon Pairs
Quantifying the Heat Transfer in Different Materials
Evaluating the Efficiency of Wind Turbines in Energy Production
Studying the Elasticity of Materials Through Stress-Strain Analysis
Analyzing the Effects of Magnetic Fields on Particle Motion
Investigating the Behavior of Superconductors at Low Temperatures

Mathematics

Exploring Patterns in Prime Numbers
Analyzing the Distribution of Random Variables
Investigating the Properties of Fractals in Geometry
Evaluating the Efficiency of Optimization Algorithms
Studying the Dynamics of Differential Equations
Quantifying the Growth of Cryptocurrency Markets
Analyzing Network Theory and its Applications
Investigating the Complexity of Sorting Algorithms
Assessing the Predictive Power of Machine Learning Models
Examining the Distribution of Prime Factors in Large Numbers

Computer Science

Evaluating the Performance of Encryption Algorithms
Analyzing the Efficiency of Data Compression Techniques
Investigating Cybersecurity Threats in IoT Devices
Quantifying the Impact of Code Refactoring on Software Quality
Studying the Behavior of Neural Networks in Image Recognition
Analyzing the Effectiveness of Natural Language Processing Models
Investigating the Relationship Between Software Bugs and Development Methods
Evaluating the Efficiency of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms
Assessing the Privacy Implications of Social Media Data Mining
Studying the Dynamics of Online Social Networks

Engineering

Analyzing the Structural Integrity of Bridges Under Load
Investigating the Efficiency of Renewable Energy Systems
Quantifying the Performance of Water Filtration Systems
Evaluating the Durability of 3D-Printed Materials
Studying the Aerodynamics of Drone Design
Analyzing the Impact of Noise Pollution on Urban Environments
Investigating the Efficiency of Heat Exchangers in HVAC Systems
Assessing the Safety of Autonomous Vehicles in Real-world Scenarios
Exploring the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Robotics
Investigating Material Behavior in Extreme Conditions.

Environmental Science

Assessing the Effect of Climate Change on Wildlife Migration.
Analyzing the Effect of Deforestation on Carbon Sequestration
Investigating the Relationship Between Air Quality and Human Health
Quantifying the Rate of Soil Erosion in Different Landscapes
Analyzing the Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Coral Reefs.
Assessing the Efficiency of Waste-to-Energy Conversion Technologies
Analyzing the Impact of Urbanization on Local Microclimates
Investigating the Effect of Oil Spills on Aquatic Ecosystems
Assessing the Effectiveness of Endangered Species Conservation Initiatives.
Studying the Dynamics of Ecological Communities

Astronomy and Space Sciences

Measuring the Orbits of Exoplanets Using Transit Photometry
Investigating the Formation of Stars in Nebulae
Analyzing the Characteristics of Black Holes
Exploring the Characteristics of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
Quantifying the Distribution of Dark Matter in Galaxies
Assessing the Effects of Space Weather on Satellite Communications
Evaluating the Potential for Asteroid Mining
Investigating the Habitability of Exoplanets in the Goldilocks Zone
Analyzing Gravitational Waves from Neutron Star Collisions
Investigating the Evolution of Galaxies Across Cosmic Eras.

Health Sciences

Evaluating the Impact of Exercise on Cardiovascular Health
Analyzing the Relationship Between Diet and Diabetes
Investigating the Efficacy of Vaccination Programs
Quantifying the Psychological Effects of Social Media Use
Studying the Genetics of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Analyzing the Effects of Meditation on Stress Reduction
Investigating the Correlation Between Sleep Patterns and Mental Health
Assessing the Influence of Environmental Factors on Allergies
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Patient Care
Studying the Health Disparities Among Different Demographic Groups

Materials Science

Analyzing the Properties of Carbon Nanotubes for Nanoelectronics
Investigating the Thermal Conductivity of Advanced Ceramics
Quantifying the Strength of Composite Materials
Studying the Optical Properties of Quantum Dots
Evaluating the Biocompatibility of Biomaterials for Implants
Investigating the Phase Transitions in Perovskite Materials
Analyzing the Mechanical Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys
Assessing the Corrosion Resistance of Coatings on Metals
Studying the Electrical Conductivity of Polymer Blends
Exploring the Superconducting Properties of High-Temperature Superconductors

Earth Sciences

Assessing the Influence of Volcanic Eruptions on Climate.
Analyzing the Geological Processes Shaping Earth’s Surface
Investigating the Seismic Activity in Subduction Zones
Quantifying the Rate of Glacial Retreat in Polar Regions
Studying the Formation of Earthquakes Along Fault Lines
Analyzing the Changes in Ocean Circulation Due to Climate Change
Investigating the Effects of Urbanization on Groundwater Quality
Assessing the Risk of Landslides in Hilly Terrain
Evaluating the Impact of Coastal Erosion on Communities
Studying the Behavior of Hurricanes in Different Oceanic Basins

Social Sciences and Economics

Analyzing the Economic Impact of Natural Disasters
Investigating the Relationship Between Education and Income
Quantifying the Effects of Public Health Policies on Disease Spread
Studying the Demographic Changes in Aging Populations
Evaluating the Effects of Gender Diversity on Corporate Performance
Analyzing the Influence of Social Media on Political Behavior
Investigating the Correlation Between Happiness and Economic Growth
Assessing the Factors Affecting Consumer Buying Behavior
Studying the Dynamics of International Trade Flows
Exploring the Effects of Income Inequality on Social Mobility

Robotics and Artificial Intelligence

Evaluating the Performance of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Robotics
Analyzing the Efficiency of Autonomous Navigation Systems
Investigating Human-Robot Interaction in Collaborative Environments
Quantifying the Accuracy of Object Detection Algorithms
Studying the Ethics of Autonomous AI Decision-Making
Analyzing the Robustness of Machine Learning Models to Adversarial Attacks
Investigating the Use of AI in Healthcare Diagnosis
Assessing the Impact of AI on Job Markets
Evaluating the Efficiency of Natural Language Processing in Chatbots
Studying the Potential for AI to Enhance Education

Energy and Sustainability

Examining the Environmental Consequences of Renewable Energy Sources.
Investigating the Efficiency of Energy Storage Systems
Quantifying the Benefits of Green Building Technologies
Studying the Effects of Carbon Pricing on Emissions Reduction
Examining the Prospect for Carbon Capture and Storage
Assessing the Sustainability of Food Production Systems
Investigating the Impact of Electric Vehicles on Urban Air Quality
Analyzing the Energy Consumption Patterns in Smart Cities
Studying the Feasibility of Hydrogen as a Clean Energy Carrier
Exploring Sustainable Agriculture Practices for Crop Yield Improvement

Neuroscience and Psychology

Evaluating the Cognitive Effects of Video Game Play
Analyzing Brain Activity During Decision-Making Processes
Investigating the Neural Correlates of Emotional Regulation
Quantifying the Impact of Music on Brain Function
Analyzing the Outcomes of Mindfulness Meditation on Anxiety
Analyzing Sleep Patterns and Memory Consolidation
Investigating the Relationship Between Neurotransmitters and Mood
Assessing the Neural Basis of Addiction
Evaluating the Effects of Trauma on Brain Structure
Studying the Brain’s Response to Virtual Reality Environments

Mechanical Engineering

Analyzing the Efficiency of Heat Exchangers in Power Plants
Investigating the Wear and Tear of Mechanical Bearings
Quantifying the Vibrations in Mechanical Systems
Studying the Aerodynamics of Wind Turbine Blades
Evaluating the Frictional Properties of Lubricants
Assessing the Efficiency of Cooling Systems in Electronics
Investigating the Performance of Internal Combustion Engines
Analyzing the Impact of Additive Manufacturing on Product Development
Studying the Dynamics of Fluid Flow in Pipelines
Exploring the Behavior of Composite Materials in Aerospace Structures

Biomedical Engineering

Evaluating the Biomechanics of Human Joint Replacements
Analyzing the Performance of Wearable Health Monitoring Devices
Investigating the Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Medical Implants
Quantifying the Drug Release Rates from Biodegradable Polymers
Studying the Efficiency of Drug Delivery Systems
Assessing the Use of Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapies
Investigating the Biomechanics of Tissue Engineering Constructs
Analyzing the Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Nerve Regeneration
Evaluating the Mechanical Properties of Artificial Heart Valves
Studying the Biomechanics of Human Movement

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Analyzing the Structural Behavior of Tall Buildings in Seismic Zones
Investigating the Efficiency of Stormwater Management Systems
Quantifying the Impact of Green Infrastructure on Urban Flooding
Studying the Behavior of Soils in Slope Stability Analysis
Evaluating the Performance of Water Treatment Plants
Assessing the Sustainability of Transportation Systems
Investigating the Effects of Climate Change on Infrastructure Resilience
Analyzing the Environmental Impact of Construction Materials
Studying the Dynamics of River Sediment Transport
Exploring the Use of Smart Materials in Civil Engineering Applications

Chemical Engineering

Evaluating the Efficiency of Chemical Reactors in Pharmaceutical Production
Analyzing the Mass Transfer Rates in Membrane Separation Processes
Investigating the Effects of Catalysis on Chemical Reactions
Quantifying the Kinetics of Polymerization Reactions
Studying the Thermodynamics of Gas-Liquid Absorption Processes
Assessing the Efficiency of Adsorption-Based Carbon Capture
Investigating the Rheological Properties of Non-Newtonian Fluids
Analyzing the Effects of Surfactants on Foam Stability
Studying the Mass Transport in Microfluidic Devices
Exploring the Synthesis of Nanomaterials for Energy Applications

Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Analyzing the Efficiency of Power Electronics in Electric Vehicles
Investigating the Performance of Wireless Communication Systems
Quantifying the Power Consumption of IoT Devices
Studying the Reliability of Printed Circuit Boards
Evaluating the Efficiency of Photovoltaic Inverters
Assessing the Electromagnetic Compatibility of Electronic Devices
Investigating the Behavior of Antenna Arrays in Beamforming
Analyzing the Power Quality in Electrical Grids
Studying the Security of IoT Networks
Exploring the Use of Machine Learning in Signal Processing

These 200 quantitative research titles offer a diverse array of options to inspire your next STEM research endeavor. Always remember to select a subject that truly captivates your interest and curiosity, as your enthusiasm and curiosity will drive your research to new heights. Good luck with your research journey, STEM student!

Quantitative Research Topics Grade 12 Students

Welcome to the exciting world of numbers and discoveries – welcome to quantitative research! For Grade 12 students, diving into a quantitative research project is like opening a door to a place where numbers tell interesting stories, and statistics help us find hidden truths. It’s a special chance to explore data, do analyses, and make exciting discoveries. So, get ready for an adventure in the world of quantitative research, where you’ll learn to uncover hidden things using the power of numbers!

In this blog, we’ll dive into why quantitative research is important in your senior year of high school. We’ll talk about the benefits of picking quantitative methods and even give you a handpicked list of interesting research topics for Grade 12 students. Get ready to discover the significance of numbers and statistics in your research journey, understand why choosing quantitative methods is a great idea, and find inspiration for your very own quantitative research project!

Why Choose Quantitative Research Topics Grade 12?

Quantitative research is a powerful tool that provides objective and measurable insights. Its emphasis on numerical data and statistical analysis makes it a valuable approach for students in their final year of high school. Here are some key advantages:

Objective and Measurable Data: Quantitative research deals with measurable variables, allowing for precise analysis. This objectivity is crucial for academic research as it minimizes bias and subjectivity.
Statistical Analysis: One of the strengths of quantitative research is its ability to employ statistical tools for robust analysis. This allows students to draw meaningful conclusions and identify patterns within their data.
Replicability: Quantitative research is often designed to be replicable, meaning that other researchers can conduct similar studies to validate or challenge the findings. This adds credibility to the research process.

Factors to Consider: Select a Grade 12 Quantitative Research Topic

Choosing the right quantitative research topics grade 12 is a crucial step in the journey of research. Several factors should be considered to ensure a successful and meaningful project:

Personal Interests and Passions

Select a topic that aligns with your interests and passions. This not only makes the research process more enjoyable but also motivates you to delve deeper into the subject matter.

Relevance to Current Issues

Addressing current issues in your research adds relevance and significance to your project. Consider topics that have real-world implications and contribute to ongoing conversations.

Availability of Data and Resources

Ensure that the data required for your research is accessible. Consider the availability of resources, including books, articles, and databases, to support your investigation.

Feasibility of the Research Project

Evaluate the feasibility of your research in terms of time, scope, and complexity. Choose a project that challenges you but remains manageable within the given timeframe.

120+ Quantitative Research Topics Grade 12: Category Wise

The impact of extracurricular activities on academic performance.
Effectiveness of online learning platforms in high school education.
Correlation between class size and student achievement.
Assessing the influence of teacher-student relationships on learning outcomes.
Comparing the academic performance of students in STEM vs. humanities.
Relationship between physical activity and mental well-being in adolescents.
The impact of nutrition education on dietary habits in high school.
Analyzing the prevalence of sleep disorders among Grade 12 students.
Correlation between screen time and physical health in teenagers.
Assessing the effectiveness of anti-bullying programs on student well-being.
Evaluating the impact of technology in the classroom on learning outcomes.
Cybersecurity awareness among high school students: A quantitative study.
The correlation between social media usage and academic performance.
Quantifying the environmental impact of e-waste disposal.
Assessing the effectiveness of digital textbooks compared to traditional textbooks.

Social Sciences

Public perception of the criminal justice system: A quantitative analysis.
The influence of family structure on adolescent behavior.
Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.
Youth engagement in community service: Patterns and motivations.
Examining the impact of social media on political opinions in high school.
The relationship between part-time employment and academic performance.
Assessing financial literacy levels among Grade 12 students.
Impact of economic recessions on career aspirations of high school seniors.
Correlation between education level and future earning potential.
Analyzing consumer behavior among high school students.
Investigating the effectiveness of hands-on science experiments in learning.
Correlation between sleep patterns and science achievement.
Impact of environmental education on ecological awareness.
Comparing the effectiveness of virtual labs to traditional labs.
Analyzing factors influencing career choices in science-related fields.

Mathematics

The effectiveness of different teaching methods in mathematics.
Correlation between homework load and math achievement.
Investigating gender differences in math performance.
The impact of integrating technology in math classrooms.
Assessing the relationship between math anxiety and academic performance.

Language Arts

Correlation between reading habits and writing proficiency.
Impact of literature-based curriculum on language arts achievement.
Analyzing the influence of grammar instruction on writing skills.
Exploring the effectiveness of peer editing in improving writing.
The relationship between language proficiency and standardized testing.

Environmental Science

Assessing environmental knowledge and awareness among high school students.
Investigating the impact of climate change education on attitudes.
Correlation between outdoor education and environmental stewardship.
Analyzing the effectiveness of recycling programs in schools.
The influence of nature-based learning on environmental attitudes.
Examining the correlation between self-esteem and academic achievement.
Impact of mindfulness meditation on stress levels in high school students.
Analyzing the relationship between personality types and study habits.
The influence of peer relationships on adolescent mental health.
Correlation between social media use and self-perception in teenagers.
The impact of history education on civic engagement.
Exploring the influence of historical documentaries on learning.
Analyzing the correlation between history knowledge and critical thinking.
The role of historical empathy in understanding past events.
Assessing the effectiveness of project-based history assignments.
Investigating social stratification in high school social networks.
Correlation between family structure and social relationships.
Analyzing the influence of social media on interpersonal relationships.
Impact of cultural diversity programs on students’ worldview.
Exploring the relationship between social activism and academic achievement.

Physical Education

The impact of physical education on overall academic performance.
Analyzing the correlation between sports participation and leadership skills.
The influence of gender on attitudes toward physical education.
Assessing the effectiveness of health and wellness programs in schools.
Exploring the relationship between physical fitness and self-esteem.

Business Studies

Correlation between business education and entrepreneurial intentions.
Analyzing the impact of business internships on career readiness.
The influence of marketing on consumer behavior among high school students.
Investigating financial literacy and decision-making skills.
Assessing the effectiveness of business simulations in the classroom.

Music and Arts

The correlation between music education and cognitive development.
Exploring the impact of arts programs on creativity in high school.
Analyzing the influence of visual arts on spatial intelligence.
Correlation between participation in school plays and social skills.
The relationship between arts education and academic achievement.

Political Science

Examining political knowledge and civic engagement among high school students.
Correlation between political ideology and social attitudes.
Investigating the influence of media on political opinions in high school.
The impact of civic education on voting behavior.
Analyzing the effectiveness of student government in promoting civic participation.
Assessing geographic literacy levels among Grade 12 students.
Investigating the impact of geography education on global awareness.
Correlation between geographic knowledge and current events understanding.
Analyzing the influence of technology on geographic learning.
The relationship between environmental geography and ecological behavior.

Family Studies

Examining the correlation between family structure and academic success.
The impact of family communication patterns on social relationships.
Investigating the influence of parental involvement on student achievement.
Analyzing the relationship between family dynamics and mental health.
Correlation between family values and ethical decision-making.

Anthropology

The influence of cultural diversity education on tolerance.
Examining the correlation between anthropology courses and empathy.
Impact of cultural exchange programs on students’ worldview.
Analyzing the relationship between cultural exposure and critical thinking.
Assessing the effectiveness of multiculturalism in fostering understanding.
Correlation between philosophy education and ethical decision-making.
Examining the impact of philosophical discussions on critical thinking.
The influence of moral philosophy on behavior in high school.
Analyzing the relationship between philosophy courses and open-mindedness.
The role of philosophy education in developing a sense of purpose.

Foreign Languages

The impact of foreign language study on cognitive abilities.
Correlation between language proficiency and global awareness.
Investigating the influence of language learning on empathy.
Analyzing the relationship between language education and career opportunities.
Assessing the effectiveness of language immersion programs.

Gender Studies

Examining gender stereotypes in high school textbooks.
The impact of gender studies courses on attitudes toward equality.
Correlation between gender and academic achievement.
Investigating the influence of media on gender perceptions among students.
Analyzing the relationship between gender education and career aspirations.

Technology and Engineering

Assessing the impact of technology education on problem-solving skills.
Correlation between engineering programs and innovation.
Investigating the influence of technology on career choices in high school.
Analyzing the relationship between coding skills and academic success.
The effectiveness of robotics programs in promoting STEM interest.

Agricultural Science

Examining agricultural literacy levels among high school students.
Correlation between agricultural education and environmental awareness.
The impact of agricultural programs on career choices.
Analyzing the relationship between sustainable farming practices and student attitudes.
Assessing the effectiveness of agricultural experiments in learning.

How to Conduct Quantitative Research in Grade 12?

Embarking on quantitative research topics grade 12 involves several key steps. Here’s a brief guide:

Defining the Research Problem: Clearly articulate the research question or problem your study aims to address. This sets the foundation for your entire project.
Designing the Research: Develop a research design that outlines the methods, tools, and procedures you’ll use to collect and analyze data. Consider the type of data (e.g., surveys, experiments) and the sampling method.
Data Collection: Collect data according to your research design. Ensure accuracy and reliability in your data collection process.
Data Analysis: Use statistical tools and software to analyze your data. Interpret the results and draw meaningful conclusions.
Drawing Conclusions: Based on your analysis, draw conclusions that address your research question. Discuss the implications of your findings and any limitations in your study.

Tips for a Successful Grade 12 Quantitative Research Project

Embarking on a quantitative research project can be challenging, but with careful planning and execution, success is attainable. Here are some tips:

Time Management: Allocate sufficient time for each phase of your research project. Avoid procrastination to ensure a well-executed study.
Collaboration and Seeking Guidance: Don’t hesitate to seek guidance from teachers, mentors, or professionals in the field. Collaborating with peers can also provide valuable insights.
Ethical Considerations in Research: Adhere to ethical standards throughout your research project. Obtain necessary permissions for data collection, ensure participant confidentiality, and maintain integrity in reporting results.
Presenting Findings Effectively: Develop effective communication skills to present your findings. Whether through a written report, presentation, or both, convey your research in a clear and engaging manner.

Embarking on quantitative research topics Grade 12 is a rewarding journey that enhances critical thinking, analytical skills, and a deeper understanding of a chosen subject.

The topics provided serve as gateways to exploration, encouraging students to choose projects that align with their interests and contribute meaningfully to their academic journey.

As you dive into the world of quantitative research, remember that the process is as valuable as the results. Embrace the challenges, seek guidance when needed, and enjoy the thrill of uncovering new insights through the lens of numbers and statistics.

Exploring Experimental Research Topics That Can Be Done At Home

100+ Engaging Debate Topics for High School: Shaping Future Leaders

Top Essential 20 Qualities of a Good Nurse

Exploring the 4 Types of Leadership Styles with Examples

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

2023 AERA in the News
2022 AERA in the News
2021 AERA In the News
2020 AERA In the News
2019 AERA In the News
2018 AERA In the News
2017 AERA In the News
2016 AERA In the News
2015 AERA In the News
2014 AERA In the News
2013 AERA In the News
2023 AERA News Releases
2022 AERA News Releases
2021 AERA News Releases
2020 AERA News Releases
2019 AERA News Releases
2018 AERA News Releases
2017 AERA News Releases
2016 AERA News Releases
2015 AERA News Releases
2014 AERA News Releases
2013 AERA News Releases
2012 AERA News Releases
2011 News Releases
2010 News Releases
2009 News Releases
2008 News Releases
2007 News Releases
2006 News Releases
2005 News Releases
2004 News Releases
AERA Research Archive
Trending Topic Research Files
Communication Resources for Researchers
AERA Highlights Archival Issues
AERA Video Gallery

STEM

Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is one of the most talked about topics in education, emphasizing research, problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity.

The following compendium of open-access articles are inclusive of all substantive AERA journal content regarding STEM published since 1969. This page will be updated as new articles are published.

Jason Jabbari, Yung Chun, Wenrui Huang, Stephen Roll
October 2023
Researchers found that program acceptance was significantly associated with increased earnings and probabilities of working in a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) profession.

Robert R. Martinez, Jr., James M. Ellis
September 2023
Researchers found that STEM-CR involves four related yet distinct dimensions of Think, Know, Act, and Go. Results also demonstrated soundness of these STEM-CR dimensions by race and gender (key learning skills and techniques/Act).

Rosemary J. Perez, Rudisang Motshubi, Sarah L. Rodriguez
April 2023
Researchers found that because participants did not attend to how racism and White supremacy fostered negative climate, their strategies (e.g., increased recruitment, committees, workshops) left systemic racism intact and (un)intentionally amplified labor for racially minoritized graduate students and faculty champions who often led change efforts with little support.

Kathleen Lynch, Lily An, Zid Mancenido
, July 2022
Researchers found an average weighted impact estimate of +0.10 standard deviations on mathematics achievement outcomes.

Luis A. Leyva, R. Taylor McNeill, B R. Balmer, Brittany L. Marshall, V. Elizabeth King, Zander D. Alley
, May 2022
Researchers address this research gap by exploring four Black queer students’ experiences of oppression and agency in navigating invisibility as STEM majors.

Angela Starrett, Matthew J. Irvin, Christine Lotter, Jan A. Yow
, May 2022
Researchers found that the more place-based workforce development adolescents reported, the higher their expectancy beliefs, STEM career interest, and rural community aspirations.

Matthew H. Rafalow, Cassidy Puckett
May 2022
Researchers found that educational resources, like digital technologies, are also sorted by schools.

Pamela Burnard, Laura Colucci-Gray, Carolyn Cooke
April 2022
This article makes a case for repositioning STEAM education as democratized enactments of transdisciplinary education, where arts and sciences are not separate or even separable endeavors.

Salome Wörner, Jochen Kuhn, Katharina Scheiter
, April 2022
Researchers conclude that for combining real and virtual experiments, apart from the individual affordances and the learning objectives of the different experiment types, especially their specific function for the learning task must be considered.

Seung-hyun Han, Eunjung Grace Oh, Sun “Pil” Kang
April 2022
Researchers found that the knowledge sharing mechanism and student learning outcomes can be explained in terms of their social capital within social networks.

Barbara Schneider, Joseph Krajcik, Jari Lavonen, Katariina Salmela-Aro, Christopher Klager, Lydia Bradford, I-Chien Chen, Quinton Baker, Israel Touitou, Deborah Peek-Brown, Rachel Marias Dezendorf, Sarah Maestrales, Kayla Bartz
March 2022
Researchers found that improving secondary school science learning is achievable with a coherent system comprising teacher and student learning experiences, professional learning, and formative unit assessments that support students in “doing” science.

Paulo Tan, Alexis Padilla, Rachel Lambert
, March 2022
Researchers found that studies continue to avoid meaningful intersectional considerations of race and disability.

Ta-yang Hsieh, Sandra D. Simpkins
March 2022
Researchers found patterns with overall high/low beliefs, patterns with varying levels of motivational beliefs, and patterns characterized by domain differentiation.

Jonté A. Myers, Bradley S. Witzel, Sarah R. Powell, Hongli Li, Terri D. Pigott, Yan Ping Xin, Elizabeth M. Hughes
, February 2022
Findings of meta-regression analyses showed several moderators, such as sample composition, group size, intervention dosage, group assignment approach, interventionist, year of publication, and dependent measure type, significantly explained heterogeneity in effects across studies.

Grace A. Chen, Ilana S. Horn
, January 2022
The findings from this review highlight the interconnectedness of structures and individual lives, of the material and ideological elements of marginalization, of intersectionality and within-group heterogeneity, and of histories and institutions.

Victor R. Lee, Michelle Hoda Wilkerson, Kathryn Lanouette
December 2021
Researchers offer an interdisciplinary framework based on literature from multiple bodies of educational research to inform design, teaching and research for more effective, responsible, and inclusive student learning experiences with and about data.

Ido Davidesco, Camillia Matuk, Dana Bevilacqua, David Poeppel, Suzanne Dikker
December 2021
This essay critically evaluates the value added by portable brain technologies in education research and outlines a proposed research agenda, centered around questions related to student engagement, cognitive load, and self-regulation.

Guan K. Saw, Charlotte A. Agger
December 2021
Researchers found that during high school rural and small-town students shifted away from STEM fields and that geographic disparities in postsecondary STEM participation were largely explained by students’ demographics and precollege STEM career aspirations and academic preparation.

Kyle M. Whitcomb, Sonja Cwik, Chandralekha Singh
November 2021
Researchers found that on average across all years of study, underrepresented minority (URM) students experience a larger penalty to their mean overall and STEM GPA than even the most disadvantaged non-URM students.

Lana M. Minshew, Amanda A. Olsen, Jacqueline E. McLaughlin
, October 2021
Researchers found that the CA framework is a useful and effective model for supporting faculty in cultivating rich learning opportunities for STEM graduate students.

Xin Lin, Sarah R. Powell
, October 2021
Findings suggested fluency in both mathematics and reading, as well as working memory, yielded greater impacts on subsequent mathematics performance.

Christine L. Bae, Daphne C. Mills, Fa Zhang, Martinique Sealy, Lauren Cabrera, Marquita Sea
, September 2021
This systematic literature review is guided by a complex systems framework to organize and synthesize empirical studies of science talk in urban classrooms across individual (student or teacher), collective (interpersonal), and contextual (sociocultural, historical) planes.

Toya Jones Frank, Marvin G. Powell, Jenice L. View, Christina Lee, Jay A. Bradley, Asia Williams
August/September 2021
Researchers found that teachers’ experiences of microaggressions accounted for most of the variance in our modeling of teachers’ thoughts of leaving the profession.

Ebony McGee, Yuan Fang, Yibin (Amanda) Ni, Thema Monroe-White
August 2021
Researchers found that 40.7% of the respondents reported that their career plans have been affected by Trump’s antiscience policies, 54.5% by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Martha Cecilia Bottia, Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Cayce Jamil, Kyleigh Moniz, Leanne Barry
, May 2021
Consistent with cumulative disadvantage and critical race theories, findings reveal that the disproportionality of racially minoritized students in STEM is related to their inferior secondary school preparation; the presence of racialized lower quality educational contexts; reduced levels of psychosocial factors associated with STEM success; less exposure to inclusive and appealing curricula and instruction; lower levels of family social, cultural, and financial capital that foster academic outcomes; and fewer prospects for supplemental STEM learning opportunities. Policy implications of findings are discussed.

Iris Daruwala, Shani Bretas, Douglas D. Ready
April 2021
Researchers describe how teachers, school leaders, and program staff navigated institutional pressures to improve state grade-level standardized test scores while implementing tasks and technologies designed to personalize student learning.

Michael A. Gottfried, Jay Plasman, Jennifer A. Freeman, Shaun Dougherty
March 2021
Researchers found that students with learning disabilities were more likely to earn more units in CTE courses compared with students without disabilities.

Ebony Omotola McGee
December 2020
This manuscript also discusses how universities institutionalize diversity mentoring programs designed mostly to fix (read “assimilate”) underrepresented students of color while ignoring or minimizing the role of the STEM departments in creating racially hostile work and educational spaces.

Miray Tekkumru-Kisa, Mary Kay Stein, Walter Doyle
November 2020
The purpose of this article is to revisit theory and research on tasks, a construct introduced by Walter Doyle nearly 40 years ago.

Elizabeth S. Park, Federick Ngo
November 2020
Researchers found that lower math placement may have supported women, and to a lesser extent URM students, in completing transferable STEM credits.

Karisma Morton, Catherine Riegle-Crumb
August/September 2020
Results of regression analyses reveal that, net of school, teacher, and student characteristics, the time that teachers report spending on algebra and more advanced content in eighth grade algebra classes is significantly lower in schools that are predominantly Black compared to those that are not predominantly minority. Implications for future research are discussed.

Qi Zhang, Jessaca Spybrook, Fatih Unlu
, July 2020
Researchers consider strategies to maximize the efficiency of the study design when both student and teacher effects are of primary interest.

Jennifer Lin Russell, Richard Correnti, Mary Kay Stein, Ally Thomas, Victoria Bill, Laurie Speranzo
, July 20, 2020
Analysis of videotaped coaching conversations and teaching events suggests that model-trained coaches improved their capacity to use a high-leverage coaching practice—deep and specific prelesson planning conversations—and that growth in this practice predicted teaching improvement, specifically increased opportunities for students to engage in conceptual thinking.

Maithreyi Gopalan, Kelly Rosinger, Jee Bin Ahn
, April 21, 2020
The overarching purpose of this chapter is to explore and document the growth, applicability, promise, and limitations of quasi-experimental research designs in education research.

Thomas M. Philip, Ayush Gupta
, April 21, 2020
By bringing this collection of articles together, this chapter provides collective epistemic and empirical weight to claims of power and learning as co-constituted and co-constructed through interactional, microgenetic, and structural dynamics.

Steve Graham, Sharlene A. Kiuhara, Meade MacKay
, March 19, 2020
This meta-analysis examined if students writing about content material in science, social studies, and mathematics facilitated learning.

Janina Roloff, Uta Klusmann, Oliver Lüdtke, Ulrich Trautwein
, January 2020
Multilevel regression analyses revealed that agreeableness, high school GPA, and the second state examination grade predicted teachers’ instructional quality.

: Contemporary Views on STEM Subjects and Language With English Learners
Okhee Lee, Amy Stephens
, 2020
With the release of the consensus report , the authors highlight foundational constructs and perspectives associated with STEM subjects and language with English learners that frame the report.

Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan
, 2020
This essay presents a rightful presence framework to guide the study of teaching and learning in justice-oriented ways.

Day Greenberg, Angela Calabrese Barton, Carmen Turner, Kelly Hardy, Akeya Roper, Candace Williams, Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl, Elizabeth A. Davis, Tammy Tasker
, 2020
Researchers report on how one community builds capacity for disrupting injustice and supporting each other during the COVID-19 crisis.

Tatiana Melguizo, Federick Ngo
, 2020
This study explores the extent to which “college-ready” students, by high school standards, are assigned to remedial courses in college.

Karisma Morton and Catherine Riegle-Crumb
, 2020
Results of regression analyses reveal that, net of school, teacher, and student characteristics, the time that teachers report spending on algebra and more advanced content in eighth grade algebra classes is significantly lower in schools that are predominantly Black compared to those that are not predominantly minority. Implications for future research are discussed.

Jonathan D. Schweig, Julia H. Kaufman, and V. Darleen Opfer
, 2020
Researchers found that there are both substantial fluctuations in students’ engagement in these practices and reported cognitive demand from day to day, as well as large differences across teachers.

David Blazar and Casey Archer
, 2020
Researchers found that exposure to “ambitious” mathematics practices is more strongly associated with test score gains of English language learners compared to those of their peers in general education classrooms.

Megan Hopkins, Hayley Weddle, Maxie Gluckman, Leslie Gautsch
, December 2019
Researchers show how both researchers and practitioners facilitated research use.

Adrianna Kezar, Samantha Bernstein-Sierra
, October 2019
Findings suggest that Association of American Universities’ influence was a powerful motivator for institutions to alter deeply ingrained perceptions and behaviors.

Denis Dumas, Daniel McNeish, Julie Sarama, Douglas Clements
, October 2019
While students who receive a short-term intervention in preschool may not differ from a control group in terms of their long-term mathematics outcomes at the end of elementary school, they do exhibit significantly steeper growth curves as they approach their eventual skill level.

Jessica Thompson, Jennifer Richards, Soo-Yean Shim, Karin Lohwasser, Kerry Soo Von Esch, Christine Chew, Bethany Sjoberg, Ann Morris
, September 2019
Researchers used data from professional learning communities to analyze pathways into improvement work and reflective data to understand practitioners’ perspectives.

Ross E. O’Hara, Betsy Sparrow
, September 2019
Results indicate that interventions that target psychosocial barriers experienced by community college STEM students can increase retention and should be considered alongside broader reforms.

Ran Liu, Andrea Alvarado-Urbina, Emily Hannum
, September 2019
Findings reveal disparate national patterns in gender gaps across the performance distribution.

Adam Kirk Edgerton
, September 2019
Through an analysis of 52 interviews with state, regional, and district officials in California, Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts, the author investigates the decline in the popularity of K–12 standards-based reform.

Amy Noelle Parks
, September 2019
The study suggests that more research needs to represent mathematics lessons from the perspectives of children and youth, particularly those students who engage with teachers infrequently or in atypical ways.

Rajeev Darolia, Cory Koedel, Joyce B. Main, J. Felix Ndashimye, Junpeng Yan
, September 30, 2019
Researchers found that differential access to high school courses does not affect postsecondary STEM enrollment or degree attainment.

Laura A. Davis, Gregory C. Wolniak, Casey E. George, Glen R. Nelson
, August 2019
The findings point to variation in informational quality across dimensions ranging from clarity of language use and terminology, to consistency and coherence of visual displays, which accompany navigational challenges stemming from information fragmentation and discontinuity across pages.

Juan E. Saavedra, Emma Näslund-Hadley, Mariana Alfonso
, August 12, 2019
Researchers present results from the first randomized experiment of a remedial inquiry-based science education program for low-performing elementary students in a developing country.

F. Chris Curran, James Kitchin
, July 2019
Researchers found suggestive evidence in some models (student fixed effects and regression with observable controls) that time on science instruction is related to science achievement but little evidence that the number of science topics/skills covered are related to greater science achievement.

Kathleen Lynch, Heather C. Hill, Kathryn E. Gonzalez, Cynthia Pollard
, June 2019
Programs saw stronger outcomes when they helped teachers learn to use curriculum materials; focused on improving teachers’ content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and/or understanding of how students learn; incorporated summer workshops; and included teacher meetings to troubleshoot and discuss classroom implementation. We discuss implications for policy and practice.

Elizabeth Stearns, Martha Cecilia Bottia, Jason Giersch, Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Stephanie Moller, Nandan Jha, Melissa Dancy
, June 2019
Researchers found that relative advantages in college academic performance in STEM versus non-STEM subjects do not contribute to the gender gap in STEM major declaration.

Nicole Shechtman, Jeremy Roschelle, Mingyu Feng, Corinne Singleton
, May 2019
As educational leaders throughout the United States adopt digital mathematics curricula and adaptive, blended approaches, the findings provide a relevant caution.

Colleen M. Ganley, Robert C. Schoen, Mark LaVenia, Amanda M. Tazaz
, March 2019
Factor analyses support a distinction between components of general math anxiety and anxiety about teaching math.

Felicia Moore Mensah
, February 2019
The implications for practice in both teacher education and science education show that educational and emotional support for teachers of color throughout their educational and professional journey is imperative to increasing and sustaining Black teachers.

Herbert W. Marsh, Brooke Van Zanden, Philip D. Parker, Jiesi Guo, James Conigrave, Marjorie Seaton
, February 2019
Researchers evaluated STEM coursework selection by women and men in senior high school and university, controlling achievement and expectancy-value variables.

Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Debra Plowman, Haiyan Bai
, January 2019
The results showed that a focus on curricular content knowledge and examining students’ work were significantly related to teachers’ learning.

Rebecca Colina Neri, Maritza Lozano, Louis M. Gomez
, 2019
Researchers found that teacher resistance to CRE as a multilevel learning problem stems from (a) limited understanding and belief in the efficacy of CRE and (b) a lack of know-how needed to execute it.

Russell T. Warne, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip M. Sadler
, 2019
Researchers investigated the relationship between participation in AP mathematics courses (AP Calculus and AP Statistics) and student career interest in STEM.

Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Barbara King, and Yasmiyn Irizarry
, 2019
Results reveal evidence of persistent racial/ethnic inequality in STEM degree attainment not found in other fields.

Eben B. Witherspoon, Paulette Vincent-Ruz, and Christian D. Schunn
, 2019
Researchers found that high-performing women often graduate with lower paying, lower status degrees.

Bruce Fuller, Yoonjeon Kim, Claudia Galindo, Shruti Bathia, Margaret Bridges, Greg J. Duncan, and Isabel García Valdivia
, 2019
This article details the growing share of Latino children from low-income families populating schools, 1998 to 2010.

Rebekka Darner
, 2019
Drawing from motivated reasoning and self-determination theories, this essay builds a theoretical model of how negative emotions, thwarting of basic psychological needs, and the backfire effect interact to undermine critical evaluation of evidence, leading to science denial.

Okhee Lee
, 2019
As the fast-growing population of English learners (ELs) is expected to meet college- and career-ready content standards, the purpose of this article is to highlight key issues in aligning ELP standards with content standards.

Mark C. Long, Dylan Conger, and Raymond McGhee, Jr.
, 2019
The authors offer the first model of the components inherent in a well-implemented AP science course and the first evaluation of AP implementation with a focus on public schools newly offering the inquiry-based version of AP Biology and Chemistry courses.

Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Joseph R. Cimpian, Sarah Theule Lubienski, and Ian Thacker
, 2019
Results indicate that teachers are not free of bias, and that teachers from marginalized groups may be susceptible to bias that favors stereotype-advantaged groups.

Geoffrey B. Saxe and Joshua Sussman
, 2019
Multilevel analysis of longitudinal data on a specialized integers and fractions assessment, as well as a California state mathematics assessment, revealed that the ELs in LMR classrooms showed greater gains than comparison ELs and gained at similar rates to their EP peers in LMR classrooms.

Jordan Rickles, Jessica B. Heppen, Elaine Allensworth, Nicholas Sorensen, and Kirk Walters
, 2019
The authors discuss whether it would have been appropriate to test for nominally equivalent outcomes, given that the study was initially conceived and designed to test for significant differences, and that the conclusion of no difference was not solely based on a null hypothesis test.

Soobin Kim, Gregory Wallsworth, Ran Xu, Barbara Schneider, Kenneth Frank, Brian Jacob, Susan Dynarski
, 2019
Using detailed Michigan high school transcript data, this article examines the effect of the MMC on various students’ course-taking and achievement outcomes.

Dario Sansone
, December 2018
Researchers found that students were less likely to believe that men were better than women in math or science when assigned to female teachers or to teachers who valued and listened to ideas from their students.

Ebony McGee
, December 2018
The authors argues that both racial groups endure emotional distress because each group responds to its marginalization with an unrelenting motivation to succeed that imposes significant costs.

Barbara Means, Haiwen Wang, Xin Wei, Emi Iwatani, Vanessa Peters
, November 2018
Students overall and from under-represented groups who had attended inclusive STEM high schools were significantly more likely to be in a STEM bachelor’s degree program two years after high school graduation.

Paulo Tan, Kathleen King Thorius
, November 2018
Results indicate identity and power tensions that worked against equitable practices.

Caesar R. Jackson
, November 2018
This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for minority students enrolled in STEM courses at a historically black college/university (HBCU).

Tuan D. Nguyen, Christopher Redding
, September 2018
The results highlight the importance of recruiting qualified STEM teachers to work in high-poverty schools and providing supports to help them thrive and remain in the classroom.

Joseph A. Taylor, Susan M. Kowalski, Joshua R. Polanin, Karen Askinas, Molly A. M. Stuhlsatz, Christopher D. Wilson, Elizabeth Tipton, Sandra Jo Wilson
, August 2018
The meta-analysis examines the relationship between science education intervention effect sizes and a host of study characteristics, allowing primary researchers to access better estimates of effect sizes for a priori power analyses. The results of this meta-analysis also support programmatic decisions by setting realistic expectations about the typical magnitude of impacts for science education interventions.

Brian A. Burt, Krystal L. Williams, Gordon J. M. Palmer
, August 2018
Three factors are identified as helping them persist from year to year, and in many cases through completion of the doctorate: the role of family, spirituality and faith-based community, and undergraduate mentors.

Anna-Lena Rottweiler, Jamie L. Taxer, Ulrike E. Nett
, June 2018
Suppression improved mood in exam-related anxiety, while distraction improved mood only in non-exam-related anxiety.

Gabriel Estrella, Jacky Au, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Penelope Collins
, April 2018
Although an analysis of 26 articles confirmed that inquiry instruction produced significantly greater impacts on measures of science achievement for ELLs compared to direct instruction, there was still a differential learning effect suggesting greater efficacy for non-ELLs compared to ELLs.

Heather C. Hill, Mark Chin
, April 2018
In this article, evidence from 284 teachers suggests that accuracy can be adequately measured and relates to instruction and student outcomes.

Darrell M. Hull, Krystal M. Hinerman, Sarah L. Ferguson, Qi Chen, Emma I. Näslund-Hadley
, April 20, 2018
Both quantitative and qualitative evidence suggest students within this culture respond well to this relatively simple and inexpensive intervention that departs from traditional, expository math instruction in many developing countries.

Erika C. Bullock
, April 2018
The author reviews CME studies that employ intersectionality as a way of analyzing the complexities of oppression.

Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan
, March 2018
Building a conceptual argument for an equity-oriented culture of making, the authors discuss the ways in which making with and in community opened opportunities for youth to project their communities’ rich culture knowledge and wisdom onto their making while also troubling and negotiating the historicized injustices they experience.

Sabrina M. Solanki, Di Xu
, March 2018
Researchers found that having a female instructor narrows the gender gap in terms of engagement and interest; further, both female and male students tend to respond to instructor gender.

Susanne M. Jaeggi, Priti Shah
, February 2018
These articles provide excellent examples for how neuroscientific approaches can complement behavioral work, and they demonstrate how understanding the neural level can help researchers develop richer models of learning and development.

Danyelle T. Ireland, Kimberley Edelin Freeman, Cynthia E. Winston-Proctor, Kendra D. DeLaine, Stacey McDonald Lowe, Kamilah M. Woodson
, 2018
Researchers found that (1) identity; (2) STEM interest, confidence, and persistence; (3) achievement, ability perceptions, and attributions; and (4) socializers and support systems are key themes within the experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education.

Ann Y. Kim, Gale M. Sinatra, Viviane Seyranian
, 2018
Findings indicate that young women experience challenges to their participation and inclusion when they are in STEM settings.

Guan Saw, Chi-Ning Chang, and Hsun-Yu Chan
, 2018
Results indicated that female, Black, Hispanic, and low SES students were less likely to show, maintain, and develop an interest in STEM careers during high school years.

Di Xu, Sabrina Solanki, Peter McPartlan, and Brian Sato
, 2018
This paper estimates the causal effects of a first-year STEM learning communities program on both cognitive and noncognitive outcomes at a large public 4-year institution.

Christina S. Chhin, Katherine A. Taylor, and Wendy S. Wei
, 2018
Data showed that IES has not funded any direct replications that duplicate all aspects of the original study, but almost half of the funded grant applications can be considered conceptual replications that vary one or more dimensions of a prior study.

Okhee Lee
, 2018
As federal legislation requires that English language proficiency (ELP) standards are aligned with content standards, this article addresses issues and concerns in aligning ELP standards with content standards in English language arts, mathematics, and science.

Jordan Rickles, Jessica B. Heppen, Elaine Allensworth, Nicholas Sorensen, and Kirk Walters
, 2018
Researchers found no statistically significant differences in longer term outcomes between students in the online and face-to-face courses. Implications of these null findings are discussed.

Colleen M. Ganley, Casey E. George, Joseph R. Cimpian, Martha B. Makowski
, December 2017
Researchers found that perceived gender bias against women emerges as the dominant predictor of the gender balance in college majors.

James P. Spillane, Megan Hopkins, Tracy M. Sweet
, December 2017
This article examines the relationship between teachers’ instructional ties and their beliefs about mathematics instruction in one school district working to transform its approach to elementary mathematics education.

Susan A. Yoon, Sao-Ee Goh, Miyoung Park
, December 6, 2017
Results revealed needs in five areas of research: a need to diversify the knowledge domains within which research is conducted, more research on learning about system states, agreement on the essential features of complex systems content, greater focus on contextual factors that support learning including teacher learning, and a need for more comparative research.

Candace Walkington, Virginia Clinton, Pooja Shivraj
, November 2017
Textual features that make problems more difficult to process appear to differentially negatively impact struggling students, while features that make language easier to process appear to differentially positively impact struggling students.

Rebecca L. Matz, Benjamin P. Koester, Stefano Fiorini, Galina Grom, Linda Shepard, Charles G. Stangor, Brad Weiner, Timothy A. McKay
, November 2017
Biology, chemistry, physics, accounting, and economics lecture courses regularly exhibit gendered performance differences that are statistically and materially significant, whereas lab courses in the same subjects do not.

Adam V. Maltese, Christina S. Cooper
, August 2017
The results reveal that although there is no singular pathway into STEM fields, self-driven interest is a large factor in persistence, especially for males, and females rely more heavily on support from others.

Brian R. Belland, Andrew E. Walker, Nam Ju Kim
, August 2017
Scaffolding has a consistently strong effect across student populations, STEM disciplines, and assessment levels, and a strong effect when used with most problem-centered instructional and educational levels.

Di Xu, Shanna Smith Jaggars
, July 2017
The findings indicate a robust negative impact of online course taking for both subjects.

Maisie L. Gholson, Charles E. Wilkes
, June 2017
This chapter reviews two strands of identity-based research in mathematics education related to Black children, exemplified by Martin (2000) and Nasir (2002).

Sarah Theule Lubienski, Emily K. Miller, and Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides
, November 2017
Using data from a survey of doctoral students at one large institution, this study finds that men submitted and published more scholarly works than women across many fields, with differences largest in natural/biological sciences and engineering.

David Blazar, Cynthia Pollard
, October 2017
Drawing on classroom observations and teacher surveys, researchers find that test preparation activities predict lower quality and less ambitious mathematics instruction in upper-elementary classrooms.

Nicole M. Joseph, Meseret Hailu, Denise Boston
, June 2017
This integrative review used critical race theory (CRT) and Black feminism as interpretive frames to explore factors that contribute to Black women’s and girls’ persistence in the mathematics pipeline and the role these factors play in shaping their academic outcomes.

Benjamin L. Wiggins, Sarah L. Eddy, Daniel Z. Grunspan, Alison J. Crowe
, May 2017
Researchers describe the results of a quasi-experimental study to test the apex of the ICAP framework (interactive, constructive, active, and passive) in this ecological classroom environment.

Sean Gehrke, Adrianna Kezar
, May 2017
This study examines how involvement in four cross-institutional STEM faculty communities of practice is associated with local departmental and institutional change for faculty members belonging to these communities.

Lawrence Ingvarson, Glenn Rowley
, May 2017
This study investigated the relationship between policies related to the recruitment, selection, preparation, and certification of new teachers and (a) the quality of future teachers as measured by their mathematics content and pedagogy content knowledge and (b) student achievement in mathematics at the national level.

Will Tyson, Josipa Roksa
, April 2017
This study examines how course grades and course rigor are associated with math attainment among students with similar eighth-grade standardized math test scores.

Anne K. Morris, James Hiebert
, March 2017
Researchers investigated whether the content pre-service teachers studied in elementary teacher preparation mathematics courses was related to their performance on a mathematics lesson planning task 2 and 3 years after graduation.

Laura M. Desimone, Kirsten Lee Hill
, March 2017
Researchers use data from a randomized controlled trial of a middle school science intervention to explore the causal mechanisms by which the intervention produced previously documented gains in student achievement.

Okhee Lee
, March 2017
This article focuses on how the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) treat “argument,” especially in Grades K–5, and the extent to which each set of standards is grounded in research literature, as claimed.

Cory Koedel, Diyi Li, Morgan S. Polikoff, Tenice Hardaway, Stephani L. Wrabel
, February 2017
Researchers estimate relative achievement effects of the four most commonly adopted elementary mathematics textbooks in the fall of 2008 and fall of 2009 in California.

Mary Kay Stein, Richard Correnti, Debra Moore, Jennifer Lin Russell, Katelynn Kelly
, January 2017
Researchers argue that large-scale, standards-based improvements in the teaching and learning of mathematics necessitate advances in theories regarding how teaching affects student learning and progress in how to measure instruction.

Alan H. Schoenfeld
, December 2016
The author begins by tracing the growth and change in research in mathematics education and its interdependence with research in education in general over much of the 20th century, with an emphasis on changes in research perspectives and methods and the philosophical/empirical/disciplinary approaches that underpin them.

Marcia C. Linn, Libby Gerard, Camillia Matuk, Kevin W. McElhaney
, December 2016
This chapter focuses on how investigators from varied fields of inquiry who initially worked separately began to interact, eventually formed partnerships, and recently integrated their perspectives to strengthen science education.

: Are Teachers’ Implicit Cognitions Another Piece of the Puzzle?
Almut E. Thomas
, December 2016
Drawing on expectancy-value theory, this study investigated whether teachers’ implicit science-is-male stereotypes predict between-teacher variation in males’ and females’ motivational beliefs regarding physical science.

: A By-Product of STEM College Culture?
Ebony O. McGee
, December 2016
The researcher found that the 38 high-achieving Black and Latino/a STEM study participants, who attended institutions with racially hostile academic spaces, deployed an arsenal of strategies (e.g., stereotype management) to deflect stereotyping and other racial assaults (e.g., racial microaggressions), which are particularly prevalent in STEM fields.

James Cowan, Dan Goldhaber, Kyle Hayes, Roddy Theobald
, November 2016
Researchers discuss public policies that contribute to teacher shortages in specific subjects (e.g., STEM and special education) and specific types of schools (e.g., disadvantaged) as well as potential solutions.

: A Sociological Analysis of Multimethod Data From Young Women Aged 10–16 to Explore Gendered Patterns of Post-16 Participation
Louise Archer, Julie Moote, Becky Francis, Jennifer DeWitt, Lucy Yeomans
, November 2016
Researchers draw on survey data from more than 13,000 year 11 (age 15/16) students and interviews with 70 students (who had been tracked from age 10 to 16), focusing in particular on seven girls who aspired to continue with physics post-16, discussing how the cultural arbitrary of physics requires these girls to be highly “exceptional,” undertaking considerable identity work and deployment of capital in order to “possibilize” a physics identity—an endeavor in which some girls are better positioned to be successful than others.

Jeremy Roschelle, Mingyu Feng, Robert F. Murphy, Craig A. Mason
, October 2016
In a randomized field trial with 2,850 seventh-grade mathematics students, researchers evaluated whether an educational technology intervention increased mathematics learning.

: Making Research Participation Instructionally Effective
Sherry A. Southerland, Ellen M. Granger, Roxanne Hughes, Patrick Enderle, Fengfeng Ke, Katrina Roseler, Yavuz Saka, Miray Tekkumru-Kisa
, October 2016
As current reform efforts in science place a premium on student sense making and participation in the practices of science, researchers use a close examination of 106 science teachers participating in Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) to identify, through structural equation modeling, the essential features in supporting teacher learning from these experiences.

Brian R. Belland, Andrew E. Walker, Nam Ju Kim, Mason Lefler
, October 2016
This review addresses the need for a comprehensive meta-analysis of research on scaffolding in STEM education by synthesizing the results of 144 experimental studies (333 outcomes) on the effects of computer-based scaffolding designed to assist the full range of STEM learners (primary through adult education) as they navigated ill-structured, problem-centered curricula.

Vaughan Prain, Brian Hand
, October 2016
Researchers claim that there are strong evidence-based reasons for viewing writing as a central but not sole resource for learning, drawing on both past and current research on writing as an epistemological tool and on their professional background in science education research, acknowledging its distinctive take on the use of writing for learning.

June Ahn, Austin Beck, John Rice, Michelle Foster
, September 2016
Researchers present analyses from a researcher-practitioner partnership in the District of Columbia Public Schools, where the researchers are exploring the impact of educational software on students’ academic achievement.

Barbara King
, September 2016
This study uses nationally representative data from a recent cohort of college students to investigate thoroughly gender differences in STEM persistence.

Ryan C. Svoboda, Christopher S. Rozek, Janet S. Hyde, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Mesmin Destin
, August 2016
This longitudinal study draws on identity-based and expectancy-value theories of motivation to explain the socioeconomic status (SES) and mathematics and science course-taking relationship.

Mathematics Course Placements in California Middle Schools, 2003–2013
Thurston Domina, Paul Hanselman, NaYoung Hwang, Andrew McEachin
, July 2016
Researchers consider the organizational processes that accompanied the curricular intensification of the proportion of California eighth graders enrolled in algebra or a more advanced course nearly doubling to 65% between 2003 and 2013.

Lina Shanley
, July 2016
Using a nationally representative longitudinal data set, this study compared various models of mathematics achievement growth on the basis of both practical utility and optimal statistical fit and explored relationships within and between early and later mathematics growth parameters.

Mimi Engel, Amy Claessens, Tyler Watts, George Farkas
, June 2016
Analyzing data from two nationally representative kindergarten cohorts, researchers examine the mathematics content teachers cover in kindergarten.

F. Chris Curran, Ann T. Kellogg
, June 2016
Researchers present findings from the recently released Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 that demonstrate significant gaps in science achievement in kindergarten and first grade by race/ethnicity.

Rachel Garrett, Guanglei Hong
, June 2016
Analyzing the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Kindergarten cohort data, researchers find that heterogeneous grouping or a combination of heterogeneous and homogeneous grouping under relatively adequate time allocation is optimal for enhancing teacher ratings of language minority kindergartners’ math performance, while using homogeneous grouping only is detrimental.

Jennifer Gnagey, Stéphane Lavertu
, May 2016
This study is one of the first to estimate the impact of “inclusive” science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) high schools using student-level data.

Hanna Gaspard, Anna-Lena Dicke, Barbara Flunger, Isabelle Häfner, Brigitte M. Brisson, Ulrich Trautwein, Benjamin Nagengast
, May 2016
Through data from a cluster-randomized study in which a value intervention was successfully implemented in 82 ninth-grade math classrooms, researchers address how interventions on students’ STEM motivation in school affect motivation in subjects not targeted by the intervention.

Rebecca M. Callahan, Melissa H. Humphries
, April 2016
Researchers employ multivariate methods to investigate immigrant college going by linguistic status using the Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002.

Federick Ngo, Tatiana Melguizo
, March 2016
Researchers take advantage of heterogeneous placement policy in a large urban community college district in California to compare the effects of math remediation under different policy contexts.

: An Analysis of German Fourth- and Sixth-Grade Classrooms
Steffen Tröbst, Thilo Kleickmann, Kim Lange-Schubert, Anne Rothkopf, Kornelia Möller
, February 2016
Researchers examined if changes in instructional practices accounted for differences in situational interest in science instruction and enduring individual interest in science between elementary and secondary school classrooms.

: A Mixed-Methods Study
David F. Feldon, Michelle A. Maher, Josipa Roksa, James Peugh
, February 2016
Researchers offer evidence of a similar phenomenon to cumulative advantage, accounting for differential patterns of research skill development in graduate students over an academic year and explore differences in socialization that accompany diverging developmental trajectories.

: The Influence of Time, Peers, and Place
Luke Dauter, Bruce Fuller
, February 2016
Researchers hypothesize that pupil mobility stems from the (a) student’s time in school and grade; (b) student’s race, class, and achievement relative to peers; (c) quality of schooling relative to nearby alternatives; and (4) proximity, abundance, and diversity of local school options.

: How Workload and Curricular Affordances Shape STEM Faculty Decisions About Teaching and Learning
Matthew T. Hora
, January 2016
In this study the idea of the “problem space” from cognitive science is used to examine how faculty construct mental representations for the task of planning undergraduate courses.

Jessaca Spybrook, Carl D. Westine, Joseph A. Taylor
, January 2016
This article provides empirical estimates of design parameters necessary for planning adequately powered cluster randomized trials (CRTs) focused on science achievement.

Paul L. Morgan, George Farkas, Marianne M. Hillemeier, Steve Maczuga
, January 2016
Researchers examined the age of onset, over-time dynamics, and mechanisms underlying science achievement gaps in U.S. elementary and middle schools.

: Opportunity Structures and Outcomes in Inclusive STEM-Focused High Schools
Lois Weis, Margaret Eisenhart, Kristin Cipollone, Amy E. Stich, Andrea B. Nikischer, Jarrod Hanson, Sarah Ohle Leibrandt, Carrie D. Allen, Rachel Dominguez
, December 2015
Researchers present findings from a three-year comparative longitudinal and ethnographic study of how schools in two cities, Buffalo and Denver, have taken up STEM education reform, including the idea of “inclusive STEM-focused schools,” to address weaknesses in urban high schools with majority low-income and minority students.

: How Do They Interact in Promoting Science Understanding?
Jasmin Decristan, Eckhard Klieme, Mareike Kunter, Jan Hochweber, Gerhard Büttner, Benjamin Fauth, A. Lena Hondrich, Svenja Rieser, Silke Hertel, Ilonca Hardy
, December 2015
Researchers examine the interplay between curriculum-embedded formative assessment—a well-known teaching practice—and general features of classroom process quality (i.e., cognitive activation, supportive climate, classroom management) and their combined effect on elementary school students’ understanding of the scientific concepts of floating and sinking.

: An International Perspective
William H. Schmidt, Nathan A. Burroughs, Pablo Zoido, Richard T. Houang
, October 2015
In this paper, student-level indicators of opportunity to learn (OTL) included in the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment are used to explore the joint relationship of OTL and socioeconomic status (SES) to student mathematics literacy.

Xueli Wang
, September 2015
This study examines the effect of beginning at a community college on baccalaureate success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.

: Trends and Predictors
David M. Quinn, North Cooc
, August 2015
With research on science achievement disparities by gender and race/ethnicity often neglecting the beginning of the pipeline in the early grades, researchers address this limitation using nationally representative data following students from Grades 3 to 8.

Shaun M. Dougherty, Joshua S. Goodman, Darryl V. Hill, Erica G. Litke, Lindsay C. Page
, May 2015
Researchers highlight a collaboration to investigate one district’s effort to increase middle school algebra course-taking.

David F. Feldon, Michelle A. Maher, Melissa Hurst, Briana Timmerman
, April 2015
This mixed-method study investigates agreement between student mentees’ and their faculty mentors’ perceptions of the students’ developing research knowledge and skills in STEM.

: Reviving Science Education for Civic Ends
John L. Rudolph
, December 2014
This article revisits John Dewey’s now-well-known address “Science as Subject-Matter and as Method” and examines the development of science education in the United States in the years since that address.

Dermot F. Donnelly, Marcia C. Linn Sten Ludvigsen
, December 2014
The National Science Foundation–sponsored report Fostering Learning in the Networked World called for “a common, open platform to support communities of developers and learners in ways that enable both to take advantage of advances in the learning sciences”; we review research on science inquiry learning environments (ILEs) to characterize current platforms.

: A Longitudinal Case Study of America’s Chemistry Teachers
Gregory T. Rushton, Herman E. Ray, Brett A. Criswell, Samuel J. Polizzi, Clyde J. Bearss, Nicholas Levelsmier, Himanshu Chhita, Mary Kirchhoff
, November 2014
Researchers perform a longitudinal case study of U.S. public school chemistry teachers to illustrate a diffusion of responsibility within the STEM community regarding who is responsible for the teacher workforce.

: Relations Between Early Mathematics Knowledge and High School Achievement
Tyler W. Watts, Greg J. Duncan, Robert S. Siegler, Pamela E. Davis-Kean
, October 2014
Researchers find that preschool mathematics ability predicts mathematics achievement through age 15, even after accounting for early reading, cognitive skills, and family and child characteristics.

T. Jared Robinson, Lane Fischer, David Wiley, John Hilton, III
, October 2014
The purpose of this quantitative study is to analyze whether the adoption of open science textbooks significantly affects science learning outcomes for secondary students in earth systems, chemistry, and physics.

: 1968–2009
Robert N. Ronau, Christopher R. Rakes, Sarah B. Bush, Shannon O. Driskell, Margaret L. Niess, David K. Pugalee
, October 2014
We examined 480 dissertations on the use of technology in mathematics education and developed a Quality Framework (QF) that provided structure to consistently define and measure quality.

Andrew D. Plunk, William F. Tate, Laura J. Bierut, Richard A. Grucza
, June 2014
Using logistic regression with Census and American Community Survey (ACS) data ( = 2,892,444), researchers modeled mathematics and science course graduation requirement (CGR) exposure on (a) high school dropout, (b) beginning college, and (c) obtaining any college degree.

Corey Drake, Tonia J. Land, Andrew M. Tyminski
, April 2014
Building on the work of Ball and Cohen and that of Davis and Krajcik, as well as more recent research related to teacher learning from and about curriculum materials, researchers seek to answer the question, How can prospective teachers (PTs) learn to read and use educative curriculum materials in ways that support them in acquiring the knowledge needed for teaching?

Lorraine M. McDonnell, M. Stephen Weatherford
, December 2013
This article draws on theories of political and policy learning and interviews with major participants to examine the role that the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) supporters have played in developing and implementing the standards, supporters’ reasons for mobilizing, and the counterarguments and strategies of recently emerging opposition groups.

: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support
Xueli Wang
, October 2013
This study draws upon social cognitive career theory and higher education literature to test a conceptual framework for understanding the entrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors by recent high school graduates attending 4-year institutions.

Philip M. Sadler, Gerhard Sonnert, Harold P. Coyle, Nancy Cook-Smith, Jaimie L. Miller
, October 2013
This study examines the relationship between teacher knowledge and student learning for 9,556 students of 181 middle school physical science teachers.

: Teaching Critical Mathematics in a Remedial Secondary Classroom
Andrew Brantlinger
, October 2013
The researcher presents results from a practitioner research study of his own teaching of critical mathematics (CM) to low-income students of color in a U.S. context.

Jason G. Hill, Ben Dalton
, October 2013
This study investigates the distribution of math teachers with a major or certification in math using data from the National Center for Education Statistics’ High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09).

Kristin F. Butcher, Mary G. Visher
, September 2013
This study uses random assignment to investigate the impact of a “light-touch” intervention, where an individual visited math classes a few times during the semester, for a few minutes each time, to inform students about available services.

Janet M. Dubinsky, Gillian Roehrig, Sashank Varma
, August 2013
Researchers argue that the neurobiology of learning, and in particular the core concept of , have the potential to directly transform teacher preparation and professional development, and ultimately to affect how students think about their own learning.

: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs
M. Kevin Eagan, Jr., Sylvia Hurtado, Mitchell J. Chang, Gina A. Garcia, Felisha A. Herrera, Juan C. Garibay
, August 2013
Researchers’ findings indicate that participation in an undergraduate research program significantly improved students’ probability of indicating plans to enroll in a STEM graduate program.

Okhee Lee, Helen Quinn, Guadalupe Valdés
, May 2013
This article addresses language demands and opportunities that are embedded in the science and engineering practices delineated in “A Framework for K–12 Science Education,” released by the National Research Council (2011).

Liliana M. Garces
, April 2013
This study examines the effects of affirmative action bans in four states (California, Florida, Texas, and Washington) on the enrollment of underrepresented students of color within six different graduate fields of study: the natural sciences, engineering, social sciences, business, education, and humanities.

: Learning Lessons From Research on Diversity in STEM Fields
Shirley M. Malcom, Lindsey E. Malcom-Piqueux
, April 2013
Researchers argue that social scientists ought to look to the vast STEM education research literature to begin the task of empirically investigating the questions raised in the case.

Roslyn Arlin Mickelson, Martha Cecilia Bottia, Richard Lambert
, March 2013
This metaregression analysis reviewed the social science literature published in the past 20 years on the relationship between mathematics outcomes and the racial composition of the K–12 schools students attend.

Jeffrey Grigg, Kimberle A. Kelly, Adam Gamoran, Geoffrey D. Borman
, March 2013
Researchers examine classroom observations from a 3-year large-scale randomized trial in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) to investigate the extent to which a professional development initiative in inquiry science influenced teaching practices in in 4th and 5th grade classrooms in 73 schools.

:
Angela Calabrese Barton, Hosun Kang, Edna Tan, Tara B. O’Neill, Juanita Bautista-Guerra, Caitlin Brecklin
, February 2013
This longitudinal ethnographic study traces the identity work that girls from nondominant backgrounds do as they engage in science-related activities across school, club, and home during the middle school years.

: A Review of the State of the Field
Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea
, January 2013
This article frames the current state of discourse on computational thinking in K–12 education by examining mostly recently published academic literature that uses Jeannette Wing’s article as a springboard, identifies gaps in research, and articulates priorities for future inquiries.

Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Barbara King, Eric Grodsky, Chandra Muller
, December 2012
This article investigates the empirical basis for often-repeated arguments that gender differences in entrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors are largely explained by disparities in prior achievement.

Richard M. Ingersoll, Henry May
, December 2012
This study examines the magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover.

: How Families Shape Children’s Engagement and Identification With Science
Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Jonathan Osborne, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, Billy Wong
, October 2012
Drawing on the conceptual framework of Bourdieu, this article explores how the interplay of family habitus and capital can make science aspirations more “thinkable” for some (notably middle-class) children than others.

Erin Marie Furtak, Tina Seidel, Heidi Iverson, Derek C. Briggs
, September 2012
This meta-analysis introduces a framework for inquiry-based teaching that distinguishes between cognitive features of the activity and degree of guidance given to students.

Jaekyung Lee, Todd Reeves
, June 2012
This study examines the impact of high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources under NCLB on reading and math achievement outcomes through comparative interrupted time-series analyses of 1990–2009 NAEP state assessment data.

: Toward a Theory of Teaching
Paola Sztajn, Jere Confrey, P. Holt Wilson, Cynthia Edgington
, June 2012
Researchers propose a theoretical connection between research on learning and research on teaching through recent research on students’ learning trajectories (LTs).

: The Perspectives of Exemplary African American Teachers
Jianzhong Xu, Linda T. Coats, Mary L. Davidson
, February 2012
Researchers argue both the urgency and the promise of establishing a constructive conversation among different bodies of research, including science interest, sociocultural studies in science education, and culturally relevant teaching.

Rebecca M. Schneider, Kellie Plasman
, December 2011
This review examines the research on science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in order to refine ideas about science teacher learning progressions and how to support them.

Brian A. Nosek, Frederick L. Smyth
, October 2011
Researchers examined implicit math attitudes and stereotypes among a heterogeneous sample of 5,139 participants.

Libby F. Gerard, Keisha Varma, Stephanie B. Corliss, Marcia C. Linn
, September 2011
Researchers’ findings suggest that professional development programs that engaged teachers in a comprehensive, constructivist-oriented learning process and were sustained beyond 1 year significantly improved students’ inquiry learning experiences in K–12 science classrooms.

: Teaching and Learning Impacts of Reading Apprenticeship Professional Development
Cynthia L. Greenleaf, Cindy Litman, Thomas L. Hanson, Rachel Rosen, Christy K. Boscardin, Joan Herman, Steven A. Schneider, Sarah Madden, Barbara Jones
, June 2011
This study examined the effects of professional development integrating academic literacy and biology instruction on science teachers’ instructional practices and students’ achievement in science and literacy.

Paul Cobb, Kara Jackson
, May 2011
The authors comment on Porter, McMaken, Hwang, and Yang’s recent analysis of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics by critiquing their measures of the focus of the standards and the absence of an assessment of coherence.

P. Wesley Schultz, Paul R. Hernandez, Anna Woodcock, Mica Estrada, Randie C. Chance, Maria Aguilar, Richard T. Serpe
, March 2011
This study reports results from a longitudinal study of students supported by a national National Institutes of Health–funded minority training program, and a propensity score matched control.

: Three Large-Scale Studies
Jeremy Roschelle, Nicole Shechtman, Deborah Tatar, Stephen Hegedus, Bill Hopkins, Susan Empson, Jennifer Knudsen, Lawrence P. Gallagher
, December 2010
The authors present three studies (two randomized controlled experiments and one embedded quasi-experiment) designed to evaluate the impact of replacement units targeting student learning of advanced middle school mathematics.

: Examining Disparities in College Major by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
Catherine Riegle-Crumb, Barbara King
, December 2010
The authors analyze national data on recent college matriculants to investigate gender and racial/ethnic disparities in STEM fields, with an eye toward the role of academic preparation and attitudes in shaping such disparities.

Mary Kay Stein, Julia H. Kaufman
, September 2010
This article begins to unravel the question, “What curricular materials work best under what kinds of conditions?” The authors address this question from the point of view of teachers and their ability to implement mathematics curricula that place varying demands and provide varying levels of support for their learning.

Andy R. Cavagnetto
, September 2010
This study of 54 articles from the research literature examines how argument interventions promote scientific literacy.

Victoria M. Hand
, March 2010
The researcher examined how the teacher and students in a low-track mathematics classroom jointly constructed opposition through their classroom interactions.

Terrence E. Murphy, Monica Gaughan, Robert Hume, S. Gordon Moore, Jr.
, March 2010
Researchers evaluate the association of a summer bridge program with the graduation rate of underrepresented minority (URM) students at a selective technical university.

Open access
Published: 10 March 2020

Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications

Yeping Li 1 ,
Ke Wang 2 ,
Yu Xiao 1 &
Jeffrey E. Froyd 3

International Journal of STEM Education volume 7 , Article number: 11 ( 2020 ) Cite this article

177k Accesses

178 Citations

5 Altmetric

Metrics details

With the rapid increase in the number of scholarly publications on STEM education in recent years, reviews of the status and trends in STEM education research internationally support the development of the field. For this review, we conducted a systematic analysis of 798 articles in STEM education published between 2000 and the end of 2018 in 36 journals to get an overview about developments in STEM education scholarship. We examined those selected journal publications both quantitatively and qualitatively, including the number of articles published, journals in which the articles were published, authorship nationality, and research topic and methods over the years. The results show that research in STEM education is increasing in importance internationally and that the identity of STEM education journals is becoming clearer over time.

Introduction

A recent review of 144 publications in the International Journal of STEM Education ( IJ - STEM ) showed how scholarship in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education developed between August 2014 and the end of 2018 through the lens of one journal (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). The review of articles published in only one journal over a short period of time prompted the need to review the status and trends in STEM education research internationally by analyzing articles published in a wider range of journals over a longer period of time.

With global recognition of the growing importance of STEM education, we have witnessed the urgent need to support research and scholarship in STEM education (Li, 2014 , 2018a ). Researchers and educators have responded to this on-going call and published their scholarly work through many different publication outlets including journals, books, and conference proceedings. A simple Google search with the term “STEM,” “STEM education,” or “STEM education research” all returned more than 450,000,000 items. Such voluminous information shows the rapidly evolving and vibrant field of STEM education and sheds light on the volume of STEM education research. In any field, it is important to know and understand the status and trends in scholarship for the field to develop and be appropriately supported. This applies to STEM education.

Conducting systematic reviews to explore the status and trends in specific disciplines is common in educational research. For example, researchers surveyed the historical development of research in mathematics education (Kilpatrick, 1992 ) and studied patterns in technology usage in mathematics education (Bray & Tangney, 2017 ; Sokolowski, Li, & Willson, 2015 ). In science education, Tsai and his colleagues have conducted a sequence of reviews of journal articles to synthesize research trends in every 5 years since 1998 (i.e., 1998–2002, 2003–2007, 2008–2012, and 2013–2017), based on publications in three main science education journals including, Science Education , the International Journal of Science Education , and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (e.g., Lin, Lin, Potvin, & Tsai, 2019 ; Tsai & Wen, 2005 ). Erduran, Ozdem, and Park ( 2015 ) reviewed argumentation in science education research from 1998 to 2014 and Minner, Levy, and Century ( 2010 ) reviewed inquiry-based science instruction between 1984 and 2002. There are also many literature reviews and syntheses in engineering and technology education (e.g., Borrego, Foster, & Froyd, 2015 ; Xu, Williams, Gu, & Zhang, 2019 ). All of these reviews have been well received in different fields of traditional disciplinary education as they critically appraise and summarize the state-of-art of relevant research in a field in general or with a specific focus. Both types of reviews have been conducted with different methods for identifying, collecting, and analyzing relevant publications, and they differ in terms of review aim and topic scope, time period, and ways of literature selection. In this review, we systematically analyze journal publications in STEM education research to overview STEM education scholarship development broadly and globally.

The complexity and ambiguity of examining the status and trends in STEM education research

A review of research development in a field is relatively straight forward, when the field is mature and its scope can be well defined. Unlike discipline-based education research (DBER, National Research Council, 2012 ), STEM education is not a well-defined field. Conducting a comprehensive literature review of STEM education research require careful thought and clearly specified scope to tackle the complexity naturally associated with STEM education. In the following sub-sections, we provide some further discussion.

Diverse perspectives about STEM and STEM education

STEM education as explicated by the term does not have a long history. The interest in helping students learn across STEM fields can be traced back to the 1990s when the US National Science Foundation (NSF) formally included engineering and technology with science and mathematics in undergraduate and K-12 school education (e.g., National Science Foundation, 1998 ). It coined the acronym SMET (science, mathematics, engineering, and technology) that was subsequently used by other agencies including the US Congress (e.g., United States Congress House Committee on Science, 1998 ). NSF also coined the acronym STEM to replace SMET (e.g., Christenson, 2011 ; Chute, 2009 ) and it has become the acronym of choice. However, a consensus has not been reached on the disciplines included within STEM.

To clarify its intent, NSF published a list of approved fields it considered under the umbrella of STEM (see http://bit.ly/2Bk1Yp5 ). The list not only includes disciplines widely considered under the STEM tent (called “core” disciplines, such as physics, chemistry, and materials research), but also includes disciplines in psychology and social sciences (e.g., political science, economics). However, NSF’s list of STEM fields is inconsistent with other federal agencies. Gonzalez and Kuenzi ( 2012 ) noted that at least two US agencies, the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, use a narrower definition that excludes social sciences. Researchers also view integration across different disciplines of STEM differently using various terms such as, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary (Vasquez, Sneider, & Comer, 2013 ). These are only two examples of the ambiguity and complexity in describing and specifying what constitutes STEM.

Multiple perspectives about the meaning of STEM education adds further complexity to determining the extent to which scholarly activity can be categorized as STEM education. For example, STEM education can be viewed with a broad and inclusive perspective to include education in the individual disciplines of STEM, i.e., science education, technology education, engineering education, and mathematics education, as well as interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary combinations of the individual STEM disciplines (English, 2016 ; Li, 2014 ). On the other hand, STEM education can be viewed by others as referring only to interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary combinations of the individual STEM disciplines (Honey, Pearson, & Schweingruber, 2014 ; Johnson, Peters-Burton, & Moore, 2015 ; Kelley & Knowles, 2016 ; Li, 2018a ). These multiple perspectives allow scholars to publish articles in a vast array and diverse journals, as long as journals are willing to take the position as connected with STEM education. At the same time, however, the situation presents considerable challenges for researchers intending to locate, identify, and classify publications as STEM education research. To tackle such challenges, we tried to find out what we can learn from prior reviews related to STEM education.

Guidance from prior reviews related to STEM education

A search for reviews of STEM education research found multiple reviews that could suggest approaches for identifying publications (e.g., Brown, 2012 ; Henderson, Beach, & Finkelstein, 2011 ; Kim, Sinatra, & Seyranian, 2018 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Minichiello, Hood, & Harkness, 2018 ; Mizell & Brown, 2016 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ; Wu & Rau, 2019 ). The review conducted by Brown ( 2012 ) examined the research base of STEM education. He addressed the complexity and ambiguity by confining the review with publications in eight journals, two in each individual discipline, one academic research journal (e.g., the Journal of Research in Science Teaching ) and one practitioner journal (e.g., Science Teacher ). Journals were selected based on suggestions from some faculty members and K-12 teachers. Out of 1100 articles published in these eight journals from January 1, 2007, to October 1, 2010, Brown located 60 articles that authors self-identified as connected to STEM education. He found that the vast majority of these 60 articles focused on issues beyond an individual discipline and there was a research base forming for STEM education. In a follow-up study, Mizell and Brown ( 2016 ) reviewed articles published from January 2013 to October 2015 in the same eight journals plus two additional journals. Mizell and Brown used the same criteria to identify and include articles that authors self-identified as connected to STEM education, i.e., if the authors included STEM in the title or author-supplied keywords. In comparison to Brown’s findings, they found that many more STEM articles were published in a shorter time period and by scholars from many more different academic institutions. Taking together, both Brown ( 2012 ) and Mizell and Brown ( 2016 ) tended to suggest that STEM education mainly consists of interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary combinations of the individual STEM disciplines, but their approach consisted of selecting a limited number of individual discipline-based journals and then selecting articles that authors self-identified as connected to STEM education.

In contrast to reviews on STEM education, in general, other reviews focused on specific issues in STEM education (e.g., Henderson et al., 2011 ; Kim et al., 2018 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Minichiello et al., 2018 ; Schreffler, Vasquez III, Chini, & James, 2019 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ; Wu & Rau, 2019 ). For example, the review by Henderson et al. ( 2011 ) focused on instructional change in undergraduate STEM courses based on 191 conceptual and empirical journal articles published between 1995 and 2008. Margot and Kettler ( 2019 ) focused on what is known about teachers’ values, beliefs, perceived barriers, and needed support related to STEM education based on 25 empirical journal articles published between 2000 and 2016. The focus of these reviews allowed the researchers to limit the number of articles considered, and they typically used keyword searches of selected databases to identify articles on STEM education. Some researchers used this approach to identify publications from journals only (e.g., Henderson et al., 2011 ; Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Schreffler et al., 2019 ), and others selected and reviewed publications beyond journals (e.g., Minichiello et al., 2018 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ; Wu & Rau, 2019 ).

The discussion in this section suggests possible reasons contributing to the absence of a general literature review of STEM education research and development: (1) diverse perspectives in existence about STEM and STEM education that contribute to the difficulty of specifying a scope of literature review, (2) its short but rapid development history in comparison to other discipline-based education (e.g., science education), and (3) difficulties in deciding how to establish the scope of the literature review. With respect to the third reason, prior reviews have used one of two approaches to identify and select articles: (a) identifying specific journals first and then searching and selecting specific articles from these journals (e.g., Brown, 2012 ; Erduran et al., 2015 ; Mizell & Brown, 2016 ) and (b) conducting selected database searches with keywords based on a specific focus (e.g., Margot & Kettler, 2019 ; Thibaut et al., 2018 ). However, neither the first approach of selecting a limited number of individual discipline-based journals nor the second approach of selecting a specific focus for the review leads to an approach that provides a general overview of STEM education scholarship development based on existing journal publications.

Current review

Two issues were identified in setting the scope for this review.

What time period should be considered?

What publications will be selected for review?

Time period

We start with the easy one first. As discussed above, the acronym STEM did exist until the early 2000s. Although the existence of the acronym does not generate scholarship on student learning in STEM disciplines, it is symbolic and helps focus attention to efforts in STEM education. Since we want to examine the status and trends in STEM education, it is reasonable to start with the year 2000. Then, we can use the acronym of STEM as an identifier in locating specific research articles in a way as done by others (e.g., Brown, 2012 ; Mizell & Brown, 2016 ). We chose the end of 2018 as the end of the time period for our review that began during 2019.

Focusing on publications beyond individual discipline-based journals

As mentioned before, scholars responded to the call for scholarship development in STEM education with publications that appeared in various outlets and diverse languages, including journals, books, and conference proceedings. However, journal publications are typically credited and valued as one of the most important outlets for research exchange (e.g., Erduran et al., 2015 ; Henderson et al., 2011 ; Lin et al., 2019 ; Xu et al., 2019 ). Thus, in this review, we will also focus on articles published in journals in English.

The discourse above on the complexity and ambiguity regarding STEM education suggests that scholars may publish their research in a wide range of journals beyond individual discipline-based journals. To search and select articles from a wide range of journals, we thought about the approach of searching selected databases with keywords as other scholars used in reviewing STEM education with a specific focus. However, existing journals in STEM education do not have a long history. In fact, IJ-STEM is the first journal in STEM education that has just been accepted into the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) (Li, 2019a ). Publications in many STEM education journals are practically not available in several important and popular databases, such as the Web of Science and Scopus. Moreover, some journals in STEM education were not normalized due to a journal’s name change or irregular publication schedule. For example, the Journal of STEM Education was named as Journal of SMET Education when it started in 2000 in a print format, and the journal’s name was not changed until 2003, Vol 4 (3 and 4), and also went fully on-line starting 2004 (Raju & Sankar, 2003 ). A simple Google Scholar search with keywords will not be able to provide accurate information, unless you visit the journal’s website to check all publications over the years. Those added complexities prevented us from taking the database search as a viable approach. Thus, we decided to identify journals first and then search and select articles from these journals. Further details about the approach are provided in the “ Method ” section.

Research questions

Given a broader range of journals and a longer period of time to be covered in this review, we can examine some of the same questions as the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ), but we do not have access to data on readership, articles accessed, or articles cited for the other journals selected for this review. Specifically, we are interested in addressing the following six research questions:

What were the status and trends in STEM education research from 2000 to the end of 2018 based on journal publications?

What were the patterns of publications in STEM education research across different journals?

Which countries or regions, based on the countries or regions in which authors were located, contributed to journal publications in STEM education?

What were the patterns of single-author and multiple-author publications in STEM education?

What main topics had emerged in STEM education research based on the journal publications?

What research methods did authors tend to use in conducting STEM education research?

Based on the above discussion, we developed the methods for this literature review to follow careful sequential steps to identify journals first and then identify and select STEM education research articles published in these journals from January 2000 to the end of 2018. The methods should allow us to obtain a comprehensive overview about the status and trends of STEM education research based on a systematic analysis of related publications from a broad range of journals and over a longer period of time.

Identifying journals

We used the following three steps to search and identify journals for inclusion:

We assumed articles on research in STEM education have been published in journals that involve more than one traditional discipline. Thus, we used Google to search and identify all education journals with their titles containing either two, three, or all four disciplines of STEM. For example, we did Google search of all the different combinations of three areas of science, mathematics, technology Footnote 1 , and engineering as contained in a journal’s title. In addition, we also searched possible journals containing the word STEAM in the title.

Since STEM education may be viewed as encompassing discipline-based education research, articles on STEM education research may have been published in traditional discipline-based education journals, such as the Journal of Research in Science Teaching . However, there are too many such journals. Yale’s Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning has listed 16 journals that publish articles spanning across undergraduate STEM education disciplines (see https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/FacultyResources/STEMjournals ). Thus, we selected from the list some individual discipline-based education research journals, and also added a few more common ones such as the Journal of Engineering Education .

Since articles on research in STEM education have appeared in some general education research journals, especially those well-established ones. Thus, we identified and selected a few of those journals that we noticed some publications in STEM education research.

Following the above three steps, we identified 45 journals (see Table 1 ).

Identifying articles

In this review, we will not discuss or define the meaning of STEM education. We used the acronym STEM (or STEAM, or written as the phrase of “science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”) as a term in our search of publication titles and/or abstracts. To identify and select articles for review, we searched all items published in those 45 journals and selected only those articles that author(s) self-identified with the acronym STEM (or STEAM, or written as the phrase of “science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”) in the title and/or abstract. We excluded publications in the sections of practices, letters to editors, corrections, and (guest) editorials. Our search found 798 publications that authors self-identified as in STEM education, identified from 36 journals. The remaining 9 journals either did not have publications that met our search terms or published in another language other than English (see the two separate lists in Table 1 ).

Data analysis

To address research question 3, we analyzed authorship to examine which countries/regions contributed to STEM education research over the years. Because each publication may have either one or multiple authors, we used two different methods to analyze authorship nationality that have been recognized as valuable from our review of IJ-STEM publications (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). The first method considers only the corresponding author’s (or the first author, if no specific indication is given about the corresponding author) nationality and his/her first institution affiliation, if multiple institution affiliations are listed. Method 2 considers every author of a publication, using the following formula (Howard, Cole, & Maxwell, 1987 ) to quantitatively assign and estimate each author’s contribution to a publication (and thus associated institution’s productivity), when multiple authors are included in a publication. As an example, each publication is given one credit point. For the publication co-authored by two, the first author would be given 0.6 and the second author 0.4 credit point. For an article contributed jointly by three authors, the three authors would be credited with scores of 0.47, 0.32, and 0.21, respectively.

After calculating all the scores for each author of each paper, we added all the credit scores together in terms of each author’s country/region. For brevity, we present only the top 10 countries/regions in terms of their total credit scores calculated using these two different methods, respectively.

To address research question 5, we used the same seven topic categories identified and used in our review of IJ-STEM publications (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). We tested coding 100 articles first to ensure the feasibility. Through test-coding and discussions, we found seven topic categories could be used to examine and classify all 798 items.

K-12 teaching, teacher, and teacher education in STEM (including both pre-service and in-service teacher education)

Post-secondary teacher and teaching in STEM (including faculty development, etc.)

K-12 STEM learner, learning, and learning environment

Post-secondary STEM learner, learning, and learning environments (excluding pre-service teacher education)

Policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment in STEM (including literature review about a field in general)

Culture and social and gender issues in STEM education

History, epistemology, and perspectives about STEM and STEM education

To address research question 6, we coded all 798 publications in terms of (1) qualitative methods, (2) quantitative methods, (3) mixed methods, and (4) non-empirical studies (including theoretical or conceptual papers, and literature reviews). We assigned each publication to only one research topic and one method, following the process used in the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). When there was more than one topic or method that could have been used for a publication, a decision was made in choosing and assigning a topic or a method. The agreement between two coders for all 798 publications was 89.5%. When topic and method coding discrepancies occurred, a final decision was reached after discussion.

Results and discussion

In the following sections, we report findings as corresponding to each of the six research questions.

The status and trends of journal publications in STEM education research from 2000 to 2018

Figure 1 shows the number of publications per year. As Fig. 1 shows, the number of publications increased each year beginning in 2010. There are noticeable jumps from 2015 to 2016 and from 2017 to 2018. The result shows that research in STEM education had grown significantly since 2010, and the most recent large number of STEM education publications also suggests that STEM education research gained its own recognition by many different journals for publication as a hot and important topic area.

The distribution of STEM education publications over the years

Among the 798 articles, there were 549 articles with the word “STEM” (or STEAM, or written with the phrase of “science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”) included in the article’s title or both title and abstract and 249 articles without such identifiers included in the title but abstract only. The results suggest that many scholars tended to include STEM in the publications’ titles to highlight their research in or about STEM education. Figure 2 shows the number of publications per year where publications are distinguished depending on whether they used the term STEM in the title or only in the abstract. The number of publications in both categories had significant increases since 2010. Use of the acronym STEM in the title was growing at a faster rate than using the acronym only in the abstract.

The trends of STEM education publications with vs. without STEM included in the title

Not all the publications that used the acronym STEM in the title and/or abstract reported on a study involving all four STEM areas. For each publication, we further examined the number of the four areas involved in the reported study.

Figure 3 presents the number of publications categorized by the number of the four areas involved in the study, breaking down the distribution of these 798 publications in terms of the content scope being focused on. Studies involving all four STEM areas are the most numerous with 488 (61.2%) publications, followed by involving one area (141, 17.7%), then studies involving both STEM and non-STEM (84, 10.5%), and finally studies involving two or three areas of STEM (72, 9%; 13, 1.6%; respectively). Publications that used the acronym STEAM in either the title or abstract were classified as involving both STEM and non-STEM. For example, both of the following publications were included in this category.

Dika and D’Amico ( 2016 ). “Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 53 (3), 368–383. (Note: this article focused on early experience in both STEM and Non-STEM majors.)

Sochacka, Guyotte, and Walther ( 2016 ). “Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+ the Arts) education.” Journal of Engineering Education , 105 (1), 15–42. (Note: this article focused on STEAM (both STEM and Arts).)

Publication distribution in terms of content scope being focused on. (Note: 1=single subject of STEM, 2=two subjects of STEM, 3=three subjects of STEM, 4=four subjects of STEM, 5=topics related to both STEM and non-STEM)

Figure 4 presents the number of publications per year in each of the five categories described earlier (category 1, one area of STEM; category 2, two areas of STEM; category 3, three areas of STEM; category 4, four areas of STEM; category 5, STEM and non-STEM). The category that had grown most rapidly since 2010 is the one involving all four areas. Recent growth in the number of publications in category 1 likely reflected growing interest of traditional individual disciplinary based educators in developing and sharing multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship in STEM education, as what was noted recently by Li and Schoenfeld ( 2019 ) with publications in IJ-STEM.

Publication distribution in terms of content scope being focused on over the years

Patterns of publications across different journals

Among the 36 journals that published STEM education articles, two are general education research journals (referred to as “subject-0”), 12 with their titles containing one discipline of STEM (“subject-1”), eight with journal’s titles covering two disciplines of STEM (“subject-2”), six covering three disciplines of STEM (“subject-3”), seven containing the word STEM (“subject-4”), and one in STEAM education (“subject-5”).

Table 2 shows that both subject-0 and subject-1 journals were usually mature journals with a long history, and they were all traditional subscription-based journals, except the Journal of Pre - College Engineering Education Research , a subject-1 journal established in 2011 that provided open access (OA). In comparison to subject-0 and subject-1 journals, subject-2 and subject-3 journals were relatively newer but still had quite many years of history on average. There are also some more journals in these two categories that provided OA. Subject-4 and subject-5 journals had a short history, and most provided OA. The results show that well-established journals had tended to focus on individual disciplines or education research in general. Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary education journals were started some years later, followed by the recent establishment of several STEM or STEAM journals.

Table 2 also shows that subject-1, subject-2, and subject-4 journals published approximately a quarter each of the publications. The number of publications in subject-1 journals is interested, because we selected a relatively limited number of journals in this category. There are many other journals in the subject-1 category (as well as subject-0 journals) that we did not select, and thus it is very likely that we did not include some STEM education articles published in subject-0 or subject-1 journals that we did not include in our study.

Figure 5 shows the number of publications per year in each of the five categories described earlier (subject-0 through subject-5). The number of publications per year in subject-5 and subject-0 journals did not change much over the time period of the study. On the other hand, the number of publications per year in subject-4 (all 4 areas), subject-1 (single area), and subject-2 journals were all over 40 by the end of the study period. The number of publications per year in subject-3 journals increased but remained less than 30. At first sight, it may be a bit surprising that the number of publications in STEM education per year in subject-1 journals increased much faster than those in subject-2 journals over the past few years. However, as Table 2 indicates these journals had long been established with great reputations, and scholars would like to publish their research in such journals. In contrast to the trend in subject-1 journals, the trend in subject-4 journals suggests that STEM education journals collectively started to gain its own identity for publishing and sharing STEM education research.

STEM education publication distribution across different journal categories over the years. (Note: 0=subject-0; 1=subject-1; 2=subject-2; 3=subject-3; 4=subject-4; 5=subject-5)

Figure 6 shows the number of STEM education publications in each journal where the bars are color-coded (yellow, subject-0; light blue, subject-1; green, subject-2; purple, subject-3; dark blue, subject-4; and black, subject-5). There is no clear pattern shown in terms of the overall number of STEM education publications across categories or journals, but very much individual journal-based performance. The result indicates that the number of STEM education publications might heavily rely on the individual journal’s willingness and capability of attracting STEM education research work and thus suggests the potential value of examining individual journal’s performance.

Publication distribution across all 36 individual journals across different categories with the same color-coded for journals in the same subject category

The top five journals in terms of the number of STEM education publications are Journal of Science Education and Technology (80 publications, journal number 25 in Fig. 6 ), Journal of STEM Education (65 publications, journal number 26), International Journal of STEM Education (64 publications, journal number 17), International Journal of Engineering Education (54 publications, journal number 12), and School Science and Mathematics (41 publications, journal number 31). Among these five journals, two journals are specifically on STEM education (J26, J17), two on two subjects of STEM (J25, J31), and one on one subject of STEM (J12).

Figure 7 shows the number of STEM education publications per year in each of these top five journals. As expected, based on earlier trends, the number of publications per year increased over the study period. The largest increase was in the International Journal of STEM Education (J17) that was established in 2014. As the other four journals were all established in or before 2000, J17’s short history further suggests its outstanding performance in attracting and publishing STEM education articles since 2014 (Li, 2018b ; Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). The increase was consistent with the journal’s recognition as the first STEM education journal for inclusion in SSCI starting in 2019 (Li, 2019a ).

Publication distribution of selected five journals over the years. (Note: J12: International Journal of Engineering Education; J17: International Journal of STEM Education; J25: Journal of Science Education and Technology; J26: Journal of STEM Education; J31: School Science and Mathematics)

Top 10 countries/regions where scholars contributed journal publications in STEM education

Table 3 shows top countries/regions in terms of the number of publications, where the country/region was established by the authorship using the two different methods presented above. About 75% (depending on the method) of contributions were made by authors from the USA, followed by Australia, Canada, Taiwan, and UK. Only Africa as a continent was not represented among the top 10 countries/regions. The results are relatively consistent with patterns reported in the IJ-STEM study (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 )

Further examination of Table 3 reveals that the two methods provide not only fairly consistent results but also yield some differences. For example, Israel and Germany had more publication credit if only the corresponding author was considered, but South Korea and Turkey had more publication credit when co-authors were considered. The results in Table 3 show that each method has value when analyzing and comparing publications by country/region or institution based on authorship.

Recognizing that, as shown in Fig. 1 , the number of publications per year increased rapidly since 2010, Table 4 shows the number of publications by country/region over a 10-year period (2009–2018) and Table 5 shows the number of publications by country/region over a 5-year period (2014–2018). The ranks in Tables 3 , 4 , and 5 are fairly consistent, but that would be expected since the larger numbers of publications in STEM education had occurred in recent years. At the same time, it is interesting to note in Table 5 some changes over the recent several years with Malaysia, but not Israel, entering the top 10 list when either method was used to calculate author's credit.

Patterns of single-author and multiple-author publications in STEM education

Since STEM education differs from traditional individual disciplinary education, we are interested in determining how common joint co-authorship with collaborations was in STEM education articles. Figure 8 shows that joint co-authorship was very common among these 798 STEM education publications, with 83.7% publications with two or more co-authors. Publications with two, three, or at least five co-authors were highest, with 204, 181, and 157 publications, respectively.

Number of publications with single or different joint authorship. (Note: 1=single author; 2=two co-authors; 3=three co-authors; 4=four co-authors; 5=five or more co-authors)

Figure 9 shows the number of publications per year using the joint authorship categories in Fig. 8 . Each category shows an increase consistent with the increase shown in Fig. 1 for all 798 publications. By the end of the time period, the number of publications with two, three, or at least five co-authors was the largest, which might suggest an increase in collaborations in STEM education research.

Publication distribution with single or different joint authorship over the years. (Note: 1=single author; 2=two co-authors; 3=three co-authors; 4=four co-authors; 5=five or more co-authors)

Co-authors can be from the same or different countries/regions. Figure 10 shows the number of publications per year by single authors (no collaboration), co-authors from the same country (collaboration in a country/region), and co-authors from different countries (collaboration across countries/regions). Each year the largest number of publications was by co-authors from the same country, and the number increased dramatically during the period of the study. Although the number of publications in the other two categories increased, the numbers of publications were noticeably fewer than the number of publications by co-authors from the same country.

Publication distribution in authorship across different categories in terms of collaboration over the years

Published articles by research topics

Figure 11 shows the number of publications in each of the seven topic categories. The topic category of goals, policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment had almost half of publications (375, 47%). Literature reviews were included in this topic category, as providing an overview assessment of education and research development in a topic area or a field. Sample publications included in this category are listed as follows:

DeCoito ( 2016 ). “STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis.” Canadian Journal of Science , Mathematics and Technology Education , 16 (2), 114–128. (Note: this article provides a national overview of STEM initiatives and programs, including success, criteria for effective programs and current research in STEM education.)

Ring-Whalen, Dare, Roehrig, Titu, and Crotty ( 2018 ). “From conception to curricula: The role of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in integrated STEM units.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology , 6 (4), 343–362. (Note: this article investigates the conceptions of integrated STEM education held by in-service science teachers through the use of photo-elicitation interviews and examines how those conceptions were reflected in teacher-created integrated STEM curricula.)

Schwab et al. ( 2018 ). “A summer STEM outreach program run by graduate students: Successes, challenges, and recommendations for implementation.” Journal of Research in STEM Education , 4 (2), 117–129. (Note: the article details the organization and scope of the Foundation in Science and Mathematics Program and evaluates this program.)

Frequencies of publications’ research topic distributions. (Note: 1=K-12 teaching, teacher and teacher education; 2=Post-secondary teacher and teaching; 3=K-12 STEM learner, learning, and learning environment; 4=Post-secondary STEM learner, learning, and learning environments; 5=Goals and policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment (including literature review); 6=Culture, social, and gender issues; 7=History, philosophy, Epistemology, and nature of STEM and STEM education)

The topic with the second most publications was “K-12 teaching, teacher and teacher education” (103, 12.9%), followed closely by “K-12 learner, learning, and learning environment” (97, 12.2%). The results likely suggest the research community had a broad interest in both teaching and learning in K-12 STEM education. The top three topics were the same in the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ).

Figure 11 also shows there was a virtual tie between two topics with the fourth most cumulative publications, “post-secondary STEM learner & learning” (76, 9.5%) and “culture, social, and gender issues in STEM” (78, 9.8%), such as STEM identity, students’ career choices in STEM, and inclusion. This result is different from the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ), where “post-secondary STEM teacher & teaching” and “post-secondary STEM learner & learning” were tied as the fourth most common topics. This difference is likely due to the scope of journals and the length of the time period being reviewed.

Figure 12 shows the number of publications per year in each topic category. As expected from the results in Fig. 11 the number of publications in topic category 5 (goals, policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment) was the largest each year. The numbers of publications in topic category 3 (K-12 learner, learning, and learning environment), 1 (K-12 teaching, teacher, and teacher education), 6 (culture, social, and gender issues in STEM), and 4 (post-secondary STEM learner and learning) were also increasing. Although Fig. 11 shows the number of publications in topic category 1 was slightly more than the number of publications in topic category 3 (see Fig. 11 ), the number of publications in topic category 3 was increasing more rapidly in recent years than its counterpart in topic category 1. This may suggest a more rapidly growing interest in K-12 STEM learner, learning, and learning environment. The numbers of publications in topic categories 2 and 7 were not increasing, but the number of publications in IJ-STEM in topic category 2 was notable (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). It will be interesting to follow trends in the seven topic categories in the future.

Publication distributions in terms of research topics over the years

Published articles by research methods

Figure 13 shows the number of publications per year by research methods in empirical studies. Publications with non-empirical studies are shown in a separate category. Although the number of publications in each of the four categories increased during the study period, there were many more publications presenting empirical studies than those without. For those with empirical studies, the number of publications using quantitative methods increased most rapidly in recent years, followed by qualitative and then mixed methods. Although there were quite many publications with non-empirical studies (e.g., theoretical or conceptual papers, literature reviews) during the study period, the increase of the number of publications in this category was noticeably less than empirical studies.

Publication distributions in terms of research methods over the years. (Note: 1=qualitative, 2=quantitative, 3=mixed, 4=Non-empirical)

Concluding remarks

The systematic analysis of publications that were considered to be in STEM education in 36 selected journals shows tremendous growth in scholarship in this field from 2000 to 2018, especially over the past 10 years. Our analysis indicates that STEM education research has been increasingly recognized as an important topic area and studies were being published across many different journals. Scholars still hold diverse perspectives about how research is designated as STEM education; however, authors have been increasingly distinguishing their articles with STEM, STEAM, or related words in the titles, abstracts, and lists of keywords during the past 10 years. Moreover, our systematic analysis shows a dramatic increase in the number of publications in STEM education journals in recent years, which indicates that these journals have been collectively developing their own professional identity. In addition, the International Journal of STEM Education has become the first STEM education journal to be accepted in SSCI in 2019 (Li, 2019a ). The achievement may mark an important milestone as STEM education journals develop their own identity for publishing and sharing STEM education research.

Consistent with our previous reviews (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ; Li, Wang, & Xiao, 2019 ), the vast majority of publications in STEM education research were contributed by authors from the USA, where STEM and STEAM education originated, followed by Australia, Canada, and Taiwan. At the same time, authors in some countries/regions in Asia were becoming very active in the field over the past several years. This trend is consistent with findings from the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). We certainly hope that STEM education scholarship continues its development across all five continents to support educational initiatives and programs in STEM worldwide.

Our analysis has shown that collaboration, as indicated by publications with multiple authors, has been very common among STEM education scholars, as that is often how STEM education distinguishes itself from the traditional individual disciplinary based education. Currently, most collaborations occurred among authors from the same country/region, although collaborations across cross-countries/regions were slowly increasing.

With the rapid changes in STEM education internationally (Li, 2019b ), it is often difficult for researchers to get an overall sense about possible hot topics in STEM education especially when STEM education publications appeared in a vast array of journals across different fields. Our systematic analysis of publications has shown that studies in the topic category of goals, policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment have been the most prevalent, by far. Our analysis also suggests that the research community had a broad interest in both teaching and learning in K-12 STEM education. These top three topic categories are the same as in the IJ-STEM review (Li, Froyd, & Wang, 2019 ). Work in STEM education will continue to evolve and it will be interesting to review the trends in another 5 years.

Encouraged by our recent IJ-STEM review, we began this review with an ambitious goal to provide an overview of the status and trends of STEM education research. In a way, this systematic review allowed us to achieve our initial goal with a larger scope of journal selection over a much longer period of publication time. At the same time, there are still limitations, such as the decision to limit the number of journals from which we would identify publications for analysis. We understand that there are many publications on STEM education research that were not included in our review. Also, we only identified publications in journals. Although this is one of the most important outlets for scholars to share their research work, future reviews could examine publications on STEM education research in other venues such as books, conference proceedings, and grant proposals.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials used and analyzed for the report are publicly available at the various journal websites.

Journals containing the word "computers" or "ICT" appeared automatically when searching with the word "technology". Thus, the word of "computers" or "ICT" was taken as equivalent to "technology" if appeared in a journal's name.

Abbreviations

Information and Communications Technology

International Journal of STEM Education

Kindergarten–Grade 12

Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology

Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics

Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2015). What is the state of the art of systematic review in engineering education? Journal of Engineering Education, 104 (2), 212–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20069 .

Article Google Scholar

Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research – a systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114 , 255–273.

Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 13 (5), 7–11.

Google Scholar

Christenson, J. (2011). Ramaley coined STEM term now used nationwide . Winona Daily News Retrieved from http://www.winonadailynews.com/news/local/article_457afe3e-0db3-11e1-abe0-001cc4c03286.html Accessed on 16 Jan 2018.

Chute, E. (2009). STEM education is branching out . Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Feb 9, 2009. https://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2009/02/10/STEM-education-is-branching-out/stories/200902100165 Accessed on 2 Jan 2020.

DeCoito, I. (2016). STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16 (2), 114–128.

Dika, S. L., & D'Amico, M. M. (2016). Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first-generation college students in STEM and non-STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53 (3), 368–383.

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 , 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s4059%204-016-0036-1 .

Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J.-Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 , 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1 .

Gonzalez, H. B. & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. CRS report for congress, R42642, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf Accessed on 2 Jan 2020.

Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (8), 952–984.

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research . Washington: National Academies Press.

Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 42 (11), 975–986.

Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2015). STEM roadmap: A framework for integration . London: Taylor & Francis.

Book Google Scholar

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3 , 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z .

Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Macmillan.

Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88 (4), 589–625.

Li, Y. (2014). International journal of STEM education – a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1 , 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-1 .

Li, Y. (2018a). Journal for STEM education research – promoting the development of interdisciplinary research in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1 (1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0009-z .

Li, Y. (2018b). Four years of development as a gathering place for international researchers and readers in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 5 , 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0153-0 .

Li, Y. (2019a). Five years of development in pursuing excellence in quality and global impact to become the first journal in STEM education covered in SSCI. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0198-8 .

Li, Y. (2019b). STEM education research and development as a rapidly evolving and international field. 数学教育学报(Journal of Mathematics Education), 28 (3), 42–44.

Li, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: A systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1 .

Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as ‘given’ in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9 .

Li, Y., Wang, K., & Xiao, Y. (2019). Exploring the status and development trends of STEM education research: A review of research articles in selected journals published between 2000 and 2018. 数学教育学报(Journal of Mathematics Education), 28 (3), 45–52.

Lin, T.-J., Lin, T.-C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41 (3), 367–387.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2 .

Minichiello, A., Hood, J. R., & Harkness, D. S. (2018). Bring user experience design to bear on STEM education: A narrative literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1 (1–2), 7–33.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (4), 474–496.

Mizell, S., & Brown, S. (2016). The current status of STEM education research 2013-2015. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 17 (4), 52–56.

National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering . Washington DC: National Academies Press.

National Science Foundation (1998). Information technology: Its impact on undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. (NSF 98–82), April 18–20, 1996. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9882 Accessed 16 Jan 2018.

Raju, P. K., & Sankar, C. S. (2003). Editorial. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 4 (3&4), 2.

Ring-Whalen, E., Dare, E., Roehrig, G., Titu, P., & Crotty, E. (2018). From conception to curricula: The role of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in integrated STEM units. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6 (4), 343–362.

Schreffler, J., Vasquez III, E., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019). Universal design for learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 , 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8 .

Schwab, D. B., Cole, L. W., Desai, K. M., Hemann, J., Hummels, K. R., & Maltese, A. V. (2018). A summer STEM outreach program run by graduate students: Successes, challenges, and recommendations for implementation. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4 (2), 117–129.

Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+ the Arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105 (1), 15–42.

Sokolowski, A., Li, Y., & Willson, V. (2015). The effects of using exploratory computerized environments in grades 1 to 8 mathematics: A meta-analysis of research. International Journal of STEM Education, 2 , 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0022-z .

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3 (1), 2.

Tsai, C. C., & Wen, L. M. C. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (1), 3–14.

United States Congress House Committee on Science. (1998). The state of science, math, engineering, and technology (SMET) education in America, parts I-IV, including the results of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): hearings before the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session, July 23, September 24, October 8 and 29, 1997. Washington: U.S. G.P.O.

Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Wu, S. P. W., & Rau, M. A. (2019). How students learn content in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) through drawing activities. Educational Psychology Review . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09467-3 .

Xu, M., Williams, P. J., Gu, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Hotspots and trends of technology education in the International Journal of Technology and Design Education: 2000-2018. International Journal of Technology and Design Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09508-6 .

Download references

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4232, USA

Yeping Li & Yu Xiao

Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA, 70310, USA

Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

Jeffrey E. Froyd

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL conceptualized the study and drafted the manuscript. KW and YX contributed with data collection, coding, and analyses. JEF reviewed drafts and contributed to manuscript revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeping Li .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y. et al. Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications. IJ STEM Ed 7 , 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Download citation

Received : 10 February 2020

Accepted : 12 February 2020

Published : 10 March 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Journal publication
Literature review
STEM education research

Exploring Quantitative Biology: A Guide to Research Topics

Welcome to the fascinating world of quantitative biology, where biology, math, and technology blend to help us understand life better. Whether you’re a student, a science enthusiast, or just curious about how biology works at a deeper level, this guide will break down the key research areas in simple terms. Quantitative biology is all about using numbers, patterns, and computer models to figure out how living things behave, and we’re going to explore some of its most exciting topics. Let’s dive in!

What is Quantitative Biology?

Table of Contents

At its core, quantitative biology is the use of mathematical models, statistics, and computational tools to understand biological systems. It combines biology with math, providing a quantitative approach to solving biological problems. Whether predicting how a disease spreads or understanding genetic mutations, quantitative biology allows researchers to gain insights that would be impossible without the power of numbers.

For instance, imagine you’re studying how bacteria develop antibiotic resistance. Using mathematical models, you can predict how quickly resistance will spread in a population, helping scientists develop better treatments.

Why is Quantitative Biology Important?

Quantitative biology plays a vital role in modern science. By blending biological science with quantitative methods, researchers can:

Understand Complex Biological Systems : From individual cells to entire ecosystems.
Predict Outcomes : Such as how a disease spreads or how an ecosystem responds to environmental changes.
Innovate in Medicine and Technology : For example, designing new drugs or genetically engineering crops.
Make Sense of Large Datasets : With advances in technology, scientists have more data than ever, and quantitative biology helps analyze it.

Key Research Topics in Quantitative Biology

1. systems biology: the blueprint of life.

Systems biology is a key branch of quantitative biology that examines how different parts of a biological system interact to create its overall behavior. It studies biological networks—how genes, proteins, and cells communicate with one another. Using computational modeling, scientists simulate these interactions and predict what might happen if one part of the system changes.

For example, understanding how cancer spreads requires studying how cells interact and multiply. Systems biology helps researchers identify which proteins or genes are involved in these processes, enabling the development of targeted therapies.

Why It Matters:

Helps in developing new treatments for diseases.
Provides insights into how cells and organisms function as a whole.

Example Research Question:

How does a specific protein impact the way cells communicate during growth?

2. Bioinformatics and Genomics: Decoding DNA

Bioinformatics is a field of quantitative biology that applies computational modeling to the study of DNA and genetic data. It plays a central role in genomics, the study of an organism’s entire genetic makeup. Scientists use bioinformatics tools to analyze vast amounts of DNA and gene data, helping them find connections between genes and diseases.

For example, researchers use DNA analysis to identify mutations linked to conditions like diabetes or cancer. The data generated from sequencing entire genomes is immense, and bioinformatics is essential for making sense of it.

Helps in finding the genetic basis of diseases.
Enables the development of personalized medicine based on a person’s DNA.
What genetic mutations are responsible for certain inherited diseases?

3. Population Genetics: Evolution in Action

Population genetics is the study of how gene frequencies change in a population over time. It examines how natural selection, mutations, and genetic drift shape populations’ genetic makeup. Using mathematical models, population geneticists can predict how traits evolve and spread in a group of organisms.

For instance, a population of animals might adapt to a changing environment by developing thicker fur for colder climates. Population genetics helps scientists understand the genetic diversity that drives these changes.

Helps in conservation efforts by studying how species adapt to environmental changes.
Provides insights into how diseases or traits evolve within populations.
How do environmental changes influence the evolution of genetic traits in a population?

4. Biophysics: The Physics Behind Life

Biophysics combines physics with biology to understand the physical principles governing biological processes. It focuses on the molecular dynamics of proteins, DNA, and other cellular components. Scientists use biophysics to study how proteins fold, how cells transmit signals, and how forces within cells affect their behavior.

One crucial area in biophysics is studying protein structure. When proteins fold incorrectly, it can lead to diseases like Alzheimer’s. Understanding these physical processes allows researchers to develop drugs that stabilize proteins and prevent misfolding.

Helps in understanding diseases caused by misfolded proteins, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Provides insights into how cells function on a molecular level.
How do proteins fold, and what causes them to misfold in diseases?

5. Quantitative Ecology: Modeling Nature

In quantitative ecology, researchers use mathematical tools and environmental modeling to study ecosystems. By simulating how species interact with their environment and each other, ecologists can predict changes in biodiversity due to factors like climate change, pollution, or habitat destruction.

For example, if a new predator is introduced into an ecosystem, it can dramatically alter the populations of prey species. Quantitative ecology models help scientists understand these dynamics and develop strategies to protect endangered species.

Helps in conservation efforts by modeling how species and ecosystems respond to changes.
Provides tools for managing ecosystems and protecting biodiversity.
How does climate change affect the biodiversity of an ecosystem?

6. Neuroscience and Brain Networks: Understanding the Brain

Neuroscience focuses on understanding the structure and function of the brain, and quantitative biology plays a big role here. By studying brain networks and neural circuits, scientists can map out how neurons interact and how information flows through the brain. Neuroscience uses computational models to understand how these networks change when we learn or suffer from disorders like epilepsy.

For instance, researchers use quantitative models to simulate how neural circuits adapt during learning processes, providing insights into memory formation and decision-making.

Helps in developing new treatments for brain disorders.
Provides insights into how the brain functions and learns.
How do neural circuits in the brain adapt when we learn something new?
200+ Unique And Interesting Biology Research Topics For Students In 2023
200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In 2023

7. Synthetic Biology: Building New Life

Synthetic biology is an exciting field of biotechnology in which researchers design and create new biological systems or organisms. Using principles from genetic engineering, scientists can modify or build DNA sequences to produce new functions, like bacteria that break down plastic or plants that grow faster.

For instance, synthetic biology has been used to engineer yeast cells that can produce medicines like insulin. This type of research is paving the way for sustainable solutions to medical and environmental problems.

Offers new solutions to environmental and medical challenges.
Enables the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) with useful traits.
How can we engineer bacteria to produce new antibiotics?

8. Epidemiology and Infectious Disease Modeling: Preventing Outbreaks

In epidemiology, researchers study how diseases spread within populations. By using disease modeling, scientists can predict outbreaks and design public health strategies to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. These models take into account factors like transmission rates, immunity, and social behavior.

For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, epidemiologists used models to forecast how the virus would spread and what measures, like social distancing, could slow its progression. Public health officials rely on these models to make informed decisions.

Helps governments and public health officials prepare for and control disease outbreaks.
Provides insights into the effectiveness of vaccines and other interventions.
How can we predict the spread of the next pandemic?

How Quantitative Biology Impacts Our Lives

Quantitative biology might sound technical, but it affects everyone. From better healthcare (through personalized medicine and disease modeling) to conservation efforts (by protecting species and ecosystems), the insights from this field shape the world we live in. Whether scientists are predicting how a virus spreads or figuring out how to grow more food in a changing climate, quantitative biology helps tackle global challenges.

Table: Key Research Areas in Quantitative Biology


Systems Biology	How biological networks function	How do genes interact in a cell?
Bioinformatics & Genomics	DNA data and genetic information	How do genes determine traits?
Population Genetics	Evolution and genetic diversity	How do populations adapt to their environment?
Biophysics	Physical principles in biological systems	How do proteins fold inside cells?
Quantitative Ecology	Ecosystem dynamics and environmental effects	How do species interact in an ecosystem?
Neuroscience	Brain networks and cognitive functions	How do neurons form memories?
Synthetic Biology	Designing and engineering biological systems	Can we create bacteria to produce medicine?
	Disease spread and public health	How can we model the next pandemic?

Conclusion: The Future of Quantitative Biology

As technology continues to advance, quantitative biology will become even more important in solving real-world problems. Whether you’re interested in medicine, ecology, genetics, or any other field, quantitative biology offers exciting opportunities to make a meaningful impact on society . It’s a field that continues to grow, offering new ways to understand and influence the living world.

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

IMAGES

Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students
199+ Engaging Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For Stem Students
199+ Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students to Try Now
101 Best Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

VIDEO

BIOLOGY 1st QUARTER TOPICS [Grade 12 STEM Subject] #shs #stem #generalbiology #stemeducation
Why Choose STEM? -Top 3 Reasons |Tips from Former STEM Student #stemeducation #promqueen #STEM
How to Develop Quantitative Research Titles: Means and Ends
BIOLOGY 2ND QUARTER TOPICS- |STEM STRAND|- SHS #stemeducation #STEM #Biology
Grade 12 Prelims
Difference Between Quantitative and Qualitative Research #quantitativeresearch #qualitativeresearch

COMMENTS

200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For Stem Students
Here are 10 qualitative research topics for STEM students: Exploring the experiences of female STEM students in overcoming gender bias in academia. Understanding the perceptions of teachers regarding the integration of technology in STEM education. Investigating the motivations and challenges of STEM educators in underprivileged schools.
189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students
Following are the best Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students in mathematics and statistics. Prime Number Distribution: Investigate the distribution of prime numbers. Graph Theory Algorithms: Develop algorithms for solving graph theory problems. Statistical Analysis of Financial Markets: Analyze financial data and market trends.
Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
Chemistry. Let's get started with some quantitative research topics for stem students in chemistry: 1. Studying the properties of superconductors at different temperatures. 2. Analyzing the efficiency of various catalysts in chemical reactions. 3. Investigating the synthesis of novel polymers with unique properties. 4.
55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students
Below are some examples of quantitative research topics for STEM students in grade 11. A study of how plants conduct electricity; How does water salinity affect plant growth? A study of soil pH levels on plants; Research Topics For Grade 12 STEM Students. Here are some of the best qualitative research topics for STEM students in grade 12.
110+ Best Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
Dark Matter: Analyze dark matter in galaxies. Solar Radiation: Track solar radiation changes. Solar Flares: Study effects of solar flares on satellites. Space Chemistry: Measure chemicals in space clouds. These topics are now more concise while still providing a clear focus for quantitative research.
PDF List Of 125+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
These research endeavors contribute to theoretical frameworks and practical applications, technological innovations, and evidence-based decision-making. Here is a list of 200 quantitative research topics for STEM students. Keep in mind that these topics cover a broad range of disciplines within STEM. The impact of nanotechnology on medicine.
Best 101 Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students
Data Analysis of Social Media Trends: Explore the quantitative analysis of social media trends to understand their impact on society and marketing strategies. Conclusion. There you have it—101 quantitative research topics for STEM students! Remember that the key to a successful research project is choosing a topic that genuinely interests you.
210 Best Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students
Here are the key characteristics of quantitative research topics for STEM Students: Measurable Data: Quantitative topics examine things that can be measured and quantified with numbers, allowing statistical analysis of the data. Statistical Analysis: Quantitative topics use mathematical statistics to analyze numerical data and spot patterns ...
100+ Best Quantitative Research Topics For Students In 2023
An example of quantitative research topics for 12 th -grade students will come in handy if you want to score a good grade. Here are some of the best ones: The link between global warming and climate change. What is the greenhouse gas impact on biodiversity and the atmosphere.
250 Grade 12 Quantitative Research Topics for Senior High School
If you're on the hunt for that ideal quantitative research topic for your Grade 12 project, you've struck gold! You're in for a treat because we've got your back. Within the pages of this blog, we've meticulously assembled an extensive catalog of 250 intriguing quantitative research themes for your exploration.
STEM Research Topics: 200+ Great Choices
July 17, 2024. 10 minutes. Table of Contents. STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. It is essential for learning and discovery, helping us understand the world, solve problems, and think critically. STEM research goes beyond classroom learning, allowing us to explore specific areas in greater detail.
55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students (2024)
Below are some examples of quantitative research topics for STEM students in grade 11. A study of how plants conduct electricity; How does water salinity affect plant growth? A study of soil pH levels on plants; Research Topics For Grade 12 STEM Students. Here are some of the best qualitative research topics for STEM students in grade 12.
500+ Quantitative Research Titles and Topics
Quantitative research involves collecting and analyzing numerical data to identify patterns, trends, and relationships among variables. This method is widely used in social sciences, psychology, economics, and other fields where researchers aim to understand human behavior and phenomena through statistical analysis. If you are looking for a quantitative research topic, there are numerous areas ...
200 Quantitative Research Title for Stem Students
To help you get started on your research journey, we've compiled a list of 200 quantitative research title for stem students. These titles span various STEM disciplines, from biology to computer science. Whether you're an undergraduate or graduate student, these titles can serve as a springboard for your research ideas.
Quantitative Research Topics Grade 12 Students
Factors to Consider: Select a Grade 12 Quantitative Research Topic. Choosing the right quantitative research topics grade 12 is a crucial step in the journey of research. Several factors should be considered to ensure a successful and meaningful project: Personal Interests and Passions. Select a topic that aligns with your interests and passions.
Trending Topic Research: STEM
Trending Topic Research File. Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is one of the most talked about topics in education, emphasizing research, problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The following compendium of open-access articles are inclusive of all substantive AERA journal content regarding STEM published since ...
Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal
With the rapid increase in the number of scholarly publications on STEM education in recent years, reviews of the status and trends in STEM education research internationally support the development of the field. For this review, we conducted a systematic analysis of 798 articles in STEM education published between 2000 and the end of 2018 in 36 journals to get an overview about developments ...
Academic Motivation of Grade 12 Science Technology Engineering and
A descriptive type of quantitative research was composed of 60 students in TMCSHS. It used a quota sampling procedure to choose the respondents to have 20 of each STEM classroom. The data were ...
Can someone help us pick our research topic for Stem which ...
Can someone help us pick our research topic for Stem which must be quantitative? (doable and many rrls) (dumb grade 12, STEM) Need Advice We were having trouble picking out our quantitative research topics that must be related to stem. Some of our old title proposals were rejected because it was hard to quantify and required a diploma to do.
Exploring Quantitative Biology: A Guide to Research Topics
Key Research Topics in Quantitative Biology 1. Systems Biology: The Blueprint of Life. Systems biology is a key branch of quantitative biology that examines how different parts of a biological system interact to create its overall behavior. It studies biological networks—how genes, proteins, and cells communicate with one another.
Research Topics for STEM Quantitative : r/studentsph
Research Topics for STEM Quantitative . ... I am a grade 12 stem students and I am in need of research topics. Currently I have these topics but my teacher suggested that we won't use "Academic Performance" because its too common. ... -level of preparedness in making research of grade 12 students -The Effects of Online Learning on Senior ...
Grade 12 STEM student, need advice on Quantitative Research Topics
Grade 12 STEM student, need advice on Quantitative Research Topics : r/studentsph. r/studentsph. r/studentsph. For students from the Philippines, by students from the Philippines. For strand, course, and admission questions, please post on r/CollegeAdmissionsPH. • 10 mo. ago.

189+ Good Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

What Is Quantitative Research

How To Choose Quantitative Research Topics For STEM

Step 1:- Identify Your Interests and Passions

Step 2:- Review Coursework and Textbooks

Step 3:- Consult with Professors and Advisors

Step 4:- Read Recent Literature

Step 5:- Narrow Down Your Focus

Step 6:- Consider Resources and Access

Step 7:- Think About Practicality

Step 8:- Define Your Research Question

Step 9:- Conduct a Literature Review

Step 10:- Consider the Impact

Step 11:- Brainstorm Research Methods

Step 12:- Seek Feedback

Step 13:- Assess Ethical Considerations

Step 14:- Finalize Your Research Topic

Step 15:- Stay Open to Adjustments

Quantitative Research Topics In Physics and Astronomy

Quantitative Research Topics In Biology and Life Sciences

Engineering and Technology Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics In Mathematics and Statistics

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics In Science and Earth Sciences

Chemistry and Materials Science Quantitative Research Topics

Computer Science and Information Technology Topics

Good Quantitative Research Topics Students In Medicine and Healthcare

Agriculture and Food Sciences Topics

Social Sciences with Quantitative Approaches

Environmental Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics Robotics and Automation

Quantitative Research Topics Materials Engineering

Nuclear Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics In Biomedical Engineering

Good Quantitative Research Topics Chemical Engineering

Best Quantitative Research Topics In Renewable Energy

Brilliant Quantitative Research Topics In Astronomy and Space Sciences

Quantitative Research Topics In Psychology and Cognitive Science

Geology and Geological Engineering Quantitative Research Topics

Top Quantitative Research Topics In Forensic Science

Great Quantitative Research Topics In Cybersecurity

Mathematical Biology Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics In Chemical Analysis

Mathematics Education Quantitative Research Topics

Quantitative Research Topics In Social Research

Quantitative Research Topics In Computational Neuroscience

Best Topics In Transportation Engineering

Good Quantitative Research Topics In Energy Economics

Quantum Information Science

Human Genetics

Marine Biology

Data Science and Machine Learning

Environmental Engineering

1. Understanding a Phenomenon

2. Testing Hypotheses

3. Contributing to Knowledge

4. Informing Decision-Making

5. Enhancing Understanding

6. Application

7. Contributing to Theory

Conclusion – Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students

What is quantitative research in STEM?

What are good examples of quantitative research?

What are the 4 C’s in STEM?

Similar Articles

13 Best Tips To Write An Assignment

How To Do Homework Fast – 11 Tips To Do Homework Fast

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Best 151+ Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

What is Quantitative Research in STEM?

Importance of Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

1. Empirical Evidence

2. Data-Driven Decision-Making

3. Innovation

4. Problem Solving

5. Interdisciplinary Applications

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students

Biology and Life Sciences

Engineering

Environmental Science

Computer Science